skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Get yourself a mod that starts you off with construction robots, like FasterStart [1]. That plus ghost images plus blueprints allows you to plan your factory, and cut-paste it when you need to. Also, you can persist blueprints across games, so you don't have to re-invent a working factory layout in a new game if you don't need to.

As a bonus, FasterStart also takes away the grind of cutting trees by hand. I use it just for that. Few things annoy me more than having to take a break from building a factory to mindlessly holding right-click and pressing movement keys for a while because RNGesus decided to put a rainforest in the way of my expansion. It's the video-game equivalent of being broken out of a programming flow to sit in a pointless 2-hour meeting.

Another option is to use a mod like Factorissimo2 [2] which lets you put factories inside a building and move the entire building around. Buildings can also be nested so that you can group, say, all buildings related to iron ore -> iron plates inside one outer building. ( * ) Factorissimo2 was invaluable when I played a game with Angel's mods, because with Angel's the process of getting iron plates from iron ore starts off as a one-stage process but eventually becomes like a ten-stage process. There was no way I was going to lay that out on ground level while still accounting for future expansion.

[1]: https://mods.factorio.com/mod/FasterStart

[2]: https://mods.factorio.com/mod/Factorissimo2

( * ) IIRC this is disabled by default because people think it's unrealistic. I just pretend a nested building is an upper floor in the third dimension and the belt connections are freight elevators.
Build Docker in GitHub and Run in DevOps
Yesterday my team just received an email from IT department where another largest company was infected with Maze Ransonware

I would say current times is crucial for malware programmers, it's a lifetime opportunity to grab cash before everyone else learns the importance of security

Malware programmers also have a family to feed you know
I’m not arguing either way but would point out:

1/ Drawing a salary is profit sharing.

2/ Keeping your job is a reward.
Pulp novels were. Even in this millennium.
Something like the NDI-compatible apps from NewTek: https://www.newtek.com/ndi/applications/
Just another example of how the transition to digital from analog wasn't a complete solve. Switching from analog cable to digital cable also introduced this latency so that button presses on the remote are not instantaneous (due to timing issues switching between transport streams). It's kind of like Coke/New Coke/Coke Classic. Eventually, those that remember will fade away, leaving only those familiar with the current situation.
Why would that be best? Professional medical ethicists do it every day. For example when deciding which patients receive organ transplants.
Aptoide Hackeado
Sorry.. Here is a simple quadruped to ease your suffering: http://vectorslave.com/exobot/
"Beyond reasonable doubt" is a standard of evidence, it doesn't have anything to do with whether the jury needs to be unanimous. They need to be unanimous regardless of the standard of evidence, even for "preponderance of the evidence" (which means that the jury finds it more likely than not -- that the evidence "tips the scale"). If the jury is not unanimous they need to deliberate more until they are unanimous (if they deadlock then a new jury is called and the whole case starts again).
It honestly bothered me at first too, but now that your comment isn't [dead] I can finally reply and say it was because I was too lazy and didn't want to write extra code / bash script for it. It works perfectly fine with just a header file, and isn't dissimilar to something an early year University student would write, which is definitely the caliber of this project.
How+to+Start+a+successful+blog+in+2020
What makes it astroturfing is that the organizers are being paid by GOP donors. You can agree with their objective or oppose it but it meets the definition of astroturfing.

Part of astroturfing is getting the grass roots to participate.

I wonder how astroturfed this was: SF Anti-mask League 1918.
https://mobile.twitter.com/timkmak/status/125193624283456307...
I was looking for something like this. But with add-on to summarize the news text as close as human. Any idea???
It’s like the plot in the movie Inception. How to plan an idea “don’t think elepant” to an human idea?
> many states are suspending unlawful detainer and eviction actions until the crisis is over and people can get back to work

So how does that work? Instead of right now, they'll get evicted and become homeless as soon as things open up, because they've been piling up rent with no income in the meantime? Would you find that comforting?
1.) Case fatality ratio, alias CFR, alias the number of deaths per the number of reported cases is NOT 1-2%. And pretty much never was. It was much higher.

2.) We knew it is deadly from observing meltdown in Italy and from observing China. Currently from observing New York.

3.) When you complain that reported cases "underreport" what exactly are you claiming? And what exact unfair burden of proof is there on this scientific study?
Most important is what the advertisements at the top show. The organic results are so yesterday. The Google Ads AI should already be teaching you that All you base belong to us.
I checked a few links listed in that MassMove github repository around the Bay Area in CA, including:

https://sanjosestandard.com/

https://sanmateosun.com/

https://sanfransun.com/

I wouldn't characterize these as fake news, they just appear to be massively automated sites generated from public press releases from local government. In several of the articles they list the byline as "By Press Release submission". So it appears they aren't trying to be too deceptive, and if you search the text from the articles is does link back to the actual press release from a real .gov site in that locality.

Also looking at the bylines from metric media news service itself ( just append /author/metric-media-news-service to the main domain ), I would have expected a more discernible pattern of articles biased towards a particular viewpoint, but again, I didn't see anything too nefarious.

So at first glance, it looks like a reasonable local site albeit very cookie cutter, and primarily regurgitations of press releases from local official govs. And at second glance, it doesn't appear to be much worse than that.

NOW having said all of that, I can easily see how this can be turned sideways very easily and quickly by the site maintainers. If you're actually able to build up a good readership with some of this 'basic' content, then come election time or some other critical moment where influence is important, you can easily seed more biased content into the articles. And these don't necessarily need to be blatantly 'fake', they can just be slanted a certain way. They could certainly go full bore and insert some really fake content in there once in awhile.

The sheer magnitude of it all is impressive, taken in isolation these sites would seem legitimate but seeing them all side by side and seeing the content laid out it becomes painfully obvious there's an ulterior motive to it all.

Thanks to the parent comment for making me ( and hopefully more of us ) aware of this type of activity.
No need to be condescending. This is hacker news not Reddit.
I think another issue is having to re-invent cues for changing who is talking in the conversation. When you're talking to someone in person, you can pick up a lot of information as to whether they want to continue talking, or whether it's your turn. On video conferences, those things are missing. You might detect a lull in the conversation and start talking, but at the same time, someone else does the same thing and starts talking. You have 100ms+ of latency, so you can get into what you're saying before realizing that someone else took their turn (or you took theirs). The collision mitigation algorithm takes place, and it's just as bad for your mental fatigue as it is for your WiFi's latency (which uses the same algorithm -- listen before talk, and if you collide, wait a random amount of time and repeat). These things just don't happen when a few people are in the same room together.

The result is that we try to use the video channel to pre-allocate timeslots for speaking. You make your eyes bigger, you raise a finger... but sometimes people aren't looking at the video, or don't understand what your newly-invented cue actually means. This is all very tiring.

The overall quality of the call is much lower than real life, as well. People do not own good microphones or cameras, so you can't actually hear them or see them very well. The noise gate intervenes and just cuts off audio from time to time. It is maddening how bad it all is.

Many years ago when I worked for Bank of America, we had these multiple-100k Cisco videoconferencing setups. They worked really well. My friends and I were at work pretty late and there was a tornado warning, so we couldn't go home (we all biked). We went to these conference rooms, set up a link between the two rooms right next to each other, and had a totally normal conference. (Things were set up so that the entire wall of the room was a video screen, and it had an array of cameras, microphones, and speakers. Everything was tuned perfectly so it looked like the people in the other room were just sitting across the table from you. There was no latency, everyone was their normal size, and the audio and video quality were perfect. Obviously with two rooms across the hall from each other, there shouldn't be any latency... but at least the system didn't add its own. It makes a big difference.)

Finally, I think another issue is that people just aren't used to getting work done with video conferences. I worked as a remote team at Google, so pretty much 100% of my meetings were video conferences. 1:1s with my manager and everything else. The system suffered from the same quality/latency issues as anything else (though we did typically have good cameras and microphone arrays in every room), but through practice, people got good at getting stuff done despite the limitations. I never really felt fatigued the way I do on calls with random people at home. (I guess my tips are: have an agenda in advance, and use your screen share to show progress through the agenda. Call on people in remote locations: "Anyone from the New York room have anything to add?".)
Are you personally willing to be civilly and criminally liable if you injure someone by transmitting a disease to someone despite the known risk? You have to be so willing when you drive; and you can usually find an insurer to cover your civil liabilities.

If you can’t find an insurer to indemnify you if you make someone ill, that should tell you something about the level of harm you could cause someone else.
I feel it really boils down to the preferences and approach to the programming. My preference is C# and having no generics and exceptions irritates me quite a bit. (among with unused import/variable and styling being enforced.)

One aspect may be tools, too. Generics works great when things like contextual code completion (e.g. Intellisense) is present. One might see a bit of gaps, where someone's coming from C# on Visual Studio, compared to someone doing the same on a simple text editor. For this, I wonder if there's some correlation to preferred development environment, too. (IDE vs. editor, for instance.)
Sun Gun
Beyond reasonable doubt is one of several standards of evidence (along with "preponderance of the evidence" and "clear and convincing evidence"), but this is about whether the jury has to be unanimous in their decision that the standard has been met. In other words, what happens if 11 jurors find you guilty beyond reasonable doubt but 1 juror disagrees.
One annoying aspect in Factorio in the short time that I have played it was that there is a player character, who needs to move to each location before an object can be placed there. It adds a degree of tedium in building, if having requiring the player sprite to move about..
The investment wouldn’t exist if the investors were not making money
Metabolic compound could rewind fertility clock for women
So ive got a few questions about this legislation now that its in effect...

>Businesses rushed to apply for the loans, which the government said would be forgiven...

Forgiven? Then its not a loan anymore is it? Its a bailout. Was the intention to give a handout of cash to small businesses free of charge?

>Democrats have since called for rules that would ensure smaller, community banks, particularly those that service minority and underbanked populations, have a leg up in the lending process.

I mean, the program ran out of money a week ago. What exactly are we legislating? these are businesses that are likely already shuttered after waiting five weeks to be told they either dont qualify or the money sacks empty.

This isnt something you get a do-over on. Rubio doesnt seem to care that Hilton is a nine billion dollar multinational corporation that could afford to keep the lights on in every hotel they franchise for the next year, easily, without federal aid. They could give away old hotels as makeshift hospitals. Hilton is the thirty-sixth largest company in the USA and the fact that they qualified for something called a small business relief fund can only be attributed to a completely detached legislature if you're being amicable and giving the current legislation a fair chance to be anything but corrupt but frankly thats hard to do when the presidents friends are getting kickbacks from this program.

https://www.npr.org/2020/04/20/839455480/company-with-ties-t...

What Rubio has basically managed to do is wipe out coffee houses, machine shops, shoe repair businesses, daycares and nail salons in every north american city. Its pretty transparent that this funding was never intended to make it to taco trucks and barbers.
Sorry I wasn't able to get a reply out today but will sometime tomorrow...
This is clear, but does the cpython team want to maintain Python2? If not, either it’s time to use an alternative or move on....
Same. I can't even remember the last time I deployed code with a channel into production.
Epic Games shows off real-time digital human with Siren demo
LibreOffice 7.0 Will Prefer Building Its Rendering Code with LLVM's Clang
Ask HN: What is the best resources to prepare for a remote YC interview?
Very unlikely NY is anywhere close to herd immunity as the number of those infected is probably well under half the population.
This crisis shows you who some people really are. It seems a lot of people can't care less about the life of someone they don't know. That's a good thing. I now know what to think of those people. Who to avoid.

But even better: it warms my heart to know the vast majority of people think it's okay to take an economic hit to save lives, to prevent the collapse of our healthcare systems, to buy time on our way to a vaccine. We're in this together, young and old. We don't want other people to spend the last days of their lives suffocating in their own lung fluids. Not if we can help it. Some people will kill someone for a couple of bucks and there are different limits for everyone, and there comes a point where we're no longer the majority, but right now I'm happy with what I see.
The Cross-Chain hackathon has just gone live. Register to win a prize
You can use Ctrl+E / Cmd E to invoke the `Recent Files` dialog -- the first file in the list will be the last closed tab.

https://blog.jetbrains.com/phpstorm/2013/02/navigating-betwe...

There is also the `Reopen Closed Tab` action, which it seems doesn't have assigned shortcut by default, but you can assign it to whatever you feel comfortable with.
>Just because a robot can do the same job doesn’t make an activity dehumanizing - you seem to merely be justifying a negative view.

Well, you asked "why would safely and efficiently performing your job be dehumanizing?" as if it somehow the fact that those two qualities are meritorious precludes that characterization. That's why I brought up robots, because they are a clear counter example to your implicit claim. Also, to be fair, I did ask if I was wrong to assume that was indeed your claim...

>You’re also ignoring that the point of pointing and calling is precisely to keep you from responding robotically...

Actually, here you're conflating robotically with habitually or instinctively or carelessly. Consider that robots can respond to deviations as edge cases, in a manner analogous to conditional statements; such a response would have to be robotic, wouldn't it? Robots can very obviously handle deviations if they're programmed to, so that was a bad example.

> Using motion and language to amplify our natural faculties for best effect at a social purpose sounds pretty human to me.

I agree the creative use of this is human, but what I'm asserting is that this can be done to a dehumanizing end. Humanity created robots.

> I’m curious, what activity do you view as not dehumanizing?

Inherently human activities such as creating knowledge of other people.
I live under the Orban-regime, but not sure I agree with your analysis. His style of government does not exactly provokes violence -- it incites apathy.

The absolute lack of sophistication in their messaging[0] is turning large demographics away from politics, and in many cases, the country.

[0]: They explain COVID-19 as an evil plan by George Soros, of course. The opportunity didn't occur to them for a long time, but the brilliance prevailed.
The broken English aspect also happens because we know search engines don't understand English anyway.
Ask HN: What has been your biggest learning from this Covid-19 situation?
Compared to Sweden they are certainly draconian.
So why the fixation on a video call? I'm probably just an old curmudgeon, but to me the benefits do not out weigh the oddities being discussed. Everyone wearing their pieces of flair with their "personalized" backgrounds are tiresome.

I can see the benefits of a screen share/presentation, but I really don't need to see the other people involved. I don't care about tone of voice. I get sarcasm. For the people that don't, then even if they can see them, the sarcasm isn't more/less because it's a video call.

Video calls to me are just another version of "Hey look at me!!!! I'm special"
I have very clear memories of my first overseas long-distance calls in the 1980s, which were over a satellite link. The latency was so pronounced (about half a second) that carrying out a conversation took quite a bit of practice. You almost had to carry out a formal protocol of handing over control of the line, as if you were on a walkie-talkie.

I have equally clear memories of my first overseas calls carried by undersea fiber because the lack of latency was so pronounced compared to what I had become accustomed to by then.

I still can barely tolerate carrying on a conversation on a cell phone though. The latency and compression artifacts are just horrible compared to a landline. VOIP has gotten pretty good though. I can't tell the difference between a good VOIP landline and a POTS line.
Result without correct match!
Yeah, let me rephrase. COVID is the deadliest thing most people will ever have a chance of coming into contact with, you'll spread it to others before you even know you have it, thus it's almost certain you won't be the only one "taking the risk". It's not like driving, flying, takeaway, or any other inane, minimizing comparison. It is a highly infectious, stealthy, lethal pathogen. If we let everyone get it, at even .5% fatality rate, that's millions and millions of people dead just in the US alone. It kills everyone, infants, the elderly, the healthy, the comorbid, just at different rates.

Here is what you should do:

- shelter in place

- if you must go out, wear masks and gloves, stay at least six feet away from others if possible, and wash your hands thoroughly when you return

- lots of places need volunteers, please help them if you can and follow their safety protocols

- donate money to funds for responders and local business/community relief

Here's what you shouldn't do:

- flout shelter in place orders

- minimize the risk in public forums

- engage in armchair epidemiology; this isn't like having an opinion on tabs vs spaces

I'm sympathetic to (indeed terrified by) the economic destruction of this, and I know it's happening right now. Let's stay alive and keep each other alive first. We'll figure the rest out later.
It is the same thing! The mistake is obvious. For-profit content is prioritized. Google is the driving force behind the for-profit internet but sadly for google: you cant do organic ranking on commerce. ahhhh The index is now a [very limited] snapshot of the glory days.

You don't have to bother creating anything new unless you have something to sell and are willing to invest (big).

Facebook is actually a pretty pathetic implementation where we can still find content created by normal people. If people made traditional websites in stead of facebook groups and facebook pages NO ONE would be able to find it.

We've witnessed the great obliteration of what was once a nice place and now we have to hear google was not to blame?? The death by a thousand cuts is actually well documented.

We tell you what your site must look like or we'll gut it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Penguin
Google Penguin is a codename[1] for a Google algorithm
update that was first announced on April 24, 2012. The update was aimed at decreasing search engine rankings of websites that violate Google's Webmaster Guidelines[2]

There, this is what the entire internet must look like. We went from indexing to engineering here.

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/96569?hl=en

rel="ugc"

We recommend marking user-generated content (UGC) links, such as comments and forum posts, as ugc.

If you want to recognize and reward trustworthy contributors, you might remove this attribute from links posted by members or users who have consistently made high-quality contributions over time. Read more about avoiding comment spam.

Before this those elaborately contributing got actual credit for it. Do you think you got a choice in it? Google clearly demands you ban credit for comments. OR ELSE!

rel="nofollow"

Use the nofollow value when other values don't apply, and you'd rather Google not associate your site with, or crawl the linked page from, your site. (For links within your own site, use robots.txt, as described below.)

Woah association! How did we go from linking-to to association? It was important enough for readers but be careful to hide it from google. Such little unimportant websites simply shouldn't exist in our index. We command you to help keep our index clean of such filth!

Then the magical: We wont actually tell you what is wrong with your website! Ferengi Rule of Acquisition 39 "Don't tell customers more than they need to know." Get a budget and hire someone to do SEO. Deal with it, we don't care. No, you don't have any feedback.
Obasanjo Log
The study linked does nothing to directly affirm your statement, which you admitted was an opinion anyways. There's nothing left to discuss.
Clearly c got it wrong. The number of + should have been increment so
e->e + 1 should be e+
e+->e+ +1 should be e++
...
Have you checked the subreddit dedicated to this program?
It's been an unpopular opinion but I've contended for a long time that if Go had map/filter/reduce from the onset like it has copy and append, most people screaming for generics would have been silenced.