skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Beware of NATGW and serve as much media as you can from CloudFront+S3. NATGW data transfer costs are obscene to say the least. As for the EC2 v. Fargate: sorta depends more on what elasticity you need and if the application is sufficiently stateless, among other things.
Well, when a pediatrician recommends a delayed/modified vaccine schedule for pseudoscientific reasons, we call that doctor a quack.
I think the numbers will coma out to show this ripped through the USA in February; we slammed the barn doors closed well after the horse was gone.

Of course that's not the narrative that fits agendas so just like with "why cant we test people?" back then, there will be many official reasons not to look for antibody data and to doubt what data gets gathered.
Geometry and arithmetic and calculus all existed before axioms and worked okay. You can do quite a lot of mathematics "naively". It's only in the 20th century that axiomatization became really important, because naive set theory turned out not to work very well.
Opinion: Forcing someone else to take a vaccine, if they don't want to, or forcing someone else NOT to take a vaccine, if they do -- is no different than forcing a woman to take an abortion if she doesn't want it, or forcing a woman NOT to take an abortion, if she does want it.

It's no different than forcing a man to join the Military if he doesn't want to join, or forcing the man NOT to join the Military, if he does want to join.

A future Constitution will explicitly support the right to be medicated/vaccinated if one wishes to be, while conversely supporting the right NOT to be medicated/vaccinated, if one does not.

Our current Constitution supports these rights, implicitly, via the 9th Amendment:

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

(Although, in an increasingly legislative and legalistic society, those rights may have to be asserted, asserted repeatedly, asserted to multiple people who are not aware of them, and asserted hard...)
Even with the price drop (last year some time?) isn't Fargate still incredibly expensive?
If Fargate is scaling down between visits, I feel like your load times would be unacceptable, and if you are running Fargate continuously you're better off using EC2 (or, whisper it, ECS.)
> I can't say as conflating antivaxxers with a pediatrician that recommends a delayed/modified vaccine schedule is exactly productive. Delayed/modified schedule isn't to blame for measles. Pretty disingenuous, IMO.

> For those who don't know, there is a camp of people who believe that we're getting vaccinations at way too fast a schedule. Yes, this includes doctors, like the aforementioned pediatrician.

It is not only "anti-liberal" to shout people down, but it is anti-science to ignore claims on findings and this is how I find the "anti-vaxxer" term to be used.

I can't find the article right now, but I strongly encourage people to be more cautious about throwing the stupid terms around as some people are rather more nuanced.

I am not defending the following claim, but among other claims is one that states a popularly cited measles outbreak occurred with 95% of the people catching having been immunized. The claim is that the immunizations are no longer effective. Again, I am not trying to support the claim, but simply labeling "anti-vaxxer" is not the way to address such claims and will attract an audience who will have no way to counter such claims because all opposition is engaged in schoolyard name-calling activities.

EDIT:

It is astounding to me that the commenters of, at least this article, are unable to distinguish my claim from claims of people discussed in the article.
> oh well

herd immunity is a big deal for many different reasons

- it stops the spread

- it protects the immunocompromised

- it protects newborns and those too young/old to get vaccinations
look, i love CSS. Not dumping on it. but you have a bit of stockholme syndrome going on here. sometimes loving something means realistically looking at its flaws and limitations. and you seem to have a distorted view of history, and what a “stylesheet” is. (they existed for decades before CSS was invented, and come
from the tradition of printing and writing, not design so much. they do not, generally speaking, specify layout. layout specifies layout.)
from the start, browsers didn’t have a css engine. css was added later, and has never fully exposed every piece of the browser display engine. some of the browsers needed to be rewritten from scratch for this to even be possible. as for layout, from the start and for a very long rime, the position of the w3c and browser authors is that website authors shouldn’t want layout and refused to implement any layout capabilities. in their view, layout should be left up to the client, and a website author should focus only on writing plain semantic documents. they told people to stop using floats for layout because it got in the way of client decisions about layout. they have only been added grudgingly, and after the forced removal of the people who were blocking it. i for one welcome these layout capabilities, and am glad the old farts didn’t get in the way. that doesn’t mean we’re up to par with the best layout engines though.

your link makes only one reference to style: “style of shape”, and a passing reference to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Style_guide with regard to keeping non layout elements consistent, and that page in turn, which makes no reference to layout.
Watch some course lectures on Youtube. Work your way through some books such as by Schutz or Sean Carroll, or if you are brave by Misner, Thorn and Wheeler.
In Python education: Getting new language learners to a functional local development environment as quickly and painlessly as possible.

"Just use Anaconda/pipenv/the-Python-installer/Docker/etc" isn't a great answer, because they probably tried one of those six months ago, got into a weird state and can't remember what it did or where it put things.

Obligatory XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1987/
Learning to See in the Dark (2018)
> there is a camp of people who believe that we're getting vaccinations at way too fast a schedule

Keyword here being believe. Their opinion is based on purely belief without any proof. All it does is give the kids their immunity later giving the pathogen a window to get them sick and spread the pathogen further
If anyone's interested in a decent colour scheme, a friend of mine put some time into developing one:

https://github.com/jan-warchol/selenized
This is actually still true in a lot of cases where proper compute shaders are not available - notably webGL.

See: https://threejs.org/examples/webgl_gpgpu_birds.html
and: https://github.com/yomboprime/GPGPU-threejs-demos

Though WebGPU is coming which I believe will mitigate this.
Related: https://danluu.com/term-latency/

While it's great to use other terminals and customize the terminal visuals to your liking, don't forget about the additional latency it adds; this is one of the main reasons I still use macOS' default Terminal.app
He missed a point (and probably an important one for wechat's home market): CCP approval.

/snark
That's definitely not true. WeChat has a bunch of ecommerce stuff built in among other features. You can pay for stuff on WeChat and there are stores. It even has translation built in to facilitate buying and selling between people from different countries.

I think there are also apps and other stuff there too. It's more like a chat app that became an ecommerce and mini-app platform.
I would argue that at least in terms of the environment that wasn't a particulary 'conservative' act, wouldn't you?

It's possible for both sides to be wrong. But when people like John McDonnell - ex-Labour Shadow Chancellor in case you are not familiar with British politics, and the flavour of politician that's prone to quoting Mao in parliament - start talking about the climate emergency you know it's been hijacked.
Looks like it used to live at http://www.escapeyesterworld.com.

You can look through the Wayback Machine's archived URLs to find the video URLs here: https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.escapeyesterworld.c...
> Well, when a pediatrician recommends a delayed/modified vaccine schedule for pseudoscientific reasons, we call that doctor a quack.

Why not provide a scientific argument instead of engaging in name-calling?
Hugging Face: New Transformer Container and Notebooks
Video from the paper here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWKUFK7MWvg
I have been using ligatures in my shell and editor for a few months and haven't had any issues.

I do recommend it; the only issue is now I'm a bit lazier. For example, instead of making proper arrows like →, I just type ->, which looks good to me in monospace font, but looks different to everyone else.
This is why I like fish shell so much. It has the same features as zsh, but requires no config. They have a guiding principle of "if users need to configure something, that means that the defaults are broken".

All I do is "sudo apt install fish" and I'm good to go with the 100s of out-of-the-box improvements it has over bash.
It's very different. The main difference is that you define the capabilities on the back end through your GraphQL schema once, then clients generate the query ids through an automated process in development.

In the old way, someone would have to write backend code to build and maintain each individual endpoint. With GraphQL, you only maintain the schema on the backend.
Wordpress + Beanstalk is fine for small deployments. Anything bigger and you'll need a true microservices architecture using cloud native technology.
You can build all sorts of bizarre structures in ZFC that seem to have no relationship with reality at all. You can prove that almost all real numbers can't be computed or even described. There is an entire tower of infinities bigger than the natural numbers that telescope up and up. The axiom of choice gives you all sorts of nonphysical results.

The world of ZFC doesn't feel very constrained by the actual universe, is all.

And if you don't like ZFC, you can pick another set of axioms entirely- there are several alternatives.
There is a big existing literature.
Look at 'graph grammars'.
> That sounds like an argument based on faith.

Faith? That when everyone has to stay home, no significant economic activity can happen? You can call it faith...
Testudo – Ancient Roman Shield Formation
> Forcing someone else to take a vaccine, if they don't want to, or forcing someone else NOT to take a vaccine, if they do

"Making somebody pay taxes, if they don't want..."

Dude, this has been discussed ad infinitum. You don't want to take a vaccine? Fine. But then, do I have the knowledge to know you haven't taken it, as refusing to be around you, etc etc etc because you refuse to do something that is proven to better the life of humanity as a whole (And you can't prove otherwise). I could argue a lot more, but english is not my mother tongue.
Privacy discussions often gloss over or outright ignore the many factors that affect perspectives on privacy. Quite often this will make a stance that is perfectly reasonable to one person look like raving lunatic to another person.

Trust is one factor. Even if an individual agreed that the approach being suggested by Apple and Google is a good one, they are unlikely support it if they do not trust those businesses. Even if that individual trusts the motivations of a party, it does not imply that they trust their competence.

Social change is another factor. Whether we acknowledge it or not, there has been an enormous change in attitudes towards privacy over the past quarter century. If you took anyone from 1995 and showed them the technology of today, they would likely be amazed by our access to information and horrified by other people's access to our own information. Keep in mind that was an era when the Internet was just starting to reach into homes and the typical phone call was made from a landline. On top of that, most devices were siloed by necessity so that phone call was between you, the recipient, and the phone company. You did not have to worry about a social media company trying to mine your contact data with an app installed on your phone (because phones did not support apps and barely supported storing phone numbers). Even though we have had decades to adapt to those changes, some people are more likely to embrace their benefits while others have held on to their old values.
Software Development: How to identify unknown unknowns and communicate the effects of scope creep?

See also: https://www.quora.com/Engineering-Management/Why-are-softwar...
Thanks, first time I've heard of them, will be going through those (they seem to be available at archive.org [0]) soon!

I'd like to point out another interesting 18-part series of videos about prototyping (in his words "a short course on how to build stuff" :)), by engineer/inventor/professor Dan Gelbart: [1]

[0] https://archive.org/details/GingeryMetalWorkingShop/mode/2up

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMP_AfiNlX4
Vaccines are an absolutely revolutionary technology.

That said, mixing profit with essential medical technology is a recipe for failure.

The first way to make something more profitable is to cut costs.

What corners do these corps cut to up their margins? And how does that decrease health outcomes for some percent of the population?

The bottom-line is that no for-profit corp can be trusted with your health.

Vaccines must be developed and distributed by the government for the benefit of all human beings. Sure, we need to minimize cost but not to enrich the select few wealthy enough to be investors in the first place. If there is a surplus (profit), that money gets invested right back into R&D. No pharma-bros needed or wanted.

I am pro-vaccine and anti-for-profit-corps.

Yes, my kids are vaxed for measles and a few others, but, no, I did not go in for the entire schedule, which is frankly insane. Just compare our vax schedule in America to what they do in Europe. It's maybe 2x. And, yes, we will all get a Covid vax as soon as it is available.

But, remember, selling three of something (ETA: instead of two) that has a little margin gives you a 50% increase in profit. B-School types don't care that that third dose might be too much; besides, they can find/fund researchers to goal-seek safety for that extra 50%.

And, yes, vax is big business, just not as big as other meds.

And, yes, anti-vaxxers piss me off, too, the fucking anti-science morons. But people who trust for-profit corps with their health are stupid marks.
This has been the worst for me. It seems near impossible to properly calculate edge-case development, alongside core functionality, while also building a good UX.
> Why not provide a scientific argument instead of engaging in name-calling?

That's just the issue - where is the evidence for delaying vaccination? Why are we just assuming that what's worked for decades is only now ineffective and suboptimal without data?
Unvaccinated people put the immuno-compromised, newborns and the elderly at risk. The state doesn't have the right to force you to vaccinate, but they do have the right to force you into quarantine if you're not.
> but among other claims is one that states a popularly cited measles outbreak occurred with 95% of the people catching having been immunized

Source? Regardless, the large majority of aggregate cases of measles in the United States are among people who aren't vaccinated, which is a massive, massive over-representation and suggests that the measles vaccine is effective, regardless of specific anomalous cases.

I find this take of "being fair" to "nuanced" views quite common, but when I patiently let the whole anti-vax view be laid out, it is generally not particularly coherent nor well-sourced. I think stigma can be an effective way to change beliefs, because people can pretend they never held the belief in the first place. When you have someone lay out their whole argument, they often become more entrenched.

My source: https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html
In-space satellite servicing proves successful in record-breaking orbital
I fear for the .tw domain space if ICANN were to fall under the purview of the UN in any way.
I got an el-cheapo one from Staples. Same idea, same shape, etc. It helps a lot, but it takes some fiddling to dial in the right amount of tension pulling your shoulders back.
We run very similar scaffolding to host different workloads, except we run it on ECS, so you could complicate reference diagram even further.

In reality, when we had to add Wordpress to our workloads, there was nothing special we had to do except for introducing EFS. All our workloads before that didn't require keeping state on a file level.

And just like that we had a scalable/HA Wordpress setup with pretty decent performance.
Doesn't that exclude Apple?
YC invested in the long-term success of its startups by participating in every round. Is YC no longer interested in a long term partnership? Seems so.

Imagine investing in only one round and pretending that you care about, or even understand, the trials of a startup!
With so many data privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA, etc) propping up across geographies, how do i make sure that my company is in legal compliance and doing right by our customers data.
Works for me in Chrome Linux. Try another browser?

There is a video demo further down the page which is much more informative than the demo IMO.
10-30% survival odds are much better than 0, and the negative consequences of being ventilated depends on the ventilator settings; more time is worse, but it also varies by the ventilator pressure.

Germany is seeing better results by ventilating earlier, FYI.
Perhaps what you’re thinking of is inductive logic programming, although I’m not sure that field has advanced to the point where your particular example can be solved.
For what? The are nearly unusable and definitely not currency by common understanding and usage
What costs do you think were cut? Which specific vaccines do you think do more harm than good?
It's strange to label anyone who disagrees with a position in this way. Sure, some disagreements are spurious, but is every single disagreement spurious? Is every single person in the group incapable of rationally coming to reasonable conclusions on their own, so must be dismissed as some crazy eyed person that has a fundamental inability to understand scientific data?

I don't think such treatment is productive.

A) It makes members of the group feel persecuted, which tends to not change anyone's mind

B) Also benefits the pro-side by giving them a demon to slay

However, neither A nor B will answer any real disagreements possessed by the targeted group, and will thus not eliminate those holding to the position on a rational basis. Instead, it'll just perpetuate A and B, leading to greater polarization. It may also grow the targeted group, since at least we Americans tend to have sympathy for the underdog position that appears unfairly persecuted.
I'm curious how this differs from wavelet analysis?
Is this a wavelet application with the wavelet function optimized by AI?
There are a couple of other groups I would like to be interviewed as well.

- Economists who have bought into the crowding out theory. Are they consistent and still oppose government spending? [1]

- People/corporations who have lobbied for and taken advantage of all kinds of loopholes in taxation as to avoid paying taxes and who think taxation is theft, and are now expecting government to pay them out from this mess. [2]

- The ones that vouch for strong IP and patent protection. Do they propose to not share any information between research groups and give them even longer patents to incentivize better innovation?

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/crowdingouteffect.asp
[2] I cite no examples. I am astonished if there is none, though.
from my experience that's standard practice. We had reverse vesting from the very first angel round
Prototype Human Power Plant – Human Power Plant
IT - easy automated governance for non-technical folks
I read the article as calling out this one particular pediatrician. Reading his Wikipedia article makes me highly skeptical of his judgment, because it seems to be based on something other than data and science: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Sears_(physician)
Follow up with alternate cloud solutions in "Even quicker dirty static sites."

https://craigphares.com/even-quicker-dirty-static-sites/
> I am not defending the following claim, but among other claims is one that states a popularly cited measles outbreak occurred with 95% of the people catching having been immunized. The claim is that the immunizations are no longer effective

One of the key aspects of science is presenting data and methodology to support a claim - this enables reproducibility.

If we don't have these pieces of information, we're essentially back in the realm of religion: believing statements without evidence.
Is BGP Safe Yet?
It's amazing how the avalanche of knowledge offered by the internet does nothing to counter even the tiniest seed of doubt planted in these people's minds. Undoing the brainwashing is going to be one of the major challenges of our time.
> Nowadays the internet is pretty decent for all

... what? The web is rapidly becoming more and more unusable. Often, sites only work well when I fully disable JavaScript, and the associated autoplay ads, trackers, custom half broken and CPU intensive navigation behavior overrides, and similar sources of misbehavior.

The modern web is more user hostile than ever before.
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Bok/Landers/?)
Once you’re dealing with criminals that are stealing in the order of millions of dollars, or sometimes even hundreds of thousands, the probability of being killed off for being a trouble maker dramatically increases. Anything over 10 million you will almost certainly be killed if discovered. By then you are dealing with robust criminal organizations with full time employees on a payroll with families to feed, and they aren’t going to put all that at risk because of one nosey fuck snooping around.
I disagree with that example. This bug is exposing a server side infrastructure password and has nothing to do with user safety. Of course, as an operator of servers on the Internet, one must be aware of risks of bugs. This article talks about the security of the client application, which has been in the news recently. There was little news on the zoom infrastructure security, so we might as well guess about that.

Apart from that, the bug you mentioned was found and fixed by the community, and someone scanned all servers and notified the server operators. I'd say that this is about the most professional response to a vulnerability I've ever seen.
This is what profit-driven systems do.
It also increases profit.

You trust those B-schoolers and their hand-picked goal-seeking researchers to shade toward safety or profit?

I am pro-vax (within a sensible schedule) and anti-for-profit-corps, who NEVER EVER give a shit about your health, only that you can't prove that it was their product that harmed you.
The author wrote an article with a click bait title to conclude that they are not sure of the answer?

No one should be governing their moral principles based on a magazine or blog post. Evaluate the potential consequences of your actions and make the right decision for you. While I don't get food delivered as there are no options for that where I live, I personally see this as no different from any other delivery. Is it unethical to get mail?

My personal compass says this is perfectly ethical and presumably the alternative for the delivery person is unemployment. One could easily ask if it is unethical to NOT have deliveries given the plight of restaurants and their staff.

In the end, I see the whole conversation as a gross tone deaf exercise in privilege.
Safety Pin Shirts – Teespring
.onion is reserved, no risk for it at least... (as a special use domain)

https://lwn.net/Articles/657056/