skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I remember i have read this a year ago.

https://www.nngroup.com/articles/tesla-big-touchscreen/

A Case Study of Car-Dashboard User Interface

And it was discussed here before:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19968970

Im curious, have any of these problems been fixed?

- Soft Buttons That Demand Attention
- Poor Target Design
- Target Size
- Accidental Touches
- Map Always on Screen
If that were the case, then coc.nvim [0] wouldn't work quite the way it does. I run VSCode extensions in NeoVim all the time now.

[0] https://github.com/neoclide/coc.nvim
My Mazda3 has no touchscreen controls and I am very happy with that.
Sign in with Apple Announced, or on June 30 Your App Will Turn into a Pumpkin
It's always dangerous to mistake the abstraction for the underlying Reality.
If people routinely wore capacitive clothing, the screen could determine which seat the finger's owner was sitting in.
I’m annoyed by pile on culture and hate when a company goes from darling to demon. But as distasteful as I find that element of our society, I don’t think this is an example of pile on culture. Rather, I think that in this case, Zoom is using a false message with real life implications.

If you have a level of technical sophistication, you can see the shades of grey in all security. So maybe this usage of E2E can be overlooked in HIPAA or other threat contexts. But a wider array of people, including senior decision makers in sensitive organizations believe that E2E means ‘gooder’. :)

When I look at it through this lens, I’m not comfortable with the implications of their marketing message. I’m not sure this makes Zoom a demon, but I definitely trust them less as a result. Is that reasonable or am I overreacting to something? If I am, I would love to know where I’m wrong!
You mean, other than requirements that service provides track & preserve an audit trail for all data. ;-)

I believe this is a similar problem with financial trading systems with ETS.
everybody does that and it's getting really boring fixing this. When the PSREF is out then we can talk until then, that's just a heap of typos. They already published a correction over RJ45 and blablabla i need to type this up four times a week on various social media, people, get a grip, there is ONE certified AMD motherboard with TB3, an extremely expensive Threadripper it is beyond unlikely that it will happen
I just need a basic stereo, manually cranked windows, and a 5-6 speed stickshift.
You work at the 1%

The real world is filled with barbershops, daycares, bars, clinics, PVC manufacturers etc

None of them get VC money.

When they need money, they go to a bank and usually have to place a PG in order to get funds.

Tech startups have it easy. Its all equity. You are not pledging your lifetime earnings on a business idea.

Once tech startups lose their upside potential (prob not anytime soon if ever), you will be sitting with the regular folk, those that pledge their skin and life to their business.
I prefer QtCreator- it's not written in Electron.
> Power Ventures was using Facebook Users credentials to log on to facebook and I think thats a clear case of unauthorised access. Facebook had no direct relationship with Power Ventures and had not granted them access to those accounts at all.

I strongly disagree. Facebook didn't have a relationship with Power Ventures, but it did have a relationship with its own users who granted Power Ventures access to their accounts. And while I admit it's not legally recognized yet, I firmly believe that users have an inherent Right to Delegate lawful access to 3rd-party software products and services[0].

I don't think the Power Ventures case had anything at all to do with unauthorized access. I think it was an attempt by Facebook to block users from exercising control over their own data.

For context, look at the DMCA claims Facebook also filed in that case. It's been a really long battle to fight against the DMCA's unconstitutional provisions against subverting DRM for legal reasons. We have a lot of precedent to see how companies use systems like the DMCA. And the way they commonly use them is not to go after pirates, it's for market lock in and to restrict legitimate users. To paraphrase Doctorow, there are really bad consequences when we allow a company to make it a federal offense to use a product in a way that doesn't make their shareholders money.

Treating ToS violations as a federal crime gives companies that ability on an even broader scale. It's legal to circumvent DRM? Oh, but our ToS blocks that. You exported your own data that you legally own? No, our ToS blocks that. You build a Matrix bridge for your DMs in my chat app and another competing service? Sorry, that's a federal offense now.

A company should not be allowed to arbitrarily invent new federal laws. At most, violating a ToS should be a civil offense, and companies like Facebook should be forced to sue their own users, not providers like Power Ventures.

[0]: https://anewdigitalmanifesto.com/#right-to-delegate
there are several projects for browser automation, any should work for you if you can write some JS
I'm just going to respond to the top part of your post, as it's at least somewhat relevant rather than being a disconnected rant about the kids censoring you.

> I am just hooking linux kernel calls, I will never take JS for this. Pure C.

Why not? Hooking native code in other languages is already fairly common: http://www.cycript.org

> Valgrind? I have a header with #define MALLOC/FREE/REALLOC/... which returns larger buffer with guards at beginning and the end while after 25 years of C I hardly do anything more problematic that this.

Valgrind does significantly more checks than your solution.

> System language? Make it.

"Systems language" is a very ill-defined term, often used to gatekeep people.

> If it is just a newage nonsense wasting resources for the sake of deallocating and taking care about buffer boundaries as it is so hard to take care and track your memory I will skip it.

Keeping track of your memory is hard. If you say "no, it's easy for me", I'd like to see a non-trivial sample of your code that doesn't have memory safety issues.
Or just running caffeinate -t 10000?
I don't think have the luxury of imagining a metric that we wish money to represent any more than we can say that "the number of rats in New York" means anything in any abstract sense. The value of money is an emergent property of what people do with it and if its numeric measure fails to track our selected "objective metric", it's the fault of our metric, not money itself.
We did "sorta" focus group seat belts, and I was there to witness it.

Before laws mandated the use of seat belts, most people didn't use them. My mother bought a Volvo 122 in the 1960s, and people marvelled at the three-point harness.

But it's not like US manufacturers rushed to take advantage of Volvo making the patents freely available, and nor did Volvo take over the world by storm.

Some cars had alarms that nagged the driver if the seat belts weren't done up. I recall my uncle routed around this by looping the driver and "shotgun" belts -behind- the seats and fastening them.

Left to their own devices, large numbers of people prefer convenience and low price to safety. Only by regulation did the mass market adopt safer cars.

So I completely agree, no, people did not like wearing seat belts. They only did so when their option to forgo safety was removed.

p.s. I recall watching this PSA in Ontario. Everyone laughed about it, but soooooo many young men then went out and drove their muscle cars sans belt. Enjoy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sri9j3PA5vE
Mathematics as a Team Sport
Most of our users run this on kubernetes. Developers want an abstraction that is not kubernetes or infrastructure. Something simpler entirely focused on the development of services. So it fits well. We run it on kubernetes.
Wasn't it the US marine that moved back from touch screens to physical controls in their ships?

While the actual reason could be a case for discussions, the decision is correct in my humble opinion. The reason was, the loss of (I think) one destroyer, that crashed with a civil ship (a big freighter or tanker), because of misinterpretations of the steering control on the bridge of the destroyer.

In my humble opinion, when it comes to mission critical and distraction free control, nothing is better than physical control systems. In a good car, not only you have physical control systems, but also buttons and switches are of different shape or size or way of control (pressing, twisting, ...), so they can be identified simply by touching them.
One difference is that Amphetamine isn't updated as well, also seems more hackish. I switched to Caffeine a while ago.
Is there any low level language, which is actually close to modern x86_64?
> Access through a union allow the same region of memory to be interpreted as different types.

…only in C.

> No mainstream compiler will ever not optimise that.

Actually, it's mandated by the System-V ABI for structures of an appropriate size.
Did I read/you write that correctly? "VSCode extensions in NeoVim"? (Going to be honest, haven't used either since I'm on "plain" vim right now)
But it's a wider phenomenon than HN. North American (well, especially Americans... up here in Canada maybe less so) culture in general prides itself on its relative distrust and distaste for government, and talks big about opposition to authoritarianism -- but fails to recognize corporations as having said authority, and they often get carte blanche.
Why did you buy it?
Well, the original C was pretty much exactly how a PDP-11 worked. And the PDP-11 was a source of design inspiration for the original Intel x86 and Motorola 68000 chips.

So there were computer chips sold in the 1970s that worked a lot like C thinks. You are right that there were also ones that didn't.

Going forward from close to 1980 you added more and more features to all architectures that diverge.
Some Best Practices ReactJS
Economies at scale. I didn't think of that. Thank you, this was eye-opening.
I've had a lot of compatibility issues between my U3818DW and macOS and Dell doesn't care. Even more, their support staff on their public forums don't even acknowledge their buggy USB-C implementation and insists on blaming Apple. [1]

[1]: https://old.reddit.com/r/UsbCHardware/comments/ettgrg/dell_r...
Oh nice, thanks!
Do you have an idea of why dials and buttons are so expensive? That surprises me. The components aren't particularly high tech.
Who charged you? Infragard's sole job is to facilitate data transfer between industry and the feds to ensure there's security at every layer. That's some weapons grade bullshit right there.
Could also be an issue of pricing. I wouldn't be surprised if Zoom is cheaper than MS. Maybe someone with knowledge on the sourcing side could comment on that.
‘We can’t go back to normal’: how will coronavirus change the world?
Using a union still has the going-through-memory problem, though. I spent a day or two trying to coax clang into doing the efficient thing with a union a couple years back when I could have gotten the job done in 30 minutes with raw assembly (alas...)

RE: Return values, you'd be surprised. You can't assume you'll get properly optimized code for something like that in WebAssembly for example, despite the fact that you're using an industry-standard compiler (clang) and runtime (v8 or spidermonkey).
It really goes to show how deadly entitled individual rights can be. People in the US and in NYC in this case, whether Right-wing or Left-wing, justify going out, crowding and being selfish on the ground of their individual rights. The ACLU is challenging anti-congregation orders and there are still Trump people who refuse to comply on similar grounds. It's not even political - Americans wish to die for their freedoms.

In some European countries drones are flying around threatening fines and jail time for being out for non-essential reasons.

The individualism versus communitarian debate is in full swing, and Nature chose communitarianism.
We're indeed planning to broaden the support for various databases in the future (e.g. already looking into MongoDB and FaunaDB).

If you have a specific DB in mind that you'd like to see supported, please open a feature request here: https://github.com/prisma/prisma/issues/new?assignees=&label...
video or it doesn't exist
It doesn't. The concern is that all of these assertions are captured by the browsers, who are given custody of the signed assertion as part of the SAML POST flow. The attack being contemplated here is that you have a SAML IDP configured for Cat Sharing Application and for Internal Admin Application; a attacker's browser holds onto the Cat Sharing Application assertion and feeds it to the Internal Admin Application, and, because SP SAML libraries are terrible, the Internal Admin Application honors it.
I can't find any primary source, but I'm pretty sure about it.
Could Open VSX be used with VSCodium, and could it potentially be made a default there? They have expressed an interest in using a different marketplace: https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium/blob/master/DOCS.md#ext...

Edit: Someone just opened an issue. If that was you and you're reading this, thanks! https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium/issues/372
That may be true, but in this instance there is clear evidence that Mr. Smalls was retaliated against for his labor organizing actions.
Show HN: I made a list of 50 bootcamps and the stack they teach
Larry Tesler would be pleased today.
It's not really a fork. They reuse things like Monaco, but other than that they reimplement most things, like plugin compatibility. In fact, they started with an API and later implemented the same API as vscode. I'd say it's more like a clone.

I was very excited about theia because you could run it as a web server, meaning I could develop with a complete IDE (ideal for TypeScript development) from anywhere, without the code ever leaving a certain network.

This didn't work all that well when I tried it because it wasn't 100% compatible with vscode extensions yet (for example couldn't get vim keybindings), but I was able to use for a couple weeks during a trip and I got things done.

Now that vscode allows working over ssh and other solutions, I don't see a need for an alternative. I can work remotely with the exact same thing as from my main workstation.
Recording will work fine locally, no (albeit perhaps more fiddly)? It does push some things off the server obviously, but arguably none of those things should be happening on the server in a situation when E2E is mandated, anyway.
Since no one else has brought this up, I think one of the big drivers behind this project is actually another eclipse project (che): https://www.eclipse.org/che/technology/

Che is a cloud ide that is supposed to be easily deployed into a k8s cluster. Che supports authentication and spinning up pods for projects, and other management features. Theia may have been developed to work nicely with Che directly (I am not a developer of either so this is only speculation).
What you need is both. The screen should still be a touch screen, and there should be buttons and toggles around it.

For example, I hate it when I can't pan/scroll through the map on the car screen for lack of touch screen. But I also hate it when I have to use touch buttons to change the music that's playing.
It seems like the middle way would be:

Build your console with a big hole in the middle. Mount the buttons to the insert, figure out your UI and adjust the button placement, so really most of the last minute design is producing a new mounting bracket for the electronics and physical controls.

The biggest problem I see there is that you are very limited in button placement without resizing the panel. But if you pick a clever panel size to console hole ratio you could buy yourself some flexibility. For example, an almost square panel could allow you to rotate it and move some buttons from vertical to horizontal.
> As a sibling comment mentions, your company shouldn't be using random articles found through a search engine for HIPAA advice.

Trust me. I am not. I'm simply trying to demonstrate colloquial usage of the term within the Hipaa community.

> If the intended recipient of your protected health information is another client, then SSL/TLS would not be HIPAA compliant. If the intended recipient is the server, then SSL/TLS is totally fine.

This is not correct, though. Both of those use cases CAN be fine. They can both also NOT be fine.

* Client-to-client (assuming we're talking about a computer client) over SSL/TLS is completely fine if the usage case allows for it. You don't need a server involved to exchange ePHI.

* Conversely, client-to-server does not automatically make the use case allowable.
Even having the "unblock this site from camera and microphone" burried in the browser chrome or settings pages somewhere is a dealbreaker. It's too easy for people to mindlessly click "no" to can this access your microphone, because of the way the browser pops it up during first use, instead of during "install."
You can't use the market as an example of it, because the producers shifted in (almost) unison, and bundled it with other more valuable features.

The same thing happened with 3DTVs -- the manufacturers all decided this was the next big thing, and shifted all their production to it, and it turns out.. it wasn't. But we as consumers had a 5-year drought where you simply couldn't buy a new TV that wasn't 3D. The same is happening with SmartTVs today -- if I want a new TV that isn't bottom-of-the-barrel tier, my only option is Smart.

When I got leased a VW Jetta a few years back, you had the option of no-touchscreen.. but that was the lowest-featured car, so you have up 10 other things for it.

You can also find the same thing in MacBooks with the touchbar -- once it was out, your only real options were to buy it, or throw the baby out and buy nothing/windows.

You can't judge whether customers like them, because it's bundled to other far more valuable aspects.
Unreasonable, IMHO, for a car meant for consumption by the masses. Few people actually care about that stuff in the real world
My home library is mostly of two sorts: reference books I might need (field guides, math/engineering texts, knot books, etc) and books I haven't read yet. After all, who wants a library full of books they've already read? If I particularly like a book and expect I'd re-read it, I'll keep it, but the rest I donate.
With physical buttons we can keep eyes on the road, one hand on the wheel and the other one looks for the right button. With a touch screen we have to look at the screen, hoping we made the right decision about what's going to happen on the road. If there are laws against texting there should be laws against using touchscreens when the car is moving.
It is at the token level. The length of the results can be changed.
The (approximately) 360-day year is a property of nature (the ratio between the Earth's revolution speed and the Earth's rotation speed is approximately 360 if expressed in base 10). It is a discovered number, not invented/chosen.

It is possible that the base-60 numbering comes from this basic astronomical observation, or they may be mostly unrelated.
Agreed.

I was precisely stating the reasoning behind the number we see everywhere. I was not offering an opinion on whether that reasoning is sufficient to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

That said, in an emergency it makes sense to focus on people with symptoms and tell everyone else to act like they might be exposed. In which case people who have been exposed and have symptoms should act like you want everyone else to act. Which means that if they are working in a warehouse, you want them to have protective gear to prevent them from giving it to people.

Which is exactly one of the things that this strike was about.
Building a Simple GraphQL API with Actix and Juniper #1
> The problem that touch interfaces solve, ever since the advent of the first smart phone, is that the interface is now dynamic. You can change it without having to replace the hardware.

I mean, the other point of a dynamic interface is that you can now have more controls than would fit on a static interface. Touchscreen fit-to-purpose controls might suck more than hardware fit-to-purpose controls, but either option is better than a single set of generic controls that control multiple systems that "should" have different control paradigms, translating to the generic controls being a compromised bad fit for any use-case.

E.g. a hardware English-language keyboard is probably better than a touchscreen English-language keyboard (though people with modern Blackberries might dispute this); but both are better than entering English text through T9 on a dial pad. And the touchscreen has the benefit of allowing you to have more keyboards (for e.g. the multiple native languages you type that use different alphabets), which wouldn't even fit on the phone as hardware keyboards.

I bring this up, because eventually you run out of space to stuff additional controls. As airplanes become ever-more advanced, their cockpits will approach that point. At that point, dynamic affordances may be necessary, just so you can have some kind of "pagination" allowing you to squeeze more controls in. (Hopefully it'd just be for the non-time-critical switches to flip.)
All purposes are equally as valid on unallocated port ranges. Inconfigurable port ranges with no fallback when those ports are in use is bad design.
New blood test can detect wide range of cancers
> Who charged you?

Sylint pressed the charges through the FBI.

Originally, they also insisted I caused damage days before the date of incident and tried to tack on $32k in damages. I pointed out that I do not possess a time machine, and they shifted it from (June 18-24) to (June 21-27) and lowered the dollar amount to $9k.
Amazon pays very well for an entry-level job. Yes, work conditions suck compared to white-collar work. Many blue-collar jobs do, especially now that the 6-figure blue collar factory jobs have all but disappeared.

But that's the price you pay for a job that has no requirements beyond being able to use your hands.
The vietnam era missiles were really bad missiles with a really bad pk. Lack of a cannon wasn't the problem, and adding one wasn't the solution. Fixing crappy missile technology was the solution.

I don't think there's been an air to air gun kill in four decades, maybe five (US at least). Essentially all air to air combat is with missiles, to the point two of the three JSF variants don't even have a built in cannon and will likely almost never fly with the gun pods they are building for them.
I used to be an "Adventure Traveler" when I was younger, trapsing through forests and jungles - basically doing nothing of value. I had a lot of reasons I could come up with for doing all this stuff, but at the end of the day it was just a personal desire to experience these places and be able to tell the story.

I wish more people would just cop to that, wanting to
"Be an Explorer" to tell stories and experience the edge.

The majority of people doing this stuff now aren't doing it for what the author quotes as: "[finding] new geographical information that adds to humanity’s stock of collective knowledge"

That's what botanists and archeologists and GIS experts do with LIDAR and robots and the like. At a certain point once you realize that you, the human are the limiting factor when it comes to improving knowledge about the world, you start creating tools to learn, probes and planes and radars and things.

I think "nature" people just need to be real with it, that they are trying to live out a naturalistic fantasy or just enjoy the solitude and stop pretending there is something more philosophical about it.
A Practical Explanation of AIOps for Engineers