skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The argument from those in power against encryption is mind-bogglingly stupid...

Is it, though? I mean, most people think all sorts of bad stuff happens on the internet, so playing to those emotions would garner more support.

> ... extreme ignorance, or because of a lust for the power and leverage...

The latter. They believe that tech companies have too much power right now.
i wonder whether by triggering (not causing) correction earlier than later the virus actually softened the otherwise much stronger crash which would have anyway happened sometime later due to all that overpumping/overinflating of the economy with the cheap money during the recent years (resulting in particular from the low rates amplified by the tax cuts).
By running a Python SAML authentication proxy.
I've been finding the same. When I first switched to ddg, I thought it just wasn't ready yet... But now i feel more like search is broken in general. The content farms have won.
Just drives up demand for lobsters.
It helps some, but not enough. Some of these social networks (such as Facebook) will develop a profile on you whether or not you have an account with them.
Ryzen 4000 mobile laptops could hit “18 hours” of battery life, AMD says
Cloud developers are falling in love with serverless computing – and more should
There are multiple reasons.

1. Prices (especially wages) are sticky. Interest rates you can adjust overnight, but to get the adjustment of wages can easily take years.

2. Economy is not actually nicely behaving equilibrium seeking thingy, but a complex, chaotic system with various time constants. So we actually need a body that works to stabilize the mismatches of aggregate supply and demand. So it is not "artificially propping" demand, but trying to actively keep demand and supply aligned. And people may be "demanding" better housing, but it does not mean they can afford to.
When you come back sober, the solutions won't make any sense.
There can't be two of us in the world with a personal SAN/NAS that isn't a giant anime collection. Since I know I'm the one with a personal NAS without such a collection it stands to reason that if you have a personal NAS you have it full of anime. QED
The host has to agree to allow your review for it to appear.
I appreciate this concise framing. I do think it gets more complicated than this though.

Defining the pie gets really complicated. Sometimes you make one pie bigger and another smaller. Companies like Lyft certainly decreased the taxi pie but then made a new one altogether.

I believe there are fair ways to extract value from what already exists by creating a better version in a competitive market. Ultimately I think the value should be defined at the customer and societal levels. The tangents and levels in between make things messy.
For security+fraud+IT examples, you can see some of the talks @ https://www.graphtheplanet.com/ a couple weeks back

We primarily get pulled in as a component for projects that use as part of:

* Asset management, whether sec, IT, manufacturing specs, pharma, metadata stores, config systems...

* ML model unification (e.g., how Google translates between many systems)

* Knowledge bases/search for both people & for algorithms. Wikis, recommendors, ... .

There are less common scenarios we see that I also expect to explode, like massively bootstrapping ML systems via weak supervision. GraphDBs & compute are also used for what I consider non-knowledge graph scenarios, likely scaling some compute tasks. Exciting times!
That makes sense.

But I wonder how the manufacturers will manage the transition of their large global franchise model to supporting “farm equipment as a service”?

It will be pretty disruptive to the franchise network.
What value does knowing the total number of asymptomatic cases provide today? Such data is doubtlessly invaluable for studying the virus, but it's unnecessary today for managing the outbreak.

Yes, the data can help us more accurately estimate the rate of infections, but that'll take months or years to pin down to the precision that such fine-grained data promises. In the mean time, you can roughly determine the spread of impactful cases by the change in number of presentations of respiratory infections, just as we've done for decades.

You characterize what they're doing as stonewalling, but I'm charactering it as prioritizing. The biggest priority is collecting data on severe cases, and generally following established protocol to minimize unforced errors. The number of asymptomatic cases doesn't help you figure out how many ventilators you might need, at least not in a timely manner. The middle of an epidemic is not the time to revolutionize the practice and science of medicine. If you don't think things through carefully--i.e. the impact of false negatives and false positives of assay kits--you can easily fsck things up.

Researchers want data, but the primary concern right now is juggling medical resources and finding treatments. More data is not always helpful, especially data not directly relevant to the present task.

You're also assuming that hospitals and doctors are itching to run assay kits on every suspected case. Why, because some nurse's complaints went viral on social media? To out-do Singapore? Because "more data"? Doctors not interested in running millions of assay kits aren't going to be the ones complaining, not unless you forced them to run the tests. An assay result won't change the way you treat a patient with characteristic signs of a severe respiratory infection in the middle of a global SARS outbreak.
Damn, I might be guilty as charged! Not long ago, I officially launched greenleaves.io, a logistics startup. The main issue I have with the about us thing is, that for now it is just me. So I use a lot of we and such (the co founder will join as soon as there is enough money to sustain a second person, we both have family, so...).

Would you to have quick look at https://greenleaves.io/about/? Because the last two weeks told me that I might be overthinking a couple of things...
Sorry, but I love caviar. In fact any sort if fish roe is good. It does not have to be expensive. In Russia they eat fish roe/caviar on buttered bread for breakfast. It's really good.
Better quality and logistic difficulties.

California's lobsters had the finest flavour, are more dangerously deceiving to naive fishermen (crushing's fingers creature), and much more challenging to catch and put in a table. They have a bad habit of losing legs at the slightest opportunity (and nobody wants to buy a three legged lobster).
Very interesting, thanks for sharing.

I wonder how farm equipment manufacturers will manage the necessary transition in their dealer franchise model?
Any review I write on any of these platforms will blandly positive, anodyne, uninteresting. I understand why that doesn’t work at scale but I’m not a practitioner of radical honesty, and honesty is not incentivized. Unless something is really egregious, 5 stars every time.
any idea what they use on aircraft skins?
GNG increases when in ketosis, but is still capped because ketones regulate the GNG process. That is the effect which was observed here. It says it right there in the synopsis:

"Glucose concentration was lower (4·09 (sem 0·10) v. 4·89 (sem 0·06) mmol/l, P < 0·001) and β-hydroxybutyrate concentration was higher (1349 (sem 139) v. 234 (sem 25) μmol/l, P < 0·001) after the high-protein compared with the normal-protein diet."

β-hydroxybutyrate is a ketone body.

Note that this contradicts your statements that GNG will kick you out of ketosis. It absolutely will not.

To repeat: GNG is constant, regulated by ketones, and its relative level is not driven by protein demand, but by glucose depletion.
Amazon is reportedly working to find a cure for the common cold
> But a business that uses it to run their marketing, using transactions with their business?

It's about informed consent. The businesses should at least warn their customers that they're doing this, and who they're ratting us out to. That way we can each make an informed decision about whether or not to use that business.
Most evidence is that antidepressants and other forms of therapy (particularly CBT) go together like peanut butter and jelly.

Depressant drugs such as Xanax or Klonopin on the other hand open up ion channels in your neurons that let the electrical charge drain out. You get fast and often complete relief from anxiety but learning and memory is impaired.

People who use benzodiazepines for a long time seem to grow older but not grow up, you see them and they still have the same conversation that they had with you ten years ago, they just don't seem to move on the way that most people do.

That's not true about antidepressants.
Hmm, well, counter-example here. Lobster just tastes great, no matter how cheap it gets. ;-)

Nothing like a fresh lobster roll on the Eastern seaboard!
In my experience most people just drown it in butter or mayonnaise or other toppings. Anything tastes good when smothered in butter.
Support for AWS HTTP APIs – Serverless Framework
> it's not particularly good for finding a service provider in a large area.

Unless I'm misunderstanding something, this doesn't make much sense.

For example, running a search for "car mechanic 94105" doesn't restrict your results to car mechanics that are located inside the 94105 zip code. It restricts your results to car mechanics that are near the 94105 zip code, where "near" is a fuzzy term. I just ran this search myself, from outside San Francisco, and there's just a single result in the 94105 area. But there are plenty shown in 94107, 94103, 94102, 94111... (primarily 94107).

The zip code is a cheap, easy, and unambiguous way to tell the search engine what you want. It's on the search engine to decide how to respond.
I think op is saying that they were given another airbnb to replace the bad one, and in doing so, you lose the ability to review the first, bad location.
Discussed at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21199134 a few months ago.
Watch them at 2x speed, it will require your attention. You can always pause and rewind if you need to take notes or miss something
It’s not. Not even close. There should be some sort of “search benchmark” that could show this more objectively.

A table of searches with search queries and the correct first resukt. In maby cases it’s clear what the correct result is (Search for a major company and I want their website index page for example). In other cases the expected result is “what google does”, e.g when searching for “123 GBP in USD”.

It’s not that DDG doesn’t let me find what I want eventually, it’s that it doesn’t have the right result as #1 which is extremely frustrating when you are used to the I’m feeling lucky-click on the first result without reading.

To switch I’d want google quality results with zero added effort on my part e.g in learning better DDG-querying or accepting a slightly longer time to browse results. That’s pretty tough to pull off without the resources and data that Google has.
My chef son-in-law, who's worked at some great restaurants in the Pittsburgh area, says that they almost never pass on cheaper ingredient costs to the consumer.
This is awesome--really excited to see this need being solved.
Sometimes I feel like humans do not understand that we're the prisoners and nature is the police.

Nature does not care about killing us. The universe will feel no remorse if an asteroid kills us all or we do it ourselves with nukes. Corona doesn't feel shame.

We're prisoners in so many ways. When are we going to start cooperating to try to escape our death sentence? Or are we content to fight each other over scraps while we await our fate?
i absolutely love this comment, you’ve got a great writing style
My argument was

>That's possible until somebody links surveillance cameras and phone tracking.

Turning off the mobile phone doesn't prevent surveillance.

In an information society, intelligence will be paid handsomely. Whoever remains in the proletariat doesn't have the brainpower to circumvent surveillance, if it is possible at all.
Is it possible that it wasn't personal?

That the contract was cancelled because the product wasn't worth it?

That the note wasn't extended because he thought the company was a money sink which would not be profitable? That he thought trying to liquidate the good bits was a better way to get his money, rather than a payment plan from a value destroying enterprise?

That he sued personally because he felt they might be trying to hide assets of the firm?

I could be wrong, but there are other angles to see the picture from.
the paper does mentions that; and honestly i'm interested in how long this sort of micropatterning lasts when it's incorporated in an aircraft, as well as how its anti-ice performance is affected as it gets fouled/abraded:

> Further research is required to understand the influence of different icing parameters on ice adhesion and to assess the compatibility and robustness of such surfaces in operational environment (i.e., rain and sand erosion, UV resistance, interaction with other fluids, such as hydraulic and anti‐icing)
Would be nice to save weight on full size anti ice systems. Flying around to test anti icing is also not the greatest approach. If ice starts to build up and you shed it, it can come off in chunks and break things.
Not sure how you got to that conclusion. A simple ad blocker and not using fb would solve this issue entirely. Transaction data like restaurant purchases is only useful in this scenario if it’s linkable to other online tracking data on you.
With car shopping I’ve always hunted down fan forums. There you can usually find out if there’s any issues and whatnot - and even sometimes when deals are about to happen.
> They are not going to offer it to you, normally, because they are not a charity. They want to give you the least amount of money that you will except.

An alternative perspective from my time managing: That reflects the viewpoint of the business, not necessarily the viewpoint of the manager.

Getting an out-of-band raise approved triggers entire internal processes, outside of the control of the immediate manager requesting it.

Triggering one proactively as a manager with no impetus other than "this person deserves it" is likely to get denied or a token amount approved. As you said, the business wants to pay the least amount of money an employee is willing to accept. If the employee has given no indication they have issue with their current pay, the business has no reason to presume there's a need to pay them more.

However, once someone asked for one, I could take that and use it as leverage. If the employee has brought it up, there's evidence of doubt on whether the company is still meeting that minimum threshold. Denying the raise outright increases the risk of attrition, so the business takes it seriously compared to the proactive request from the manager. Then I can use what I know to work the system in the way that results in a far more favorable raise.
The US wants to collect DNA from immigrant detainees for a criminal database
Oil plunges 10% for worst day in more than 5 years
Whoops! Fixed, thanks.
Can you give us some examples of recommendations that would translate favorably?
I've never understood expensing trivial stuff like that. It's far more effort than it's worth, in my opinion.
How do we make a single thumbs down not trigger a 5 alarm fire in the customer service department? Anyone else dread the onslaught of follow up from a company after you give a bad rating?
Local generation is worth paying a premium for if it allows transmission infrastructure to be avoided.
The discipline to maintain focus is a skill that requires practice. We practice "multi-tasking" a lot more than we practice single-tasking. The problem is not the environmemt or the medium or the technology.

A good way to practice paying attention to video is to take notes while watching. And use pen and paper! You don't need the notes later, they are just a tool to help maintain focus and process as you listen.
Not necessarily. Twilio leaking would mean all the identities you thought were separate are one JOIN away from being aggregated into one.

See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22505464.
There's also the aspect that, as the price goes up, the more it'll be cooked by more expensive/better chefs -- which presumably produce better food, or at least, better looking food (and if you believe in eating with your eyes, translates to better food)

In which case, it does actually taste better as a group. It probably finds better recipes as more experienced cooks take a stab at it (whereas before, it was so low-class few would likely even consider doing anything with it beyond the simplest/cheapest combinations).

These kinds of things are usually compounding, or even feedback loops; it's rarely useful to only look at a single step of impact. Though I wouldn't doubt cost isn't a part of the explanation (and ofc it goes the other way too -- good things made cheap, cheapen the perceived value. Perhaps they were also good when it was cheap... But cost was so low you wouldn't accept it as good-eatings)
Thanks. The key topic seems to be "Kinematic Synthesis" for which there appears to be a developed theory.

https://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs194-28/fa15/lectures/kinem...
We've got pretty good evidence they were correct to criticize supply-side economics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_experiment
Very cool! Are you the author?
I had that revelation last week. Well, actually earlier but it took a while to settle.

The plan was to build product until around May / June, simply because I wanted a little bit more sophistication than spreadsheets ( these would do the job, by the way). A chance encounter with a potential customer ended with me sending an offer after his most important question was "are your transports insured". Pretty much looks like my MVP is much more M than I assumed!
If Facebook doesn't know this, then things are far worse with Facebook than I thought. At a minimum, they should know who is feeding them data just as much as they should know who they're giving data to.
Of course. Creativity is not a matter of more brain activity, more synapses etc. It comes from elsewhere. One could say we have two brains, the one that is active while we're awake and the one which activates when we sleep and dream. It is known that some painters deliberately entered in a dream like consciousness state, and from there they took the creativity and inspiration to paint out of the box things;
My biggest concern in moving to AMD is support for profiling and system visibility. On Intel, there are many more performance counters exposed, and Intel themselves make great tools (Vtune, Intel PCM).

AMD has a profiler, but it is nowhere near as capable as Vtune.

AMD has ways to do some things that Intel's PCM tools do (like monitor memory bandwidth), but they are exceedingly awkward (eg, only option is producing a CSV, no live output). And there are lots of things which are just missing (like support for monitoring NUMA fabric bandwidth, PCIe bandwidth, power, etc). I gave a talk at AMD in Austin last fall where I beat them up about some of these things.

Oh, and I'm up to over 260Gb/s of 100% TLS traffic from an AMD Rome :)
Could be easier said than done. There are lots of edge cases that could become a problem in real use. Stuff like surface contamination from various fluids or environmental factors.
As I explained above, we already have a term for "a device which is proven to execute computation using quantum effects"; we call it a "computer". All practical computers (since the transition from vacuum tubes to transistors, and arguably before that) depend on quantum effects for their computation. Transistor action is a quantum-mechanical effect, which is why the Boltzmann constant pops up in the middle of the Ebers–Moll equation.

Please do not resort to personal attacks on this site. Your repeated insulting remarks do not rise to the standards of behavior we attempt to maintain here.
I experience the same problem as a fairly novice programmer who doesn't always know the right term to stick into DDG/google.

>It's gotten to the point where I almost always automatically bang out to Google for those types of searches.

But this is why I stick with DDG, because it is very very easy to check elsewhere with a two letter bang. Even if I never used DDG search it would still be valuable to use DDG with bangs for wikipedia, google, youtube, etc.
> You shouldn't assume just because an organizer team has detected a problem, that it really is a problem.

You shouldn't assume things in life, yes.

But you have to treat problems and complaints from "accusers" seriously.

Which means raising them with the accused, listening to their side, evaluating both points of view, and acting accordingly.

Which is EXACTLY what this article is saying, just through the lens that MOST (vastly) accusations are valid and have some basis in reality.

Any other whataboutism is a distraction.
This article is astonishingly vulgar.
An Algorithm for Passing Programming Interviews
The paper looks like it will be a nice resource to direct AI students towards; however, the Reviewer 2 in me is stirring, I'm sort of concerned with the lack of Betty's Brain citation in the paper, as that is one of the studies on knowledge graphs in education.
My point was that they don't actually delete your account and so don't lose any data with the exception of your on-facebook behavior. I would assume that your profile still exists and is treated the exact same way as before you deleted it, just with a flag that it was "deleted".

So they still can tie back impressions to your account in the exact same way.
China's coronavirus recovery is 'all fake,' whistleblowers and residents claim
According to which benchmark?
That's not an application you can generalize. Literally everything is dependent on requirements.
Yikes, will look into it. Thanks for the heads up!
I personally cycle my caffeine usage, with intentionally low dose weeks between higher dose weeks.
I found causal loop diagram much more effective
You assume that all parties have same IQ, same previous experience, equally informed, share same moral values, and share same goal. In this case, yes, they are doing wrong.
I’ve always found the reviews useful. Never had a bad experience. Reviews will mention downsides even if five stars. And will be superlative if the place is great.

They also between 4.5-4.9, with those at the upper end better. Review volume is indicative too.

Have stayed in dozens of airbnbs, always had a great stay.
Or... closer than Maine
Anyone with a better background, are micro surface features required for this kind of thing or could teflon/rain-x type chemical coatings create a more durable/corrosion resistant/easily repairable effect?
A single person can do whatever and no one gives a F.

As to the health authorities - they are acting responsibly.

It is in the best of interest to delay, manage and contain the virus spread, even though it's probably impossible to stop, because no country is in such surplus of medical resources to be able to admit hundreds of thousands of patients with severe respiratory issues. And the collapse of some local medical systems will incur mass hysteria which will make managing the crisis really difficult. So distributing the infections is really, really important, and will save many lives.
In the context of business, I would frame being an asshole as doing things that benefit yourself at the expense of others. Not being an asshole is doing things that benefit yourself and others.

Let's say you sell some Saas tool. You're an asshole if you try to sell to anyone even if you think it won't help them. You're not an asshole if you truly believe your service will benefit your customers. You're an idiot if you're selling to someone and you can't tell the difference.

I agree that my definition was certainly lacking but I hope this clarifies my intent to separate true assholery with simply being unpleasant to be around.