skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
1) Because it's open source so you don't need to trust them.

2) How is Mozilla facilitating that at all, much less doing a great job of it?

3) Brendan Eich co-founded Mozilla, so that's pretty funny given your point (2).
Can US citizens work in Berlin for this position?
Measles but without the vaccine. And even then, people seemed to get by just fine for thousands of years with it out in the wild.
The problem is that none of those things are why California has a homeless problem. We have it because they come here from other states /because/ we offer those types of services. Most of the homeless in my area aren't even especially wretched, they're just lazy teens and druggies who would rather get handouts than rebuild themselves. What California needs is a wall against its neighboring states not those things you mentioned, California already has public health and mental health programs that we provide and don't charge for if you're poor. No amount of funding will help you if other people can just dump their problems onto you.
I find this post to be unintelligible. Given that it's been upvoted to the top of HN though, can someone TL;DR of the intellectual value of this post? It seems to be stepping through the details of what is going on while also being rambling.
The product and engineering challenges involved in building out our network such that it is both performant and cost-effective to operate are fascinating.

The easiest way to learn the answer to this sort of question is to come work at Cloudflare :)
More important is to appoint someone with the right motivations and with a technical background. A pilot with a good formal technical background might be a fine FAA leader, but so might someone with technical expertise in the operations of the national airspace, or a Chief Engineer type involved with aircraft certification. What's critical though is that they remember they are supposed to work on behalf of the people, not the short-term economic interests of the regulated, and not to see themselves as firstly serving political patrons.
To the contrary, this is a decision that impacts the entire city, involving many, many people. The mayor is the right person to make that holistic, wide-ranging call.

It's not bad optics at all. This is a public decision that is most responsibly taken by public officials.
It's a good caveat, because Lua, in particular, has fully-reentrant functions. You can run a bunch of Lua_states cooperatively or on a threaded basis without problems. Everything the VM does, from the C side, receives a Lua_state as the first argument.

It's intrinsically single-threaded, yes. But each instance is quite small and they stay out of each others way. Add coroutines and there's a lot you can safely do with Lua that's a real pain to accomplish with Python.
That's opposite of my experience, although I am not flying until September. I booked a flight from JFK to Athens and back for around $400. The day after I booked (earlier this week) alerts were almost 2x as high. I wonder if I just got lucky.
I think that if passenger numbers go down and fixed costs stay the same, and if passengers aren't very price sensitive (their company is paying their fare) then it makes sense to raise prices.

The trouble is that this will drive out the holiday flyers and leave them dependent on business flyers whose companies can turn off the tap on a whim. And will have every incentive, and excuse, to do so.
Seems fine when viewed in Emacs https://pasteboard.co/IY3oxMD.png
HTTP 2 is more reasonable. But by the time you get to HTTP 3 you're just doing HTTP 2 over QUIC. At which point, why not just send RPC payloads directly over QUIC?
I'm digging https://github.com/RobertoPrevato/BlackSheep myself, since I prefer the terseness of Bottle and stacking decorators to add functionality to handlers.

Any of the above (or Sanic) can do ~3K RPS on a single core on a Raspberry Pi (which is where I test things for portability, optimisation and a little fun), and the RAM overhead is generally not that bad small (just did a little "hello world" uvicorn/blacksheep app and I see 22MB resident/10MB shared per worker, and one of my Clojure servers taking up over four times that...)
Brave does not own the majority of BAT. At least do a modicum of research before arguing about things on the internet.
Years ago my friend and I started a joke-repo called OpenICBM. I guess it's time to bring it back to life.
I'm not discussing whether their safety outcomes were changed.

My point is that management deliberately set out to create a completely different company culture that would no longer be engineering-driven. I don't see how anyone can seriously dispute that.

> Whatever killed Boeing's engineering culture is irrelevant. Arguing over that is a distraction from the fact that Boeing's current engineering culture pushed this product to market.

You know what? The insanity of this argument is going to be so obvious to any reader that rather than argue against it I'm just going to emphasize it by quoting it.
I recently started playing around with Google Cloud Run and am running some python/flask/gunicorn code in a docker container on the platform.

I noticed in the logs that I am getting a lot of Critical Worker Timeouts and I am wondering if this has anything to do with it.
Kind of a sweet spot to be in. We sell you these fancy jets and if you decide to invade us, we flip a switch and they fall out of the sky. lol
Yes. Lots of homeless people are "happy" with their drugged-out life. Shelters that require people to stop doing drugs or require even the most bare minimum amount of being willing to not act like an animal are often mostly empty -- the only services people will take are ones that let them continue to drug themselves into oblivion
also, don’t forget about [0] (another rust-based learning mini for risc-v)

[0] http://osblog.stephenmarz.com/
What has been very strange for me, is the main streaming of comic book culture has made much of my decades old knowledge hip and current again. But when I was reading comic books as a teenager, it wasn't culturally relevant at all to my peer group.
Preserving data integrity: A ZFS-inspired storage system
There are hoses on both sides of the line of pillars, but at the same time cars can approach the line from either end. No matter what side your port is on, you can use any spot.

In these stations.
I think she does The Daily WTF better than The Daily WTF sometimes.
Gevent was doing it right and async syntax was a huge mistake that fractioned community-contributed libraries into two incompatible camps with lots of unnecessary cloning happening at present moment.

In high-level languages with virtual machines and/or garbage collectors, the runtime system should be solely responsible for scheduling green threads around IO entry points, all without special syntactic markers. GHC has it right (https://www.aosabook.org/en/posa/warp.html), Gevent was a right development with on-par async performance metrics (https://gist.github.com/rfyiamcool/41d4004b7fd46516d0b4f34f6...), that had a standard synchronous coding style. It could be adopted into the core language and improved further without splitting the community.
Because what I have in place is a good old HTTP 1.1 ?
It only takes one homeless person to ruin any amount of publicly-available space or service.
The disjointed presentation and numerous typos make this harder to read than the original paper, IMHO.
If the WHO director really said that, then it should be available at the WHO press release section, I believe. [1]. Or perhaps it was a false HN headline.

[1] https://www.who.int/news-room/releases
AFAIK there is only ever just one thread (that runs user code). setTimeout, etc are all also invoked by the event loop.

I can vaguely recall (but it's 1AM so I didn't verify - take with a grain of salt) that nodejs uses an a thread pool for IO, but I guess that's only for IO for which there is no async API, otherwise that would be wasteful.

I imagine a quick search about the event loop and said thread pool would yield better researched answers :)
What Is a Backdoor?
Possibly not because so much of it is political, for lack of a better word.

I would like to see housing policy changed in this country and I would like to see us solve the healthcare stuff.

If I had unlimited funds, I would make a go of building SROs/microunits and Missing Middle Housing as a real estate developer. This country has torn down about a million SROs in recent decades and largely zoned out of existence the ability to build Missing Middle Housing, which used to be a common form of housing.

New Urbanism was an attempt to build walkable neighborhoods. It wasn't wildly successful in bringing back historical patterns of neighborhood development and became mostly enclaves of nicer homes for upper class Americans. It faced a huge uphill battle in getting anything built at all and it was apparently common for developers and architects to take their New Urbanist neighborhood plan to the city, get it declined and then comb through the building codes and regulations and rename a bunch of stuff on their map while making little to no changes. Then take it to the city again. Rinse and repeat until they got approval of something vaguely similar to their initial vision.

The new version of this is YIMBYism. What little I have seen of YIMBYism is political stuff and I am mostly not seeing them bring answers as to what kind of housing works well, what kind of financing works well, etc. They seem to just campaign for "more housing in my town" and that seems to be it, which has potential to go all kinds of bad places.

If I had both money and power, I would wave my magic wand and bring back walkable neighborhoods full of Missing Middle Housing (and SROs) that even ordinary joes can afford and I would move this country to single payer healthcare. And then I would go on vacation for the rest of my life, having done enough to feel satisfied with my life.
Yes. Given the other article on the front page regarding the guy who got dragged in by the dystopian drag net, we need companies who don’t rely on keeping our information in PII form in order to make money or hold their stock value.

This should be cheered by all.
Python pretends to be a nice homogeneous "everything is at run time" language, but it is all a big lie and there aren't big flashing letters saying "you really probably shouldn't do this" when you start solving a problem in a certain way. For example, it is almost certainly best practice to _never_ call a function, class method, or static method inside a module that is going to be imported, and certainly never instantiate a class. However, there are certain patterns that almost necessitate it if you don't want to write loads of boiler plate or deal with the performance overhead of metaclasses. There are also a bunch of nice hacks like using `object()` at the top level as an instance distinct from everything else, but I'm sure there is a way that `MYTYPE = object()` will come back to absolutely ruin your day if you have to compare two `MYTYPE` instances in two different dicts derived from a parent process and a subprocess.

I have personally made this mistake on two or three occasions where I conflated file/module behavior with class behavior because I wanted a python file to act like it was a bit more declarative. Unfortunately this leads to a world of eternal pain. You can work around it, but you should have made everything a python class and pretended like the files/modules don't exist or at least have staggeringly different semantics hiding behind that innocent little `.` operator. Python simply cannot support the desire to solve a problem in a certain way because of the structure of the problem and forces you into using its happy path patterns if you want it to work in slightly different run time contexts.

Two relevant posts from instagram engineering on the subject which suggest that best practices for avoiding these kinds of issues are non-obvious and easy to miss.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20708889
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21284669
Threema, a well-proven app, already convers the use case of no phone number. Instead, each user has his or her unique id.

https://threema.ch/
Once you step back and read a little political history, it is remarkable how little sunlight there is between the two major parties in the USA and also in my home country of Australia (labour and liberal). Arguments like yours really expose the system for what it is (a loose conspiracy to maintain the status quo and prevent third parties from competing).
Why COBOL has that 80 character limit. But for far reaching legacy hangovers, you can't beat the QWERTY keyboard when it comes to tech. A layout born to slow down typists in a way to prevent the hammers jamming upon mechanical keyboards of old.

But the legacy of punched cards is deeper with that 80 character limit and bank card data formats and many other things had that character limit consideration come into play.

So if you ever see a data field that seems to arbitrary have around 70-80 characters(rest used for transaction ID, EOR char, checksum char(s) to pad the 70+ to the full 80 characters), it may well be down to punched cards if you go down the historical rabbit holes.
You’re going to have to dumb that one down for me, if you care to explain.

My comment on the license was from an embedded perspective - if you do a bare metal product I believe adhering to *GPL becomes difficult since you have to proved the ability to update QT. Sure, there are ways to allow this but it’s not straight forward.

I’m not sure why I got downvoted for my previous comment - I mean, I just posted the license types.
That’s precisely the point.
> I assure you I did not write "codes" nor did the Engineers

Ok.... good for you? Neither do I in academic writing. But many accomplished scientists do. You can look at any HPC conference proceedings right now and see it for yourself.
Thanks for this link - I had completely missed it (I think I was just expecting to disable gc entirely or perform some rudimentary surgery on its linked list)
Note that submission doesn't equal agreement.

Personally, I think that ordering 5G equipment is mostly a choice of which country spies on you, so I do not find Huawei's argument to be persuasive - but I still thought this warranted a discussion.
Starbucks is doing very fine.

2008: $9.15/share

2019 peak: $99/share

now: $75/share

Given that they are mainly expanding abroad these days (where their brand is stronger and less likely to dilute), they might even go higher in the next decade.
Having traveled extensively in Australia I don't think you can hold this position if you have ever been to The Northern Territory, where more than 7% of the population is homeless and 0.4% of the overall population sleep outside. If the same was true in NYC, there would be 35000 people sleeping outside, 9 times the actual number.
But does that matter? The other guy didn't have shares, he was owed money. If the investor provides money, there's enough money to pay the other guy off...
Well, you can technically push the src changes to `master` branch, have a github action build + update a `deploy` branch and then have gh pages read from there.
You might be buying too far out. People are assuming the virus will be contained by then.

I just looked at prices for a round trip ticket from San Francisco to Montreal for Monday. It was $389. I've never seen such a low price for buying two days in advance.
What an ignorant comment. Hundreds of British soldiers died fighting alongside America in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia.

(Plus hundreds more in Ireland killed by terrorist groups in part funded by donations from US citizens)
LLVM guide for stupid people essentially
They can't fly half a plane if only half the seats are taken. During times of low demand you'll have to pay for the empty seats.
The important highlight is that Sign in with Apple allows somewhat anonymous login. So Apple can argue it is requiring everyone to support a more privacy-friendly login option.
> I wonder what this will do to the method of estimating Chinas economy via Electricity/Coal usage.

I think the causality goes the other way. I think that they are doing this because that is how their economy is measured.
Isn't it basically just the old YouTube logo? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_of_YouTube_(2015-201...
Yes, the first time I saw this described was in 1987 in a paper by A. Birrell, et. al. See [1]. It was also available as a DEC SRC report, number 24.

[1] A simple and efficient implementation of a small database, https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/37499.37517?download=true
A testimony about the good work
When I found Dr.Wealthy I was in desperate need of bringing my ex lover back. He left me for another woman. It happened so fast and I had no say in the situation at all. He just dumped me after 3 years with no explanation. I contact Dr.Wealthy and He told me what i need to do before he can help me and i did what he told me to, after i provided what he wanted, he cast a love spell to help us get back together. Shortly after he did his spell, my boyfriend started texting me again and felt horrible for what he just put me through. He said that I was the most important person in his life and he knows that now. We moved in together and he was more open to me than before and he started spending more time with me than before. Ever since Dr.Wealthy helped me, my partner is very stable, faithful and closer to me than before. I highly recommends Dr.Wealthy to anyone in need of help. Email: wealthylovespell@gmail.com. Call him or add him on whatsapp via: +2348105150446 Dr.Wealthy BLOG PAGE: http://wealthyspellhome.over-blog.com/contact
Big companies often work this way too.
When I found Dr.Wealthy I was in desperate need of bringing my ex lover back. He left me for another woman. It happened so fast and I had no say in the situation at all. He just dumped me after 3 years with no explanation. I contact Dr.Wealthy and He told me what i need to do before he can help me and i did what he told me to, after i provided what he wanted, he cast a love spell to help us get back together. Shortly after he did his spell, my boyfriend started texting me again and felt horrible for what he just put me through. He said that I was the most important person in his life and he knows that now. We moved in together and he was more open to me than before and he started spending more time with me than before. Ever since Dr.Wealthy helped me, my partner is very stable, faithful and closer to me than before. I highly recommends Dr.Wealthy to anyone in need of help. Email: wealthylovespell@gmail.com. Call him or add him on whatsapp via: +2348105150446 Dr.Wealthy BLOG PAGE: http://wealthyspellhome.over-blog.com/contact
> Even after recovering from an infection there will always be a piece of that virus encoded within your DNA.

I did a little research and this appears to be almost completely false.

This sentence makes it sound like every time you get a cold, your body's DNA is permanently altered. Which would be insane if true.

The reality is that this insane outcome is incredibly rare, but nevertheless has happened enough times over all of human history that we have genetic code from viruses in our DNA, because a virus at some point managed to alter the DNA in a sperm or egg cell.

But the quoted sentence is just not how infections work 99.99...+% of the time. The cold I got last month isn't in my DNA forever. It's very sloppy writing that appears to be aiming for sensationalism instead of accuracy.
Another shibboleth I associate with Indian developers is "a software". They might say "I wrote a software to..." while their American counterpart would say "I wrote some software to...", would say "X is a software which does Y" rather than "X is software which does Y".
It seems to me that this submission is getting a lot of blowback in the comments for 1) the style and 2) the implication that wiring up Python services with HTTP is bad engineering. I don’t think this is productive.

On the first point, yeah Rachel’s posts are kinda snarky sometimes, but some of us find that entertaining particularly when they are highly detailed and thoroughly researched. I’ve worked with Rachel and she’s among the best “deep-dive” userspace-to-network driver problem solvers around. She knows her shit and we’re lucky she takes the time to put hard-earned lessons on the net for others to benefit from.

As for “microservices written in Python trading a bunch of sloppy JSON around via HTTP” is bad engineering: it is bad engineering, sometimes the flavor of the month is rancid (CORBA, multiple implementation inheritance, XSLT, I could go on). Introducing network boundaries where function calls would work is a bad idea, as anyone who’s dealt seriously with distributed systems for a living knows. JSON-over-HTTP for RPC is lazy, inefficient in machine time and engineering effort, and trivially obsolete in a world where Protocol Buffers/gRPC or Thrift and their ilk are so mature.

Now none of this is to say you should rewrite your system if it’s built that way, legacy stuff is a thing. But Rachel wrote a detailed piece on why you are asking for trouble if you build new stuff like this and people are, in my humble opinion, shooting the messenger.
This time I think its the first one :)
Didn't the Lisp Machine have a graphical interactive punched card simulator?
Fair enough. I think the concept of some alternate way of paying publishers is great. But that's not what Brave is doing. They're more like the AdBlocker Plus shakedown, where they deprive a site of their ad revenue and then say "well if you want some of that back you can have part of it back from us by showing the ads we want you to."
Preprints are a pretty common thing.
This formula gives you the odds someone on a plane is infected:

1-(1-IR)^N

N is the number of seats.

IR is the infection rate.

Takes a lot of assumptions to get the odds someone on the plane is infected, and even more to get the answer you want. The biggest assumption would be how likely you are to get the virus just because someone on your plane has it.

You could replace the N with total number of people at an airport. Again, not that helpful because it takes a lot of assumptions and only gives you half the picture.
I was going to say "no it doesn't, that's blatantly stupid, you load things during page load, that's why it's called page load" but on further research, Firefox apparently does do that now. I hate everything and I'm once again glad I stopped updating years ago.[0]

0: I decline to treat the unintentional flaws of [Firefox] as more important than the intentional ones.[1]

1: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/upgrade-windows.html
If someone is in a personal emergency, even if it's just perceived, that they need to protect themselves against a virus, their consent is no longer freely given. It's coerced consent, not by the seller, but by circumstances. In plenty of european countries, price gouging is illegal for that reason. You can't charge what you want, especially in situations like this.
The theorem you mention is true for networks whose widths tend towards infinity.

This paper assumes a nn is given with fixed width n and fixed depth l. The main result is that there exists a subnetwork of a nn with depth 2l and width polynomial in n and l that can approximate it arbitrarily well.
The airlines that are stockpiling capacity at our expense will come hat in hand for a bailout at our expense.

Yep. The same airlines that today are crying because of their "razor-thin margins" are the same ones that recorded billions of dollars in profit just a few months ago.
There are similar ghost trains in the UK: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150723-why-britain-has-...
Most of it comes from the regular budget docs. Classified spending is only reported in aggregate. But most of the time, you could come up with pretty good estimates of how much a brigade of infantry soldiers costs, especially if you already have one or more. So what's the point in trying to hide that?
Entrepreneurs lead the charge for a more connected Africa