skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wonder too, whether this is a service to help parents to stay sane or is it to help children overcome development hurdles?

Both of these ends are somewhat irrational, with no one right solution. Especially so when it's a health issue, or living environment problem. Health calls for pediatrician attention.

There're already well established meeting point web sites for parents, like whattoexpect.com and similar. Which pretty much sooth parent's worries and give a variety of community-advices. As often as "it's a stage to grow over". And, in personal experience, we parents grow over it together with the kids.

Personally, I see benefit in a variety of resources vs. one central, no matter how expert, point. But I could understand busy parents' desire to source this from a single "curated" and customized place.
You can pay for third-party support based on FOSS, and you'll still avoid being locked in to a single supplier.
As a car guy, I increasingly view BMW as I view Maserati - A car that is leased by people that want to display a certain level of wealth. BMW's decreasing reliability reputation backs up that thinking, along with the changes you mention.
Construction is a big field, and there are many niche industries within it.

I work in natural stone. There are several different types of companies just in this niche. Usually the flow of product is:

quarries -> factories -> distributors (us) -> fabricators -> kitchen and bath shops -> end user

There are maybe 5-7 major pieces of software for the first four stages. "Under-served" is an understatement.

Similarly, there are 10s (if not hundreds) of other niches within construction, each with its own vertical. Tons of niche software is missing.

When I see another niche analytics/forms/site chatbot/automate social media startup, I slap myself to make sure I'm not crazy.

There's a whole ocean out there, but most software startup companies are running into each other in Depoe Bay.
>Much of the streaming work is "security by obscurity" -- the systems only provide security because the end user either: 1) lacks the technical knowledge to save the data or 2) lacks the desire to do so (presuming they do possess the technical knowledge)

That's what I thought. I do think that a streaming video provider can provide added value, especially for live streams--e.g., by providing adaptive bit rates--but the terminology itself has a strong "wishful thinking from the business side" smell to it.
Everyone is talking about "receiving money with no-strings attached" however there is a huge string attached, and everyone knows it very well, especially the researchers, and that is the experiment will end.

This means that the experiment is temporary whereas real UBI would be permanent. A temporary experiment where everyone is aware that it will end cannot simulate the same changes that a permanent experiment would do. But I guess that wouldn't be an experiement anymore.
Kubernetes local environment setup

Kubernetes debugging

Too many configurations to worry about

Ever evolving features

No good practices

All these apply for small teams who wanted to get the products out to the market
Sounds good for workers.
'HAVING sum(coalesce(o.price, 0)) < 100'
No need to take it personally, they never claimed that 100% of older people are that way.
Look at what happened to Atrium though.
That's not how supply and demand works. People aren't going to accept lower wages because your company pays for a dashboard.
Do they need something like Kialo? https://www.ft.com/content/4c19005c-ff5f-11e7-9e12-af73e8db3...
UBI doesn’t get stuffed under the mattress, it gets spent, buying electricity, funding investment into electricity networks.

Give money to the poor and most of it will end up back at the rich. It doesn’t work as well trickling down.
That’s what I always come back to with UBI. It needs to be survival level but not desirable long term, so that the goal is for it to supplement a job and not to replace it.
Would be really interested on this paper. When you have time, if you can, mind linking to it?
When X is matched, then we can discuss whether that is true.

Currently, it's not. That does not make current efforts bad. I think they are quite nice.

They just do not yet actualize the vision X did and does today.

Whether that is wanted / needed is also an open discussion at this time.
So I wasn't really on the Docker train for a good while, but using containers takes so many sysadmin and environment issues out of play that I've started to change my mind. The position I find myself in is actually that for development environments Docker Compose and similar tools are wildly convenient, but that there's often not a really obvious path from that to production at small scale low cost.
California’s Lying Fields of Gold (2018)
It's you, I had no problem reading it all.

Put down the phone, step away from the computer. Read some books. Meditate. Take a long walk in a park with your phone off. Your attention span will expand once you start using it.

(Or there could be something going on outside your brain - being sick, hungry, or thirsty can all lower your effective intelligence, so can lacking something important like vitamins or sunlight; I've been stupid in the past due to all of these myself.)
Convince regulators that advanced control techniques can be used on flight software (model-based predictive control, optimal control, etc.)

We know how to do these, maybe not as safe as we can with simpler methods today, but convincing the public and regulators will always be the challenge in aviation/aerospace.

Probably the only realistic (software related) method in today's world without a materials/battery improvement, but we won't get there for a while.
That's already here for auto insurance.

"Some of the factors used to calculate your discount at American Family Insurance include vehicle usage (how often you drive), braking (how smoothly or abruptly you apply the brakes when stopping), and acceleration (how quickly or smoothly you accelerate after stopping). Speed and time of day are also factored in, among other driving behaviors."[1]

[1] https://www.amfam.com/resources/articles/understanding-insur...
Your opinion is spot on. Also the studies are short term whereas real UBI would be permanent.
Been using SwiftUI pretty in depth for a side project. It's been 80% awesome and 20% super frustrating. I can do so much more with SO much less code, but there are definitely a lot of gaps & annoying issues (particularly around documentation and in depth customization).

Fortunately it's easy to fill in the gaps with UIKit & there are some amazing people out there doing documentation (shout out to the guy at https://swiftui-lab.com/, you've saved me so much time!)

Per usual with Apple its a fantastic product launched in a buggy, incomplete state. Still a great option if you're willing to deal with the kinks.

Hopefully 2.0 will make it an even more solid (if not de facto) choice for all iOS devs!
What a pile of pretentious bullshit.
I don't see it as "stopping technological progress" so much as trying to mitigate the harmful aspects of technological progress. Mitigating the harm is just as important to helping progress along as developing the tech is. That's why the two have always gone together.
I saw an interesting sign in Hyderabad saying "Think! Talking on Cell Phone while driving may pave the way to hell." It had Yama, lord of death talking to a driver on the phone and welcoming him. Photo: https://photos.app.goo.gl/FrWaV356DXfjCjWj8
Yeah, ok, you are assuming SaaS replaces high performance in house applications...

That's usually not the case. SaaS usually does not replace in house machines, and it usually does not deal with high performance applications.
There are millions of Americans below age 55 with means to support themselves for several months running the campaign. Suggesting that younger people do not run for office because they risk starvation and eviction is just absurd.
https://xkcd.com/927/

Couldn’t help myself, the number is even the same!

What do you think a solution to this problem (too complex, too many things to monitor) would look like? And all-in-one like Basecamp? Or maybe a super system that puts stuff in one place?
It's important to note that definitions don't reflect reality so much as humans' interpretations of it.

IMHO, the life/not-life dichotomy is a false one. We observe the "lifecycle" on our own timescales, which biases our understanding of what is "living" and "not living" as distinct entities. For instance: is the planet Earth "alive"? Are geological processes synonymous with "life"?

Further, what are "organics"? If we take the biochemists' view, it's anything in which organic molecules occur. Are rocks then "alive" since they fit into this definition?
I have read the book. It has a lot of useful thing to say and think about, but I don't find the conclusions convincing.
There is no law that prevents stores from having limits. Most places seem to manage not running out of inventory with significant sales or coupons just fine.
The SAAS bill never goes down though, eventually you aren't paying for that in-house dev anymore. Everything Ive read is that if you plan to use it for more than 3 years going on prem/in house has a better ROI.
I learned programming in order to do my job more effectively while I was employed as a research assistant in a university neuroscience lab. At some point I realized that programmers in industry get paid 10x more (not an exaggeration, literally 10x) so I left after a couple years.

I enjoyed my time there a lot, I was building tools to help very smart and motivated people solve cool science problems. My users sat across the lab bench from me (the original open office plan?) and iteration/feedback cycles were super fast. People were appreciative and I could see how much time I was saving them. It was very motivating. Some of the more useful stuff I built got picked up by other labs in the group.

Maybe I'll do that kind of thing again someday, if I decide I've had my fill of megacorp programming.
Voting using computers is such a terrible idea even in principal that a trust breach like this is irrelevant.
Are you thinking of an O'Neill colony?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%27Neill_cylinder

> The O'Neill cylinder (also called an O'Neill colony) is a space settlement concept proposed by American physicist Gerard K. O'Neill in his 1976 book "The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space". O'Neill proposed the colonization of space for the 21st century, using materials extracted from the Moon and later from asteroids.

> An O'Neill cylinder would consist of two counter-rotating cylinders. The cylinders would rotate in opposite directions in order to cancel out any gyroscopic effects that would otherwise make it difficult to keep them aimed toward the Sun. Each would be 5 miles (8.0 km) in diameter and 20 miles (32 km) long, connected at each end by a rod via a bearing system. They would rotate so as to provide artificial gravity via centrifugal force on their inner surfaces.
The headline is deceptive, at best. What's the context?

Presuming these SaaS solutions are replacing internal dev, and internal staff (including benefits) then less than ~$900 p/m might be a steal.
Amen to that. We use ECS to run some millions of containers on thousands of spot nodes for opportunistic jobs, and some little Fargate for where we need uptime. It's a LOT less to worry about.
Oh, so maybe we should fund UBI by just stripping out the capital gains exemptions that allow insanely rich people to get insanely richer.

Some people have more money than they need, it can be removed from them - the intricacies of how they got that money should be very carefully considered when it comes to structuring how UBI would be funded - but they clearly have more money in absolute terms. And that wealth is transferable.

Also, in the western world, we have enough of everything. No one starves in America because there isn't enough corn, they starve because they don't have enough money to afford it - no one is homeless because no homes could be built, they're homeless because nobody wants to pay for the home to be built.

These are all solvable problems.
There is a lot of interesting information. However, is it only me, or the style of writing is chaotic (almost as if every paragraph was shuffled)?
This misses the point entirely. UBI is the democratic socialist version of The Great Leap Forward. Its an attempt to better human existence via direct government intervention, something which rarely works as intended (assuming you're counting net gains). I'm pretty pragmatic, (and libertarian) so if we're going to start down this path let's skip the faux capitalism and get straight to the bread and games part. The government already has a near limitless amount of power to effect changes in the economic structure of the country, and this is where they've gotten us. Going further down that path seems a bit daft.

I realize part of this problem is that we've moved into being a post-frontier world, where there are few, if any, places left where people can go to govern themselves, but I don't see why the lack of empty unclaimed space should lead to the government taking money from some citizens to buy the loyalty of other citizens.
I know Hoan. He's a great guy. Very talented. Super capable. Totally trust him to deploy this responsibly.
Oh My What’s This Stuff Worth?
hah.

Go create this lean startup factory that raises children from infants to 18 year olds. After all interested parents are superfluous to the well being of a child.

Child raising is invisible and yet so crucial to our economy. What happens to our economy when parents refuse to raise the needed labor inputs for free anymore?
Bonds, Bubbles, Bust, & Michael Burry in “The Big Short” – EBrand Me
In theory, you could just keep adding n+1 layers of fake passwords (maybe with realistic fake data), on the hope that after n attempts, they think they've broken you and hit the jackpot.

But as sibling commenters describe, if sufficiently motivated, there's no reason that an authoritarian state wouldn't just keep torturing you anyway. :(
Hm. Allocating credit for achievements is a tricky thing.

Management is necessary to allocate resources (including labor) efficiently at scale, but it comes with overhead.

As such, at smaller companies, startups, small businesses, the overhead of management can be outsized, the pain felt acutely when compared relatively to the actual output of ICs and such.

At larger companies, the massive cadre of management which is necessary to keep the machine running is also very obvious, as the overhead of a large organization is very large, even if the management itself is excellent and highly efficient.

As such... How does one allocate credit? An analogy would be like financing or investment. Necessary. A filtering mechanism. Sometimes helpful in an advisory mechanism. But are they the ones creating output? No. But do they deserve some credit? If something cannot be done without it, then they must deserve SOME credit, it's just a question of how much.
No, that's not what "fiduciary duty" means.

Fiduciary duty means that the board is supposed to be honest with the shareholders and not actively work against the corporation. That does not mean, in fact, that they are required to put growth of shareholder value to any respect.
Thanks for your comment! It seems some companies have a spam filter on our site that blocks our sign-up and payment sections. Perhaps try on your phone (off a work network). There should be a sign-up flow right away (try this, which might get you all the way to coach match, if it stops, then it's the filter): https://www.trustle.com/challenges/general-support

We support a range of families on Trustle: While lots of parents feel incredibly supported by their wonderful nannies, not all do. And while nannies certainly have expertise in lots of areas, we find that they don't in all domains (this is why lots of people have nannies and talk to their child's teachers or another behavioral health provider). I have even done sessions with parents AND nannies together.

Several of our coaches are educators. And I can strongly say that they are some of the strongest advocates for Trustle and our service. Our educators tell us that in their experience, parents are constantly asking for support during drop-off or parent teacher conferences that relates to challenges at home (rather than school). While the teachers feel they can help somewhat, they don't feel that they have the time and space to fully give the parents the support they need (we hear often from teachers that parents want a 5-minute drop off consult for a challenge that really requires more time).

We are far more affordable than most behavioral health (we are $50 dollars a month for membership which includes call time and unlimited text) and our accessibility by phone and the ability to text your coach makes implementation possible. We support parents to give them back some energy by helping them with accessible and affordable advice to make some changes and tackles challenges.

One thing that has been really exciting is how happy our families are on the service.
So many companies try to force you onto SaaS. Products that you previously had a perpetual license for are now SaaS only if you want to upgrade.

O365 is the only SaaS platform that makes sense where I work. But we have a bunch of SaaS services because that is the only way the product is offered.

I hate SaaS.
Consciousness as Broad Informational Access
The point of a decoy is to satisfy scrutiny. Truecrypt WITHOUT decoy will escalate the scrutiny, truecrypt WITH decoy will avoid further scrutiny.
Then raise the voting age to 25 or something. It's just an illustration.
While I was learning UNIX, the UHH was given to me as a rite of passage. Great book.

I learned a lot.

Love UNIX.
Coronavirus privacy: Are South Korea's alerts too revealing?
Some time ago I had considered (and rejected, due to a bad review due to a freak bad sample, apparently) equipping my unit with POWER9 systems from Talos.

I am now reconsidering the idea.

https://www.raptorcs.com/TALOSII/
However, if you roll your own crypto payroll, the risk of one project perfectly offsets that of the other. It's a perfect hedge.
I've seen a sign (in the US) with three messages in eternal rotation:

YOU LOSE

YOU DRINK

YOU DRIVE
Do you have an example of how you structured your cards for such a question? It seems impossibly hard to remember an algorithm without committing it to muscle memory so to speak.
I have a 15.6" LG Gram running Mint 19 and I love it. It's lighter than a 13" MacBook Air and I usually get ~10 hours of battery life. My only complaints are the very high-gloss screen and the flimsy, proprietary power connector (edit: it looks like current versions use Thunderbolt instead). Also, I like the keyboard, but I'm not picky about keyboards so you may not want to trust my judgment on that.
What kind of clip was it without getting too specific?
UBI would reorient the idea of work in the sense that new generations won't think about work the way we do, for them it will be something that you can do, not something you have to do. Similarly how sport is today, you can do sports but you don't have to.

Also with UBI you are guaranteed a certain amount of income for the duration of your life. You can go to a bank and take a loan against your UBI. A big portion of the UBI will end up at the banks because basically the loans are guaranteed by the government.
Yeah, but "SPAs" based on Java/Flash/ActiveX weren't nearly as ubiquitous as web-based SPAs are now, were they?
Yes! We absolutely agree! Did you pursue the idea at all or have any thoughts about doing so? I would love for you to check us out and let us know what you think!
I agree there are legitimate reasons for doing so. None of which will matter to some official busybody rummaging through your drive. To them, a drive filled with random noise (instead of, say, being zeroed out) is going to be unusual in a way that correlates with bigger things they worry about. Or, in short, suspicious.
I am far too apathetic for that.
UBI is a tool for dealing with rising inequality and economic insecurity, not a solution on its own.

People will be incentivized to work despite UBI because they still want better things, and will work to pay for things that provide social signalling value.

A UBI shouldn't be designed to try to cover all desires and eliminate all reason to work, but rather should be tailored to give people more flexibility in choosing jobs and locations.

Even Andrew Yang's $1k/mo/adult proposal will not allow anyone to live very well in even the low COL areas of the US. But it might help them not to lose their roof or car while unemployed.

This is analogous to how universal healthcare will never cover cosmetic procedures, but that's ok because it will cover your healthcare even if you end up unemployed.
I too read many books on Positive Psychology and can highly recommend for you an attempt to unify the field into a cohesive whole:

The Good Life: Unifying the Philosophy and Psychology of Well-Being by Michael Bishop

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00YD26TIS/ref=dbs_a_def_r...

The author points out how the current field is fragmented with no underlying theory, and he provides one by reconciling the demands of psychologists and philosophers who have thought and written about this topic.
I suspect that intelligent-like-us life is vanishingly rare. It’s only happened to one species (maybe a few of our extinct relatives) out of billions of species on Earth so far. And even we spent most of our history not being space-faring — it doesn’t feel inevitable even given our biology that we would be.
The problem is not the productivity of those on UBI, the elephant in the room is the ideology of humans on this planet who are forced into labor for survival vs those who are percieved as having a free ride.

That schism will exist for any set of parameters and methods of rolling it out. It will not solve class imbalances, it will make them painfully clear.

E.G. for those of us who have wealth, own houses, etc, UBI will make having a job seem like an optional folly to a person with debt and rent to pay. We really don't want a society like that.
Shareholders take a risk in their investment, mitigated by making it more fluid as they can easily trade the shares compared to more traditional investments.

There's however no law that holds a figurative gun to the heads of corporation that their duty is to increase the value of those shares.
Yikes. Putting it on the same page as the past logos just emphasizes how chintzy it looks.
> This has absolutely nothing to do with "flat" design.

I don't know the design history of the logo or the intent of the redesign, but I do know that it fits well into the current "flat" design aesthetic, so I lump it in with that. If it walks like a duck...
Include health insurance, retirement match, employer side payroll taxes, equipment, etc. I don’t make nearly that much but I easily cost my company more than that.
According to BMW[1], it looks like this is only designed for brand communication.
I wouldn't expect to see this pushed to non-concept cars, at least not for a long time.

[1] https://www.bmw.com/content/dam/bmw/marketBMWCOM/bmw_com/cat...
from here: https://www.bmw.com/en/automotive-life/bmw-logo-meaning-hist...
> 3. I fared better with lots of small, one-sentence cards. My rule of thumb is that a card should fit in a tweet.

Can someone tell me if this is a crazy good idea? Social network + spaced repetition. Why should you build all your own cards? Taking a class with classmates? Create a group & create cards during lecture, review/curate cards afterwards during study session, then rate which ones were most useful after the exam (or homework).
You don't need wealth to run for the office. Bernie Sanders, while certainly wealthier than average American, doesn't have any more liquid wealth than typical 30-something software engineer, and doesn't seem to be spending any of it on his campaign.

What you need to run is people who will vote for you, and that's a real problem for young candidates.