skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My reply was to say that it's relatively easy to make a clean install not look 'fresh' :P
The rocket equation [0] disagrees: "In what has been called 'the tyranny of the rocket equation', there is a limit to the amount of payload that the rocket can carry, as higher amounts of propellant increment the overall weight, and thus also increase the fuel consumption"

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation
Nothing can go wrong with a single function like Write - but in that case you don't need a structural type, you can just pass a write function. As soon as you pass a bundle of two or more functions, you're implying a relationship between them, and it's then easy to accidentally violate that relationship - for instance, a structural type will almost always admit a mutable implementation where the relationship breaks down if the thing is mutated in between calls to the two functions.
And when they pull the hdd and realize it says 512gb when you're only showing 256gb?
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: JavaSript, Vue.js, SQL

Résumé: https://www.dropbox.com/s/8scrmcu5146o8jw/DanHoganResume.pdf

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iamdanhogan/

Email: on résumé

6+ years of fullstack experience with a wide variety of languages and tech.
> I think a lot of these anti-k8s articles are written by software developers who haven't really been exposed to the world of SRE ...

Think again. There's plenty of SREs at FAANGs that dislike the unnecessary complexity of k8s, docker and most "hip" devops stuff.
I don't get it.

If the source is responsible for the correlation, what other explanation do we need? why we need to explain it with a local hidden-variable theory of QM?

Why isn't it enough that the source is responsible for the correlation?

And since it's impossible to write that algorithm, why not simply suppose the values of iA and iB are such that the correlation is possible?

Wouldn't global variables actually be non-local communication, instead of local? they are global variables, just like entanglement is 'global' for the universe.
> This is true for you and other discerning readers. A lot of people just want the new Jack Reacher.

I don't know what the experience is in the US, but in the UK, Waterstones' insight has been that it's not worth competing for those customers. They'll just buy the new Jack Reacher from a supermarket or, at best, WH Smiths (the stationery store). To be price-competitive with the supermarkets, you have to discount so heavily that you'll lose money on every sale anyway.

Waterstones have targeted the discerning reader and are doing well at it. This appears to be an attempt to replicate Waterstones in the US.
It's actually an Emacs keybinding, that was added to GNU readline, which is used by Bash; most shells followed suit (either by using readline, or implementing it themselves).

Ctrl + l is in Bash, in your case.
HP rejects Xerox's raised takeover offer
setterm does not work on macOS. I find reset(1) working fine. It already does clear, too.
A fixed time before renewal is fairly common for legislation though; For instance, many of the tax cuts expire in 2025; Or the Bush capital gains cuts had to be renewed for 10 years.

One question about expiration dates; are study participants more likely to take caution them than general populace.
Building a web app with functional programming languages
The pace of innovation here is absolutely ludicrous. They designed and built a custom welding machine _and_ a custom x-ray machine for building tank domes in four weeks? They've gone from a production rate of one prototype in 8 months to one prototype every 2 weeks in less than a year. They doubled the size of their workforce in less than 48 hours. I'm gonna have to agree with the article author here: this is absolutely mad.
In late-stage capitalism, the cloud gets you off "your" lawn, when your Lawn-as-a-Service provider gets acquihired by an adtech company.
Yes, this is the glaring flaw in all of them as far as I've seen.

On the other hand, who knows how long UBI would stay in place in a democratic country? It might get voted out in the next election, too.
Absolutely. However humans are simply not built to be incredibly careful for minutes on end, day after day. One hopes self-driving cars will never let their guard down.
you can use systemd to manage your dockers
SoftBank-Backed Oyo to Cut About 5k Jobs in Overhaul
Was just taking a break from my Anki session to check HN.

I'm a regular user, though I'm terrible at consistent, daily reviews. I somehow manage to keep on top of it, even after skipping weekends or entire weeks. You can tweak the settings to make it easier for less-than-perfect users.

Lifehack: Anki + exercise. Combining Anki with an elliptical or stationary bike improves both my review and exercise frequency and duration.

I've made my peace with the terrible UI/UX. Like many folks here I tried to roll my own SRS app at one point. But my review sessions would always get derailed with brainstorming new features or dealing with bugs. Personally, I'm not sure that the productivity gains from improving the UI/UX are worth the development time (especially when the whole point of using Anki is efficiency).
just a few reasons not to use the library:

1. New popular books take months or even years (looking at you harry potter, got a call from my local branch 2 years after I bought the book that it was ready to pick up) to become available. I know a lot of people can wait, but maybe you need to read it sooner so you can talk about it with your friends while it is in the zeitgeist. Maybe you don't want to wait half a year only to have it for 2 weeks before it goes to the next person with a hold

2) You mention interlibrary loans, every library can do that but every library has different polices and because there is a cost (somebody has to pay to have Dan Brown shipped from Kirkwood to Albuquerque) most place limits on how often, fiction vs non-fiction, etc. It won't help you at all with 1) because if's nationally popular, every branch is checked out.

3) Can't markup a library book, which to me is one of the only advantages of a paper tree-killer vs my e-ink reader.
Anyone Can Map Inspiration and an introduction to the world of mapping
If you care a lot about this stuff use tcmalloc, and its very helpful tc_malloc_stats()
It does a cycle in Emacs, actually. First it centers, then it puts the caret at the bottom, then it puts it an the top (like readline, in a way)
Humorous highway signs aim to steer drivers safely
FL Studio Crack 20.6.2.1549 with Keygen Full Version Download 2020
When I was younger, I believed technology is developed to solve problems people have. Today, I've grown much more cynical, and believe that most technology is developed to sell worthless crap to other people, which may or may not occasionally do something useful for them (but not as much as it would do if the vendor actually cared).
Design Best Practices for Paywalls
Daily local rebase on master is really the only acceptable use I know for rebasing. It's not just after a month of vacation, but simply when your local branch has a lot of commits, that rebasing can become very painful, as you may have to resolve the same conflict over and over and over again. That must be the circle of hell where programmers end up.

Basically you'd have to rebase after every single commit. That would keep it the most painless, I guess. But I can also just do a single merge and I'm done.
Relatedly, photography itself developed an early bias against black people in terms of what colors/contrasts they optimized film for photographing:

https://www.vox.com/2015/9/18/9348821/photography-race-bias
Any entity big enough to seize your laptop for analysis is also going to be able to look up the specification for any particular part in your laptop, and eventually this portion of the cat and mouse game will end.
I think it’s helpful to recall that the language is called English, not American, and the people who are experts on it think we don’t talk good.
The issue I see with basic income is that most money is spent on housing and health care. These two things are supply constrained so it's more of an auction for who can afford them.

With basic income, we may just raise the cost of those things.

This problem wouldn't appear in a study that distributed to only some individuals.

We need to solve the regulatory or otherwise organizational problems of these things to provide real relief. Throwing money at the problem will just move money to a few hands.
Can't reply to child for some reason but the reason that SM is so great for managing content is a feature called incremental reading (https://supermemo.guru/wiki/Incremental_reading). To sum it poorly, it lets you go through hundreds of articles in parallel and slowly convert them to active recall material over time. It sounds terribly complicated in practice, and learning it is indeed a pain, but once you know it there's really no way of learning more enjoyable. I can promise you that.

I don't understand how anki users are able to make cards for non-language things,I personally absolutely hate making cards while reading anything. It's hard to explain the exact process but incremental reading by contrast makes it much easier to take what's really important from an article and make cards from it.
On a standard PC keyboard, I just use my palm to hit Ctrl (part of why I detest keyboards where Left Ctrl is not at the bottom left corner.
Slightly off-topic but apart from Mars-related things, I don't think are appreciating how big of a deal Starship/Super Heavy will be.

Because space is hard and expensive, when designing payloads, they also have to be over-engineered to make sure you're getting the most out of your ride, which then makes the rockets over-engineered and expensive to make sure they don't blow up carrying the precious cargo. It's a positive feedback loop. So we end up with incredible telescopes like Hubble or James Webb, but it's literally a once-in-a-generation event. There's no tolerance for failure, so budgets and timelines ballon.

What if you knew you could get a cheap ride anywhere anytime? Why not mass-produce slightly lower quality telescopes instead of these masterpieces. The JWST's successor is LUVOIR, slated for sometime in the 2040s (!!), why not build a dozens JWST-like telescopes and use interferometry to build giant telescopes larger than the earth with higher light-gathering ability than even ground-based telescopes? This is the technique used by Event Horizon Telescope to capture the first picture of a black hole last year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-long-baseline_interferome...
Big Pharma is on a stock buyback spree
I am not that old, develop most apps besides embedded firmware for the cloud and have been yelling at it from the beginning to absolutely no effect. In my experience it is often C-level customers who embrace the cloud with most enthusiasm.

Interestingly the older generation often had the most reservations against hosting data on external systems. They are generally very big on everything surveillance though.
I think that many people could think that fair assessment, but really it's just about what you value in the world.

Is becoming more knowledgable just "procrastination?" Is reading non-fiction outside your specialty procrastination?

I feel like for much of human history we've held people who have read an entire library's-worth of books in high esteem. Were they just procrastinating?

I still see where you're coming from. I used to think that people who meditated, or hiked the Appalachian Trail were "selfish," because they were doing something that benefitted only them. And I still find it hard to understand someone who decides to learn Mandarin at the age of 93. But people should be allowed to enlighten and actualize themselves however they wish, and it seems absurd to think that a planet full of more knowledgable people would be a bad thing.
High availability is much easier when your product is a single runtime, and not a bunch of services running a complex communication network, any of which is likely to go belly up at any given moment.
>The only reason why we have the prosperity that we have today is because inventive people built things that people like you said were not worth the time.

Does it? Do you have some examples? As far as I can tell, societal progress moves slowly and incrementally, with many people contributing by building on the works of others.
I absolutely love Kubernetes, it makes my job so much easier...

I can’t understand for the life of me why any start up uses it, it’s insane.
Boosted lays off ‘a significant portion’ of its team as it looks for a buyer
Adam Curry Talks Linux on Joe Rogan
If every vehicle on the road is autonomous, signals are not required. The only exception would be walking crosses but actually the cars should see you and wait for you.
> years designing, simulating

So trial and error, but virtually.

You're telling me we went to the moon on the first try? We went into space on the first try? The Wright brothers were successful on their first flight?

No, it was all trial and error.
Also, Terminal.app seems to implement almost as many extensions as XTerm, and does them pretty well.

It's too bad it's so slow though (in terms of throughput, that is; latency is pretty okay).
I would argue “All on red” with known risks and rewards is more educated than a blind investment into a technology that you don’t even understand, which describes most speculative crypto investments by “laymen” as the op said
There are a number of reasons. One is that states don't stay simple for very long. Just the other day I saw someone ask "how do I find all the children of a parent resource?". The answer was to iterate over everything that might have that parent resource as an OwnerRef. In a normalised schema this would be simple. In a document database it is not.

Another problem: there are no multi-document transactions. If I rely on updating A and B together, I am out of luck. I will instead need to account for A and B being out of sync, which involves 4 permutations: A,B; A, !B; !A, B; !A, !B. As a CRD controller author I am now responsible for a shitty database. Where Kinds have crisp hierarchies this is fine, the supervising controller can inspect and repair the lower documents. But many things are not hierarchical in nature and you can easily wind up with control loop fights.

Another is that there's a difference between "I already have a cluster" and "I am using the API server as a database". Because CRDs wind up in a single global document store, folks inevitably want them to have hard isolation. RBAC, namespaces etc get you some of the way but it's basically just hard. Eventually some bright spark suggests putting things into a different cluster, at which point the balance of ease flips the other way.

CRDs are super useful extension points (note, for example, I am writing a book about Knative), but they are not suitable for most application and business logic purposes.
I know I will get downvoted for saying this but every thread on women issues always get hijacked by men talking about themselves and how the world is unfair to them. That doesn't happen on articles on men. Those don't get hijacked by women similarly.

My female friends always point this out and this is true. Every time someone talks about issues surrounding women, instead of letting them, men comes in swamp telling them how miserable their lives are. They don't go to a therapist to resolve issues they should but instead take any chance to vent on women. They don't try to make a community, movement or some statement to help other men left out but cry in misery. They told me how it awful was and the experience really sucked for them. It was toxic. They needed a baby sitter instead of a partner.
They also wasted a lot of time on useless things and less on improving their lives i.e, hygiene, eating habits, schedule etc. They told me how they were relying them to pick up those daily stuff for them. That I'd consider unpaid labor and god knows how much labor they are performing for free.

Edit: I am only describing what I heard from them in the second part of the post.
I would read a deep dive blog post about this.
I buy stuff with them. Email, domains, VPS and VPNs. The beauty is that I can buy these things anonymously.

Oh I also make donations. As for why that's a good use case, remember that USA froze all donations to WikiLeaks before.
This is exactly what lock-in looks like.
It's substantiated by the fact that humans don't have radar and ultrasonics, just two cameras on a swivel and a lot of signal processing, and they succeed at operating a car to five-nines reliability measured in miles traversed. So Musk's bet isn't completely bonkers; he knows of at least one reference system that does the task with fewer sensors than even shipped with the Tesla.

... but we do want the SDC to do better, and there are failure modes that human perception is also vulnerable to generally. In addition to closing the gap faster on solving the problem without a copy of the human perception wetware, the LIDAR signal might also improve on those perception error states and be worth keeping in the design even if it could be done with cameras alone (or camera + radar + ultrasonic).
If youtube's automated system detects a copyrighter (eg.) song, the user should be given an option to say "no, it's not copyrighter, or it's fair use, etc", after that, the claim should be forwarded to the copyright owner.

The copyright owner would then verify if it is indeed a copyright infringement, and if they believe it is, and the user still believe it isn't, the case should be brought to some quivalent of "small claims court", where both sides would present their sides, and the loser has to pay some fine (not too large, but still high enough to deter pointless cases.. eg $1000 (to cover the court cost), and damages up to eg. $1000 due to lost views, or damages due to unlicenced distribution).

Basically, make it worth fighting for, if you're sure you're right in what you're doing, and not too expensive, when eg. Sonys lawyers build a multi-year case, destroying you financially, even if you're doing the right thing.
Possibly. I've had trouble getting TypeScript to discriminate object unions in the past without manually writing type guards, which are cumbersome. This is one of the few things Flow is actually better at.
One anti-feature makes me go away every time I return to give Anki another try: lack of a "dismiss once and forever" button. Many decks I'd like to study contain too many cards I already know. Yet I can only choose how easy it was so it would decide how often to repeat it, it won't let me choose "it's easier than saying my own name, don't repeat it ever".
No one can predict the future. Investment values evaporate outside of your control, "black swan events".
These studies feel like "free energy machines" that totally work as long as they are plugged into a wall socket, that is: as long as the budget doesn't come from the system itself, you're not testing under anything close to real world conditions.

Otherwise, the results aren't surprising to me. I know very few people that wouldn't keep/be working if they had a UBI (and the ones that wouldn't aren't really working now), but I also know very few people that would keep their current job. UBI, if sustained and sustainable, should work similar to a roaring economy with full employment in that regard: if you want somebody to work in the sewers or garbage collection, you'll have to pay them well.
(co-author of the article) I wrote a longer list of categories [1] a while ago (some of which aren't mentioned in the article), here's the list:

* Basic information about countries e.g. population
* Ingredients and dishes from restaurant menus I didn't know
* Important people and places
* History facts (typically from Kindle highlights)
* Conversions between units (e.g. lbs to kg)
* Season for various vegetables and fruits
* Keyboard shortcuts for vim, readline, etc.
* Learning words and terms I don't know from Kindle/Instapaper highlights
* Useful statistics

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17847031
This is what he's replying to:

http://jasonrudolph.com/blog/2011/08/09/programming-achievem...
Well, not really. For instance our Attribution Engine [0], which is much more advanced than YouTube's Content ID is free to all rightsholders and platforms. We make money from taking % from all licensed content, but that also means both platforms and rightsholders generated revenue in the first place.

[0] https://blog.pex.com/introducing-the-attribution-engine-19ec...
I imagine mars would be terraformed eventually over time. It just needs a little atmosphere to get going
Yes, a BBS Still Exists
Apologies; I've never posted here before, so it's possible (probable?) I'm "doing it wrong." Anyway, I saw in this thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20012977) that people were wondering if BBSes still existed. Well, what was at one time one of the largest ever -- ISCA BBS (Iowa Student Computer Association), with 100K active users and a thousand+ on at any given time -- does still exist, and is even active. Granted, the numbers have dropped several orders of magnitude since the heyday in the early 90's, and we are no longer under the aegis of UIowa, but there are perhaps 100 active users with plenty of discussions on technology, politics, and how old we all are (since most of us have been on for 25+ years, it comes with the territory). Feel free to drop by: telnet://iscabbs.com I'm a sysop, and will endeavor to validate accounts quickly. We do ask for valid e-mail addresses as part of the sign-up, but other than that, I consider most of the personal info as optional; certainly don't feel compelled to put in your phone number, though you can opt to hide whatever identifying info you like.
adsfad902##@CARRIER LOST
I will check these out!
I use Anki for Japanese right now - mainly because I found Anki decks for each chapter of Genki 1 which I am working through right now.
I think this is going to be the big year. Regulatory approval from a bunch of markets and the beginning of fleet deployment, with general availability around most of the US by 2022
Because systemd is an operating system by itslef nowadays.
As I said right before the statement you quoted:

>so perhaps these states that allow self-driving cars need to think about adopting traffic laws specific to self-driving cars and figure out who those tickets should go to and the proper punishment
While my niece uses flash cards with her daughter as a game. She's not yet 2 and has 100 words already.

You can leave it all to chance, do it the same way the good ol parents did, it was good enough for me! Or you can plan how you raise your child.

Not a helicopter parent. Young Becky is as independent and happy as any other toddler.
What do you mean? You would continue to use the copper infrastructure, but fibre connections in to it would be regulated. A serious ISP could still do them, but one that just allows random people to make an account wouldn't be allowed to connect.

So, Verizon could peer their copper network with Sprint's copper network and connect them over fibre, but if Verizon would accept fibre peering with random VoIP providers Sprint wouldn't peer with them because they would be liable for fines.
> who should be paying me if I fix my own shoes for example?

At no point does the article suggest that women should be paid $10,900B for their work. It is simply pointing out that the work they do has monetary value and highlights how different the gender balance is in different countries.

You fixing your own shoes is unpaid work, sure. Why does that render the article invalid?
I've noticed that a lot of people who are born rich still choose to work.