skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That isn't the experience in noticing here as a tourist in Berlin, where locals seem to cross against the light quite often. But yes, I realize Berlin is not the typical German experience.
The spikes will have a very positive effect on those not in the vehicle. You need to split the stats into those inside and outside of the vehicle other than the party facing the spike (the driver).
It's not every day that you see a news article reference dendrochronology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendrochronology
I don't get why promoting your product would be an anti-competitive behavior. Anti-competitive behavior would be not letting Edge users use google or gmail.
They're fast, sure. But not very efficient in certain problem domains, specificially where humans are efficient (for reasons that are IMHO historical, not innate).
> Consumers don't care about energy

Smart metering should be compulsory in all households with a display showing the current spot price. I should be able to see that right now electricity is expensive or cheap to decide if I should wash my clothes or run the AC.

Its crazy the electrical utility industry ties itself in knots to guarantee supply and meet demand peaks when consumers blindly use electricity when they feel like it. Changing demand behaviour should be a priority if we want wind and solar to become more widely used.
That doesn't answer the question, which was

« Given a specific priority, what additional benefit do you get from having an additional severity label on the bug? »

not

« Given a specific severity, what additional benefit do you get from having an additional priority label on the bug? »
I think ultimately it boils down to what you want to glean from the data. Not all crashes are mustfix, and some cosmetic issues really are mustfix. If you're trying to assess the priority of two bugs, both are p1, but in your world are marked crash and cosmetic, you would choose the crash. But it might be that the cosmetic but is related to a sponsor/third party/branding/legal issue, which warrants fixing immediately. Having a "cosmetic" tag on that doesn't help you, but a severity of 1 vs a severity of 3 on an edge case crash on shutdown _does_ tell you.
I work in climate tech, and it's funny to hear the US democrat candidates for president talking about investing huge amounts in energy research. I think, well yes we could grow our research efforts, but taxing carbon emissions and changing the tax advantages for fossil fuel extraction would be a lot easier than trying to wring another 1% efficiency out of air source heat pumps or doing more grid integration studies...
> Personally, coming from communism, I fear the nanny state more than I fear big companies from other countries.

I am from Slovenia and I know exactly what you mean, and agree 100% with that.

I just think that in the end POE is worse, since I think it will result in concentration of something that was widespread (plenty of small ISP's and providers), into few
bigger and easier to backdoor providers. So it will be easier to monitor then before.
And I don't think think that western democracies and "democracies" will just throw in their towel.

I trust Cloudlfare and Google less than I trust my ISP, if nothing else their budget (and competence, and reach) is much lower(isp's).

I mean gmail and outlook are much more competently run than most ISP's and businesses ran their mail servers. I am afraid something similar can happen here.

> DoH is first of all a protocol. If you run your own DNS resolver at home, surely you'll be able to run your own DoH server too.

Packets never leave local network. The advantage of DoH is that it's over https, so if you don't control your firewall you can still use it.
But if you control your own network, DoH is not that useful, since you still have to support old DNS for all the applications and devices that don't support DOH.
If someone can listen on your LAN you have bigger problems than someone being able to intercept your DNS queries.
Not saying there are no advantages, it just isn't a priority.
WFS – Walmart fulfillment services for 3rd parties
But then the question becomes on which level of OODA loop you should spend your focus, right?
It's anticipated that at least millions, more likely hundreds of millions of humans will die to the consequences of climate change including effects of extreme weather, flooding and (especially) famine. This won't extinct all of humanity but can be expected to severely impact civilization(s), with a chance of this impact being fatal to individual cultures.

For a prospectus of what could happen, I point to the large-scale devastation of (ancient) civilization attributed to the Sea Peoples (https://www.history.com/news/who-were-the-sea-peoples). They're believed to have toppled the Hittite Empire and severely weakened the Egyptian one. "some historians believe they had been displaced from their homeland by famine or natural disasters." -- the parallels to the anticipated effects of climate change should be clear.

Large-scale political unrest, very possibly including a WW3, is something I feel justified in considering "an existential crisis." Your mileage may vary.
Yup, Microsoft won't be left behind in shady practises by these comparatively young web companies. /s
Given the state of the justice system in the UK and USA, maybe the best course of action for Assange is to get extradited, then tell the public that Wikileaks helped expose Hillary's private email server, and get pardoned by Trump...
i think they take their lesson from industry experience of microsoft embrace and extend strategy to take open standards and lock users into their proprietary extensions. as an example do you not remember IE?

EDIT: because of microsoft decades long behaviour, they have good reason to be wary
> Get shipping off oil and onto renewables

Good luck moving container ships without diesel. You'll also have to put the passenger airlines and air cargo carriers completely out of business.

It is honestly something we need to do but doing so would require every continent to rely entirely upon the resources on that continent. It would also mean all of those hundreds of millions to billions of newly middle class folks around the world would have to give up their newly won quality of life and go back to living how they were before.

We either have to radically change society on nearly every level or cross our fingers and hope a humanitarian (alientarian?) fleet of alien ships show up in orbit with highly advanced technology that can replace all of our energy needs AND actively remove huge amounts of CO2 out of the air.
Ads suck, no doubt, but ads also enable a lot of free content which is great for the open sharing of knowledge. An ad model that can preserve free content by reimbursing the content creators while still respecting user privacy would be ideal, agreed?

If you agree, how would you disrupt the existing ad models in an effective way?
Smithsonian Open Access
looks like you should look into skynet (It's a web hosting/CDN platform based on a decentralized network of incentivised hosts.
Laracon Onine 2020 is about to start
It’s about funding for amnesty int. On a side note, it can be confusing when you refer to them as AI
Oh yes, the main reason not to choose any of the existing solutions I've been able to check is UX. That's why I'm thinking on building something tailor-made starting by capturing the most details of her process.
Tailwind UI
Yes, I probably ought to have mentioned that. Though ime people are more likely to talk about isomorphisms in other categories, since the only “structure” a set has is its size
Yup, search for "Google Chrome" on bing and a loud Edge promotion awaits you.
> “We beat Waymo. We beat all the big OEMs. We’ve beat just about the whole industry,” says Stefan Seltz-Axmacher, founder and CEO of the San Francisco based start-up.

I find this statement pretty disingenuous when Waymo is trying to tackle the part of the problem Starsky isn't able to solve with their own self-driving tech - driving without a human in the loop for the last mile.
> Your job is not to build the perfect/best product, it's to build the one your client want and is willing to pay money for.

So why have severity and priority as two distinct dimensions then? If customer impact is the only relevant metric for your process, why would a bug about which the client says "that's fine for me" ever be considered severe or critical?

If the only metric you care about is customer impact, why track two of them?
You mean like this?

https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.h...

Or like this?

https://visalist.io/emergency/coronavirus
Maybe this is a start https://thevirustracker.com/ The German map is based on regular reporting from doctor's offices, it's a proven process for 20 years. A new 2020 app might work with self/crowd reporting.
Energy research is changing the whole landscape of renewables. Any progress there can easily tip the balance in favor. Some luddite tax on old technology is missing the point/the opportunity we have at this juncture, to make batteries/renewables the obvious/cheap choice for energy in the future.
This is a recurring problem when working with floating point values. Intuitions about concepts like associativity or even equality don't necessarily hold, but in many cases you will still get away with it, so it can feel like there's inconsistent or unpredictable behaviour. That can be a big stumbling block for inexperienced programmers working with this type of data at first, and it surely leads to many bugs.

With experience, programmers adjust their intuitive expectations and guarding against these kinds of bugs becomes second nature, and to some extent that is probably the best we can do because of the nature of the beast. However, it does illustrate the cost of violating intuitive expectations about how familiar operators and functions will behave.
We kind of expect this from Microsoft. But we're still in denial about Google
It sounds like they're using:

- "severity" as level of importance the tester assigned it when they found the bug and
- "priority" as level of importance a developer assigned to it after triage.

That first piece of information is important when you need to determine which bugs to look at first for triage, but how important is it after that point? Can it not just be replaced after the developer's judgement?

In other words, could you not have a single priority field? The tester uses a heuristic to assign an initial priority (e.g., crashes are P0, cosmetic are P4). The dev uses this to prioritize which bugs to triage first, and once they've determined a new priority based on customer experience combined with app behaviour, they replace the old one.

If you really need to go back and check what the tester assigned, then I assume you can just use the "history" or "revision" feature in your bug tracking app.

Additionally, as suggested in a different comment, you can add a label for the bug's type if you feel that's important (crashing, lagging, cosmetic, etc.).

Perhaps the message here is that the app's behaviour in a vacuum is not the sole determinant of its priority. But then that should be the message, rather than claiming there is another metric which needs to be separately tracked when evaluating bugs.
We’ve decided to postpone DEF CON China 2.0
> I perceive myself to be safer when I have autopilot enabled on a Cirrus.

What you perceive may not be born out by the stats. It is very important to realize that humans are simply poor at self evaluation. Half the drivers think they are better than average, plenty of people think they do not suffer any adverse effects of consuming a glass of alcohol with respect to their situational awareness and reaction speed and so on.
I see this as a more practical problem: waste receptacles provided by waste companies are substantially smaller than recycling receptacles.

So, just take a guess at what most people do when that waste receptacle is full.

If the industry genuinely wanted to cut down on their sorting costs, they would provide larger waste receptacles.
I think customers do care but there is a lot of friction in the process to change. Took me several hours to switch energy sources, should be a toggle option on an app.
> "if you click anywhere in the left half of the screen during the 5th screen all the settings get deleted" might be a very severe/critical bug, but if the client says "thats fine for me don't worry, but can you fix the wrong color on screen one where the logo is purple instead of fuschia that's not acceptable for my needs" then this one has a higher priority, even though it's much less severe.

The problem here is the made-up definition of severity.. basically, you decided that crash or losing settings equals severe and cosmetic stuff equals not severe. Why?

I could easily give it a different definition. For example, a crash that nobody cares about is not severe. A small "cosmetic" slip up that can cause big damage to brand is very severe.

So I agree with the GP here; why do we need to have a definition of severity that does not align with the things that we care about when it comes to actually fixing things?
Not sure what "stealthing" is. I know that in Sweden, having sex with someone in a way they don't want, still counts as rape, and I think that's not unreasonable. It's certainly a different case than violent rape, but that doesn't mean it's 'not actually rape'.

I hadn't heard that the condom contained no DNA. That certainly sounds odd to me, but I'm no forensic expert. If that's sufficient proof that the whole story is a lie, then that's certainly worthy of investigation. False rape allegations are as serious as rape in my opinion.
Ads are not enabled by default. And when they are, they do not transmit information that can be used to identify the user.
Yep, and they come up higher on the search results in bing and google. Not sure if I really recommend them, but their dang domain name sure is a hell of a lot easier to remember. Maybe I would recommend them on that fact alone- in a public health crisis, easy access to critical information is important.
Yes... but their whole spiel was that they were the anti-MS. But now they are becoming a more insidious version of the MS they railed against.
> Consumers don't care about energy.

Therefore lets make it illegal not to care?? You need to think more pragmatically.
Those, who think I do: please name anyone.
I just wanted to point absurd generalization "we all".
100 years of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari – Why we’re still living in its shadows
Until marketplaces are fined by the FTC directly for enabling I think this will continue to grow as an issue.
Severity is how the reporter sees the problem: if it interferes with their particular use case, it's of the highest severity. Almost all bugs end up being of the highest severity.

Priority is how the developer (or, more likely, the project management team) sees the bug. Highest priority bugs are the ones in the project manager's spreadsheet and ended up there because of the most vocal complainers (paying customers, an inconvenienced CEO, etc). The rest will never get fixed.

It's impractical to use the severity of the bug to rank the priority, because they're not strongly correlated.
Climate tech has driven solar and wind generation from the most expensive generation assets to the cheapest over the last 20 years. Energy storage has gone from a product for cordless consumer devices to something that's cheap enough to replace fossil fuel peaking and reliability units. Nest built an energy efficiency product that's a household name. So, yes, the world would be way worse off.
Coronavirus will burn itself out in May when temperatures rise. Just like common flu virus, increasing sunlight and humidity will stop the spread of the virus during summer.

Source: professor John Nicholls a clinical professor in pathology at the University of Hong Kong and expert on coronaviruses had a conference call where he explained most likely outcome.

transcript here: https://www.fwdeveryone.com/t/puzmZFQGRTiiquwLa6tT-g/confere...
I have tracker blocking extensions and ad blockers to the hilt, which makes some sites almost unusable. For example: I simply don't see ReCaptchas with how the browser is configured.

The easy solution (if you trust the site) is to restart Firefox without add-ins:

Hamburger Menu > Help > Restart with add-ons disabled

You then get a dialog box, where you can restart in safe mode, or clean-up your Firefox installation.

Don't forget to restart with add-ons re-enabled (can also be done from the help menu.
the US has a lot of leverage due to post-brexit trade deal negotiations, afaik that's the only change
Architectural plans in vector format are quite small in file size. I imagine it will be more of a ship of theseus type situation, where the files reside on one big NAS/SAN type system (which of course has backups) and are migrated while online to new bigger storage systems over time, repeat several many dozen times.
Pretty interesting article.

> "Google Chrome ads started appearing next to Firefox search terms. Gmail & [Google] Docs started to experience selective performance issues and bugs on Firefox. Demo sites would falsely block Firefox as 'incompatible'," he said.

> "All of this is stuff you're allowed to do to compete, of course. But we were still a search partner, so we'd say 'hey what gives?' And every time, they'd say, 'oops. That was accidental. We'll fix it in the next push in 2 weeks.'

> "Over and over. Oops. Another accident. We'll fix it soon. We want the same things. We're on the same team. There were dozens of oopses. Hundreds maybe?"

> "I'm all for 'don't attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence' but I don't believe Google is that incompetent. I think they were running out the clock. We lost users during every oops. And we spent effort and frustration every clock tick on that instead of improving our product. We got outfoxed for a while and by the time we started calling it what it was, a lot of damage had been done," Nightingale said.

You can do a lot more damage as a trusted friend than you can as a known enemy.
They typical experimental setup is a pilot or train operator that is given the task to monitor a warning sign and to signal periodically that they are still alert. This is then used to throw up possibly critical situations and then to evaluate their responses versus those situations where they are supposed to be in control all the time.
Important to note though that Euler probably didn't think of students trying to follow their professor at 8 in the morning while he scribbles proofs on the blackboard using ∑, ∈, E, e and S.
Is that not tampering with evidence? If true, I'd expect some serious investigation into this.
There are people using Microsoft Edge with Google Docs? What sort of logic puts one in this position?
Microsoft has turned Google's own weapon against them, crazy. Once they bundle it with W10, it's really going to take off. It's smart they changed the logo too.
I would say that I do very much have an incentive to be extremely wary of what's going on ahead even when not driving: my safety, people's safety, children safety, insurance premiums, cost of vehicle repairs. How can you say there's any less reason to stay focused.
because Elliot Higgins is an Atlantic Council puppet who gets his intel from UK spooks for strategic disemination, and responds to anyone who challenges him with "suck my balls". The guy is a information-terrorist and I hope the Russians slip him something into his tea one day.
I mean an app where you can simply enter the street where you are and you can see if there were cases of Coronavirus around. We need to fetch a lot of data sources from the web in order to retrieve so much information.
I'm sure that 1) modern inflections were exactly the same 170 years ago, and 2) builders of all ages are extremely precise and well-educated writers that would never mix up their letters.

I mean, even RP was barely formalized at that point...
The internet is more than just internet businesses. It costs me 70€ per year (paid in small monthly installments) to run a site to share my thoughts and info & tips related to hobbies. I don't need ads & tracking, donations nor any other form of monetization to run the site.
https://www.mapbox.cn/coronavirusmap/ (https://blog.mapbox.com/visualizing-the-progression-of-the-2...), though it seems to cover China only.
That was not very popular at Morgantown. You could just buy actual alcohol from the street. It was usually 10 or 20 dollars for a peanut butter jar full of vodka, normally Grey Goose. It sounds "racial", but a lot of things were based on stereotypical vices. We had Newports and Grey Goose. You could request something specific, but then you'd be paying the 4x premium. You could usually get a better deal because they'd be bringing in entire cartons of Newports, etc.

There was one night nurse who didn't watch you take your pills so tightly. Most people who had the prescription didn't share it.

There is a lot of creative food. I don't know if I'd eat the cheesecake on the street, but it is good when you haven't had anything for a while. We'd occasionally get street food inside, but it was like McDonald's breakfast, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, or chicken wings.

There was not a lot of petty criminals at Morgantown. Simple possession rarely lands you in federal prison. The worst of the worst is conspiracy. It doesn't take much for you to be linked to a conspiracy. The mandatory minimums don't make sense for that kind of crime. There's a lot of marijuana + money laundering. I'd say around 15% of people really had no business having anywhere near their actual sentence length.
right, we have to create value for the masses and find public attention/marketing for it. This is going to be hard.
There are more than 60,000 power plants in the world, the bulk of which are fossil fuels. Replacing them, with a continually growing power demand as newly middle-class individuals begin to consume more, is effectively impossible without radical change on a planetary level.

Never mind the concrete production for all of the new plants alone would release a staggering amount of CO2.

Even if someone figured out fusion this afternoon, and could start construction of one plant on each continent (sans Antarctica) this year, with the plants going online late next year, we'd still need radical change to hold us over for (likely) the couple of few decades it would take to build enough of the facilities.

Also consider ICE vehicles are still something like 90% of the annual sales in the world too. If you outlawed the production of ICE vehicles in every country in the world today, in 30 years you'd still have many millions of those vehicles on the road being used.

Concrete, plastics, livestock... there are many facets to this problem.
I agree. My experience with the issue is that, while the distinction may exist academically, the reality is that most people don't grok it. The result being that they are so frequently misused that, in practice, they are indistinguishable dimensions.

Basically, if what you are trying to do is too complex/nuanced for everybody to understand - don't do it.
> 1. Assange may be innocent, but it does not matter as the real verdict was already rendered. This is just a formality. 2. His pre-punishment punishment is not as bad as it could have been somewhere else. 3. Assange knew what he was getting into, therefore he does not have basic human rights ( variation of: you don't kick the bear argument )

I get what you mean and yes, you have a point. I guess I'm just surprised that people are getting annoyed this is happening now when it was always going to happen.

It's like constantly reminding someone that the boiling water will burn your hand, the boiling water will burn your hand, the boiling water will burn your hand. Then people being surprised and outraged that the water burnt your hand.

This outrage just seems almost topical. It should have been made earlier, it wasn't so this is the result.
By "develop" do you mean wrap one of the many already-existing websites showing this information in a UI? I'm not sure what your use case is here.