skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The counterpoint is that automatically-created stub articles serve to encourage community editing. It's much easier to edit an existing article than create a new one from scratch. This is one of the key principles behind the Gene Wiki project[1], which creates stub articles for human genes for this reason:

> Basic articles (called “stubs”) were systematically created based on content extracted from structured databases. These stubs are then edited by the broader Wikipedia community, while “bots” keep the structured content in sync with the source databases.

(The "structured content" mentioned is the info box on the right-hand side of a gene article. Nowadays I believe this is populated directly from Wikidata[2].)

Note: I am a member of the lab that runs Gene Wiki, but my work is unrelated.

---

[1]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944608/

[2]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26989148
You're incorrect. This document is describing languages used to develop the platform itself (and a bit about priority of external support for languages). The Fuchsia platform was designed to be language agnostic, bring-your-own-runtime.

at least as of when I last worked on it, but it has been a core principle from day one that I would be shocked to see abandoned.
Learn to Create Git Aliases Using Shell Script
I _really_ like the "martial statues" image there, along with the implication that the statues don't convey information about educational attainment... :)
All knowledge should not be free. The comment above mine wrote knowledge should be free and easily accessible. They are talking about all knowledge, not just academic journals, and that makes no sense.
Girls who’d never talk to me at 22 are stalking me at 32. You gotta work out tho
What if - dating apps are not the answer?

We are irreversibly addicted to various forms of information consumption that keeps us isolated with our attention glued to a screen. Pretend for a moment that you could live in a time pre-television. How would a 20 year old spend his/her time after work? From reading classic english literature - it seems like going out and socializing and interacting with other people was the norm (or, society of that era was often portrayed like this in their popular literature).

Now, we can't go back to that era - However, for the people who choose to break out of this addiction, literally the only option out there is meetup.com That option isn't even a very good one. But a lot of people actively use that platform (myself included) despite several obvious flaws because there is nothing else like it out there. It's the most effective way to meet interesting people.

My hypothesis is that there exists a market for an institution that serves as a meeting ground for socialization. A place where you would dress up to go to, a place where you would go to socialize with like minded people from similar demographics and a place that provides meaningful ways for strangers to share a long dialogue together. A place that isn't home and isn't work. A place where you can grow to know people really well over time. A place where it is socially acceptable to present a friend as "being single" in polite conversation to a group of people.

I don't know what such a place would look like. In my head, I think of a library-coffee shop with a tennis court in the back yard - but that's probably not it. My point is - dating apps try to solve an absence of IRL human connections with the screentime addiction that caused the isolation in the first place. The answer should probably be some brick-and-mortar business that serves a community around it.

If dating apps really were the answer, why not go all the way and build an app that permanently matches up two people as their virtual spouse - you only interact with each other by updating your digital avatar and sending text messages. Think of an anime girl/guy on your phone that you can interact with - but that person maps to a real human somewhere in the world. You can pretend-love each other all you want till you decide you actually want to go and meet real people in the real world.
> It's perfectly consistent to both want the work funded and want it free

No, it really isn't. It sounds like you're saying you want someone else to pay for it. That's not free.

> When someone says knowledge should be free, it's unreasonable and illogical to assume they are saying that knowledge work shouldn't be funded.

Funded work is not free.
This isn't necessarily comprehensive or authoritative, but here's a quick overview of Japanese:

https://atadistance.net/2017/03/13/japanese-typography-basic...
IIRC sel4 was initially specified in Haskell, formally verified, then formally translated to C.
"The data" means more than pure computer science people want to admit. In any "advanced" application, that means annotators. Radiologists drawing circles around cancer, attorneys labeling contract clauses as unacceptable, drivers labeling stop signs, etc.

ML is a mining problem. Digitizers are the miners. Annotators are the refiners.
Information freedom radicalism is not in any way mutually exclusive with compensating creators.

Grants, shareware, donationware, donation subscriptions (like patreon), crowdfunding, and the list goes on and on- of all the ways information creation is compensated prior to the information being given away for free.

Copying information takes virtually no work. It's not unreasonable to hold that the concept of "intillectual property" is morally bankrupt.

Nobody here suggested creators shouldn't be compensated.
Three words:

Air

Traffic

Control
What makes this library different from something like Newspaper? https://github.com/codelucas/newspaper
Google has orders of magnitude more computing power and humans to throw at the problem.
> “AT&T’s support for JavaScript is more than support for cool technology — it is support for an open standards process. Open standards are and will be as important to the success of the Internet as open connectivity.”

Still true, but ironic to hear a huge telco monopoly say it.
>Maybe some more substance would help your argument.

What is it called when someone demands evidence for a counter position when the original position has never been supported?
> Nobody here suggested creators shouldn't be compensated.

Sure they did, they said knowledge should be free.

If it is funded, someone's got to pay for it, and that is by definition not free.

If it is the government who funds it, you're paying for it through tax dollars. And, you're not paying a competitive rate, which means low quality information is coming out.

edit: I'm done with this comment chain of people claiming free doesn't mean $0. It clearly did in the original comment to which I replied, where they said "I am of the opinion knowledge should be free and easily accessible."
Mostly because I'm not qualified to write serious close-to-metal code (I majored in embedded systems 25 years ago, but gravitated up the stack), and don't have enough time for that as a hobby.

The day is only 25 hours, or maybe even less.
There are quite a few laptops on ebay at considerable discounts because the seller doesn't know the BIOS password. This could come in handy.
That ship has sailed. It taught me a lesson not to base any business on any 3rd-party platform.

If I ever start a business on a platform again, my goal will be to move away from it as soon as possible.

Amazon is a horrible company and although it's tempting to sell products on their platform, they will only steal your business from under you.
Any idea of when this product was introduced?
author here: this is why i suggest to use mix of reserved instances and spot instances. worse case scenario, everything will be on the small number of reserved + on-demand instances.

there are other strategies to avoid this as well

using multiple type of instance, of different sizes, on different availability zones. because price spike is different for each combinations

using bigger size instance than usual because bigger = more stable / less likely to get evicted
Scott Alexander is the best writer (in this "field", whatever you'd call it) in his generation.

So if that's how far you have to reach to find someone better, he may be pretty decent :)

I'm also open to be told what other great such writers I've missed out on, Cunningham's Law stye :)
He writes the "Star Slate Codex": https://slatestarcodex.com/

Personally, I've never been a fan. His writings are far too verbose for my liking. He uses 6 paragraphs for what could be one sentence, and I don't think that most of the content is that insightful either. But some people really like him shrug.
It wasn't gmail -- it was google maps that really made everyone look again at javascript. Although MS added XMLHTTPRequest, it took something like google maps that pushed it further than anyone thought at the time to make JS a real thing.
Apple to launch ARM Mac without Intel CPU in 2021, says Kuo
We are moving from swarm to k3s.
Kubernetes Tools that follow Unix philosophy to be simple, and composable
Me too. Neo Geo taste, Turbo Grafx 16 budget :-/
You're conflating free as in beer with free as in liberty. "Information should be free" means that it shouldn't be caged away- it means free as in liberty.

Funded information can be liberated.

Shareware is free. Donationware is free. Crowdfunded creative works are often free.

Creation of valuable information is effectively infinitely more expensive than copying valuable information. It's not unreasonable to consider that this distinction alone may be enough to consider restrictions on copying abhorrently immoral.
> If this becomes a true epidemic it’s going to be bad, but societies have been dealing with epidemics for a long time.

Yes, but we’re still often left with millions or tens of millions dead.
same in Russia
It's a fair comparison in a real world context. If you were to solve the problem at your job, would you start writing the program from scratch, or would you use ready-made tools made for the job?
End of 2019 https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws-cost-management/reinvent-ro...
because at the time when we did this (2016-2017), kops did not support spot fleet
because at the time when we did this (2016-2017), kops did not support spot fleet. worst case scenario, you get mix of reserved + ondemand instances.
All fifty states are at will states.
Always keep in mind Twitter takes away check marks as a form of punishment. It’s bizarre to think of validating someone then invalidating them when they say something naughty, makes it seem like children are in charge.
The way locking a TPM to firmware config works is that the TPM has several registers called PCRs that contain a hash value. Anything can send data to the TPM and have it update the hash value, and you can lock TPM keys to the PCRs such that you can only use the key when the PCRs you choose have a specific value. The TCG spec defines some of these PCRs to be sent certain information [0], but it's up to the firmware to send it, the TPM doesn't magically know what the state is. If there's even a single setting or nvram variable that you can change to gain code execution that isn't part of the data that's sent to the PCRs that the crypto key is locked to, it's game over.

[0]: https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TCG-EFI...
Always happy to see more of these resources available for FOSS development. The problem with a lot of paid graphics is that they can't be open-sourced, which make them a non-starter for me.
If you don't expect 30 matches a month to include a reasonable flow of date-worthy people, I think you've encountered exactly the problem the app is trying to solve. Your standards have been skewed unreasonably high by the constant availability of one more match, and some of the people you're not willing to date would make you perfectly happy if you did.
I don't think I've ever seen spotfleet not satisfy a request with all the same instance type. When the instance gets terminated, it seems to fill again with the same instance type as before (and then get killed again in busy periods).

For the past few weeks I've been having this exact problem with GPU instances, where on-demand requests would kill my spotfleet instances in the middle of a job, I'd spin up again, get killed again a few minutes later.

The only way to fix it without rewriting a bunch of stuff was to blacklist that instance type from my spotfleet requests.

It definitely wasted a bunch of my time though which seems to be increasingly more common with newer AWS APIs.
author here: please note that this is what we did in 2016-2017 where kops(what we use to provision) did not support spot fleet yet.

also, this works out so well for our use case because we were using .net framework at the time so the cost saving was huge.

a lot has changes since then.

Also, this strategy is not limited to AWS, the similiar type of instances are also available on Azure, GCP, etc...
> While the Haskell prototype is an executable model and implementation of the final design, it is not the final production kernel. We manually re-implement the model in the C programming language for several reasons. Firstly, the Haskell runtime is a significant body of code (much bigger than our kernel) which would be hard to verify for correctness. Secondly, the Haskell runtime relies on garbage collection which is unsuitable for real-time environments. Incidentally, the same arguments apply to other systems based on type-safe languages, such as SPIN [7] and Singularity [23]. Additionally, using C enables optimisation of the low-level implementation for performance. While an automated translation from Haskell to C would have simplified verification, we would have lost most opportunities to micro-optimise the kernel, which is required for adequate microkernel performance.

https://www.sigops.org/s/conferences/sosp/2009/papers/klein-...
I wonder how this performs in comparison to actix[1] & axiom[2]?

1. https://github.com/actix/actix
2. https://github.com/rsimmonsjr/axiom
Remember, Fuchsia is a microkernel, so a lot of the stuff that would be in the kernel in a monolithic kernel is in Rust here.
I do. If it's a callback and all arguments are passed in, it's fine.
You're mixing up free of cost with free as in liberty. Information freedom is about liberating access to information not demonitizing creators.

In the context of freedom of information the opposite of free information is not funded information- it's censored, withheld, horded, etc.
A bit, as posted in this blog, but for most part having physical unlimited access to a device it's game over. Hence why encrypting your sensitive data should be the norm (I am aware that is not the norm, not by far)
Guessing it’s same in Auckland (on iOS - just got blank page).
Hey, thx!

1. We would love to do so. Depends on our time and motivation. I definitely will write about all the steps on my Medium blog (you can find the link on newscatcherapi.com)
2. Yep. RSS. With package, you scrape this data yourself. So I do not see any problems here.
Regarding the product, I still do not understand how it works, but there are many products that to the same so I am not worried at the moment. I think it is important not to share the full text of an article.
3. Start from 4/hour for MVP. Then can increase it for as much as I want. Use serverless infrastructure.
4. Totally.

Waiting for your PR!
If you are interested in the routines of writers, I can't recommend Daily Rituals by Mason Curry enough. Kierkegaard's method of preparing coffee is probably my favorite:

“The Danish philosopher’s day was dominated by two pursuits: writing and walking. Typically, he wrote in the morning, set off on a long walk through Copenhagen at noon, and then returned to his writing for the rest of the day and into the evening. The walks were where he had his best ideas, and sometimes he would be in such a hurry to get them down that, returning home, he would write standing up before his desk, still wearing his hat and gripping his walking stick or umbrella.

Kierkegaard kept up his energy with coffee, usually taken after supper and a glass of sherry. Israel Levin, his secretary from 1844 until 1850, recalled that Kierkegaard owned “at least fifty sets of cups and saucers, but only one of each sort”—and that, before coffee could be served, Levin had to select which cup and saucer he preferred that day, and then, bizarrely, justify his choice to Kierkegaard. And this was not the end of the strange ritual. The biographer Joakim Garff writes:

“Kierkegaard had his own quite peculiar way of having coffee: Delightedly he seized hold of the bag containing the sugar and poured sugar into the coffee cup until it was piled up above the rim. Next came the incredibly strong, black coffee, which slowly dissolved the white pyramid. The process was scarcely finished before the syrupy stimulant disappeared into the magister’s stomach, where it mingled with the sherry to produce additional energy that percolated up into his seething and bubbling brain—which in any case had already been so productive all day that in the half-light Levin could still notice the tingling and throbbing in the overworked fingers when they grasped the slender handle of the cup.”

https://www.amazon.com/Daily-Rituals-How-Artists-Work/dp/030...

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/05/daily-ritual...
So the DOM was introduced in 1998, three years after applets and plugins. In 1995, you could write JavaScript code to dynamically render a page on load using document.write, but updating the rendered HTML was another story. Otherwise, JavaScript was limited to very very simple things.

When DHTML was introduced in '97-'98, the only major browser that had a reliable DOM was IE until Firefox came around in 2002. Netscape tried, but it was buggy to the point where there were no real workarounds to the huge gaps in missing functionality.

As far as 1995 was concerned, applets and plugins looked like the future. Honestly, the web was so new and so inferior to other things in 1995 (Macromedia, WYSIWYG tools, etc.), I think most of us saw HTML being replaced in a few years by a richer clients, applets or plugins.
What's a good replacement for Swarm that isn't as complex as Kubernetes? I like the platform abstraction and flexibility of k8s, it's just really heavy for many of my use cases.
Mimic: [ab]using Unicode to create tragedy
Is this doc no longer valid? https://fuchsia.dev/fuchsia-src/development/languages/new

It's worth noting the distinction between the Fuchsia API Surface (consumed by End-developers) and the Fuchsia System Interface here: https://fuchsia.dev/fuchsia-src/concepts/api/council#definit...
Been a nice little side business for years. So, yeah. Considerable discounts.
That which Lua is missing is primarily in terms of its ability to define clear, succinct algorithms. And in this respect the more Algol-derived languages enjoy a substantial advantage by having readily available tools for the task. Tables are a semantic compromise compared to list, array and map primitives, and the standard library assumes little, making it hard to write "native" Lua without encountering a need for R&D on some dependency.

But when it works in its true intended domain, gluing together and applying configuration to structured APIs and data, it's about as good as it gets, having had the benefit of major revision. And that makes it a stable computing platform, even more stable than the Lisp family(which are like BASIC in that it's quite easy to make an incompatible one). As a side effect, that also makes it an excellent source-to-source target.

But to put it another way: Everyone says they like minimalism until they try to live in it. Everyone who needs minimalism knows its limitations and makes exceptions.
Elsewhere they have mentioned the UI is written in Flutter, which is completely Dart based. It seems as if this is what tipped the scale. Both are Google-developed languages, but one seems to be closer to the project.
Thats why people wrote Applets. Even if u wanted manipulate the dom (u could), u didnt, because the Applet was so much faster and more feature rich.
It is very different. Newspaper3k allows you to automatically collect data when you know the url of an article.

Newscatcher gives you all the latest news (with url) for all the news providers.

It is nice to combine those 2.
They are not secure at all. Full disk encryption is the only way to protect your data in case a stranger has physical access to your device.
It's worth playing with: it's primarily designed for writing literate Python, and I greatly enjoyed working with it on a project as an experiment. I shuttle between neovim, emacs and leo, and dream of an editor that would somehow bring together all of their benefits. Oh, and maybe some smalltalk too!
A Brief Guide to Understand Duplex Steel 2205 Uses in Oil and Gas Pipeline
Set theory and graph theory came up often in my undergraduate operating systems and computer organization classes. I imagine it'd be even more so for graduate level classes.
It can literally take control of the machine. Even if it's written in Rust, there's no "this binary used an unsafe block" on binaries. If they're signing and proving everything, then what's the purpose of sticking that code in user space to begin with?
This is the problem with these technology companies: they either provide whatever their app does for free and do who knows what with your data or they make you pay something crazy like $20 and you still don't know what they're doing with your data.
It does make sense. You're just misreading what they said.

They did not say information should be unfunded or creators demonitized. They said information should be "free" as in liberated, as in freedom.

Valuable information is virtually costless to copy and yet you can be locked away in a cage by men with guns for accessing it. It's not far off from how North Korea handles people found with Western media. That's what the commenter above is advocating against.

Have some perspective.
> You're conflating free as in beer with free as in liberty. "Information should be free" means that it shouldn't be caged away- it means free as in liberty.

Sorry, no. What you're describing is "easily accessible".

The comment above wrote "knowledge should be free and easily accessible".

> Creation of valuable information is effectively infinitely more expensive than copying valuable information. It's not unreasonable to consider that this distinction alone may be enough to consider restrictions on copying abhorrently immoral.

That is an entirely unreasonable and absurd conclusion. Of course it takes more effort to produce valuable information than to copy it. That is the whole point of copyright; it protects creators and encourages people to create their own works. In doing so, creators contribute to higher quality of life for everyone by earning an income in exchange for putting the fruits of their labor down on paper.
You say it is propaganda but do you have an argument against his actual claims? Can you point out factual inaccuracies or omitted facts that are relevant?
Off-topic: I think it would be awesome to have a browser extension that collected HTTP codes as achievements, and you get a pretty little badge every time you run into a new code.
Whatever Kierkegaard was drinking, calling it coffee would only dignify it.
Basically, the system is massively ad-hoc and driven by this large scale annotation, training and testing.

The big question here is, what happens when the world changes next year? You rebuild the application. I know there are companies that advertise doing continuous updating of deep learning models but it seems like calculating total costs and total benefits is going to be hard here.
The apps are asymmetric because dating is asymmetric: most women do not want to date most men.

Likewise subtle prostition is common because it's part of heterosexual dating: men are expected to provide resources.

You may disagree with the morals of this, but it is very clear this is how dating works, not a new thing created by the existence of apps.
I'd checkout HashiCorp's Nomad: https://nomadproject.io/