skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you're looking for an IDE with remote interpreter support I've been using JetBrains products for years with Vagrant and Docker and they work great with full support for launching tests in the remote, setting breakpoints etc.
As a mere mortal reading the code, I would rather not have to reason about try blocks longer than a couple of lines.
They had been recently sued for having a monopoly from bundling IE with Windows. The chain of events you describe was in many ways not a choice of Microsoft.
> Do you have the data for wait times for other countries?

https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/text-altern...

29% of Canadians report waiting 4 or more hours the last time they went to the hospital emergency department.

Patients who reported waiting 4 or more hours: Country results from highest to lowest

Canada, 29% (below average);
Sweden, 20%;
Norway, 13%;
United States, 11%;
Commonwealth Fund average, 11%;
Australia, 10%;
New Zealand, 10%;
United Kingdom, 8%;
Switzerland, 7%;
Netherlands, 4%;
Germany, 3%;
France, 1%
Did a mod edit the title? If so, this has to be the most useless edit -- it completely eliminates the whole point of the domain name.
Basically... Dart and C++ only?
Just wanted to point out that the menu doesn't work properly on mobile in case you want to fix it.

https://imgur.com/a/TcibAKs
Another blockchain snakeoil. Look at one of the excerpts it's no different than today's way of doing things, where publisher needs to take the help of legal enforceable contracts. Not going into technical details where today's distributed systems with immutable records are already very good to handle structured data from multiple sources without the unnecessary complications of blockchain. It's just convoluted way of repackaging how it works now. Hopefully instead of spending time on these things, hope research community can make it better to work with semantic data and build easier tools for managing it.

> Clients must pay for each query they send to AnyLog. Once a client obtains access to the result of a query, there are few effective technological mechanisms for preventing or constraining further disclosure. A client may attempt to resell the data they have access to or disclose it publicly. Therefore, publishers must take unauthorized disclosures into account when setting query prices or providing access to decryption keys. In some settings, relying on more traditional deterrence mechanisms such as legal contracts may be appropriate
It has never been easier to run a wireguard client-server :)
I'm surprised you put up with that kind of censorship. I'd get a VPN if I were you.
I always thought the big paradigm shift was the introduction of xmlhttprequest.

Prior to that, it was really just form validation and cool DHTML interactions.

I also wonder why AJAX is not called AJAJ?
I'm sure I'm one of many who would love to hear all about it. Please do it!
I'm all for linear optimization and other optimization techniques. It's refreshing to see other people talk about Gurobi, CPLEX, etc... Having done research in the field of scheduling and now getting contacted by companies, it's demoralizing to see that everybody usually speaks about machine learning while many problems can be solved in a more precise way with other techniques.
Props to the ML community for being so open.
This reply might be what you're looking for: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22407399

Cloudflare is a solid company with a good reputation and has done a lot for general welfare of the internet. The staff there generally care about customers and it seems like they're trying to figure out what went wrong here, and of course preventing negative PR is always a bonus.

There's really not much of a process when you're a top officer at a company, you have the freedom and responsibility to exercise your judgement and do whatever it takes for the good of the organization.
Sci-Hub is such a marvelous resource. I like to read research papers for fun sometimes but I'm, let's put it gently, no scientist. So it'd be a huge waste of money for me to pay the steep prices of scientific journal subscriptions just to read 1-2 articles per month where I understand at most 75% of it.

However, I still feel bad about accessing them without any benefit to the scientific teams. Is there any way to give back to the people whose work I'm reading or at least some kind of science-related general fund or charity that I could contribute to?
Your definition of quality is different than mine. I think most native apps are unstable, unlearnable, gratuitously animated messes. Even supposedly “quality” apps. I can’t tell you how many voice memos I’ve lost because of Apple’s “lickable” and totally broken (but very pretty) UI.

I would prefer a simple, well designed web app to the vast majority of them.

The native toolkits have too big a surface to reliably product high quality UIs. Yes, it’s possible but they push you away from making the choices that lead to good user experience, in favor of UIs that look impressive on an interaction designer’s or a developer’s portfolio.
Grindr seems to be more successful than Tinder at hooking people up. Most of the problems I've seen from dating apps, revolve around the security a woman feels and an over supply of potentially suitable men.
> Even today's modern 64-bit CPUs begin execution in 16-bit mode. In UEFI, this is called the SEC phase.

Is that true even for the T2 Macs and such?
In the context of that time, Electron would be considered inferior.
Do you think the security holes killed Java and Flash? Or do you think they were just nails in the coffin?

I suspect performance and inconsistent experience killed Java applets and Sun stopped caring about desktop Java when they realized they can't make much money off it. Flash stuck around a lot longer than Java because it was fast, fun and ran consistently. It still lingered for some time after Jobs poisoned it.

Honestly, I don't think people cared that much about running updates. For most people, if the computer tells them they need to update, they update. I also don't think average users cared about security issues back then.
Google does not run ads on scholar.
I am working on two projects in one that may be similar to what you’re thinking. I really like the way the University of Waterloo’s CS Python tutorial [1] is done, so I’m trying to get a little bit of comfort with web development, and I decided I wasn’t happy just being familiar with Haskell and wanted to get into ML... So I’m slowly going through the 2019 version of this book and inserting dummy formatted JS input blocks with the intention of hooking them up to an online interpreter. I doubt I’ll get all the way through the text, but if I want messing with fancy formatting and trying to learn the web design aspects (and therefore messing around with CSS waaaay too much) it doesn’t seem like an insurmountable task.

—- Also, the responsive design of the book works pretty well on iOS, and that has been a rarity in this area from my experience.

[1] https://cscircles.cemc.uwaterloo.ca/
Even when the disclosure is not actually coordinated, in the common sense of the word, because the vendor doesn’t agree to the deadline and/or isn’t given any option to pick a longer deadline?

Edit: The Google Project Zero FAQ[0] explicitly states its approach is not coordinated disclosure:

> Prior to Project Zero our researchers had tried a number of different disclosure policies, such as coordinated vulnerability disclosure. Coordinated vulnerability disclosure is premised on the idea that any public disclosure prior to a fix being released unnecessarily exposes users to malicious attacks, and so the vendor should always set the time frame for disclosure.

It seems to me that if “responsible disclosure” is problematic for the reasons you’ve mentioned, “coordinated disclosure” is too. Actually, it’s maybe even worse, since “the researcher refused to coordinate with us on the deadline” is objectively true, whereas “the researcher didn’t disclose this vulnerability responsibly” is totally subjective.

As I said in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22407821 I don’t like the phrase “responsible disclosure”, especially given its history, but “coordinated disclosure” doesn’t seem to do any better at being a phrase that can’t be weaponised against researchers. It also has the downside of meaning different things to different people within infosec which makes it unreasonably hard to communicate effectively and concisely.

So, you know, anyone reading this with high stature in infosec, please coin something unambiguously unique (“time-gated disclosure”?) so less time can be spent talking about semantics and more time can be spent on how to improve software security for everyone. :-)

[0] https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/p/vulnerability-discl...
Your perspective and analogies are all wrong (which is why you have downvotes). You must not be close enough to many women who have shared the reasons why rape and rape culture are a non-joking manner. Just don't say the word "rape" unless it's serious or medical.
It took several days but once I realized that the simulation wasn't confined to earth, it ended as I expected. Kind of a sci-fi, dystopian simulations (but I won't spoil all the fun in the middle).
This is a very sweeping statement about the German economy that I find hard to comprehend. The global car market in 2019 was 80 million vehicles sold. 1 million of which were electric cars. 300k of which were Teslas.

The automotive industry in Germany constitutes about 5% of the German GDP. Now losing a tiny fraction of that market to Tesla is not going to push the country into a recession, and it's not even going to bother the carmakers much in the short term.

the EV question for Germany is going to be an issue 10-15 years down the line, not now, and the reason for sluggish economic growth are more broadly related to the contraction in international trade due to the trade tensions between Europe, the US and China which has not just hit the German car market, but the entire industrial sector.
I am of the opinion knowledge should be free and easily accessible. Research papers through sci-hub only helps to make knowledge easily accessible. Humanity's progress depends on people who shared their knowledge, not by people who use it as a tool to rule and hold on to power.

It will be nicer if whole sci-hub is able to move to IPFS network and accessible through a domain. The problem is IPFS do not offer anonymity of the nodes hosting the content. So publisher can sue any of the nodes being part of the network providing a chunk of data. Even though they are not liable as intermediary, but now a days it's pretty hard to defend in court and like the default judgement in case of sci-hub will happen with the node owners.

Hopefully libp2p and IPFS, IPNS can provide some way to be performant and anonymous.

Indeed some countries like India, China, Russia will even punish intermediary for hosting such content (there is no Safe Harbor laws in these countries). In USA and other economies hiring a lawyer and getting access to legal remedy is so expensive that even with Safe harbor law, one cannot defend unless have deep pockets like google, facebook, microsoft etc.
There are no issues with the platform (https://zeit-status.co/). The deploy has been blocked due to ToS violations.
Didnt we just have a 500+ comment rant about how shit HackerOne was?
Show HN: Web-based Babel alternative for React/JSX (ultra-fast and tiny 5.1 kB)
Expedia to Layoff 3000 People
I'm compiling a list of companies using Rust (https://github.com/omarabid/rust-companies). Probably the next step is to rank companies by how much they are really using Rust and linking products that are using it.
No, I don't think so. All the major internet companies listen to their non-enterprise users. They may not provide enterprise quality support to each individual user, but user voices in aggregate are considered critically important.
> I registered for Cloudflare with a Gmail address specifically so that I could receive notifications from them if there were issues with my email setup.

good idea
does the src directory include any vendored software for the other languages? Or is that also only fuchsia code?
I mean, he grifted a bunch of flat earther's into funding his hobby. That's a win in my book
I do not consider spear phishing an advanced attack (despite many governments doing it). Credential theft definitely is not. Malicious docs generally are not (as they are typically just macros that the user has to run).

Watering holes can be depending on how the malware is delivered once the user visits the site. If it just tries to download it and hope they click, that is not advanced IMO.

I do agree that this is what most organizations face as threats though. Resources like these are for people who want to eventually sell exploits, hunt for bugs, or learn enough to analyze them effectively. I do not think these are for teaching someone to teach corp users to not run docms.
Very off-topic but hilarious.

Back to topic: inability to distinguish O and 0 seems pretty terrifying for avionics. Related, I love SF Mono, but it's so hard to read 0000080 in small fonts (try it).
It’s not an answer to your question, but when you pay JSTOR or whomever, none of that goes back to the scientists. It’s not like royalties for an author.

I don’t know if that makes you feel any better?
It’s serverless, it can’t be down. What’s going on here?
Here is a Hello World Demo:

https://www.dataformsjs.com/examples/hello-world/en/react.ht...

If you view with any modern browser it will use `jsxLoader.js` as the compiler and if you use IE 11 or other old browsers it will download and use Polyfills with Babel Standalone.
Another recent big user is 1password, both on the Windows desktop and in the browser with wasm. Great notes!
If you want something more in-depth about OCaml itself, http://dev.realworldocaml.org/ is a good resource.
So all 60k people visit this site and parse negative comments to rebut them ?
What terms?

Edit: I didn’t know Sci-Hub was illegal.
Scientists don’t get paid anything regardless of whether or not you pay a subscription/article fee to the science journals. The best thing to do to benefit scientists (usually) is to spread awareness of their work, as that is the main currency in academia that determines career advancement and future fundraising. Ideally you’re promoting it to other academics (so that they generate trackable citations), but general publicity also helps.
Modularity incurs a complexity tax. If you are smart enough to keep it all in your head, like a Motie Engineer, you can simplify by omitting it. But if you're not...
What I was addressing was specifically the notion that companies pay zero cost for ignoring a customer, or the idea that they believe the same. That's false. Now there's no question there are some customers these large companies are better off without, and there are large and small examples of companies firing customers, or ignoring them til they go away. Nothing wrong with that. All the time on this site we talk about firing unprofitable customers. If you do this judiciously it's just good business. Doing that in particular cases is not the same as doing that generally.
I'm getting a 451... Did zeit.now take this down?
Those teams receive nothing from publishing either, other than CV credit and occasionally, a copy of the journal. Many of them put their pre-prints on academia.edu and often will email it to you if you ask.

It's complicated, but places like Wiley and Elsevier take much more than they give.
GMail had a massive impact, but I didn't really think it was novel from a technical JS perspective. It was really basic, and loaded fast. It had excellent fast search and very good junk mail rejection.

Most email providers had approximately 100Mb mailbox limit (I can't remember specifically), but Gmail had 1Gb.
Dos and Don'ts of Stackalloc
In Britain, even jails have a class system
As someone who was doing web development at that time (since '96 actually), oddpost did have an impact on perception of JS and what was possible among developers. Yahoo buying them was kind of a big deal at the time, and every developer I knew who was involved in web stuff had seen it or at least heard about it.

The biggest drawback at the time was that it was window/IE only, and when gmail was released, google made an effort to be cross-platform.

IMO, Google's 'big win' wasn't so much showing what JS could do, but that complex JS could be done cross-browser and cross-platform.
> Lead pollution of “tap water” in Roman times is clearly measurable, but unlikely to have been truly harmful.
“AJAX” when it was mostly grabbing chunks of HTML to insert or otherwise not doing much but “grab, render” was sometimes faster. Not so much these days.
I'm not that familiar with Macs, but if they're using an Intel CPU it almost definitely starts in 16-bit mode. From what I understand the T2 chip is more akin to what's called an embedded controller in other laptops.
I kind of think that agreeableness is a major factor in seeking intimacy that isn’t captured well enough in online dating. People are afraid to meet people that disagree with them and actively ridicule people with differing values/opinions/lifestyle. Religions, sports teams and other mass clubs obfuscated a lot of the concern away. But without those people need other groups and tools to trust a stranger to agree with them over time.
Ask HN: Would you ever pay for a browser?
What features would you want to have in it?
Unpopular opinion: Governments are doing the right thing by lying to the public
> does sound serious

Do you mean legitimate, instead of serious? The issue you point out sounds more like technical debt and verification/specification rather than something that can’t or won’t be overcome.
Sounds like an issue with the platform to me.
Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus (C4): Open-Source NLP Pretraining Corpus by Google
IPFS is actually a better fit for this than it might appear.

It doesn't pro-actively replicate content, so it isn't like bit torrent where everyone is uploading.

Instead, it provides resilience, where the actual location of sci-hub could move around, but requesters could still get access to the content. The rest of the network acts to help with routing, but won't be serving data they haven't accessed themselves.
> Sometimes it requires a lot of thinking to come up with simple solutions.

Author here - I should have tweeted that instead of writing a blog post
I've encountered some latency issues with allreduce on transformer models due to vocabulary sizes when communication have to cross PCIe lanes. Increasing batch size helps a lot, but low-latency & high-throughput is universally more helpful to lift these minor concerns (I don't really want to care about my batch size to improve allreduce performance). Hence worried not only throughput, but also latency on consumer-grade 10ghe equipments.
It's interesting how the process seems... completely backwards.

A group of engineers studying the CV/portfolio of the candidate followed by a culture fit interview should be the first and second thing to happen, IMO, yet for Google they're the last and second to last, respectively.

Afterwards, there should be an interview discussing the developer's portfolio with the candidate.

And then, and only then, (and if and only if the candidate's portfolio isn't extensive or clear enough) there should be a technical interview. And even that shouldn't be a stupid hackerrank/leetcode type challenge or a generic take home test, but a pair programming session resolving a recent bug that the company/team faced, in a simulated environment.

Obligatory IMO, of course.
Why Independent Farming in America Is Close to Extinction (2019)
T5 Trivia: Play against T5 (Google's new NLP model) in a trivia challenge
Much better if it had gone with Scheme
Sadly you can't filter by it, but it does kinda make sense since it is freeform so not sure how valuable search would be for that.
I just have #gaymer and #geek for mine
>Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Seems high for an "average", even in King County, and even with stocks. Or maybe I need to up my billing rate. :-)
Having the blue check mark removed isn't a suspension or ban so you can't really go with "that group just happens to break the rules more". It's not like saying vile shit makes your account less verifiable. So when Twitter takes away verification it looks like they're just trying to signal affiliation with the opposing group.
That’s too bad because I’d personally want to hire someone that could demonstrate they knew something I didn’t in an interview.
You realize that heavy metal poisoning is cumulative right? There is no safe dosis.
The OP made it clear that he used a gmail account for contact so there was no excuse for him to have not received a message regarding the deletion of his domain records.
Matomo 3.13.3 released – self-hosted analytics
Rust binary size can be pretty painful, depending on what you're doing. Also, it doesn't look like that document is receiving regular updates, so grain of salt and all.
For reference, 451 Unavailable for Legal Reasons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_451
Shout_At_Netflix_To_Continue: Literally the worst way to make Netflix continue
I feel like that was the original point of having to login through Facebook to access Tinder, you could see whether your matches had shared friends. The idea being this was a potential indicator you might be a good match or not
My classic offshoring story is of a team of people we brought in to do QA (literally to write the unit tests that Troy's blog post no one ever writes). This team was very bullish on getting to do more than "just" testing. My CEO wanted to let them take a crack at it, and I had more than enough to do so we tried it out.

I had written some domain models for dealing with users and I needed equivalent models for dealing with notifications. So I asked them to take the work I'd done and use it as a template for the new stuff. I got back code with the method and variable names search and replaced, pretty much exactly like what I expected. What they _hadn't_ bother to modify was the SQL that actually operated on the data (yes, I had to write it out like a cave man). So I had a bunch of notifications domain objects that operated on the USER table.

That experiment terminated early.
Question: how secure are BIOS passwords, really? If you have full-disk encryption anyway, is the BIOS password adding anything?
Sorry, but that was not the only con. The other were that the design was unusual and it is not yet understood.

And not enough people are using it is devastating critique of a language - every piece of code written will be read by someone eventually. And you want that pool to be as big as possible.

To me it seems Google are cautiously bullish on Rust.
Plant Breeding Innovation: Crispr-Cas9
Very accurate to say the love of power makes a fool. A fool is just closer to an animal than a "wise" man. Power over another is just selfish, as love, or the care of more than yourself is altruistic. By smart enough to know better I meant they aren't the ones perpetuating the games, not that they are not suffering from the games. You flipped it backwards.
It is rare for innovation to be technical or purely technical. It is far more common for innovation to be from a novel business model, which perhaps is enabled by the technical innovation from someone else. Many times one technical innovation (Internet, smartphones, PCs) leads to many business opportunities (Amazon, Uber, Microsoft)
According to the CPU processor manuals, they all boot in "real mode" which is a 16-bit legacy/bootstrap mode.
When I tried loading the page, it timed out, whereas now I'm getting an immediate 451
Chinese medical staff request international medical assistance against COVID-19
Judging by https://gitlab.com/Flockademic/whereisscihub/-/blob/master/i... it is vice versa — whereisscihub is reading URLs list from Wikipedia.