skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't usually cling to the status quo, but I do believe that the CEO must have the ability to set the vision and get the "right people in the right seats." Every management book in the last decade pays homage to this idea put forward in Jim Collins' book Good to Great.

I guess this model presumes that the right people will be supplied by the investor to fill predetermined seats. Does the CEO have a say in that? Is it possible to fill seats without the CEO in the decision making process? If they do have a say prior to investment, then why not raise capital and hire people of that caliber regardless?

If the issue is that some founders with good ideas are simply clueless and a team that knows better must be built around them, it seems conflict between the CEO and the new team will be inevitable.
> I'd advice against changing the ssh port

Hard disagree, even if for as simple a reason as port 22 gets inundated by drive by hacking attempts, making the log files virtually useless.

Running telnet with no password on any port would be, but having ssh on a non-default port isn't trying to achieve security through obscurity.
That's not accurate. CPI adjusts both in basket composition and the more nebulous hedonic quality adjustment. The TV you bought for $500 today is not the same as the one you bought for an equivalent price 30 years ago.
Sort of like how society doesn't require me to not be a billionaire, but in practise i'm not a billionaire.

Code not deployed and probably never tested (perhaps never even worked) does not count.
IE (but not Edge, not surprisingly...) actually has a built-in feature which was probably specifically designed to target such things:

https://i.stack.imgur.com/855az.png

Selecting "prompt" will result in this:

https://i.stack.imgur.com/jvDUh.png

I set it to Prompt for trusted sites, and Disabled for all others.
> Sounds like you're imposing a complex build process on yourself while getting locked into a web of AWS features to be honest.

I should elaborate a little. My whole site is contained within a Docker container that has NPM, Yarn, headless-chrome, Hugo, etc. I can generate everything with a single command. The AWS bits are just there for hosting and responding to a GitHub commit. So the build process is portable-ish, but from what I saw Netlify doesn’t just let you do headless-chrome on a free plan[1].

> Could you not skip generating the PDF resume

Not really, the point is to automate everything away behind a single Git push.

1: https://community.netlify.com/t/using-zipped-binaries-how-to...
You can stretch the term AI to refer to a lot of things, but not as far as I think you're implying. Even today, the vast majority of software written is unambiguously not AI, and the substantial majority of startups couldn't be called AI companies even as a dumb marketing tactic.
So I would argue that most businesses use tabular data that can be used to train classical models (XGB, etc), and reach the same performance (if not better) than deep learning.
Video experts have already established the videos are real, and not edited. I think it probably is US tech in the videos, but since it's FLIR cameras the government doesn't care because you can't see details. Otherwise, I don't think your theory is implausible...but the videos are definitely legit. If the tech is a drone, or a manned aircraft or some sort of diversionary tech to throw off enemy radar/instruments (which we tested against our own highly advanced instruments) that is up for debate. I do doubt it's aliens, though I want to believe. It could even be a way to sow doubt into enemies like China, as a way to say "look what we have." We'll probably find out in 40 years.
You are trying to solve a social and legal problem with technology.

We all know if Wikileaks wanted to open a new handle, there's really nothing Twitter can do to preemptively stop them. They can only react with a game of whack-a-mole.

And that's what they do. Avoiding a ban by creating a new account is already against the terms of service.

Imagine an unauthorized client that overlays on top of vanilla Twitter. Instead of subscribing to Twitter handles, you subscribe to cryptographic identities. Participating Twitter publishers cryptographically sign their tweets, proving their identity. The overlay client regularly scans the entire site's feed to discover any new handles using a known signature. If Twitter Inc. bans your handle, just fire-up one of your sock-puppets and all your overlay subscribers seamlessly re-point to the new handle.

So then Twitter (or a motivated investigator) runs the overlay network as well and gets the new account automatically identified.
You my friend, are an evil, sadistic meglomaniac. I love it. Remind me not to make you mad.
Do not fear running your own server. There is no such thing as perfect security and neither is the cloud inherently secure. Many of the infamous data leaks you've heard about in recent years occurred on cloud-hosted systems. Ultimately, if security is a concern, you need someone that understands security, regardless of where its hosted.
Typescript doesn’t really do code generation, it transpiles via pure type erasure unless you are targeting an older JS runtime.
I think browsers need to implement options to block most of the bad behaviors you describe, and bundle it all up into a "this site is an app" permission that is off by default. Pages that are fundamentally just documents dressed up with fancy navigation features don't need all those anti-features and it's the browser's duty to spare the user the annoyance, but Google Docs does need most of those APIs.
1) Adding a "partner" only helps if he is actually competent. My experience suggests that this is untrue more than the majority of the time.

2) It also means that you are privileging information from your "mole" who may have a different agenda from both the company and the VC.

Every time I have seen a VC put an "insider" into a company my advice has been to consign him to metaphorical Siberia. The companies who didn't follow this advice regretted it terribly.
Every time we clean something, we simply dirty something else. Ala Einstein, energy is neither created nor destroyed. Chaos is neither created nor destroyed, simply moved. And to move chaos, requires isotropic heat emission, which releases chaos in itself - hence entropy increasing. Thus, moving chaos, increases the total chaos a little bit. Until there's chaos everywhere and nothing can be moved, ie. heat death of the universe. Prepare for the big crunch, the big pancake deep freeze, the cyclic big bang, conformal cyclic rebirth, or whatever your cosmological spirit holds to be an inkling of inclination. :-)
If the marginal cost is low enough, it may be profitable to give rural populations Internet at a price that they can afford, even if it's way cheaper than in California, and so low that the entire system couldn't be run profitably if everyone could get it that cheap.
It’s basically adding listeners for pointer etc events in addition to click events. It’s not difficult to implement.
When you're new to everything, how do you find the right people for those seats?

How do you perform a proper search while wearing lots of other hats? I suppose it's a never-ending exhausting task?
For general use-cases, I doubt the performance benefit matters as much as engineers claim that it does.

But there are more specific use-cases where it would indeed matter. Hand-held devices, high calculation loads, etc.

Even Dan Abramov's popular talk on React Suspense shows that even the newest versions of React begin the chugg under the influence of an extreme performance situation.
Oh, I agree it's useful! I'm pretty sure it's a great improvement over my high-school Spanish classes or my rudiments of grade-school French in Canada.

It's just that I moved on nearly as soon as I could to learning by osmosis from reading real books; which, not being deliberate practice, is quite suboptimal in learning rate too, but is a much more tolerable use of time. If they were as effective as I think they could be, I wouldn't ditch them so soon.

I have the unusual issue of being severely hard of hearing and I'm not sure what'll be the effective way to learn spoken conversation if I do move to a French-speaking country. Even hearing English is, uh, problematic in most settings. So this is also an example of tailoring your own approach in view of goals and context. I like reading books, and this most directly got me the thing I like.
No, you're thinking of Bruce Wayne.
Alex Jones' fans will no longer be exposed to rational arguments from non-fans on the same platform. They'll instead become increasingly trapped in their own filter bubbles, and now have even more of a martyr complex.

This is a common argument, and yet every study of conspiracy theories shows this isn't the case. Conspiracy theories thrive on reach, and in the absence of reach they tend to die out.
I quit doing it because I have an AWS account for small business side stuff and adding webmail is like 5 bucks a month.

That and there are so many nosey devices on the home LAN these days I had to create 4 subnets with isolation so the nosey IoT crap cant poke around my personal stuff
> If someone approached me with this idea to help my startup, I would promptly move that email to my junk folder and stay focused on building a great product

I'd advise you to let them give you a quick pitch by email and see if it sounds reasonable.

As a founder, you have so much to learn. Be wise with your time, but don't shut out potential ideas from someone who says they want to help you. It's not every day (or any day, in my experience) that something like that happens.
Like anything else, it depends on your workflow and preferences. For those of us in Animation/VFX, it really helps having multiple monitors as we have a decent amount of windows to manage interactive graphs, timelines, viewports, outliners, render views at full resolution, reference, etc. Pixel real estate comes at a premium here, and flipping back and forth between workspaces is not efficient in this context. For some in this area a single 4K may suffice, but dual monitors of anything is usually better (for editorial and grading it's essentially a requirement as a dedicated reference monitor, with other departments like comp able to use as well).
The meeting so useful, you have to crowdsource the agenda!
It's not enough for me not to use them. Everyone else must be made aware of what's going on so they don't get taken in by the manufactured false consensus.

So I will complain.
I doubt it. What properties specificly?

Hell even bitcoin doesn't have a great notion of verifability (verify what? No double spending? Lets hope your opponent doesn't control 33% of the hash power.). Central-db systems can issue recipts (like humans have been doing for thousands of years). Centralized cyrptocurrencies basically offer the same protection at best and much less at worse.
Isn't 99.99999...% of any currently used AI good ol' statistics or (not XOR) classical operations research stuff or (not XOR) well-known and rather simple NLP?
In which case it could have just turned on the microphone itself?
You may be able to refinance it.
Dear NVidia, While I and many others appreciate the quality of your video, in an age where people are distributing ray-tracing code on business cards, there’s not a ton of value in producing even more “Basics” or “Essentials” of ray tracing educational material.

What would provide most of us with interest in ray tracing real value is expanding on the territory covered by the PBRT book, making the material it covers more accessible, and covering the changes to the state of the art which have occurred in the decade since it was written (particularly the elements that the RTX hardware enables; real-time mixing of ray tracing and rasterization rendering).

Thanks!
I would wait for Caddy 2 at this point, for I found 1.0 doesn't work very well when your site gets complicated - many directives conflict with each other. Fortunately it seems that most of these are solved in 2.0.
No Excuse For Data Tampering
Anyone already can invest through the simple expedient of lying about their assets and income. I know people who did this in order to invest in pre-IPO stock. Some financial services companies do minimal verification, and even if an unaccredited investor gets caught there's no real punishment.

(I am not recommending breaking the law.)
What do people use for 2FA if you only have 10-20 employees?
RE: Hero worship

Tangential, but I think that's one thing "Indie Game: The Movie" did really well - it covered the indie game devs while also really humanizing them and their weaknesses.
Thanks for this. I had never heard of it before, but will definitely be playing around with it.
This article is from 2015:
https://adage.com/article/digital/inside-google-s-secret-war...

"If advertisers believed the company's operation were fraud-filled, they could take their money elsewhere and the business would falter."

That's it, in a nutshell.

(and if they had 100 people working on this in 2015; you better believe that number is much higher now)
The pinnacle of UFO research quality is from Jacques Vallee [0], who seems to have always been well ahead of the field, but he doesn't really hold back, which is both a pro and a con to someone casually interested. I'm also not familiar with his opinions on more recent developments in the space, which are quite significant.

I can recommend a fictional book "Sekret Machines" by the former lead of Blink 182 who has used his fame and lifelong passion for the phenomenon to create a media company espousing a more gentle introduction to the subject, while still providing some sobering and fascinating context on the phenomenon. The flashbacks are allegedly historical fiction, one of which was referenced in this popular mechanics article (when a UFO floated over Malstrom AFB and took all the ICBM's offline). It's also just a really good read. This same company hired Elizondo and a number of other "in-the-know" advisors, and caused the current UFO media hype cycle by releasing the Nimitz tape to the NYT in 2017.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Vall%C3%A9e
> The companies pay SEV in common stock shares, the same held by the startups' rank-and-file employees, and SEV's team, in turn, get paid salaries by the firm and also receive part of the firm's carry like a traditional venture model.

The VC pays for employees. The company pays the VC in the form of stock. The risk to the VC is the stock they've received is worthless or worth less than the cash they have paid employees.
That's easy to say but pretty much everyone I've talked to, albeit the few oddities, thought that dedicated space heaters were way different than X-Box getting hot, or computer getting hot. Think of the cognitive dissonance to switch to all LED bulbs in a cold climate, because you're told it's more efficient, meanwhile using electric space heaters at the same time... It happens more often than you think, given the politics.

Of course, there are some heating methods that are cheaper than electricity - like natural gas. So one would have to factor that in, along with power plant emissions vs home emissions.

It's a complex entrenchment. It'd be interesting to produce a video of street interviews just to see what the average person thinks about electronics getting hot. It would make for a good case study of the intersection between common sense/basic physics knowledge/and energy/eco politics.
I'm not a Tesla owner. In fact, I find the company's hype driven marketing annoying.

That being said, your info is out of date. The fit and finish isn't an issue anymore.
(Kind of unhelpful after the fact - but regarding chewed posts:

The method that works where I didn't accidentally close the last tab associated with a particular renderer process (or, TL;DR, didn't close any tabs), is to promptly figure out which renderer process is behind the tab in question via chrome's task manager, quickly attach to it with gdb, then `generate-core-file (filename)`, and grep through the result for my text. (Usually `grep -aC100`.)

Alternatively, hibernating generally seems to always(?) save the disregarded bytes to disk (the associated memory regions immediately get used for something else, so they stay in in the pagemap); then I can reboot the machine, carefully prevent it from resuming, boot to Linux, mount the FS readonly as appropriate (since it was never unmounted cleanly), then go through the hibernation/swap image. (Bonus points for then resuming once you're done.) I recovered a family member's lost draft email this way once (TIL Gmail encodes emails in both HTML _and_ HTML-inside-JSON O.o).)
Displayport has an extension called dual mode which basically all modern dp devices support which lets them use passive converter cables to hdmi and dvi. Usually you get a displayport port and you convert to hdmi. This must a displayport chip connected to a hdmi port which is pretty whacky but I can't see any reason why it couldn't be done.
Also, some of the competition for most overstretched buzzword is pretty stiff. For example all of those "block chain" applications that are equivalent both philosophically and practically to one trusted party with an SQL database.

I don't think IoT is stretched at all, the name implies "refrigerators but with GSM" and "cars, but they report your every move to the manufacturer," and that's what we have. They're "things" (objects) on the "internet" (a data collection system for marketers).
People would suggest two main solutions:

1) Avoid things with bad design.

2) Find a way to accept bad design, so it doesn't affect your emotions.

The real solution is to fix the world so it has less bad design. This is about both making people act more intelligently in the present, and ensuring that at the very least, people do not become stupider in the far future (and, hopefully, become at least a little smarter).

This solution involves significant changes to the entire world.
> Maybe I'm missing something here, but it sounds like they aren't putting any skin in the game. The VC will benefit from all of the upside while literally taking none of the risk.

They funded the company and they could lose their money if the company fails. That's their risk. Now they are trying to help the company build a team and somehow that's a bad thing?
Fixed: Tesla's marketing is so powerful, that they don't even need to advertise.
Richard Dolan has written a number of books from a ‘smoke then fire’ perspective focusing on how much the US (and other) governments appeared preoccupied with the subject while denying that preoccupation.

He doesn’t speculate or fill in gaps. He is and writes like an historian, however, so get ready for some dry reading.
Ok, so the situation right now: you make a web forum, and delete posts that are about your friends doing bad things but leave posts about that organizer because you don't know then and don't bother to look into reports that it is all, in fact, libel, because that's work and you aren't liable.

Meanwhile, you take down posts of people talking about how the tournament did not offer gender neutral bathrooms or how there aren't enough female chess masters, because that's "political" and off topic, but then turn a blind eye towards people harassing women on the forum and require them to keep begging you with the flag buttons to clean up your mess.

The result of this is just that the powerful majority gets something akin to a working filter and all the marginalized people don't just get lip service to their issues: they end up being unable to even bring up their complaints, because those complaints are divisive and often themselves against some terms of service banning meta-conversation (a common enough issue that this website--Hacker News--has such an indefensible clause).

This is all just not OK: you don't get to have immunity and have control. The idea that you should be able to restrict some of what happens but somehow not be even sort of responsible for everything else that happens is the kind of position you can only hold if you are part of the powerful majority, whatever it might be (cishet white males, corporate stooges, western prudes... take your pick) :/.

So, I guess, "congratulations tzs": you are demonstrating loud and clear that you think the legal position of running a chess forum that actively distorts the world view of everyone using it is more important to defend than the rights of groups like breast feeding mothers (a group that is routinely thrown off of websites and deplatfored even as alt-right groups are empowered).

(Meanwhile, the entire premise that people should get to sort of look like a platform without really being a platform is robbing the world of actual platforms, and it is ridiculous: the existence of things that almost work like platforms for the majority of powerful people means that getting people to tolerate the pain of using fully distributed systems is by and large off the table :/. Either these large websites should offer real platforms or they should be forced to not pretend to do so, so we can actually launch and use distributed systems instead.)
Is this satire? Because I can't tell anymore
I've revised the naivety out of their 3 points at the beginning of the article

--------

In particular, many AI companies have:

1. Lower gross margins due to heavy cloud infrastructure usage and ongoing human support ---> Their product is actually an army of expensive humans

2. Scaling challenges due to the thorny problem of edge cases ---> Their products don't actually work

3. Weaker defensive moats due to the commoditization of AI models and challenges with data network effects ---> No truely valuable technology or systems
I mostly think it's because Angular is the whole package, it comes with a set of standards and concepts that you have to stick too. Where React still kinda lets you do whatever you want, it has the concept of components, but other than that there's not much to it.

We use Angular at work, just because it comes with that set of standards, we don't really have to introduce our own rules, but they're already there.
The point I'm making in my comment is that "Senior Software Engineers" are not making >600K in SF.

"Senior Software Engineer" is a role you can reach in 3-8 years of experience.

"Staff" is a whole different ordeal, a role many never reach. And even then compensation is closer to 450K; you might find some around 600K but those are outliers (whereas OP made it sound that >600K is something common)
Terrible? I'm sure free software was also considered terrible 15 years ago at Microsoft! In fact, more than terrible- it was perceived as a cancer!

Linux was sucking value away from real research in the form of copyleft (lost IP rights), financial speculation (VA Linux IPO, etc), hacking and other forms of cybercrime (don't they show nmap in the Matrix?)

But perceptions change.

The only thing that doesn't change much is the value created, as measured on the public markets.

Whether you like or dislike the morality Bitcoin (and there is more dislike on HN as usual), the market seems to indicate its potential is greater than an isolated dislike.

You are free to be like the Microsoft of the last millenium and consider Bitcoin as a terrible cancer. But I think your perception will change with time.
Huh? Are you trying to say it's okay to have an opinion? I agree, and that's what editorials are for, opinions.

Unfortunately, social media does not distinguish between editorials and fact-based journalism.
In Europe, and the comparison is even worse in $AUD
I think the reason for std::move is that the && function typically has a plain & counterpart (i.e. plain copy). Without std::move, the lvalue (named object) ends up calling that override.
You can use a lambda function that is triggered by a cloudwatch alarm when your bill approaches an arbitrary limit.

What you do in response to such an event is entirely up to you
I was also talking about total comp, and like you noted >300K is common for senior software engineers, but >600K is unheard of.