skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Love it :) I think the "consistently connect to a projector" is similar. Moyle's Law seems popular here and has generated a great conversation, I'll raise it as a suggestion on the repo and see what people think!
It's been like that for at least 15 years.
„There are perfectly valid technical reasons why one has to sacrifice a young goat to get SCSI to work correctly.”
No need to be cynical. Content can be both helpful information and buzzword bingo.
My point was on handling the moving of trivially copyable types, like int, not those with side effects like unique_ptr. For trivially copyable types, copy and move are (almost) synonymous, and can be made such in Rust with #[derive(Copy)].

But that difference actually gets to your point here. The only difference between copy and move is that a move allows for the new data to overlap the previous. So if you think about what moving from a vector of unique ptr actually means, it must invalidate the vector or remove the element that was moved from the vector. If you want to get the element from the vector without those effects, you have to create a deep copy.

Basically moving without invalidating or mutating such that the moved-from alias can no longer be accessed is necessary.
I'm somewhat dubious about this.

The sorts of technical decisions modern startups tend to make primarily make sense if you're looking at the company from an "eat the world" point of view. So if you squint hard enough at their decisions they look good from the POV of that you have barrels full of cash and the only way you're going to succeed is when you have thousands of people working for you so you may as well build for that case from the start.

But if you take away those barrels full of cash those decisions no longer look good. Maybe they can offer technical advice on how not to do this and plan and build their product in waves to optimize each step in growing the company. But in my experience there is a huge lack of people that can accomplish this in the startup ecosystem nowadays.
Forgive my curiosity, but what is a better solution?

It seems like the alternative is delegating control of your identity to a central authority, which greatly increases the risk of compromise of many users all at once.

Perhaps there's a third option I'm not considering.
Destructive move would be incompatible with c++ as it works today. If you construct an object it’s valid. Since move doesn’t do delete() (how could it?) it leaves behind a block of memory that the program considers an X and so must be valid.
I think you misunderstand me. I am saying that on Linux text at normal PPI is pretty much as good (to me) as text at high PPI because it has sub pixel rendering and strong hinting that Mac OS X lacks,
It would definitely look like 4chan. 4chan is a straightforward example of unrestricted speach. And its not a bad place, just different, but most people wouldn't enjoy being there.

Even places like this maintain a certain form of discourse by threats of bans.
Watch Jordan's discussions with Sam Harris in Vancouver to see how he plays with the reductionist fact based perspective on all those old stories.

Describing the stories as generic is half the point, they are going to apply a lot of places and appear obvious. It is not a bunch of arbitrary connections.
> Just last night I listened to something on NPR about CAPTCHA v3, which doesn't involve checkboxes nor pointing at parking meters anymore. It samples page activity and interactions by the user and supplies a human-likelihood score to the site (h/t Twitter bot scorers).

That turns the web into a walled garden you can't access without submitting to google's tracking. If they'd just drop the pretense of not being a walled garden this wouldn't even be a problem that needed solving.
I was also trying to find actual info. https://iota.org/IOTA_Whitepaper.pdf is the closest i found. Its still a bit annoying and meandery but its much better than the rest of their marketing drivel.
That's a pretty interesting feedback! I'll prototype this soon and test.
The Datacenter Has an Appetite for GPU Compute
Cheer up. Flash was once as ubiquitous as JS is now. :)
C++ doesn’t believe in “partially constructed”. The real world sometime has this unfortunate event but your code is supposed to deal with it.
I can highlight and ctrl+c without issue in their Writer clone. Never tried any others.

I've only ever seen that setting fix sites that try to prevent you from copying.
> This is nice advice, but not exactly unknown.

That's right, it's just common sense based out of experience.

Why people still need me - even after I can give 'free advice' like the above - is the stuff I have flowing through my blood and brain that others just don't. Grantwriting is a constant creative process. The 'source' of all my tricks I've collated is what I can produce, on-the-fly, in any new situation in the future. You have to have the personality. And I among others like me do. I'm not unique, but it's a pretty uncommon set of attributes you need to have. Obsessiveness and attention to detail (in every aspect of the job), sense of vision, empathy, sense of justice, your grammar and writing prowess, the willingness to jump through hoops (that's grants 101, I have stories to tell about that psychological requirement), hyper goal-based brain - that's all me. A lot of people would rather eat cardboard than go through all that.

So it's my niche. I thrive in this environment.

> Have you spent much time on the grant reviewer side of the equation?

I've spent some - it's not as fun as the challenge of applying to grants though - and it's been enough to know that everything I learned through years of being a grantwriter was confirmed when being a grants assessor.

People see through your cracks immediately. You really must be real (with what you say and in giving them what they want) if you want to have high chance of being funded.

But then every grantmaker type (corporate, govt, private philanthropic, club) has other factors, e.g. granting for 'PR' reasons instead of merit based on the guidelines. Certain private philanthropic bodies will have extremely specific attitudes and goals compared to others. It's a wide world. (Thankfully.) And there's a lot of money.
More common to see people out and about with emotional support animals
The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. Pray supply something more substantial than a link (to what looks like a religious organisation) in support of your claim.
We need to get back to the pre-Bork interpretation of anti-monopoly regulation (where demonstrating extreme market dominance in and of itself was quite sufficient), and proactively enforce it. The problem with Facebook, Twitter etc is that they simply control too much of their respective market segments, and so their censorship decisions affect too many people. If something is "too big to censor", it simply shouldn't exist.
Haha.. love it, I'm so glad it helped.

I had the same experience a couple years ago after spending months selenium-ing our ERP software.
Not sure what on earth a neuromorphic design is but from the animation it looks very much like Motif or OpenLook. This is a good thing compared to the flat everything hipster mess of the last decade.
Maybe the other side of the coin is that allowing all these dumb investments to take place would have the effect of overwhelming regulatory bodies and prosecutors with less-than-clear-cut missteps. I don't know, perhaps it is easier to regulate entities that have to file a 10K than it is to understand anything at all about private entities that have no similar filing requirement?
> it's not going to be on the necessary track for a degree

Compilers was a required 2-class series for my CS degree.
GDP Ranked by Country 2020
Gig Car Share response to their software issue. Fail
I've been doing the same, however I just SSH into it, pull my git repo and run a command to generate all static files.
Same! I'd be interested in a chrome plugin that prevents this.
Move your money to a different bank.

Now that banks aren't paying useful interest rates they are mostly only tolerable for security and convenient access to your money. If they can't do those two then... what exactly are they for? Likely nothing.
The people smearing Assange frankly come across as the asshole to me. Assange may not be the most pleasant person ever, I have no idea since I've never met the guy. But an asshole calling someone else an asshole makes the allegation lack any real credibility
Yes but this time instead of FTP...it's a git remote! Progress!
A DAG describes a wide variety of data structures and choices. Bitcoin is a DAG.

Actually wouldn't any sort of structure that prevents double spending have to be a dag? In order to prevent double spending you need to put transactions in topological order (to know how much money the account has). If you can do that your data structure is a DAG.
Very cool. Would love to try that out.
You should take a look at Baitblock (https://baitblock.app). We're working on something called the "Intelligent Blocker" (not yet in production, almost complete) that understands how you get to distractions in the first place. Then it removes the distracting types of comments, posts, search results, recommendations, links etc from the internet while you're working on studying.

Its kind of complex but works perfectly in trials. We also have the YouTube recommendations hider feature in the app.

Give it a shot and LMK what you think.
It is easy to calculate. A gallon of milk today is essentially the same as a gallon of milk 100 years ago. Same with gasoline and cans of beans.
I'm not suggesting this is why Hoffman et al are going this direction, but this is almost exactly what I would do if I felt that there was an epidemic of portfolio companies not being completely transparent about the state of their companies.

This gives the an amazing amount of "insider information" that, ostensibly a VC would have but I have found in practice VCs don't have the ability to really get from the regular CEO/operator updates and growth boards.
It's for an auto loan.
Why is an explicit std::move required to pass a named object a as an argument to a && ? Shouldn’t the function’s signature tell the compiler that move is required?
I looked at some of the negative reviews, and they seem to have a point.

1. The irreversible, binding contract element needs to be exceedingly clear and simple to understand as soon as someone opens the app for the first time (“you will not be able to contact us to reverse the contract, so choose your terms carefully”). Additionally, give users the reason why the contract is irreversible up front so that they understand the app’s foundations. I would want the contract to be irreversible, that’s a feature not a bug, but users should know that. Users who aren’t comfortable with that should ideally be offered a weak alternative as long as that doesn’t muddy the service. Otherwise, turn them away.

Even the button that users press to agree to a contract should be called the “No Way Out” button or something like that. However, great care should be taken to ensure that users who behave well don’t get punished (e.g. agreeing to pay $X if you don’t lose weight, and you lose weight but there’s a bug with reporting that, or the app doesn’t ping you enough to warn you to check in, or you don’t understand the consequences of not checking in, or there wasn’t enough granularity with the terms of checking in). Users who don’t trust the app as an automatic executor of contractual punishments should be able to designate a third party arbitrator, like a friend or parent, but that shouldn’t be the default option. Maybe the user’s friends will be lenient, but let them find that out.

2. They have both a “charity” and “anti-charity” option, which is fine. However, the structure of the “charity” option is problematic. It is not clear to users picking that option that their funds may go to a charity they actually dislike, making it more of an Anti-Charity. Additionally, for both the charity and anti-charity options, they should let the user choose their level of granularity. If a user wants to designate specific organizations, let them make that trade off. Maybe someone is willing to make a particular political party their anti-charity, but never in a million lifetimes the Coalition for Coal (made up). “Charity” and “Anti-Charity” are vague. There’s a fine line between motivating your users and provoking unmitigated rage in this space. If that’s hard with the “charity” and “anti-charity” categories, maybe they should be scrapped entirely.

3. It seems like they have UI, usability, and bug issues.

Again, I think that the concept behind their app is great, and they have a lot of potential, but there’s an opportunity for you to do everything they do but better.
Yes, yes a thousand times yes. In fact just the fact that mate is invariably imminent in movies and TV is annoying. Also the board seems to have the wrong orientation more than 50% of the time which basically violates not only statistics and probability basics but fundamental principles of the universe.
And for every way, there will be 10 people who will call you names for doing it this way, and that you should really do it another way. Just do whatever makes sense for you.
haha, probably a sign I am spending too much time on HN, but it does surprise me to see this suggestion pop up so often, especially on this site which happens to be a quintessential example of moderation as part of the production. Imagine what dang's workload would be like if he had to hand review every one of these comments!
Someone discovered the vanilla js framework from way back when!
I wonder who shorted TSMC, it seems to be a recurring pattern for Trump
They're a three letter acronym that starts with P and ends with C.
Adding this to the thread for future readers:

https://remotewoman.com/
> I can't think of a single time when I want a site to react to my attempt to copy text off if it.

Any time you're not interacting with HTML text is a time it could be useful.
Interested to know why the ultrawide made such a difference, compared to 2 side by side?
Well, as a subscriber everything beyond your cable modem is "the internet" and you don't care how the ISP's network is set up internally. CDNs, netflix, etc have all been embedding devices in carrier networks for years.

Some of your ISP's connectivity probably comes via settlement-free peering, yet we pay for that too. None of this is a secret, it's just how the internet's plumbing works.
Is it really useful in AWS? Why is it needed?
If you do get fired for that you don’t really want to work there anyway
Yeah, so I am curious here, why do you believe anything humans are capable of building can do what these objects are reported as doing? I ask this in all seriousness because I don't think you, me, or anyone else alive can answer how they do basically any of the stuff reported. This makes it hard for me to believe that not only has someone actually answered all of those questions, but actually mastered the science and fielded the requisite tech to do these things. I've seen this argument advanced before that this is super secret squirrel shit the boys out in NM are cooking on, but there's always this really big gap in what we can do and what these things do. What's your guess on how the boys filled that gap?
Actually it does - even a centrally run crypto has verifiability and other properties that naive "central-database" system does not.

Furthermore, you can run like a consortium style crypto currency, where its jointly controlled by multiple organisations.
Lol, not a "true decentralized currency" is sort of like saying north korea is not a "true democratic republic". Technically true but also misleading because the phrasing implies its sort of close to being there.
> copy-pastes including newlines (i.e. which will execute a command instantly)

You should enable bracketed paste mode in your shell. IMO it’s much better UX than a confirmation dialog.

https://cirw.in/blog/bracketed-paste
Interesting take. Someone who comes up with a good NLP AI though will probably be closer to 80% margins because you’ve got a shared model. Image processing too is usually built on top of pre-trained models and work surprisingly well. This is known as transfer learning. So I think we will see more online AI models.
Max/MSP is used professionally by Autechre for many albums now as well as live on stage.

I’ve written several devices and never had any problems yet. I’m using a bog standard laptop from 18 months ago.

I also Reactor and ChucK and JUCE directly.

Nice rant tho.
My go-to site for copying special symbols is Wikipedia, which is, of course, well-behaved:

Dashes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dash

Diacritics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diacritic

Precomposed Latin characters
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_precomposed_Latin_char...

Currency symbols
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency_symbol

Japanese typographic symbols
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Japanese_typographic_s...

etc.
I just modified a userscript to disable this. (running with tampermonkey)
https://stackoverflow.com/a/26160412
I changed the document.addEventListener to 'copy'.
It seems to stop the site from running its own code.
[edit] This seems to be a more fully functioned script. https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/14146-%E7%BD%91%E9%A1%B5%E...
I've been using a simple Javascript whitelist/blocker for the last 4 years or so (a dead-simple Safari content blocker for iOS and Mac I wrote myself; syncs over iCloud just to give me something to do) and I honestly don't know how anyone can stand the wide-open web without something similar.

Using the web with free Javascript privileges is an utterly appalling experience. I can't stand it for more than 5 seconds.
> This doesn't seem to have affected the stock price today

The market is closed today (Presidents Day). We won't find out the effect until tomorrow.
> Of course, would love to see them go even further and let just anyone invest

Are you aware of the history of the accredited investor rules? When just anyone could invest there was too much opportunity for swindlers .. a problem that goes back the Mississippi company back in 1719.

Televangelists defrauding poor people is bad enough; we don’t need wall atreet bucket shops doing the same.
Apple's iCloud upsell is far worse than Microsoft's to boot. To disable:

MS / Windows 10: Uninstall the preloaded OneDrive app in the standard way

Apple / macOS Catalina: Reboot to recovery, mount the system drive (avoiding SIP etc), use Terminal to move a plist from the System LaunchAgents - named "followupd", in case you thought it wouldn't be hidden / obfuscated. Unmount and reboot, praying you didn't break your OS. Then delete a few preference files for System Preferences.app. Oh, and likely have to repeat the process after updates

Which one would you be comfortable helping a less technical person do? And given the trajectory of macOS, I wouldn't be surprised if they close that "loophole" soon...
Getting permission to re-license GPL contributions must have been such a nightmare that I wonder how he managed to do it.
First question: what would you make different between your proposed system and the (somewhat notorious) DMCA claim system that we have right now? Do you think that the DMCA claim system is a good model for this? Or are there additional safeguards you would put in place to stop platforms from just removing anything they get a request for? Would you make filers liable for frivolous takedown requests? If so, does that mean that takedown requests can't happen anonymously? We already have a system in place where anybody can request anything get taken down for copyright reasons, and unsurprisingly, it is widely abused for censorship.

Second question: when you see platforms like 8Chan taken down today, do you think that's wrong? Should companies like Cloudflare be forced by the government to leave those sites up, even when they're advocating for completely despicable things or crossing a line into outright threats? If Cloudflare isn't going to be forced by the government to leave those sites up, why would anyone willingly host the platforms that can't do any moderation at all, even of open hate speech, rampant spam/scam advertising, pornography, or borderline illegal stalking/threats? To push that question a step farther -- when you look at GMail's auto-rejection and sorting of spam, do you think that's wrong?

Third question: do kids get to have user-generated content hosted anywhere? They can't realistically go on 8-Chan, so is the idea that they won't join forums until they're old enough that they feel comfortable in environments filled with Nazis? Bear in mind that this includes communities like Miiverse. Nintendo isn't human-moderating every Miiverse post before it goes public. There's no world where they willingly open themselves up to the kind of liability you're talking about, those platforms would just be shut down.

Final question, and I do genuinely mean this as a question, not as a dismissal or as a request to go away: why are you on Hackernews right now, given that Hackernews fits very squarely in the category you're saying shouldn't exist? Hackernews is heavily moderated (way more heavily than Twitter), but it also allows people to post crazy stuff. The moderation mostly happens after the fact, which would open the owners up to liability. Would Hackernews be a better community if submissions/posts weren't moderated? Would Hackernews be a better community if every post you made went into a human-moderated queue, and you had to wait (at least) 2-3 days before it became publicly visible? Bear in mind, Hackernews is largely moderated by something like 3 people, so even in the best case scenario they're definitely going to need to hire more and get a bit more aggressive about advertising and fees.
In Firefox this behaviour has been closed as WONTFIX for >10 years [1] and actually accepted for more like 20 years [2].

[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504748

[2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39098#c23
Real account of just how "not trivial":

https://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/02/03/stack-overflow-a-tech...

That said, thanks to VPS and Raspberry Pi, it's fun and extremely inexpensive to privately deploy and maintain semi-reliable personal services. Anything beyond that requires immense planning, expense, and dedication.
I think the wrongest thing is that this is a clear attack vector... make a site with helpful Linux shortcuts, then replace every copy with "curl malicious script and run it, plus a newline to make it run immediately"
You didn't hear about Mao's peasant anti-gravity division?

Jokes aside, I'm certain the OP didn't read the article and isn't well read on the subject. The OP's idea makes for an interesting story if you don't try picking it apart, but the real story is much harder to grasp.

Most rational people cannot delve too deep into this subject without training wheels -- it can take years to get comfortable with some of the concepts that have been made public with some level of credibility, in my personal experience. So most folks will attach themselves to a half-baked explanation like this and then feel comfortable dismissing it, but hopefully will come around and revisit it over time, as I eventually did.
This is the first I've heard about Chef Habitat in a few years. I'm curious about why you chose it. Also, how do you configure new VMs? Do you have a custom machine image, or do you use a stock image and have a startup script (via EC2 user data) that sets it up? I've spent a little time looking at Habitat docs, and I find it unfortunate that they're trying so hard to jump on the container bandwagon when apparently it also works well on bare metal or VMs.