skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You mean, like a CMD SuperCPU?

https://www.c64-wiki.com/wiki/SuperCPU

I hear they run Geos great.

If you want a cleaner ROM and a better BASIC, there's the Acorn Communicator: http://chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Communi...

Not a games machine, though.
Those are great features of a great language to program with, but when you are talking about adoption, you want good, easy tooling to expose the good stuff. When the first two chapter of the oft recommended Clojure for the Brave and True are just about setup and and long Emacs tutorial, you are putting up a barrier to using the language.
I sometimes think that they make it harder to discover content, so that it's also harder to discover that there is nothing you'll actually like. This will keep you browsing longer and starting some movies you'll stop watching. Shitty customer experience, but as far as I know they optimizer for time you spent with the platform.
Open the laptop up and reapply the thermal paste. It dries up over time as it gets exposed to higher temperatures, and then you get constant overheating problems as the heatsink can no longer cool the CPU effectively.
I have an intel chip from 6 years ago and I still feel there is hardly any reason to upgrade. It still does everything I need it to do very well. I upgraded my gpu that was about 5 years old and I saw about 3x the performance.
Use Shift + 'scroll wheel' when there is a (mouse) focus on the scrolling iframe.
Not full-time, but I have done a couple of a days a week remotely on projects for a few years now. It started by working onsite and building trust. All of it comes down to trust really.

I started doing one day offsite, and then totally remote. We built an understanding around communication and clarity (video calls > voice calls > slack > email) and the whole team had a strong vision around what needed to happen week to week.

I imagine it must be easier to turn an onsite job into a remote job instead of trying to find something remote from day one, maybe someone else has some thoughts on this?
The NSA used to intercept Cisco routers in-transit to swap them out for back-doored ones.

I'm sure they knew about these, that's the problem, the NSA "hoards" zero-days instead of alerting the manufacturers.

And then we end up with nonsense like this, and you know half of these won't be patched for years, if ever.

Tens of millions of Cisco devices.
The main problem has not been the language it was written in. It's hard going mathematically as well (for average graduate students at least). A few people have started translation projects, but gave up after realising that by the time they had translated more than a few pages, the French was actually pretty easy to follow. The maths, however, was not so easy.

It is really nice to see someone finally translated more than a whole chapter though.
I've been working remote and i don't remember this. Is it because you don't want people to talk to you? Kind of like avoiding eye contact with someone who is going to ask you for money?
The effects of extraterrestrial impacts on life on Earth
I'm currently at an office where some of it is arranged that way but some others are perhaps more hybrid into open-office arrangements that will works pretty well:

+------------+-----------+
D D | DD DD DD |
DD DD DD |
WWWWWWWW DD |
W BBBB |
W W BBBB |
W W DD |
W W DD DD |
W W DD DD |
+------------------------+

The open end is towards 'the rest' of the office, the W are walls, the B is a block that makes the rest seem like a somewhat divided area and dampens sound, has benches and TVs and whiteboards. The D's are desks, they are farther apart but it's a pain to draw them better. You generally find the same people at generally the same desk, but they can shift around as day-to-day partnering differs or if people want to sit together for other reasons. It feels much more like a 'larger' private office than an open plan office because there is plenty of blocking yet you can move freely and sit freely where it happens to makes the most sense at any given time. Silence and concentration? Most likely to happen in the bottom left desk block, want interaction and many ideas? Sit somewhere top middle. Want to have two different teams working together? 12 people can fit at the right side of the drawing, top to bottom. Yes there is a gap, but that helps give you plenty of air, carpet sound damping and room to walk around while you think. And when you do need a meeting room with projector and bean bags etc, the W-enclosed room is exactly that. The two single D-desks are mostly for people that need to sit close to us for a day or two and just want a bit of desk space. Right edge is a wall, top and bottom are windows all the way left and right.

I think that it's not as much the 'best' plan, or planned to work this way, but with the people that sit there (which is always the same ~20 people in different configurations) and a small amount of 'togetherness' as a team, you don't really have any of the 'open office' annoyances while still having a lot of the working-together benefits. Without the small B-block in the middle or the large W-room it probably wouldn't work.
Sorry, meant co2 emissions, not energy use.
Ok thanks, I'll take a look. It's possible for me to generate these files for each of the various material settings so I can manually 'diff' them, simillar to what you're describing
To be fair, the machines that took Z80 home micros into the 16-bit era were MSX Turbo-R.

https://www.msx.org/wiki/MSX_Turbo_R
People are not very good at giving critical feedback. People are not very good at receiving critical feedback. In the middle you have lawyers who must protect the company from liability.
This is why the Uber/Lyft rating system is effectively useless. Five stars is basically "was not unsafe", and four and below indicate significant safety, cleanliness, rudeness, or other problems.

If each star rating had a textual description of what it meant, and drivers didn't have to maintain something like a 4.3 (or whatever it is) in order to stay on the platform, the ratings would actually mean something.
Only in the US, in India, every medical procedure has a cost attached. 90% of the transactions are cash, and it would not work otherwise.
And yet normal people can still act narcissistically at times, and can do this more or less often at different stages of life or in different circumstances.

The OP could very well be a person just realizing that they want to focus more on others and this is a completely normal stage of life that different experiences or perspectives can help with.
As someone who liked to watch obscure world cinema Netflix makes it way too hard to find such things and to be honest their catalog doesnt even have a lot of such content anymore.

These two complaints are actually two manifestations of the same complaint. With a shrinking catalog, it is vital that the UI be nerfed in order to keep it from being too obvious just how little content there is.
the 402 has been fixed! Take another read!
We need to stop pretending that these missed estimates are a catastrophe. They're inventing new things, and there's uncertainty.

We'd be a lot better served, as a nation and a society, if we accepted these realities in the same way that our best businesses do. Instead, we're stuck with a Day 2 mentality, where the risks associated with grand endeavors are unacceptable because a bunch of whiners will complain.

The same assholes who whinge about the JWST being $4b over budget will happily cheer for hundreds of billions to be spent on wars or whatever. They're not arguing honestly, and we need to learn to ignore them.
Calling it 'conversational prostitution' isn't really an accurate analogy; or rather, it shouldn't be if you're taking the therapy seriously, though a lazy therapist/patient couple could certainly devolve into something more like that. A prostitute provides a luxury service; a therapist is more like a business consultant, as you are both expected to put in work to understand the problems and work together towards solutions. So, sure, you could try to find the solutions yourself, but you don't know what you don't know, or even if you do generally know what your problems are, there's still an opportunity cost in building up the psychological domain expertise to fix them 'in house', when you could expedite the process by bringing in an expert.
Correction: -n and -x are obviously mutually exclusive. Have to use -v instead.

curl https://example.com/setup.sh | bash -vn

As for trying to hide commands from an execution trace, it is not possible to hide the set +x command.

cat > 1.sh
echo visible
set +v
set +x
echo hidden >/dev/null
^D

cat 1.sh | bash -x

Output:

+ echo visible
visible
+ set +v
+ set +x

One can syntax check setup.sh before downloading it with -vn (or perhaps shellcheck). After downloading and reading it, one can observe it while it is running with -x.

The truth is that people download and run shell scripts without reading them all the time. For example, how many people installing software packaged with configure scripts actually read the scripts. (Except in the event they do not work.)
I wouldn't work for a nutter like Musk. He's out of control.
I think I would pick a topic that you're interested in because newsletters/podcasts really only work if you have the passion to see them through.
> historically Mexicans have been in the US forever

As recently as 1940, Hispanics made up only 1.5% of the US. Population. As of 2010, they made up 16.3% of the U.S. population (about 50 million people). As a point of reference, Canada has a population of about 37 million people and the UK has a population of 63 million people. So we have imported roughly an entire Canada/UK's worth of people from Latin America. As far as I am aware, immigration of this scale is basically unprecedented in human history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_racial_and_ethnic_d...
Hmm, I had in mind the phrase “insecure systems languages”, but I don’t want to get into a boring debate about what “systems languages” or “systems programming” mean...
Didn't this also happen years ago with the EU trying to force Apple to use Micro USB?

I believe Apple got around it by selling Lightning to Micro USB adapters in their stores.
Netflix now has much better sources of information than the self-reported star ratings.

Self-reported ratings fail in a lot of ways. Users can upvote what they think they're supposed to upvote. They'll downvote something, then go watch the sequel, because "It's terrible but I love it". And since they're seeking out stuff that they suspect they're going to like, they either compress all of the ratings into the top tier, or they end up "hating" things that they actually thought were merely so-so.

I suspect that even the up-down ratings get little attention in their recommendation engine. They have far more information, especially in the streaming service. Did you watch all of it? Did you watch it all at once? Did you watch it more than once? Did you watch it immediately after discovering it?

That's all stuff that users can't fake or be confused about. You don't get users saying, "Citizen Kane is the greatest film of all time, but I really don't want to see it." It's more likely that you can tease out what it is that a user actually wants to see, rather than what they tell you they want.

Netflix did run a competition back in the DVD days, when they had less interaction with the user. They did get a slight improvement, but at about the same time, they introduced streaming, and a whole lot of Big Data techniques appeared that could take advantage of that new data.

So it wouldn't surprise me if the up/down buttons were completely ignored by the recommendation engine. Maybe it's just a reminder to you: "Oh, yeah, I did see that. It sucked."

The new system clearly misses some things, but a lot of the problem is that the DVD catalog is immense and full of classics, but the streaming catalog is weak and full of crap. The whole thing may be back-ported into the DVD recommendation engine, but that's the redheaded stepchild at Netflix these days. They tried to spin it off entirely.
will they require to use the same charger (as now) 10 years from now? What about 20, 30 years from now?
I love how the news of it being changed is also on top of HN, /r/television and /r/movies right now (and probably more subreddits too).

Goes to show how hated autoplay was.
The problem with the up/down system for me is not my own ability to like/dislike specific titles, but more the fact that Netflix no longer displays the average of all user votes. Sure different people used the 5 star system in different ways, and there were some who may have misused it by giving poor ratings to things they never intended on watching, but it was a great signal to me for the extremes.

Scenario: I'm considering some odd looking sci-fi movie to watch that I never heard of before. Ratings between 2-4 stars might not tell me much, but very reliably titles with only one star were terrible movies. Now Netflix happily recommends any and all sci-fi titles, saying they are a "98% match" for me! Sure by category, but when the movie is a low budget dumpster fire I no longer have that instant signaling that the previous rating system gave me.
>You can't talk in confidence with any of your coworkers, so the only talks you have, the only things you say, are what you are OK with everyone nearby hearing. It hurts possible relationships/bonding.

very insightful. makes perfect sense. Even a mild joke might offend someone so you subconsciously decide to not say it in public, which definitely prevents bonding.
I have thrown away loads. I need 2 or 3 maybe. I would easily have 30 or 40 by now if I didn't regularly take them to the dump and chick them in the electronic bin. All of my wall sockets have USB charging sockets built in already anyway.

Often you get crap ones bundled with stuff anyway - e.g. 500ma or 1a output.
> It doesn't, you can download toolchains from swift.org or build them yourselves and load them into your old version of Xcode.

IIRC, the toolchain checks the versions of SDKs shipped in the installed Xcode and refuse to compile your source code if anything's not up to date.

> But you're not allowed to submit apps to the stores with unofficial toolchains.

Not sure this is true. Apple does not allow you to copy/run Xcode from non-Apple hardware. Other than that, submitting an app built with an OSS toolchain should be fine.
> I just don't see it

That's half of the point right there. You only know all the thoughts you will come up with. You go to a therapist because a good one will tell you things you never would have considered at all. Your mind has ruts so deeply worn you don't even know they are there. A therapist will nudge you out of them.

I've had a number of therapy sessions where my therapist said something about myself or my past that I literally had never considered in my entire life.

The other half is that good therapists have a lot of training in how the mind works and the tricks it plays on itself. They know to look for patterns where when you say X the problem is really Y, which is a connection you yourself have never made.

It's like asking "Why should I read this book? I'm not aware of anything in it that I don't already know." The point is that you don't know what you don't know that's in it. You can't accurately simulate a therapist in your head because your simulated one only knows the things you already know. An actual therapist will provide novel insight.
The OP link, of course.

Scroll to the GAAP section, earnings are under "CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS".

The GAAP loss per quarter is $1.096B, which comes out to $0.64 per share.
nope, that means for (take your example, MagSafe) to ever be shipped the EU would have to create new legislation for it.

That means you'd be unlikely to ever see something like MagSafe be shipped.

Similarly, for anyone to iterate on usb-c they'd have to get a new spec standardized, and then go to the EU parliament to get that new spec bought in. The moment that happens you're back to multiple plugs.

I still don't understand what problem they think they're solving with this - the first change is millions of cables and devices become defunct through legally mandated obsolescence.

The next change is what...?
First, really cool that you are trying to work on you. I am sure that path will lead you to something good.

Concerning your disinterest in people... approach everyone as if they were a teacher. Not only contentwise, but in any regard. Even people at the bottom of society can teach you something about their life by merely looking at them or by exactly analyzing how they talk. See human interaction as a way to learn and not primarily as some humility. Learning makes YOU better, which, in some way, caters to a narcissist trait.
> if you were worth it you could get an office

Well I'm not good enough to demand an office, but I like to think I'm on the upper half of the talent scale and when I'm job hunting I can be somewhat selective. The office style is one of my selection criteria, so companies with open plan offices are putting themselves at a disadvantage. It wont show up on a balance sheet but it will hurt them in the long run.

Typically companies with open plan offices have more "quirks" sending people away.
All evolution to get at this moment we realize an HTA's were not too wrong
Depending on how weird the format is, it might be more efficient to reverse-engineer the file-reading routines of that program which can work with these files.
Is it great that they did this? I think the EU has a lot of good qualities, but this might stifle innovation. Think about it...

What if I create a new charging cable that's super fast charging, 10x safer, supports massive transfer rates and so on and so forth... how do I test that in the market? I can't, because it would be illegal to sell it.

This is a law that, to me, seems good on the surface and potentially products consumers, but actually it prevents people/companies trying new ideas and using the market to test them.
Recently I was reading about the Aberfan Disaster in Wales. A huge coal spoil heap slipped and destroyed a school in 1966.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberfan_disaster
it's a real problem, but it also seems unlikely that we would have USB-C without lightnight, basically every generation of apple's various connectors have driven improvements in USB.
I see an age where our orbital space is so full of waste we can no longer leave the planet
Holy shit, that's my college prof from KTH who taught us Intro CS
I use a pencil to type on the keyboard.
100kg to space is a _lot_ of fuel, I think they'd notice. I'd be shocked if weight isn't checked on the launch pad.
Ahh because these two are decoupled. I am sure smartphone usage contributes a significant portion to CO2 then.
If you think of a therapist as less "surgeon for the brain" who exists to fix issues and more like "personal trainer for the brain", then it makes more sense to have one long-term.

It's less about fixing things that are profoundly broken and more about incrementally trying to make the most of the brain you're given.
Ahh, gotcha. Sorry for misunderstanding your point.
> … the US would have had the opportunity for a lasting victory instead of a stalemate.

I am sure I'm missing the point, but the US (together with the other allies) did achieve a lasting victory. It surely wasn't a theoretically optimal victory, but it was unquestionably lasting (for about 70 years, apparently). Am I factually wrong, did I misinterpret your meaning, or is it something else?
Narcissism is a popular armchair diagnosis these days but you haven't really listed anything that makes you abnormal. I don't know who you are but chances are you're not really in need of treatment.

So, if you feel that there are areas where you just want to improve how you interact with people, try ordinary coaching. You can learn how to become interested in what other people do. You can develop habits that demonstrate that you honestly care.

Find a good life coach, counselor or therapist :)
> Because we [rightfully, as this thread suggests] restrict border crossings.

We see plenty of illegal immigration. So much so that some people want to build a wall, as if that is a meaningful control. If all it takes is a country to be worse than the US like the parent states, then we should expect much higher rates of legal immigration applications and significantly higher rates of illegal immigration. The argument was that it only takes one metric to convince a regular person to move, and I reject that notion.

> Because homeless people understand that the minimum protections and niche lifestyle they have here are orders of magnitude better than a violent third world country.

Again, this is in response to the idea that all it takes to convince a person to relocate is for a situation to be worse than another situation. Theoretically, due to cheaper cost of living and less focus on technology/high skill jobs, Mexico or Central America would provide a homeless person more opportunity to at least survive compared to the US. But, since that is not the only factor in relocating, people don't do that en masse.

> Considering the difficulty of illegally crossing the border for a poor South American, we are seeing just that. There's another selection bias here - those who are competent are less likely to risk illegal entry because they understand life as an illegal immigrant is difficult.

And this brings us back to the beginning, where I don't think all it takes is a place to be sufficiently bad enough compared to the US to get them to move. It takes a host of factors, and some of those factors are personal drive and aspirations, and a fairly high tolerance for risk. Both of those align with an entrepreneur, which is basically the American Dream.

Thus, we then see upward mobility from these same demographics.
The thing with scope functions is, you are doing nothing if it is null, returning default (even magic..) value or throwing an unchecked exception, even though you want to force your colleague to handle his failure accordingly
> I'd say that incorrect sensor data is something that should be taken into account

I think that is the GP's point: MCAS operated exactly as it was designed, and it killed people because it was designed incompetently, not taking into account things that obviously should have been taken into account.
Absolutely this. This is exactly the same advice I gave earlier to defend against this SurfingAttack and yet somehow I was downvoted for no reason. Oh dear...
Hey, maybe it doesn't contribute much to the conversation. But it's a super rough thing, and dealing with your grief in the ways you are able to is super important. And as long as you're not taking it out on other people, which you clearly are not in this comment, I figure it's a good thing.

It's always amazes me when such an awful thing happens how the world keeps on spinning, when it really feels like it should just not be able to, but maybe there is ultimately some comfort to be found in that.

Anyways, I really have no idea what you're going through, the loss of any relationship is a very individual experience, but you have my deepest sympathies, I really do feel for your loss.
> NASA routinely launches things into space designed to last a few weeks that end up lasting for a decade or more because they are so amazingly overengineered.

i worked on some of those. they're not overengineered, they're underpromised.

and no, i can't provide a source for that because the whole point is to look good to the public. there's not a line in the proposals about how long things are _actually_ supposed to last if you want to ever get another contract.

if the delivery estimates were good, we'd see a nice uniform distribution about expected lifetime. instead we see everything lasting so much longer than "expected". if we're attributing it to the engineers, then that's bad engineering. but the discrepancy isn't the fault of the engineers.
How long does a company need to grow for? They are 11 years old and there is arguably only 1 competitor.
Hex, CMYK, Pantone-What’s the Difference?