skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You'd want to orient the ship to hit it bow first probably, rather than on the side where it could roll or punch a hole in the ship. But what Captain in a serious storm is not going bow first through the waves anyway? I don't know much about the industry, so that's an honest question - maybe deadlines and route optimization still plays a role and they will often sail at an angle to the waves, I doubt they would ever sail near 90 degrees in any case, but maybe you could change a 30 degree angle to closer to 0 if you had warning.
I'm making an open source .NET Core CMS where the UI is written in non-transpiled ES6 run natively in the browser - including imports through Javascript modules
Even e.g. A53 is in-order, and it's a 64 bit, pretty quick CPU (as seen in Raspberry Pi 2/3).
What's New in BareOS
Such newspaper articles are of limited use because they don't cite the studies they refer to. No one's gonna buy the author's book to verify her statements.

You also have to consider that women are sometimes bullied into breastfeeding even when it's very hard for them and that is the author's main message. Otherwise she still thinks that "breast is best": "Breastfeeding seems to improve digestion in the first year, lowers rashes for infants and is especially important for preterm babies. It also seems likely that it has some impact on reducing ear infections in young children and lowers the risk of breast cancer for the mother."

"Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect" - https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...
> I (am actually told to) teach that changing the business to fit SAP is preferable to changing SAP to fit the business.

That is my goto advice on buy vs build. If you buy, then you should be willing to change your business to fit. Otherwise you should build. The more you resist changing your business the more you should build. The more you don't want to build, the more you should be willing to adapt.
The "chroots doesn't offer any security" statement needs to be a bit more nuanced. A non-privileged process in a dedicated directory can't do much damage, and certainly can't escape the chroot without some sort of privilege escalation.

That does not mean you can slap chroot syscalls everywhere and call it secure, of course. But it is still an important part of dropping privileges, together with seccomp-bpf, control groups and the various ACL systems.

It is an important part of things like the OpenSSH privilege separation, where the early protocol is handled by a dedicated process in a read only chroot. It proven both simple and effective in practice, contrary to the idea that chroots are escapable.
I have a Wacom tablet. The drivers don’t install on macOS any more. There doesn’t seem to be any technical reason for this. It’s a USB device (“essentially a mouse”) and it worked fine for several major versions. Maybe it was a 32/64 issue.

You’d think if keeping users happy was their primary goal, they might start by keeping their existing USB drivers compiled for the current macOS.

They don’t need me to email them to tell them it’s broken under current macOS. They’re the ones who told me!
Excerpt:

"We also put a lot of hours into the modernizing of the legacy code. We replaced GNU Autoconf with CMake. As a result the source code is much easier to maintain.

Instead of 70,000 lines of Autoconf scripts there are now about 5,000 lines of CMake to look after – a pretty good result."
Right. The complaints seem largely about being unable to understand the map.

If rural western Kentucky gets 2 climate migrants and Chicago gets 100, this may represent a much greater increase in Kentucky migration rates than Chicago migration rates.
I always use LaTeX style equations although I think it supports MathML if you want a WYSIWYG. The LaTeX math is the main argument for it, mathtype is kind of miserable.

The reasons I prefer asciidoc to straight LaTeX are:

1) the formatting is completely seperated from the text

2) you’re insulated from the specific rendering engine (you can use PDFLaTeX or WebKit+MathJax etc.) while still getting decent equation syntax and BibTeX.
Lessons from big software failures. Fodder for “how could WE be that dumb?”
> What if investing in a company was in fact an act that bears consequences?

The investing market would shrink.

> Would it make people invest more wisely in things that are less damaging?

People are incapable of investing "wisely" enough in a company where they don't have any meaningful access to data or control over employee behavior, so I would say the answer to this is no.

> Would we hold corporations to a higher standard of responsibility?

Probably not, as holding corporations to a higher standard isn't really the job of individual, passive investors. Institutional investors might try, since they do so already, but you can see how successful that has been.

> A faceless corporation won't keep you warm at night, no matter how much love you profess to them.

I don't expect them to do so, so I'm think I'm fine here, but thanks so much for your concern.
...and his living costs are probably way higher too, so it's not a fair comparison.
I was amazed when I found out about this "trick" a year or two ago. It basically means that if you've used your personal email or phone number to create an "anonymous" twitter handle (e.g. a whistleblower, leaker, etc.), then it's not anonymous at all.

Someone can just put batches of emails into their gmail account (e.g. journalists' public emails, their employees' emails, other suspects), then use the Twitter contacts-import functionality to import those emails and match them up with Twitter account handles. It's insane.

I first saw people explaining how to do this on Quora a year or two ago, but here's another explanation that was posted just a few days before this announcement: https://www.quora.com/How-228/answer/William-Boyd-181

Twitter MUST have known about this loophole for many years. It's nigh on impossible that they are that incompetent, so, as far as I can see, they were just ignoring the loophole because they didn't want to slow down their growth by removing the feature. As with all social networks, the most important factor in keeping users is to quickly get them a network of followers and followees.

EDIT:

> "People who did not have this setting enabled or do not have a phone number associated with their account were not exposed by this vulnerability," Twitter said.

This spokesperson is extremely sneaky. They completely neglect to mention that the "let others find me by email" is checked by default, and so we can only assume that anyone who has a publicly scrape-able email somewhere (basically everyone, because you've got to count all the leaked databases too - see: haveibeenpwned.com) has had their Twitter handle linked to that email. Atheist bloggers in Saudi Arabia, whistleblowers in the US, opposition activists in Russia, and so on - all potentially fucked over (past tense) by this.

And while I'm ranting: What's worse is that they apparently haven't disabled that API. They've just removed a few big crawler swarms. But the thing is, Russia / Saudi Arabia / etc. probably have narrowed their suspects down to 500 (or so) emails anyway, so they can discover the heretic/activist in a SINGLE API REQUEST! So Twitter has done nothing to fix this loophole.
Nope, never heard that.
You beat me to it...I would agree that it has been a very long time since Windows Search was 'not broken' -- it is a painful sad joke.
Machine Unlearning: Fighting for the Right to Be Forgotten
Correct, thus my use of "almost always". For an example of an earlier dual purpose port, the Sony Ericsson line from 2000.
I hadn't seen that. It is a bit shorter, because you needn't repeat the source object. My e.g. would be

lim = getLim();
const {minimum: lo, maximum: hi} = lim;
Same here. It's incredibly striking to sort of see the pieces laid out in front of you, really _feel_ that they put together facts, but not have the glue you need to objectively/factually put them all together.

To me it feels like the "Israeli operative" scenario seems pretty legit.
I thought causality was a function of time by definition?
Two reasons: it's a standard form-factor, which makes it easier to work with and the additional pins hold it securely to the board.
> It is a public facing SaaS API which does not have much traffic in terms of requests, but would be catastrophic to be blackholed. So its that bad?

Well, depends on whether you have people that don't like you. For them it can be rather easy to stage a DDoS against your server and take that server offline for some time.

> Regarding hardware failures- have never experienced any so far, but guess it's just a question of when then.

It has been happening to me much less often since they switched most of their portfolio over to "Enterprise Grade" disks. These days I tend to go with NVMe anyway so it has become less of an issue.
No because you'll get black mold growing that will spread throughout the structure.

Maybe in otherwise dry areas, but I doubt it.
Haha, we had no idea -- sorry about the confusion
Sure, I was focusing on the blackmail subset of extortion, because (a) this posting was discussing their releasing of information and (b) they can't actually use any force or threats of force. Helping their users decline to provide tracking information on unless they and their users get a cut is also not extortion, because the website owners don't have a right to that information.

You seem to believe that owners of websites have a natural right to their chosen business model, even if others don't wish to help enable that business model.
I have stuff I wrote in the mid 90's. Mostly C code. It's horrible to look at.

I wish I kept the earlier stuff from my Amiga days.
The Chaos Programming Language
The same thing happened to me. But I was somehow able to create a new account on Microsoft Edge. It hasn't been disabled, but I don't plan to use it. If they want to kill their own business, I say let them.
RevOps launches the source of truth for your pricing
Poor man's RTG. Love it.
The focus on food was very distracting, I remember.
> I agree that Twitter using this to get people to give them PII those don't want Twitter to have, especially when Twitter aren't a good custodian of that PII is terrible, but it's not as though Twitter's other option (anybody can mint a thousand bogus Twitter followers with no pushback from Twitter) looks great either.

Third option: don't display follower counts.
>Neither markets nor democracy are perfect, but at least free markets are efficient.

Markets (free and otherwise) work against people's best interests all the time as well, in which case their efficiency is not a virtue.
> Its main use case is code close to hardware, where we still program C out of desperation, because nothing else actually works.

I think I'll stick with Ritchie's language over this fly-by-night invention.
Super Star Engineers
This analysis is also garbage and is typical what comes out of clueless single-dimensional thinking.
This 'research' doesn't take into account technological advances, human responses, infrastructure innovation that can happen while the oceans are slowly rising at 0.01 mm per day
It literally is Google's business. That's what they do. They're an ad agency. They sell you.
In 1903 humans first achieved heavier than air powered flight. Less than 60 years later, in 1959, man landed on the moon.

I feel confident that in the next 80 years we'll manage to figure out how to build some 6ft tall levees.

There will be little climate migration. People like living near the coast.
Dayum. Almost every designer in my team at https://draftss.com has a Wacom tablet.

I guess I'll have to send a company-wide emailer along with the above instructions. Thank you very much for your writeup.
Leakage is widely exaggerated. From what I read it's something like 0.1% loss from leakage.
Casper's IPO is officially a disaster
Specifically the square version of Kufic, which is apparently a more recent variant.

First, the style of Arabic that Larsson says she has identified—square Kufic—is not known to have been used in the 10th century; it only became common about 500 years later.

I imagine it's just like how, with the Latin script, anachronistic letterforms can be used as a line of evidence in identifying less-skillful forgeries.
TFA claims that "Marxist" is the wrong reading of this argument:

If instead, like Pistor, we attribute the production and distribution of wealth to a combination of legalized theft and an elaborately veiled ponzi scheme that moves money around without creating anything of real value, we are certainly speaking the language of the left, but it is a language with a distinctly populist tinge. A true Marxist would at this point interject that only a politics that grasps exploitation at its root, not in the sphere of distribution but in the sphere of production itself, can really offer any escape from prevailing conditions of inequality. But Pistor holds Marxism at a distance both analytically and politically. Understandably enough, she dismisses any prospect of a Marxist revolution against capitalism. Leftist populism, on the other hand, is enjoying a substantial vogue both in Europe and the Americas. And perhaps the best way to read Pistor is as offering a highly sophisticated program for a leftist economic populism.

ISTM your repetition of constitutional platitudes doesn't really address these points. Sure, we shouldn't take properties from the people who own them. Except... that happens all the time in this "best of all possible worlds". The way to retain one's property isn't to trust the Constitution. The way to retain one's property, and that of others as well, is to hire the right lawyers. Which may be the point of this book?
You are very nearly talking about the Intel Quark. They weren't very popular and Intel have since discontinued the line.
So what are some actual uses for these at such low power?
It is easy to mock the Australian army but when the Commonwealth needed them they answered the call. Same with the Canadians.
I don't have a clear position here, but why not? Shareholders can do their due diligence after all. If you are not directly involved in the decision making that caused suffering to occur then you perhaps incur monetary losses (either through insuring yourself or paying fines). This will of course, change the risk equation. Previously potentially profitable investments suddenly become non-viable because when you factor in insurance costs / possible fines, you can think more than once about funding endeavors by people which might be crooks.

If you were directly responsible for the decision making that caused predictable suffering, you can be criminally liable. You can go to jail. What is the problem with that?
I have seen so much discussion about coil whine on Reddit and HN and I have no idea what people are talking about. Maybe it's just me or I just got lucky, but I think this is a very vocal minority of people that are experiencing this. Perhaps it varies from model to model though? I feel like I'm pretty sensitive to high pitched noises and I've never noticed any sound emanating from my XPS 13 9370 besides what comes out of the speakers and the occasional fan spin up, which really only happens during the occasional Civ V game and firmware update.
Have you tried Stadia?

It's consistently sub-50ms latency (on my home network). Sure, the latency will never be acceptable for fast-paced games like Fortnite or Rocket League, but for slower games like Assassin's Creed or Destiny, it's not even noticeable.
Nice comprehensive guide.

I don’t know how relevant it is for HN users, I’ll still post my two cents for the general installation of OS’s and boot media.

• B A C K U P S!!!

• make sure you Have the correct bootmode Setup in the UEFI/BIOS and on wherever the image is written on.

• make sure beforehand that the devices (printer, mouse with extra button, etc.) will work as expected. Don’t take the support for granted, fell into that trap a few times.
Too bad that there hasn't been decades of materials science improvements, including and in particular to handling flammable materials, between some highly propagandized disaster and today.~

(Almost every modern cruise ship is bigger than the Titanic, imagine if people acted like the Titanic was the last word on how big a cruise ship could get.)
They would be unlikely to report an income stream seperately unless it was material. Materiality is a matter of judgement but most auditors would use about 1% of revenue.
The US has a higher gdp per capita than Sweden anyway.
Universal App Purchases Coming to iOS, TvOS, and macOS
It's absolutely normal to steam with little regard to wave direction in mild seas. Merchant ships typically follow great circle routes with as little deviation as possible.
I just put everything on Github, good or bad. I always try to keep code smell at a minimum, but I can't even recognize my earlier code anymore, like ten years ago. Doesn't look like I coded it at all.
Yet another instance of RedHat buying something I used/liked and killing it off and offering a shitty alternative. And yet another reason I've tried to avoid giving RedHat money over the last 20+ years.
But you are moving the goalposts now.
You:
> The article doesn't give even 1 example of that
GP:
> It does.
You:
> but They weren't supposed to.
Me:
They did though.
I never appreciate about how complicated this must seem to people until I read an article like this (holy schnikeys that's a lot of words!). Although I'm not sure someone who's running win7 in 2020 is the same demo that will engage in changing boot devices, boot order and annihilating partitions.

It's nice that they cover installing Ubuntu on a VM as an alternative to bare metal install, but no mention is made of just upgrading the machine to Windows 10 and installing Ubuntu on WSL.

I know that it's not what the article is about, but for me on a day-to-day basis, WSL covers 98% of what I need on a work computer, especially considering that you can lay different distributions down (Debian + Ubuntu).
I know that Google builds its business on the backs of user data. That doesn't change the fact that data regarding me or my machines is "none of their business" in the colloquial sense. That Google forcefully disagrees is what makes them a spy agency.
Worst case scenario is you wind up with T2D3 in losses, year after year, and get diluted to almost nothing.
I see that on the page for "Bose-Einstein condensate", in the section "Derivation". I don't see it in the "Derivation" section on the "Bose-Einstein statistics" page, which is where I was hoping to see an explanation (of what it means that it showed up here).

But this page has some of the desired info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polylogarithm#Integral_represe...

"For ''z'' = 1 the polylogarithm reduces to the Riemann zeta function:

\operatorname{Li}_s(1) = \zeta(s) \qquad (\operatorname{Re}(s)>1)"

And

"The polylogarithm can be expressed in term of the integral of the Bose-Einstein distribution:

\operatorname{Li}_{s}(z) = {1 \over \Gamma(s)}
\int_0^\infty {t^{s-1} \over e^t/z-1} \,dt"
Nobody in range, even if I increase the range.
There’s a couple of deviations from standard practice here:

- In theory, secured creditors should be ahead in line and always get paid ahead of unsecured creditors. In actual practice, sometimes unsecured gets paid something even as secured creditors take some loss. One reason is because you end up before a bankruptcy judge, and unsecured creditors can fight for their claim and tie things up, so the secured creditors pay the unsecured ones something to go away

- Related to above, security is usually fixed assets (like a factory), rather than posted cash collateral. Making derivative collateral special means it’s even better than normal secured assets-especially since your factory is a depreciating asset while tied up in court

So yeah, one way to look at it is 'security means you’re paid first, what’s the problem?' but posted derivative collateral under an ISDA can be actually better than normal security.
SEEKING WORK.

Location: Lahore,Punjab,Pakistan

Remote: Yes.

Willing to relocate:Yes

Technologies: angular JS, angular, es6, react, redux, webpack, html5, css3, sass, scss,python, Django, building restful api’s, git, grunt, mysql, postgres, redis, mongo, firebase, aws, heroku,vagrant,Flask,numpy,scipy

Email:abdurleo91@gmail.com

Linkedin:https://www.linkedin.com/in/abdur-rehman-8281284a

profolio:https://talent.hubstaff.com/profiles/abdur-rehman/portfolio

blog :https://medium.com/@abdur91

As a experienced full stack web developer having 5 years+ experience in multiple technologies,My main experience lies in developing modern web applications,preferably in angular 4 with backend in python mainly.The backend framework can be django,or flask depending upon the client's requirements. Having delivered many projects successfully, I know what it takes to build, lead, grow and maintain a web application
If your goal is to eliminate user complaints about this, justified or not, then just stop intrusive data collection entirely. Then you don't need to bother with obtaining consent.
More than a thousand scientists have built the most detailed picture of cancer
> As a sibling comment pointed out, it would by no means be impossible for Arabic cultural items to have found their way into Viking possessions

Sure, but it also requires time travel into the future to use a script that wasn't used at the time and won't be common for another 500 years, if it was to be Allah, they spelled it wrong (and got lllha), and even this is conjecture based on what they think the pattern would have been because half of that isn't even there and the band would have to be a lot wider than it is to fit that text.

These are some pretty compelling criticisms to which no good answer is given, especially the fact that the text is from the future, which gets no real answer at all except that she "does not agree" for reasons that are left unstated.

The white supremacists are idiots, but this just looks like someone trying to sell alternate history books to me.
Like most providers, it does depend. Some products are priced very competitively while others seem over-the-top. For smaller companies, the cloud is a cheaper starting point for many systems but even for larger organisations, there are savings to be made by outsourcing your servers. Do you know how much it costs to install and maintain a decent air-con system for your server room?

One of the other major advantages of cloud is that you can save a lot in support staff. Compare the wages of even 1 decent sysadmin looking after your own hardware compared to several thousand dollars of AWS and it's still loads cheaper. Hardware upgrades, OS updates etc. are often automatic or hidden.
Is your doubt founded in any research or more of a gut feeling?
Well, considering that global CO2 emission has been steadily increasing [1], and sea level rise tends to follow CO2 level, it's very unlikely that it will continue to increase linearly...

[1] https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emiss...
I legitimately thought this was just an Aussie joke.

Huh.
Voices of coronavirus patients: 'Wherever we go, no one cares'
I mean this question at face value because I don't want to be that guy -- what are the applications?

This seems like a very small amount of power with very specific and unusual benefits over other power sources.
Batten down the hatches.

Or maybe a herd strength thing where one ship detects and can send out an alert for others to redirect around the path.
In Norway we get the paternity leave after the mother goes back to work. It is just the man for 4 months. When baby gets sick/teeths then it must be the man that is there with baby 24/7. You are describing a support role. The Norwegian model forces the father into the primary role.

It's amazing and really really hard.