skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think we just need a security and privacy focused alternative that doesn't suck that:

- does all video processing on the client (e.g. as it's generated)
- optionally uploads encrypted video to the cloud
- stores encrypted video locally
- allows sharing video by downloading and decrypting that video on your device
- never stores the key in the cloud

Ideally, it would be a drop in replacement for Ring, but with the complicated logic done on the camera or your viewing device. I'm happy to pay extra for that, though I think it can be competitively priced. It should also come with an optional VPN device/service to access your cameras when outside your network.
interesting, has anybody here tried to use it? I'd like to hear some user experience!
I dont think a lot of people claim that the mother isnt most important for, at the very leasy, the first 6 months and up to 12 months. I took my leave at about 14-15 months age, and that was more or less perfect in my mind.
I think this is why evolution gave men nipples.
> What would happen if the only programming language left is C? Wouldn't we become better programmers and raise the bar so high that the bug count drops to 0?

Given that C was the dominant programming language for UNIX applications for over a decade, I think we can look to history for an answer to this question. And I believe the record shows that the answer is "no."
You'd be surprised how quickly they start turning into people by doing things like, you know, bonding with other human beings.
Nope - it really is about 20000€ the government gives to families.
The way I was always taught the Bernoulli explanation was that the speed difference created the lower pressure which causes the lift. So it seems a little circular, what's causing the low pressure in your version of it? Is it a mix because any time the flow separates from the wing it leaves a low pressure area that attaches the flow to the wing?
If I may interject: I believe you are both trying to make orthogonal points. calcifer's is trying to say that some features of Go are compiler intrinsics, and cannot be implemented as a library. You are making a different point, which is that those intrinsics are implemented in Go, the host language. Both statement can be true at the same time, but I agree that the terms were not used entirely accurately, causing confusion.
Async-Await Best Practices Cheat Sheet
I know it's just an example, but buying ford or bmw in this case just wouldn't work
"weird" but in a good way
Just looking at the picture I don’t understand how anybody could pose proudly with an animal he just killed. I just don’t get it. Maybe I could understand it if someone went out with his bare hands and caught the animal. That at least would demonstrate some skill.

This is nothing to be proud of.
If would be say the first 6 months the mother takes leave while the next 6 months the father takes leave, for a total of 12 months.

It just means they share the burden and benefits. What exactly is wrong with that?

I cannot say I understand your "entitled" question. Is anyone in principle entitled to anything? Does it matter? Why not simply do what works great? Does doing something need to have any other reason than that it works great and everybody is happy about the result?
I'm fairly sure you could change every colour you wanted in Windows 95/98
The correct implementation of this is to apply more personal liability to executives and directors making the decisions that lead to oil getting dumped in the ocean. When decision makers go to prison as a result of negligently bad decisions, they will not be as negligent as often.

Is that specific enough?
I think you mean stable. I’ve been more productive and happy in Elm than with any other language in the past 20 years.
Because most people can't go on a 6 month vacation no matter what the circumstance. And this is a much more critical event to another persons development than going to see Macchu Picchu.

And I'm saying this as someone with no kids, but I did have the displeasure of growing up with my family overseas at various wars throughout my childhood.
> I understand why there is a human need to hold someone accountable for everything

You're right, there has to be a balance between punishment and forgiveness.
Is it a volunteer organized event, really? IIRC, there is a non-negligeable number of staff nowadays. And an NGO that likely pays salaries.

Unfortunately, they do not report annual accounts to the National Bank [1] so I can't check. They do not seem to have financial statements online, which is a pity.

[1] https://cri.nbb.be/bc9/web/catalog;jsessionid=EB073167100A6A...
More importantly, don't iOS and Android track every app you open also?
That’s why these things should be national as far as we can support them. Healthcare being a perk of employment was a mistake from taxing only profit.
==Unless your company has thousands of employees and billions in revenue, Google/Microsoft/Apple processes are probably not for you.==

Then you probably don't need and shouldn't buy SAP.
Does Oberon have any major commerical usage? I read up on it a while back and thought it was a neat experiment
As an American, I find it hard to be patriotic about my country when my fellow citizens can’t muster up the political will to ensure any paid parental leave for most people.

Edit: changed parental leave to paid parental leave
Data Quality in iNaturalist Downloads
Turning Lambda Edge into a Software Platform
You can't assume nor demand every company can deal with an employee getting hit by a bus. Not every company is a big corporation.

Example: our childcare facility employs two people, and replacements are VERY difficult to find at the moment.
Supporting either party at this point goes against my moral values. Both parties support war (or other violent action) and I refuse to support any such action that isn't purely defensive. That issue alone is a disqualifying factor for me, and I care about more than one issue.

That said, I'll continue to support individual issues I care about, and I'll happily call my reps to tell them how they could earn my vote.
Regedit to fix windows search? No thanks.
I love this idea. Does anyone know what the compile-time performance is like?
> I certainly don't. Do you have a specific OS in mind?

Windows from 1.0 - ME, for example, would let you customize the color, font, and size of just about any thing you wanted. Starting with Luna In XP and forward, you got a few choices of themes, but you weren't really able to change all the decorations to whatever you wanted. Windows 10, for example, won't let you change the color of the text in window title bars without hacking the registry
I imagine special care instructions for children with health conditions or allergies would be useful as well.
What are you even on about? I live in LGBT land.

Copy-pasting unattributed quotes doesn't make you look smart.
> It would be easier to just to have a normal job such as being a software developer.

Sure it is, but there's a whole world outside of the US, where jobs aren't as easy to find, nor as well paying as software developer job in the US.
>Staying home from work is not free, and the cost of it comes out of my salary

So does every other aspect of caring for people (police, fire, education).

>but I'd prefer that negotiation to stay between me and my employer

Hey that works great if you are one of those people that is invaluable to your company, or can easily negotiate and move into a better job. Do you know how that would go for 99.9% of people?

"Hey boss, I'm pregnant, isn't that great! Can I have 12 months paid off so I can take care of my family?"

"Erm, how about 3 days?"

"Ok I see how this goes, fine how about 2 weeks?"

"No forget it, you're fired. I'll just hire someone who isn't having a baby to replace you. Good luck!"
Websites will have to charge their users upfront, instead of secretly with their data.

Some websites will earn their keep. I'm not shy about throwing money to my favorite streamers, the newspapers I enjoy when they have reasonable subscription prices, and supporting the game servers and hobbyist websites I care about.

Some websites won't earn their keep. The bazillion listacle (Top 10 ways to naturally cure cancer!) websites probably won't survive. I'm ok with this.
So is breaking and entering. I doubt most determined thieves are going to be deterred by something being illegal. Your typical junkie isn't going to do that, so you're mostly looking at attackers going after higher end neighborhoods or middle tier business campuses.
> as far as I can tell anyone with the presence of mind to decline it could do so with no adverse consequences

Makes me think one should try declining these kinds of agreements to see what happens, before accepting. As someone who also has an "anti-privacy-policy-policy," I wonder how many of these kinds of things I've agreed to when it was unnecessary.
Yeah, it's hard to quantify in any meaningful way. That's why I said I am not in a position to confirm or challenge what you said and all I know is that, for the most part, we can't really make scientifically supportable statement about the consumer world (by this I mean with actual published data from an authoritative source). We are blind.
As lng as the data in these spreadsheets goes back into SAP. If it doesnt' you can kill SAPs MRP. I saw that happen. Which is then kind of hell's hell. And then the spreadsheet-users complain about SAP.
YES BUT DID YOU READ ABOUT THE FALSE POSITIVES? ;p
The basic premise seems simple and not-wrong enough: External costs are not borne by shareholders, so they are not priced into the market. I mean, that's kind of the definition of externality.

Everything else is hot garbage, though. I don't understand why the shareholders are being dragged into this at all... Suddenly making millions of people partially liable for the acts of the company would result in nothing other than panicked crashes. Not to mention things like index funds suddenly becoming untenable -- imagine liability to the entire stock market?! And that to me is enough to confirm that this is barking up the wrong tree, because index funds are one of the best things to happen to the investment market for the average person.

The answer is to internalize the costs to the corporation, so that the market can properly reflect them just like every other cost. This works fine, and doesn't destroy the very nature of the market or shareholding.

EDIT: I mean this broadly. Not just carbon taxes and other classic examples of externalities. But also things like proper fines against damages discovered in court. Currently fines seem flatter than they should be. They're often enough to completely shutter a small company, but when scaled up often don't even negate the potential profits for megacorps.
> If we are not able to detect one of the OSI-approved licenses below, only limited package and module information will be made available.
I don't understand the sarcasm: if teachers and mail carriers were liable when their pensions were invested in terrible things, they would demand more say in where their pensions were invested.
You may ask, Why does nobody call atoms quasi-particles?

The original quasi-particle is the phonon.

Ultimately, it comes down to convenience. It's a zoo down there. Physicists have to impose some order to be able to say anything about what goes on.
Climate change: Trump and Republicans pivot from denial to “optimism”
Hence temps. Or they can redistribute the salary as overtime. If there are enough interested workers.
"taking risks" isn't even strong enough. "doing harm." a capitalist system is a system by and for capital, and if capital isn't held to account for harm, it will never do anything to prevent that harm (the harm is almost always inflicted on those without capital). in fact, there is incentive to do more harm if it is profitable.
or react/reagent and clojurescript :)
welcome to the shit show that has been present for quite awhile. at least this article up and declares its political while too many are slipped in under the covers and are very easily traced back to one campaign's or another talking points.

just flag every article and maybe enough others will join in and we can get back to pretending to having an agnostic view on this site
I originally bought mine for pork butt, it makes doing pulled pork super easy as you have to use spoons to get it out because it falls apart that easily. Then I found it made chicken thighs incredibly easy to cook to fall-off-the-bone. I did a smaller beef roast in there too once and the meat was more tender and moist than in the oven and was done in 1/4 of the time.

Last year I transitioned to 95%~ whole food plant based eating and used it a ton for black beans (I've since switched to low sodium canned black beans just for convenience) and now every 3 days I cook a bunch of peeled potatoes and baby carrots in it for my lunches.

I put in some water, hit the broil button to pre-heat the water and peel my potatoes. By the time I'm done peeling the potatoes and have dumped the baby carrots in the water is boiling and I go ahead and set it to manual for 16 minutes and put the lid on. 20-25 minutes later it beeps and I manually vent the valve and get my meal prep containers out, fill them up, 30-40 seconds to clean the pot and I've got lunch for three days. It's great!
The whole thing is a red flag. McGowan's ties to the Buttigieg campaign[0] are a clear conflict of interest. Whether or not there was malicious intent, there was no disclosure ahead of time. Now we get the conspiracy theories.

And I can't really blame people for theorizing conspiracy. The IDP and DNC should've vetted this company in advance and declined due to the conflict of interest.

Let's not forget that they were told not to go ahead with using this app (albeit for other reasons than the ties to the Buttigieg campaign)[1].

[0]: https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2020/02/04/us/politics/ap-u...
McGowan, 34, is married to Michael Halle, a senior strategist for Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign

[1]: https://www.npr.org/2020/01/14/795906732/despite-election-se...
I actually love this. I don't foresee it replacing JS|TS for major app development but this looks like the perfect fit for a certain subset of SPAs. The syntax does a wonderful job of describing exactly what is needed for that subset of applications
Does this quote apply more to going short?

I interpret it as a general 'warning' for any market speculation.
Bullying falls under intent, so that isn't really on point.

Who defines what insensitive means in a public forum? As a willing participant in the discussion, the onus is on you to opt out if the discussion makes you uncomfortable. Nobody is targeting you.

If the world has to censor all public discussion that may be painful or dredge up old trauma for some random person, then it is going to get extremely quiet.
I'm sorry you see things in terms of competition and curmudgeons. But I see your point, it's just another type of FUD: don't stay behind and adopt Rust because you'll be a curmudgeon.
But limited liability comes into play in none of his examples which is why he appears to be conflating issues. All of the examples he gives are of companies which had enough money to cover their liabilities (none of them went bankrupt due to the example misconduct). So it appears that the issue is with liability in general, not limited liability in specific.
> I noticed when visiting the US that breastfeeding was not very normal. Like they don't even teach it in a standard hospital.

On the contrary, that was one of the first things they teach after giving birth (apart from diaper changing). They also stressed heavily on the importance of nursing and set us up with a lactation consultant if we needed help in the future.
Which language doesn't.
I am Canadian. I live on the West Coast. Vancouver has lots of high expense rentals but move out from there and any of the small communities there are plenty of low cost nice rentals.
>>I (am actually told to) teach that changing the business to fit SAP is preferable to changing SAP to fit the business. And it's accurate advice.

Never worked with SAP, but spent a lifetime working on other ERPs, and would agree.

Your USP is NOT how you do HR, Finance, etc. Walmart's expertise is Retail/Supply-Chain Management. SpaceX's expertise is rockets. Backoffice is a cost centre, and the assumption (validated by decades of projects) is that you are probably (exceptions do exist) not a special snowflake when it comes to HR or Financials, no matter how much Sally in Accounting or Joe in Recruitment office insist.

As I've mentioned elsewhere on this site, the #1 success criteria for ERP implementation is whether you take it as an IT, or a BT project.

- Take it as an IT project, try to adapt a COTS system to whatever gobblety-gook of disjoint processes you have right now through a myriad of customizations, and you will have a failed implementation project which will be over-budget, over-schedule, and result in dissatisfaction of all stakeholders.

- Take is as a BT (Business Transformation) project, and adapt your backoffice processes to match the industry standards and best practices as exemplified in the ERP, and you'll have a smoother implementation project and at least a chance that some stakeholders will satisfied - though more likely to be VP of Finance or HR, rather than Sally & Joe, because Sally & Joe, while experts in their field, are humans who are resistant to change, but more importantly unfortunately in most companies are not privy to the big picture results.

It is absolutely true that most ERPs are hobbled by decades of legacy code; I would agree in principle that it's theoretically possible that a company could make their own ERP that is more efficient; but in reality, company's expertise is probably not making efficient ERPs, and in the end it would be seen as an IT project and no business transformation would take place - IT in service of business, after all. Even as a techie, my jaded/experienced view now is that amongst other things, when done right, ERPs provide drive and impetus for business transformation that needs to take place.

As a techie, I would agree with your students on probably all the issues they see with ERPs. But their USP is not the brilliance of technical design - it's the proven business workflow and processes that have been standardized over decades of experience across hundreds and thousands of real world enterprises. Students are also likely to see inelegance of code or even business processes in isolation, but may not have real-world experience to understand why some business workflows are the way they are; why processes are seemingly inefficient but minimize ambiguity, or provide traceability and auditability; and myriad other unfortunate but realistic real-world constraints, scenarios, and frictions :-/
> Is there any science to suggest that there are no adverse effects on an infant from having an absent mother?

This is a straw man argument. It's not possible to conduct such a study scientifically because it would be unethical and that's not what this policy is promoting.

Mammals are polygamous by nature and humans are no exception. We have only changed this in the last several thousand years and the benefits have been substantial enough that it's now the model in most of the world. I expect gender equality in the workplace to move in that direction.
> Not a freak, don't care for the infant stage. Happy to dote when they start to turn into people.

It seems like you may not care, but that infant stage is the most critical for bonding and attachment. You're potentially sacrificing your ability to have a strong or deep relationship with your children in the long-term, regardless of how present you are later on. But as I said, perhaps you're making that tradeoff knowingly.
It has to track interior pointers. The problem for them seems to be the mark phase, where the GC has to track down all the pointers either way.
You're projecting your own experience as if it's a universal truth for other fathers, but it simply isn't. You may even be an outlier amongst new fathers in developed nations.
Do parents typically work at the same workplace? How does this work across employers?
Programming Languages by Dan Grossman, I took it too. Pretty good course, and a nice intro to static typing and FP with SML. Also nice: the DrRacket part, I wasn't familiar with lisp/scheme-like languages. Also also nice: how you can tell he doesn't really like Ruby ;)
Why be responsible for your own actions when you can have everyone else be responsible for you?
> This argument is nonsense an innefective.

Yeah man, we should just go on like that, remove more and more responsibility from people until they are tame enough that you can just give orders and they follow.
Containerization is nice because it literally becomes a "write once run anywhere" kind of deal. If it runs on docker, it will run on any* docker.

The true gain is from container orchestration, ie Kubernetes. Scaling becomes nearly trivial. Resiliency is handled like a charm. There are so many pros to containerization with orchestration that libraries full of books have been written about them.
How to do an ethical sex scene
I'm totally OK with this if the ratio of punishment equals the ratio of the participation.

I.e. teachers go to jail for a few minutes, whereas major shareholders go to jail for a few years or decades.
Oh, I hate the phrase "best practices" in general. Reeks of cargo-culting.
> The feminist narrative, which governments seem to swallow, is that fathers don't want to spend time with their children, and force mothers out of their careers.

I think that is all in your head because you are so anti feminism.

Look we have been through this in Norway for years now. Reality is that many men felt uncomfortable making that choice because there was an expectation in society that staying home with your child was a mothers job and a silly indulgence for men.

Once we made part of the leave reserved for men, they suddenly had a simply argument for the boss "sorry man, we got to take it or we loose it."

It reduced the stigma for men to stay home with the child. It also changed how bosses viewed it. You could say it was a bit of clever social engineering.

> The reality is probably that it is primarily a financial issue. Fathers spending more time with their children means less money for the family, in most cases.

When you get full pay during leave as in most Nordic countries, that is not the issue. The issue was the stigma attached to men being home.
went last year. Many talks were so far over capacity you couldn't even squeeze in to stand, let alone get a seat. If there was a talk you really wanted to attend, the only way to have a good chance was to go and queue outside 15 minutes before it started, meaning skipping/leaving another talk. Glad I am watching this year's talks from home.
"Every embedded/kernel/driver developer know what they are doing"

If that was true, then we wouldn't see more memory bugs found every time academics test a new analyzer or testing tool on open code programmed in C or C++. Microsoft said 70% of the problems they saw were memory safety. Linux has a ton of them. Even OpenBSD has many security fixes for memory safety. Your claim is mythical in the general case even if some individuals working on small codebases can pull it off.

https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-70-percent-of-all-se...

https://events19.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017...

https://www.collicutt.co.uk/notebook/openbsd_bugs.html
> Personally, I find that this "gender equality" push winds up being extraordinarily anti-woman in effect, and whenever I see a man preaching it, I assume that he is likely a broken individual in his relationship with the fairer sex, certainly someone that I would care to keep far away from my daughters.

You could try getting to know people, instead of making broad assumptions. They might surprise you, and you might start wondering why you're in such a rush to assume things about them anyway.
I have yet to not see it.