skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Is someone else worried that the vision is not 180 view in the front ?

At 22 seconds at the stop sign, after the first car drives past what if theres a car that breaks the stop sign and ends up ramming into the tesla (as a human sometimes you anticipate this by seeing that the car is not decelerating as it is approaching the stop sign)
Given the national security aspect of this case you might be right, but in general a lot of dirty details about the hows and wheres of CP cases comes out eventually in court filings.

Exhibit A: "Mad Thad" McMichael / https://imgur.com/a/xr2IH - of "\things\dont click\cp\cp" fame.
You could do everything YouTube does, but better, and still have a hard time of it because content creators audiences are still on YouTube
Celebrities Who Have Lived in a Manufactured Home
It's complicated but here is a response from archive.is

https://mobile.twitter.com/archiveis/status/1018691421182791...
I think part of the issue is that their "very long bets" (i.e. AI and self driving) have shown enough progress to now be merely "long bets" now which increases R&D expenses and means GOOG is essentially doubling down on the future via "other bets" in lieu of nearer-term revenue.

Time will tell if that's a good strategy.
This kind of talk is irresponsible. Debt isn't free, you pay interest on it, you children might have to pay interest on it. Debt introduces systemic fragility. If the only way to grow your economy is rising public debt, something is fishy.
Exactly, same happens in other markets like consumer electronics or cars, people complain all the time that “things aren’t built to last anymore” but when faced with the decision they will just buy the shiniest one for the price. So who are to be blamed? Us the consumers.
Trayport | Software Developers and Testers | C# / .Net / react / WPF | Full Time | ONSITE (London and Vienna)

It’s used to help us build our cities, heat our homes, transport goods and power the device you are using right now. Trayport’s network and suite of trading products allows buyers and sellers the opportunity to trade with each other regardless of country borders. Our technology underpins ~80% of all Power, Gas, Coal, Emissions and Freight energy trading in Europe. We are a company that has a big impact on the world!

Yes, we're a Fintech company looking for software developer and testers in both our London and Vienna (Trayport VisoTech) Offices.

We've got a variety of developer and test roles open for a mix of skills sets.

For more details please visit our careers page -
https://www.trayport.com/careers/?
Yup. Once I got to the point I was considering adding support for range requests for streaming videos, I figured it would make more sense to implement a subset of HTTP. HTTP started as a pretty dang good protocol and I really hope we never full ditch HTTP/1.1 in favor of the newer binary versions. I'm all for progress, but simple things should remain simple.
I've only seen autopilot examples in places with uniformed and fairly good infrastructure. Self driving even in the near future will be a toy for the rich and geographically privileged.

That should trickle down during time, but the fact that a self driving car is still a car won't. We need better and efficient trasport and self driving cars won't chage that very much.
Here: https://web.archive.org/web/20200203154312/https://captcha.n...
MintTwist | Full Stack Developer (mid-level) | London (on-site) | Full time

MintTwist is a creative full-service digital agency based in Old Street, London. The agency takes on web design and development builds from clients based in London and across the globe. We have a lot of new projects which means that we are looking for a full-stack developer to join our growing technology team.

We're looking for a developer who has some experience in Laravel to help with, among other things, a large project using this technology. Any experience with SASS, AWS or WordPress is also great! We're looking for someone who is passionate and wants to join a team where you can have a really significant impact within a relatively small company (about 30 people).

Whole tech stack includes: PHP, Laravel, WordPress, MySQL, AWS, Atlassian tools, Nginx, Apache, JavaSCript, VueJS & Docker

Please apply here: https://www.minttwist.com/careers/full-stack-web-developer or reach out to chris@minttwist.com and let me know that you came from HN!
Cool idea. I was trying to sign-up with my Gmail for the free plan, but it doesn't seem to work.
He didn't say previous abuses didn't occur, he said he doesn't trust this administration to not have ulterior selfish political motives.

Edit: Also, poor form or not, I see the same patterns here as I do on threads about china and the people that took over bitcoin - votes up in increments, then all comments are downvoted multiple times in batches. That and lots of whataboutism.
Now I'm intrigued but I'm assuming something like jail/prison. :D
I believe it varies across co's. Here's what I found for FB

"Netflix NFLX CEO Reed Hastings and Peter Thiel both collected $349,151 just for being on Facebook's board in 2017, mostly in the form of stock awards. The other three members of the board made comparable amounts last year." https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/all-fun-salary-info-uncovere...
You are missing the name of the house resident as the first line. Once I had my mail returned to the sender because my parents-in-law did not put our name on the envelope.
They will probably make cuts along market segments, along horizontal integrations, along prior M&A; they will probably also, as in the Bell case, cut geographically.

The main obvious cuts for Google and Amazon are to fully split up the technical infrastructure and Web hosting technologies from the consumer marketplaces. For Google, they would force Alphabet to spin off Google Cloud along with Google's own datacenters into a new datacenter host, and force Google/Alphabet to purchase hosting services at arms' length. Similarly, Amazon would be forced to be fully at arms' length with AWS.

As an aside, Facebook could not be directly split up in this direction, but instead regulators would probably choose to unwind their M&A spree of the past decade, in particular spinning off Instagram and WhatsApp.

Your question now can be reframed: What stops Alphabet from becoming big anyway? Nothing, really, aside from the same regulators that have the responsibility of splitting them up right now. Nothing short of legislative action will work, after a certain point.
Are you asking if you can or should trade some holiday for more pay? Within whatever the legal bounds are, if any, I don't see why not. Note that local rules may require some minimum holiday, and some regulated professions (such as banking) may require time fully away from work to make hiding bad things harder!
Why do you need an extra room?

Laptops can go anywhere, and my living room is empty until ~4pm when my kids get home. I've been remote for going on 5 years now and routinely take my work laptop to the kitchen or living room (though I'll concede I need a quiet room for some calls/tasks that involve PII).
Searching "dash cams" on Youtube says otherwise.
It's actually quite simple: Nationalization.

Edit: instead of downvoting me, you may want to argue why AT&T is any different than Amtrak, The Postal Service, and the TSA.
CA TX FL NY are also the most populous states, in that order. I never knew FL was that big.
Right, my bad. Upper parent was about using IN and having return everything "but" 5 and 6. So here the select that will do that:

select mumu from kaka where mumu not in (5, 6) or mumu is null.

That will return everything, null included, except for 5 and 6.

But wait, there is more. If, for example, performance is the main issue here above query is quite slow. Even on an indexed table on column mumu, it will still do a full scan of the table before returning. How to improve performance in this case? Well, you use LEFT join on itself. Implementation is left as exercise for reader :D.
What Is the Difference Between a Junior and a Senior Developer?
In the lab for my second or third CS course, the professor was walking us through intro Unix usage, but he didn't take attendance so it ended up being just 2-4 of us showing up. After a few weeks, he cancelled the lectures and told us he'd just be around to answer questions, help with homework, etc.

The last lecture before he cancelled things was an intro to Vim. The next would've been Emacs.

And that's the story of how I became a life-long Vim user. :-)
It has to be disclosed, so you can look it up in the SEC filings. When Ken Chenault was added in 2017, his offer was $350k per year, with $50k in cash and $300k in RSUs. Jeff Zients received the same offer in 2018, except he got an additional $20k for being on the audit committee[1].

So, to answer your question, $350-370k / year.

[0] https://content.edgar-online.com/ExternalLink/EDGAR/00013268...

[1] https://content.edgar-online.com/ExternalLink/EDGAR/00013268...
Getting insurance can be done online in about 5 minutes and the registration at the DMV equivalent is your problem (as the buyer) afterwards and can be done anytime in the next 2 weeks.
If you have to divide your budget between UX and security, a bank focuses on security. Your favorite startup focuses on UX.
Necessary to what end? It could be necessary to maximize survival for the species, but that doesnt make it necessary to maximize survival for an individual.

It's perfectly possible our heuristics are muddied beyond necessity in order to generate variety in action, so as to reduce risk to the unknown for the species - even though it would cause a minority of individuals to consistently make sub-optimal choices. From a speculative standpoint, it's easy to find examples of people doing things that we consider 'stupid' but it pays off because of some unlikely event occurring in coincidence.

Reality has a lot of unknowns. There is no perfect model that could account for that. It's possible being hyper-intelligent (beyond our current ability) is (or was) a disadvantage for the species
Tell them you founded a job applicant filtering startup that ultimately failed because it couldn't parse whitespace. Then wait for them to laugh. Then if they don't laugh, get up and leave: I think we're done here.
The problem is the datasets are incompatible. Tesla's numbers are very impressive until you realize that it will currently only engage in scenarios which are less prone to accidents across the board.

As the number of situations where self-driving kicks in increases to include more complex environments, it's likely the numbers will shift.
It's a red herring designed to distract from the fact they missed ad revenue estimates by $800M.

Lol at getting downvoted. They missed on revenue and down -5% after hours. This is a fact, not an opinion.
nitter.net is down, so here is another Nitter instance:

https://nitter.42l.fr/Mantia/status/1223302649849597953

Source: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/Instances
I don't know, and I don't think there is a rule for that. It depends on what sort of impact the people at that company had on you and your career. I had a job years ago that I held for two years that I think back fondly on. While it's been about 10 years since I had that job, the people I met through connections in that job are still some of my closest friends. I don't think it's farfetched for others to have similar experiences, and then make impactful decisions to help their friends out when they obtain positions of power.
That's nonsense. The reason for low interest rates is so that Italy won't collapse. It's widely hated in Germany as bank accounts have basically zero interest nowadays.
Or, you know, pay for YouTube Red
The jitter artifacts could be removed by applying some kind of temporal consistency constraints on the network predictions. But such an approach will also definitely introduce a lot of edge cases where a sudden change is actually ignored due to enforcement of the constraint. An adaptive consistency parameter could probably work better, but it's non-trivial to have a meta-algorithm to figure out the paramter.
I've harbored a counterargument for a while against breaking up Google or Facebook:

Both of these are effectively surveillance capitalist companies. Their primary business is spying on people and using that data to target them for ads and other forms of manipulation.

When big bloated "Soviet bureau" corporations are broken apart the result is generally an explosion of innovation and growth in a sector.

Do we really want an explosion of innovation and growth in that sector? Maybe it would be a good thing if the surveillance capitalist behemoths are allowed to continue to get stagnant and bloated. If and when an alternative paradigm for sustainable business on the Internet emerges it would make them easier to displace.

Breaking up these companies would also vastly increase the surface area exposed via surveillance. Instead of two or three companies spying on us we'd suddenly have dozens of former divisions of these companies.

Edit: lastly I must echo others in their lack of trust for this justice department. I think this is likely to be a political cudgel deployed to force these companies to stop filtering out or de-prioritizing extreme far right propaganda.
Deflation is bad because it is a self-reinforcing slowdown in the economy.

The money gets more valuable and the assets get cheaper. so the incentive in every micro-decision is to hoard money and not spend. Why spend when the same thing will get cheaper tomorrow/next week/month/year...?

So, the key factor of the Velocity of Money declines, and the entire economy either grinds or crashes to a (relative) halt.

My understanding is that deflation is also very hard to get out of. Requires massive liquidity injections, and doing that without creating a crisis of confidence by overshooting is tough.

For the current situation, my working conjecture (w/o running hard numbers/models) is that the Great Recession 11yrs ago destroyed so much wealth/value, and was so deflationary, that the central banks may never soon fill the hole with new liquidity. The evidence is that despite nearly continuous quantitative easing and other CB programs, over a decade later, we're still seeing this kind of phenomena - they just can't create & maintain even minimal inflation. Not sure what to do about it, but that's what I see...

(edit: typos)
Iowa and West Virginia are bright green in all years. I guess no rich people live there.
>You can then appeal to YT directly (good luck with that) but in the meantime the claimant can issue a "strike" on your account.

Sure ... These "strikes" are DMCA claims.

"If they had to file real DMCA claims, these claims on obviously fair-use materials would disappear."

So your position is that YouTubers aren't disputing claims because they're scared of strikes, but also that if the only option was strikes then they would vanish? How do you figure?
AWS is comparable to GCP revenue not Google Cloud revenue, which includes GSuite (same with Azure whose revenue is mainly Office 365).
TX, FL (& NV) no state income tax.
One interesting thing is that North Bend is alongside a highway/railway/river. Even if there were multiple independent cables running alongside the river, I suppose a large landslide could knock them all out. There are railway tracks on both sides of the river though, and phone lines were often run alongside railway tracks (or roads), so even though it's one valley, two fiber paths should be possible.

Ideally you'd ensure geographically diverse routes for internet fiber, but I don't know how easy that is for legacy telephony networks.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/North+Bend,+BC,+Canada/@49...
> I'll do a little pre-buttal here about what kind of science we're "losing out on" by not pursuing more space: Building for underground or undersea habitats has significantly less research put into it than space habitation, so you'd see an equivalent boom in research/technology development that has dual use as we did in the 1950s likely.

This is so absurd. You aren't losing anything by pursuing more space. What's up with all the binary stuff in theses discussions? Why every time someone talks about no doing something, the argument are that binary?

You know you can do both right? It's not space or water. We don't have a thresold where we have to choose between one or the other. Research into underground and undersea habitats doesn't happen because we are unable to make them happen, not because we love space.

Our society is interested into space, just like you said, it's "sexy". It's also filled with potential, space mining for example is worth trillions. It's also filled with unknown, there's reasons why stars are so much filled with legends, stories and mythology. That's what make space something that sell, unlike underground or undersea.

So the alternative isn't underground or undersea research, it's no research at all.

You can make undeground or undersea research sexy. Go for it! I'll be the first one to support your cause, more research is always better. Please stop arguing for less research....
Quorn
> The dirty little secret that the successful don't like to admit. Plenty of people worked as hard as they did - the only difference between them and the "losers" is that they got lucky.

That is part of the mental challenge of being an entrepreneur isn't it? Maybe you'll make it, and maybe you won't. Maybe your hard work will be paid back, or maybe it will all be wasted on a stupid dream.

There is only 1 way to find out.
The Board of Directors is the most powerful group of people in a corporation. They have the power to hire and fire executives (including the CEO). They set the top-level direction of the company. If the Board isn't entrusted to address systemic faults, then I can't think of a more appropriate place within the company.

That said, FB is an anomaly -- Mark Zuckerberg has special voting rights that prevent the Board from overruling him on any question. So for that company, it really doesn't matter who's on the Board; Zuck can do whatever he pleases.
He may not need it ( for a given definition of need ), but he certainly does not have a problem with milking his presidency for all it is worth by forcing stays at his various real estate locations instead sticking to WH.

How that is not a more of an impeachable offensense is beyond me. But no, he can milk taxpayers money. The redline is if he dares to cross another power center..
Traditional public transit only works for the geographically privileged. If you don't live along one of the few transit routes in a city, it doesn't work, and even when it does it can be quite inefficient.

In contrast, self-driving cars scale quite well especially to rural areas. They are point-to-point and on-demand. Low cost to operate compared to traditional public transit means that even rural cities could have a self-driving car based public transit option.
> it's really hard for me to see me being better at it than a computer

There's a big difference between seeing and interpreting. The car sees literally everything and can maybe identify most things, but a pedestrian window shopping across the street isn't really that interesting and neither is a bollard. As humans, we filter out the unimportant stuff to focus on the important stuff. We can also pickup on subtle clues in posture, through eye contact and even through the driving style of another person. The car will see all this, even in people across the street, but it won't be able to interpret it.

Humans are still way ahead of anything close to autonomy in most situations and it will take years for anyone to get close to covering 95% of situations. Removing the steering wheel needs way more than 95% covered.
My bad. I had to click "I agree...". Maybe you can make it a bit more evident that I have to click that with a pop-up or something similar.
Almost all random matrices are nonsingular
Andromeda ? It's closer than you think !

(to the tune of The Specials' Enjoy Yourself)
Or they're all rich.
As you have implied in your example, humans cannot make observations about the present and reason about the near future. As a result, they must learn the consequences of any action by experiencing it.

So the situation is really much worse than you describe. Even if we invested in demonstrating the "soccer ball and child" scenario for all driving students, they wouldn't be able to apply the experience to tennis balls and dogs, or a child entering the road without any sort of ball. Teaching people to drive would require an exhaustive course in every conceivable scenario that might arise while driving. You can see why it's an intractable problem.
That would never work because only one of those things is profitable, the Ads. I guess also Cloud can be profitable.
I agree with the principle, but in this case it seems very easy to do the right thing in either language once you have done the hard work of designing a good API. The same goes for doing the wrong thing.
tl;dr

1. Here I present an elementary proof for a classical result in random matrix theory that applies to any random matrix sampled from a continuous distribution.

One of its many important consequences is that almost all linear models with square Jacobian matrices are invertible.

2. This is also relevant to scientists that want stable internal models for deep neural networks since a deep network is an exponentially large ensemble of linear models with compact support.
I exchanged cash in Canada before heading to EU for 10 weeks and the kiosk gave me all EUR500 notes and said it was all they had.
To be hugely successful, you have be extremely talented AND work extremely hard AND be lucky. Because there are lots of other hard working talented people out there. This isn't news, it's written in Ecclesiastes and it probably wasn't novel even back then.
I don't think this is always true. You could believe that something like Bitcoin is a good investment over a 10-year term, but recognize that it's volatile in the short-term, and so want to dollar-cost-average for that reason, regardless of what you think the broader economy might do. Some might even see it as a hedge against the rest of the economy.
Its clear this is so zuck can learn about cloud storage given that was his backup plan in the early days. He wanted to make a cloud storage company as I recall if fb went under. Now with fb workplace not doing super hot he wants to learn more about b2b and enterprise solutions.
Vaccines aren't that innovative, they just take a lot of trial and error.
Microsoft are not even close to the only company this happens to. The problem is a human one - as people change positions within a company, or leave a company, responsibility for this kind of thing can fall through the cracks.

Happens all the time, even if ACME is employed, and it's unlikely to ever stop happening.
The best divide is actually far less aggressive: Platforms should be split from services. Android and Chrome are IMHO the primary things Google should be forced to divest.

I am not sure you could (or even should) split Search and Ads, but there may need to be some significant rules laid down on Google's ability to tie their other products and services to search. Strict rules should be laid down on allowing ads to sell placement above trademark holders for their own trademark, as that kind of shakedown is insane.
Some of the video essay YTers have done this already with Nebula[1], some of the gaming YTers have done this with DLive[2]... So I think it's pretty fair to say people are on the same wavelength as you, whether or not it's economically viable for them to jump ship is still to be determined.

1. https://watchnebula.com/

2. https://dlive.tv/
DACA was a Presidential memorandum. What DOJ connection are you referring to?
alternatively, we could look at markets like the EU and China, and see how many vaccines they come up with.

Perhaps we are already in a sweet spot, and neither more or less markets is the solution.