skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I submitted it to https://talktotransformer.com/ , and eventually got:

----------------

In Season 9 episode "Homer to the Max", Springfield celebrates Susan's 22nd birthday. A mob gathers at the museum, which is filled with all of the statues of Susan. Outside, they have erected a yellow tree. Homer enters the museum and sees a giant statue of Susan. He tells his speech and when he's finished, this statue shatters into small pieces of clay, then fragments into more clay.

In the episode "Uncle Grandpa", Springfieldians recreate the "seven fat girls of Ancient Greece" who were robbed of all their hair and body beauty by the Greek gods.

In the episode "Summer of 4

----------------

Then I just wanted to see what it was "thinking about":

----------------

I am thinking about declaring it $B by $B, but that might be misleading because we still need to specify the bit width. After the bit width we need to use the same syntax, as the bit width depends on the number of bytes passed as an argument (but don't worry too much about that, because once we specify the number of bytes we'll check whether we really need a shift or not).

import pygame as pg pg.init() pg.display.set_mode(pg.HORIZONTAL) pg.display.set_caption('Test Bit') bitwidth = 15 colour = pg.Color( pg.COLOR_RED, pg.COLOR_GREEN, pg.COLOR_BLUE) pixel = pg.Rect(
Ask HN: Should I move in with my co-founder?
Hi everyone,

My cofounder and I started a company in April last year, and it’s all going okay so far. I’ve known him from uni for a few years now, and while obviously not everything is perfect we do manage to get along okay.

Now we’re considering moving in together, signing up for a year contract. But this really makes me wonder... is this really a good idea?

While I can see the benefits of doing so, ie. more opportunities to discuss ideas, iterate, etc... I also worry it might create a “too intense” environment, where there’s little space to breathe and think of things outside of our immediate business needs, which may decrease our productivity and create potential unnecessary friction.

I’m sure somebody here has experienced something similar before, so does anybody have any advice?

Remember this is a year contract... so yeah, any advice would be very welcome!
`.await` is just a postfix keyword. You seem to be concerned that it reuses the `.` sigil, but there are only a few distinct sigils available in the ASCII character set so having some reuse is quite inevitable even in principle.
> If that's the hitrate, then so be it

Pardon? That's awfully generous you're being with other peoples money. If that's the hit-rate, can you imagine what people could do with the money if it had not been taken from them in taxes? For starters you might simply ask, how many face masks could have been purchased.

Basic research should not be an ivory tower that is isolated from questions of cost vs. benefits.
That just indicates people are so worried about loosing their reputation on their main account that they resort to throwaway account for projecting their views thats just sad.
Any comments on my personal site? Things to improve?
My vague recollection is that studies so far have found mosquitoes aren't the primary part of any particular species diet but the data is incomplete. We are still unsure if we can pull this block out of the jenga tower.
The problem is if it’s worth $2 to send me an email then I’m worth a lot, so I don’t care about receiving $2, is rather just not receive those emails at all. I can just subscribe to the emails I do want, and would be happy to do that for no payment.
I’m still grateful that this feature is still available behind a toggle and not whatsapp using its smarts to decide what should be downloaded or not. But I can understand the desire for frictionless user experience because for vast majority of the population this is not an issue. If you hold something of significance it is upto you to practise and execute sensible security measures.
PFAS sediments in ice and ground layers, coupled with the insight into how PFAS-materials are made via non-natural processes should do the trick for many million years to come.
So basically you do something like Windows 3.x?
You can configure your IDE to warn of incorrect usage, and you can configure your compiler to flag warnings as errors. That will catch a lot of potential problems at compile time. It’s not perfect but it can be lot better than nothing.

Java annotations are better than Optional when you’re interoperating with Kotlin code, such as when you’re partway through converting a large codebase to Kotlin.
You can trivially initialize one to null by setting it to reference a dereference of a null pointer.

That's undefined behavior, but the big weakness of C is that undefined behavior nearly always compiles without even a warning.

(I was going to suggest that a dialect of C in which undefined behavior would never compile would be very useful, but then I remembered that it wouldn't be able to do integer arithmetic)
It seems from the article that they just wanted to extract money out of Amazon. Moreover, they never gave a single reason on why they didn’t want Amazon to have the domain.
Why even write this? It's yet another convoluted use of the term and meaningless for SQLite of all things.

Re: downvotes - what are people disagreeing with? That the term is not convoluted? That it's actually useful? That it helps to have more sub-definitions in an industry known for overloaded terms? I guarantee not a single person here has used "classic serverless" over "in-process" or "embedded" in their entire career.
The answer is either private organizations have to act with integrity to promote and coordinate 'proper news' - or there has to be social intervention. The former kind of holds true for network news wherein there is institutional control over distribution. But not so much in print, and definitely not on the net. In Canada, there's the CBC and they are considering subsidies for other news outlets.
More importantly, they let you safely not check for null (because with null-types, you should really always be handling it, because anything can go from never-null to null-in-this-one-case without warning)
It's true that unionization is not a solution to every problem; but what you describe is not the situation the GP post was describing: Pressure on an individual journalist to bend his/her professional integrity. With a union - at least, an independent and non-corrupt union (which is not a trivial condition by the way) - the employer would need to "go nuclear" in order to have his way; and the individual employee would not have to deal with it alone.
Inflection points aren't timing, you recognize them after the fact. Literally when was the last time the market changed direction and what did it do for 3 years after.

It doesn't matter if it goes down again, once you invest you stay invested. The rule was a simple guide on when to get in. Or you can just stay out forever.
The big vector units aren't the problem though. They're a consequence of the big complicated schedulers that most x86 cores are designed with. As long as the core has to be huge anyway, you might as well spend some space on more powerful math units.

It's possible to design an x86 chip with much more priority on throughput per square centimeter, with many more simple cores working together, but I have no idea how it would work out.
TSMC will be shipping 6nm / N6 this year, which is the performance / cost reduction of 7nm.

5nm is coming later this year, most likely the A14 Chip used in iPhone.

Not sure if that fits the description of "complete"
> As an exploit category, iOS sandbox escapes are medium difficulty.

Are there any published explanations of exploits that achieve this? Just curious what it would look like.
this youtube channel i like "Curious Droid" made not long ago a video on the subject

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xDK2LgSeyk

What Fossils Will We Leave Behind in 65 Million Years?

65 million years ago the dinosaurs died out, we only know of their existence because of the few fossil remains found. So what if a similar fate were to happen to us humans tomorrow, in 65 million years time what would remain of everything we had created and would there be anything be left for any future intelligent species to find.
Those are probably using a smartphone processors, the die-size alone of Graviton2 makes it desktop/server class.
Does that mean all traditionnel outlets are just bound to... Die? Because they could do websites with only quality journalism but they dont have enough people subscribing to do so. In the meantime they have to maintain the flow of content, content, content so ads will continue supporting them in the meantime.
If you add to that most of them are still paper magazines which are going down in sales and require it's own workforce...

Someone made a point in another discussion that traditional news outlets are no longer trustworthy and would have to rebuild somewhere else to get a new sort of trust. Maybe that's the way...
Not that hard, if there's something like a Tenant implementation.

Which would limit the scope of the "moderator" role explicitly to the tenant database.

Eg. https://martendb.io/documentation/documents/tenancy/

Fyi: The op, which i was responding too, was referring to using roles as const. Which is not dynamic :)
Indeed ... by the same logic they could conclude that eating any non-trivial amount of carbs is harmful because it's deadly to cats.
how old are your children? At what age did you start to teach them in how to challenge you respectfully ?
It’s nice, but not that nice. The type system is primitive compared to modern alternatives and the use of functors for generics is clumsy. Also multicore still isn’t a thing, despite it being just around the corner for years. If the type system was as powerful as, say, Scala and multicore worked OCaml would be my go-to language. But at this point, I think F# would be a better choice for new projects. And you also get to use Akka.net with it, which could be a major value add.
> Tax VC funding on non essential problems and use that to fund non-profit competing startups. The essential word here is problematic to agree on.

Not only are people going to disagree what is essential, as you say, but many things that later become essential do not start out that way. Personal computers were expensive toys for hobbyists. Google was a research project by a couple of grad students. An online bookstore? Why would we need that? Just go buy a book at Borders. And so on.
> so Dino A. Dai Zovi (head of security for CashApp) published code to do it.

Great! May be useful to decrypt also the whatsapp videos, mentioned in Lev Parnas' excerpts.

FTR, Just found that there are many other tools available for decrypt whatsapp in last two years.[0]

[0] https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=whatsapp+decrypt&s=update...
Skimming through this article, while all these IE features are cool, they seem to have been created with no common strategy or goal other than to make something that another MS team thought useful, like MSXML for the Outlook Web Access team.

The implementation of them seem to be totally inconsistant (sometimes weird nonstandard CSS syntax, weird meta tags, ".htc" files, etc. etc.), and very IE-specific, so it's almost impossible for other browsers to implement.

This is the real reason why they cranked out all these weird features: to vendor-lock people into IE.
You are the first person in the world who has a dialogue with me about this. Thank you!

Here are a bunch of solutions I use instead of complexity:

I hash with one time server generated salt for login:

http://talk.binarytask.com

I use Comet-Stream for real-time communication over HTTP:

http://fuse.rupy.se

And my latest finding is DPI for video:

http://talk.binarytask.com/task?id=2433316338364993026
Yeah I suppose we should not be surprised by that, I'm just curious whether the exploit 1) only gave access to data that WhatsApp would normally have permission to access, or 2) gave access to the entire phone regardless of permissions.
Mozilla has banned nearly 200 malicious Firefox add-ons over the last two weeks
I have seen that page for around 10 years or so (except the section that was added in 2018). The term has a very clear meaning and consistent uses within the docs (and consistent with my common sense understanding of the word too). It is not SQLite's fault that AWS and co muddles the water with their usage of the term
The article is from 2007, and explicitly calls out that the "neo" usage of the term is different than the original. If you scroll to the fifth line or so, you'll find the update. I didn't have to scroll on my device, though i can imagine there are some smaller devices that may not have that line on the screen when opening the page.
Yes, those tend to/always have at least two big cores, not only one. Having only one complicates scheduling needlessly.
> Due to end-to-end encryption employed by WhatsApp, it is virtually impossible to decrypt the contents of the downloader to determine if it contained any malicious code in addition to the delivered video.

I can't make any sense of that. The phone is the end in "end-to-end". It contains the decryption keys. Why would "the downloader" be any different to decrypt than the video? Also they show a screenshot of the video being sent through WhatsApp... but they're saying that the video was downloaded via some malicious executable? I would have thought the video would contain the malicious code. That makes no sense.

> Advanced weapons grade mobile malware typically installs itself to the root filesystem of a device to maintain persistence and avoid detection.

This report sounds like bullshit. It sounds like they looked at the cellular data use, noticed an increase after this whatsapp message was sent, and did a bunch of random stuff they barely understood to fill out the report. Their list of "forensic tools" or whatever includes like... grep. And virutalbox. They also didn't jailbreak the phone and look at the filesystem, so I'm not sure what they even looked at besides just sniffing the wifi traffic.

EDIT: I reread the report. Jeff Bezos' phone was not hacked. They are claiming that a video attachment in whatsapp contained a malicious executable that gained full filesystem access to his iPhone based on absolutely nothing other than the fact that his cellular data upload increased. Most of that increase happened almost a year later. The guy just started using iCloud photo backups or sent someone videos via imessage or something. There are way simpler explanations for why the media got his text messages. Like, you know, the person he sent them to showed somebody.
I treat it like speeding. I go five over. For that I'm also unethical. I also occasionally jwalk when there is no traffic. I'm breaking the law there too. Those minor infractions must make me unethical also. I can't justify either of those things either. I simply don't give a shit, copyright is just a minor and unimportant infraction.

How many laws are you going to break today?
Devil's Dictionary of Programming (2013)
If the US government wanted to protest, they’d probably do so in a far less incompetent manner.

>ACTO insisted on a face-to-face meeting and Marby duly got on a plane to Brasilia. He was in his hotel room in Brazil’s capital when he was told the meeting had been cancelled due to the political situation in Venezuela.

In the end the ACTO folks didn’t even care enough to meet with the ICANN CEO who had traveled all the way to Brasilia to meet them.

I can’t buy the Venezuela excuse, surely the ACTO gtld experts are not the same people who deal with Venezuela.
>Bezos did not choose the right company to handle this work.

I think that sums up the whole problem.
Capex as a percent of sales for the dominant cable companies is generally 15 to 20 percent. Why do you think there was no investment?
But to really get best results, you need that management on both sides of a chokepoint, and you still want every other link in the system to be oversized.

Fast links are a simple solution to a lot.
> won't play well with external libraries though, right?

1. Library use boundaries are indeed a place where you often need to "unpack" more complex types. But then - external library APIs do tell you whether they take ownership of pointers and generally what you can expect from them. And it's not so bad to write

lib_foo_function(my_unique_ptr.release(), other, args);

instead of

my_function(std::move(my_unique_ptr), other, args);

2. Libraries slowly adopt features of language standards, and typically lag behind. To be honest, though - this is going slower than I would have liked or expected.
Where does it say 2007? Regardless it's vague and irrelevant material.

Classic serverless has always been known as "in-process". The attempt at differences seems like adding marketing fluff rather than just removing the page entirely.
It describes an important architectural feature of SQLite.

Also, this page was first written in 2007 (or perhaps earlier) [1], long before 'serverless' was applied to things like Amazon Lambda.

[1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20071115173112/https://www.sqlit...
It doesn't say 2007 anywhere, but the page is clearly at least that old.

https://web.archive.org/web/20071115173112/https://www.sqlit...

I also found material from 2004 with the term.

https://www.tcl.tk/community/tcl2004/Presentations/D.Richard...

> Regardless it's vague and irrelevant material

It's not vague at all, the term makes sense to distinguish "in-process" from client/server models. The page also includes an explanation on the very next line.

> Adding an original timestamp to the page would've been 100x more helpful

Not everyone reading about a database product is a developer. A timestamp would not help anyone unfamiliar with the history of the serverless term. The alternative is to rewrite all instances of "serverless" in the documentation which is a waste of time. Modern "serverless" is a stupid buzzword and this page clearly serves as a protest.
I don't need HN critically, and there are alternatives.

Even if I did, let me clarify something. When I go to amazon.com and start looking for pens, I don't really consider the product listings to be ads at that point, even though each is obviously advertising a product. The listing is the content I am there for. If I go to a company's website to learn about their products, they are clearly advertising their own (first party) products. I'm fine with that.

Note that there is a difference between "an ad" and advertising. Characteristic of ads is that they are not the content you're there for. The real content is independent of "an ad", and you could block or remove ads and the real content would not suffer. Characteristic of ads is that they are not the topic of the site/content/video you're reading/watching (they might relate to the same subject matter, but they are not the topic). Also characteristic of ads is that they're advertising third party products/services, which again have little to do with the actual content.

If you removed a company's products from their own website, or the products from amazon's listing, then you'd be removing the content I'm specifically after. Does not fill my criteria for "an ad."

Now as to how this pertains to HN: HN was specifically created for startup-related links. So if they're advertising startup jobs here, they are very much posting the kind of content users would come here for. That would be actual content, not ads. Also, like a company advertising their own products on their own website, I think it is quite appropriate for YC to advertise companies they've funded here.
Adding an original timestamp to the page would've been more helpful than the updated section, or just deleting the page entirely. Or just title it as "SQLite is not client/server".

Nobody goes around talking about "classic serverless" instead of "in-process" which has been around for decades.
I'm not sure, this is the only list with detailed info I can find: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1itaohdPiAeniCXNlntNz..., but even that list is severely lacking in information, and seem to rely on official reports that have proven untrustworthy. I imagine the person I quoted got the information from his nurse friend/family in Wuhan.

Official numbers (2020 confirmed cases, 100 deaths and 49 recoveries as of right now) also seem very worrisome. That's a 20% death rate without taking into account that we still don't know the outcome of the remaining 1871 confirmed cases that has neither died nor recovered.

An optimistic person might say that confirmed cases primarily consist of those showing the most significant symptoms since everyone else would be sent away as there's not enough room at the hospitals. A pessimistic person might say that the government has proven completely untrustworthy and incapable, that the number is much more likely to be ~100.000 as reported by the two nurses, and looking at the many mental breakdowns of medical workers, videos of people collapsing or seemingly lying dead on the ground, the fact that the virus has already spread to numerous countries and throughout all provinces in China, as well as the lockdowns all over the country, then there are reasons to believe the number of infections and deaths are severely under-reported by the government.
"ponds on farms"

Do you even know what you speak of? You seem easily manipulated by propaganda!

What you seem to be references are people in the mid west and rockies that were creating "ponds" that were multi 10s of acres large with depths of multiple feet if not 10s of feet deep.
The tributaires to the Rio Grand are regulated by treaties with Mexico.
If left to do this, as more and more did, the water sheds to the larger tributaries would dry up.

The federal government has treaty laws that dictate certain water flow to mexico, ranges of water flow that we have not met in decades, RANGES OF WATER FLOW THAT WOULD STOP ILLEGAL MIGRATION across the rio grande.

"Congress did not create the EPA as an agency that has plenary authority to regulate environmental issues"

O K A Y, S L O W, P E R S O N.
T A K E, A, P I L L.

Congress regulates the EPA. If the EPA has authority to do anything then the current congress has allowed it!

YOU ARE A LIAR AND AN IDIOT.
Those are AMD Epyc 1 CPU's, which are built using a 14nm process at GlobalFoundries. Epyc 2 CPU's, which are significantly faster, are announced to be available at AWS in future, but aren't yet.
So, even though Greg does not use it himself any longer, it is still in use tompower the racket blog: https://blog.racket-lang.org
His internal team could have done better.
Seems like a PR price for GEM pawnbrokers.
> It's yet another

Actually seems more like the original than yet another. And also it makes more sense “serverless” as in “there is no server” and not as in “someone else manages the server for you”.
Muslims didn't kill 65 million people in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_casualties and 85 million people in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties
>> use that to fund non-profit competing startups.

Research is another matter entirely. I am only leaning towards taxing when someone has already thrown a product in the market for commercial interest.

If google is making profit or big enough revenue and taking VC funding to grow, then it will be taxed on the funds granted to create another non-profit search competitor.

That way, initial funding is not taxed but hacks to growth are.
Graviton2 based EC2 instances aren't generally available yet either. To quote the product page [1]:

> Amazon EC2 M6g instances are currently in preview and will be generally available soon.

[1]: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/m6/
I’ve seen similar studies done in the U.K., where in cities plenty of relatively affluent people live directly on very congested, polluted roads, and the findings were identical. IIRC they found the worst effects were on people who had been living there for 40+ years - and speculated that that was down to lead exposure until TEL was banned - however the impacts of contemporary pollutants was still significant.