skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Under SteamPlay, any game played using proton counts as a Linux sale. Therefore from a developer point of view Linux sales are getting more visibility and it becomes more attractive (or more justifiable) to invest in Linux development and maintenance.
I know many people who were more angry with stimulants, especially Vyvanse (According to my wife, I definitely had that side-effect).

However, one symptom of ADHD is something my therapist refers to as "explosiveness" which is a very sudden change from not angry to extremely angry and then often right back to not angry. Note that this can also be a symptom of bipolar, and misdiagnosis between the two is why they tend to screen for bipolar before prescribing ADHD meds.

This is not what I experienced on Vyvanse; rather my baseline level of "being annoyed at things" was much higher, so it was easier to make me angry.
Concurrency and Automatic Conflict Resolution
If you want to do something like DDG, proxying some other search engines results, a point of reference could be Ecosia, which publishes financial reports. It looks like they operate on somewhere in the range of 12M/year.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecosia
https://de.blog.ecosia.org/ecosia-finanzberichte-baumplanzbe... (in German)
He was both aware and vocal about it and tried to do something about it, but HP was not interested, which gave him freedom to pursue it independently with Jobs.
Phase it in slowly, make it a joint standard, that is a minimum requirement for compatibility. Have a planned upgrade path, and mandate backwards compatibility for 2 generations.
Practice helps, it’s just an uphill battle without meds.

There are many books on the subject of good exercises, and some therapists that specialise in helping adhd people.
This comment reinforces the OP's point: opponents of facial recognition seem to approach the world with a particular value system that includes a disagreement with several existing laws. Instead of working to get these laws changed, facial recognition opponents advocate bans on technology that would maken these laws easier to enforce. Why should they succeed?

> No street art

Good. Graffiti is a blight.

> No protesting

There's protesting and there's "protesting". Lawful protest will be unaffected. Unlawful protest involving criminal behavior will become much more difficult. Good outcome.

> No way to break away from the stigmas assigned you your face

In an age of background checks, your face is the least of your worries. Are you opposed to background checks?

> No speeding

Speed cameras already exist and don't rely on facial recognition to issue tickets

> No jaywalking
> No pissing outside
> No way to rebel

Why should people get to break the law?
Google has gradually moved from search engine of the web to search engine of their products.
A common trick to remembering someones name is to repeat it, verbally, when they tell you, and to associate that name with something or someone else, mentally.
Kevlin Henney: Old Is the New New (2018)
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to be aggressive. As someone with ADHD and a history of depression (misdiagnosed as having bipolar disorder at one point), this is an emotive topic for me.
Migrating from JavaScript to Typescript and declaring interfaces for classes and data structures forced me to put more thought into each piece before I start implementing. Now I’ve cleaned up a lot of old code I didn’t have much visibility over thanks to the compiler warnings.
> Generally speaking, we know exactly what we need to get done

I don't agree. I still don't know what I really want to achieve in life. I have a better idea but honestly a big part of that better idea is realizing the things I thought I wanted aren't things I actually want.
What if people don't want to volunteer this information?
A nitpick, but it doesn't help your argument when your analogy is a medical myth

> By analogy, if you would feed somebody ungodly amounts of cake day in, day out, it is no wonder if they develop diabetes.

No amount of sugar in your diet causes diabetes, type 1 or type 2. Being overweight and otherwise unhealthy, or genetic predisposition does cause pancreatic degradation.

If you eat cake all day, but have sparse genetic history of diabetes, get your other nutrients, maintain a good fitness regime and stay on top of your physiological needs, you are unlikely to develop diabetes.

AKA: Often you are inherently defective, and only secondarily a product of modern society.
As soon as you open the barn door for having ads at all, the floodgates will open. Also a pointless concession given Wikipedia has far more money than they need.

If Wikipedia ever puts ads up because of the bureaucratic WMF cancer exceeding donations, that's the day Wikipedia dies.
It's #4A412A, rgb(74,65,42), cmyk(39,47,81,67).
Is also be concerned about residual chemicals from the manufacturing process, and this goes for metal too. For example I'm sure the molds have release spray that can get passed into the bottle, same with stainless steel machine spray, oils, and greases. And the thing with metal containers is that it's slightly porous and the chemicals can permeate a bit which would then leach back into the water. Another concern is low grade recycled metals with previous chemical contact used to manufacture the bottles of produced in places like China.
This might be of interest to you: https://github.com/wbenny/ia32-doc
"It’s not a real disease like other diseases" is not a truth. Not being "a single thing" doesn't make it not a real disease; there are plenty of physical diseases that present as syndromes with no known cause.
The difference is that one system is designed to heal people, while the other is designed to profit from it. In a system designed for profit, poor people have little or no access to medical care, and anyone who's not filthy rich is at risk of bankruptcy when they're struck by an expensive medical condition. There's a drive to make healing people as expensive as possible, because that means more profit. In this system, people being unable to afford healthcare is by design. If you want better care, it's the system itself that needs to be replaced, because not taking care of people who cannot afford it, is part of the system.

For a system designed to heal people, the priority should be to heal people, and to make the cost of doing so as low as possible. In this system, when somehow someone is unable to access healthcare they need, it's a failure of this particular implementation of the system, and something that needs to be fixed. The goal of the system is to take care of everybody.
I use emacs, but I don't think lsp-mode can do all the refactorings which intellij provides:

Safe Delete
Extract Method
Extract Constant
Extract Field
Extract Parameter
Introduce Variable
Rename
Inline
Change signature

Refactorings are great, because you can do safe code transformations very quickly. If you get to know these features, it's hard to do without them.
Assuming at least two of the components are "idea" and "execution," if you start with a definitely super bad idea, you'd get an execution-independent (bad) outcome.
Technology is never inevitable and I don't put much faith in people that cannot shape their future.

If there is political will, it is pretty easy to ban public cameras for example.

The hardware is already mass produced and as cheap as it gets, but not everyone became as paranoid as Londoners.
It says 'might be associated'. Sounds like a correlation to me. Look, I'm not saying BPA is good (I use glass jars as food containers for that reason). I'm suggesting that this issue hasn't been thoroughly explored. I assume you can see that declining sperm count might be the result of excessive masturbation. It's not unreasonable to explore a connection to testosterone, which is a sex hormone, after all.
I read "The ugliest colour in the world" before I saw the actual colour and I had the exact same colour in mind.
Or you have it completely backwards, and ADHD people as a group seek out sources of dopamine because they're desperate for it.
Looks great, will definitely be trying this out. Is it available in Australia?
That’s because AMD licenses the x86 patents from intel and Intel licenses the amd64 patents from AMD. There are a few other niche x86 licensees (VIA, DM&P, etc.) that don’t make anything in the high end market.
I don’t think the EOL of CPython 2.7 should necessarily bother anyone using IronPython. It’s not like IronPython depends on CPython in any way, or is exposed to any CPython bugs or vulnerabilities. I can see it from a standardisation point if view of course.
Little Things Will Make You Go Broke Fast
The "my brilliant friend promo" effect
The question is whether the people in the Air Force who send stuff into space should have their own unit, or if the creation of the space force was just a rebranding stunt. The creation wasn't without cost; it gave talking points to other countries seeking to increase their militarization in space. It also increases bureaucratic overhead and might --- if they eventually become more independent --- cause integration issues.

Few dispute the military should have some people who do space stuff, many dispute that they should be on equal footing administratively to the rest of the military.

> For now, the 16,000 active-duty airmen and civilians who work at Air Force Space Command will be assigned to the Space Force, but nothing else will change. Uniforms, a rank structure, training and education are all to be determined, and for the foreseeable future, Space Force will continue to be manned by airmen...

> Meanwhile, U.S Space Command, which stood up in August, will continue to exist as a combatant command, similar to Cyber Command, Special Operations Command and others.

> Barrett will be the Space Force’s service secretary, as the service will be nestled within the Air Force Department, the same way the Marine Corps is part of the Navy Department.

> Eventually, she said, those services’ space commands will be rolled into Space Force, and those personnel will transfer branches. In the more immediate future, officials said, soldiers and sailors could be detailed to Space Force.

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-military/2019/12/21/...
They do allow some unicode chars like: ⏩⏪⏫⏬ and ⏰, I guess they are validating up to some unicode code point. Because most emoji are not shown. I believe this chap: ◿, the lower right triangle, U+25FF, is the last one allowed.
You're not quite disagreeing with the analogy, you're actually re-enforcing it. What you've really taken exception to, is the OP's perceived standards of 'hygiene'.

And between say 'medicine' and 'refuse collection', standards of hygiene and priorities can and will be wildly different.
I would love to know how many people actually fell for that. People who own bitcoin isn't your normal crowd but recent surges in the scams and hype, may have created a lot of people who are oblivious as to what bitcoin technically is but talk and broadcast it everywhere along with having invested a lot.
to clarify I'm asking about the meaning of dwm. The only term that I'm familiar with, and that shows up in google is
Desktop Window Manager.
> I don’t have beliefs - I have methods of various degrees of effectiveness that get me what I want.

It is a self-contradictory claim. You believe in your methods. You believe that your vision works by means of your methods, but how do you know this? Take a look at a your hand, all your mind get from it is a bunch of "pixels" from your retina, and by some means your mind construct a mental representation named "hand". How your mind had learnt to do it? Did it use bayesian learning or maybe it used some other mistaken method and your vision fools you? Maybe in the basis of your bayesianism lays totally non-bayesian vision? Maybe information about reality you have is not facts?

You fool yourself believing that you use bayesian reasoning. Mostly your mind thinks for yourself by itself, all you can do is to get into your consiousness some small part of reasoning and to check it with bayes. No one proved that it is possible to build mind based on the bayesianism. Our computational resources are weak for this. You cannot be a bayesian mind while you have no ability to reflect all the reasoning of your mind, starting with individual "pixels" from your retina as informational input and ending with claims like "there is no God".

So you are believing that you are bayesian mind, and therefore Aumann's theorem is applicable to you.
So the Iran nuclear deal is dead. North Korea has the bomb. And Russia is attacking the US political system -- and winning apparently.

Glasnost and the fall of the Berlin wall in 1990 are pretty much the benchmark for marking nuclear peace in the world. Given what I said above, you really want to hold onto your opinion that we're the furthest from nuclear war we've ever been in a long time?

And apparently in war gaming out conflicts with Russia and China, well... we suck lately.

https://breakingdefense.com/2019/03/us-gets-its-ass-handed-t...
Yes - from my experience managing bots, low IQ people and bots are pretty much indistinguishable, if looking purely at user behavior.
In JetBrains you just double shift and a small searchbar opens to allow you to type in any file name. It autocompletes so you do not have to remember the whole name. It is pretty neat.
For example Google's OpenTitan.
I think the argument is that relative value to an employer translates to absolute value to the employee.

The rewards of effort, ambition, and talent are absolutely diluted by that of others.
Registering Your Company in the USA
As always ... a relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/993/
Cyan is also adequately offensive.
The nature of Dunning Kruger implies that people who are not qualified to answer this question will try answer it.
I once booked trough booking.com

When I arrived the hotel had all my credit card detalis printed on a paper that was just sitting there.

Never booked again trough that site.
This will come out as cynical, I know, but I have to say that when I see people so excited about freely contributing their time and efforts to the product of a global behemoth, something feels off.
I know we all have a better free service as a result, but still this is basically free work.
If anything, Google has been the most successful company ever in convincing people to work for free (and hand over their data).
No judgement intended, just an observation.
> I think it is more useful to think "what is causing my ADHD behaviour?" Rather than using the explanatory model "I am behaving like this because of ADHD."

> The former can lead to finding models that allows one to mitigate ADHD behaviour. The later leads to the same thing over and over.

If you don't have ADHD or a similar disability, then in the best possible way, what you think is useful doesn't really matter. What causes my behaviour is that my brain is literally retarded - it thinks in a different way from the neurotypical one. Knowing that that is the source of behaviours is extremely liberating and useful for developing a good mindset for coping with them, as is explained in the article we're commenting on. Asking "what is causing it?" is the dead end.
Making games for the money is what matters at the end of the day, if you don't want to live on a rented room eating spaghetti Napoli every single day.

Those indie devs hardly do any support and QA testing at scale.
Excellent write-up and interesting story - thank you for sharing. I'm wondering about whether Buildium had to restructure itself from LLC to C Corporation prior to the first VC round (or subsequent rounds). VCs very rarely invest in LLCs ...
Exactly too late for me.

I've been there in October and the data was not updated yet. I took the bus (which was shown as being faster!) and got stuck in a traffic for 2h. I arrived at my hotel exhausted and frustrated.
Yep, it's pretty much in the browser!
I guess it may depend on a signal saturation. Some empty channels were relatively dim and sparse, and some screamed white morse at you. That picture is not exactly what we should have seen, for one I cannot count 500+ lines in there. It must be only a part of a screen or a non-standard resolution (or a very short expo that captured half-frame?). Couldn’t find a good one quickly.
Except that has happened multiple times across the industry's history, specially on the consoles, it is a know business factor to take into account.
With something as important as data at the border being farmed out to so many parties, I can hardly trust information can be kept securely with so many 3rd party relationships, especially with foreign firms.
The solution to that is to abolish or neuter your insurance companies like the us in the rest of the world did. The fact that a private for-profit company decides if you live or die is absurd.
> that's not about executive function.

Actually, I'd argue that it is. The other people's executive function is what allows their sensory filtering: they can almost completely filter out sounds their brain has decided is unimportant.
Not do homework but to give any basis for a claim that is actually quite preposterous - that women have in many instances have to deal with different things or preferential treatment or harassment on a platform where you can't even see the gender of the participants on that platform. What is the implication? That people who harrass stalk every single participant and somehow hack their accounts or otherwise analyze their speach or something, to first determine their gender, to then go ahead to harrass them? This is on a website where 99% of converstaion is about technical issues? Yes you would need to provide some evidence if your claim is this much out there, people are not just going believe it just because you happen to be part of a group.
While he is right I think Bruce is also missing the point here himself: he states that this law is the wrong way to fight surveillance – but that is not the stated goal of the law.

The goal of the law is to prevent the development of a technical reality in Europe, to which a Jurisdiction can only passively react. The technical space moves so fast at times, that reality has been made before the law can even start to think about what is okay and what isn't.

This time they wanted to say: "Yeah it is a shiny new thing, that would definitly come if the law stayed as it was, but it is such a hairy ball of mud that we ban it till we figured out what is allowed." Or phrased differently: it is so obvious for them that this is prone to abuse, they ban it first and then figure out how to deal with it in an adequate fashion.

So Bruce' idea that the goal was to fight surveillance is a tad bit to optimistic in my eyes..
having access to a vast, identified DB of DNA is a lot different than hiring someone to follow millions and millions of people to capture their DNA.
"There's no evidence" is a weird claim to make against a thing that is well known to have happened, to the point that it is documented on Wikipedia?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_M._Krauss#Allegations...

"ASU found that the preponderance of evidence suggested that Krauss had violated the university's policy against sexual harassment by grabbing a woman's breast without her permission.[30][31] As a result, Krauss was not renewed as Director of the Origins Project and the University moved its staff to a project run by planetary scientist Lindy Elkins-Tanton, formally ending the Origins project.[32]"
Still need to make it run on PS4, XBox and every Android version lower than 10 (Vulkan was an optional API until 10).
Matrix is like a bright teenager: they are full of promise and to be encouraged at every opportunity, but they also need to cut their hair and stop wearing CND T-shirts before they can be taken seriously.

(I’d add here that I’m a big fan and user of matrix, while being aware of its limitations as a marketed product.)

Matrix have shipped some high profile products to clients like national governments, but there’s little hope for traction with the general public when the riot.im signup process is so unpolished, and when the most common entry point into the Matrix system brands itself with a name other than Matrix.

Signal uses the signal website and signal app for iOS and signal app for desktop and refers to the signal protocol in all it’s literature. Matrix could take a leaf out of their book!

(Perhaps licensing the trademark would be a good start?: Riot -> Matrix Riot, Synapse -> Matrix Synapse, and move the riot.im functions into a domain that has matrix in it?)
That is true as long as the cost of lawsuits is higher than the potential gain from breaking the law.

Companies knowingly break the law all the time, reek in profit and send out an army of lawyers to pay some minuscule fine that doesn't impact their bottom line.

Fines that don't threaten to break a companies business are just ignored and basically written off as operating costs.
So only home owners are allowed to life there?

The only sustainable way to deflate housing cost is to increase supply.
Precautionary principle notwithstanding, this is framing the question wrong. The proper question to ask is: is it safer than microwave transmission at low doses like used in phones and wifi.
Those are already absolutely known to be unsafe. Just extremely mildly. (Likely not even carcinogenic given historical population incidence data.

Current evidence suggests similar impact for similar power high frequency transmitters.)

Policy questions are not somewhere we can afford ignorance and black and white thinking. Precautionary principle is only good if you're not stopping a better and safer solution with it for sake of conservatism.

See, 5G is not just washing everyone with radiation, it comes with widespread beamforming, which is likely to send lower energy through anything obstructing it. Skin effect prevents getting penetrated with the waves at low energy used in communications.

Those are extremely strong arguments and the onus is really in anyone that says it's unsafe to actually show it is, properly and without doubt.

Otherwise it's plain scaremongering to suggest "we don't know" when the consensus is "it's safe". Exactly the same tactic as used by some climate denialists.

Sample study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997488/
(Read all the links to see the whole story. And these scientists used a rather high energy level compared to expected. The current analyses suggest the studies - which mostly show effects - inadequate. There's a strong bias towards publishing an evidence of effect when there's none.
See: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6765906/ )
The US health system is not as regulated as in other countries where health care costs are much lower.

The software market is a very different market from the health care market. An unregulated software market may not quite be a free market due to monopolies and vendor lock-in, but for consumers, it's quite possible to say no to any software purchase. That's not the case with health care, where often your options are to pay or die. That means that in a profit-driven health care market, prices can be raised indiscriminately, especially in the case of the US where health care prices are often kept hidden, because the people who can afford to, will pay anyway. There's better margins in providing health care to the rich than in providing it to the poor. It's profitable to let the poor go without healthcare.

This makes the healthcare market a very poor market to let be government primarily by a profit motive. Of course health care companies in other systems still make a profit, but they are very limited in how far they can rip off their customers compared to the US.
Allowing any specific benefits to a single group, based solely on their own reports of their unreasonable experience, without any proof or any other information would indeed be quite stupid, don't you think? Should the society just give in to any group with any claim about their group identity, without any checking?

Also what does my name has to do with this conversation?