skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm convinced that the Model 3 interior is already designed for a self-driving future. The screen is meant to show movies not gauges.
I think OP is describing the mechanism that got us here, not endorsing it.
1) Great project!

Is there a simple way to install it without having to install Node.js or Haskell or Ruby? (I don't want to install Node.js just for it)

Is there a

apt-get install tldr

solution on recent Debian / Ubuntu distros without installing another additional package manager?

I mean even the bash solution:

bpkg ...

does not work out of the box.

(bpkg or brew or npm aren't installed by default)

2) Is TLDR linked with the project cht.sh? e.g curl cht.sh/tar? Does it share a common source of documentation are they two totally different projects?

3) Few people won't remember tldr.ostera.io (I won't)... Ok we have bookmarks, but still, it would be more convenient if we could just do:

tldr.sh/tar
tldr.sh/git_push

instead of having to remember ostera.tldr.io oh no ostera.tldr.sh oh no tldr.ostera.sh no...
I wonder where those people not living in the city go to work or at school...

Oh, wait!

Rome is a city with less than 4 million inhabitants, they become almost 6 millions during a normal workday.
A Simple Way to Setup/Build/Deploy React App and API on GKE/Kubernetes
That site isn't loading for me. I would hope that vapor-permeable membranes work (e.g. gore-tex). The only problem is that the outside of the garment gets wet, and they're not very breathable
The other elephant in the room is hardware acceleration in browsers. Fire up a Google Meet (or YouTube for that matter) on your distro of choice using Chrome/Chromium/Firefox and watch those cores shoot through the roof, the fans ramp up, and battery life nose dive. Now, try the same thing on Windows or macOS ... night and day.
What you are claiming is that the market is 100% efficient but history and just knowing how business work says otherwise. The thing is that resources that have been mismanaged by the market are long gone so you don’t hear much about them. For example Galapagos island turtle meat was a great industry until they were all wiped out except a few in a remote island. The market takes time to react, for example if you sell something that turns out to be toxic, it takes time for the market to react (cigarette industry).
Information Leaks via Safari’s Intelligent Tracking Prevention
Agreed in general, but there are some advantages.

> It's taxed every year, regardless of whether you actually earn any money on it (aka: sell it)

Property tax is generally lower than your imputed rent. In the US at least, there is a huge advantage of being shielded from capital gains taxes (up to $500k if married)

> Returns are relatively low, roughly in-line with inflation

This is market dependent. SF Bay is something like 5.4% nominally over the past 30 years, which crushes inflation. Housing prices in the Bay Area in fact imply heavy future price appreciation. [1]

Also, the high leverage position (which you point out cuts both ways) does drive expected returns above inflation. Especially with, in the US, interest being somewhat tax deductible.

Also strongest advantage of owning a house over renting is the stability you get. My rent can always go up, potentially above my ability to pay; my ownership costs (esp. in CA with prop 13 limiting property tax rise) only barely goes up. (and far less than inflation)

[1] https://medium.com/@usaar33/why-you-shouldnt-buy-a-home-in-t...
Most of the major auto makers are trying to sell various tack-on services to get that ARR honey. Car-based internet is one of them.

It's tough though: most people don't care about car based internet when their phone already has it.

It doesn't feel like anyone has yet found a recurring revenue stream for vehicles that has met any actual demand.
My company is also not publicly traded, but rest assured investors and analysts still attach a valuation to it.
Well, if you want another anecdote, I used to live in a neighborhood close to DC/Beltway, and my commute by car was 20-22 minutes.

By public transportation, it would be north of 1:15, because it takes 20-25 minutes just to walk to the nearest bus stop.

Maybe you can concentrate and do work on a bus, but I can't, so for me it's just wasted time (almost 2 hrs every work day, adding up to 400+ hrs/year). Having a car is essential (unless you live and work downtown, for which you're paying a premium, obviously)
Commend them for their wisdom.
The issue they're getting bit by now is that technically, MAX can't be architected the same way as older 737's due to the Flight Computer representing a single point of failure with catastrophic consequences.

Older 737's are fine having two separate Flight Computers with only one in command at a time. MCAS changed that. So they now have to consider significant hardware/software rearchitecture which goes beyond a mere

If(MAX){
MCAS();
} else {
otherStuff():
}

For instance, early on in the investigation, pilots had to use the NG simulators with manual fault injection to recreate the experience because the MCAS software simply wasn't there.

https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/newly...

The "newly-stringent" tests described are basically 101 level test cases in excluding catastrophic outcomes from a design, where you basically assume the perfect confluence of bit flips occur to ruin your day. If you've done your job right, that shouldn't end up being a problem.

Boeing didn't, therefore, it was a problem.
Yeah, that just sounds like a short term punt.
Our raid group (spread across Europe) has communications break down about 1 in 6/7 raid nights. Its quickly solved by swapping to US East but the latency is not great for our Eastern European players. We used to be able to bounce between Western Europe and Central Europe to avoid problems but discord recently pooled all the european servers claiming it would help solve issues like this, but it hasn't really.
Troubleshoot an SSH Session Easily
It's a common enough story. I myself have quite a few friends and acquaintances who are in your camp, including a handful of bleeding-edge adopters who bought model S's seven years ago and suffered through some of the company's growing pains. The difference now, I think, is that the people who are switching to Teslas are not early adopters.
You automatically get that if you visit them from the EU and decline tracking, it’s amazing :)
Regardless of regulation and body size, I would still prefer wider cars than narrower cars.
Made me think about the Skroderiders from Vinge's "A Fire Upon the Deep."
The Mercedes voice control system can't understand anything I'm asking for.
Offices don't bring in new voters.
If you're using AdSense, you're already giving Google your visitor data, no matter what visitor analytics package you use.
Why would you sell a scarce resource for cheap? Your incentive is to ride the supply & demand line.
Doesn't each project maintain its own man pages? There is a huge variation in quality between them with some being excellent while others are lacking.

Have you tried talking to any of the projects?
On the surface, 'user experience' is a good starting point to align Tesla with Apple. However, I look at the underlying product / service being offered to see if their trajectories should strongly correlate, and when analyzing this way they have significant differences in addressing their core product - which means the Apple - Tesla narrative should not be the defacto response.

Here's what I mean: Apple has always been about bringing computing to the masses. What happens with one person and one computer is Transformational (was never done before, changes society), Platformable (random people build on top of your core product: raw computation, frameworks, etc.), and Valuable to the end user (I now can communicate high bitrate, FaceTime, and low bit rate, twitter, messages real-time, all the time).

Placing Tesla in that same bin doesn't necessarily check the boxes. Tesla's product is personal transportation, and when you look at the three categories above, Tesla is not in the Apple echelon. Tansformational: the Model T was the first and we now have a 5 day work week because of it. Platformable: you can't build directly on top of the driving experience, only entertainment purposes. Consolation: Robotaxi's could allow such platformable-like characteristics - however, the robotaxi platform is discounted as it is not mass platformable as having a Mac, learning Swift, then publishing to millions. Valuable: Tesla's value is in 'a faster horse'... except we call it a 'self-driving car'. Transportation time will not significantly decrease just because the car drives itself. Sure, a faster horse would have been really loved because it was faster (i.e. I no longer have the stress of driving), but when it comes down to it... the core value of transportation is A-B.

The iPhone level change to me is coming with Flying Taxis. The platform side is still out - but as far as transformational and valuable - I see no greater impact on the 2020's than these flying machines.
This is only loosely related, but reading this brings back a wonderful memory.

At Hampshire College in the early 90's, I took a "Math Concentrators' Seminar" which was really a free-form math club with free pizza one evening a week run by an offbeat, charismatic professor whose name I forget [edit: David Kelly[1]]. I wasn't focused on math at the time and didn't have anywhere near the foundation I should have for the class, but the professor was happy to have me.

We spent hours just informally batting around diverse, fun math concepts, and one of the topics I remember best was all the fun and counter-intuitive properties of infinite series like this. In any case, this paper is really a treat. Thank you OP.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kelly_(mathematician)
Closest thing I see at a glance is the not-yet-available Ford Mustang-E. At bottom end, comparable to a Tesla 3 but $3885 more without autopilot, and ~1s slower (0-60) acceleration. For about same price, can get 72 miles more range, or majority of extra price for full self-drive.
Isn't such types of shenanigans SOP in many communities?

Not against options per se, but can see the arguments against implicitly hiding alternative behaviour. Many compilers fail to be simple, performant and provide the right incentives.

Again, never had problems adding experimental code (// TODO: Remove), bootstrap-code, extra debug-info, etc. Ie. Why you should want to prefer refactoring.
Got it, makes sense
The Bay Area is where it's worst, but it's essentially the same problem there as it elsewhere. Also, what people do down there has a ripple effect everywhere else. Where I live in Bend, Oregon, we see a lot of people moving up from California who either 1) made out like bandits because of scarce housing, prop 13, etc... and can afford to sell out and live like kings because housing is "cheap" here (for them, not for the rest of us), or 2) can't hope to afford a home there, so move somewhere like here seeking that opportunity.
The SerenityOS author makes fairly regular videos related to the OS, bug fixes, and other dev and life things. It's cool and inspiring to see a highly productive hacker do their thing on stream, kind of like watching Steve Gadd do a drum solo.
The two are pretty much comparable. Published numbers give the Tesla a slight edge[1], but they'll both sell well to the limited set of people who want to spend well-into-six-figures on a car boasting speeds they can't actually do legally.

That's not really Tesla's market, though. Tesla began there because it was a way to get large profits from a small number of vehicles. Porsche wants to stay in that market, but Tesla wants to sell larger numbers of mid-range cars at more modest profits -- partly because that's where the money is, and partly because Musk has bigger plans for electric infrastructure. They'll also continue to play in the performance range, because they can and because it makes good marketing -- even their low end models produce insane torque.

[1] https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/porsche-taycan-turbo-4s-t...
> I don't know why people in this thread seem to think that Turkey is a poor developing country.

In the EU, there is a lot of prejudice against Turkish people because of the decades of immigration. Think of how most Americans stereotype Mexico and Mexican people, and that's roughly how many people in the EU regard Turkey.

In the US people don't really know anything about Turkey, aside from a vague idea that it's "middle eastern". Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if a huge percentage of Americans think Turkey is all deserts and they speak Arabic.
A friend of mine used to be a rather... prolific graffiti artist and he once explained to me how, once he's up on a scaffold somewhere, he can basically do whatever he wants because nobody bothers to look up. So I'd say it's true in real life too.
Cadillac's Super Cruise and Tesla's autopilot are very different systems. Super Cruise relies on detailed Lidar maps, cameras, and radar to function and will only function on scanned limited access highways. It's like operating a slot car on a closed track.

From a software and sophistication perspective, Autopilot is a more advanced system that improves over time. It uses Machine Learning and other advanced techniques to read the road and comprehend it in a way that Super Cruise does not. It does not have the operational limitations that Super Cruise does.

Functionally Super Cruise works well, it's debatable if it performs better. Most reviews I've read of the two systems, from 2 years ago, found them to be functionally comparable at the time. The primary difference is that it Super Cruise is more akin to a flip phone with fixed functionality that won't grow over time, AutoPilot is more like a smartphone that is updated overtime to expand it's capability.
maybe tech companies, but not any company.

coca-cola is still going strong. so is BNSF railway. so is McDonalds.

i mean, i could go on here with more counter examples if you want?
> browser

> zero-friction environment

Giggle.
Anybody ever heard of server logs?
> Housing works as an investment because everyone is in on the scheme.

Does that not apply to most investments? The stock market, aftre all, only works as an investment because everyone is in on an elaborate confidence game.
Is there a link to your hiring page? I'm not seeing one on roamresearch.com
Surely you're missing something about having highest paying jobs concentrated in a few cities where lots of people want to move to. Most of American has cheap housing, just many people would rather move to the most expensive places (which is why they're expensive).
> Introduce laws that make it harder to (legally) build housing. Note that much of New York would be illegal to build today, for instance.

This really, really bothers me. The fact that we let our elected officials blame everybody else except them is part of the problem.

They’re interesting in preserving their power (via ask-first permitting and other laws and red tape). They’re not at ALL interested in increasing the supply of housing. Don’t believe them and vote out every single one that lies to you.
Freeman's Mind predates Black Mesa by almost a decade.
Is Japan the top crypto destination to watch out for in 2020?
That doesn't preclude them from including examples of the most commonly used flags and scenarios.

Man pages for newer tools, like all of the lvm utilities, include examples at the end.

I would like to see it similar to what powershell has with their examples built into the documentation.
I'm not sure you understand how the BEV tax credit works. First of all, it's the customer that gets the refund NOT Tesla.

Second, the buyer has to owe enough in liabilities to be even be eligible for it.
Ideally this information would be controlled by the individual package maintainers, I agree.

However, realistically at the moment I don't see man pages competing with the spirit of tldr/bro/whatever, and I suspect that PRs geared towards making them compete would in fact be rejected by most projects.
> On HN maybe, every local forum or town-hall I've seen it's the other way around.

You may be right! I spend too much time in HN and reddit, and no time at all in forums and town halls. Perhaps my view is warped.
By any chance does anyone else have an extra invite?
I tried Matomo (Piwik) recently, but I only do log analysis and it doesn't really treat log access as a first class citizen. If you use Javascript tracking, it's probably the right way to go.

I switched back to AWStats for my personal stuff. It's probably too basic for business or company apps, but for your personal stuff without javascript/cookies, it's still a great analytics tool.
The Meaning of Margaret Mead
Are there any Home "Appliance" that make Distillation simple.

Instead of rather expensive filtering that requires you to buy filter every now and then in recurring cost.
By threads I meant the corresponding runtime thread (not OS thread) on each platform. In Elixir they're called processes, in Haskell (green) threads.

Both Haskell and Elixir web frameworks spawn a new thread for each web request they receive. Those threads on both platforms are very lightweight. You end up writing mostly synchronous code on both platforms for handlers that perform the work for those web requests. In some typical smaller API I may not have even a single piece of async code (async statement/expression) on either of those platforms, it's all synchronous in terms of code. It's all thanks to the execution running in its own thread.

I don't understand what possible gain there would be to make everything implicitly asynchronous in this kind of scenario. Haskell already evaluates lazily, and on Elixir you can always just pass messages to other processes. In a typical web request you still need to fetch something from the DB, manipulate the data a bit and then return it. Synchronous code serving a single web request makes perfect sense to me, having everything asynchronous sounds like it'd just make everything more complicated for no reason at all.

Addition:
The point of lightweight runtime threads is exactly to allow concurrency without having to write asynchronous code.
> You have to believe that the judicial branch actually would safe guard privacy and keep law enforcement from overreaching.

These warrants become public record. I don't have to blindly believe it. I can look at the records and see that the US is not even close to China as far as government access to user data.
> The underlying failed assumption in our representative democracy was that representatives would represent their constituents' interests and people would elect people who would represent their interests, all of course with hopeful protections for minorities. Obviously, this doesn't work

This doesn’t seem so obvious to me. PFAS is a perfect example. It’s used in literally everything from clothing to food containers, because it’s an engineering marvel. I want my elected official to push back on people who want to jump the gun issuing radically lower guidelines for PFAS unless we have rock solid evidence not only linking them to harm, but quantifying that harm in relation to the benefits they provide. I like my non stick pans and stain resistant clothes and carpets, and as an Asian man who can expect, statistically, to live well into his 80s in the United States, I want a concrete assessment of how much longer I’d be living if we took a different approach to PFAS. And I fully accept that DuPont will have to be the one to tell the government: “hey, we use this stuff in a whole bunch of products people like”—because who else is going to articulate that essential part of the story?

Regulating this stuff is complex. For example, banning leaded gasoline was undoubtedly a win. (Which the EPA did after extensive cost benefit analysis.) By contrast, the dangers of DDT, which was and continues to be banned, probably we overstated: https://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/11/magazine/what-the-world-n...
Nothing in the graph implied other car companies are going to go out of business.
> to make housing "more affordable" while also making it ever more expensive.

This is a simple but excellent way of putting it
Andreas, I find your improvements in the SerenityOS security posture really interesting (including pledge()/unveil()). Could you share your thoughts about choosing the BSD/pledge API instead of the Linux/seccomp way?
That's good, right?

Governments destroy wealth while private businesses create it. It is better to have wealth retained by its rightful owners than expropriated and wasted by the government.
This! sometimes I think it would be nice if they produced a low cost small car like the 1960s mini. with today's productivity they could build a simple version for quite cost effective. But, regulations mean it's completely impossible and so the cost of cars and their size keeps going up.
I tried to do a weekly humorous stock market analysis podcast about 2 years ago. I wrote and recorded a couple of episodes, but it was hard to do it consistently. I wanted to get the feel of the podcast down before I started publishing them, but I only ever ended up recording a couple demo episodes and sending them out to friends to listen to.

Here is the first demo - Episode 1 (2018-04-06) "The 5 Ts of the Econopacalypse": https://www.dropbox.com/s/2u6iatk39b2hpnh/E1.2018-04-06.mp3?...
If you check out some of the automotive AI companies, you will see half a dozen names like Nuro, Aurora, Momenta, TuSimple, Pony, Zoox. There are more in the neigbourhood with tech like lidars, computer vision and so on.

Those companies has literally NOTHING beyond software and early prototypes, but they still are valued at billions of dollars each. So, compared to them, what should be a valuation of a profitable company with large scale production, foothold in China, massive and ever growing real life datasets and so on and so on?
Ok, so something has been bothering me ever since I started thinking about housing in an economic sense. Housing prices seem to consistently rise faster than inflation over long periods (at least in large/medium metros). This means that housing is currently more expensive to people than it was 30 years ago. So what happens 50 years from now? or 100 years from now? Who will be able to afford to buy a house? Will people spend more than 50% of their take-home pay on mortgage payments? This doesn't seem sustainable long term.
Minecraft modding is fairly out of hand. But that's only for Java (PC) Minecraft where they basically couldn't stop it once it had started.

In Minecraft you've got a situation where there is such a vibrant modding community that curation and configuration of mods to produce a complete working system with some particular flavour or theme is a whole separate skill. It's like the skill needed to make a decent container for a particular piece of server software. The right pieces but badly tuned may still be a miserable experience.

It's actually very strange now for me in "vanilla" Minecraft because I'm so used to certain features "everybody" mods into the sort of packs I play. Vein mining is an example: Most packs these days recognise that individually mining several adjacent blocks (or similar with other tools e.g. chopping down a tree one block at a time) is busywork, so they eliminate it. Hold down a modifier, hit one block, all identical blocks are affected at a proportionate cost to hunger and wear on the tool used.
Discussion of housing as an investment without also taking into account that you live in your house is pretty silly. There’s really nothing like owning your own home. What other investment options allow me to grow food to eat in it?