skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm a little confused why work-life balance is the 'alternative' argument when it feels very much contiguous to the ones we already know and discuss, which is why I wrote what I wrote. Clearly, several people agree with you that what I said is a non-sequitur. My initial instinct was to agree, but trying to formulate a worthy reply and referring back to the article, I've decided to disagree.

She's talking post-engagement, I wrote about pre-engagement, but was thinking about both. People get it coming and going.

We have this not-at-all accurate mindset about professionalism and self-sacrifice, that 'everybody is doing it' but 'everyone' is mostly young, unattached men with something to prove. It's the Prisoner's Dilemma and young men defect. Immediately.

One of the things I value most about trying to get men to look at toxic masculinity is pointing out the self-harming aspects, showing how it's not that great a bargain. To demand better for themselves, and of themselves. I think the unattached bachelor who can work 60 hours a week 'with no consequences' is toxic, at least a little bit. We should all say 'yes' to anything that is not that. Travel, partners, relatives, children, volunteer work. Hell, throw pinball games and scifi conventions in too, not because I equate those with the first things on that list, but because I have taken the long way around to find that "there's work to do" should be a lower priority than self-care. Adjust your own oxygen mask before helping others with theirs. Advice I need to follow better myself.

I just spent a bunch of time writing down some specific examples, but it was starting to feel like a cherry-picked narrative about myself, which my partner teases me about, so block-delete. Suffice it to say that at the bottom of it I came away with this thought: I think 'treating people the same' but still volunteering yourself for things you shouldn't expect from others is not actually 'treating people the same'. If you never say, do, or look away from a single directly disrespectful thing in your whole life there are still a dozen ways you can contribute to a hostile environment.

In child development I think they call this 'bidding'. The child observes differential behavior from their guardians and tailors their interactions to maximize their returns, and things can get pretty out of control unless the parents communicate with each other, respect each other's concerns, and agree on boundaries.

Solidarity counts a lot. Maybe more than anything. And solidarity will, I believe, give you family leave, gap years, partial leave, childcare near work, hobbies... but those things without solidarity are just salves on a wound that never heals.
There are many ways to do this, but I pose the question: are you trying to build a community, or just make money?

If you think about your audience and work backwards from there, you might be able to answer that for yourself.

Off the top of my head I would say https://www.patreon.com/ would be the first step...

Side Note: I would warn against going for the “best results” and instead built the community... once you are getting funds to be able to worry about colors, affiliations, etc... that will be a good problem to have :)
919 is one of the greatest Porsches ever so some marketing dept thinks its pretty good.
Unless those issues affect a person directly then they don't care.
Wait what,holy shit this changes everything. Always thought those were just random manufacturer marks on smt resistors.
My startup analyzes historical sales via LSTM and makes future predictions based on geo location, description of products, price of products, weather and holidays. I did the similar work for IBM 10 years ago and we could hardly accomplish fraction of what my startup can achieve today.

Right inventory at right location in right quantity is essential to e-commerce and our ai is helping out a lot in this regard
What rubs me the wrong way is the notion that if it's for free it has no worth. This "free == shit" idea that is expressed in "you can use it but don't expect much of it because it's free". Maybe I'm just too much of an old school open source idealist.
>>Tongue-in-cheek

it is not Tongue-in-cheek , democrats fail to make the connection to the policies they support and the effects of those policies.

See the polices are suppose to "fix" those problems and when they inevitably fail because socialism is not workable, they do not blame socialism they blame the execution, it just was not done "correctly", so if the just vote in the correct democrat this time socialism will work
Gah. That new design is horribly ugly. One other thing I've always hated about Google: if you just want the URL for a page, you can't right-click on it in the search results and copy the URL -- because Google will instead give you some Google-riffic hybrid URL that first refers you through a Google address so they can capture your clickthrough.

I've tried to steer most of my searching away from Google. (Of course, that's easy if you're already using a search keyword to skip the part where you go to the search engine's home page first.)
Reasonable expectation does not equate to entitlement.

So what is the person who finds the flaw supposed to do:

1. announce to all the other users of the library to download his branch with just the single fix

2. report it to the maintainer with a suitable patch, discuss it, and hope the maintainer applies it sooner rather than later.

TBH the maintainer sounds like the boy with the soccer ball who ends the match and takes his ball home with him, because the opposing side scored against his team.
This is a good idea! Do you know any projects that are particularly helpful/supportive in the JS community?
A practical difference between TTL and CMOS is that a CMOS gate draws negligible current when it's sitting in one state (1 or 0). It only draws current when changing states. So CMOS circuits can run at much lower power, and this power consumption decreases as the gates get smaller. This in turn means you cram more gates onto a slab of silicon before heat dissipation starts to kill you. And it's kind of an invitation to miniaturize in the pursuit of both higher computing power and higher speed... nice.

Now I'm dating myself, but there was a time period when CMOS gates were slower than TTL or even faster logic families like RTL. So a fast machine like the Cray was built with RTL, if I recall correctly. But eventually CMOS won this race.
In these pictures[1], each individual 'dot' is a whole galaxy's worth of dark matter (and here[2] are said galaxies).

So you may view galaxies as "neurotransmitters" of the universe, maybe. Or hormones. The big luminous nodes are the neurons, where all 'dark matter synapses' converge.

Perhaps what happens when over the short course of a few billion years, some "life" is taken from one node to another, is just a cosmic neuron doing its thing. Perhaps said life is just the equivalent of some positive ion charge, and it ends up blowing up the node into a huge black hole and that's just the universe doing "two minus one" (cataclysmic event = "remove 1" from the neuro-galactic graph, just the time of a thought.) Maybe treants had it right all along.

[1]: Finally found a good source. (thanks Filligree for pointing out the screensaver mishap) https://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/galform/virgo/millennium/

[2]: https://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/galform/virgo/millennium/...
I used to do electromagnetic modeling using finite element methods (though now a product manager for AI software infra) and it would to take me on the order of hours to days or weeks to model wave interaction with real-world objects.

A machine learning model trained to understand Maxwell's Equations can in principle be used perform said simulations, resulting in probably an order or more of magnitude increase in simulation speed. Getting this to work well will reduce the time (and cost) it takes to design optical sensors, radar for autonomous vehicles, smartphone antennas, MRI machines, and more.

Having said that, it would require a lot of heaving lifting to pull this off to achieve near-physical accuracy for real-world physics problems.

A cursory search on Google for "arxiv deep learning electromagnetics" returns results of proofs of concept in this direction.
I don't understand the point you're trying to make in this post.
This was what I was trying to communicate, albeit not as clearly as I should have!
Moving where? Why should people leave their homes that they built and paid for ..Human beings like their community and neighborhood where they have a support system. When you know your neighbour is just a phone call away next door, you don’t have to rely on doctors or nurses or ambulances or fire departments. As you get older, community is a great source of comfort and moral support.

People won’t realize this until they get older or have lived with older family members/friends. Older family members are also a great source of support and mentorship for the younger generation. It is not always about money.

A million dollar check won’t speak to you or hold your hand. Most of the million dollars will go to taxes and then barely paying for the next roof in a not well serviced and strange new zipcode. It’s a downgrade. Why would anyone want to downgrade their lives and walk into uncertainty when they are old and vulnerable?
https://github.com/jaywcjlove/awesome-mac
Long delays make this difficult to attribute and also, difficult to correct if there's a design error.
It's super depressing. My friend made the impolite and glib comment that perhaps they shouldn't be allowed to have math classes online either because the mentally disabled can't understand them. Emotionally, it's a pretty bad argument. But it definitely stuck with me as an interesting point...
This is true. Once you have the minimal set of things you need for your lifestyle, having more space for those things makes it easier to keep everything clean. This breaks down if you acquire new things to fill unused space though.
Also the 2 factor and marketing emails. Despite reasonable efforts it's almost impossible to keep a non-high effort inbox zero at work and personal. At least authenticator apps are becoming a thing and adoption is rising.

But white papers post sign up and "marketing people" just flood the channel. I wish there were human only channels where any automation was banned. I guess like whatsapp.

Same concept as "can we get on a call to discuss my product". A) please dont cold call me, and if you do please just ask if now is a good time and B) as a personal rule I won't get on any call with a vendor who won't tell me how many digits his product sells for. In 2020 you can basically put your price on the website for most things or hint at a range. If you vary prices by so much at the same usage/feature level that you need to hide it from part of the customers.... theres something wrong with the product because really good vendors nowadays don't act like that.

I heard it's worse with younger peeple. The moment the doctors office gets a tablet they won't talk to anyone.

One more thing: yes I clicked on all 8 tabs of your webpage. Yes I knew you were watching on hot jar. Yes I got there white papers too even thought at best I would skim one to see how good the graphic design was. Please don't creepily make it so obvious you're tracking at the page view level. Not fun.
They keep getting voted down because comments like "just use brave" don't actually add anything relevant to the discussion about the subject article.
I completely agree with you. I just wanted to comment to tell you that you are absolutely right.
>> It is almost never mentioned but most men won't respect other men who are stay at home parent. So there is also an expectation on the man to be the bread winner.

That too, is sexism, of course. Sexism also harms men.
so many catchphrases and clichés in this post.
> a system which encourages vote harvesting even more than it already is is encouraged is not a step in the right direction

Are you arguing that it’s bad when all Americans are encouraged to vote? That sounds like a functional democracy to me.
Prop 13 reduces the supply of housing massively. The carrying cost for any property that was bought more than 20 years ago is negligible. This reduces the incentive to sell when you no longer need the property. This in turn raises prices by reducing supply. This likewise reduces the incentive to sell. As prices go up, the incentive to allow new construction also goes down.

Prop 13 has effectively created a vicious cycle of escalating property values.
Bad counting in the probabilities.
I don’t have any off the top of my head (helpful... I know), but I do have a tip that might save you some headaches down the road:

Remember to support Case Sensitive file system partitions.

This has bit me A few times and is a very annoying bug to trouble shoot down the road if you aren’t consistent with your naming structures.
No, that's not the converse. The license says exactly what it means, which is:

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,

Period. Calling it a 'liberal license' doesn't mean what you think it means.
> being transparent

being transparent means the admission that public policy has failed the vulnerable and those in need. I dont believe this problem will ever be "admitted to" - and it's more likely that the gov't will let it "blow over" (read, let those who got automated out of a life to fend for themselves, and eventually they either die/find new opportunities on their own, or the family slack picks them up).
Having Bill for <some department> choose a product to endorse is also 'choosing an algorithm to choose a product'.

Just because your algorithm is a digitally encoded series of steps, as opposed to a a meat-encoded series of steps, doesn't mean you can wash your hands of the responsibility for its outcomes.

If an algorithm told me that the best way for me to optimize my tax bill is to commit tax fraud, I'd be just as liable for it, as if I followed the advice of an accountant to do so. I'm responsible for my outputs, not my inputs.
Who cares all that much about being the "uncontested leader" in science?

Isn't there a more important question to ask here, namely how the US compares to other countries in bringing "traditionally marginalized peoples" into the R&D workforce.

After all, when one factors in the impact on social justice, there's a big difference between a discovery being made by the oppressor, e.g. the "douche-bro entitled STEMlord" that Scott Aaronson talks about in this recent blog post:

https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=4522

versus one made by the objects of their oppression, e.g. all of the women who are being denied "free and conveniently located childcare that makes a colossal difference to women's choices of whether or not to stay in STEM."

So let's stop fretting about "global leadership" (that's kind of a testosterone-driven thing anyway) and focus our attention instead on making sure that lactation stations are installed in all laboratories that receive government funding. The requested childcare centers should quickly follow though.
It's worth noting that Brazil[1] has been exporting aircraft for quite some time, although it's still regarded as 3rd world.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embraer
in reference to 2001 this sounds about right, sorry just was confused which time span those 2 decades refer to.
propably even 2 1/2 decades or more, the big demostrations started about 78/79.
The Holmdel Horn Antenna
But these women did not experience sexism. Of course it wouldn't stop them.
You keep using that word "rushing" but there's no solution that I'm aware of that would cause hordes of homeless to rush towards housing.

What we can do is judge whether a policy helps or hurts. Higher housing costs causes more homelessness. Period.
"building new housing doesn't really drive the prices down" there is a lot of empirical evidence against this claim, and almost no evidence for it. Rising costs in cities are due to a few factors: (1) lack of new housing, (2) changing economic conditions in which high paying jobs are moving from the suburbs to the cities (to be fair, there is a small factor in very few cities of super rich people buying housing and not living in it, but that is largely confined to Manhattan, London, and suburban Vancouver, but is not broadly an issue in housing affordability) From after WWII through the 80s, American cities were largely in this strange largely racism induced recession (white flight to the suburbs) which caused a historical aberration of cheap housing and commercial space in cities. That trend was a very short counter trend blip in the 5000 year history of real estate in cities. The way forward is to build a lot more housing in cities, as its eminently clear that lots of people want to live in them, that living in cities is better for the environment than the alternative, and that our economy would be doing much better if the desired urbanization was actually allowed.
NASA engineer here. I assure you we would be on the moon right now if it was a top priority in the Decadal Surveys. Its not. Recently, there's been a re-rush to the moon policy wise, and its been utterly delightful to watch astrobotic and several other companies step up to the plate so we dont have to. I was, just last week, working on a robotic payload for just one of those lunar landers, and my friends are working on even more ambitious ones.
> it's already winter, and we've long been in it

In terms of research and innovation, yes, but in economic terms, it has not even begun. There is still huuuge VC and government money being pumped into anything with AI on it. The last AI winter started when the financiers discovered the disconnect between the money they put in and delivery on promises.

AI went from an obscure hard CS field that only a few graybeards at MIT knew anything about, to this worldwide meme. Before the default thing your grandmother would tell you to study in college was business. Now your grandmother would tell you to study AI. I'm seeing a lot of people enter this space with the vague goal of getting rich quick. This is the same cohort that jumped into tech in the late 90s and the real estate market in the mid-2000s. It's not the AI of the Norvig and Marvin Minsky days.

I couldn't be more bearish about AI. I still love it though. I won't stop studying it when it becomes not cool anymore.
It's not wrong, but we'll assume you think we're from the city and start trying to explain where our specific part of Upstate NY is.

Upstate New Yorkers also works fine as an alternative.

Michigan has it easy with their conveniently hand-shaped state. NYS but not NYC is a pain to describe.
Just wanted to clarify a bit of the legal terminology here. There's a loophole/exception to the first sale doctrine that says if the products are materially different, it can be considered trademark infringement even if the product was originally made by the brand.

In some jurisdictions, there's a "quality control" subcategory of "material difference". The quality controls must be non pretextual. The basic argument is that if the brands's products are subject to quality control procedures that the alleged infringer is not following, then the products are different enough that it can potentially create a likelihood of confusion between the two. Only a jury can actually decide if there's such a material difference in a particular case.

Now, quality control can be temperature controls, or it can be additional inspections before sale, and so on. It must be something where customers would care about the difference, so you can allege customer confusion.

In these cases and in most of the vorys cases I've seen, the quality controls appear very pretextual. If the product is sealed, authentic, and there's no damage to it, it's hard to see why any consumer would care about any of the alleged differences in quality control.

The cases I've seen where quality control was accepted by a court were typically imports, where there were actually different standards being used for the ones the brand was selling in the US. In my view, none of these would go anywhere if they made it to court. But that's very expensive - it's been at least several years that similar cases have been filed, I'm aware of over 100 so far across 30+ different brands, and as far as I know none have actually gone to a jury. Most settle well before that point, or are voluntarily dismissed.
Don't get me started on this. I helped an friend get into below market rate (BMR) housing in SF. She paid approximately $330k with almost no money down for a 2 bedroom, 2 bath condo in the center of Hayes Valley. Today, equivalent market rate units in her building sell for $1.5k to $2m.

Basically, there is a supply of homes that are available to you at three points: 70%, 90% and 110% of the median income. How these three points are chosen I don't know. Very few are at 110% of median income. Most are available to those that make 70% or 90% of the median income.

The reason this is bullshit is because it's estimated that you need to earn about 400% of the median income to be able to afford a market-rate home in SF. This pretty much leaves everyone between 110% and 400% of the median income without any real options.

Worse yet, by making a policy that covers the just above the center of the income distribution to the bottom, you basically disincentivize those voters from becoming active and involved in supporting solutions that help the entire distribution. Basically those between 110% and 400% end up a permanent minority unable to achieve support for policies that will help their cohort.

Needless to say, I don't live in California anymore, despite earning almost 3x what she earns because I can't really afford to buy into the market. California is fundamentally broken.
> But affected customers say the trouble began even earlier with firmware version 2B588, which rolled out in November. (Apple later pulled firmware 2C54 for unknown reasons.)
You can make a tube of toothpaste for a few cents. With counterfeit branding you can sell it for a hundred times as much. It's drug dealer profitable at much lower risk.
This is way too much thinking for a Friday ... call me a Boltzmann brain all you want, but I'm having beer!
I'm glad someone said it. I dont understand AWS either.
I have a Varier Balans which I use a few hours a day and it's helped a lot with my back pain. The rocking and variable angle is a big part of it, I don't reckon the fixed ones would work as well.
Ah yes the 50s, when women took care of the children and men would attend serious matters, how god intended.
Are you able to update the AirPods Pro firmware through any Apple laptops?
Prop 13 is essentially "rent control" for homeowners, and largely has the same effects as rent control for renters.
Yeah, my opinion, neural networks alone aren't going to cut it. We need a better primitive.
I was long ago told a story about interviewing a candidate who had on her resume that she was a member of Mensa, and seemed to have no real achievements, at least that she was prepared to talk about, otherwise. The implication was that if you have your IQ certified, you're probably a loser.
No, I am allowed to criticize a corporation which is obviously acting against public good.

Even if I'm not paying them anything.
Which ISA did it have?

Even the minimal AVX-512 ISA on any mainstream CPU (SKX) is pretty much a strict superset of AVX2.
> How many people _use_ that support?

That's not really relevant to Enterprise sales.