skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>>Cloud gaming means you will be able to take your game “everywhere” and avoid dreaded 20-minute updates before you can start playing.

The problem is latency.

In a world where I am not even happy with the latency, or delay on most of the Code Editor, Keyboard, Screen, Display etc. And Gaming Display Monitor being 120Hz and trending towards 240hz+. We are not even anywhere close to solving latency issues in a local environment, let alone one that is separated by a fibre Optic.

And I not sure about "dreaded" the 20min update, on a decent Internet connection, most of the time is no longer in the network, but CPU decompressing the Data and installing it. But they way update are package are still optimise for minimal bandwidth, not minimal user time.

I dont think the problem with Gaming industry is Distribution or Delivery with Cloud Gaming. It is with the forever increase in Asset Prices. Middleware Engine helped Software Gaming Development cost to stabilise. But the Asset, especially Graphics will need ways to dramatically reduce its time and cost.
Instead of spare containers, you can use Temporary Containers: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/temporary-con...

This is like incognito mode on a container level.
What Everyone Needs to Know about Data, Physics, Memory, and Information
How American CEOs fuel stock market inflation
We are using this at the office. We and our clients often use IP restriction to servers as first line defense, so Pi in the office lets us access office static IP while outside.

This has helped tremendously and is super easy to set up.

Bonus is while traveling we can access services without firewalls from our home country and everyone sees us as "still in the office". This includes clients, government, banks, etc. Additionally while using it we are not detected to be using VPN so far.
It‘a roomkey.com , but Marriott/IHG/Hilton/Hyatt/Choice/Wyndham franchise most hotels and collect a 10% to 15% royalty of gross revenue from hotel owners, so they don’t care about commissions paid since it’s not coming out of their pocket.
If you already know C++03, I'd first take a look at the C++11 Wikipedia page. (It might be less bloated if you go back in the page history, so try going back to 2012.) I don't think guides or resources beyond that are really necessary to grasp what's new and how to make use of it, except for precise reference documentation.
No idea what systemd's implementation is meant to accomplish, but, in general, on a memory-constrained system, a binary log can theoretically speed up system performance by taking up less memory, which leads to more available pages for other purposes.
Mostly, yes. Though whether people resort to commodity barter or an outside currency like the USD varies.

Sometimes both happen. Eg in Germany after the war cigarettes were a common currency, even among non-smokers.

But that's probably more a function of comparatively effective restrictions on using foreign currency directly, than anything else? Not sure.
You're asking for examples where science is robust and well-documented but has been _blocked_ from being published? You understand that this is effectively an unanswerable question, right? How would anyone here come to know about such findings if they existed, and further know that they well-documented _despite their not being published_?

It's fundamentally unknowable how much science is being denied the imprimatur of good science for ideological reasons while "actually" being good science. The best you can hope for is examples that meet a lower, more reasonable bar that point to problems in the culture of academia, from which you can extrapolate chilling effects.

There are examples of things like this, as in Case & Deaton's description[1] of the reaction to their study on declining mortality amongst US whites:

> Deaton: Anne presented the first paper once and was told, in no uncertain terms: How dare you work on whites.
Case: I was really beaten up.
Deaton: And these were really senior people.
Case: Very senior people.

This example is just off the top of my head, and it's a blatant example of a study that _isn't even saying anything that taboo_, except among those whose brains have been thoroughly liquefied by politics. If examples as dramatic as this exist, at well-known, highly-regarded institutions, for a paper _published by a Nobel Laureate_, it's not unreasonable to conclude that there's some degree of unobservable cases that were actually successfully blocked, along with chilling effects changing the direction of research in the first place.

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/04/06/how-d...
They are all in various international standards. The specification for IBAN, for instance, can be found here https://www.iso.org/standard/41031.html
Waterloo does this where they mix internships and study throughout their time.
No, it's because it isn't unreasonable to have more than 32,768 processes on a sufficiently large host.
Lots of languages have several ways to indicate an invalid value.

With SQL, I generally prefer dialects where an empty string and null are considered the same, although that may be just due to what I learned first. Various Microsoft technologies seem to tend towards multiple ways of expressing null/missing/empty.

An interesting thing about null in SQL is that the rule that any operation on a null returns null, only applies sometimes in some contexts. For instance in Oracle SQL:

select max(case when x = 'ABC' then 'ABC' end) as y
from ...

...is taking the maximum of an expression which is null whenever x <> 'ABC', yet it doesn't return null if there are rows where it does = 'ABC'.

(sorry for any errors)
HTTPS: //Buddysupplement.com/Loberton-Paris/
L'Oberton Paris
L'Oberton Paris Cream is probably the most ideal approaches to dispose of wrinkles and reestablish youth! This top selling cream contains the absolute most dominant enemy of maturing peptides that do some incredible things for your skin. As indicated by the Official L'Oberton Wrinkle Freezing Moisturizer Website, this top selling hostile to maturing cream has the ability to support you: The wrinkle-freezing advantages of L'Oberton Paris are unbelievable! This choice recipe will get you unmistakably more youthful skin quicker than at any other time. You should simply utilize this cream daily while you rest. One examination even expresses that utilizing a topical cream can assist you with seeing prompt and long haul hostile to maturing results. Along these lines, in the event that you are prepared to hold up your childhood set up and the sky is the limit from there, click any picture or catch on this page before provisions are no more.
> You do not make statements to law enforcement officers who are investigating a crime.

"Do not make statements" even if these statements may help investigating officer to resolve a criminal case in your neighbourhood?
What is the difference between that and an "AI bot" ?
Why should I have to wait for STMP and POP3 ?
Most phones lack Switch controls. The silicon or the screen was not in doubt but the input method (touchscreen).
Gerontotherapeutics: Treatment of the Aging Process (1951)
On the reverse, a gaming company with the intent of catering to the zionist crowd could create a CoD-styled game focused on slaughtering Palestinian "terrorists", and it would be a huge hit amongst American jews and evangelicals. There would be no outrage, and republican politicians who spend all of their free time railing against video games would become vocal advocates for gaming.
That is the problem with provincial or local level government - they are effectively encouraged to go with antisocial options like that and guard them because it localizes benefits.

One virtue of a centralized system is that their incentives are to stop this parasitic crap because the systemic costs are greater.
>but I know it'll be able to read and edit text files.

Unless Apple and Microsoft decide that the ability to view and manage files directly is too confusing and dangerous for users and removes your ability to have portable raw text files.

And then all the HN users rejoice about how much simpler life has become when they let tech companies make choices for them and how files were never that good anyway.
good point. autonomous killing is nothing new.
Hospitals Say They Want Affordable Care, but Actions Aren't Clear
How to get free Instagram followers 2019 – 1000 followers every hour *g
Nike's plan to prevent counterfeiting by securing products using blockchain
I'm hopeful it won't, a growing subset of young people is actively rejecting video games as they introduce harm and escapism to their lives. My best friend was set back in life a whole year because he got sucked in Leauge of Legends.

We need to start having a discussion not about video games causing violence as it's proven to be bollocks, but about video games causing passivness and apathy.
You're not really clarifying yourself here.

All competitive sports are zero-sum. For one team to win, the other has to lose. That's what "zero-sum" means.
List comperhension version without threading:

(reduce +
(for [n [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
:when (= 1 (mod n 3))]
(* n n)))
Just curious, would you trust a scientific organization that would compromise scientific ethics including censorship and bullying at the whim of the current government in order to preserve their funding?

I'm not sure if you're defending or supporting CSIRO here. Bending to the whims of the government is reprehensible for an "independent" organization.

Also, consider the words of the scientist who was censored: "Managers said it was a political hot potato — too political to publish". [1]

So CSIRO is acting politically, using bullying and harassment to force censorship.

I don't see why I should have to prove a trend, I've already shown the chilling effect they intended. [2] Speak against the political grain, and get severely punished personally and have your career ruined. This means politics is driving climate science through intimidation.

Honest question: do you think anyone would put their livelihood, career and reputation on the line to question the political status quo after someone was publicly executed for doing so?

[1] https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-05-02/csiro-missing...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilling_effect
An almost sculptural rock in this category that I think about is Mexican Hat Rock in Utah. It is shaped in such a way that it looks like strong wind would have eventually blown it off balance.
I don't do the sort of programming recently where it matters, but when I read the debates on GC on HN, I think, why not a language where there is a GC, but it is "cooperatively scheduled" - you explicitly invoke it for a fixed amount of time. Wouldn't that be the best of both worlds?
For me this is the most exciting outcome:

> The only Python 3 feature that Mercurial developers seem to almost universally get excited about is type annotations. We already have some people playing around with pytype using comment-based annotations and pytype has already caught a few bugs. We're eager to go all in on type annotations and uncover lots of dynamic typing bugs and poorly implemented APIs.

Over in perl land people still spill their hate on types, which caused hard forks.
> never about climatology

Bullshit. They look down their nose at climatology just like any other science without any experimental validation of theoretical models (a.k.a soft science).
If it is war there is ...

And if you inform everyone that they have vulnerabilities not only that is security leakage it is a kind of security commerical activities without pay.

But nobody it is not. You have Russia and totalitarian china.

... the world is not pure and black And white. The wiki writing is too bias. And too political correct based on the wrong assumption.
There are plenty of fire-and-forget weapons that will attack a designated target autonomously. Some may even be totally automated, like CIWS, if you put them in some paranoid mode.

A landmine is indiscriminate, by that logic anything with a triggerable fuze is autonomous (even a snare trap would be). The difference would be if the landmine chose to explode based on some other factor.

Autonomy and intelligence are not the same thing.
Oh, I didn't mean "how are we going to pay for this", I meant "who's going to be paying for this", and your answer is apparently "everyone with money, by way of government".

That's not exactly charity and coops anymore.

The only reason to favor government construction over private construction is that it'll be subsidized for the poor, unless you somehow think the government will be better at building apartments than a private developer. (Whether that be a coop, charity or for-profit, they all have incentives to make things actually work while not breaking the bank - the government generally doesn't)
The a to Z of Providing an Ultimate Candidate Experience
Some ability to loiter and choose targets via algorithm. Mines can't move, and guided missiles are spatially and temporally bounded in what they can target.

There have already been cases of "autonomous" targeting, such as in 1982 when Exocet missiles fired by Argentine aircraft at a British warship selected a cargo ship instead (possibly due to countermeasures used by the warship). In this case, the weapon hit a target not intended by the firing unit. Of course, unguided weapons do this all the time...
I'm arguing for "most things can in most cases be considered through lens of simpler system" instead. "Everything is a system" to me implies that every phenomenon maps to exactly one comprehensible system, which is far too strong statement to make.
If Wright's long history of deception wasn't enough evidence that this is bunk, the term "bonded courier" should be a clue.

It's conspicuously ostentatious and fake-official. When you think about it, why would data need to be delivered by a dude in a rented uniform?
That seems (although I don't have experience with either language) straightforwardly correct treatment in Python and wrong in Ruby, and the problem seemingly should be attributed to [lack of] range checking, not nil/null.
Do you intuit - or think - or whatever - as a neuroscientist - that speed of this "swapping" matters?

What about "swapping" one-by-one vs all-at-once? Would that matter?

What I'm getting at - which is where things seem to go sideways to think about it - is that if you did this swap - but rather the artificial neurons remain outside the body, and you did it near-instantly (vs slowly one-by-one) - and I am speaking of relative speeds here; say "near-instantly" means the entire swap takes one second, vs the slower manner of each swap taking a millisecond (or whatever).

Would that matter?

Now - what if instead of swapping - you did a parallel simulation instead - one-by-one, recreating the brain, but the artificial version operating in lockstep with the original; when one neuron "fires" the same artificial neuron "fires", same "paths" taken, etc.

Then you kill (choose your method and make it quick) the natural brain - instant swap? Or is there something different? Where does the "consciousness" go? If it is different, why is it any different than the "near-instant" swap?

Why would making that "lockstep-copy" matter, vs not making a "copy"?

I think you get what I am saying. Think on it a bit. There isn't a good answer that I am aware of.

Note: I'm assuming an "instant kill" - death to the natural brain faster than neural signals can travel neuron-to-neuron, ideally. We can posit the idea that if it were any slower (and especially if it were really slow) that the two brains would diverge in experiences, and would become two different "consciousnesses". But it does make you wonder why this should happen with a copy, vs not (in theory?) with a one-by-one swap. Heck - maybe there's an answer in there somewhere...
> April 6, 2000

Wow. That goes waaaaaaay back. It’s crazy to think that 1980 was to him at the time as 2000 is to us _right now_.
Watching 1917 in 2020, When Our Lives Are More Edited Than Ever
EQRx could potentially lower drug prices, but only because of competition and not out of the goodness of their hearts. Few companies deliberately lower profits without exogenous pressure. If a company has a 20 year monopoly on a drug and a similar drug shows up before the patent expires, competition will somewhat bring down prices. I say somewhat because healthcare is a convoluted opaque mess.
A big difference is that every browser provides easy-to-use native features to clear or block cookies--not true for fingerprinting. The complexity and opacity of how it works makes fingerprinting harder to block and clear.
Fascinating. I see three possibilities:

1. the project succeeded and the government has kept cryogenic processors totally dark for a decade with no public leaks or hints to industry (far-fetched, though Skunkworks hid the Blackbird pretty well.)

2. they aggressively funded it as a black project but hit insurmountable design challenges (like quantum computers) or bureaucratic abyss (like the F35.)

3. the funding never materialized.

are any research teams working on superconducting classical computers, rather than quantum computers? does nonlinearity get in the way?
Python is growing in fashion because those Fortran and C++ GPGPU libraries happen to have Python bindings out of the box, whereas other languages are only getting them now.

That and has replaced Java in many introduction to programming courses.

Which is good, when learning to programm performance isn't a concern as such.

I know Python since Zope was the only reason to use it, so around Python 1.5 or something.

Other than replacing what I used Perl for, regarding UNIX shell scripting, I never used Python in any scenario where performance might come into play.

There are plenty of options that beat Python's LOC, while providing an AOT/JIT toolchain out of the box.
>> but what about companies that are so large that they effectively control the labor market

> There is no such company in the world, and if there was, it would almost certainly be an illegal monopoly.

Funny wording, it's like saying "nothing bad as happening, but if there was, it would be illegal." My original point is that yes, there is bad stuff happening, there are many monopolies, but no one is doing much about it.
> Doubt. In the same way that movies on PSP had this idea in mind but fell flat on it's face, games are strongly tied to the format and environment in which you consume them.

I used to have a cheaper laptop back in the olden days so I subscribed to a service called OnLive. It worked like Stadia where the cloud would host and render your game and you could play it online. I loved it! I wish it hadn't gotten bought out and canceled. Doesn't work for certain types of games, obviously, but it's great for most casual things.
It seems to me the difference is not so subtle. As I understand from https://commonsclause.com/ you can use Commons Clause licensed code-library as part of your commercial application without having to make your source-code available whereas with AGPL you would have to. But I may be wrong?
The only thing coming to my mind for a possibility to this question is any type of research that would be for pro-assisted-suicide. Research promoting positives of assisted suicide for people with illnesses or disabilities. That type of thing likely was held back by certain ideologies rooted in culture. I'm not sure if it can be proven and makes me think the question is very difficult to prove.
The fact that your comment is gray means to me there are a lot of racists on HN. Sigh...

And worse, they're thinking they're not racist because they think they have scientific backing for their beliefs..
Competitive sports are zero-sum only if you ignore all the things that competitive sports are about. Winners and losers are a side effect of the competition not the essence of it.
> Now, if only there were a secure method to share the key...

... that doesn't include a critical cryptographic vulnerability. :)

To be generous to the now greyed GP, there's probably a way to teach a recipient a short pad and its proper use so that the recipient can later decode a short ciphertext sent over Twitter. Perhaps even performing that feat in their head. None of the cryptography that could fit your quip has that property.

And if the recipient does something catastrophic like resend the pad over Twitter to confirm they memorized it correctly, there's at least a chance they may catch their error. Perhaps they may even correct it without the goddamned Department of Defense coming into it.

I don't get cryptographers' condescension toward OTP zealots. All they want is a better boat. At least have the decency of the captain from Titanic and apologize while we sink for not having delivered it.
I believe landmines (of the type used in wars of the past) are not allowed by international law anymore, precisely because of the problems that come with them going off on whoever happens to be there, including far into the future.
I actually almost wanted to mention goto as an example of this kind of dogma.
I was accepted to MIT and could not realistically afford it despite my parents having a low-medium household income. I chose a lesser private school that offered me a full scholarship instead.

I'm in my 30s-40s - was entering college before need-blind was a thing. It absolutely happens.
Absolutely. Your negative emotional reaction to scientific research is not a valid refutation of that research. Science is based on logic, not emotions. Facts do not care about your feelings.
all genes on X is a meaningless statement unless all genes are involved in X... if you read the paper the authors seemingly put quite a bit of effort into the rigor of their model.

they used multiple validation cohorts, they controlled for environmental factors, they controlled for non-autosomal factors, applied multiple methods to boost the predictive performance of their model. adding more snps typically leads to an overfit and poor performing model on validation cohorts, which is why they use so much rigor and end up with usually 100-400 snps for each of the phenotypes.

in anycase they found a lot more than 10 SNPs, and they did more than one analysis in the paper.

Parent educational status is a significantly better predictor than the polygenic risk score for educational attainment. heritability (also known as r^2) for cognitive performance they estimated at an even lower ~7-10%.
That doesn’t sound right at all. I just searched on coveredca.com and anthem platinum ppo for 2 40 year olds with 10 and 15 year old children is $3,600 per month.
It doesn't detract from your argument, but there appear to be nine US banks listed at https://twofactorauth.org/#banking which offer hardware- or software-based 2FA.
When those CPython applications are actually pure Python, without any call to C helper libraries.
Of course the majority of people is good people almost everywhere and yet our prisons are full with bad people that we need to lock away because they disobeyed the written rules of society and couldn't get away with it.
Turmeric Used to Treat Cancer, Heart Disease
You would have think that him winning a Nobel prize would have made him aware that IQ tests are a scam, apparently he didn’t.
Many academics are more than happy to raise a stink about suppression of other topics outside of traditional channels. Ex: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/23/agriculture-depart... So, it’s reasonable to expect examples of actual suppression.

If nothing else I expect someone to be making that argument on at least one paper somewhere. Though how much merit that’s worth depends on the paper.