skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If a company acts to suppress & hurt a community then attempts to participate in said communities events, they should be ejected from said event.

Pride organizers need to grow a pair and start kicking companies and orgs that have abused LGBTQ+ people to the curb. If said org tries to pull a Salvation Army, they should be publicly put on notice like the Greater Seattle Business Alliance did: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/as-salvation-army-...

Actions speak louder than words, we have to fight back against PR that conveys lies.
I'm afraid I don't know, I really don't have any particular knowledge of performance engineering in Python.
There are several ways to handle this, but a common one is to have a deed restriction that sets a maximum resale price and requires the buyer to meet income eligibility criteria.

I wrote some about this, and about how I'm worried that wealthy people could abuse this, in https://www.jefftk.com/p/affordable-housing-workarounds
This is still very common in NYC. Most small restaurants and retailers here have credit card minimums, typically $5-10.
This makes a lot of sense, actually. But it is difficult to define what is passive vs. active, and there will be many loopholes to create "activity".
This is such a fascinating problem. On the one hand Jack Bogle's invention of the index fund has been so good for retail investors but because the process currently requires a middle man - i.e. one of the big three - these index funds have slowly become bloated with power.

What if the algorithm Vanguard uses was open sourced and could be self-hosted by independent investors?

Where each investor owns their portfolio outright and adjustments to the portfolio are made automatically by a free index manager bot that runs the simple algorithm an index fund manager like Vanguard would.

Why wouldn't something like that work?
Although perhaps to a lesser extent, (but probably not for long as they adopt these features), the same goes for other car manufacturers.

Tesla or not, if the company from which you purchased your car goes away, you're gonna have a bad time.
If you only drive a car once a month (or less), then you should probably just hail an Uber. Color prints aren’t a big part of my life... I suspect this is pretty common. If I want to share a photo there are plenty of ways to share it them without committing them to paper.
> I wonder why ultra-elite companies like Google don't swap to a model where they reach out to people they want to hire, rather than accepting random applications?

This is exactly what happens. Most experienced engineers I know with a good resume get emails almost weekly from Google and Amazon in particular.
These are the stats of my most read article: https://imgur.com/BAICxnm

As you can see only 8% came from inside Medium.
Facial recognition tech is a problem. Here’s the Democratic candidates' plans
> Not all heroes wear capes

The best ones do, however:

http://heroesinthenight.blogspot.com/2012/08/angle-grinder-m...
Despite that, he's confident in VW's ability to make a Level 4 autonomous vehicle, saying that the upcoming I.D. Buzz electric van will be the first VW to receive the technology.

He's poo-pooing level 5 autonomous driving and says that they just about have a level 4 autonomous vehicle?

This article makes no sense.

Honestly, the CEO of my company has very little idea of the details of the technology that we produce. If you picked some cutting-edge technology that isn't key to our market-share yet, he'd have even less of a clue.
Caddy is a one-liner. Plenty of the one-liners are suitable for production. There are so many solutions that you might as well use one, even in development, that doesn't have such glaring issues, because you're basically training your muscle memory to reach for it.
None of that sounds like taking responsibility for the impact of occupying useful land and polluting the campus air, which is what you claimed to care about.

(Even squatting on parking spaces doesn't show a lack of responsibility for the impact of parking spaces occupying land - it's a calculated use of a small amount of a resource in order to aim for more of that resource in the future. You may as well say that someone who invests their money instead of keeping it safely buried in the ground isn't being responsible with their money.)
I'm not sure that Apple owning a company is an endorsement of quality as much as an indication that it's a complementary product with a similar business model (high perception, high margin). I've owned one pair of Beats (wireless Studio headphones with noise cancelling), and a small handful of Bose products. I prefer Bose.
Oh yeah, I recall that from a pair of our old bootlegged version of some regular 10 dollar noise cancelling headphones that I'd bought from the good guys. It turned out that there was an attempt to shift in from noise cancelling to sound defying, the counterfitters curse for making more needed varieties and being heard. I literally lost my ear drum, ended up dating an ear sucker (she would quiet, sink and pull water to the tip of her tongue to only the left or right side, I may have attracted her with my shitty phones, and I would get super boned, I'm not fatty anymore so it feels worse), and ended up having to actually encounter her devices with her as I was. Something my presence remedied. The problem was then that she would pull from the out side, so it might be the right side, sometimes and I ended up having to actually encounter her in that to get back her attention. She used to be fat is what it turned out to be.

What the problem here is then is that left ear is IN air and noise, sound is defied by identifying the noise and all products of that go into bone and are not usual for keeping a source of energy. Right side then, you guessed it, is for OUT! And does almost literally nothing, so is infant in real attempts for coursing the humours of the body to what trust and treating in the body for the confidence we must astound it to.

These simple switches broke my ear drums. And funny enough, she was aiming for them, because this stuff was common knowledge to her (I'm currently in court attempting to remove her from my life through dismissing a phony child support court and attempting a restraining order on her), stuff that she knows, because she also ended up injuring me to the left ear when I proved to have learned what was wrong with the situation and seemingly "threatened" her state of mind by being well aware. It was gruesome and excruciating. She basically attempted to break and rip the muscle and bone in the back of my left ear, with a stab and at a higher than expected, for a stab, quickness.
The blunt effort from that alone would have destroyed my dreams, the stab just happened to also leave me hopeless. But I've figured it all out since and we are not hoping a remedy to anything of theirs without solving the problem of her and her boyfriends, whom she'd hope to leave for me, as a worse version of them, through the valued court from earlier and through a sincere and coursed effort to incarcerating the leader of the pack and then having them turn the others in. I don't like not having my noise cancelling. It was an amazing token to these apparatii.
Clearly so does the software in the submission, as it mentions in the second sentence (full actual non-fragment sentence) in the readme.

The difference is that nginx-ingress requires some external access TO nginx still. On the other hand, inlets-operator, argo-ingress-controller, (I'm surprised there's not an ngrok controller too) etc, don't require configuring NAT or external internet access TO nginx due to how inlets/argo work. This makes it incredibly useful for exposing a service running on a laptop behind a firewall, or that roams networks frequently but you wanted a stable endpoint name, etc.

Personally, I'd skip the middle man and just deploy an onion hidden service (and do -- for kube services and home services that I'd otherwise NAT punch - they just work. No matter where I take my Pi, if it can hit the internet, my Onions are available.
I would get a job and save up. Shouldn't take too long to make $6k for someone with your skills.
The parking lot would just tow you then
They do sound terrible and I hope to never encounter one, but my brother made a good point: the NHS get something like 12k applications per week, they have an average of 25k job openings each month. They apparently can't deal with that manually, which does make some sense.

I personally think they _should_ handle it manually, and if the system breaks we should fix it in another way because this way sucks, but I'm not sure what that would be. More consultancies or temp agencies? Not sure that's a better option.
I think this is a fair criticism and if the goal is to change behavior then I agree.

If the goal is to make sure there's always a spot available while having the lowest possible price to guarantee that then I think variable pricing based on capacity is better.
It gave enough detail so that 'raiyu will know who it is; it was very descriptive in that way.
For the same reason that lots of other things are subsidized, paid for even if you don't use them

- school buses and the like

- sporting equipment and facilities

- library

There's lots of services that schools provide, and charge everyone for, because they think it's good for the student body as a while.

Maybe a more controversial one... a school that supplies free transit to/from the local night scene, so that people don't drive to/from bars while intoxicated. It's better for everyone, including locals, for this to exist. However, the non-drinkers, the ones who are nowhere near the night scene, get no benefit from it; they pay for it anyways. And a lot of people would say that's good, and a lot would say it's bad.
Am I the only one who thinks this is wrong? An alternative headline could be something like, "Entitled College Kids Learn How To Keep Parking Like Assholes Without Paying Fines."

And it's a pyrhic victory anyway, because chances are now the cars will get one of the metal tire boots put on, or get towed. Both of which are more expensive and a bigger hassle for everybody.
Just FYI, your comment appears to be a response to the parent of my comment, not to me :). Agreed on all points!
What? I don't understand what that means.

A monorepo is just 1 repo. There is nothing more straightforward than that.
As far as I've seen, the only people who have suggested noise canceling may be a possible source of hearing damage are people who don't understand how sound works. Would love to see a single coherent explanation of how it could be the case from someone who has a clue.
Cost of living, sure, but in this thread we're discussing how significant the tax aspect actually is.
> So the way we can solve this problem is to outlaw shares ownership of competing companies? Seems like a fair solution.

Your suggestion is for people to take big risks and put all their eggs in a few baskets. Not only is this totally opposed to why people make multiple investments, but doing so could make the market more volatile because any fluctuation or current event could encourage people to suddenly "switch sides".
Sure; nothing wrong with that comparison either - you're just not going to get a straightforwards apples to apples comparison. Unlike libusb, the windows api really is part of the OS; whereas libusb is a convenience library that - on windows - must use the lower level api; it's not a peer. Then again, there's no reason to care much about great convenience from a lowest-level api, so I'm not really sure what all the fuss is about: as long as the api isn't so wrong-headed to make good wrappers difficult or error prone, inconvenience seems like a fairly small price.
Tbh, I haven't seen a real-life example that perfectly clones this method but I've adopted parts of the system that makes sense for my own workflow. I think that's how it should be approached. Luhmann developed this in a non-digital world after all.
A brighter future for kidney disease
Shouldn’t the priors be updated and improved each step to be closer to a good prior, and that’s why inaccurate priors may be acceptable? (Do BNNs not iteratively update the (next step’s) prior with the previous step’s posterior?) I haven’t worked on BNNs, but since Bayesian are always talking about updating their priors I thought this would be the case.
The thing is that e waste recyclers generally try to re sell working electronics and have come out hard against Sonos's recycle mode.

There's a reason why the saying is "reduce, reuse, recycle" in that order.

They also don't verify that you recycled it, practically it only makes sure that the otherwise working speaker is removed from the market so that Sonos isn't competing with itself. I'd imagine that a lot of these just end up in the garbage.
Pure fraudulent AI snake oil. Where is a hungry lawyer that wants to team up with computer scientists and take down these predator companies. There is serious wealth to be had by exposing these con men, and a hell of a lot of misery to be halted.
No privacy. In future privacy will be a luxury only billionaires will be able to afford.

The internet is more likely going to wall up in subtle and complex ways rather than stay open.

CEOs make astronomical salaries and benefits while shareholders and workers receive... not much.

Most healthcare costs are a rounding error compared to a lot of military budgets.

Automation is eating large chunks of the economy meanwhile capital is no longer as valuable.

Wages in real terms are flat lining. Commerce is screaming about costs and low revenue while demanding even lower salaries.

Worldwide interest rates are basically zero at best.

And the climate is heating up. Or its totally not. Depends on who you believe.

Most new tech gadgets turn into landfill in around 1-3 years.

Everything is fine.
How does it make no sense? He’s saying we might never get past level 4. And they’re going to offer level 4. That statement is logically coherent.
I’m from Lüneburg, Germany and have never heard about Niklas Luhmann nor have I seen any Zettelkästen.

I unfortunately have nothing else to add to the topic of Zettelkasten, but if anyone is in Hamburg or near Lüneburg and wants a little tour through our lovely town, let me know!
To catch a thief, go to Google with a geofence warrant
I agree. I'd also love to block Pinterest from the image search results.
If that's true then they're already doing it and they should have it free sometimes.

I'd suspect that the goal may be generating maximum revenue rather than capacity at lowest price though. If the goal was variable pricing so you get a spot at lowest price (free when possible) then I'd be happy with that.

You could have an upper bound price per lot if you wanted people to know what they might have to pay worst case, but uncapped would be interesting if you want there to always be a spot available.
yeah i was trying to make a charitable re-interpretation of the parent
Amazon to Funnel Fake Product Data to Authorities
My favorite part of the article: Guerilla'd.

"but our fave low-tech workaround was shared by a user who found out his campus only had 12 wheel boots to go around and bought and illegally parked 12 scrapyard cars that could be “sacrificed” so everyone else could park however they wanted."
I've been beating this drum for years. Well said.
The same thing happened to my Turtlebeach Audiotron.
It doesn't cost $42M to make a CSV file available.
Do you know when their next open house is going to be? I went over there once, but it seems to be closed to the public. I subscribed to their newsletter, but no news.
> This is what confuses me about monorepos. Their design requires an array of confusing processes and complex software to make the process of merging, testing, and releasing code manageable at scale (and "scale" can even be 6 developers working on 2 separate features each across 10 services, in one repo).

False. It is having multiple repos what creates those problems and a huge graph of versions and dependencies.

What "processes" are you talking about?
'Extremely rare’ Assyrian carvings discovered in Iraq
It applies not to one, but to four:

> No employer shall coerce or influence or attempt to coerce or influence his employees...

So it's not just coercion, it's prohibiting influence (as well as attempts at either). And it also describes the manner of influence that is prohibited:

> through or by means of threat of discharge or loss of employment.

It is prohibited to influence employees through discharge or loss of employment or through threat of discharge or loss of employment. Both threatening to fire someone and actually firing someone over political activity are prohibited.

And lastly it describes what the employer is prohibited from influencing their employers to or to refrain from doing:

> to adopt or follow or refrain from adopting or following any particular course or line of political action or political activity.

Using the above to get employees to follow a political action to to refrain from following a political action is prohibited.

> You also dodged the question.

Because the question is inane and you know it. My whole point was that both threatening to fire Eich and actually firing Eich for donations violated these protections, so this distinction is irrelevant. But I'll entertain you: threatening to discharge someone over political activity is when an employer threatens and employee to fire someone for taking or refusing to take a political action. Discharging someone over political activity is when they are actually fired.

And now it's my turn to give you an inane question of my own: When the law prohibits both threatening to discharge someone for political activity and actually discharging someone for political activity, is trying to justify firing someone for political actions by saying, "it's okay they actually discharged him for political activity, they didn't threaten to discharge him" an effective approach?
I doubt however that LA Metro will ever have the same range of the original Red Car. I never see the system going deep into Balboa Newport Beach in Orange County.
How to Install Arch Linux on a Late 2015 Retina (12,1) MacBook Pro
As soon as everyone's submitted their bio-profiles to 23andMe DNA collection.....
I think the point here is that going from level 4 to level 5 is a much, much harder problem than going from, say, level 1 to level 4.
I work at a hospital. I have to pay for a parking permit to park at my work. On its face, this is ridiculous.
If you have a user, after reading a few posts you are denied from reading if you don't get a subscription.

The Practical Dev (dev.to) has been consistently growing, while adding incredible features and offering everything for free (and open source).

My guess is that dev.to should create a similar amount of traffic as Medium and maybe outgrow it, since many writers/readers have migrated over there.

My advice is to move to dev.to, it doesn't make sense to write on Medium anymore.
All of these things can be done without internet connectivity.
I think Hyundai/Kia has a good electric car strategy in place. They have taken some of their popular models and offered an electrified versions of them. I bought a Kia Niro EV last year and have been enjoying it. Although not as flashy or exciting as a Tesla (e.g. no self-driving features), they are appealing to those who want an electric car but want something more practical and familiar.
Very little concept of security, privacy and a default paradigm of "lisp assumes it owns the environment".

This may no longer be true, but it's a large barrier against being adopted in many industries.
That and it's kind of hard to do modern graphics with many implementations.... although they can do html serving pretty well.

LISP environments may be the start of GUI, but that code is largely locked up, or in systems that can no longer be used (I think?)
Anyway, all stuff worth putting some attention on!

(note : just a lisp fan, and only an edge one, so likely no longer accurate on many points Most of the above came from reading 50s through 90s texts, and trying lisp environments at the time)
In my opinion, this abuse of "AI" is criminal fraud. It is simply not possible to do what they claim. The entire "industry" of companies offering these services need to be investigated and shut down.
To Apple's credit, they have released fairly recent firmware for all their airport devices, even adding Airplay 2 support to (either 2nd or 3rd gen?) Airport Express' that had the hardware to support it, despite the devices not being mfged anymore (for many years) and the entire product line discontinued. Fwiw, I just used a 1st gen Airport (>$20) as a wifi to ethernet bridge to get a GoldenTee machine online for a client. They also work great as a wireless airplay receiver for older stereo equipment using the 3.5mm output from the Airport!
It sounds like AirBnb is just trying to prevent someone’s home from becoming a whorehouse, or the set of a porn film.
Your private Docker Registry
Procedural Polyomino Generation (Go)
Davis also has the rare advantage of rarely raining, and being incredibly flat. Both of these make biking far more attractive to the average student.
KRSI and Proprietary BPF Programs
Having spoken with few people, the process is still mostly people, building algorithms in Excel.
Much of what drives decisions is research, and personal decision's, not automation.

I've heard AI trading has done very poorly as the system isn't predictable, it's people making decisions in ways which can become self fulfilling prophesies.

Algorithms when distributed would also fall victim to the fastest person benefiting the most
A wire in the road can't handle stuff like a pedestrian. Pedestrians normally aren't in highways but sometimes are after break-downs, accidents, construction, etc. Lane-following is close to solved on the highway, it is all that other stuff and more that is an issue. A wire could still help, but you'd still need a complex system or significantly more infrastructure than just a wire (maybe caged barriers over the lane in a way that doesn't cause issues if there is a fire, and more).
> If you could only invest in one tech company, who would have invested in Apple/Amazon/Google instead of IBM?

IMHO there shouldn't be Apple/Amazon/Google/IBM companies as they are today. I want Google and other companies be splitted to AdWords, GoogleSearch, YouTube, Android, Waymo companies. And they should not use their dominant/monopolistic position in search/ads areas to get unfair advantage in other areas.

So you would have to choose your investment between Android/Apple/WinMobile OS, AdWords/AdMob ads, Waymo/Cruise cars, Google/Yahoo/DuckDuckGo search, YouTube/Vimeo videos.
No worries, thanks for the suggestion!
Staying inside a lane isn't the hard problem.
I think the problem with this would be brokerage fees for buying/selling. If a fund is rebalancing 10% of their holdings the fees are a rounding error, if I'm rebalancing 10% of mine as an individual the fees would be a noticeable percentage.
From Scott Aaronson

> Yet another reason to be excited about this result—one that somehow hadn’t occurred to me—is that, as far as I know, it’s the first-ever fully convincing example of a non-relativizing computability result.

This is one of the three known barriers any proof of P vs NP must overcome. Not saying any of this applies to P vs NP but the proof technique demonstrated is important for such a proof.
Does Tesla or Waymo actively lobby against such efforts?
Why not drone cars, driven remotely?
partial clone is different from sparse checkout.

We are using sparse checkout. Partial clone is the one that only pulls down objects that are needed by the store.
Yes, exactly! Sorry for attaching it to yours, the parent comment didn't have a way to reply directly (perhaps banned?)
If your car gets booted and you pick the lock to remove it can you now legally sell the boot?
This is the first part in a series of tutorials I intend to create based on my experience with creating netris:

https://git.sr.ht/~tslocum/netris