skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure. But increasing the number of frames with tracks increased the number of datapoints you need to throw away, reducing the effective time on target and therefore sensitivity of your observations. Astronomers are not idiots. They know how to deal with obstructions. But that is not free of cost. Neither in observational limits nor computer time nor required brain power.
You can sometimes grab these ssh keys if the server has a severe directory traversal, local-file-inclusion vulnerability(run server/DB as root) , or to use for pivoting to different user/machine... But never heard of these being exposed outright.
Materialized views are fundamentally just some syntactical sugar over the results of a query cached in a table.

The syntactical sugar does have advantages, but comes at a cost of flexibility - if you need more control over the update process or modification of the data than a full refresh, then you should just use a table (create table whatever as select * from ...).
Imagine what we could do with just a 1% export tariff and funneling that money into renewable energy sources. At 10% we could invest in renewable energy projects in other parts of the world.
What’s the Big Deal with React Native?
Yeah, the worry's pretty unambiguously justified; even today, native speakers sometimes just forget how to write words they know. It's just a question of how much it matters.
I think you have come to the right conclusion but it would be more accurate to say "the state is the sophistication of evil."

With that being said, welcome to Libertarianism.
if you're curious about this topic, I highly recommend checking out the webpage linked in the sibling comment, "There Ain't No Stealth in Space" if you're curious about this topic.

tl;dr: it's exceedingly difficult to hide anything that consumes power in space. the rcs thrusters would either be too weak to achieve the delta v to hit the target, or the friction from the thrust against the nozzle would unstealth the missile. even the radiation from the onboard computer would likely stand out against the cosmic background. a missile like you describe could potentially evade current detection systems, but would almost certainly be detected by any civilization where ship-to-ship space combat is feasible. and not in a handwavy future tech way, but just from extrapolating current tech. I highly recommend checking out that page. it makes for a great read.
I'm not buying it. The labour agreement allowed for students working 8 hours/week. This wasn't even an oversight -- it was specifically considered during contract negotiations and the (lack of) benefits such students would receive was agreed upon.
> It can (and often does) make sense to invest in industries in terminal decline as price paid for an asset’s cash flow is the primary determinant if returns for the investor. You can buy coal stocks for 25%+ earnings yields. Even if those plants are phased out in 6 or 7 years, one can make solid returns.

For Blackrock, those 25% yields you talk about don't exist. If Blackrock were to retain a significant investment in those companies, share prices would be higher and yield lower.

What makes sense for a small investor often doesn't make sense for large corporate investors.

That said, investments like what you describe have their own risks. At this point it largely depends on contracts and how quickly alternative power sources can ramp up.

You are the second person to mention tobacco, and I think it's a poor comparison. People are literally addicted to tobacco which guarantees long term demand. Even if that demand is decreasing over time, it's predictable and not severe. Coal does not share those characteristics.
If the endpoint you are requesting says it does not want to expose itself to unknown origins, that should be respected in the default config.

For testing, security research and so on you can always modify the browser config or use a proxy.
The Fine Art of Baloney Detection by Carl Sagan

http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/lehre/pmo/eng/Sagan-Baloney.pdf
>In negotiating the 10-hour threshold for tuition remission during contract negotiations, the union says it understood that eight-hour appointments would be used only sparingly. And they were used that way for about a decade. Since 2015, however, non-remission-eligible appointments have surged from about 2 percent of assistantships to 12 percent.

It appears that it all comes down to whose understanding about the final contract was right. I understand these are legal documents. Was "sparingly" defined there, and did increasing the number of 8-hour appointments exceed that threshold?

Either way it's bad that the trend always seems to be towards decreasing instructional staff pay and benefits. It's a nice windfall for these TAs whether they were expecting it or not.
It might be worth posting to reddit.com/r/longevity as well. I'm looking forward to it.
Seems biased. Isn't the purpose to choose something that is news worthy and interesting to the community?

I think we should let it come naturally.
The problem with this is it assumes that OP's direct bosses have access to their fair chunk of $4.3b, which I doubt.

The money stops flowing some place, but no one can ever seem to point where. Individual departments are always severely strapped, so not likely there. Could be the university admins are just holding it in coffers and the individual departments only get small incremental increases relative to class sizes.

As a UC school, is it possible to get access to the books?
Also, verify whether the facts actually (comprehensively) support the conclusion the author is wanting readers to put into their brains.
I think Joseph Pilates would disagree there!

The classes I've taken all focus around strengthening the core muscles in the lower back area.
I agree. The comment I was responding to said they had to raise prices to combat overcrowding. I was specific in saying that if that were truly their goal, there are other ways to achieve it, and that there are other reasons to raise prices. No need to use over crowding as an excuse.
They're using standard tunnel boring machines same as anyone else. It's not clear what their "special sauce" is that's supposed to enable them to do it at one-tenth the cost. So far they haven't delivered.

As for LA, you've had ample opportunity to expand your subway system over the past decades to solve this problem, it's just never actually been done. It's not clear how Boring Company changes anything. I would love to be wrong about this, but I'm not seeing it.
It turns light colored websites into dark websites [1][2][3].

Here is an example: https://colinespinas.github.io/darken/

[1] https://support.apple.com/en-ca/HT208976

[2] https://css-tricks.com/dark-modes-with-css/

[3] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@media/pref...
Tbh I don’t understand what this is.
The title (not the text, though) sounds a bit like the premise of The Flow from John Scalzi's The Collapsing Empire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Collapsing_Empire
They surely don't live there now either.
Google Parent Alphabet Joins Apple and Microsoft in the US$1T Club
There is also a fairly predictable decline curve for coal and shutter dates. I’m not talking about building new plants. That makes no sense I agree (as do the utilities). Existing coal plants absolutely make money as they simply need to cover variable costs.
Loved and hated.

Being both attracts way more interest and engagement than one or the other.
IIRC, that Faramir plot was cut from the theatrical release and was only included in the extended version.

I think I sort of prefer showing him struggle with it and then make the right decision rather than just making the right decision easily. Resisting the temptation makes him more heroic.
I have 6k photos on my phone and this works just fine. The search speed is mostly the same.
Unfortunately I'm using python, Java, node, and C. I don't know much go and I don't get many changes to use it at work.
Happily, there are some settings like that. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/intellisense

```
// Controls the delay in ms after which quick suggestions will show up.
"editor.quickSuggestionsDelay": 10,
```
Sure, I think it's quite technically obvious when you look at any aspect of the matter. Taiwan is five feet from mainland China and they have a massive military that is increasingly quite advanced technologically (clearly the overall #2 military in the world in both capability and technology at this point; Russia is superior to China in a few categories, but not overall; China is rapidly rising, Russia's military is rusting) and they have an increasingly potent navy. They can stand off US carriers effectively and are building multiple carriers of their own. They can rapidly, massively resupply locally, whereas the US would have the British Empire problem of trying to supply a conflict very far away (and facing non-stop Chinese harassment & losses in attempting to resupply into Asia). US bombing capability is far too limited in volume now versus a target as massive as modern China's manufacturing and military (we can't take it down effectively or fast enough; and we couldn't easily consistently penetrate their territory air defenses anyway; Russia would very happily feed them volumes of S missile systems, which would severely restrict US bombing efforts). US military resupply is wildly expensive, Chinese military resupply is not (specifically on such a local/regional basis). My god the resupply capabilities of a full war footing modern China in the local region - just get the fuck out of the way of that. Picture WW2 scale US manufacturing arms output capability and then double it.

What is the US going to do, lose a couple hundred thousand soldiers and a large number of naval ships trying to save Taiwan, which is an impossible task long-term. No chance the American public goes for that unless the mainland US is at risk or unless China makes the mistake of killing a large number of US soldiers in eg South Korea or Japan. Taiwan is an ally, it isn't necessary for US national well-being. If China gets Taiwan, and the US keeps its manufacturing-import relationship with China/Taiwan for its domestic economy benefit, the US public will have little appetite for an actual war with China. Where's the US public self-interest otherwise?

Do you kill everyone in China, alternatively (not plausible, as that's all out nuclear warfare between the two nations)? Because that's the only way to permanently stop them from taking Taiwan if they want it. They have an authoritarian system, truly epic scale manufacturing capabilities of all sorts, a rapidly advancing military, and 1.4 billion people to throw at problems (with only minimum regard for killing large numbers of them if it's regarded as absolutely necessary for national goals; China will tolerate losses far better than the US, authoritarian systems have demonstrated that repeatedly in the prior century).
Depends where you're digging. Might be water table; might be existing infrastructure; might just be a certain type of rock.
For me, I find that having a good autocomplete makes code easier to read because it makes long names easier to type correctly.

Compare "save-lisp-and-die" vs "s-l-a-d<TAB>". The latter is much easier to type and the former much easeier to read.
The requirement that all transactions in the new "city" will have to use his crypto is going to make it impossible to get going. All players will already be involved in regular non-crypto economic activities. Why would they want to pay or be paid in crypto, especially such a limited one as this?
Carl Sagan, who coined the term, has admitted that he is a carbon chauvinist. And I suspect most biochemists are as well; there are decent chemical reasons to disfavor any other system.
Guys, if you’re having muscle related pain, focus on your electrolytes! Most muscle spasms are caused by imbalances.

Sodium, potassium, magnesium, zinc, calcium.

Also if you cook at home a lot you might not be getting enough sodium. especially if you’re sweating a lot you need to replace an tom or sodium.
They aren’t “entirely different feature”. Why do you think C#8 introduced Nullable reference types that work exactly like Java Optional ? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/nullable-refe...
Assume for a moment the guy is right by whatever circumstances. There are three supporting pieces of evidence and perhaps the last sentence is "charged" but I don't see how it is offensive even if wholly incorrect. How would he present the very ideas as "curious conversation"?
"Holding programming back" means that it would have advanced in the absence of Java. What language would have advanced it? Cladote seems to assume that ML would have, which would have been actually used if Java hadn't taken over the world. That seems unsupported by evidence. Overly optimistic, as well.

And if Cladote's answer, ML, would not have taken over, then did Java hold back anything? No. Was it better than, say, C++? For many uses, yes.

"We would have ruled the world if it wasn't for you meddling kids!" is wishful thinking. If ML was so good, it should have won anyway. Instead, "has managed to avoid being used by anyone" is a pretty fair assessment.
Even domestic cigarette investments have done phenomenally. Not just PM. Look at LO for instance (no longer listed as it was bought out).
A proof of the constancy of the velocity of light (1913)
That's a very ostrich attitude to the problem though.

Allowing toxic behaviour to persist and shutting down discussion of the problem.

I'm just wondering why pointing out a flaw, that I'm grateful if someone answering, which is ultimately useful for the community as a whole gets downvoted.

Downvoting doesn't give any feedback to the poster what they did wrong. I'm all for good feedback, shutting down that discussion does greater damage in a meritocracy IMHO
Sure it's not without cost, but in most cases the cost is not very high.

Remember you don't need to throw away the whole frame, only the pixels that were obstructed. One track across a frame will obstruct less than 1% of the data in that frame.
It does index all the memes just fine. I should add inApp-purchase on the extra dank ones, jk.
Re: Though [separating in Lisp] has tried a bunch of times.

I haven't seen it done well. The attempts kind of end up with the worse of both worlds.

Re: Could be that or that one just needs a bit of practice

But the key is how much, and how long does it vary per individual. There is no solid research that I know of, so it's just opinion and anecdotes either way.

I tried to get used to it and read it fast, but it just felt progress was really slow. Most Algol-derived languages use punctuation and symbols that seem to make them stand out better than words alone. I'm not quite sure how to describe it, but standardizing the meaning of "funny symbols" help my particular eyes work faster. My head parses words too slow, and I have been reading words since kindergarten. Similar discussions:

https://wiki.c2.com/?LispLacksVisualCues

https://wiki.c2.com/?ChallengeSixLispVersionDiscussion

One can make that claim about any tool I should note, even COBOL. Some seasoned COBOLer's can crank out and read COBOL code really quick, I'd note. The top COBOLer can probably out-code an average Lisper I'd bet.

Re: That you observe two things does not mean that they are necessarily in a causal relation.

True, but per lack of formal studies per above, speculative observations are all any of us have. It should be a curiosity why after 60 years it never caught on mainstream. Almost nothing else in IT has had that many shots at it.

Re: One just introduces variables like in your imperative example:

Yes, but the Algol-derived languages (like C, Python, etc.) do that "style" in an easier-to-read and more consistent way, at least in my opinion.

Side note: why am I getting a rotten score? What did I do bad? I don't want bad scores. I'm just expressing my opinion openly. I don't feel I deserve punishment.
We've been doing optical interferometry for quite some time. Homodyne techniques (see facilities, CHARA, VLTI, COAST, NPOI, SUSI) in which the light is interfered with itself are quite common. Heterodyne methods (one facility, ISI) in which the incoming light is mixed with a stable laser and downconverted to longer wavelengths are uncommon though.
Everything I learned came out of a computer so these statistics certaintly don't apply to me.

I found human teachers terrible at explaining things. Their explanations are often full of holes and they expect you to move at their pace - They don't give you the time to absorb the content. I felt that math class was just for show. I never learned anything from it.

I failed math in my final year of school, then I went to university and I got distinction in math. The difference was that at university, I was watching videos online and using free online interactive graphing software and programming matrix transformations.

The problem is not technology in general. It's using the wrong technologies.
What if? It is.
Yeah, I'd be a lot more worried about that big ball of fire that scientists all agree will one day consume us.
What do you do if you don’t mind answering? I recently quit my job because of my mental health and would love to find a part time job though having trouble finding one in the tech space
> C# Nullable<T> is near useless because it only works on value types. I.e., you know, the types that are least likely to generate NullReferenceException for you.

You are completely missing the point of Nullable. It was introduced because databases allowed int, float, etc ( value types ) to be null. It was never meant to be an Option type. Reference types are already "nullable" so the database returning null for strings wasn't a problem. But databases returning nulls for int was a problem. It led to performance issues ( boxing and/or adding additional code to marshal data from one source to another ). If you find Nullable to be annoying then you either don't code in C# much and you especially don't deal with data/databases.

For what it was intended for, Nullable did it's job. And if Nullable is your only complaint, given the extraordinary changes that C# has gone through, I think it speaks well for C#.
I get that in Firefox, but if I open it in Safari everything plays just fine. You might just have to play the browser juggling game!
Reference; heap;

They are data containers, not control structures.
If you believe that car travel must be innately evil, then induced demand is a problem with building more roads. More roads mean more people using them to do something they want to do. These tunnels will be toll roads, so if you just up the tolls you can have them not get jammed up. You then have a real idea of how much a tunnel can make and you can get people to invest in building more of them.

Individual point-to-point transport systems are great. We just need to find a way to reduce the bad externalities of cars (pollution, traffic deaths, non-walkable cities/town, traffic congestion, taking up surface space). Elon Musk is working on three of these with Tesla and the Boring Company.
You're welcome; I figured it was something like that.

Sorry "vultures" took it over, I would use something like GitHub/GitLab pages if you are looking for minimum maintenance.
That's how I remember it - they were starting down their current path in privacy terms but hadn't hit the moral event horizon yet, and they were still in that unbridled optimism phase where they were launching moonshot projects rather than churning through web service offerings. I didn't get seriously concerned about them until later (around 2014-2015 iirc) and it took until the start of 2018 for me to completely de-google myself.
To be fair, _everything_ takes unnaturally long to happen in SF due to all the ways a Very Concerned* Neighbor can tie any project up in approval meetings.
https://forms.sfplanning.org/NeighborhoodNotification_InfoPa...

[*] About their property values
Ariane is also an EU rocket launcher, why do you want to shadow the name?
As an ex-KDE3 user, and a Unix starter with Debian Woody, I loved Mac OSX Tiger and stuff like QuickTime VR/Macromedia 3D stuff such as the Street View like (steregraphic?) views on encyclopedias and such.
ConcurrentHashMap contains multiple volatile fields. These are kept in sync (i.e. their invariants are preserved) by the ConcurrentHashMap implementation. Concurrent programming being hard is a property of concurrent programming. It being hard does not require pattern matching.

Most mutable objects are easy because they don't support concurrent modifications. Therefore pattern matching would not make them harder to implement. Pattern matching such an object while it is being concurrently modified is simply a programmer error just like any other use of the object.

Not allowing pattern matching of mutable objects would be similar to not allowing equals and hashCode methods on such objects and for similar reasons.
I worked with a company who were doing (basic)analytics on their live ERP db, sales and margin reporting etc. There was a view written to join in all of the common tables so the in house people could query it easily, things like product names, customer names and addresses etc. When performance fell off they materialised the view as a stop gap... until they got around to a data warehouse. 10 years later it is still there, building each night! It was actually the perfect solution for them, simple analytics with no more infrastructure!
I guess we would have to look at the actual costs and trade offs. Personally I am still not convinced that launch cost is the biggest problem but I am sure astronomers are crunching budget numbers right now and will adjust plans if it makes sense.
>Even the Voyager probes will someday fly-by some star.

Not necessarily. I think you underestimate how much of space is space and how little of it is anything else... and that most of that "anything else" is dark matter. Only ~4% of the mass energy of the entire universe is matter.

It seems more likely than not to me that any arbitrary path through interstellar space would never pass near anything larger than a grain of dust.
As a general principle, just because some of something is good, does not necessarily mean that more of that thing is better.
> Because that's one of the things that the market sometimes does when it's free.

Correct -- a truly unconstrained market tends to devolve to a highly unfree market. This is why even Adam Smith commented that proper regulation is essential to ensure markets remain free.