skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Android user 8 years, iPhone 6 months.

> > Not letting you side load is a feature.

> I absolutely do not see it that way.

This is the key. Not having this option frees me from having to worry about the whole issue which is liberating. Either it's in the AppStore or it's not and I move on. With Android I spent days/weeks following whispers/rumors of such an app and trying different alternatives, rooting, etc.

It depends on how much patience and control you want. I had time for that years ago, but not now. iPhone gives you a lot less customization and control, but I spend a lot less time managing the phone and one-off issues, weird needs-fixing cases, phone-vendor specific things.

Not trying to sell you on iPhone, just saying I thought the same as you, but understand both sides of it now.
This is great, and everything you’ve said is true.

But the change in iOS13 is the regularly occurring pop up alert to prompt users to pick a lower permission for apps they don’t use often that are also tracking location.

As others have mentioned, iOS has had the fine grain permission for a while. What’s new is the regular prompt.
> Lying in court is always* illegal.

So if you plead not guilty to some crime, and they find you guilty, do you get prosecuted for lying in court with your plead as well as for the original crime?
Is crypt32 supposed to be secure against side channel and timing attacks?
Would you feel the same way about someone planning all your meals? Where you work? Where you sleep? It's beneficial to resist control even when that control seems beneficial at first. In the end, only you have your own best interest in mind.
This is a wonderful example of how to lie with statistics. Look at the first graph [0].

Super scary up and to the right line that appears to show our labor force being destroyed over time with no link to economic conditions.

But wait. Look at the scale. This data represents a 6% change over 50 years.

Very weak sauce. Why trust a paper that starts off by deceiving people in such a base way?

[0] https://www.nationalaffairs.com/storage/app/media/Winter%202...
Average users won't disable tracking unless prompted.
> And you know what? Not letting you side load is a feature.

Apps released under the GPL are banned from the App Store.
Majority of women who have an abortion don’t regret it five years on
Apache Tika is a powerful text extraction engine.

Why this over Tika?
Having it be the first thing in the morning seems to be the least efficient option possible, way worse than being interrupted in flow. This is the peak working time for most people, peak alert time for the majority of the population, and therefore the most productive time for many people, even many of those who are not prone to waking up early. Starting with something that's mostly useless to the developer and taking focus away from what really needs to get done that morning sometimes kills the entire morning. I'd rather be interrupted mid-flow and I'm certain I'm not alone considering the majority of the population actually is most alert in the morning (along with the other peaks of energy throughout the day). The optimal time for such a meeting would probably be either right before or after lunch, with lunch being variable and taken based on the workload of that day.
What the parent described is true - that's basic human psychology.

What's new is the scenario he described is playing out in real-life on Tindr now, with roughly those ratios.

And it's not pleasant, as reported in the press. If you're squeamish, I suggest not researching it further.
No code has been a thing for a long time. I don't think we need to be so defensive, though. The limitations of this approach haven't changed in the decades since its first inception.

I think it's a little ignorant and short sighted to speak down on the current trend. The reality is, there used to be a whole host of no-code products that solved a whole host of problems. We haven't outgrown those problems, but the solutions we had didn't scale well with the technologies we use today.

We need similar tools to those that we had before, updated and adapted for modern technology. Some of the new tools go a step further, which is incredible. Think about every aunt and uncle who have an idea that would solve a problem they and 10 of their friends have. Those 11 people are super stoked about the tool that Aunt Linda built. Why can't we let them have that?
One might hope you have a formal spec of a cryptographic library.
Ask HN: How has BigTech not gotten better than WallStreet at predicting markets?
With the massive amounts of real-time data that Facebook, Google, Amazon, Twitter, and even Apple, etc. collect on what people are buying, wanting to buy, how people feel about news and events, etc. How have these companies not completely negated the usefulness of Wall Street?

Is there any evidence to suggest that these large companies use all of the data they own to improve their own portfolios?
15 years ago I failed out of computer science at UIUC because I skipped class, got high and played video games all day. Once my parents cut me off, the depression of working dead-end jobs after having such high prospects before led me to enlist in the Navy to try and start over.

Today I’m married with a child, I support my family as the primary breadwinner, I have a BS and MBA and am pursuing a PhD in computer science. All of that education was paid for by the GI Bill.

Sample size of one, but I can confirm your hypothesis.
Looking forward to it! Thanks again!
I was wondering if there's a correlation with weather for the particular crashes recorded.
Interesting idea but most of the situations I've worked from home it was with stuff scrounged from the main office or.... just from what I have at home.

I don't naturally just have room for my employer to outfit me... although I guess that could be nice.
> and does not work if you have 2FA enabled

Certainly false, at least for Bank Of America. Just yesterday I connected BofA to privacy.com using Plaid and it asked me to enter the SMS 2fa code.
Sadly they don’t (well, can’t) release the audio+transcripts as dataset, as they clearly don’t own the rights.
I'd more more worried about either hacked sites, or a country with something like China's Great Cannon doing that than a legitimate US company like Google.

Google doing that would be a great way for everyone involved to spend a long time in jail.
Android 10 also has a similar prompt via notifications.
Harry Potter checkouts may also have been heavily bottlenecked by the number of available copies.
Paths ARE Unicode strings on 99% of the computers with humans sitting in front of them. NTFS, HFS+, and APFS all use Unicode but more importantly, the experience of not using valid Unicode where that’s possible is horrible: undeletable files, crashes, etc. I’ve seen that many times over the years (it was popular with malware authors) but never a time where this was a desirable behavior.

The default should always be Unicode with only people writing low-level backup and security tools dealing with bytes.
They are adding value alright but it goes to invisible (to us) shareholders, not to the end users.
only 4 years to go :)
Coquitlam has a report. And the weather predictions are quantized to a certain cell size. And in coquitlam, why bother. It’s all just rain :P
It’s not meaningless words - it’s common English words that are overloaded and I think considering their position in sentences instead would give better results.

I haven’t yet tried TFIDF though so I’ll see what that will do.
Usually because the strategies which have genuine alpha and consistently outperform are capacity constrained, and so cannot be scaled to handle both.

Of course, at RenTech in particular the employee-only fund is the good fund. But that's not always the case, so the parent commenter has a point. Deferred/locked up compensation can really suck.
Prompt, another iOS SSH app, does the same thing. They even named the feature "connection keeper."
Reminiscent of Dune, which had living "chairdogs".
„1-2 publications in top ML venues“ now required for entering a PhD program
They can’t, because they are trained on more-or-less high-quality recordings of people reading books out loud. Phone conversations are very different, not just in audio quality but in the way people speak.
Makes me think more of The Island of Dr Moreau (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Island_of_Doctor_Moreau) but yeah. Sounds useful, but ghoulish.
We get dangerous ones like tornado sent as part of
Emergency broadcast. Snowfall warnings and thunderstorms warning are sent without geolocation as well.
According to Google, the US minimum wage is $7.25. $7.25 * 40 = $290/fulltime week. Tens of millions surviving on less must be an exaggeration?
1. You will never be at 0% when you hit the supercharger.

2. You don't necessarily need to charge up to 100%

3. Supercharger V3 can reach 250KW, and the Tesla Model 3 supports this. The next gen Model S will as well.
US colleges struggling with low enrollment are closing at increasing rate (2019)
I need to go back and check, we might be in one of their test groups as I haven’t heard any issues with 2FA. We do a catch-all and based on the error, we prompt the user to manually provide their banking info to proceed.

Worth noting I don’t work for a financial services company so the use case is likely very different than the services you’re discussing.

Apologies if I came off strong, it appears I may be a one-off consumer as opposed to mainstream.
You're saying a feature that's in alpha, released 2 months ago is painful? You should at least wait until a feature is beta until expecting it to be easier to use.
I believe that entering a plea doesn't count as testimony, thus isnt subject to perjury laws. Most of my cases were plea deals before trial, or were cases where the defendant did not testify. Saying "not guilty" also doesn't necessarily mean you didn't do anything, you may honestly believe at that point, and make the argument, that the thing you did was not illegal.
The only reason people like to claim we are spiraling into 1984 is because of its popularity. When it comes down to it the resemblance to today is superficial at best.
It's just that a certain type of officer is usually eager to catch you in a lie; it gives them leverage, and it often flusters people into saying things that they didn't mean to. You also don't want, "...and they lied to me about it" to show up in future discussions.

Ideally you would simply never speak with a police officer. But this is a stressful and unwanted situation that we're talking about, and most people (myself certainly included) aren't going to know how to assert every one of their rights that are relevant to a situation in that stressful moment. It's fairly easy to remember to avoid giving the officers anything to work with, though.

But you make a good point, I'm not a lawyer and I only speak from anecdotal experience.
What an amateur. Your brother should have told the officer his traffic stop was unconstitional, under the 1st amendment, because his driving is a form of self-expression.
>(perhaps by design)

That was my point.
you sir are a corner case.
This article is a great damage control policy. You should be able to avoid getting screwed by following its advice.

That said, this is a complex topic and an article of that length can only cover so much. There's a lot of nuance in these kinds of things (human interaction is complex) and by behaving as the situation demands an not coming off as one of those sovereign citizen types you can turn a lot of $50 "contempt of cop while having a tail light out" tickets into warnings without giving up your rights.
Which is another way of saying Apple values money over users being protected from something terrible.
A plea is not a statement of fact, is it? It's your opinion and true by definition.
Every serious software engineer that plans on developing public APIs at some point in their career needs to have an understanding of and some basic practice with implementing auth.

"Don't reinvent the wheel" is easily bypassed by just reading auth code from prominent open-source projects to see real-world auth that is secure and works. You don't need a service and using a service doesn't negate an engineer from being competent to implement their own if necessary.
It's part of their mission.

Back in the day they helped make DES stronger against differential cryptanalysis, which was unknown at the time.
I'm aware Diaspora itself doesn't render without JS. It's what avails itself, my apologies.

Post text: https://pastebin.com/raw/9K5h6c5V

I nominate joindiaspora.com as the first banned site.
My own anecdotal experience says that not all the dropouts are, by typical definitions, unskilled. It’s a lot more complicated than that, and I believe it is closely connected to psychological factors such as susceptibility to anxiety and depression.
Samsung's Galaxy S20 Ultra Might Have More RAM Than Your PC
Certificates in the Web PKI (so they'd be trusted) aren't likely to be a good basis for an exploit.

You aren't supposed to get to pick very much of the document in the Web PKI. Rules forbid CAs from letting you write nonsense you made up into most places - they themselves get slightly more opportunity but "Let's attack a windows zero day" doesn't feel like a good use of control over a trusted CA. The biggest contiguous arbitrary chunk of data you get control over will be the public key, an RSA public key might be one kilobyte in size. So, conceivable but unlikely that you can squeeze a working exploit and payload in there.

An X.509 cert that isn't trusted in the Web PKI (ie hand rolled) is a better attack surface because you can write any amount of garbage without some busy body forbidding it, but now your problem is that a non-vulnerable client will see a problem immediately because it's untrusted which is weird. I don't look at the certificates on random web sites I visit... unless they don't work and then I might be curious.

I think code signing certs are a more likely vulnerability, unlike the Web PKI in practice this is down to Microsoft who have a very hands-off approach. I suspect you can get a lot more leeway to write crap into a cert for code signing and as a bonus it'll get seen by the vulnerable Windows PCs, because it's not as though Macs or Linux check the code signing certs on Windows software they can't run anyway.

But as you say we don't know anything, it could be a much more subtle but still dangerous bug.

For example suppose Microsoft's implementation of ECDHE misses a check on the parameters supplied by the other participant. This would make you vulnerable to invalid curve attacks when negotiating ECDHE. Of course a legitimate participant won't try to attack you, but you're doing ECDHE before you know the other participant's identity.
So I will give you my perspective as a team member whose team lead transition a couple years ago.

The initial announcement was awkward but the company supported her. She must have been in talks with them for a while. At the announcement meeting, she told us she would come back as a female after a short vacation period. HR attended the meeting. They followed up with a clear statement they support her transition and wouldn't tolerate any harassment.

For me, the hardest part was keeping the pronouns correct when talking about them in the 3rd person. Most people respected her after the transition and leadership do not treat her any differently. Some of the people didn't accept her after the transition but HR did not tolerate any harassment. I think she lost some work "friends" but overall she is a lot happier. I think it was totaly worth it. She eventually changed jobs and her new reports don't treat her differently.
styled-components v5
Open Banking Standards in Commonwealth Countries will make the need for these scrapers redundant and limit the tools use to the US only.

Never been a fan of scrapers. Very unreliable and a big security hole especially when MFA is used.

I wonder if the tightening data privacy regulations (CCPA et al) forced them to sell or whether it was just a good sale opportunity.
Benefits of Exercise Without Working Out? A Protein Called Sestrin
“As a cop, if you get caught lying, i.e. intentionally false testimony in court, your career is effectively over.”

I wish that was the case, but as a LEO yourself you have to be aware that that’s absolutely untrue.

Oh neat, there’s a whole Wikipedia article about it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_perjury

I want to assume good faith and positive intent, but I have to be honest that it really strains credulity that you really believed that cops would refrain from committing perjury for fear of suffering professional consequences
She lied to federal investigators. That's illegal. Lying to local or state police, not so much.
Considering Apple is a hardware company first, probably they would do the same thing. They wouldn’t rely on ads even if Google didn’t exist, therefore they wouldn't have to worry about the poor ad companies losing revenue.
The same logical content, yes, but...

Do you write the Fibonacci function as "n * (n-1) = fib(n)"?
> APIs are concrete work.

So in the case of an API re-implemented without copying any code, what concrete work is taken? If not the code, then what thing?

> APIs are things as much as code is.

I can print out code and read it. I can't print out an API and read it. (I can print out documentation of an API, which is copyrightable, but I cannot print out the API itself).

> No. sort as an API is both fundamental and preexisting.

What makes sort fundamental but other things...not fundamental? Historically copyright has been pretty straightforward: if there's a physical thing (like a written work, in the case of code) you can copyright it. Now you're adding weird rules like "well some apis are obvious and fundamental but others aren't". Who dictates that?

> Maybe. But that's fine. Someone would have just written their own APIs and licensed in a way that allowed others to use them - the way all software development has gone for decades.

The problem here is that it means that people can, for example, api-squat. Which is terrible. Imagine the ML craze of recent years, but with Google or Facebook or whomever copyrighting the tensorflow API so that other libraries couldn't be tensorflow compatible without licensing to Google. Sure, companies could just not use Tensorflow, but it was like a half a decade ahead of the competition, and had the backing of basically the largest Machine Learning practitioner in the world. An Open Source version could maybe compete, but probably not.

> Again, developers have more power in a world where Oracle wins, and less power in a world where Google wins.

Some individual developers have more power, but the development community has less freedom.

> The fundamental question here is who owns the code.

No, the fundamental question here is if an API is copyrightable. Oracle very clearly owns the code. The question is if the concept of how to do something is a copyrightable work in the same way that actually doing a thing is. A map is not the same as a taxi, and you're saying that the protections we give taxis should also extend to maps all of a sudden.

> I am far more concerned about the future, as tech companies grow massive, and consolidate. We already see AWS implementing open source APIs with drop-in replacements.

But you don't seem to consider that Amazon probably already has an answer to API-licensing.

> they can create licenses that restrict the ability for massive companies to reimplement their open source code as a proprietary service.

No, what you're saying is that companies can restrict the ability for competitors in the same space by building arbitrary lock-in. Companies can already use licensing to prevent competitors from stealing their work, but what you're suggesting is that a competitor can prevent others from entering the space. Consider the opposite situation: Spanner and CockroachDB. If Google decided to license its API, cockroachDB couldn't exist, or at least couldn't compete. Your ideas cut both ways, they don't magically fix things for the little guy.
Seize the means of production and ensure a ruling government whose core is utilitarianism, comrade xupybd.
In Brazilian (Roman?) law, you can lie if you are one of the sides, not if you are a witness.
Some many masterpieces of classical music feel identical to dream states to me. This is a rich area of inquiry ;)

Chopin's Nocturnes. Erik Satie's Gnossiennes. The Tales of Hoffmann which influenced Shumann and Wagner

Franz Liszt - Liebestraum

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpOtuoHL45Y
>Matter/anti-matter asymmetry is expected to be present. It is a basic feature of individual random walk

It may be the cause, but it is not known to be the cause.

And it's not a random walk; black holes accumulate charge from pairs, making future radiation not symmetric.

My understanding is that people have probed this for some time and it's still inconclusive if it can generate the observed imbalance. Here's [1] a 1979 paper on the idea, with hundreds of citations, in case you want to poke at the literature.

If I remember, Cosmology by Weinberg has a chapter on various theories of how the imbalance may happen, none of them known to be all of or even part of the answer.

[1] https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.19.10...
Gorgon Stare
In many countries, the answers get really complicated, really quickly, and can vary based on location and other factors.

For instance in NSW Australia, you may be cautioned by police that “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you do say will be taken down and may be used in evidence against you. It may harm your defence if you fail to mention something now which you later rely on in court.” [1][2]

The impact of this is incredibly complicated, and it'll take a lawyer to fully explain it. Which, if you don't have one on hand when you're questioned - can be a major issue.

[1] http://theconversation.com/when-you-say-nothing-at-all-nsw-a...
[2] https://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/oppn-slammed-...
First off, mathematics did actually reinvent itself in the late 1940s, with the discovery of Category Theory, which, despite being sometimes called “abstract nonsense”, has found its way into theoretical physics. Further, there is nothing mystical at all in any of the concepts of the modern physics - not more anyway than in the concept of, say, the atom. It is actually math that should be credited with the removal of the shroud of mysticism perceived by some - perhaps even many - of the uninitiated. (Physics is not an exception here - some people still look at a working computer as a miracle, for example.) And the homogeneity at the scales at which there’s just too many things to allow for much diversity should, too, be seen as one of the manifestation of the absence of any true mystery in the universe.
> Fundamentally k3c is a built on the Container Runtime Interface (CRI). In fact it's really like a nicer version of of cri-tool. CRI doesn't cover image building and some other small image tasks like tag and push. For image building Moby's buildkit is used internally, and for other things OCI's containerd is used.

I have to admit that in the container world I can't keep up with the different standards, what they each cover, and the different implementations of them. I think a non-docker K8s is already possible, this just reuses that stack while reimplementing part of it in order to make the cli more like the docker cli? Maybe despite the description this is actually intended to be used outside of K8s?
So now they are competing with Relativity? (Chicago based)
Thanks! Our subscription is meant to be flexible, what we offer is precisely what you describe. We can provide brand new desks and ergonomic chairs every year for as long as needed ensuring that employees always have a great place to work from. When the employee is no longer with the company we take the furniture back, minimizing waste.
This is also how google photos works to upload photos in the background.

Apple needs to fix this.
H.R. Giger would dig it.