skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Surely putting imaginary characters in an imaginary setting can only result in stories limited by the authors imagination. If the author does not know all that much about human nature in the first place, only unrealistic stories will be the outcome. Worse, as a reader it is not possible to discern realistic behavior unless you already understand human nature, which makes literature somewhat useless for learning about it.

I would argue that understanding of human nature is a necessary (but not sufficient) element of becoming a good writer, but writing in itself is not necessarily a good way to learn about human nature. As an aside, I'm a bit weirded out by the idea that reading books would be the best way to learn about human nature as opposed to going "out there" and interacting with people.
I had that laptop. Amazing screen (and a tank of a laptop).

Back then other other cool thing was the 17" MacBook Pro. It was glorious.
Any relation to the pronunciation video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pa1vXovXn-M ?

:-)
Who is a narcissist?
(Jeopardy for 10 points)
Impossible Foods is finally making a new fake meat: Pork
When the cloud will be commodity as the HW has become?
When we analyze the history of the I.T and how it has evolved since its inception, a clear pattern draws itself and rules any transformation, let’s call it: the stacked abstractions.

So, everytime we have a new technology and the cloud is not an exception, it is most likely to be an abstraction of the previous inventions/technologies, here are just a few examples:

The operating system abstracts the HW.

The virtualization abstracts both the HW and the OS.

The containers abstract the operating system.

The orchestrators abstract the HW, the OS and the containers.

The cloud abstract all of them: HW, OS, containers, orchestrators and even applications.

Even the tools we use like Ansible, Terraform... are abstractions on the low level commands or API calls.
This triggers an interesting question:

What will be the next step? Make the cloud and multi-cloud commodity as the HW has become and create another abstraction?

Or the history of the I.T will repeat it self: big corps, vendor lock-in, then open source...slowly...revolution-like...repeat?

https://www.brainboard.co made a bet on the following points:

Abstracting the cloud and multi-cloud will be a common practice.

Visualization has always been the starting point either on whiteboards or papers, so a visual graphical designer allows you to be fully productive by saving you a lot of time while respecting our native approach toward designing architectures.

Automation is already a common practice, so we take it to the next level by generating automatically and from the graphics the necessary code to deploy your cloud infrastructure.

We all know that DevOps is not a skill neither a technology but a culture that needs among a lot of things tools to unlock the creativity of the teams, we aim to be the bridge that connects people (engineers, developers, operators, administrators...) with the efficient use of technology.
There does seem to be a lot of variance in that though. The top post on HN right now is from a green user name. Also the number of comments in the two threads is vastly different.
I was looking at Java properties the other day and I thought to myself, "We still need to set /dev/./urandom in 2019?"
Clearly it exists to them because it can interact with someone they can interact with.
Not waiting to provide you with free storage is not a "scalability problem". I can't spend company money on Perforce either, is that a Perforce problem?
I keep reading weird stuff from the US about employee pension obligations being a burden on companies, and those savings getting eaten or stolen in all sorts of corporate shenanigans. Are these things really not handled by life insurance companies and subject to all sorts of regulation? That sounds woefully irresponsible.
> LFS is a bolt on solution that could/should have better support.

Like gitlabs own web ide that seems to ignore LFS rules.
It could potentially help with 1 if you have some early bootstrap code to configure the sound card and get some samples. I agree with your general point however.
It's named in a previous article linked in this article.
Scientific American did a pro Goop piece.

They then deleted it from the record (Rather than standard practice of retracting it)

Why should we expect anything of Netflix given SA does the same?

Doctors Are Not Gods
https://digestinternational.com/2019/11/26/doctors-are-not-g...
Reddit level response.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
>> ... the car we’d used to get to the town had broken down...

A car is still a luxury where I live.
The Big Number: 24 percent of young adults may have prediabetes in U.S., study
We have been using ClickHouse in production for some months already and we find it a real game changer.
We're running queries over 3B rows for business intelligence purposes.

As a side project, a group of friends and I are working on a simple web analytics project powered by ClickHouse (what it's been originally build for).
If anyone wants to contribute, just let me know.

Cheers
Parenscript, but worse.
Some really good advice in this comment, especially number 2 in the list.
Considering CVS had branches, Subversion probably had them from the start or at least some early development version. Very different under the hood though, as you say.
where plants, flowers and other fauna can thrive.

Calling plants and flowers "fauna" makes me think of Seymour from Little Shop of Horrors. Not sure a bunch of man eating plants between the buildings would be optimal civil engineering.
Yet doesn't do anything about the "shallow" fakes or other misinformation. Great stuff.
>Why do vegans/vegetarians have to promote/preach their diet restrictions to everyone else?

This is fundamentally the way we talk about morality - not as a matter of attitude or personal preference, but as objective facts we believe are true. Whether any particular moral statement is true or false is what most people would question, not whether moral statements are in themselves motivating. In this way, most people seem to be (1) moral realists, (2) moral internalists.

Assuming you're a moral realist, it's easy to understand why someone would "promote/preach" their diet restrictions on moral grounds - because morality, to the realist, is a matter of fact (either an "objective" morality, or a "relative" (to a culture, time, or place) one). The assumption, also, is that unlike other facts, moral facts are inherently motivating.

To the moral realist, a statement like "eating meat is morally wrong" has a truth value, in the same way "the earth is spherical" or "the earth is flat" has a truth value. The moral internalist further states that this fact is enough to provide some motivation for action, so the statement "eating meat is morally wrong" necessarily implies and states to us that "one should not eat meat" - assuming there is no failure to motivate (as may the case with depressed people or people who face extreme exhaustion, or have some other mental malady).
Poster ranting about not able to migrate SQL data, wanting sqlite storage, forgot to do research and apparently did not read https://darryldias.me/experience-wordpress-sqlite/
It's not a matter of one being objectively better than the other but which suits your needs.

The basic distinction, from a purely SEO perspective, is that blog.domain.com will be treated as its own entity whereas domain.com/blog will be treated as part of the main domain.com entity.

The question you have to ask yourself is whether you want to bolster the "value" of your main domain or if you want your blog to be an asset in its own right.

There is no right or wrong answer — there is simply what's best for your situation.
> Whats nice about it is that it not only is a very capable VCS but also a complete project management tool with tickets/issues, wiki, blog, mailing list and user management.

That is not nice. That is way more things that might not match me, more attack surface, more irrelevant cruft I'll probably have to look up how to disable. Project management, wiki and issue tracking preferences are very personal and often don't map particularly well to specific repositories. And _blog_ and _mailing list_? Why, you're spending time on stuff most of your users will hate, not because it's bad, but because they either don't need it or would like it different.

> In addition fossil never looses data, unlike git which can easily destroy branches that are not pushed, delete stuff while stashing or unstashing, delete stuff when rebasing and so on.

Which is why Git is successful. That's by design, not accident. We want to, and sometimes _have to_, delete stuff.
The smart guide to (de)dupe dirty data
Indeed! Even the Go wiki advocates exactly what you're saying about looking at the tradeoffs: https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/MutexOrChannel
That's the same thing that's always bothered me. That physicists never seem to discuss global time dilation - which also to my layman's eyes seems like a simpler explanation.

Time everywhere is slowing down (speeding up?) Which it's why the expansion of space seems so perfect to neither accelerate nor decelerate.
Given that these instances are typically virtualized I wouldn't be surprised if you could extract a decent amount of entropy just by using the system timings (interrupts, RTC sampling etc...) given that they would be affected by the other running systems. And of course there's always the network card.

In my experience it's not usually super difficult to get a decent amount of entropy on complex desktop or servers, it's only a real issue on simple embedded hardware where you might have no way to sample the environment and all the timings are ultra-deterministic. In this case I've resorted to using temperature measurements and fan speed as a source of entropy during early boot, which isn't ideal.
OK, once more: at no point did I ever suggest that people can't find love if they don't have much more than table stakes things like "clean fingernails" and "stable jobs" and "capability for love", only that they should not feel entitled to attention from the appropriate gender.

I'm curious as to what's driving your serial misinterpretation, if anything. I suppose it's possible you're just having difficulty with parsing out arguments and reasoning about them (is English your first language?), but it seems just as likely you're on the insecure side. You keep cropping up and asking complete strangers on the Internet to validate your relationship.

So, ok. Dude, you're probably fine. Although it's not a guarantee; there's still a possibility that your girlfriend runs off with Mick Jagger, or a rock-climber who works in a cafe who has $18.23 in his bank account, or a temperamental chess player with a huge schlong who bathes once a month, whether he needs to or not. Keep your eyes peeled at all times!
I have some reasons to prefer domain.com/thing now :

- You don't have to add and manage subdomain

- You don't have to stop and restart the reverse-proxy of your VPS

- Only one cert to deal with (I use traefik w/ automatic LE renewal but that implied more things to set up on the chain)

But I still use blog.domain.com because I find it prettier. And when I need to type it in the URL bar it's just $service<tab>.domain<tab><enter>.

Now the SEO crowd has other requirements that make their choice more valid than my own (one user, one set of idiosyncrasies).
Fallout from the trade war.
Say someone makes 150% or more of what I make (ergo are valued 150% superior in a fair labor market) and they can save far more and build a their net worth significantly faster even with a more luxurious lifestyle

That person thinks the same way about someone who earns 150% more than them... this cycle never stops
Hey, author of the Mathe Carlo essay here.

Markov Chains is on my list of things to write these kind of explorable essays for, good to know there's some interest for it!
I assume that it would be possible to ask and find out from the packaging, just as one currently finds out if foods contain certain allergens. Asking the BBQ host if the meat is factory farmed or grown in a lab would be just like asking if the mustard contains gluten.
The sex toy banned from CES last year is unlike anything we’ve ever seen
Nice Blog | Thank you for sharing Such a wonderful information. The data that you provided in the blog is informative and effective.
https://www.kellytechno.com/Hyderabad/Course/Data-Science-Tr...
I feel like x.example.com is preferred over example.com/x because it is simpler to move the files around (when you want the same app/bundle of static files to be y.example.com). Browsers by default will make <a href="/foo/bar.html"> into x.example.com/foo/bar.html when served from x.example.com, but it won't make it into example.com/x/foo/bar.html when served from example.com/x/; something else has to make sure the URLs are correct. The options available to make links work are to generate correct links in the first place (CGI back in the day provided enough information to make this possible, but modern reverse proxies have no way to convey this), never use absolute paths in links (restrictive), or to have some machinery intercept the document, parse the HTML, and rewrite links (super flaky). If you are always going to be at exmaple.com/x/ and never need to change the base URL, you can make it work. If you are making something reusable that people download and self-host, you will pull all your hair out making the /x/ case work well. Therefore, people tend to prefer the subdomain approach. It's just easier, because of an implicit base URL assumed by browsers (and even things like grpc clients). When you try to override defaults, it's like rolling a stone up an infinitely long hill. This is that, I think.

For your blog, it doesn't matter. You can hard-code the entire URL in every link and it will probably never go wrong. Applications are harder. Applications that various people are going to self-host are hardest.
Release of New CISA Insights on Increased Geopolitical Tensions and Threats
>> Samsung is a 30% shareholder of Xtal.

Samsung's 30% share amounts to less than $8M versus Samsung's share in ASML which amounted to about $500+M and $277M in additional funding, or $777+M in total. XTAL had fewer than a dozen employees. I think it's fairly clear where Samsung's "economic interest lies in this case, but Samsung is also known for diversifying their suppliers. The company bought display panels from their competitors Sharp, LGD and even BOE who had been "hinted" as having stolen their flexible displays.

As for the CEO's comment, I also posted a link to ASML's official statement denying Samsung's role after the CEO made that statement. And yet you claim that you "didn't mean implicate" the company?

> Korean Chaebol industrial policy has history of IP theft to benefit domestic industries

can you cite sources for Korean Chaebol's "industrial policy"? Or are you still bitter about Samsung implicating Taiwanese display companies, like AUOptics in price-fixing cases, which resulted in $500M fines years back?

>Like what is this even?

Sure, read my earlier comment about Taiwanese's collective insecurity or inferior complex which stems from their fear of Samsung (https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/22/technology/taiwan-tries-t...). See also my comment about Samsung's reporting of price-fixing by Taiwanese companies. I've encountered into others making similar comments about this particular case and they were all predictably of Taiwanese origin.
As he said, a sub domain is often considered a separate domain when it comes to SEO. His other arguments about naming seems rather hand-wavy, though.

Security-wise, a subdomain can also be a different origin. Which is often positive, so a flaw in your blogging software doesn't allow someone to extract cookies or so from the main site.
Interesting, where does Taleb discuss this?
Events happen in fiction that can be rare and unpleasant to experience oneself IRL... Fiction is a magnifying glass, a condenser.
Google Publishes Its BeyondProd Cloud-Native Security Model
Right, because no nic vendor was ever retarded enough to purposely cripple their product by restricting throughput to thousandths of actual potential theoretical physical capacity at the driver level like you and your toxic coterie did. In fact nobody has ever been this stupid in the entire industry period that I can think of except that coterie.

Good thing for you it's in the interests of extremely rich and powerful people to see that your sabotage is well supported, and good thing for the rest of the world you have a containment chain where your stupidity is restricted from bleeding over to the rest of them, and every single other chain appears to be completely mercifully free of your idiotic philosophy.
Look into Unison, a language that stores the AST and immutable history of all functions to provide a combination of package manager, IDE, and DVCS. Once you store the AST and all history, some fascinating side effects happen!

https://github.com/unisonweb/unison
With so many frameworks available this is indeed a silly rant. Example flask and SQLite work just fine. I would think one could configure Wordpress to use any dB as well
I don't get it, if he doesn't like 7-eleven franchise conditions, why he just doesn't open regular non-franchise convenience store? it's not like they have monopoly, article claims they have 40% of market, so he would join majority of other convenience store owners
Nothing about your problems had anything to do with git & everything to do with the commercial service you were using for your source code hosting.

Github the company is not interested in providing you (or anyone else) with free storage for arbitrary data. You were unable to pay for the storage options they do provide because you did not have admin rights to the github account you wanted to work with.

None of this is a problem with git, be it GUI git clients or command line ones.

This isn’t just "technically correct". It’s the "a commercial company doesn’t have to provide you with a service if they don’t want to" kind of correct.
If you still need to point to right area of the screen using trackpad or mouse, and can only perform the click event with your mind, I can't see how is that useful.
I don't think that "Peer-to-Peer" in the whitepaper's title ("Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System") refers to the network structure being p2p - and that's probably also not what most people mean when they talk about bitcoin being peer-to-peer. The very first sentence makes it pretty clear that peer-to-peer means person-to-person without any intermediary:

"A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution." [1]

Furthermore, the previous title was "Electronic Cash Without a Trusted Third Party" [2]. So reading "Peer-to-Peer" as "Person-to-Person" would mean that the title hasn't changed in meaning, it just became a bit more catchy.

Also, when analysing the incentives of participants in the bitcoin network, it turns out that network nodes do not actually form the ideal-typical p2p mesh network (where all nodes are equally distributed and connect to a few other nodes) but a more densely connected network where connectivity to mining nodes is strongly incentivised. This topic has been researched and discussed by Dr. Wright (See [3] for more information).

[1] https://bitco.in/bitcoin.pdf

[2] https://nakamotostudies.org/literature/ecash/

[3] https://nchain.com/en/blog/bitcoin-network-topology-small-wo...
You have to answer a quiz
You can also use ClickHouse to query files directly - with clickhouse-local tool.

Example: https://www.altinity.com/blog/2019/6/11/clickhouse-local-the...
How come you assume they can be? My understanding is that they have generally been protected by patent but I'm open to being proven wrong (preferably by being shown a court case, but being shown big licensing agreements for copyright would also be interesting).
nobody stops him to hire employees, if it's not worthy financially then just give up such business
Are the terms that interchangeable? "I used a random algorithm" is a different expression from "I used a stochastic algorithm". For me, the term stochastic is one half of the stochastic vs deterministic categorisation.
But you can go back and change a commit message with ammend? Or are you wanting to change other people's?

https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/rewriting-history#gi...
Think about drawing two circles on a balloon, one with radius 1cm, and the other with radius 2cm. the distance between the two perimeters is 1cm, but if we inflate the balloon so that the surfaces double, now the inner circle has a radius of 2, and the outer circle a radius of 4, the distance between the perimeters has grown along side the rest of all the lengths. That's my best understanding of the situation, I mostly do non-linear classical mechanics.
The people I'm talking about are beyond needing proposals. The only point of getting proposals at this point is to get more flattery. This is not to say it isn't useful for society to have some guys floating around funding new projects, just the point of it for them does not seem to be to find interesting projects to help. You can help people quietly.
When I was in high school in the early 2000s I had a friend who told me his parents purchased a 386 when they first came on the market where I live and they paid around $15k. My jaw just dropped. Then my friend just started chuckling at his parents folly when looking back even at that time it was such an expensive paperweight. Heck, thinking about it now it probably came up in conversation because at the time I had a hobby of picking up old computers that people had thrown out and cobbling together the working parts and built a 386 and a 486 that way. Good times.
I want to work with people who care about the product they are working on. People who care about building great products are not solving coding interview problems.

Unless you are a founder or have significant equity, why should you “care about the product you are working on” more than enough to get a paycheck? It’s naive to think that a profit seeking employer cares about you. If you got hit by a bus tomorrow, they would send flowers to your funeral and have an open req for your position before you are buried.

While you may want to work with people who care about building great products, most people go to work every day for a paycheck. Why wouldn’t I optimize to play the game in a manner that increases the amount of my paycheck?

That being said, I personally don’t live on the west coast, have no desire to live on the west coast, and haven’t had an algorithm style interview in over 20 years when I was applying for a job doing low level cross platform C. I did get the job and they did need someone with algorithmic knowledge.
Agreed. If the applications we built using git were as awkward as git...our users and clients would scream, or worse.
not really. although hugo is pretty established, too. for a personal blog, i'd just pick one and run with it. getting stuff out is more important than the "right" generator.

(that said, personally, i prefer the runtime hackability of pelican, and i don't find the speed of generation to matter much under 200 posts)
> "Some humans have the necessary genes to digest milk, some do not. Can't lump all mammals together."

Note, adult mammals. Drinking milk as a baby is literally the definition of mammal. Even the platypus, which lays eggs and lacks teats, counts as mammal because they still produce milk to feed their children.
I use commento[1] on my site, running on my own server so no third party has access. I do not get many comments though so I don't know how it handles higher load.

[1] https://gitlab.com/commento/commento
How long does the lava lamp system take to start from a cold boot?