skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That was an interesting read I agree and find that code names that rely on a word that means a specific thing in a given field is really helpful as well. For example with Neural Networks we extend the analogy that originated from a graph/network into an image of the brain and add a new term and properties, so when we add the term neuron we can give it the property that behaves like it does from the field it originated from such as being able to fire. This creates a wonderful mental model that not only explains the purpose of the algorithm to "learn" much like brains do, but also serves as a way for people to remember, much like a pneumonic device, all the different pieces that go along with the algorithm.

I also find trying to draw analogies from different fields can lead to new discoveries for yourself and others. In the case of the neural network maybe the person who invented it said, what would it look like if we were to model the human brain in a computer? Obviously the intent there would be for your model to function as a human brain. You could always do it the other way around and start with an existing model and say what properties could I add or remove to this system to make it perform a different and interesting function? If I add this new property does it make it a different enough function that I have to change the underlying analogy? I think if you ask the right questions and seek their answers then this is one way in which you can evolve ideas. Also this way of stating different disparate ideas and evolving them is a good teaching method. For example I was once explained that a binary search tree with all items inserted in order was just a fancily decorated linked list, and though kind of silly it gave me an aha moment and connected the two more deeply in my mind.
Internet commenters all have amazing eyesight (which also seems to improve along with hardware).
"Back in the day" you could hack CRTs to output 2560 by 1600 at over 75 Hz and I'm pretty sure I've seen resolutions in excess of 4000 px width.
You will save a ton of time, money, energy and productivity that you currently waste in going drinking and recovering from drinking.

I mostly stopped, not particularly by trying, but just by sort of growing out of the lifestyle and almost like, "forgetting" to drink, after a while. I'm big on the forgetting thing. When I failed to quit smoking dozens of times, it was by paying close attention to what day/time I was going to stop, how long it had been since then, etc. In other words, thinking a lot about smoking. The time when I finally succeeded, was the time when I just sort of forgot to smoke. Although note that there was undoubtedly an "infrastructure of forgetting" in place, without which it wouldn't have been possible to forget. For example the band I was in (with two smokers) broke up, so I stopped being reminded so often of smoking. So set yourself up for success by going through and trying to get rid of things that remind you of drinking. And don't make a big deal of it or count the days. Certainly "Only 5 days left until I can drink again" is a sign of failure, but in my opinion so is "Alcohol-free for 12 days! ... 13 days! ... 14 days!" Makes me thirsty just typing it! The biggest indicator of success in my book would be that the thought doesn't enter your head, and you're not paying any attention to it. Fill the extra time that you save, especially at first, with new or neglected activities that are more interesting & pleasant, yet not too demanding, so that you have better things to do and experience and think about.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Available February 7th for 3990 USD
You're using a lot of words to say that Youtube doesn't have a viable business model.

They don't. The cost of providing the service they pretend to provide would greatly exceed the income on that service. Even with the most aggressive advertising one could imagine.
More simply, "what the public wants" is irrelevant to the law? Am I understanding your position correctly?
You would imagine so, but every permit that does not have a state-level override (for example, SB-35 of 2017) is subject to discretion of the Planning Commission. Which is an unelected commission with members appointed by the mayor or the Board of Supervisors.

Most permits go through anyway, because the Commission chooses not to involve itself in everything, but every permit can be appealed with an application for Discretionary Review.
https://sf.curbed.com/2013/4/17/10252934/what-the-heck-is-di...
Sorry? The US invaded so disgustingly so many places since WW2. The "invastion of Ukraine" is not quite the same: many on Crimea want it to be with Russia? That's a much lighter invasion when 50%+ welcomes you, than Korea, Dominican, Vietnam, ... Iraq, Afganistan, etc.

Ukraine status as an ally is the whole point here. As I understand it they were "given" crimea in the assumption things would stay cool. Since NATO is hostile to Russia/USSR (they decline their membership, why would that be?), the Ukraine joining would mean Russia could never get "it's army base" back. See how difficult the US does today (pay 1B if you make us leave our base in Iraq + sanctions thread)? Why should Russia not be protective of it's interests?

That "ally" thing is quite a sick reasoning. There's always some group in a country that one can say is it's ally. South-Vietnam was the ally! South-Korea! The common people of Iraq/Libia/Syria/Afganistan! The people on Crimea! Sure that allegation needs some substance...

I live in neither country. And I have some anti-state tendencies in general. But the NATO is clearly no all "love and peace" as their PR dept makes it seem.
Public reputation is a funny thing its not binary and its lagging. By the time people tell you stuff to your face usually its way too late for they have been building their beliefs around who you are way before.
I was thinking more in business situations. If your friends have a problem with it that's another story.
Why does the 15" have 240 hz but the 14" only goes up to 120hz?

The AnimeMatrix display looks kind of cool though.
This finding would not cast any doubt on the existence of dark matter.
Oh I recognize where it is, I've wasted away plenty of time in Mario games over the years.

I brought it up because I'm told that the general idea applies to all pipes. They take you to the secret area for that level, and if there are multiple pipes that lead to different areas then that secret area has to be switched out. That sounds like it's relevant if the secret area in this case is an empty space, perhaps that memory hasn't been initialized or there's a specific load instruction that's doing something different in the emulator as compared to the hardware. (And for all I know the emulator could be following the spec correctly, but the hardware worked differently)

Either way, thank you for the video link.
Why should anybody go to a 4 year university if they can do a $10 Udemy course? Even a bootcamp of questionable quality still confers some sort of credential, much like a Bachelor's degree does.
Yeah but that was in an age before clickbait and "In this house, we believe science is real" yard signs.

People are too bought into science as a source for truth instead of being a messy, difficult method of discovery.
Those already exist. For example, look at the HP ProDesk machines.
When people talk about killer features missing in Git, there is more beyond the UX and mono/poly repo.

One thing is code review. There is no code review in Git.

What I expect in 2020 is that I should be able to specify reviewers for the commit (which I pick out of a list of people who can approve it). These people should be able to leave comments on the commit. I should be able to both respond to comments and modify the code before the commit gets checked in. The history of the comments and changes should be maintained.

There is nothing in Git that supports this flow in a natural way.

A replacement for (or evolution of) Git can be a tool that would support this code review flow from the get-go.

And yes, there are external tools for code review. But that all should be a part of version control.
That's how I understand it.

But maybe there are other standardizable objects. The sense I got from TFA is that there aren't.
However, “Carlin almost decided to abandon the journey and liquidate Half-Safe, but was convinced by his wife to continue.”

Sounds like she was – at least for a time – just as invested.
"Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution" by Steven Levy. I found this one very motivating, covering MIT hacker heroes of old, early game developers, and the Homebrew Computer Club.
Google already requires accounts with a birth date indicating they are 13 or older, thus not subject to COPA, to verify their age via charging a credit card or sending in a copy of a government issued id. Any kids that were watching either stole a credit card or their parents created the account for them. The FTC decided this was not adequate, so I don't expect they would deem your scheme compliant either.
Yes, they care.
You guys should quit wasting your time on this BigCo BS and do something that will actually benefit your real career.

http://paulgraham.com/lesson.html
I know nothing about engines and found this article a good introduction about how computer controls help reduce emissions.
https://www.pitchcare.com/news-media/diesel-engine-emissions...
I don't go on huge drinking "sprees", but I feel like this comment applies to me.

I don't drink during the week as I reserve it for social occasions, even though I really enjoy certain drinks (wines, cocktails and liquours). I also eat healthily during the week and try to look after myself physically and mentally.

I'm pretty actively social, between family and friends, and we get together pretty often. That manifests itself usually with a dinner, with a drink or two proceeding it depending on the time available, drinks over a nice slow dinner, maybe a digestif and then either relaxing with a couple bottles of wine and good conversation at one of our houses/apartments or maybe move on to go listen to some music, go dancing, etc.

All-in-all, over the course of a typical 5:30pm to 2am gathering, that can equate to quite a few units of alcohol (at one unit per hour you'd be looking at 8.5 units, and it doesn't take an hour to finish a cocktail or glass of wine) and the majority of the time it's not people getting wasted, it's simply enjoying themselves with a variety of alcoholic beverages they enjoy.

I, and I'm sure many others, enjoy this approach while also enjoying not drinking on a day-to-day, "more moderate" approach.
Off the top of my head:

A magician show. A circus performance. Summer Olympics.

Will some algorithm deem a full-body swim suit, or sparkling bikini outfit, or an ad-laden sports bra as "not for children"?

What if my kid is into gymnastics, volleyball, swimming, stage magic more complicated than Blues Clues and Smiley The Clown?

Will I get my entire Google existence snuffed if I log in as myself and let the kid watch anyway?

As an adult, will I no longer be allowed to watch clips from "Legend Of Korra" [an example]?
I was quoting public rights from the opinion I cited. The property rights that decision mentioned were private. The court didn’t contrast private vs state but rather private vs public.
I don't think there are many people that considered CVS good enough, even back in the days. For example, there was no way for end-users to retain the history of a file when renaming/copying it. When the FreeBSD project still used CVS, committers always had to file tickets against the admins to ask them to do it server-side through a so-called 'repocopy':

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106080
Speaking personally, definitely no. Even before I heard of git, I did not like SVN. In particular, it made an error I don't hear many other people mention where directories were checked out to revisions, rather than entire repositories. Consequently it was very easy to accidentally update just a subset of your repository, and have your whole repository in a state that didn't exist in the version control system at all. There were several times there were builds that were completely unreproducible because it turned out that they were, technically, r83726, except this directory was r84713, but this other directory was r78372 except for a subdirectory that was r84299, etc.

That problem I saw even before I saw a replacement.

But once I saw git, having a full copy of the repo was pretty killer. It was also better at merging, partially for having the history local. In fact I recall some SVN people protesting at the time that merging wasn't so hard, but in a nutshell, they were just wrong. It was harder. Source control that can't merge fluidly is pretty limited from the get-go. There's literally entire dimensions of things we do with git that were so impractical with SVN that only the very largest projects could afford to do them, with the whole "workflow" question. Now you don't even hear about the difficulties of merging since all the open source SCMs copied each other and "good merging" is just table stakes now.

The problem is is that git doesn't really have fatal flaws, it has annoyances, and that's not the same thing. "The UI is difficult" is an annoyance for its target audience. Most every other criticism I've seen of it is an annoyance, not a fatal flaw. Fossil doesn't solve a problem I have with git. It has some neat ideas and arguably does solve some problems, but it doesn't solve the problems I have with git; you could lift Fossil's solutions to wiki and bugtracking and just put them in Git and I'd probably be happier with that than Fossil itself.

The problem isn't that Fossil is an SCM competing with git; the problem is that Fossil is a monolith competing with the rapidly-moving git ecosystem. The former is perhaps beatable, the latter is a juggernaut. All of Fossil's other features sitting in git is something that might get somewhere, but if the base source control isn't git-based, I can't sneak it into a work project to try it out. I've got a corporate mandate that all source belongs somewhere standard, and it's a perfectly sensible requirement for someone paying me to do a job.
He didn't purchase the beach. It was already California's beach.
Thanks for the explanation, but I'm stuck on the last sentence of this part:

>evidence of accelerating expansion is that based on the redshift of nearby objects, we would expect distant objects to have a higher redshift than they actually do.

I think what you mean is "than we'd expect them to."
"Nuclear power; the world's most expensive way to boil water".

Luckily, there are many cheaper power alternatives that don't involve the problem of having to bury nuclear waste for THOUSANDS of years.
Also, you’d have to scale up text to 150% anyway (exactly to avoid straining your eyes).
Well, she did accompany him for the first five years. She just kept getting seasick. Too bad they ended up divorcing but that's the power of obsession right there.

She's featured in this short video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diuiv5iCAw4
you're assuming that based on your case. Maybe on countries outside US it can be a pain to do that?
The fix to it coming crashing down seems to be to append another version number, at which point the date code becomes kind of a branch indicator.

Now you have a choice of either incrementing the date code liberally for small releases (e.g. Twisted), or keeping it sticky until you make a major change (e.g. Teradata.)

If you do the former, you're depriving the user (or chain-up developer) of information on how big a particular change was. It might be 20190322 to 20190411 but you merged a huge rewrite. Or it's 20180107 to 20190929 and it's just some fixes. You might as well give your releases alphabetically increasing codenames, same information content there.

On the other hand if you keep it sticky until you make a major change, you're back to making a call whether some change is "major" or not. You might as well use SemVer. If anything, a date code in front of the version number becomes misleading since if you reach a reasonably stable API it'll start getting weirdly old and confuse users.

I also find it funny (and somewhat disingenious) that you assume I never tried calendaric versioning. I use (or suggest) it whenever some project starts or otherwise (e.g. rewrite) goes through an instability period. This generally means version numbers like "0.20190811". When the instability period has passed, it moves to e.g. "1.0" and sticks with SemVer from there. If we start rewriting on top of 2.3, the version number might temporarily be e.g. "2.99.20200105". Exact numbers (and components/dot count) depends on the specific situation.

It's hopefully obvious that all of these versions are something I'd call "alpha" or "internal consumption". (Also means my brain has learned prejudice to distrust any version number with a date code.)

[Edited] P.S.: developers can't escape time, but code can. I recently dug up a project I last touched in 2007, and you know what? I don't even get compiler warnings. It just works. (It's obviously written in a language & ecosystem that affords this possibility — not all of them do.)
That seems like a heavy interpretation of the situation. This guy bought a property that included these features and had always been treated as private with discretion for access and services provided. When told he does not actually own what he thought he bought it makes sense to have the courts make a final decision. It is a weird fluke that the extremely strong protection of coastal access in California has taken this long to resolve.

It is kind of odd that people continually frame this as a problem with an individual instead of a legal clarification of land use rights. The conflicts over access and who pays for services and liabilities such as trash accumulating have always been there but were allowed to fester as long as people sort of worked things out. Realistically that situation was never stable and was always heading for some kind of forced legal resolution no matter who was owning and who was surfing. Was public access allowed or not? In the past mostly locals would have known about the spot in the first place and anyone having problems with access would have walked away and maybe tried again later. The longstanding tension does not represent full fair access.
I worked for the Calgary Public Library when we eliminated it. Partly the PITA for the patron but more importantly was we wanted people to borrow more and not be limited. If you were going to Peru and we had 7 books that looked interesting to you, you could order them in and decide at pickup if you wanted them all. If 6 them were crappy oh well - that was difficult when we charged $2 a hold, you wouldn’t risk ordering 7 books to your library. The point of the library is to facilitate your access to the bed information in the form that is best for you. The borrowing limit remains 99 items per person.
The main reason Bombardier sold the CSeries to Airbus was that it was about to be hit with big tariffs that would have made it noncompetitive in the U.S. market. Airbus has a U.S. production plant in Alabama that can do final assembly and avoid the tariffs.
Thermals? No good reason? General availability of panels?
AMD's hardware is pretty amazing, but their drivers and various utilities are fairly lack luster still. I hope with their new found head room, that they invest more in that side of things too. Intel didn't just increase performance during their reign with just hardware, they upstreamed patches and optimizations to _a lot_ of libraries. Some of it was anti competitive garbage directly detecting AMD CPUs, but most of it was just hard optimizations to use new instructions.
Yeah, I think given unlimited, I’d make it clear to my manager that I expect that to mean I can take 25 days off, and possibly more if I absolutely have to. As long as that understanding is there I don’t think it’s necessarily a problem.
>The FTC has indeed explicitly said that the content creators, not YouTube, are responsible for flagging their videos as "for kids," and the content creators are personally liable to pay a $40,000 fine if the FTC thinks they made a mistake

Can you clarify on this? So, you're saying that the FTC will punish content creators who _don't_ flag content as "for children" if it winds up being "targeted-to-children" via some subjective notion regardless?

Those videos wouldn't show up on YT Kids, correct? So they're not going to show up for kids anyway...right? That sounds like the way things should work.
Yes it has geospatial support. Variant columns are better than every other database so far. Redshift and Bigquery just have a text field and require far more verbose commands to operate and cast. It sounds like most of your issues are with importing and exporting data rather than querying it?

Snowflake is basically EC2 servers reading files from S3 so you get more bandwidth with a larger warehouse size but it's fundamental limit and will have much higher latency compared to running on a local SSD with clickhouse. Lack of streaming is a known problem. They actually do have an HTTP interface, you just don't see it but that's how all the ODBC drivers are implemented (with HTTP calls and JSON data in the background).

If your data fits or you don't mind the operational overhead of running your own data warehouse then it's almost always a cheaper and faster option.
I've not done NES specifically, but I've written some emulators. As the pack-in game and a cultural landmark, I'd probably be targeting SMB 1 accuracy first and foremost. It doesn't seem to do anything crazy like vertical scrolling, so my ignorant assumption would be that it'd be a good game to start with.

> there are several bugs that need to be reproduced such as the oamaddr bug for example

Given what I've heard about how pipes work, that sounds like a good place to start digging in. Do you have any specific references for that? I'd much rather hear first-hand experience rather than google results, since so much of early console hardware documentation is flat out wrong.
When they say Git, isn't Github and Gitlab they actually mean?
No, just because some kids are harmed so they should not operate at all? Thats crazy.
I think this is about the easement, not the beach.
> Your application of the term tyranny here is an insult to those that have actually lived under it.

Tyrannical governments like the Soviet Union were premised on disregarding private property rights. In the name of "the common good" they confiscated private farms and ended up starving tens of millions of people. Obviously the effects of that are much worse, but the mindset -- that private property rights and the rule of law must yield to bureaucrats' view of the "common good" was the same.

Private property is sacrosanct. In the Constitution, "property" comes right after "life" and "liberty." That rule dates back to the Magna Carta, written 805 years ago. Using regulatory powers to end-run around property rights is one of the most tyrannical things a government can do.

> The state trying to force a billionaire to open up a beach is not tyranny.

That's not what I said. I said OP's hypothetical world, where private citizens don't have the "financial" "power" to "see [a] battle through" with the State over property rights would be tyrannical.

To date, Khosla has won on the key legal issue: the public has no easement to access the beach over Khosla's property. Khosla is entirely justified in fighting the State's efforts to do through its fence-permitting powers what it cannot do as a matter of property law. Saying that Khosla shouldn't even be able to engage in that "battle" is espousing tyranny.
LIDARs for volume use should add a few microseconds of random (not pseudorandom) jitter to the outgoing pulse time. That will prevent multiple interfering scans from different units from all synchronizing. You may still get blinded on one scan, but not all of them.
It's amazing how I see this problem everywhere, not only with books. On trakt.tv, all movies and shows that are for from being released already have ratings...