skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's not clear to me from that link what my error is. Would you be willing to expand?

The commonly used definition of recycling I've heard is the first one listed on the linked page: "to process (something, such as liquid body waste, glass, or cans) in order to regain material for human use."

That's why the phrase is "reduce, reuse, recycle", right? Yes, technically you could say reuse is a form of recycling, but we distinguish between reusing something outright, and breaking it down into component parts that can be partially recovered -- because we want to point out that the first option is better than the second.
I think people are missing the whole context of BOFH.

In the '90s there was no prestige in working in IT maybe as a developer but not as a Sysadmin.

Sysadmin and Support (the guy who fixes your e-mail or set up Netscape) usually were the same guy.

The prestige positions were in Marketing, Law and executive/finance.

The assistant on HR?Finance? They usually earned more than the Sysadmin.

People used to tell me:

"People who work on computers will never grow in the company. They stay there working and nobody notices them then. If you want to grow and climb de ladder go to Finance or Marketing."

So then who were the people who worked on computers?

The ones that really liked it and the ones socially inept. Sometimes Both. It was the "misfits" people dept. Data Centers? Basement or an ugly off-site. Location of Dept? The worst possible.

(Check the IT CROWD series).

But it was very rare someone that Did not like computers and did not have a hacker mentality to work on the field. Because of low pay and prestige.

Then BOFH represents the "Dr. Evil" that makes all right. Punishes the people that earn 2-3x times more and still can't do anything in IT.
It is dark humor like "Nick burns, your computer guy" from SNL.

The big difference is the people who started at 00 and later got a Very different market and with other people went after looking for prestige.

Take Bezos, Gates, Stallman, Linus and any other big tech guy before 00. They were "NERDS". Nerds only became cool after bringing billions to the table.

What a young, socially inept, smart guy and nerd will do in his 20's?

1) Have a lot of girlfriends? Party like crazy?

2) Fail miserably in #1 and code?

I remember on dates saying that I work with "IT" and the face of frustration in my dates.

One of my date father saying to her "He will not be able to support you... If he was a Lawyer yes.."

There was no "diversity" need because the requiremnt was: be smart and crazy to work in IT.

Last comment:

Once in a HR meeting they asked what traits they need to fill an position without thinking too much I said:

1. Low self-esteem;

2. Smart;

3. Desesperate.

My coworker was there agreeing.
The HR said that we can't put it. So we change the words a little.
If you’re happy running on Linux (root or otherwise) you have I need of a unikernel.
The web is stuffed with malware. That's not Google's fault. Our computers have more value to protect than before. That's a good thing, but it requires security. Instead of focusing on your download metrics for software you aren't even charging for, think about your users who don't know the difference between you and a thousand malware sites that look like you.
Reading is a trade-off. Sure, an ebook reader is lighter and smaller than a book, but reading on an LCD is 20% slower than on paper, meanwhile eInk screens are rather slow. Both are only slowly catching up to books in terms of print quality (i.e. pixel density). Also books don't require a battery and have often better UX in terms of annotations etc.

In some situations the ebook will win (e.g. when traveling), in other situations the book is still superior.
Flagged just because you don't like him and don't want to give him a platform? Jeez, what is up with the socalled liberal left always being intolerant towards anything that goes against their literal brainwashing.

Go dilate.
Huh, I had no idea there was a dedicated QR reader "app", since it's not a default icon (you have to add it from within Settings), and there's no actual app. But it's there!

Interesting they added that when the camera app already scans QR codes. I wonder if it's an enterprise thing for devices in the field, where companies want to prevent the camera app (no photos), but need to scan codes.
If anyone knows of an equivalent on Android (preferably available on F-Droid), I'm all ears.
Of course you’re right, but this site is plagued with ugly fat trolls, based on the responses here.
Why Deep Learning Has a Bright Future
Show HN: Navattic – A Visual Content Management Platform for Pre-Sales Demos
They don't want him gone. They are actively helping him dismantle democracy in the hope that he succeeds. If he fails in a decisive way, they will be on fox gaslighting the country about how they never supported him and tried to work against him, and it was all the Democrats' fault that he remained in power.
the ecosystem is moving!
Which part of the UWS policy states that this will stay like that in the future?
> I had to move a couple of times and the paper weight was one of the biggest hurdles.

It is painful, but packing and unpacking books is by far the least painful bit about moving. You can clear or stock a shelf in seconds and they transport well too.
Not if you are a certain breed of leftist, then violence is always the answer, dialog? Never!
If there's no abjudication, then there is just retaliation. I.e. other countries will apply punitive tariffs to Turkish (car) imports.

Good luck producing an entirely new car model for domestic consumption only. Even when country is as big as Turkey, it will not be able to compete in scale, because in automobile industry, scale is very important.
Buy an Audimobile
Mostly, the efforts are toward managed access rather than secrecy. Getting to the tree requires significant intent and commitment. And while it's awesome, the tree is somewhat unspectacular relative to nearby [1] alternatives with better access: Yosemite, Kings Canyon, Sequoia, and Death Valley National Parks. Getting there even requires a detour from US395 and US395 is not a high travel highway...nothing of note to the east and the Sierra Nevada to the west. It's about 250 miles of second class roads from Los Angeles, Reno, and Los Vegas.

Currently, the road to the grove is closed for the season. Weather also keeps people away.

[1]: at the scale of the western US.
Apple Scorpius CPU architectural specification. (1989)
TLDR: Django backed by MongoDB with Solr for search
I guess you made your point.
It's a video of a presentation from 36C3.
Using includeOS with an application would require installation as an OS, whether on a VM or bare metal. Either way, it would take up many resources. This would be great if the application is a resource heavy app and thus would mostly utilise most/all resources. But for most apps this isn't the case. Hence they're better to be in containers so that multiple applications can be run.

I'm thinking as an alternative to CoreOS or COS. These OSs will likely have a relatively high overhead in comparison to IncludeOS should such an OS exists.
I'm a Republican. I favor smaller government and more individual freedoms. (Ok, so maybe I'm almost a Libertarian.)

I think Trump was a necessity. The Democrats successfully smeared several past Republicans as racists or idiots, both lies. (i.e. Mitt Romney was a gentle Mormon who successfully goverend a liberal state and even implemented a nice health care system. Still, he was painted a racist and a misogynst. By the party of the Clintons!) So Trump was necessary, because he could out-shout the misinformation from the other side.

In truth, the Republicans will replace Trump with someone like Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, or Nikki Haley. All these are really good people, but they will be smeared once they emerge as a front-runner.

It's time to reduce the amount of misinformation in American politics. The other side (no matter which side you are on) is not all bad.
Jrnl.sh might be a good fit.
Where does the cap come from?

I assume you mean gap, but when you start reversing and are not aligned with your parking spot yet, the thing you'll soon see in the rear mirror is the car parked in the next slot. No gap.

Idk about other people but I feel like I've got very bad depth vision in general, and telling how far my car's rear is from a wall or another car when looking through the mirror is very difficult.
So basically your point is that the overhead of Linux is already low enough that you don't care about this project?
It shouldn't be all on Amazon/one-company. The whole industry needs to be responsible.
Locks and keys harm poor people who can't afford them. Filtering water harms poor people who can't afford to remove pollution. Blame the criminals, not the security providers and consumers.
It's better than your whole identity and existence constituting clinical depression, video games and no career—let alone work history.
>There's selection bias here; people tend to know people like themselves and people like each other.

And, presumably, someone who is young, mobile, and lives in a small urban apartment (and knows mostly people in the same boat) will tend to default to lugging and storing less stuff than older folks who have a roomy house. I know if I were starting out today I'd almost certainly have less of a physical footprint than I did in college and immediately afterwards.
Diseconomies of scale are the biggest barrier to pay decreasing at this point. The more software you have the more engineers you need to build and maintain it.

Every software project is bespoke at this point, custom made to fit the situation.

Also consider that the iPhone only came out in 2007. In 13 years smartphone penetration has reached billions of people. Which is a gigantic increase in the demand for software.
I can appreciate all those things about great books. However, all of that is secondary to actually being able to read it for me. If my eyesight gets bad enough, I'll probably switch to audio books.
Translations are contributed by volunteers: https://events.ccc.de/congress/2019/wiki/index.php/Static:Tr...

I don't think they usually add translations after the talk, but I guess they wouldn't outright reject it if someone provided a Mandarin translation.
I've worked for US companies and I'm amazed how low quality their talent is in general compared to talent in Europe. Then I realized that US companies can afford to buy top 2% talent in the EU, but most of them can't afford to do the same in the US. So this leads to a very frustrating situation where you're smarter than most of your US colleagues, but they still tell you what to do because they hired you.
I'm genuinely curious as to how you keep track of hundreds of tabs, apparently without tree-style tabs or similar extensions?

Why not just bookmark them in folders once and for all?
> After tussling with these complexities, my students and I ended up with nothing publishable because we realized that there’s no good way for external researchers to quantitatively study radicalization.

So did he start a twitter thread calling out all those articles about youtube radicalization as "not even wrong"?

> That’s the note on which I’d like to end: a plea to consider that the available quantitative methods can’t answer everything. And I want to thank the journalists who’ve been doing the next best thing — telling the stories of people led down a rabbit hole by YouTube’s algorithm.

The "next best thing" is cherry-picking data, I see. Is telling the stories of immigrant-committed crimes [1] also the "next best thing", or would his opinion change in that case?

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/22/trumps...
Agreed, and even if there wasn't a Chrome warning, there is then the Windows warning (orange, click yes to bypass), or if dangerous the SmartScreen warning (red, need a few more clicks to really get through).
DDG isn't going to break a monopoly on search, much as I want it to (I use it myself.) It's also browsers that may begin blocking pages and downloads outright. Basically Google is telling me now that I have to remove the links and are flagging them as a (false) security issue. I don't know what happens next or when if I choose not to, so the links are now gone.
What was the iops you eventually got or needed?

Since you mentioned model and cluster I’m curious as to wether or not others were also on said cluster.
> They are actively helping him dismantle democracy in the hope that he succeeds.

You're completely deluded. You need serious mental help if you believe this.
Is that feasible? Last I used Common Lisp, I seem to recall the spec being rather ambiguous on a number of important practical points, so any real program couldn't depend on only CLTL2.

For example, Maxima lists a number of implementations that can compile it, and says "Ports to other ANSI Common Lisps should be straightforward and are welcome" [1]. The source code is full of #+ #- conditionals.

[1]: http://maxima.sourceforge.net/lisp.html
Carpentry Compiler: Convert geometric designs by users to low-level instructions
They can make a price advantage for TOGG, but if they do it via taxes, tariffs or subsidies, they will cripple all the other manufacturing in the country.

Because car industries are expecting a downturn in the coming years, this would be a strong indicator to international manufacturers for deciding where to cut production.
You probably felt relieved
Tangentially related Is the idea that we should not eat any more learning curve than absolutely necessary during a project.

The technical risk of integrating some fresh technology has bigger, sharper teeth than most risk predators seeking to devour our success.
There aren't a lot of areas left in CS where "clever" solutions are warranted. If you're writing clever code, then chances are you're doing a disservice to anyone who has to maintain the mess you're creating. Code is mostly just plumbing. Boring code is better 99% of the time.
>should probably be even cheaper given their effectively $0 distribution costs

Distribution costs are actually pretty trivial. Maybe $2/copy or so.
Not an expert, but the ability to profit off something without being liable for it would seem to cause all kinds of perverse incentives.

As an analog example, imagine you could open an e-commerce business and get a cut out of each transaction - but are not responsible to check which products are sold on your platform. An obvious strategy to make money would be to allow drugs on your platform: You'd be able to profit off the "reliable customer base" provided by addiction without having any risk of getting in legal trouble.
He wasn't being an idiot. If you were literate, you would have snupped out the fact that he was told to write an "im sorry for having a different opinion" essay in order to attend, which he didn't. Why should he... Having an opinion is not a crime.

Also he was clearly physically assaulted by a bunch of teenagers who obviously isn't up to snuff when it comes to performing security detail. Having untrained security personel manhandle other attendants looks really bad no matter how you look at it.
"Rx" already has a history of use as medical shorthand for "prescription". See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_prescription

I would also recommend choosing a less overloaded name. Searching for "rx" in Google brings up prescription-related results.
One point I've made in alignment with this is to ask why decentralized systems are inherently more private.

Most decentralized systems seem to have more surface area for surveillance, not less. Why couldn't surveillance agencies and data-grabbing corporations just launch a bunch of "Sybil" nodes to surveil everyone? These would be virtually undetectable as they would be otherwise well behaved nodes and could be put behind ordinary looking cloud or ISP connections. Most shared data stores can be trivially scanned and data mined, decentralized networks like DHTs can be crawled, decentralized apps can be MITMed with Sybils and honey pots, and so on.

I predict that if any decentralized or federated system really becomes popular enough to merit attention from data-grabbers we will see the launch of an industry of companies and consulting services dedicated to mining and surveilling it. Security is hard, and security across a heterogenous decentralized network run by users and volunteers is many times harder.

I suppose you can see something analogous in the cryptocurrency space. I've argued for a while that Bitcoin and similar CC systems were in fact rapidly compromised, but not by attacking their cryptography or protocols. They were compromised via social engineering and financial game playing that transformed them from currencies of the sort they were intended to be into decentralized Ponzi schemes and money laundering vehicles. They were taken over and repurposed, not taken down or hacked in the conventional sense. The same thing would probably happen to e.g. Matrix or Mastodon if it got popular enough. Companies and governments would just assimilate and repurpose these things into surveillance and spam-delivery vehicles. With superior resources and economic forcing functions this would be quite easy.

A centralized system has a single point of failure, but that also limits attack surface. I assume centralized systems to be surveilled by their own operators and their host countries, but it's a lot harder for other actors to do so.
This is changing quickly in Toronto at least.

There were a bunch of gray market retail dispensaries which were way more convenient then ordering online and waiting a few days for delivery.

OCS has launched a bunch of retail stores in the same areas.
You can see what the tinyurl redirect destination URL is (value of Location response header) without also requesting that URL. Not with a typical browser configuration, but with curl or some hosted solution delivering this functionality.

Of course, if the email actually has a unique URL per recipient, then doing this gives away the fact that you interacted with the email.
Some people aren’t lucky enough to be born in a location with a growing or sustainable economy or a secure society, or myriad of other reasons one might find themselves away from friends and family.
I stand corrected. Video then.
> You feel accomplished because now you can talk about $LANGUAGE along with the rest of the cool kids who are exploring it.

This the actual problem imo, not learning new languages or “perpetual novice-ness”.
This complaint could be made for literally all policies.

"What if they change the rules in the future and suddenly do something I don't like?"

If the Safe Browsing system suddenly starts doing things that people don't want, then the other browser vendors will stop using it. Problem solved.
Google receives 92.42% of US search results. If you want new customers or users to find you, there's no choice but to do as they say. Also see AMP and media publishers.
You see the same problems in the American market too. Contrast the following experiences. To buy legally, I have to go trek out to my local dispensary, sit outside for 30 min - 1 hour, hope they have what I want when I get inside (no way to check in advance as they have no inventory management), pay 100% more than black market value per quantity, deal with ridiculously arbitrary restrictions on how much and what I am allowed to buy, I have to pay with cash, and I receive product with low potency.

If I want to buy illegally, I can call ping my friend, they tell me the whole inventory in advance, I tell them what I want, they bring it to me for free, I get very high quality product, it's very cheap, and we hang out for a few hours.

Which experience do you think most people choose?
There are 49 remaining copies of the Gutenberg Bible, I'm not sure how you can claim with a straight face that digital media last "much, much longer" than an acid-free book.
I think it will affect the incumbent the most. Trump used the impeachment fiasco to do record fundraising, and now he’s heading into 2020 with a massive war chest.

With major platforms banning political ads, they’re increasingly making that war chest less valuable.
The thing that's burning me out isn't the coding. It's the constant updating of everything I use across 3 machines and nothing working despite these updates. Within minutes of sitting down to code I encounter some flow killing problem. I so miss the days of DOS, μEmacs, and Microsoft C. Yeh we had to code everything, but it all just worked.
That does sound rough. I suspect if I ever reach the point that I cannot read my own books, I'll not do well mentally...

There's always the physical assistance of a stupidly bright light and a well shaped magnifier :)
GraphQL: How to Convince Your Boss?
It’s considered yes, but IMHO it’s often dismissed out of hand without any actual credible analysis. For example, I suspect that any self replicating machine would need to be run by an AI. So it would have to be able to manufacture, from base materials, a computer capable of running an AI and a duplicate of all the industrial mechanisms needed to do that again, from the silicon chips up. That, plus the infrastructure to construct metal foundries, chemical works, propulsion systems, power reactors, the list goes on and on. It would have to be absolutely enormous, and sending it to another solar system is basically throwing it away from a practical point of view.

It such a huge undertaking I doubt think anyone has ever seriously done any analysis of hat would be involved. That’s not a good sign, when a task so many people seem to write off as trivial, is so hard that nobody has even managed to do an overall actual engineering assessment or draft plan.
There is a flip side to this: check my other comment. "Overseas talent" is not invested in the product because most companies don't treat "overseas talent" as equals. My experience as "overseas talent" is that US companies bring their own technical debt which they are powerless to fix and they blame us for their incompetence.
Uh, maybe you mean one radiologist is interchangeable with another. And one pediatrician is interchangeable with another.

Doctors are definitely less interchangeable with each other than engineers.

Top surgeons probably make more money compared to median surgeons than top engineers to median engineers. So the idea that all, say, plastic surgeons are roughly the same is ridiculous, too.

Same thing goes for lawyers and marketers.

Engineering isn't uniquely complex, and top engineers aren't uniquely highly compensated either.

This is how it works in every industry, from sales to marketing.

If anything, top engineers seem to be uniquely surprised that they get paid so well. I've never met a salesperson who thinks he's overpaid. Almost every engineer I know thinks he's overpaid. If anything, that's suppressing our wages.
There's Apple, B&N, Kobo, and other also-rans but let's not kid ourselves.
As a former remote worker, showing the salary would be priceless and instantly put you on top. Nothing worse than wasting your time and finding out a position is severely underpaid.
A guide of modern Java (Java 17)
Sheet2site – Create any website without writing code using only Google Sheets
New to me that ebooks have failed. I almost never buy physical books now.
Could add 1999 to the title.
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/faqs/lang/lisp/part2/fa... Apparently, Spice is a derivative of MacLisp.
Ah you are right. It gives the illusion of quality loss until you commit the change, and then it looks crisp again.