skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How to Make Mushroom Risotto.

Traditionally, Risotto is a northern Italian rice dish cooked with broth. It is easy to digest a dish, that is cooked until it reaches a creamy consistency.

The broth can be made with anything ranging between veggies, meat or fish. In general, risotto contains butter, onion, white wine, and parmesan cheese.

It is one of the most common ways of cooking rice in Italy. Here, Chef Abhijeet Thakre, Executive Chef, Taj City Centre Gurugram is making a simple mushroom risotto recipe that is very close to his heart, as he used to make this dish in the early days to impress his love of life, who is his wife now.

Abhijeet feels that the best way to make a perfect dish is to make it whole-heartedly and this is one rule that he always follows in the kitchen. While making this risotto dish too, he dedicated himself to bring in the best flavor. This mushroom risotto is full of flavors and nutrients.

They are low in calories and are a great source of fiber and protein. They also provide many important nutrients, including B vitamins, selenium, potassium, copper, and (particularly when exposed to the sun) vitamin D. If you don’t know, mushrooms are beneficial in diabetes too.

Studies have shown that people with type 1 diabetes who consume high-fiber diets have lower blood glucose levels and people with type 2 diabetes may have improved blood sugar, lipids and insulin levels. Now that you are aware of the benefits of mushrooms, try this healthy recipe that can be served on any occasion. Click the play button, watch the video and start cooking. Also, tag us on Instagram using our handle @toifood and get a chance to be featured on our page.

Video here > https://streamable.com/0e1gg
I have that exact trackball.

Its not anywhere close.
For me, it doesn'tmatter if ut's fake. It's possible. I boycott the communist government and Chinese products whenever I can. I discount Chinese products and prefer alternatives from other countries (and no, this is not racist as my wife is Chinese and she even has stronger opinions than me).
We've been through this a gazillion times and the upshot is that the site guidelines ask you not to post insinuations of brigading, astroturfing, foreign spying, and all the rest of it, unless you have some evidence for saying so—in which case you should email hn@ycombinator.com so we can investigate. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

Someone posting internet comments that you strongly disagree with is not evidence of any of that; it's evidence merely that people have opposing views on divisive topics—a phenomenon that hardly requires explanation.

I've spent years investigating this stuff on HN and can tell you that the overwhelming finding—and I do mean overwhelming—is that nearly all comments like what you posted here are purely imaginary. This is simply how the mind reacts to offensive things on the internet: we assume that people couldn't possibly be posting such obviously wrong and awful stuff in good faith, so we make up a sinister story to explain it. These sinister stories actually do far more damage to the site than the things they're claiming. The underlying reality is that the community is simply much more divided and diverse than most readers assume it is. Posting poisonous stories makes it more so. That's why I post about this so often; it's probably the single most destructive internet trope that we see here.

Is it possible that far more successful manipulation is going on than any of our investigations have ever uncovered? Sure it is. But if you go down that road, you have to relinquish any need for evidence of any kind, which puts you in the wilderness of mirrors. That can't be right. So the principle we apply is that there needs to be some relevant evidence of some kind, any kind—just something objective to go on before making these sorts of accusations—and that already rules out over 99% of these claims.

Plenty more explanation here for those who want it and have the patience: https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme....

By the way: you broke another site guideline also, the one that asks you not to go on about downvoting because it never does any good and makes boring reading. There's a third reason too: it usually ends up completely inaccurate, as it did in this case, because the GP comment has now been heavily upvoted. Meanwhile the complaint sticks around, adding off-topic and false information to the thread.
Sorry. Understood. Original comment also seems to suggest astroturfing, though. Apologies again.
Federal government's gotten too big, and operates outside of the boundaries the Constitution outlines (Commerce Clause? More like "we do what we want clause").

This should very clearly be a state issue, at most. Federal government has no business making these decisions.

Lemme guess - they didn't implement a gradual introduction of this policy, meaning that suddenly tons of people who could legally smoke won't be able to do so. I'd be happy to be proven wrong, yet the article doesn't really say.
Not a fan of thumb balls, personally.

The Logitech Trackman Marble is my go-to now, but its nowhere near the legendary FX.
> But I still feel like this trillion-mile-high context is glossed over in many of these environmental diatribes and the endless drumbeat to protect it which we've all grown up with in modern times.

I'd guess, because in the end, it isn't really relevant.

Sustainability isn't really about living in some kind of partnership with nature, it's making sure that our exploitation of resources doesn't reach a point at which our species experiences dramatic loss.

We can't reasonably move to another planet. Barring breakthroughs in terraforming or the invention of FTL engines, we're stuck here. Which means we need to continue to live here for the foreseeable future, and we don't want to cross that tipping point and screw over the up-and-coming generations. We've become largely dependent on a series of things that won't be able to continue to exist in their current form.

We will continue to exploit and manipulate the natural world. We just need to change that manipulation so it can continue to persist. We're not talking about reducing our consumption of power - we instead talk about more efficient or less damaging ways to consume it.
It doesn’t matter as it has already happened a long, long time ago. No matter what it was
Predictions for 2020
«CoVe»[0] is a contour line vectorization tool for raster templates, internally developed especially for open-source GIS and desktop publishing software for orienteering mapping & cartography — «OpenOrienteering Mapper»[1].

Since now CoVe included in latest OpenOrienteering Mapper pre-release builds.[2]

[0] https://github.com/OpenOrienteering/mapper/issues/833

[1] https://www.openorienteering.org/apps/mapper

[2] https://github.com/OpenOrienteering/mapper/releases/tag/mast...
'Not good with computers' is not a function of age. There is also an assumption that people who grew up with smart phones are 'good with computers', but often it is pretty much the same thing: rote learning, fumbling around, getting friends to show them and sticking with the familiar. Tools, and maybe the applications are toys. Where as 'good with computers' tend to view the computer itself as the toy (and what are toys? Learning devices)
https://t3x.org/klong/prime.html

For what it's worth, this URL is the first result on search engines.
This has nothing to do with languages. I saw the same happening in a company writing pure Java, JS or Python. Doing a project with people who don't have command of whatever stack they are using is asking for trouble.

On the flip side, Scala can be a very pleasant stack to work with if you have right people on the team.

> While with c++ there is a body of compiled recommendations on what not to use and how to write c++, for scala that doesn't really exist.

Principle of least power is what you need.
No, the default return value is self if the last statement is not "^expression".
Yep - I've complained numerous times about being able to go through the upgrade with points flow on an existing booking, only for something to go wrong after entering my payment details and then just having to wring a call center to process the upgrade.

I wonder what the cost of annoyed customers who now fly Virgin and call center salaries is compared to proper engineering?
This doesn't help you see how it works with electricity, because it's not really how it's done with electricity.

Put two valves after each other on a pipe. The water can only flow if the first valve AND the second valve are open.

Fork off a pipe into two pipes with a tee, put a valve on each side, and connect the other ends of the valves together with another tee. Water flows through the whole thing if the first valve OR the second valve is open (or both).

That's how it works with electricity too. The valves are themselves controlled with water/electricity too.
Or does SMT make sense because looking at instructions coming in and branch predicting to execute some speculatively can only go so far, and sometimes hints from the application that "hey, this can be run independently of that" helps with overall throughput?
Would you rather live at the bottom of the ocean?
Nintendo Switch has a copycat that sells for only $50
I think the author is overreacting, to be honest. What’s wrong with having client-side interactivity? There’s no possible way that would fall afoul of GDPR.
'I wonder what's the motivation though - is it the likes?'

It does look like some sort of attempt to garner likes rather than an innovative means of publishing content?

Then again, that's twitter.
I really don't understand all of the format hate here. Am I the only one with a working scrollwheel? This just seems like such a non-issue.
DMA originates from a time when the CPU accessed memory via the North Bridge chipset; in effect, the CPU was just one of many peers in accessing memory, and data could be transferred between memory and devices without ever touching the CPU.

These days, RAM hangs off the CPU -- and even "DMA" involves data passing through the CPU.
> After all, if this is possible and the earth has been much warmer, why hasn’t this happened already?

We have two large-scale extinction events on record that may have been caused by or exacerbated by global warming: Tirassic-Jurassic Extinction event, and the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (more a series of small-scale extinction events than a single large one).

In world-scale timelines, humans haven't been around that long.

> I just don’t believe we’re that close to a tipping point. Climate is complicated and the earth can’t have been livable for billions of years without some balancing factors, right?

It wasn't. We've had many extinction level events. Humanity should be concerned about not becoming one.
The Dummies Guide to Bizus
Go is a very weird language :-(.

It's very limited when you started to do complex thing. Example, let's say you are building websocket. You will have a hard time to write type safe websocket handler to process the payload from client for all the events...

I started to do Rust/Crystal and both of them are better than Go(performance, type system).

Yet, whenever I build something for work, I come back to Go :-(. I told myself to use Rust or Crystal.

Then I realized that Go is a practical language. It compiled fast so it makes testing easier. The cross compiler just make it so easy to build binary run on everything thing. And the limitation of Go makes it very consistent on how you do thing. This makes working with Go become faster event by the fact that it slows you down on other parts.

So I think Go is a language that people easier to fall into because it has the speed of interpreter language like Ruby/Python(or even faster) during development and have a better performance/type safe story.
Author splices the data multiple ways, but ignores one obvious one which is African-American single-parent households (over 65% - [1]), and to a lesser degree Hispanic or Latino households (over 40%). The percentage is also high for American Indians (over 50%) but that has a smaller overall effect because of their population is an order of magnitude smaller.

This obviously has a large number of upstream causes and a large number of downstream effects.

[1] https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/107-children-in...
I agree. After adding all the uncertainties of the proxy data and our models (which we use to calculate temperature throughout Earth's history) it's not that sure change like this has never happened before, or that it is happening faster than ever before. There's no doubt we have impact, but it's not certain that it's the major driving force (though it may be, of course). Earth has several effects which periodically changes the climate. Those effects can coincide.

At least that's what paleobiologist on a lecture I visited said. His appeal was: hold on to strict facts and take uncertainties into account. Don't hop on the doomsday wagon. We simply don't know enough about complexities of the climate.
Beneficiaries? We’re the ones paying the rent, bro.
LA Fresh Poultry: a store where Los Angeles converges
I appreciate you pointing this out. Reminds me of a book called Obliquity where I think the author specifically mentions Boeing in a story talking about how companies make more money when they don't specifically focus on making money. If I recall correctly, he mentions how Boeing used to focus on making really good planes and when they did, they made a lot of money. When they shifted to focusing on profit, they started to make less money because they made worse planes. The book is a few years old but feels quite prescient.
As someone who scaled the database at a company that dealt with over a petabyte of data, here's a few thoughts I have:

It seems like the biggest issue Etsy had was a lack of strong engineering leadership. They relied on an outside consultant to rewrite their application in a fundamentally flawed way. The lack of eng leadership resulted in both poor technical decisions being made and bad engineering processes for how the app was developed.

Etsy's biggest technical mistake building an application using a framework that no one understood. This led to the predictable result that when they deployed the application to production, it didn't work. Even if the application had worked, Etsy still would have needed to maintain the Twisted application indefinitely. Maintaining an application written in a framework no one understands sounds like a recipe for a disaster. Sooner or later you are going to run into issues that no one will know how to fix.

Process wise, Etsy made the mistake of not properly derisking the Twisted application. They only found out that it didn't work when they were deploying it to production. They made the same issue a second time when they tried to deploy the replacement. When I'm building a new service, the first bit of code I write is to test that the fundamental design of the new service would work. Usually this only takes a few days instead of the months it takes to implement the full service. It sounds like Etsy could have setup a simple Twisted app that did a fraction of what the final version did. If so, they would have found a number of fundamental flaws in the design before having spent a ton of time building out the service.

To be honest, this story shows how a business can succeed even with a bad engineering team. It would be one thing if this sort of incident killed off Etsy. Instead Etsy has gone on to become the $5 Billion company it is today. I'm not saying engineering doesn't matter. All I'm saying is you can build a pretty successful business even with a bad engineering team.
No offence, but did you read the article? It's all about how blame is negative and should be actively discouraged.
Failure of interpretation, really: I can't see how any of that could be considered personal data.

Mind you, the attempt to be technology-independent rather than clearly mandate solutions has been a huge problem of the tracking law.
"When people in the future are so screwed that they'll take whatever they can get, they can..."

Not unlike how people recycle ships and electronics right now
It's inspiring, really... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qImHuiYnVQ0
It is really cool that much of this is still relevant over 50 years later.
I've been living in Canada and BC) for 6y so I'm still quite new to all this.

But from an alien coming in, this situation is so fucked up. The politicians, with Trudeau in point keep spending their time recognizing fucking up and apologizing for it, blanket initiatives are launched here and for truth and reconciliation. Meanwhile, corporate greed keeps laying wastepipes across sacred lands, RCMP keeps discriminating against natives and "preparing to shoot them", native women keep disappearing etc.

It is so hard understanding the depth of all that, there are so many layers and ramifications. Our local friends try as hard as they can to avoid being opinionated about it.

And at the same time I'm wondering if it isn't simple - indigenous peoples are easy to empathize with, given history and all, but boy o boy wouldn't life be easier if they'd be gone already. No more guilt! So look the other way.
Not in the standard library. Kotlin went with specific language features to achieve null safety:
https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/null-safety.html

Personally, being able to solve problems with the abstractions you can achieve within the language over adding very specific language features to solve them appeals to me more.

Having said that, Arrow has Option:
https://arrow-kt.io/docs/apidocs/arrow-core-data/arrow.core/...
Ha, Spouter a middle layer for talking to DB instead of just talking to DB (proxy to do connection pooling, etc could be between). This kind of project came up at my previous job and while I didn't know about Spouter at the time, I knew I didn't like the idea one bit.

Managing a DB + middle layer for a small and an already stressed DB team? Can't imagine that going well. The problem was that they spent too much time doing reviews for simple SQL patterns for CRUD + operational issues like debugging database performance issues or watching devs perform migrations. Of course they have other things to do in their job.

My opinion was the root of the problem is database choice and practices. If all I want to do is simple CRUD, then give me good scaled Redis cluster (AOF enabled), dynamo or something that constrains the query model. DB team can worry about about the cluster management leaving me to worry about structure. I could consult DB team if I needed opinions for multiple cases. Give me a way to watch db performance as well, so DB team does not need to watch over a migration at 12am or some off period.

Sometimes I may need higher performance or more dynamic queries, so just creating a table or elastic search with only indexable values to get the ids works. Use those IDs to fetch from original store.
I roll with the free plan. Not that much added in the pro plan tbth. Comparison @ https://raindrop.io/pro/buy
Scala and Rust are not competitors. They solve different problems and are designed for different kind of software. Rust will never be in the same league of productivity / abstraction as Scala is. There is a huge mental overhead of manual memory management that the language forces on you everywhere. Try to write a lockless or immutable Hashmap in Rust and then in Scala to see the difference. Or a graph-like structure. Or async code. Just compare method signatures. Scala is a piece of cake compared to Rust in this area.

On the flip side, Scala will never be as good system language as Rust is, even after adding more improvements to the JVM e.g. value types, or even with Scala native. In these use cases where I need a tight control of resources I'd take Rust over Scala every time.

As for Kotlin - meh, it is just Java with nicer syntax, not interesting to me at all.
Yeah? Catch the part about what inspired him? It’s one of the reasons I don’t use TurboTax anymore. That doesn’t make it right, but it does lessen my shock at finding Domino’s to be equally dishonest. And there’s just no reason to be dishonest. Heard about this internet thing, Domino’s? Someone is going to test this and post about it. Let’s assume that pizza tracker gives sales a bump (I know, big ask). How much good will is lost if, say, the WSJ gives a column inch or two about that new feature is just window dressing?
I used to think I didn't enjoy "hard" SF so much. Then I changed my mind after reading a few really good books ("Permutation City" by Greg Egan was the main one).

The thing I like about hard SF is that it allows the exploration of questions we can't answer, but that are clearly implied by real-world science. I.e., what is consciousness? You can definitely give a great not-hard-SF exploration of this idea, that focuses on imaginary technologies and the relations people have with it. But you can also explore it from the angle of extrapolating real-world experiments, like the famous split-brain experiments, and trying to dig into what they could mean for the question of consciousness.

Permutation City asks questions which are most interesting because they are real questions we don't know the answer to.
Ever been to a European capital? They consist almost entirely of that type of buildings.
In my mind, SMT made more sense when core counts were low. These days, desktop use cases can more often run out of threads to run than places to run them. Server use cases can often run more threads, but it might not be useful to run 32 cpu threads if your NICs can only properly run 16 queues.
This is excessively sensitive and represents an opinion-driven interpretation of the law. It seems like a lame attempt to make an "edgy" political statement.
It's not a continuity problem. It's that "bogus" is defined with respect to what it should do, and that criteria requires a working understanding of the environment which isn't present in the model.

If you had all possible images of all possible roads in all possible (lighting, weather,..) conditions, etc. then the ideal behaviour is just a function from all inputs to all desired actions. In the absence of this infinity of data you need a model. Any model which has no explicit understanding of the causal behaviour of an environment is going to misbehave for one of those unseen data points (eg. an unseen road in a weather/lighting/etc. condition).

"Correct"(/Safe) behaviour is not a function of pixels. No statistical model which associates pixel patterns with action can be correct.
Indeed, microservices is mostly about scaling development.
> I am much more concerned about someone being able to impersonate me

Well, great?!

> (security)

Erm ... no?

> than to know what I'm doing (privacy)

Privacy is not about what your software knows, it's about who else gets access to that information. Software allowing access to your information to parties other than the ones that you intended is a vulnerability class commonly called "information leak".

> This doesn't mean im unconcerned about the latter.

And thus it is, as per the common understanding of the word, a security concern.

> If secure software compromises privacy in ways that concern you

That's just logical nonsense. You might as well be saying "If secure software kills you in ways that concern you, [...]".

> it may not be the right software for you to use, but it is still secure

So, let's assume your browser had a bug where for some reason, every website could read all the data in the browser. Like, could access the storage, cookies, cache, history, page contents, everything. But no write access. This is obviously purely a privacy violation ... but, according to your definition, not a security problem, right?
It's an e-stop button (probably NFPA 79 Cat 0 implementation), not dead man's switch. This timestamp[1] clearly depicts an air gap between fingers and button while maneuvering.

[1] https://youtu.be/3x3SqeSdrAE?t=74