skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Mathematicians consider them to be true because they are provably true, i.e., they hold in the unique up to isomorphism model of the theory Ordinals, which subsumes ZFC.
End to End Testing with Selenium in Docker
It works well for companies where there’s typically recourse in company policy to deal politics and bullying.

For communities, especially those that are open, this model often fails as soon as one bad actor comes along because there’s often no recourse against bad behaviour.

Unfortunately for Mattermost, it’s communities that are less likely to be able to pay, and more likely to be affected by this policy. That just feels like poor policy making.
Why would they do that tho? Doesn't that encourage fraud and damage their brand? I am just scratching my head trying to understand the benefit of doing that besides logistic cost?
"Everyone is an admin" might be usable for some small teams, but it makes the software absolutely unusable for any sort of public project -- like open-source developers, or public communities. It really makes it clear that the primary purpose of the "team edition" is to drive sales of the commercial product, not to be usable in its own right.
no LA, but SF bay area is here: http://www.inat.fr/metro/san-francisco-bay-area/
Slipping off-topic messages into a security system just seems like such a ridiculously stupid thing to do that I'd be surprised if it's ever happened before at Google before.
Amateur radio can be as expensive or inexpensive as you want it to be. I've drifted in and out over the years, and recently found myself really enjoying a super basic 2M handheld (ICOM V-80) which can be had for $50 on eBay. It's so simple you can easily memorize every function, and it's surprising that even something so basic has so many functions to explore. I think that's why I like it so much.

Now in the digital era, you can spend $250 on a handheld that can literally reach any spot on the globe. The primary digital platform for amateur radio, D-STAR, allows cross-band communication by connecting to the internet.

A lot of the cost of amateur radio is people trying to get the best equipment possible to transmit and receive via FM modulation over the longest distances with the best possible audio quality. But that's just one aspect. That's what costs a bundle, but there's much more to it than just that.

IMO, what's interesting about radio is that, if you know how to use it, you can get a message from anywhere to anywhere else on the planet… or even low earth orbit. It requires minimal infrastructure and it can work with AA batteries. The community is very friendly and people are happy to help/relay messages.

Honestly, amateur radio, for me, is a lot of what the internet used to be when it was difficult to use. Since amateur radio is still relatively difficult to use it keeps the trolls away.
Was "Happy birthday Sundar!" made without consulting leadership and using emergency push to deploy it?
The employment green card backlog tops 800k. A solution is elusive
MS-DOS was basically the store brand CP/M.
I would counter that Gödel's Incompleteness theorem has had the greatest effect on the practice of mathematics by inventing digital computing which has revoltionised mathematics - all as a side effect of Turing and Church's proofs of Gödel's theorem.

Turing's proof of Godel's incompleteness devised the Turing machine as a metaphorical device to demonstrate incompleteness - this then led to the whole of computing.

And for Church's proof of Godel's incompleteness he devised the lambda calculus which founded functional programming, McCarthy's LISP, and the Y-combinator of algebraic recursion.
I had a 4 roundtrip email thread with their support over a speech API bug. Eventually sent them a narrated step-by-step screencast, and the guy is finally like "oh, it's not supposed to work that way." (Yes, that's what I said in e-mail 1!)
I guess google values intelligent people, and since intelligence involves

- thinking outside the box

- considering consequences

- estimating impacts of 2nd and 3rd order

this should lead to the realization this may not be a good idea: why didn't the managers (which quite probably have been engineers before becoming managers) consider that?
You are saying a lot of different, seemingly subtle things, while heavily hedging everything, which makes it super hard to have a meaningful discussion. I am honestly not entirely sure what you are trying to say with things like

> Agreed, but this does not logically preclude my concerns that it is possible that [...]

I mean, if you're talking philosophy here, I obviously agree that this is a logical possibility, but how does that move the conversation forward? What we need to see is evidence one way or the other.

I would suggest to focus on specific points of contention and cite sources. This forces everyone in the discussion to actually go researching those sources in the first place, which should improve the level of dialog.
It always seems to me Google won the Search Engine battle, ads became their revenue source, and that is it. Android came out of necessity and stupidity of Microsoft at the time.

Comparatively speaking they are incompetent both Technically and Manageability, compared to Amazon and Azure, or to better phase it compared to Jeff Bezos and Satya Nadella.

It remains to be seen now Google CEO Sundar Pichai, now also Alphabet CEO will change. ( I could never understand how Google Cloud also had a CEO )
Not high enough for management obviously. Also, is it growing profitably.
What was the original title? This comment chain reads a little confusing now.
I'm also sure many a happy person has left their job....when the job decided that person needed to leave for some reason. This is article is a very one sided approach to a problem, but its nice to see someone at least acknowledge its an issue I suppose.
Most of them were either complete rewrites or products that didn’t exist internally. Eg they internally use Borg and not kubernetes.
Cultural problem seems to be playing no small part in this. In average high schools, being interested in STEM is just not considered something cool.
If you -- in perfectly good faith -- accidently disrupt vital services, like emergency com's or air traffic control, potentially endangering human lives, then the identification requirement allows us (as in society) to contact you to remedy the situation.

Without the identification requirement it would take a lot longer to track you down, puting human lives at risk.
That’s the problem with Slack — too easy to switch to equivalent or superior alternatives. I suspect this issue will continue to weigh on their stock price.
Reading "establishment" synonymous with "organization" would be anawkward and un-idomatic even today. Would you call the ACLU a "civil rights establishment?" Would you call NARAL a "women's rights establishment?"

Quite frankly, I don't care what the words mean today, since we have a body of court cases that has expanded the application of the First Amendment beyond the strict scope of the words as they were written.

There are good reasons to believe that's not the sense in which the word is used. The Constitution repeatedly uses the word "establish" in the sense of "to make official."

You keep trying to make linguistic arguments while ignoring the linguistic means of the words at the time they were originally written, especially when one of the men responsible for actually writing the Bill of Rights explicitly stated what the words of the First Amendment were intended to mean at the time they were written.

The First Amendment was explicitly intended to create separation of church and state at the Federal level. Like the rest of the bill of Rights, it wasn't intended to apply to the states at the time, so your arguments about state churches are entirely irrelevant.
That's not what free speech is.
It's kinda strange that these accounts are popping up all over the place to stoke fear on China. What's the agenda here I wonder?

Chinese are known to pay folks to post on foreign forums. I'm not sure who is behind these...fascinating stuff
2020 Guide to Cryptocurrency Taxes
Of course, it isn't "nonsense"; instead simply the state of affairs ;-)
Another way of looking at this. If you are shopping for a cloud platform Google is a really hard sell. On one hand you have Amazon who really paved the way here and literally built their company atop their platform and currently powers a huge piece of the web. On the other hand you have Microsoft who has decades of experience figuring out how to appeal to CEOs and enterprise customers and can dangle the prospects of integration with existing corporate infrastructure.

Google offers the Google name and a reputation for ditching services when the wind shifts. They really have little or no competitive advantage here. I'd personally rather build atop Linode or Digital Ocean than Google or at most, stick to the middle of the road, most generic parts of Google's platform.
Any plan to add job task management like RQ or Celery?
I couldn't find any authentication / user registration code within the Flask application itself?
I have the same problem! What the hell is that? I've been mystified at that noise for ages.
I'd recommend getting something that can do HF, because that's where things get interesting.

That kinda depends on what you consider "interesting". IMO, there's plenty of "interesting" stuff to do on 2m / 70cm, plus anything you can do in receive only mode on other bands. But to me, "interesting" includes things like listening in on air-traffic control using an RTL-SDR, participating in the local ARES group, working the local repeaters in voice mode, and experimenting with decoding various digital modes.

This is not to say that working HF doesn't open up additional doors, because clearly it does. My point is just that there's a lot of fun to be had with just what you can do with a Technician license, a $40 Baefung radio, and a $25 RTL-SDR dongle.
My biggest gripe with the current de facto recommended approach (even mandated in HSTS) is that you need to redirect to https from untrusted http.

So you are being forced to either not serve http, or to condition users to trust MITM-able redirect. How many people will notice a typoed redirect to an https page with a good certificate?

The solution is simple: browsers should default to https, and fall back to http if unavailable. Sure, some sites have broken https endpoints, but browsers have enforced crazier shit recently.
iFixit Shares 2019 Mac Pro Teardown: 'A Masterclass in Repairability'
I worked on eliminating Amazon from my life ( my account is from 2007 and I begrudgingly subscribe to Prime) and it was HARD.

The thing that constantly kept hooking me back in was the the 2 Day shipping. I've ordered from Target, eBay, and the OEM's directly.

MOST of the time, the non-amazon option has a decent fulfillment lead time. But once in a while, they'll take 3 days to ship the package, then they'll ship it with UPS Ground, which is slow a shit. Realistically, that often means it takes upwards of 8 business days, or nearly two weeks, to get your stuff.

I think they understand this very well as they continue to invest in the logistics network and do jack squat to address the real issues facing Amazon.
Cool? Maybe if one fetishizes overengineering and abstraction layers.
I've previously found this site helpful for a high-level view of the ecosystem: https://www.fullstackpython.com/angular.html
Maybe he is aware of the existing maps ... and as he states “this isn’t an improvement”. Since the current NYC maps serves both purposes astonishingly well.
It will almost certainly take longer for someone to read your Makefile to notice that weird curl line than it would be for someone to try to compile your code as a regular user and have the compiler spit out an error because it can't read the include file "/etc/shadow".
I know that, but I was more curious to some notable differences, from someone who knows enough about both to explain.
On paper or in reality, because the deaths by rifles total is < 400 a year? My point is that any rifle, especially the larger caliber ones are more lethal than handguns, so the AR-15 isn't that special for a rifle in terms of lethality, all rifles are more lethal than handguns on paper.

When you access risk, likelihood is a factor, you mitigate for risks that have a higher likelihood. If I'm worried about protection from being killed I'm more worried about a drunk driver than a meteorite even tho the meteor has a higher lethality. Handguns are lethal enough you get shot by one, the survival rate isn't significantly higher than a rifle especially considering you're statistically more likely to be shot by one. Stabbings tend to be more lethal than either, but and there are more people stabbed then shot by rifle (~1500-3000 in US per year), certainly more the case overseas. Missing forest for the trees.

Are we just being pedantic here? What are you arguing or is the point of argument if you don't want to ban guns or ban the AR-15 or military style weapons specifically? If you're arguing it just to argue I honestly don't see how that's constructive. I'm discussing this in the context of gun violence, in the context of the media hyper focusing on military style rifles when they're not the major cause of deaths, even in mass shootings (which are just as often or more often pistols).
I used to love to go to Service Merchandise as a kid and watch the boxes/items come out on the belt/wheels. I was oddly fascinated by it and excitedly waited for whatever Mum/Nana bought.
The whole reason of buying a product from a company you "trust" is that they aren't giving you dumpster trash.
If you have used a very early version of MSDOS, its is not very different. File names are 8+3 characters long with a dot in between, upper and lower case is not distinguished. There are only 5 "built-in" commands: DIR, ERA (erase files), REN (rename, but the syntax is REN NEW=OLD), SAVE, and TYPE.

There are no directories, but "user areas" numbered from 0 to 15, so different users can have different files on the same disk. User areas are selected with the USER command. However, most people used user areas as poor-man's directories.

There is no COPY command. Copying files (and much more) is done with a program named PIP (peripheral interchange program). For instance,

PIP B:=A:*.COM[E]

would copy all files of the type COM from drive A: to drive B: and echo the file names.

What was great about CP/M was that it allowed programs to run on different computers, as long as they were 8080- or Z80-based. It was a thin, but very effective abstraction layer between the hardware and a program.

MSDOS, which was originally based on CP/M, was a step back, really, because everybody tried to program the hardware directly instead of going through the proper interfaces.
This is true for MS-DOS 1.0, but 2.0 introduced tree-structured directories, which 8-bit CP/M didn't have.
"Objective labor market indicators and expert assessments suggest demand for AI talent will far outstrip supply for the foresee- able future."

Ok, at what salary?

At minimum wage, lots of demand, not much supply. At $500-$750k a year, lots of supply, considerably less demand.
> Hence, users achieve a significant productivity increase with the mouse in spite of their subjective experience.

Sorry but between doing a high level, interesting activity that takes a few more microseconds and doing a mind numbing activity that makes me want to die inside, and also takes a few less microseconds, I choose the former.

We should not base everything in efficiency. Eating only soylent green is efficient but also awfully boring.
Off topic: The link for this article is,

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/google-brass-set-202...
?pu=hackernewsyw3xln&utm_source=hackernews&utm_medium=unlock

How did it end up with utm_source=hackernews in the url? Dang is this something you change or is it user submitted?
There's also "compartmentalize your data", so that one breach doesn't get it all.

Compartmentalization is a guiding principle for things like spy networks. It's also how you make critical equipment able to survive failures.
My ISP, since I have a contract with them, I can switch to another ISP anytime, and they are bound to lots of data protection laws.

On the other hand, the Mozilla Corporation clearly is desperate to find alternate sources of funding.
Thank you, it looks very promising, and I like the host-it-yourself aspect.
Side rant about these coding bootcamps.

I would find 10% to be wayy over-estimated.
Either Alipay or WechatPay, most of the time. Cash is allowed as well.
Did a conspiracy destroy LA’s streetcar system?
Aren't all cables replaceable if you have a soldering iron?
Eventually, yes. Although that is an interesting philosophical question in itself.
I don't doubt that Amazon.com runs on its own dedicated "installation" of AWS, but are you saying that it doesn't run on AWS at all? That doesn't jive with the infamous "API mandate" email that Bezos wrote that essentially kicked off AWS. Have I been misunderstanding that email all along?
Why wouldn't we give tax breaks to EV buyers given all that sweet gas tax revenue EVs generate for general upkeep on infrastructure they use.

A broken clock is right twice a day. Corporations are just pissed they can't jack the price of all their cars up by an extra $7500
You're repeating yourself. I addressed that argument already as well. If you want to rebut what I said, that's fine, but you can't just repeat the same point as if there hadn't been a response to it. Be specific about what your issue with my argument is. Or rest your case; it's fine if we just disagree.
I'm a US citizen working at a tech company. I have a normal HN account with reputation above 2000. These are my own thoughts and opinions. I'm just honestly afraid of being targeted by Chinese hackers for posting sentiments like the above.
Sorry for the delayed response. I have multiple MRIs of my brain and the entirety of my spine, most of them at 3T. I got them stored as ISO copies of the CD they made for me. I have no idea where to begin by applying computer vision. If you can point me in that direction, I would be happy to try.

EDIT: As for viewing, they come with a proprietary viewer loaded on the CD. I do have the ability to export them as JPG image stacks though.
15M LifeLabs customers lost personal health numbers, labs test results and more
There is no captcha. It's a fake page meant to harass certain referrers.
You know, I might be. In that case, please enlighten me with a counterexample. Anyway, the point isn't to pick on the competition. I'm merely saying that RealVNC is a fine, fairly priced product with a rather bad name. Many people, myself included, have a dismissive initial reaction based on memories of old-fashioned (slow, hard to set up over the internet) VNC. At least with RealVNC, it's nothing like that anymore, whereas with TightVNC for one, it still pretty much is. I use the latter as well, but only for light usage on local networks—acceptable and better than it once used to be, yet a completely different experience.
Well, Commodore Basic allowed you to execute Basic code from outside of a program, at the command-line prompt. CP/M wasn't based on Basic, and didn't let you do that. Neither did MS-DOS.
One thing to do to slow down such downloading is to add a great deal of bulk "junk" data, and have a rate limited network connection.
To be perfectly fair, I have had these types of experiences (plus more) with AWS as well. Their solution engineers are pretty useless, bugs in products never get solved and you get endless forwards and escalations on their issue tracker.

I think in general, scaling support for such complex a product that’s constantly changing is really difficult.
It's solid numerology. Like if you add up all the ASCII values for Bill Gates III, you get 666.

/s
So similar, in fact, that it led to years of allegations that MS-DOS was a ripoff of Digital Research's intellectual property (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/86-DOS#Intellectual_property_d...).

> one could safely say MS-DOS/PC-DOS only existed in the first place as a "quick and dirty" approximation of CP/M

One could indeed, especially seeing how the original name of the product Microsoft acquired and turned into MS-DOS 1.0 was QDOS, which stood for "Quick and Dirty Operating System" (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/86-DOS)

:-D
Devils advocate => a business exists to make a profit- if business software uses OOP and OOP helps it make more of a profit than other options it is a better choice.
I don't care about this argument. This isn't a courtroom or a legislative hearing; we're discussing ideas. You'll have to address the things I'm actually saying instead of demanding that I answer for everyone else on my side of this debate.
After trying all, I prefer zulip over all (including slack).

It is very polished, functional and easy to write extensions for! It is slightly annoying that I feel like none of these will last a decade and wonder why we couldn't have stuck with XMPP or an extended standard and figure out federation, privacy and enterprise.

Unfortunately, outside of tech, everyone is moving to Teams!
Some things are just common sense. It wasn’t her role to disseminate information about any type of compliance outside of security. As a professional, you should know what’s appropriate in a workplace based on your position.
Not a great comment, in my opinion. He does nothing to address the artificial neutering of the community edition, especially when compared to all the open source products that Mattermost uses - as the blog post author's response sets out.
https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-...

Or a more gentle summary:
https://supermemo.guru/wiki/Taleb:_IQ_is_a_pseudoscientific_...
Often, I don't have a contract with my ISP. Since my ISP is a random coffee shop, the public transit provider, or so on.