skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd also contrast with what Obama did when Turkey shot down a Russian fighter plane with the loss of a pilot, he didn't even offer the slightest of rebukes to Turkey, but rather slapped additional sanctions on Russia. Standing by allies right or wrong seems to be a bipartisan thing.
We know how kids who really might be "incapable of empathy or love" behave, and it's not the sort of stuff autistics do. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppositional_defiant_disorder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conduct_disorder

Autistic kids are demonstrably not "incapable" of empathy as commonly understood. They may be impaired in their expression of it, but that's something quite different.
Thanks I clarified my comment.
That's definitely true, but given the sensitivity of having access to private source and secrets I think its fair to call out a warning.
>it’s a bit of a weasel word, but I think it’s still important to recognize that jam can be healthier than honey.

I agree with your points on vitamins/minerals (like I said above, jams will have micro-nutrients which the honey does not).

So its pros and cons not healthy/healthier...the person who obtains their micro-nutrients elsewhere doesn't need them from jam and probably better off getting the sugar/calories from honey over the fruit jam. Again the honey is just more easily converted into energy and generally will cause less of an insulin spike than sugar from jam.

So whats healthy/healthier often depends on purpose or needs...are you eating the jam/honey for energy only? Honey is better. Are you eating it to as your source of those certain vitamins/minerals? Obviously honey is void of those, so jam. That said no one eats Jam for the vitamin/mineral or fiber content, there are just better sources. Then again you may get some great anti-oxidants from various jams made from berries specifically (of course you would get the same from the berries themselves without the added sugar in jam).

Getting more into the weeds of "health", many people will "use" honey for coughs, sore throats, etc... because its anti-bacterial properties and use local honey as an anti-allergen (exposure to small dose of local pollen) all to great effect.
He should really remove the political content too. Yes, many of us think Trump is an asshat, but why alienate a potential customer who disagrees? I think it's an attempt to be edgy/cool (along with "Frigging") but I think it risks hurting more than it helps.
Docker-compose is the best thing I've found for sharing dev environments so far. You do have to help people, but if you do a good job, they'll learn and then they can help other people too.
Digital my ass. So it's all Zuckerberg's fault now?

How about the fall of Soviet Union and communist block? Which events (although being good for people) were abused by certain groups to:

- end the public debate on whether capitalism is the right way to run the society,

- enable unprecedented power concentration in a single country,

- and make money and greed govern practically all aspects of human life?

Lots of clever thoughts in the comments, but I'm really surprised no one brings this one up.
You can say the same about geocities when it was acquired by yahoo. But it didn't last and then now it's happening with yahoo-groups. So I am not hopeful if GitHub becomes a liability microsoft will keep it.
I wouldn’t be surprised if PCI forbade inviting white hats.
Sorry for that, the pages have been corrected. We've redirected the 'recent questions' to our legal website where we've been answering questions for a few weeks now:

http://helplicit.com/questionDashboard
Software consulting is a tough business.

Customers often want to pay some equivalent of per hour/week/sprint/month, with hard estimates where the work is very often difficult to estimate.
Reading Recommendations: Top Books I've Read in 2019
>The US is alienated from widespread fear of crime, immigration [...]
It's roughly the same in Italy, are you sure that those problems are only USA's problems? I think those are pretty widespread today.
I agree broadly but I think the real cause is overlooked.

When I was young, everyone in our town read the <Town Name> Times. They may have passionately disagreed with it, they may have thought it was too right or left, but they all read it and could at least have discussions from a common starting point.

Now that is gone. Right-wing boomers read only news sources aimed at right-wing boomers. Left-wing millennials read only news sources aimed at left-wing millennials. Of course they are hopelessly alienated from each other. One side reads that unemployment is at an all time low, one side reads that income inequality is at an all time high, and both are convinced that the other side is fundamentally incapable of reason.

So they all sit in their echo chamber and get angrier and angrier at anyone outside of it, fed day after day by a media whose only real interest is more clicks, more ads, more money.

I don't know how we come back from it. I'm not sure we do. It scares me frankly.
I know your comment is the typical explanation, but to play devil's advocate, it may just be that as organizations mature they move away from "innovation" and towards "maintenance". There's a perspective that that may not exactly be a bad thing. [1]

I've heard people say SpaceX looks very much like NASA during the Apollo days, including the average age being in the mid-20s in the control rooms. Contrast that with today where NASA's average age is north of 50. What I think will be interesting is if SpaceX maintains this over the coming decades or if they will become more bureaucratic as the organization ages.

http://freakonomics.com/podcast/in-praise-of-maintenance/
There is nothing wrong with being sexist. Reality is sexist. She is only successful because she's an attractive female. And there's nothing wrong with that. Not everybody is equal.
Grace hash join would be another major topic to cover first.
I'm not sure it's possible to sink Trump's reputation among Trump supporters at this point.
Not to be overlooked: ProPublica actually constructed a 3D version of the navigation system's control board: https://www.propublica.org/article/how-we-reconstructed-the-...
> a new phone that has localized apps that non-English speakers can use

Apple localizes their operating system.
With what we learned about the NYC FBI and from the recent IG report, why would we not assume that there are political factions within the intelligence agencies abusing their training and tools to try to help a particular candidates?
> There is little socialization at home - when's the last time (outside Christmas and Turkey Day) most families hosted a large gathering?

Can you support this assertion as a blanket statement? I don't see much evidence of this in my own personal experience. I grant that it may be the case in certain areas and groups, but across the board? I'm not seeing it.
Bernie Sanders calling himself "socialist" (although he could also use social democrat) is a very similar example.
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil
Commercial or open source? PDFTron can do it, but they’re not an open source project.
This is incorrect.

If you have futures, your marginal cost is still $4, since now you're using an additional gallon instead of selling it at market price at $4.
Yes, but there is a difference between helpful therapies and treatments, and "a cure".
I could see that being pedantically correct (the best kind of correct? lol).
Also amazing to see how little has changed process wise.
So, living conditions in your typical high polluted city have nothing to do with being depressed or suicidal?
For some values of "on schedule".
Just had to emergency deal with this issue within a large scale complex ISP env. Fun times!

Edit: And yes as others pointed out, right into the day or two before holiday moratorium.
Why do you allow yourself to feel anger and nausea over something as trivial as a tweet? Social media is just entertainment and a game, not something that sensible people actually take seriously.
I worked at Lockheed Martin as a Systems Engineer for a few years. Everything we worked on as a project was waterfall. We did annual training using the methodology and did exercises around it as well. I think it's rather commonplace for defense contractors and wouldn't be surprised if this were still the case for Boeing.
Hohmann Transfer Orbit
Hey Jose!

This is hilarious. I think of the Cape as pretty tech starved, but I see why we all ended up in the comment section of this post!
> If we were not on an anonymous website, we would probably not start the conversation with “I disagree.”.

What leads you to think that? This has been a common way to respond in substantive real-world discussions for my entire life, even predating the internet.

"I disagree" is not, after all, some sort of attack or insult.
Exact, and is even worse. We are taking the behaviour of an adult animal, a short lived one, strongly wired to have sex, bite other males at sight, chase off everybody from their territory and chew and eat other smaller animals and plants while avoid inminent death in form of many predators...

And they are living in captivity, between plastic toys and hamster wheels. Males in a cage, and females in another cage. An environment that for its evolution probably would be seen as normal as for us being abducted by aliens and living in an alien zoo for our entire lifes.

And we are taking that and extrapolating it to explain the behaviour to a human children.

Would be ridiculous even for neurotypical children to expect them to behave like vicious sex driven mammals.
If you keep Control+Tab set to cycle through tabs in recently used order, you can use Command-Shift-Left/Right or Control-PageUp/PageDown to cycle through tabs in tab-bar order instead.

Additionally, you don't need an extension to jump to a tab anymore. Command-[1-8] goes to that number tab in the current window, where 1 is the leftmost tab. Command-9 goes to the rightmost tab.
This is a common problem in healthcare insurance. API connections will stop working for about 3 weeks every year as each side performs a complicated dance of noticing the expiration and updating the systems to accept a new public certificate.
Follow Every Step of a Major Midcentury Modern Renovation
Maybe not the Trump supporters who run Bloomberg terminals. But the center-right could be flipped if something sufficiently damning is found.
I think the concept of software "parts" (similar to the auto industry - many of the components are made by 3rd parties) is only tangentially related to object oriented programming.

There were always APIs but they're still parts with an exposed interface - now just distributed over the Internet "as a service".
:) I guess I just keep a select group of friends that I want to be with. What I don't know wont kill me and all that, but fair enough. Each to their own !
GP's point isn't to move goalposts, it's that your example is not indicative of the autistic community at large - it's a biased sample and, in line with GP's reasoning, I suspect there is a substantial proportion of (especially high functioning) autists who would strongly consider a cure. Imagine having normal, innate desires for friendship and companionship, but being unable to form such relationships and being crushingly aware of this fact. It's a miserable, deeply lonely existence and some of us would consider giving up "ourselves" in order to have a chance at a more socially fulfilling life.
Title should be adjusted to mention branches & tags specifically.
If anyone wants to be more aware of this issue, I recommend the book Amusing Ourselves to Death, and also Technopoly, both by Neil Postman.
It’s all well and good to encourage understanding and whatnot, but the question is what actually works in reality on a societal level. It might sound nice to say “a strong economic system is not based on greed but on a willingness of each person to contribute to the best of their ability,” but it turns out that philosophy doesn’t work very well when dealing with large groups of people. I think the same could be said about your statement.
The story "cowboy innovates rapidly, kills someone" sells a lot easier than "old crusty firm attempts to take zero risks, floats on past success, still kills someone"
> why would we not assume that there are political factions within the intelligence agencies abusing their training and tools to try to help a particular candidates?

That has nothing to do with what I said, and is in fact completely orthogonal to it.
They do it do differentiate their phones. If all phones look the same and basically have the same hardware - why bother buying Samsung, when a cheap Oppo is the exact same phone?

Then Samsung won't make lots of money. This way you can have Samsung fanboys that'll swear that Samsung stuff is better and will keep buying it.
Please note that I added data as well. It isn't just based on personal experiences.

There may be regional differences, there may be urban/rural differences, but overall, the US socializes significantly less.

Same goes for leisure time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_time_devo...

Dropping amount of social time in the US: https://qz.com/1320344/americans-are-socializing-less-and-pl...

Also, it's likely income/wealth dependent: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/194855061664147... (Given that the US is what, #3 in terms of median wealth, I'd consider this mild corroboration)

(Edit: Formatting. I swear, the lack of lists in HN...)
This example still involves a lot of manual work. It's often times even easier.

from concurrent.futures import ProcessPoolExecutor
import string

def hello() -> int:
seconds = random.randint(0, 5)
print(f'Hi {seconds}s')
time.sleep(seconds)
print(f'Bye {seconds}s')
return seconds

# Don't forget this for processes, or you'll get in trouble
if __name__ == "__main__":

inputs = list(string.printable)
results = []

# You can sub out ProcessPool with ThreadPool.
with ProcessPoolExecutor() as executor:
results += executor.map(hello, inputs)

[print(s) for s in results]
I'll add that it's really fucking sad, that one of the greatest achievements of human society (Internet is basically a huge collective effort), is demonized for somehow unleashing lowly human nature and similar nonsense. It's just a medium and, in some cases, a mirror.
Twitter and Facebook Want to Shift Power to Users. Or Do They?
"a sinking ship raises all boats"

Humor aside, I prefer to subscribe to the Harry Potter ear worm and make sure everyone is aware of it and is comfortable to reach out at any time:

"Help will always be given at Hogwarts, Harry, to those who ask for it"
If our governments won’t stop climate change, should we revolt?
Nobody sells perpetual licenses anymore.
> Actually lots of people have voluntarily starved to death.

As I said: Not for very long. Besides, I wouldn't call that reason (except for people who do that to die, it's pretty efficient for that purpose).
This is the problem: "According to Amazon's 2018 annual report, 58% of Amazon's sales came from its millions of third-party sellers, many of whom ship directly to consumers."
Infinitely small is the same as nonexistent, and stalls don’t mean what you think they do on jet engines. Comparing a jet engine stall to an automotive stall is the easiest and most obvious tell that someone is speaking from aviation inexperience. Stalls definitely, categorically, absolutely did not occur in the contextual incidents at any time including impact. Source: ATP with 17,000 hours on a similar type, and I’ve flown the accident configuration.

I swear this site is nothing more than a competition to be most correct (and outside of JavaScript arguments people never are, amusingly), because this entire thread is so pointless as to be a detriment to all involved, me included. In what other context would it even be remotely useful to argue about this, aside from the investigation? Why do HN readers think the ability to write software makes them coherent debaters on every topic imaginable, including extremely complicated propulsion systems they’ve probably never touched? Aviation discussion particularly worries me here because in the past I’ve seen some doubting of those who have held the wreckage in their hands by those whose primary competency is Rails and React, commenting safely from several thousand nautical miles away from the investigation.

I look forward to the societal impacts of upvoting and karma being studied more deeply in time, because it is quite a rot on conversation and drives people into hopelessly pedantic arguments like this one that are literally a drain on human productivity and the limited time you have on this planet. There were over 300 deceased pax aboard the aircraft you casually referred to as “obliterated” in an off topic thread about Starliner, too, but keep driving to the bottom of this argument, for sure. I’m sure they and their families will appreciate you getting it right.
Do you mean something like an external enclosure containing a backplane connecting to NVMe drives, connected to the main server over SAS 12gbps, or something else entirely?
The execution logs (or "Captures", in our Jail terminology..) do get fairly large if you capture something hardcore, like database or compiler.

For normal web/business/enterprise applications you can configure BugJail to only capture your own packages, which massively reduces the file size (and performance impact).

To give concrete example of hardcore scenario, capturing startup of Elasticsearch results in about 85MB file.

There is no way to enable capturing dynamically, and this is likely never going to be supported, due to the way how BugJail works (it reconstructs the program execution, so if beginning of the execution is missing, "things are not fine").
"for fun and profit" is a common English idiom used to describe things that are both interesting and potentially earn money. Since this is stackoverflow, they earn money with this tech and features of the site.

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/323606/whats-the...
There is a difference between honest anonymity and dishonest anonymity that can probably be exploited to help.

People who need anonymity for purposes such as expressing opinions that could get them in trouble with their government, religious community, abusive family, employer, school, etc., generally do not need complete anonymity. They just need to be anonymous from the adversarial group that would penalize them for their comments.

Such people will usually be able to have contacts that they can trust with proof that they are legitimate, and who are sufficiently outside the influence of the adversarial group that they can openly vouch for the comments from the anonymous person without fear of reprisal, and openly explain how they verified the legitimacy of the comment author.

Certain contacts would probably end up being used by multiple anonymous commenters. For example, Amnesty International might serve as a contact for people who want to write anonymously about their government's human rights violations.

People who need anonymity for criminal activity or for disinformation campaigns would have a harder time finding a contact to vouch for them that their targets would trust.
> Chinese brands have almost 50% global market share.

You can say that Chinese phones have 90%+ of global market.

Samsung still manufactures in China, it just closed its own factories there. OEMs and CMs took over manufacturing for them.

Only their cheapest models are made in Hanoi and Seremban. Some of their domestic market models are still made in Gumi.
couldn't a malicious docker image also be tooled to dump all of that stuff to an external destination?
Your Boeing cost prediction don't include the possibility of catastrophic RUD during reentry (still 2 days out). At that point does NASA cancel starliner?
Everything a manager does should be based on discourse. If something needs to be adressed, start off by politely asking.

Bad managers are all those who start off providing ready-made solutions and prescriptions. Basically orders from above shuts down critical free-thinking.

These ignorants are terrible leaders that should not have the positions they now enjoy as privilege, not as responsibility.

This is also working advice for everybody else as well, wether you are leader or not:

How else would you trick out minutia or get people to think for themselves how the solution should evolve?
Python Poetry 1.0 Released
Putnam also did research on the causes of the breakdown of social trust. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9477.... and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_D._Putnam#Diversity_and...

> "... in the short term, other things being equal, more diversity in a community is associated with less trust both among and within ethnic groups. Putnam describes people of all races, sex, socioeconomic statuses, and ages as "hunkering down", avoiding engagement with their local community as diversity increases. Although limited to American data, his findings run counter the contact hypothesis which proposes that distrust declines as members of different ethnic groups interact, and conflict theory which suggests that while distrust among ethnic groups rises with diversity, distrust within ethnic groups should decrease. Putnam found that even when controlling for income inequality and crime rates, two factors which conflict theory states should be prime causal factors in declining inter-ethnic group trust, more diversity is still associated with less communal trust. Further, he found that low communal trust is associated with the same consequences as low social capital. Putnam says, however, that "in the long run immigration and diversity are likely to have important cultural, economic, fiscal, and developmental benefits."

It's no secret that the racial demographics in the US have seen significant change over the last generation. According to his research, this transformative time will lead to exactly what you're describing, but he conjectures that it will be worth it in the long run.

Not very appealing to the current zeitgeist, or to Putnam himself, but it's the continuation of the 'Bowling Alone' research you mentioned.
This is an absurd comparison. Turkey shot down a regional adversary's plane that violated their airspace. Obama didn't rebuke them for it because what Russia was doing there was supporting a regime he wanted gone.

Trump basically said he didn't rebuke the Saudis for it because they were negotiating a large sale of weapons. A cold blooded murder of a journalist due to what he said is completely different than shooting down an aircraft over your airspace after signaling that you'll do so and warning them to leave.
sort of been on my mind lately because like you say, should be easy ;) snapshot of current thinking:

-some open pit data mining/management protocol exists and scrapes data out of your own personal forward proxy / metal that lives on the edge of fat bandwidth, you can do whatever you want with it, autogenerate bookmarks and forum interaction tags if you want (hadn't thought of that,) .. including not store it, because the software that stores it is part of a personally owned open source platform that is also providing all the cloud services that you normally go to third parties to obtain

..so..

-the basics are baked in, its got your social media/self-promotional pages that are interoperable with others, an online store, search/index peers are essentially friends on social networks.. its gets foggy, how much granularity? what sort of resource commit to the forward cache? anonymization routines? regional compliance issues? capability to sell dataset(?) like, who would actually use it?

.. etc ..

-if something like this were actually to organize i think it would be best visualized as some sort of platform in support of some server-farm co-op. also i keep thinking of openstack being overkill, somehow, and am likely wrong.

-for a personal user on a watered down feature-set that isn't supporting a large organization and still elects to own their own bare metal, it would be like .. two netbooks in a post-office-box housing place that has fiber ..