skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Again, you instead missed the main point of the article that you can replace painter in your sentences with any other creative profession (including even a physics professor or a joke like a wizard) it would be the same. Which makes the analogy terrible.

Heck, most of these adjectives would also fit other jobs.

Going into detailed comparisons Graham digs the hole deeper.

Engineering such as programming is subject also to constraints of purpose and logic.

Art is not even subject to having an audience, and limitations of material are almost completely chosen, not given. I mean, you choose to make a painting rather than say an art installation. You choose specific techniques, topic and media even in painting.

You cannot exactly choose an operating system or hardware for most programs, even the choice of language or runtime might be limited.

There is purposeless art. (The piece itself has no purpose, the act of creation might still have one.) There was never a purposeless computer program.
> the kind of differences in performance and achievement that would be explained by psychological and physiological differences between men and women

That's a bit of circular reasoning though.

- Look how men and women behave differently!

- But why do they behave differently?

- Because they're different.

- How do you know that?

- Because they behave differently.

It's not logically consistent and doesn't answer anything.
Weird, my car (2018 model) is from a german company and was originally sold in germany and it certainly lets you remotely start the engine in order to heat up the car.
The problem you describe is a fabricated hypothetical which has never happened in the real world. It's proven false by every single bike/ pedestrian friendly city in the world.

Similarly, increasing range has had little to no positive effect on housing prices. Look at the insane real estate prices in the California Bay Area or LA which are both very car-first locations.
It is quite difficult to reason with people who would rather blame an invisible force. For example - most women did not work in factories until much later or even today. More Americans died in making stuff for the WW1 than in the actual war, as the conditions of factory work was brutal. Why would anyone want to subject themselves to that environment if they can avoid it?

Not even for a minute suggesting that women should not be allowed to work in dangerous environments. Having said that no one wants to subject themselves to dangerous work and it is perhaps slightly easier for women to avoid that.
The odd thing is that the same people who talk about there being no inherent biological differences between sexes then go ahead and talk about 'male aggression'. The amount of people that employ mental gymnastics to justify saying both these things is amazing. In fact the attacks I've seen on Peterson have bordered on the downright delusional/incoherent.
Tricks for Postgres and Docker that will make your life easier
Emmanuel Carrère’s Disconcertingly Personal and Utterly Gripping Prose
Soviet tractor quality wasn't that bad, especially considering they shared a lot with tanks. And for the price they were likely even better :) . Not to mention that they came with capabilities to be repaired - something Intel in its chips will likely, and sadly, not include...
> You can replace the bearings in most kick scooters with skateboard bearings for an easier ride.

Does this work even if you have large wheels? I have this: https://www.amazon.com/Micro-SA0034-Black-Scooter/dp/B001L2N...

> I have much more control and power on a bike that I’m basically wrapped around then a scooter I stand on.

If your bike falls over, what do you do?

That's the thing that really makes me feel safer on my scooter. I was riding my scooter in the rain one time, and didn't realize that metal grates would be slippery. My scooter skid and completely fell over sideways. At some point while it was falling, I automatically hopped off and let go†. The result was my scooter lying sideways on the pavement, and me standing up unharmed, and I feel like that would have ended differently on a bike. Is that incorrect?

†I assume that's what happened. It was so fast, I don't remember the exact moment—just the result.
> You're denying the existence of a problem, not offering a solution

Actually, I believe @unearthed acknowledged a problem, and asserted the best solution was to do nothing.
Lately, I've been asking these "simple" question more often on HN. They are consistently down-voted: I can't imagine why.
I guess everyone who ever had the means to create an endowment for a school is a criminal, then.

A hundred million dollars is a very powerful tool in the right hands. To suggest that having such means should be criminalized is farcical.
The Xeon Phi[1] CPUs were already up to 72c/288t in 2016, if the market demanded it I'm sure Intel could built it, but more than likely the high core counts are a GPU/Compute card's territory until ARM scales it's way up that high.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xeon_Phi
I don’t know. I have a few non binary friends. I find them more artistically inclined rather than STEM inclined.

I feel like creative pursuits tend be more collaborative and thrives better when there is more inter personal energy. Study(for me at least) is solitary. Artists and creative people flourish when there is a lot of back and forth of energies and they birth something from those interactions.

Within my circle of friends and acquaintances, I find that Uber-STEM thinking people are either asexual and/or autistic.(is there a correlation there? I don’t know..I haven’t looked into any studies about that) In my mind, I visualize both characteristics as though it is the blunt end of the emotional/social quotient. Obviously there are many who are in the middle and balanced, as it were..I am just picking on the ones see-sawing on both spectrums.
Read https://aeon.co/essays/game-theory-s-cure-for-corruption-mak... and the supporting material it cites. A little corruption may be socially better than one which is totally clean.
This refers to the Language Server Protocol [1] which is intended to decouple the IDE features from your editor so you can use it with any editor, such as Vim.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_Server_Protocol
That's simply not true.

Anecdotally, I've worked in Colorado my entire career (17 years now, over half a dozen jobs) and have never signed an agreement like that, and have never been asked to sign one. I go out of my way to bring it up (in writing, even), because it's a deal breaker for me. Never been a problem.

And logically it doesn't make any sense. GitHub profiles can't be used as resumes if employment contracts prevent everybody from contributing to projects on GitHub.
GitHub at AWS Re:Invent
I get it through my Visual Studio Subscription at work. And based on how they promote it I don't think they will take it away anytime soon:

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/member-offers/cred...
2012: “Moderators of HN: please stop changing post titles”
Show HN: Tap water you can trust
The "original" VB fell out of favor because the architecture didn't scale well. It was great for smaller projects, but shops that wanted bigger apps or stronger abstractions to avoid reinventing the wheel had an easier time with Delphi and C++ with libraries.

This isn't necessarily a bad thing because it's hard to make both small projects and big projects happy at the same time. But MS decided to focus on "enterprise" because the profit margins are usually bigger there. Thus, they mostly abandoned the original VB.

This sent a shock-wave through the industry because their code base couldn't go anywhere. It did give a boost to FOSS, because it's less likely that a heavily used FOSS product will be outright abandoned.
There are absolutely zero "biological imperatives" here -- your take is some pretty low-effort, tired sexual discrimination.
GCP Comes Out Swinging Against AWS and Azure in 2020 Cloud Report
Or more sinister: the pinned car could have acted as a tourniquet, and once it was removed the pedestrian could have been free to quickly bleed out.
I think there is value in posting this sort of advertisement to HN, because it reliably leads to a good discussion of how to subvert it as a user :)
> You'll find this helpful sentence:

Thank you for clarifying.

Nerding out is a good way characterizing where we've gotten and--as I suspected earlier and am now certain--I don't understand what "Federal Rules of Evidence" means in the larger discussion of what kinds of disclosure would violate someone's constitutional rights.

<thinking face emoji>
No, not similar. Crypto is very different.
> essentially

exactly
You could be right. I have considered that, but not wanting to be in a traditional manager position is one of the reasons I came to farming. I have since realized that it’s no better for women here too.
I should rephrase.

Why does it affect men disproportionately less?
"Little relevance?" They failed 4 times to get a FISA warrant until the magical Steele dossier appeared. It was the entire basis for the warrant. If Trump paid for a research paper on any of the democrat candidates and then used that paper as a basis to spy on their campaign, then the democrats would actually have a reason to file impeachment charges.
> women are expected to be in control of their emotions / self and men are not

> Men are not often held accountable for taking their emotions out on people, be they anxiety, depression or insecurity

I think a more accurate framing is that women are not allowed to be angry or aggressive, and men are not allowed to be sad or vulnerable. In public, at least. Consider how much more tolerable, and therefore common, it is for a woman to cry in public than a man.

So when men feel anxiety, depression, or insecurity, they express it in the socially acceptable way for men: anger and irritability. Presumably women feel angry a lot more frequently than they show, and have to find other ways to channel it. However, the latter is changing, because it is becoming much more acceptable for women to be angry and aggressive than it used to be.
> It's complicated with Facebook due to its lack of competition.

Twitter, Reddit, Snapshat, Marco Polo...lots of competition in the social media space.

Is there a successful FB clone, a la Google+? No there is not. That does not mean FB somehow owns social media.
I agree with you. Good DJ mixes build up the energy. It does help me get my brain in a rhythm that enters into a flow state. BBC's Essential Mix do put some good mixes, as well as Diplo and Friends.

Some tracks:

* Dimension Essential Mix (DnB): https://soundcloud.com/dimension_uk/essential-mix

* Nicolas Jaar Essential Mix (Various): https://soundcloud.com/otherpeoplerecords/csp06-nicolas-jaar...

* Mano Le Tough Essential Mix (House): https://soundcloud.com/manoletough/essential-mix

* Charlotte De Witte Essential Mix (Techno): https://soundcloud.com/charlottedewitte-essentialmix2018-02-...

* Diplo Burning Man 2019 (EDM): https://soundcloud.com/diplo/diplo-burning-man-cloud-art-car and https://soundcloud.com/diplo/diplo-burning-man-tetrix-art-ca...
I'm really curious if this is a legitimate growth driver for brokerages and what % of trading volume is represented by a buyer looking to buy < 1 share in a certain company.

It feels very incremental to me.

It also feels like a feature that is representative of something that would only happen at the "top" of the market.
>isn't it clearly better to hire someone with no responsibilities outside of work

Umm. No?

I see nothing "clearly better" about someone just because they don't have any responsibilities.
The legal profession is far ahead of STEM in addressing sexism. Many law firms have adopted the Mansfield Rule, which requires the pools of promotion candidates to comprise 30-50% women or other underrepresented groups: https://www.law.com/dailyreportonline/2019/09/06/more-firms-.... Major clients are imposing diversity criteria on outside counsel hired for their matters. Many major firms have 20% or more women in the equity partnership ranks. About a third of newly promoted partners are women. More than 30% of Fortune 500 GCs are now women.

That’s the result of decades of work, which started with affirmative efforts by law schools to achieve gender parity at the beginning of the pipeline. (Those efforts proved self sustaining. Once women didn’t have to swim upstream to choose law school—facing years of being in a small minority at the outset of their careers—efforts to recruit them specifically became unnecessary.) There is a ways to go yet before we hit parity, but I feel like in STEM folks are still litigating the issue of whether numeric parity should even be the goal. That question was settled in the legal field a long time ago.
Right I definitely knew it was math (have 2 engineering degrees myself :) )...but still assumed it was commonly assumed to fall on the spectrum of STEM (definitely on the opposite end from say...physics...but still on the spectrum).

How can anyone get a qualifying score on the MCAT without significant exposure to science?

Disclaimer: I'm definitely coming at this from a U.S. point of view which someone mentioned in another comment effectively (not always but definitely in the overwhelming majority of cases) requires STEM undergrad degrees to get into medicine.
Go and React (re-learning, haven't dome frontend in a few years). Definitely a career-focused choice, but not unhappy or dreading it.
Sorry if this comes off as rude, but do you have a financial relationship with repixel?
The jam is probably not realistic. Because that area is a divided set of one-way roads, there are a few intersections each tagged with a traffic signal in OpenStreetMap. I'm simulating each signal independently right now. In reality, it's one signal with more reasonable timing.

(Also sorry for the slow replies, HN is rate-limiting comments because this is a new account.)
Horowitz's "The Art of Electronics" is excellent: https://www.amazon.com/Art-Electronics-Paul-Horowitz/dp/0521... I spent many a fun afternoon with it back in the day.
In theory, https://github.com/dabreegster/abstreet/blob/master/docs/new.... There are a bunch of unsolved problems -- for example, most places in OSM don't map on-street parking, so there won't be any. For Seattle, I'm inferring from an extra shapefile. Have to figure out how to generalize that.
GDPR would not have applied as the location data was not being collected in the first place. The entirety of the response to request for data would have been "We don't have that data."

This was the response Honda provided even without the GDPR applying.

The police could acquire a warrant to compel generation of the data, which Honda would comply with.
I think STEM just has a much lower barrier to entry than med and law. It's a lot more accessible in terms of cost and number of opportunities available, and doesn't require spending a third of your life in school.
When people are more equal they will have more reason to differentiate. Women in countries like Norway tend to choose more professions based on the alignment with their gender. Men in the same country are known to have more typical "guy" hobbies and toys. It's basically a catch-22.
No, that would be impossible. The best they can do is seize the company assets that are located within Russia.

Be aware that the creator and CTO have both been detained. It seems more like government over-reach than anything. It's also opensource, so likely a lot of government over-reach and not really planned out.

Knowing very well how Moscow works, money speaks. A large corporation could easily purchase a warrant and raid. (money controls actions, not policy)
I did say that ‘this is a BS theory of mine’ and that I would like to know what others feel about it.

It’s right at the beginning of my comment. Do you want to read it again?
I tried autocomplete in vim for Python a few years back, I forget which plugin. It was annoying, too aggressive. Uninstalled.
In gear is fine. The engine wouldn't be able to turn over. You'd need a serious hill, like 45*, to have a car bump start without gaining speed in neutral first.
It would indeed be ironic if he supports the current government. But in general patriot can also be someone who dislikes the crazy regime and doesn't want to give up his home without a fight.
^ This. However I still take issue with Python 3's removal of the PRINT statement.
In the future, office design plans will prioritize employee wellness
But science includes biology, chemistry, pharmacy and medical research (e.g. molecular biology, neurology,...). So just because it is not the M does not say it is not part of STEM.

Actually, I am unsure how country specific this is and where to put medicine with respect to hard sciences, soft sciences, social sciences etc.
Yeah "what's the last version that runs on X" is a tough question in many cases, even old Windows versions. In case you run a blog or are member of some public forum, news group or anything that's indexed by search engines consider dumping your findings there. Someone might try to do the same in a decade or so. For your license key issue, did you try to just contact the vendors? Maybe some are even willing to make these old versions free now, they might just not have seen the point in it...
I have to echo that Re-frame is superb!!
After some time with Clojure, I can not bear to look at any OO code. It's like I developed an allergic reaction to class-based programming.
I agree with you, and I've done that approach, but it is really more painful and it only works if later on you are considered a Guru (by them, not by you), hard worker and a go-to guy who always helps. And it takes longer to work.

The subtle way is less painful and you begin with the right foot.
I frequently read HN and this site was new to me.
The (2011) in the title lets me know it isn't new content.

What do I have to gain by knowing it was posted several times before?
HN et. al. have become really quite cynical about FB these days, but I suggest reality is something more pragmatic, however ugly --> yes, FB likes taking money from anyone, but I'll bet they really, really don't want to be in the business of content filtering, or having to make such decisions, and would rather wash their hands of it.

There's little pragmatic leadership coming from the powers that be over this stuff - obviously there's a good deal of noise out of governments concerning 'fake news' - but I'd argue it's much more difficult than one would imagine given 100 different nations, different laws, lobbying power, even aside from the concerns over really deciding 'what is fake'. I think a lot of TV spots might reasonably fall under the category of 'not exactly factual' as well.

If there were reasonable, clean and coherent direction from US gov (probably not going to happen), it would be easier. A lot of the EU thinking/legislation I suggest mightn't be specifically nuanced enough as well.

I am not cynical about this announcement. I'd wager FB would be somewhere in the range of 'happy' to comply with a set of reasonable bits of legislation, especially if was applied universally and coherently. In the absence of anyone actually doing anything, they're going to set it up themselves.

Impartial? Hardly, but it's probably better than nothing.

$130M is not chump change, this is a big deal. Perhaps wit a change in governance maybe something will happen. (I'm not making a political statement other than to say the Trump regime will never do anything about this).

Absent any real collective movement on this issue ... I think this is a positive step. It's better than the status quo.
Clojure has the same number of parens as Javascript, C/C++, Java, and similar languages have parens+squiggle-brackets.

(print "foo") vs print("foo"). same same.

There's so much more to it than this. I can say without reservation that people who do not take a couple/few weeks to learn a Lisp just do not know what they are missing, and their arguments against it are viewed as children who lack enough experience to know what they are rejecting.
Small farms are dying. This plow-free plan could help save them
> Traditional media political ads can't micro-target people

They may not "micro-target", but they can definitely target them.

Any political campaign will tell you they do their damnedest to ensure their ads are running at the right times on the right TV/radio stations.

Honestly, hours of traditional media itself (Fox, MSNBC) likely does far more to bias opinion than handfuls of 30-second ads.
A friend once told me "Python is the Visual Basic of the Internet". That still brings a smile to my face.
We used om before om.next was a thing (back in 2014). Seeing the abandoned state of om and om.next and how it even had trouble keeping up with the latest React releases, and after maintaining a fork for a few months we switched to TypeScript. Burned once; not again.
Why is it a ‘diatribe’? It is my life. It is my work.

That each gender has its own set of pathologies is exactly my point. When they don’t complement each other, why not create an environment where each of us can be our best?
Are observable differences not the basis of empirical science?
> My form of eating organic doesn't vibe with theirs

I've never heard this before but I love this quote. In my opinion, hunting responsibly brings one a great appreciation for conservation efforts and increases connection to nature. Especially hunting fowl, where you are walking the whole time and working with a dog that you trained yourself from a pup for this purpose. It gives great appreciation for nature and responsibly sourced food.
I stopped blogging after a couple years in because I started running out of new things to talk about. I started back up about 5 years later and repeated the same experience. I've seen other bloggers and web comics struggle with the same issue.

The mistake I vowed to correct if I started a third time was this feeling that if I'd already written a couple pages on a topic I should be done. People change. Tech changes. I shouldn't feel guilty 'retreading' something I said a couple years ago. I have new information.

Which is to say, rather than forever going back and updating old entries, it might be more productive to revisit the material you still find you have the strongest feelings about. Talk about what has changed, and what hasn't.
I didn’t graduate from an elite college. I graduated from a no name college over 20 years ago. Software engineering jobs are a dime a dozen. I’ve also only worked for a company that anyone has ever heard of for a couple of years.

If someone hinted that they wouldn’t hire me because when I left work, I shut down my computer and didn’t think about software development until the next day, that would be a hard pass. I would move on to any of the dozen of companies that are looking for experienced software developers - and I’m not on the west coast.
Good point, though that's probably less ideal for an office setting, where people can hear your cranked-up volume.
In case of medicine - because it's a large field full of career paths that are very different from each other. The daily realities of being a pediatrician, a surgeon, a psychiatrist or a radiologist have very little in common.

There's this hypothesis that men statistically tend to pick jobs involving working with and treating patients as things, and women tend to pick jobs involving people and socializing. Medicine as a field is full of high-status jobs of both kind, so - under this hypothesis - gender parity of the overarching field is entirely unsurprising. And, as predicted, individual specializations tend to show strong gender skew.

Law is also a very large field, so I suspect the profession probably shows a similar dynamic.

Viewed through this lens, our industry is less like "medicine", and more like "radiology". And I suspect - but didn't check - that if you expand the definition of "software" to include supporting fields like design, UX and testing, the overall gender ratio will be much closer to 1:1.