skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Voluntary military service was also male only, so I'm not sure why you are focusing so much on conscription.

As you point out, the people in charge were all men. It was up to them to make the rules about who could or couldn't volunteer and who would or wouldn't be conscripted.

>Most people would agree that white men used their power and influence to get a pass on military service.

This perfectly illustrates my point. That is exactly not how women got a pass on military service. Thus, it misses the point to complain that men disproportionately do certain dangerous jobs. Women have been kept out of those jobs by men, and by sexist attitudes more broadly, not by some kind of inverse sexism that favors women over men.
You mentioned two stablecoin methods, but not the interesting and somewhat successful MakerDAO approach. What do you think about that?
That's rich coming from somebody who's username is literally Der Einzige. :) It's hard to believe you deign to label Baudrillard a crank yet identify enough with Stirner to make the title of his most well-known work your nom de plume

Edit: See this [1] lovely video to learn why it's a common misconception that his work has any relevancy to the Matrix franchise beyond superficial pop philosophy.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bf9J35yzM3E
Once you have data, how can I tell you what you're using it for? Parallel construction is a thing.
Are they a strict addition? I never learned class-based components. I literally never think about “mounting”.

I also never think about “updates”. I do think about rendering as something that happens continuously all the time outside my control.
Thanks ydb! Small world but that status would have been super relevant for me today :)
Woman lawyer from Wall Street here. That’s about as “Old Boys Club” as it gets. When I left law to pursue tech I figured it couldn’t possibly be as bad as what I was leaving behind. I was so wrong. Silicon Valley is infinitely more difficult to navigate and less welcoming.

The major difference (in my opinion) is that the Old Boys Club owns it. They know they’re not welcoming to women and for the most part they don’t care. But Silicon Valley, for whatever reason, absolutely insists that they’re welcoming and that it’s all in our heads. The Old Boys Club was frustrating but Tech is infuriating.
Which network is that? 3G on At&t will continue to work until 2/2022
https://www.rvmobileinternet.com/att-plans-to-shutdown-its-3...
Except they are a multibillion-dollar public company with almost infinite resources and reach.
Very good chance the GP left those words at the river, hopefully you will too unless it's purely an academic study.
What about DMA over IPv6? Using a single 256-bit address, you would be able to address any byte in any IPv6-enabled computer directly.
Unfortunately you are missing out on a lot of things Lisp has to offer, by working with non-core Lisp-variants. For example it would be clearer to you what interactive working with a Read-Eval-Print-Loop in Lisp actually can do - besides the simpler improvements in interactivity. There is a whole world of core Lisp which you are ignoring. You are also slightly misleading people by not mentioning core Lisp languages and language contributors to those.

> or that title forever belongs to Common Lisp only.

Emacs Lisp, Visual Lisp, ISLisp (an ISO standard), various Common Lisps and their variants, Interlisp, Portable Standard Lisp, ... and a bunch of others.

You are setting your focus on languages which are more or less derived from those (for a reason, often with specific improvements or alternative features), but missing out on the core language implementation features. All the above have LISP in their name, which Racket, Clojure, Clojurescript, Fennel, Chez don't. There must be a reason for that. ;-)

Take Clojure and ClojureScript. Without Common Lisp those would not exist. I can remember when Rich Hickey was an active Common Lisp user (he used LispWorks and we were on the same mailing lists). He developed stuff in Common Lisp, worked on Common Lisp to Java integration, wrote a first sketch of Clojure in Common Lisp and so on.

Luckily he was open minded, learned a lot and created a language (with lots of lessons from Common Lisp), which a lot of people like...

The language you wish is dying, was literally the one where Rich Hickey learned from..., like many people before and others, open minded, will also do in the future.
Besides which, I'm fairly certain it passes muster as a derivative work. It requires substantial transformation to generate/alter from it's original form. Therefore, not infringement.
This sounds like authentication with extra steps? Why not just send a bearer token?
I mean software. Professional sports is also accessible and lucrative in the same way. Most white-collar professions secure their gravy trains through guild membership, insider knowledge, and personal relationships. Software, however, gets more competitive throughout a career, not less, and most people don't understand how obsessed they must be to keep up. I like that about it, and I didn't make it as an athlete, so it suits me, but most people that come into this profession would rather retire into management than keep up their coding skills for more than a few years.
Caching with Spring Webflux
Soldered ram.
> Even worse, removal of 32-bit support in macOS

32-bit macOS used a fragile ABI for Objective-C, meaning all ivars had to be in public headers and changing any of them changed the runtime layout of your class and _all_ subclasses. AKA adding a field was a breaking change. This imposed a huge maintenance burden up and down the stack. Often classes would include a void* pointer to a side-table where new fields could be added, or the public class was a wrapper around an internal implementation. Both of those have a performance cost (extra pointer chasing + extra mallocs, or double objc_msgSends for every method/property).

There are many other performance optimizations (eg non-pointer ISA) that were impossible on 32-bit, meaning every app that refuses to move to 32-bit imposes even more performance costs. Shipping 32-bit versions of frameworks also bloats the size of the OS and forces the OS to load a duplicate dyld shared cache. It even makes system updates and installs take twice as long (two shared caches need rebuilding after all!)

None of this accounts for future optimizations and improvements that would have been nearly impossible if the system still had to support 32-bit without forking half of the userspace frameworks... that kind of forking would be an absolute maintenance nightmare.

The deprecation of 32-bit has been obvious for over a decade. It is based on sound technical reasons. You may not agree with those reasons but they have nothing to do with not caring.

You might instead ask why a developer would choose to ship a 32-bit app/game anytime after 2010 when 64-bit was available and obviously the future? Should all Mac users continue to pay the cost in disk space, memory, and performance? How long should they pay that cost? Were you hoping macOS would support 32-bit applications in 2030? 2040? What about the undeveloped features and unfixed bugs due to the overhead of continuing to support 32-bit?
Back in the day, I used SuperShuttle over taxis for airports, but when ridesharing arrived, it was just much more convenient. For early morning flights, there was no more getting up super early so you can be on a shuttle that picked up a few more people.

That said, I miss SuperShuttle because I met some really interesting people on it in the SF Bay Area. Some of the more notable people I talked to included one of the original engineers on the Apple Lisa and one of Larry Ellison's private plane pilots. It was neat to listen to stories from both.
There's also McGyver, Neo & Trinity, Rey also doesn't seem to have her thumb in the middle of her hand, David Lightman, Tony Stark--in fact, Marvel is chock full of male engineering types; Beast, Hulk, Reed Richards, Peter Parker.

The examples are legion.
Trying to change the paradigm about how the planet connects and share information is an incredibly challenging task.

At twitter's scale, 5 people are a team you put together to decide if they are going to migrate to X library/framework for an internal tool.

This is not a task where you want to be frugal in terms of resources.
Really inspiring! Nicely structured, and easy to follow along, especially with the "Try it yourself" links. Amazingly addictive to tweak with variables :)
I'd encourage you to read at least the trip reports on erowid[1] and The Psychedelic Explorer's Guide by James Fadiman.[2] You might also be interested in reading LSD, Spirituality, and the Creative Process: Based on the Groundbreaking Research of Oscar Janiger.[3]

Then, if you decide to try it, prepare yourself for a very special journey -- one that you'll only be able to go on once in your life (as you'll never again have a first time with that particular substance.. an experience many chase over and over again later in life, but few ever manage to recapture it). You'll want to be in a safe, supportive environment, ideally with an experienced trip sitter you like and trust, and without any prior commitments for that day and ideally the next. The Psychedelic Explorer's Guide has more specific advice on how to prepare.

[1] - https://www.erowid.org/chemicals/lsd/lsd.shtml

[2] - https://www.amazon.com/Psychedelic-Explorers-Guide-Therapeut...

[3] - https://www.amazon.com/LSD-Spirituality-Creative-Process-Gro...
> Linus Torvalds continues receiving his Linux Foundation salary paid for by the massive cheques it's member organizations cut him in exchange for influence over the kernel's development.

The author seems focused on that aspect as the reason Linus is against ABI changes. But in fact this was his stance for years as he's user-centric: people expect things to continue to work when they upgrade the kernel, so if you have to break their experience, you really need a very good reason. It's not like he's started thinking this way when he became an employee of the LF.
This boy crying wolf bullshit of accusing everyone of being a fascist means that when it really happens here no one will believe it.

Is our government getting increasingly Authoritarian and Repressive? Yes. Are we anywhere near fascism? Fucking no
This is a webview embedded in a native app that we don't control, not a web browser. No, clearing the cache in Safari doesn't help. This stackoverflow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5468553/clearing-uiwebvi... says you can write some native code to clear the cache, but we don't control the native app, we control the web app that runs in the webview. We will report the problem to the native app developer, but hopefully the user can just free-up space and upgrade their iOS in the meantime.
Seems like the fork was more for the way to govern the project and less about the tech itself
> It really boils to "if it doesn't look like C, I'm not learning it"

I think it's funny that most people who complain about this are likely coming from Java, JS, or Python, not C. And they probably would suffer a lot in C...

I've made the jump to Clojure, and to be honest, it's painful going back to other languages, but not just because of the syntax, but rather the lack of expressive power, and the excess of boilerplate. I had to do some Python work last year, and it felt like coding with a straightjacket on.
Fair enough, I should have been more specific.

Let's not forget that OpenGL is only alive thanks to NeXT acquisition, and Apple"s trying to cater to UNIX devs on their survival years, OpenGL wasn't even on the radar for Copland, rather QuickDraw 3D.

Which actually was probably the only OS that provided an usable OpenGL SDK, that neither ARB nor Khronos ever delivered.
I've heard this kindof system of feedback is brutal, and is certainly not for everyone.

I think the point is to aim for apolitical and tactless information transfer.
The only chance it'd have of working is if there's a shared understanding that correcting mistakes is more valuable than political standing; and this applies to everyone, especially the bosses.

The saner way to try and get these benefits is to foster psychological safety.
do you have any proof for this?
Some parts 1Password X Manager are rewritten in Rust
Life, video game and quantum mechanics
Tony Kay is also working on Fulcro RAD, which seems very promising: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkx9F-RIFiY
> My main complaint with hooks is people seem to think they always need them

The low level problem here is your team doesn’t realize that every word of code means something.

You need to get past the idea that code has to be there to do a thing and get to the place where you expect every bit of
code to explain something.

“Why is there a useMemo here”... if your team can’t explain that, then “changes requested”.
This kind of service could probably be impproved with route optimisation and booking using an app. A certain delivery company is already using route optimisation for parcel deliveries so that their employees don't have to think about it, just follow a set course. I don't know if it's enough, though. People would rather take ride hailing services out of convenience anyway. Maybe it could work for smaller vans 6-9 seater with 2-3 stops max instead of cramming up into a shared ride.
Stirner, and the rest of the German young hegelians, are far more coherent and interesting than French post modernists. They also don't engage in any type of fashionable nonsense.

Stirner also doesn't advocate for his ideas on the basis of anything except self interest. The "dialectical" Frenchies will tell you a far different story about why you should agree with them.
Wow that was super cool to follow from beginning to end. I’ve always wanted to create art this way, perhaps with a physical user interface to tweak its parameters
If I was in your company, I would find some way or other to change that.

> I'm more than ever of the opinion that a decent human existence is possible today only on the fringes of society, where one then runs the risk of starving or being stoned to death. In these circumstances, a sense of humor is a great help.

-- Hannah Arendt
> I know Upwork/Freelancer is just a no

Why? I find people on there. I think you need to choose carefully, put them on smaller jobs and fire fast. I find trying to work through issues never works. As soon as they show lack of ability/attention to detail etc they go unless you've really established a relationship and know its a one off. I would guesstimate every 5 or so people you find someone good and keep using them.
PayPal Sues U.S. Regulator over Prepaid-Card Rule
> It is no surprise that people like you still romanticize the notion of state violence and greater authoritarian power.

I think that's a grave misunderstanding of my analysis and one entirely rooted in your own bias. Nowhere in my comment did I romanticize any state violence; at worst you could accuse me of engaging in ethically dubious moral calculus.

Authoritarian power will always be present no matter what label you identify yourself with. A world built on libertarianism can easily devolve into a competition of whoever has the biggest stick -- the NAP and other such pie-in-the-sky ideas only get you so far.

Re: leftists, I think you have a skewed understanding of leftism and its origins. The lumpenproletariat are the real obstacle that leftists need to overcome. See for example the election this past day in Britain; Boris Johnson was elected by an overwhelming majority on no other grounds besides a rabid fear rooted in nationalism. If leftists hope to see genuine change that fits their ideology, they're going to need to deal with the folks who succumb to conservative propaganda. Here again comes the spectre of authoritarian power.

Eventually we must face the reality that power and violence are integral to human social functioning, and that if betraying privacy is what it takes to avoid that, you'd have to be a radical ideologue -- on either side -- to choose otherwise.
Super shuttle was too expensive for what it was. For less than twice the cost I could schedule a town car. For a single rider the shuttle was cheaper, but for me it was always to log. And I was shocked when I saw two and three people groups take the shuttle.
The turning point for me was when the shuttle refused to take the faster hov lane.
This is not really fair. The "why not aliens" article is an interview with a scientist who argues that we should not outright dismiss the possibility that something (particularly omuamua comet) is alien technology, until we have proof one way or the other, which is not a ridiculous thing to say.

I also can't see what is particularly wrong with the description of quantum mechanical observations in this article. It looks to me like a good enough description of the idea of research done by the author himself.
It depends. But if that header only library is now in your hands - good luck modifying it without paying the penalty of recompiling anywhere else it's used.

Also, now have to prefix the hell out of it, as even anonymous namespace won't work. And not only that.
You seem to think that software must be a continuously updated thing, or it becomes legacy. This is somewhat true in the current world, but it is massively wasteful and unnecessary. It should be normal for software to be finished, and one should expect finished software to keep working for many years.

One huge market where this does happen is games. Disregarding the current plague of microtransaction-funded 'live experiences', most games are pieces of software that get released and are mostly done, barring some added content going out for a year or two. Losing the ability to play these games because someone has decided that ABI compatibility is kinda hard is ridiculous, and would definitely not fly for a consumer OS.

It would be interesting for someone to try to apply this same argument to hardware: would it make sense to abandon old hardware support every release? Doing this with device drivers was one of the things which hurt Linux adoption on the desktop, and hurt Windows Vista's release immensely.

Overall, end-users do not and should not care for OS updates. They are a necessary evil, to help fix bugs that the OS developers missed that threaten their security; and to be able to use new applications that rely on new OS features. But breaking old applications or hardware is a massive pain point that makes users weary of updating despite the risk to their security.
Care to share some :-)
If you have limited props, why would your component be rendering often?
It’s not like fractional shares are going to give you any voting rights anyway.
Boris’s Blundering Brilliance
Best Practices for Network Cost Optimisation on Cloud
I'm curious how they are bridging the gaps for windows and doors. I imagine toothpaste consistency concrete doesn't hang in the air very well. Or at least not nearly as well as thin, hot, stringy PLA, ABS or TPU filament coming out of the nozzle of a common 3d printer.
> the only way to implement them (that I can think of) is messing with global state

What do you mean?
Why are you assuming it's supposed to be attractive? It's optimised for getting 'likes', not dates.

The assertion that every picture of yourself is driven by a biological urge to reproduce is wrong. Humans do stuff for many more reasons than that.
Treatment of Childhood Schizophrenia Utilizing LSD and Psilocybin
You are moving the goalposts. You stated:

> What I am upset about is the removal of a standard that worked well

That is not correct on either count:

1) OpenGL is a terrible fit for modern GPUs so I don't agree that it "worked well"
2) OpenGL was not removed anyway

> OpenGL support has been abandoned

That is not correct. Code continues to be written and maintained to keep OpenGL working on newer GPUs, both OpenGL ES on iOS GPUs, as well as OpenGL on mac GPUs.

> The fact that it is now officially deprecated is just a warning from Apple to remove it soon without bad PR.

macOS/iOS continue to support /many/ deprecated APIs, some of which have been deprecated for over a decade. Contrary to popular opinion, things are not removed just for fun. Things are removed when there is a sound security/technical reason, or when there is a high ongoing cost either to end users or the development process.

The alternative is to be MS and never remove anything, and where any changes to observable behavior of the system (or even moving internal struct values around!) can cause breakage and so is not done or requires inserting hacks to preserve behavior. If you think that doesn't impact individual engineer's decision making process ... well I don't know what to tell you. It must be soul-crushing to know if you change an internal data structure from uint16_t to uint32_t some crappy app that depends on being able to poke around will break. Surely such policies encourage some developers to do even more such hacky things, knowing MS will take the blame and end up making sure you can keep getting away with it.
How to configure Openbox for your Linux desktop
Congratulations !
You've hit the market validation milestone.
That's not easy.

I believe your project success is tighly coupled to DeFi success (as a platform).

In order to succeed you should help spread DeFi - make yourself and your product an authority on the subject - and prepare material easy to digest and understand.

First of all, you should know your customer. Why paid, what benefit/outcome gets from your service.

With this information, you should be able 'lower the barrier of entry' for other users.
I agree - but the counter example I'd give is portage which gives you all that and more.
> You shouldn't be below $100k

Entry level base salary (not including signing bonus, stock, RSUs, annual bonus, etc) in Bay Area even 5 years ago was $110-140k for level 0 eng. Sounds like the startup is trying to get one heck of a deal at your expense.
Just put the conditional inside the hook.
3D Printers usually have support columns that are easily taken down once the print is complete. Maybe something similar?
I wonder if we could bring them back to some extent. Apparently they interbred with Homo Sapiens so there are many of their genes amongst our DNA.
The fact that you cannot define templates out of headers also explains why C++ has a lot of header-only libraries. : if you use templates and have no global references, you are most likely already header-only.
Django Test Plus Extension, an Advanced Tool for Django Tests
Saved! Nice book.
This is a detailed analysis of the atomic parts of Django tests. In short, each running test understands how long it runs.
How to replace a hard drive on Linux
Ctrl-p like functionality wouldn't be too difficult... But I see your point
This is where the Scrum Master should step in and move the conversation along.
To understand yourself, Study your childhood.
I would have bought this argument a decade ago, but at this stage the number of site users not doing some form of automatic updates on their browser should be in the minority. The problems user agents were designed to solve back in the Netscape Navigator days have since been standardized using much better signals, and the odd standards compliance bug here and there isn't really justification for something as weak and unreliable as a user agent string.

I say kill it. Fix it to some static value and require new sites moving forward to do proper feature detection if they really care to work around standards bugs or use experimental new features.
I wouldn't say they don't deal in truth. Scientific theories clearly capture a lot of true elements of how the universe works. But proving that the mathematical methods are correct, starting from basic axioms, is something for mathematicians. Most physicists will use a mathematical tool if it's useful, even if it's not been formally proven correct.