skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Dietary cholesterol is at most 25% of your serum cholesterol. Your cells and your liver will make up to 4G per day as required. There is no such thing as good or bad cholesterol. It is just a transport mechanism. People tend to conflate high LDL comprised of small dense particles with high LDL in general. If your LDL is high, then your doctor should be getting you a low-density lipoprotein spectrum graph. If the small dense particles are high, then you need to find the root cause, which is typically inflammation and most commonly from insulin resistance or an infection.

Eat all the eggs you want. They are the second most efficient form of protein next to human breast milk. They also contain a wide range of vitamins and amino acids that are important for good health.
Go to your nearest airport and start talking to people?

I'm curious how you arrived at your idea if you don't know people who would actually use it.
New York's problem with Tether – as set out for the appeal judges
Previously the realsense stereo depth cameras suffered from a lot of depth noise compared to TOF cameras like kinect. I had to use a lot of filtering which limited the usable frame rate. Hopefully this new lidar cam has less noise.

The realsense API is pretty good, I found it much easier to use then the kinect API.
Revoking per-JWT requires state per-JWT, but you can get away with globally-revokable tokens ('logout everywhere' functionality) with a single nonce-per-entity instead of a nonce-per-JWT, which is a bit nicer.
I'm not sure whether a covered car can be brutalist, to be honest. When I think of a brutalist car design, I think of go-karts.

Other features of brutalist design:

* By exposing the skeleton, the object shows itself as a platform that can be built upon. However, the Cybertruck's convex hull and covered, armored plating do not lend themselves to confident self-expression, but instead drown out any attempt at customization.

* The purpose of the object is apparent and plain in its construction. The Cybertruck's wheels give away that it is a rolling vehicle of some sort, but otherwise its design does not indicate that it is road-worthy, fast, durable, rideable, etc.

* One of the article's main points: The object should, in its humility, elevate a shared societal viewpoint. Quoting from one of the experts in the article:

> The truck is consumerist, whereas brutalism’s monumentality is civic. The truck’s boldness serves the bravado of an individual, whereas brutalism’s visual power was meant to project the shared dignity of the public realm.

The other quote that is worth repeating:

> [But] we don’t see any bolts or gaskets or other details of joinery. Brutalist architects would never allow this. They wanted the method of making and the assembly of parts to be legible — to be put on display as a way of being vividly honest. This was a core principle, and the sleek machined quality of the Cybertruck is ultimately a disqualifying characteristic.
One Man Odyssey Building His Dream House
The touchbar should been an extension at bottom of the screen where you would always be able to see it’s state, not of the keyboard.
This is interesting - all I see is angles - where is it curved?
Startup Offers a Silicon Solution for Lithium-Ion Batteries
I know where this article is trying to go, but as someone who rarely shops .. damn is it nice.

I went to Uniqlo in Faneuil Hall here in Boston yesterday. Simply walking into the store is an _experience_. It's in a historic district, surrounded by quick bites and other fun knick knacks, and the store itself is beautiful laid out.

This is where the physical store absolutely destroys the abysmal online experience. Curation and the human experience.
I am not a lawyer. But I think this was settled with the LinkedIn lawsuit. Yes, it's perfectly fine to scrape public facing information.
It almost gives me an uncanny valley feeling. There's a certain pattern to every comments thread that makes me feel like I'm watching a 'conversation' between lazy teenagers, vote-manipulation bots and a handful of (paid?) adult political activists. (I know that sounds paranoid, but fwiw if I were an American I would vote Democrat, and if you applied a hundred randomly-chosen negative adjectives to Trump I would strongly agree with most of them. So this isn't a shocked reaction to seeing an echo chamber populated by the wrong team.)
And I'm totally sympathetic to that argument. If it was up to me, I'd nuke all zoning laws. But there's no real evidence that these bigger homes are imposing any significant financial strain in aggregate. The percent of household expenditures spent on shelter has barely budged since 1990 (19.8% vs 17.7%)[1].

Maybe all else equal we'd prefer to use rising incomes and productivity to stay in the same size houses. It's definitely plausible. Comparatively expenditures on apparel have fallen by nearly 50% since 1990.

But what isn't plausible is OP's thesis that housing is making us poor. (Well at least in aggregate across the US, it is probably making Bay Area residents poor.) At most you can argue that zoning laws are making us spend a constant percent of our growing paychecks on proportionately bigger homes. For which we're no longer deriving much marginal benefit from the increased square footage.

[1] https://www.bls.gov/cex/1990/share/age.pdf
Astronomers map a neutron star’s surface for the first time
Latency between GPUs kills performance
That's why we see menopause in us and in other species like Orcas. Grand parents contribute more food to their grand children without competing to have more kids. I can't find the reference, Google is spammed with diet websites.
Please note that IPCC projections do not include carbon from permafrost in their projections: https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2018/02/the-permafros...

As a result, the carbon budget for keeping warming under two degrees over postindustrial (widely thought to be catastrophic but survivable) has shrunk. Dr. Peter Carter, one of the IPCC's reviewers, explains how we are likely to miss 1.5 and 2 degree targets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa13KrOvE2s
Are there any real world applications that are built on Cyc's knowledge base and actually in regular use? Is Cyc critical to those applications or could they have been more easily built some other way?
Yes, it is obvious. I did not try to erase anything, I posted the source without being asked for, and pointed out the discrepancy and my interpretation of it, which was correct, as you can see in this other article: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/01/08/most-dangero...
How do you feel about the Pacer? Edsel? VW Thing?

There's good and bad cars from every era. Some vehicles have aged well. Some vehicles still look stupid today. I find middle of the road vehicles that were neither designed to make a statement nor was aesthetic design ignored generally look good regardless of the era they're from (which makes sense considering that a bunch of professionals had to sign off on its mass-market appeal). The stuff that tries to push the limits is what either looks iconic or terrible in hindsight.
The police in the article declined to share info that would have been helpful had the victim known. I'm trying not to assume anything about what they would or wouldn't share.

You're right on the other point though, if the hit actually happened there would definitely be a murder there, regardless of any suicidal actions on the client/victim's part.

Which leads to another question: If the hit website was a scam, and you tried to put a hit on yourself, could you be criminally charged with attempted murder of yourself?
Subscriptions might work.
If you require a blacklist, then you are doing JWT wrong.

If you are using JWT to maintain client state, then you are doing it wrong.
Twitter is a good source of information now, and it in fact looks like the free tutorial is making a comeback with Twitter as a podium.
- J. Bikker aka Phantom. :)
Definitely! I'm still in the process of learning and figuring this out, I'll write something after this goes on for awhile. The last thing I want to do is start something, write about it like I know what I'm talking about, then stop doing it.
Exactly. Unless your decision has lasting, serious ramifications on your life, just make a decision.
It’s likely by this pedantic definition that no automobile could ever be brutalist. Architectural gatekeeping.
Yes, it's been well established that accessing a site is not the same as accepting it's TOS. And That's why Google and any competent site know it's their responsibility to detect scraping and suspicious behavior and block it themselves.
linguistic shift. meanings and etymologies can drift over time.

in english, in the modern age, brutalist implies brutality.
It's because those thing require taxes, and taxes are evil/theft/waste.
Maybe we could start with some simpler services?

Context: I very rarely set up autopay because the cost of a mistake is high.

I wish I had a bank that showed my money in a cashflow view: Money coming in per day / week / month / year, cost of bills and services per day / week / month / year, and some semi-smart automation to autopay my loans, save, and invest.

What do I mean by semi-smart? For loans, know the interest rate, date due, length, ect, and calculate when it's better to invest versus pay off early.

For example, if, when adding a loan to billpay, I could add some of this additional information, it would be much easier than just adding autopay.
> but I think this is confusing something painful with something useful

There is software out there that absolutely cannot break. Like "if this breaks, people will die". Medical software, power plant software, air traffic control software, these are obvious examples, but even trading and finance software falls into this category, if some hedge fund somewhere goes bankrupt because of a software bug real people suffer.

It doesn't matter how boring, inefficient and outdated these systems are. It doesn't matter how much pain they are to maintain and integrate. These are systems you do not fuck with. A lot of times people who do maintenance of these don't even fix known bugs in order to avoid introducing new ones and to avoid the rigorous compliance processes that has to be followed for every release. Updating the software just to bump up some related library to the latest version is simply not a thing in this context.

I am not working on anything like this. I work on a lighting automation system. If I fuck up my release, nobody is going to die (well, most likely, there are some scenarios), but if I fuck up sufficiently, a lot of people will be incredibly annoyed. So I have every version of every dependency frozen. All the way down the dependency tree. I do check for updates quite often and I make some effort to keep some things current, but some upgrades are simply too invasive to allow.
> Really, this is just criticizing people for acting in their own rational self-interest to protect their reputation.

Yes but normally we limit people's self-interest when it harms other people, and it's totally legit to limit such behaviours by law. This is no different from why you can't just take people's stuff from their house. It's in your interest but not theirs.

Specifically, this harms other people who are interested in doing due diligence in Gottlieb. They are less likely to hear about his failed ventures, which is something people care about.
If that's the goal, only a small subset of volunteer work is a good way to achieve it.
That's kind of the point, though. Supply chains are becoming more transparent and accessible to the end customer, so in 2020, you have a much better chance of going "directly to the source" than you did 20 years ago.

So the FOMO is paying a brand markup for consistent quality you could get for less.

Then you have "established" brands that are just trying to maximize profit. And "new" brands that are just AliExpress resellers. So trust that even a Brand™ experience will be a good one is waning.

In other words, the premise that you're paying for time savings is less assured, and the information to actually make comparison shopping worthwhile is right there.
I don't play video games, but if someone created one that was entirely glitches like this, I might start.
A pickup truck is more Brutalist than the cybertruck.
We chose JavaScript/Node because it's the language we knew best, and because we have to write it in the client as we're building a web-based service. No other language offers us that, unless it compiles to JavaScript (eg TypeScript).

This grants us a magnitude of benefits, like being able to do server-side rendering and share code between the client and server. It also means we only need to hire people who can write JS, instead of JS and something else.

TypeScript, Flow, and ESLint aren't hacks. These are mature tools used by some of the largest, most sophisticated engineering teams in the world.
3D reconstruction using single X-ray image for Pediatric Orthopedic applications
The seats are probably a little comfortable. True brutalism needs to crush the human spirit.
Maybe that we get 10x less infrastructure for every dollar spent has something to do with it.
Thank you, but your last sentence is not really correct. The concept of cardinality captures different sizes of infinity. This is why I mentioned countable and uncountable infinites upfront: a countably infinite set and an uncountably infinite set do not have the same cardinality, but both are infinite.
I used to use the free tier for the 1 year period, turned everything off, and have an alert set to go off at 1 penny of spend. Even with a lifetime spend of <$1 I still get to talk to real people for support at AWS.
That's when you hit up r/builtForLifeMice... That's one of the strengths of Reddit: you can get ever increasingly niche with your community.
Privacy guarantees (or, rather, an explanation as to what you do with the statistics you can gather from people using the tile server) – currently it's not clear what's the policy for your site v.s. the API.

Plus, actually knowing about it in the first place would be nice! You have a piece of text saying "you don't need to credit us; just credit OpenStreetMap contributors because they made the thing", but it might be a good idea to say "but if you're feeling generous, you can tack a 'via NetToolKit' on the end". I found out about Mapbox, Leaflet and OpenStreetMap via those little copyright signs at the bottom of maps – and if asked, I'd certainly put one in for you if I were using your services.
Credential attenuation in Macaroons is cryptographic; it's in how the tokens are constructed. I don't see the opportunity for a DoS (that didn't exist without attenuation already).

Macaroons are a really lovely, tight, purpose-built design that happens to capture a lot of things you want out of an API token, including some things that JWTs don't express naturally despite their kitchen-sink design.

JWT is more popular because there are libraries for it in every language, and people don't think of tokens as a cryptographic design (or nobody would be using JWT!), they think of them as a library ecosystem. JWT is definitely the stronger library ecosystem!

This is also why I probably wouldn't ever bother recommending PASETO. If you're sophisticated enough to evaluate token formats based on their intrinsic design, then you should implement Macaroons if possible (it's almost always possible). If you're not, then you're going to use JWT.
Check out Goat Simulator: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goat_Simulator

"The game, initially developed as a joke prototype from an internal game jam and shown in an early alpha state in YouTube videos, was met with excitement and attention, prompting the studio to build the game into a releasable state while still retaining various non-breaking bugs and glitches to maintain the game's entertainment value."
Unnecessarily exposing innards doesn't feel brutalist to me. Covering up the innards is a functional requirement of being a reliable car - you don't want the engine exposed to the elements, for example. You don't want to expose the driver to rain and snow. You don't want to have the frame rust. A huge part of brutalism is not letting design compromise functioning of the object and not hiding the materials that compose the object.

Buildings that are considered brutalist still have walls and a roof, because you know, a building being covered by a roof and having walls is what creates room and space inside. There'd be no point to building it otherwise. But they don't worry about hiding the ductwork and piping inside because hiding it doesn't add to the functionality of the building.

In the cybertruck, the use of unpainted stainless steel is letting the inherent useful properties of the material shine - that's certainly brutalist. The material being difficult to work with is what created the harsh angles in the silhouette - again, that's brutalist.
Thanks, this is a great comment! You've cleared things up for me a lot.
Amazon’s choice is just an algorithmic label that sometimes gets applied to total crap, there’s no actual curation.
Where do you get your initial trusted list from, and what do you do when "it doesn't work out" and you need a replacement supplier?
> I'm afraid Mr. Yang has forgotten one of the most basic principles of economics: When you tax some behavior you get less of it

This is true, but if you subsidize some behavior, you also get more of it. And giving people $1000/month would certainly encourage consumer spending. It's not so simple as you are making it out to be: you're ignoring spillover benefits like an increase in entrepreneurial ventures that would create new jobs, as well as an increase in worker productivity that comes with better well-being as a result of UBI.

Also, I'm of the belief that the VAT will become more valuable (in the sense of tax $ earned) over time, as margins will certainly increase as automation becomes more widespread - and VAT is a tax only on the margin that consumer goods producers earn.
Did you know the original proposal for CSS was meant to include "user styles"?

They where even supposed to be blended on how much they should be yours or the websites.

User Author
Font o-----x--------------o 64%
Color o-x------------------o 90%
Margin o-------------x------o 37%
Volume o---------x----------o 50%

source: https://www.wiumlie.no/2006/phd/archive/www.w3.org/People/ho...
Check to see if your town/region has something like GiveCamp (https://givecamp.org/)!

I help organize my city's spinoff of GiveCamp, called Code for Good (https://codeforgoodwm.org/), and we bring together hundreds of volunteers every year, and help dozens of nonprofits.
>> inflammation ... most commonly from insulin resistance

Please could you elaborate, this is new for me (I am a layman in medicine).

Thanks
Or, after they've gone ahead and bought it, "don't force us to shoehorn our revenue-generating functionality into this steaming pile of garbage!"
“The truck is consumerist, whereas brutalism’s monumentality is civic. The truck’s boldness serves the bravado of an individual, whereas brutalism’s visual power was meant to project the shared dignity of the public realm.”

Literally no product you can buy would meet this definition.

I guess you could make a brutalist city bus?
Not too different from a rich person hiring people to say flattering things in the press or basically paying journalists or subsidizing their access to favorable events to get positive coverage. Well, maybe amplified a bit more by the internet.
IKEA furniture assembly meets machine learning and robotics
1950s Smart Homes and the Longevity of Design
https://github.com/Tharun24/MACH/blob/master/amazon_670k/src...

Run on a single machine by logically partitioning GPUs. Don't get me wrong, I'm not disputing that this could work or that it could be a "breakthrough". I'm just saying that unless it's independently replicated and confirmed, it's just a paper like a million others.
>Just keep N low.

"Your self driving car has been compromised, but don't worry sir the attackers will relinquish control at some point in the next 30 seconds"

In my view JWT are fine so long as you don't really care about whatever is they are being used for.
Some said it was Tim Cook, and other Executives like Scott Forstall trying to tell Steve Jobs to lower the selling because not everyone could afford it.

On the other hand Steve did acknowledge in various interviews that Apple had to make profits to sustain its R&D and innovation as well as Cash options if big chances were to come.

Steve never had the Apple right now where they have too much cash and not sure what to do with it. To date Apple had already spend $400B in buy back. And they still has $100B Net Cash on hand, with all of its business segment extremely profitable. I wonder if Steve would say we might want to lower our margin a little, or AppleCare+ for free.

Instead Tim Cook decided AppleTV + will be the moat and bait to keep people within the iPhone Ecosystem. Which I dont have much faith on.
Rich and powerful people depend on us forgetting their crimes in order to continue to predate us. The moral rules are a bit different for the victims and the powerless.

“The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting.” — Milan Kundera
There are exceptions. The Washington DC Metro, for instance.
Or if you fully intended to commit suicide and were only interested in a hit as a way to make sure the insurance pays out.

Trying to make sure someone gets a life insurance pay out is a really common feature of a lot of stories about suicide.
In Canada you can buy btc in cash at any post office without ID.
Signing session cookie? wut?
>> Google RSUs also vest monthly (and no longer has a cliff at 1 year, you start venting 1 month after you join) so as far as I can tell it’s exactly equivalent to salary but paid in shares of GOOG rather than dollars. Waiting for vesting shouldn’t keep anyone around for more than 1 month.

This all the more reason employees dont "just quit" and join another company. Say they quit and join Amazon -- now they are stuck on a 15/15/30/40 vesting plan and just kicked all their comp into a future year that may or may not arrive. Say they quit and join a typical startup, now they have a 1yr vest.
My single biggest issue is weird complexity requirements... let me simply use a relatively short sentence (15+ characters). If they limited requirement to length only + a breach check, that would be enough and encourage a sentence.

"I really like sour grapes." is easy enough to remember and has plenty of complexity... of course, it gets much harder on a mobile device, this is where passphrase managers come into play though.
Twitter Bug Notifies People When They Get Added to ‘Private’ Lists
Hacking Team Communications
And crappy. You are much better off buying last years galaxy x (or the year before that) than this years A series.
Because fewer women in positions of power equals less misogyny?! Ok then.
You can search for Amazon Basics or Amazon Essentials, which seem to be listings of high volume commodity products. However, I don't see adult dress gloves in Amazon Essentials. There are kids gloves. And if you want high style, these products aren't for you.

The other alternative is to use specific branded sites, such as LL Bean or REI. These will provide premium products at a premium price.

Finally, you can go directly to the manufacturer. If you want Marmot gloves, go to marmot.com. (Of course, it's unlikely that Marmot actually manufactures their gloves.)
Possibly, but it doesn't have the problem of treating the actors as a homogeneous equally skilled block; "10X actors" are definitely getting adequate compensation while at the same time all guild members benefit from the common protections.