skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's already happened and will happen again.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/3/150302-syria-...
Creating End-to-End API Tests Effortlessly with APId
Escher – The world’s first cloud-controlled Etch-a-Sketch
They'll likely have to answer the airplane impact question directly during licensing. A combination of steel mesh structures and below-grade can help, as can the fact that this reactor is very low power and low burnup (meaning the radiological source term will be fairly low for worst-case). But it will still be important and non-trivial to physically protect the plant. This is a fundamental challenge for small reactors, and is part of the reason reactors got big in the first place.
I think you can just run one node.js per core (or whatever the optimal balance is) and tell your load balancer that there are instances of your service available at hostname:8080, hostname:8081, etc. A lot of people are going to get this "for free" when they tell their container orchestrator that they want 8 replicas that each request 1 cpu, and the scheduler finds a node with 8 free cpus.
Until you need revocation.

Which is to say until you need a working authentication system.

JWTs solve a nonexistent problem in the 99.9% case but are so very, very bloggable that they've brainwormed the population but good.
There is insurance for cars that are rarely driven, e.g. collector/classic cars, that requires your car to be in an individual garage.
> But once you do

Sure.

The vanishing minority of projects ever get to that point.

Didn't we internalize YAGNI literally a decade ago?
I wholeheartedly disagree. I loved the companion missions and the dive into the characters and their psychology. They all were interesting in different ways.

Notably, I found that the Vicar had a really interesting progression as a character and his relationship with religion. It lead to some interesting philosophical dialogue, especially if you bring him when you meet the Iconoclasts. He has a healthy debate with their leader and they both come to the conclusion "let's agree to disagree". It was great.
Thanks for the info, I’ll let you know how it goes!
> Also this list by it’s very nature favors schools with less overall majors and more majors of a technical nature.

That's true, but if your model of using the list is "someone is looking for advice on how to make money by going to college", it is a desirable feature. This person doesn't know what they want to do, and funneling them to a school with only good options will guard them against choosing a bad major later, when they've stopped looking at the list. Adjusting ROI to major availability would make the list less accurate.
Pick between spearing a bison or gazelle with a rock tip, or harvesting from a small plot of not quite domesticated, hardy crop that you just scattered somewhere fertile, and putting off the hunt for a few more days. Or a proto-goat you keep tied up somewhere where it can graze.

It's a gradual process and has immediate benefits even on a small scale with relatively low investment. Consider also that women were probably not hunting, and probably had some spare time when they weren't gathering/taking care of kids or what have you. It's pretty easy for a community of Hunter gatherers to have occasional free time, if you look at data from more recent tribes from the last hundred years or so. Plus there's all kinds of art and such...simple crop rearing and basic animal raising isn't hard to imagine.
I wonder if we're over-reacting with anti proliferation.

It takes 3 very difficult achievements to build a nuclear bomb. Access to reactor grade uranium is only one of them.

I'm not sure the dangers of potential proliferation outweigh the tangible deaths per year that result from large ship pollution.
Politicians still attend planned outdoor events. Drones can be deployed at the security perimeter, fly rather quickly, and carry an explosive payload. I'm not sure security is good enough to stop a swarm of such.
You would think the various military academies would be pretty high on the list with free tuition and an officer paycheck immediately following graduation.
Is there a way to get the table as csv? This data is worth some charts and analysis.
Get a hairless cat, similar personality actually
Any chance you can elaborate the reasons for staying away from Intel syntax?
This can't be understated. Like, for this particular thing? Yeah, you could say "oh, they're out of range of the ship and that should never happen, warp them back." But you have to have them escape the zone first to know you should do that. And what's the most likely way to do that? Falling out of the world. Not climbing. So there's a good chance you'll miss it even if you thought about it!

This is exactly the sort of bug that anybody under the kind of bone-crunching compression you see in game development is gonna fix after they see it. "Don't start bandaging until you bleed."
Im done being excited by anything out of Intel that isn't an desktop/laptop CPU.

I've been burned personally and professionally with every single Intel IoT device I've touched.

Remember the Edison platform? Huge promises and possibilities that turned into fatally flawed silicon that took Intel 2 years to admit.

The Compute Stick?
The whole Atom ecosystem?

I was so excited by the realsense cameras, we got a bunch of them and thought we must have gotten a bad batch. The hardware was so bad compared to similar cost machine vision cameras, it was astounding.

The SDK was great at first glance, a really easy OOBE for multi camera setup and PCL processing. Then you discover over a few weeks how flaky everything is, how brittle the SDK and drivers are (like every other Intel dev platform it seems) and after spending thousands of dollars on hardware and hundreds of hours of dev time, you finally chuck it all in a bin and say "I will never buy Intel crap again" for the third time.

Hopefully this Lidar device will buck that trend, but I doubt it. They keep making random IOT hardware platforms with seemingly no long term strategy and no path to commerical implementation.
Thanks for the "feedback".
Here's Ladyada's interview with the co-author, Paul Horowitz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCI3B5eT9NA
Hi, author here. I have no doubt you’re right. My only lines of defense are that (1) I didn’t use MySQL directly and I didn’t open myself up to injection attacks, and (2) I stopped being a PHP dev years before 2013. This is custom, legacy code still powering my humble personal site after over a decade.
Brazil's Amazon deforestation this year nearly size of Puerto Rico, says agency
The Webinar to boost your career progression in 2020 using neuroscience
A GitHub gh-pages web template
I would think move away from Gold is part of the "informationization" of the world. A bit like crypto-currency. Bitcoin is not "real", it is information.
I was also in a situation at work where I found that redux did not work great for real-time code. Have you made your solution public?

Also related to this article, webworkers are great for offloading work from the main thread until you've got high data rates. It doesn't take a lot of data to get to the point where serialization across the worker boundary nullifies the performance gains of moving the work off of the main thread.
Star Trek Translator, version 0.0001...
use a computer, learn basic threat modeling
Honestly, if you invent something good and it’s better people will flock to it. If they don’t, then usually it is not.

Look at angular, the full backing of google yet people moved to react... and now to vue which was basically made by one guy
Erstwhile means "former" not "potential."
Liberty BASIC. It's been around for nearly three decades, is very well documented, has excellent support, and is the closest you can get in modern times to the syntax of the original Dartmouth BASIC. So it easily appeals to the old-school crowd like me. But it also has over 300 commands or constants to keep up with modern operating systems and methods which allow for GUI design, event-driven applications, calling DLLs, playing media files, interacting with joysticks, displaying graphics, etc.
I thought (hoped!) that `mjs` was just a hack that node used to get around the fact they couldn't do native javascript modules with .js extensions nicely - but (with --experimental-modules for now, but default eventually) the `mjs` file extension hack should be gone forever soon (I thought!).
> I thought this idea that humans had short lifespans historically was thoroughly debunked.

Then the Lord said, “My Spirit will not contend with humans forever, for they are mortal; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”

Genesis 6:3.

I don't know how old Genesis really is, but 2000 B.C. might be a good enough guess. So yeah, pretty thoroughly.
And still has to be proofread afterwards?
Huh, you're right. I guess I shouldn't be reading this on mobile.
Flexport is hiring a senior product manager to lead our ocean freight products
No you can do all that stuff with grpc. You can use active health checks (grpc.health.v1) to add or remove nodes from the pool. (You can configure the algorithm that is used to select a healthy channel for the next request, too.) You can also talk to a central load balancer, which provides your client with a list of endpoints it's allowed to talk to.

When you control the client, you don't have to resort to L3 hacks to distribute load. You can just tell the client which replicas are healthy. (And both ends can report back to give the central load balancer information on whether or not the supposed healthy endpoints actually are.)

L3 load balancing actually works somewhat poorly for HTTP/2 and gRPC anyway. They only balance TCP connections, but you really want to balance requests. That is why people have proxies like Envoy in the middle; the client isn't smart enough to be able to do that, but it is. But if you control the client, you can skip all that and do the right thing with very little resources.
Now there's something that went of my head as a child when I read the books.
Think about it this way. You take a crisp photo, blur it a bit, then sharpen it, then blur it a bit again. The first and the second image will not looks identical. The first blurred image is the simulation, then we “sharpen” it by observing it at a subatomic level, then “blur” again by calculating up from the subatomic observations. The calculations and the “reality” would not match, but only because the quantum data was generated complexity not necessarily exactly representing the original.

So, if the base of the reality is designed around something on an atomic level, when you zoom in past a given level, it would stop making sense if the program was designed to continually add complexity as it is studied more and more, perhaps in the effort of discouraging people form thinking that they are in a simulation :)
From Google:

"Previous to Brooker's work, Alick Glennie who was an MOS external user of the machine had developed his personal automatic coding scheme in the summer of 1952. Glennie's system, which he called autocode, was very machine-dependent and was not released to other users." -- Early computing in Britain, 1948-1958, pg 257

https://books.google.com/books?id=NAOhDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA257#q=gl...
"It seems that someone has already adapted to the system from police searches, or simply to support NGINX!"
https://pari-match.club/
https://monosnap.com/direct/JM4VGPga3PaV7Z4pQEdQgiMEIwi0ub
The power structures are sociopaths' club. If anything, I'd rather say that it's powerful people prefer to be men, than being a man gives one any power. Most of the men are clueless powerless people.
49%? Way too low, something's wrong with this study.
Uncertain, lazy, forgetful, & impatient: It’s what you want your code to be
Period. You all are actually creating the story you constantly scorn. I'm crying when I laugh every time someone references Orwell when you all work for the same orwellian actors. Keep referencing the same story that you so unwittingly create yourselves. Har har har. FANG subjugates. Directly or indirectly you still create the story you all "loath" I on the other hand am a leather worker which has nothing to do with spying. Keep being in denial of the cog you are in the machine however far removed you think you are. If you get paid by any tech companies you are culpable for any spy tech against the American public. Take a look at the "public" discourse that is happening within google and you keep working there. Pot calling the kettle black. Living and dieing under the watchfully eye of ceaser. Are you not entertained?
you have to use the shift key to type a colon though or if you're in mobile you have to long press. same with duckduckgo's exclamation mark.

I much prefer the Firefox method where you add the search shortcut to a browser bookmark and then if you sync your bookmarks to the mobile app.

I use gg for Google, gi for Google images. dd for duckduckgo and di for ddg images etc
Nothing is public.

Regarding your comment about serialization: that's why I used websockets in the workers. It went pretty well except there was a bug in Chrome where the websocket in the webworker was still subject to the main loop. Something like that.

Anyway, the point of offloading everything to webworkers was to make sure that the main thread is free for rendering. So there was very little to serialize, aside from dom differences which are generally not significant.
> By "not really sandboxable", what powerful features of jq do you mean?

On close inspection I can't find things as bad as I imagined, but there are still some unexpected barely-documented features like reading files from anywhere on disk[1] as long as they have the right extension, with much wider implications than one might expect at a glance. (Note the while the module path is relative and checked for path traversal, you can just set the search path. Undocumented is that the text needn't even parse as JSON because you can just set the raw flag.) In general, many language features are implemented by exposing a more powerful primitive than necessary to the language and documenting a less powerful wrapper but not the primitive itself; the security implications go more or less unexamined.

There seems to be no particular provision for executing any less than enough to generate the next output, so if you want to set limits on execution you'll have to do that at the process level. This is something you can probably do better in a separate implementation, though.

> I'm not sure what's meant by "expose as a user interface". It's a pretty abstract DSL, so I would certainly only expose it to programmers.

Only trusted users should have access to jq. I would assume that anyone who has access to executing jq code can execute arbitrary code in the interpreter's context. I'm less sure that it's true right now than I was when I made the post above, but it still seems pretty likely.

[1]: https://stedolan.github.io/jq/manual/#importRelativePathStri...
https://www.manufactum.com

I haven’t but anything from them but this seems to be their premise.
Austin, TX. Known for being tech hub. I have two choices. Spectrum or AT&T. Both overpriced with mediocre but acceptable service. Known that we have it better than most of the USA. Your situation is an outlier and not the norm.
Author here.

After coding in Scala for a while, I brought a couple FP-isms with me to TypeScript, including Option and lazy. A couple other battle-tested, small classes and functions are also shared in this post.

I couldn't imagine working on a TypeScript codebase without these, and thought I'd share.
I had an employer that blocked access to lastpass.com to discourage that sort of thing. I guess the idea is you shouldn't be using a work computer for personal stuff and you shouldn't put work passwords on a 3rd part site. In reality, things aren't split that cleanly, so the block was annoying.
Did you read the article or go straight to the comments? I’m talking about buying the exact same thing the article used as an example. I think that’s a fair thing to contrast with its thesis that “all shopping sucks now”.

She had a terrible time spending days researching the Perfect Pair Of Gloves online, going to the one “big box” store in her area that had supposedly had it, and going back home ungloved instead of looking at other stores when the one store had no gloves in stock that day. I had a perfectly fine time going downtown when I was probably going there for some other reasons already and visiting a couple of stores looking for some Okay Gloves.
This is one of the many things I miss from cycling when driving a car: being able to just match speeds with someone else and hold a conversation over something that happened.
If it's publically traded, yeah, nothing nefarious happened. But if it's private, all bets are off. Often, options there are nothing more than a couple of pages of paper tracked by the company itself. It may very well require legal advice to unwind what happened.
It's "Brooker". Someone please correct the title.
You're presenting a very cliched argument, but there's something that I don't get about it.

You seem to be saying insurance companies must discriminate unfairly by saying that if insurance companies discriminate unfairly, they will lose customers.

Say I am male, and I pay more for car insurance because of that. Your argument is that if sex discrimination is illegal, then the market will collapse because women will stop buying insurance. But isn't it equally true that men who are low risk should "evaporate from the pool" in the present system? There doesn't seem to me a fundamental distinction between these two examples of discrimination.

Now, there may be a quantitative difference, a difference in economic impact, but if it's only quantitative, then why should one automatically be manageable and the other not, which is the assumption I think people implicitly make.
There's also a Perl script with the same name since 2009, written by Audrey Tang (of pugs fame) and then rewritten by Ricardo Signes (of Dist::Zilla fame). I've used this script for years, not realizing there were other implementations of it. Nice to know.

https://metacpan.org/pod/uni
Maybe a more practical option since it's open source, let them fork it and you each run with your preferred roadmap
Surely the whole point of a password manager is to have a different long complex password for each system you login to without needing to remember any of them but your master password?
Consistently. My grandma does a lot of volunteer work, and one of her gripes is with students who show up to fulfill a requirement, learn just enough to start being useful, then quit.

One place I work did a volunteer day at a local community center for underprivileged kids. It was fine going and helping kids out, but I felt like shit for the kids who never get to build any sort of relationship with anyone from the rotating cast of techies who show up to assuage their guilt. These kids have enough instability in their lives.
I think it's the people in power are applying the usual divide and conquer technique: they add more women to tech, alienate men and women and keep them busy fighting each other. How to alienate them? By giving special preferences to only one group. This is a textbook technique.
Gold Value in CPUs and Computer Chips
The EAA store had a shoplifting problem in the 80s

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp85-0...
I may say that I would work for them while you DO WORK FOR THEM, no matter how much you are in denial. You still try and criticise me for the verbal opinion while you physically create the reality yourselves. Ironic.
Which is why, as mechhacker pointed out, they are using a site with existing security arrangements. That’s a common approach for plans to use mini reactors like these.
This thread is speaking to how regular programing and game play programming vastly differ.

In regular programming scopes are small, small enough for programmers to accomodate all expected logic. In games interaction scope is unlimited, or atleast that is what the game designers want.

If you try to program every expected system interaction you would never finish. So instead game programming is about making systems flexible. For example, as far as the gameplay code is concerned the inside of players ship is just yet another level. The bounds of any level are defined by what the map designers have layed out, not any pre-planned "ship area".

There are no meetings where project managers request "more playable area for level 7".

Likewise the systems programmer who made the furniture system was not the script writer who created the ladders. The script writer likely thought it was brilliant and elegant to split the entrances and exits, because in game programming it was indeed brilliant. It allowed the save system's existing code to handling what would have otherwise been special handling. It allowed the existing combat logic to handling what would otherwise be special handling.

Of course regular programming is different. In regular applications if a user's data is being sent to a server there is no secondary system which needs to be allowed to kill this data. Nor is there any save system which needs to be able to save and restore an in-progress action.

Games programming is all about figuring out ways to allow more varied and more complex interactions without exploding the implementation exponentially.
List of gold quantity and value in some old CPUs : http://www.ozcopper.com/computer-cpu-gold-yields/

Interesting to see that the pure gold cost was often a significant percentage of the CPU's price!
>There is no verified fission reaction that is used to produce energy on this planet yet, is this a scam ?

Fission, not fusion.
Dude, that’s a total dick move.

Is twenty bucks really that precious to you that you’ll throw money out of your local economy into Bezos’ pockets? Right in front of someone who just helped you decide this is the watch you wanted and could have put it in your hands right now instead of waiting for shipping in the middle of the super-busy Christmas season and hoping it’s not gonna end up be a counterfeit copy?
Do you mean fusion isn't working yet? All existing nuclear power is based on fission.
Keep downvoting. It doesn't erase the facts. Children.
It's hard for me to imagine people who know React moving to Vue. I'd have to assume different people, who've never known the beauty of React, are driving Vue's growth due to marketing.
Makes all the sense in the world for reactor development and testing.

For commercial deployment it'd be nice to understand the basic plan.
The future becomes completely predictable as it approaches, so probability necessarily evaporates in the limit.

As the data gathered increases, the probability eventually reaches 1.0. For instance, if an insurance company could legally gather all telemetry from your car at a high enough frequency and cancel your policy at will, then it could determine that your car was on an unavoidable collision course and eliminate losses.

This may sound like a silly thought experiment, but I think it demonstrates that in principle, there must be some point at which we draw the line on discrimination to have insurance, so if you find yourself defending all discrimination then you've gone wrong somewhere. Either there's a principle that has been missed, or it is valid to just set the rules in society that people are comfortable with.
> physical stores treating their employees like shit

Wait until you hear about amazon.
What part of the parent comment are you replying to?
By value add, I mean. But I don't know what's ambiguous about what is and isn't tech?
My dad had a vynil LP with BBC sound effects, which I remember listening to when I was a kid. I particularly liked to listen to the disaster sounds, like cars skidding and crashing and, shockingly, a crowd of people being shot at.