skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>That's fine. But "Shut the hell up" remains good advice. The only benefit to "cooperating" with the police is at SENTENCING. And, if I'm actually innocent, that's a bit of a problem, no?

I agree with the basic advice. That being said, if a cop knocks on my door and says the neighbor's kid is missing, I'm still willing to take the minute personal risk of being implicated in order to help the police in their search.

Yes, technically I could have been the last one to see the kid alive and this could make me a suspect, but I also couldn't live with myself if I knew something but withheld it and something bad happened.
Let's should make a religion with secure encryption (no master key) at its core. Once it becomes recognized, it would be unconstitutional to ban it.
Yeah, there's only a x86 Docker image on Docker Hub for Huginn. You could probably just build an ARM image from whatever Dockerfile the x86 version was built from.
For what it's worth, an archaeologist friend told me once that "ritualistic" is basically a synonym for "we have no idea what it was used for".
Even worse is having been through the enlightenment and then witnessing people talk about Javascript or Scala like it is still 1990. You just want to yell to them "You're all living in a cave!"
No hotel deals with bodies themselves. They will call the police.
These kinds of top-down initiatives are well and good, but the real problem is cultural. You only have to read this discussion to see why women don't want to work in STEM.
But all else is not equal, and this is what I find incredibly silly. You have a very strong prior on time when that is probably just one of many factors. Experience, efficiency, the ability to work well with others, organizational ability, and perspicacity are just a few of the several other things that goes into being an effective engineer.

Moreover you don't seem to balance your time prior out with others. Sure, time may have an effect, but what if this effect is marginal? This also gets down to something that bothers me about this line of thinking, which is the desire to create overly simplistic models of talent. Talent is incredibly multi-faceted, and hiring based on pithy narratives without actually looking at data is how we ended up in this situation where class signalling or age has become a substitute for talent.
This assumes that everyone over 30 or so is focused on family, which is obviously not the case.
in the universe of obfuscating the origin of funds those would be subsets of it yes, but it doesn't have to have an illicit origin
You can just do a chargeback. Merchant agreements with card issues forbid charging the card for anything other than what the cardholder explicitly agrees to.
Yes! Albert's work using Huginn at the NYTimes (and contributing some changes back) was one of the big early successes for the project.
There are 2 issues in this:

1) Governments have law and warrants allowing them to get those data.

2) Companies with a lot of data are complying with those warrants.

The question is: can we fix #2 without fixing #1?
You can theoretically turn off your iPhone easily as well. Unless your dumbphone has a removable battery it would be just as difficult to trust it's actually off than a modern phone. But sure, removable battery would be an advantage on that dimension, I agree.
Space is the place for impossible molecules
Ask HN: Who can I reach out at Facebook to report acute bugs in its UI?
The "best" option they offer is a dumb contact form, for which they automatically respond with a dumb "we will review it" but it never gets to Engineering.

I want an email of someone who's very close to the dev teams.
As a pseudonymous nym, quite literally the only stock I have are the facts and reasoning I post, and my past record.

I'm not willing to compromise either.
My gf is in a community oriented job here in India. Dominated by women. Men are criticized much harshly, the environment is outright unprofessional with sex talk and gossip constantly at work. Every other day there is another girl crying because her work was criticized (fairly). Maybe try looking outside populist narratives with a more nuanced view, toxicity flows both ways.

tl;dr: Ask Men and Women.
The first one sounds like a few different games. Did it happen to be "Monuments of Mars"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monuments_of_Mars

If you like games like that, this one's not Mars but you might also enjoy Sentinel Worlds I: Future Magic. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=sentinel+worlds+future+magic
What do you want? Do you want fun, or money, or to make an impact?

I am not you. But in your situation, I might be inclined to work on the group project that is needed, and do the "fun" project on the side, in spare time.
Why is Ring allowing brute forcing? Individual cameras should be set to only allow logins at least a few seconds apart increasing up to several minutes and perhaps blocking IP addresses with excessive volume. If they're brute forcing Ring's servers an application firewall would catch and block this.
Maybe because nobody uses 32-bit x86 anymore?
Proper procedures are for all doors to always be closed, even while working in the room, and never to let anyone into a room without verifying their identity unless they have their own key.
>Did you assume that's what they were estimating because the number seems low?

Yes, look for any estimate of 5 year olds' vocabulary and it's much higher than this (unless it's an estimate of expressive vocabulary).

You don't really need to look at studies, though. Just talk to some 5 year olds.
The safe layer between you and your smartphone
And if you couldn’t figure that out doesn’t that say a lot about your interviewing process.
too suspicious, instead we should have the existing courier network (food delivery services) have an additional service where they take people's phones around with them for a few hours to mess up the travel pattern data

could be a charging lock box with a little accountability like the ones at bars and clubs
Testing whether your brain is a quantum computer with Jupyter
Elaborate. What are the "serious efforts" made by medical and law industries that got women into these professions that STEM has not employed?

Furthermore, do you care to identify what in this discussion makes it so clear why women would not go into STEM?
> they are all fully capable of being done remotely.

They certainly are, as long as others cooperate. Good for you if you've never been on a team where people resist and sabotage any such effort. I don't see any particular reason to believe your shorter experience is more representative than my longer one.
Stretch Timer
Perhaps, it helps the police in making arrests but I believe that evidence like this would be considered circumstantial in court.
My 2011 macbook is already not supported by new versions and Mac hardware are not backwards compatible with older OS versions. It's extremely likely that they can't even run newer versions even if they wanted to. If not now then in the near future.

I think trying to make any moral argument in this situation is pointless as the risks are so minuscule. But should we go down that road the environmental benefits of keeping older hardware in use for longer far outweighs any security risks they may impose on others.
It’s been open sourced now:

https://github.com/OpenLiveWriter
The comment I was responding to was "Almost all of those procedures are perfectly ok as long as everybody is not doing the same ones. The problem appears if every well paying job requires your to have a public portfolio."

IOW, a fair reading is that the parent acknowledges that the practice excludes people who aren't in a position to have a public portfolio. (For whatever reason: IP rules, family obligations, lack of interest in programming as a hobby.) And that would be a problem if everyone did it. But everyone doesn't so it's OK as long as just some of us do it.
In my opinion the idealistic variant of the enlightenment is conceptually not significantly different from materialism. The big thing is rejection of teleology, which also results in the radical egalitarianism since there is no longer a purposeful ordering to reality and no longer a natural law.

And yes, a teleological philosophy like scholasticism makes the most sense if we are trying to figure out the best way to live. Otherwise we just end up with the specious word game philosophy that everyone hates
We should call the meme version of these type of works "memetic" works.
The original Surface table was renamed to MS PixelSense and it's in the list:
https://www.versionmuseum.com/history-of/discontinued-micros...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_PixelSense
How is it not a part of science? What does a field need to have to be included in STEM?

Just because there are other skills needed besides science based ones doesn't mean it isn't a science field.
The only thing that is a problem is that one physical machine can still handle 10 times the spike of "vcpu" which is shared between multiple customers. For much lower price. Very strong computers are available for real bargain but nooo, lets use the cloud. Its a buzzword so it needs to be good

It is funny that no one used the most realistic "excuse". That you just have no clue how to do it (install, setup software) and as you cant do it yourself, you need to hire someone. This is the only case where google does make sense. It is path into idiocracy as you will be able to do less and less yoursel with outsourcing know-how (we didnt learn anything from past China expiriences right?), but we wont worry too much about it too much about it, untill then you will all be zillionaires and it will no longer matter.
Not sure what the proper way to respond to a deeply nested comment around here is, but @scarface74:

Company A will pay me $400k/yr, but only if I make work my top priority

Company B will pay me $150k/yr, no matter what

Please explain why it's "naive" to choose Company A. I don't need "ownership" in the company to profit from this.

I don't see how the company's reaction to my death factors into the decision at all.
Show HN: Ziptalks – tech talks, summarized and illustrated
All of the other mechanisms of hedging inflation have issues. Crypto has issues too, of course, but the important point is that it's issues are different and uncorrelated to traditional inflation hedges. If you can hedge the same risk in more than one way, you should, because it will reduce your overall volatility.
Agree with OP, but thought it was interesting how much the debate is being shaped by the general sentiment shifting against big tech and how unsympathetic major tech platforms have become in public policy discussions, particularly around this subject.

Liked this rundown of all the forces lined up on the other side. Debate doesn't seem to be driven by tech or really by policy, so much as pols trying to cut down an industry a notch (particularly as that industry's lobbying has largely been tone deaf):

https://www.axios.com/distrust-of-tech-could-be-encryptions-...
Purism and Pine are looking interesting.
> People can operate their own encryption, either by operating their own server technology or sending encrypted blobs over FB.

> Encryption technology can hide content, but won’t hide the parties to a communication without a lot of extra work

These two statements alone are reason enough why the whole encryption debate is pointless. The moment the government of a country makes it illegal for chatting apps to use encryption, the criminals are just going to roll their own crypto.

So it'll just end up taking away the privacy of regular citizens, and will undoubtedly be used to violate their rights.

Furthermore, I'm 100% that if enceyption is outlawed, in the case of WhatsApp, Facebook will just start analysing all your chats and using them for more targetted ads. Yay.
Many investors have been switching from Robinhood to M1 Finance but maybe this announcement is intended to slow the flow.
I'd even want to use similar tech on a personal level. I can't do a brain scan myself, but I can take a picture of a mole. I'm at high-risk for skin cancer, but I honestly wouldn't go see a doctor just for a change for a skin lesion that I'm not sure about. There's too many, and even with an above-average knowledge of what to look for, I have little confidence in my own observation. But if a neural network could tell me it's a higher risk, I'd for sure not wait until my next physical. Gotta be careful people who don't understand the risk & statistics don't depend on negative diagnoses too heavily, though.
The scripting language used for developing Roku channels is BrightScript, which is based on BASIC syntax with some bits of other languages thrown in.
Isn't that why fuel taxes are for?
So you're suggesting the lawyers and doctors in charge back in the 60's and 70's were more progressive and less sexist than engineers in 2019? Really? That's what you're going with?
There were 32-bit netbooks being sold the last time I looked in 2015.
How the Fed Lost Its Faith in ‘Full Employment’
lol @ this screen name and question combo.

By open we mean everyone gets full permissions, tovarisch!
>It's important to know that the lying thing is specifically about federal law enforcement

It's actually much broader than that. Making a material false statement to any federal agent (for example your local postman), about something in his jurisdiction (say, the mail) is enough to qualify.

Note the "material" part. If you lie about the color of socks you are wearing, it doesn't matter.
"As to the men being jerks/toxic etc argument. Are there times when that is true? Absolutely. But, men do not have a monopoly on being jerks, creating toxic work environments or harassing people"

This is a red herring. If you ask women they won't say their bosses were "jerks" or "toxic" (though a lot of time they are), they'll say they made them "uncomfortable", "un-accommodating".

It reminds me of a friend who got pregnant and left the STEM field because the dudes at her office made her feel like she was SUCH a huge drag on them. None of them were jerks, just not accommodating. Its a subtle but substantial difference.

"I'm sure this will be down voted, but it is what it is."

Actually, its the top comment, the popularity of this opinion among programmers is the crux of the issue. Nobody wants to work at a company where a majority of people think you are "unnatural" or an "outlier" for being there.
I have no doubt that women face adversity, often in the form of sh__ty behavior during their STEM careers, so I'm not particularly surprised by accounts of it. I'm far less sanguine about the idea that they face more of it than men, as I've been on the receiving end of a lot of it myself (some life-changing).

It'd be interesting to see this studied.
They are also known to steal anvils. [1]

[1] http://dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php/DF2014:Kea
Unless I'm missing something, you don't need all that just to have 'componentDidMount' eg:

export const useMounted = (f) => {
useEffect(f, []);
}

Edit: originally:

export const useMounted = (f) => {
useEffect(() => {
f();
}, []);
}
This is actually a great point, and one thing that has me skeptical of Stadia and other upcoming game-streaming services.

People who never got rid of their NES can still play their games. If it breaks, they could buy another one, or maybe even try to fix it themselves.

Once a service shuts down, you don't really have anything to keep or to revisit. If there was a Stadia-only game in the future, could you somehow get a copy and run it on local hardware to keep playing if Stadia shut down? Could you do it easily.

Super Mario Bros, Classic Tetris, etc. they still have active communities of speed-runners, tournaments, etc. It's kind of weird that something with the level of cultural impact a videogame can have could all of a sudden disappear because it doesn't exist anywhere but in a centralized space outside the control of the people who experienced it.
No, you didn't understand what I meant. There is no single codebase serving all users. Some users are on v1, and they use its codebase. Some users are on v2, and they use its codebase. And on and on. There is no notion of removing features. All forks live forever. They just get updated less and less frequently over time. No single fork grows larger and larger over time.
And to code-golf it a bit further, it can just be:

useEffect(f, [])
I managed to avoid most of that, thanks to a bit of sheer, dumb luck.

Back in the early 80's, my elementary school piloted a program (inspired by Seymour Papert, I presume) to teach school age children to program in Logo. So we had a lab full of twelve C64's across the hall from the Apple ][ lab and were taught to program in Logo. This included structured control flow, sub programs, recursion and the like. It was a far, far better experience than I imagine it would've been to be initially exposed to Basic.

In retrospect, this is probably a big part of why, a few years later, I found some of the structured programming facilities of QB4 as appealing as I did.
It may be that FB collects data on everyone they can. The subject of this article is about content/content moderation. If I do not produce or consume content on FB then I might not care about or be subject to any moderation practices.
If MariaDB hadn't been there, and as competitive as it was, I doubt Oracle would have played so nicely with MySQL.

Oracle has one goal, and that is to make money. They've realised due to the competitive pressure in this case that they can't abandon the community and go straight into value extraction mode.
This is the one to read
A "smart" phone lets you use software with better protocols than the government approved (designed) cell network. For example, turn off your cell radio but still using a messaging app (eg Matrix/XMPP) over open wifi (rotating macaddrs of course), instead of having to connect to cell towers to receive text messages.

I can't tell you which results in better opsec today for say carrying out government-disapproved commerce. But I can tell you that the privacy benefits of having a bona fide computer that you control in your pocket will continue to grow, while the cell network is stuck being forever subservient to government/commercial surveillance.
I don't think that the above comment means brute-forcing in the "try a million different passwords in a short time-period" sense, it's referring to finding a list of known password and email combinations and trying just those. I would expect that a few attempts wouldn't trip any brute-force alarms.
Anecdotally, it seems like it at least for developer evangelist. But I haven't seen any hard data.
It was using the example of US colleges to make the point that it is too narrow a definition to say only fields that are pure science count as STEM. There are very few pure science or math fields, but I don't think you need to be 'pure' to be considered STEM.
You graduated - what - 30 years ago? You presumably have more than 20 years of experience. Do you really think you're the person who needs to pad their resume out with open source contributions to make a strong resume as an IC? I'm gonna guess no.

Hiring the trendiest is also a bit of an SV thing. I don't know if you're in SV or not but if your job searching doesn't involve any leetcode prep then I presume you're not in SV. (Less than 3 weeks on leetcode prep seems crazy to get a job in SV unless you practice regularly)
> They fooled your rep into thinking police were involved.

This is why you have policy for appropriate response and organizational escalation in place if necessary. Not hard to contact the department in question via another directory and verify the request.
There’s an animation showing the face before and after. It’s better than a photo, in my opinion.
It's a hassle but you can carry the turned-off phone in a small metal box. Feels bad but should work.
> How are you managing to miss the point with such vigour?

I could ask the same of you - how are you helping matters at all by chopping down a tree and burning it over digging up a tree and burning it? You're emitting the same amount of CO2.

Want to reduce global warming?

1. plant a tree

2. burn less

If you're wondering what to do with the tree after it grows, you can:

1. use it for lumber

2. bury it
And no shortage there either. Or rather the shortage is in efficient interviewing techniques and interviewers.
Here is the original source (results of the survey): https://www.wellness-heaven.de/wellness/study-theft-in-hotel...
Immediately remind me of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEfQ_9DIItI, where the scores in the movie are constantly borrowed/changed from known good version.

Also: the music in Iron Man 1 eventually became part of Game of Throne theme song: https://www.reddit.com/r/MovieDetails/comments/e81vr8/18_sec...
No? Where do I say that?
Women in Science (2006)
> a company that owns a website containing information that in my opinion is valuable to the public

Please do post your efforts on HN if you succeed in getting the material archived. I'd love to hear more about it.
I remember being an early adopter of 64-bit Linux with my Athlon64 back in the day. Lots of stuff was broken and I got a lot of debate on whether it was any faster or worthwhile at all. It's really cool to see the technology curve go full circle.
This is a tech community, and I like tech metaphors - it’s like old CCTVs were inside the firewall and these new services our outside the firewall. In the old model, sharing your data (videos) was opt in each time. You could be sure that only you had access to the data unless you chose to share it. In the new model, you are always sharing, and these hacks show you don’t really even know who you are sharing with.
There's no solid coupling, but in neutral the viscous drag through the clutches (especially when the fluid is cold) is often enough to transmit some force to the output shaft; and as anyone who has pushed around vehicles on a flat level surface would know, it doesn't take that much force to start a car rolling. However, stopping one that's moving even very slowly with no actual power behind it is surprisingly hard due to the inertia alone (I've manually moved around cars in a shop before, and had my fair share of bumps and bruises --- no crushes, fortunately.)
> Some global masterminds reducing pay across multiple corporations across the board when they find out women are being hired in that industry?

No coordination is necessary. People will simply start to view the role as less valuable or skilled due to more women being in it.
No, that's the i386 architecture, which is still well supported AFAICT. x86_32 is a funny architecture that requires 64 bit chips but uses 32 bit pointers.

http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Kernel-Log-x32-ABI-get...
And women are punished for demanding pay increases, so they can't win either way.
Jesus was closer to dinosaur times than we are to 2015.
iPad Air 2nd still gets updates. It's probably a iPad Air 1st gen
Could also be power itself. Not sure if you've experienced this. I've seen it in the military and in my current workplace where people seek power over other people and don't care as much about the compensation. There's something about controlling others that is intoxicating for some.
Studio monitors are a different game (and are pricier for a reason). I was talking about consumer speakers.
Your proposal is to force numeric parity through discrimination when women comprise 20% of the people entering the field? Of course people oppose this: it's blatant sexism, and it is illegal.
True, but camera=deterrent?
I still miss Sunrise. Outlook calendar doesn’t compete last time I checked, so I’ve been using Fantastical plus some other integrations for special calendar subscriptions.
Now that would be a truly interesting drone business.
I would spend time working with a group of talented engineers. You will gain so much perspective on their working patterns, design discussions, and learn to work on a team. Very rarely is software written by just one developer regardless of the tech.