skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Ufc245
https://reddit.com/r/UFC245LivePPVTv/about/
https://reddit.com/r/UFC245LivePPVTv/

https://reddit.com/r/UFC245LivePPVTv/comments/eallr0/official_kamaru_usman_vs_colby_covington_live/

https://reddit.com/r/UFC245LivePPVTv/comments/eallsj/officialstream_kamaru_usman_vs_colby_covington/

https://reddit.com/r/UFC245LivePPVTv/comments/ealltg/officialreddit_ufc_245_usman_vs_covington_live/

https://reddit.com/r/UFC245LivePPVTv/comments/eallob/ufcofficialfight_ufc_245_live_streams_reddit/

https://medium.com/@skgghsf534e/official-fight-ufc-245-live-stream-reddit-tv-8ad8bfeab7c7

[Official/Fight]ufc 245 live stream reddit

https://medium.com/@skgghsf534e/2019-livestream-ufc-245-usman-vs-covington-ufc-245-fighting-c314a557c998

https://medium.com/@skgghsf534e/official-fight-ufc-245-live-stream-reddit-tv-8ad8bfeab7c7
They had $20 dollar rebate that was really hard to claim and had relations with a shady company called Great Fun I'm sure pissed of many customers ...don't blame Uber or the new stuff... SuperShuttle thrived in era where there was little real competition but company had mismanagement issues, bad employees, and it was not innovative and when competition came along they just tanked
Ironically, this essay shows the biggest problem I have with having kids -- especially in the US, people with kids seem to single-mindedly focus on them and can't stop telling you about their kids. What remains of their social lives and all their holidays seem to revolve around the kids. I think pg echoes a bit of this sentiment himself when he says:

> To some extent I'm like a religious cultist telling you that you'll be happy if you join the cult too — but only because joining the cult will alter your mind in a way that will make you happy to be a cult member.

My offhand guess is that this general situation is due to dual-earning families that live separately from the grandparents. This seems to be social experiment started after World War II, and from the point of view of an observer I can tell you it's not going great. I suspect that the traditional large joint family approach is probably best in case you do want to have kids and not have it completely upend your life.
That's exactly what they're doing, using JWT for OAuth 2.0 bearer tokens.
TBH I think it's just the chemical change. Basically you are happy in one way or another, and once you made decision most people tend to regret a bit/lot afterwards.
I agree with this a lot. I was pretty anti-kid, not in the sense that I didn’t want them ever, but that I didn’t want them “any time soon.” My wife was this way too, until one day she wasn’t. I still felt pretty ambivalent about the whole thing until our first was born.

Children really are interesting, and really do fill life with all kinds of quietly wonderful moments.

We live in San Francisco, which is very hilly. When we drive up and down steep hills, my daughters get so excited. They squeal with glee like they’re riding a roller coaster, and beg us to drive up and down the hills again.

That may sound mundane, but when you’re there, sharing the sheer joy of life with fellow humans, it’s anything but.

Now looking back, the thing that I regret is that the modern world is pretty anti-kid, and makes things harder than they need to be. Cars, in particular, are terrible for kids. The roads are deadly, my number one fear is that they’ll run into the street and get hit. Car seats are also the worst. Long road trips are physically painful for the kids, I’m sure, so we’ve cut back on those. I wish, very much, that I could find a car-free city in North America to move to, but this doesn’t seem to exist.
Neither the article nor the malware reports it links to
identify which merchant networks are affected.
last time Cliqz came up on here was not in the best of contexts...

https://old.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/74yo19/cliqz_and_m...
We are using this in my org alongside LinkedIn CCFE.

It works great. You can see message counts, sum of offsets, partition sizes and basic broker information.

The only part its not good at is showing the topic list. Since there is no pagination it takes a long time once you get past 1k topics.

Also,it doesn't help "manage" Kafka since it can't create partition assignments or create, modify topics.

It's good as a lightweight read-only Kafka UI. Good to hand to the teams using Kafka but not enough for the teams managing Kafka.

EDIT: Seems like a lot of new features have been added. Take my comments above with a grain of salt then since they might be outdated info.
Yeah... I can't finish this. It's... too much. I'm glad that there are people who can work with law enforcement to help get these people off of the internet, but I couldn't do it.
American parenting is a cancer. I was raised in Europe and had a kid in California, I hate how most kids are raised here and I hate the expectations put on parents. Most people think you gotta stop having fun, you can’t go out because kids and you have to constantly hover them. I took my son out when he was 5 days old and I brought him everywhere since. He knows he needs to be quiet when we go in public and we will not be listening to him if he tries to interrupt our conversations without asking politely. He’s completely fine and well adjusted and the teachers love him.

If you want to raise your kids well, stop treating them like they are a rare Chinese vase and they’ll be just fine.
One possible confounder is that having children is a pretty much irreversible step. Whereas many people who don't have children might choose to have them later. So they regret their choice less, because it's a less final choice.
I should perhaps step back to explain my concern over the 5% tax on "everyone richer than me".

Rather than starting from "we should exercise our power to tax the rich as a reaction to their success and to promote fairness", I start from "What services must the government provide the people?" then "How much will it cost to provide those services?" then once that is determined, figure out how to raise the needed revenue.

Tax revenue should not be raised to punish or correct for market distortions, but rather because it's needed to pay for an essential government service.

I believe, with very few exceptions, that the creation of wealth, even the concentration of great wealth in a few hands, represents evidence of a market success not a market failure. Those wealth creators mostly got there by providing something that many other people wanted and wanted so much that they parted with their own hard-earned money in exchange for the goods and services the wealth creators had on offer.

Similarly, when considering the role of government (such as when weighing a new program), I think it's better for society overall if the decision is made on a basis of "this newly proposed program is so beneficial/essential that everyone would be willing to pay some part of the cost of it" rather than "I'm willing to support this program that benefits me because I know that only other people are going to be paying for it."

So, yes, I'd be opposed to a tax presented with strong supporting evidence that that tax was motivated by raising incremental revenue under the justification/cover of "improving fairness".
> There is no logical basis for it. Or rather, any latticework of logic you erect to justify this choice is based on a foundation that has nothing to do with reason.

Any formal system is going to be based upon some set of axioms. You can't apply reason without some foundational choices (ie. your axioms).

The bright line you are looking for is a lot fuzzier than it seems at first glance.

If you take as axiomatic that "the human race surviving is a good thing we should work towards". Having kids becomes an exceptionally rational thing for people to do.
As a wise man once said, good ideas do not need a lot of lies told about them to be convincing.

Also, who is "everyone"? Whose culture is "cultural"? Which religion is the "religious framework"? The problem with the 1950s white patriachal evangelical Christian version of America is the huge bunch of people it didn't work for, who got counted out of "everyone".
They don't, that's my point. I can find only one library for this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.05343
If it's chemically-based, maybe it can be induced.

I wonder - and I'm being serious here, although this could certainly be a terrible idea for various reasons - what would happen if, say, a low dose of MDMA or similar were administered to new parents when they first began bonding with their child. Surely a spike of serotonin and oxytocin plays a role in the physiology of parental attachment? Perhaps guaranteeing such a spike could have significant long-term effects by helping to cement this bond?
> Yes, and they wear out and must be replaced.

Doesn't everything? Some production fuel cells have a service life of >50000 hrs. That's way more than you can expect out of batteries.
I still like my Model S quite a bit, but Tesla cars have always looked a little dorky to me, models S, 3, or X (I'm not sure how I feel about the Cybertruck just yet). I certainly didn't get mine for the look. They sure look much better than the i3 or Mirai though.
It's true of a lot of ancient sites; Newgrange in Ireland is essentially a modern reconstruction, complete with a reinforced concrete substructure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newgrange#Modern_conservation,...
"Partly, and I won't deny it, this is because of serious chemical changes that happened almost instantly when our first child was born. It was like someone flipped a switch. I suddenly felt protective not just toward our child, but toward all children."

This, almost exactly, happened to me. I wasn't interested in babies, and then suddenly my newborn baby in particular and babies in general were amazing and precious.
I don't know enough about the process to make comparisons, but NuScale currently expects to be producing grid power in 2026. Nothing against Terrestrial Energy or molten salt reactors which is certainly an interesting tech. NuScale is about as boring as all get-out and might face fewer regulatory hurdles, but it might also have a harder time competing against better tech.
I'm in my 30s and much more selfish than I was in my 20s. Everybody is different.
Is there with lithium batteries? Storing large amounts of energy is inherently dangerous.
In Development – RetroArch Angle Support – OpenGL Support for UWP and More
Everything you listed is already highly represented when it comes to Canada. Let the rest of the country have a second of attention and you might discover why they despise urbanites so much. Toronto, Calgary, and Vancouver already have enough attention as it is. Not everything has to be about them.
I'm not sure how this would work in practice. Many sites allow infrequent visitors to view content free of registration and charge; or have specific articles which do not require registration. Sites which require registration might work in reader mode, or with javascript disabled, or with some components not loaded. For these reasons and more a submitter may not know whether registration is required.

In this particular instance, without your post I never would have known registration is required. Because, by whatever mechanism, I can read the entire article.
I'm not knocking Paul Graham or anyone who did well for themselves. But comparing your experience with that of Paul Graham, one of the richest people on the planet, is pointless. The wealthy live on a completely different PLANET than you or me.

Of course he enjoys having kids, he has NONE of the stress of supporting himself and his family.

His kids are going to have private tutors and house cleaners.

He won't sweat the cost of daycare. He will never have to worry about paying for college.

He is going to have a nanny whenever he needs someone to watch the kids.

He will never have to worry about making rent for the rest of his life.

He will still be able to pursue whatever he dreams of with basically 0 risk.
DynamoDB under the hood
I don't like kids. I don't want kids. I'm 46 and single and I don't want to date someone with kids. It drastically reduces my dating pool but I'm willing to live with that.

There are enough people on earth as it is. I don't feel like I need to increase that number.
It might surprise you to learn that gasoline-fueled cars do not usually explode in collisions despite gasoline being far more volatile than hydrogen.
Company goals, and $5, will get you a mocha grande at Starbucks.

None of those have any real chance of being commercial viable. The tokamak approaches, in particular, are both much larger than, and much more complex than, a fission reactor of equal power output. Yes, they are more cost effective than ITER. Only 40x lower power density vs. 400x lower. Yay?
* less productive
* less time for your ideas
* less ambitious

These points may or may not be true depending over what timeframe you measure.

If it’s your own lifetime, sure. If you measure your productivity over the next 300 years as what you plus your transitive offspring accomplish, it’s possible having kids is a huge boost to your aggregated productivity.
Shift in Earth’s magnetic north throws navigators off course
How cool! I remember Mozilla announced some work on improving text rendering under 3D transformations, do you think that could be integrated? https://github.com/servo/pathfinder
I always assumed they made their experimental cars ugly so people would notice them and talk about them.
I remember in another thread here on HN an engineer chimed in and said it is Cassandrs.
If the script is accessible to other people I suppose you have to worry about it being hacked, especially if you let php get out of date or take input in say password length?
Mid thirties.
It's more or less a tautology, because the most severe accident the reactor is thought to withstand is the design-basis event. AFAIK in the instances of Fukushima and Chernobyl/RBMK it was later thought that the design basis was simply incorrect.
Labor unions serve to protect workers from poor physical working conditions...and in some cases their fragile ego too???
Your responses read like I said "you never need a lawyer". I was suggesting caution before telling your employer you retained one, for this specific situation. I think you are mixing me up with someone else. Also, replying to someone with your opening word as "Nonsense" isn't constructive.
This is hacker news. I have read all about fun and have several years experience in it (I also have this in Haskell, Paul Graham and Material Design). These days I have moved on from having fun to telling my wife (we met through an algorithm) what she does wrong. Someday a comment on HN will make me very rich, somehow.
Guessing that it's English words is no harder than guessing that it's random uppercase/lowercase/numbers. So that part cancels out. Realistically you'd try all simple patterns in order of complexity. This makes cracking slower than knowing the pattern up front, but the password is already getting exponentially harder to crack every time it gets longer. The small factor of trying different simple patterns pales in comparison.

The attacker doesn't need to know how many words. They would try 1, then 2, then 3, etc.

Capitalization and tiny modifications are only worth a few bits. They can't get you anywhere near the quality of 32 random alphanumerics.

Your password example is a lot stronger. But even then I don't know if it's better than a full 32 random characters. That would mean every two characters in your password have more randomness than a completely random character with no patterns. That might be true.
I don't know about the moose...I encountered one up in Atikaki and, well, I wished I was anywhere but there (luckily he ignored me). Playing basketball with a moose is just foolish.
Can you elaborate? What exactly is wrong with parents talking to you about their kids? Kids are a big part of our lives. We're telling you about our life.

I think what you're saying is that you want us to be interested in different stuff, more along the lines of what you're interested in, because you're not interested in kids. That doesn't sound so much like a social problem to me as a simple personality mismatch.
The "last time Cliqz came up" can be found here: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu.... We have been posting multiple articles on our tech blog, explaining what we do and how we do it in great details. Your link points to an old thread of more than two years ago.

There were more recent discussions about Cliqz no latter than this month, in particular here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21676252

[disclaimer: I work at Cliqz]
Having kids don't automatically make you a better person. Anecdotally, most of the people I know are the same after having kids as they were before having kids. The only difference is that they're working an extra job.

The ones who coo and cuddle with their kids are those who would coo and cuddle any child they come into contact with. Those who are patient with their kids were patient before having children.

The chemical high from having a child doesn't necessarily change who you are. If anything, it simply amplifies existing traits by putting you through a high pressure, long-term project.

The biggest (positive) child-related change I've noticed? The sudden and prolonged surge of happiness when those children are out of the house. Everything else tends to be the effects of time blunting the worst of the negatives.

As a point of reference, I have no children of my own, but I had two teenage girls adopt me as their father. I spend several days a week tutoring and helping them. I get the high of watching them grow into themselves without having to live with them.
For sure. I wasn't intending to give life advice, just a personal account for younger folks who regret/are afraid of parenting. It's easy to change without realizing when it happened!
As I said in another comment with some napkin calculations is about 30%. Another user gave a 22% number compared to 73% for batteries. The difference is hugely in favour of batteries.
Actually, this is obvious. Voter votes for person who says they will do X. Voter doesn't understand the implications of X. Person gets elected, does X, fallout ensues. Voter now complaining about the consequences. This is a very obvious factual observation of voters voting against their own interests. It's not something up for debate.
This nicely shows that they don't need more surveillance. A simple honey trap appears to fill up like a bug zapper tray in Mississippi in July.

No dark web, no Hollywood hacker shit. Just go on social media and pretend to be a pretty underage girl and fish meet barrel. These days you could automate this with a good adversarial neural net (including image generation!) that would engage predators and let them incriminate themselves.

The authorities don't do this because they don't really care. Child abuse is a political dog whistle but it's not a real priority. As with many child care issues there is an unspoken classism at work too: that only happens to the children of less responsible lower class people (which is false).
They have had a personal bone to pick with the Go team for a while as a result of some of their marketing language around low-latency GC designs. It sounds to me like their personal work focuses on high-throughput designs, and an increasing industry emphasis on low latency threatens that.
The article was written back in August, so are we already seeing the higher prices?
To get involved in these biohacker projects check out:

BioCurious (Santa Clara) http://biocurious.org/

Counter Culture Labs (Oakland): https://www.counterculturelabs.org/
For a total efficiency of 22%...
Having skimmed the article, I'm increasingly convinced that the perpetrators of this sort of online "grooming" are largely sociopaths/psychopaths/dark triad personalities. The whole M.O. seems to fit that characterization quite closely, AFAICT. It's very helpful to have these chat logs to look at even though they're so disturbing, it lets us know more about what makes these folks tick and how they arrange their predatory activities.
Europe probably isn’t the target market from what I understand many more people drive pickups in North America than Europe?
Yeah. As babies they're not terribly interesting. Around 1 years old they're at about my level.
In the last write wins mechanism if two writes (V1 and V2) happen concurrently to different replicas why is V2 considered the last write in the article.

Reading the explanation and lead up, i was left with the impression that the last updates to each column (for a columnar store like Cassandra) would take effect so the final would be

{"street" : "Cubbon", "city" : "Bombay"}
Indeed. I actually ordered it just now.
As for variously damaged boxes in transit, there are two reasons:

1) many logistics processes (even inside e-retail companies) are designed around packaging that should survive being sent through normal post/package service (ie. "fragile" means "may not survive fall from 3 means, but should survive fall from 1 meters", "this way up" markings are ignored, etc.) and not around generally more fragile retail-level single item packages.

2) Even if retailer repacks the products into reasonably sturdy transport packaging, often there is either insufficient (usually due to operator error/inexperience) or outright none (in some cases by design of the process) inner padding.

This comes from the fact that packing everything completely correctly is expensive, both financially and in terms of the environmental cost (all the packaging material will be thrown away, period) so it tends to done in terms of experience with how bad the packaging can be before the amount of returns due to shipping damage out-weights the savings in packaging costs.
At Starbucks in Taiwan, it is commonplace for customers to bring their own bottle for a refill (the bottle is also sold by starbucks). Customers are entitled to a discount. Same thing at 7/11 and many cafes.
I don't know much about costs, but papers like this make me pretty giddy at the prospect of supercapacitor-only cars.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6409971/#sec1-n...

That energy density is at least as high as current generation lithium ion, which is obviously already feasible for production cars.
It's basically two worlds:

People who have kids (and people who really want kids) and people who don't (and people who don't want). They can't understand each other and most of one camp think the other camp dull and crazy.

It's just pov, and yeah, I keep distances from people with kids when the kids are around, because very possible they will leave their kids to me to gain a couple of hours to themselves.
They do, they specifically select it to get paid for their articles.
> What happened in 2008 that might call into doubt Labour’s management of the economy?

The blowup of Lehman Brothers (US investment bank), ABN Ambro (Dutch bank recently acquired by RBS), Northern Rock (overextended British building society), Kaupthing (Iceland), and Anglo-Irish (despite the name, entirely Irish)? Yes, I'm sure that's all the fault of the Labour government.
That's awesome. It would be cool to somehow automate the shaking of the box, taking a picture and making a SHA hash.
It's hard not to talk about the most dominant thing in your life, and only a few people have the skill of being genuinely interested in the priorities of other people.

Some people are boring about their hobbies, some are boring about people, some are boring about work, some are boring about their kids.

If you find the conversation boring just remember they are probably just as bored at you droning on about blockchain or whatever it is you are keen to talk about.
I have to imagine that a large part of the interest in fuel cells comes from its defense applications (particularly for submarines). It's been clear for years that for cars it's a total dead end.
You provided no such thing, the professions you mention are not part of the top 25 let alone 8, so there is nothing to respond to in your comments