skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I am an engineer this was not a personal attack. Most people are not qualified and will never be rated to work on their own aircraft, in the same way they are not qualified to structurally engineer their homes or similar. Aircraft are not software projects and it's not really about php vs bugfixing.

Please identify which part of the post was a personal attack so I can fix it to your satisfaction
> It is not psychologically reasonable to expect one person to care for children all day every day [...] It is normal for children to be cared for by many adults throughout the day

I'd argue having the child away from parents so often is harmful as well. Financials aside, that middle ground somewhat exists: stay at home parents that still leverage social environments for their kids. I too don't know how we can get everyone there, but the first step should be recognizing that a non-working parent doesn't have to be an isolated parent.
Temperate climate is a bit of a stretch. Maybe “not as bad as Houston.” But, yeah, Austin has a lot going for it relative to a lot of other cities in that general area of the country.
This was the Setun (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Setun), developed at Moscow State University.
Sorry to hear that! Taste improve faster than ability, so when learning a creative subject there will be a stretch where it feels like your stuff is getting worse rather than better.
95-99.9% of the population lived in sustenance or worse from the beginning of time until the Industrial Revolution in England in the 1800s.

And outside of the US Post WW2 -- from the 50s to the late 80s -- no where else on Earth could one working low skilled person afford such a high quality of life.

If you consider farmers in the 1890s as living outside of sustenance, I guess to each their own. But they worked 7 days a week, basically 12 hours a day, including their entire family, just to afford basic accomodations and food and almost literally nothing else. This is staunchly different to what an autoworker at Ford or a Steal worker at United Steal or a salesperson at IBM could afford from the 50s to the late 80s.

Compare that to now, a person working at Ford trying to raise a family of four on his/her own can pretty much only afford sustenance again.
Local cache would definitely be the (easiest) way of solving it. Tools like Memex [0] are most of the way there.

But a text-only copy on my local device isn't great if the content had special formatting in presentation. Also, it misses out on images or embedded videos. That's where something like ArchiveBox [1] comes in.

> ArchiveBox takes a list of website URLs you want to archive, and creates a local, static, browsable HTML clone of the content from those websites (it saves HTML, JS, media files, PDFs, images and more).

But really what I'd like to see at some point is an opt-in community tool where every page I visit that fits a certain criteria (URL, topic, special mark by me, etc) is fully cloned and uploaded to IPFS [2] for anyone interested in that topic to find and use later - regardless of what happens to the source content. Definitely a host of legal issues around this, but not impossible.

0 - https://worldbrain.io/

1 - https://github.com/pirate/ArchiveBox

2 - https://ipfs.io/
No. TLS certificates have nothing to do with domain ownership or the businesses providing services behind them. Anyone can buy and transfer certificates. Besides there are actual business contracts in place so there's no need for such tenuous connections over domain names in the first place.

As for your disagreement, what's your basis for claiming that publishers can build, operate, and scale their own adtech infrastructure and salesforce?
Where can I read more about how you came up with those numbers? I didn't knew that side of lightning.
I think you are mixing a bunch of unrelated stuff together in some kind of attempt to bash "modern feminism"

I can agree there is a lot of societal pressure to enroll your little kiddo into a bagillion silly programs and stuff, but that hardly has anything to do with childcare costs or feminism.
It's funny you should mention GDP, because childcare is one of the iconic well-known examples of why it can be a misleading measure. If person A is paid to care for person B's kids whilst they work, that results in higher GDP than if person B cares for their own kids and person A takes the job instead, even though exactly the same amount is being done, because caring for those kids is no longer a service that counts towards GDP under the latter scenario.
> Taking care of your own kids is much more rewarding than going to work. If work is better it's because the job is great, not because the kids are annoying.

Be careful; you're stating as fact something that is incredibly subjective.

Regardless, "taking care of your own kids" encompasses a lot of things that are not at all like one another. Teaching a kid how to do math: rewarding. Cleaning up after your kid accidentally dumps paint onto the carpet: tedious and frustrating. In part, kids are noisy, disobedient, stinky little things (as well as many other things, some of them not so negative), and I would not consider dealing with that aspect of them at all fun.

(Your opinion on all that might differ, which is kinda the point I'm trying to make here.)
No, it's also a sport event.
It's not the class of materials but the class of problems.

"Good enough for real world existing programs" and "best possible for a specific problem" produce very different designs.
You're being downvoted because it seems you didn't bother reading it. This is the strongest action they can take. Both Russia and the implicated athletes should be punished.
Bitcoin attracts three different niche markets:

- Crypto enthusiasts who are infatuated with the technology or the math involved

- Anti-Fed Libertarian types who want to use something that isn't controlled by a government

- HFTs and speculators who either use it in part of their models or as a pump and dump vehicle

Some people also use it to buy illegal stuff, but most of them have moved onto Monero as the primary privacy-based cryptocurrency.
Crypto Exchange LedgerX Places Twitter-Raging CEO Chou on Leave
That’s a problematic definition of in the workforce- in the US 32-47% of people filing tax returns have 0 or negative income tax liability. Paying payroll taxes might be a better definition. Regardless, accounting for value provided in “gray market” untaxed like child rearing, in home work, and volunteer work is very hard and subject to a lot of assumptions in economic models. It’s not a complete strawman argument to worry about it when discussing ROI.

Theoretically, we should just grant parents a tax exempt voucher per child every month that is exchangeable for cash or daycare at equivalent rates. That way you aren’t disincentivizing stay at home parents or other familial care (like grandparents or shared part time parenting).
> "Dude, I'm from Montana, this is considered LUSH"

Good old prarie grass, green after it rains in June. Don't put a flame near or you'll start a wild fire brown the rest of the summer.
Comparing raising children to receiving healthcare is absurd. Raising children is an instinct that's hardwired in each of us. Administering healthcare as we do today is a modern technical skill specific to a particular time and place.

Regarding your last comment about people not having kids because it's too expensive, while that may be a popular thing to say it's 100% false. As individuals and societies become wealthier they have fewer kids not more. The poorest places have the highest birth rates and that's true both within and and between countries. People are free to have as many or as few kids as they like, but it's silly to argue that money is a barrier when we are living in the wealthiest era in human history. Why are people having fewer kids? Who knows, but my guess is that it probably has something to do with historically high levels of access to birth reliable birth control and the decreased importance that most folks place on having large families. Those aren't necessarily bad things, they're just historical outliers.
I mean, one thing that seems missing from this analysis is that a lot of these titles really wouldn't generate much revenue.

iTunes do not actually want to bother spending money ingesting files et al on films that do not sell, and you have to sell a non-zero amount before you're not making a loss.

It mentions rights are a solvable problem, but solvable by who, and who will pay for it?
> Child-care is subsidized. A child who would otherwise have been raised by a loving parent is raised by minimum wage daycare workers who don't care about the child.

You are assuming massive incompetence on the part of child care workers with no prior evidence. At scale of course saving lives will result in the life of a future criminal being saved, but on the whole the # of good people outweighs the number of bad people, thus why society continues to, however slowly, lurch forwards.

In comparison to unknown potential future murders, there are known numbers for how many woman leave the workforce after having kids, 30% of women with bachelors degrees, and 19% with a Masters or PhD. [1]

19% of women with a post graduate degree is huge. How many millions of dollars of investment in education is that? If someone wants to leave work then of course they should be allowed, but if they don't and feel they are forced to? That sucks, and it is a net loss for society.

[1]https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/09/the-number-of-women...
> Jobs were never guaranteed in the US. If you were worth more, you still needed the salesmanship to convince an employer that you were worth it.

Right, but from the thread for this post it seems like it’s much harder to even get to the point where you can talk to an employer, and instead you won’t even be able to pass the set of hard requirements that seemingly didn’t exist a couple decades ago. And that just makes it hard for people to really show what they’re good at. (Personal anecdote: I think every job I’ve had has little to do with what I’m actually good at, because I’ve found it hard to sell that sort of thing convincingly on a resume. So I never meet the people who’d be able to judge me appropriately in those topics.)
I hypothesize what was really missing to make the transputer successful was a language/compile-target to express propagators: https://youtu.be/nY1BCv3xn24

We are starting to see languages that could leverage such an architecture:
* http://minikanren.org/
* https://cuelang.org/
* https://github.com/ekmett/guanxi

Is there an algebraic logic strongly associated with what we conventionally think of as types (see https://cuelang.org/docs/concepts/logic/) which we can effectively and efficiently compute unions and Boolean satisfiability?
This is exactly what the Russian government would want you to do with this: question everything and everyone. You seem to at least admit that you were unable to verify some outrageous claims that the US has planted evidence against Russia. It has been proven time and time again that Russia doesn't shy away from systematically cheating in major sport competitions. This entirely adds up with my experience growing up there: status and perceived image have always ranked higher than truthfulness or honesty in Russian culture.

Also, based on your comment history, I'm not necessarily doubting your truthfulness but you do seem to be pushing a focussed agenda in your comments.
> Why would you be OK with any kind of disincentive to parents staying home with their children?

I'm just recognizing the realities of incentivizing anything. There's a difference between a work requirement for both parents and attendance requirement for children and maybe, in some cases, a portion of your income tax would go to a program you don't take advantage of.

> You don't have to dump your children off to be raised by minimum wage daycare workers in order to put them in a group setting.

Where did I say this should be mandatory or that full-time childcare was the best and only option? You're grossly mischaracterizing my position here and the realities of daycare. Part of the reason daycare is expensive, as mentioned in the article, is because of the regulations in place around the environment and staff. I've found group daycare staff are often more qualified than individual nannies.

I would love to see studies because the issues I've seen caught and missed are all anecdotal and do involve tight-knit communities--which not everybody has. The situations I've seen caught did not "rely on the judgment and interest of minimum wage daycare workers" but were done through communication. After discussing an issue between the daycare and parent it would be presented to a pediatrician or other specialist to see if intervention was needed.

> you and your friends and family members can observe the behavior yourselves

Kids act very differently when around primary caretakers and others. Like I said, part of something like daycare would be communicating what you've observed and what they've observed. A select few motivated parents read books and seek out information (often only for their first child), I see a lot of "bad advice" from previous generations. One thing I've seen come up a lot is older generations either don't know, or dismiss, "back to sleep" as a way to minimize SIDS. I also notice that knowledge about children atrophies very quickly. I constantly have to give milestones for my kid; birth weight, when they rolled over, crawled, walked, first word, first sentence. As years pass I have a rougher idea about what's normal and completely forgot about more minor milestones like; parallel play, object permanence, when pronouns should be understood, etc. even when I'm close to other families kids hitting those milestones.
Better link: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21747817
"Not much of a cheese shop, is it?"
Why not introduce a new layout rule? `text-align: tex-justify `
Tell me, which kind of cars or manufacture would we like to give you money for? Fuck off.
Your proposed tradeoff space are not the only two options.

As a ‘third way’, you can match ads to real content, and have audience interests and advertiser interests aligned.

Folks who try this, find it works, in some cases only a percentage point or two worse than high end retargeting, and in most cases, better than retargeting when sold by third party or retargeting across run of site.

EDIT: CPC (cost-per-click) and CPM (cost-per-thousand impressions) are both fine when matching ads and content. For instance, the ‘affiliate link’ business is predicated on the idea that inline clicks on products mentioned in content are so valuable as to be individually worth a piece of the actual sale.
Eh, at work I either have to assign them pre-approved MAC addresses or get approval for VM MACs, or just use pretend my PC is a router and all VMs get a 100...* IP (10...* is used for the network already).
F# Suave App on Dotnet Core on Kubernetes on Google Cloud
I don't know about google search results, which I wouldn't trust for something like this. But I just logged back into indeed, searched 'new graduate software engineer' and the vast majority, as in nearly every ad, was a thinly veiled recruiter ad, or an internship, or was an irrelevant result; 7+ years experience required in the first 3 results and many more in successive results. This has been my experience on similar job boards.
This is pretty standard. Google Groups bans me whenever I open too many tabs at once. It's annoying, but these big corps don't have any inclination to support user behavior other than standard, especially when closing down a product. I think the blocking bit is sensationalizing it a bit more than is the reality. The site policies and design intentionally prevent joining a group just to download everything, it's not an intentional blocking of a group or action beyond the default behavior of enforcing the TOS.
There are a few possibilities in that situation:

(1) The engineers are not actually all leaving - it may feel like that, but maybe it's cheaper to hire a bunch of junior devs and filter out anyone that doesn't buy the loyalty bullshit and isn't content with 3% annual raises

(2) They don't need decent or senior engineers, hiring and managing cheaper juniors is effective enough and cheaper

(1) HR/Management are incompetent and the business is doomed to failure
The original question made this mistake probably because the poster didn't know it but Pathom is the actual alternative to GraphQL-based APIs.
Datalog solves a subtly different problem of querying the data, while Pathom/GraphQL/REST is about exposing the data (interfacing?) as API.

It's more like:

Pathom vs GraphQL-based API (vs REST)

and

Datalog vs SQL (vs NoSQL)

The mainstream is in the process of migrating from REST to GraphQL, but I think Pathom could be the black horse in this race.
Just watch the last part of Wilker Silva's The Maximal Graph talk to see the potential:
https://youtu.be/IS3i3DTUnAI?t=2080
C’s a dumb language that we need to rid ourselves of. Just let it go, times have changed.
You don’t need a liberal arts degree for that.

Math? Yes

Physics? Yes

CS? Maybe

Cogito ergo sum? Hell no.
The seamntics of ! is stable as far as I know. It being retconned into the Never type is the unstable bit.
I guess that the usual "model" was a bit too weird for a layman?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin-%C2%BD
At work we had a daily script that took about 30 minutes to run, and about 3 hours on the weekend due to more data. One day we got a report that a downstream service was missing SLA because the script wasn't finishing. I'd come onto the team late so wasn't aware this was abnormal.

It turns out it was now taking about 1-2 hours daily and 6-12 hours on the weekend depending on data size. This had been going on for months but gradually getting worse as the data grew, to the point it was unbearable so finally reported.

A senior programmer had removed the shell call to sort on an indexed text file and written their own ad-hoc sorter through every fresh programmer's favourite (you guessed it) bubble sort. To make things worse, this was perl which has a perfectly functional sort itself if you really have to do it that way. I still have no idea why this was done, I don't think asking would have been productive in that place at that time.
Absolutely not.

“Worse is better” applies on all levels: microarchitectures, ISAs, operating systems, applications, languages, computing paradigms, etc. Once Moore’s law is truly over, we will be forced to make some real progress in areas other than shrinking silicon features.
Don't use a work computer for any personal or side projects. Otherwise the employer may be able to claim copyright ownership over the work.
I think there are a lot of crappy attitudes around both child care and elder care, but I reject the notion that a child has an obligation to care for their parents. Children don't choose to be born, and any parent that chooses to have kids in part because they want someone to take care of them when they get old is incredibly selfish.
Storing DNA data in common inanimate objects
Why is ternary better? I haven't heard this argued before?
Besides committing crimes (pirating content, fraud, etc) and doing questionable things (such as accessing porn), I would refrain from creating anything using my work computer (such as a web app, mobile app, blog). It is very common for companies to add clauses that says that anything you produce using their equipment is their IP.
Hahahahaha a WSJ article. Fuck you.
“Non-compete agreements are automatically void as a matter of law in California, except for a small set of specific situations expressly authorized by statute.“

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clause#California

Apple has no legal case, but just wants to punish him.
I don't know why people are stuck on this model of a long chain/log of successive schema changes when you can simply make a diff.

I lay out this approach here: https://djrobstep.com/talks/your-migrations-are-bad-and-you-...
Serial Experiments Lain is another SF work that makes little to no sense today, though the time between its release and obsolescence was much shorter (10 years later it already seemed quaint).
That is wrong, because quadratic means that the variable is in the base, while exponential will tell you, that the variable is in the exponent (just as the name tells).
This is a weird comment that, in my experience, doesn't represent the reality of today's stay-at-home parents. I'd love to see hard data on this, but let me share my anecdotes in response to the middle paragraph here. My older sister has been a stay at home mother for almost a decade, so I'll share my observations from being an uncle:

> It is normal for children to be cared for by many adults throughout the day, from birth - be they older relatives or simply members of the community.

My sister engages in a community of stay-at-home parents and homeschooling parents (there is a lot of overlap and she also homeschools) to provide her children with socialization and to also share the burden of parenting all the small ones.

By contrast, in daycare, where my sister and mother both worked professionally at different times, it is common for adults to be split between many children, usually as many as seven or eight per adult (by regulation).

> It is abnormal for one person to have to deal with all of their energy and issues.

See above

> It is normal for children to wander and play and experience a wide and varied world. It is abnormal for them to be kept in a small, unchanging indoor space.

Funny that this is an example! Many daycares are inside only or maybe have a small playground. By the time the child is 5, they're expected to sit still in actual school all day! My nephew and nieces get the pleasure of participating in something called "Forest School" where they're able to socialize with other children their age and learn about nature, shockingly, outside in nature. They're also always allowed in the backyard and have friends in their neighborhood as well. So actually from what I've seen, homeschooled kids and kids with a stay at home parent actually get _more_ outside time. It's the poor kids in day care and school that don't get to go outside.

> It is normal for new parents, especially new mothers, to be intensely supported by their community. It is abnormal for them to be left alone unsupported. It is normal for homemakers to accomplish their daily tasks communally and to be active in their communities. It is abnormal for them to endure years of social isolation, primarily spending time with their children.

Again, see above. Maybe this varies a lot by locale, but here in Texas, none of your criticisms actually apply to the community of stay at home moms and homeschoolers that I have observed in my community.
I am all for bans for crooked behavior, just please do it evenly - how about famous asthmatic Norwegians, Carl Lewis vs Ben Johnson doping cases or Team Sky in cycling? It just makes the whole decision politically-colored instead of pure science/fairness-based. I find it weird when other national agencies do some ugly workarounds as well but nobody bothers... Funny that even F1 driver Kvyat who lived since his childhood in Italy might be banned... It resembles 1980/1984 Olympics-level idiocy.
Recent Books on Dinosaurs
It has been reliably demonstrated for decades that conservative poor states receive more national (federal) dollars than they pay in to the system. Wealthy states like California and New York recieve less than 95% of the funds they put in. The NASA campus in Huntsville, Alabama was put there for no other reason than to funnel national dollars into the state for decades. Johnston Space Center (i.e. Mission Control for Apollo/Moon, ISS etc) in Houston, until SpaceX built their spaceport in Texas, was built over a thousand miles from the nearest rocket launch pad for similar reasons. Just one example.
Don’t take it anywhere you’re enjoying yourself.