skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In regular chess it's incidental. It only comes up in relation to the touch-move rule and similar rules. And even there it's given special treatment: if you touch your king, then your rook, you must castle on that side if it's legal, instead of making any other legal king move.

In this variant, whether castling is considered a king move or a rook move or both has an effect on which moves are legal, so it needs to be spelt out.
This is way overblown. They have at least a Hololens equivalent, and if you value occlusion, they're ahead. And that's without Microsoft's reach. Equating them to vaporware isn't fair at all.
How many real alternatives exist, though? DuckDuckGo is based on Bing, afaik.

So there are Google and Bing - any others?
Are you kidding? Twitter is a tech company with a great brand and a monopoly platform that has a stock that performs like a mall chain. The rate of product change is so slow. There are so many opportunities for growth that are not advertising.

Seriously, if you can't push out a CEO for under-performance in this case, when can you.
They are trying to get money out of me. Their was a legitimate claim between them and I regarding some minor damage to the property and I paid them in full for that damage which I took full responsibility for upfront. I could provide proof of the issue and the payment for damages in private.

They are now trying to accuse me of other severe damage on the property that did not occur during my stay and milk extra money on me and using this as leverage.

Regardless of all of that, posting my passport scan to a public forum is not appropriate and is against facebook's terms of service and there should be a way to get it removed.
Bat price rises 4% as Brave crosses 10M monthly users – Decrypt
The Road to Valhalla
Autotools Mythbuster (2017)
I strongly suspect $2300 was at or below their breakeven cost, even not including amortization of R&D, NRE, or CapEx. They are presumably well aware that building a platform dependent on applications requires network effects that can only come into play if you have a large install base of units. I don't imagine they attempted to sell the hardware at a profit, which would work against that.

As other commenters have noted though, the problem is not so much the price as not having a real target use case or audience. Hololens is similarly expensive, but Microsoft cleverly did a late pivot before launching the first one to an audience that actually had a need for it.
Apple to Launch Completely Wireless iPhone Without Lightning Connector
Your estimate is off by almost an order of magnitude. 100g is not 10% of a person's weight. Maybe you meant 10% of calories.

Also, look at the comparison. It is seaweed! Wouldn't
you expect that eating 10% of your weight in seaweed changes a microbiome? It is a massively different food than what we (or mice) typically eat - thus the microbiome has to adapt. I am not saying the discovery is not important - it is the right question, set up correctly.

Compare that to a human eating two slices of different breads for a week. The differences between bread are too subtle. The amount ingested is too little, the time is too short. Your microbiome is already set up for digesting bread. That's all I am saying -

I will stick to my story that there is very little chance that this would ever be sufficient to detect any change.
Replacing with _who_ though? Twitter is not going to be another Facebook or Google no matter who runs it - there's really no meat on the bones there, Jack knows that. And it could get much, much worse if motivated entirely by profit.
Users throw a huge fit any time the slightest thing changes on twitter
No results show up. Is the queue working atm?
This might actually be a great direction to go.

I don't think there's any particular reason that WASM has to be more obfuscated than JS. You can already throw a WASM file into a bytecode-to-text translator which is about as useful as deobfuscating a minified JS file, and I assume decompiling/debugging tools will only get better in the future.

For a long time now, I've been thinking of a future where your OS properly isolates all the programs that run on it and even gives us the ability to have direct control over how programs interact with the rest of the system. OS's seem too mired in backwards-compatibility requirements to make big changes like that any time soon, but that's basically the way our browsers already work. Download some code, and execute it (relatively) safely because it's sandboxed from the rest of the system. Our browsers are basically the new OS, and this time around we can do it right using what we learned from OS's (and hopefully backport these browser features into the next generation of OS's).

For example, an app asks for a filesystem handle. You can hand it one that refers to a real location on your OS fs, or you can hand it a completely virtual fs that won't affect anything else on the system.

Whenever an app asks for a resource, being able to hand it a virtual or sandboxed one instead is a huge gain for user-control.
In theory a lot of this funding should've been spent securing sales so they wouldn't be producing the items on a bespoke scale but instead would've been able to get the cost per unit down. I'm sort of amazed at the funding this has received when it seems to be performing like an underwhelming kickstarter.
That's not Seattle, that's everywhere. I lived in seven states and can't think of a town where the cops would do anything other than write down a report for your insurance. They for sure aren't going to investigate anything, even if you say "it's this guy, at this address, with these car plates. My camera has it all recorded"
Right, which is why punishment for thieves needs to go far beyond just “arresting” them.
Cookies aren't inherently against GDPR if they're used explicitly for necessary site functionality—you don't even need to tell users about them in that case.

What's not allowed is user tracking.
The problem is that it doesn't work, it's bad. You can make a bad product with a company with a "valuation" in the billions, we need to start to understand that. And there's good alternatives to the product that actually do work better at a similar price point.

This is not a "product market fit" problem, this is bad tech being pushed down the pipes until it makes it out of a fucked up company.
Both in UK. 32A ring mains at 240V powering sockets up to 13A each. https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Book/6.3.3.htm
To flip that around, their customer acquisition costs for online orders is probably lower, and their customer retention for online orders could be higher too.
I am currently nowhere near your level. I am still a rank and file developers.

Also I am not that interested in management track. If I can I want to be on technical track. It is harder to do as I get older.
Galloway is trying to cash in on his cred from having a pulse and noticing the huge gaping goatse financial wreckage that is WeWork

What a thought bleeder
This partially comes from the SV all-or-nothing attitude: you can have AR on all the time (and thus revenue stream all the time), but you can't do that with VR.
To elaborate on what others have said (editors), Emacs' auto-indentation of lisp is _phenomenal_, even if you're not using "paredit". You basically can press tab on any line, and it will be indented to the Right Place. It quickly gets relatively easy to correlate indentation depth to how many parens you need to close your s-expression.
The design goals of WebAssembly are the following:

Fast, safe, and portable semantics:

* Fast: executes with near native code performance, taking advantage of capabilities common to all contemporary hardware.

* Safe: code is validated and executes in a memory-safe [2], sandboxed environment preventing data corruption or security breaches.

* Well-defined: fully and precisely defines valid programs and their behavior in a way that is easy to reason about informally and formally.

* Hardware-independent: can be compiled on all modern architectures, desktop or mobile devices and embedded systems alike.

* Language-independent: does not privilege any particular language, programming model, or object model.

* Platform-independent: can be embedded in browsers, run as a stand-alone VM, or integrated in other environments.

* Open: programs can interoperate with their environment in a simple and universal manner.

Efficient and portable representation:

* Compact: has a binary format that is fast to transmit by being smaller than typical text or native code formats.

* Modular: programs can be split up in smaller parts that can be transmitted, cached, and consumed separately.

* Efficient: can be decoded, validated, and compiled in a fast single pass, equally with either just-in-time (JIT) or ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation.

* Streamable: allows decoding, validation, and compilation to begin as soon as possible, before all data has been seen.

* Parallelizable: allows decoding, validation, and compilation to be split into many independent parallel tasks.

* Portable: makes no architectural assumptions that are not broadly supported across modern hardware.

If webassembly is truly able to meet this goals, together with good debugging and tools, it will become the the universal way to represent computation across devices and platforms.

Really cool.
That seems pretty likely to fail. How often does that actually result in positive gains?
Why not? Left to their own devices they couldn’t afford to pay their employees anything.

The mom and pop shop can’t get millions of dollars thrown at them because they “pattern match” what a successful founder “looks like” without a business plan. They actually have to be profitable.
How do search engines stay out of trouble with things like copyright trolls and FBI-operated honeypots for child porn? If I had a private Web crawler, I'd be terrified to run it.
The PLC/DCS/SCADA world hasn't really caught up to modern open-source software in a lot of cultural ways.

That may be a feature. Otherwise you get a Raspberry Pi, with enough attack surface to drive a semi through, to control a pressure regulator.
That's a great example of an over-complex pattern. The yield sign is awful--hard to even tell whether it's for the cars or the bicycles.

Here's what worked for me, over thousands of miles of cycling back before bike lanes, etc.:

1. I rode as far right as I safely could, typically on the white line or a foot away from the curb, and always with the flow of traffic.

2. I was careful to ride in a straight line, following a completely predictable path.

3. I had a glasses-mounted rear-view mirror and kept an eye on traffic coming up behind. I never needed to, but I was always ready to bail out to the right in a split second. Towards that end, kept my bike in top shape and practiced quick stops and counter-steering.

4. Never made left turns if vehicles were present. Instead, passed through the intersection, stopped on far side, dismounted, and lifted/turned bike 90 degrees.

5. Reflective gear day and night. Never rode in poor visibility (e.g., rain storm).

6. Most importantly, always yielded to all vehicular traffic all of the time. If a car could intersect my path, I just stopped and waited, unless I could make eye contact and it was clear that they saw me and intended to wait.

With that, never had a close call, nor even got honked at.

Now, you might say that that's not fair, or that you don't want to ride in such a wimpy style. I understand. But I think it's the only safe(-ish) way to ride on public streets.
That won't work here, nobody would buy software for this thing because it's really underwhelming.
it's a bit better than the hololens, but it's a much less slick piece of hardware.
Fugitive Indian guru establishes 'cosmic country off Ecuador'
Occlusion is cool and all but Microsoft ate their lunch.
It's not an intonation thing, the idiom is "Surely (conditionally true statement)?" and uppost was verbing for some reason
This would be really sensible especially giving the funding they've been floated - that said maybe their debtors are coming home to roost and they've been given pressure to avoid setting any more money on fire.
25 Arduino video tutorials for beginners
He's corrected the results (possibly even before I wrote the post you responded to this AM): they originally showed Intel at 2.8 IPC in the second table, they now show 2.1.

I measured 2.0, but I guess Daniel is using docker w/ a slightly different compiler version, so I think it the gap is sufficiently small that we can declare "close enough". I also measured quite different numbers for SKL (2.0) vs SKX (1.7), which is quite odd given the non-memory intensive behavior of the test: in that scenario, I'd expect SKL and SKX to perform identically.
ShipItWise: Why this Algorithm SaaS shut down
Also has almost twice the cap of Ford.
Except twitters DAU has been pretty steady at around 300-315 million since 2015.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/282087/number-of-monthly...
Have you used one?
Show HN: What Is Hiring?
Yes, I’m in a major population center. But whatever the case, a symmetric fiber connection would be a solid improvement over the nonsense coaxial situation we have now.
The units i've used have worked reasonably well. but nobody is paying $2300 for them.
Last year I decided to share my Arduino knowledge with brief video tutorials on YouTube. These tutorials include downloadable course material, part list and circuit schematics.

All these videos were in Dutch. A couple of months ago I figured that it would be useful to re-record them all in English (yeah, that is quite some work )

Now that I've done 25 tutorials I thought it was time to share https://arduino-tutorials.net with the world
The most telling tweet here IMO:

> lmao gofundme: help me sue Jeff Bezos
We have a button that opens their email client. This possibly wouldn't scale, but our usercount is not intended to get arbitrarily high. We then read those emails and respond to them
What's Inside SC Johnson Products
I sure hope so. As a developer for a language, we’re planning on creating a language server and debugger to make it easier for people to use our language.
Some of my clients use Zenefits and like it.
But didn't Twitter turn off the firehose of data to Google awhile ago? Therefore Google could benefit from the increase in data access to the thoughts/feelings of 300 million DAU.
Overlayed content is sharp enough, not great. Ghostly opacity. Biggest blocker by far is field of view vertically. Images outside the "screen" get badly cropped and look very unnatural.
I generally dislike when people jump in with their own projects or products, but your project is relevant, useful, in PHP which I use, well documented, and the OP hasn't actually posted a project (Show HN) but is asking for a market (Ask HN).

Thanks and good job!
Mainly Lafayette for me. Vermillionville has French speakers as well. There are a couple of French meetups in the Baton Rouge area as well.
And yet, that's what it says on the article.
> This isn't merely about access to guns--people in countries with few gun suicides also show a substantial gendered difference in success rate.

There are countries where women die by suicide more often than men.

You need to be careful with how you're defining a death by suicide too. Someone who shoots themself in the head is more likely to be counted as a death by suicide than someone who overdoses on prescription meds, because the intent is clearer.

> Another element is that someone who attempts suicide and fails is likely to attempt to commit suicide repeatedly.

This is incorrect. Some people do make multiple attempts, but plenty of people don't.
Verifiable Voting: A Primer
Even without any analysis it's quite clear what a company based in Beijing who censors everything on the party's whim is doing, though reading about the methods of fingerprinting was quite fun.
I write a lot of low level C++ network/disk stuff. I need minimal decoding costs and rely on the type system to catch message differences asap. The following is an example of an append only format that uses the sizeof as a kind of version.

In practice, not only is this infinitely faster performance-wise, but I find maintaining this is about the same amount of work as Protobufs or JSON but with less fussy tooling issues.

By using X macros or BOOST_FUSION for the struct definitions, you can infer the type definition of message fields and automatically write serializers for JSON, SQL, CSV, Python, or whatever schema format is your favourite. Unfortunately, all that macro/variadic magic is too verbose and fiddly for a hnews comment.

The important thing is that the drudgery of schema maintenance and conversion can be eliminated using C++'s (limited) reflection capabilities. Your code is the schema.

In WhateverMessages.h:

#pragma pack(1)

template<typename Message>
struct Header
{
uint32_t type = Message::MessageType;
uint16_t size = sizeof(Message);
};

struct Msg : Header<Msg>
{
static constexpr uint32_t MessageType = 'msg1'; // Can constexpr bswap this to appear correctly in GDB and hex dumps

uint32_t somedata;
char someText[32];
};
#pragma pop(pack)

In EventHandler.cpp:

void processMessage(const Msg& msg)
{
// Everything is type safe now, do real stuff
}

void processMessage(char* data, uint32_t len)
{
Header* hdr = reinterpret_cast<Header*>(data);
// should check the packet length is sufficient, return length processed, process multiple messages, etc
switch(hdr->type)
{
#define DISPATCH(m) case m ::MessageType: assert(hdr->size == sizeof(m) /*or warn, whatever */); \
processMessage(*reinterpret_cast<m*>(hdr)); break;
DISPATCH(Msg);
DISPATCH(OtherMsgDeprecated);
DISPATCH(OtherMsgButForRealThisTime);
#undef DISPATCH
default:
err("Unknown message type: %x (%s)\n", hdr->type, fourCCToString(hdr->type));
break;
}
}

Another important thing is that the raw binary is the first class format that requires no translation of any kind on x86-64 after the initial dynamic type inference in DISPATCH.

Python, JSON, SQL, etc are all slow anyways, so we can spend time massaging their serialization format afterwards.
When reading the story, I thought, "well of course that's the solution ...", but then couldn't recall ever learning it. I'm grateful that someone shared the name, as Wikipedia's explanation is surprisingly clear:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_detection#Floyd's_Tortoi...
Media Jobs Show Highest Attrition Levels Since 2008
Am I the only one disappointed this wasn't about someone refurbishing the Dardanelles Gun?
Examples like that still exist: AMD popcnt throughput is 4x Intel's, for example (4/cycle vs 1).
Innovation as the process of literally inventing time itself
Canonical Makes Ubuntu for Windows SubSystem for Linux a Priority
It depends on your definitions. You don't need a headset for pretty interesting AR. If I could just point a phone at things and get genuinely useful information as an overlay, I'd consider that a pretty decent AR application. Sure, the same thing in a pair of stylish glasses might be even better but it's not strictly necessary.
Hi Chris, I would like to get in touch with you if possible and if interested, what would be the best way? tried to pm but didn't see the option :)

got something on my mind and you might be of help
Good. Justice!
Or still just "bring your own bottle"
Also, from the reviews that I have read their software seems to be pretty good, at least when it comes to spatial awareness and surface detection.

Most reviews are positive but main problem seems to be the price and the fact that the overall end-to-end experience still feels pretty rough.
This is actually a form of solar energy anyway because it is the sun that provides the initial energy to separate the water, and move the water into the atmosphere against gravity.
I find it absolutely disastrous that we spend more time talking about the environmental impacts of humans, than we do about the inevitability that one of the Sun's CMEs completely decimates our power grid and can cause warming of several orders of magnitude higher than the human footprint.
Domains matter in email addresses.

Domains matter in links.

Domains matter because they name a thing. This allows us to create an expectation. This is also what certificates are based around. They certify that "The server you are talking to really has this name". This is important because names have meanings to people.
The way I heard the story, Alexander Nix was a chronic exaggerator who pushed the narrative that CA had a huge impact on Brexit and other elections when it simply wasn't true. He did this in order to gain more sales. They said the Facebook data was deleted by the time of the Trump campaign.

My theory is that they are not so different than a typical digital ad agency but they got caught up in a political tornado. I think we should at least be open minded to the possibility they have been scapegoated here.
I think the issue is that a lot of people already live in Major metros where commute time is inversely proportional to rent and just accept it as a fact of life. This is why I refuse to move to LA, SF, NYC, Seattle, etc.

I currently live 15 min away from my job in Miami and pay less than $1k in rent. It is amazing being able to wake up at 8:30, dress and pack lunch and still get to work before 9am.

Most people here who have longer commutes are because they own homes and don't have the luxury of moving around like me, but then again, the own homes which is pretty hard in the cities I mentioned.

Honestly my first filter when job hunting is commute times and the price of rent within a 10 mile radius of the office.

Having had a 90 min commute at one point I realized that it just wasn't worth it unless you could have flexible hours to avoid rush hour and even then it's almost 900 minutes a week lost to "just" driving.
I thought the article was trying to compare to the "typical" fractional formula, not to completing the squares?
I'm also on a sabbatical, and to some extent, also self-studying -- but focusing on filmmaking. I'm acting, writing, directing, and producing!

I recently made this hour-long, no-budget feature film about an evil social media company, available on Prime Video: https://www.amazon.com/Opt-Aaron-Royce-Jones/dp/B07ZZMXGK1 Worse than even The Room, but might be the first movie including a realistic depiction of a FAANG interview?
> How many decades ago was this?

Er... two. Now get off my lawn.
Other people are implying that named algorithms, especially those named after someone famous, are somehow more special/difficult. Sometimes they are, but often they aren't. "Linear search" for instance is the name given to the easy idea of: iterate through an array until the value == search value or you hit the end. Most candidates could do this, though they might sweat a bit if you said "find x by implementing linear search" as the name for such a straightforward idea might not be known. They might have trouble writing proofs about its properties, which is where I imagine a lot of supposed scariness comes from. (i.e. "This approach looks correct but I haven't proved it yet." Academics aren't satisfied with just a test suite, or "looking at it".)

My favorite named-after-a-person one like this is Dijkstra's algorithm, which he claimed to have come up with in 20 minutes on the back of a napkin. If we suppose the average professional engineer is at most 3x slower/less brilliant than Dijkstra, it's not that unreasonable to imagine someone could reproduce the design on a whiteboard in a full hour...

Of course I don't buy that assumption, nor do I think it's a good problem or good idea to have as an interview filter even if it was true. (While I enjoy the occasional programming puzzle, I hate that they're lazily used to evaluate people in interviews so at least I avoid ever giving pure algorithm puzzles for interviews.) Nevertheless I agree with Mark that it's not "basically impossible" to come up with a good algorithm for many classes of algorithms and problems. I do wonder though how many people who could reinvent tortoise+hare without seeing it explicitly before would then be able to reinvent the teleporting turtle optimization right after.