skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> That's one of the worst domain name ever. When the topic comes along, I always remember about "that single-serving website with a domain name that looks like a number" and then take a surprisingly long time searching for it.

That's why we need regular expressions support in every search box, browser history, bookmarks and Google included.
Many of the "competing" definitions have been made up decades after the manifest e.g. the ominous "growth hacker".

Or the one in "hacker news", for that matter.
Documentary spotlighting ameowzing cats and the human dads that love them
A Week with the Surface Pro X
App Store Best of 2019
“A few hours(...)”

Are you referring to this?

https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/infosec/atom-community...

The telemetry in windows is ongoing so I’m just wondering if I missed something new
You appear to be misreading the chart, it is 4.5T to 9.95T. "T for trillion dollars" not "t for percentage".

Considering 20 years of inflation yes, a doubling in twenty years of a nominal cash record is trivial. GDP in real terms (inflation adjusted) doubled in the same timeframe.

In other words: debt as percentage of GDP has done down.

Also of note you claim "you see how debts were not paid" pointing to a point in the graph where debts _were being paid_, that is why the curve does down. When debts are repaid faster than issued then total debt reclines.

To recap: everything you wrote was either factually wrong or a mis-understanding how to read a single variable graph. Please put more thought when attempting to nerd-snipe.

There is no doomsday debt bubble, not based on these numbers.
Between 2016 and 2019, display resolution has increased a lot. I suspect people have noticed little or no change in the overall scene quality yet are pushing 4x more pixels.

Also PC game titles tend to be developed primarily for console hardware first, then retargeted for PC.
I really like the smiling poop and everything but [personally] I've only ever needed a feed icon⸮
The anti-safety culture is kind of surprising. When they made previous announcements I thought that safety was what they were bringing to the table. Autonomous drones, even large scale ones, are pretty ubiquitous at this point. People are building human-scale drones using off the shelf equipment in their back gardens. The thing they're all lacking is properly safety certified electronics. I would have thought the thing a project with deep pockets like kitty hawk would bring would be the huge effort required to build a certifiably safe done.

Having worked in other hardware startups though, I'm guessing what actually happened was a few years of reinventing the wheel and learning on the job. Safe systems don't look any different to non safe systems to an outsider, so unless there's a real buy in from management it's very hard to build them.
Or the civil service. I'm sure there's plenty of dickheads would still want derry put first even when using both, though
The Oligarch Game: use coin-tosses to demonstrate “winner take all”
My local not us-based university did invest heavily in a new building from a star architect. I don't even want to know how expensive that has been. Just saying that it may be wise to look into how the funds were used.
I don't have a disability but plenty of people do. Not everyone can use a mouse, and that's a fairly important thing to remember in UX design.

Thanks for adding other options for scrolling!
just assume they considered your suggestion and ask as if they did and must indeed have a reason why it didn't work:

"so what was the issue with using sshd?"

you're assuming competence, and if they say "oh I never thought of that" then you can prompt them to consider it - "might be worth a shot" or something like that. Comes across less accusative I think.
Thanks, I usually use PiHole with the lists merged into one and just block it at the DNS level.
Fair enough. Probably shouldn’t draw too many conclusions from movies and Wikipedia. I find the organized crime involvement in American unions very interesting, though, because from what I’ve read it’s different than the case often is in Europe. I find unions a somewhat interesting alternative to government regulation (such as in Scandinavian countries which have no minimum wage but broad unions). But at the same time I tend to view organized crime as being the most dangerous thing to a civilization.
20 years ago businesses bought the .org for whatever trademarks they owned to stop someone else grabbing it. Same for .com (which they used) and .net. They usually pointed all three domains to the same place. That activity has stopped. There will be far fewer .org domains sold today because businesses have stopped doing that.
> So the fact that kanji literally means "Chinese character" doesn't mean that kanji and hanzi should be considered the same script.

The Japanese writing system differs from the Chinese one by having its own distincts scripts (hiragana, katakana), but most of its subset made of Chinese characters (kanji) is the same than the Chinese script. The most comprehensive Chinese character dictionary is a Japanese one (Daikanwa jiten), which give definition and Japanese readings and this is possible precisely because the script is the same.

The only differences are characters created for use in Japan (kokuji) which can be treated as an extension like the Vietnamese Nôm, characters simplified by the Japanese government (some jôyô kanji) and variation in some glyph's shape (黃/黄). So, treating the full inventory of these languages as different scripts wouldn't make more sense than encoding the English, French and Czech alphabets separately because few characters differ.

My opinion is that Han unification makes sense, but the mistake made was to encode the variant interpretation at application level (e.g. html lang tags), which is not portable. I don't know how Unicode variant form works in details (putting a trailing code to a character to indicate precisely which variant is meant) but something like that at text encoding level could ease a lot of pain.
“No person has ever been harmed or exposed due to undue risk in over 26,000 test flights with over 100 prototype vehicles,”

Well that isn’t exactly difficult to achieve if no one was on it. I’d like to know the data if it was carrying a crash dummy.
OS spying is so much more invasive than application or service spying because you can’t opt out as easily. You can go without Facebook but a lot of people just need windows (for their jobs if nothing else, though I sure wish unity3d ran better on Linux and that more games ran smoothly on Linux)

The OS is also theoretically able to watch what you do in other services by monitoring keystrokes etc, where Facebook merely dreams of such things
Some programmers will ask you "why didn't you just" questions about something you've worked on for weeks, months or years, not because they think they're smarter than you, but because they never think about anything for weeks, months or years.
I see, for those out of the loop, the English title screen does not have the horizontal bar in the As.
Your last paragraph is really difficult to parse. I originally thought you liked the feature because it put you through the emotional wringer (in terms of making you work through certain negative emotions), and that it wasn't coddling you.
There's a few sets of punctuation marks that look quite interesting. Wikipedia currently uses SVGs to represent the characters. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuation#%22Love_point%22_a...
And combinations are used, so e.g. a new emoji only takes zero to one new code point, not one code point per variation. (zero because if I remember right the emojis for families are just something like "woman + boy + girl + man", all existing characters, joined by Zero-Width Joiners)
You were doing well until you dragged GPS and the dollar into the argument. Those are US assets and the US are free to dispose of them as they see fit, no ifs or buts. The rest of the world chooses to piggyback on them because why not, but everybody knows US military and economic requirements will always come first on those platforms.

What you should have brought up, really, is the UN. The US pays for most of what is effectively a common good, because it derives prestige, influence, and material advantages (indirect control of a huge chunk of diplomatic communications, tons of money from workers and diplomats stationed there, etc etc) from hosting it.

And sure enough, the UN has a specialized agency that would have been the natural destination for a global communication service: the ITU. Sadly, the ITU is (in)famed for being a political clusterf#ck, so a choice was made by the Clinton/Gingrich generation of US politicians to keep the internet well away from it. That might have been a wise choice at the time, but we've since seen the drawbacks of that choice: instead of getting captured by known evils with some (small) degree of accountability, dns was captured by a bunch of new evils that answer to no one. That way lies oligarchy, as Russia showed in the last 30 years.
>You can't say its only a half

The character is only half a character.

There, I just did.
> Even humans grasping the concept of solid-liquid-gas is a very recent historical thing, only happening in the last several hundred years

I bet people were heating up ice to melt it to get water way before that...
I hope also on C++ server generator will come some improvement, also with OAUTH2.
Qt is a GUI library in the same sense as node.js is a GUI library.
Thanks for the response to my other question! I have another though

Your filing indicates a 10% discount for a data sharing agreement. Can you expand on what data my business would share with you to be eligible to get that discount?
Filled circle means "vent is blocked, so no air can pass". Empty circle is an unblocked vent through which air can pass.
It's interesting how it expects librarians to be arbiters of morals and ethics - they should recognize when ideas in books are good or bad (or in this case more accurately current and "outdated"). That includes explicitly mentioned "outdated" philosophies on ethics and moral values (are Aristotelian ethics outdated?) and "hot button" topics like euthanasia, genetic engineering, and sexuality. It suggest to "Be aware of changes in political rhetoric and discard books with outdated ideas." Also "Weed books that reflect outdated ideas about gender roles in childrearing."

And atop of being arbiter of wrongthink it expects librarian to keep abreast of scientific knowledge and review books on organic gardening "for accuracy and currency of information after five years".
E-books at libraries are a hit, leading to long waits and reader hacks
Moving data into and out of a remote cloud is expensive and slow.

The speed of light isn't getting quicker any time soon, so low-latency processing of locally-generated data requires local compute resource.
Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia founder) AMA on new social media concept
Maybe they can use the money to buy some shares in Ethos. They seem to be going places.
I am not familiar with Hugo but I watch out for documentation stuff.

How hard would it be for a casual user to add some search capabilities ? IMO, that's a key point to have.
Instagram is broken. It also broke us
The Next Closet | Software Engineer | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Onsite | Full-time | €60k - €80k | 0.0% - 0.8%

Technical Lead Ruby on Rails & Mobile development team

You will lead our development team into the next phase of the company. It is a technical job where you will be writing code, managing team decisions, and mentoring your fellow developers into becoming even better coders.

The Next Closet is a fast-growing web-based and mobile marketplace for second hand designer fashion. We have been in business since 2013 and our customer base, sales & revenue are doubling every 12 months.

You will be hired in the capacity of technical lead, our aim however is to be able to promote you to VP of Engineering or CTO at a later stage.

Apply via homerun —> https://bit.ly/36l9vRD
I am a victim of forced pornography. AMA
Yes I agree. A 'what is the problem with using sshd?' or similar seems valid to me. It gives them a way to actually explain if there is a problem and if not, oh that might work.
Data Management 101
Care to elaborate? I don't understand why it's a "game of fools" or how it would lead to insanity.

Honest question.
The mean value theorem also guarantees existence (of a parallel line tangent).
They just removed 'c' from typewriters.
The loan packaging and insurance was a symptom of the underlying problem that drove the 2008 crisis: transatlantic transactions that worked to evade regulations to control systematic risk.

This process started, if you had to pick a place, with a US bank issuing a mortgage. The cash part eventually wound its way to various short-term "risk-free" assets, one of which being short-term asset-backed loans to European financial institutions. The mortgage asset got packaged up and sold on to the broader capital markets, of which European financial institutions participated. So, the US banking system basically created a market in which European financial institutions could buy mortgage-backed paper, financing the purchase at good short-term rates generated by the cash created by issuing the backing mortgages.

Of course, banking regulators know that just letting banks go hog-wild creating asset-liability pairs is going to end up badly, so this is where the regulatory arbitrage comes in. Under US banking regulations, banks had limits to the assets on their books. There's a strong incentive to offload them into the capital markets - the banks realize an immediate profit, and clear out valuable space on their balance sheet. European banks, on the other hand, had a more complex leverage limits that took into account the perceived riskiness of various assets that they owned, with AAA-rated assets giving the highest leverage limits.

So that, in a nutshell, is what happened in the run-up to 2008. Banks generate more profits when they create more risk, so there's regulatory limits on risks. US banks evaded those risk limits by selling the risk on to the capital markets, and US regulators assumed that this process was systematically safe. EU banks evaded those risk limits by blindly levering up to buy whatever AAA-rated dollar-denominated assets the US capital markets handed to them, and EU regulators assumed that high leverage on AAA-rated assets was systematically safe. Neither regulatory regime had a good holistic view of the financial asset vortex brewing in the Atlantic.

Anyhow, my overall point is "so that they could be sold to suckers" doesn't really tell the entire story. The asset packaging was done in order to take as much risk as possible under US and EU banking regulations, taking advantage of transatlantic differences in regulatory regimes.
Yes, and for the same reason YouTube ads will slip through Pi-Hole (at least without some customisation).
Sex Trafficking via Facebook Sets Off a Lawyer’s Novel Crusade
Thanks for the feedback. I find writing to be very difficult. It’s really helpful to me when people take the time to point out where I’m not clear, especially when it’s constructive feedback, like yours is.
>It's that various parties started packaging up financial instruments to make them look like less risky instruments, so that they could be sold to suckers.

This was enabled by fraud. At the root of it were the people fraudulently stating borrowers had incomes higher than they really were.
I think it's more to do with avoiding overheads typically associated with system calls (presumably involving some interrupt and disabling/enabling/changing paging behaviour).

Here's an example of a syscall-heavy command on my system:

$ time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=10M of=/dev/null
10485760+0 records in
10485760+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB, 10 MiB) copied, 7.09089 s, 1.5 MB/s

real 0m7.092s
user 0m2.123s
sys 0m4.968s

3 million system calls per second seems quite slow on a 3.2 GHz CPU when all it should really be doing is dereferencing a couple of pointers until it finds some functions that simply write a zero byte to a buffer (the "/dev/zero" descriptor handler) and ignore bytes from a buffer (the "/dev/null" descriptor handler).

If you have a safe bytecode format for representing operations that are performed in a loop, the kernel can just perform those operations without having to switch back and forth to userspace.
Array.prototype.reduce() in JavaScript
Bitcoin's Missionaries vs. Wall Street's Mercenaries
Global Temperature Headed Toward 5 Degree Increase, WMO Says
AFAIK it's not about the screenreader, but about the browser. The browser knows these aren't visible, so I don't expect it would have any reason to report them to the accessibility interface (IAccessible et al.).
I enjoy Haskell's approach to numbers.

The type of any numeric literal is any type of the `Num` class. That means that they can be floating point, fractional, or integers "for free" depending on where you use them in your programs.

`0.75 + pi` is of type `Floating a => a`, but `0.75 + 1%4` is of type `Rational`.
If it's that sensitive, I'd probably start by spending extra time, trying to figure it out without asking.

If it's a code review, then it's expected that hard questions be asked. I'd remove the "just," and watch my intonation.

Chances are better than even, that it ain't that important, and not worth my extra time.

If the engineer isn't that good, it will show itself in more obvious ways, sooner or later.

I've come to value team cohesiveness. When you have a team of high-functioning, self-confident, highly-intelligent, motivated people, it won't be a smooth ride. Passions abound, and people will disagree; sometimes vehemently.

Respect and cohesiveness are EARNED. If someone knows that I respect them, then I can be a real jerk, and it won't damage our relationship (as long as it isn't chronic).

I managed just such a team for a long time. When we finally disbanded, the engineer with the least seniority had ten years.

The current tech industry is hyper-competitive. Everyone is competing against everyone else. It's not enough to be "as good as" someone else. We have to be BETTER than everyone else.

When the average stay at a corporation is 24 months, people don't get that invested in a team. They are there for a fairly quick job. In and out. Don't make eye contact. Don't lower your shields.

One of the important things about working in a team, is that other members of the team watch how we treat others. If I'm mean to Joe, then Bob will assume that I'm mean; even if I'm right, and Joe was in error. The emotional impact will impart the lesson; not logic. He won't remember Joe as wrong; just me, as mean.

There is no solution that can be achieved by a simple change in wording.

But that's just me, and my experience. YMMV.
Vendors move away from open source database software licensing
In many cases, the actual language itself is only one reason why a particular language gets used. Often the decision also involves tooling, culture, 3rd-party libs, workforce experience, etc.

Having said that, I'm sure D would shine in OP's case.
A Deep-Sea Magma Monster Gets a Body Scan
Are you talking about x87?

That's ancient history. Compilers don't use that instruction set any more in normal operation.

GCC, Java, LLVM, etc, will normally emit SSE2 in order to be standards compliant. They will only relax this if you tell them to, then it's your problem.
Good to know the difference. Thanks!
Thanks mate. It sucks having to complain like this, but it seems it's one of the few ways to confront giant companies like Liander and make them do the right thing.
Not only the ads. I once recreate the feed for a university project. Just take a look at the sources. Every element is completely obscured, every class and id is just long random strings.
Praise in public, criticize in private

In my (considerable) experience of working in large organisation (private and public), whether this works or not depends strongly on the power differential between praiser/criticiser and praisee/criticisee. Basically this is the most likely outcome:

- Powerless praises publicly and criticises privately: criticism will be ignored, praise will be milked.

- Powerless praises privately and criticises publicly: if played right, this is working, since the powerful cannot brush aside the criticism, but this is likely to lead to retaliation!

A way of making public criticism more digestible is to make it very constructive: "You are wrong because XYZ, I recommend ABC instead because <reasons>". Ideally the <reasons> align with the organisation's goals, e.g. "ABC is clearly in the interest of our shareholders / voters / students / environment because <other reasons>.

Make of this what you will.
I studied philosophy and physics in my youth and I can distinguish between a genius and a "crackpot" very well. Details are what counts, you can get every model to fit roughly if you don't care about the number of constants involved. If the model is correct, it also works for extreme situation. FQHE is the extrem situation that breaks the electron and SC model.

I have not heard any "crackpot" to distinguish between classical logic and mathematical one, because this is something only well studied people with background in logic and philosophy of science do. This was on of the hints that made me realize this guy is good, really good.

Science is always 80 years ahead of current discussion:
https://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7426

We are talking about interdisciplinary physics here, it's the top rank.

It took me a year to really understand Stoyans Model. Now I'm in a paradox free, consistent world view with the fewest possible assumptions you can possible make. For me galaxies and the the universe as a whole, is the logical and deterministic consequence from the lowest number of fundamental particles you can have. The world became a very complex, deterministic machine of utter beauty.

I understand the fine structure constant, 137, relativity (I only can smile on your implementation of it), time, Newtonian mass, magnetic fields, planetary fields (origin), gravity, electron orbit conditions, the periodic table in it's fullest (why), quasars, pulsars, globular clusters, periodicity of the redshift, lyman alpha forest, black holes, super-massive black holes (totally different object), photons, beta-particles, ... the list goes on.

I understand the internal discrepancies inside the standard model, I know for a fact, that most parts of it are in fact falsified.

If you bring up a error in the math equations or a logical error in the theory of his, I would be glad to discuss this in detail. So far, I have not found a problem and in fact, came to the conclusion that this is the first model I can remotely accept as true, because it is complex and not complicated.

Just some weeks ago, another confirmation from a different model with quite close values was presented at a physics conference I attended. His was ~10^27 N/m² and in BSM its 1.3 * 10^26 N/m² of Vacuum pressure, a hidden variable in the standard model.
That's pretty much how life works :)
See How the World’s Most Polluted Air Compares with Your City’s
"I'm obviously coming at this afresh. Could using _X_ work?"
Location: Warsaw

Project types: Contract

Remote: Yes (8+ years remote experience)

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: iOS, Swift, Objective-C, RxSwift, SwiftUI, CoreData, CoreGraphics, Python, JavaScript, Node.js, React

Résumé/CV: 10+ years of experience on high-profile applications. More than 5 years of experience with Swift. Full resume available upon request.

Email: dworakowski.lukasz@me.com