skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Update: I tried it twice. Both times it failed. There were times between the beeps were I swore it was gone, but when I took off the headset (or muted the volume), it was indeed still there. Perhaps you have to continuously do it?
That's the minimum amount i.e 4.99 drinks within a 2 hour period is not binge drinking. Also, I have a drink just about every day or every other day, and I haven't had 5 drinks within a 2 hour period in at least the last decade. It would cause me to fall down and puke on the sidewalk.
Facebook is trivial to recreate. The only thing that’s hard is convincing users to rebuild their social network. Shutdown Facebook and a more worthy contender will trivially take its place.
that's rich. The Hong Kong people had their freedom and autonomy. And what have they done with it? squandered it. They've been subjects of an empire. They are not equipped to rule themselves. They don't seek self-determination and autonomy and responsibility for creating their future they seek to blame the government or China or the police. and now they are seeking to destroy not to create. And yet they should possess greater freedom?
The US left-wing and right-wing media propaganda is just a piece of cake comparing to the CCP's propaganda. Anyone died in Tianman Massacre? Anyone died in Natural Disaster Years of 1960-1963? None. LOL.
This post occasioned me to coin "dunning-krugerbait".

If you think you have cooking sussed in an hour, you're doing it very wrong
I’d win by another service for events popping up because facebook is gone. It’s nowadays the only thing I still need fb for.
If an illegal operation exists, should users be allowed to make that choice for themselves?

User choice has no bearing on the issue. The activity is either legal or not, and it should not be legal.
There was a study recently showing that people that do not have Facebook account are happier :) Not to mention their personal data are not being abused.
This assume the goal for China is democracy, and the one the west set for them. If they failed, we must destroy their economy, take their people into poverty, because the barn door must be closed.

This narrative basically can be taken verbatim by the CCP as propaganda material. “The west didn’t like our political system that made great economical progress, and they will try to destroy your livelihood. By the way, they think the economical success of China is entirely a gift of the west. It has nothing to do with your hard working.“
if the court gives them another fine (probably yes), FB will probably become a paid service in europe, but then will pay you back with its "ad viewing" program so it can be free again. This would also be compatible with california's new regulations i think
Binging with Babish has a great series on basic dishes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBGoJUxxRqU

He covers the American omelette which is my go-to. Usually with spinach, red bell pepper, red onion and sometimes mushroom filling. Often with some old cheddar and they are monstrously simple to make mediocre and not too difficult to make very well.
> So I'm not sure if Facebook can do anything here without a drop in revenue.

Probably not, but that's kind of the point: Some things may make you money, but we do not allow you to do them. Find another way to make money.

GDPR is not different from other laws forbidding lucrative, but scummy, things.
YouTube are the worst. With TV they find a break to pause for messages - it might be a cliff hanger, to ensure I don't go away, but at least it is a pause. YouTube breaks in right in randomly in the middle of a sentence which means it is difficult to follow the thought across the ad break. (YouTube breaks in at deterministic times, but they have no relation to the program so it counts as random)
I'm not the parent, but from my pov FB is a net negative for society, so if they are unwilling to play by our laws, then I'd rather see them get the fuck out.

They won't of course, because it leaves the market open for grabs.
1) Learned to type correctly by switching to dvorak.
Nothing to do with the supposed benefits of the layout, just forces you to relearn from scratch the right way.

2) Mechanical keyboard (doesn't have to be mechanical specifically) with very light actuation force
The limitation of Bors for us was throughput, we were more interested in testing multiple simultaneous pull requests merging at the same time, rather than testing against the latest master.

With our CI times and PR volume, by the time any CI run completes, master would have drastically changed.
I certainly won’t miss them. My biggest concern isn’t even the data privacy issue, but the way they have effectively killed most discussion forums which were actually designed to make communicating clear and effective, as opposed to the unsearchable stream hell of facebook groups.
Awesome news. I bought a Darter Pro back in March and the experience has been great. I was a little hesitant at first because I'm not a Linux expert, but their team puts a lot of effort into making sure stuff with Pop_Os "just works." It might not be quite as polished as a macbook, but it's a comparable product at half the price, plus I get to support open source. Thelio looks amazing and I'm excited to see what they can do in the laptop space.
I agree with you on all but pointing out the cancer rates.

If we're looking at it purely from a statistical point of view, then yes, the numbers might not look that good in favour of "more drinking + ridesharing is better than less drinking + drink driving".

Ethically, I consider people drinking themselves to an early grave of their own free will to be "less bad" than a drunk driver killing someone else on the road or a drunk person committing a violent crime against another person.

I make this point in the context of the rest of what you've said, though, which raises good discussion points about "should we fix X really bad thing if it leads to people doing more of Y maybe-less-bad thing?"
Corrections:
In that incident:

* the "influencer" was fired from their job because of their public troll behavior

* the laugher was not fired (and was publicly supported by their CEO

* the joke-teller was fired for something shortly after the incident, but the CEO and the joke-teller won't say exactly what the justificaiton for the firing was.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5398681
This article is poorly structured to be polite.

I recently set one of these up for my daughter, and there is indeed no way to use the display without a Roku account, and that does require a credit card, and sneakily tries to get you to sign up for trials, as the article mentions. It took a lot of effort for me to make sure my (3 year old) couldn't order HBO, etc.

Had I known that, I woudln't have bought it. It's easy to envision a future where Roku is out of business and this tv can't be activated again if needs be.
learn how to tie a good knot. Just one. Practice.

I recommend the alpine loop or shoreline hitch.
The core shopify codebase is a monolithic one, hence the merging infrastructure described in the post. It's not a "single project" in any useful definition of the phrase.
My understanding is that it's not a fashion thing, but to make it easier to alternate the right hand between the keyboard and the mouse.

I prefer a full keyboard myself and view every single incident where I have to use the mouse as a UI design failure, so can't confirm. But it seems to make sense.
Knowledge Distillation with TAs
What I also meant is that I don't want bots on whatsapp.
I'm sure it depends on the company, but my company grants a dollar amount and figures out how many shares add up to that amount. If the stock price tumbled I would get more shares next time I get a refresher grant, because more shares would be needed to add up to the dollar amount the company would grant me.
> A very slippery slope that will not end well for anyone,

An anti-trust case against an established monopoly is a slippery slope? I'm having trouble understanding the fear here.

> I don't particularly care for the closed ecosystem but it does create security advantages

Anyone can claim "security advantages" from their walled garden, there's nothing particular about their implementation that grants them any additional security. Further, there are plenty of instances where Apple has had to remove malware and violating apps well _after_ they had been released to the store so it's not entirely clear what the true advantage for the consumer is here.

> and Apple is making efforts to protect users more so than greedy Corporate interests when it comes to data and privacy rights.

Do you believe this is the only model? Why should the manufacturer of my computer have any reason to be "protecting my privacy." Why are they involved in that discussion in the first place?
I had the exact same experience in the US when CD burning became popular. Same with Divx DVD players.

Your comment was spot on until you turned it in America thing.
I was reminded of that when I saw people using a crude contraption inside a helmet to project different faces onto their own in order to evade facial recognition.
EEZ Bench Box 3 crowdfunding started
Nowadays it is very easy to have a front server with behind-scene server farms. You as a common end user without special tools just cannot see through, unless you are a genius script kid.
> monolithic software pipelines controlled by a corporation sure are bad

I would guess a lot of people wouldn't agree with that as a general statement.

I suppose we can argue about what "bad" means. They certainly aren't perfect and have various drawbacks. On the other hand, where are the better software pipelines not controlled by corporations, all things considered? Keep in mind that people generally opt-in to the Apple ecosystem, despite the high dollar cost of entry.

Meanwhile, let's consider an unpoliced app store. It will be full of malware, scams and frauds that only highly sophisticated users will be able to navigate with some safely. One one hand, no one's going to get banned. On the other hand, no one is going to be banned! It doesn't sound good to me.
Someone close to me taught me how to square knot, so my hoodie-tied-around-my-waist would stop slipping, as I was using a double overhand knot before.

I'd also like to add that learning knots is honestly more of a 5-minute commitment to learn than a 1-hour commitment, but it's definitely still a commitment.
Every time I start thinking about ads being made illegal, I think about the small businesses who don't already have their brand established. Banning advertising entirely would crush many entrpreneurs for whom advertising is the only reason anyone knows who they are.

There's a big difference between massive companies seeking to keep their brand in your mind and small businesses trying to let you know they even exist.

But how do you ban one without banning both? Its a complicated issue
They are in complete control of the programs that you can install on your iphone, and take 30% of all transactions that occur through that marketplace. Are you a lawyer for apple?
Plus the OTHER 32k they have saved. Over 30 years that is an extra 50,000.

You could save it for 15 and have 37k (7k interest)after 15 years. Or 0.
You could save it for 30 and have 126k (54k interest) after 30 years. Or 0.
Your are funny, you say their arguments are not well articulated, yet you do seem not to be up to point.

You argue they are regulations? European Regulations are law. European Directives and Regulation are the two main legislative

They argue users are using facebook because they want advertising, their primary usage is advertising and for that advertisement they consent to share their data. That's so ridiculous it is funny.

And no, FB does not give all the data, the definition of what data is in the regulation.

Both FB and their Privacy Director are not looking good.
And then we beat you up for deliberately sabotaging our investigation. If you didn't have anything to hide why would you wipe your phone? Clearly you must be a spy or worse so we have no choice but to send you to the re-education camp.
Oh no, it sounds like "cryptolocking" has the potential to be yet another term subsumed into meaning the wrong thing, much like "hacker", "drone", and "bot" have been.

This pattern and cryptolocking both have the common trait that you have to pay to get past a specific point, so I get why this happens: they're indistinguishable from a "typical end user" point of view.

Really, I think "Paywall" is maybe closer to the proper term to use here.
Questionable? Meaning different from somebody else' advice? Show me somebody else giving advice for free that has gotten thousands of people out of debt. My guess is his advice is questioned by those who don't show the willpower to follow the steps. When they fail, they criticize the program. What he says here is solid.

edit: I just googled his name. On results page 5, yes five, I found one "advisor" disparaging his advice. And I think that guy's advice was questionable.

You can do all the paperwork you need easily in an hour. If you have any spreadsheet skills you can show in detail when you'll have each loan repaid.

I would challenge you to follow the steps, put it on paper, calculate how much and when. Then show me any fault with that process.
Macy’s data breach left customer information exposed in October
Ethics and economics rarely agree.

Slavery was also profitable for slave-owners. Fascism was also profitable for the willing corporate partners of the state. The argumentam ad pecuniam is valid only for the accountants, not for policy-makers.
A 70-year-old's secret to a full and happy life
OK what if line 950, subsection B of the TOS agreement, gave Facebook the option to harvest one of your kidneys? Would that be enforceable? The point of the regulation is to make clear consent for personal information to be used. Saying the person clearly agreed to their "personalized advertising contract" by accepting the TOS, which allows them to use all of your personal info is debatable.
That pretty much forces tooling to try to rebase and run CI either way ? If it cannot rebase its up to the developer to fix his branch.

Master should be always in a state of release at any moment.

I just cannot imagine it was an unknown practice for some.
Seems very foolish to break the developer agreement without keeping yourself anonymous. It's his own fault that Apple was able to connect his account with an individual breaking their terms of service.
How is the DoD going to help with China and Russia? We're not going to invade them.

If you're referring to the NSA or CIA they're both organizations that ignore the US constitution so there's great reasons to not work for them.
NaPoVoInterCo is a terrible idea. The idea of states giving up even more sovereignty is silly bordering on ridiculous. CGP Grey has all the outward indications of being a smart person, but the blase way he approaches this subject is unsettling as i think it reflects how many of the "nominally smart" view this issue.

The term popular vote is very deceptive. If the only vote that mattered was the national election of the chief executive, it might be useful. But if voting is viewed holistically, as in local, state, and federal, there is no such thing as a popular vote. The vast majority of US citizens do not fully participate, and it is a large minority that participate in the national selection.

Further, many people love to point out Hillary gaining more popular votes in 2016, but they never seem to point out that this was almost solely due to California. Subtract California voters, and the competition's outcome makes perfect sense. This is precisely what the Electoral College was built to do. Just because 1 quarter of the entire nations social welfare beneficiaries decide to congregate in one place and all vote the same way does not mean they deserve to pick the president.

I have to wonder why the video didn't even touch the genesis of the NaPoVoInterCo. Just glancing at the map at the top of this link will tell you everything you need to know about both the politics and the purpose of this scheme: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Intersta...

This is a plan to turn the US into a one party state. This guy explains why that is not only a good thing, it is inevitable. After you read his piece, you should look up his net worth and where and how he lives: https://medium.com/s/state-of-the-future/the-great-lesson-of...

I fear there are dark times ahead. At least CGP Grey will be very entertained as he watches us collapse from London, a city completely inoculated from demographic shift, political infighting, and terrible consequences for poor decisions.
There's a lot wrong with this article, but:

> Lets get something straight here. Gender should ALWAYS be a optional choice.

This is a good take. Many more services should make gender more optional. It's unnecessary for almost all services, it's something that is often used for _poor_ targeting – targeting based on markers in platform activity is likely to yield much better targeting, and unless you spend a lot of time thinking about how to model the answers to that question it has the potential to exclude and offend. Let's just stop asking for it!
The ability to partition work into independent chunks is way more important than social skills when you work as a software engineer with other software engineers. Then they can work on their things and you can work on yours with little need for further communication.

And don't come saying that divvying up technical tasks is a social skill, it really isn't.
Note that for certain financial services, perhaps including PayPal, they may not legally be allowed to explain why they closed your account.
Do you do any of them for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, 52 weeks a year?

Used to row about 20 hours a week for a few years. It does the same thing if you're not careful.
Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. That destroys intellectual curiosity, the value of the site.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
The article ignores the impact on poor people in the US if trade with China was cut off. In general, poor people would pay more for everything that is currently imported from China. Everyone would pay more, but poor people would be impacted the most.

I'm not sure if that's enough to say trade with China is a good thing.

But it should turn your idea of a very simple answer into a much more complicated picture.
I want to go the other way. I want a 200% keyboard. I don't want to have to type SHIFT for capital letters or symbols and I want extra keys for diagonal cursor movement. The SHIFT key is an artifact of the physical limitations of a typewriter and is no longer needed.
Poor journalism and writing ruined an otherwise thoughtful piece of influential computer scientist.

The root cause probably is that the author does not understand the ideas well enough, so he/she is urged to overblown the implications...
Apple would very much like that there was no way to jailbreak your device. It's not like they've purposefully left an "out" to install unauthorized software.
How I Became the Most Hated Man in Tech
Happy to see this rose to the top. I mean, knowing about compound interest and how to coil cables is cool and all, but the art of preparing food for oneself and others is by far the most important skill listed in here. As someone once said, “if you don’t know how to cook you’re loosing at life”.
That's funny in a sad way. I do remember that being a thing ~10 or 15 years ago - they were at least demo'ing it at one of the blocks in my city where a large concentration of bars could be found. I was very curious on the technology of their fold-able scooters (how quaint given Lime at al)

I could also imagine having to drive a drunk person's car home would be somehow risky, given that you have no idea how said person will act with their property.
> But if they show me an ad based on a page I visited with a Facebook script snippet on it, a message about sneakers I sent to a friend, or a post I liked on Instagram they crossed a line regardless of what terms and conditions I accepted.

Uh, no, they haven't. YOU are responsible for visiting websites and using their services under terms and conditions you agreed to. YOU are responsible for and capable of not using sites do not agree with. You are getting a service in exchange for being tracked and shown ads. If you don't like it, delete your account, or fix your damn /etc/hosts file to block the (admittedly overwhelming) number of domains FB uses for these purposes.

I'm no fan of Fb. I deleted my account, blocked thousands of domains in my /etc/hosts file, use multiple ad-blockers, etc. etc. Fuckerberg going to prison would make me giddy. But, you don't get to have your mystical cake and eat it, too. You don't dictate how they run, or what data they collect, or how they use it. Get real, dude. Take responsibility for your actions. You agreed to what they do when you read(skipped) the terms of service/privacy policy when you signed up.
I think so. More info in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_hypothermic_circulatory_a...
An interview on what makes Postgres unique: extensions
The lobbies have been trying to reverse the controller/processor relation from the very start. They have been told time and time again this was not an acceptable interpretation of the GDPR. It's time one of them is made an example in court, with fines stiff enough to discourage any corp from trying this strategy again.
The cost of housing is a complicated matter but is mostly not due to jobs going elsewhere. Single family zoning and 'never change' rules in home owners associations and cities are some of the biggest drivers of housing prices.
Maybe be careful putting your credit number into a card in the web service though...
To my knowledge, Apple has not gone after people doing this in the past.
I would venture that people who only like to hear themselves probably don't fit my definition of interesting...
> China highlights protester violence, the west talk about police. The only difference is that west is doing it voluntarily.

Both in the US and in China people work in media voluntarily. In neither case they have freedom to publish anything they want, they have to push specific narratives coming from the top. In China narratives come directly from the government, in the US indirectly through the system of "manufacturing consent".
I agree. Removing the other people (i.e doing it in a car) helps make it bearable but spending X hr/day in a box commuting is not good for quality of life no matter how you cut it.
I got around this by deving on virtual machine.
So here's a question about flax, and other things.

It seems like there is a technological progression in clothing from "I take the unprocessed hides from the animals I kill or the leaves and vines around me and just wear them" to "I tan hides to make leather" to "I grow flax or cotton to make fibers and fabric"

Actual question: Do these technologies correspond to lengthy time frames in large areas in such a way that it could be useful to identify a "Leather Age/Culture" or "Plant fiber Age/Culture"?
Changing semantics due to header order is considered a feature in C/C++. If you aren't willing to waste hours working through esoteric header issues, you just aren't tough enough.
What about it requires the more expensive option? If an entry level chromecast can stream from youtube, why can't it stream from stadia?

Maybe google is only willing to sell hardware equivalent to the ultra for use with stadia, but I don't see how that's a technical requirement. It seems like a business decision, and as such, is fair game for criticism.
Some of those low cost areas are in the country. A lot of the Rust Belt jobs moved within the USA to the South (especially with the auto industry), which is one of the reasons top line US industrial production is pretty stable/growing but you have some very obvious depressed industrial regions.