skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I would recommend reading the issue I linked for why it's necessary. JS needs special access to resources that can't be provided without proxying.

You can see this yourself in a DASH player[0] and testing with e.g. https://invidio.us/api/manifest/dash/id/CvFH_6DNRCY. It will fail with

> Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://r5---sn-ab5l6nzy.googlevideo.com/videoplayback' from origin 'http://reference.dashif.org' has been blocked by CORS policy: Response to preflight request doesn't pass access control check: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource.

0. http://reference.dashif.org/dash.js/nightly/samples/dash-if-...
I don't understand why Microsoft persist so much on ARM tablets with their limited OS given their history of failure.
Yeah. Apparently cp got a lot smarter about isos at some point? Like basically everything else GNU/Linux, I'd never have guessed if some random website didn't say to try it.

(I can't respond to you person responding to me, but I meant that I think cp being able to write a working image directly to a dev was not always true, and people always used dd for that before)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't it always been 100% clear that police would be able to search online DNA databases easily, through the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine if nothing else?
I agree the site should be banned.
> x86-64 (also known as x64, x86_64, AMD64 and Intel 64)

One official name among others. Linux distros tend to refer to it as amd64.
The Art of Data Manipulation
I bet there’s a bunch of people at WeWork that can relate to your story right now.

I haven’t been fired but it’s no secret that there’s big problems in tech right now caused by everyone valuing growth above all and forgetting to build a sustainable business. I think we’ll start seeing a lot more small tech companies that our bootstrapped and focused on profit from the start. Good luck with your app and try not to make the same mistakes as your old company!
> Just because you can do $PROFESSION doesn't make you above average in intelligence.

That was never claimed but a different claim:

FACT: The groups of people that work in certain professions definitely have _average_ differences in IQ if we can accept that IQ exists.

That is NOT to say that any individual mathematician can say that he or she is more intelligent that the rest of the population.

Understand the difference.
Ugh, two or three years is decent now? Within my lifetime you’d expect a small appliance to last 20 years.
I think a lot of these don't suffer direct comparisons well. eg, the greatest risk of accidents to a bus, comes from other passenger vehicles where the bus is more likely to win that particular dispute. The greatest risk of accidents to a train, comes from the trains own inertia, where the train is much more likely to lose. The greatest risk of accidents to an aircraft is the ground, in which the ground has an undisputed record.

So I think it's safe to assume busses would be more likely to have accidents, but less likely to have fatalities.

I think it actually gets worse if you try to normalise the results. There is greater risk in a car journey from LAX to JKF, than there is for an air journey along the same route. However, if I tried to commute by air to work (a 2km commute), the risk per km would rocket, as take-offs and landings are the most dangerous part of each journey, so with an atypical number of take-offs per km, I'd get an atypical risk per km.

The wiki article does go on to point out the difference in usage of these statistics. per-journey does make more sense for air insurance, as the difference in risk between long-haul and short-haul isn't really significant - the take-off and landing are still the riskiest phases, there's just a larger period of boredom between them for long-haul. So 10 short flights vs 1 10x longer flight might normalise to the same hours & kms, but 10 short flights means 10 landings etc (10x the chances to miscalculate fuel, 10x the entries into & out of congested airspace, etc)

But comparing per-journey between a car and a plane is rather meaningless, as they are on average very different journeys. commuting in a car isn't two phases of high risk separated by one phase of near-immunity.
Unlikely. That would be inconsistent with the heritability, for one thing, for which no genetic correlations with immune-related things have ever been reported that I've seen, and with the best attempts at finding a physical cause landing on things like under-reactive amygdalas and other things one might describe as general brain damage (like toxo) rather than any kind of cunning plan to spread a particular virus/parasite. (How would psychopathy spread a virus? It'd have to be an STD, I guess, except symptoms of psychopathy often show up in childhood and long before individuals have ever had sex, which is also problematic.) Psychopaths do seem fairly fertile, though, which is why theories sometimes invoke an evolutionary life-history explanation: it's a hawk-dove kind of strategy (adaptive if there are enough suckers around, and weak enough social constraints on psychopathic behavior, which would explain why it seems rarer in traditional rural environments and more common in modern urban environments).
Illiterate people are twice as likely to develop dementia, study says
It has nothing to do with cp being smart. You can do the same thing with dd, or simply with shell redirection (cat >/…)

It works only for hybrid ISOs. Not every ISO supports this, although many do.
"The reason I disagree is that single player games with compelling story, although my favourite, eventually run out of content, even if it's compelling and if the world is open and freeform"

That is true, and that alone would make the necessary development not economically viable for any game whose life is measured in few years, but what if, along content provided by players, the game creators could insert new environments with NPCs and new stories without ditching the game? In a few years/decades probably AI could also generate characters that develop themselves according to the environment they "grew" into or events happened during their "life". Dreaming too much maybe:)
For some reason I don't ever see people recommending the MSMG Toolkit[0]. With it, you can take a regular Win10 Home or Pro .iso, and completely gut it. Like, completely gut it. It'll stop automatic Windows updates (you can still choose to do them yourself), you can remove all default metro apps, you can completely remove the Windows Store from ever being on your system. Seriously, this thing is an absolute godsend it my opinion. Combine with the Windows 10 Privacy Guide[1] to pick up any slack that it misses.

0: https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/msmg_toolkit.html

1: https://github.com/adolfintel/Windows10-Privacy
What about the counterfeits and lead levels in toys? Those are two major issues that you glided right past in your non chalance
Congress can still pass a law after the court's decision that would change the outcome.
a recent talk on the spacecraft and the project — https://youtu.be/H62hZJVqs2o
"Development banks" have more of a fiscal than monetary responsibility.

Just like with IMF which is supposed to keep the world's monetary system stable (more like central banks/monetary side of things), and the World Bank which is supposed to induce progress (more like governments/fiscal side of things).
Ask HN: Is it enough to use deep learning?
Looks like deep learning models are good enough to solve almost all types of ML problems. So isn't learning that sufficient instead of doing every other ML algorithms? Or others are still needed in specific situations?
I don't know if coding makes you smart, but the causal relationship might go the other way: you're more likely to be good at coding, the smarter you are.
An important difference is that Go not only has a concise set of constructs, it also tends to deliberately avoid abstraction.

So any given piece of code is very explicit and self-contained. Apart from function calls, you can tell exactly what it does without looking up anything else, like a macro definition for example. It similarly doesn't have a lot of different ways to do the same thing tends to be opinionated about idioms (gofmt, for example).

Something like a Lisp DSL would be antithetical to the Go model of what simplicity means.
Nix is dynamically typed. This shows badly in its discoverability and validation stories.

The ecosystem is fantastic, but it's hard to make the case to migrate an existing configuration to it for the sake of using nix.

Dhall is another option in this space, BTW. It has other faults that score CUE existence points, thought.
The simplicity of Go isn't in a syntactic minimalism. It's in the self-conscious restraining of abstractive power (eg. the article's example of the only generic data structures being slices and maps).
If some conspiracy theory is popular, it should absolutely show up in search and autocompletion. Google isn't the arbiter of truth and shouldn't be reducing visibility of anything on the basis of its "conspiracy theory" status. There are many theories that were ultimately proven true.
It might be changed to "IN_PROGRESS" with Microsoft Edge being released for Linux next year :).
At a gun show, two individuals could use PayPal to conduct a sale (if it was allowed on their platform), without any background check or government-issued ID.
We just launched the Startup Guide 2.0 /Take the first steps to launch your idea
Most Hated Enemies in American History
Author here. The closest thing to borgcfg in Kubernetes would be kubecfg [0]. It is based on jsonnet, the open source equivalent to GCL. The official blessed solution right now would be kustomize [1] since it is directly integrated into kubectl. I categorize both in the article with my evaluation as solutions.

[0] https://github.com/bitnami/kubecfg

[1] https://kustomize.io/
Why does it matter? The API is as dead as the telegraph, everyone is just building garden walls higher instead.

I worked on and with lots of APIs back in the day. They are all gone. All of them. Eliminated for business reasons. The internet has become a tool for carving out fiefdoms of engagement to be monetized, it's not about connecting people or systems anymore.
Isn’t DNA sequencing my medical information and protected by HIPAA and other privacy laws? Can the police search my medical records without a warrant?
Not really. Ideas are just patterns. Apply a pattern from something else to something else. A lot of what I do comes from sports or military.

If you're not getting enough ideas, think laterally, learn about other fields. See how chess players think, martial artists, football players, soldiers, food franchising, theology. Every field has its own 'common practice' which seems really obvious to the people in the field, but strange and new in a different field.
We bought a $1 house in Italy. Here's what happened next
The World's oldest person of (2015).
Ha, extra space was great, but hated the location. Spent all our time in the car (I was working remotely as an FTE), so basically stranded.
You can't tell if someone has a quantum computer until you observe it.
Lisp is simpler on a completely different dimension. Lisp code can be arbitrarily complicated to read due to arbitrarily complicated macros. This is frequently blamed for Lisp's continuing failure to take off, that every major program written in it is eventually actually written in a custom dialect of Lisp. This directly opposes, for better or worse, the sorry of simplicity Go has. (I think there's a place for both, so I'm not judging one as "better" here.)
Awesome! Thank you for sharing this Gem
>> Why is it just on HN that I run into these struggles

It's because HN is, actually, a very unique internet message board. It is
unique in that it takes its own guidelines very seriously and enforces them
very actively. Compared to every single other internet message board I've been
on (and I've been around the block a few times, like they say) flamewars are
prevented effectively and personal attacks are simply not tolerated.

For me, that's what keeps me combing back for more. HN is, well, a safe place,
where I can disagree with others, very strongly, without risking that a thread
will degenerate into put-downs and name-calling. This is in stark contrast to
other message boards where there seems to be a genuine belief that "winning" a
thread is some kind of achievement worthy of praise and self-respect.

So to be honest, if you're struggling to adjust to HN but you're feeling fine
on other message boards then I'm inclined to believe that, on the balance of
probabilities, it's because you bring with you behaviours and ways of
communicating that you've learned on other message boards that are
incompatible with HN, and that you are unwilling to change.

P.S. :%s/combing back/coming back/g. But it's a funny one, so I'm leaving it
like that.
FYI Elsevier doesn’t like people linking to Sci-Hub: https://boingboing.net/2019/08/02/publicsphere-v-elsevier.ht...
This guide is a must!!
I think you are experiencing "typical mind fallacy". https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/baTWMegR42PAsH9qJ/generalizi...

I imagine there are programmers who build objects by imagining people asking them questions and thinking what the objects would answer, or all kinds of other things. People for whom Spring's Repository/Service/Controller/View are real things with personalities or flavors. I tend to think in a mix of "If I could just tell the computer what to do in English, what would I say?" (function names) and "Whose responsibility is this? Is this really their job?" (classes).
Please note: Starting with Debian 7, the minor number is not part of the Debian release number, and numbers with a minor component like 9.4 or 9.7 now indicate a point release. Basically, only security updates and major bug fixes, with new updated installation media images. This, 10.2, is not a new major release of Debian.
>my iPhone 4S

That hasn't been secure to use on the internet in a long time.
Not looked into it, but the simplicity of Go doesn't only come from its syntax.

It also comes from the standard libraries which cuts down on libraries you have to use.

For most of the stuff I do with Go I don't need extra libraries and when I use them, there are no suprises which mean I can easily check what they do.

Compare that to JS or even Python, where I have to either use libraries for even the most basic stuff or have a huge amount of syntax and keywords.
I would be okay with it if it was properly anonymized. I'm talking for instance some peer-to-peer mixing scheme, not just a privacy clause by which they swear they won't use the data to identify the particular users. There are technical solutions to privacy-conscious telemetry, but of course the non-trivial cost of implementation, and perhaps more importantly the loss of valuable data for the company means it's almost never implemented.
If it’s strictly 64 bit it’s not x86-64 it’s amd64 but the rest of your comment is accurate.
> Even in a totalitarian panopticon like China, it's hard to picture exactly what downside a complete dna database would have.

This is a really bad take, because we already know that China is running an ethnicity-based genocide and cultural obliteration programme in Xinjang.

You might also want to consider this case, which is the reverse: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/ray-cromar... - refusal to perform DNA testing even when the defense demands it.
I really like the concept. Here are the highlights:

- Helm v2 support didn't use Tiller, instead it rendered the YAML client side and pushed that to the server. Sort of how Helm v3 will be, but it didn't work very well in practice with the charts I wanted to deploy. It felt like Helm suppor t was an afterthought and the best way to deploy was to port all your Helm chart dependencies to Pulumi.

- It was really intuitive to create functions that deployed the same thing repeatedly with slightly different settings. I used it for Office365 email server settings. I managed a couple domain names that use Office365 email so I had a single function that deployed the correct settings to the specified domain name, and I just called it twice with slightly different parameters. Way more intuitive than Terraform.
It's helping me a lot searching for, say, "thing" versus 'thing' or url vs URL.

I don't mind whether the coding style is ¿question? or simply question?, but I don't want to see both in the same file.
I am curious to know. Why does the Jewish community have a disproportionately large number of extremely intelligent people as evidenced by the number of Nobel laureates and other great intellectuals?
Does anyone know of a distribution other than debian with a social contract[1]? To me this is the reason why I never really considered another distribution.

[1] https://www.debian.org/social_contract
I'm a little unclear on the benefit here. Say I have a hard problem and want to spend say $15 million for one machine, and further say that my problem might be suitable for a quantum algorithm, and further say I'm okay restocking all the exotic cryogenics etc.

At that price, I could buy at least 15,000 boring old machines using a boring distributed algorithm.

Is that quantum algorithm really worth it?
Hackers have already put up thousands of Disney+ accounts for sale since launch
A few ways Safaricom can protect M-Pesa users
It’s a public forum with particular guidelines. Personal attacks that have nothing to do with the topic at hand are very explicitly against those guidelines.
Daniel Vassallo’s post might be interesting to you:

https://danielvassallo.com/only-intrinsic-motivation-lasts/
The simplicity of not having generics? Plus a broken type system (interface{} everywhere). That's not simplicity, that's just sloppy bad design.

Look into Zig for a much better language in the same niche.
The nine-year-old about to graduate from college
I'd say the premise a bit differently: matplotlib is tricky to learn but once you figure out how it works it's not bad.

I just went through this process myself (http://kachess.k2company.com) and this outline would have been SO helpful. I learned these points the slow, hard way.

(And while it doesn't suck, it's certainly not fun and intuitive.)
Nah, oracle’s sql is so different there’s hardly any overlap with standard sql.
You don't need dna to perform an ethnic cleansing. It's not even really that helpful. We've been doing those as a species for centuries, long before we even knew what DNA was.

In the case of the reverse: doesn't that just strengthen my point that this tool should be used to narrow the set of possible perpetrators?

Btw, I find the "this is a really bad take" verbiage to be rude and unnecessary. You could just leave it out and it wouldn't make your argument weaker.
This is something that people overlook quite often. It is very important to have a well-documented, up-to-date, and capable standard library packaged with your language. It just creates a smoother experience altogether.

Besides that, it also sets the standard for the 'right' way of designing your interfaces and whatnot. In Go, the third-party libraries are often compatible with the standard library methods and interfaces, which is just fantastic in both mobility between libraries, and having consistency with different projects.
There will be several bidders, I expect. IBM would have a reason to buy SuSE as would Microsoft. Nothing grows your market power by buying a competitor - no matter how small or technologically different.
Yes, I've been programming in Lisp and Racket for the past twenty years and recently switched to Go. The main reason was the availability of a large number of packages and the general tooling for Go. So far, I'm quite happy with my choice. Productivity is slightly less than with Racket, but outweighed by the small size of the executables, easier deployment, and more 3rd party libraries. Of course, I'm missing a lot of features that pretty much any Lisp offers, but the simplicity and static typing does overall have many advantages.

Since you mention Clojure: That's useless for me, because it runs on the JVM. One reason to use Go is exactly that it produces static, self-contained executables that don't require any heavy infrastructure.
Because they have higher than average intelligence, thus having "disproportionately large number of extremely intelligent people". I doubt their distribution is not normal.
I have lived the first 1/2 of the article for the last 1.5+ years and have gone through that mental cycle. We've been moving our product from AWS to GCP. We have a custom deployment tool based of off Capistrano, Chef and Cloud Formation to setup our stack in AWS. There are a couple things that have helped me and may help others who have to do a similar thing (or any setup for that matter).

Tooling: I looked at them all. yaml, kustomize, helm, deployment manager, etc and in the end I went with Terraform. The reasoning was simple. We deploy Infrastructure, not kubernetes services and terraform lets you do the entire thing with one tool. It has the ability to do loops and clunky if-like statements but if you want real programming power then you can create your own terraform provider which is what we did. The pattern of how to create a provider already exists so you are not re-inventing the wheel. We even add our own services to our provider so that we have one tool for setup of GCP resources -> Kubernetes resources -> our own service(s) resources. 1 tool, 1 flow, 1 statefile and the same pattern when working with it all.

Establish patterns: "My service is a multi-tenant service and should do X". Don't allow people to get away with special cases when it comes to deploying infrastructure. Create patterns and stick to them. As an example, one pattern I have is that I have 4 variables that all of my terraform modules use: project, region, cluster and tenant. A combination of any of those variables is enough to create unique resources for everything you deploy... dns names, storage buckets, databases, service accounts, namespaces, clusters, etc. Those variables allow me to know where your git repos are, what GCP project your deployment lives in, what kubernetes cluster you are on and what namespace you are in. Patterns.

Keep it simple: There will be pressure to have custom settings and provide as much flexibility as possible. Try and avoid this. Set defaults for values and try and reduce the number of configuration options available to others. In our case, there were around hundreds of environment variables being set on a deploy and most of them were the same. I took the list, standardized the environment variable names, DATABASE_USER, MYSQL_USER, MYSQL_USERNAME, DB_USERNAME... come on guys!, and deployed them as a secret in kubernetes so that all of our running services can access them. Reduce complexity.
Correct I have updated the title to reflect that.

Unfortunately she died in May 12,2016.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susannah_Mushatt_Jones
>To solve this, they have an upgrade you can get called "Windows 10 Pro for Workstations". Costs a little over $300.

At that price point you might as well get the LTSC version instead, which has none of that and has 10 years of security patches without needing to install feature updates.
I wish developers of TypeScript would learn from Go. TypeScript is awesome, but it is getting larger and larger and larger with every release. Soon it will become like the US tax code, and no one person will know the entire language.
Not since Smith vs. Maryland, one of the SCOTUS’ truly awful rulings.

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/12/what-...