skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Besides the advantage of an already established network - what are facebooks other advantages?

Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
"Good behavior" is double speak for "following the groupthink". Just look at wikipedia for an example of how bad this can become, where 1/3 of all content is edited and moderated by one dude with all his biases.

This wiki model is not the solution.
I went down this rabbit hole a week or two ago. From my understanding, it is a few orders of magnitude slower.
Meta but: I love how this page, despite being pretty much just plain text and images (2mb), takes > 6s to load. It even has a loading bar built in! Why is it okay to have so much bloat for a basic blog?
It's actually a lot easier than you'd think. You can move to another state and many problems go away. I've had a number of friends do this to allow the statuate of limitations expire for certain things.

For instance if you have a DUI arrest warrant in Washington, I know Arizona and California will still issue you an ID. I think a license too if Washington hasn't convicted you and removed your driving privilege.

It's quite easy to hide in other states for most crimes, the bigger the crime, the further you need to go. The problem is that, most jurisdictions don't have the funds/means to come get the person(let alone hold them until they can come), so they don't act on the notification when your name is ran, and don't ask the other party to hold you.

I know an executive of a company that has a Florida arrest warrant and travels very freely to every other state. He is not hiding, but he is also not dealing with his Florida issues. I know someone else who left Texas after sentencing, but before checking in to Prison for a decade. She still flies to Texas to see her parents under her new married name.

You might be amazed how many people are living in hiding from something.
Cool. Where do I sign-up to give it a try?
I said "between" left and far-left, and that's the majority politics of the employees. Also capitalism has nothing to do with left-vs-right.

By your definition, every corporation is right-wing by the fact that it's a corporation and all leftists want communism.
someone is attempting to build a curated internet for each other, check this out:

https://www.producthunt.com/posts/get-kelvin
It feels like you have no understanding of the underlying problem, honestly. There is a saying that everyone has heard that goes, If you are trying to outrun a bear, you don't have to be faster than the bear, you only have to be faster than your friend.

The bear, in this analogy, is the problem. It is society's problem. And the solution you propose for society is for everyone to run faster, but no one can run faster than a bear.

Maybe it is time instead to deal with the bear.
Not 100% sure, but didn't Yahoo have TGIFs in the 90s?
That's what "free as in puppy" stems from: the puppy is technically free, but there are a lot of other costs involved. It was originally coined, AFAIK, to suggest than even "free as in speech" free software can have a lot of other costs associated with it, but I think it applies to free services that get their revenue by showing you ads, aggregating and monetizing your data, or both.
The caused-based ads policy addresses some of the open areas from the initial 'Political Content' page: https://business.twitter.com/en/help/ads-policies/restricted...

Overall, Twitter's new policies are better than nothing, and better than leaving the platform as the Wild West of advertising politics/policies/values.

That's not to say it can't be gamed. Someone, somewhere has got to be working on how to still game the system.

I think the biggest "shift", nefarious-wise, would be exploiting Cause-Based Ads, and using accounts (real, bot, or funded) as a channel to spread messaging in a more 'faux-grassroots and less PAC' way.

For example: Instead of putting out an ad directly for a politician or proposition, I could put out a bunch of content (caused-based or through accounts) appealing to people's values and fears, and then conveniently a politician could step up and say "I'll fix this!". It's basically just producing fake (or biased) news in lieu of campaign videos.
Depends on the scheme and your security parameters. The best known ones we have are probably 5-6 orders of magnitude slower than plaintext in the best case (obviously the worst case is much worse).
Ah—unions of strings (e.g., `"foo" | "bar"`) effectively are enums in TypeScript and JavaScript. They are autocompleted and type-checked at compile time, so you should get exactly the same behavior. Even exhaustiveness checking. See docs[1] for details.

And, to the specific point: you absolutely should not have to look up the docs. These values definitely will autocomplete.

Anyway, aside from all that, unions of strings is "the idiomatic way" to do this sort of thing in TypeScript and JavaScript.

[1]: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/advanced-types....
Walmart.com is basically the same as Amazon though, isn't? I thought anybody could sell their stuff there.
To the extent that we lie to ourselves when we hold something to be absolutely true, yes. Everything is just a guess based on patterns and expectations.
Tech Before and After 1980
If you like to be outdoors, camping etc or in situations where glasses could be broken it is a no-brainer.

Also if you do the math it can potentially save you money on contacts and the ever-obnoxious eye checkups.

9 years since I had it done and it is amazing. No regrets so far.

I get out of bed every day and I can just see. No searching for glasses or going to the bathroom to put contacts in.
Have you considered making this open source and distribute as a container image that people can self-build/deploy/host on a serverless platform, like a Google Cloud Run?

For example, this DOC to PDF converter: https://github.com/as-a-service/pdf
I think it's a valid counterpoint. Those who would be great shipbuilders should hopefully love not only the sea, but also the act of building a ship. They should get as much if not more joy out of executing a weld perfectly, or shaping a piece of wood partly to their own will and partly within the constraints of its grain. Those who only yearn for the sea make great ship passengers i.e. customers, or ship captains or crewpersons. There's a divide there, and it's inherent.

But I guess (still using the language of this quote) you could say the the article is presuming the shipbuilders already love shipbuilding, and just need to be reminded that what they're building is for purposes of going to sea. Fine, but should they be impressed? To milk the analogy for all it's worth: A ship goes on the sea but it's not of the sea. It's of metal that comes out of the ground, or trees that grow out of the ground, and it's built on the ground, by people who go home at night to sleep in their houses that are on the ground. That's the divide. Shipbuilders actually have very little to do with the sea; in fact it's sort of their enemy, the thing they're protecting the customers from, the thing always threatening to creep in, seep in, and ruin their work! Maybe the analogy breaks down there... although then again... :)

Anyway I disagree with the notion that doing something for its own sake, or even (perish the thought) TO MAKE MONEY, somehow isn't adequately motivating. Half the time I wish all the temporarily-embarrassed millionaires could just fess up for once and say, yeah, I need the money. I wish it were okay to say that.
So, should people who are inherently political, say gay, trans, or non-binary folk not exist in the workplace?
Why a BiLSTM instead of just a smaller Transformer?
> When we talked about it in the past, his reasoning is: "life is short, I'm going to have all the fun I can before I die."

Happiness comes from within, and I respect this more than chasing fame or fortune because of the expectations of others.
There's almost 100% chance it would have failed, I doubt they could have found a more dedicated and driven person to take it through its darker times.
What Google as a profit-seeking corporation does is not the same as the majority internal political culture amongst its employees.
These are very salient questions.

Context cannot be ignored.

I’ve experienced these toxic environments where good sleep and healthy food was almost impossible to obtain and it can be crippling.

I got a full-ride to university, but could not take full advantage of because of a toxic domestic environment and impoverished family.

I got to learn from smart professors and supportive friend which greatly improved my life because they helped me develop better learning and social skills. I’m using everything I learned to better my family and the immediate environment.

Good education is a powerful force for betterment. It’s troubling that access to opportunities like the I had one was based on luck.

Fortunately, educational opportunity has increased. Resources like Khan Academy and other MOOC platforms can help you get a top-notch education cheaply. Our society just need to make sure it’s accessible to those who need it most.
I hope that regular exercise of my body and mind can minimize this.
Oh, well, my vision is not that bad. I suppose if I could barely see when getting out of bed in the morning then perhaps I would consider it more seriously. I only had to get them because I failed a drivers vision test but just barely.
There is excellent touch rejection on the edges when the contact patch originates from the edge. You can even customize touch rejection with a good lock plugin.
Salesforce is moving Marketing Cloud to Azure
Since when were advertising agencies button-up affairs? Crispin Porter is down the street from me and they seem to be every silly brogrammer stereotype, just in a different market.

Like their shuttle looks like a prison bus but is labeled "disruptive thinkers transport" or some such. That's Mike Judge levels of ridiculousness.
> If you're from a rich neighborhood, your school has tons of money and resources. If you grow up in a poor neighborhood, some barely have enough money to keep the roof from leaking. And we've all just accepted this as normal and OK. We have the power to change this but we choose not to.

I would suggest that the reason kids in rich neighborhoods turn out ok is not because their schools have more money but because their parents have set them up for success. I can say this confidently because my dad is in the military, and I've attended several years at a poor high school in Alabama where cheating and truancy was rampant.

See, here's the thing. People often greatly underestimate the role good parents have in producing good, contributing members of society. We like to pretend that everyone is born equal and that the reason some kids fail and other don't is because the public infrastructure they had access to was good or bad.

But I would wager that's only 10% of the issue. The other 90% of the issue is that all parents are on a spectrum. And it turns out that poor parents are at the end of the spectrum that sets up their kids for failure.

I totally get that it's not intentional; Nevertheless, they set bad examples to their kids (smoking, drinking, lotto), often times one parent (usually the male) is missing, they might not enforce school attendance/homework/chores, etc. Kids follow the example of their parents. If the parent is a single mom, pregnant at 14, smokes and drinks excessively, etc. chances are the kids are going to be the same way.

I am not convinced throwing money at schools is the solution. I think there needs to be some kind of mentorship between the poor and middle classes that essentially causes there to be better parents with each generation. Like temporary foster homes where poor kids can learn and observe how middle and upper class people do things.

Basically, I believe the ultimate solution to poverty is love - personal relationships with the poor. Actually making friends with poor people as a middle or upper class individual and helping lift them up a little. Money is part of the problem, yes, but my argument is that the importance of money is greatly overestimated in the poverty problem.
Nothing to see here. While most employees are chill, I would imagine Google has a disproportionation of hyper ideologists who are intolerant to different opinions and self-righteous to bring everything down to achieve personal validation.

The trust is reduced, but it is both way, between employer and employees. Without that, any conversation is meaningless.
Also, if you need to interact with a Supermicro BMC that doesn't support the HTML5 console (for example, because it's running older firmware), I reverse-engineered the proprietary "iKVM" protocol (along with a lot of other parts of the BMC) and implemented support for it on a branch of noVNC, which you can find here: https://github.com/kelleyk/noVNC
Not everyone does, the UnrealEngine doesn’t for example, you can see project code words in the commit history.
note to self:

Required for education: Unskilled labor "must" pay less to motivate people to get diplomas.

Required for productivity: Wages "must" be low enough so that people have to keep working.

Since motivation to get a diploma depends on the size of the income advantage "ideally" people without diplomas should barely be able to sustain themselves - forever.

All other economic talk seems filler material. All excessive wealth "should" go towards sustaining the filler material or otherwise be destroyed. For this purpose we also see endless investment in businesses that exist only for the purpose of extracting wealth from everyone else. Some of course deliver useful products in return but if they could increase ROI by not making anything most if not all would do it. If they operate at a loss it is even more "beneficial" to the system. For this purpose we also have 32 Trillion "hidden" in tax havens.

The whole thing seems to have "evolved" so that we all are as productive as possible only to sacrifice the produce on the altar of productivity again. The bad thing about this is that all this "productivity" destroys everything around us. It all costs finite resources. We would be better off just making what we need efficiently.
The big thing that's missing for me is support for operating systems that aren't Linux or macOS. At work, Windows support is a must (I may strongly dislike it, but that's life).

The other blocker was historically the lack of threading, but now that seems to be implemented.
Sorry how is suppressing your right to organize in the workplace not internal politics?
As an Xoogler (left in 2015) I find that news highly disappointing. I think that without honest, regular Q&A at events like TGIF, the company will become more and more out of touch.

When I was there, TGIF was watered down, but we still asked uncomfortable questions of management. I remember asking a question of Sundar when he was head of Android when the Nexus 6 came out questioning our chasing Apple into the high end market, rather than making affordable devices.
Looks like Credit card and PayPal only.

Definitely not Bitcoin. I've given Bitcoin to Wikipedia in the past (using the same email address). When I try to pay for a WT Social subscription with a credit card, I get a bit scary error message:

Card Input Error(s):

You cannot combine currencies on a single customer. This customer has had a subscription, coupon, or invoice item with a different currency.
Silicon Design Reimagined
I met a man whose life as a programmer ended after a failed Lasik in the early 2000s - it was quite traumatic and he had serious financial problems afterwards
and when "anybody who thinks that it's okay for there to be consequences for racism / sexism / other bigotry is a worthless California leftist and should be ignored" became the default modus operandi of many right-wing extremists.

and when essentially everyone in the right wing decided that their feelings were more important than facts.
not sure what happened, but your code example is almost all tofu (unicode [X]) to me. looks like it's using characters like "mathematical monospace lowercase letter 'm'" etc

edit: unidecoded:

my-router
my-route(pattern="/home")
// some home page
my-route(pattern="/news")
// some news page
I wanted to test DD-WRT couple of months ago, but figured out they still use kernel v3.2 for my and couple of another devices (TL&Netgear).
My brother worked in ad agencies, and this is the opposite of what he said. Tons of drinking and just generally bad behavior which would only be tolerated in the worst silicon valley startups. He moved to the startup world because it has a healthier work culture.
I’m pleased to see this as I have been working on some shell scripts for managing a collection of research PDFs myself. But I think the headline’s a little misleading. The scripts don’t do much more to help you avoid journal webpages than feed a DOI into Sci-Hub. If the material you’re collecting isn’t on Sci-Hub, or breaching the publisher’s copyright is likely to cause problems for you at work, then these tools aren’t useful.
Events are the thing that keep me and my peers using it.
Buy your own domain, dns, and email. DNS made easy is low cost and very reliable. For email use Fastmail. Amazing product.
The Pledge of the Computing Professional
Improvements in amino acid assembly imaging can help understand life formation
Someone should take this to the next level and implement a floating point ALU with this.
Alt+Cmd+I -> Console -> closeOverlay()
Well, that's historical. In 2019 it was 1. China 1. USA 3. S. Korea (51M) 4. N. Korea (25M). And Hungary lost to Serbia (7M).

https://www.imo-official.org/year_country_r.aspx?year=2019&c...
One of the biggest problems is that NASA's Plutonium-238 stockpile is running low, and is only barely being replenished (it was an artifact of nuclear weapon production, at the time). Each of Voyager 1 and 2 used something like 15kg of it for their RTGs. Because they were so heavily powered, the half-life won't power the craft down for decades.

The availability of Pu-238 is why European missions can't go past Jupiter without coordinating with NASA -- politically is impossible for them to produce nuclear spacecraft, but solar power becomes ineffective farther from the sun.

But given that NASA has a limited Pu-238 stockpile, they're only stocking new craft with the minimum necessary to hit the key science objectives.

There's (finally) a new program to produce more if it, but in very limited quantities: https://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-nuclear-battery-plutoni...
> Forcing someone to live

Suicide prevention is not "forcing someone to live". Suicidal thoughts are usually transient and any delay in suicidal action allows the person to seek help. Like I said in my first post, reducing access to means an methods is only part of the package that we need to be providing.

You keep trying to make this point: you keep trying to say that suicide is a choice that people make. I'll try again: it often is not a choice that people make. Please just go read the research. Here's a tweet about "Rapid Onset Despair": https://twitter.com/ProfLAppleby/status/939820235946971138

You especially need to pay attention to intoxication and suicide. Or are you saying that an impulsive decision made when very drunk is no different to a considered decision that is stable over months made when sober?

> no right

Since you mention rights, people have a right to life and suicide prevention respects that right. It respects that right in a way that wide-spread gun-ownership doesn't.

UNCRC Article 6: https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/U...

UNDHR Article 3: https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

UNCRPD article 10: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-...

I live in England and the Mental Health Act and Mental Capacity Act specifically give HCPs the right to take away people's choice in some limited situations. I don't know where you live but you almost certainly have similar laws around substituted decision making.
Yeah I gotta be honest the two sites I both like and hate most on the internet are Wikipedia and StackOverflow. Great resources in most cases but my god the moderation is.. overbearing.

I have my doubts that'll work for a social network. Good luck to them, but I'll have probably forgotten I signed up by the time they next send me an email.

Side note you seem to be able to bypass the signup queue by visiting your own friend share link.
They did both eyes at the same time?
To add to this, the pilot also mentions fuel as another primary reason that Phoenix or Las Vegas were not considered.

Bakersfield Airport is the same distance from LAX as San Diego. Would they have had enough fuel to basically double the flight length?
Can agree. I was also at Yahoo when FYI was implemented.

It was 45 minutes of scripted presentations, followed by Q&A (and later, raffles :))

The Q&A part was great. Super-awesome to know the executives will at least try to answer any random question that got enough upvotes during the week. Of course we would sometimes get the canned "we will look into that" answers, which Marissa would tell the exec to come prepared with the real numbers next time.
This is a cool little bot, but I'm not sure if it is priced appropriately.

$10/mo is too low. Makes it feel cheap. I'd recommend if you want to keep that same price to go for an annual membership.

But a better price would be in the $29/mo range. Still affordable by team, and you would actually get paid for your work.
A bond requirement after a certain amount of sales isn't a bad idea, but the threshold should be significantly higher, maybe over 50k or 100k in sales in a year.

A better idea may be to enforce the insurance requirement. This de facto requires sellers to commit a similar sum of money towards the business, but they're getting something for it instead of it being tied up. The Amazon contract says if you sell over 10k/month for 3 months then you must carry $1 million in liability insurance. The threshold seems about right, if they'd require proof of insurance for anyone over that threshold it would mostly fix bad actors using multiple accounts, while mostly leaving alone those that have legitimate business purposes in running multiple accounts.
My parents worked pretty relentlessly to make opportunities for me. My mom was a professional librarian (still works a couple days a week), so we always had tons of books around. My dad made sure there were computers around - we built our first 8-bit kit when I was 6. Also he reached out to a lot of people who could be resources, for example when Niklaus Wirth gave a talk on Oberon at a University Maryland, he drove me out to see that.

I think (2) is a good question, but a huge one, I'm not sure what to say within a HN comment. I know it's a cliche, but certainly that being smart isn't everything, there's a lot more to life. The game-like recognition of academic credentials and so on is not as meaningful in the real world as it seems "in the bubble."

That said, what I think is a common thread of prodigies is a hunger and thirst for knowledge, to learn things. I carry that with me today, and think it's something to be nourished.
> I can say this confidently because my dad is in the military, and I've attended several years at a poor high school in Alabama where cheating and truancy was rampant.

I'm not disputing your personal experience, but this is an anecdote :)