skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think the keyword is "typical." Which is probably true that the math is pretty basic at most universities and in most programs.

But you can go to schools like the University of Toronto, which is a strong math school and has very challenging programs like ASSPE1165 (https://fas.calendar.utoronto.ca/mathematics-specialist-scie...)
It's just a function of multi-targeting. When problem can be framed in a way that one of the outputs helps explain the other output I would call that component to be an "explanation component".

For one of my problems I know that the model would need to 'see' an orientation field in order to make its predictions, so instead of just asking for the predictions I also ask for an orientation field. The loss function has only a small weighting and is set against a very rough ground truth along with a total variation loss. This ends up producing a nicer orientation field than the ground truth.
Hyundai develops world's first cabin active noise control aimed at road noise
I am a happy lasik success story. The procedure changed my life and allowed me to start diving again, it is the best money I have ever spent.

I think it is unfair to blame suicides on the procedure, as they warn you about the risks beforehand and are clear that you may have some halos/blurriness for a few months.

Blame the suicide on mental illness, because that is where the problem actually lies. Anything else seems like an emotional play to get money from a lawsuit.
A lot of the good “social networks” these days are organized a single topic or community. Like a community slack/discord or moderated subreddit. I wonder whether there will be much of a market for open ended social networks into the 2020s as both twitter and Facebook have become cesspools... and frankly don’t feel like good places to interact with folks
What do people crave at 45, 55, 65?
TFA also notes that the roles of the wires in the two types of memory is reversed
I designed official Joker logo using wood type from my letterpress collection
It’s fake, and it’s poisoning the data pool.
Remember when Google was preaching how its algorithms are "objective" in the last years of Schmidt as CEO? It was also around the time it was being investigated over antitrust issues.
You’re definitely on to something here. The comments are half the value. There’s usually someone wanting to know why a given option was excluded or why a conclusion was reached by Wirecutter staff.
Because amazon doesn't add seller stickers/labels it's nearly impossible for them to even determine the seller if it's "Fulfilled by Amazon" ... I tend to stick to the "Sold by Amazon" or "Sold and shipped by MFG" because at least with Amazon, returns become easy and/or I trust orders from MFG slightly more than otherwise.
(not op) Somewhat, although it's fairly minimal for avx2. The serious downclocking problem comes from avx512 instructions, which the author seems interested in:

> This algorithm should map fairly nicely to AVX-512, and should in fact be a bit faster than 2x the speed of AVX2 since a few instructions can be saved

In general, you aren't going to make a faster wheel without some trickery (vectorization usually). All the obvious optimizations have already been made in the stdlibs.
The suicides aren't going to take the survey, which skews the survey results in a favorable direction but are of interest to the FDA.
He also never intended to be public about it, he kept his memo internal and posted it in a place that was soliciting feedback on the topic. It only became public when one of the activist types leaked it.
So, kind of like Walter Pitts but born with a silver spoon in his mouth rather than being abandoned to the streets of Chicago.
Monte Kali (Heringen)
I visited that page from Manjaro and it says it supports any Linux distro with Snap support (so most).
There is internal work on a SetMaxHeap API: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/23044 (there's a review of related code at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-codereviews/b... ). It isn't perfect (notably, heap size and process size as seen by the OS are not identical) but seems like a step up from ballast or other workarounds.

In the issue thread Caleb Spare also proposed a minimum heap size so that you get GOGC-ish behavior once your app uses enough RAM, but don't have constant GCs with a tiny heap.

There's definitely a common issue where the GOGC heuristic doesn't take advantage of situations where it can collect less often but still remain in the "don't care" range of memory use. (CloudFlare talked about the same thing making benchmark results weird: https://blog.cloudflare.com/go-dont-collect-my-garbage/ )

And there can definitely be situations where GC'ing a bit more would be worth it to keep a process under an important memory threshold to avoid swapping or OOM kills.

The designers famously don't want too many knobs, but some other ways to convey user priorities to the runtime could certainly save users from some awkward workarounds and fiddling w/the existing knobs.
On my browser it says "Download for Mac", so presumably you get a link specific to your current OS.
It sounds like just what I want.

But I use VPNs. So I'd need to get a mapped port.

What port does Aether want?

Edit: Also, can I just install from source?
I see your point and it's valid.

Broadcast messages from people you care about are nice. So and so had a baby, or whatever else is going on in their life. It's why FB was useful for before it became a continuous stream of reposted drivel.

I like to keep up with what's going on in people's lives at a scale greater than one to one interactions can support. In my view, there's definitely an upside to technology that supports a number of friends and acquaintances roughly 10x what one could support otherwise.

Hell, even linkedin is somewhat useful to be able to keep up with what old colleagues are up to and reconnect at times.
>> Swedish organizational culture is very meeting and consensus oriented.

How does that work ? do people get a say regardless of their status ? do good ideas really rise up ?

Or does it just become a different type of political game ?
no artificial lightning which would not be there just for photo
What costs more is not hardware but the salaries of employees.
WT:Social is never going to have a Facebook level network effect, but it's certainly going to be higher than GNU Social. I just created an account 5 mins ago and I was number 100k+ so they're off to a good start.
how did you draw the diagrams?
I've contemplated hosting an instance of Mastodon. It doesn't quite have the features I'd like it to have.
What is pedantic?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_old_telephone_service
> shout down others for as little as not vehemently agreeing with you

Isn't this what you're doing now: shouting down others for as little as not vehemently agreeing with you about the place of political discussion in the workplace?

Edit: To rephrase since you missed what I was getting at: you are advocating for institutional support in silencing people who express views with which you disagree in the workplace. That is, views which are "too political" should be forbidden and, if expressed, presumably shouted down or otherwise silenced.

If for example, I expressed my disagreement with you that I believe political views are reasonable to express in the workplace, what action would you take?
I was pretty happy with several Asus routers. Tomato firmware worked on them. After the FCC pushed mfgs to block third party firmware, it wasn't so good... my current higher end Linksys is ok, but will probably go Ubiquity next round when Wifi 6 (ax) becomes more common for actual devices.
Thank you for taking the time to clarify. The root of why we're talking past each other seems to be a disagreement on the operation of System 2. In a couple earlier posts, I stated that I thought the terms 'rational' and 'intelligence' were being conflated.

It seems like you are saying smart people are better able to guard against their biases because they have more access/capacity in their System 2 thinking. I disagree on this, and I think both Kahneman and Stanovich make it clear that equating (or correlating) System 2 to intelligence is a mistake. It feels like you may be making an unsubstantiated logical leap here to fit a model of the world that 'makes sense' but hasn't transitioned from hypothesis to theory. In the context of Kahneman's work, it comes across as a System 1 error to try and maintain coherence in a previously held worldview. Maybe I'm misinterpreting their work, but that's why I deliberately pointed out that I'm largely relying on a layman's understanding. I am genuinely interested (because it's a topic that I enjoy) if you have sources to back up this stance.

In regard to why I started using the term 'bias', it was mainly because Kahneman's work focuses largely on heuristics and biases that affect decisions. To speak about System 1 and System 2 hinders communication because it's generally only known to people familiar with his work. However, most people immediately understand what is meant when people say 'bias' or 'emotional decision'. It was probably bad wording on my part, but using 'emotional' was in response the earlier post because that was their choice of words to describe how people can't parse emotion from reason. I'm assuming if they were familiar with Kahneman's work, they would have chose more precise wording like "System 1" and "System 2". So the choice of words between 'emotion' or 'bias' was a bit clunky but meant to redirect the parent comment's sentiment into the verbiage of the academic work, not really an attempt of 'moving goalposts'. It was essentially the same topic (unless I misunderstood the parent comment's intent). The reason I responded is because I felt that comment missed one of the fundamental takeaways from Kahneman, namely that "simple minded" people are biased by their 'emotion' but smart people are not.

I think the key distinction in our opinions is that (to re-state your position), some 'simple-minded' people don't have access to System 2 (and thus can't avoid biases) because of the very nature of their lower intelligence. Psychologists specifically studied if intelligence is a discriminator between the level of bias in decisions and the conclusion was bias is independent of intelligence. To re-phrase one of my earlier comments, rational != intelligent. Or put another way, greater intelligence does not make you more rational or any less biased. The book Thinking Fast and Slow is rife with all kinds of examples of smart people doing otherwise irrational things as case studies.
I suspect the community here is just too large for something like a mailing list. I mean, there are mailing list, but they're less generalized than I like.
Just today I stumbled on lemire works when looking through the dependencies of jgit and found the java ewah bitset implemenation and ended up browsing his code seeing the utf8 validator and simdjson. Coincedences..
If you've been developing for 35+ years and you still have to look at the keyboard.... you teach yourself touch typing. Unless touch typing means something other than "not looking at the keyboard before you press the keys"?
> Despite publicly denying doing so, Google keeps blacklists to remove certain sites or prevent others from surfacing in certain types of results

Google absolutely does this. Around 6-9 months ago bluelight.org (a somewhat controversial drug harm reduction forum) disappeared from search results overnight.

It will show results if you explicitly use `site:bluelight.org`, otherwise nothing

* I feel the need to add a disclaimer here: I don't abuse drugs, but find blue light an interesting source of information regarding side effects and bioavailability of various prescription medications
This sparks an idea... what if there was a tool that crawled all academic studies’ sources. Basically allowing you to see the root source of every cited study back to square one. Would make it much easier to discover studies based on a pyramid of weaker/wrong studies.
That would be an exceedingly thin signal. Very few posts will have incoming links, so you'll get very little scoring data.

The signal will be hugely susceptible to outlier bias -- The Post That Goes Viral, and generates a huge number of incoming links -- will dominate the rankings.

Because the signal is so thin, distorting and manipulation (through link farming) will be cheap and difficult to detect (a small number of links across a large number of sites).

Don't get me wrong: looking at incidental behaviour is useful, and can often be much more beneficial than direct actions. But remember that all of these signals are actually proxies for some ineffible quantity you're trying to measure, quality.

(The very definition of which should leave you crying on the floor after a few hours. Or days. Or weeks. Or months. Or years....)

May minds have attempted this task. All have fail.

Your correspondent included.

(Small site, many moons ago, since surrendered its electrons back to the Great Disk in the Sky.)
Maybe because more people who types those queries find the first result from GeeksforGeeks page more useful ?
People searching for those are more likely beginner programmers. Being an old unix geek, I personally do like the official documentation better but it's true the official documentation is a lot more obtuse for beginners, whereas that first result looks a lot more friendly with examples, etc.
Try. My blog got 16 visitors from another blog today.

(edit: it is now 23!)

Won't make me rich.

But it makes me happy that I am part of rebuilding an old style web.

If you write about interesting stuff, post your website below and I might add a link and I don't care about nofollow and all that SEO stuff. Maybe 5 of my visitors visit you.

You won't get rich but you will be part of something.
This sort of homology[1] or this sort[2]? It looks like this is about the first one and proteins usually involve the second one. If they are more related than I expect, I would love to find out.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homology_(mathematics)

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence_homology
Fry’s Electronics says it’s not going out of business
Yeah...the stuff we do in most industries today is so complex that if we used Assembly or even C, nothing would ever get done. The problem is the abstractions we need (OS, high level langs) create many additional layers of complexity that can fail and bite you.

I might have a rudimentary understanding of electronics and digital design and could write Assembly and kind of understand the full toolchain from A to Z, but on a modern computer (hardware, BIOS, OS, programming language...etc) there is no hope.

Everything is a trade-off. If I had to write code for a probe today I would opt for the absolute simplest hardware and software so there is a lot less room for error.
If you knew that there were alternatives two years ago (like SMILE and ortho-k) that you are no longer a candidate for due to LASIK and that possibly additional therapies in the future are ruled out, how would that impact your satisfaction? I see a lot of comments comparing LASIK vs. glasses for eternity and not so many including other alternatives.
They mean of all the people who did not have one of the three side-effects of LASIK before the surgery, 46% now suffer from such symptoms after LASIK. Basically suggesting that LASIK caused these complications.
Honest question: would it be possible to set up a machine learning endpoint to work through these Human Intelligence Tasks?

I mean, I guess anything's possible. Maybe my question is it practicable…
Incidentally, if this is the level of information you are looking for, you can get the same thing by typing help(str.replace) in the Python interpreter.
I'm going to take a picture of an Anish Kapoor sculpture tomorrow. Will that be an infringing transformative work?
Please follow the guidelines as follows:
> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
Reddit, like HN, was never as good as it used to be, though many like to pretend it was.

The locus has shifted, though. Early Reddit was decidely techy, it's now exceedingly popular/memey. There were and are many cesspits. As well as numerous dead or stagnent fora, several of which I can lay claim to myself.
I took a job in sales (commission based, fail and starve) just to force myself to socialize better.

Short term - very very hungry.
Long term - a far more effective and well-integrated member of society.
It's what this sweet poster that hangs on my wall is for, first one in the set: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/visions-of-the-future/
Ah, you're the author. I missed that. Cool work by the way.
Why am I getting down voted for asking an honest question?
I don't think anything Uber did related to selectively ignoring laws when a new administration took office.

How is any of this about large companies not caring about laws because of a new president?
These salaries are higher than I expected
Why are people using GC in this day and age for anything other than processing on fully-general graphs (where the tracing and auto collecting is genuinely helpful)? Literally everything else can be dealt with by using more flexible memory management strategies, that do not need a pre-allocated 10GB heap, and will not hog cpu in wasteful and unpredictable ways when memory utilization rises above a set percentage.
I'm not sure if the compiler is smart enough to do it for you, but you might be able to squeak a bit more performance by precomputing a partial sum (data + V_LEN - 1) outside the loop for this statement:

> v_load(data + offset + V_LEN - 1);

Other than that, this is incredibly clean code and I doubt you can get much more performance without dropping into assembly. I wish my coworkers made code this well documented :/
We started on Gecko -- see https://brianbondy.com/blog/174/the-road-to-brave-10. It lost on many dimensions, as it has for other newer browsers.

Your desire for us or anyone to die on the Gecko hill would, had we acted on it, simply have helped Google cement the Chrome (not chromium) hegemony. The crucial battle right now is a layer up, at ads/donations/subscriptions/privacy -- where Firefox has been slow and weak vs. Brave and Safari.

There will be time for better engines later, once Google loses share due to innovations that attack its deep conflicts of interest with its users, along with likely prosecution of the open antitrust case.
I am surprised he doesn't mention Bongard problems: http://www.foundalis.com/res/diss_research.html
This is not my area of expertise, but from a software engineering perspective, the proposal "Replace a constant in a configuration file with a new piece of procedural code" smells like a huge new liability when it comes to maintenance. Of course it could be truly necessary, but the author made it sound like the "ballast" method was working just fine and simply felt hacky. Personally, I'd rather document and maintain a single value change that's "hacky" than 22 extra lines of turing-complete code.
Just a few years later, HP did 16 layer PCBs instead of the mylar tape and achieved ROM that was very dense and fast for its time[1]; though apparently yields were quite poor.

1: http://www.hp9825.com/html/the_hp_9100_rom.html
Have you heard of mastodon? It seems like what you are looking for.
https://joinmastodon.org/
We evaluated WebKit too. Nope, for the Windows gap you cite, among others (e.g., no free-as-in-beer DRM plugin).
At one point about 16 years ago, I was prescribed hard contacts that dealt with astigmatism. They seemed fine but the irritation, the pain of daily installation, plus the warnings about never falling asleep with them on made me pass on these. I never experienced the blurriness that you mention in the few weeks that I wore them so perhaps there is some mitigation for the rotation?
How is an open curve "with boundary", but a closed curve "without boundary"?
Why would Walmart be on that list at all?
yeah that's what regulatory agencies are for. is this the first you've heard of them?
In many ways what you describe feels similar to having a high IQ and ADHD. Sometimes being able to dig deeper into a topic than most but sometimes entering a bit of a “mental fog” where you’re barely able to think at an average level. But instead of medication it can be “triggered” by sudden surprises (E.g. unexpected questions or situations can derail my mind for a few minutes) or environmental/nutrition changes, or even just pack of sleep.

Still it forces you to think at different levels of mental acumen and appreciate the differences people have in mental quickness. Though it’s also a challenge when people with constant “IQ” assume you don’t know a given topic if you’re in an off moment or day. Luckily the more experienced people seem to pick up on that. In the end communicating across different intellectual levels makes for a humbling challenge.
Not as sensitive as accidentally dropping information about your internal network. then take the long-troll method of infiltrating an upstream provider to attack a juicy target (build system of fortune 500? yes please)

or maybe catching wind of some dev keys that really are root keys..

many reasons to sanitize git history before open sourcing. in fact many organizations i have worked with still maintain two separate repos, one internal and one open source using fancy magic (either with git or with additional tools) to sanitize and sync commits between the two. i've seen code commits to a large organization that are then packaged up and inspected for license and security violations in an untrusted environment.. many reasons to keep two (or more) running copies
New AI System Automatically Evolves to Evade Internet Censorship
It will get whatever it can. You also don’t need a mapped port, Aether can punch holes through firewalls via reverse-opens. (Though having a port open will significantly increase your connection speed and frequency.)

You can look at the port it chooses through netstat, it does not have a fixed port. However, once it gets a working one, it won’t change it from then on so you can map that port.

Edit: you can, but it having an Electron shell for UI (the actual app is Go) makes the build process somewhat complicated. It’s on GitHub though, feel free to take a look at the makefile and give it a shot.
As someone who miss the original Whatsapp a lot I was about to reach for my wallet, but this seems to be more of a wiki than a social network to me:

> Since all content on the platform can be edited or deleted by other users, he believes there's a good incentive for good behavior by users.
A lightweight and GPU accelerated, SQL engine built on the RAPIDS.ai ecosystem
My prescription is moderately strong -6.5 and -7

Yes. I wear extended wear contacts that are supposed to be replaced once a month. I take them out and replace them when I notice a significant deterioration in vision, or when my eyes feel scratchy. For me has varied between a month and about 18 months. YMMV

I have very occasionally rubbed my eyes to the point of accidentally removing a contact, mostly this is a habit I have trained myself out of

Most days and nights I forget that I have contacts in, I always sleep in them, makes getting up in the night to pee much safer, and other night time activities more enjoyable
Yeah no shit. I'm gay and I'm not voting for a homophobic dweeb over Trudeau. At least he apologized.

Every leftist I know voted NDP or Green anyway, so yet again, you're purposefully conflating the left and the centrists/liberals.
I knew it! OS/360 was a decepticon plot all along!
Like a box that remains the same size over the years, but the contents are gradually reduced.

I would love to have "that much" Mike and Ike's, but it's never in there.
AdsDax built a decentralized message queue with Beanstalkd and Hedera