skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Clayton already answered some of this, but I also have some other ways of saying the same thing.

OKD 4 uses Fedora CoreOS for the same reason that OKD 3.11 used CentOS instead of RHEL. For better or worse, they're built and maintained by different systems and/or people, and we simply can't just make OKD use a RHEL derivative due to how support and subscriptions work.

Functionally, they should be nearly identical, but in practice, they're two different pieces of software and they're maintained and built in different systems, much like how Fedora, and CentOS are managed separately from RHEL. The differences mostly come to where packages come from and what systems built them.

The code for OCP/OKD is the same, the major difference is how it's built and released and the OS (RHEL CoreOS vs Fedora CoreOS), and potentially the upgrade graphs supported via over the air updates.

As to who Clayton is: he is basically one of the the main architects for Openshift since basically the beginning (I forget if it goes back to prior to v3).
I’m convinced that POTS is already a dead man walking. The younger generation has no interest in talking on the phone in the first place, and with the amount of spam calls my phone number is absolutely the worst part of my phone.

Texting and apps is a much more pleasant way to interact with someone, and bonus of no hold times and much can be automated.

I think business texting is an upcoming startup unicorn which will be another “trivial idea packaged properly into a billion dollar product”.
This is a straw man. I made no statement about income inequality and I'm not calling for everyone to make the same amount.

The economy doesn't obey immutable laws of the universe. It works the way it does because of rules that we constructed[1]. Nothing prevents total compensation in the US from being higher allowing everyone's salaries to rise. With more progressive taxation, we could reduce the amount of inequality.

[1] e.g. per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_inequality_in_the_Unite...

> Labor's share of GDP declined by 4.5 percentage points from 1970 to 2016, measured based on total compensation. The decline measured for wages and salaries was 7.9 points. These trends imply income due to capital (i.e., asset ownership, such as rent, dividends, and business profits) is increasing as a % of GDP.
"No longer ignorant", I certainly am not. Thank you for the positive reinforcement though.

Becoming less ignorant is a life-long process, as far as I can tell.

I'm just somewhat more aware of my capacity to over-generalize based on my individual experiences, and allow biases to settle in my subconscious in the form of racism, sexism, ageism, or what have you. I try to find where I have internalized these thoughts so I can do a little internal reforming. I also pay a lot more attention to "_______ is/are _______" statements, as they are almost always over-generalizations.

Being aware of this mental mechanism doesn't really stop me from doing it though. I know I'll tend to cluster experiences to create generalizations indefinitely, as it seems to be an evolved trait (makes sense for survival reasons, to assume the worst until you find evidence otherwise) - even though it's not perfect.
Where does a context switch fall in this? A function call?
This whole thing is a shot across the bow of Java. Everyone is finally piling on to kill it once and for all.
I don't get why they couldn't fit both a touch bar and the function keys on a 16 inch laptop. Other vendors manage to put a numpad on their notebooks of similar sizes.
> I'd sure like to be convinced that this isn't such a dilemma and that there's a way to have both

Take a look at end-to-end auditable voting systems [1]. In particular, look at some of the specific E2E systems that article links to, such as Scantegrity II. These systems allow individual voters to check that their vote was properly recorded, but do not provide a way for the individual to prove to someone else that their vote was or was not cast for any particular candidate. They also typically provide for allowing any third party to verify the vote tallies.

Scantegrity is particularly interesting, because it is an add-on to existing optical scan voting systems. All the magic is in how the ballots are prepared. This means that it could be adopted in many jurisdictions without requiring buying a lot of new voting equipment.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-to-end_auditable_voting_sy...
For the longest time the iPhones were getting thinner and thinner and hn/reddit complained that they really wanted chunkier iPhones with better batteries.

Then Apple turned the battleship and since 2014 (iPhone 6) we've gotten a thicker phone with improved battery life in every redesign.

I'm pretty happy about this new direction.
SO has always been hostile to questioners by design. It's a natural consequence of requiring "high-quality" questions.

Since most questions will not be "high-quality" (for any reasonable definition of "high-quality"), most new participants' experience will be of asking a question and being told "that's a bad question" either explicitly (downvotes) or implicitly (editing their question to "improve" it).

It gets worse as time goes on because of the "no duplicates" policy; the more questions that are in the system, the harder it is to come up with a question that isn't marked (correctly or incorrectly) as a dupe.

Banning all politeness words (hello/goodbye/please/thank you/you're welcome) from questions/answers because they're "noise" is just the cherry on top that makes people who aren't already immersed in SO culture think that everybody there is rude/mean, no matter how many times they put "be nice" in the CoC.

Not saying these are _bad_ policies per se - SO has a stated goal of being a "curated resource of high quality questions and answers", and they need to separate the wheat from the chaff somehow, but the policies _will_ be perceived as hostile by most new users.

Giving the questioners an extra +5 fake internet points will not fix any of that.
Here's Where Painted Lines on the Road Came From
I just map caps lock to escape, then i need even less finger movement.
You do get paid, considering you can sell the tokens. I expect the tokens I've earned across all my devices to be worth a nice few hundred USD some day.
>Only ones that care about the appearance of propriety though

Such as the United States?
Except coding jobs that are heavily sought after also pay a lot less than those that aren't, and often have worse conditions. See for example, game development. It can be as tough as working as a software engineer at say, Google, but pays significantly less because of how many people want to get involved in the industry.
Graphcore are coining the initialism, therefore I imagine they’re not keen on it being applied to anything other than their design and its novel architectural approach.

It’ll likely end up just like GPU though, as part of the industry’s nomenclature.
You wouldn't get top quality journalism on day 1, and you wouldn't get as much per person, but you would get something publishable.

Lots of real journalism is really low quality, so this means you would have a product that is in some sense competitive.
It's impossible to transact in actual dollars online. Dollars are made of cloth. When you use a checking account or credit card online, it's using crypto.

You can buy BAT and send it to a site owner.
> But people don't need to realize anything for ads to die. All they need to realize is that they should all be using ad blockers and never ever turning it off again.

That isn't true at all. What about when I play a youtube video on my chromecast and it shows an ad on my TV? What happens when websites draw all their content using the canvas instead of the DOM, and adblockers don't work anymore, or websites like Hulu which already make it difficult to enjoy the content while avoiding the ads.
I mean if they really did that there would likely be numerous paths to successfully sue the private equity company now controlling the .org TLD. Basic consumer protection laws require, for example, that buyers of like kind be charged the same price. I think that law applies to physical goods and commodities, but there is an argument to be made that domain registration is not as much of a service as it is a commodity loaning program. Another avenue could potentially be predatory pricing and price gouging laws. IANAL but I'm sure there are many, many things they could cite in a civil suit to stop such blatant ripoff schemes. In fact, I think if they did gouge them so obviously and in such a targeted fashion, it would probably be a great case for getting them torn apart under antitrust law since there is literally nowhere else you can register a .org TLD.
The problem with cheap cases does tend to be airflow and locations for fans... but also the build quality of the case.

Things like ports for routing cables without causing a rat's nest... cheap stamped sheet metal with sharp edges to cut yourself on, decent I/O backplate, temperature control zones, bottom mounted PSU, etc. A good quality case will cost you... but you can likely get several builds out of it over the years... so well worth it.
Funnily enough, TNG used models as well, I don't think it was until Deep Space 9 that they actually started using CGI starships. The versions of the first two Star Treks on Netflix are the remastered versions, so they might be pointing out CGI issues that came up years after the original airing.

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Remaster
A weird Internet career in linguistics
"IPU" was made up by graphcore to describe their processor, so you call choose to use the term for as many or as few processors as you want. IMO, any processor can be an "intelligence" processor.
Oil Pulling – Know Dental Health Benefits and Step by Step Instructions
Can someone explain like I am 5? I work in vibrations and often deal with real world modes and mode shape vectors which are really eigenvalues and eigenvectors. I see this might have an impact on the work that I do. But I can't comprehend what the paper says.
Given the impressive inference results shown on this page, I find it interesting that graphcore did not participate in mlperf inference v0.5.
Sorry to be that guy again but B-S assumes stock prices are log-normally distributed but stock returns are normally distributed :) [0]

[0] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blackscholes.asp
sigh... you can't have capitalism without government.
This is a poorly written article. As someone who is not overly familar with Docker's missteps, this piece seemed to jump around various supposed causes only to conclude with a completely different accusation of poor leadership.
Thank you greenyoda!
Yeah, I'm generally fine with that for that one example.

But the bigger problem is that I like being able to use friends' mice if I find myself without one, jack HDMI into my laptop for random conference room projectors (my MBP has HDMI out, it is frequently used), etc. I can carry around adapters/dongles, but I have multiple bags, and adapters don't always come with when I'm throwing my laptop into the bag I'm using that day. So the chances that I'll have something I want to use and can't because I just don't have the adapter on me are pretty high. This is a problem I never have on my 2013 13" MBP because of the port selection, but that I will if I don't change behavior if I get this 16" MBP (which I'm seriously considering).
That's the "status economy" for ya.

You're either fighting to get it or fighting to hold on to it.
Play the L-Game
That's true.

Always pans out, sometimes pans out, never pans out. Pick your preference.
It’s the buzz phrase that requires being part of every corporate’s mission. Even my trash company is into machine learning.
They're not paying me for the compute resources their suspicious unnecessary JavaScript payload consumes. If they were good actors respecting my property, I would respect theirs.
I'm reading "Legal System Very Different From Ours". The first one it talks about is ancient imperial China, where (as the author presents it) the Confucian legal tradition was about teaching virtue.

I'm reminded of a description of "conservative" vs "liberal" wherein it's about risk management versus experimentation.

Right now, if I'm faced with a choice between accommodating people who are doing it wrong, or challenging those people to become more, I'm going with the second option. Then again, this might not result in a viable society; or perhaps just a viable large-scale society.

To put it another way: You can view the loophole as the problem, or you can view the attitude that finds loopholes acceptable to use the problem.

> You should not treat people poorly, even if you believe that they are intolerant,

I can treat people well whom I also do not tolerate. It's just that yeah, usually, those acting intolerant are also acting like assholes.
Your solution seems to assume only one thing will be accessing what is being mutated at once. If another thread comes in and gets a cart (e.g. maybe the user reloads the page) and they aren't waiting on the operation to be processed anymore. If you remove it from the queue after a few seconds of failure then fine. But if the point is "self healing" it presumably hangs around for a while.

You have to deal with this to some extent in any webapp that has more than 1 OS thread or process. But if you're keeping actions around for minutes or hours instead of second you're going to have to account for a lot of weird stuff you normally wouldn't.

If you really wanted something like this, I would think you would want a concept of "stale" data and up-to-date data. If a process is OK with stale data, the service can just return whatever it sees. But if a process isn't OK with it (like, say, checkout), you probably need to wait on the queue to finish processing.

And since the front end may care about these states, you probably need to expose this concept to clients. It seems like a client should be able to know if it's serving stale data so you can warn the user.

Maybe I'm mistaken.
Jordan Peterson got it right months ago. "It’s hard to imagine a technology with more power to disrupt. I’m already in the position (as many of you soon will be as well) where anyone can produce a believable audio and perhaps video of me saying absolutely anything they want me to say. How can that possibly be fought? More to the point: how are we going to trust anything electronically mediated in the very near future (say, during the next presidential election)?"

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jordan-peterson-deep-fake
Those mostly aren't "type-A devices". The connector is not the protocol. Except for those physically integrated into a type-A connector, those are mostly USB-2/3 devices that generally ship by default with a cable that includes a type-A connector at one end and a type-B or mini/micro-B at the other.

I too have an external audio interface, a printer, scanner, and external HDD, and they are all connected via USB cables that have a type-C connector at one end and the relevant B subtype at the other. These are now cheap and ubiquitous. My keyboard is lightning to USB-C, and my mouse is bluetooth. As for flash drives, I buy the double-ended ones these days.

The adapters I still use are for an older U2F dongle that is physically integrated into a type-A connector, which is due for retirement later this year, and a Thunderbolt display.

So the writing isn't just on the wall for USB Type-A connectors in my household, they're basically gone.

As for what happens to all the cables with type-A connectors that shipped by default, those are in my travel kit for device charging off wall-warts or vehicles that often still have type-A sockets.
I see, so how do you measure the difference between the incoming data and your training data?

Also, it looks like you have a very low volume of predictions?
Eternal reminder by @paulskallas (Twitter):

> there's never been a good ad in the history of advertising. 120 years and there's never been an ad that has stood the test of time and was fondly remembered like literature or a song. It is a profoundly anti lindy medium that exists in the now, forever
Then getting rid of ads has to stop being a technical process but a legislative instead.
The unemployment rate for recent college graduates is getting even worse
An email suggesting enabling 2FA isn't coercion. You voluntarily enabled 2FA and then choose not to protect the backup codes as they repeatedly warn to do because loss of them along with loss of your 2FA device will result in exactly this situation.

Now instead of accepting the result is the consequence of your own poor choices you are trying to shift the blame to GitHub.
It might be better to allow the market to decide how the reward mechanism should work.

People who see a question as relevant and interesting to them, would add points or monetary incentives. Thereby increasing the speed and quality of the answers.

This mechanism has already been tested out and actually works only with crypto currency due to low transaction costs.

Better explained 2 mins video: https://youtu.be/lcsgx_5c7D0

Here is an example:
What makes you nostalgic?
Answer with #Obyte Know-it-all and earn up to 410,172,272 Bytes : https://t.co/EaVFrscFC7 (enough Bytes to make > 700,000 transactions whenever you want in the future thanks to obytes' tiny predictable fees)
Improvements in .NET Core 3.0 for monitoring distributed apps
That's exactly what op's saying.
ML does two things, ideally:
- Makes meaning from data (this is customer value)
- It insulates the raw data from competitors. So the customer gets their actionable insights from your algorithms and your competitors can't run algorithms on your raw data, trying to do a race to the bottom with you. This works in two scenarios: !) lifestyle businesses where it isn't worth it for would be competitors to generate their own data and 2) big projects where the first mover gets an unfair advantage from huge data sets.
is it safe to buy from Amazon's Zappos?
Any issues with the relatively new ONNX format? How do you handle model monitoring, verifying accuracy of model over time?
> So no, the data shows that these jobs are paid a normal amount, while programmers are vastly overpaid.

You are speaking a lot these days about the ills of socialism in contrast to capitalism. Programmers being paid well is a great example of capitalism at play. If you're a great programmer, you can make a lot of money. This is now common knowledge, and it should encourage more people to get in the field. It's an example of capitalism working well, why do you have a problem with this?
I wasn't only speaking about Vim. Even then going to Caps is less travel than Tab.

I use Caps less than I use Tab like for switching programs.

Whatever works for you.
I never thought of financial logs as an angle for history, very interesting.

Funny to think that in the future this might be done with the default-public Venmo transaction feeds. "Here we see Handel paid his friend with the message ";)". The meaning is unknown."
Aspark Owl Is a 1984-HP Electric Hypercar Claimed to Hit 60 MPH in 1.7 Seconds
If truth is irrelevant then just return random output and call it a day.

The reality is, truth is relevant and sometimes the truth is inconvenient. Tech workers may want to build an AI that measures risk of recidivism that produces uniform risks across race and gender. But the truth is, rates of recidivism is not the same across all groups. If we produce the desired outcome of equal reporting of risk, then the consequence is that men have their risk underreported to put them on parity with women, or vice versa.
exactly. arrows are something that always bothered me in my mac , not butterfly ( to some extent yes ) or not esc.
I only use Amazon to browse selections, and then buy direct from the brand's site. Buying only from Amazon made sense in the bad old days when most sites didn't have their act together with payment processing and shipping. Thankfully, those days are long gone.

It's basically the reverse of the "browse in store, buy on Amazon for cheaper" experience.
that is why there are two variables: difficulty and demand. There is more demand for coding than physics work.
The function of the diamond engagement ring no longer exists: it was essentially a down payment: if the engagement were broken off, the former fiancée could sell the diamond instead of bringing a breach of promise suit. Those suits have faded away; all that remains is the vestigial diamond.

Weddings are full of such rituals; European weddings typically had seed cakes (fertility, get it?) dating at least from Roman times. Victoria had a big white cake and a big white dress and that set the fashion not just for Europe and North America but many parts of the world too.

My mother has a diamond ring -- my parents were married in the era of breach of promise suits -- but more interestingly I have seen the gold she was wearing in her wedding (in a wedding sari not white dress): it is so pure (soft) it could only be worn that one time and was given as wedding gifts also as a hedge against financial misfortune.

I remember as a kid jewelry was bought and sold entirely by weight -- the workmanship was free! (Obviously nobody in my family was buying gems or I would have learned how they interacted with this system.) I have no idea if this is still the case as I am not a good boyfriend/husband in this regard.
Thanks for taking the time to answer. I think my curiosity has been satisfied. I did a bit of reading after posting the question here and it seems to me that the simplest way to move the planet out of its orbit would be to pull it by having something really large pass by it, rather than hit it directly with something very large. If I understand correctly, that seems to be the way that scientists think that rogue planets leave their solar systems and wander around. Collisions with large bodies seem to either result in moons being formed or planets breaking up completely?, so it seems that a collision is not a "safe" method to move the planet.

I'm not sure about mantaining the new orbit, rather than falling back towards the sun, as per your comment, but I'm guessing that if the Earth was pulled away from the sun by something as large as another star then it would just start falling towards that other star.

Anyway to be honest I didn't need an exact calculation, more a general intuition. But thanks for the offer :)
I tend to agree with this, it's also important to note that this is a new user, linking to their own blog too. There is self interest at play for eyes on links.
Any divergence from upstream means

a) ongoing cost of merging
b) security updates delayed because of merging.

This means that there is a limit to how much any fork can allow itself to diverge. They will have to pick their battles and accept the least-worst.

It's possible the limit is high enough that it wont be a problem in practice though.
Right. This is why they use a VM on other platforms.

In general, I always try to give the contrarian opinion as it causes an interesting discussion between the community members.

Also, there are some young members here, that might not realize that what we see as "innovation" might happened before (multiple times).

The truth is actually in the middle.

I could care less about the points.
> Ask the same question in 1965

To be fair, though, a LOT has changed about the nature of computer programming since 1965.
Algorithm Can Remove the Water from Underwater Photos
software is transforming humanity's culture and society on a scale comparable with the invention of written language. This has just begun. We ain't seen nothing yet.
If Amazon undercuts all a manufacturer's (other) distributors, they also stop having distributors.

Maybe that's why Nike is going in this direction.
Data cleaning and data labeling are two separate tasks, with vastly different workflows. For example, getting structured data out of Whois requires a lot of cleanup. Labeling domains as “bad” might take forever.
>business texting

You mean Slack?