skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I do agree, but that's not what you wrote before. You wrote that "all humans should have the same protections against their rights being violated", which implies you think everyone should have the same rights. This clearly doesn't make sense, as I pointed out about voting rights. The bottom line is, not everyone has the same rights. Citizens of any country have more rights than non-citizens; there's nothing abnormal about this. You can argue that certain rights should extend to everyone (and I would agree), but this argument seems to have some disagreement about whether unreasonable-search-and-seizure is a right that should only be afforded to citizens or not, and I'm just pointing out that non-citizens don't get all the same rights as citizens.
I argue this is different for a //simple// "human readable" ToS.

In the lack of any clear infringement you can go through the terms of service and disprove every single one, and then come to a list of those that you're less clear about on a second pass and ask if you are mistaken about one of those portions and/or some other area that your conceptions are blind to.

At that level of genuine effort at the very least you've proven an attempt to understand (and maybe that the ToS got a little over-simplified in one or more areas, or that moderation was wrong).
Hate is a strong word - perhaps these voters you speak of simply don't feel there is a very strong correlation between amount of taxes/fees paid, and services rendered.
> Absolutely. There are a zillion different problems to solve like this, but I don't think they're necessarily unsolvable, though.

They are solvable, but with regulation, and they will sometimes get an edge case here or there wrong, which will inevitably result in a low-effort, sensationalist news article which will decry the situation, degrade people's support of the systems, and damage the institution.
That's not far off from what I had to go through the last time I took an education-related standard exam. Nothing but my cloths and ID were allowed into the room and they had a quite through check to make sure of it.
And the great thing is that you then can use an instance that has a sysadmin that filters better for your needs.
I've just tried disabling Javascript in Firefox Klar/Focus (a built-in option) and the article loads, while this page says 'No':

https://www.whatismybrowser.com/detect/is-javascript-enabled
I'm pretty impressed with the level of automation I'm seeing in general. Looks like many are using docker/k8s or containers in some way or another. Inspiring.
This was just a federal court, not the Supreme Court.
Weird Number
Even on HN I've pleasantly told people to please disclose affiliate links (that I've only found out about because I click them and uBlock blocks the page from loading completely due to malicious amounts of tracking scripts) and people get upset about it.

I wish they would overdisclose here. It does not help that on social media, lots of people think adding "#sp" is enough.
That's very refreshing. I'm glad that more teams are choosing open chat options like Matrix or IRC.
is there a greasemonkey/tampermonkey script to fix this?
My company is considering licensing DataRobot.

It looks to be a time saver.
I've been seeing this fallacy a lot lately in these times. If you're ever in this situation: the longer you're held without a lawyer, the higher the liability on your captor becomes. Period. This is where million dollar lawsuits by the ACLU and jail time for corruption begins.

The US was founded on habeas corpus, and it doesn't matter what laws have been written since, or what national threats have been used as an excuse to undermine our inalienable rights. Your duty is to the future people of the US so that their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness aren't infringed.

My feeling is that this house of cards of government officials skirting the law and pleading ignorance is going to come crashing down in the near future. They know that they are breaking the law. They're just assuming that you will be afraid and let them.

I had hoped that we were past all this and the 21st century would to be free of injustice, but unfortunately we're all going to have to fight just like our ancestors did. But I think that better times really are just around the corner, as long as we stay informed and unified.

Related: congresswoman Nanette Barragan questions Kirstjen Nielsen on asylum seekers being turned away at US border crossings:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQ-cURrFLVk
The question of the thread is to what extent non-citizens have particular rights. Parents cite two distinct yet substantially similar groups of non-citizens (one presumes that children don't have much agency with respect to the circumstances of their immigration). Both examples argue in the same direction on the question of the thread, so why does this distinction matter?
> (Thats called Surprise Billing, btw)

Yes, and in some states, it's starting to be illegal.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/upshot/california-surpris...
It means that we can't agree on the list to begin with, and it's not always cut and dry.
The queue sits behind a service. If you don't do the work in the service, and do it in a queue instead, you've got more infrastructure to manage, monitor, and autoscale.
Yeah... the article is pretty garbage. If you have given the Facebook app permission to use your camera, it can use it whether it's showing you a frame in the background or not. The tweet in question is merely showing a bug that happens to speed up the loading of the camera UI. If FB is spying on users, they're doing it whether this article is true or not.
For physicians, it is understanding the biology together with the patient’s unique humanity which makes it much more rewarding or heartbreaking depending on outcome. As William Osler said: “The good physician treats the disease; the great physician treats the patient who has the disease.”
> The difference is operate vs. build.

This is so key. I do a lot of government consulting and one of the iceberg issues right now is how to reconcile devops, whose economics are designed to facilitate revenue growth, with fixed budget public service horizons of a decade or more.

The whole public enterprise model was up front costs for expensive developers, then offload it to cheaper operations teams on shared production infrastructure for long haul. The unspoken implication of devops/CICD/cloud/agile, etc, is that you have developers available to roll out patches and features, which sends the long term cost of the service multiplying. Imagine retaining your development consultants and a product team past the 2-3 dev years through the 10+ years of production, with no revenue growth and more probably, budget cuts.

The table in the article provides a good overview, with the caveat that defence is not normal public services in government.

Even many bank architects aren't close enough to the code of their services to meaningfully reason about what's going on.
Tech is necessarily the expression of economic relationship models, where if you don't have a grasp of them, implementing tech without a view to the economics is going to sink some ships.
That is a good start. That said, anything done in software can be conditionally disabled. So this assumes that the malicious behavior does not have root level access on the phone. But I agree, it is a start and is much easier and cheaper than requiring hardware changes.
Every time that I think that Google couldn't be any worse, they prove me wrong.
I understand that problem, it's just that it is impossible for them to own the copyright that it matched against.
How Quantum Teleportation Works
I'd say on the contrary it's the American system that's needlessly complicating things here.

There is no need for deeds to _exist at all_ in 2019.

The government ends up as the authoritative decision maker on who owns real property, so rather than pretend these pieces of paper matter, just go to the horse's mouth and use government registration.

How does the US still have this quaint document based system like it's still the 19th century? Same reason ordinary working Americans have to fill out a bunch of paperwork for the IRS to tell them what they already know - lobbying. In this case from companies that make their money navigating the complicated property system or insuring against problems with it and know if it was simpler they'd be out of a job.

A fancy modern country might deploy a GIS to handle all of this down to the millimetre. For somewhere as old as the USA that's likely to cause more trouble than it saves, but a system like that in England, where registration is done but the question of who own this crack in the shared driveway is not resolved by that registration‡ would simplify the vast majority of property deals in the US.

The core trick is to make the registration in the government system de facto the truth - definitely beating any documents no matter who swears they're genuine, this takes some alignment work up front, but you only do it once and most conflicts discovered during alignment will be about land nobody is actually using, scrub land or abandoned mines that six people have identical deeds for as part of a decades old scam, that sort of thing - not homes, because a conflict about who owns your home would already have been resolved.

‡ If you start from deeds drawn up in an era when a boundary might be "From the old oak tree to the river" rather than "Here's the co-ordinates accurate to eight decimal places in the NAD83 datum" then the question of whether the fence put up in 1923 is on Alice's land or Bob's or if it's in fact neatly on the boundary and so belongs to them both is a matter that a court will have to settle if Alice and Bob can't manage to agree it amicably.
Not sure why removing the close other tabs was a good idea.

I use it all the time and now the quickest way is to drag the tab out and close the previous window.
Yes, for brevity sake. Anyway, banning "fuels" but allowing other types of refills is a slippery slope. Can a machine have maintenance if it breaks? If no, can a human player be treated by a doctor if he has a muscle spasm?
Thanks man! I used vanilla javascript to create it. App submission process was painful... :(
I get targeted ads all the time from big consulting companies. It's not about SAP purchasing decisions, they want people to pursue SAP as a career option. In my case, their targeting is right on the money - I just have a better job at the moment
No competition for Tesla at all, only e-tron is selling here a bit and I think the model 3 and Y will crush it here. In terms of market size, well they have them in Jordan next to us which have the same population size and they don't have half the country working in the tech space as our GDP per capita is way higher.
Buy a guidebook on Amazon. It’s worth it before a significant trip and saves time compared to sifting through dreck on the Web.

But if you’re in town for business and you happen to have a few extra minutes and you think “hey, what is there to see around here,” TripAdvisor works well enough.
> For languages that can express unforgeable pointers as first-class concept, that is indeed a very attractive, fine-grained approach. Unfortunately bringing that to languages like C/C++/Rust is a different matter altogether.

The semantics of these languages aren’t incompatible with unforgeable references, though: it generally works in practice, but it’s technically undefined to create pointers out of thin air. Why can’t we take advantage of the standard here to disallow illegally created references? (Which, as I understand it, many other vendors are already beginning to do with e.g. pointer authentication and memory tagging.)
They'd ask you how the fuck you managed such a bad job of raising the next generation and how the fuck you managed to make them worse off than yourself rather than better.

They'd be disgusted by your incompetence and your attitude. You don't like the generations following yourself? Look in the mirror for someone to point the finger at.
I read a thread on Twitter about this. It's an interesting take by the guy who used to be CSO at Facebook, has since resigned, and at some point commented that Zuckerberg should step down [1]:

https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/1185954967086981125

[1]: https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/5/24/18637823/alex-stamos-fa...
I'm surprised most of the nice iPhone cases (e.g., Otter) dont do this already. (Hint: Product suggestion if anyone is reading!)
Why would anyone think that?

A startup can't coerce people to become its customers. A startup has to convince individuals to part with their money voluntarily.
I wonder if it would be effective to produce "vaccination" videos containing polar opposite juxtapositions.
I'm in Australia not the US and sin taxes aren't spread out evenly, especially with cigarettes (not that this is a bad thing). For perspective $50 a week is a doable food budget for an individual, a pack of 40 cigarettes is $50 and a pint of beer can be more than $10. So a weekly budget can look like Food: $50, Cigarettes: $200, Drinking: $100. And that would be a quiet week.
At Google, engineers make money (lots of asterisks with that statement but it's generally true). At Disney, engineers are just another cost.
Even though I love Python I don't really like Jupyter, seems like with a dev environment like VS or VSCode I can't quite find the right use case.

With C# it might be a different story, since the development cycle is fundamentally edit-compile-run an environment like Jupyter might give me an extra platform for in-between testing. I already use the Interactive built into VS quite a bit to figure out, for example, just the right format string for Datetime.Now.ToString() or stuff like that.
Berlin has a very large tech industry, a lower cost of living, and lower wages.
Way colder than in Nevada. And also they already have them in Jordan next to us so that's not the culprit.
I bet elon will not be able to land in BER for the celebation of the millionth car rolled out there.
Yes, one of the answers I want to give any time someone asks "why will WASM succeed when the JVM didn't" is that there is 25 years more experience and research to draw upon.
The rate at which exploitation of people (via exploitation of loopholes) occurs does not have a continuous positive linear correlation with the number and complexity of the regulations.
This makes more sense to me then all the talk about CDN's. CDN's don't solve all problems.
Interesting that the + operator doesn't work but the - operator still works just fine.

I don't know how many times I've had to add -nodejs to things I'm trying to search to eliminate irrelevant garbage from some of my searches.
"OpenIndiana obtains its name from Project Indiana, an open source effort by Sun Microsystems (now Oracle Corporation) to produce OpenSolaris, a community developed Unix-like distribution based on Sun Solaris. Project Indiana was led by Ian Murdock, founder of the Debian Linux Distribution."[0]

[0] https://www.openindiana.org/documentation/faq/#why-is-it-cal...
How come they can make a thin, power sipping high resolution OLED panel for like $100 that fits in a phone but they can't make a reliable switch that ensures privacy?
And many who talk about how we should gladly pay our taxes get or figure they would get more than they pay in if everybody would happily pay as much as they possibly could.

Not that the amount of taxes paid ever stopped a government from trying borrow and spend way more than that.
The post office will not deliver the brick because the postage doesn't cover the weight (or shape) of the brick.

They will deliver an envelope stuffed with sand unless it exceeds the weight limits covered by that postage. (I know that second part from actual recent experience.)
What's Aurora?
I'm sure YOU never said anything stupid over IM when you were 19.

I'm sure YOU'VE not changed a bit in the past 16 years (the Zuck IMs were from 2003).

Yeah, it was a stupid thing to say, but again... 19.

[disclaimer: FB has no interest in me speaking on their behalf, unofficially or otherwise]
at the border you are not yet on US soil. They can deny you for any reason at all
Ah typo I know how it’s spelt.
Education via libraries requires dedication and critical thinking; neither is necessary for modern universities.
To me it says that in his circles people are currently talking to downplay the Uber killing, likely worried about consequences for what was ultimately senior management pushing to disregard safety in the name of hitting milestones for investors, and on the other side people downplaying the brutal killing of an American journalist, likely to ease the minds of those taking blood money from the man who ordered the murder to fund their ventures. They are feeling the heat, so they keep reassuring themselves that really it’s all nothing, to the point that in his mind, equating the two made perfect sense, because really they where both just silly small mistakes....
That's cool!

Two things I would like to see:

* EBS (Evidence Based Scheduling)

* i18n (just the support for it, as I can provide the translations myself)

Also, thanks for including screenshots in your readme.md! Xx
Plus it’s not really portable.
> As others have said, entering into a BAA with a covered entity, as HIPAA defines it, shouldn't be seen as a controversial action.

You place more faith in HIPAA than I do. HIPAA does not protect privacy to the degree that most people assume.

> There are numerous problems in healthcare that are too complex for individual health systems to tackle.

True, but that doesn't mean that Google is the right entity to do this. In my opinion, they're the wrong entity, because Google is not exactly trustworthy.

> Google is not the only player doing this at scale. They're not even the largest one.

But they're Google. What this sort of thing means for me is that I need to start asking medical providers if they're participating in this sort of thing with Google (or other companies that I consider bad actors), so I know which ones to avoid using.
If it is directly under the flight path the noise would make it less desirable and lower costs while the easy access to labor could possibly make up for the rest of the land costs.
A new ‘Zombieload’ Flaw Hits Intel’s Newest Cascade Lake Chips
How ironic that this article (which was actually written in the spring and goes to great lengths to explain why people are mistaking DST for standard time) was posted here in the fall just after the switch to winter time; some master level trolling posting this here now.
I don't use them and don't rent anything from them.
Do you have a typo in your second line? I can’t figure out what your question is.
"Several years ago, Chancellor Angela Merkel said the one in every seven jobs in Germany were "directly or indirectly" linked to the [automotive] sector."

https://www.thelocal.de/20150924/what-the-vw-scandal-means-f...

Germany is the home of Mercedes, BMW, and VW (which owns Porsche and Audi and is one of the largest car manufacturers in the world). Their economy is very dependent on the auto industry. They are also home to many automotive suppliers including bosch and kuka. They are also one of the largest markets in Europe.

So yeh it's all these reasons: logistics, infrastructure, talent. Plus they need German's to think of Tesla as a local brand. Imagine if Tesla is gutting market share from these other companies and they were in another country. It would engender resentment.

Plus Berlin is a cool city :-)
This is false. Gas pumps utilize utility electric as their primary source of power, but are required by law (in CA at least) to have backup sources of power, like diesel, in the event that a natural disaster (like an earthquake) knocks out power lines.

And solar charging only works if you live in suburbia or rural neighborhoods. If you live in a city, you're SOL.
Very true, attribution error on my part :)
If your entire multi-million dollar business hinges on manipulating people into believing you are something you are not so that they send you money without being provided any value in return, you aren't a petty thief. You are a large-scale criminal enterprise and deserve to be treated as such. This dude's a parasite on society.
"But the 2013 Snowden revelations damaged that tenuous relationship yet again. In hindsight the damage wasn’t the result of what the United States was doing, but over the Pentagon’s inability and unwillingness to own up to why it was doing it: After the intelligence failure of 9/11, security agencies overcompensated by widespread, warrantless datamining as well as electronic and telephonic surveillance, including on U.S. persons.

Without a clear explanation of why this had been done, startups,..."

I don't think that lack of understanding of the reasons for surveillance is the problem. It is quite common for people to understand the desire to fight terrorism and prevent another 9/11, and still understand that the NSA's methods are ripe for abuse. Lying to Congress about the nature of the program (the what, not the why) doesn't inspire confidence that abuse won't happen.

I find the idea that the reasons for surveillance was simply not explained very well to be ahistorical. Perhaps that's just the bubble I've been in though.
You were cheated, Mr Kebab, upvoted yours.
I use messenger.com which seems like another bare-bones alternative they have. But I'm guessing it's still heavy on tracking somehow?

Also using Messenger lite on Android for whatever that's worth... Would love to hear any reasons to make me delete that as well.
Later on page 46 there's a more succinct statement.

The judge is evaluating one element of the relief the plaintiffs sought--that the agencies be required to expunge data copied during a search which, per the ruling, is unconstitutional. More specifically, the judge is addressing one stated reason for seeking that relief--concern that data obtained unconstitutionally will leave them forever flagged for extra scrutiny.

> "in the future, whether information has been retained from prior searches or not, agents must be able to point to specific and articulable facts for reasonable suspicion to believe that Plaintiffs’ electronic devices contain contraband, which also addresses the concern about any likelihood, greater than the general public of U.S. citizens returning to the U.S. borders, of being subject to a non-cursory search."
> Don't different countries have different views of rights?

And so they would apply their views in their own jurisdiction.

> What happens when those rights are at odds?

Whichever jurisdiction you stand in correspond to the rights that prevail for you.

The way I see it, a country says what the rights of people/humans are, and they defend those beliefs in their own jurisdiction, where they have the absolute power to.

> So I think the main issue is, how can all humans have the same protections if different jurisdictions protect different things?

I think baddox's comment does not necessarily imply all humans in the world. I interpreted it as all humans in a given jurisdiction.
Excellent stuff. My couple of notes..

1. printf may malloc so don't use it in an out of memory situation. Though I think this problem is vanishingly unlikely these days.

2. printf of floats used to require linking to the math library on some platforms (-lm)

3. I am pathetically grateful for nice diagnostics you get when you use the wrong % formatter in more recent C compilers. This used to be a rich source of errors and non-portability.
> In fact that is what most modern compilers do by default in debug mode.

Assuming that “debug mode” is -g or equivalent, then I have not seen a modern compiler that does this.
Washington State has privatized the DMV for most non-ID-card-related transactions (titling, etc.). It's cheaper and faster than every fully-state-run DMV I've experienced.
I love .NET and I love Jupyter. I don't know how well they will combine though. I feel like the lack of Pandas and flexible typing of Python will make it a lot less useful.