skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>He died at age 53 on February 8, 1957, at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., under military security lest he reveal military secrets while heavily medicated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_von_Neumann#Illness_and_d...
With risk of offending both sides of the argument, both long functions, and split functions are fine. Functions within functions are great for async code as you can make use of the closure/lexical scope. eg. When the network request come back you still have acces to variables declared in parent function. And you can also freeze state/value of variables in time - by making them into function parameters copied by value.
The post claims it was an algorithm, but this could easily be a human mistake. Maybe someone reported the comment (either maliciously or ignorantly), then a moderator, unaware the user was writing in German, suspended the user.
Import Outlook Express DBX to NSF Format?
I doubt it. We've been crashing things into comets and asteroids before this.

Like the Deep Impact mission in 2005. [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Impact_(spacecraft)
The more I see these kinds of products coming out, the more I realize that Creative Labs, of all people, had something right when they designed the Zii Egg .. if only they'd put some weight behind the platform and finished PlaszmaOS, which was a Linux OS on par with iOS at the time - but alas cancelled "because Android":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zii_EGG

I really have to wonder what could have been if CL had the balls to finish this project and make it available to all and sundry to serve as the basis for commercial products. It was a delightfully cheerful little system for the time ..
> How do we know the more relaxed/organized schedule leads to success, and not that success leads to a more relaxed/organized schedule?

In the article, they looked at university students, prior to success. Of course this meant they had to predict the future, and they did this by asking the professors and by self-selection: The assumption was that music students who study to become teachers are average performers whereas music students who study to become performers and whose professors think they are great are also in fact going to be great.
Some people disagree.

https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-...
Well the mistake is so consistent I started to wonder if they have created a new archetype: someone who not only adopts early but also adapts to the challenges of a beta product...
Still? It should have been fixed. It works for me.

A user reported it worked on firefox.

Thank you so much.
This isn't even internal stuff, all paid commercial applications. Oracle is notorious for it, but most recently dealing with SysAid(Helpdesk software).
I'm sure plenty of admins do, that doesn't mean you will test with the same flags chosen in an experiment it only means you will see changes going into stable permanently enabled a bit early.

My own experience with ChromeOs is that I switch to beta, report bugs via interfaces provided (by Google) and then the chromium team acts surprised when the regression hits stable.

If you ignore signals don't ask for them.

Edit- clarity
I would agree that "coverage gives an idea of how many lines of code have been run, but obviously no guarantees of correctness for those specific lines"
If you use husky (as many front-end developers do for pre-commit hooks), setting it up together with git-lfs might get... adventurous.
The article brings about some really good points. I find myself sitting down and studying without deliberate intent, which leads to countless wasted hours in my life. I think this is in part because you need to have some fundamentals down in order to actively learn, but mostly because it's just that much more work to actually do the core work.
Well I'll be damned -- It's a fork of WRT54G.
4 Obstacles to Bitcoin Mass Adoption
No, because I very rarely do algorithmic stuff that would benefit from unit tests.

When I start to build something, I don't exactly know how it will work and what the output will be.
It was DeAgostini in Poland as well. As a kid, I had a few T-rex bones from that myself.
Andrew Yang: Yes, Robots Are Stealing Your Job
Mathematics culture and mathematical pedagogy in Hungary has legendary reputation. I don't know how their system works now,but at least up to 80s or 90s it was seen as being the highest level. It emphasized creativity, communication and problem solving.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-28582-5_...
We can be thankful that the likes of Eisenhower and later Kennedy, who lived through the very same times, recoiled from the prospect of initiating a greater slaughter than WW2.
My experience too. I strongly believe there is room for some kind of tool to help with this process, whether it be a library, DSL, or framework. Something lightweight that places some order on the problem of generating configuration, nothing more.

Otherwise writing raw python and dumping to JSON (or using python client libraries for whatever you're targeting, e.g. kubernetes), quickly becomes an unmaintainable mess.
Your answer above is incorrect in a very funny way. "At random" implies an uninformed prior, but the question presupposes there's a correct answer, as 0% is missing.

0% and 100% are indefensible for any uninformed prior.

There are two answers giving the correct probability for uniform prior. One of the 25% is a wrong answer despite being indistinguishable. Such a thing can happen because of a typo or in any myriad of ways. It's not a paradox.

If it asked the question "knowing that probability of success for random single choice question out of 4 answers is 25%, what is the probability of selecting the correct answer at random from one of the below?"
That formulation implies an informed prior.

That'd have the answer of prior% with 50% for uniform prior, but it's not duplicated, so the actual answer is 0% making it a paradox. If it were duplicated, (answers only 25% and 50% available) the either answer of 50% would hold.

But that was not the question asked in yours or former question.
Q4 2019 Investor Crunch Newsletter – Eventerprise
What you are doing is resulting, connecting result with decision under probability. I am not sure what was probability of a war but I don’t think that because war didn’t happen that it was unprobable.
What about voting? Not anonymous but often secret. But wouldn't the same arguments apply? Or to any privacy in general?

> anonymity presumes you are being preyed upon somehow.

No. You could argue that anonymous alcoholics are preyed upon by society looking down on them, but the argument in general is pretty far out. Are there no alcoholics in the middle class? Do they automatically move in an underclass in this case? If so, the definition of middle class can indeed be trivial reduced to "people not in need of anonymity".

I don't think it has no use cases. Especially if you include topics like religion, sex and politics, the use cases become quite obvious really. An age old constant.
Killer app for AR.
Still no answer about 2017 tax cuts.

Your "rebuttal" ignores debt over that time span.

You also add a lot of assumptions about assumptions. In the interests of discourse, we'll give you partial credit for participation.
I found this Chromium bug report, which seems to be the epicenter of all the debate and also the source of the citations from the linked article:

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=102483...

It is well worth a read! There are lots of complaints from what seems to be business users of the free version, but also a few by customers of the Chrome Enterprise subscription with managed installations, and they also appear to be affected by this issue and are demanding an option to disable the trials. From that I conclude that it can be considered safe that the trials also affect paying customers, and it does indeed seem as if they also have no option to disable them, at least currently (my personal guess is this is going to change, for sure at least for the paying customers, hopefully for everyone).
Or there's some kind of magical properties of paprika that the rest of the world hasn't yet noticed ...
See also: writers/musicians/artists/etc who talk about the hard work behind their success while omitting the part where their partner provided for them while they focused on that instead of working for someone else to pay the bills.

They might have made it anyway, but there's a good chance all the stress and worry from providing for themselves in the modern economy would have taken all their focus and energy for starting a creative career. I've seen too many independent ambitions crushed under unpredictable automated schedules, wage theft, repair and medical bills, and cascading overdraft fees.
Parent is using the commonly accepted stat abbreviation for intelligence in role playing games
I didn't read it closely... but isn't this about Apple the device manufacturer?

Ie. the device manufacturer called Apple is to be forced to make contracts with payment providers on FRAND terms rather than having an exclusive relationship with the payment provider called Apple.

(I suppose the same applies to other device manufacturers, if any have/own/are payment processors.)
I usually write an implementation first, but when testing it i try to re-evaluate the requirements - i do not look at implementation at all. Test should handle all edge cases.

And i do modify tests, because sometimes assumptions are wrong(or domain experts change their mind or got something wrong)

Sadly functionality requirements are very soft in my industry(once it was requested from me to do a perfect fuzzy match..)

Most of the time i am required to modify untested legacy code, that starts with test(if it is even possible).
people dont like being shown things that dispute their world view, especially on things which wield as much weight as intelligence, which is why i assume youve been downvoted. IQ may not be an exact metric of intelligence, but the correlations of IQ to success in the modern western world are too obvious to ignore, and indeed could be detrimental to ignore. Note, correlation does not equate causation, but suggests deeper research is required
Almost never.

With the kind of software I mostly write these days, I'm fortunate to be able to incrementally develop my code and test it under real-world conditions or a subset thereof.

So my approach is exploratory coding -- I start with minimum workable implementations, make sure they work as needed, and then add more functionality, with further testing at each step.

The upside is that I don't have to write "strange" code to accommodate testing. The downside is that I'm forced to plan code growth with steps that take me from one testable partial-product to the next. A more serious downside, one I'm very aware of, is that not every project is amenable to this approach.
Citrix support kb is one.
I've heard Twitter & Spotify too.
For his purpose you can check 'Team Sharing' feature of our BI tool (SeekTable): https://www.seektable.com/help/share-report-to-team
I think it is more that this correction allows more generic algorithms like object classification to work.
Of course you could do object classification without color, but that would be throwing away information.
It is just that the back scattering currently is overwhelming the colors in such a variable way that it is hard to use color inclusive object classification without doing stuff like requiring the exact same distance between camera and object for each picture. And likely that doesn't even work yet.
SSC had a great post on that: https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/05/26/the-atomic-bomb-consid...
https://twitter.com/timmartin2/status/23365017839599616?lang...
> Do you write tests before the implementation?
Absolutely, day in day out. New code and bugs fixing a like. It's the proof that I need to know that whatever code I am doing is an exact fit to the problem it's trying to solve.

> Can you describe the practical benefit?
Testing first help me clarify my intentions, then implement a realisation of those intentions through code. Testable code has the side effect of being well modularized, free from hidden dependencies, and SOLID.

And it's also about making sure that whatever code you write, there's a justification for it and a proof that it works, could be seen more like a harness protecting you from writing things that you don't need, YAGNI.

> Do you happen to rewrite the tests completely while doing the implementation?
I follow the classic TDD cycle, RED/GREEN/REFACTOR and I can not be any happier.

> When does this approach work for you and when did it fail you?
The only exception to the above is exploratory code. I.e. the times where I don't know how to solve a given problem, I like to hack few things together and poke the application and see what happens due to what I have changed.

Having verified and learned more about how to solve that problem, I delete all my code and start afresh but this time TDD the problem/solution equipped with what I have learned from my exploratory cycle.

If you are in doubt or need further information to help you make your own decision about the matter, I can not recommend enough the classic TDD by Example from Kent Beck as a starting point.

For a more real-world view with an eye on the benefits of adopting TDD, have a look at Growing Object Oriented Software Guided by Tests, aka the Goose book.
Chrome experiment crashes thousands of browsers and angers IT admins
Imagine a programming language except it also has to be valid YAML. Yeah. Now sprinkle some JavaScript in there just for good measure.

Look no further than their own hand-crafted examples (confusingly called "Episodes") for compelling arguments for why to NOT use Common Workflow Language.
Pseudonymity and anonymity are synonymous in many use cases. And unions did have a lot of secrets at their time.
I totally understand why you would do that and it makes sense, but I personally like to keep them in one commit so that I won't get any problems with an automated git bisect later.
wow, great!
I am too on the "I do not like google to know what I see in youtube"
Seems to be hugged to death.

https://archive.is/ty7Yu
One of my professors at an ivy would occasionally at the end of a lecture jokingly say something like, "ok here's what I think about all this, this five minutes is what you're paying 30 grand a year for so pay attention, everything else I've said today you could have read in the textbook. Nobody actually uses this algorithm, if you need it you're already overloaded, people just buy more capacity before utilization gets this high."

At the undergrad level I think the main benefit of a high end school is simply being grouped with other high end students and so getting a curriculum tailored for you. As if the Honors and AP classes in high school were only available in a few schools that were selective and more expensive.

I don't think this is completely true but I think there is a lot of truth to it... you go to fancy schools for the other fancy students as much as anything else.

Point being, at the undergrad level Harvard isn't better because it's Haaaard-vard, it's better because their curriculum is more advanced, which they can do because they have sufficient concentration of high-talent students who can handle it.
Buy Adderall online without a script or prescription +1864-513-2442
Our online pharmacy is a reliable vendor of Adderall and other Add/ADHD products quality is outstanding .
We ship to all locations payment and shipping are all secured .
Other products are available besides Adderall and quality is outstanding .
To visit our web page go to www.trustedmedsshop.com
Our contact is +1864-513-2442 calls, texts, whatsapp accepted.
There's a Visual Studio Code extension that supports org-mode. It's what got me into it at the beginning after I tried Orgzly for Android. I now use Spacemacs, btw, which is vim-based key bindings for Emacs, and works really nicely, yet still exposes all that great Lisp stuff too.
Thanks!

So does that mean the average retired Japanese person is living on less than $1k per month?? How are they doing that? Isn't Japan pretty Urban and the cities relatively expensive to live in?
No description of what’s happening (on mobile anyway), but it looks like the variables are being replaced?
Thanks, Gorgoiler for the feedback. Yes, it is basic as its part of Ruby Workshop new book on Ruby programming. Its actually for beginners (and gradually takes them to advance Ruby concepts). So stay tuned for more posts :)
Or, to understand this one level deeper: Functions/methods should do one thing, and do that one thing well. In general, each of those one things should be smallish things that you use to compose bigger things, which also do one thing and do it well.

24 lines is as good a rule of thumb as any, as long as you're not actually counting the lines. Your goal is flow and readability (ultimately: maintainability), not some countable metric.
*I recommend starting at 9:40 and watching at 2x speed
TLDR; increased revenue by 3950%; they can influence behavior (and confirm); your private experiences are for sale; it undermines democracy; epistemic inequality; we need to fight this by using browser extensions to block ads and tracking cookies; we need to be using duckduckgo.com for our internet searches;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodification
Storybook and Loki is a simpler setup. And far more useful
I've been struggling with this recently when trying to print stdout from subprocess.communicate with code that runs on both 2 and 3. Such a headache - got any recommended reading around this area?
function int untested_sum(int a, int b) {
return a + b;
}

function int tested_sum(int a, int b) {
return a * b;
}

function void test_providing_total_coverage() {
assertEqual(tested_sum(2, 2), 4, 'Expected sum to be 4!');
}
If you need 43 mocks to unit test a class, your TDD has already found a bad smell. Why are there so many classes tied to a single component?
The "lorem ipsum" identifier names are foo, bar, baz, qux, quux, etc.
I noticed those randomly one day and did a few of them. I failed the one for the primary programming language I have worked in for the past decade and passed ones for two different languages I have hardly used and AWS, which I barely know anything about outside of EC2 and R53.

I felt like there was a big difference in the quality of the questions and answers for each quiz. For the AWS one, for example, the phrasing used for most of the questions and answers made the correct answer basically obvious without actually knowing it to be correct.
How Can CRM Prove Helpful in Enhancing the Travel Company Day to Day Operations?
"Self-driving trucks will be great for the G.D.P. They’ll be terrible for millions of truck drivers."

Language matters. Someone who earns a living today driving a truck does not have the right to earn a living that way in the future if the market changes. Self-driving trucks are not "stealing" something from him. We all need to adapt as labor markets change.

The current unemployment rate is 3.6%, near a record low. Unemployment can be kept low by reducing labor market frictions and removing disincentives to work. We don't need a massive federal handout such as a Universal Basic Income, funded by people who are working.
As a former resident of Coventry, if you want to understand both how it got its reputation and how that is in some ways unfair, just have a look at this panorama: https://goo.gl/maps/c4NxFtsxrsDbJNVRA

As you look around, rank the buildings in preference order, and rank them by how old you think they are.

Obviously, all tastes are subjective - but I think a lot of people's preference order would be about the same as their age order.

However, as you can see, some of the buildings in Coventry are pretty nice and its reputation is, to an extent, unfair.
> With the kind of software I mostly write these days, I'm fortunate to be able to incrementally develop my code and test it under real-world conditions or a subset thereof.

What kind of software you write if you don't mind me asking ?and are your "real-world conditions" tests automated ?

> The upside is that I don't have to write "strange" code to accommodate testing.

Can you elaborate more as what you mean by "strange" ?
I tend to write test cases that re-produce bugs first, then fix the bug. Other than that, I don't stick too hard to test driven development. I did for a while, but you start to get a sense of the sort of design pressure tests create and end up build more modular, testable code from the get go anyway.

> Can you describe the practical benefit?

For a test case that produces a bug, you might find the bug manually. Getting that manual process into a test case is often a chore, but in doing so you'll better understand how the system with the bug failed. Did it call collaborators wrong? Did something unexpected get returned? Etc. In those cases, I think the benefit really is a better understanding of the system.

> Do you happen to rewrite the tests completely while doing the implementation?

A TDD practicioner will probably tell you taht you're doing it wrong if you do this. You write the minimum viable test that fails first. It might be something simple like "does the function/method exist". You add to your tests just in time to make the change in the real code.
You click the timestamp, and the flag button appears.
I wish all fans use the pi temperature sensor to regulate speed. I got one with the CanaKit and it doesn't.

My OCD kicks in when I can hear the fan running all day long.
sometimes I do TDD for modules that are simultaneously developed for both frontend and backend (nodeJS)

This way I can mostly stay in the frontend where the tooling is better and the results are more visual, but still be confident that I don't violate the proper abstraction that the backend requires.

Kinda like predefining the shared module contract between front- and backend and forcing myself not to forget about it when in the (frontend) flow
cant find it hm :?
I've always thought of these as "Wayside School" problems, because I first encountered them in the children's book, Sideways Arithmetic From Wayside School by Louis Sachar. I highly recommend it for any child who is into puzzles. I really enjoyed how the book deconstructed the format of tests and quizzes that I was so familiar with at the time. My favorite section was the sideways math, where words are added or multiplied and you had to deduce the values of the letters. E.g.,

D O G
x A D
_______

D O G
A D O
_______

A G O G

Maybe children don't learn to do arithmetic like this anymore and this section will be utterly impenetrable to them.
As a consumer, the OYO brand means nothing to me because anecdotally it's clear that they only claim to enforce standards but in reality it's an illusion.

In the absence of that assurance, what am I getting from OYO?

If I want a hotel room I will browse listings on the various aggregators that have them and go with the best find for my budget. Unlike Hyatt or Four Seasons or Taj, where you can treat the brand as an indicator of some standard, it doesn't exist in a meaningful way for OYO, even for a far lower standard. It's all over the place.

If anything I'd be suspicious of OYO immediately.

I'm unsure if my experience is the norm or the exception. If there's a huge segment of people who associate the OYO brand with trust, then their model would appear to be working quite well.
The Blogging Musician Community Forum Is Now Live
Identifiers too. It's using the babel.js compiler so the approach is pretty straightforward: https://github.com/pomber/codem-ipsum/blob/master/index.html
Ghost ships, crop circles, and soft gold: A GPS mystery in Shanghai
It's a trade off between updates per sec and latency.

Maybe simply using a timeout per job type is a better way. (That of course trades off simplicity.)
This introduces some interesting new terms, like the "early adaptor" or "Expension". Quite amusing.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Expension