skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The right-hand side of the Touch Bar is already the "control strip", which is systemwide, and it has a < at the left of the control strip that expands it to the whole Touch Bar. You can even set that to be the default if you don't like the context-specific softkeys and just want the systemwide ones.
Can we please not show yet another container ship every time there is a new about Docker? I get it - all news articles need an image. But imagine being a non-tech person trying to follow news and wonders...
> Edit: Why do so many new accounts (green text) post to any thread about Brave?

There's a pretty ridiculous amount of astroturfing going on in these comments.
This looks really nice and I want one, but 1mm of key travel doesn't seem like something to brag about. I know it's a personal preference thing, but 1mm ?
As far as I know Mirantis dont use docker for own development...
Oxford college provost faces backlash after trying to abolish formal traditions
Recent cross-platform options with surveillance capitalism:

* Google Chrome: mandatory

* Firefox: opt-out [1]

* Brave: blocked

That's the primary issue.

It's great that Brave is pioneering a new opt-in, privacy-respecting funding model for the web - we need innovation here - but it's a secondary issue.

[1] Thanks to Google $, slowly changing presumably thanks to forcing effects of Apple's increasing privacy defaults in Safari
I don’t have super strong opinions on the touchbar one way or another, but I absolutely hit the brightness / volume keys without looking. If I hit the wrong one, I slide my finger over and hit the correct one. Personally I find this more ergonomic than having to look down at the Touch Bar to do it.
So this surveillance technology started in the military to track insurgents, expanded to law enforcement and government to track suspects and the general public, and is now expanding to corporations to monitor customers.

This pattern makes it seem like the cat is out of the bag, and that pervasive expansion and abuse of this technology is all but inevitable.

Let's extrapolate a bit and start thinking about what society will look like when this sort of surveillance is made available to the general public. Imagine a free, Google-Maps-like application that allows you to see individual people and rewind with half second resolution.

This would be such a massive wrench thrown into the gears of society that I'm having trouble coming up with anything coherent.
your question is whether there are people who might be prompted to buy fashion items based on advertisements?

this seems like an obviously true thing. i would estimate that the majority of clothes retail is absolutely _not_ utilitarian: it isn't driven by sentiments like "my old shoes have worn out so i need new ones", but rather by ones like "i think those shoes look good and so i would like to own them as well as the ones i already have".
Trying various proposed solutions sounds good to me, if and only if the US federal government is not the one doing it. States could be good laboratories to try things if and as those people want to, and learn from each other etc (and not make the federal budget problems even worse while trying to solve everyone's personal problems). If there are people in need: join nonprofits or help them personally, or at the state or local level: there are many good efforts! But charity by federal force leads to too much control over our lives and huge, controlling, wasteful bureaucracies that are hard to live with, multiply laws and consume resources so limiting ability to try anything different.

(edit: I know enough about history to know what happens when the government tries to solve every problem. We definitely do not want that.)

In fact, we fought a war in the 1770's, partly because of faraway people having too much involvement and control in our lives. Then wrote a constitution that limited federal power, because of those problems. The principles in the Declaration of Independence and US Constitution really are important.

Helping people is important! There are other, better ways to do it than increasing federal control and distracting it from its core missions.

To avoid going on and on about this, I posted more thoughts including personal experiences (with even more that I haven't posted, but can, given interest), at: http://lukecall.net/e-9223372036854586100.html There is an email address in the footer for honest feedback.
A couple of years ago Birkenstock did the same - for them it was about quality control and ripoffs.

It's interesting because any Birkenstock Amazon sells is basically an assumed fake one.
> Google and Microsoft seem to have really started betting on Docker

I still remember the days when I learned docker for the first time and everything worked like magic. And I appreciate Docker for that.

However, I am not so sure if Google/Microsoft developers are happy with Docker nowadays. It was the best container runtime 3 years ago, but today I have much more pleasant experience with other runtimes like cri-o. I would say, the added abstraction layer of container runtime interface in Kubernetes is a sign, that they want to explore better solutions to replace docker.
Several posts in this subthread were flagged by users, probably because they were off topic and broke the site guideline against flamewar. The Eich/Prop 8 flamewar has been repeated dozens if not hundreds of times on HN over 10 years now. Nothing new will come of it, and nothing that predictable can be on topic here, because the defining feature of ontopicness is gratifying intellectual curiosity: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

(Nobody pays us anything, let alone to "push announcements"—of all the things we could do to ruin this community, that would be the stupidest. We don't accept gifts either FWIW.)
He has a whole crew to install his stage setup, which includes a big drum kit and a full-sized harp and lots of lighting and stuff. They can probably pack up his train sets into black instrument cases in no time.
It is, that’s the Touch Bar that has replaced the function keys on MacBook Pros. Not a fan at all as I use the fn keys a lot on a MacBook but I can’t see them getting rid of it for a while
>Approached with the same criteria as above, we could say that it's merely "unproven"

Except it's very clearly not. There is direct evidence towards the contrary. The claim in question is from a tweet that's cited directly at the beginning of the article that makes a claim that Trump did something that he did not do. It's not "unproven", it's literally "false" because Trump had nothing to do with it other than having his name on the property of the incident in question.

This isn't some tenuous historical claim where the evidence has been lost and the fact that you can't see that means you either lack the ability to determine nuance or you're being intentionally dishonest and this was the best you could do or you couldn't find anything more concrete so you're hiding behind "chosen randomly".

If you have a claim that Snopes is incorrectly listing claims without proof as false, then post them. If they're as frequent as you claim, you shouldn't have to resort to a random post. You would have an example at the ready. I suspect that you realize your argument holds no merit and that's why you can't provide an example. Otherwise, I see no reason why you shouldn't easily be able to show something that you claim is "very frequent".
I have a 2015 Macbook Pro. I use it at my desk with an external mechanical keyboard. I carry my 2010 Macbook Pro whenever I'm out of my office. Apple's butterfly keyboard is horrible.
Nice to see the Long Now Foundation involved with this. A friend of mine is a member. The work that they do is a pretty big deal given that not much of it is being done in today's culture of short term thinking.

www.longnow.org
Brainwash, a Norwegian documentary does a good job : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiJVJ5QRRUE

Among other things, he visits a doctor who has to decide which gender to choose for babies who obviously need some work ( sorry for the wording ).
The worst aspect of Helm is that is is not idempotent. If you "upgrade" a release, it always rewrites the config map that the release is stored in, even if there are no changes. The config maps also get corrupted if there is an interruption during a deploy. Ansible does an admirable job of being a better Helm. It's too bad there isn't a community for Ansible roles for use on Kubernetes instead of Helm charts IMO. It's more powerful and provides the same functionality with better behavior.
But there is no CCPA strategy. CCPA is so weak that compliance is easy: offer data exports and stop selling data on behalf of the handful people who request it. No need to encrypt stored data, or restrict what you collect, or how you collect it.
If github did their 2FA correctly/very securely, it may literally be impossible for them to give you access again.

The entire point of 2FA is to avoid someone taking over your email and then being able to access _anything_ tied to that email.
yes, traditional media is for the most part ad-funded and that's why it suffers from the same problem. There is plenty of non-traditional or local media that functions perfectly fine based on subscriptions. Diminishing or better destroying the ad model will be good for them.
I've gotten my feet wet in terms of understanding that kind of thing, but not really gotten into it. Thanks for the book recommendation!

That said, as legit as your recommendations are, I don't see how this answers my question:

How do you differentiate between biased and legitimate disagreement?
So in this world where every retailer does this I get to install N apps, re-enter my payment/shipping information N times, deal with N different return processes, update my credit card info N times when it changes, and have N questionably written systems know all my PII?

I honestly much prefer shopping on the Nike app over Amazon, but I'm going to go to Amazon to buy whatever I found on that app.
I'm the PM at GitHub for the Archive Program. We aren't making the assumption that you will have computer. The archive will include a Tech Tree that explains in plain language the fundamentals of computer programming and how to use the material in the Arctic Code Vault. We will also include technical guides to QR decoding, file formats, character encodings, and other critical metadata so that the raw data can be converted back into source code for use by others in the future.
The "Inverted-T" arrow keys here are way better than the previous version with full-height Left/Right but half-height Up/Down.

But I've always preferred the "6-key" layout, as seen on ThinkPads. Half-height arrow keys, but then an additional key on top of both Left and Right.

Commonly marked as Page Up / Page Down, but easily reconfigurable to 2 additional arbitrary hotkeys.

Looks nice and symmetrical enough for Apple. Wish they would use it.
I just got mine, so relatively quickly for only signing up an hour ago.
I’m not sure how this happened, but somewhere along the line the claim that there are no inherent differences between genders became less extreme than the claim that there might be some. You’re not making the former claim, but I see it all the time and it’s just as nuts as saying that 100% of observed difference are due to biology.
I'd think that emails can serve that purpose quite well, but now that there's a native app I'll see if it's any better.
Do these notifications fire only when the browser is focused, or do they fire when the browser doesn't have focus too? Either way, the full range of 1-5/hour seems way too frequent. Maybe one a day would be tolerable (though I have no motive for tolerating even that.)
Thanks.

> That may be how you use the term

That's the thing: It's not just me, but the entire country where I work, doesn't limit its usage to gender or minority.

> but that's not what the term means.

"a situation in which progress, esp promotion, appears to be possible but restrictions or discrimination create a barrier that prevents it."

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/glass+ceiling

"Invisible but real barrier through which the next stage or level of advancement can be seen, but cannot be reached by a section of qualified and deserving employees. Such barriers exist due to implicit prejudice on the basis of age, ethnicity, political or religious affiliation, and/or sex."

http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/glass-ceiling.h...

"Since becoming commonplace in contemporary language it [glass ceiling] has become generally applied to obstacles encountered in any field and by any group"

https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/glass-ceiling.html

"a point after which you cannot go any further, usually in improving your position at work"

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/glass-ce...
> there's a "Know Your Customer" process that the government makes sure is enforced

Which government, the US one? Who is the customer here, the person being paid?
Can we save energy, jobs and growth at the same time? [video]
> The biggest problem is downvoting.

> Downvoting is toxic.

I disagree. Ignoring SO's dubious classifications of what's on/off-topic. The last couple questions I've posted have been shit-shows of off-topic comments and answers.

If you ask a hard question, a lot of people seem to only want to uselessly question what you're doing then answer a different, easier question. Those are totally worthless, and force me to waste a lot of time writing really defensive questions that try to nip the derails in the bud.

Honestly, SO should have some feature where the asker can just delete responses as off-topic.

> A better change would have been to make any downvote COST 10 points. Or at least 1 point or 2.

IIRC, it already costs 1 karma point to downvote an answer. I would guess it's the same for a question.
I was only commenting on the "...then don't publish on the web" bit, which you seem to be back peddling on.
Asked for this 9 days ago, so happy to hear it's now a thing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21445928
Now a politician can deny any sound bite. "They just deepfaked my voice!"
If you were Apple's only user, you might have a point. But you're not.

Music professionals, video professionals, photographic professionals, and plenty of other professionals all have collections of USB peripherals which aren't going to be updated any time soon - either because there are no USB-C replacements, or because a complete replacement program might easily run to four figures, edging up to five for some users, and in extreme cases will be as high as six.

Some of these people tour or travel a lot. Having to rely on dongles - which can be lost, or stolen, or which may stop working for random reasons - is very much not a good idea.

Telling these professionals to "deal with it" is unhelpfully obtuse.
Like you say it's the access to data itself that is valuable. At risk of oversimplifying: building models is the easy part. Plenty of smart people who can do that.

Data that is expensive to acquire is the best long-term play for an ML company. Either expensive due to regulations or expensive due to the quality of sources. Ideally both.
Yes, this is a perfectly sensible stance, which of course requires you to actively pay for content instead, either through brave or some other program.

I'm sure you're not just expecting content creators to make stuff for you full-time entirely for free.

Ads should die, but it requires consumers to realize that they need to pay for content one way or another.
The other day I tried to look up a recipe for beef stew on my phone. Normally my web reading experience tends to be limited to big news sites and tech on a Desktop or Tablet - the ads there are bad, but not terrible. But recipe sites are a whole different category of horrible. I was shocked.

They are all absolutely PACKED with ads. Try it yourself. It's ridiculous. Every other paragraph is separated by ads, overlays, click-spam news, auto-playing videos, etc. I tried easily 7 or 8 different sites before giving up and installing Brave.

This is just anecdotal, but I think the categories that are targeted at the broadest category of users, probably scewing towards older and female, are just being straight up abusive. And mobile seems to be particularly bad.

This situation is untenable. I guess sites and advertisers are just relying on a continuing influx of newbies to line their pockets, but really it's a scorched Earth policy that can't possibly continue as is.
All irrelevant. The GP is bashing Chase for complying with a court order. It's not their place to decide which lawful orders they will follow.
Call options are more valuable if the underlying security is more volatile
(because there's higher chance of ending in the money)

Whatever the volatility is you still (in Black-Scholes) have a 50/50 of the option ending ITM (stock returns are normally distributed, higher volatility just means higher std. deviation). One reason why ATM options are more valuable with higher volatility is because there's a greater chance of the option ending far away from the strike price (either in the positive OR negative direction), so there's a lot of time value on those.

This doesn't discount the rest of your post though, clear that VCs go for high risk options.
It's a trial court opinion, so quite possibly not much, depending on what precedent gets set on appeal.
C# and F# don't require the installation of a runtime per se . With the most recent versions of .NET Core, C# and F# applications can be published as completely self-contained applications.

(Yes .NET languages have a runtime, but I don't think that's what the author was referring to).
If he's the one managing the relationship, doing the end-customer billing, it's perfectly normal to have a markup, especially if it's for a short-term engagement. He owns the relationship and is subcontracting you to perform your service.
A referral fee would be appropriate if he was handing the customer off to you for direct billing and leaving you to manage your relationship directly.
In essence, he's also warranting your work (which means he's bearing risk). Don't be so quick to say that this means you should raise your rates. If you did, he might not sub work out to you anymore and you'd lose the advantage of having people like him finding you work (which is a cost you'd need to bear).
We have worked with subcontractors like this where they see us marking up their service and think they should raise their rates to what we're billing. That's the wrong response, because I can't then mark that up further. It just means we're going to find someone else to do the work for the rate we need. Ultimately, maybe it would be good to consider a higher bill rate for direct engagements and a lower bill rate for subcontracting jobs, and in the meantime try and move more of your business into direct engagements. But again, this takes work and will cost you, but at least you derisk the approach by continuing to get business (and build reputation) through subcontracting.
It's a nice sentiment, but there are popular and easy-to-find cheating projects (not sure if I can name them here) that are still widely used, these projects have been active for years, before that talk was made, and still active today. Based on youtube videos and comments it seems many users are still using these cheats with little issue. And afaik, the one I'm referring to (initials P.I.) doesn't use any machine learning at all.
It seems like you can leave general review comments on pull requests.
BounceX probably counts as a data sale, and CCPA allows you to restrict data sales via a required link labeled "Do Not Sell My Personal Information" (hereafter DNSMPI) that must be present on the home page and on pages where PI is collected.

It remains to be seen how many companies comply, but the law certainly does have some restrictions.

Furthermore, there is a CCPAv2 in progress for a proposition on the next ballot.
I'm very interested, but could you perhaps provide a free open beta (perhaps invite-only) so I could see if this will help me learn before I give away money I don't have?
You do realize that 500 gun deaths alone would make headlines in most other countries?
The home page really needs a better, terse description of what this actually is.

Right below "What is Real Dev?" or below the video, which would probably explains things, but which I'm not interested in watching.

The three paragraphs below only give a rough idea that has to be pieced together.
Yup, just got mine as well.
Middlemen are not ipso facto unethical.

The publishers have voluntarily opted-in to ad exchanges because those exchanges provide value by aggregating demand in a way that would be difficult for all but the largest publishers to do themselves (and the largest publishers do, which is why FB/Google/Snap/Twitter/etc all sell their own ads).

It's not as if anyone is forcing publishers to not deal directly with buyers. The exchanges certainly don't have the market power to do so.
> "if everyone acted like you, the web as we know it would collapse. "

So blocking ads is an effective way to enact social change? Great!
How to Beat the Market
Christmas
How much money does Save the Children raise on <a href="https://digityism.com/shop/">Christmas</a> Hoodie Day and where can you buy the best Christmas Hoodie? Here's everything you need to know about the national event.
I've been waiting years for a mobile version of Github. I'm still on the beta waitlist to judge how good the working-version actually is, but at least the company is finally doing something to improve the mobile side.

So far, my go-to way of accessing Github on mobile is just Requesting Desktop Site from a mobile browser and dealing with it that way. I've tried a few of the third-party Github "mobile-version" apps, but they still don't beat just being able to go to "github.com" in Chrome/Safari on mobile and have what I want available to me directly from the source.
I wish there was a Firefox plugin that'd alert you that a site is checking for Apple Pay support and tell you, so I could switch into Safari briefly to do the purchase.
This looks like a native app.
How is it hard? They're at the bottom right so you can find them by feel pretty quickly.
Sort of, but Shopify (at least last I checked) is only the storefront and credit card processing. Warehousing, inventory management, fulfillment, and shipping are all 100% still on the vendor.

EDIT: Looks like Shopify is indeed setting up its own fulfillment network, but it was only announced a few months ago and is likely some ways off from launching:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-19/shopify-s...
There's a reason that it's so important to save those recovery codes... that's your opportunity of last resort to recover access.
How much money does Save the Children raise on <a href="https://digityism.com/shop/">Christmas</a> Hoodie Day and where can you buy the best Christmas Hoodie? Here's everything you need to know about the national event.
As much as I support the cause, I would put the URL in your post description rather than in the title lest you come off as looking scammy and desperate.
Here’s Exactly How Those Rotund Security Robots Surveil the Public
The better approach is to define what inputs are going to be used, explicitly. Some like race and religion are going not going to be used, as discrimination on the basis of race or religion is off limits. But age, past offences, and the like probably are

But I think we're diverging considerably from the original point: that forcing an AI to produce equal outcomes despite unequal behavior in the real world is not the elimination of bias, it's the deliberate introduction of bias. If we have an AI that predicts recidivism rates, and we engineer it to produce equal predicted rates across all groups despite different between rates groups in the real world then we are deliberate introducing bias. The truth, regrettable thought may be, is that a magical AI that operates with 100% accuracy - the only people who it flags would have re-offended - is going to produce disparities because recidivism rates are not equal.