skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I can't even conceive of a use case for 100

A naive serialization of cons cells?
Also the books "Anti-Tech Revolution" and "Technological Slavery"
In college wed use the library printer and paper cutter.

Put the 'proxy' cards in a sleeve with a regular card behind it.

Takes time and effort, but if you play one night a week or so it ends up more fun because you never know what someone is going to bring.
You think a site full of nerds is somehow not fans of animation, Star Wars, and Marvel movies? I'd contend that not one 'marketing bot' is involved at all. Disney's a monstrous company that's twisted Copyright to its own ends... but Marvel movies alone will drag me in.
Would you be interested in making a PR adding the .NET project to travis and the results to the README ?
In what world is Amazon a monopoly in retail? Walmart does almost double their sales.
> Do you believe her actions are inconsistent with those values - or are you saying as the values are problematic, she should not have upheld them?

Her actions appear to be inconsistent with being a good lawyer.

Part (most?) of being a good lawyer is knowing when to shut up and when to tell your client to shut up.

In addition, there is some level of attorney/client privilege to consider. Quite often, two companies will have 4 sets of lawyers in the room for particularly sensitive things. Counsel for the companies and then counsel for the counsel. This ensures that what is discussed stays under attorney/client privilege.
All people want is everything for a tiny price. They are morally entitled to that, no?
The Woman who gave us the Science of Normal life
Here's the diff for subscribe.php to require captcha for all list adds:
https://pastebin.com/tSLkvYME

if you need API support, you could use captcha_passed = verify_api_key($api_key) and include the api_key in the post request
Hollywood Antitrust Case of 1948
> I remember 10 years ago that the answer to rayiner's question was always "I don't want to pay a ton of money for a whole bundle of crap I don't want when all I want to watch is one specific thing." I saw it all the time.

> Now people complain about the complexities of unbundling.

Why do you treat people like they are one amorphous blob? People want different things. There will always be people unhappy with the way things are. Are you trying to discount their complaints?
Would be great material for a blog post as adding react native to an existing project is super undocumented.
If Go has memory management, what does fuzzing Go applications yield in terms of security defects other than D.o.S. crashes?
You're right, of course. But this isn't a court of law and so we use terms like piracy and theft when we are talking about copyright infringement and nobody is really confused.
"Problem is... we DON'T have the originals."

That's a common misunderstanding of textual criticism, when it comes to the Bible, often peddled by pop-scholars writing for the masses, who make out that the sheer number of minor textual variants is a major stumbling block in getting back to the original text.

On the contrary, the more copies you have, the better. It's the same with Google, you hope they make thousands of backups, and at different points in time.

With textual criticism, you don't need the originals if you have thousands of copies to compare, in different languages.

Likewise with ancient history, you don't need to have been there, to know that an event happened in the past.

I would encourage you to read people like Bruce M. Metzger, F.F. Bruce, or Paul Barnett if you want to understand the logic of ancient history and textual criticism, or if you want to balance your perspective.
The technology monopolies are popular because people like to have platforms. But they have a built in conflict of interest.

Decentralization technologies can help use build public platforms without the conflict of interest.
> While wearing a MAGA hat is not illegal in itself, it is a violation of any kind of professional conduct.

Wearing a MAGA hat is literally political speech protected by the first amendment. I don't like it either, but... you can't go there, not really.

I mean, yes, it's legal (because of the same first amendment) for the LF to enforce a de facto "No republicans" policy (which is effectively what you're asking for) at their conferences. But to argue that that was the intent behind the code of conduct policy is stretching reasonability way too far.
> Ignore him so he can stab innocent people in a railway station?

Maybe not, but not all beliefs that are defined as extremist are of the stabby kind. It's a bit hard to get information on which specific beliefs are covered; http://www.xjnj.gov.cn/jgdj/flfg/201502/09174829hwdu.html talks mostly in general terms, but does explicitly mention "活佛转世". Belief in reincarnation is not exactly a violent ideology, but it does create a separate hierarchy (of reincarnated lamas) that does not directly answer to the CPC, which I guess falls under the "social order" exception. Also, various kinds of headscarves and beards seem to be forbidden alongside the Turkish/East Turkestan flags: http://xjtzb.gov.cn/2017-06/19/1121167392_14978365485711n.jp... (I realize the image is watermarked by some random WeChat account; but the reposting by the Xinjiang branch of the United Front seems like an endorsement.)

> maybe even teach him some skills so he can make a living and become a part of society? The latter is exactly what "education centers" do according to the link.

I don't have a problem with that in itself, but that's contingent on the implementation. Making the plan work requires lots of resources, not just the one-off construction of buildings, but also teachers, guards and other supporting staff. There's already a shortage of teachers in poorer regions of China, so where are all those teachers coming from? How are they trained? The inmates aren't going to be economically productive for some time, so how are their living expenses paid? What about the loss of income to their family members?

These are all difficult problems to solve, and I'm not sure the Chinese government has actually solved them.

> the center is not a prison or Auschwitz (go back home regularly)

I agree that comparisons with concentration camps are not appropriate, because the purpose is not genocide, but ideological assimilation. However, I'm not too sure about the "going home" part. Only one of the three groups are voluntary signups; what's the point of sending someone there involuntarily if they can just go? They might even end up stabbing someone.

> did you get in touch of some Uyghur or you just surmise their thought from, let me cite Trump, "Fake News"?

Unfortunately, Uyghurs are a bit rare where I live. It's certainly possible that the Uyghur and Kazakh Muslims who have appeared as eyewitnesses in Western media are just making everything up, or maybe their experience was simply atypical. After all, among a million people, finding one who had to live in a room with ten people because the new dorms weren't finished yet, or who was hit by a frustrated teacher, or who was raped by a drunk guard, is kind of to be expected. In that context, a statement from the government that they're investigating those crimes and will punish those responsible would be much more reassuring than a complete denial that anything bad ever happened.

Maybe you could ask some of your Uyghur friends if they know anyone who went to one of these centers and what they thought of the experience. I guess that'd be much more informative than debating with me.
People frequently do things that they don't want to do or didn't plan to do -- most notably drug addicts and alcoholics.
There's nothing wrong with copying a $100 bill. It's when you try to exchange it for goods that have value that it becomes an issue.
Viral: Ballena beluga juega rugby con marinero en mitad del océano
> People hate the cable companies because you're paying high prices for a bunch of bullshit.

People also love cable companies because of all the content, always have and always will. That is why they pay them billions a year. I am not sure what your point is?
> That’s it. If you can provide that, take my money. In the, say 20 years since broadband existed, literally no legit company has offered this yet, for any price.

That's because they insist on (and we permit) keeping control of both licensing and distribution. If content companies couldn't distribute themselves, or make exclusive deals for distribution, and just had to say "here's the price sheet, anyone who wants our stuff and can pay our rates can distribute it" there'd probably be such a pay-one-bill-and-watch-anything service—but it'd own no content itself. There'd also probably be a few cheaper ones licensing a wide variety of cheaper content—a single, cheapish streaming service with damn near every B-movie and failed or obscure TV show ever made, as an example. The services would have to compete on price and UX, not primarily by which content they can prevent other services from accessing—so, better for the viewer than the current situation.

Given that entertainment media aren't like other goods (you can't just go find someone else to make you a satisfactory replacement for Casablanca, say) and we grant legal monopolies on copyright, it seems anti-consumer and anti-competitive to allow same entities to also own & control distribution.
>>We are also talking about a generation who is saying "I wont pay $7-$15 four times, thats too expensive" but while growing up, who's parents were paying $150/m to Comcast or DirecTV.

Yea I'm part of the group of millenials killing everything. Here's my honest to god thoughts: I don't care if piracy is killing the industry, or if these people aren't able to keep operating. Let the whole thing burn to the ground. We'll figure it out. It would be painful (the jobs! The lives disrupted! The profits!!!) and I'm aware of that. I just don't care.

The industry has opened Pandora's box. And I'm not going to feel bad when Disney or Verizon or whatever megacorp the other 5% of the industry those two don't has their business disrupted. The entertainment industry has gotten gross and stagnant and continues to progress towards a monopoly.

This current era is going to shift, and likely very fast. There's too many services, and piracy is still an easy option. You can slow roll price increases, but only so far and only if there's a very small (2-5?) number of services people feel they're getting value from.
the part about rare cards not being stronger than common cards is really not true anymore sadly, with competitively payable planeswalkers like Oko, for example, often being 50$+ each, and pretty much every card in competitive decks except basic lands being rare or mythic rare
they don’t have everything (and I regulary buy things from them). Try watching “Spirited Away” there or upcoming “Mandolorian”.
Also, what you can watch on Netflix depends on where you are.
That's not the point. The point is that copyright infringement is a very well-defined crime, and the activities we are talking about here are copyright infringement.

It's not theft.
It's not fraud.
It's not vandalism.

And yet, people in these discussion use those wrong terms to describe the activity. But the only reason they do that, is because they want to attach the greater stigma of those crimes, onto the less stigmatized crime of copyright infringement.

And that's a dishonest argument.
I tried running it, but on a normal postgres database, not used by a ruby on rails app. It failed because it assumes RoR security tables (users)?

Also tried to run it in a separate docker image, next to a postgres docker, started from a shared docker-compose, but docs where unclear how to configure this (e.g., what environment variable is used to set the database name).
China, South Korea are $2K-2.5K per kilowatt of baseload.
A Nuclear kilowatt generates 70-95% of the time. A solar kilowatt generates 10-20% of the time. A Gigawatt of solar generates 1 Terawatt hour per year. A gigawatt of nuclear generates 6 to 8 terawatt hours per year. So nuclear generates an average of 7 times more. Solar lasts 15 years. Nuclear lasts 40-80 years. Solar needs to be rebuilt 3 to 5 times versus nuclear. There is no supply chain for matching battery storage at scale. They are just starting to build batteries for cars at the 200 gigawatt-hour levels. Solar and wind in California and many other places has only 10% of the generation during winter. There is no 90-day power storage and building one would be insanely expensive.

You pay for electricity by the kilowatt-hour.
It isn't a matter of memory usage; the memory usage is still linear in the size of the input regardless of the depth. If an attacker can get you to oom by feeding you a deeply nested data structure, they can do the same with a shallow one just as easily:

"[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, <...gigabytes of zeros>, 0 0, 0, 0]"

So you need to limit the overall input size regardless of whether you already have a depth limit in place.
I don't think it's even refuted. It's just redefining what 'decision' is and using that to somehow make the case for free will.

Previously they were saying that the start of the neural activity was when a decision was made, and now they are saying that the decision is only made when a particular threshold is reached, but either way the decision is a result of neural activity that began before the person was consciously aware of it. They're just redefining terms to reach the result they wanted.
Are you entitled to get anything not sold on Amazon for free, because it's inconvenient ot go to more than one store?

Can I dine and dash from Ruth Chris Steakhouse becuse they charge more than McDonald's? Can I at least grab the broccoli for free since McDonald's doesn't offer that?
Solar thermal is zero carbon and 100% uptime, but it's still expensive. Costs are dropping rapidly, though. And as stated earlier, solar + storage or wind + storage also meet your requirements, and are technically viable. It's just a question of cost. Cost of PV solar has dropped so much in the past decade that it could become the winner, even factoring in storage costs. Wind has far less storage costs, because the "What if the wind stops blowing?" theory that sounds so clever isn't really held up by decades of actual data.
The information required to decode the data encoded on the glass is encoded on the glass. The AI/ML is apparently a testing mode, to ensure that someone who knows nothing about what is on the glass is able to extract video of the Superman movie from it.

If the bootstrap section is good enough, the naive, untrained, know-nothing AI should be able to decode the movie. If it isn't good enough, the AI cranks for a long time and then puts Superman in a purple, orange, and green costume, and won't even know that those are all villain colors.
The unit tests and integration tests serve different primary functions. There may be some overlap, but if you’re good at writing them, then you already know about that and can minimize that.
Thanks, i completely missed that part. Very interesting solution...
Big O in English
And I want just add here, as a short sidenote: It's very unfortunate Chernobyl accident happened and how it happened. Some random experiment running in an ancient Soviet nuclear plant, in the middle of the night for no good reason. Considering Soviet work culture and the most dangerous technology on the planet, I guess there was always a distinct possibility. Yet to cause such mayhem, and even better get spread out mixed with burning graphene's ashes across the Europe was really a major score for any anti-nuclear opinion from there on to I guess eternity.

I agree on lot of the points on both sides, but once feelings get in the way, it's very hard to say anything to convince the other party. I'm pro-nuclear as long as it remains as a viable alternative to fossil fuels. If renewables get to a point where they can support all energy needs in every location on earth, great. Let's do that instead. But I don't really feel that much fear about nuclear power than a lot of these anti-nuclear folks. Maybe I'm just dumb, maybe I should fear. But it just seems so far-fetched, if it's maintained properly.
Not weird
A Calculator for the Billionaires – Elizabeth Warren
The memory used by parsers that do not limit the maximum depth is still bounded by the size of the input.

An application that does not limit the maximum size of its input in bytes is vulnerable, one that does is not. This is completely independent of the JSON parser.
Call it secret consumer score, it's the same thing.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/04/business/secret-consumer-...
Note that regret isn't the same thing as "my hand moved without any intent from me, WTF?".
All the terminal emulators I have at hand (xterm, urxvt, tmux) default to 80×24, not ×25.
I hardly think this problem, while absolutely abhorrent, is unique to Montreal.
2006 - 2011, Boeing maintains the next 737 will be a clean-sheet redesign.

In December 2010, Airbus launches the A320neo, featuring new engines (LEAP included).

In July 2011, American Airlines releases a press release [1] containing the following:

"As part of the Boeing agreement, American will take delivery of 100 aircraft from Boeing’s current 737NG family starting in 2013, including three 737-800 options that had been exercised as of July 1, 2011. American also intends to order 100 of Boeing’s expected new evolution of the 737NG, with a new engine that would offer even more significant fuel-efficiency gains over today’s models. American is pleased to be the first airline to commit to Boeing’s new 737 family offering, which is expected to provide a new level of economic efficiency and operational performance, pending final confirmation of the program by Boeing. This airplane would be powered by CFM International’s LEAP-X engine." (emphasis added)

In August 2011, Boeing announces the 737 MAX program, featuring LEAP engines.

American Airlines literally ordered a plane that didn't exist. And then Boeing tried to build it.

There are structural failings (e.g. why Boeing wasn't better positioned by investing in a redesign in the 2006+ period), but American shares a fair amount of blame for this clusterfuck.

Boeing certainly could have said "No", in which case American likely would have bought additional planes from Airbus. So American had leverage, they used it to pressure Boeing into building what they wanted, Boeing failed at delivering that, and we're here today.

[1] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/4515/000119312511191...

[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX
Maybe it's not such a "simple" requirement.
I doubt such a person would be trying to engage in a political act, certainly, but I'm not sure I can make a blanket yes-or-no statement about that. Take Anduril, Palmer Luckey's startup dedicated to building a "virtual border wall." Is someone who works there really being nonpolitical even if they're personally keeping all their opinions to themselves?
At least with Netflix, where I pay for a given number of screens, I don't see how this will work in their favor.
This comparison between pandas and SQL (from the pandas site) is a good reference:

https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/getting_started...

Here's one example:

-- tips by parties of at least 5 diners OR bill total was more than $45
SELECT *
FROM tips
WHERE size >= 5 OR total_bill > 45;

# tips by parties of at least 5 diners OR bill total was more than $45
In [12]: tips[(tips['size'] >= 5) | (tips['total_bill'] > 45)]

another one...

SELECT day, AVG(tip), COUNT(1)
FROM tips
GROUP BY day;

tips.groupby('day').agg({'tip': np.mean, 'day': np.size})

These are all very simple queries, and things can get very complicated, so this list of comparisons is hardly the last word. I've had to untangle sql, but then again, I've had to untangle python code as well. I do find the SQL expression of these two queries very clear when I read it, whereas I have to expend more mental effort on the others, especially the aggregation. And I think people who don't program would have an easier time reading the SQL as well.

Also, I find it is valuable to be able to run queries directly against a database, or port them to a new environment. Pandas and R data frames are fairly similar, but if you've written them in sql, the transfer is zero effort.

I also find that if you want to join several tables or more, select only a few columns, and do aggregations with HAVING clauses, with vertical stacking perhaps, the pandas code does get considerably more complicated. The SQL does too, and UNION queries are not pretty... but overall, I think the SQL code certainly can come out ahead, and times considerably ahead, in terms of expressing clarity of thought and intent to someone reading the code later.

Oh one other thing you did add a bit of code by selecting into a data frame. With pandasql, you can run sql directly against a data frame and switch back and forth between pandas and sql operations, you don't need the additional step of creating and selecting into a new table. In this case, the code would look like

df_merged = pysqldf("SELECT * FROM df1 JOIN df2 ON df1.common_key = df1.common_key")

This is really nice, since there are some data frame operations that are much simpler in SQL and others that are much simpler in Pandas (actually, a lot of those aggregations would be handled through df.describe() -- but the querying and subsetting getting to that df may be more succinctly expressed in SQL).
How would that work for them?

All I have to do is login once on my friend's device then from then on even if the app asks for biometrics it will work since it will be THEIR biometrics.

Also I can add 5 different people's fingerprints to my device (if that even what the companies are trying to prevent, which it's not).
Not if the action was planned days in advance.
It’s not one story — it’s a pattern of stories from numerous outlets for over a year now.
Most hospital PC's allow this as an alternative, also thumbprints.

We use: https://www.imprivata.com/
This reminds me of an old joke:

3 businessmen are in prison, and they ask each other why each one is there.

- I'm here because my prices were lower than the other companies, so I was charged for dumping the other companies.

- I'm here because my prices were higher than my competitors, so I was charged for economic power abuse.

- Well, I'm here because my prices were equal than everyone else, so I was charged for cartel formation.
Super awesome. I just tried Obama's inaugural speech as Linkedin Icon - https://github.com/amrrs/stylecloud-demo/blob/master/obama_s... It came out very well!
Surprisingly, even that won’t be enough! Like I commented above - try watching “Spirited Away” via that method .... and you can’t, unless you buy a disk! (and this isn’t the only example)
I would be totally OK with listening to your technical presentation. I'm not concerned with your other opinions. Or rather, I refuse to be forced by others to be concerned with your other opinions.

I'd listen to quality presentation on a technical subject that interests me even if the presenter was Hitler or Pol Pot.

I don't think I like the opinions of this Sarah Mei on Twitter, but I'd happily listen to her talk on another subject that does interest me.
Eh, it's price + complexity.

People don't want to pay full price for 100% of a service's catalog when they only consume 10%.

People don't want to pay the complexity of switching between more than 2-3 services when they only consume 10% of each catalog.

Both of those are true.

People want ONE portal where they pay a 'fair'[1] price.

I want one service (low complexity) that has all the content I want and charges me fairly (low(er) price due to lack of absurd bundles).

[1] - fair is nebulous. People don't always like a la cart pricing, but they also don't want bundles of things they don't want.