skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This speaks to me. I do a bunch of DIY work on my cars and various maintenance on my house, thanks to youtube videos, that I highly doubt I would have ever had the skill or confidence to tackle in a time before the internet. Many of these things are literally less work to do myself than the hassle of getting someone else to do it, let alone the cost. But in an earlier time, absent knowing someone who could teach you the skill, it just wouldn't have been an option.

Despite the problems platforms like YouTube cause (or enable), I certainly wouldn't want to do without it.
> > A router can't intercept anything on an encrypted connection.

> MITM can listen in on (and modify) that TCP connection.

Not if the connection is encrypted, as was stipulated.

> Another problem is I believe DNSSEC is only validated by the recursive resolver.

True, you need a trusted connection to the resolver you use (which you also have to trust). Therefore, you can either use DoT or DoH to some resolver which you have to trust, or run your own local resolver on the local machine.
oops, thank you, fixed :)
How do you deal with an issue where engineering provides estimates but does not deliver even on their worst case? I agree PM/PO should never push. What if engineering is the issue?
Fix Notifications Not Working on iPhone 6 or 6s and XR
Could you have just used dijkstra or breadth first search?
Sounds like ballerina.io
Interesting. How much did it cost the taxpayers to collect the $6790?
A Tesla owner could ride in a cab or on a bus, though. On average, it seems like without a Tesla they would be at least minimally more likely to.

You seem to be implying that cab drivers are the only people who ride in cabs.
Ever heard about RO water? You can get a RO water filter for 150€ if you're concerned about contamination.
Note: this doesn't mean that Vitamin D and Omega-3s don't have anti-inflammatory properties. It merely shows that inflammation biomarkers are reduced. For example, aspirin is anti-inflammatory, yet is thought to have negligible effects on biomarkers of inflammation.
Never understood why the 757 wasn't more popular?? It had the best performance in its class while still being economical. Maybe back in its day there was too much overlap between it and the 767, but from talking to pilots who have flown it, the 757 handled like a fighter jet, and passengers seemed to love it too.

It's too much plane for most use cases — too heavy and too thirsty.
For extra context, this is a valid XML doc with embedded DTD:

<?xml version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8" standalone = "yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE address
[
<!ELEMENT address (name,company,phone)>
<!ELEMENT name (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT company (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT phone (#PCDATA)>
]>
<address>
<name>Tanmay Patil</name>
<company>TutorialsPoint</company>
<phone>(011) 123-4567</phone>
</address>

This is a valid XML doc with an externally linked DTD:

<?xml version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8" standalone = "no" ?>
<!DOCTYPE address SYSTEM "address.dtd">
<address>
<name>Tanmay Patil</name>
<company>TutorialsPoint</company>
<phone>(011) 123-4567</phone>
</address>
Either all the senior engineers and PhDs working for Apple are idiots, or it’s harder than you think.

This same heuristic can be applied all across the HN front page with good results.
As I understand it, all 737s pre-MAX are fine; you want to avoid the MAX planes because of MCAS and the new engine placement.

Yeah, just don't pay too much attention to the structural problems that Boeing is having with the 737 NG (cracked pickle forks). The inspection threshold keeps getting lower and the scope of the inspections keeps growing.
> I haven't had a "land line" in multiple-decades.

I'd love to have a land line but it completely stopped working decades ago. After deregulation, no one was responsible.

Countless attempts to get anyone to fix it were in vain.

This year I saw a thick line completely knocked down by a fallen tree. I called the power company. They said it was a telephone line not a power line. And that there wasn't anyone left for them to contact to get it fixed. Asking around I found it actually didn't matter. No one was actually using it. No one has land lines any more. The technology is obsolete, irrelevant, and should be removed.
What a terrible article.
We have a liberalised energy market in Europe. Therefore energy prices in this market are not that different between Germany and France.
Also, the writer is missing the costs of disposal of nuclear waste.
Because it's gone in 10 half lives.
There was another comment, and the poster was talking about cutting the THC concentrate with Vitamin E oils which is dangerous to vaporize and inhale. I can't find it too though.
>Gingko's success happens in (to me!!!!) good old microbiology, taking genes that already exist and putting them into bacteria

My intuition suggests the same... although it’s based on high school AP bio plus conversations/reading.

Any thoughts on cost efficiency? Is there some Gibbs free energy or other principle that would prevent it from ever being commercially feasible?
>maybe not for everyone who can't afford/doesn't have a Tesla.

Affordability is not as much of an issue as some make it out to be. Cost-wise it's like owning a Camry or an Accord, if you go for the lower end models. If you mean not everyone can afford a new car, then sure I agree with you.

Edit: if you think I'm wrong about this, please explain or ask me to clarify anything?
There is a do not call list (i don't know how it compares to Robinson). It's called Bloctel. But it's not really effective.
Yoga Likely Reduces Biomarkers of Inflammation
The current policies and positions of the GOP are the exact same as they were 10 years ago (slightly to the left actually)

it is progressives / liberals that have moved, not the GOP
I so often discard internet real educational value [0] but it might start to have an impact.

Even if I'd think fablab/shop per city or neighborhood might be more efficient, it's still great.

[0] to me the only good thing there was khan academy which was basically video tutorial you can rewind.
The recent high construction costs for nuclear have a lot to do with lack of scale. If you only build one or two reactors over a decade you have to amortize all the first-time construction mistakes over that small number. If you build a hundred, you may make mistakes that require expensive reworks on the first one or two but not on the third or fourth and certainly not on the fiftieth.

The other major contributor is regulatory inefficiency. That's fixable at the stroke of a pen given the political will to do something about it.

Meanwhile people look at the exponential curve for renewables as if it's going to last forever, but they never do in the end. The question is how far from the end we are, but nobody has a crystal ball. Which is why we should hedge our bets.

Build both. If people figure out how to make it work with only wind and solar then we paid some money for insurance. If they don't, we're still prepared. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.
The thing is, targeted adverts work based on the information you put into it.

If you put garbage in you'll get garbage adverts come out of it.

The adverts you get tell you a lot about yourself, the prominent adverts the the average US citizen gets should tell you a lot about the average US citizen...
In my admittedly limited experience with Rust, writing tricky data structure library code, “if it compiles it works” was ludicrously far from true. That’s not to say that the type system didn’t help immensely with correctness, but what helped the most by far was property-based testing, which works just as well in dynamically-typed languages.
Ask HN: Most profitable sectors to do data science?
Which branch / products / return has the highest ROI of data science?
Anger is the strongest emotion, stronger emotion than love. It's almost like second nature to be clever when you know some facts to prove the counterparty wrong because of anger. Learning to control emotion (ie stoicism) prevents impulse arguments because you reflect and think on why you're feeling that way before before instigating something.
> PostgREST's approach is not like PowerBuilder's.

My intent was not to equate PostgREST with PowerBuilder, but instead to use the latter as a well-known example of a two-tier system.

> PowerBuilder didn't encourage you to know your DB ins-and-outs and use all of its features.

While PowerBuilder was "DB agnostic", as you identified, non-trivial applications relied heavily on RDBMS logic (stored procs, views, etc.). So while PB may not have "encouraged" RDBMS specific implementations, those which I encountered were never without.

Granted, the client connection protocol vastly differs between the two offerings. Yet the system architecture is shared IMHO.
I had a good run with the old library / book / pen / paper way. But it was mostly math or lisp, both things are nice to solve on paper.
Their service to SEA is terrible. Competition here would be nice to CA/AZ but Delta is very reliable and inexpensive (plus it flies the superior Airbus equipment) to Phoenix, so that's a tough route to win.

Delta flies pretty much everything including the 737.
If you like numbers, then you'll like this one: Humans achieve 7 9's of reliability when driving a car, as measured for fatalities by time, or 8 9's if you measure by miles.

I've yet to see a computer just stay up that long, never mind actually doing anything the whole time.

(If you use the collision rate instead, the numbers are about 500 times worse - but that's still quite a lot of 9's.)

People have this fixed thought that humans are terrible drives. They are not! Computers have their work cut out for them to exceed the reliability record humans have set.
As long as you’re here, I’d love to get an updated PyTorch vs TF from you in the sibling thread as payment :).
> A program with undefined behavior is trivially not compliant with the specification.

Undefined behavior means doing something the compiler spec does not specify, therefore the compiler is free to do anything. There are plenty of programs that exploit the programmer's knowledge of a particular compiler's actual, unspecified behavior as an optimization.

One example is using an int variable after an overflow. Post-overflow, the int's value is undefined behavior, but in practice it is predictable for a given compiler and platform. It is possible to write a program that implements its own program spec correctly, while exploiting out-of-spec behavior of its compiler under the hood.

Much like how it's possible to wrap unsafe Rust code with a safe interface.
> there is already quite a bit of flexibility to move with your number

Oh yeah?

I've been paying for number portability for I guess at least 30 years.

I was just told by my cell provider this week that as of next month the 3G networks are being shut down and I have to buy a new phone from them.

I said sure, I already have an unactivated no-contract phone I got on clearance, let's transfer my number to that one.

They said, sorry, no can do, you can only transfer the number to a phone you bought from us.

I said wait I've been paying for number transferability, something I didn't even want, for literally decades, and you're saying I can't do it?

In the end I bought a $15 flip phone, switched carriers, and now have a stupid new number.

Number portability is a fiction and a scam. I paid that fee for 30 years and it did nothing. Fuck everyone involved in making me pay for that scam. Almost but not quite as bad as insurance, another total scam that never pays and is designed for suckers.
How many actually dies? Do you have the statistic?
But isn't much of their money being made from fees?
To think I have forgotten about this for so long, it is unique for web browsing and web development. It's useful to run untrusted binaries files that may create lots of garbage and easier to simply wipe temporary data in an isolated environment.
Which website/blog do you read to get latest software development topics?
Below are some that I visit:
1. https://www.theserverside.com/
2. https://news.ycombinator.com/
3. https://www.baeldung.com/
I have found that in one environment, without the confidence of my boss, every mistake is taken as an indication I'm stupid and incompetent. In another, where my boss is convinced I'm very smart, if I do something badly it's taken as strong evidence the task is very difficult. In either case, if my efforts don't affect my bosses' view of me, then I have no pressure to do a good job.

Doing things ten times as fast as expected easily turns into an expectation of always doing things ten times as fast, and then doing them wrong because of being in an extreme hurry.
That's because arrays happen to override the special [Symbol.iterator] method:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...

Arrays are objects of class Array which have special literals, override the toString() method, and update the non-enumerable "length" property on certain operations.

Try calling Object.keys([1, 2, 3]), or even better try Object.getOwnPropertyNames([1, 2, 3])
How does that work? Where you given the algorithm to use? Or was it really a data science question, rather than a programming question?
The technology is also more reliable than modern wireless

I remember many times where everything else was out of service except the good old POTS line...
Alternatively, some of the worst grainy, shaky cam videos I've seen, usually on the jobsite,

"on the jobsite" is probably the most important point, because then you get to see the actual process as it happens, instead of someone talking about it and a series of jump-cuts of them barely doing anything.

I feel like the quality-vs-accuracy thing happens with websites too; the highly-SEO'd flashy sites also tend to be the most devoid of actual detailed information, and personal/smaller sites have the most interesting detail, but unfortunately search engines almost always pick up the former.
UB exactly means that it's up to the implementation to decide the behavior because the language spec doesn't. "Implementation-defined" == UB.
One thing I didn't quite understand is how training sub-graphs in parallel works. If you are editing a sub-graph of a monolith type model, aren't you affecting other graphs that have dependencies on the one you're editing? If these are independent graphs, then what's a "sub-graph" even mean?
Meaning what? They're gonna break your shins?
Nobody knows where feelings come from, what makes them real and but not a mask, a behaviour people can embody? They are both real.

You said:
"There are two fundamental arguments of the self"

You conflated criticizing haircuts with a disgust reward and constructed a view on narcissists that is defined by feelings nearly everyone feels. Your view on feelings is too limited to identify a narcissist, as demonstrated by the idea that you can go through feelings and appear to be an addict from outside, but not be one.

Butted in to what? A public thread?

The mask idea comes from psychology. A narcissist suffers narcissitic wounds at an early age and learns to develop a false persona to please abusive parents instead of a healthy self that grows over time. They stay locked in a cycle of abuse trying to escape past trauma instead of dealing with it and it is unleashed on those around them when the tension becomes too much. They frequently rely on charm and a single talent to get them achievements to please said relationship and are found to be brittle or liars when challenged. They will suck the life-force out of others to fuel their own lack of a self. There is a whole bunch of psychological information on this.

This all has an overlap with the external version of the story, the narcissus myth. Narcissus is a spirit that embodies the story of self love, being so captivating to some. He has multiple outcomes. In one he captures the attention of another so completely that their life becomes drained away and the adorer becomes no more than an echo in a forest, which mirrors the fueling the self & abuse cycle from psychology. In another part he sees his reflection in a pool and becomes unable to leave his own reflection and eventually suicides or recognizes that the love cannot be reciprocated and becomes a flower, which mirrors a lot of the empathy focused therapy techniques.
Decommissioning costs, often neglected, are a ticking bomb.

UK discounted provision for decommission costs: £100+ billion in 2013
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jun/23/britain-...

£161 billion in 2017
https://web.archive.org/web/20170516093449/https://www.gov.u...

£234 billion in 2018. Costs were so quickly exploding there is a new way to forecast, which dissimulates... err... is more... well...
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nuclear-provision...

Long-term waste management is another ticking bomb.

Moreover if there is a serious glitch (Chernobyl, Fukushima...), are bets are off. You can obtain an insurance policy for anything, AFAIK even for a space trip, but no insurance company covers such nuke risk.
The reason Hinkley was structured as it was is because every other nuclear decomissioning results in socialising the cost to the state. This was intended to ensure that was not the case - despite the massive state subsidy. Which rather brings us to the normality of nuclear - the costs are always indicative of comical mismanagement, overrun and very often completely ignoring the decommissioning entirely. So it never, ever brings electricity at the alleged cost it can in the developed world - decommissioning makes a complete mockery of the figures, every damn time.

Considering Dinorwig cost £425m in the 1980s to get around 10GWh, even allowing for inflation and construction costs rising much in excess, there should be easily enough for multiple times 16GWh from $89bn even with major overruns. Hence "a ton". Probably enough to derive most generation from wind with more than adequate storage underlying it.

Clearly that needs suitable geography for several sites, but considering there were two backup sites within 10mi of Dinorwig should the main site prove unsuitable, and given the geography of the UK those should not be lacking. I know where I would spend my money given the outlook for renewable costs - absolutely not on nuclear. I was once quite keen in my naive twenties.
That's great for you in whatever treeless desert area you live in. It's not the case for many others of us and it's kinda pretentious that you know oh so much better.
Did she say why?
Are you in the US? I assume not because I have never heard of a "number transferability" fee, in the US it is required that carriers allow numbers to be ported out by law, for free
I literally cited the root of all copyright laws which very clearly states that all copyrights and patents are to eventually be public domain.
A look at Alibaba’s 11.11 shopping day, the world’s largest online retail event
You are using the 9s term wrong. It is supposed to be used with unitless numbers. Not crashes per hour or per mile.

Silly example of why: humans are zero nines of reliability if you talk about crashes per parsec.
I had about 15TB of content stored in readily available cloud storage. This was the largest cost.
Clearly you missed the part where the OP said SPOOFING of numbers.

Spoofing is a huge security issue, robocalling is annoying.
Many could lose jobs soon as Indian IT firms decide to “skim fat” in mid layer
No more traffic blues for information transfer: decongesting wireless channels
Trying since '87, to no avail.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yucca_Mountain_nuclear_waste_r...
Historically, yes. There was a reason previously the CAA and EASA were historically happy accept the FAA's certification for new aircraft, on the assumption the FAA were very good at its job.

That no longer seems to be the case (given the fact that EASA now want to have their pilots fly the MAX before it returns to service), and there's well documented evidence (many news articles over the past few months talk about this) showing that over the past 10 years, the FAA's budget was drastically cut, forcing them to effectively outsource certification in part to Boeing to "self-certify".
There's a major flaw in the argument of this article.
They calculate what Germany has payed in the past decades, including the very early phase of solar+wind development.
You can of course compare any number of things, whether it makes sense or not.

But for the question how to proceed with future energy it's completely irrelevant what solar+wind costed in 2005. We only care what it costs now and in the future. "Solar was super expensive in 2005, so we shouldn't build cheap solar in 2019" is not a useful or logical argument.

The key thing about the german renewable subsidies (and a few other countries, but particularly for solar it was mostly germany) is that they brought wind+solar from being overly expensive exotic technologies to cheap mass technologies.
Zettelkasten
Yes it's not perfected yet, which is why it requires human supervision for now. Having it operate in the wild as it is now (again, under human supervision) will help it become less horrifying, which I think you would agree is what we want.
Shouldn't we be holding the government of India to account instead of the toolmaker?

Or is the toolmaker a much easier target? This criticism really seems misplaced to me.
Apply for internship. Doing well on an internship is a great way to get a foot in the door after graduation.
It virtualizes file IO and registry API calls from running apps and redirects them to a predefined location, a "sandbox".
Deportation is also an administrative punishment similar, since you brought this analogy, to impounding an illegally parked car. People who are anti-immigration are not demanding prison sentences for illegal aliens, are they? They demand the appropriate administrative action - deportation.
I guess Harry Potter was a non-STEM breakthrough.
Elon belittles lidar saying it is doomed and will never work yet Waymo and Cruise will probably be operating self driving taxi fleets in California next year. Tesla deserves getting dumped on for those comments because they are no where near self driving.