skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Right, and a more recent paper suggests the reason for the seas on the near side of the moon is that the earth temporarily shone like a star, whereas the moon being smaller cooled faster overall. So the moon was melted by earthshine.
A good portion of GitHub’s employees live in Europe. Of the employees who live in America, most are citizens.
Right, but culpability is like a spectrum. If I actually did it, I'm obviously the villain. But if I prosper from its effects while only opposing it in the abstract, then it's not obvious to me that I've actually reasonably washed my hands of it.
Re: associated data for a state, that's possible too!

trait StateData {
type Data;
}

struct Sender<const S: SenderState> {
... // sender implementation
state_data: <Self as StateData>::Data
}

impl<const S: SenderState> StateData for Sender<{S}> {
// default: no associated data
default type Data = ();
}

struct HasSentNumberData {
sent: u32
}

// using a specialized impl (also an unstable feature).
impl StateData for Sender<{SenderState::HasSentNumber}> {
// instead of a complete struct we could also have done Data = u32,
// but a separate struct would enable a nicer constructor, default values, helper methods and so on.
// (ommitted in this example though)
type Data = HasSentNumberData;
}

struct HasReceivedNumberData {
sent: u32,
received: u32
}

impl StateData for Sender<{SenderState::HasReceivedNumber}> {
type Data = HasReceivedNumberData;
}

Example usage:

impl Sender<{SenderState::HasReceivedNumber}> {
...

fn validate_received_number(&self) -> bool {
self.state_data.received == self.state_data.sent
}
}

let sender = Sender::<{SenderState::HasReceivedNumber}> { state_data: HasReceivedNumberData { sent: 3, received: 28 } };
assert_eq!(sender.validate_received_number() == false) // client sent wrong number!

Playground link to see this in action: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edi...
The complexity of DOTA comes, in large part, to teamwork.
There's a frequency for uncontrolled fields the Common Traffic Advisory Frequency. You join the frequency and ordinarily it's silent OR you can hear other pilots who are already in the same area or on the ground, co-ordinating. You listen and build a mental image of anything happening, then as you get closer, even if nobody else spoke yet, you announce your intentions.

The accident plane will be constantly reminding people of its status on this frequency when there isn't a tower. Other pilots will be talking in response to each other but this system can't understand what they're saying. So it will just explain periodically what's going on. Something like:

"Springfield Traffic, November Six Zero Hotel Lima with Emergency Possible Pilot Incapacitation. Final Runway One Six. Full Stop. Runway Will Close After Emergency."

I can definitely imagine, especially when this technology is new, other pilots trying to ask questions

"Zero Hotel Lima, did you say runway will close? I was planning to land there after you. Do you know when it will re-open?"

The system can't understand their question and won't answer, but their training should teach them De Niro's line from Ronin. "When there is any doubt, there is no doubt". Something is wrong, they should divert and leave the emergency plane to do its thing.

The vast majority of reasonable places to land something small like these $2-3M planes will not have a tower at all, and for some of the rest the tower is only part time, but your emergency may not be, so it is usually going to be talking on CTAF and other pilots will just have to make new plans to work around the emergency.
I chose to celebrate Halloween by binging on an HP Lovecraft audiobook, the Necronomicon. Of the short stories contained within, the second one, Reanimator, is my recommendation for anyone in search of spooky entertainment on this topic. I have to warn however that it's set in the 1920s, back when the N word and eugenics were both considered hip.
>What you're missing is that all viewpoints you'll ever see are intrinsically those of someone with the money to promote their voice.

If I may jump in here, I live in a country where political advertisement is strictly regulated and almost all political debate takes place on public television, available to everyone, and there's a commitment to neutrality in reporting and equal representation of all parties.

Now this surely doesn't give everyone the same voice and many people are still marginalised and despite the lack of money involvement are excluded, but it may be worth pointing out that the US status quo is not the only model on this planet.

Instead of increasing the asymmetry by letting those with more money expand their influence even more, you could take measures to level the playing field.
I haven't looked at them carefully but two things jump out at me:

1) there is some very useful stuff there, particularly for someone new to consuming medical imaging data. The writeups are aiming to be fairly complete

2) there are some things jhoward is being naive, e.g. CT image scaling, where the advice could give you trouble.
A lot. https://www.weld.rs/
No. Just 1hr ago a colleague accidentally upgraded to Catalina and her computer is stuck on an infinite restart loop.
Many Time-Series applications do not need super complicated SQL. This is why there are many timeseries focused databases even without SQL support.

There is also PostgreSQL Foreign Data Wrapper for ClickHouse which allows you to run all SQL PostgreSQL support and often with great performance
It's not due to the definition, it's because of how the word has been used. There are terms which refer to undocumented immigrants which still represent their status, but are not dehumanizing.
Do people still play netrek these days? Read somewhere that game has been around since the '80s.
More like if doordash put extra salt or spice on my food, the restaurant owner's expectation of the food's quality and integrity were violated.

With comcast,the expected privacy of the traffic by the server is violated, until delivered the content belongs to the sender. An intetmediary transports content but does not own it,has no right to manipupate it. Vandalizing other people's property is a crime everywhere,the question is does it apply to network packets in transit?
The problem with that is that it means that consciousness is not bound to your body. Two people can share the same consciousness and from that point on it is very easy to imagine that you are sharing the consciousness of your parents and their grandparents and so on until every organism on earth shares the same consciousness. This means consciousness has to be a property of the universe. Making a clone doesn't grant you immortality because you already are immortal.

The opposite scenario is that there are now two consciousnesses. If the original dies so does its consciousness and you failed to achieve immortality. Your clone is just your offspring with an identical body and set of memories.

So which is it? I personally picked it based on what I want to believe in, because even if it is a lie it helps me shape the world into one in which I want to life in, rather than one that I do not like and would prefer to get rid of.
Correlates with my experience, too, however size of the QA team is not a reliable indicator. I've seen it first hand where the QA is huge, but doesn't have good devs, only people that point out process flaws.
Nor Spark (Sparkjava), the http framework!
About a quarter of the company has signed the protest letter. I signed the letter just so people would stop nagging me to sign. I don’t care about ICE. I suspect there are others who got pressured into signing.
Quick way (Linux FF/Chrome at least): CTRL+SHIFT+C[0], click the snake. (arrow keys)

[0] I wish I had to look that up, but no. That's the shortcut for "Copy" in my terminals and I frequently CTRL+SHIFT+C VSCode, which usually elicits a quick four-letter one under my breath.
If "marketing" means anything, it means money buying influence, independent of actual users. It might be spent on press, "analyst" puffery, huge library developments, book projects, and lavish conferences, as Sun did for Java.

Money spent developing compilers and libraries to sell at a profit is not marketing, even if the compiler is marketed: that money comes from users already committed.

C didn't need marketing. It rode on Unix, which also got hardly any. Unix rode on workstations, which had to be marketed hard against all the minicomputer and, later, mainframe competition.

C++ got no marketing either. It still has none, yet the number of C++ programmers is growing faster than ever before. Complaining about it is always popular, but as Bjarne says, there are only two kinds of language : the ones people complain about, and the ones no one uses.

Go may be counted a success when it is complained about as much as C++ or Python.
Obama tried to shut it down

It originated under Obama, and his party controlled Congress at the time.
those in outrage over ICE now were utterly silent then

Not true. You just weren't listening.
It should be noted that you shouldn't really do

> $ strace uptime 2>&1 | grep open

Instead, you should do `strace -e open uptime` to select that system call. Like Useless Use of Cat[0], this could be considered a Useless Use of Grep.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_%28Unix%29#Useless_use_of_...

Edit: Heh, when I went back to continue reading the article this was mentioned on the following line. Oops :)
Interesting product but I'm not sure if you currently differentiate enough (for a developer) from what can be created on AWS using a NodeJS Lambda function and a CloudWatch event.

AWS has the advantage of scalability and integration with their suite of other services.

Your product does have the advantage of simplicity and ease of use – but having to use NodeJS for the logic limits your audience to developers who could relatively easily learn AWS approaches.

How would you position Pipedream against building similar integrations using AWS services?
Excellent htop tutorial - I'll be sharing the link with my students!
>> Joe Biden or the Ukrainian AG have ever been in possession of 1 Billion

Nobody claims that they were. But Biden not only did get the Ukrainian AG fired in the span of 6 hours under the threat of withholding $1B (which, BTW, ended any further investigation into Burisma, how convenient), he had the gall to brag about it on stage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CY. It's also a fact that his son had no experience in oil, gas or Ukraine, and only sat on that board because of his last name (something he _himself_ admitted in an interview which you can also easily find). I mean, if this is the kind of stuff you're pissed at Zuck for not censoring, then I'm sorry, you're supporting blatant, third-world style government corruption.

I didn't read the rest of your message.
You're confusing political ads with adverts from political candidates. Your link specifically notes the difference, TV stations won't censor adverts from candidates but will from super PACs. So glassing over that difference is a bit of a red flag, since the super PAC ads are exactly what's at issue on facebook.
Why would I care whether the future is full of people like me or not? Is there something inherently better about people like me, such that we should be reproducing instead of the people who currently are?
I told you how you could make your own opinion based on sources from the independentist movement because I think that would be fairer than me trying to convince you, but I perfectly understand that you don't want to spend your whole day making a difficult research based on some vague indications so that you can agree with my comment.

Some of the evidence you ask for include the mishandling of public funds, use of personal data for their own benefit, or breaking the laws of their own regional government such that they could pass new laws without the required number of votes (because they only had a very tight majority). Plus disobeying court orders, which is something that I insist can only be accepted in very special circumstances and this is not one of them. I know these are not the most serious crimes in history by any means, that's why they will be on the street early next year.

But what I really hate about this is the image they spread of my country. I do not mind if you sympathize with their movement, or even actively support it, but I mind if you agree with their view of Spain as an authoritarian country just for not letting them to do whatever they want ignoring their own laws and a large portion of Catalan people. I do not mind if they want to fight for independence, even if I find it terribly stupid, but I do not like feeling insulted. And I constantly feel insulted by these people.
As as for the ICE thing, wouldn't the thing to do be to complain to the legislature or IG of ICE if they wanted to see change?

What is trying to be accomplished? Just relieving stress by acting out against authority figures? Or are they trying to improve the law?

What part of immigration law / regulation is at issue? Is it the actions of particular employees? Is it with CBP, ICE, or USCIS?

I am of the understanding this is about undocumented immigrants. Isn't filling out a landing form required by every country?

What specifically needs changing? If you want to get together and "replace ICE", why not? People love improvement. Go and write a better law than Joe Lieberman, he created DHS.

(He also also was the independent that voted against the public healthcare option in ACA, 59 votes, he said something like, "I'm going to be stubborn on this one")
Alternatively, a 90's style site in keeping with the aesthetics of the game would be cool in its way.
I see a selfcontradiction. If youtube was way to make living creators would even mention crowdfunding systems...

Also, maybe I watch different content but I do not see begging, just credits. Technically it's different but essentially the same, making people aware of them. What's so bad abut it? it's like any other sponsor supported content.
True, population levels are no where near what is required to support cyberpunk living density, let alone multi-planet colonization.

Perhaps if reproduction levels really fall off and there is a real lack of families there will eventually be some kind of public, private, or religious industry centered around creating new babies in vivo or in vitro, along with a paid surrogate and child-raising infrastructure.
Kasparov comments on chess computers in an interview with Thierry Paunin on pages 4-5 of issue 55 of Jeux & Stratégie (published in 1989):

‘Question: ... Two top grandmasters have gone down to chess computers: Portisch against “Leonardo” and Larsen against “Deep Thought”. It is well known that you have strong views on this subject. Will a computer be world champion, one day ...?

Kasparov: Ridiculous! A machine will always remain a machine, that is to say a tool to help the player work and prepare. Never shall I be beaten by a machine! Never will a program be invented which surpasses human intelligence. And when I say intelligence, I also mean intuition and imagination. Can you see a machine writing a novel or poetry? Better still, can you imagine a machine conducting this interview instead of you? With me replying to its questions?’
Why is there a need to post this same question every other day. Maybe to get other people’s ideas instead of generating your own to build?
I wish more programmers understood metaphysics better. We’re built to be philosophers.

The first command God gave Adam was to name every animal, which is the act of categorizing abstract concepts and building language to concretize these relationships. It’s in our human nature, but especially programmers. But any philosophy approaching the cross is to be damned lest we be convinced we must carry it and die. So we killed Socrates instead. And when the Greeks came back to ask Jesus to be their new Socrates, he explained that a seed must first die alone to become a fruit-bearing tree. The only people alive today that I know who might understand these things are programmers.

But no, even if a copy is made of you, it’s not you. Your brain is a channel for your mind, it is not it’s source.

There is a more “real” level of existence where all our actions really exist. This life is basically a metaphor for that more real life. The physical world is an analogy of what’s really happening. When we eat a plant or animal for example, we are actually consuming some of its life force to replenish part of our finite and diminishing life source. That’s why we can only eat things that were recently alive. We can’t eat rocks or very old meat.

You exist both inside and outside this physical world. A clone with an exact memory of yours is not you. It’s someone else.
If company owners aren't team players then the message needs to be sent that they don't deserve a charter or a labor force and aren't owed anything. Businesses that are party to the destruction of human rights have no basis for existence.
Thinking back to sawfish and the last time I saw it, it reminds me of jwz's classic "Cascade of Attention-Deficit Teenagers"¹ statement. It clearly isn't the kindest description of the problem, but it does feel valid IMO.

It feels like we've been through so many different "default" window managers with gnome I had to actually look up whether sawfish was just a common replacement or one of the many at-one-time-blessed components of the environment. FWIW, it was the default up to 2.2².

[This message was brought to you by Team Enlightenment Fan Club ;)]

1. Google it or open the link in a tab without the HN referrer - https://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html

2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sawfish_(window_manager)
Where is the seizing of the means of production? Even nationalization of companies is a no–no. Political discourse is radically liberal economically in the US (thanks, Mr. Reagan) so there's really little leftism in the left.
This is a common sentiment among applicants, but after many years of hiring people, just FYI, looking at people’s github projects is one of the lowest quality signals I get from an applicant. It takes me forever to wade through someone’s code to figure out what they did or how good they are, and when there are multiple people on the project, it’s not easy to see who’s driving or what the cooperation/conflict situation is by looking at the git history. It can also backfire in a variety of ways you might not want and not know about, so keep this in mind. Your personal project code sometimes has lots of decisions in it that don’t look particularly good to a very experienced engineer. I can’t even count how many people have sent me github links for code they’re proud of that when I study it makes me second-guess the candidate a little bit. As an interviewer, I honestly prefer to hear the candidate talk through their code so I can find out they’re learning and hopeful rather than read code that says more about today’s limitations than tomorrow’s potential.
It truly isn't a partisan organization. The Dems buried their heads when this happened under President "Deporter & Chief" Obama. People are pretending this issue is new because they didn't take the time to learn about it years ago. Some media reported on it under Obama, but few took the time until they were looking for ammunition against Trump.
That is one option, yeah. I wouldn't do it in this example though. I'd keep it as Mail.
This is what I got. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vm7pm3msx315h2z/Facebook.html?dl=0 All the links are broken in this file from a quick attempt to anonymize my friends, but everything else is intact. No script tags. I intentionally used the mobile site because it's an example of an extremely popular site that doesn't use JS.
Which means it'll be at 1/4G after you travel a further half light year.

That's a hell of a lot of energy. (If I'm doing the math right, the potential energy difference is on the order of ~20% of the rest mass at the event horizon)
Here's the Science paper they reference:
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/366/6465/628

And here is the Dutch Design Week exhibition that explores how vibroacoustic sound healing might promote similar effects through somatosensory entrainment U(neuromodulation). The sound healing bit is only partially tongue-in-cheek.

http://www.design-united.nl/rethinking-interaction/feel-the-...
You might need to cover openat too. I think newer glibc uses the openat(AT_FDCWD,...) syscall for all open calls.
While it is true that hooking _all_ keyboard input requires SYSTEM access (because it involves either impersonating the session manager or injecting code into kernel), you don’t really need that to exfiltrate passwords for random websites that are entered into web browser. Owner of session can hook any event that is passed to the session, which obviously includes any keyboard event that the browser is going to see.
This is one my favorite features of the language and I believe to be fairly unique. It can make for some slick and safe state machine like code.

I do wish that we had reliable RVO so that this could come at zero cost.
"the rest of the developed world"

This phrase is commonly used as though it were most of the global population or economy or something.
Well consider the cultural difference between an agency whose mission is enforcement and one whose mission is service.
Hey, thank you for the kind words!

Before being able to slice plans in these dimensions, I wanted to understand first which use cases are the most valuable, and what are the constraints that affect the value derived by the user from this service.

Nevertheless, your point hit home with me and I will definitely experiment with the impact of other plans on conversion rates.

Out of curiosity, are you a marketer (and/or do you have a use case for Monitoro) yourself?
Also, were you personally prevented from subscribing to the service do to the current plan?

Would love to hear your thoughts, please write me at omar -at- monitoro.xyz
Commercial Open Source Business Strategies
> I believe highly optimized C code in PG can be significantly faster than Scala inside Spark.

There's no question about this. If you can express your task in terms of PG on a single instance, then you probably should.

When you get to more complex tasks, like running input through GloVe and pushing ngrams to a temporal store, PG offers very little - which is fine, it's not at all what PG is designed for. Inter-node IO eclipses single node perf, which is why Spark is used despite being a terribly inefficient thing (although in the case of Spark, it's so inefficient that for interim sized workloads you'd actually be better off vertically scaling a single node and using something else). PG won't help at all with these tasks.

Also, that smorgasbord of extensions GP listed isn't offered by any cloud vendor as a managed service afaik, meaning you must roll and manage your own. Depending on your needs, that might be a show stopper.
If you want to avoid that debate, then maybe cool it with the exaggerated claims?
This might considerably lower the chance of you being employed ever again.

That is, employed in larger companies.
This site is #3,793 in Alexa rankings. Maybe it doesn't count as a popular site.
> I think that you're underestimating Go and its community.

The go community is part of the problem. And I mean that in a good way. So much of golang is about writing your own code. Like if you want a web framework, a lot of people will tel you to just write bare metal code. And it works. It's refreshing to have a simple language without all the crud. It's a wonderful feeling. Which is why people fight tooth and nail against any slightest bit of additional complexity in the language. Complexity that's sometimes needed to make it easier to write code fast.

There are so many options for statically typed languages that for low level projects, it's not worth it for go to try to get into that race.