skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You're confusing sex with gender. Sex is biological, gender is cultural, albeit often correlated with biology.

For instance - it was once considered perfectly masculine behavior for men to wear pantyhose, high heels and makeup, and to kiss each another on the mouth. Now, those traits would likely be considered feminine (or at least, not masculine.)

Does that mean men were formerly somehow more biologically female, because they expressed what we would consider feminine traits? Obviously not. Was their gender female, then? Not in the context of their own culture, they were men being what men were considered to be.

It does mean the constructs of "masculinity" and "femininity" are not innately biological, and that the correlation between sex and gender is mostly a manifestation of cultural norms, not biological imperative.

All of the confusion in your comment seems to stem from the assumption that sex and gender are a priori the same. You may find Wikipedia's article on gender to be useful[0].

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender
As might be expected, the source quoted in the article is someone who has worked as a lobbyist for meat and eggs. They seem to be especially active lately.

While true that organ meat is especially high in choline, even many meat eaters avoid it. For vegetarians, eggs have over double the amount of choline you'll get from steak. Two a day is all you need.

If you ate nothing else all day, you could achieve the recommended daily intake of choline with about a pound of tofu, but chocolate, cauliflower, broccoli, bok choy, spinach, nuts, and seeds are also high in it. Anyone who eats a variety of fresh foods will likely be fine.
I also had a prof who took Feynman’s classes. He told us Feynman was a tough grader - he didn’t give partial credits, you either solved a problem or you didn’t.
Hmm, idk, perhaps a midway between removal and hiding would be to collapse it to ~1px so you gain real estate but still see the position in the document?
Ask kids to do chi kung [1] (i.e. standing almost still for 20 minutes in a row), just try :-)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhan_zhuang
Wow, this one's actually crazy! https://grumpy.website/post/0Sar_W_5D

I already mis-swipe in my Reddit app and downvote instead of upvote... the "small" vs "large" swipe option feels like something that gets mis-input a lot. Okay for something inconsequential like votes, but I can't imagine deleting something I wanted to save because of it.
The mass media is actually pretty trustworthy for the most part. It's incredibly easy to make a binary decision between two candidate about who is better for the climate. You overcomplicate it. In the end, for most places, 1-3 people are your choices. Party affiliation, etc is not pertinent. Just research your actual choices, and make an informed decision. Most of the time it will be obvious, and if it's not, then maybe you have a dilemma. But don't paralyze yourself by assuming the dilemma.
This makes me realise that I go days without using anything besides Firefox, Emacs, Spotify, and terminal windows (with many programs running inside of course but they don't have icons).
This is (sort of) one of the sticking points people like Kay and especially Papert made. Because all computing is interactive, it is always an ongoing part of a more general "learning process." There are many types of learners and ways that they can internalize otherwise complex systems/concepts. It is the job of the computing environment to be flexible enough to take advantage of each person's particular method for learning how to properly (and powerfully) manipulate it.

Lots of talk about spreadsheets in here, and rightly so. See also Hypercard. These systems are (were) incredibly popular, and regular people were able to do things with them that they could not in other media. It's largely because the systems they represented were well designed -- not because people had some particular competency in "abstract thought" or "systems thinking." We are all human and, for the most part, we all do that stuff one way or another.
But how to retrigger all jobs that are loading a plugin, when the plugin is updated?
Not so easy to do when you haven't committed your coworkers numbers to memory.
Not sure about OP but to me rules in GMail don't work.

Gmail filters don't seem to work anymore. I had filters and labels and it was great but I noticed they seems to be failing.

If you go down the rabbit hole of Google Gmail support you'll find filters don't apply to email ("conversations") already in your inbox. But they also don't seem to apply to new email.

Asking on various groups people seem to be giving instructions for options in GMail that no longer exist.
Indeed, making maintainable software is difficult.

To share your analogy: many folks have trouble with algebra. It's not that it's categorically impossible for them to do it; there could be any number of factors (bad math education, home troubles making school more difficult, etc.).

With a lot of time and dedication many of these folks could eventually get pretty good at doing algebra. I've tutored these folks before. Some of them have enough time and dedication to get better at it. But without that (and at least time is outside most of these folks' control), many of them will struggle.

So I don't think the parent comment was saying "Most people can't program in the same way a gorilla can't speak English", but instead "Most people can't program because they don't have the acquired skills to program." I would add that these folks' goal is often not programming but their original job.
> I'm not talking about lowering standards, I'm talking about lowering barriers.

One and the same. Making it easier to join a group necessarily lowers the barrier for joining said group which necessarily lowers the standard of said group. There are entire books written about this problem which leads to it being impossible to build large above-average skilled teams.

No need to bring identity politics into engineering practice. They have as much place here as they do in getting a pilot license.

There is a minimum bar to pass, and part of that bar is speaking a common parlance with members of your professional body from the rest of the world. I'm sorry you feel upset that English happened to be the language of choice for that, I personally just invested the time to learn it. I get paid more than doctors or pilots with the same amount of experience as me, so I'm not going to start complaining about satisfying the same language requirements that they deal with.
I'm not a native speaker, so maybe there is some nuance I am missing... Why not a "dead person's switch'? Is legacy control a male only thing? Nevertheless, great service indeed!
Gotta love vice:
>Motherboard identified an MPC employee thanks to those company database records, web domain information, and the business card. Two sources confirmed this person’s role in the company, with both saying he acted as a “frontman” for The Brothers. When reached for comment via email, the frontman asked Motherboard “[Where] did you hear about MPC.” He did not respond to a series of follow-up emails or messages. Motherboard is not naming the person as they have not previously been named in media reports, and to minimize any potential harm or retaliation against the individual for being identified.

So you're telling us how to find out who this person is..
On the one hand, you're right, pneumatics won't burn the house down. On the other hand, their failure mode is to explode like a bomb and send shrapnel flying through human beings. But at least the house is safe?
Fed Tapes
I’m genuinely curious, how do you turn on Do Not Disturb in Android? On iOS, you swipe the top right corner to open the control panel and then tap the moon icon for enabling Do Not Disturb. I won’t argue that magically knowing the control panel is in the top right corner or that moon == Do Not Disturb is intuitive, but I am curious how android does it that is significantly better?
Cloudflare: Public keys are not enough for SSH security
> It feels like change for the sake of change when it worked perfectly before.

Companies hire too many designers, developers, project manager and product managers which means they must do something to occupy their time. Bug fixing is boring. Writing something new is sexy. Sexy > boring so you get a "new and improved" version.
Hi! David, the author here. I'm glad to hear you enjoyed the comic style. This post is a high-level introduction/overview of OAuth/OIDC, so definitely not intended to be complete. However, I would like to understand more what parts you think were "unreliable" or leave the "wrong impression." Thanks!
> Accessiblity will not work as emscripten does not have access to the DOM at this time.

Rust has had this figured out for a while. You build a few helper methods in Javascript and call them from WASM.[0]

WASM has access to Javascript, so it has access to everything in the browser; that's already how Qt is getting the mouse position and intercepting keyboard events. Spitting pixels onto a canvas is an architecture decision, not a language restriction -- it's possible to build accessible WASM apps.

> Seems responsive to me, tab works fine and dandy, text is selectable, right click works fine as well. I dunno what you are complaining about.

From a quick test in Chromium:

- Right click won't work on mobile (long presses should trigger a right-click).

- Clicking on the main document to enter edit mode is broken via touch controls. You literally can't enter edit mode at all.

- Tab support is poorly implemented. On the web, when we talk about tab support, what we mean is that you should be able to use the entire interface from the keyboard. Here if you open a menu you'll immediately get stuck in an infinite loop. This is something you'd get for free if the menu was rendered with a <ul> element.

- Scrolling is inverted from my browser settings.

- Middle-click scrolling doesn't work at all.

- Searching for text doesn't work at all.

- On mobile interfaces or when looking at the app in responsive design mode, the entire interface gets scaled by a fixed percentage. This is particularly interesting, because that had to be a conscious choice. Container sizing just works on the web, I would need to think about how to break something like that.

- I don't know if the intention was to support all of the keyboard shortcuts the app lists (ctrl-f/command-f), but a lot of them don't work. I'm impressed that command-z gets correctly interpreted as undo. I guess the app must just check the user string to determine what OS I'm working on. I'm curious whether that'll also work on less common operating systems.

- Accessibility is obviously nonexistent, but the position of multiple Qt developers I've talked to is that this is apparently the browser's fault, not theirs. Still worth bringing up though, none of these apps are ever going to be compliant with A11y standards.

I'm leaving out any of the bugs I'm noticing with collision detection or resize performance, and just pointing out the issues that would be immediately fixed, for free, by rendering to HTML.

Also as a quick sidenote, stuff like broken scrolling isn't an "issue" in quotation marks. It's just a bug. I don't think you can chock something up like "my mouse scroll wheel should work" to a user preference. In the same way, you can blame accessibility problems on whoever you'd like, but a text editor that's impossible for a blind person to use is a real issue.

[0]: https://github.com/rustwasm/wasm-bindgen
Not to mention a lot of guys won't break up with someone when they want to, but will instead do things to get the person to dump them.
If that's true then how did we end up with garbage like "Material Design" and similar flat UI themes?
You seem to think that knowledge of electrons (regardless of what we call them or how we arrive at that knowledge) has some cultural significance or requisite, which it does not.

Oxidation is a chemical process - any entity on any planet with a laboratory will be able to mimic and study that same chemical process (regardless of the chemical makeup of them or their world).

Culture is irrelevant in both of these.
Facebook includes Breitbart in curated trusted news
Yeah a continuous problem with 'markets' and 'market based solutions' are negative externalities. If a cost isn't felt directly by the purchaser it takes a lot of social pressure to make up for that and dissuade the person from buying it.
> I think a lot of vegans drink soy and pea protein powders to get enough protein in their diet.

Actually a common misconception, most vegans get more than enough protein in their diet eating a relatively healthy/varietal diet. The exceptions would be people particularly concerned with their protein intake, namely athletes, bodybuilders/weight lifters specifically.
> 1) Most likely, the model is still susceptible to adversarial triggers as demonstrated on other systems here

Humans are susceptible to adversarial triggers too, so this doesn't necessarily make the model less impressive. It is a big problem in practical use though.
Long dead, don't worry you're safe!

Edit: useful lesson though.
You need to understand the underlying dynamics of the modern corporation.

Each one is structured differently, but they have general similarities. It takes some time and study, though. One of the best lenses I have found to view the corporation is 'The Gervais Principle'[0], now about 10 years young. Rao uses 'The Office' to illustrate the dynamics of the modern corporation.

Broadly speaking: Sociopaths, in their own best interests, knowingly promote over-performing Losers into Clueless middle-management, groom under-performing Losers into Sociopaths, and leave the average bare-minimum-effort Losers to fend for themselves.

One of the key lenses is the idea of 'talk' and how people in a corporation talk to each other. Specifically, the 'power talk' of how the sociopaths talk with each other, and 'the 'posture talk' of the clueless to the losers.

Your question is about 'posture talk', how to deal with it, and how to 'baby talk' to your Clueless managers. The answer is to pull a Ryan and turn into one of the Sociopaths, not one of the Clueless.

Though it is only one lens, and one that is ~10 years old now, the 'Gervais Principle' is a valuable resource and mental model for viewing the modern corporation and may help you in understanding the kinematics that underly what is going on with your managers.

[0] https://www.ribbonfarm.com/the-gervais-principle/
Must not have been clear in my post: It was 6.001 in 1983, when I took the class with Sussman and Abelson. The book was still not published, and they gave it to us as xeroxed notes.
You are essentially arguing that all gender studies are useless because there is parity among individuals in each gender. It's true there is parity, but the scientific division between male and female is very clear. It seems VERY useful to study the differences. To throw them away because all men and women aren't identical feels to me like a terribly short sighted perspective.
>>they just need to man up

This is exactly what men are told.

One good example where the difference can be demonstrated clearly is forums devoted to dating questions. A lot of people come there to whine and they get very different responses depending on gender. Guys almost always get something along the lines of "be more confident, go to gym, be more interesting, etc", while girls gets reassured that they are totally fine, just not lucky yet
I know, most of the time the side I was getting was the side of the story my male friends told me.

But for the last 5-10 years I also got the side of my female partners.

Sometimes even both sides in parallel, because my partners would date my friends.
Design Notes from Early Quora Team (2010)
Great book ! Does any one does know of a similar material but for opencl/Vulcan for gpgpu ?
Ugh... it’s the same in Apple Music (as tfa mentions). Biggest iOS 13 complaint: going from a a song on a list to it either at the beginning or end of your queue used to be:

Toich and hold on song, move finger to “play next” or “play later” button, release.

Now, it’s: touch and hold on song, release when menu comes up. Scroll menu up. Tap button.

Sounds small, but it’s such a usability setback for no gain. I want a full screen modal, that’s why I’m going into the song options. Why would I press and hold on the song, then only want half of its options?
And people think WH40K is silly.

Look at us trying to appease the machine spirits.
'But bro, where do you get your choline?'

These anti-vegan and anti-vegetarian pieces always have clear ties to the meat and dairy industries.

Anyway, this rebuttal is spot on: https://medium.com/@Kahn642/the-choline-vegan-crisis-a-pseud...
It's a title. If you want full details, read the article.
Yeah the shift for social psychologists probably happened 25ish years ago. Though, I'd argue up until 5 or so years ago if you asked the average person the majority would tell you gender == sex. Even today I'd guess close to half couldn't tell you the defined difference between the two.
The observation that the climate is changing is a scientific fact.

The hypothesis that draconian reduction or even elimination of CO2 emissions by humans will stop the climate from changing is not a scientific fact. It's the opposite: it's a hypothesis based on computer models that have been falsified by the data.
I interviewed with them a few months ago. The guy who interviewed me was super nice and really smart, but the company's business model seemed really odd. It was some sort of arbitrage on cars with dealerships owning most of the stock and trying to guess when the best time to sell the car as used was. Plus they had this belief there was some customers who wanted something between ZipCar/rental cars and a traditional lease, which I found dubious. I can see wanting one year leases, but below that seems like a pretty tiny market. I'm not surprised they've mostly switched to focusing on Uber.
Muh blank slate
The headline made me think bitcoin miners were using free charging stations to power their mobile mining PCs.
Read the actual Kaufmann report that generated that 1-in-5 claim to see how not probative it actually is.

The actual rate of denied claims varies wildly from state to state and from insurer to insurer inside those states; some states have rejection rates in the single digits. Meanwhile, the report authors don't have the reason for rejection, and the reason matters a lot: providers have varying competence submitting claims, and a large chunk of denials are probably miskeyed services. Very, very few denials are appealed, suggesting either clerical errors or low-dollar claims (the financial value of those denials would be a number you'd really want to see but does not exist either). Much of this is covered in the Discussion section of the report.

Right now, this 1-in-5 thing really just seems like a cudgel for people to swing randomly around in message board arguments.
"Social Psychology has one of the worst reproducibility problems in all of academia."

Not to be defending social psychology in any way, but I have to point out this assessment is seriously misled. Social psychology gets bad impression on reproducibility, because there are tons of research on the reproducibility of social psychology studies. The statement makes it sound like there are reproducibility examinations across all fields in academia. In reality, it is rare. Most fields in academia do not get this kind of examination at all.

Also, reproducibility examinations mostly are focused on experimental research. However, this study is observational research, which is a totally different kind of social science study.
"It is always better to let the possible spam go through than to filter out something that is not spam."

Spoken like an email sender, not an email receiver.

I'm deeply sympathetic with the sender, and not inclined to defend Google here, but I'm also aware that Google is a very large target with a lot of bad actors specifically targeting them, and I just checked my spam folder in gmail: wow!

The problem here is spammers, and a communication system that assumes good faith on the part of senders. Gmail is choosing one way of trying to counteract that problem which is causing problems for people in certain IP blocks, and that sucks. But the problem is still spammers, not Google.
Right, but you can stay profitable without the need for hockey stick growth
I mean, just empirically we can say that those free media aren't significant enough to drive public opinion which is why the regime tolerates them.
It's an industry term: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_man%27s_switch
You're not wrong, but what is an EV going to do with 10,000 volts? You'd have to convert that into something useful to the battery system, so all you've done is shove the efficiency drop and heating issues into the vehicle's on-board transformer systems (which would add more weight) instead of the charger.
Google pixel is as rigid in this case. Samsung allows disabling this.
Right, but "truly random" or "pseudo random" won't matter for decoding if the 4096 can be guessed by brute force. A video file has at most tens of thousands of 4096 blocks, and he'd be picking from 100 of top videos on youtube at a known approximate date range. That's nothing as far as entropy goes.... 20-something bits.
Apple design often prioritizes "slick, stylish and minimal" over straightforward, obvious and pragmatic utility. It's definitely gotten worse as demonstrated with the iPhone X, but they've always had things like hidden gestures and timed presses for basic functionality.

Android designers aren't doing much better though.
Until the amount of water available becomes less than the rights that have been sold. Then things get sticky again.
Maybe they are vastly overrun by sandworms that spew unlimited supplies of oil rather than Melange?
Implementing a ‘Forgot Password’ Feature in React Native with Firebase
If there's a choice between producing more oranges for export or providing enough water to support your population, it doesn't make much sense to choose the orange export.

There are plenty of ways to manage water rights so that you have a reasonable amount of farming and other uses also get to exist.
OK so you have no more information than anyone else? We all have friends who talk about relationships and its all anecdata. Not to mention you have a very specific group of open and non-standard people which could give a very different selection of behaviors than the normal population.
This is a strange title. Why did they use the word 'citizens' rather than just 'people'? Does it imply something important? As opposed to what else? Foreign mercenaries of some kind? Or was it mistranslated and it's actually 'civilians' and the news is they're using non-military personnel for this?

And isn't this a really small appointment? Is the story actually that the MoD has created a cyber reserve force? It's a very small one if it's just a company's worth of people.
That's not what he said though. Words matter and lying is not okay.
I'm not trying to be a dick and you're obviously free to do what you wish (in case you wonder, I have not downvoted you). But this attitude has absolutely ruined the web. Despite all the improvements in web technologies, browsers and even bandwidth, I have noticeably more difficulty consuming good information today. This is 100% because of lax attitudes to user privacy.

Please stop. :)
This depends on the process of manufacturing and the stability of the trade network. What industry does not benefit from redundancy and locality? Efficiency is only one thing to optimize.

> Where externalities are correctly priced, and without tariffs or subsidies

Where is this market!?!? We live in the real world with events, people, and utterly irrational decision makers.
Total Commander is by far the best file manager out there.

Highlights to Double Commander, the unforgiven clone of Total Commander.
A Woman Archiving the World’s Ochers