skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It looks like they require a PIN but disallow repeating characters. Here's the Security Technical Implementation Guide[0].

[0]https://www.stigviewer.com/stig/apple_ios_8_interim_security...
Tip: long press the image you want to save, tap Save.
DC electrical systems go far bigger than 2MW. The science and engineering is well known.

Thats why this is more of a standardisation effort than a research effort. And considering what a massive fuckup CCS made of electric car chargers (there are 5+ incompatible standards!), lets hope they've learned their lessons for trucks.
The BBC just announced the launch of their Tor site. Clearly Tor sites and illegal sites are not equivalent. Unless, perhaps, you live in China.
All of these fixed in Mac and Windows fifteen years ago.
I'd put it down to privilege. Women in traditional relationships are expected to perform more emotional labor over the course of the relationship and so the experience of being in a relationship is generally better for men, so they'll have more positive feelings afterward.
>while at the same time it's advantageous for women to be as sceptical and critical of men as possible.

I don't know about this. These days, I've seen and met many women who have numerous male friends. Sure, ultra-conservative and religious women don't, but lots of women aren't conservative any more.
I used my iPhone X un-cased for nearly two years based on that reasoning. My replacement is cased.

And I've realized: regardless of how thick the phone is, people are likely to drop them, and give the materials nature of these things, a case is going to be required. So I'd rather start with something as thin as possible, given that I'm going to add a case either way. The end result is therefore as thin as possible.
> 0.001% of US women is somewhere in the six-figures territory (125,000 per year if I do my math right)

No - you're off by two orders of magnitude. Much closer to ~1500 women/year.

That's still ~1500 too many, no question. But is it likely to impact this study in any meaningful way? Seems unlikely to me (to put it mildly).

> Among US women, fear/wariness-of and preparedness-for attempts at bodily harm and abusive behavior by men appears to be near-universal.

That sounds like a reasonable assumption and not one I'd argue against (as someone with no real insight here).

But the question was explicitly regarding murder. Not more general violence/abuse.

I welcome the well-meaning comment and think your contribution was valuable in its own right, but please don't move the goalposts.
This is why I disabled Google spam capture entirely on my account. They were capturing things that I had marked as non-spam many times over, so to me, the feature became worthless.
Peak OSX / MacOS was Snow Leopard. From next version they hid scrollbars, swapped default scroll direction and started a steady move to make it seem everything should be hidden like iOS.
I'm specifically talking about moving around and building things in the space, not so much the specific "game ui" elements.
It's already "too late" in the sense that stopping carbon emissions won't be enough to prevent catastrophic change. It's just now that in addiction to stopping, we need to go negative and start sequestering carbon. This is a far more expensive path than if we had decarbonized sooner.

For detailed info from real scientists rather than an internet rando, see IPCC SR 1.5, in particular figure 2.5:

https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/graphics/#cid_457

And if you have kids or care about fairness to future generations, this paper should spur you into action:

Young people's burden: requirement of negative CO2 emissions

https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/8/577/2017/
To support your point: I've seen products avoid using "sex" on a form in favor of "gender", when what they mean is "sex". Like, the difference was brought up in meetings, and they just didn't want to have the word "sex" appear in their program because it seemed more immediately eye-catching and distracting (and they're probably kinda right).
On the other hand they might go out of their way to use it to take advantage of the word play.
Startups are typically awful for this because the business is the founder's baby and they can't understand why other people aren't willing to sacrifice as much as they are.
I've felt it first hand and in the exit interview the founder didn't even understand I wasn't in it for the stock options are they're vested after 3 years and no way he paid me enough to actually buy in.
I have a feeling I know why he hired you instead of writing it himself...

Also contributing my part: a boss declining unit tests because they cost money. In the meantime, he's wondering how crucial bugs appear again and again and urges us to be more careful. It's always a relieve to leave those places :)
You seriously want to ban comments about limitations in America? Because america is really great or something? I read your comment and I think it's serious, please elaborate why comments about the us should be treated differently.
We shouldn't use "believe" and "don't believe" terminology when we talk about scientific facts. It is more proper to say that people refuse to accept the climate change.
Both lovers of C and its detractors should read the Turing award speech of Tony Hoare http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~engelen/courses/COP4610/hoare.pdf
They are doing it differently than the MiT systems. The key is they are using greenhouses with electric lights as a supplement to natural light, adding up to 20% yield as a result. They are not relying on electric lights for 100% of the light the plants need to grow.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=49939807621308041...
Never believe a hiring manager who tells you they'll hire you at level X-1 and promote you to level X after some amount of time. Make sure you get hired at the level you deserve.

Never believe that money is the only thing you can negotiate at a company. Most benefits are negotiable; the only question is who is authorized to negotiate them. Vacation policies are often negotiable, if that's a thing you value.

"Don't talk about salary" (or other compensation) is a common unwritten policy. Note that it carefully isn't written down anywhere, it's just an unwritten expectation. That's because 1) it's illegal in many jurisdictions to prohibit discussing salary/compensation, and 2) it's often to the employees' benefit to discuss salary/compensation with each other, just not to the employer's benefit. (That doesn't mean you bring it up in unrelated conversations; it means it's completely reasonable to discuss and compare compensation when you're trying to figure out things like "am I being paid fairly" or "is this person I'm mentoring/advising being paid fairly".
And this is why Jenkins is horrible. You have a Jenkinsfile, which describes jobs in code, but... you need to create a job... to use those other jobs... and there's no simple, officially supported way to do that as code.

There are 4 basic ways to manage the initial job configuration: By Hand, Save The XML File, JCasC, and Groovy init files. JCasC is of course the most ideal, but also the least intuitive, and requires further server setup. Putting a Groovy file in an init directory is the most straightforward way, using code. And if the Jenkins server is already running, you need a specific interaction with some API call to actually update the job in the running server.

You can also do more horrible things, like Jenkins Job Builder, but I think making someone manage that is against the Geneva Conventions.
Okay, this is where I leave you I'm afraid.
VW was fined MILLIONS of dollars for trying to skirt the law on emissions.

This has lead to the direct DEATH of untold numbers AND has endangered EVERY SINGLE BLACK PERSON IN THE COUNTRY. This is an intentional genocide. I can only hope that the reaction will be appropriate.
> Blurring the Line Between User and Programmer is unpossible

And why on earth do you believe that this difference in mindset cannot be taught?
On the back end, that flexiblity to let you end at any time costs more than the 10 to 15 percent premium you pay. Equity dollars are used to recondition and transport your car and also to pay the debt on it until a new customer can get in it. Since the majority of their customer base churns through the platform with low tenure and is not retained (short term Uber drivers), it is a major problem and has destroyed every other player who tried to do short term leasing. You need a longer tenure to cover the cost of turning the car around.

Your gut is very wrong on this one, sorry.
Depends on the language, I suppose, but isn't the text of the book the bigger problem than the language? sprintf, uint64_t, #ifndef may as well be foreign languages to English speakers too. There's a benefit if the mnemonics are native to you, but your comment sounds like it's the book that's the key obstacle, and less the language.
https://www.tablix.org/~avian/blog/archives/2019/04/google_i...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19756125

From a few months ago. Self-hosted email getting dropped for seemingly no reason.
tSNE for the Web: Tensorflow.js Powered tSNE Implementation
Thanks! I can understand where your friend is coming from. I think if you polled most Christians (a least most that I know) you would find that most of them believe it is fine to defend oneself or at least take oneself out of harms way. So even though 'turn the other cheek' is such a common phrase in our culture and most Christians are well aware of this saying by Jesus, they don't interpret it literally. Most would say it means to forgive those who do evil towards you and not take revenge against them. I think the original saying has some cultural connotation of a strike on the cheek being more of an insult than a physical attack, but I a not an expert. (Though this article supports this idea: http://learntheology.com/turn-the-other-cheek.html)

Now, in Muslim culture (I am again not an expert) it may be that they teach a more strict sense of a right to take revenge/justice on those that do them harm?
I'm under the impression that Kyle Bass and a lot of other investors think Alibaba and Ten Cent could be cooking their books. Is this not true?
Actually I saw a presentation about pharmacy companies already aquiring startups at Phase 1 or even after pre-clinical trials, so VC money isn't needed post Phase 1 generally.
Writing Perl is enough.
Imgur Is Bad Now
In fact, support for languages like Arabic, Farsi, or Hebrew is still pretty bad in many computer programs. This is why we started an initiative to improve the support of any bidirectional language in terminal emulators and terminal programs, e.g. vim, emacs, mutt, ncurses-based programs, etc.
I maintain a list[1] of the supported programs. The specification[2] of a new standard is also available, moreover GNOME Terminal supports it since GNOME 3.34 version.

[1] https://gist.github.com/XVilka/a0e49e1c65370ba11c17

[2] https://terminal-wg.pages.freedesktop.org/bidi/recommendatio...
Imagining an Atom
Facebook starts testing News, its new section for journalism
I love that someone in the comments decided to change to Kubuntu because they took away the color picker for the wallpaper.
It could be simply solved by selling water usage rights or incentivizing saving water wherever the river runs. This was done with success in some parts of the US.
Need that mobile app. Good luck!
The CBO Just Handed Us Two Trillion Dollars
>It might still turn out to be, if you see if you can get a faster C version of wc.

You definitely can, at least if you allow manually vectorized code.

On my system, with a 1.661GB file (256 times big.txt from the original Haskell post) GNU wc takes about 6.5s (real time), a stripped down version of Apple's implementation about 4.1s, and a single-threaded vectorized wc (written in C) only 0.27s. (These times are of course only with a hot cache. For reference, catting the same file to /dev/null takes about 0.18s.)

edit: corrected the time for the BSD-derived implementation
This comment doesn't really make sense to me. To me, (paraphrasing heavily), the comment two tiers above you is trying to say, "The upside is not high enough as typical moonshot companies to raise as much as they did. Plus, they could have probably broken the problem down further."

The guy above you responds: "But these game engines had very high upside."

And you respond: "But those game engines didn't need high upfront investment. And none really do, you can make them cheaply."

That wasn't the point of the guy above. His point is, "There may be enough upside to building a really good game engine." The hypothesis of this company is by spending a lot of money building a really good game engine, they can get upside like Unreal. Whether or not that hypothesis makes sense is entirely a different discussion than: "Is there enough upside to justify this hypothesis", the question at hand.
Trump administration sues California over cap-and-trade deal with Quebec
>designed to process heavy crude

Yes, because historically, that's what the US produced. The refining and transport infrastructure takes time to modify and catch up to the new markets, (especially after Warren Buffet and Obama's back room deals to the benefit Union Pacific RR).

California is set up for lighter crude because it has even higher costs and stricter environmental regs than the US standard, but the same premise applies. It's still cheaper for them to import the more expensive light/sweet than to refine heavy/sour from LA or Mexico or Colorado.
Australia would be a net power exporting nation if they harnessed their solar and especially wind resources. The fact that they still burn coal is ridiculous and shameful.
Naïve question: why does Zuckerberg keep doing these? They never go well, and bluntly, there's really no chance they would. A lot of it is political grandstanding. "Have you learned that you should not lie?" That's a "When did you stop beating your wife?" question if I ever heard one.

I understand the the highest legislative body in the land is calling him to testify. Are there limits to their ability to do that? Or is the PR from declining to testify really likely to be worse than actual testimony?

However you feel about Zuckerberg, politics, Facebook, etc., he's still the CEO of a half-a-billion dollar company. Doesn't he have better things to do that show up to be the punching bag for a handful of politicians looking for a soundbite?
What the end of modern philosophy would look like
Ban Facial Recognition at Festivals
Why? So that people can be forced to live in cramped cities, constantly share their space with rude, smelly, or violent strangers, and suffer the loss of freedom that necessarily entails?

Not all of us are so enthralled with the rest of us. At some point in the last decade, I went from wanting to be constantly surrounded by others (youthful insecurity) to having my own life, doing my own thing, and not wanting to deal with other people’s bs.

The very wealthy can have a similar experience living in a city, but for everyone else, it means loss of independence and freedom. Plenty of people accept those tradeoffs, but please don’t shove it down the the rest of our throats.
Probably meant to write a quarry rather than a mine. I think GP was talking about edumper[1]

https://www.autoblog.com/2019/08/26/edumper-electric-mining-...
Here's my not-so-scientific hypothesis partially formed by my last relationship: women frequently get "BFFs" (other women best friends) who they're extremely close to emotionally, sometimes much more than their own boyfriend/husband. And sometimes (frequently?) these BFFs are extremely "toxic" women, who give them terrible relationship advice, try to break up their relationship because they hate the woman's bf/husband or are jealous, etc. So, as you said, after the breakup, the BFF feeds her resentment, continually telling her what a POS her bf was, and how she's better off without him even if it means being forever single, etc.
>where you imply the part you can do as an unskilled person is the important part //

It's the important part, it's not the difficult part.

Like "I want a square, four tier cake with baby-blue royal icing, using a light fruit cake". That's super easy to say, hard to achieve. But the vital bit is contained in the simple definition.

The only other thing to say at this juncture is that in general there are two experts, domain-expert and programmer.

>I just need to grunt some sounds to express what I want and a writer can tidy up the details //

Well yes, we already have algorithmic story generation (eg ScienceDirect webpages), you "grunt" the topic and the program fills in the details.
Airbnb in the Himalayas
You only have to rename if people import each hook separately.

I prefer to use React.useWhatever(); so I don’t have to keep going to the top of the file and importing new things.

Is my preference wrong? Much of the code that I see online does not use my preference...
How SoftBank made WeWork an offer it had to accept
The IPCC gave models to scientists that are necessarily missing part of the picture (namely, all energy from the sun that is not part of a specific EMR spectrum)[1], and then said "we have a consensus" when the scientists came back with an inevitable conclusion. This resulted in the inevitable false attribution of human activity being the cause of [strike: global warming] climate change.

To fully appreciate the gravity of the IPCC's misadventures in "climate science", here is a seemingly hyperbolic, but actually quite accurate analogy of the situation:

A group of 100 people have been consuming candy, water, and Raid®. Among those 100 people, 20 have died within a 1 month period. A committee is formed to solve this crisis. The committee tasks a group of scientists with determining the cause of death, and they are told, "Here is a group of 100 people, 20 of whom have died, all of which have been consuming candy and water." A consensus is formed among the scientists; obviously the candy is causing the deaths, since water is known to be safe.

When some of the scientists discovered that the subjects had been consuming Raid®, they reached out to the committee to ask why the Raid® consumption had not been in the data, and the committee decided that, since the first ingredient in Raid® was water, and since water was known not to be a health risk, it was of little significance in the study.

Now, imagine knowing all of the above, and then trying to be patient while listening to everyone you know become a "candy science" expert over the ensuing decade, and seeing your favorite news show, movie actor, musician, etc. calling for a candy tax, and constantly berating you as a "candy denier" when you question the consensus... then, those same people begin calling for candy-related fines, fees, and taxes that will affect your livelihood, and then facing the irony of those same people berating you as ignorant swill living in a fly-over state that's simply "voting based on ideology"; imagine that.

1. https://progearthplanetsci.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186...
Men are the WORST! BLEGH!
Even if you accept it, it does not mean you have much power to act on it. The largest emitters of CO2 in the world are by far India and China and Australia is a tiny country with a tiny footprint in comparison.
Evolution of the Scrollbar
TL/DR: Book appointments on your calendar to get work done and stick to them. Shut off notifications while you're in there.

I've been working from home for a decade now, and basically I think this is bonkers (no offense, I see the founder is here posting). With all the tools out there if you really want to do that pair up with a coworker and do it with an existing tool. I don't work in pajamas or do anything dumb but I have zero (0) interest in having someone I don't even work with having a video feed into my house. That's as a man, don't even get me started on how uncomfortable I'd be if I wasn't a cis / straight guy.
Eventually, they will remove the display from iPhones entirely, reducing them to a transparent touchscreen that speaks to you in whirs and beeps through your AirPods. Then even the touchscreen will be removed, to be replaced by a LIDAR chip mounted around your belt buckle. The design of the Great Wizards of Old will have come to fruition, and men will call forth driving directions and Amazon orders using mystic incantations and vigorous, unnatural hand movements.
Sí, tienes razón. Deberíamos extender eso y expresarnos cada uno en nuestro idioma. La experiencia va a ser enriquecedora y seguramente no vamos a encontrar pegas.
This same thing started a few weeks ago for me as well. I have a cron job that parses my log file and sends me usage statistics every morning. I had been receiving this email for 100+ days when suddenly it stopped. I investigated thinking it was a problem in my script only to find that all worked well and all emails were in my spam.

I use SES from AWS and now my new user sign ups emails for email verification also end up in spam. It’s very frustrating because they changed some rule and now my low volume email sending is considered spam
It is the same in the US. Drives me nuts, but I'm using a 5 year old phone with a cracked screen, so I guess I'm the weird one.
English speakers being tolerant?

I suggest pretending to be a foreigner and ask for directions, next time you have 10 minutes to waste.
I mentioned to a group of friends that I had run into a female acquinatance from 20+ years ago, who is now a judge.

The reaction: "Lol. She was quite the party girl." Not the reaction that you'd get re: a dude.
The top comment right now is hijacking this story to talk about climate change.
Haha that's great. "Let's settle with 3! Ha, good deal."

Things like these make me sometimes think that the whole business world is just a bunch of people lying to each other. Very depressing.
I don't know about this one. Some % of culture money comes out of your paycheck but perks can make for brighter days and nicer colleagues.
Excel and other spreadsheet software products localize their function names.

So people learn to use those in their native language which is great.

But if they need to use the same software with a different language setting, because they move or work abroad, they have to relearn all those function names, which sucks...
The shoe would actually look pretty cool from an artistic point of view.

Given the current situation. I'm sure this will not be the last time we'll see that design.
> I am a native English speaker, and I honestly don't understand what they are thinking the second sentence means

Clearly the enemy conferred lesser nobility and commensurate landownership unto said aircrafts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landed_gentry
On viewports that are wider than than they are tall, scroll bars work well. On viewports that are taller than they are wide, they are not great.

The problem here is that Apple used no visual affordances. Scroll bars are the wrong choice, but there are others.
Why would you violate your users' privacy just because of the network they are using? Many activists use sites listed here, including ProtonMail, Keybase, DuckDuckGo.

If you're so happy to help USA law enforcement without a subpoena it's a very good thing you didn't build Facebook or Twitter.