skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
According to Merriam-Webster, gender /includes/ the social & cultural aspects of sex. The exclusion of sex from gender is an extremely recent development that isn't widely accepted yet.

Also, motherhood and fatherhood are biologically gender-linked roles. They are measurable biological phenomena that tie strongly into your definition of gender.
Being honest, there is a certain amount of privilege baked into this mindset. Not everyone is a software engineer with RSUs and a six-figure income. For many individuals and many communities, every dollar matters and increasing taxes to square off against a massive, but global and impersonal, existential threat is simply not something that everyone can get behind.
>>> it should be possible to directly predict the end sensory result of an input molecule, even without knowing the intricate details of all the systems involved

Maybe we're missing the most interesting aspect. Olfactory Receptor Genes in humans comprise ~1% of the total genome. The benefit here is in understanding how environmental changes trigger beneficial mutations and enhance sensory features.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_olfaction
OT: Outreach via email and I am not talking about doing some crappy newsletters has the highest sophistication level in our company. And I am not talking about setting up some lame DMARC/SPF, we (must) do 10x more. DB adminstration is easy compared to getting emails through on a large scale.
You can clone the Github repo and then run a local webserver to access it at localhost:8000/book.html (there is a `make.sh` build script, but the repo already contains the produced HTML).

You can also fork the repo, enable Github Pages, and then access it at yourgithubname.github.io/python-opengl/book.html

I just made a Github issue suggesting to the author, if he's not opposed to using Github pages himself: https://github.com/rougier/python-opengl/issues/38
I loath the cheap humor aspect to forum commentary. It is hurtful as noise or incidentally inflammatory, as you mentioned. There is no way to eliminate it, but that isnt the point. I dont promote pure misdirection.
It's often about the opposite of self-sufficiency - community mutualism, and community visibility.

This compares to having a phone in a publicly visible booth away from houses. It wouldn't be hard to run the phone cable right to the house, but then people would be tempted to make personal, idle use of it.
Usually people work for startups for low pay/high hours for a big payoff of stock options.
Will those laid off get nothing?
That doesn't seem fair.
The internet was a sort of toy used by 10000 people.

Nowadays you should need 2 teams of academics backed up by 4 companies and 2 governments to change anything.

I'm not kidding. The internet of today should be like democracy: really hard and slow to change because sudden change is very disruptive.
He's talking about evolution though, and it definitely seems to hold up for our past as a species.
Hey! This is David, the author. I'm so glad to hear this post helped you to better understand OAuth and OIDC. Thank you for the feedback!
The Rise and Fall of the Exuberant Airline Map
That's.... true?

Math isn't a science, and some quantum physics is regularly chided for being more philosophy than science, because it doesn't make testable predictions.

The distinction seems useful.
Also see https://github.com/metasoarous/datsync - note that this project stalled out due to technical challenges, though i hear they're stealthily working on it again and coordinating with the Declarative Dataflows project https://github.com/comnik/declarative-dataflow
D, skates, and funk

"Sloppy Cosmic", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vTfloaph-M
Rofl, just yesterday I was teasing a ex apple employee about how I can do that very same trick in Android but apple can't do it unless you install the Google keyboard.... Even HE didn't know this trick was in the default some keyboard!

Can't wait to show him on Monday... Lol
https://www.mining.com/kal-tire-at-minexpo/ seems to back that assertion up.
I'm glad to hear it! Thanks for the feedback!
Everything You Need to Know About Calangute Beach
I run a personal mail server for just myself and I’ve been getting full delivery to Gmail so far as well. Same with Outlook.

I’m waiting for the day they try to shut me down.
I managed to lock myself out of the office earlier this year on a work from home day, so no one I worked with was there and my phone / keys were at my desk.

We're in an office park, so I could still get into the building, just not into our office.

Wandered around a while hoping to find someone that would let me use their computer. Eventually found someone I'd seen a couple times before. Told them I was locked out and asked if I could use their computer to contact someone who could come let me in.

Instead of their computer, they handed me their iPhone and said they'd be back in a few minutes. I had absolutely zero idea what the heck was going on. Eventually did manage to find a browser. Took probably a minute to figure out how to open a new tab.

Finally managed to navigate to the Slack page and sign in, only to be greeted by a notice that I couldn't actually use Slack from the website, I had to download the app for "optimal experience". I wasn't about to install an app on some random person's phone, so instead I just accepted defeat.

Handed the phone back when they came to check. Told them no luck but I'd figure something out. Ended up just walking two miles to the coffee shop I was planning to meet my wife at for lunch and waiting.

End slightly related rant.
I'm so glad to hear it :)
Taking Notes Like a Pro
What do you mean with that asterisk that you didn't define?

Why do you hate freedom?
Pneumatic tires have far superior performance characteristics.

They have steel wheels. They are called sheep foot wheels or compaction wheels. They are much harder on the equipment running them.
Anecdotes: https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/zngjgw/lesbians-friends-e...
Because, the usual train/ validation/ test design often fails to generate a useful ML model/ pipeline. With out some serious consideration into the nitty gritty of the 'experiment design' (see above for what I mean by that), we get 'all-hat no cattle' results.

Lets take a small toy example from one that came up a few days ago, the model that could predict 'heart-disease' from one heartbeat. Their data set came from two different sources: their 'disease state' and 'null state' patients had their cardiograms recorded via different instruments. They did some statistical re-sampling to get the data to 'match', so, a skeptics flags should already be raised. Second major issue: without resampling, they had an effective N of 30; they made the decision to 'slice' every ones cardio gram into thousands of examples. The RNN (i think it was an RNN), obviously, will need thousands of examples to train. They then randomly sampled (according to their train/validation/test split) from this distribution of 'beats' to train their model.

So they didn't do anything 'wrong' according to what myself, and what I would assume yourself were told when we did this or that course in ML. But actually, from an experimental design POV, this is clearly going to overfit. Even disregarding the resampling of the original data (its own, very suspect issue), the slicing alone is enough to realize 'Ah. This is horse crap'. Think about it like this. Say its a 80:10:10 split. Take a random sample of n heartbeats, 3 heartbeats long, from n=100k heartbeats. What is the probability of a heartbeat in the training data set not being very close (in time proximity) to a heartbeat in the validation/ test set?
I don't have the time to work it out on paper, but its most likely that anything in the test/ validation set will be temporally adjacent to something in the training set. The probability of anything in the test/ validation being very different from something in the training dataset (say, 3-4 beat sets away in either direction) is very very unlikely. The vast majority of data in the test/validation dataset will have two direct neighbors, both used in training, the next most populated class will have 1 neighbor in one direction, and the almost none will be separated at great distance (even 2-3 beats isolated from something in the training dataset).

This issue central here is the lack of independence in the experimental design. They've created quasi-independence in their sampling methodology, but at the end of the day, they've still only got an n of 30 (not 300,000-3,000,0000). I get it. For most cases, one almost always has to create a condition of quasi-independence in ones data. To get these algorithms to work, you need lots of data.

Knowledge of what ML is, how it works under the hood (a bit), and how to implement it (more imp. imo), all matter in this space. What matters more (imo), is the mindset that can be developed by doing science as an intellectual exercise. Its good science to remain skeptical and be adherent to the evidence rather than our assumptions.
Unity 3D – Smooth Turning with NavMeshAgent AI
Getting one side of the story is not getting the whole story.
Could throw gitlab-ci-runner on a machine: either windows, macos, or linux, and register it.

There's also a way to get CUDA working in Docker by passing the device paths, which gitlab-ci-runner can also use.
I think the Trump administration is right about this -- the states are not allowed to make agreements with other countries without Congressional approval, according to https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/dictionaries-thesauruse... : "States can make an "Agreement or Compact" with other states or with foreign powers but only with consent of the Congress (Article I, section 10)."
At low density, ants move at a speed that maximizes efficiency. At medium density, they move a bit more briskly, sacrificing some energy to keep from blocking traffic. At high density, they move more deliberately, avoiding situations like we see on highways where a single vehicle advances rapidly but slows down many others as they brake to avoid it and cause a traffic wave.
Fascinating... I always thought that stuff would be the last to be electrified.
You know, those things can also make something called a 'phone call' where you are voice-connected?
Until now I trusted them so I use their own email servers. They are perfectly aware of my usage since while sending they even implement a trick so that one can't send bulk email from their SMPTP.

And that's why I now fear they are utterly incompetent...
MS is really bad at this, a few web forums I am involved with are unable to sign people up at all.
You're on a hiding to nowhere attempting to frame this in terms what the subject does or doesn't decide to mention. You say:

> This is a badly made retake of the original two problems where you had one where you just mention that you have a boy, and the other where you mention that the older is a boy. The older being a boy removes 2 cases while 1 being a boy just removes 1 case so they are different. But in this case mentioning the weekday doesn't matter at all.

This doesn't make sense because if you concede that being told at least one child is a boy yields a two boy probability of 1/3, and you also concede that then being told the elder child is a boy changes that probability to 1/2, there's no reason not to concede that being told instead that at least one child is a boy born on a Tuesday gives 13/27 as Sean1708 has demonstrated. Otherwise you're applying your "decides to mention" augment differently in each case.

Anyway, it's mathematically more interesting to dispense with all the intent and instead consider the matter as an enquiry, which you may well argue is not equivalent to the original pronouncement (for reasons of intent), but nevertheless is an interesting counter intuitive observation in its own right:

(a) We have a man we know has two children. The probability he has two boys is then 1/4.

(b) If we ask him if at least one of his children is a boy and he says yes, the probability he has two boys is now 1/3.

(c) If instead we ask him if at least one of his children is a boy born on a Tuesday and he says yes, then the probability he has two boys is 13/27.

(d) If instead we ask him if at least one of his children is a boy born on Christmas Day and he say yes, the probability moves even closer to 1/2. The exact value is left as an exercise to the reader.

i.e. the probability tends towards 1/2 as the additional information narrows the boy being referred to down to a specific child. So:

(e) "is at least one child a boy with this fingerprint? - yes", or:

(f) "is the elder child a boy - yes"

will both get you to p = 1/2.
Do you have an explanation handle on the windowed reductions? Specifically what the number on the left means in this case (or in general)? I've tried it and it looks like `(n+1)</v` is basically `2</(n</v)` for `n>1` but I also see some things that don't exactly fit that pattern.
You clearly visited that site, have you given your IP address to the FBI?

why a throwaway account btw? I would really want to know you so I avoid anything you ever build.
It is a major challenge to have functioning mechanical equipment in a salty, high-pressure aquatic environment.
Idk, I'd say the same about a party dude turned judge.
Sports science research reveals some clues to Eliud Kipchoge's marathon success
I don't think many people with direct dealings with Amish or similar communities would consider them 'more pure'. Heck, I have had a few and the best I can say is that it is very complicated.

There is a lot to admire about Amish communities. They aren't really anti-technology, they're just into a different kind of technology. That has given them strong competitive advantages in areas, for example, they still export farm equipment to third world countries where animals still do a majority of farm labour. Some of their wagons are technological works of art...they just use different technology. The Amish/similar approach to family and group is quite interesting.

I remember going on a tour of a similar group's community. Afterwards, we had some refreshments in their community dining room and we got to mingle and talk to some people. I ended up in a conversation with these two gentlemen about farm implements. Within about thirty seconds, I realized that I was among fellow nerds. They reminded me more of startup founders than I ever would have expected. They were very innovative and obviously very smart. I am not convinced they even think their views on technology make sense, but at this point, I wager it's more about holding onto a way of life than genuine belief.

I might be wrong and hope that wasn't offensive, but that's just a nerdy outsider's point of view on their technology.

There are also downsides. Personally, I find some of their views patriarchal and oppressive, but I was not raised Amish, have never practiced any of those religious and so that's a very uninformed opinion.
> we’d love to know why, but we don’t truly know why yet

This isn't much of a mystery.
It is simply easier to control for external factors in physics, making it easier to isolate the causal links of interest. In the social sciences, you have layers upon layers of biological, psychological and then cultural complexities.
Secondly, physicists have higher IQ as greater economic incentives attract brighter people.
Lastly, physics cannot be abused politically as easily.
Dutch MoD appoints 72 citizens to cyber-military reserve force
Thank you for this! We've been creating a point-by-point list like this as well but your point #2 especially is something I don't think we've included, I'll add it.
For me, this context sounds like "damaged, but in a minor way which forced them to leave the battle/exercise/war/whatever and go land"
I saw the shift to "gender" as the social side of sex way before I ever heard or read the term "gender identity". Though maybe that is what happened and "gender identity" was just very, very niche at the time (like, 25 years ago, probably) such that its descendent term "gender" outran it, so to speak. However, I got the impression that the distinction between "gender" and "sex" predated my encounter of it by decades.

Webster's 1913 does appear to regard "gender" as exclusively a grammatical quality, so far as definitions related to this topic go. So the modern usage may not be quite that old.

[EDIT] huh, whaddaya know, Garner's Modern English Usage puts the move to "gender" in places where "sex" would previously have been used (to refer to all or to any part of the whole deal, not just the biological bits) as right around when I first encountered it, at least outside an initially-narrow set of academic disciplines. Go figure. It is newer than I thought, by a long shot. I figured it dated to the 60s or so in academia, mainstream by the 80s and I just hadn't encountered anyone who cared to make the distinction until later.
Yes, I hear you on this. It's the old nature vs nurture debate. And the leftist orthodoxy is against any theory, finding or research that would assign some non-trivial level of blame to nature. My beef is that the left, who like consider them pro-science, can at times be just as anti-science as the right.
LogMine: Fast Pattern Recognition for Log Analytics [pdf]
You still have to transfer it over the phone line using electricity.
I don't know if I would say recently, this distinction started becoming used in the early 60s which was almost 60 years ago.
Is this what it means for communities to be too large? Like, you'd never do this to a coworker or a friend, but here there's enough content and users that you can say "fuck it" and assume you know better than what you didn't actually read.
President Xi Says China Should ‘Seize Opportunity’ to Adopt Blockchain
> BTW we could charge 10X what we do.

So we can expect that the price will eventually increase to $50 a month when your company is transitioning out of its growth phase and into generating revenue.

Good to know.
note that I said training or talent, I don't think these topics are secrets only accessible to few, but thinking the tool is the craft is misguided. Even in college, I'd use C or Java blindly and made a mess. Anyways, you need to ensure some ideas are understood before letting people "program".
I don't understand Latin at all but I picture a centurion dictating this to a scribe, chiseling into stone, soon to deposit it in a Flintstone-ian rockputer.
Hello, this Bitcoin mining software is awesome and one of a kind, I made 2.0249 bitcoins with ease. You can check the website to get started: https://bitcoinzone.cash/btc/
> The only thing left is what label I want to put on myself, which is largely meaningless.

That's... that's the point. I'll refer to you however you want to be referred (inb4 helicopter joke). There's nothing more to it. Just accept other people's preference and move on with your day. It's that simple.
This language has the potential to attract native Arabic speakers to programming who may not otherwise take any interest. And who knows what insights or new paradigms they could bring. Lowering the barrier to entry to programming is a good thing.
Everyone in our circle of nerds recommends this book and all three times I tried to read it I found it absolutely unbearable. It collects dust in a donation box that I haven’t mustered the strength to carry down to goodwill.

Does anyone else share this sentiment? Did you ever crack the reason why so many love it? Obviously taste is subjective and we are not all supposed to like everything but I’ve always felt like the odd man out with this specific text.
InfluX
While a mine itself is remote, they typically either have utility power or on site generation. Many mines are moving to renewables for local generation for cost savings reasons. Anything you have to bring to a remote location is expensive, including power or fuel.
People need to learn that statements about differences in group averages are not "sweeping" statements. Almost all psychological measurements vary much more within groups than between groups, and reports of differences in group averages tell us basically nothing about any individual.

Yet, the effects might appear in contexts involving many individuals.
> Do you actually think anti-car people are actually that stupid or inconsiderate?

Yes, I do. I hope it is not shocking for you that people are treating you based on how you behave?

"We should make cities walkable and transport efficient and there are more efficient options than individual car travel" - probably someone smart and considerate.

"Cars were mistake from the beginning!!! Ban all death machines!!!!eleventy" - probably someone stupid and/or inconsiderate.
>I'm running 69.0.2 on Ubuntu and it works just fine here.

Thanks for your help. I just tried another test and installed the latest Firefox 70.0 on a clean Windows 7 machine and it does not work there either.

I also tried Ubuntu 19.04 with Firefox 69.0.2 and it does not work there either.

To be clear, pasting the javascript in a console tab of Developer Tools always works. It's only the url bar that seems to ignore javascript.
Ironically in New Zealand, climate activists are the first to block any water retention infrastructure even after a series of very bad fires in my area, I'm guessing it's no different in Australia.
Re: 1), you also have to place the cursor before you can grab it and move it. You used to be able to place it precisely in one step using a long press to get the the magnifying glass, but now that selects the word under your finger instead.

If there’s no cursor yet, you have to 1) tap somewhere to get a cursor to appear, 2) drag it where you want it.

Super annoying to change such a basic, useful functionality.
There is a license if you want to hit a nonzero audience. It's called peer review. It's merit based. You might have heard about it.
One could easily amortize the startup cost by putting the backend logic into a background service where it only starts up once and continues running. A frontend program like `wc` would just forward requests to the backend service.
"There was no Committee," by Geoffrey Pullam really captures my feelings as a mostly monolingual native English speaker:

https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2014/04/30/ther...
Ultimate Go study guide is approaching 4k stars on GitHub
About 2 months ago, I shared my project Ultimate Go study guide and surprisingly, it got a lot of attention from the community → https://github.com/hoanhan101/ultimate-go

As it is approaching 4k stars on Github, which is a huge milestone, I just want to say thank you again all for your support. I appreciate it a lot! I hope that it is helpful to people and one can learn at least something from it.
That's how I used to feel, but it's turning into a nuisance.

It used to stick to single words or sometimes splitting one if missing a space, but now will sometimes attempt to "correct" the sum of two perfectly valid standalone words after the fact, 97% of the time resulting in nonsense.

I cannot for the life of me understand why.
Thanks, I'll look into that and it would make sense t ohost it on github.
This would be a very interesting comparison.
This is from 2012/2013.
People who have attended U.S. universities have likely taken the SAT or ACT. I wonder what the correlations of SAT and ACT scores is with IQ. There have been studies of this, but the SAT has changed over the years, and I've read that it has become less g-loaded.
Hi! Tell more please about tech. U use websocket? WS-RS? Client side wasm bindgen? And more... please!
An update fried wi-fi on my iPhone 4S. Sometimes physical reality interferes with expectations and idealizations.
Query Nested Data in Postgres Using Node.js