skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly, bankruptcy punishes the creditor which is how the system is designed. They assume the risk instead of passing it on to society.
You can compile Java to native code.

And in the case you don't want to, it is hardly any different from shipping a bunch of .so/.dll with the application.
WSJ links should be banned from HN, and anyone submitting them should be banned as well. Surely I would be banned if I linked directly to my Patreon with a clickbait title and claimed you could access my blog article related to the title if you start paying me.
> It shouldn’t have surprised us that you have strong feelings about opt-in/opt-out decisions

Well yes, it should be obvious by now that requiring users to opt out to avoid some privacy-violating behavior is a facebook-class dark pattern.
We can do repetitive manual work for your company for free
Just because someone is entering a seemingly frivolous lawsuit, is it fair that the HOAs sidewalks are inaccessible in general? I feel like it feels wrong because someone is profiting on it but society is more equitable as a result and I don't feel that is an abuse of the legislation.
Ask HN: Is there a name for this role in a startup?
When I started at my current job, we were an extremely small startup. We basically had a couple front end devs and myself on the back end. As such, not only did I do the coding but also all of the infrastructure. That includes things like setting up and managing Kubernetes, MongoDB, Kafka, AWS, etc.. We’re now at a point where we’d like to hand that piece off to someone else and I’m trying to create a job description. However, I’m not sure what to call this role. I had thought of this as a DevOps position, but after speaking to some people doing full time DevOps at larger companies, it seems that these are not typically the types of things a DevOps engineer is responsible for. So is this a SysAdmin + DBA role? Is there a term for this? Are there even people who fill this niche?
You're misinterpreting what an SFC is, it's just something like the following:

<template>
<!-- A mustache-like template -->
</template>
<script>
// JS, TS, or whatever
</script>
<style scoped>
/* CSS, LESS, SCSS or whatever */
</style>

That components may use other components itself, no part of SFCs disallow that.
VAC servers don't really matter; the bans come in waves so even when new cheats are detected you're still going to play a bunch of games against people using them until the actual ban wave happens. Retroactive fixes are applied to stats and stuff so you don't have "losses" against cheaters but when you're playing against them it really sucks, and sucks the fun out of the game.
They gonna come talk to me about money laundering? On the internet? Shieeeet

Reference: https://youtu.be/6ktvE2vfxSQ?t=69
This is the first time I've heard Milton Friedman get called a crypto-communist.

Basic Income is also somewhat popular with some right-wing libertarians. For one thing, it helps make the labour market more free.
https://spectre.cam/full-res/Full%20Size%20Comparison%20for%...

This one from the article is a pretty good example. It looks like a photorealistic painting when you zoom in, and not just on the sky, like they point out in the article - the whole thing does.

I'm really impressed with the 11 pro for stuff that gets viewed on the same medium it was created in, but the trade offs are very apparent when you look at things on a computer monitor.
Stack probing isn't useful in places with fixed length stacks like Linux kernel.
Err, Apple is far more typical in supporting older mobile phones with new versions -- and getting them updated to the latest version fast.

Android vendors had (have?) a horrible history on this...
It’s a simple fact that they delivered more units than they produced in Q3 2019.

They can be production constrained across their full range of Model 3 ASPs, while it’s also true that they aren’t selling 100% fully loaded M3 Performance with FSDs each quarter.

The thing you’re missing is the SAM is bigger when you have lower ASP options. So you grow your SAM and then become production constrained. Yes, you could shrink the SAM to no longer be production constrained, but since it’s profitable to sell at all price levels that would be a big mistake.

Raising the price by $1,000 and a 10 week lead time is strong evidence of being production limited.
> No. You don't seem to understand how protected intersections work.

I'm well aware of how NACTO[1] claims they work.

> The design of the intersection itself forces cars to slow down quite a lot to make the turn.

According to NACTO, they make drivers slow down to about 10 mph to make a right turn (see page 11, paragraph 2, sentence 1).

> Plus, generally you make the parking lane end a bit before the actual intersection, precisely to improve visibility.

This doesn't address the case where a cyclist approaches the motorist from behind from the motorist's point of view. In other words, the only time the motorist will have a chance to see the cyclist is when they're in the process of making a right turn. We can't assume that the cyclist will yield to a motorist or even be paying attention to the adjacent roadway (think of an 8 year old cyclist who doesn't have the concept of how intersections work).

The document makes the assumption that a cyclist will traverse 50 feet in 3 seconds (about 16.67 feet per second which is about 11.4 mph). On page 13, they have a figure depicting the motorist's field of view as they make their way around a protected at a speed of around 10 mph.

If you measure the bikeway setback line shown on page 12 and compare it with the horizontal measurement from the drivers field of view cone (from the origin to the left most extent), you'll find that the driver can only see about 8.2 feet down the bikeway.

Remember that both the cyclist and the car are traveling at a speed of around 15 feet per second. Also, the average reaction time of someone who's not expecting an event is around 1 to 1.5 seconds. This means that the motorist will not have enough time to see the cyclist in order to yield to them. The picture right below it showing the cyclist entering the intersection makes that evident.

> What you're describing is vehicular cycling, which has been a complete failure.

Vehicular cycling is the safest way to cycle in the current environment and addresses the problems of intersection conflicts by positioning the cyclist right in front of the motorist who will have no trouble seeing them well in advance of catching up to them.

The sidepath type intersection actually increases conflicts due to lack of visibility as I described above.

[1] https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/NACTO_Dont-Give...
It was most def a non-prime match (VAC enabled). They are a complete shit show and deter new players from lasting long in a free to play game.
Forever silver IV
The Elements of Style by William Strunk Jr. (4th edition) helped a lot. (Note: English is my second language.)
It's been like that for a while if you have your wifi/Bluetooth on when airplane mode is on, it will do it the same way next time you turn on airplane mode. I used that frequently on my 5S, spare 6, and iPhone X.
one could set up a wiki .onion, where users can "be bold" to summarize and go over all ramifications implied or suggested by the standards.
Assuming Free Software was meant to be professional in the first place was a mistake. It may have gained a professional following from sheer utility but it isn't fundamentally professional - there is an expectation for professionals to obey or outright refuse if it crosses some line and be calm either way. Not so for a community.
> However they are not a software company

The stellar user interface that preceded industrial design dazzle was pure software. Apple does many things, and one of them is developing software. It is possibly fair to say they are no longer doing software as well as in the past.
The reasoning is that airlines used to ban all wireless communication during flight. Now they permit Bluetooth and WiFi but still forbid cellular. The iOS behavior is calibrated to the air travel rules.
TSX is supported by Vue and, unlike templates, that is not opaque to the compiler. I recently switched the code in a side project of mine to TSX and it was worth the change.
I read in one of the issues that it was Marketing that wanted Pendo tracking. (I'm guessing marketing mainly wanted it for gitlab.com).

In one place I saw a developer basically say Pendo is marketing's, and product is only interested in using Snowplow (with first party data processing).

Development was entirely happy with a true opt-in. Development does want to be able to get data back from on premises instances, but is totally fine with having it be an instance wide option that can be off.
That's how competition works - people voting with their wallets that the product sucks so much that being cheaper is not enough. Steam is competing with Epic store, and succeeding - for me it's the same, if it's exclusive to Epic store, then they apparently don't want my money because I'm not going to buy it there.
Lol, I think you're forgetting about another provider. Besides you can always try Gitea.
I doubt it. “Tampering” usually requires an intent to obscure or subvert. Computation photography applied broadly to all photos doesn’t have that.

Definition from OED: “interfere with (something) in order to cause damage or make unauthorized alterations.”

The “in order to” seems to imply intent. Not sure if there’s a different legal definition however.
Also, for those interested in the military side, check out Swords Around a Throne, John Elting’s excruciatingly detailed history of the Grande Armee, or anything by Brent Nosworthy.
Solder flows like water, it "wants" to stick to absorbent material via capillary action. The only difference is the material needs to be clean and free from oxidization so it has a direct metal contact (that's why solder has a flux core), and it needs to be hot. If you take care of that, the solder will pretty much do what you want it to.
Overview of Facebook Research at ICCV
I don't share your summary of this paper. I would summarize it as follows: for USA and Australia, high-resolution/precision lidar-based maps are available of coastal areas. For other regions of the world it is not the case (or severely limited). However, gaining an insight into the elevation of land is crucial to determine a region's vulnerability to sea-level rise. NASA’s SRTM has almost global coverage of elevation levels, but is known to be too low resolution to be meaningful for this application (esp. in urban areas). A neural network was trained on the USA lidar data to augment the SRTM data (i.e. make the resolution higher). The network was verified on the Australian lidar dataset (and they got a good match; the model was already published elsewhere before [1]). edit: I should add that the point of this paper was to then have the newly-derived elevation maps be exposed to sea-level change. This is where the maps with flooded cities come from.

Now, you can discuss whether these datasets are representative of other areas, whether the methods make sense, whether the assumed sea-level rise is realistic or if the outcomes of this analysis have value with arguments. But you give none.

To address your other points:

> "Even with sharp, immediate cuts to carbon emissions, it could rise another 0.5 m this century." Then later in the paper share this wildly broad range of predictions

The authors don't contradict themselves here. You even quote them: "End-of-century projections diverge more, with typical central estimates ranging from 50–70 cm under representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5". The RCP 4.5 pathway involves major cuts to GHG emissions.

> neural network using the highest levels predicted in the most recent models

Their neural network has nothing to do with the sea-level rise prediction. It simply tries to (better) estimate the current land elevation.

> trained on data from areas with climates and landscapes wildly different

Also verified on coastline that is "wildly different" from the USA coastal line.

> produces maps that freak people out

The truth is hard, sometimes

> and fuel political agendas

Any findings to the contrary would equally "fuel political agendas", namely those of climate change deniers. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00344...
I can't find much to corroborate this article's take. RDF is a stark counter-example - a standard from the W3C. It has endorsement from Tim Bray, one of XML's co-authors.
Well, actually, an even better example is:

<employees>
<employee id="1">
<name>John</name>
<city>London</city>
</employee>
<employee id="1">
<name>Jack</name>
<city>Boston</city>
</employee>

I know what you’re trying to do there - you’re trying to “future-proof” your schema by allowing introduction of arbitrary new elements. Which means that there’s no standard way to guard against somebody omitting a required field (like “name”) or adding a new field like “creditCardNumber” - other than to document your acceptable key values in a non-standard format and add defensive code that a validating parser would have given you. You’re better off taking as much advantage of the format as you can.
Many years ago, people believed that "magnetism" is the answer for mysteries of life and soul. These days, magnets are considered boring, so people updated to "quantum".

Tomorrow... will it be string theory? The true secret of the soul is without any doubt hidden in the 13th dimension.
Telemetry still sucks. I don't want it, and it should never be opt-out.
There are religious, evangelical Taliban-style control-freaks who are in love with their made-up magical thinking fairy tales everywhere. Drawing more Muhammad's and shouting more OMG's is part of the solution to counter this insane repression of free speech and human rights. They can feel free to get offended all they like, but they don't have the right to tell anyone else what they can say or do.
Imo, not everyone knows they can slow things down on youtube, and "slowtube" transmit the idea they're trying to build much better than "looptube" despite it being slightly inaccurate.
I think it's just youtube's playback algorithm
The Apple web store only sells official Apple hardware shipped directly from Apple.

Put more thought into your posts. This isn’t reddit.
It largely is an implementation detail. The official guide starts you off without them. You ostensibly could develop an entire application without touching SFC or using the vue cli. But they're such a well implemented pattern that you'll find almost no one in the wild avoiding them, which is pretty telling.
> In a world where companies feel the need to track every part of my life with or without my permission. This is something I can't escape, as every time I interact with someone that does use one of these platforms than they are able to collect data on me.

I find this attitude honestly kind of confusing. I mean, you know that the shops you go to know what products you're buying from them, right? Presumably those shops look at that data in aggregate when thinking about which products to stock. How is this any different? If you're transacting with someone, it's not possible to hide that transaction from them.
I am giving an alternate proof of your implicit statement "There exists a line which has the same number of points on each side". You did this by computing duals of cell arrangements. I am arguing that you don't need to do that.

The proof I outlined will work for any point. Initially it might have the wrong number of points on both sides but for some rotation it will have the correct number of points on both sides.
I didn't buy the game so you must be right. That's unfortunate for valve, because I won't be buying the game.
I think this concept is pretty cool

https://www.personalfinanceclub.com/time-the-market-game/
I liked vue guide, but now that I'm making an application, I'm dubious about the component thing for application state trees. After seeing some clojurescript talks it seemed quite a lot cleaner. I now wonder how different is react..
A function being in O(f(x)) means the function grows no more than a (multiplicative) constant factor faster than f(x). So O(1) is a subset of O(n). O is analogous to <=.

The semantics that GGP comment meant to convey are better represented by saying that autonomous cars' driving experience grows with Ω(n) (analogous to >=) or Ɵ(n) (analogous to =).
That's not what I'm saying. What if I have a child component I don't want to put in a separate file? What if I want a child component defined as a closure inside my parent component? What if I want one file that exports many components? React makes no judgements here -- it's completely up to me to decide what's best for my application.
I mean I've got plenty of guesses.

- The operator is lying or otherwise mistaken

- A radar jamming system under test

- Noise and/or weather effects

- Multiple objects

- Cyber warfare

This isn't to say that I don't think extra-terrestrial intelligence isn't probably out there. I just think it's extremely improbable that they made it to earth.

I also think it's possible that the measurement device reported an object, and a human saw it, but the device wasn't measuring something that was there. Either by malfunction or sabotage/stealth technology.
>Untitled Goose Game is a front for the (Australian) feds

It just keeps getting bettter!
By the same logic should cropped photos or photos that have had the sliders mucked with count as altered?
I still don’t have a clue how to do a lot of the splitscreen stuff with my ipad pro. I sometimes do it by accident, or get stuck in a multitask UI. Discoverability is horrible.
Suppose they send you to one of 20 hardcoded applications in the playstore, only one of which is theirs and the other 19 are innocent third parties being used as cover. Do you ban all 20?
Cheating has exploded in Danger Zone mode lately.
Hard to play a few games without a cheater.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I imagine that's more for the tooling (e.g. syntax highlighting for my template and styles) than an actual preference for SFCs.
Having being a `screen` user for over two decades, migrating to tmux has been a pain. A week ago, however I discovered a wrapper called `byobu` (1) which really helps, and controls both screen and tmux depending on which one you have on your system. It basically wraps Function keys and more to tmux, but has plenty of other features. Time will tell if it was worth installing, but I do believe it's simpler for me to use it as a transition from screen.

(1) https://byobu.org
Am I the only one who sees visible flickering on the iPhone XS OLED screen? Fine white lines on a black background are terrible. It reminds me of using an Amiga in interlaced mode.
Huh? I happen to run my own intercepting proxy which rewrites HTML pages, and if I wanted to, I could easily track exactly how many bytes came in and how many bytes went out.
I disagree with almost all of this. I doubt there's any point arguing the individual points with you though.

Time will tell who is correct.
Audrey Tang is a Tawaainese Minister (not sure of what.. computing?) and wrote one of the first Perl6 implementations using Haskell I think.
> use both a completely untyped dynamic language such as Tcl, where everything is a string, and a static, strongly typed programming language (ideally a proof assistant with dependent types).

This is gradual typing. The real problem with gradual typing is that you largely forgo the performance advantages of static typing, since you spend a lot of compute time translating data in and out of "dynamically-typed" (i.e. tagged/runtime dispatched) representations. This is especially obvious in stringly-typed languages ala Tcl, but applies elsewhere as well.
In America, due to a distrust of bureaucracy and the fact that enforcement or lack thereof can be up to the willpower of the executive, establishing liability via the judicial system is an effective enforcing mechanism.

Absent liability, the other alternatives are some sort of executive branch enforcer (which does things to the whim of the executive) or some kind of onerous licensing/certification scheme (e.g. doctors), and both are IMO worse outcomes.
It's not like Francis would have been the last employee to be soured on the company by Lee's behavior. The promotion denial was beyond petty and toxic.
I find the anti-telemetry attitude honestly kind of confusing. I mean, you know that the shops you go to know what products you're buying from them, right? Presumably those shops look at that data in aggregate when thinking about which products to stock. How is this any different? If you're transacting with someone, it's not possible to hide that transaction from them. Of course you should have the right to have that data deleted, but that's different from saying it should never be collected at all.

Also, given that nearly all websites are using something like Google Analytics or similar (or several of these at once), the reaction and vitriol here just seems weirdly disproportionate.
Since the way you build a vuejs application encourages breaking your code into small, mostly self contained, focused components this is rarely a real problem in my experience.

Tooling also seems to deal with it just fine.
Immediately thought of this:

https://masterofmagic.fandom.com/wiki/Steam_Cannon

Here is a great retrospective if you missed out at the time:

https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-04-20-retrospective-...
Could you make money by buying a div stock a bit of time before the dividends are distributed, but then sell BEFORE dividends, then short it until after dividends and people sell?
Outside SV they'll send you absurd hackerrank problems after a 5 min phone call with a recruiter on contingency.

Which is arguably worse than whiteboarding.
No, they are not reflections in the optical system. In fact, Raytheon is actually using this to advertise the system that was involved. I don't think they would be doing that if it was in fact a flaw in their system that was at fault. Also, they were tracked on radar, infrared, and visually. How does that that square with a flawed infrared system?
> In 1996, XML was invented.

XML wasn't an original invention; it is specified as a proper SGML subset. From the XML spec:

> The Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a subset of SGML that is completely described in this document.

Now I totally agree that SGML and XML aren't for service payloads and config files. The sole purpose of markup languages is representing structured text. And arguably, SGML fills this role much more adequately than XML today as it can represent (via the SHORTREF mechanism) custom Wiki syntaxes such as markdown and others, and in contrast to XML, can deal with the largest corpus of markup out there eg. can parse HTML with all its minimization features such a omitted tags, enumerated and unquoted attributes, etc. See [1] for a practical introduction (disclaimer: link to a tutorial I held last month at ACM DocEng).

[1]: http://sgmljs.net/docs/sgml-html-tutorial.html
>We have not yet added instrumentation to the Enterprise edition versions, and we will not do so until we have a way for self-hosted customers to opt out... (Scott Williamson, Gitlab VP of product, responding to the OP)

That's not the right way to do it. Customers should need to opt in, rather than having to opt out.
It isn't? You don't have to define them in a single file.

I prefer having the template, styles, and code together, but it isn't required.
"The React core team has done a wonderful job incorporating actual CS concepts like algebraic effects into their framework"

Is that a good thing?
Study copywriting.
Even the Librem 5 is on backorder, but at least I can find a price for the Lebrem 5 ($700)