skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There has to be. And it has to be in German.
My hot take: Women give and men take in relationships.

See life expectancy of married vs unmarried men and the same for women.

When a breakup happens women loses more as she committed more.
> The same implication could be made about climate scientists, who are not trained in geopolitics or economics.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. I would take a climate scientist's opinion of macroeconomic trends with a grain of salt, to say the least.

PhD's are a deep dive into a very narrow field of study. They are most definitely not a "universal expert" certification.
This is where command and query (with subscribe) must be neatly separated.
An event A launches an updates of the DB, that launches the query part to react, then stop. There is the risk of having an infinite loop, if the event A is launched by the query part, which is very related to the behavior of your app.
Fair enough. This is what the RFCs are for, which I also prefer.
Learned the hard way.
doctor_m's question is legitimate though. "Men" is a very large group (obviously), and subgroups may have very different behaviors on this topic; hence asking for "which men?" (although they badly phrased it)

And it's worth noting that the study only focus on heterosexual people, so a more accurate title would be "Heterosexual men hold more positive attitudes towards ex-partners than heterosexual women do"
Speaking as a Cobol programmer I find your comments deeply offensive.
Arabic is pretty rough because there's a lot of rules about how letters change based on the letters around them. Also it reverts me back to hunt and peck mode for a long time until I learn the new layout which will be a while if I'm just using it for programming.
It's always interesting to see "common knowledge" quantified in studies. I've had a few of the same observations as you, although I have a slightly smaller sample size to work from.
Building Cactus; the app to help you see yourself and the world more positively
just because you succeeded doesn’t mean it wasn’t risky.
Aftermath – 42s
Why, Apple kills multiple birds with one stone.

On pictures, iPhone looks sleek, easy to brag about.

In spec sheets, iPhone is impressively thin.

In real life, iPhone is expectedly fragile, so people put protective covers on it. It also solves the problem of uneven shape.

In real life, people want a wider choice of colors, textures, and a larger battery. Custom covers solve this at no expense to Apple, which can continue to pretend they don't exist.
This confirm my real-world usage. We had to do a "Semantic Similarity search" for some documents, where we represent a document as a vector using BERT, and had to look for documents close to a reference document.

First we did on top of an ANN library(Facebook FAISS). For simplicity we moved to the naive Vespa vector search and the performance was good enough( FOR 1Mi documents, FAISS did the search in 50ms, Vespa was around 600ms), and we moved to Vespa to reduce the number of tools to maintain.
Guild of Founders
We are starting a 5 weeks long Seed/Angel Fundraising Bootcamp for hackerss and wannabe founders starting 15th Nov, 2019. Apply here www.funding.venturehandle.com. Its free and fully virtual so you can work on your startup while attending the bootcmap. Last date to apply Nov 8th, 2019. Thanks
I've added the 42s because this is a meta post about us... and 42s is the average amount of time we hners spent reading that post.
> I seriously believe that the last time any real thought went into usability in UI was with Windows 95

Way to throw Bob under the bus...
Yes. Gender is arcane, fuzzy, some inscrutable configuration of the brain. Sex is concrete, logical, your allosome configuration.

Phew. A bastion of sense in this crazy w--

>Genetic women with Turner syndrome have only one X chromosome; they often display less-developed female sexual characteristics than other women. And people with a genetic mosaic possess XX chromosomes in some cells and XY in others. So how do we determine if they're male or female? Hint: Don't say that it depends on the chromosomal makeup of the majority of their cells, since women with more than 90 per cent XY genetic material have given birth. [0]

I--

>Sex can be much more complicated than it at first seems. According to the simple scenario, the presence or absence of a Y chromosome is what counts: with it, you are male, and without it, you are female. But doctors have long known that some people straddle the boundary—their sex chromosomes say one thing, but their gonads (ovaries or testes) or sexual anatomy say another. Parents of children with these kinds of conditions—known as intersex conditions, or differences or disorders of sex development (DSDs)—often face difficult decisions about whether to bring up their child as a boy or a girl. Some researchers now say that as many as 1 person in 100 has some form of DSD. [1]

>When genetics is taken into consideration, the boundary between the sexes becomes even blurrier. Scientists have identified many of the genes involved in the main forms of DSD, and have uncovered variations in these genes that have subtle effects on a person's anatomical or physiological sex. What's more, new technologies in DNA sequencing and cell biology are revealing that almost everyone is, to varying degrees, a patchwork of genetically distinct cells, some with a sex that might not match that of the rest of their body. Some studies even suggest that the sex of each cell drives its behaviour, through a complicated network of molecular interactions. “I think there's much greater diversity within male or female, and there is certainly an area of overlap where some people can't easily define themselves within the binary structure,” says John Achermann, who studies sex development and endocrinology at University College London's Institute of Child Health. [1]

>These discoveries do not sit well in a world in which sex is still defined in binary terms. Few legal systems allow for any ambiguity in biological sex, and a person's legal rights and social status can be heavily influenced by whether their birth certificate says male or female. [1]

... ¦´C

0: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/opinion/think-gender-com...

1: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the...
By that logic, for example, math and some quantum physics are not science. This distinction is useless.
> Women give and men take in relationships
> See life expectancy of married vs unmarried men and the same for women.

Why not look at divorce settlements to decide who takes and who gives?

Muh sexism much.
> But the _3rd party client_ is the one can do things on behalf of the user (post messages on a forum, add details to a map, etc).

How does this part work? It's unclear to me how a web/mobile app should be posting to a forum. It's invoking an API that exists on a server (client-side code is not secure). Perhaps I'm picturing your model wrong..
Haut.py
I think the parent means clients (user agents), not actual human users. As soon as any state that needs to be hidden is exposed to clients, that's a security breach regardless of whether any human eyeballs have seen it.
Gender identity is an emergent social construct, there isn't anything biological about it.
Are there any mines where machines/vehicles are powered by e.g. overhead cables? Seems like that might in some cases be cheaper to pull off than equipping huge vehicles that go up and down the same path over and over again with huge batteries.
Interesting point about German, though du/Sie isn't the kind of "agent" I was thinking of. I meant something where you name the agent by name, like "Frau Huber, machen Sie das!". And yes, I know you can put the name at the end as well.

The du/Sie in such sentences is something that's specific to German compared to the other languages I know, which don't need (or even allow) the pronoun: "do this", "faites ça", "gjør det" are all complete sentences. In fact even in German it's specific to Sie, for while you can say "mach Du das", "mach das" is fine as well. (If you speak a different dialect from mine, you might insist on "mache" instead of "mach", but around here that ship has sailed.)
Yep: prhodes@fogbeam.com

I use GMail, and basically just rely on their spam filtering. It's not perfect, but it's "good enough".
As someone who spends a lot of time puzzling out intent, I would infer they are using "landed" to mean "grounded" in that context.
So this is literally 20 years ago now (plus or minus a month) we had this conversation, and I'm not sure I 100% understood what he thought even then.

What he said was something like that Islam says that when you're attacked, you should be strong defend yourself; and maybe let the other person know that you're not weak. So I guess he thought that this contradicted what Allah said elsewhere (through Mohammed), and therefore couldn't have been said by Jesus (since Jesus also spoke for Allah); and so must have been added in by someone later.

(To be clear, trying to repeat what I remember he said, not making any claims about what Islam does or doesn't teach.)

The thing is, the whole reason Jesus' statement stands out is because it does contradict our natural ideas about the right way to react. I can understand someone adding in fake stories about miracles or fake claims to be divine; but why would you add in fake teaching that's so counter-intuitive -- and on the face of it, so... pathetic?

His question honestly caught me off-guard; I was expecting him to bring up claims of Jesus' divinity, or his death and resurrection. "Turn the other cheek" is so firmly established in our culture as one template for "how good religious people behave" (a la Ned Flanders from the Simpsons) that it wouldn't have occurred to me that people would consider it "false teaching".

And because I was caught off-guard, I didn't ask him how he thought it came to be that way in the first place. Probably he hadn't thought that far. :-)
Very true, maybe I'm overthinking it? In my head: If I update full_name from first_name and last_name whenever a user table row changes, if I do this naively I will update the user on every update and trigger a continuous loop of updates.

I have certainly created infinite loops while using React's componentDidUpdate, maybe it's just important to define triggers on single attributes rather than entire database rows.
Social conditioning? Let's start at the basics: What do you think "gender identity" means exactly?
Designers deserve every bit of this stereotyping. There was a time when designers were taught to value fitness for use. Now "design" seems to be exclusively about aesthetics. This may be rooted in how designers are taught or simply in how they now practice. Or it could be that managers insist on aesthetics-only, in which case designers need to push back hard.

Whatever the cause it's a failure on the part of designers and their profession, and they deserve criticism for it.
Maybe I'm oversimplifying, but it seems to me that once you have the model trained, it should be possible to partition it somehow when inferencing, to fit smaller machines. At least for a proof of concept it should be possible.
Thanks for the links.

> If my ISP doesn't announce my IP address, then they can't connect me to the internet, which I pay them to do.

Indeed, it's more nuanced and that's the message that we try to give here. As long that you do not use IP geolocation to identify an individual by itself, it seems to be a legitimate use.
My gut feeling is that that proof isn't quite correct, since you haven't used the notion of a limit anywhere. There's a fundamental fact about convergence of geometric series that you need to use.

I think your proof goes wrong since you haven't justified how arithemtic operations work with infinite decimals. AFAIK the only way to add non-terminating decimals is to convert them to fractions (or sequences of fractions as with pi, e, etc), add the fractions, and convert them back. So if you convert 0.999... and 9.999... to fractions, you've assumed the conclusion.

To play devil's advocate, I can try to rephrase your proof without infinite decimal arithmetic as follows.

Assume

n = 0.999... = 1 - epsilon, where epsilon is 'infinitesimal' (an ill-defined version of not-quite-zero). We'd like to show that epsilon is zero.

10n = 9.999 = 10 - 10epsilon

9n = 9.999 - (1 - epsilon) = 9 - 9epsilon

9n = 8.999 + epsilon = 9 - 9epsilon

The only way to get the epsilons to cancel is to assume epsilon = 0, which is to assume the conclusion.
Transgender Men See Sexism from Both Sides
I am not an email spammer, an SEO spammer, an automated password cracker, or a jaded failed Google canidate.

I have my mailserver configured in pretty much an optimal way, with all the special bells and whistles, have never sent spam, and never will.

Gmail refuses to deliver my mail, so please don't lump me in with malicious people and then say my concerns should just be ignored.
Despite robot efficiency, human skills still matter at work
This "bug" is a violation of the Equality Act, and so can have legal consequence if a customer reports it.

This is the type of issues you want to fix before are reported, not after.

It's like waiting for someone to die before adding a zebra crossing.
It's all the social stuff that goes along with being a "man", "woman", or whatever other identity we adopt.
Depends on what you're moving, I suppose. Some materials may have gasses that don't like sparks.
I can’t tell whether this is “I just want to describe the high level and have an expert do the hard bits” (that’s what consultants do and how things normally work), or if it’s Dilbert Pointy haired boss “if I don’t understand it, it must be simple” where you imply the part you can do as an unskilled person is the important part, and the part an expert spends years learning is the trivia which can be tweaked after your important part is done - if it’s even needed at all.

Poser is one possible “3D human in a pose” software since 1995, like python and Delphi and Visual Basic are your rapid application development (RAD) tools that have been trying to do “programming as doodles” for years.

By the point you say “lex-parse process” you’ve already narrowed the scope from all possible software to a tiny area and used a lot of expertise to know that’s even a thing.

Choosing arrangement of 7 English letters has 8 billion or so possibles, “real words which people probably know” is four or five orders of magnitude smaller space of choices; maybe I just need to grunt some sounds to express what I want and a writer can tidy up the details of my comment later. But the choice of words is dozens of small choices which are inseparable from expressing myself. A writer, a consultant, doesn’t make your idea, they make their idea of your idea.

An artist could surely tell you why the choice of clothing doesn’t work, but the time you’ve got your artwork expressing what you want to the level where the choice of clothing fabric is the only thing left to tidy up, you are an artist already and have saved none of the important effort. You’re hiring Mozart to tell you why b-flat sounds off some fourteen minutes into your symphony.

It’s like gaining expertise is narrowing a space of options by orders of magnitude until we can jump close to a solution quickly. Being a non-expert is like assuming there is only a small space of possibilities that everts deal with and if we try to solve the problem we must end up in that space too and then all we need is an expert to nudge us to a settled location nearby. But instead we don’t see how big the space of billions of possibilities is and we go very far away, and an expert can only do the hard work of moving our solution to the space of possible answers - which is basically all the work and almost no better than starting from scratch.

It’s almost like we need the expert to jump near the solution space and then the non expert to nudge the details towards what they’d prefer. The program draws for you and you chose the clothing fabric and lighting. Like a computer game avatar generator where you just choose the hair colour and T-shirt colour - and equally unsatisfying because it’s not at all like you imagine you could express if only you knew what the expert knew.
Social Psychology has one of the worst reproducibility problems in all of academia. Claims like this make is easy to see why. Simple scientific inquiry into this claim leads me to the question, “Okay, but why?

That women potentially harbor worse feelings of their ex partners on average than men is one of the most interesting but useless things I’ve heard. The confounding explanations for this type of research are mind boggling. Does this research hold cross-culturally, are there any other psychological variables that explain this phenomena? Is it possible that the current nature of modern relationships is a confounding variable and sex has little to do with it? These are the more interesting questions to answer than whatever question this dubious result is trying to answer.
> Google's ML mail spam models are that way because there's too many bad actors. Email, even in 2019, still extremely valuable.

Instead of just blocking bad actors why not work to prevent bad actors from being a problem in the first place?

Oh right, it would go against their business model.
Developing software for Bolt scooters: how we built the communication layer
If you ask women, it is rare to find instances where they'll agree that men are ever correct, in anything. There's been so much rah-rah girlpower feminism and promotion of the idea that men are bumbling incompetents in the public consciousnesses.
If prices flow on to the consumer, that's good. It motivates consumers to buy less water hungry alternatives and industry to find less water hungry production methods. It certainly would lower water usage.
> Something about non-English comments in source code is really off-putting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_cringe
I mean the experience of using Windows has dramatically declined in the past 5 years. Forced Windows updates was a terrible idea, updates break things much more often, the start menu has ads in it by default, start menu search does strange things, it's possible to break the start menu, if you unpin an application from the task bar while it has running instances and then re-pin it you'll sometimes end up with multiple icons, the new settings panels are slower and less capable than the old ones...
I suppose that's an empirical question. I'm not sure what happens to apps run from the terminal in Ubuntu Touch when they're not the currently active application (i.e. whether it will run properly in the background). Having an app-ified version would be ideal though, so I could do things like on Android when I have syncthing disabled unless the device in on AC power.
Context. I don't know what lingua franka means, but I also know what it means. I could bother and find literal translation, but why would I? The same applies to obscure English words, weird programming language keywords or math symbols. Integral and differential symbols don't really translate into anything and we use the word "integral" only because we can't type this symbol on an average keyboard.
Ask HN: What are some B.S. tricks management pulls on naive developers?
As a company gets older it seems like politics are inevitable, no matter how hard or well you work.

In your experience, how can you smell the B.S from a mile away?

How do you deal with it?

Thank you
That misses the point. Gender roles is a cause for anxiety because the cost of failure is magnified and strike at the gender identity of the person.

Without understanding gender roles the different in anxiety in fathers and mothers is unexplained, but there is no reason to do so as gender roles is a fairly well documented and understood concept. Even in households that do not perceive the father as the provider and the mother as the caregiver the gender roles in society still imposes expectations that results in anxiety and stress that align identically to those gender roles.

I am not sure where you got the concept of a competition, as the key insight from identify the problems of gender roles is that both women and men suffer from it. A simple decision such as taking a day off to nurse a sick infant should have same outcome for both women and men, but with gender roles pushing the mother to prioritize the child over work and the father to prioritize work over the child the outcome becomes stereotypical.
> Men, in contrast, are more likely to claim that they do not know what caused their past breakups (Amato & Previti, 2003).

This is a very funny quote. Men truly are dumbasses on this topic.
The expression "God's country" is not that uncommon, and maybe used ironically or just without any particular expression of religiosity. Usually I've heard it used to refer to an area pleasant to live in or visit.
The Darling river has a water market [1]

[1] https://www.mdba.gov.au/managing-water/water-markets-and-tra...
Wrong, they never delivered anything to anyone. I got insider sources.
Admin-Dashboards.com – [6k/mo Google searches] goes open-source. But –. Why?
No idea about the USA either, but I wouldn't like to imagine how big that thing is with an added case. Good grief. The phone comes in multiple colours. If it has to be used with a case it should come with a case. Otherwise it's like selling a car without seats.
>But no transport at all is more efficient than even the most efficient method of transport.

You can't make a general statement like that because it ignores the geographic advantages of the locations you are transporting from. If a certain location has a high concentration of copper for instance then its local abundance might be 1000x higher than the location you are transporting it to. Simply looking at the transportation cost doesn't capture the whole picture.
Respectfully it may have been above their risk tolerance, and of course you being successful with it doesn't make it a prudent investment. That's the "I won the lottery so everyone should have played the lottery" thing.
There was once a German expression for felicity, "Living like God in France."
It is a serious decline - Apple was literally the best there was at this in the past.

I noticed their design attitudes towards affordances and contextual clues changing around the time Ives made some claim about how phone users have been educated about touch UI sufficiently to start dropping them. That seems to have become an general excuse to lean towards 'pretty' over 'functional'.

And worse are third party apps. They always have been more variable, of course, but the old HCI guidelines were actually really good, so much so that people followed them because they were convincing.

UI decay isn't the only reason I use my phone and Ipad less, but it is one of them. (Current Screen Time: 24 minutes a day. That's mostly checking email while standing in line and mashing 2FA buttons.) The dynamic lists of recent activities and such mean I have to stare for a while to see what the options are this time, and generally be careful not to make mistakes. I've turned off autocorrect, because it makes enough enough mistakes that it is slower (and really irritating) to use.

I like my laptop a lot more these days.
Besides the concepts of motherhood and fatherhood. Ignoring those glaring omissions, you're closer to having a point.
Show HN: PoseAlert.com – A tool to maintain correct posture
Since when life expectancy is measure of a good and meaningful life? It is more a measure of risk-avoidance.
Rather than coupling your abstractions to Jenkins/Jenkinsfile/Groovy, I strive to put all commands ran from CI in a `Makefile` or something similar. Ideally, a Jenkins step/stage is a single shell command just with the correct environment variables set. This makes it super easy to reproduce locally, switching to another CI tool is much easier, and your Jenkinsfiles are 20% of the length and only focuses on things directly related to the CI tool itself: parallelization, cleanup, notifications...