skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The first version of XML was published in february of 1998, I think the chance you're thinking of was somewhere around early 2000s - I'd think 2004 was still possible, at any rate before the apparent failure of SOAP and XSD. By 2006 it was becoming clear it wasn't gonna happen.

JSON is a better data language, but a lot of that can be laid at the feet of XSD and the big squandering of momentum it represented.
Yeah I should have said people claiming to have Banksy’s blessing, or at least omitting the fact that they don’t.
> Known terrorists shouldn’t be free in the first place, least of all in an Western country

If I were a Western country, I would simply arrest all the known terrorists.
And the think tanks and lobbying organizations are funded to this day, continuing to fight against climate legislation.
Earthquakes are jolting the Netherlands. Gas drilling is to blame
No the dates are wrong, and the conversation used is stupid.
Yeah, you’re talking about unknown/not-yet terrorists, but I expect that people that have actually committed terrorist acts in the past to be either behind bars or reformed (spending 20-25 years behind bars may make you change your mind about killing inocent people the next time). By definition, people that have not yet committed any terrorist acts are not, well, terrorists, thinking otherwise risks making us dive into thought-crime territory.
Type declaration is supposed to signify the choice of concurrency model. Either way algorithmically the choice has to be explicit, even it it's not a type declaration, it still has to be an explicit declaration somewhere or there is no choice and algorithms have to be expressed in terms of a single concurrency model.
The arguments here are that the tech doesn’t work as well with people with dark skin and maybe it will be used to deport visa overstays or undocumented / illegal immigrants? Is that it?
It starts off with obvious and socially acceptable uses of technology, such as stopping terrorism. Over time, though, the application of technology like this will be used to target people for lesser offenses. Unpaid parking tickets, for example.
You honestly believe that deporting 11m people from this country would just drive up peoples wages? It wouldn't have incredible ripple effects across our economy as 5m jobs go un-done and many businesses go under? Maybe if you look at it on 30-40 year timescales things will stabilize, but you just ruined the lives of every american you said you want to help by starting a recession that would be much much worse than 2008.
Can you point me towards any sources that show skyrocketing levels of casual violence?
Air Force spaceplane returns to Earth after 780-day mission
Perhaps existing law isn’t perfect, but ignoring it isn’t an answer to it; otherwise there’d be no point in having any laws at all. Our laws are supposed to codify what we collectively believe are the boundaries of individual and collective action for the common good. And we have constitutional means to change them when we conclude we need to do so.

If you want to practice civil disobedience, it can sometimes effectuate change, but it doesn’t always work — especially not immediately — and you have to be willing to be punished in the meantime.
Yeah - you are probably correct - basically the same thing though albeit done by a different company.
It is to prevent claims that the petition count is fraudulent.

Voluntarily providing your identity is different having it involuntarily collected.
Maybe it reflects human nature. Most scientists agree that being overweight is harmful to our health, yet the majority of us can't even control how much food we consume, in spite of the strong motivation of self-preservation. If we can't even control ourselves to do that, how can we expect to control ourselves to reduce carbon-emitting activities?

Humans aren't that far removed from animals. If you keep giving a cat food, it may keep eating until it's sick. Communism or capitalism can't change human nature.
I believe you and the parent comment agree based on the rest of the parents comment.
Or should we hold environmental groups accountable for being anti-nuclear when surely they knew that nuclear would have resulted in less CO2, yet they openly opposed it.
I know you said nodemo but their demo store is quite complete and close from a real world website, it's a ecommerce solution built on react. They open sourced it, it's called cezerin.
https://store.cezerin.com/

EDIT: didn't check if it was online but apparently they stoped it
Couldn't you do other types of storage rather than batteries? Pumped storage can do very fast spin-up because gravity doesn't take any time to warm up, nothing to 1.8GW in a few seconds at Dinorwig (in Wales), if you own half a dozen of those then 11GW in 3 hours feels like child's play.

Not everywhere has the geography for building power stations inside mountains (which is the only way to do pumped storage that isn't horribly ugly), but the US is huge and seems like there are mountains everywhere you look in some parts, surely some of them are suitable for hiding a pumped storage facility?
I'd say a closer example would be Elon Musk. He definitely is

* the face of the company
* drives the products of his companies with a unified vision
* works his ass off
* is an asshole to people under him
* a visionary and a bit eccentric

Jobs has Musk beat on charisma though by a long shot. Musk is kind of Woz and Jobs combined.
To whit, in China it is now used to issue jay-walking tickets.
> They noted that mobile web browsers also unintentionally help obfuscate phishing URLs by truncating them, making it harder for the victims to vet the legitimacy of the pages.

JFC... I never understood why that "improvement" was necessary in the first place. Now its causing real harm out in the world. Kind of infuriating.
I check my spam folder regularly. It's almost entirely false positives
Deflationary policies are far worse for inequality than inflationary ones.
Good. This is no different than cigarette companies knowingly selling a cancerous product and misleading the public.

How many more times do we have to be subjected to known harms and disinformation campaigns before we outlaw this kind of corporate behavior?
And this is where it gets into competition law. If Disney won't allow Amazon and Netflix to screen Disney and Fox films I would hope they are big enough to litigate...
It’s not being given away. They pay taxes to live in the city and at 3% it’s not cheap.

I live in the city and think having a car is ridiculous in many parts but let’s remember that the citizens are paying a lot of tax.

Forcing everyone to use a garage is elitist as they run over $600/month.
> And the second solution is make the penalties on trucks meaningful. Have the fine amounts escalate with every violation within a certain period, with no cap (so that a ticket could eventually cost tens of thousands of dollars for a particular scofflaw truck, rather than the current ignorable amount of around a hundred). And tow/confiscate trucks that have enough tickets.

Part of the reason these companies can get away with settling is due to the large volume of tickets they receive. In the case of a fine escalating for each ticket, I would imagine that the company would then fight each ticket in court. This could easily overwhelm the courts. This seems like a fundamentally unfixable vulnerability that has been exploited by other actors (like Scientology).
Let us assume Exxon Mobil suddenly aligns with the ideals of the anti-climate-change-brigade (like the state), and pulls the plug on all Oil and Fossil fuel business. All other companies follow suit. What plans does the state have to provide altnerate sources of energy? Zilch! (Remember in this scenario, Norway will collapse economically, from what I recall).

No only is the lawsuit frivolous, it also indicates short-sightedness on the part of the State, not to metion, a huge waste of taxpayer money. I also believe this to be a case of "virtue signaling" and selective outrage than any meaningful change.

Climate change to me is not black-and-white, there are infinite shades of gray. I think firstly the word "crisis" should be disassociated from "climate change".

(I also know my response will be downvoted and I will be told so, which is another case of virtue signaling. As I stated earlier, I don't write for the HN brownie points).
I would cache the default animation. You’re doubtlessly getting hammered by folks just running it (like me) to see what it looks like, only to get stuck waiting for a GPU slot to render the same word again and again.
I prefer https://hasura.io

Instead of JS, it's written in Haskell (end user does not write haskell). It's incredibly performant and has hooks for database events.

Another similar tool is http://postgrest.org/en/v6.0/
You just described something that costs thousands of dollars to set up and thousands of dollars of added rent. Or we could just go to the movie theatre every couple weeks.

Hmm
Since property, both private and public, is a fundamental human right. Just as you have a right to privacy of your home, a country's citizens have the same right to their country.
I don't know about any aspect but maybe the one by far most contributing to the problem they claim to care about would be a decent start. Flying on a private jet to a climate conference really does look bad.
When such people is in 100m range from event - nothing can be done

Police forces _has_ to act before such happens

This is like metal detectors in airports - useless

Coz if someone want to do harm - they can do this on parking, in line or in any areas near where people are crowded

And even more
There is no evidence that facial recognition lower terrorists attack possibility
I don't really know Kotlin, but it was discussed while async/await was being designed. https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/83tak7/implementing_k... is one thread I remember.

There's also https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/6zy8hl/kotlins_corout...

One tough part about digging through history here is that designs change over time...
Let t(n, i) be a function where n is the number of recursive TREE calls and i is an integer.

So t(1,3) = TREE(3)

t(2,3) = TREE(TREE(3))

etc.

Now you can do:

t(TREE(3), 3)

or

t(t(t(t(t(t(t(t(t(TREE(3),3),3),3),3...)
I want to be surveilled everywhere I go, because I trust corporations and the government to safeguard that information and never abuse it. After all, corporations and governments have never acted against the best interests of the people in the past, so there is no risk in them having a live-updating data set on the locations, activities, companions, and sentiments of every American.

Is that what people think? We are letting this shit run wild on us, and if the future is anything other than a bonafide utopia (spoilers: it's not going to be that), people are going to pay for our present naivete.
I play CS GO pretty often. I don’t register the in-game killing as killing at all. It’s more like scoring a point in volleyball or clearing a line in Tetris. The toxic behavior of your teammates however is very real and detrimental to the game. Its people insulting you for making mistakes or making a teamkill because they wanted to get revenge for something. I doubt anyone would be banned for calling someone a lame dumbass. We’re talking about screaming in the mic, thus hurting your ears and occupying voicechat, threats of violence and racism (I never witnessed sexism but that could be a problem too).
Counter strike is not a 'realistic' game (Arma is moreso) and even if it was, it's a game first. Simulation isn't the goal. Fun is. And toxicity isn't fun.
NeXT workstations and OS were not successful, and at this point had largely been shelved. WebObjects was the only thing which they had which was profitable. Most customers were developing/deploying on NT, which (I assume) is why Jobs is at the Microsoft conference.
Exactly. It’s fraud against every citizen and shareholder.
How do we know whether this system of knowledge actually describe our world?
> Type declaration is supposed to signify the choice of concurrency model.

That "supposed to" is an aesthetic/ideological/pragmatic/whatever preference, and one with significant tradeoffs. Again, Scheme's shift/reset gives you the same control over scheduling as Rust's async/await, but you don't need to declare that in the type signature. Rust puts it in the type signature because in the domains Rust targets it is important that you know precisely what kind of code the compiler generates.

> Either way algorithmically the choice has to be explicit, even it it's not a type declaration, it still has to be an explicit declaration somewhere or there is no choice and algorithms have to be expressed in terms of a single concurrency model.

First, we're not talking about two models, but one model with two implementations (imagine that the OS could give you control over scheduling, like here [1]; you'll have the exact same control over the "concurrency model" but without the type declaration -- even in Rust -- although you'll have less precise control over memory footprint). Second, that the language's design dictates that you must tell the compiler in the type signature what it is that your computation does is precisely what creates accidental complexity, as it impacts your code's consumers as well.

[1]: https://youtu.be/KXuZi9aeGTw
Seems a lot like the whole impeachment, even though no president has ever been impeached. Just a bunch of empty virtue signalling that won't make a real difference.
Because copyright is artificial, and the only reason that we grant it to artists is so that the artists may make money and thus more art. The interest of the public domain far outweighs any imagined right of relatives of the artist to make money; it's not like they're automatically artists themselves.
Title is a bit misleading,apparently James Mattis said he will not follow that order.
More broadly, should corporations be liable for their extremely costly externalities, and if so how do you quantify them?
We’ve had judicial procedures to challenge the results of technological processes for nearly a century (radar guns for speeding violations, for example). It’s not a foregone conclusion that the computer is always right.
Right, but server-side includes mean unnecessary technology and bandwidth use to work around the absence of a trivial(ish, there are probably a few snags) feature.
Do we know the story of what happened in the Intel 10nm debacle? I know that they went from being a generation ahead of everyone to a generation behind TSMC, but that seems like a bigger misstep than just fumbling a single node.
I used the word “majority”, which doesn’t precluded that “some” are here legally.

If I had to quantify my suspicion of Spanish radio listeners in my city, I’d say that 90% are likely illegal immigrants.

If I was in Florida, I’d say that 10% are likely illegal immigrants.

Don’t interpret my observation of illegal immigration existing as condemnation of a group of people who migrated across vast distances and dangerous deserts in order to work hard manual labor jobs in order to better their families. If I were in their shoes, I’d do the same. But, that doesn’t make it any less illegal.
Revit, the big architecture software that Unity’s thing integrates with, definitely has daylight analysis tools

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/revit-products/learn-...
I don’t read that post as using fear tactics nor for that matter do I even read it as supportive of FR. I read it it as simply an explanation for why venues will choose to use FR.

One can both support the ban and doubt its success.
PG&E
Oh no, little johnny is gonna hear a bad word!

Can we at least have an adults section before the wole of the internet becomes a kiddie pool? I find yelling at the opponent part of the fun, as do many players. Sure, segregate us, but please don't ruin our fun we paid for. We tend to only play with others like us anyway, no need to butt in.
In your completely absurd strawman scenario, you’re right.

In real life, it would take (is taking) decades to switch over. Your comment is totally moot.
I'm smiling reading your comment, having fought with jails/iocage and networking in the past. The counterpoint is that you likely didn't have inbound connection problems with Docker because it seems to quite effectively bypass all of the iptables rules on the host.

I didn't dig too deep into it, but I had iptables rules set up to only allow inbound 22 and 443, but all of the exposed ports on the containers were still externally available.
Similar argument can be made for fast-food, frozen and heavily processed food, and many other daily use items. By your yardstick, all of them spread misinformation and mislead the public since the harms of consuming fast-food or overly processed food are known.

I then wonder, why this happens to be the case. Can't fathom, really.
Illegal immigrants are not sent to prison unless they committed additional crimes, usually they are deported and sent back to their respective countries.
> there are None jobs ahead of yours...

Sounds like I'll be getting it soon then :)
You may be unfamiliar with how legal documents are structured. As is typical, every paragraph of the complaint is numbered for easy referencing; the fact that this was 687 doesn't indicate that the other 686 things were more important, just that they were written earlier in the document. The paragraph I quoted was the beginning of a major section about "greenwashing".
The illegal immigrants aren't staying in your home, they're staying with whomever they're paying rent to. What right do you have to tell him who he can rent to?
There are people debating a lot of big issues in this thread.

I just don't want a facially-tagged database of me doing my shitty drunk dance moves at shows ... is that too much to ask?
And wouldn’t this be a nice discussion to have had, 30 years ago, without firms like Exxon and Fox destroying our ability to discuss this freely and honestly?

And if we had realized 30 years ago that we were not happy with it, or that maybe we wanted to reduce our exposure wouldn’t we have had 30 years to change our infrastructure ?

Wouldn’t the amount of emphasis on the Middle East changed?

Mass transit would be a conversation 30 years more advanced.

The trick in my argument is that 30 years ago we Knew that oil was problematic.

And we saw good scientists avoid engaging with the paid shills and cranks arguing for oil and against global warming - because that would give them more credibility.

Then we saw how that made no difference.

Then scientists went on Fox hoping to have an honest discussion- and were slaughtered by dishonest arguments, fired by news anchors who were part of an ecosystem funded by Exxon and their ilk.

We all collectively owe Exxon and it’s friends an accounting for their actions, which they knowingly took in bad faith.

Because, it would have been nice to have this discussion 30 years ago.
Using your dominant control over a resource in order to kill off a business in competition with you could be viewed as anti-competitive?
Your figure is not even an observation; it is a guess. There are paid statisticians doing this job whose data you can cite that would make your argument more compelling.
Why do you think citizens deserve to be paid more than citizens of another country? By what moral logic do they deserve better treatment just because of where they're born?
Econometrics (aka stats for economists) is how we test models on real data. It seems to often be confused with the idea of using math in econ however ("reducing irrational economic actors into mere equations" seems to me to be economic theory, not something specific about econometrics).

This has two purposes:

- we would like to know which of our models are true, or at least good enough, and which ones are not.

- we would like to know the actual magnitude of things. For instance, if we increase tax rate by 1%, how large will the taxable income reaction be? Decrease by 0%? .25%? 1%? 10%? That's useful information for policy making.
You talk to him and everyone else with decisions power.
It'll make a difference. Finding a bogeyman and making a lot of noise about making them pay is a great way to launch a political career.
It's not either/or. Unless you are suggesting s/he quit while looking for the next role, there's still the question of what to do meanwhile. In my experience it's never a bad idea to do a good job at your job while you're there.
Does the SWAT perform surveillance?
Is this a joke? Econometrics is literally how you test models, quantify changes in the economy, etc... Versus just hand-waving and hoping your assumptions work.

And the reason economics doesn't always help the economy is because politicians almost never listen or shills are paid to advance policy that's detrimental to the economy.
Members of terrorist cells do. However they’re not terrorists until the actual act of terrorism.
Yeah. A relevant example of the EU way is the CE mark:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CE_marking
Festivals should just start inviting bounty hunters instead of using facial recognition.

Or maybe they could just put shock collars on every attendee in case they begin to act in an unacceptable manner.

In fact, once it's proven to work at festivals we can extend this to schools!
Is it legal though? It could be market abuse?
Keybase
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/hamzabj; my proof: https://keybase.io/hamzabj/sigs/YSBylDf37z_hr9HV_elRkZi7NRJFAsfIk5PWUAys-Ys ]
No nastiness intended - I’m just underscoring they point that individual actions are at best well intentioned, at worst illusory, false hopes.

We need structural change mandating a low carbon economy, regulatory enforcement, and energy sources factored in throughout the supply chain to achieve this. This kind of effort is already working with RoHS and REACH - the technical infrastructure exists - but the political will isn’t quite there yet.

I fly, but I am working with the European Commission to make this kind of regulatory accountability a reality - similar to substance restrictions, it’ll start as an audibility measure, and will then grow to encompass enforcement and public transparency. Several of the world’s largest electronics manufacturers are on board. The automotive and aerospace sectors are trying to do their own things, as ever, but are making noises towards harmonisation.

So. Living in the forest isn’t the solution (although I do, and produce 100% of our energy and water, and 90% of our food, here), rather pushing for structural change through whatever means are available for you. I’m a techie. I’m helping define XML standards that might just save the world.

But I do fly.
When Exxon realized the problem decades ago, they could've lead a forward-looking campaign. Investing in renewables and nuclear technology. If they had done that, maybe today we'd be mostly powered by clean energy.

Here's the kicker: It would've been a long term win-win for both Exxon and the world. Putting themselves in a strong position to capitalize on the transition and even be a respected player.
Since you handle these threats professionally, can you help settle this discussion?
How many threats do concerts receive on average?
What percentage are made anonymously?
What percentage via email?
Over what date range are your data valid?
Providing cheap daal, rice and butter chicken is a recipe for a race to the bottom. I can see why, as a restaurant owner, you might not want to cater to that market. There's more profit in going after the customers who are looking for a new experience and will pay for quality and exoticness.
Let us assume that a situation that will never happen will happen. Suddenly, everything is bad! Therefore you are all filthy virtue signallers.
Other than a few slurs, name-calling, racism is pretty absent in my experince. I have not seen peoples experince impinged upon because of any of their unseen atributes other than being a 'squeaker' (young player with high pitched voice), who are ruthlessly mocked by some. So the same gatekeeping bs that happens in every schoolyard, but without the local consequence.