skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Reminds me of how French-speaking jurisdictions insist on using a .gouv TLD instead of .gov, almost as if they have to remind you're abbreviating a French word, even though the shorter one is also a valid abbreviation of their language's word.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.gov#International_equivalents
Yet the last thing anyone worries about during war is pollution. Resource usage goes way up, tycoons get richer. The poor and young are sacrificed.
That's your opinion.

I think it looks awesome. Pattern matching, short keywords, types on the right... It accomplishes this beauty while also carrying lifetimes, pointer types, and traits. I personally like it much better then Java or similar static typed languages.

You can't compare it to a scripting language because it has type information.
The bigger problem with GMail is that the mobile app has no controls to manage large amount of emails - not even a basic 'select all'. Which is hilarious, because Inbox was so good because it was easy to manage most of your email on your phone.

Now my Gmail is overflowing because it's too difficult to archive thing I want, or delete what I don't in bulk. I actually have to log into the web interface to do any kind of clean up, which is something I never had to do with Inbox.
I recently had some building work done.

I was shocked (shocked!) to learn that the "municipal" inspector of works was a private individual, who was paid directly by the building company. Not by me - by the company that was supposedly being monitored. I didn't even have his name and address.

[Edit: I am in the UK]
Using GMT would be quite confusing, because most GMT-using countries are also DST-using and people in those countries tend to (strictly speaking incorrectly) refer to the timezone as GMT all year round.

There's also a not-insignificant risk that the UK moves timezone at some point; if it stays in Europe it will likely be required to drop DST, and may end up on UTC+1. This would make GMT even more confusion-prone.
So Google's approach to customer support is a security feature?
Brave looks amazing, the question I have is, just like how Google Chrome, can they be trusted as a private entity?
Personally I pay for Gsuite because I worry smaller providers aren't well resourced enough to protect me from attackers.

I trust Google that if I have 2fa enabled and alerts for suspicious activity going out, they'll protect the infrastructure.
Came here to say that I bet that wasn't part of the original site!
Your argument is moot, nothing prevent V8 to make two competitive implementations of a feature. With mozilla ressources focused on not duplicating effort, they would even have resources for making 3 or 4 compretitive implementations per JS proposals.
Community colleges are usually a place anyone can goto and talk to advisers. May want to try that route. Give the local community college and call and tell them where you're at, and where you want to go. Good luck!
Restoring ancient text using deep learning: case study on Greek epigraphy
OK.

I had a friend in a similar situation to yours.

Very smart guy that was able to get a PS file or Adobe Illustrator and create an HTML with all details.

My friend always took the coding part as "not for him," or he did not like it as he says.

So once in a big Javascript conference, I was talking with one of the big guys of the conference, and He knew my friend, and we both got talking:

"L. is very good. He should learn a little javascript and bang! Make money, real money".

Then once I meet my Friend L on a BBQ I had to say in front of his wife:

"L. Look everybody likes your work can you stop resisting and make an effort to code javascript.
No big things, just small front-end stuff.
Stop complaining and saying no.
If I am wrong, you can say:
"Superflit is wrong and gave sh*t advice."

Three months later, he is earning 2x.
After one year, 3x.

The guy who knows HTML and all Dom/browser stuff.
When it learns javascript is like a person riding a JetPack.
Sure the first fly will be bumpy, but now he really can fly.

Then please: Learn one framework + jquery — something like React or Vue.

Make an effort to learn and create a portfolio.

If, in two months, nothing changes with real effort, send me an email telling me I did send you bad advice.

If the opposite: you earn more money or get a better job, you send me an e-mail with only "Thanks, bro."
Next time I'll have to remember my sarcasm closing tag.
Perhaps, but they don't have to like it.
and a maple leaf in the logo, I'm sure
Oh, I definitely agree with you that communication should be more active, it's just that right now this is more left to the new maintainer to do. On Github, everyone's email is public anyway, so the new maintainer could message the old one.

I don't think Github/Gitlab provide any automated way to send people messages (short of creating a new issue and mentioning people). Actually, creating an issue on a maintainer joining might be a good idea, I will look into it.

Other than that, we have to take many scenarios into account (many people don't want to talk to the new maintainer, for example, because the project is completely abandoned).

We should definitely add something, though. I'll see if we can automatically add issues that will be something like "Introduce yourself" with a body of "Hello @maintainer1, @maintainer2! @newmaintainer just joined, please say hi".

I have opened an issue if you want to contribute: https://gitlab.com/codeshelter/codeshelter-web/issues/34
Yeap because I really love your work. This book should be the foundation for people that want to dive into typed-programming.
This is one of these cases though, were coverage doesn't really matter. The fall-back is fairly reasonable.
It's funny because of all the crickets. I asked a question after the OP requested one and I've seen no response in 5 days. :shrug:
Thanks a lot for the feedback, I'll definitely keep it in mind!

My idea and recommendation, taking a cue from Noah Chelliah (link above), is basically to have two smartphones — 1 dedicated to SailfishOS, and 1 "fallback" on Android for everything else. Then see from there.
Actually yes.. Production of goods does indeed create money out of thin air (and raw materials).

They could have earned just as much elsewhere. However since we are not in a situation of labor shortages yet, every income providing job is still important. If your employees worked elsewhere they may be as rich as they are with you, but the guy whose job they replaced would have to look for another job.
I didn’t say that WeWork was built to be sustainable.
To me, what you’re sort of doing is flipping the StackOverflow model around so that the authors share in the profits. That’s an interesting concept to experiment with. I wonder if “Teachers Pay Teachers” might be a company for you to benchmark?

Side note... It’s not often we see HN front page stories from Tucson, AZ & that’s awesome!
Because there are billions of dollars/year of money in it.

Things that happen outside New York have an impact on stock prices in New York. Much of HFT is essentially companies racing each other to be the very first to act on external news/stock movements.
If you rent the backhoe... make sure you call before you dig and don't cut one of my fibers, please.
I wish the tweet would have a speed test screenshot of some sort.
That doesn't make sense. Why would an ALB only support GET and POST and not the entire REST protocol?
47 Attorneys general now support Facebook antitrust investigation
The Nobel committee has lost touch with actual science
>The 2+ Trillion dollar expansion of the Fed balance sheet during the crisis costs taxpayers every day that they pay interest on a loan enabled by that 2T+ expansion.

Taxpayers don't pay interest on Fed assets. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of how monetary policy works. What makes you think your statement true? Did you read it in a explanation of how the Fed works, or did you make it up?

>The financialization and securitization of housing was the creation of bankers, not borrowers.

This is shortsighted and incorrect. If borrowers didn't default, there would be no crisis. Many were expecting housing to rise forever and were taking out second mortgages as piggy banks, then got in trouble when prices didn't increase forever. High risk borrowers could keep refinancing at higher and higher prices since house prices were climbing. When the prices stopped climbing, this process stopped.

>Debtors have been defaulting for millennia, it's a well-understood process.

And bubbles from irrational people have been happening for millennia too. Does this simplistic tautology allow me to assign all blame to borrowers?
I feel like, whether with human or computer languages, you can only really say what the experience of reading a language is like once you're fluent in it; and you can only compare the experience of reading a language to another if you're fluent in both of them.

Like, to me, the human language of Vietnamese looks like a mess of accents, and I'm baffled by why they're necessary. But I'm not a fluent speaker of Vietnamese; and I can imagine that, for someone who is fluent in Vietnamese, and another sibling language like Chinese, maybe the extra accents actually compare very well and help readability compared to e.g. the reduced set of accents in Chinese pinyin.

Likewise, I would suspect that for someone fluent in both C++ and Rust (i.e. someone who knows how to write code that takes advantage of arcane language features in both), Rust might be more readable than C++ because of some of the initially-offputting syntax, whereas C++ might seem less readable because it eschews extra syntax in favor of using template constructors for everything.
I can think of only rare occasions where any status other than 200 is cached. Usually this is an edge case that has to be configured in the caching tier.
You think this affects video decoding?

Anyway, I imagine that's the price to pay for being crossplatform. You can't implement everything for every platform. Safari only has to work on macOS/iOS.
Ah ok thx. At some point in the future, I would like to move further into the sticks and go mostly off-grid, but I would still like internet. It needs to be low latency (ssh, games, voice, etc) and high throughput. I am hoping that this network can meet those needs. Otherwise I have to be close enough to a city for cable modems...
Is there much diesel out of Paddington now?

Sleeper to Cornwall is the one I often see but the rest is all electric for the Paddington bit - of course trains going West switch to diesel once they get off the electrified line e.g. at Swindon for Cheltenham
https://schema.org/ — email metadata for things like events and purchases.
Mine is. And it's all 2FA'd up. That was a part of the "Take Responsibility for your Own Stuff: For Dummies" guide I followed.

I imagine it would be easier to socially engineer a cellphone store employee and get a SIM to do a SMS-based password reset for a Google/Microsoft/Apple email account than it would be to hijack my domain.
My guess is they say "not our problem".
Supposedly, people have tried to claim it in the past but have been rebuffed by both Egypt and Sudan. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/03/welcome-to-the...
It has the features that Chrome has but the UI and performance is worse.
I agree with your thrust but one caveat:

"despite cars horses are still around"

This is an absolutely terrible argument, because the population and societal use of horses have been greatly reduced once the automobile came into play. If we were to transfer this with people, this means that once automation comes into the play, the vast majority of working humans will be culled and those remaining are only luxury/recreational items...
Also a firewall usually operates at layer 4 not 7.
They were one of the first third-party APIs I implemented when I started building things properly - very polished, very easy to onboard and I remember being extremely impressed by the simplicity once it was going.
Because when something happens in China companies in the UK and the US that have supply chains there (almost everybody) will be affected.
Just like Chromebooks are a market failure outside the US school system, because a large target of the world population requires more than a browser manager OS on their laptops.

Amount of Chromebooks on sale across European electronic consumer stores, less than 1%.

The 1% is left for when they occasionally pop up under "deal of the day", when the shop decides to test waters and is more than happy when it finally goes away after a couple of weeks on display.
That's fair, but before computers, not much was available for free. Getting a newspaper would generally cost money, as would using the payphone to communicate, as would so many other things that are now freely available. So, while its definitely a problem, as long as it's cheap enough for "most" people to afford it, then I think we aren't really regressing?

Perhaps if we consider information on the internet to be vital to daily life, a program like food stamps could be implemented? It sounds rather over engineered but it's the only idea I've ever heard for working around the "privacy is only for the wealthy" concern.
"The court rejected the notion that additional data increases the barriers to competitive entry, and indicated that this issue “requires closer examination and a detailed explanation/review and conclusive presentation by the antitrust authorities.”"

Maybe someone who knows more about this topic could clarify but this suggests that the court believes network effects and scale don't affect the barrier to entry? (pending further reviews)

I would be very interested in learning more about how they came to this decision as from what I've seen a number of large tech products (e.g. youtube) only seem to become feasible at extreme scale.
Not much traffic, no. But "spend as little time administrating it as possible" was a goal that had me looking into managed options.

Hugo + Netlify is working well, some up-front work in the setup since I didn't want to use a premade Hugo theme, but when I update anything it just takes two commands to rebuild and upload:

hugo
netlify deploy --prod

I'll eventually simplify that further since Netlify can run hugo builds automatically from changes to a git branch.

Beyond that, it's just publish and forget. And the page speed is great (Google scores it at 99) since Netlify is serving it off of a CDN.
Rust is very middle of the road when it comes to using weird symbols all over the place. Just take a look at some C++ or Objective C code...

I think this is more a problem with what you're used to. You see the same criticisms of every language: Basic dialects are too wordy, Lisp dialects too bracketty, C dialects too symbolly, etc. etc. It's hardly the measure of a language.
Can't speak for Android, but for iOS Firefox has an app which does all the proper hooking into system autofill to be able to fill your passwords browsers/apps.

(There's an Android app, too. I'm just not familiar with Android's affordances for that sort of thing so I can't really comment on how it works.)

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/lockwise/
Is This Board Game Shop a Front for a Gambling App?
Make the pay high enough to match the value generated, and you'll find enough janitors and garbage collectors.
> The guidelines specifically call out linkbait titles:

That's true, they do. And the parent comment here claimed linkbait. The suggested guideline is to default to the original title first, and avoid editorializing by default, that's the spirit of the rule, and then if the title is egregious, try to fix the wording to be less misleading.

There are lots of possibilities, one of them is that the submitter doesn't know or doesn't believe the title is linkbait. One of them is that @LegitShady has an opinion that is shared by a minority or nobody.

The problem with suggesting a ban when not editorializing titles is that it assumes linkbait is clear and absolutely recognizable, and that everyone agrees. Banning someone for an offense they might not be able to recognize in advance is a draconian measure that will reduce the quality of open discussion here. We already have mechanisms that help filter bad titles, including article downvotes, a flagging system, and moderators that actively respond to title wording complaints.

> I'd be interested in what the ratio of users that only know portions of the guidelines that are often repeated in comments vs those that have actually read through the guidelines.

I'd likewise be interested in what ratio of users read a comment and use assumptions to jump to a hard conclusion that denies benefit of the doubt without acknowledging the possibility that other causes are possible, including their own misinterpretation.

Having read through the guidelines completely, I know that reading with charitable interpretations and giving benefit of the doubt is in the spirit of the guidelines. With respect to the top comment here, I humbly suggest that banning anyone for using verbatim titles goes directly against the spirit of HN, and the literal wording of the guidelines too.
haha this is fantastic.
Show HN: Alternative to Email Newsletter
You could argue that purposely designing things to last only a year when they could last ten years is purposeful destruction though
Yep, all maintainers are vetted specifically to avoid that. If Code Shelter existed back then, this (hopefully) wouldn't have happened.
> Most people won't hit lifetimes early on in their use.

Depends on what you're doing, doesn't it? If you're using Rust for its original design-goal purpose—as a systems language—then you're probably writing some kind of daemon that keeps persistent in-memory state between RPC requests from clients; or some kind of UNIX-ish CLI tool that reduces over IO streams. And as soon as a request, or a stream event, wants to persist some state into a longer-lived scope, lifetimes rear their head.
this will make me switch to firefox, only feature I needed as multi lingual user
Then what happens when you're on a different browser?
No. Starlink will follow all local laws, including licensing the bandwidth they are using. They are not going to run a pirate internet network.

Due to complications in US laws, this actually means that Starlink cannot directly offer service in much of the world, instead having to let a local company resell access. (Because SpaceX as a US company cannot do certain kinds of filtering without running afoul of US laws.)
The problem here is not that Google started charging people for their services

The problem here is not the question if Gmail is good or not.

The problem is that they subsidized their Gmail and other services in order to get rid of small competitors and once they have a large market share, they will make most of their services paid. It will take time, it will be slow but it's going to happen.

And they use their large market share to keep all of the small independent mail providers and self-hosted email servers in check by marking their emails as spam.
Which it won't. Which is kind of the point the author is making (just instead of "free" in this case it's "3$")

While I do not feel that restricting Gmail and their other data collection tools to paying customers is in Google's long term plan, the potential of random price bumps on a highly integrated, wide ranging and very much closed product experience like the Gsuite certainly creates a problematic power dynamic.
Just use a proper desktop client. Gmail's IMAP implementation was pretty non-standard last time I checked but it should be good enough for this.
You could try a plugin which forces h264 Youtube. Just about anything made in the last decade has mature hardware support for decoding h264, but not necessarily for VP8/9. This may be what's going on here.
It's still an old boys club, but it's more revolving door now. You flip between industry and consulting. Each move you bring a few with you who reward you later.
Information density isn't the end goal though, otherwise we'd all be writing into something like APL or its derivatives (K/Q/J/etc). And yeah, if you have ever missed a & in C++ you can easily see why a single character symbol can be annoying (i really prefer C#'s approach where you not only use ref and out in function declarations, but also during function calls - though overall i prefer Pascal's more explicit and verbose syntax).
Thanks! I'd say "you're welcome to say hi" sounds softer than "please say hi", but other than that, sounds good to me!
plus expenses!
Last I checked it was looking like they would now be as "good" as Chrome, which is much worse than Safari. Hopefully that improved or will soon improve.
My wording clearly wasn't the best, so thanks for picking this up. Your comment reflects what I had in mind. We don't have to go from one to the other in one big swing. Evolving and moving towards a less broken system would go a long way already.
Real Engineering has an interesting video on why it would be useful for firms trading internationally

https://youtu.be/giQ8xEWjnBs
Read up on "Perfect forward secrecy": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_secrecy

Assuming their IPsec was enabled with it (and OpenVPN should be enabled by default), them leaking their keys does not matter. The sessions can not be decrypted even if the master key is leaked.

TLS also has perfect forward secrecy by default.

Impersonation is an issue, but the article stated the CA keys have already been rotated and are out of date.

EDIT: I meant to reply to the post below me, but this is fine. Sorry about that!
Your use of "primary" paints in a worse light than it really is. From the quote it sounds like they don't use it period for advertising
Finally, numeric separators!
30k based on latest filings. The number goes up rather often...
I currently pay $25/mo for wired internet, 25Mbps & 1TB/mo cap, no discernible latency.

Closest available is $80/mo satellite internet, 12Mbps & 40GB/mo cap (overage => deprioritized), latency measured in seconds.

While little to go on, assuming Starlink will be aggressively competitive on all factors.
I mean... yeah, that’s correct. The world’s resources are overtly unequally and inefficiently distributed.
California doesn't have the highest poverty rate in the country. Not even close.
> That all sounds nice, but what is suspicious that we have not seen a working implementation yet.

You mean to say that Western and Central Europe don't exist? They have single-payer healthcare and it works way better than American healthcare. They have cheap tuition and it works way better than American tuition.

We see that America could be better if we stopped being dogmatic about capitalism, and stopped putting it where it doesn't belong. Capitalism is about money. It is not about well-being. It is very poorly suited for well-being.
The 800's west out of Paddington don't seem too bad

I regularly get the Cheltenham to Paddington train, and apart from the slight extra delay at Swindon while they switch power haven't had any problems with them.

Some of the early seat covers are being replaced because they don't wear well though
Hey, dang, where are you, man? Gonna ban this guy for "ideological flamewar"?

Nah, this Dan is a founder, a YC alum with 11,000 karma points. He can say whatever he wants. At worst, he'd get a "Well, yeah, you're right, they are religious bigots, but please be more subtle about it." But he won't even get that, because no HN user with >=500 karma's going to flag his comment.

Of course, weberc2's comment is downvoted.

Nah, HN isn't biased to the left at all, dang. After all, people on both sides complain, therefore it must be perfectly balanced, right?
Pinch-to-zooooooooom!!!!!!!!!! Finally. I will definitely try Firefox again for a week or so, and see how it manages, battery-wise, compared to Safari.
I'm already a software engineer. Ideally, I would like to remain in the "TECH" field. But I would like to be involved maybe in technical sales or consulting or something like this. Maybe management or product/techproduct management.

I'm looking for something like this, not necessarily getting completely out of tech.