skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
One can equally think of the entire code base as a single document, and of the release version as an executed document. In the long run the non-release repository states don't matter that much either, they're just helpful for anyone willing to gain an insight on why the things work the way they do.
Working full-time
The commit messages would eventually all be WIP or somedoc_version_xx.
The memory leak is the result of a poorly designed interface between compiled code and javascript. The result being that memory wasn't truly leaked in the traditional fashion but rather was consumed rapidly and freed on no sane timescale.

This mismatch between compiled code and javascript existed from inception to now. The fix if I understand it correctly is to really aggressively free memory in a fashion that appears grossly inefficient but in practice performs acceptably.

The release of gnome 3 was in spring of 2011 the "fix" was released in spring of 2018. It would be more accurate to say that it was terribly broken only for the first 7 years of its existence.

Because their "fix" is a hacky workaround for the fact that the only true fix is to throw everything away and start over the bug is actually back in 3.34

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1740

This brings us to an 8th year of shipping a broken product heading for year 9.

That this was a bug that sprung into being in ubuntu 14.04 and was fixed in a point release is totally incorrect.
I don’t understand this line of thinking. My father worked a minimum wage job most of his life and was able to retire a multi-millionaire simply because he saved and invested his disposable income. Most people can become wealthy but they choose to drive fancy cars and go to the movie theaters instead then complain how unlucky they are. That’s simply not true. If people are lucky because they realized wealth was attainable then yes, the most successful people are lucky.
This is incorrect. It's a crossover built on the Model 3 platform. It's basically a Model 3 but slightly taller and with a hatchback.
I just want to say that if the deaths would have happened Hong-Kong or Venezuela you would see western journalist calling for intervention. Inequality is something that has taken the world and it's not about ideology. Chile Government and YouTube have been taking down videos showing the military violence against civilian.
In fact, exact title searches will usually not turn up videos with that title unless you use quotes. YouTube will return clickbait and Jimmy Kimmel, entirely unrelated to the search, for exact title searches of videos with only a few tens of views.
> The goal should be defined first.

> What would be too little from Blizzard? What would be a “good” response? When would it be too late? What exactly do these people actually want Blizzard to do?

I'll give a solution. They should completely reverse every punishment that they made, against everyone, get rid of any "rules" they had that caused these punishments, and do not enforce this in the future.

And if they received any communications from the Chinese government, then they should publish it all, and they should say that they will never give in to any explicit or implicit pressure from them.

And they get bonus points, if they do stuff like create Mei Li, pro Hong Kong skins for overwatch.

Doing this stuff would absolutely make all the protesters happy.
Thanks for mentioning this. I've poured through docs on SameSite and none seem to mention subdomains or what setting is required for a cookie set at root Domain to be shared with subdomains.
The Porsche Taycan is not superior on any metric.

Also, they just turned a profit. Did you write this comment before they reported?
Just curious what region you’re in? I’m in the Southeast US and haven’t been able to find anything too far below MSRP for them.
The financials themselves are the facts, everything else written about it is interpretation and punditry.
Modern cars don’t have frames. They are unibody.
I also had a similar idea for a project that tracked changes so citizens could see exactly which representative changed a bill. The OpenGovFoundation built Madison[0] to enable the public to comment on bills, but that project has been shuttered.

I still think there is some merit to the idea. The challenge, however, is to convince legislative bodies to use such a system.

[0] https://mymadison.io
While NYT themselves just shadow-edited the article about HRC calling Tulsi a Russian asset to a Republican asset.

Video from Tim Pool about it: https://youtu.be/tzTod38VS8c
None of these names nuclear power plants that are "operating beyond their design life and keep (sic) increasing their allowable crack tolerance". There's no mention of crack tolerance at all, just references to containment vessels and caps requiring maintenance for radiation damage.
Shouldn't be the public libraries though. Public libraries will not save certain videos. Especially if the local police or the guys in the blue windbreakers with three yellow letters on them show up.

Maybe that's a problem that everyone has? But it would be best if there was some offshore, FBI proof, kind of way to do this archiving.
Go ahead and add reddit into the mix as well. It's starting to be really concerning only a few people control these important discussion and meeting places, and exercise (often) power abuse from such a position to push their agenda. History isn't pleasant, that doesn't mean reddit and YouTube should be white washing it.
That’s a good point and I think an important distinction.

surveillance !== supervision

A quick look and they might seem equal but when you compare the underlying values they’re nothing alike.
Oh yeah! Now they're taking down videos showing the Chilean soldiers and Chilean police unleashing their rage and violence against their own civilians.
Yeah, the Vega II GPU is pretty interesting, but the rest of the system is pretty lack luster. A 3rd gen Threadripper, 3600mhz ram, PCIE 4, 64-128 pcie lanes, and the option of either Nvidia or AMD GPUs seems just like a much better deal.
I continue to enjoy staying on Mojave (10.14.6) and iOS 12.4.1, and won't be buying an MBP or iPhone anytime soon. This is due to Apple's pattern of extracting money from customers through immediately crappy, defective, and less repairable products needing expensive services to operate as they were promised (repair services are now more profitable to Apple than hardware) and releasing buggy, critical feature-eliminating software that has negative value, means I refuse to play along with their unreasonable cult of conspicuous-consumption games lacking meritorious value any longer. Fool me once ...

Catalina removes iTunes and 32-bit programs.
erm, how do you mean? DoH and DoWG have essentially the same security properties, no? With authoritative servers only responding in the clear, you have to trust some egress provider. If I'm understanding it correctly, the only use case for DoH is for end users that don't have a remote box to trust with their egress.

Which certainly is a worthy segment. It just seems like any DIY network setup would be orthogonal to that. And so there's no point addressing DoH on your local network unless you're trying to mitigate DoH's effects on eg ad blocking.
Yes, but you could also have invested your money elsewhere and continued to see growth.

Except for the complexity involving taxes and fees, if your money sits in Tesla shares for a long time and the stock stays flat, then you've lost money. Both in terms of opportunity cost and through inflation.

And this is irrespective of when you bought them.
It's not obvious that an 11 year old comment from somebody who's not really involved in the community anymore should be taken as gospel.
I think we as developers understand the rationale behind it. The outrage you may see is that in self hosted instances, the companies and people that pick that as their option do so because they want an isolated/independent system. Telemetry from a self hosted system is atypical, especially compared to SaaS that's hosted by you. It's more normal in apps people download that already use the internet, but you already have that option in what you host.

Frankly, I used to work at a DoD contractor and we ran GitHub Enterprise and GitLab behind secured networks. That kind of expectation -- that the software will never phone home -- was what let us run and justify them in the first place.

Edit: Looks like the comment I replied to has been changed, and essentially removed. I'm sorry if this is now out of context.
I'm curious too. Tracking your own website makes sense but there're definitely better ways if that's your own website. Why do people want to track other website regularly?
And it's good they didn't invest on your advice to go long on TSLA. If you invested into The diversified SP500 instead with the same timeline (2015 to today) it would give you a slightly similar or even better return than TSLA that went from 195 to 295 ( and that is IF the current price holds until tomorrow which will most probably not).

Never forget opportunity cost while investing!
I definitely resonate with this.
I noticed a month or two ago that certain sites seem to be excluded even from internet archives like the Wayback Machine. The first example I stumbled on was Snopes. I only noticed because I saw a Snopes link on Reddit where the thumbnail was clearly different from the live version; the thumbnail appeared to show a human-like baby in the womb, whereas the live version had that edited out. Example: https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.snopes.com/fact-ch...
Based on our experience with Wikipedia, that would be the worst idea imaginable from a social and political perspective.

The wiki would just become a series of editing wars with multiple parties attempting to be the last to edit the wiki. For any sort of sanity, you'd need to lock down most of the wiki, putting the power in the hands of a few editors. And then you'd have the problem of selecting the editors....which would bring you right back to where we are today.
As far as I'm aware, knowingly destroying evidence of a crime is illegal. So would this be illegal also?
Don’t Let Metrics Critics Undermine Your Business
https://i.imgur.com/VUdcIou.jpg
Are there any startups building legal tools with nice UX, but git as a back end?
They may be less known, but a huge percentage of the world's internet backbone runs on those Broadcom chips.
It's also little used, partially because it's a handy venue for violent crime due to lack of patrol or surveillance.
Your IH interview [1] is one of my favorites! Highly recommend any bootstrapper to read it.

Wishing you continued success!

[1]: https://www.indiehackers.com/interview/2fa6c5e1eb
Forgive me, but this is a load of absolute horseshit. There's a gulf of difference between choosing given terminology based on religious belief and choosing terminology based on personal interpretation of scientific text.

Sex and gender aren't the same thing. It boggles my mind how seemingly complicated this is for some people to grasp. There's a substantial corpus of established science and historical research that more or less proves that physiological sex and social gender are not and never have been mutually causal; your argument here is predicated upon the notion that a person's chromosomes are inextricably linked to their gender, which simply isn't true.

In [1], you're literally making the exception that proves the rule here. What do you define as "male characteristics"? Doesn't it seem like that might not be the most rigorous qualifier for determining whether or not somebody falls on one side or another of whatever arbitrary boundary you seem to be defining?

Does it not strike you as a little cruel to suggest that treating a person with a modicum of respect over a social issue that barely (if at all) affects you is as offensive as disrespecting an entire religious viewpoint?

Is it really that hard to understand that in pursuit of whatever maladaptive compromise makes you feel more comfortable in your belief, you're actively harming people who have to constantly struggle to be understood or even recognized in modern society?

Doesn't that feel a little selfish? Like you're missing the point a little?
> Why legal professionals are not using version control goddamit?!

For a start they’re using Word, which doesn’t work well with version control.

And asking most people to stop using MS Office is like asking them to go and live on the Moon, they look at you like you’re some kind of crazy person.
Yet the rich keep buying waterfront properties.
This was bound to happen. The "community" always finishes last if a company is involved with investors on the table and as far as GitLab's is concerned, they must please them with evidence of "growth" to attract more funding and more investors.

It is foolish to think that GitLab would really listen to the priorities of the "community" and so would do anything to turn a profit. Even disrespecting your privacy whilst "promoting" themselves as an alternative with zero spyware seems to have driven many devs to the platform.

I won't be surprised if another repository exodus happens again.
This is great! You should create an API usability guide!

On webhooks, how does the caller (like Shopify) care if the transaction is completed without errors? Is there any message queue built specifically for webhooks?
Google Accused of Creating Spy Tool to Squelch Worker Dissent
That's a reasonable question for any required or opt-out telemetry collection.
20% jump after market. I'm really confused. Is this short covering?

I've read through the financial statement. They're fine, but I'm scratching my head over why it warrants 20% jump? Anyone have a good explanation?
2002 - Goodrich Corporation acquires TRW Aeronautical Systems.

2005 - United Technologies Corporation (UTC) acquires Rocketdyne from Boeing and merges it with subsidiary Pratt & Whitney.

2007 - Raytheon acquires Sarcos.

2008 - Rockwell Collins acquires Athena Technologies.

2009 - Raytheon acquires BBM Technologies.

2010 - Raytheon acquires Applied Signal Technology.

2012 - UTC acquires Goodrich Corporation and merges it with subsidiary Hamilton Sundstrand to form UTC Aerospace Systems (UTAS).

2013 - Rockwell Collins acquires ARINC.

2015 - Raytheon acquires Websense and Foreground Security.

2016 - Raytheon acquires Stonesoft from Intel.

2017 - Rockwell Collins acquires B/E Aerospace.

2018 - UTC (51 in the Fortune 500) acquires Rockwell Collins (415 in the Fortune 500) and merges it with UTAS to form Collins Aerospace.

2019 - UTC (46 in the Fortune 500) and Raytheon (114 in the Fortune 500) announce an intent to merge, forming Raytheon Technologies Corporation (RTC).

--- Speculation time ---

2020 - UTC and Raytheon merge to form RTC.

2022 - RTC acquires Boeing.
I am (was?) a big supporter of GitLab and am having trouble believing what I’m reading. GitLab.com having analytics, whatever. But Gitlab EE having mandatory analytics? This just seems downright out of touch.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but isn't the whole point that Amazon and PayPal need to update their cookies if they intend for these affiliate/pay now links to their domain to pass along their own cookies?
It's not an economic TBTF - it's political and strategic.

Boeing in Chapter 7 wouldn't kill the US economy. It would just dent it badly, and give competitors from other countries (China? India?) an in to a large market.

But the US military machine would be very badly damaged if Boeing failed. And there would be spectacular political fall out, both internally and internationally - some of which is already happening with the tarnished reputation of the FAA.

Aerospace is one of those prestige industries that is as much about promoting national status as about making money. A major failure would be very bad indeed for America Inc - survivable in practical terms, but a disfiguring and ugly wart on the face of the mythology.
> Terminal.app comes pre-installed in every Apple computer, it is developed by software engineers who work for the same company that makes the entire operating system. Why do I need an alert asking for permission to execute this command: “cd ~/Downloads/” ?

Because differentiating between that command and any command that may be harmful is NP-Hard. Like I said, these kinks will have to get ironed out. Terminal is UNIX legacy and that "security" model was broken from day one. The sooner we get rid of it, the better.

> The point is that Apple is focusing on increasing the security of the system the wrong way, these alerts overwhelm regular users to the point they will mindlessly click “Allow” every time an alert pops up, hackers will take advantage of this and assume users will grant system-wide access to their malicious programs.

You don't get system-wide access, that's the point of asking you for every folder. Let me ask you, what's the alternative to asking for permission? If I accidentally give a malicious program permission to do something, how is that worse than just giving it that permission without being asked?
>> The shareholders, the board, and to a lesser extent the upper management are parasites that can be dispensed with and literally no one else will care.

> Show me an Investor that doesn't care who the upper management is.

Investors are a kind of shareholder.

And if they were kicked out of the street as payment for the mess they had a hand in creating that is Boeing, they're not going to get much sympathy from me for their personal misfortune.
In practice you can host your browser redistributable on non-US server that has no obligation to US laws. And if US user chooses to download from that location there is nothing they can do about it.
On any metric? The car reviews disagree. There's a general consensus that Porsche did a great job with a sporty car that appeals to its client base, and benefits from the luxury and build quality experience of the brand.
Very interesting, thanks, I didn't know it was an active research area, although that completely makes sense.

> That still leaves the issue that past-time communication may be decrypted in the future.

Honestly I didn't even think of this. Pretty freaky nonetheless.
I am not in any way implying people need to fall in line or avoid disagreement. I am more commenting on how my mind works. When someone tells me I am wrong, my first instincts are self-doubt and/or questioning why someone would think about the topic differently. I don't get or fundamentally understand the reaction of other people disagreeing with me leading to me being more confident in my initial opinion.
Since I had to look it up on Wikipedia.

Quantum supremacy is the potential ability of quantum computing devices to solve problems that classical computers practically cannot. The weaker term Quantum advantage refers to the potential to solve problems faster. In computational-complexity-theoretic terms, this generally means providing a superpolynomial speedup over the best known or possible classical algorithm. The term was originally popularized by John Preskill but the concept of a quantum computational advantage, specifically for simulating quantum systems, dates back to Yuri Manin's and Richard Feynman's proposals of quantum computing.
Do they actually delete the files? Or do they just remove public access to them, but keep them on their servers?

Maybe they send the data to law enforcement automatically? (I've heard that they do that for child pornography; maybe they do, or could do, the same for terrorist material as well.)
The number of times I've taken a google search that gave me useless results, copied-and-pasted it into duck-duck-go, and immediately found what I'm looking for, is astounding.

I do think that they are starting to lose the power-user userbase when it comes to browsers and search engines. But their email, docs/sheets/whatever, drive, and now their DNS registrar services are all cemented into business flow.

It makes sense. They don't need the power users - they need the most users. As long as they have the most users, businesses (where the power-users are working) are going to use ancillary services like Google MyBusiness, Google Analytics, and embrace google-backed (and ranking-factor) tech like SSL certificates and progressive web apps.
Where are you getting your CHM files? If you're getting them from untrusted sources — that is, people you wouldn't give your password to — you probably don't want to pass them to a buggy C library. That's just begging to get pwned! The only way this seems like a reasonable idea is if your CHM files are generated by your own software or by something like SafeDocs: https://www.darpa.mil/program/safe-documents

Wrapping your buggy C library in Rust isn't going to give you the kind of security against malicious data that a rewrite in Rust would give you.
Naive question: Are you able to use MKL on an AMD chip without jumping through too many hoops?
i’d argue that it’s not “designed to fit our workflow” so much as designed around a subpar, but flexible tool that everyone was using. that don’t make it good; that just makes it ingrained
Just use the DNT header and they won't track you.
> It's affecting the quality of the web that you, as a user, are browsing.

Any numbers to back this up?

(also while I'm asking for numbers how about "There is no doubt that this has affected the revenue for website owners negatively regardless of the size of the website." ?)

>The proposed solution is to maintain a global whitelist that each ad blocker is forced to respect.

I personally can't think of an effective way this could be achieved.
Getting even a small proportion of the world to agree on a single whitelist would be difficult if not impossible; who would maintain it, who would decide what was whitelisted and what was blocked? not to mention any actual legal issues across any sort of jurisdiction.

But assuming you could, what mechanism could be used to stop people loading extensions and apps into their browser?
Then, for the more technically savvy users, how do you propose to block the use of something like a pihole (https://pi-hole.net/) or equivalents ?

This all assumes that blocking the ads is even a problem (for the quality and stability of the web) in the first place and without a solid range of evidence to back it up, it's anecdotal at best.

Pure conjecture, but i'd guess there is probably evidence to support declining advertising revenue that might possibly be partially attributed to adblockers, but I doubt its the only factor( or even the biggest ).
No 12V socket, too complicate the bureaucracy to add one.
It's natural though. Consensus is that votes are for both post quality and agreement. HN seems to be generally good at focusing on the former.
There's an interesting conflict with labor theory of value where the left will complain labor is deprived the full value of their labor but then nullifies that value by claiming (in many cases) full rights to it for redistribution with the aim of absolute equality. Therefore getting the full value of your labor is essentially meaningless in that state anyway, and from the get-go certain professions aren't entitled to their labor value.
So, time to go back to GitHub?

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/ywen8x/13000-projects-dit...

I'm self hosting my projects on one of my servers but I have some projects on GitHub because I want them to be public. I copied them on GitLab one year ago and switched origin. I feel like I won't keep using that service now. Bitbucket is quite a pain to use so it's not an alternative.
you can take my screenspace when you pry it from my cold dead browser cache.
Very apropos comment and thanks for your service alternative!
> This is probably common knowledge to Americans

I for one never heard of this, so thanks for sharing!
Mueller clarified in his final hearing that he misspoke when answering Lieu's earlier question and stated that the OLC policy you describe was not a deciding factor. Video is embedded in the below PBS link.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-mueller-clarifie...