skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, we can quite safely say that visible light also does not cause cancer, seeing as how we're bathed in it daily.

So any proposed grey area would in fact have to be a total surprise outlier, where EM far less energetic then visible light tripped over some biological weak spot.
Its normal. You may disagree with my morality and me or other people may as well disagree with your morality, whatever that is.
https://www.stilltasty.com/
Happened to us several times with our subscribe and save for baby food. Expired or near expired items. In the end we just don’t buy baby food from them.

We’re shifting more and more spend away from Amazon due to this, and counterfeits due to commingling.
You can make gcc generate it, and versions of Linux without no-execute support will actually run it. Like so:

int main = 0xc8c70ff0;
Having looked at all of these options recently, I can say very few people would chose Powerwalls and solar over a standby generator. A whole house generator capable of running everything in your home, including HVAC, for many days on end will run ~$10-14k installed. A single Powerwall alone costs about that much and can't distribute nearly as much power as the generator.
Bruce Dawson does some of Microsoft's most valuable work for Windows. Doesn't even work for them.
Not when it comes to GSM, it has consistent timeslots for active calls. The dial tone is modulated the same way as speech data and can be considered active.
I find your certainty regarding the reasons we have increasing incidents of cancer to seriously detract from your previous points.
Node.js 12.13.0 LTS Released
We need to get a few more engineers into sales, I think.
I know at least one store that uses this as a business model. Food past its sell-by date can be acquired from grocers for little to nothing and resold at insanely cheap prices. The difficulty is in making sure your customers know what they're signing up for without loudly proclaiming that you're selling expired food.
> You'd rather be ruled by a credentialed class that could have opinions completely divorced from reality?

There's a great New Yorker cartoon about this. https://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a20630
And a rise in carcinogenic substances in air, water, and food. Maybe changes in the landscape of pathogens. You can't really rule out additional causes or contributers based on knowing some.
> That's a very reasonable general approach.

If made in good faith, yes. I’m not convinced that this is the case here, however, given that the author is fundamentally at odds with the scientific consensus on 2G, 3G and 4G safety, without acknowledging that he’s in the clear minority. In fact, he claims that the majority of relevant experts have signed the 5G moratorium, and this seems to not actually be the case. I actually think that disagreeing with the consensus, based on limited but potentially valid evidence, is completely acceptable. But he goes further and pretends to be in the majority, and that contrary evidence only marginally exists.

In sum, he makes demonstrably false claims about the current state of the scientific consensus, which makes me sceptical of everything else he says.
My server in the Netherlands has had a 1gbps connection for almost a decade. I've had 1gbps at home (in Portugal) for a couple of years and I can reliably transfer at about 900mbps between home and server at any time of the day; Other tests confirm that both backbones are excellent. The Portugal connection is about 50% more expensive.
You are absolutely correct, my good sir/madam/gender-inspecific pronoun.
Correct-ish. In the US, "left", "liberal", and "Democrat" have been related for so long that they've been nearly synonymous for a good two decades. Which isn't the case in almost any other part of the world.
Maybe you will be able to get one of these (before or later):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COXM2V0wn_I

You will need also a bigger house, probably.
Can there be engineering teams with honest salespeople and marketers?
Some of them. Most of them, like most ordinary people, do not have the capability or the discipline for coding. Testing seems to be within the capability of more of them.
So their inability to adapt to a modern world is our fault? I find that hard to believe when they as a society have had way more resources than the rest of the world for quite some time, and haven't really done much with it.
People buy them because 90% of the customers are happy evangelists. "I pay next to nothing for my health insurance!"

The other 10% actually wound up having to use it, and discovered why the ACA said they don't count as insurance.
Introduction to Algorithms by Cormen et al.
> We’ve been in denial about potential health risks of mobile for years.

Citation needed.
We're talking about it - that's a measurable impact.

If you want to argue it didn't have a substantial impact then please provide proof that the media amplifying the Russia (and related narrative) as it has - distracting us from the real, underlying issues - wasn't substantial. Please prove that Russia's actions, including brigading Reddit and other communities via their propaganda farms, didn't provide talking points to the media to distract the majority of us from the important, underlying issues.

Perhaps you're trying to gate keep by limiting the scope by saying Russia's efforts didn't directly have a substantial impact? But then you're ignoring the full picture in order for your argument to be "more right" but still not correct; Russia's direct actions don't exist in a silo - likewise Trump would be nothing if mainstream media didn't amplify every insane word coming out of him.

As POTUS candidate Andrew Yang is pointing out to us: it's automation, not immigrants, that have been taking jobs leading to Americans suffering and lead to the symptom of Trump; as Noam Chomsky also rightfully pointed out, Netanyahu of Israel greatly interfered - directly - with American politics.

The mainstream media is directly and indirectly part of the dis-ease, and has allowed such dis-ease progression. Trump, a tyrant wannabe-never-will-be, understands this mechanism of mainstream media (reach, the attention economy, manipulation) - in general called marketing, Trump being a charlatan or false prophet vs. a genuine entrepreneur with true compassion - an ideal example being Yang to contrast Trump to, regardless of what you think about his policies, how he holds himself, his character.

Curious what your thoughts are, what your response will be.
I haven't read the article, and I'm not a party to the 5G debate, but what you're describing in your comment is a meta-analysis, which is a practice that has produced some of the most controversial findings in recent times. If anything is needed to clear up an inconclusive body of studies, it's better and more reliable studies and experiments, not meta-analyses.‎
> And apparently, even if your tires crossed the stop line after the 1st second, you will not get a ticket if the photo series shows you did not move across the intersection.

Indeed. For many years, there was a nasty traffic light in the Stuttgart city center (at the Main Station) which was guarded by a traffic camera. It was positioned inside a very sharp turn, and it was very difficult to notice that the light was changing to red if you were already on a position of the road which was too close to the intersection to see the large overhead traffic lights, but too far away to see the small traffic light at the side of the road. I remember my father sometimes only coming to a stop a meter past the traffic light, which always triggered the camera. It never resulted in a ticket, though, as he was standing and not moving.
It's just a specific use of either a Bayesian Prior or Heuristic.
Yes, let's go to 6G (or was it 7G?) satellites directly.
Even if what you say is true (I have no reason to doubt you), I simply no longer trust Amazon enough to believe it. I don't imagine I'm alone.
Sometimes is not, some people values does not involve the betterment of society. Unless you claim everyone think alike.

How is slavery or extermination camps not subjective? The slave owner may think slavery is good thing but the slaves may think its horrible.
May I ask what you use instead now? I've tried replacing Google search a few times but was never successful.
No it doesnt. It can work with more on 60GHz, or it can work with the same amount on the same frequencies as 4G.

And in either way - more towers, less power per tower.
As people turn to home power generation, PG&E will lose revenue. So, PG&E will suffer in the longer term as they lose customers. Not very good business planning.
He worked for Microsoft years ago. Still an MVP all this time later.
Most writers aren't even making minimum wage as writers, but we need more storytellers? I'm obviously missing something here...
If the link is "weak to non-existent" and our a priori thinking is that it should be perfectly safe, shouldn't we default to it being safe? I'm not against also running studies to make sure we haven't missed something, but this seems like an unfair standard that we don't apply to other forms of things we expect to be safe a priori.
Trace Mayer explains why he was buying Bitcoin in 2011
I use ontologies like https://webprotege.stanford.edu

Fewer descriptive words, more structure.

A company ontology has three top level categories: Parties(internal, external), Metrics(Platform, SaaS), and CompanyStructure which has links to things like cap table, incorporation artifacts, org chart, accounts, etc.

The metrics piece is useful because it provides north star metrics for a SaaS business, and then performance ones for the Platform itself. All features roll up into these, and then their git codebases are linked from there.

If your features don't drive your metrics, you're just in the custom dev business.

I use it personally, but it's a bit dominating to have an umbrella framework that encapsulates what people think is their special contribution.
Sounds like they need Erlang.
> The Art of Computer Programming

I'm guessing like most people who bought it, it sits collecting dust on the shelf.

Youthful naivety is the only reason I bought it. Completely impenetrable but look, "I'm a real™ software engineer now"
The part that requires bureaucracy for Medicaid is making sure the recipient is legally entitled to Medicaid at all (and, if they are, that they still don't have other insurance which should be paying ahead of Medicaid.)

That’s where having a separate system for the medically indigent in a mostly prvate-pay system becomes much more burdensome, per covered person, than a universal coverage system without private insurance.
Has this been answered in part by:

> Does 5G pose health risks?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48616174
And jurisdictions with auto-ticketing based on red-light cameras shorten the yellow light, driving up income by making it very hard to avoid running a (barely) red light.
BlizzCon 2019 Protest “Full-Steam Ahead,” Say Organizers
Mostly in my brain, some of it in a calendar and even less in my smartphones note app.
Oliver here from the Memex team.

Yes! That is indeed a major problem with all knowledge management tools. They tend to not be interoperable enough so you can easily integrate them into your existing workflows.
Also they are not built to be adaptive to the individual workflows of people, so you have to wait for the dev's priorities to be high enough to implement your features. You can't do it yourself.

We are also not there yet when it comes to the level of interoperability or flexibility needed.
However we started from a fundamentally different angle by changing our economic model and not taking venture capital money: https://community.worldbrain.io/t/why-worldbrain-io-does-not...

In essence what we want to achieve is that you can copy/fork Memex, adapt it to your needs and still use your old data and social connections. Once that transition is complete you'll be able to even use 2 different Memex tools at the same time, both maybe serving different use cases for you.

May I ask what tools you use and how Memex in your ideal world would integrate them? What is the workflow you'd like to implement?
>>The recourse to the EU's Precautionary Principle to stop the distribution of 5G products
appears too drastic a measure. We first need to see how this new technology will be
applied and how the scientific evidence will evolve.

This is so facetious. The Precautionary Principle is always going to appear a drastic measure - that is its purpose - to be used for large-scale changes like this that are difficult to reverse (another example being GMO).
We have no reason to believe that any computer system and/or software is safe because bugs always pop up... I know of no software that is perfect.
The culture of clan loyalty predates British rule by a couple thousand years. It will be difficult to overcome.
So I started checking the articles in the link, seeing the ones that reported positive effects:

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29725476 The article only measures exposition, no conclusion on effects other than a literature review.

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268055 Can't get the full article, but I only see mentions of a 900MHz source (inside 3G frequency band) and no mention of power. Also it's a biochemical study on rats. Slim evidence.

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25747364 One author, talks about wildlife orientation.

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017559 This study talks about the effect of intensive radiation (3x the FCC limit for mobile phones, during 8 months) and it looks like it's actually beneficial for Alzheimer's disease. Funnily enough, it links in the abstract a lot of studies showing either inconsistent or no association between RF and cancer.

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427287/ An study from the department of ¿Psychology and Psychiatry? that finds changes in EEG activity due to mobile phone use, only when the phone is placed near the ear. Little mention of whether the RF radiation can interfere in the EEG measurement.

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25738972 Mentions the CERENAT study, which shows increased risk with really heavy mobile phone usage (as in calls). The only one with actual positive effects and looking like a serious study.

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885019 Decreased nasal mucose in rats. No mention of whether thermal effects were at use here.

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25918601 Finds decreased sperm quality, but also discusses other studies finding no effect, and also says "A point of limitation in this study is the inability to assess [...] whether sperm affections are time related or not".

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531835 This one is about nicotine sulfate + RF exposition in frog embryos, and doesn't find effects of RF alone.

That's just off the first page and a half. Probably someone should do a more thorough review, but it does not give me any assurance that most of the studies with reported positive effects are done by people not in the related fields, have no relation to the problem or do not answer the actual important questions.

> And nobody knows why. However everybody who points to a possible answer is shot down without much investigation. Sad, really.

Mobile phones are not the only thing that has changed radically in the last years.
We use confluence. To overcome the issues some other people have mentioned (namely, lack of version control), our confluence docs are generated from version controlled markdown docs. It’s integrated with our build system so it doesn’t require much thought, you get the benefits of having your documentation living with your code, and you generate a doc that’s easily searchable and shareable for non-engineers.

The only thing that sucks about this setup is that you can’t fix typos without making a diff :)
No it wont require, it will be able to work on the same frequencies as 4G does.

It can use more towers at higher frequencies in really really crowded areas or industrial setups, but those work at lower power outputs, and penetrate the body less (due to higher frequencies).
Personal : small library of notebooks, I generally dont share these

Professionally : physical notebooks and Onenote books. Every time I join a new team I start a new notebook and when I leave I pass it to someone else if they want it. My Onenote files are publicly accessible to anyone.
I'm as lefty-socialist as they come, but we have to be careful because UBI schemes can also look like the UAE -- which has created an upper class of "citizens" who receive a generous stipend and an undocumented underclass of people with no rights.

Stateless refugees are a big problem today, and climate change is going to create a lot more of them. Jewish people were the group left stateless in the nationalist period after WWI, and we all know what happened there. If no country is willing to protect the rights of people whose nations deem them "problematic", UBI won't matter because there is still going to be an underclass that doesn't officially have rights and can be persecuted. You can then just cram all your political opponents into that box and watch fascism happen.
> Even if current levels of radiation are harmless, it does not mean that the same applies to 5G.

Good thing I'm talking about overhead powerlines and not 5G then. Unless your reply was meant for someone else.

Although I believe the chance that 5G is harmful is basically nil, mostly due to my EE degree and a basic understanding of "non-ionizing radiation" and "ionizing radiation", it is probably about 100X more rational than complaining about overhead powerlines.

Seriously I just don't get it what problem do people have with overhead powerlines. Saying overhead powerlines cause cancer is like, on par with calling aircraft contrails "chemtrails" and saying they are part of a nefarious government plot. There are plenty of real nefarious government plots, but you hear people talking again and again about chemtrails because they don't understand aircraft engines or heat or water. Just like there are real issues in the health system, but again and again people cut off the legs of their own argument by going off about overhead powerlines.

Lastly, WTF are those sources? Is nutritionfacts.org a leading independent organization on cancer causes? That is a 5-minute long video of someone doing zoom-highlights on excerpts from studies from 2011. The first comment is someone saying the WHO is bought-out by corporate interests, although, the WHO is like the main ethos argument from the video.

Do you use a cell phone? How do you hide from the other people using their cell phones, or the Wi-Fi rays coming from your computer? If you have a new router, 802.11ad already communicates in the 60Ghz band, that's a pretty big number if big frequency numbers are scary.
Personally, I think this article is full of a kind of techno-utopianism. For example with the smart phone revolution the technology has been deployed extremely rapidly to billions (!) of people. In less than a generation we've gone from nearly zero to people and in particular children (hey I pretty commonly see infants with iPads positioned in front of their faces on the bus) spending the majority of their waking life in front of these devices. And because of this extreme speed of deployment we have no data on any long term developmental effects of this. The little slivers of research on some of these effects that we have do not look particularly great.

As such, I think we have the opposite problem from what the article suggests. We happily approve and deploy many technologies and find out about the environmental, health, mental and other hazards the hard way many years later.
Are screens destroying our eyes?
Trying a few and it is good.

But for the topic like metaphysics, is the topic list normal?
But let’s imagine for the moment a candidate was actually rejected for being “too introverted”, as an example for the sake of this argument. Disclaimer: I’ve not seen anyone rejected for this reason explicitly, but I have heard an instance of a self-identifying extrovert reporting “organizational culture problems” to upper management which when asked for details became “while there was no bad or unwelcoming behavior of any kind (not even indirectly), the majority of engineers are too introverted and that makes me uncomfortable”.

In such a case, how is “too introverted” as a reason for rejection or even as a negative cultural connotation not overt discrimination to exclude neurodiversity?

I’d even be willing to concede that such personality-based discrimination may need to be made for customer-facing roles or roles if being charming or extroverted is explicitly part of the job description. But other than that, it seems odd to reject an engineering candidate for reasons like this.
You can't always do this with current traffic planning. In busier areas you have to consider throughput at _other_ junctions and not just the immediate one. Changing one light's timing could make zero difference to that junction, but could totally screw up traffic flow downstream of it.
Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs (), Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation (Hopcroft Ullman), don knuth's art of computer programming, Tanenbaum's Modern Operating Systems, Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools5 (Aho Sethi Ullman)
There has to be at least one Frankenstein out there who wants to see how far he can take this.
It shouldn’t. Yellow lights are supposed to last an amount of time based on the speed limit at that section so this doesn’t happen.

Traffic simulations are generally quite complex. In your proposal, if your approach is not detected correctly, you either stop traffic for a car which isn’t there, or you never stop traffic for a car which is there.
German authorities unfortunately usually are of little help, especially in situations other than the default case. They usually also don't speak languages other than German - neither English nor French (which might or might not be relevant in your case).

I'd suggest talking to a registered accountant / tax counsellor ("Steuerberater" in German) instead.
Thank you. This is exactly what I was looking for!
Mark Zuckerberg Has Quietly Advised Pete Buttigieg on Campaign Hires
Europe is not a country. In France a yellow gets you a fine. A red gets you a heftier fine and a penalty on your driving license points.
The answers from this[0] post can be helpful.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20729252 (What book to read to get a footing in CS theory?)
oh, WOW this looks great. Serious, enthusiastic-yet-polite applause!
That's honestly the reason for me not buying groceries online, well that and shipping cost. Given the cost of shipping, I'd do one order a week at the most, but the I risk getting 5L of milk which expires within three days. If I only order once a week, then that is the minimum expiry date I'll accept on perishable food items.

I don't blame the companies for wanting to ship the items that are about to expire, but please apply some common sense. If the amount is more than an average family could reasonable consume within a week, then may mix the items in with other with later expiration date.
macOS Catalina WiFi issue – captive portal broken and solution
That's clever, I wonder how well known it is though.
A finding from your link.

"the biological activity of any specific type of EMF is inversely proportional to its frequency and proportional to its intensity"
The radiation you get from pussy is tinier than your dick. Think about it. No harm done.
One of the use cases I saw somewhere for 5G was "smart wine glasses".

Like glasses with sensors in them so the waiter at a restaurant would know where he needed to go to refill someone's glass.

This was in a context where it definitely was not an ironic jab at the overuse of technology.

I don't know if the product actually exists, but honestly. Honestly. Smart wine glasses! I think it's just like... a really, really dumb idea. And if that's the kind of thing that 5G is going to enable, I absolutely do think we should consider it a threat to the environment.