skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> a portion of Tesla's superchargers (and cars) are shipping with a CCS plug

European chargers and the European Model 3 have CCS plugs, but Tesla disallows other EV brands to use Tesla chargers:

https://insideevs.com/news/343728/most-tesla-superchargers-n...

> I suspect it's just the matter of financial terms

What terms? Ionity's open to everyone already. Tesla doesn't exactly have much leverage here, and they'll have even less leverage as time goes on.

Tesla says its mission is to "accelerate the advent of sustainable transport". If that's true then Tesla should open their chargers up to all EVs. Ionity is doing a far better job of Tesla's mission than Tesla is.
> Now I've seen this approach, it's what I'll do next time

I'd suggest calling or sending it to the bank instead. I'm sure they can find its owner with a lot less hassle than this.
I feel like a large part of where we are in the world now is because in 2015 or so, YouTube mindlessly and singlehandedly funneled millions of apolitical young male gamers into gamergate extremism. It took forever for YouTube to stop giving me personal recommendations for various alt-right content no how many times I told it I wasn't interested.
A word of caution, some of these settings break stuff.

I don't remember the exact items anymore, but seemingly innocous privacy-related changes I did some time ago from a list very much like this broke the ability to paste to google docs (which was a bit confusing, since I noticed it weeks later when it "just" didn't work with no messages hinting why) and the integration for the Evernote WebClipper plugin; and it was a bit of a hassle to find which changes I need to revert.
Well, until now YouTube had broken autogenerated subtitles in Firefox on Android and no playback on thumbnails in FF on desktop (at least I don't think my plugin setup is at fault). Gotta watch out for what will be broken tomorrow.
> This has been driven by earlier and earlier school start times

What about later and later bed times?
Free will is an illusion but you can continue to postulate otherwise. You can feel like you’re responsible while not really being true in both situations.
Advertisers aren't interested in entering into new relationships with companies that can't tell them how well their ads are converting; they're too addicted to what ad-tech can do for them. Only the massive reach of the few existing old-world ad-space providers (e.g. cable TV; newspapers) allows them to keep doing things the old way. It's not a door open to anyone new.
While I agree that parenting would suggest some consideration of the material accessible, perhaps the number one video sharing website could put some effort into what clearly is a funnel towards evil: it's recommendation engine. I routinely get wacko right wing nonsense in my recommendation feed and I'm rather left wing and never once searched for such content. I

It's probably time to lean on the Goog a bit and get them to stop feeding Alex Jones and his ilk with unsolicited "recommendations" that run counter to previously viewed videos messaging. I get it. They think that people should leave their filter bubbles, but they equate all points of view as equally educational, when common sense would point out that some points of view on some topics should be considered off-limits.
If I say "I want to live"
and your point of view is "die mofo die!"
do we really need to compromise on merely mutilating me?
perhaps your point of view can be entirely dismissed in such a case, as situationally wrongful.
Morality has social functionality, gasp.

But I reckon that
1) there's likely no state actor with sufficient power to control the goog by now, accumulated dirt being accumulated dirt, pols having browsing histories, money having value, and all...

2) there's likely to be no such reaction here on Hacker News due to this malicious algorithm being considered a form of "free speech" I suppose.

Here I always figured on tech being a liberalizing social force, but between FB and the G, it's going downhill rather swiftly...
You've been breaking the site guidelines a lot lately. If you keep doing it, we're going to have to ban you. Would you mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and using the site as intended from now on?
Practical AI 60: Blacklisted facial recognition and surveillance companies
From here:
https://developers.redhat.com/products/rhel/download
Of course it happened in Drenthe!
We went from NetFramework->NetCore 2.x->NetCore 3.x with very few difficulties. The hardest phase was NetFramework->NetCore 2.x because of the differences in dependency resolution rules (e.g. no binding redirects allowed).

We ultimately restructured our projects a bit to dramatically simplify the number of points of touch for managing 3rd party nuget versions. We now have a common platform core (targeting NetStandard 2.1), with specific application implementations consuming it and targeting NetCore 3.0. Mercifully, we were able to capture 100% of our 3rd party dependencies into this common platform core project, so we no longer have to worry about mismatches between our own internal projects or nugets. The picture for us is: (3rd party libs)=>(shared platform library)=>(specific application). This seems to work out really well, and with the newer AOT/linker capabilities, we are resting easier knowing that we can shake off some unused bytes if our distributions start getting a little chunky due to this approach.

Also, the .NET compatibility pack is a life-saver for anyone stuck using System.Drawing or DirectoryServices. Those are our only 'difficult' windows dependencies, and we expect to be able to replace these with cross-platform alternatives next year.
Do tell; which midwestern cities?
I've reported felony theft twice in Oakland and never even got a response from OPD.
Huh? I'm just saying it's not unreasonable to support software downstream that upstream doesn't. That's the entire point.

I don't care what Debian does at this point, too old for practical use.

> should support software they aren't interested in.

You mean like pestering all the other package maintainers to support python3 when they're not interested in doing that? That goes both ways. Nobody wanted python3, expect PSF. This is the continued backlash.
Unfortunately watching any videos related to father's rights in custody battles leads down the same path. I'm guessing it's not just a case of "people who watch x also watch y" but rather "video y is sticky and increases total daily watch time for those who watch video x".
Ok. How? And are we talking predestination or simply external locii of control lack of free will?
Wow, this is great! It's nice to see this in a new/contemporary tool. I've caught myself mulling over taking a week at our cottage, working on some hobby project - only to realize that most of my "whe I find the time" To-do-list is crowded by various spa web stack stuff that I just know won't have an easy path to "pack what you need for a week of off line exploration" (when you don't already know enough what you'll need to look up, before you go offline to work..).

But now I can shift "do some stuff with Rust" higher up on that list, so thank you!

Ed: now the bad thing about lean core - fat ecosystem - and the great cargo - is of course that I will need to either "pack my expected dependencies", or just stick to the core... Which is great for learning, but kind of annoying if the plan isn't to write a database and a graphics library... But rather some kid of application. But we can't have everything.
Per the second sentence of the paragraph you pulled that quote from, they are restricting her internet. It's not helping.

> I’ve tried to go in and manually delete all recommended videos, put in parental controls, everything (including blocking the app) — but she’s finding ways to log on using browsers and school computers.
As one of those enthusiasts, I don't think that's a situation you really have to worry about. It takes a little while to reconstruct oneself to the point where you'd want another deconstruction. For most people, it's not going to be every day or even every month.

Only once have I run across somebody who wanted to trip twice in the same week, and I think he was just following habits ingrained in him by his previous cocaine problem.

Still, there would be outliers. If availability were higher, I would be worried about the few for which this isn't the case. They might cause some significant harm to their sanity.
For me it's a natural reaction to seeing sensationalized stories. Step back and ask yourself what the reporter is leaving out of the story, especially when the story seems outrageous on the surface.

Sometimes the story is completely right, but a lot of times they're omitting key details that make it much more sensible.
Keyboard is even worse; advancing by page with Space, as I normally read, skips half the text (perhaps a blessing in disguise).
That's due to Western philosophy, which itself is seems to be OK with the idea of mob rule for short periods of time before it burns out due to idiocraty. The Bonnie and Clyde phenomenon as one example, and Trump as another. No Trump supporter could stand to enter a rational debate on the subject, and even if they did, they would attempt to be irrational anyway.

Think of our philosophy as starting a fire on purpose to prevent an out of control fire later. We know we've got a bunch of rowdy idiots here, and love them for it, but every once in a while they find an amazingly lazy way to grab power and shake things up a bit - like a randomization function.

I'm still hoping 5 years later all of them will forgot what was so important and go back to discussing Jennifer Lopez's butt.
I agree about the mirror facet to this. Sometimes I'm even meta-aware of being sucked in to a new demographic when I start charting new video territory. I often pause and think to myself, "Wow, here's a whole batch of content targeting demographic XYZ, no thank you." I've often detected video suggestions going off my mental road barriers and I put a stop to it early before it pollutes my feed. The trouble is when you give in to temptation and let curiosity get the best of you.
Because TV and radio are synchronous formats. The station only needs enough storage and bandwidth to play the one piece of media that they are playing right now, in this very moment. Once it's been broadcast once, it goes right in the trash unless they really need to record it for reruns or something.

Online video requires you to be able to store every piece of video that has ever been uploaded, for the rest of eternity, and requires you to be able to play anything on-demand to ~600 million simultaneous connections, each requesting a different piece of media. You can't fund that with advertising.

Google hasn't ever released figures, but the speculation consensus seems to be that youtube has never made a profit.
Just want to chime in to tell any prospective new Transferwise customer that my experience with the company has been dreadful. They can for no reason deactivate your account with funds still remaining. That’s not the problem though, it is that their appeals teams takes over 2 weeks to respond per message. Yep, waited 3 weeks to get an answer for deactivation. Another 3 weeks to convince them it was an error. Now it has been a month since I sent in my supporting documents and no reply yet. Think I might have to file a formal complaint at this point.
You've been using HN primarily for ideological battle. That's not allowed here—see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu.... We ban accounts that do it, because it's destructive of the value of this site, intellectual curiosity.

We've had to ask you not to do this before. I don't want to ban you, but we need you to fix this, so please fix it and use HN as intended.
From Hilbert's perspective, he did a lot of work that he cared about, but one random thing got his name on it out of proportion to his own sense of what his important about himself. That's disorienting.

Gauss avoided this problem by getting everything named after him.
Lots of comments talking about a possible fraud behind the story, if that's the case why anyone use the expression growth hacking, it wouldn't be the appropiate term ?
My last six years of public school in South Florida all started before 0800.

As for college, there was one year I was getting on a train at 0530 to make my first class...
Create an Android self-help kiosk app with Apache Cordova on Windows 10
I read recently that QE has disrupted capitalism's process of creative destruction by keeping alive companies that would have died otherwise[1]. These low-growth zombie companies drag on the economy.

[1]. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/qe-would-kill-finance-and...
feel like a large part of where we are in the world now is because in 2015 or so, YouTube mindlessly and singlehandedly funneled millions of apolitical young male gamers into gamergate extremism. It took forever for YouTube to stop giving me personal recommendations for various alt-right content no how many times I told it I wasn't interested.
YouTube does have problems, but I'm not sure what Mozilla tries to accomplish by hosting this once-sided set of gripes. The first one I saw was from a father concerned that his daughter would watch dance videos and would want to become more physically fit. A healthy response would be to say "Great! Now let's find a gym or studio where you can do this safely, effectively, and work toward your goals."

For my young children, I hand select videos for them. Videos I've watched or know about. Just like parents have done for kids for the past 30 years or more.
Have you run into any difficulties with the GC, or are you already playing around with some of the configuration options here?
Also my sentiment. Good fictional storytelling describes the corners and in-betweens of human experience; non-fiction typically describes a mix of technical tools(basically trade skills and weaponizable knowledge) and self-promotion(the book was in some fashion written for a career purpose).

The exceptions abound, of course, but categorically speaking, you only need some technical knowledge. It's the "how to lead your life" knowledge that is harder to glean, and one most resistant to taking a head-on approach like studying all the philosophers and then ranking their greatness in a spreadsheet.
Which keywords? I just searched (as posted above) for "extent space taco secure". It breaks bing. Yahoo returns results that are closer (including some shared oddities like storage units in Nashville), but they're still very distinctly unique.
Thanks for dropping in. Sorry if that actually happened to you. The sad thing is when much of tech is dedicated to churning attention capital into financial capital in an ever-more-clever cat-and-mouse game, one stops being able to trust anything that grabs one's attention. Or, at least every social interaction starts to feel purely transactional. It's a shitty social dystopia we're building for ourselves.

Whichever way your story went, thanks for the neat tale of what can be done with bank transfers! Glad it worked out.
It's only civil for a first infraction, like the people in this story. Disobeying any immigration order or being deported and then returning is civil and criminal.
It's really embarrassing that Mozilla is pitching this as if people have no agency. The idea that we need to stand together and tell youtube that we are incapable of any kind of self controls is a bad joke.
Last time I was in a Silicon Valley Hotel, I had to sign a waver that I accepted that there was an Alexa in my room. Of signed it, and unplugged it (as well as the TV). I will not have these horrible things near me. The hotel claimed they would charge if you unplugged it. They didn't.
Thought: Is there a way a parent can turn the phone into a "basic" mode between times of X and Y?

EG: At 11PM, the phone goes into basic mode. It can only call the list of pre-defined numbers (parents/family) and emergency services.

Maybe give a 30 15 and 5 minute count-down warning that way the user can gracefully finish their activities currently at hand.
That reminds me of a certain older movie (Underground, by Kusturica) where the main characters live for decades underground hiding from Nazi Germany not realizing the war was over long ago on the surface).
> It just seem like a place for hate groups to unite and bad things to happen... I would love a different perspective on this

Just because the world's loudest whiners have decided that people disagreeing with them is censorship, doesn't mean that there aren't legitimate examples of actual censorship and oppression in the world.

There are plenty of countries where criticizing the government on social media results in prison, beatings or being disappeared. There are regimes that aren't above using a dissident's family members as collateral or for retribution.
>Reflexive cynicism is a simple, easy way of asserting intellectual superiority over others without directly insulting them. Super common in internet comments, including, arguably, this one.

Or maybe it's a natural adaptation to a world where almost everybody seems to have some ulterior motive.

Edit: a word
Yes, they still do. IIRC, alterations like length are free.
This came up in a TED talk about the ethics of online advertising a while back, but I can't recall who the speaker was. They talked about the transformation of advertising in the age of big data, and how marketing efforts have shifted from benign, widely-encompassing efforts in print and tv to highly-targeted, tailored initiatives to drive sales. The implication being that by using consumer data, we could be building systems that are capable of targeting those who struggle with impulsive behavior or are easily co-opted (think old people and scam callers) and not even know it.

It really comes down to how you view things like addiction and impulsive behavior, and how those things impact free will. The fact that we don't really know with any kind of certainty that people who struggle with these things are protected when using the internet raises a lot of questions. Should people with these struggles just not use the internet?
Thanks. I didn't find any software opportunities in Gates Foundation.
Don't forget metros/subways.
You see a lot of luggage pass through without inspection (unlike airports or stadiums) but the potential for a terrorist attack is real and they've been used for exactly this.
So transit police in US respond very quickly to unattended packages or luggage and treat them as dangerous by default.
(https://wjla.com/news/crime/suspicious-packages-in-d-c-unpac...)
That's exactly what they want! I expected to scroll down and see a new alternative YouTube being launched. I was puzzled when I didn't see it. What's their point? That they don't like one of their competitor's products?
Well if you abandon the right to all government services, then someone else will be stealing your home instead so, idk, pick your poison.
That makes sense, the debit card will be EMV compatible so it'll need a number that's about 16 digits long, because that number needs to be unique compared to all the world's payment cards.

However most such (debit) cards in the UK have the associated account number and "sort code" in smaller type on them too. Certainly all the ones I've ever had are like this.
I think it was a neutral opening to the matter they want to bring up that should hold recognizable substance in pattern to folks who've experienced the YouTube recommendation blackholes. Things get more "controversial" the further along in their examples, which would probably turn off people from reading further if hit with that stuff right off the bat.
> Free will is an illusion but you can continue to postulate otherwise

Aren't you implying free will by saying a person "can continue to postulate otherwise"?
It's called content Marketing and it's quite commonly seen here.
Unless your company is going to spend years and millions of dollars to create their own OLAP database product for their own internal use knowing that they can then charge customer $4.80 an hour for a usable system, Amazon isn’t a useful model for any other IT organization.
I stick my email-address on all valuables I could conceivably lose. Just last month the police sent me a message about a camera found in the road with my address on it. I'd been wondering for weeks where I misplaced it. It must have fallen off when I passed there with my bicycle.

The poor thing must have seen at least one bout of rain and a lot of sun judging by the ablated jacket. And it still works perfectly!
Sure there is:
Recommend videos with topics related to previously viewed videos.
Ratings. While there will be borderline cases, it's pretty clear that "death and dismemberment" content should not follow a childrens train cartoon.

Oh I know, "censorship!" etc... but at Googles scale, as you point out, what else shall we do?

I do rather throw that ball back into your court.
At that scale, they are regulatable :D
I'm not sure that anyone concerned with Twitter's policies/content has focused on the retweet-ability of rule violating world leaders. This is a super shallow effort.

Edit: Though the article mentions that violating tweets are totally un-interactive, except that they can be quote retweeted. Still pretty shallow but slightly less than my original comment.

With that said - it's un clear to me what constitutes a rule violating tweet for a world leader. They should come out with some examples of what is and is not a violation, they should also better specify what a world leader is.
I'm glad there's beginning to be a wider conversation about this. We are what we consume, and it's incredibly easy to consume via the YouTube sidebar. I think most of us derive some portion of our beliefs and values from things the see and learn on the internet, whether it be here, reddit, YouTube, etc. When you consider how many thoughts are shaped by that algorithm that has virtually no human oversight, driven purely by engagement metrics, it's humbling and frightening. I think entities like Google that have become so influential are going to have to start taking more responsibility for the effects their algorithms
Oh the irony bit was just pointing out how it even occurs in groups of people that are trying to get rid of a dichotomy (that there are more than two genders), but ironically they still form a different kind of dichotomy. (not taking sides here just supporting initial argument)
>I think it is important to realize that YouTube is merely a mirror of our societies.

YouTube, and all for-profit social media construct experiences that take advantage of our human fallibility in order to drive eyeballs and clicks. You're writing something very explicitly crafted to drive potentially self-destructive behavior off as merely "a mirror of our societies."

The closest parallel is the gambling industry. There's a reason it's highly regulated.
There's nothing wrong with juvenile jokes; we can be adults without being prudes. The only issue with D is the well runs dry pretty quick.