skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I can't say I know much about licensing and/or GDPR stuff, all I know is that if it's public, I don't have to agree to anything and I can do whatever I want, which is great for me and my business. From the other side, yes it sucks that people can take my stuff and profit from me and there is nothing I can do about it and no way to enforce it and I probably don't even know it's happening. (sounds like ad tracking!)

The way things work in North America at least to my understanding is that it doesn't matter what license you use, I don't have to agree to it to scrape it and use it if there is no click wrapper. I guess if you caught me explicitly using it in a certain way, I could get in trouble, but that is not easy. What you propose sounds reasonable, but I don't know how it would be enforced or if it would still stop people. I'm owed 30k in consulting wages and I can't even make it worth my while to pursue that from a legal standpoint, let alone try and sue some unknown and/or potentially massive company or scattered random ghosts across the interwebs.
That's not, but any of the mobile games will be doing their best to replicate the same behaviours, and social media gives fleeting dopamine hits.
The fact checkers are too often biased/liars/propagandists. I want to hear what someone has to say. As an adult I don’t need someone to translate a tweet for me, nor protect me from its contents. Most media is propaganda today; Twitter is the closest to live news we have, and @Jack is eager to end that too.
It's not a "fallback", I'm pretty sure being a private company is their entire raison d'etre. And, you know, like the sign in every small-town diner says: “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.”

Which is to say, they can give any reason, or no reason at all, for showing a user the door. That's their prerogative as the owners and operators of a business.
JIT runtimes try to give you both.

It starts interpreted, but if you run for very long, it runs compiled.

But that costs memory and startup time.
Biology is a factor because the sun isn't up.

Also there is the desire to do things in the evening, such as a parent having dinner and interacting with their kids before they have to go to bed. Or to get home from work to help them with their homework.

Or let's say as a parent I don't want to have to wake up at 6am because my kids have to wake up that early for school when I don't have to be to work until 9 or 10.
> Well, that's ridiculously easy on Twitter. Just follow them.

I was responding to the GP "We have no obligation to allow them to use social networks for propaganda purposes."

> Twitter recently published their rules for fact-checking

Didn't find anything, care to link it? I hope it's not PolitiFact
Illegal entry (8 usc 1325)

This is/was generally waived as a matter of policy for a first offence.

The status of being/remaining in the country is a civil matter, and not necessarily criminal.

But crossing the border illegally is criminal.

>court order

It's an immigration "court" order, which is administrative/executive (under the DOJ), and which is not an article III court.

So immigration order might not be 100% accurate, but it's no more wrong than calling it a court order.
>Has anything like this been attempted? Might it work?

It has been tried, and early attempts failed. Jon Udell was one of the drivers behind the Elm City Project, which merged many RSS feeds of calendar information into a uniform resource. [0] Maybe its time has come again.

[0] https://blog.jonudell.net/elmcity-project-faq/
E. M. Forster, The Art of Fiction No. 1 (1953)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325

IANAL, but up to 6 months in prison for first infraction under Title 18 (which is US Criminal code).

There are additionally civil penalties.
D is easier to use than rust and way more capable than go.
Thanks!

aws-iam-generator still requires you to write the actual policy templates from scratch, and then they allow you to re-use those policy templates.

Consider the JSON under this area of their README:
https://github.com/awslabs/aws-iam-generator#managed-policie...

It's essentially a method for managing their policies as code - but it doesn't make those policies restricted to certain resources, unless you configure it that way. Using `policy_sentry --write-policy --crud`, you have to supply a file with resource ARNs, and it will write the policy for you, rather than supplying a policy file, and hoping the ARNs fit that use case.

Does that make sense?
The arguments were based around also supporting complex multiple assignments and being to be able to do them anywhere, not just if… and while…, list-comps, etc.

Of course neither of those things have been seen in the wild or production code since. Some folks complain even the simple case above is less readable.

"as" was the Pythonic choice, rather than the C/Pascalic one.
I used to have both a technical math and a statistics class that started at 7am in college. Fridays if i remember right for the math class. That was always a 'fun' way to start the day.
I applaud this idea, but at the same time I feel like the use cases where this will actually work are pretty limited. I doubt the scooters will be able to cross a street or navigate any kind of actual obstacles, so you're going to be limited to corralling them somewhere on the block that isn't occluded by obstacles. Also, scooters are just an awful target for autonomous movement for the same reasons they're pretty crappy to ride: high center of gravity, small solid wheels, and no real built-in self-balancing features (bikes self-balance to a reasonable degree due to having large wheels acting as gyroscopes).

If you want to get rid of humans for pickup/dropoff and charging, you'd be better off building super drones that can literally pick up scooters wherever they are and drop them on a roving flatbed for charging. Or at least put an IR strobe beacon on them so they're easier to find either by chargers or locating drones.
Centralized because running a press or a radio tower is expensive. For the same reason, there were a smaller number of channels, and a more unified discourse (everyone reads the same newspaper). Now, neither of these is true. Twitter, Facebook, etc can customize the feed to every user to maximize engagement. At the same time, whatever doesn't fly politically at corporate HQ can be restricted, with as much or as little visibility as they choose.
I think there's a big difference between YouTube actively recommending things vs. people searching for things and not liking the results they get.

The latter is what I meant by "content I don't like exists on YouTube".

From the article:

>I started searching for “fail videos” where people fall or get a little hurt.

>My 10-year-old sweet daughter innocently searched for “tap dance videos”[...]
http://archive.is/0gxq8
"World leader" is an extremely common term for a leader of a country. They are called "world leader" because they are involved in world affairs.

You seem to believe it means a leader of some kind of whole earth government. That isn't implied at all.
What? Who uses twitter anymore? I mean, besides politicians and celebrities.
This is great to hear, I'd be extremely happy to see IPFS become fast and reliable, and I think it could be a hugely important piece of software.
Can't wait until one of them moves to NYC and they have all sorts of zany adventures!
I don't know about Bloom, but it has become abundantly clear of late that many sexual predators and generally nasty people were very good at covering up their misdeeds, and enabled in so doing by institutions and silent conspirators. I'm completely over this idea 'yes he may have abused X, but he made great thing Y, let's remember him as a great fellow'. It's time for complex appraisals, and to say 'yes, he was a shit' if that was the reality, even if some illusions are shattered.
...and it will fall on lots of others.

For the children!
Daudin: A Python command-line shell
It's disgusting because they're trying to force others to conform with their beliefs and assuming things are wrong simply because they've been told so. The teacher is upset because there's "anti-American propaganda" on youtube. Is everyone the world over supposed to love america and is dissent no longer allowed? It's disgusting because despite essentially claiming to be standing against what one would call brainwashing, they're actually calling for MORE of it, as long as it's the right kind.
Use a 3rd party client like god intended.
You mean the DOI? It's at the bottom.
If you're referring to the gripe I've copied and pasted below, I read it differently - it sounded to me as though the father is concerned about anorexia.

---

My 10-year-old sweet daughter innocently searched for “tap dance videos” and now is in this spiral of horrible extreme “dance” and contortionist videos that give her horrible unsafe body-harming and body-image-damaging advice. I’ve tried to go in and manually delete all recommended videos, put in parental controls, everything (including blocking the app) — but she’s finding ways to log on using browsers and school computers. These terrible videos just keep being recommended to her. She is now restricting her eating and drinking. I heard her downstairs saying “work to eat! work to drink!” I don’t know how I can undo the damage that’s been done to her impressionable mind.
As soon as they delete and curate content they are also endorsing the content that stays online. If this endorsed content is slander they should be liable.
One can not "limit construction" (per GP) and yet still have high prices.
WiFi Triangulate Using NPM
I understand that "the media" has held this kind of sway for a long time. But here we are with a single, publicly identifiable organization (and ultimately a private individual) casually invoking their power to mute every world leader at will, with the flip of a switch. This is a new normal.
Please don't ask friends or teammates to upvote your posts. It's against the rules here—see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html. And especially please make sure they don't post booster comments in the threads. HN users are really good at detecting this and consider it spamming. They'll flag the post and email us to complain.
Group of rich dudes forecast the weather...

How dare they try to model a thing which is not themselves!
Show HN: Yanggangs.org – Auto Generated Cohorts for Slacktivists
Hard determinism
>If, in the final 7,000 years of their reign, dinosaurs became hyperintelligent, built a civilization, started asteroid mining, and did so for centuries before forgetting to carry the one on an orbital calculation, thereby sending that famous valedictory six-mile space rock hurtling senselessly toward the Earth themselves—it would be virtually impossible to tell.

I consider this claim to be complete nonsense. Change my mind.
There are 4 billion year old rocks still on the earth to be found. 7,000 years of civilization is not going to be completely erased in a few million.
Average users aren't aware of its existence. Also for a lot of mainlanders living in the US they won't prefer to set their region to US because that means imperial units instead of metrics units.
Really cool visualisation, thanks for sharing.

Mentally I tend to further categorise heuristics into "construction" and "improvement" heuristics. Your "shortest path" is a construction heuristic that I normally call "nearest neighbour". Other common heuristics are "greedy" (iteratively add the shortest feasible edge) and "farthest insertion" (iteratively add the farthest point from the subtour to the best position). There's an interesting synergy between construction and improvement strategies, e.g. 2-opt might be more worthwhile after nearest neighbour than greedy. It would be extra awesome to be able to choose both construction as well as improvement and see how it pans out.
> Leave politics out of the tools you build. Politics don't belong there.

Why not? I understand the argument that it will be problematic for consumers to intermingle licenses; that's fine, if it's cheaper for you to rebuild a library than it is to audit licenses then that's fine.

Beyond that, I don't understand why it's undesirable for you to specify that your creations are not used in ways that you find morally reprehensible. It's functionally the same as an embargo; we, as a nation, ban trade of items with nations whom we have found guilty of violating some moral principle.

I would counter that by allowing your work to be used in potentially immoral acts, you are complicit in those acts. If you create an image recognition algorithm that ends up being used in drones, you have helped the resulting drone strikes be launched just as if you had worked for the army. You are effectively working for the army, but for free.

> This "ethical code" movement will only gum up the works by mixing in a whole bunch of incompatible licenses

Which we literally already have. Have you looked up the compatibility chart for the GPL? Almost nothing widely used is compatible with it: http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses

Not to mention that none of your examples are incompatible. Sure, one could potentially have a license that says "you must use it in nuclear tech", but that seems odd, no?
Again, I'm going to ask, where are you calling `store.dispatch({type: 'INCREMENT'})`?

You're saying I can't modify global state and have effects on a completely different area of the code, but I'm saying, yes, you can. All you're doing is telling me about the fairly-pointless layers of indirection Redux adds. Adding a layer of indirection doesn't solve the problem.
I rely heavily on those I follow to retweet interesting tweets. I may not want to read everything lots of people say just to get the interesting bits. For Twitter to decide “you can follow directly, but you can’t spread what they say” is one-off censorship.
Another solution is to look up the BIN (bank account identifier, i.e. the 6 first digits of a credit card number):

https://binlist.net/

Then drop the wallet at the bank's closest office.
Right, I'd expect just that from a company where a Saudi prince owns more shares than Jack Dorsey.

And I'm from a small town, and I've been to many. I've never seen a sign like that.
Good. "World leaders" should be subject to some facsimile of the rules that apply to regular people. This strikes a good balance of neutral reporting and responsible platform stewardship, in my opinion. Note that the media has always exercised this type of judgment, and as imperfect as that judgment is, I think it's better than neutrally amplifying whatever people tell them.
Dr. Doom: Crypto is “a big, fake thing.”
The US govt. shouldn't be using some third party tool to communicate with its citizens. Post a blog on usa.gov and say whatever you want, problem solved.
Yes it does - hence the use of this term.

Same with Mahmoud Abbas (leader of Palestine, which is a de jure state, but not universally recognised[1])

It allows Twitter to apply it to anyone involved in world affairs, without having to make a determination about their political status.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_state#De_facto_and_d...
I have read that a study is very unlikely to replicate if p is juuust under 0.05, but very likely to replicate if just over 0.05. The first is a good sign of p hacking, while the second is a good sign of a real effect with a sample size that wasn't quite big enough.
Yeah it's a joke. These settings might break a few websites, although I don't recall that ever happening to me. And any websites these settings break shouldn't be websites you're visiting anyway.
I do kind of enjoy the over 15 hours a day of sunlight Seattle gets in the summer, it peaks at around 16hrs on the longest day! I can get off work at 6, be home at 7, and still have 2 hours of sunlight left!

Less than 9 hours in the winter though... that part is harsh.
Texas in so many ways scares me, but the fact that many of their laws have expirations actually makes sense.
While this is neat and kind, wouldn't it have been easier to see which debit / credit cards are in the wallet, and simply take the thing to the nearest branch?
Also yes, please!
If email worked this way, the whole thing would collapse, because much of the time, you really do want to receive messages from new people. How would contacting a business work if their email system auto-rejected all messages from people not already known?

Sure, spam is a big problem, and that's why we've invented spam filters. Google was able to do that and it works well. Granted, Google is a huge company with lots of resources, but so is Facebook, so why can't they be bothered?

>Don't use it to message strangers, it's very explicitly not what the platform is designed for.

Wrong, it's designed to help people get in contact with each other. This doesn't mean everyone wants to be friends first before exchanging some messages.
I do not have any recommended reading. I had relatives that came of age in the late 70s and early 80s, so this was personal experience.

http://www.paulgraham.com/re.html suggests that young professionals being paid more was new around this time. I don't know if this is true or not. If it is true, then this would suggest that there was a sudden increase in disposable income among young professionals. Professionals were already a small fraction of workers, and social change is usually uneven, so it seems likely that in addition not all professional jobs experienced this shift at the same time.

If you suddenly give a small fraction of the population more money then they are likely to live it up because there aren't enough of them to drive the costs up in lock-step.
I'm not talking about IPNS, I'm talking about normal IPFS lookups. Hopefully this will improve (maybe has improved, I haven't tested lately), but it used to be bad, to the point where some gateways wouldn't discover content that already existed on other gateways.
Dev use only though
Parents can’t hover over their kids 24/7. Moreover, I’d question whether having your time micromanaged in such a way by a parent wouldn’t cause resentment and arguments.

A technological solution seems perfectly reasonable in that context - and Apple has blocked some third party apps from the store so putting more of an onus on them to fill in the missing capabilities seems reasonable.

The parents who don’t want to parent are probably perfectly happy handing youtube to their kids and not monitoring or managing the usage at all.
> Just like parents have done for kids for the past 30 years or more.

Parents traditionally haven't though. They relied on rating systems for television content and movies to efficiently screen out content that might be unsuitable for children. These voluntary rating systems were formed in different countries, at different times, for different media (e.g. video games, movies, television, and comics each have their own). It's important to note that these generally accepted rating systems were created as a voluntary measure to avoid widespread regulation of content.

Parents for the last 30 years didn't hand select movies to watch, they read the synopsis, looked for the rating, or asked a friend or employee at the video store for the rating of the content. They used a recommendation system, but that system was a fair bit more interactive. It's anecdotal, but in my high school and university days I worked in video stores, over about an 8 year period - translates into literally hundreds of user education sessions talking about how rating systems work what they cover and don't cover, and regional differences since Canada uses different ratings than the US and often had both a Canadian rating and a US rating.

Your "healthy response" statement also clearly comes from a position of reasonable economic privilege - I can also indulge my childrens interests, and do regularly through sports and other activities, but for the majority of middle class families, that kind of indulgence is out of reach due to the cost.

It's just not economically viable for most families to enroll their kids in something to help them "learn about it safely", any more than most families have time to create curated lists of content (which requires a degree of technical proficiency that is also somewhat challenging for many people).
It's aimed squarely at narrowing the exemption in the rules they carved out specifically for Trump in the first place.
A bunch of studies came out saying that students are better with more sleep and generally waking up after 7 is best so we get this law.
The problem here is that I am betting that the kids still get home before their parents from work and now they will have to start after their parents leave for work so it will put an economic crunch on dual working parents.
Whose decision was that?

Is the US (or any other) government incapable of creating their own online fora for dissemination of information from leaders?
Caused by?
I should have clarified for it’s intended purpose MERGE is a useful statement, but for the use case handled by INSERT .. ON CONFLICT the ANSI MERGE statement falls flat, as it does not have the same concurrency and atomicity guarantees. It’s routinely a pain point when people try to use it to implement upsert’s in MSSQL.

For other cases there is work being done by 2nd Quadrant to add MERGE into PostgreSQL, but I’m glad the other functionality was added first to avoid a common and faulty use case of MERGE.
Then replace secure with "maintainable" or "high quality". It's still a subjective opinion, unless you can prove that large files are inherently less maintainable or lower quality (which you can't, because all the arguments here are subjective and, like almost everything in software development, these opinions are driven by fashion rather than any evidence).

It's popular to use "objectively" for "clearly" and I've been guilty of this myself, but let's try to reserve the term for actual matters of fact, lest it lose any meaning.
This is kinda silly but for me it always works if I do it in the other order: ie. “weather 12345”

Maybe try that?
In their defense, they’ve been around for a decade, and the whole time criticized for not doing enough to stop people from breaking rules.
Also, Fuji had more recent experience in making film cameras and lenses. Mostly 35mm compacts and medium format cameras by 21st century.

Fuji did make pivot to mirrorless at the right time.
Two karmic superhero's. The guy that found it, and the concierge!
So you too stole from him, as you stated you "threw out weed". That's not very nice.
I'm working on a site that basically groups you into a cohort of like-minded Yang supporters and helps you accomplish simple but helpful stuff online. Things like favoriting a tweet seem tiny, but if every yang supporter did it, the difference would be huge. Especially just raising his visibility online since only half of democrats even know who he is.

Open to any and all feedback - getting people on the internet to do anything at all is insanely hard, but could be the best chance we have bots, false info and astroturfing.
Let’s be real here. In a developing country like India, 99% of phone buyers will be getting third-party budget Android phones that’s in their expected price range.

Very few people are buying flagship phones as expensive as the Pixel in the $600+ tier.
Can you tell me how this constitutes as flame-bait? From my anecdotal experience I feel my comment is true. The comments in response to mine offer enlightening information to the contrary. I didn't post it to flame anything only to generate interesting responses.

I'll try to stop doing what I think you want but note that from my perspective, I just have a different perspective on certain things and I find it only worth saying things that are different or controversial rather than saying things everybody already agrees with. It's not necessarily purposely flame-baiting though differing opinions do tend to look that way as a side effect. I will admit I use sarcasm to illustrate some points, but I can stop that. Just note, that I'm not purposely flame-baiting anyone. I am literally just saying an opinion that I have that many people disagree with.