skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Erm. No. There's plenty of reasons why "rock star developers" and plenty of blogs discuss this. ORM usage is only as good as the stored procedures that are written. If devs don't understand an ORM they're bound it abuse it, because it's easy to do so.

My biggest issue with stored procedures is change management. I've seen plenty of crazy custom tools that try to use Git, SVN, and just file system copies of Stores procedures. All of em have been 'lovely' to work with to say the least.

Having your core business logic on the server is amazing due to version control. If it's performance that's a bottle neck I would say 95% (my POV) it's a developer that doesn't understand what the ORM is doing. The beauty of using EF or another micro ORM (dapper) is that SQL performance is optimized from caching the SQL hash. And the option is still there to execute a stored procedure.

Theres absolutely times for using stored procedures, but I'd sacrifice a little bit of performance for maintainability.
I think the traditional stock market has significantly greater environmental externalities, even proportionally to net value.

Greed creates waste in all venues.
Personal story, the first I ever heard of big cats living in the Grampians, Victoria was after coming back from a lone morning hike up Boronia Peak overlooking Halls Gap. I would have been around 14 at the time and told some of the adults back at the campsite that I found really big cat paw prints on the bank of a creek.

Similar story of US Airmen releasing their mascot pumas into the wild.
You don't need time and money to make a good school, what you need is pupils that are encouraged to study by their parents and that are not absolutely poor. We all know which group of people has a study culture and which doesn't and responsible parents make sure their kids are raised among those people who want to study. Simple as that, all the rest is a smoke screen for this basic fact of life.
The US has a lot of small cities/towns, where it's arguably easier to implement this sort of thing, even by accident. The US also has a lot of old cities/towns (or sections thereof) untouched by the World Wars, and thus having missed out on the "opportunity" to rework things for cars without having to demolish perfectly good and usable (and now historic) buildings.

There are also quite a few golf course / country club / equestrian / etc. communities where there's some other mode of transportation (e.g. golf carts or horses) that's common enough to make car access less necessary.
Refusing to serve black people is illegal discrimination. It sucks that sexual orientation isn't a protected class in all states, but the bakers are legally clear here.
the bit you missed is that he implied your stuff has to be so good that people choose to mirror it!
️ oops, a typo in the query, but why they have query correction for popularity based, not date based?
Just saw that, I was utterly shocked how many terms I thought were casual normal socially coined things (like PR) but were in fact introduced with malign interests. High level of cynicism
Japanese food art is nuts. There are specialists in the art of creating super realistic-looking fake food. This is not merely decorative, it also is set up as a display in restaurant fronts to whet the appetite and give you an idea of what's on the menu.
trying this alternative: https://github.com/csaftoiu/yahoo-groups-backup
You can try your luck on archive.org - https://archive.org/advancedsearch.php

They strip out all kinds of the things from the captured page.
I have used a Perl module PDF::API2 to make some nice pdf reports with tables and images about 10 years back. The reports are still being generated to date.
I guess the investigators found out somehow, for example by looking at transactions on a computer already seized for realayed investigations. Also by sending bitcoin to the service themselves, the investigators could trace the flow of coins into addresses used by the dealers to spend their bitcoins. Then backwards from there to other users payments.
Please read this article about how wealth is not zero sum

http://www.paulgraham.com/gap.html
This confirms one of the guidelines I've always been taught; char is not an arithmetic type, and never treat it as such. It represents ascii characters, and nothing else.
Is always reported but never caught
There's plenty of room between "inhospitable desert" and "protected wetlands" where people could live.
At the cost of 2 trillion a year. Or 1 trillion if if you only count service fees and not liquidity.

https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/financi...
A house is the only highly leveraged long term asset not subject to margin calls. In a normal fixed interest mortgage, you can be forced to liquidate based on inability to service the debt, but not because of depreciation of the asset. This is neglected in most analyses of relative return.
You greatly underestimate the resiliency of the Bitcoin network.
Some junior engineers do (most don't). There was this thread from a while ago [0] where someone negotiated a 300k offer. I believe they were a new/recent grad.

Most of the time it's due to having some leverage (multiple FAANG+ offers).

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19057514
> The problem is also that they are advertisers, and I'll be damned if I want ads for my company appearing next to "Illinois Nazis" or ISIS or whatever other garbage.

I don't understand the problem. Why can't Toyota or Proctor and Gamble say it only wants to bid on a certain white list of channels or videos? The only downside is a smaller reach for the advertiser and a smaller "pie" for the "content" company (be it Instagram or YouTube).

I think the main problem is the "content providers" be it Instagram or YouTube want to maximize the ad revenue and any suggestion I have such as strictly reverse chronological timeline by default goes against the idea of "growth hacking".

I would personally love to be a fly in the wall in Netflix or Spotify headquarters. Because in my naive mind, Netflix makes MORE money when people subscribe to Netflix but never watch anything. But then if people watch Netflix a lot, they are more likely to talk about what they watch to others and encourage others to subscribe to Netflix?

Any company probably wants to make sure they make more money the more customers they have? Kind of sounds obvious but I don't think it is the case with every company. I'd imagine there are some businesses where there is an ideal size and if you are bigger, the additional customers kind of follow a law of diminishing returns? I can't think of any examples but would love to hear if anyone reading this can...
If your ok using a book, I would highly recommend the book The Pyramid Principle. It covers logical structure and logical thinking.
Practice.

Try writing a blog about something you know very well technically, but imagine you are explaining it to a Jr. Dev or maybe even a complete beginner.

Also, pay attention to the technical docs you like. For me, I think Digital Ocean does a really good job.

Experiment with drawings; simple sketches/models that can illucidate systems in a way that writing cannot.
> How many of these posts do we need a day?

Who is "we"?

> They have long ceased to be "news" or interesting.

To you, apparently.

> The only real variation here is that it isn't citylab.

Indeed. That's why I filter out citylab references on HN in my feed.
The default state is still a state, its not a null option. You wouldn't be apolitical if the current politics said your parents had to be executed when they hit 50 and your children had to be turned over to the state so they could best determine their use, would you?

That's a hyperbolic statement, but the intent is to show that being "apolitical" about current politics has no distinction between agreeing with the current politics. If you start telling people they can't discuss their politics because "we want to be uninvolved in politics" what you are really saying is, "My politics are in charge and the status quo. Your opinion needs to be silenced"
LOL. Sure, but that is only being done because bitcoin gobbled up all the electricity that could have been used doing useful things like running data centers, smelting aluminum, air conditioning homes, etc.

Bitcoin is a drain on the electrical system. You are basically arguing that it is okay to litter because it will create jobs and spawn new anti-litter technology.

Doesn’t work that way, sorry.
It is not helpful to change the definition of the word "inclusive". In the context of the workplace - not the church - inclusivity means ensuring all employees have the opportunity to execute to the best of their capacity. In workplaces that are less inclusive, some groups may not be able to do so for various reasons.

The OC named LGBTQ+ people as an example, which is fair, as at many workplaces discussion of family or inviting family to social functions is considered a norm and perhaps even a core value. If gay employees face harassment or (in some jurisdictions) termination for discussing their family, that is a failure of inclusion policies.

Another example of inclusion is related to accessibility. Is your workplace welcoming of colleagues with disabilities? Can someone with limited mobility attend all corporate events? Are people with speech impediments given time to speak on meetings? This is outside of my personal wheelhouse but I hope the point is clear.

There are many ways in which a workplace can improve its inclusivity, and they are all rooted in improving the performance of the employees.
FPGA Design for Software Engineers
I've once engaged in a similar discussion with a female colleague and it escalated into a shit-show with manager & HR being involved and colleague being in tears claiming I'm "sexist" despite my aggressive attempts to de-escalate and walk away from continuing the conversation. The HR did an investigation and came to a conclusion that I didn't do anything wrong, but strongly suggested not talking about anything like that in future. The colleague made a claim that she wouldn't be able to work with me in the same company and quit.
No bones, no story.
Could be dogs or foxes easily also
And you say they are using “excess energy” based on what? What is “excess energy” anyway?
I'm surprised that they don't try to set up few dozens photo-traps in the area, in Europe it works quite well for proving re-emergence of wolves in areas where they were not seen for hundred years.
India suddenly demonetized a large portion of circulating cash without warning.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/08/india-withdraw...
What right does SpaceX have to externalise the costs to astronomers of their launches?
I have the same issue, but I'm also using the Dell 180w dock with it. I just have to switch ports for the USB-C cable that comes from the dock 1-4 times. Usually the first plug in produces nothing on the monitor. The first port swap gets me on the external display, but at 1920x1080 resolution. The 2nd port swap gets me back at 4k on the external.
Jane Little (Musician)
They built their own. The engine is baked into nginx modules.

https://blog.algolia.com/?filter=engineering
I see how my comment was confusing. In capacitor, when you initialize a project for a platform (IOS, Android, etc), a bunch of native source code is generated and they are not overwritten.
The FAANGs are starting new grads at these levels now. 150K base salary, 100K+ RSUs vesting per year, 30K+ bonus targets per year will get you there and then some.
The traditional financial system is the root cause a significantly greater amount of pollution.
There should be only once choice, either you're a platform or a publisher.

A platform should be open, and only illegal stuff should be removed. No preferences, no nothing.

A publisher can be closed, can be whatever they want it, can filter whatever, promote whatever and censor whatever.

...but!

If you're a publisher, you've decided what to publish, and you should be responsible for all content published on your webpage. Fake news? Illegal porn? Nuclear bomb plans? Your problem, your responsiblity, you face the consequences.

If you want to be an open platform and blame users for content posted there (and have them face the consequences), then you should have no right to promote, censor or block/hide content (except illegal).
Simulation and the Sense of Understanding (2009) [pdf]
Most Trump voters elected him to do exactly this and put an end to US entanglement with the Bush/Obama interventionist wars in the ME.

That it happens to please or displeases some "tinpot dictator" or Putin or some nomadic group or mercenaries on the other side of the planet is really not the primary concern.

Not sure what is so confusing about that, or how you feel the need to come up with such an elaborate conspiracy theory to explain something that should be so completely obvious, but it reeks of confirmation bias, to say the least.
It's upside-down in more ways than one, apparently.
Just because it's possible doesn't mean it's common. So OP is correct.
That doesn't say that we've been attacked by China or Russia, only that they have the ability to.

The Iranian and North Korean "attacks" here are just laundered transfers on the swift network.
is there a cost related to the treatment?

if the answer is yes, then quite a few people probably care; regardless of the humanitarian element.

Who is paying it, if there is? The payers would tend to care.
Care to actually quote where the banks are spending $2 trillion a year to stop double spends?
I don't know. My bank "double spent" a hundred bucks the other day, that took them half a month to return.

There was some error with the debit card system where it wouldn't accept my card, then when the cashier rebooted the device, it informed me that my account balance was insufficient. Sure enough, checking my balance I see that somehow the first try "stuck" into the system as a 'pre-authorization' -- inexplicably unusable money. The bank just shrugged, it would fix itself in two weeks.

I stopped paying with plastic. Fear the day the ATM fails to produce the bills yet drains my account.
Google internal political discussion and an example of related workplace rule
I'll just copy/paste from the source of the chart, but a tax unit is everyone on a single tax return where a household is everyone that lives in a house. So if an elderly parent who pays their own taxes moves into their adult children's household, that property would consist of 1 household but 2 tax units. The net worth of the household would increase, even though the net worth of those two tax units stayed the same.

> "For most people, their tax unit and household are the same. But there are cases where a household would include multiple tax units. When an elderly parent moves in with an adult child with kids filing taxes separately to form a three-generation household there would be multiple tax units exist in one household. The same is true when a child moves back in after college or an unmarried couple moves in together. These are groups that we probably want to think about together because they rely on each other economically. On the other hand, a group of unrelated adults living together as roommates would also count as a household."

> We might prefer tax units to households for income trend analysis because household structure is not independent of economic circumstances. For instance, adult children move back in with their parents (Gallup reported that 14 percent of 24 to 34 year olds lived with their parents in 2013 and a Pew Research Center study showed this to be increasing). Similarly, homeowners sometimes take in boarders for economic reasons. In each of those cases, the tax-unit data captures the deteriorating economic situation associated with these types of living arrangements.

> In contrast, household data captures more earners under one roof, which increases household income. Imagine a group of three graduate students living together where each makes $25,000. They would show up as three different tax units but one household making $75,000. Now image that they all got $5,000 raises and decided to get places on their own. This would show up as a 20 percent increase in their incomes by tax units, but their household incomes would have dropped by 60 percent.
Fraud is absolutely a big deal in banking.
I had no idea who Naval Ravikant was until I randomly read one of his tweets and thought "this dude has good thinking" and went to look up him. Interesting character.
I stared at that figure for about a minute and wondered at how friggin' satisfied they have to have been about it.

It was and is really neat, even if the likelihood of its reality is low.
I ran the math -- If you are a married couple who earn $500k/year in California, you'd have to save 40% of your post-tax income at a 7% rate of return for 27 years to accumulate a net worth of $10M. It's exceedingly rare to make that much money for that long of a period of time.
Check out Days of Destruction by Chris Hedges. One chapter is focused on the Pine Ridge reservation in South Dakota.
I felt a sudden sense of longing and felt incredibly sad, as if I had forgotten something, something that had been precious to me.
I think, by Occam's Razor, the most likely explanation is that there's a skybox surrounding the solar system that Voyager 1 may run into any day now, like Truman Burbank at the end of The Truman Show. It seems to be a more parsimonious explanation of the available facts that we're looking at the result of a super duper planatarium projector, as opposed to an actual vast and frequently inexplicable universe.
You aren't going to be showing up in the top few hundred against the people with recent brand new huge fortunes if you have generational wealth - note that 0.01% of a 300M population is population is 30,000 people. How many of those do we know much about?
It’s ambiguous if people misunderstand you even if they’re “wrong” for being confused. Avoid those terms. People will widely misinterpret them.
I don’t think there is anything preventing them from defending him or EO13769 is there?

I don’t quite see how they could effectively do that, but the possibility is there.

(Yes, I realize it would be social suicide, but while I understand that this is theoretically a bad thing, I just cannot quite apply it to Trump supporters)
Also, while characteristics defined by biology or history are not choices, identity to a large extent is.
I'm curious but are you living somewhere far from a place with a tropical climate?

In Australia pineapple on pizza is a really common thing. The only person I've ever met who didn't like pineapple on pizza just doesn't like pineapple at all in any context. Over here it is also pretty common to have pineapple on burgers.

My Canadian born girlfriend (who mostly grew up here) has told me that when she visited Canada at 14 and was shown a mango over there she didn't recognise it as a mango because it was so small and weirdly coloured compared to the ones we get here.

I'm beginning to think the objection to pineapple on pizza comes from people not having access to halfway decent pineapple
> ...so they will be controlled by the government."

The cynical Regulatory Capture inspired take is that they want to be regulated now. Because regulation always favors the established players and makes it very hard for newcomers to overthrow them.

Google, FB etc are now big and old enough to need that protection, and settle in to comfortable corporate middle age.
Actually politics generally is spam - in the sense that much of it is knowingly dishonest self-promotion of individuals and social groups.

Just because politics isn't trying to sell you a penis extension doesn't mean it isn't trying to sell you something far worse.

It doesn't even matter how political content is published. What matters is that currently voters get more protection from a faulty toaster than from lies knowingly generated by politicians and corporate PR outfits.

The creation of deliberately false "talking points", fake news, smear campaigns, organised trolling and astroturfing, fake reviews, fake feedback, and other kinds of cognitive pollution should be banned from all forms of media.

Which is not to say this is easy or straightforward. But attempts should be made - because lying to voters and consumers is absolutely toxic to genuine democracy.
You can't fast-forward your net worth and leave everyone else's frozen in place. If 10M is the bottom of the top 1% now, In 20 years 10M won't be enough to be in the top 1%.
I also went to a school that was majority black and am white.

> When applying to college, many colleges use race to assume a level of hardship and then adjust admission standards based on hardship. Someone who goes to a very underfunded school won't score as high on the SAT as they would have if they had gone to a better school. Yet because of my race, the assumption is made that such reasoning does not apply to me.

I do not think this is true for the highest tier of colleges, who will also consider what highschool you come from.
> To me the issue of asking "would you" sounds like the request is optional and they can say, "no I won't". In this case there is no negotiating.

If the answer is no, then like I said, negotiation probably won't work, so you escalate. The point of something like NVC is to avoid escalation when possible. Sometimes it isn't possible.

Another way of putting this is: NVC assumes good intent. When that assumption is invalidated, other strategies are superior, but you lose very little by assuming good intent for a while.
Maybe we're talking about different algorithms. Do you agree that we are talking about random search as outlined in this Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_search)?
It depends on interobject density and single object mass, I'd reckon.

Having it redirect the orbit at velocity might be astronomically (!) low

Also, I don't know it's trajectory relative to the solar plane; it might be ruled out by that alone
They have. Here's the best result so far:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-06/tasmanian-tiger-sight...

It's not exactly convincing.
Darkweb child porn site busted by feds by following Bitcoin trail
I’m unable to find more details. Does anyone have anything else on this creature?

How long has this been studied? What is its scientific name? Where did it come from?
No one who has to actually work for a living, even if they're earning near 1% in salary, is ever going to be 1% in wealth.

Even in Silicon Valley, being a top manager, developer, etc. is only going to get you a very nice, comfortable life. '

The 1% wealthy you think of when you think "1%" have all gotten it the usual ways: got lucky, inherited, or shadier methods.