skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> are all the boiler plating you have to do for Redux “really” necessary just to have state management?

You can actually take this pretty far with regard to React in general. You can get in to some pretty funky situations with "proper" React boilerplate.
Control Panel has been around for 24+ years and on top of that some (older) driver packages and apps install third party control panel applets as well. It's going to be a long rough road deprecating Control Panel and replacing it with Settings.
You shouldn't treat China as a single entity. The question should be whether the Chinese people can come up with the design.
Well, yes, it does actually. Not all 'common sense' solutions have the same impact. I will never understand this line of anti-science thinking. In the past, all sorts of 'obvious' advice turned out to be terribly wrong. For example, in the past, before knowledge of infectious disease, people would have told you that you didn't need scientific inquiry to understand how to stay well, just avoid 'bad air'. This was terrible advice as the air could be crisp and clear, but still contaminated with viruses or bateria, while polluted air could be free of the same agents.

Another example is low-fat diets. These are now known to not be as healthy as purported, and indeed for men, it is known that such a thing would actually lower testosterone, so maybe it's not just simply a matter of putting into motion the abstract ideal of 'treating yourself well', but actually a matter of offering targeted, specific advice.

We should not substitute 'common sense' with actual, careful study.
This study shows that being in Mensa is associated with mental and physical disorders - based on self-reporting.

I appreciate the irony of this study having been done by people who were being very very dumb.
It is the abstraction layer that will let Google swap in Fuchsia and de-GPL their platform.
Don't sleep on Foundations and Trusts.

You can contribute to them even during a marriage and you could be trustee and your ex-spouse would not be a creditor.

In this topic of shares in your startup though, it is more likely that your Foundation cannot be an owner of it (or maybe a percentage limitation of ownership if you are actively involved in the company), so don't donate shares of that company to that foundation. But for the fiat money earned you can donate unlimited amounts to that, with a 30% annual tax deduction against your annual gross income.

This may not be obvious, but its correct that you can't get money out of a foundation aside from 'reasonable salary' which will then be taxed as ordinary income, but you can use the foundation's nest egg to pump the value of other assets you own, as long as you aren't buying and selling direct to the foundation. Ideally an invigorated market will purchase from your personal orders above the price the foundation has pumped the market to with its tax free money. foundation just ends up owning a bunch of the asset from the pump, you personally just have a bunch of short or long term capital gains, which you can again offset by donating to the foundation or offset from prior donations above that prior year's AGI limit. illiquid markets are always ripe for this behavior.

Foundations can also support other causes you have in mind, as they were designed for.
I can relate to your situation, because I was there a few years ago, at a similar age. Please forgive me for offering some unsolicited advice.

I highly recommend meditation. A helpful book I started with is called Wherever You Go, There You Are. I'm now getting into The Mind Illuminated, and I think it is also good. The subreddits /r/meditation and /r/TheMindIlluminated are informative, at the moment.

When you find the time, which can be difficult when you are working a job, try forcing yourself into social interactions. For example, chatting with people at cafe or at the train station, volunteering, and meetups.

Also, I found myself feeling like I've been Tom Sawyered just a little bit with the job thing. If I could go back in time and tell myself not to sweat the job thing so much, I would.
Very early in my career when I was trying to figure this stuff out, I learned (from the mistakes of others) that using someone else's code as scaffolding affords you absolutely no protection in a civil case.

If you want to copy someone's application you have to do it separately, and not only that, you can't look at the old code. That's where the whole idea of Clean Room implementation came from. One party had to 'taint' themselves by reading the code and converting it into a requirements document, and another party implements the requirements without ever reading the code.

Things get a bit fuzzier around compilation units. If you write your code as an add-on or a DLL you might be able to walk away from it. Might.
My old therapist (who literally saved my life fwiw) made me go through a series of IQ tests and I also received a similar score (141). At the time, he was attempting to prove that I had intelligence, and that I was smarter than I gave myself credit for. But the thing that I noticed was that it actually spun me in the opposite direction - when I thought I wasn't smart I could explain away the lack of motivation or success or whatever. When it was "proven" that I was "intelligent", I just felt like more of a failure. I had this big brain that I was barely using.

I'm glad I know, because it feels good to know I guess. But I don't think that making me take that test really moved the needle for me in terms of self worth or success or anything like that. I had to figure my shit out via other methods (while working with that therapist). I suppose the point of this message is only to say that I empathize with your situation.
The grocery store has access to your credit card number when you swipe it. It can associate that card (or a hash of it) with your itemized receipt.
The Swiss watchmaking industry was once largely focused on producing cheap copies of English and French watches. Today Swiss watchmakers are renowned for quality and innovation.
Which company has Rubin started that was not a huge commercial failure?
9 months ago, 137 comments, with a less obnoxious title:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18830186
> Most IQ tests only go up to 145. Anything very close to 145 may mean you "ceilinged the test." In other words, your IQ could be even higher, but the test can't measure it beyond that.

This has always bothered me about IQ tests. I mean, how smart is the person who comes up with the test? If your IQ is 120, how could you come up with a question that verifies someone's IQ is 180? Maybe the 180 IQ person would have an answer that is different than yours for reasons that you didn't think of.
It's a liability issue.

Say someone gets hurt from a seatbelt. If it's designed exactly as required by regulation, there is an immunity for the company (IANAL so I don't know the legal term for this)

IF you try to make it better, and do make it better for most cases, but worse for some edge case, then you have a liability issue in that your 'negligence' caused injury that wouldn't have happened otherwise.

The stance on civil liability in America often stifles innovation in many areas regarding life safety. Tesla is learning this quickly.
> why can't you "think your way out of those problems"

The tool you're trying to use to fix the problem is itself failing in some way. This is part of the pernicious nature of depression.
I especially appreciated the following articles when I was in the throes of full-blown nihilism:

- https://meltingasphalt.com/a-nihilists-guide-to-meaning/

- https://meaningness.com/preview-eternalism-and-nihilism

- https://meaningness.com/wrong-about-nihilism

- http://cook-greuter.com/9%20levels%20of%20increasing%20embra...
(founder here) Definitely not dead! Far from it! Profitable and still growing.

September was our largest single month growth since April 2014 and we'll easily beat that this month. Lots has changed with the app in the last 12 months and lots happening as we speak. If you haven't looked for a while, drop in and take a look!
What if I’m not having kids? I love a nice Manhattan.
I mean, they supposedly stole the full plans for everything related to the F22 and F35, including their engines. So, that doesn't really jive with your idea that it's lack of access to IP there.

What's way more likely given all that is that Chinese companies so contract lots of the commercial engines' components, it's that putting it together and filli g in the gaps in a way that passes cert is the issue. The fighter jets engine components are starting from scratch, and being very very different designs that are much more exotic from a materials science perspective.
There's nothing strange about an active recovery workout. Elite athletes do stuff like that all the time.
Hi there. I left a comment on the site, but I'm not sure if it got through because it went down again before I could check to see. The main problem I have found so far trying to use the site is that you've made a huge variety of communities and posts using a reddit scraper. I understand the urge to have content, but starting small will allow users to actually find places where other living users are rather than an endless wasteland of bot posts with no comments.

In addition, having user-driven content from the start will (hopefully) lead to a community and a unique style forming - with people sticking around because they enjoy the content and discussion already there, and posting more of the same themselves. If you want to shape the community, the best way would be to make one or two posts yourself, and try hard to comment and engage with other user's posts in the way you hope future users will.

Also, the personality of the first few active users will have a large effect on how the site's culture will evolve. If you're interested in left-wing politics, perhaps try to publicise the site in the kinds of places people already talk about left-wing politics - specific subreddits or discord servers. Of course a lot of places won't like straight-up advertisement, but if you pitch it as an ongoing project and ask for ideas, people will likely be happier to accept it.
This might be a third party shell extension crashing. You can try disabling unneeded extensions and seeing if that helps.

https://www.nirsoft.net/utils/shexview.html
I see that you are employing the rhetorical device of diluting rather serious allegations by putting them in a list that also contains things of no importance, but nevertheless, I am in favor of judging a person's contributions independently from their personal attributes. I will not, however, accept that the contributions either justify or excuse harmful behavior.
This is what my 4th grader just learned is called a "convenience sample" and all the ways it can be biased... :P If he can understand the shortcomings, then so can the rest of us.
Apple: We're not handing over Safari URLs to Tencent, just IP addresses
People are entitled to like sex and to approach people for relationships that may become sexual.

If female grad students were inviting him over for booty calls I think the tone of the conversation would be much different.

But the claim is that he was making advances on people who didn't welcome them. This is especially a problem since he was an influential professor with power over their careers.

Even for professors, where the natural state for many is social awkwardness, you have some obligation to read the signs of when your behavior is unwanted.
10 minutes of charging on a fast charger can give you 56 miles of range (assuming 100kW charge rate, 300 Wh/mi).

You don't have to park your car for hours or walk. Assuming a fast charger is enroute.

Ideally, you'd pair shopping with charging, in that case electrify America chargers are often located in Walmart parking lots.

L1 and L2 chargers are more ideal for work or home parking. They'd be better for your battery in the long run, but a fast charger would do in the short run.
August 19 is 4 months after March. That's a lot of time for details to have finally been worked out about how MCAS actually worked.

Also, they did cutoff the electric trim, but had to reenable it in order to try to neutralize already present mistrim.

If the switches had been left alone from the NG, where the flight computer could be isolated while maintaining the electric trim controls, they could have been fine.

...Of course, if Boeing had actually mentioned MCAS in training materials, then things may have been different too.
3 months ago, 1500 points, 400 comments:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20350306
Similar boat for me, but in my case it was that everyone else then raised their expectations. Because if you're "gifted" or whatever term they use these days, clearly you should be accomplishing amazing things constantly and if you don't you're a disappointment to the world at large. That kind of burden is pretty awful for most kids to grow up with.
It seems like this is the us equivalent to me. The nice thing about this approach is you don’t have to use so much wrapping paper like in the linked article’s video. Both the banana and sandwich come in their own case.
Social systems, like kindergarten, can tell if someone is smart or average or very not smart. Society generally only tests those at the outer boundaries to verify and classify them into groups.

You're right, someone who seems average (or totally unknown to social systems), but is actually super genius, might not get tested. It's the "genius in the rice paddy" argument and yes, those exist. Srinivasa Ramanujan was one.

That doesn't mean IQ is fundamentally flawed. You don't need to know if someone is 99th percentile or 99.0004 percentile to know they are probably the smartest in the average room of a hundred people and that's what we use IQ to determine.
Why would anyone trust you with their money? Specially when your asking for help
This presumes writable code segments, which many OSes shun.
The US famously did the "catch up and then leap fast" thing, which worked out great for the US, and probably less bad for the rest of the world than if Germany had won WWII or the Soviet Union had been more dominant.

Hard for me to feel that all that influence over the next century going to the particular flavor of country that is modern China is gonna be good for the rest of the world, though.

But, interestingly, that's not an IP-related argument, that's a political system one.
What bothers me is that the / is separated by commas, which makes it seem like the signature is one more than it actually is (even if that is not the case technically). I haven't looked too carefully here though.
> Can we try combine the actions, types, and reducers into a single domain so they aren’t seemingly repeated in 3-4 different locations.

This is what the "duck" pattern is for:
https://github.com/erikras/ducks-modular-redux
I try PyPy every 3 months. It has improved greatly and for some periods I migrated to it. But for this particular project, most of time is spent inside lxml, pandas, scikit-learn and other extensions. CPython is actually faster than PyPy for this project.
Maybe GraalVM / GraalPython can improve on this use-case.
Its still there, you just don't use it apparently. I have a pirate audio books site that gets tons of use.
It’s just how it is with coding (and probably anything else), the more of X there are, the more chance of mistakes you can have.

Can I ask what other state management libraries you have used? If Redux is super easy, how do you feel about MobX or even VueX.
I was thinking specifically here about people in North-Western Europe and the UK who panicked when the Chernobyl accident first came to light and thought they'd be dead within days. To my mind, that was indeed pretty irrational.

It's also an interesting contrast to what I've read about the attitude of the people who actually lived in Pripyat at the time who were arguably irrationally calm.
> India has great healthcare outcomes for its poorest citizens.

Does it? Why does the life expectancy at birth (68-69) trail the US (76-81) by so much then? That's an average across the country; presumably the poor in India have even lower than that average.
The problem is that it does affect the free market systems that China trades with. If China didn't trade with other countries I would agree, however Chinese companies do trade in massive amounts, and the government has signed on as a member of the WTO. They agreed to certain rules of the road when dealing with foreign market economies and have benefit greatly from selling goods and services abroad. And in those market economies, expensive R&D that is cheaply replicatable is disincentivized without IP- the dominant strategy is to just wait for a competitor to innovate and then clone them. IP is a hack that balances out this strategy with licensing costs. If you remove the licensing costs, the free market most likely won't incentivize expensive R&D, and there will be a net loss to everyone in the market system. So of course people in the capitalist market system are kvetching about how they are competing with someone who doesn't pay licensing fees to balance out R&D costs.
> for others I have met, it was a limiting factor and they would heavily disagree

The GP comment isn't really about intelligence - it is about the measurement of intelligence & the impact of parental expectations (societal, self and partner ones too).

And very unfortunately it cuts both ways.

People who measure poorly at 7 years old might be kept out of challenging classrooms where they would actually discover their talents & flourish.

People who measure high are pushed until they burn out of their skulls trying to fulfill their "measured" potential - or alternatively placed in the company of the talented where they end up with an underachiever's ego[1].

As my sister once told me "Society doesn't want you in particular, anyone who will do what you could do will do". I often think about that at work - society can afford to burn thousands of bright minds on optimizing ads and their placement.

[1] - I remember chills watching the setup for Molly's Game.
I have had exactly the opposite experience. I recently rolled onto a React project without Redux and the code was pretty gross. Multi hundred line React components with markup, API calls, and business logic all mixed together in an untested and untestable cocktail garnished with a heavy dose of prop drilling and deeply nested callbacks.

Adding Redux to this app was a huge improvement. Test coverage is now almost 100%. The views are now tiny and simply render props and dispatch actions. Complex workflows are handled beautifully by Redux sagas. Overall, the codebase is now one of the cleanest I have ever worked on.

I am not saying you have to have Redux to have a good frontend codebase, but it definetly helps a lot. If your app is even remotely complex, its hugley helpful to have a global data store. If you are going to have workflows with asynchronous components, Redux sagas are an incredible tool.

My hunch is that the apps that don't use Redux either 1. suck or 2. have had some smart person hand roll a framework that has most of the core principles of Redux in it. I am not that smart, and I don't want my codebase to suck, so Redux is the best choice for me.
Anybody can run, but it remains to be seen if anybody has the right incentives to enforce. For Tesla maintaining a highly-available network of super chargers is business-critical. For McDonald’s it’s probably not.

That’s what’s disappointing to me about current deployments by municipalities or retailers. It could be blocked for hours (by a non-EV, too), could be broken, and nobody cares. Volta is probably the least reliable network, as they still get paid for displaying ads whether or not the charger is operational.

I agree that smaller operators have more skin in the game.
And what about all the crptyo currencies trying to do the same idea?
Mythology to the contrary notwithstanding, but IQ at age 7 is not indicative of much. And paying attention to it is actively detrimental.

First of all at the tail of the IQ distribution, the normal approximation breaks down. Secondly, we get a big jump in mental development when we hit our growth spurts. So IQ at that age is not massively well-correlated with your IQ a few years later.

But that doesn't get into why it is actively detrimental. It turns out that children are motivated to seek confirmation of what they are complimented on. So a child who is told they are smart seeks easy tasks where they look smart, and tends to avoid hard tasks that might show them not to be so smart. While children who are complimented on their hard work and willingness to learn will seek out challenges to push themselves.

Research indicates that this effect sets in shockingly easily. And the two groups respond very differently to setbacks. The ones who are complimented on what they are gets demotivated. The ones who are complimented on what they do get motivated to tackle it again.

See https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-power-prime/2009... for more on this and some verification that I'm not just making this up.

Your personal life is an anecdotal data point, but it fits perfectly. You were identified young as smart. It was drilled in enough that you know exactly how smart. But it sounds like you learned to coast on brains and avoid challenges, and are now suffering the consequences.

If this is true, I would recommend that you read https://www.amazon.com/Cant-Hurt-Me-Master-Your-ebook/dp/B07... for advice on how to build mental toughness. That can help you overcome life challenges which are in your way.
Good question. Someone submitted this Meetup link and discussing on here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21251596
> This reads like every forum post where someone has asked "how's X distro work on Y laptop", and then people respond with something like the following:
"Runs great! No issues. Suspend/resume are wonky but I'm able to get by. Bluetooth doesn't work reliably but who needs that? Wifi is slower than in Windows."

I am not sure what you are talking about. I didn't mention a single suspend/resume/bluetooth or wifi problem. I mentioned the following brands: Apple, Dell, Acer, Lenovo, MSI

And laptops from these brands that I purchased and used worked out of the box. You are free to not believe me, but you shouldn't put words in my mouth. I am typing this on a Dell Latitude E7450 and there are no issues with this laptop whatsoever. Suspend/sleep works flawlessly, no audio issues, no wifi issues, bluetooth works flawlessly, everything worked out of the box on manjaro linux.

Also I use my Lenovo X1 carbon with manjaro linux to develop software for a fortune 500/inc 500 corporation 8 hours a day and have been doing it for close to a year without a single issue.

My work gave me the latest fully loaded macbook pro but I returned it because I hate the keyboard (it's unreliable as hell and has no travel distance and feels awful) and the touchbar is an abomination. The keyboard is one of the single most important things on a laptop and if the keyboard experience is lacking, the whole experience sucks. I am very happy with x1 carbon latest gen and manjaro linux and my setup destroys the macbooks other devs use when it comes to things like running unit tests.
We use MobX and I highly recommend it. It basically turns pub/sub into a non-issue, while remaining unopinionated about the plain JS patterns you use to actually manage your data. Using it as intended requires some build configuration, but there's zero boilerplate. It can even be more performant than Redux under certain circumstances: it allows components to update without having to traverse the tree above them first.
That wouldn't work for a lot of people (like me), who have a dark theme on all the time.

I don't have any statistics to back it up, but most everyone I know just leaves dark theme on all the time (or in the case of one light theme on all the time).