skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You'd need a longer term study to see if the group's recieving it are better off than a control group after x years, assuming that's the specific thing you want out of this study.
New Security Risks Create Need for Stealthy Chips
The trouble with warnings is they inherently balkanize the language into multiple incompatible and even contradictory languages.

Warnings arise from being unable to modify the language semantics. But even if you can modify the semantics, warnings are spawned as a compromise when people cannot agree on what the language semantics should be.

I've tried pretty hard with the D programming language to not have any warnings - that the semantics should be firmly decided upon. Some warnings still have crept into the compiler, but fortunately just a handful.
Do your homework: find the firms you want to engage with before attending, call them A firms, call the rest B firms.

Have two talking points based on recent news releases and one on company culture for each A firm. When you go to the fair, learn from the B firms: what are they pitching (they might switch to A status), and most important of all, use B firms to master your general networking/pitching.

Then, and only then, go stand and smile next to the A firm recruiter—yes the one talking to others. Stand patiently and smile. Once they notice andEngage with you, start drawing your talking points from memory. If you like the way it goes, hand then your card. Your card should not be cute, it should be clean. Recruiters talk to a ton of people at student fairs, when you hand them your card after speaking intelligently to them, they take notice and they pocket your card. Given that 99% of the other students don’t have cards, the recruiter will walk away with a dozen or two tops. And, when they receive your thank you email in their inbox the next morning, they’ll grab a hotel pen, find your card and put a start on it.

Congratulations, you just made great impressions on your favorite companies.

Just remember, even if you win the rat race, you’re still a rat. So, use that first internship to learn tools, write down ALL the stupid things you see the firm doing, write this down in notebooks. You will fill three this summer and three next summer. Three years after graduation, you’ll have many notebooks covering all the things you don’t ever want your company to do.

Congratulations, you just increased your startup’s likelihood of making it to an A round by 100,000%

I could keep going, but I’m going to save the rest for chapters 2-10.

Final thoughts: be thoughtful, be hyper critical of everything you observe at fairs and jobs—but keep that to your self, and rather than getting frustrated, take that energy and ask yourself how YOU will do it differently when you’re the boss.
Even in the best cases (i.e. where there isn't intentional voter suppression and gerrymandering), this is a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem. In my Seattle, for instance, city candidates will usually spend most of their canvassing efforts on (wealthier, older) homeowners rather than (pooorer, younger) renters. They do this because they know that homeowners will vote at much higher rates than renters. Yet this is something of a self-fulfilling prophecy: renters are also less likely to vote because none of the candidates have bothered reaching out to them.

So it's generally hard - for good reason - to persuade young people that any of the political candidates on the slate care about them. This has only barely begun to change recently.
I updated the code to highlight the principle a bit better.
You might not even know it if you see it! It might be dog whistles that you don't even understand until it's pointed out to you.
Sorry but I'm exciting as a Chinese coz the gov think in long term and do good for the entire country in building such infrastructure.

>>autocratic and repulsive...
I agree the govt's autocratic but disagree it's repulsive.
Well in SV all you have to do is work at a startup for more than a year to get "promoted" to senior/lead developer, so it's not surprising that many people applying for those roles aren't actually at that level.
There's a few factors at play. To name a couple:

1) A lack of ability to outsource memory to the written word. I forget who it was, but either Plato or Aristotle was famously against writing because they said it would degrade human's capacity for memory (and "learning" if I recall correctly, though this was arguably wrong).

2) Perhaps even more importantly, the content of the time was shaped to the available medium. It's no accident that epic poetry from the oral tradition universally contains huge amounts of redundancy and pattern: meter, repeated adjectival phrases, character epitaphs or titles, etc.
I have two Hondas with this feature and once you have it, it feels frankly unsafe to drive other cars (even with various other tricks). Once you realize how wide the angle of the camera is you basically never have to turn your head away from looking forwards.

I only wish that it also worked for the left-side mirror as well. My understanding is that Hondas new all electric cars will feature cameras instead of mirrors entirely.
TBH, it's not far off...

I've done 200+ problems on leetcode, all of ctci, and lots more. Hundreds of hours of prep over the last 5 years. Never received an offer from FAANG after 10+ on-sites with them. Know others with similar experience. People I know who get offers are even more aggressive with prep but also get lucky. (As they sometimes get rejected even when they've received an offer from the company before...)
Accessing the Clipboard in JavaScript Using the Async Clipboard API
I am a young person who greatly favors building new housing!

Any and all housing built to last, and be owned, managed, and maintained by the municipal, state, or federal government and undercut “market” rental rates gets an OK from me! The sky is the limit!
SSH Man-in-the-Middle Attack and Public-Key Authentication Method (2010)
I view these systems as a backup in case I miss the danger, not as a primary.
I'm more mid-level in my career, but this a great point. Maybe my strategy in my parent comment, only works to a certain level. Beyond that, perhaps you do have to move into FANG's. There very well could be limits I haven't reached yet.
The title of this article literally reads "Why do those with unlimited power not take steps to limit their power?".

Also, name ONE company with INFINITE resources.
There's a Playstation 2 FPS that focuses on a miner uprising on Mars (with destroyable walls) that gamed this out:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Faction_(video_game)

>Red Faction takes place on Mars around the year 2075. Earth's minerals are being depleted and humans need more of them to survive. The vast Ultor Corporation runs the mining operation on Mars. The living conditions are deplorable, human rights for the miners are few, and a disease called "The Plague" is running rampant throughout the colony with no known antidote available—predominantly within the confines of the mine complex. Parker, a downtrodden miner, came to Mars to make a new start in his life—taken in by the promises and advantages Ultor has to offer in the mines of Mars. After a routine day in the mine with the typical aggression toward miners and cramped living conditions and poor nutrition, he witnesses the spark that starts a rebellion when a security guard abuses a miner at the end of his shift and heartlessly kills him.[5] Parker takes up arms, with the help of Hendrix, a rebellious Ultor security technician who guides Parker through the complex.
It's not "career advice" - i.e., something people can contemplate and act on to improve their career. It's just inflammatory social commentary.
One neuron versus deep learning in aftershock prediction
I get that, but it seems strictly better than, for example, blowing up a trail full of oil cars.
> the letter raises concerns that Facebook’s plan to build

> end-to-end encryption into its messaging apps will prevent

> law enforcement agencies from finding illegal activity

> conducted through Facebook, including child sexual

> exploitation, terrorism, and election meddling.

Not buying the case for the protection of children from the UK, after repeated failures to protect children despite mountains of evidence [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. Finding pedophiles is relatively easy in the UK, they are one of the single most hated groups and often cited as the reason to bring back capital punishment.

Terrorists are already using encrypted chat services such as Telegram to evade intelligence agencies. Encryption has no influence over election meddling.

What this is really about is watching the general public. Facebook now blocks content even in private messages. The other day I wanted to share a free-documentary (i.e. fully legal) with a friend and so shared a page with a direct download and magnetic link, which in turn Facebook kindly blocked. Something that is pouted as "safety" is actually just about trying to line the pockets of the film/music industry.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploit...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derby_child_sex_abuse_ring

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huddersfield_grooming_gang

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile_sexual_abuse_scan...

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester_child_sex_abuse_rin...

[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcastle_sex_abuse_ring

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Wales_child_abuse_scanda...

[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oulu_child_sexual_exploitation...

[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_child_sex_abuse_ring

[10] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring
Feeding examples generated by an attack back into the network is a very classical defense mechanism. This works ok, but it is not attack-agnostic, and removing adversarial points works better in 3D. There are also works (mostly in 2D) on detecting adversarial examples with neural networks.

I am not sure about statistical identification, but we show that it is difficult to identify and remove adversarial points by looking for statistical outliers points.

I am not sure about truly robust 3D-specific defenses---if anyone has some idea, I am open to collaboration. I would imagine some sort of provably robust method built specifically to handle the varying density and distribution of points.
I claim Citizen Privilege per the Constitution and the "... Supreme Court has found that the Constitution implicitly grants a right to privacy against governmental intrusion from the First Amendment, Third Amendment, Fourth Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment."
Law enforcement rooted out criminals and organized crime before end-to-end encryption and you can do so now.
YOU, a hypocrite who testified he was against law enforcement spying on Americans while investigating if a possible crime was occurring ... even if they have probable cause.
Public Safety my Ass!
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Right_to_privacy
Replacing an old building involves tearing down the old building. If somebody lived in it, and cannot afford the rent cost in the new building, they are displaced!

Building a new building does not make the rental price of old buildings go down!
SEEKING WORK | Asia. Internet. Planning to relocate to Canada soon | Working remote since start of my career

From developing MVPs from scratch alone, to doing growth hacking, to leading international teams spanning across continents, I have done it all. I have a solid track record of delivering projects when others have failed.

Resume: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fvnKGKM6T2yAtkMhShAyxJtS....

Technologies: Rails 2.x, Rails 3.x, Rails 4.x , Rails 5.x, Rails 6.x Sinatra, Ruby 1.8, Ruby 1.9, Ruby 2.x, Elixir/Phoenix React.js, Haml, Sass, Bootstrap, Javascript, CoffeeScript, Jquery, Spring, Zeus, Geokit, Geocoder, ImageMagick, MiniMagick, Rmagick, PalerClip, CarrierWave, Devise, Sidekiq, ActiveAdmin, RailsAdmin, CanCan, Nokogiri, FriendlyId, Ckeditor, Liquid, SimpleForm, Rspec, Cucumber, Postgresql, Mysql Git, Github, Vim, Ubuntu

Email: sunil.sks222@gmail.com
I interviewed with Lyft for a front end SWE role and got no leetcode questions. I ran through a bunch of 45-minute "make-this-thing-in-React" panels, and passed all with flying colors. That's only one example, but the type of questions I find unusually challenging (dynamic programming) -- the only time I was asked those, was at Google.
Is a higher-paying job the goal of UBI? I thought the fundamental macro issue was that as automation of one kind or another becomes an increasingly inherent part of new technologies, it will inevitably depress the human job market beyond its ability to employ enough people to maintain the economy.
I like it. Only thing I'd change is maybe the stars to be a fainter, more blue hue, and maybe have them as points or subtly x shaped, just to help visually distinguish the ball.
Very real effect. I argue with the massive increase in surveillance that I should never have to submit a form or write a contract again, particularly with government. Simply answering yes/no to the correct question that is recorded and databased should count as effectively as filling out the endless DMV forms. All of the corresponding ID work has already been done once country-wide face recognition is in place and the phone can act as a physical confirmation device.

Radical vulnerability is the only way forward. There are comedians like Dara O Briain asking young people not to take dick pics or sex videos (for the love of christ), because it ends up on the cloud and out from there. But I argue if you are going to shine a light on everything, then you have to take it all. The only way to combat the panopticon is to radically reveal everything you can consciously do, and then hold the authority to the same higher moral standard. An elected official cannot be as vulnerable as your average citizen and they must be pressed to create safe harbours from the eye of computing judgement. Once the politicians have protected themselves the line between privacy and transparency will have been renegotiated and it will spread downwards.

The problem with the Panopticon as a model for current society is that the criminality in the story removes innocence. We have plenty of innocents that need protecting. Protecting from the world but also the Panopticon itself, which changes the model from a power dynamic to something more fluid.
Given that the revolution was in 1917, and how much the working class urbanized following the revolution, I'd have a hard time believing that pre-revolution housing stock was sufficient beyond the first decade. Surely much built-to-suit communal housing must have been made in the 60+ years of communist rule.
The whole West Coast is a perfect example for this. How does a train between Vancouver and Seattle take 4 freaking hours?
The specific technology is irrelevant from a philosophical standpoint. What I mean is that fundamental rights enumerating individual freedoms for people were thought out and documented into law by the founders of the US. Even though they didn't realize there would be jet planes, the internet, or cars the founders thought about what it truly means to be free and for the government to be limited from trampling our rights. People have allowed these freedoms to be slowly restricted one at a time basically giving over control of their lives to the government. Technology enables a level of control and surveillance that could never have been imagined 300 years ago and so it has become even more important for us to fight back and remove the ability of our government to oppress. If we don't then in a few hundred years time our children will be slaves to a complete surveillance and control system that we probably can barely imagine today.
He's on Windows 2000, though, which doesn't offer anything newer than TLS 1.0 support. Not really useful for the modern web.
Oh, actually I'm also interested in how you made the levels. Because of the computational difficulty of solving similar things (eg the three-body problem is hard) and you've got several variables to work with, did you just experiment with each level and place the holes retroactively based on an interesting shot you found?

Or did you have to do a bucketload of math to work out where to place things?
Ditto for my '16.

Apparently instead of just making the pillars thicker to satisfy rollover ratings like many manufacturers, they used some engineering and higher strength materials to reinforce it. (https://www.subaru.ca/WebPage.aspx?WebSiteID=282&WebPageID=2...)

My wife (unfortunately) has a Jeep Renegade. Every time I get in it I'm surprised she doesn't get in more accidents. Never mind the A/B pillars, the C pillar is like a solid foot and a half wide: https://st.motortrend.com/uploads/sites/10/2016/05/2016-jeep...

If you try and back out of somewhere at an angle you're backing out 100% blind.
Check out old Mae West movies where she adheres to the letter of the Hayes Code yet always finds a saucy way to get her point across. A couple classics:

Reporter: "What do you think of foreign affairs?"
West: "I'm all for 'em!"

"Is that a gun in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?"

Language is infinitely malleable. Algorithms don't stand a chance.
Many answers suggest passing -Wall -Wextra to the compiler. In my experience, this misses many useful warnings. Here's a good list of additions warnings that usually produce useful results:

https://kristerw.blogspot.com/2017/09/useful-gcc-warning-opt...
Not sure why you're being downvoted. It's definitely not that hard, and contributing to LLVM/Rust/V8 is not a requirement either (I would still recommend it, but mostly because it sounds interesting and you would likely learn a lot).

Source: interviewed with 3 FANGs a few months ago without any significant open-source contributions, got L6 or equivalent offers from all 3. I also don't have a CS degree, for anyone who would feel discouraged by that.

Edit: I don't want to minimize the effort involved, though—I did spend a lot of time learning algorithms and data structures over the years, but I enjoy learning this stuff and find it far more relevant in practice than most people here appear to think.
There's a highway near me with periodic lights triggered by the cross traffic such that you almost always have to stop. The limit is 55 mph, but if you see someone on the side street and speed up to, say 70, to try to beat the light, you will probably see it turn yellow within a second and have to stop anyway. There aren't that many lights, but you almost always have to stop for every one because of the cross traffic taking precedence.
Ask HN: Who is building something that will change the world?
Who are the Apple's of this generation? What is a young Wozniak or Jobs doing in the 21st century? Where can you find them?
I was under the impression that before AWS, Amazon did SOA'd almost the entirety of its departments, as in OP mail, every dept had to enable web services to other depts, creating an environment where

Between 2000/2003 Amazon started to learn how to properly make something that resembled AWS (launched in 2006), it was a necessity targeted towards scalability. What Yegge letter meant is that Amazon was doing SOA to all its depts, making these be useful both internally and externally

>"5) All service interfaces, without exception, must be designed from the ground up to be externalizable. That is to say, the team must plan and design to be able to expose the interface to developers in the outside world."

So you see, it wasn't to enable AWS as the digital service as we know it, it was to build a scalable company that could use everything it had both to serve its needs, and also to sell it as a product (then, all services we all know EC2 etc). Bezos applied SOA as a company, not only to its digital philosophy. And this corporate move, with no precedent, enabled not only AWS, but the whole Amazon as it is today.
A lot of books in libraries can't be repurchased easily. Personally, I've had two books I've placed on hold turn up lost recently and they're both out of print. Considering both books are over $300 on used book sites, I rather doubt that they were lost.
They’re pro-whatever-gets-them-political-wins. Sometimes it’s “protect rights of businesses!” sometimes it’s “think of the children!” ️
Sorry to hear that but you really don’t need to be contributing to the projects mentioned to get in. Theres tens to hundreds? of thousands of FAANG employees and I assure the majority are not at that caliber.

It’s nice to glamourize it a bit but you guys make it sound downright mythical.
More generally, and as hinted to by floatingatoll, the the 'X minutes ago' is also a permalink meaning after you click on it you can bookmark it in any bokmarking system you use. (I use pinboard.in)

Also FWIE, going to the permalink for a comment also gives you access to the flag feature.
In favor of hsr, but still with some big assumptions and limited distances. The fuel factor is huge, but still relatively comparable between modes, and it's all heavily dependent on % of empty seats.

95% is extreme, but it's usually assumed to be in the 55-65% range for generic civil infrastructure, not hsr specific. Compared to that hsr is heavy on concrete and steel, so would be higher.

Embedded rail infrastructure costs are calculated based on near track capacity (amortized over 30-50 years, which is generally correct for civil projects), and typically near train capacity. Empty trains are much worse than empty airplanes, and if ridership isn't projected accurately pulling a train from a route doesn't reclaim any embedded costs of the track or row, while airline infrastructure can be completely reallocated. Multiply a miscalculated capacity by 50 years and it turns into a big number.

I'm about 2/10 so far on finding these papers I'm looking for today, but this one at least addressed ridership implications for the California project in terms of LCA.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014...

And arguing for the greater use of LCA in passenger studies:

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024...

And here's one comparing air to hsr in Europe, showing only 3%-20% gains by shifting passengers from air to rail, based on existing infrastructure, but using LCA assuming a %50 recyclable rate for rail.

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jat/2018/6205714/
Perhaps a “fake table” (e.g. a view) that is the result of two tables being joined but presents itself as a normal table with the expected columns? That would be a very declarative way of querying joined tables, but yeah, you’d still have to create the views or have some means of declaring the appropriate relationships between tables. ORMs sort of let you do this, like in Django where you declare that a User has many Permissions and the ORM knows how to generate that JOIN query for you.
Admittedly I don't particularly follow Marc Benioff and / or Salesforce in the news much, but is his advocacy for privacy laws generally considered be an attempt towards regulatory capture?

Relevant quote: “We need a national privacy law,” he said. “Otherwise you’re going to get a patchwork of privacy laws. We have to get our privacy and data locked down so we know where we’re going. [Regulators] need to be stepping in now and they should be working hard to make those changes.”
Last week I got my comment downvoted and flagged for suggesting someone needed to read Foucalt.

I still think a lot of you need to read Foucalt.
Location: Bangladesh

Remote: Open

Willing to relocate: Yes

Technologies: Python, Django, Elasticsearch, PostgreSQL, Kubernetes, Docker

Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/safwan-rahman/

Email: safwan.rahman15 at gmail.com

Github: https://github.com/safwanrahman/
In what ways is your resume unconventional?

I'm pursuing a Math degree, and my strategy has been to tailor to tech companies by getting involved in organizations and starting side projects. I've interned at [LARGE GRAPHICS CARD COMPANY] after my sophomore year because I did signal processing for a student organization.