skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> And if you build your worth on your gender should I really be interested? It was your choice.

We live in a world where entire social structures are built up based on gender. It's not a choice.

Also, it's not about "worth". It's about identity. If we lived in some alien society that defined nothing along gender lines and didn't even have gender specific pronouns, maybe there would be some merit to the argument. But we don't and there's none.
Theoretically it works. If Facebook's implementation is actually sound and trustworthy is another problem...
“constituencies” is a great untruth isn’t it, they largely serve themselves and the people who give them money.
> Yeah homebrew does that remote lookup thing when I try to complete `brew install xx<TAB>`.

AFAIK Homebrew doesn't do remote lookup, you can try it out by turning off your Wi-Fi & autocompleting formula names still work.

> Because of the delay, it's not a good way to discover packages at all

The delay is due to ruby's slow speed, it looks like home-brew just searches the whole formula directory with ruby.
Pibot PUBG Stream Highlights #2
This is really nice. I have a semi-abandoned project that uses PHash to canvas my photo library to flag duplicates, and am quite likely to use this instead.

Now if only Apple hadn’t repeatedly broken PyObjC over the years...
> Worse, through our handling of this situation, we made [members of the LGBTQ+ community] a target for harassment as people debated their right to express themselves and be addressed according to how they identify

I wonder how is that possible, the QA are as anonymous as each user wants to be and regarding QA, is there any question in which people cannot ask anything and should not be replied with a proper rationalized argumentation?

How does it help a bullied child to be the protected kid of the teacher? In the other hand the day we stop having open debates, QA and knowledge, we will be going backwards in scientific evolution, no matter what the topic is.
Life of Tyler Perry's Studio Grand Opening in Atlanta
More generally, the world is simply not fair or just.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis
SO has been on the decline quite long already, drowning in a sea of homework question, fix my bugs beggars and editors running perfectly fine answers. finding relevant solutions is as hard as ever and asking moderately difficult questions just gets you nowhere. long standing issues, like a way to tag library versions to avoid people ending in stale answers or restrict your area of expertise properly as to be able to quickly network with other in the field working on the same problem were never addressed, meanwhile we got a disfunctional job board that did the opposite of attracting talent, resulting instead in a horde of resume padding desperados copy pasting answer off a script in all questions tagged java or xml

the moment to remove that sticker was c.a 2013
especially as the author works from home so I assume could choose to live anywhere?
I think people are just too afraid too share, as they are effectively doing fun things but... really they then think that it is just crap.
We are too much in a society that is telling us that if we made it in less than an hour, it can only be crap. This is one thing the the near futur of the earth must fix ;)

If sharing IS important for you, change you design in the way that it becomes the default option.
Railways can be privatized if you keep the infrastructure (rails) public. Public railway infrastructure then charge the rail companies for usage of the rails. This should work in theory.

About affordable inter-city buslines, I feel that the new companies (uber like) that handle buses brought much more affordability than any law before.
You don't need child exploitation as bogeyman. There is also plenty of organized and disorganized crime and terrorism that is routinely disrupted by surveillance.
So now, when referring to an Adam in a third person, I have to write things like "I like 2019-10-07!his answer, ..."?
Was this by way of FOIA request, or another process?

(I ask because I'm looking for a pet project to test drive the FOIA process on.)
I was referring to the formality of CoCs vs more informal approaches to disagreements.

So in this context, "pick your battles" means that not every dispute is worth escalating and mediating in the context of a CoC. More often than not, when you have been wronged it is better to just walk away rather than intensifying the dispute.

As for "life isn't fair", It is misleading to think that a CoC is going to eliminate unfairness, sometimes things won't go your way and you should accept that and move on rather than reach towards contractual or legal frameworks for some sort of resolution.
Lyft, sure. Tesla? Maybe he hasn’t driven one? It’s just a better car than a BMW 3-Series. If the Tesla truck is better than an F-150....
Well, trivially that's a yes. However, the "specification level breach" property of A.T.'s work is what intrigued me - i.e. the circuits are specified to do a digital task, but work in an analog manner - constructing antennas and receivers - to the extent that the same digital circuit wouldn't work when written to another FPGA.

Also, entanglement doesn't need to be perfect. You can have 1% entanglement too and have that propagate over time and operations. The question is whether an evolved circuit can figure out pathways to use that little bit of entanglement in ways that our understanding doesn't quite admit .. in much the same way as a digital FPGA designer wouldn't think about using not-gates as antennae.

An unreliable circuit achieved this way would also be interesting I think.
I too made the switch from LastPass and I find Bitwarden heaps better in every single aspect. More reliable autofil, better UI and better mobile app.
Definition incomplete. It's also used for the other way around. like when something broke, you call the help desk. Technician shows up and it works then!
Based on Monica Cellio's blogpost (https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/2064709.html), I think what happened is that, last year, she posted saying that she prefers, when possible, to refer to people in ways that don't require using pronouns at all. Later, this was misinterpreted to mean that she refused to use people's requested pronouns, and she was fired from her position. That might have been reasonable if she had actually said that, but it sounds like she didn't say anything of the sort.

That makes me think that it's not really about pronouns, it's about people using bad-faith misinterpretation and unjustified accusations to hold a witch-hunt. Pronouns are just the purported subject.

But I'm new to the whole kerfuffle, so I may be missing something.
Please explain to me how giving producers, traffickers and consumers of child pornography would not benefit from easy and hurdle-less end-to-end encryption.

I'm not saying that this is a good reason to stop Facebook from implementing this. But there is no question that it is going to make the lifes of a lot of criminals a whole lot easier.

We may imagine criminals, especially the semi-organized ones, to be experts in cryptography or at the very least covert communications. They really aren't. If they can just use their usual facebook accounts, they'd really appreciate that.
Original URL (business insider simply copy / pasted): https://www.profgalloway.com/mdma

Tiny previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21163923
My guess is that it has to do with low worker motivation, both from lack of individual incentives and organizational inertia. My friends in government jobs know what their promotions will be for the next 30 years and there is no allowance for variability based on personal performance. This prevents nepotism and corruption, but also means that leadership is based on seniority, not competence.

It would be interesting to see how successful governments manage promotion of talent.
Note that Fullerton's apology lacks any reference to Stack Exchange's turn towards the press during the controversy. As brought up in the Dear Stack Exchange letter (and in numerous Meta posts over the last week), it is concerning that SE would be willing to make a (potentially libelous) statement to the press, while refusing the same to the community.

This conspicuous absence makes me question the authenticity of the apology.
Key ideas in computer science, such as for instance Chomsky grammars, are derived directly from linguistics.

I don't think it's fair to say that approaching a foreign language has nothing to do with approaching a new programming language.
I did not use FOIA. I just showed up at there offices and worked my way up to the most senior person who would talk to me.
Even if we accept public surveillance I think technology has to be the boundary. We push so much data into our smartphones, most of us literally sending our thoughts through private companies non-stop.

To allow digital surveillance is to allow the government into your head and our children's heads.

No.

It stops here.
The folks moderating SE are very pedantic about the wording of passages. Once I called SE a "forum", and I was politely told not to call SE a "forum". I would really hate to be a person that is not very fluent in English and trying to interact with SE.
Bill Gates presents Windows 98 and plugs USB device in -> blue screen!

"Demo effect" is the English version for this.
Does anyone else find it ironic that Stack Exchange, a company which replaced a website that was often misnamed "ExpertSexchange", is now going through controversy related to the misnaming of sexchanged people?
Most likely yes. But, as I noted in another comment, that would still be interesting since we can test for entanglement on a larger scale. I'm kind of expecting error correction to "evolve" in the iterations. Robustness can come later.
While I'm happy you are having success and enjoying Haskell, I feel in the context of this article (you can have success in Haskell with a small easy fragment of the language), the use of the "Lens" package means you can no longer claim to be writing easy simple Haskell, unless you are using it in some way I'm unfamiliar with :)
I tried mightily to go all digital with recipes, but ultimately I went back to 3” x 5” lined note cards with optimally abbreviated instructions and measurements. I use small magnets to attach them to the vent-hood over the stove to keep them from becoming sullied. Using the refrigerator any other magnetic surface obviously works equally well. All the recipes are stored in an easily accessible wooden box that was handed down to me by my grandmother. I find this to be the best solution.
Google said no to China's censorship and is doing pretty well.
Get a laminator?
How do you have unique emails per site?
Two types of presenter – The autopilot majority vs. the mindful minority
> (I know "fascism" is the wrong word here, but what's the correct word for "fascism-like, but with $random-issue instead of nationality, and without the far-right"? We need that word.)

I think Social Justice Warriors is the proper term.
Cool! Will check it out and see if it defeats my own system. Also great you started cooking yourself. It is a great way to relax and be creative. Hard work pays off afterwards:)
Ill write down my way of working, hopefully it inspires you.

My current system is: when i have found and tested a good recipe, i copy/paste it into an email and email to myself, with a headline prefixed with “recipe”, for example “recipe: soto ayam”. Copy pasting recipes is important, as websites blog posts disappear quite often.

Email is always with me, gmail has a very good search engine. Content is free form.

Usually i can just copy/paste (missing) ingredients into the google keep list i share, for groceries, with my better half.

Additionally i can share recipes with her by mailing them, although sharing links would be more convenient.

Will try it out later this week when i probably come up with a never before tried recipe.
Thanks Dat for open sourcing it, once again I'm shamelessly linking my Kaggle Kernel with `imagededup` installed https://www.kaggle.com/nulldata/image-duplicates-without-dee.... This one used `PHash()` and a run time less than 88 seconds.

Anyone can just simply fork this kernel and add their dataset to it and perform the task!
That argument seems to stem from a profound lack of understanding about how child abuse, trafficking and pornography works.

These children don't have relatives who can or want to protect them, and that's the whole deal. Either the government enforces their rights, or they don't have any.

This is really not a hill limited-government activists should try to defend....
> What? Sure they do. They were clothing that puts them in a particular group. (Or do you feel you'd have a hard time identifying punks or businessmen?) Or they'll wear religious symbols. Or speak with an accent. Or carry a firearm. Or any number of other external identity markers beyond gender.

None of that is control, and it would be equivalent of a transsexual choosing their dress and appearance - which they already do.

It isn't that these requests are unreasonable, it is simply that this is a situation that goes well beyond basic politeness. This is asking society to change how it uses language.

And this change being achieved by bureaucratic fiat rather than because everyone thinks it is a good idea. It may or may not work out, but it just isn't basic politeness - there is real change being pushed here.
Bizarre gives me no information on what's wrong with it. Care to elaborate?
I'm using a MBP 2015 myself, so I do have an escape key. Regardless I bound it to my Caps Lock key because that's the position I use on my personal custom keyboards. You can do this natively in "System Preferences > Keyboard > Modifier Keys". You can change all your modifier keys there to whatever modifier key you like.

I very much prefer typing on a separate keyboard though, I don't really understand the people who just work straight on their laptop all day. Get yourself a screen (or more than 1) and work with a keyboard and mouse, far better ergonomically.
Location: Shanghai China

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies:
Languages - PHP, Python, JavaScript, HTML, CSS, mysql
Framework/toos - laravel, tornado, angular, nodejs, express, sequelize, mocha, jasmine, git, gitflow, jira, docker, jquery

Résumé/CV: https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ug3opuz25f2n0l/Tom%20You_Resume_2...

Email: email.tomyou@gmail.com

I am a full stack developer worked with various stacks and languages for 10 years.
Though whatever data is "lost" in a password manager is usually recoverable; each password could be individually reset in each website. True though that it's a pain.
Price controls is an unfairly simple way to say that the company signed a long-term contract in which the city covered 2/3rds of the construction costs and set the fare at a maximum of 5 cents for most rides for the next 49 years.

When the company tried to raise the fare to 7 cents, they were disallowed by the courts because they couldn't prove the 5 cents fare was confiscatory.

I understand the city could raise the fare to benefit the company, but that isn't their obligation.

I would assume you're libertarian from the point you've made, and am curious whether you believe it was right for the contract to be enforced as it was agreed upon.
I think it ultimately boils down to what future does Silicon Valley want for itself. The Silicon Valley may be ideal for the top 10% of developers, who benefit from compensation that is high enough to be able to afford to live in central locations in Silicon Valley. But what about the remaining 90%? What about those who don't work for FAANGs, unicorns, or VC-funded high-growth startups? They will eventually have to leave as they won't be able to keep up with the ever-rising cost of living here, but will Silicon Valley still be an innovative place in their absence? Will those remaining in Silicon Valley want to strike it out on their own, or will they play it safe in order for them to afford their housing costs? Will pushing out the other 90% of developers led to missed opportunities by VCs, who may turn down an unconventional business idea that may turn out to be the next huge, lucrative industry? That's why I believe Silicon Valley should address its housing problems; its engine of innovation may be threatened if large amounts of engineers leave for cheaper places where they can afford to take risks and where they can afford to work for other types of companies.
Ask HN: What are the other companies you'll never work for?
What are the companies you should absolutely avoid?

Why? Culture? CEO? Management? Customers?
Open Source Data Management Software Survey
That is a strawman argument and nobody actually proposed that.

Human trafficking and the distribution of child pornography is a valid concern and distinct from familiar abuse. Just that you can only fight one of these issues through technological means does not mean you shouldn't.
If you ever discover the technique, please also make the civilization finally do something about climate change and getting us gently off the exponent in our economies. Sincerely, a time traveller from the 2080s.
exactly "they" are people who create problems where they dont exist.

if YOU specifically dont have a specific preferred pronoun then theres no problem to be concerned over. editing posts to be gender neutral is the most privileged form of outrage ever
As long as the lines are still running at max capacity, you are still taking the same number of vehicles off the road. If you extend the period of max-capacity, you taking more cars off the road.

The question is if the benefit of more revenue and environmental savings warrants making the secretaries an cashiers adapt to less efficient schedules (eg come in earlier, stay later)
This kind of chat is not on SO though.
You can always switch to VK.
Int8[0 0 0 5 4 6 0 0 9;
0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7;
0 0 3 9 0 0 0 0 4;
9 0 5 0 0 0 0 7 0;
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0;
0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 0;
0 5 6 0 0 8 0 0 0;
0 1 0 0 3 9 0 0 0;
0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 6]
It really is absurd!
Bullying anyone for anything will already get you kicked off of those sites.
It is such an odd hill for them to want to die on.
> Now this was my first time in europe,i was shocked to see people were doing stuff outside of tech

I don't know where you're from but regardless, there are young folks working jobs outside of tech literally everywhere. Unless you work, sleep and spend your spare time in Google's HQ or something. How is this shocking?
Also the security of the theoretic primitives behind symmetric encryption rely on the existence of pseudorandom generators / pseudorandom functions ect. which is not proven either. On top of this, AES for example is "only" an apporoximation of what a pseudorandom function really is. In the end these ciphers are secure as long as nobody finds a flaw in them. However, flawed implementations are the main risk.
fix a small monitor in your kitchen and add leap motion controller (https://www.leapmotion.com/where-to-buy/us/)

I have not tried it but it should solve your problem
That's with $random-issue = something from the bag of things related to gender identity and minorities. I wonder if there's a more general term, partly because I have the feeling that the very use of "SJW" is now perceived by many as association with far-right.
TLDR version: duct tape and hundreds of people helping prevent the contraption from falling apart :-)

That’s not the scary part, though. The scary part is that those completion scripts run with the user’s privileges, unsandboxed. I could find only a single CVE (https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2018-7738/), but I think it would be wise to sandbox these scripts.
The most stunning part of this is that there exists a robust, competitive minesweeper community.

Also a key bit that is a little buried: “on roland's vid the board before the dreamboard is the same as the one on matt's 10sec vid. this board has a large significant opening in the top left corner. so i think roland's method or at least a possible method is this: you put the cursor in the top left corner and keep hitting the left mouse and the F2 button until you get that particular opening. pretty dull, but it works! that way you already know that you're getting the dreamboard before you start the board itself.”
But that diminishes their Power. That’s it.
I see the moderators as (major) part of the problem.

> There was a time when the most valuable asset of the Stack Exchange network was the people who freely contributed their time and energy to build communities in support of its mission.

Deleting valid or interesting questions is not something I consider to be a valuable contribution.
Free speech doesn't come into it at all.

If a government wants to limit your free speech it will do that, no matter the technology. In western society, the defense of free speech has to be done in the open, and through the democratic process.

Lack of end-to-end encryption in Facebook does not affect anybody's free speech rights. Not even in authoritarian countries, because those will just block facebook if they can't crack it or haven't already.
thats not a problem either. you cant force people to say anything.
Because given the prominence of identity as a central cultural debate, this essay comes across as tone deaf. I said it still might be because there's a tendency to judge past works by todays moral standards. For for instance, look at the twitter kerfuffle that ensued when Netflix decided to carry the old television show Friends.
Stack Exchange is now a political battleground and long are gone the days when it was a tool for sharing technological knowledge. They are now competing who is more oppressed instead of who knows more.

That's what you get when you let ideology become more important than the core of the product.

This is only the beginning of the downfall.
Yes, I think moderators aren't to blame for the poor quality of the experience (mostly).

But I think this recipe is a disaster: users downvote and close-vote. Moderators look at votes and clean up accordingly. I think the problem is that the algorithms allow a small group of drive-by downvoters to destroy the experience. I'd be more than willing to accept a somewhat lower content quality for a more friendly experience.
Some feedback - Clicked on a random soup recipe, it gave a photo, the ingredient list, but for the instructions it wanted me to go to some other site. This is inconvenient and it also carries a real rick of losing the recipe if the external link 404-s (see the LuckyPeach fiasco, for example).

I realize there might be some copyright issues, but for me, as a user, they don't exist when I copy recipes to my own private collection, so I would expect any online version of it to behave the same way. It needs to keep full versions of every recipe and an optional "source" link.

I'm not interested in calorie counting as a central feature, so the way the site functions right now is not dramatically better than just keeping a plain bookmark list.

EDIT - I can formalize my main gripe now.

Above, you describe the site as a way to _organize my recipes_, where in reality it's more of community _index_ of recipe _links_ with some diet-oriented extras. That's the main issue. It doesn't actually do well what you describe at the top, but it does well some other thing that's mentioned at the bottom.
Yes.

After WWII, the US imposed a constitution on Japan. Here's Article 21: "Freedom of assembly and association as well as speech, press and all other forms of expression are guaranteed.
No censorship shall be maintained, nor shall the secrecy of any means of communication be violated."

All wiretapping was illegal in Japan until 1999.[1] Even today, it's very rare. 40 wiretaps in 2017.[2]

[1] https://www.iol.co.za/mercury/world/japan-passes-controversi...

[2] https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20170217/p2a/00m/0na/01...
You can self host Bitwarden or use the cloud version