skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Ahh, the old "you can't joke about anything anymore". The laziest excuse for crap comedy ever.

You have it backwards. It was always the best comedians who complained about censorship and how you can't joke about things -- people like Lenny Bruce, Richard Prior, George Carlin and anybody who offended the sensibilities and ideologies of their day, either political, moral, puritan, etc. (I'd add Zappa and other non-comedians). And nothing's more crap than the forced PC-oriented comedy, that reads more like a sermon and doesn't take any chances with the audience...

>Todd Philips- "You can't do edgy comedy anymore! SJW's ruined comedy!" Taika Waititi- "In my next comedy I play Hitler."

How's that a counter-argument? If anything making fun of Hitler and nazism has been the safest and most easily acceptable comedy trope ever since 1939 or so. It only took guts in the US back when Charlie Chaplin did it...
they were more peaceful in the sense that violence was individual and local to a large extent whereas once metals were introduced incidents took on a larger scale according to the article
> Intel NNP-T TSMC 16FF+

Intel has stuff made by other foundries?
You can use systemd-run with the --calendar option for one-off timers, it even supports the cron syntax.
I agree. As an example of just how offensive it was seen:

For Norway, Life of Brian represents the last time the country's anti-blasphemy law was used as justification for censorship (Life of Brian was not formally banned, but it initially did not get a classification, and so could not be shown in cinemas, at a time when there were few other options; it was finally granted classification about 6 months later). The law was finally repealed in 2015.

From the mid 70's until the law was struck off the Norwegian Heathen Society have periodically tried to provoke prosecution with the intent of triggering public opposition to the law, but they consistently failed to get the kind of reaction Life of Brian got.

Prior to that the last person affected was the poet/writer Arnulf Øverland, who in 1933 was charged (and acquitted) for the speech "Christianity – the tenth plague". The last conviction happened in 1912.

For something similar to happen again today would be near impossible - when the law was removed there had been cross party support for removing it for many years.

Of course that's one country, but similar secularisation has happened in large parts of the world, and I can think of very few parts of the world where the trend has gone in the other direction.
> with 'social media', the internet is finally seeing the real messiness of the real world

You only see loud, minority groups. It becomes evident that they 're a minority in every election
Does anybody suspect that software development is just that tad slightly a completely micro managed profession.
If you click into the manufacturer you can read details about how they came up with the rankings. For example,

> UPDATE: On some phones with EMUI 9+ (Android P+) Huawei introduced a new task killer app called PowerGenie which kills everything not whitelisted by Huawei and does not give users any configuration options. See below how to uninstall it.

Previous discussion on HN [1]

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18901006
Those are just regular GPUs (and one FPGA offering)
> although moderation was quite angry that I didn't choose an accepted answer within a day.

I don't know about Stack Overflow, which is the largest SE site, and may have some cultural differences.

But I'm pretty sure that accepting an answer within a day is strongly discouraged on all Stack Exchange sites in general. You should wait, at least one day before accepting it - some users may still want to answer it. I only accept answers when nobody posts new answers. Also, a user doesn't have to accept an answer, if none of the answer is helpful for solving the question - it has been discussed on Meta before.

Personally, if I asked a question and none of the answer solves the question, I'll accept the most helpful one. If none is helpful, I don't accept any answer, and usually I will be able to answer my own question and accept myself in the future.
I think they were referring to the fact that those are all bought in from outside vendors, rather than having their own custom accelerator chips produced like e.g. Google's TPUs.
How long did the generating take?
There's two ways of reading this. You can read it from a technical perspective and take the message of something along the lines of "Don't invest your ego into unnecessary technical questions because it'll stop you having logical and productive discussions". But if this were written today in the context of something like this SE issue you could read it as tone deaf - a trans-man/women doesn't choose to face discrimination, they don't have a choice over their identity, they merely express their identity, so telling them to "Keep your identity" small is basically akin to saying that they shouldn't express their identity - something that PG as a straight white male doesn't have to worry about.

Disclaimer: It was written in 2009, read in context it's very clear the first interpretation is the correct one, there's an entire concept of identity that didn't exist in the public discussion when this was written.
their battery and motor research are used in spaceX too. I 'm not saying they re making profits, but they have large market cap
Show HN: Small Clojure Interpreter
When I google the WSJ article URL, and click the link from the search results, I don't get a paywall.
A warrant can also authorize surveillance, at least in most countries. In Japan even that was impossible until 1999. That's why I said the Jakuza and other criminals in Japan probably liked that policy...

And both surveillance and the seizure of evidence are routinely the key to convicting criminals. Outlawing court-approved surveillance or even seizure of evidence makes basic laws, like against homicide, much less enforceable.
This "small" Clojure interpreter can be used from Clojure on the JVM and GraalVM and JavaScript/ClojureScript. It implements a subset of Clojure. The main goal is be able to execute snippets of Clojure in environments where you normally don't get to use Clojure's "eval" or where it isn't safe to do so.

Its main use is being the interpreter for https://github.com/borkdude/babashka, a native Clojure scripting tool which can be used to alleviate your bash pains, but it could potentially be interesting for other use cases too.

Malli (https://github.com/metosin/malli), a Clojure schema library, is using it for letting users express in code what they cannot do using the normal configuration language.

Closh is investigating if sci can be used to compile closh to native code using GraalVM: https://github.com/dundalek/closh/tree/feature/sci.

Undocumented features (still figuring out the best API):

- Explicit allowing and denying of certain symbols.

- Limit evaluation of infinite sequences.

A pure Java API is certainly possible if this is useful to anyone.
Some seniors don't even need a kanban board on a fast moving project, they just know what needs to be done now to create value at lowest cost, they just feel it.

These are always the worst people to work with, because they think they know much more than they do.

Frankly the most difficult parts of effective engineering are nothing to do with software and all to do with good team communications.
The problem is trying to formalise a process which should be different for each project and team. Instead of just using common sense and putting something in place to suit the situation people come with all those methodologies which are not really so sophisticated but rather complicates terminologies to such degrees that it looks as if it is sophisticated. It was true to waterfall and true to agile.

At the end of the day what you need is a homogenous team of good people that can do their job well and understand each other. They will figure out the right way to manage thing for the specific project.
Some people would say that "keep your identity small" is functionally (although not in tone or spirit) the same as saying "gay men, stay in the closet" because in the absence of anything saying otherwise, people will assume you're part of the majority.

Furthermore, some people would say that everyone staying in the closet is bad advice for the gay community overall, as it means the average person will only hear about the 1% of gay people who are arrested for sex crimes, not the 99% of gay people who are perfectly nice people living normal lives and minding their own business, or the great scientists and inventors and authors who happened to be gay.

This is, as I understand it, an area of substantial strength of feeling in the gay community - it's part of what underlies concepts like 'gay pride' and the famous chant "we're here, we're queer, we're not going to disappear".

And although I've used gay men in the example above, it applies to any minority group - although with different details, I've never seen a female programmers' pride march!
SeizedBatteryGate turned me off of Louis Rossman for life:

https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/9pow06/louis_rossman...

I liked the guy before he became a professional YouTuber who pretends to not be one.
A lot of HN commenters have a tendency to project what ever experience they have with poor management onto all management in general. Poorly run teams have problems, poorly run projects have problems, poorly designed apps have problems... But well runs teams exist, and they use a lot of the same management tools as the bad ones. I’ve had both great and terrible experiences with standups. In a well run team, I love them. But in a poorly run team, getting frustrated with the idea of standup is about is misguided as getting upset with Jira for your managers shortcomings.
As a self-described "average user of SE", I find this drama pretty similar to drama I've seen circling around the Quora "community" for the last 6 months or so: confusing.

I use both SE and Quora to get answers, especially to extremely-niche questions. I understand that some people do use them for community and that people do interact and know each other on both platforms, but it's hard to understand complaints about a subpar community when the goal of the site doesn't seem to revolve around a community at all.

To me, SE is a Q&A site. It exists to let people ask questions and get those questions answered. If you took away the community entirely, would it be any less useful?

This probably comes off a bit flippant to the situation, but it's meant to illustrate that you're right: I'd say I'm a pretty average user of SE (in that I just use it to get answers, and occasionally write my own answers when I can, and so far it's worked perfectly well for me) and I don't care one bit about community-based drama.
1. Model X sales aren't great, compared to SUV vs sedan sales for other manufactuers.

2. Other manufacturers have multiple mid-range sedan models. Honda has the Civic, the Insight, the Accord, the Clarity, and the Fit hatchback. Their sales are being split across five different low-mid-range models. Tesla has one. Toyota has the Yaris, the Corolla, the Prius, the Camry, the Avalon, and if you're some kind of lunatic, who for some insane reason wants a hydrogen fuel cell car, the Mirai. Again, for other auto manufacturers, sales in the same price/specs/form factor are split across five different models.

3. There's no reason to believe that five different Tesla sedan models are going to lead to anywhere close to 5x the demand. I mean, maybe if 4 of them are ICEs...
Don't forget about the Alt-Shift-U keyboard shortcut to open Bitwarden in a Firefox sidebar. Using that, the extension doesn't close when you click elsewhere in the page.
Why wouldn't you? These opcodes seems to be used by most people these days, so there seems to be no reason not to treat them just like any other opcode?
Sure, we aren't reverting to small scale communities. The police can go after predators in many ways, and asking to technically remove privacy from society should not be one of them. It's the lazy way and the police is addicted to it. We need the police to do better, and we also need absolute, unbreakable privacy, just like we can have in the physical world.
I think we need to be very careful when we talk about tone in text-based communication. One of the worst things about this new world of text-borne communication is that we lose most of what makes a conversation. There is no tone, there is no body language, there is no inflection.

So how can we truly judge the tone of a comment without inferring details? People today /seem/ to be so ready to disagree, so ready to argue, so on the edge when it comes to opinions, that even objective discussions and comments are taken as personal slights and overlaid with reader inferred malintent.

It's the reason why /I believe/ that people who argue on the internet would otherwise get on with each other in person.
The account was banned in 2017: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15691778

If a comment is marked as [dead] but not [flagged] it was killed automatically, usually for reasons related to the account, not the specific comment in question.
Thank you for explaining why my crappy thumb drives no longer interfere with my wifi!
> Also rooting is breaking the security model of the device which is also a dumb thing to do.

More often than not, that's security against the user, not for.
As a grunt, hate them but as a team leader they really help make my life easier. In short, depending on team size, you are sacrificing the producers to make the manager's job easier and unfortunately this is a decision that the manager gets to make, so guess what decision is made all the time.

The problem is that as a manager I don't want to look bad in front of my manager and he he/her manager's and so on and so forth, so I have to do things that are suboptimal from a delivery point of view to avoid this, e.g. run a stand up to keep a close eye on what everybody is working on rather than say not and ensure that they guys (and gals) know that I'm here to help should they get stuck.

To be fair, they do help with managing people that are, for whatever reason, reluctant to look for help, but there are other ways of managing this
Temporarily, eventual all social media evolves into the same thing.
I prefer the blade element theory physics of xplane. I started with Flight Simulator 4 waaaaay back in the day and I used to like the microsoft flight simulator, but since a long time I'm only using Linux which Xplane runs natively.
This type of article has far too broad a brush. It's like saying don't play 4-4-2 in football (soccer) because we just won a trophy using 3-5-1-1 so 4-4-2 killed your team's chances of success. It's so small minded it's incredible.

As a manager or as a team, you need to determine what will work best for your team and you will need to adapt.
As a long-time simmer, this is really impressive given the state of the art. A shame they did not adresse properly AI traffic and ATC which is really a big issue in current sims.
Last Chance to Attend Code Beam Lite Berlin 11 Oct
Depends on the size of your team. Once you get to 10+ people in a team, it's hard to spread information effectively with 1:1 communication. What I've liked about standups in teams of that size is the opportunity to kick of unexpected brainstorming because you mention what you're working on and someone mentions they have expertise/ideas in the area that you didn't know about.

There are of course many ways to run a productive team.
Seriously? Comedy is about laughing at death, misery, and everything in between.

Jewish comedians for example frequently joke about nazism and the holocaust, which is even worse (and more numbers wise) that the crossings, and they're not 30+ generations removed from it (like we are with Roman times), but one or two -- some even had parents who died there.

Comedy is not (or not just) about jolly people slipping on bananas and throwing tarts at each other...
An excellent place to get a loan
It seems they're downvoting my criticisms :-D
Why don't you familiarize yourself with it then? You're basically trying to argue a point you know nothing about, and then getting snippy that people aren't "refuting" a point that you have provided no basis for. Until humans can store large amounts of arbitrary context in their heads, and look it up very rapidly, we will not be using any kind of table based compression algorithms.

And that is exactly how English works. You take a basket, and a ball, and make basketball. Or grape, and soda, and make grape soda.
It was for SE, apparently
Honestly curious, how would one examine their phone's ROM dump? Asking as a non-expert on this here.
A delightfully condescending reply.
but everyone blocks ads and buying upvotes is extremely cheap
I've done both and I personally prefer beginning of day. Standups are usually (in my experience) the beginning of a conversation or a brainstorm and that works better when there is time left to continue after standup. If they are just reporting what you did then end of day might be better, but that sounds like a bad standup.
I've been doing that for over a decade. It's great. If I get a phishing email about my iCloud account, but it's sent to my yahoo@mydomain.com then it's obviously a phishing attempt, not need to check for other markers.
You can also see who has sold/leaked your email address for marketing purposes.
Because in non-negative interest world there's a limit on how much debt you can take?
Here in the Netherlands electricity is 25 cents per kWh and up to 59 cents per kWh for a fast charger next to the highway, if you don't have a subscription with them. Some chargers also have a starting cost and/or parking fees included. The 59 cents is close to what a fuel efficient diesel costs.

In the future you will only get 8 cents per kWh for what your solar panels generate and put back into the grid. At that point charging your car will be a very good proposition, because you are practically filling it with 8 cents per kWh.
boot speed seems to be much faster with Librem 5 compared to Android. I suspect that most apps will just run faster on Librem. https://puri.sm/posts/librem-5-vs-android-which-boots-faster...
I'm sure sure we're talking about the same things: not communicating daily is obviously going to be a problem, such as not giving the team a chance to change your priorities.

But a senior knows basic needs for a product to live on like stable production, continuous integrations, unit/functional tests, code reviews, continuous deployment, infra & application monitoring, alerting, backups, service & dependency versions upgrades, fix regressions introduced by new features, with test ... and all sorts of quick wins for the product that come out of a casual discussion with a product / sales person etc ... The kind of usual things that becomes a daily routine and may just take the day to the point where you couldn't move any new feature card in the kanban anyway.

Is it necessary to create a kanban ticket every time they do a package update, fix an impediment or do something in 0day ? It can surely be useful, not sure if it's more useful than just reporting on a text based chat, can it be harmful by polluting the kanban with tickets that don't create any obvious value (tech debt treatment) ? as long as communication goes through it's fine with me unless someone wants to build a report at the end of the month (ie. billing), I believe the practice matters more than the tool.

But I'm more trying to understand the point of this article, searching for conditions that would validate it, rather than defend it in all case.

For me daily communication and the three questions are important (but I prefer async / text based, and even twice a day: when I check-in and check-out), for the rest it depends, I can understand why some seniors would feel like blindly applying procedures may seem un-necessary or harmful sometimes, like they say : it's the dose that makes a cure or a poison.
The problem is that your "1 Billion" have virtually no reduction in their security, because the government doesn't have a warrant for their data, whereas the 8000 incidents may each have severe consequences. And "attempted solicitation" is by far not the only crime that is routinely prosecuted with evidence from Facebook or other types of surveillance.

The slippery slope arguments are as stupid here as they are in gun debates. Not making encryption the default for text messaging, thereby leaving a chance of court-ordered disclosure, is not remotely comparable to total surveillance.

But I guess that's not the kind of distinctions the audience here is going to appreciate, is it?
Right after the part you quoted:

> All this with the humongous caveat that courts and judges will often not enforce laws as they are written

Please don't use selective quotations to misrepresent the viewpoints of other commenters.
Well, it is a pretty hateful way of doing things. I mean, that's how I treat people I hate; shun them, ignore them, not reply to them. So there's an argument there.

I agree though. It seems to me to have more to do with aggrandizing power and influence than with hate. What better way to get rid of competitors than to bait them into behaving "bigoted"? Look at the Monica case. She never refused to use someones chosen pronoun. She was baited into admitting that she already avoids certain ways of addressing people out of kindness and politeness and a desire not to rub people the wrong way. Now she's out. This has nothing to do with bigotry, and everything to do with a group of people that want to kick everybody else off every position of power or influence.
It's not a question of censorship. This is caused by the protesters themselves (at least some of them).

I'm in the UK and the Chinese people I know only need to watch the reporting on the BBC to be convinced that a lot of protesters are anti-China and potentially propped up by foreign forces: Violence, attacks on government buildings, attacks on the Chinese flag, flying foreign flags, calling on the Brits and Americans to intervene, etc.

The actions of these protesters have ensured that the Chinese government cannot do anything but standing firm.

I don't know what Chinese TVs show to the public on the mainland, but if they show what the BBC shows then the people can only be outraged and absolutely against the protesters.

The way these protesters behave has completely drowned any message regarding democracy, which the Chinese public might actually be receptive to, though indeed that would be censored by the media on the mainland. That's another reason not to hand the government the stick to beat them with.
I'm curious, why were they draining?
Retrieval using CNNs requires computing a cosine similarity matrix. So, for 'n' images, a matrix of size n x n would need to be stored in the memory. As you can see, the storage requirements blow up quadratically as 'n' increases. We have already made some optimizations to reduce the memory footprint but there would be clear upper limits to it (We haven't experimented). As for the numbers, the cifar10 dataset example present in the repo was carried out on google colab notebook. The dataset has 60k images and ended up consuming about 6G of RAM using CNN. However, since there hasn't yet been a principled benchmarking done on the package, I would consider these numbers as only marginally indicative of the capabilities. A better way to figure out if it works for you would be to try it out with your own dataset, starting out at a small scale and increasing the dataset size gradually.
This is kind of interesting, because import substitution was what Latin America tried more or less as a whole back in the 80s. It didn't work particularly well then, which leaves the question of what to do now?