skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thank you guys for the feedback.
I'll answer both the comments telling you more about what I have in mind.

I'm the CEO of Leva, this company here www.leva.io.
We work in the field of entertainment and retail, building unique context-aware machines with mechatronics and computer vision technologies.

From this spring, I've been focusing/obsessed by this idea of crossing cyber-lives of online shoppers (indoor in front of a computer) with outdoor shoppers. The latter are people with their smartphones, in front of the physical products that the others are seeing on their browsers at home. What if we put together users with the same "browsing intentions", with people that are out there with the real things in front of them?

Plus, we think about browsing activities, as individual "jobs".
But what if those become collective? What if an influencer could guide a group of online shoppers through different websites/opportunities?
At any given time, thousands of people are willing to solve same problems online: buying shoes, food, book a hotel, flight, enjoy something, etc.
Those people are related in some way, and only together, in some cases, they can achieve advantages. Like what happens with the shopping teams of the Chinese Pinduoduo, or the users of the American Drop.

A case study could be the one I mentioned before, teens with low-budget that want to buy a particular Nike sneaker, want to be a part of a shopping team, to get discounts or feedback directly from people who have those shoes in their hands. Maybe influencers or people that are in malls right now in front of those shoes? Perhaps they'd like to receive real-time feedback about the quality/materials/sizes/prices?

The value proposition needs to be adequately defined, and this message could seem a bit messy, with many opened ways. That's because it is just the beginning.

We need to do user research to understand pains better, get user feedback and define the real personas of the market segment. For now, this is just a business hypothesis.
We'll be doing interviews to the first leads to understand what they want, and we'll define the features of the first MVP.

Does this answers your questions? What's your point of view/suggestion?
Capitalism, Alone
It's in keeping with the 3000+ year old sentence of exile or imprisonment.
There's a section in this notes about it https://ziglang.org/download/0.5.0/release-notes.html#zig-fm...

The end even has a link to a web-based version of it.
NCAA should be counting on the fact that more states will adopt California's stance on this issue.
There is a new technique out there, with a different approach, but in the end you will have to decide what works best for yourself.

TRANScendent MEDITATION: NLP, Hypnosis & Mindfulness method course How to quickly stay longer into meditation state, practically use mindfulness and get results with your meditation today!

Explore and try techniques that you feel aligned with on some level. I try many of them and I finally make my own technique that is working great for me, and apparently for more than 600 students since May 2019

ENROLL NOW
30 Day money-back guarantee
https://www.udemy.com/meditation-nlp-hypnosis-mindfulness-me...

You will learn:

How to instantly have higher meditative states of mind and experience benefits during the course
Quickly enter meditation state and improve your mood whenever you desire
Stay in a perfect state of mind with NLP techniques and natural control and quality of your visualizations
Practically use the knowledge in everyday life situations and have tangible results today
Save time with this one-time process and solutions for most common problems in meditation practices
Self-exploration beyond your conscious limits and better relationship with your subconscious mind
Course lessons:

Lesson 1 Common problems in meditation and Transcendent Meditation solutions

Lesson 2 TRANScendent meditation questions

Lesson 3 TRANScendent meditation loop

Lesson 4 Demonstration of Transcendent Meditation process

Lesson 5 Doing the Transcendent Meditation process individually or with partner

Lesson 6 Most powerful Affirmations creation with Transcendent Meditation

Lesson 7 Using NLP Submodalities for a better quality of your meditation visualizations

Lesson 8 NLP Stabilization of your inner world during meditation

Lesson 9 Application of Benign attention in meditation practice

Lesson 10 Grounding and exiting meditation state the way it makes you productive

Lesson 11 Starting points of meditation process for self-exploration beyond your known limits

Lesson 12 Practically use meditation and mindfulness to improve every day of your life.

Lesson 13 NLP Behavior secrets of peak performers

Lesson 14 Conclusion

Lesson 15 BONUS Technique + Guided meditation Mp3

ENROLL NOW
30 Day money-back guarantee
https://www.udemy.com/meditation-nlp-hypnosis-mindfulness-me...

Get more: CLARITY, AWARENESS, and FOCUS

Have more: ENERGY, MOTIVATION, and ENTHUSIASM

Increase your: PROBLEM SOLVING, CREATIVITY and IMAGINATION

Improve your: WELL BEING, CALMNESS, and SELF-LOVING

Check it out, it just could be what you are looking for

TRANScendent MEDITATION: NLP, Hypnosis & Mindfulness method: Have results with your meditation today

ENROLL NOW
30 Day money-back guarantee
https://www.udemy.com/meditation-nlp-hypnosis-mindfulness-me...

Stay curious and have fun!
Sort of. A single person's cells don't really all have identical DNA, because of mutations and so on.

So it's one of those things that depends on how close you are looking.
That was THE coolest design. Couple of weeks back, I integrated feedback collection (using fadeIn css) into the service we offer, definitely, this looks way cooler, and gets more user attention - unlike ours.

Unsure, if I would like to put the my customer details in other apps, also, from the Plans, I did not notice any option to push the collected feed into an endpoint, which might be a good option to consider.

Good Luck.
And many don't (share an upbringing, that is -- obviously they're genetically identical to at least the level that a clone would be). Twin studies are a foundational technique in studies of heritability. This is really well covered ground.

I think the question stands: what is it about twin studies that is insufficient and needs to be replaced with ethically questionable techniques like cloning?

For those who aren't aware: cloning of vertebrates isn't remotely mature technology. It remains routine for such an organism to be born with significant developmental flaws. Now tell me how you're going to get consent from such an individual pre-conception.
I think the difference is that when you open Spotify, you expect a complete or almost complete catalogue. People have existing artists that they really want to hear. That puts Spotify in a tough negotiating position as they have to license more or less everything.

When you open Netflix, you just want to watch something interesting within some category. That opens the door to Netflix creating its own content and puts them in a much better negotiating position vis-a-vis Hollywood. They don't need to license everything.
I think that one is a little bit on the software engineer for not negotiating that out of their contract. There are plenty of shops who won't try to own your brain at work and at home.
Find a problem you hate, or find people you love who need something.
Hmm, allow me to correct myself here, Borges' library may not include all the characters required for representing code in some of the programming languages we love
Building the Azure IoT Edge Security Daemon in Rust
Does anyone here have a good understanding of the relative merits of Zig, Crystal, and Nim? Especially compared to higher profile languages like Rust and Go?

All of these languages seem to be statically compiled, and they all seem to promise both performance and safety. Rust and Go are discussed all the time on HN, so I expect most of us here have a reasonable notion of their relative benefits, for example, performance compared to ease of learning.

What about these lesser discussed languages Zig, Nim, and Crystal? Are their runtime performances comparable to one another? Are they equally safe to program in? What are their relative strengths? Or does it just come down to syntax preference?

I think there's value in having a lot of choices to program in, so I'm not asking which language is "best" any absolute sense. We're better off for having all of these languages coexisting. I'm just asking if anyone with experience in the three of them has any insight or impressions of their relative merits.
> They can just make you pay for the service AND extract your data and track you.

Indeed. When cable TV started, it didn't have advertising. The premise was that you were paying for the service, so they didn't have to show you ads. That situation lasted as long as ice cream in the Nevada sun. Cell companies were capitalizing on tracking data we were providing them -- despite the high cost of cell service -- long before the general public got wise. Microsoft just took longer to get to the same idea.

Microsoft is going to double down on this, and make the consumer version "free" by way of explicit advertising. If they lose customers, they won't care. They've got corporations around the globe by the short hairs for at least another generation. Maybe two. They've been losing the consumer space for years, and they're just going to ride it all the way into the ground.
It’s a character trait, not a cognitive skill. Still learnable of course, but it’s more about managing emotions than thinking.
There’s also a bigger question of why should being able to play sports get you into university in the first place? The only reason the sports scholarships have existed is because they are massive profit centers for the people who run them - most of the money raised just goes back into the sports facilities and management, the players frequently get dumbed down courses - especially given they’re required to participate in a training regime that hampers the education their scholarship is meant to entitle them to, and by the time they graduate they have long term health problems and most can’t join a professional team so don’t have earnings post-uni.

It’s a system that is fundamentally unfair: it’s unfair to the students who are academically capable but are deny spots by less academically capable players, and it’s unfair to the players who aren’t given a quality education, aren’t supported for their long term health issues, and aren’t compensated for the money they bring in or even permitted to make money themselves.
I think those folks will still shoot for top companies, so if that’s you, most likely.

(psst, train your own, damnit)
The problem is that data is going to be walled off. There will be a lot but it will be siloed and inaccessible.
Shale Boom Is Slowing Just When the World Needs Oil Most
there are also many, many sincere chinese nationalists, some of whom use twitter. people forget that the number of chinese people on the internet is substantially larger than the entire US population, even if most don’t hang out in the same places
Option 4: you're a member of a voluntary organization, and your state can't change our bylaws.

Which is what's probably gonna happen.
Rethinking Project Maturity as a Community Process
Not necessarily true:

https://www.livescience.com/24694-identical-twins-not-identi...

paper (PDF) : https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Constantin_Polychronako...
See other comments here for why the NCAA can't just do nothing about this situation. The scenario you describe is unlikely to happen.
Losing $4.5B in value really understates the impact LTCM's failure had on the public markets.

Multiple wall street firms (at US Government urging) needed to urgently inject massive capital into the markets to contain a near-systemic collapse.

PBS produced a phenomenal documentary, The Trillion Dollar Bet[1], which covers the development of Black-Scholes and the rise and fall of LTCM. Highly recommended.

[1] http://watchdocumentaries.com/trillion-dollar-bet/
The vast majority of what is transported is not food. It's other material goods. Targeting the pennies misses the budget by pounds.
> This is a good lesson. If someone has a protected legal right, they have the right to lie about it too. Firing someone for lying about a disability is the same as firing someone for having a disability.

is it really the same? I could see having a legal protection for "no comment" but it seems like you should be able to fire anyone who directly lies to you. if it's illegal to fire people for having a disability, isn't it better just not to ask in the first place?
Ned Ludd would be proud!
Fine. Are the hypothetical weird poly people ineligible to work for MIT because they openly advertise their enthusiasm for cuddle puddles?

Edit: also, there are plenty of people accusing Stallman of sexual assault. But I'm happy to argue under the pretence that that isn't true.
Same media illiteracy problem as Fake News. Most people are unable to discern ulterior motives. So, "trust".

btw; The solution is not improving one's ability to discern (because that is an arm's race the people with power motives (political, financial) are gonna out spend you and vast majority of humans are incapable of beating that) Rather it is by default not to trust and have high bar for earning your trust.
The pasted text is from the film script, which isn't really optimal for reading. The passage from the book[1] is a bit more readable. The scene does work well in the film, but it leaves a little something to be desired on the page.

The book is a classic; the film is pretty good but not groundbreaking the way the book is. The passage out of context lacks a bit of the overall flow that helps the book work. It looks like mere absurdism rather than the rigid but off-kilter logic that pervades the narrative. It's about the way the military forces you to buy into an authoritarian system as the only way to risk your own life for no reason you can see, which manifests as ridiculous incentives. And that goes well beyond military life, which is why the book is widely held as a classic.

I really can't say if you'd enjoy it or not, but if you like Monty Python and Douglas Adams you might find it reminiscent.

[1] https://www.google.com/books/edition/Catch_22/Xfze51E7TEoC?h...
>>That's certainly not going to improve the broken state of post-secondary education in the US.

Tangential. This isn't about fixing public education, this is about worker's rights.

As for "Wealthy schools get best athletes" that's already what happens. Also, why is that any worse than the Yankees being perennial WS contenders while the Royals have to get lucky with player development to field an elite team? That's just the nature of sports. Pretending that there's a level playing field now (go look at some of the articles about LSU's new 28 million dollar football facilities) is laughable. Besides you're never going to get there, and it doesn't really have to be a goal for the school.
This gets called "being disruptive" but it's possible to be disruptive without ignoring the law. For example see SpaceX: successful disruption of the launch industry, without breaking any laws.

The issue is that not every industry is so inefficient as to be possible to legally disrupt profitably, so people try to do an end-run around the law.
Is there also some level of virtualization with eSIM, where the single chip allows for multiple SIM "profiles" (SIM-card-ISA VMs, basically) to run on one chip? Or are the manufacturers that claim that eSIM "allows" for multiple simultaneous operator accounts, just putting multiple eSIM chips in their devices?
That's the same as Option 1.
exactly! you can gain so much more efficiency (and improve morale) by just examining your processes more, before trying to throw more engineers at the problem. and honestly, it is wasteful and lazy to just pull that trigger before thinking things through, not to mention all the negative (and honestly obvious) consequences that you describe.
No one here was acting like anyone's military was wholly altruistic...
The players should be paid a salary, full stop. If you're an athlete at a D1 school in the primary money making sports of men's basketball or football you're hardly a student -- most days are spent training or preparing for a game, the athletes notoriously take cupcake classes and majors; and we've seen enough academic scandals to know that 'student-athlete' is a misnomer. The NCAA is another case of cartel like behavior in the American economy and I'll be glad when this phony amateurism is put to rest.
I remember this Bret Victor piece from 2011 and I was thinking about it recently when Google announced Soli for the Pixel 4.
https://www.cnet.com/news/project-soli-is-the-secret-star-of...

Soli and other gesture-based technologies seem like at least an incremental move to using motion that Bret Victor was advocating for in 2011.
Peter Norvig – Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach – AI Podcast
> Can't fly fast, can't fly far, can't carry much load, can't dog fight, needs ton of maintenance and may or may not be invisible.

that is exactly all the "can't"s the F35 ancestor - Yak-141 [1] - was designed with. All the stealth and quasi-fighter related capabilities of F35 are just bolt-ons onto that design in an attempt to mitigate the "can't"s and to stretch if even just a bit the very limited otherwise capabilities of that design. The only "can" in that design, its raison d'être, was the VTOL with swiveling nozzle (which can't even vector in flight). While that swiveling nozzle is a great thing for a country with no capabilities to build real aircraft carriers, it is a thing born in the pre-stealth age, and thus naturally compromised the stealth (especially in IR) of F35 as there is no way of making it "flat rectangular", like for example on F-22 and B-2, at sane (even by DOD standard) costs.

[1] https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Lockheed-Martin-fund-Yak-141/a...
That's because it takes time. It will take decades to convert a lot of key systems, even if renewable energy is cheaper.

The infrastructure that burns fossil fuel is highly distributed. Millions (billions?) of cars on the road. Worse, millions (billions) of cold-climate buildings heated by gas or coal.

In the meantime, it's not growing exponentially. It had actually leveled off. There was a spike in the past couple of years, but it doesn't seem reasonable that it's a sustained pattern.
On Yelp yeah, Yelp is basically worthless as an actual rating system. There has been a trend of articles just taking the top yelp reviews for "____ type of food" and making top ten lists (there is a trend for doing similar articles with top voted Ask Reddit content). Anyway, where I live the top burger place on Yelp is in a mall and is basically a greasy less-tasty version of Five-guys.

A mall.
>That would be because sufficiently controversial conclusions in the social sciences can upend social stability (endangering the ability of social science work to be performed) and serve as the justification for the infringement of human rights.

This is assuming the current incorrect findings aren't being used as justifications for infringement of human rights currently. For example findings that might relate to rehabilitation for crimes and how long we sentence someone to prison, or if we even sentence someone to prison at all. Findings related to forced institutionalization of someone deemed too mentally ill to be allowed their freedom. Findings that are used to justify existing laws that see people put in prison for things they perhaps shouldn't be.

Using such an impeccable standard for changes when such wasn't used for the existing social structure isn't justifiable.
I was surprised by that omission as well. It is from his short story, Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius (one of my favorites) for those who don't know the reference.

A lot of the concepts that Borges writes about have always struck me as relevant to computer science, and Tlön, Uqbar is no exception. For example, identity vs. equality when comparing things:

> They said that the heresiarch was prompted only by the blasphemous intention of attributing the divine category of being to some simple coins and that at times he negated plurality and at other times did not. They argued: if equality implies identity, one would also have to admit that the nine coins are one.

And this bit always makes me think of reference counting and garbage collection:

> Things became duplicated in Tlön; they also tend to become effaced and lose their details when they are forgotten. A classic example is the doorway which survived so long as it was visited by a beggar and disappeared at his death. At times some birds, a horse, have saved the ruins of an amphitheater.
Thanks, but that's too generic.

I mean what practices, habits, who knows what else
> Zig both signed and unsigned integers have undefined behavior on overflow, contrasted to only signed integers in C

make a feature unwanted in C, worse. nice.
If you're saying dang made a shallow dismissal, I agree. He did apologize for it, however...
This is a dangerous argument to rely on, because it still allows for devices to phone home via independent means. Just as your new car may well have some sort of embedded mobile network access today, so your TV may come with a built-in SIM, or use some kind of mesh network that doesn't rely on your own home WiFi access.

The problem is the principle that it's OK for your devices to monitor you at all without your explicit knowledge and consent -- or even with those things, if the market leaves no reasonable alternative and so the consent isn't really consent at all.
These articles are spectacularly uninformed, jumbling together claims which have never been made, uninfomed guesses and lack of domain expertise. It is more interesting as a propaganda exercise, conceivably so Boeing/Dassault/Saab can sell their planes more competitively, or so the RADAR operator can get more government funding.

Problems with the article:
- The F35 isn't flown to air shows in 'war mode'. It has a bunch of reflectors added to increase its RADAR signature. It is only naked when it might be used in anger or over test ranges, and the USAF is very careful to make sure non-JSF program RADARs are off, or have the recordings deleted.

- Passive RADAR is a real thing that works, but it only gives a general location. It would be meaningless to try to send a link track to an interceptor or SAM site from a passive RADAR system -- all you could do is call and say "look sharp chaps".

- When you want to shoot at it, your S band (ground) or X band (interceptor) RADAR will have a very hard time picking it up or maintaining lock (because its signature changes depending on aspect, and obviously the pilot will manoeuvre to minimise). Meanwhile your ground receiver is getting jammed and transmitters are getting blown up by JDAMs.

- Passive RADAR can also be jammed and deceived. How many times will you scramble interceptors for a false passive detection?