skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Establishing a new identity wasn't a huge task when we were paper based. A pretty common approach was finding someone that died young, roughly your age, in a rural or religious community that probably didn't file the right papers to document the death. Or somewhere small enough that destroying the single paper in a file accomplished the same.

Then bootstrap that up from a birth certificate to a social security card and so on.

I imagine it's not that simple anymore.
Reality is that most production ML workflows still use 1.x,( not even the latest 1.14[5]. Migration to 2.x does not make sense in many existing use cases unless you want to build your new algorithms from scratch. From previous experience with TF, API changes so much that is impossible to keep up from an Enterprise perspective, I expect TF team do some type of LTS version for Enterprise and continue improving 2.x, which clearly was a response to Pytorch and is an evolution of TF.keras and eager execution plus all the cleanup.
AI Isn’t Funny Anymore
How do the military academies get around the "no direct payment" rule? AFAIK, all their students (athletes included) are salaried members of the armed services. For a Navy football players, it's literally part of their job description to go to practice and show up on Saturdays.
An excellent point and I would welcome any of those firms to use this job board.
It's also worth noting that Benjamin Tucker predicted vanguardism as a natural consequence of Marxism back in 1888.
Hardware is the way to go unless you're wanting to do complex routing labs, then I prefer virtualization, in general.

Per my other comment, the subreddits I listed are by far way more informative than what you'll get from the HN audience. That's not meant to be a slam, it's just that the subreddits are a more targeted audience.
Yeah this is my point exactly. A staggering amount is known about human behavior and where it comes from, most of it is just sitting in PhD level books at college libraries. Most will keep their head in the sand, best not look at something which tears apart my philosophies on society and life...
They are looking at the entire system and they are willing to challenge (improve or replace) everything, including buses like PCIe. This is also an effort not meant for regular servers, but very high end. We already have 128 PCIe lanes or more in a single server, that means 8 Tbps; not in a single connection or slot, but aggregated.

Also dual socket CPU's are very popular and more than that is still accessible; multiply the memory bandwidth by the number of sockets. Think about total throughput, not per bus, per socket, per NIC, etc.
Croshaw's Mogworld isn't hard, but relevant.
Does that include sales of things like generic UofA apparel and stickers? There's a great deal of UofA 'stuff' that isn't labeled football.
> America cannot address the inequality, poverty, inadequate education, the racially biased criminal justice system, and the limited life chances of black people that define contemporary society until the nation confronts and acknowledges this history. The obligations of the past weigh heavily upon the present.

Hardly a day goes by without me hearing of some injustice perpetrated against African-Americans, and a whole lot of US movies and videogames include these themes. Just how much more acknowledged can this history get?
Interesting that no one has raised the implications of this on the taxable income in the state. Given budget shortfalls in the state, and 50-some NCAA institutions with several power programs, this would surely be a welcomed source of revenue for the State government. It begs the question of intent behind the law.
There are always limits. Time, resources, energy, entropy, bandwidth, intelligence, cultural norms, the bounds of the law, physical stamina, what the market will bear. Value is subjective, so claiming that there is no limit to anything to which "value" can be applied in a capitalist marketplace is meaningless. Unbounded infinite progress only exists in the realm of pure math.
I think people are more talking about working towns and cities that aren't SF levels of prices, which can be non rural towns of +100k people.
Elon Musk says SpaceX Starship will use carbon captured from air as fuel
Journalists of major publications and celebrities are pretty evenly verified. Maybe it's just the circles I follow, but I encounter a lot of random 'liberal centrist with a podcast who has written 2 op eds'-types that seem to be more famous on twitter than anywhere else.
A Sports Supplement Mogul
I think in this case they are just spoofing the "From:" address, not the envelope address that SPF protects.
Former Facebook Guru Decries Political Exemptions
We do not have technology to optimize the DNA in any real way, and most likely it will not be possible know what the effect of specific combination of genes will be without letting people with that DNA to live, so their moralization will be wrong (like most talk about morality and ethics).

But they can consider us stupid for not investing more into research.
People are told they should live in places like this because the rent in more populated places is too high.
This reminds me of the black hole shown in Interstellar (movie). It's fantastic even though being in a shelf is kind of unbelievable ;-)
This is the most american way to think about education.

This anti-social thinking is why the USA is not going to fix any problem in a meaningful and lasting way.
Thank goodness, NCAA has been a blight on collegiate education for decades. The end of NCAA would be good for students, good for athletes, good for athletics, and good for colleges and universities. If most of what an organization does is harm, then absolutely that organization shouldn't exist.
You can resolve this paradox by making a distinction between the whole & its parts. Capitalism is not a monolith - it's a system where many competing firms and ecosystems vie to become the dominant producer. Some of them inevitably grow faster than others and take over the ecosystem. At that point capitalism is redefined to mean "the winner", and all the losers wither and die off. Then some small variation within the new definition of capitalism takes off, grows faster than its competitors, eventually replaces them, and redefines capitalism as itself. As a result, "capitalism" is always growing, but it doesn't mean the same things, and most of the things that it previously meant end up dying and being lost to history.

You can see this cycle actually happening if you look at history from the medieval rennaissance until today. "Capitalism" initially meant the decoupling of farm labor from manorial estates that owned the land; in the wake of Black Death, there was a surplus of land and a shortage of labor, and so peasant farmers were able to choose from the estates that were most productive and gave them the best life. That spurred competition among estates to improve farming mechanisms, which increased food productivity, which allowed some laborers to specialize into guilds. Capitalism was then redefined as the private ownership of the tools used for this specialized labor, which competed to produce the best quality goods at the lowest prices.

The surplus generated by this then allowed the conquest of the New World, of Africa, and of Asia, which opened a big new resource source and ushered in the era of mercantilism. Those raw resource sources then created demand for more efficient ways than the guild system, which led to the invention of industrial capitalism. "Industry" initially referred to one specific industry, textiles; as mass-production techniques were applied to more and more areas of the economy, "industry" eventually became synonymous with "capitalism", and people forgot that mercantile traders used to be the dominant corporations on earth, or that there was a time when everyone was either a farmer or landlord. Now software is eating the world, while software in 1975 was a tiny industry that most people thought of as a hobby or loss-leader.

Along the way there've been plenty of losers that were destroyed. If you were one of those peasant farmers who weren't among the most efficient, you are now dead. If you were a cobbler, or a tailor, or a baker, or a smith, or a weaver, you lost your specialty when industrialization came around. If you were a Luddite, sucks to be you. If you were a Native American, you're probably now dead too. If you were a plantation owner in the American South, you lost most of your holdings after the Civil War. If you're a factory worker in America, you're probably jobless. Someday software engineers will be the dinosaurs of the future.

But all of these groups are just written out of the narrative: capitalism is defined in terms of the winners, and the losers drop out of history. Capitalism will expand forever, but it won't look like the version of capitalism we have today.
What Broke the Bank
And pay two thirds less. The qualifier is equal pay.
MARPOL is utterly toothless and not enforced, and also only really covers 12 nautical miles from land.
Hence the past tense.
These toy-intepreters are very useful for putting scripting support in your applications.

I recently wrote something similar for allowing evaluation to be applied to arbitrary golang objects/structures - so that I could write simple scripts rather than hard-coding logic in my application.

With only a few primitives it becomes very useful!

https://github.com/skx/evalfilter
So you want to watch the same shows and movies over and over?

When I listen to music I usually want a large percentage of that music to be stuff I already know. Of course I like discovering new music but, at least for me, probably > 50% of the time, maybe 90% of the time I'm playing music I know.

Conversely with Netflix I always want somehting I have never seen. Less than 2% of the stuff I watch on Netflix (or any other similar service) is stuff I've viewed before, maybe even less. Off the top of my head the only thing I've ever viewed more than once on Netflix is Rick and Morty.
I don't see a CDN as something that customers get bored of in the same way as coupons for random services.

When a consumer realizes they are getting 50% off of a service or product they didn't want or need in the first place, they stop signing up for deals. Also, once the businesses realize these customers don't provide repeat business and they are devaluing their product for consumers who do want it, they stop offering the discounts. Finally, it's trivial to sign up for each of their competitors and play them off of each other.

When does a Cloudflare customer stop needing secure, performant content delivery, and how easy is it to switch to a competitor?
I don't maintain the IEEE site, so I guess I can't be sure, but that seems more of a CMS default label for image credits than a deliberate statement on the nature of the content.
> my understanding is the common argument is that they are not truly communist and that no

the concept of the state is intended to be a temporary fixture that gets dissolved, and no communist state has ever been able to make that transition

pushes for decentralized finance aim to do the same thing under a strict private ownership and capital appreciation method, with egalitarianism sprinkled in

so it is interesting that these parallel ideologies are propelling towards the same zenith
How is that different than a scholarship paying room/board/tuition for athletes?
> outlets for governments that hide behind a thin veneer of 'independent' ownership.

Considering how much of US media regularly pillories Trump, I'm skeptical that of the claim of government control. I'm certain they do, however, serve as a PR mouthpiece for various moneyed interests.
Thanks man! Already employed in SA. Hope to see you in Canada :)
AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Associate in 10 Days
He's quoting the font from catch 22 as well.
That might have been true yesterday. But today, https://developer.nvidia.com/rtx-broadcast-engine
I know for the Naval Academy, you don't get the salary. Even if you were previous enlisted you are no longer paid your salary, though I believe the 4 years in the academy count towards retirement.
> If you choose to live in rural US, you are signing up for this kind of lifestyle; you're on your own.

Some people don't choose, and other people do choose, but more importantly: your food comes from the rural US and you should keep that in mind before being flippant about their fate.
Bribing employees of a company to perform corrupt actions should obviously be criminal. It’s ridiculous to say that it shouldn’t.

Paying high prices above board and openly for services is not fraud or corruption, bribing an employee to break clear standards and policies at their work place absolutely is.
GitLab employee, our plan is to go public by next year: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/being-a-public-company/
Interesting, I did so as well, back in - I think - 1990 or so. Did it together with a fellow student, we both reported seeing a quark, but did not get the Nobel prize;-)
If this is news, I’m officially old.

Good times.
That's Toronto in a nutshell, which is pretty much the only place in Canada that has real tech jobs.
Semi related:

Does anyone have a good tool for keeping lists of books and links and things to save for later? I always end up bookmarking things and they get lost in the large black hole known as my bookmarks bar.

iOS app and browser integration would be great too.
I really wanted to see that on the road - it's one thing to see it on the set, but I imagine it's even more surreal when it's interacting with a bunch of different light-sources.
Actually it does not.

Converting an scientific issue into a political (or better say an emotional) one is only needed if the science does not support your side.

Therefore it makes sense for deniers to move from a scientific discussion (which has largely been lost) to a political/emotional one, where things are more flexible and a good presented bad argument might still enable you to win.

So why should the "green energy industry" move the debate from a science driven (which pretty much supports their argument) to a political one?
Spectrum has been a verily low quality publication for a long as I know it (about 10y).
There is no "undercutting" in health care. Vast majority of services are already priced out by insurance companies, there just aren't enough people to do all of them.
The radeon VII already has 1TB/s memory bandwidth, using HBM2, with HBM2E offering almost double the bandwidth.

Also if we're looking a bit forward, Intel recently demoed, with Ayar Labs, a 2.5D chip with a photonic chiplet that can do optical I/O at 1tbps/mm2.
Fotocommunity
Thanks!

Edit: I'm glad you like the idea. Definitely should not have extended the tone of taking the site seriously into the comments. My Mistake.
While preparing some slides I was looking for pictures of machines. I stumbled upon this really cool site. There are a lot of very high quality photos. If you are interested in photography give it a try.
If endowments go, so do good professors. My wife was recruited by a couple institutions last year. One of our key concerns about one institution was the endowment. Tenure is not nearly as valuable at a institution that is not on strong financial footing.
Correct. The C64 would just step the motor to the first track -1 and that is the reason for the head banging you got, as well as for the crappy alignment issues.
> Not really

Yes, really. Those number support my point. The vast majority of CO2 emissions are from countries with "relatively modest" living standards.

> But yeah if everyone's going to live like the current US/EU citizen we're fucked for sure no matter how many trees we plant.

I guess we're fucked then, right? Because that's the trajectory.

> Or we could do both since these things are 100% unrelated and not enough anyway.

They're not unrelated at all, because money spent on one thing can't be spent on something else. Furthermore, giving up airplane travel for, say, railroads, is a lowering in standard of living. Investing in infrastructure abroad isn't.

> We're all responsible and we can all do better, so let's stop playing dumb games and do what we can.

Sure "we" can, but "we" won't, so let's indeed stop playing dumb games of moral posturing and figure out how we can have the best impact without relying on humans suddenly acting in a rational and responsible manner. It's just not going to happen.

> It's not like skipping your trip to standard_tourisitic_location_#231, eating less meat, buying local food, using public transportation or buying less useless junk on amazon/ebay is going to turn your life to absolute shit so let's do it

Yeah, fuck that. I'm not giving up on any of it. Now what? What are you gonna do about it? Remember, I'm billions of people.
Agreed. To do this correctly would take long term planning on the scale of decades most likely; growing the faculty from within and providing the necesarry resources to develop them. But it is possible and the elite universities should be moving this way.
I've dived ~1 mile away from anchored cruise ships and it's jarring, and frankly, pretty scary how loud they are. I can only imagine how the whales feel.
Err... that's not an accurate comparison. If Softbank gives WeWork $10B for 100% of the company then its book value will skyrocket as its liabilities won't increase even by a penny but it will get 10B on its balance sheet. There's not a single company in the WW lines business that has this kind of a prospect. Regus simply can't raise this kind of money -- if they could, they would have.
I've never seen a climate scientist say that every change in temperature is linked solely to the effects of CO2 & etc. Everyone recognizes there are multiple drivers of fluctuating climate (e.g. el nino/la nina, solar cycles, natural CO2 spikes from volcanos, etc, etc, etc).

To jump back a few steps, I'd think that APGW could be falsified at least three ways.

1) From a top-down perspective, if warming over years & decades consistently decouples from models, then clearly the models are wrong. It's invalid to expect the models to be accurate month-by-month, that's not the granularity they are built to explore.

2) From a bottom-up perspective, if someone can establish on a theoretical basis that additional carbon dioxide & methane do not have a baseline or secondary warming effect, then we'd need a new theory to explain observations

3) If we see the regular surprise emergence of unexpected climate effects to the point where our models are invalid. I can't come up with a good example. Something like "Ocean water gets dramatically lighter above XX degrees, which vastly reduces the absorbtion of sunlight"
Keep in mind, people have to pay for these services. Pay doesn't go up in a vacuum.
The software engineers talk about it, but they never do it. Romanticising about moving to a simpler place is very different from actually doing it.

A developer is even more relocatable than the doctor. You can still work for a major company and you still have the big city market open to you, even if you live in a small town. Whereas for a doctor it's a major career change.
I don't think any jobs pay salary of $1m+, they typically have a high base of $600k for university presidents or CEOs, then they are given enormous yearly bonuses to push the figure over $1m.
Design patterns for hacking together prototypes: object dictionaries
> Option 4: ban college sports. School should be about education, not sports.

Are you okay with paying higher tuition that would have otherwise been offset with TV, merchandising, ticket revenue and alumni donations?
ahh was really hoping this was something new from Bret
It seems from your description that it would be possible to capture the teenage market with artists who are independent from any existing label and own the music rights and thus run a streaming service with greater than 26% gross margin.
Jailbreaking is software based and doesn't actually void your warranty. Demotion will.
Maybe some younger views will be less shocked by not knowing what's a floppy.
I imagine you're right, that's why I made sure to specify on the site that "Expected total compensation includes salary, equity, benefits, and bonuses."
> if you're accepted on a Sports scholarship, you should be allowed to complete at least 5 years of schooling regardless of injury or ability to continue playing,

This is significantly the argument between Bobby Dodd and Bear Bryant leading to Georgia Tech leaving the SEC.
ASICs apologizes after porn plays on promotional screens outside NZ store
That's a really good point. I can understand why other stories have been dying to wanting quality merchandise. Victoria Secret is going out of business, but True (an online only company as far as I know) is amazing. I'm in love with their products. Victoria Secret I never cared for.
Interesting piece, but there seems to me to be contradiction in its thesis: If people have become so devoted to monetary success alone, how can all these industries that rely on vice exist? Indulging a vice is inherently wasteful. It costs time that could be spent working, and money that could be better spent on self-improvement, or invested or saved.

And while we may have accepted greed to the point that there is nothing distasteful about saying one desires a better car or house, or a better paid job, in practice most people do not work day and night, spurning all other opportunities, to make it happen. In practice, most people make decisions every day that place other desires, both traditionally "good" and "bad", above the simple pursuit of more money. So to say that people have internalised capitalism to the exclusion of all else seems incorrect.

I have a different take: The development of capitalism and commodification had a mutually reinforcing relationship with the fluidity of labor and the fungibility of goods. Many "traditional" bonds between individuals and communities were really a consequence of local monopolies: There was only one local doctor, shopkeeper, school, etc., and a small pool of potential employers. As such, relationships were inevitably more personal.

As technology, law and institutions allowed civilisation to become more mobile, it allowed the possibility of markets in many areas of life where it was previously impossible. This is unavoidable. Even if you personally choose to stand still, the people around you move, meaning your relationships and interactions are nonetheless more transitory and impersonal. In such a world, commodification emerges not as the consequence of internalised capitalist ideology, but because it is the only way to manage constant interactions with strangers.

So it is commodification itself that has become internalised, not capitalism. Indeed, most modern society isn't arranged around acquiring capital and leveraging it or maximising its value, it's about the consumption of things and experiences—driven by materialist, emotional and spiritual instincts—using money as a points system used to ration them out. Most people approach their work in a simple way: they want to earn enough points to meet their basic needs, and indulge their desires to a point of equilibrium between effort and general satisfaction, after which they don't work any harder or longer.
What are you talking about? It doesn't take any more time to buy 2 shirts than to buy 1 shirt. Maybe it adds an extra 5 seconds at the cash register, but that's not significant.
Serious question: do you have children? The quality of schooling in large swathes of the country is abysmal.
Even if the number field is finite, there are an infinite number of polynomials for it. For example the finite field F2 has two elements {0, 1} but an infinite number of polynomials 0, 1, x, x + 1, x^2, x^2 + x + 1, x^2 + 1, «x^2 + x, and on and on. Some of these have nontrivial factors (x^2 + x = x(x+1)) and some don't (x^2 + x + 1 has no factors beyond itself and 1).

(The other answer to your question is more complete but also a bit more advanced, figured this was worth surfacing.)