skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> As long as the ticket moves to someone with a higher willingness-to-pay,

Which, as I said before, is only some of the time, but even under that assumption...

> Since the ticket holder without scalpers isn't the same as the one with scalpers, they have a lower willingness-to-pay than the price the scalper sells at. Therefore, they'd be willing to sell to the actual ticket holder at that price.

Then why don't they? Anyone who buys a ticket intending to go to the play is free to change their mind and resell it. Modern online services make this quite easy. But most people don't resell their tickets.

There are a variety of possible explanations. One is to invoke arguably irrational (but still real) behavior like loss aversion. Another has to do with the inconvenience of rescheduling or the risk of not selling, but that doesn't apply to the Kaldor-Hicks calculation since being deprived of a ticket (as opposed to selling it) doesn't create that inconvenience or risk. But here is one possible situation where even an economically rational actor would prefer to have a ticket than to be awarded a market price:

The value of the ticket to them may be higher than the scalpers' market price. This can be true even if the holder was not originally willing to pay that much, because the holder effectively gained net worth as soon as they "won the lottery" for the ticket, so they have a different amount of spare money to work with. And if this person took the time to buy tickets as soon as they were available, they probably care more about the play than the average person in the secondary market, so they would put a higher value on it relative to their wealth.

This is balanced by the fact that other people in the secondary market will likely be wealthier than them. Indeed, in the case of those rare orders-of-magnitude price hikes, most holders probably would be willing to sell if they could be sure the sale would actually go through. But most scalping margins are much more moderate and may not be enough to get the price over the value to the original holder.
Union City CA working to restore services in wake of computer virus attack
I recommend contacting them directly by the contact email on the site. It is an amazing team and I am sure they will be very responsive.
Maybe I missed something, but my impression was that this guy's beef with NPR is that they attempt to be unbiased?

I give them major props just for attempting. It's obvious on many of their interviews with more right wing guests that the reporters are more or less gritting their teeth to get through it, but they do attempt to let both sides make their voices heard.
Why light sport airplanes suffer so many crashes
> It's unfortunate that internet people have been falsely conditioned to believe the people who create the media we consume shouldn't be paid.

Don’t get paid, not shouldn’t. The issue isn’t the reader’s lack of willingness to pay here lol.
Based on my friends who are in academia, money might be a serious problem for people. Even something better than other tools.
> The fact that a language compiles down to C doesn't mean it compiles down to efficient C.

Where do you see me claiming otherwise?

> At the simplest level, the compiled code could add a bunch of unnecessary function calls and pointers and other forms of indirection that wouldn't be present in hand-written C.

Again, why are you telling me this? Please quote where I claimed otherwise.

> But for a more extreme example, you could also compile an interpreter or VM to C, and it would still be much slower than the equivalent hand-written C code.

The more that I read your response, the more that it seems that you’re debating yourself, because I’m not sure why you’re telling me this. You started your response by telling me that I’m “missing the point” when, in reality, you seem to have not even read my point. My main point was the following:

> If the code from which the resulting machine code is compiled is C, then it’s objectively “as fast as C” […] your resulting program will perform as fast as a C compiler [worth its salt] can get you.

This is true. I made no claims re efficiency; “as fast as C” and “as fast as efficient hand-written C” aren’t interchangeable claims. Forgive me for not assuming efficiency, because I’ve seen a good amount of inefficient hand-written C code in my years.

> This is why "as fast as C" typically refers to normal, hand-written C code—even though there is no formal definition for what "normal C" looks like, it's still a useful description.

Says who though? I’m professionally experienced in C, and as is very clear by this discussion, it’s down to individual interpretations.
They specifically called out one particular aspect of their design as being novel and patentable, about halfway through the video. Shaft drives for bicycles in general are not new. Calling out that one particular feature this way tells the consumer watching what sets theirs apart.
It's also probably entirely random fluctuations in this case. uBlock doesn't add anywhere near that much latency normally.
but is it as good as pastebin at being a command and control for you botnet :p?
I remember watching the Troy Kell documentary and how they mentioned him OD'ing while in solitary. His only contact was with the guards. That must be the problem with how he got the drugs while in solitary -- the guards are allowed to have graphing calculators.
pyenv/virtual environments
Those are cancers caused by viruses, and it's the viruses getting transmitted.

On the other hand, clonal transmission refers to the cancer cells themselves leaving sick individual A, entering healthy individual B, and continuing to reproduce there.
Why Struggle Is a Good Thing, Even If We Never Want It
A Fake British Accent Took Old Hollywood by Storm
Duped CIA: U.S.-Cuban Tensions Rise as Spying Charges Spiral (1987)
Can someone “fly under the radar”?
Russian national confesses to biggest bank hack in US history
(however, let's see what happens when their free accounts come to an end on December 31st)

Set a deadline and set some goals for financial objectives. Start prioritizing monetization.

If you can't meet those goals, then go get a job or do what you need to do to take care of yourself financially.
It is basically the same phrase as the site you currently are on use in its Privacy Policy.
Have you seen any way to use Nix to test with tox?
Amen to that. Anodyne snark becomes cloying quite quickly.

Big thumbs up to production staff of "How I Built This". Huge thumbs down on
Guy "exaggerated incredulity" Raz.

Also on the shit list: moth radio hour and ted radio hour (damn you Guy Raz!)

And a resounding meh to that most sacred of NPR institutions: car talk.
Neither funny nor helpful.
> Is it okay for someone to murder a person if they saved more than one life before ?

That is a yes or no question. That is literally a binary choice. Yes or no - is murder OK if that murder saves more than one person.

That is literally the Trolley Problem.
Well, in the US, that means jobs, and we've got the money. Done right, it makes us worth more and won't even have a meaningful impact on the overall value of currency.
It will be an interesting race. Ssd's if nothing else have forced hdd's manufacturers to build higher capacity drives.
Sounds like you got out of an unhealthy situation all around.

When working at google take advantage of their tech stack and stay away from socializing.

Sex prefs shouldn't really be that important. So whatever you did/didn't do or why you wanted fong's approval in the first place shouldn't matter.

besides 2014 was 5 years ago and him
Motorcycles have had shaft drive, belt drive, and chain drive off the lot for decades. Many Harleys are belt-driven. Many BMWs are shaft-driven. Nearly all offroad and racing bikes are chain-driven.

It's not just friction efficiency, but weight and other factors, too.

The split pinion reminds me a bit of a DCT. Especially when they put the cover on.
Probably not for a race bicycle but this problem of 'covering from the elements' is kind of solved. a lot of tour bikes or city bikes 'stadsfiets' have internal shimano nexus gear hubs and internal hub brakes with an additional rain cover for the chain.

These bikes stay chained outside overnight for years with minimal maintenance.
You can program the FPGA, just seems the docs aren't helpful.

https://forum.arduino.cc/index.php?topic=602341.0 (response #5 is useful)
I mostly agree with this. If you are interested in Extended Church-Turing Thesis, this event is very important. If you are interested in factoring, this is a non-event. I think most people are interested in factoring.
https://simplednscrypt.org for Windows has a one-click setting to enable round-robin over 20+ DoH, DoT, DnsCrypt servers. I don't see why anyone must use a proxy for DNS only to incur additional latency.
If only the 9ft tall terror birds [1] from South America hadn't gone extinct 1.8 million years ago, we would never have thought Dinosaurs went extinct in the first place (or said differently, the fast that birds are dinosaurs would have been obvious from the start).

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorusrhacidae
If I'm understanding right, those journals still kept it copyrighted, without copy-left provisions. It's more like the notion of open source, where the source may be viewable but isn't necessarily available for redistribution.

While Stallman says you can charge as much as you can, his terms say that once someone buys it they can immediately undercut you, and he admits that limits the amount you could charge sustainably.
The third stage is the hardest. Thermonuclear energy production has been sitting in "theoretically possible, but economically unviable" for decades, tons of technologies like supersonic commercial flight has been achieved and then scrapped because of practical concerns, many other technologies struggle with passing economic viability barrier. Taking that into account, getting from 2nd to 3rd stage would be the hardest task. Comparing to classic computers, their practical usability has been clear since Babbage time, so far it's not the case for QC.
Then maybe here: reddit.com/r/WeWork/

But looks like it is business as usual there.
At the time of the Wright brothers, which was incidentally before Frisbees were invented, there were some naysayers that thought heavier than air flight was simply impossible. A Frisbee, which can be chucked much further than a balloon, would for them serve as actual proof of "wooden supremacy."
Unbound does prefetch [0]. Not sure abt the tor split tunnel, but is easy to setup one over WireGuard.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unbound_(DNS_server)#Feature...
This is a fascinating take on the purpose of discourse. I'm not sure if I agree but I'm upvoting it because it made me think.

> the victory condition for any belief is to be so universally accepted that its negation can not be expressed in polite company.

Kind of! That's been the measure of progress as a society; several beliefs that were once fringe have become almost mandatory in polite company.

But we're still not talking about the linked article which is about a distinction between freedom and openness.
> John Doe is not going to be pursued aggressively to fill the Senior Marketing Manager role.

That's exactly what recruiters and headhunters do. Aggressively nails it.
AI is very definitely not procedurally fair unless you can explain all behaviors. Which is why designers generally don't know what they built.
Microsoft have been running things like Bing on it for a while
I love seeing new languages that do interesting things. I wish I could see what languages everyone will be using in 100 years. Or at least I'm curious what we'd see with 100 years of development towards solving today's problems (and without AI because that's not what this particular fantasy of mine is about).

It's one of my favorite things to fantasize about when I run into another python bug or a write a tedious unit test that feels like I should be able to let my tools deal with for me. Super-future-dependent-haskell's type system with python's ergonomics, and fantasy-future-python's gradual typing to go fast and loose when I feel like it, and C's ability to specify exactly what I want when I need to with rust's ability to keep me from shooting myself in the foot while doing so, and zig's ability to do dead-simple compile time programming, and super-future-idris/coq's ability to write ergonomic proofs in place of many tests, and so on. Or even the futuristic fantasy one-FFI-to-rule-them-all, so I can mix and match pieces super smoothly.

Every time I see an interesting new language catching on, I can't help but engage in optimistic flights of fancy about the future of programming.
Data is data and cannot make value judgments so not sure how it can be racist. If the data is how racist people label things it still is not racist data it is data is perfectly valid for what it is racists. Removing the images from ImageNet seems absurd.
Snapchat reportedly has “Project Voldemort” dossier on Facebook’s bad behavior
Having done SLC I15 to Spokane I90 (the route that takes you into Idaho twice, and crosses the inter continental divide a few hundred times) in the winter before, I’m not even sure human-driving works well across those passes. Was in first gear going down while locals were passing me at 80 MPH.
Entitled People Don't Like to Follow Instructions (2018)
It is most certainly a branding problem. Most men hate the term 'toxic masculinity' and react poorly to it because it usually comes along with obscene generalizations about how men (all of them) are doing everything wrong and must fix themselves. Which especially makes men mad if they're discussing some close-to-home topics, like male suicide or loneliness. In that context, even though it's probably not victim-blaming and done in good faith, such comments can really come off as accusatory.

Does this sound familiar to you?
You have other measures than prison.

You can still have enhanced vigilance without enhanced annoyance and mistakes.

There's often a superior choice lurking that nobody is thinking about, sometimes expensive, sometimes not, seemingly unrelated to such optimization.
This is why ML is not intelligence, it cannot find new solutions you're not already looking for.

The main problem of the judicial and police system is it tries to be procedurally fair and still fails at it anyway.
This doesn't seem to be an entirely American phenomenon. Gottfrid Svartholm, one of the founders of PirateBay, had significant issues getting a graphing calculator for self-study in Swedish prison. Graphing calculators were apparently deemed a security risk.

https://file.wikileaks.org/file/anakata/13.1_GSW_09042013_AP...
I wish this entire topic wasn’t so focused on the speaker rather than the ideas
You can't really do problems of meaningful complexity without either a calculator or forcing your class to do a large amount of arithmetic which is really not what you're testing. And at the same time you can't really twist those problems around to not require arithmetic, without also making them abstract and too different from what's encountered in the real world.

Try doing matrix multiplications for hidden markov chains without a calculator. I dare ya.
RMS was and always will be a fraud.
I don't get why this grosses you out at all.

We have the water cycle, the carbon cycle, etc. The planet is reusing materials all the time. Thus, some of your clean drinking water was someone's pee at some point before.

I don't see why that is gross at all. Drinking actual pee would be super gross. But drinking water that used to be pee is still just water now and that's all the matters.
So it looks like QC is good for speeding up simulations, and with far less overhead for ECC and such than it needs for things like factoring. So is simulation the QC "killer app"?

Does it only do certain kinds of simulations well, i.e. simulations of quantum systems, or can that be generalized? Can it be applied to economic, environmental, traffic, etc as well?
In other words, you can't do RAII.

Instead you call a constructor that sets a dumb default state, and then another, "init()" function, that sets the state to something else, and returns a status result. But first it has to check if it is already init'd, and maybe deinit() first, if so, or maybe fail. Then you check the result of init(), and handle whatever that is, and return some failure. Otherwise, you do some work, and then call deinit(), which has to check if it is init'd, and then clean up.

I knew someone else who worked at Google. 15-20% was his estimate. Bjarne ran experiments and found overheads approaching that.
Tony Stark in the first "Avengers" movie had a pretty good plan B: "If we can't protected the Earth, then you can be damn well sure we'll avenge it".
Except reality has so far proved that it is possible to use QC for solving one QC-specific task that is hard to solve classically, that's it. That's not what "naysaing" was about - the "naysaying" was about the fact we have no way to use QC for known classical tasks, and the path to such juicy targets as breaking commercial public key encryption is entirely unclear. Virtually nobody says it would never ever happen - but so far it has not happened and will not happen soon, and reality has not proven anything contradicting that yet. When, in 2038 or in 2083, the reality finally gets there, then your condescending attitude towards the naysayers would finally be completely warranted. But not yet.
>It's a shame that RMS has to spout forth on every issue, and in the current climate of outrage, science may have lost an important transformational voice.

The four freedoms are truly revolutionary and have grown on me over the years. If he had been a bit more focussed and perhaps even a little pragmatic it wouldn't be hard to view him as a Steve Jobs or Bill Gates like figure. At the very least we would be having conversations about software in terms of non-free and free versus proprietary and open source.
But removing the images from ImageNet, an inanimate set of images that cannot make value judgements, will surely fix this problem...

Our culture is broken and nobody is willing to stand up to insanity or even admit to it. People are too happy to do completely insane and senseless things if it saves them from the social lynchings.
>Which, as I said before, is only some of the time, but even under that assumption...

The only scenario where it's not is if the demand curve is perfectly inelastic. If the price is set at $100, and selling it for $400 instead doesn't raise the average willingness to pay of buyers, then there has to be exactly the same demand at $100 as at $400, which is extremely unlikely.

>Then why don't they? Anyone who buys a ticket intending to go to the play is free to change their mind and resell it. Modern online services make this quite easy. But most people don't resell their tickets.

We're talking about a hypothetical scenario without scalpers. In that scenario, it's difficult to impossible to resell tickets.

>But here is one possible situation where even an economically rational actor would prefer to have a ticket than to be awarded a market price:

Yes, positing an income effect from winning the ticket lottery can produce a model where this result no longer holds. But income effects that strong are insanely rare. To reframe this, you're suggesting if they had found $400 on the street that morning, the rational thing to do given their preferences is to spend $400 on a ticket, but they shouldn't otherwise. You're depicting someone so poor that an additional $400 represents a significant wealth difference, but also where it makes sense to spend $400 on a ticket rather than on other things. In the real world, I think we'd call someone like that irrational.

It might be plausible in other contexts, but it doesn't seem reasonable in the ticket context.
I think you refer to the publication, and not the journal? I was referring to "making data openly available", quoting the top-level comment, and "If you have useful data" in my comment you replied to.

The data repository I mentioned is the PDB. Quoting http://www.rcsb.org/pages/policies :

> Data files contained in the PDB archive (ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org) are free of all copyright restrictions and made fully and freely available for both non-commercial and commercial use. Users of the data should attribute the original authors of that structural data.

That means it's available for redistribution.

BTW, the general trend is to use "source available" instead of "open source" when the source is available for viewing and perhaps local modification, but not for redistribution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-available_software
its very simple to get .net core DI working, shouldn't be much code other than registering your types / service.

await new HostBuilder().ConfigureServices((context, services) => { // services.AddTransient.... }).UseConsoleLifetime().Build.RunAsync()
It would be very hard to retest, not just because of traffic, but also because some websites like amazon.com will throttle you to a halt or start showing captchas if they think you are scraping.
Share Whatsapp Stories to Facebook Stories with Latest Whatsapp Update
Interesting. Any idea how they responded to the obvious retorts about heavier than air birds?
Because the woke scolds have spoken and nobody wants to stand up to them. So better to do patently insane things than risk becoming collateral damage in a social lynching.
Maybe I'm reading the GP's anecdote incorrectly, but the behavior in question seemed like targeted harassment, not just "a bit of adult off-color talk".
This but virtualenv / virtualenvwrapper.

workon [project name] and deactivate.

Pycharm sees these and they work.
USB Cable Resistance: Why your phone/tablet might be charging slow
Here in NZ its very popular as well.
I feel like we're just transferring the labour from ops to dev though. Where I work we still haven't got as good a development workflow with lambdas as we did with our monolith (Django).
Oh man, I love tmux.

I guess I am not a very advanced user but some of its features really appeal to me.

We use Macbooks at work and initially I used iTerm2. I've always been a heavy user of the terminal and split views. (Neo)Vim is my main editor. However, I experienced difficulties switching back and forth between my work laptop and my personal Ubuntu system at home. I switched to tmux to be able to have the exact same set up on both OS's.

Although that was my initial reason for switching; I have come to love tmux. Just the fact that I can quickly SSH into my home machine, attach to my tmux instance and continue working from anywhere is amazing.
Many of these features sound like Julialang to me.. Not certain how well they fit with Nim.

In fact, I almost suspect you are hinting in that direction yourself ;)
Arbitrary lines on the map do not matter as far as the atmosphere is concerned, which is why per capita is the correct measure when accessing whether a country is doing better or worse than other countries on emissions.
> his leadership qualities depend only on his ability to lead a group towards a goal, which he was doing swell at

It sounds like his behavior was alienating people who would have been willing to work toward that shared goal, but were instead pushed away. So based on what I'm reading, he was a poor leader in this regard.
Or just jam ctrl + b + space until it looks good.
Local stations can also sponsor their own content and get content from sister stations. Content providers don't always have stations. They have affiliates.
On the one hand, it's a 2% gain in efficiency. On the other, it's a 60% reduction in losses. From that viewpoint, it's pretty significant.
In the US you need an undergrad plus 4 years of dental school. Most dentists then start practice immediately, although some go on to do a residency in Orthodontics or other area.

Oral surgeons do a 5 year residency after dental school, and are usually awarded an MD as well as the DDS from dental school.

Physicians do undergrad + 4 year med school + 3-9 years of residency / fellowship.