skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
People will make content as a hobby, but you won't see people doing it on the level (frequency or quality) they have been today. Internet likes and shares are nice but if they won't pay the bills, and a lot of creators will prioritize their time accordingly.
Pihole is just a GUI on top of dnsmasq, they're not doing anything fancy, apart maybe for the extra statistics. These are some interesting ideas for improvement, I'd also be interested in something with more flexibility, but I'm not sure if there's an alternative at the moment.
Yes, like May's deal that MPs rejected. One of the fundamental things you need to understand in order to make sense of what's going on in Parliament is that none of the Brexit-related options have the support of a majority of MPs and it's unlikely they ever will unless there's another general election. So the only way for anything to get a majority is for a bunch of MPs who disagree on what they want to ally with each other in order to vote against one of the other options. Also, a general election would most likely have given Boris Johnson the majority he needs to push through no-deal Brexit, which a majority of MPs oppose.
Based on the design. It is a corn revolutionized
This is absolutely what I have heard from people I know in the fashion industry. Manufacturing these items requires a lot of skill.
Note that it was the prime minister who wanted to suspend the parliament, not parliament itself. So the court protected the functioning of parliament from interference from the prime minister.

Also, the US also has the Supreme Court ruling on actions by the other two branches, so there's really no difference there. If Trump tried to suspend the House of Representatives and a court had to rule on that, you can bet Trump would get slapped down.

And then there's the recent politicalization of appointments to the Supreme Court; not exactly good for the Court's independence.
>dns server (dnsmasq or unbound) + periodically updated hosts file (via systemd timer) passed to the dns server.

This is what Pihole is...

All extra is just default blocklists, API access, dashboard with stats and settings.
Ugh, you're right, compassion gets the better of me yet again. To be honest, her brave stance has really made me feel so lucky for the way I was able to live my 16th year. Hard manual labor for low pay during the summers, social anxiety about my social status and the mind-numbing tedium of school were the absolute best. I can't imagine where she finds the strength to give all of that up.
Liberal Party of Australia shortened the parliament sitting days to avoid scrutiny: https://www.sbs.com.au/news/labor-accuses-government-of-cutt...

That's just the tip of the iceberg. There's much more anti-democratic changes in Australia.
Yeah, Gates was born wealthy, so Microsoft isn't exactly a rags-to-riches story.
I would respectfully disagree. The builder of the AI should be trained in recognizing that his discrimination machine can be used for good and for bad. If the creation shows racist tendencies, it's an outcome of the machine but a function of the (lack of) quality in the modeller. If the end result is racism, I would like to be able to point to the creator of the AI (a human) not a piece of software.

More concrete: government AI shouldn't use things like names, zipcode demographics (at least those strongly to those characteristics we think discrimination = racism) and pictures of humans in their models. Why? Because it's pretty much impossible to control your model for racist tendencies one you start there. It's in the ethics of the creator of the model to point that out and just don't do it. If you do, and all people whose name start with an M (for Mohammed) get a different category, racist is the right term IMHO.
< Church is an institution.

This is incorrect. Its original meaning is "assembly", "meeting" and refers to a group of people more than a building/denomination/organization: https://www.compellingtruth.org/definition-church.html.
> The apple trashcan certainly looks vastly better than other commercially available *trashcans.
There is something of a bait-and-switch when you segue from neoplatonic "oneness" to Christianity. The concept of "oneness" is vague enough that it cannot be in opposition to science, since it doesn't describe anything consequential or observable. It is basically a feel-good phrase, which is of course perfectly fine.

But Christianity implies certain ideas which are absolutely consequential, primarily that a certain historical person was the "Son of God" and that he literally rose from the dead. The idea that a single specific person could be God or the Son of God (as opposed to everybody else) is in direct opposition to any reasonable idea of God as "oneness".
Yep! Thank you so much! I really need to update the documentation, but I think `cross` (https://github.com/rust-embedded/cross), a drop-in cargo replacement, is the probably the best available solution for building musl-based binaries.
A wonderful introduction to the Estonian language and some of its quirks.
I have minor quibbles, although my relationship to the language is as a non-native historian of the country, not a Finno-Ugric linguist or local. I always felt (rather unscientifically, of course) as though Estonian traded some of the agglutinative regularity that characterize Finnish and Hungarian for greater vocabulary familiarity for Germanic speakers. Despite what the author writes in her first endnote on foreign loan words, I've found a knowledge of German to be quite helpful when trying to guess the meaning of a word (or to extemporaneously construct one) using a calque from German.
I literally just switched in the past two months (actually, went from having used screen two jobs ago (~2 years ago) to using tmux at my current job). I'm on the tmux train now and I'm pretty happy with it.
Yeah unfortunately not many consumers think in terms of "cost per wear", we are trying to change this at Thread!
All true - and yet this parliament seems remarkably reluctant to allow the electorate the opportunity to correct this state of affairs.
AD0-300 Adobe Campaign Classic Business Exam
The goal of the law is not to make information impossible to find. That's why this targets search engines primarily.

The goal is that it becomes harder to resurface irrelevant information from someone's past.
Uber's London licence renewed for two months
The Ex-Felon Who Has Made $1M as a Hacker, Legally
Nice it reminds me of the classic Runescape to an extent. I wasnt big on Runescape at the time like my friends were but I still admire the game. I know some still remember it fondly it is one of the icons of mid 2000s gaming much like Starcraft.
Recruiters don't replace the interview process, where the dynamic is that the applicant is the interviewee. They only change the way the applicant discovers the job.

Most people will never be headhunted.
Yes but running multiple lambda jobs in parallel would still add upto more time than 12 minutes. What am I missing?
What is a specific example of a PC behavior which you don't appreciate? I want to understand why you are concerned.
Given the current state of "AI", the dispatcher would've sent Jehova's Witnesses and then badgered you for the next three years about "people with emergencies like yours also liked"
> The builder of the AI should be trained in recognizing that his discrimination machine can be used for good and for bad.

Quite a tautology.
Sunspel is great, but I think it would be equally great if manufactured outside the UK, perhaps in Portugal, and probably quite a bit cheaper. The UK just isn't that skilled at this anymore – those who had the skills retired out of the workforce and we don't have many with the experience to train a new crop of workers.
Is it plausible? Seems a bit too good to be true
thanks - that was super interesting article.
Makes sense, with their main business being the inverse.
This wasn't an action taken by Parliament, it was an action taken by a private citizen and his assistants. It's just that the private citizen happened to be the Prime Minister. Individual members of parliament can still be subject to the law, without threatening the supremacy of parliament. After all, the laws these judges are adjudicating on are made by parliament.
This essential phenomenon is nothing new, of course. In the UK, it's just as fashionable and pretty much always has been to borrow words and phrases from other more exotic languages.

But I do agree that some languages are more inured to this than others, such as British English. Having enough native speakers generating new OC in the language also helps prevent a fashionable trickle of loanwords become a flood that threatens to sweep everything away.

It's the same in Sweden, English has become so commonplace you see it everywhere. Probably half od all public adverts on bus shelters and the like are written in English for no apparent reason other than it's fashionable. "Yes" has become a fairly common alternative to "ja". But overall, I don't worry too much than Swedish is really under threat or that in a generation English will have taken any deeper root.
I'm not a Commonwealth type, are the UK and Australian governments somehow linked?
If you think an article about communicating well in life-threatening emergencies is somehow advice for "the next big product pitch", maybe it's not HN that should step back and think for a second.
Announcement here:
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/powershell/out-gridview-retur...
Show HN: HackerThought – Indie Tech Blog Aggregator
It's unclear what connection you're making between the expenses of travel and booking speeches and being a "shill". What is the difference between this case of public speaking and others?
I’ve never encountered a compiler that needed ALL CAPS. I guess some people saw old code and just emulated that.
I'd miss Temporals grumpy assertions. I learned I'm even older than him, that's disconcerting.
> If speech is so potent a weapon that to protect against it we have to use extreme social defenses like expulsion, why not to use the same weapon against the perpetrators? Why not to speak in return? Stallman says something, you say something. Take that, Richard Stallman!

Because the power of the speech in question depends upon the power of the speaker. This isn't rocket science. If I as a random human person say something creepy to you on the street you can just go away. If Stallman does it and you are working under him you have to weigh a whole lot of things (academic standing, his prestige, the possibility that a whole lot of people will defend him just because of who he is and accuse you of accusing him of a "thoughtcrime") in your response. It's an assymetrical situation.
I completely agree. Time has proven that the international market is a powerful force, both in positive and negative. As far as I can see focusing on nurturing the positive effect of the already existing market is the way forward.
At her age (okay one year younger) I was busy overthrowing a communist government. One month at the barricades, in the dead of the winter against battons. Didn't consider myself brave at all.

We had teen driven revolutions and riots agains governments in the last decade. The least proteser at Gezi park was braver than her. Ditto for arab spring, Venezuela and now against Putin.
It's a shame really, I feel like we've lost something from the years of SGI workstations that looked like they came straight from the future.
Bill Gates Is Right to Support a Wealth Tax
It means large companies and organizations will be able to do it, but you won't.
> Few people ever hit the world stage as adults. She did it as a teen.

You have to ask how much of this is genuine and on merit, and how much was engineered.
With a canceling of the brexit the time and money spent would be wasted, while with a brexit (no matter if deal or no deal scenario) there would be at least no waste plus the chance that a harsh Brexit will prevent Visegrad, Italy and Greece from further pursuing their dream of "becoming independent from the dictators in Brussels".
I often run tmux in ssh in tmux. The outer tmux is just for my local terminals. The inner tmux is mostly so I can reattach later. Though it is also nice to easily get two shells on the remote machine side by side.
Out of curiosity, why does this apply to US and Isreal residents? Is there a legal framework that makes Isarelis eligible for these kinds of settlments automatically?
Gotta add something.
Our democratic system is shit. Most people are to stupid to vote for the things they actually want, instead everything is a popularity contest, propaganda and a bunch of lies. Or it's a straight autocracy where only a small handful of people benefit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy

Please, thank you.
This is the "hard part" with atom-level biological simulations. You need extremely tiny timesteps -- like, sub-picosecond, even -- but many interesting molecular events happen on the timescale of minutes.
Cloud Computing - Browser Based Serverless IDE
This feels like child abuse to me. Those who incite and subject children to such trauma should be ashamed. She is absolutely right that she should be in school. It is her peers that study and work hard that will deliver solutions for the problems in the future.
No: you can create system libraries in Nim, unlike Go.

You can also entirely disable the GC or replace implementation.

Nim can run without OS and on microcontrollers.
It still seems strange for "how the hell should I know" to ellicit such a reaction. Even if/when it's considered a curse, it's not aimed at anyone. It's strange to me to see someone take the defensive when they're not being attacked.
Better; use dvtm within Screen. This is what i do; one Screen session (fullscreen size) on my main dev box with each Screen window running its own dvtm instance. Thus each Screen window becomes a "workspace" (if needed, connected to a remote host) with dvtm-managed multiple tiles/shells. Flexible and not too complicated with all the power of Screen and the simplicity of dvtm. In fact, i use this setup even when working on my local machine. Throw in vim for the editor and you have a simple and standard setup which you can carry with you everywhere.
Class actions are interesting. Basically the lawyer for the class has a dollar value he or she wants before they even send their letter to the company being sued. Then they work towards that. Once they reach that number they don’t really care how the class is reimbursed. And neither do the judges.
US (and UK) have been in more and longer wars than China and Russia in the past 70 years, recession or no recession. And their wars cause damage on a global rather than regional scale.
I'm totally okay with ads in my podcasts if they're helping fund one of my favorite activities without profiling and tracking me as an individual. I don't want even more podcasts to go to Patron route - I can't afford it. I seriously hope this doesn't become popular.
Only through the Govenor-General, who is the Queen's standin in the Australian copy of the British system: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/dec/16/queen...
In fact it was. It was a simple vote between leaving and remaining, with the exact details of both options being left undefined. Certainly our remainer establishment would have wasted no time in interpreting a Remain vote as permission to rapidly speed up integration.

The pathologically EU-loyal British establishment is now trying to destroy the vote via the following simple trick:

1. Declare that there's no way to leave without a "deal"

2. Make it clear to the EU they can dictate any terms they want whatsoever because the UK will under no circumstances walk away from the table.

3. EU dictates terms that are essentially the same as not leaving, or actually even worse.

4. Establishment declares that this "deal" is the same thing as leaving and tries to ram it through, or failing that, to cancel the whole thing by claiming that the UK can't leave unless the EU agrees due to <generic chaos>. Both outcomes are fine by them because it establishes for good the principle that leaving the EU should be as impossible as an American State seceding from the Union, which is what they want.

What we see at the moment are people actually working in the real economy, like port operators, saying they're prepared for no deal and there'd be no disruption at all. The EU has also quietly agreed various unrelated agreements to e.g. keep planes flying and even granting London a financial passport, the thing they said they'd never actually do. The fact that "no deal" actually means already "a bunch of small continuity deals" has gone largely unnoticed in the UK.

But ultimately now it's gone far beyond port disruption, mobile roaming costs or other trivial things. The British people are receiving a message loud and clear that the entire ruling class simply will not let the UK leave unless the EU agrees, despite it being a theoretically self-governing nation. If the UK doesn't leave without the EU's agreement then many will conclude it's actually a dictatorship.
I think the point is that she's acting on her own volition and under her own motivations, not that she is somehow physically alone.
Trackers are indeed a big part of the problem.
I have a feeling that sometime in the near future we'll see a rise of publisher-aggregators. Pay once, to access many. (that's a glove thrown there, in case anyone missed it)
Free software and open source software cover basically the same software. The main difference is that these communities value different parts of the software. Free Software supporters value the freedom aspects of the software, while Open Source Software supporters value the development practices to create powerful and reliable software. If you listen to these supporters on the benefits of releasing your software as Free and Open Source, you will hear completely different reasons why.
Just so I can reverse your convenient sterilization of terms, On a global scale you are talking about millions of people starving to death.
You don't even need to buy the latest model. I've been running mine in a Pi Zero for +2 years without any problem.
Yes. https://www.gnu.org/software/screen/manual/screen.html#Split
The Naomi Wolf one is most excruciating listen on radio I've ever heard.

https://mobile.twitter.com/thymetikon/status/113170257787850...
I remapped the prefix locally, and run vanilla tmux on remote boxes.
Openwrt has DNS ad-blocking built in which works just as well as pi-hole. It simply doesn't have the monitoring of what is being blocked but it is rarely needed anyway.

https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/ad-blocking
No, but other outlets also aren't put on a pedestal and given public funding.
As a fellow tfjs user - what were the most annoying parts in the API access for you?
You can see a screenshot from my VPN pihole blocking tracking requests from my android phone and make a decision do you need it or not.

https://i.imgur.com/Hpcw42h.png
I know ublock origin does because I have been using that on my systems and never see them.
Anymore? Advertising has been the major source of newspaper revenue forever.
> The PM is only the first minister, the serve at the behest of parliament.

As a non-Commonwealther, what exactly is the PM supposed to (or not supposed) to do? In school the PM was always explained as "their version of President," which I know waxes over tonnes of detail.

The day after the proroguing announcement, I read a bit that claimed this was "normal" in the UK Parliament. What makes this so particularly unusual and illegal?
A few comments/explanations on that ruling:

1. It is not the end of the case -- this ruling is from the European Union law's top court (the CJEU) to give the ultimate interpretation of European Union law on the topic.

2. The case now goes back to France, where the French judge will decide, taking into account both EU law and French law, whether the Data Protection Authority's (CNIL) ruling against Google was correct or not. The most crucial point that most media reports miss is that the CJEU ruling states clearly that French courts are not prohibited from ordering a global de-listing of all versions of Google, if the protection of privacy requires so (Point 72 of the ruling).

3. The CJEU ruling restates many points from its 2014 ruling against Google Inc (US) and Google Spain - i.e. this is about an individual's right to remove certain results from the list of results based on the individual's name. It is not a right to remove content per se, nor is it a right to remove results entirely (i.e. the de-listed results should be searchable through any other search query)

4. As in 2014, the Court rules that as a general rule/principle, the individual's right to opt-out prevails over the public's freedom to access search results -- but this is not absolute, and the other way around may be true depending on the circumstances (e.g. if the result is particularly relevant for the public's interest). [This "general rule" is the part of the ruling which I find most open to criticism, as in my opinion this is not what the law provides]

5. This ruling is based on law before the GDPR. While the GDPR will continue to apply this mutatis mutandis as we say, this ruling has nothing to do directly with GDPR.
Apparently, it's not enough that you need the biggest dongle in the world (i.e. the machine itself!) to use the software.

Same for a lot of other industrial equipment. In my (admittedly limited) experience, they get cracked pretty quickly by the owner, either before the factory ever gets any downtime, or right after the first time.
Yes they have the same head of state: Queen Elizabeth II
See I get the exact opposite, conservatives I know constantly talk about their worldview, in the very annoying "facts don't care about your feelings" fashion, have you considered you might just be overlooking things that match your worldview as "not political", as people do.
That's a false analogy and doesn't fit here.

Leaving aside how naive a statement like "the Chinese believe" is (you're talking about an ethnicity which clearly has multiple opinions on everything, just like any other group of people).

In democracies communists are free to say how great it is not having a choice of government and others are free to disagree.

The issue is not with the expression of opinion but with the expression of extremist falsehoods delivered on both sides of an argument with the only goal of causing instability.

Just like in a sales tabloid newspapers, truth is not important only the reaction. Ever notice how the retraction notices are so much less prominent than the original articles were?
You're correct, I should have mentioned the purpose. I'm currently testing the service, want it stop when it fails and just not when I exit the SSH; hence the tmux.

For restarting the service, systemd is the way to go.
> The problem is people are willing to pay for certain products with their attention, via ads, but not with money.

1. People who are adblocking are saying that they are not willing to pay with attention. You can only compare their relative willingness to pay with attention vs money when you provide both options fairly.

2. I don't take it as given that businesses have the right to make money however they want. There are human right principles and I think an important fundamental right missing from the UN Declaration is the right to not be subjected to subtle influence techniques that compromise your beliefs (even if those belief are about which soap you should buy). Any business strategy that goes against this principle should be illegal and if certain industries and businesses die as a result, so be it. I would take no economic growth over compromised human rights any day.