skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The hardware isn't the problem, it's the drivers.
For performance and to improve the development workflow.

WebAssembly looks amazing. Much faster web applications. Then you have stuff like Hudini which will let you create custom DOM elements and allow open source web frameworks to provide really sane DOM element offerings.

WebAssembly has the largest potential. Just look at Microsofts Blazor project. If you do any .NET Blazor looks even more amazing! Then Microsoft also has React Native for Windows.
evolution is very usable imo, geary looks nicer but tends to crash more.
mailmate for mac!
That's partially true. The other benefit is that there's no vDOM, the way things change is reactive (kinda like in react), but there's no such thing as a no-op change. if you set something to what it was, it would trigger a partial rerender so you have to check before setting. With react you get those checks for free (provided you comply to certain restrictions).
Not so much of an issue as long as the population keeps increasing (maybe even the opposite...)
Then call it flooding, not spamming. Or “rate limiting”.
The "or later" clause is at the discretion of the licensee. People who own no copyright of GNU can keep redistributing it under GPLv3 indefinitely, regardless of what GPLv4 says.
Wire fraud has no mandatory minimum and depending on the transaction value the sentencing guidelines are very light. The killer is ID theft which carries 24 month mandatory minimum with no ability to run concurrently with any other charge.
> working on automated vehicles for the US military

Somehow I missed this, so a person literally working on helping the government kill people was the one asking to remove RMS? Interestingly enough, such hypocrisy came up in all the deplatforming cases too, where they removed some relatively innocent stuff claiming it had bad impact on people, but ignored and keep ignoring all the weapons promoting content, war propaganda, etc. that literally causes death and destruction.
Most men at MIT aren't asking out people less than half their age.
The first job to be replaced by AI: taxi driver or mathematician? Or perhaps analog designer [1]?

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21083173
It's a shame but I've done the same.

Went from pine/mutt because HTML is annoying and HTML is everywhere. Then from TB to pure Gmail because labels are weird, general slowness, etc.

I know Gmail is a slow-ish SPA but.. whatever. Properly formatted plain text emails are not appreciated as they used to. I guess I caved in.
Well, if you’re spending time at a job that is leading to “anxiety”, “stress”, and “burn out”, you’re optimizing for PTO when you should be optimizing for finding a job that doesn’t stress you out while you’re working.

I made a promise to myself that I would never stay at a job more than a month that was stressful. I’ve kept that promise for the latter 10 years of my life.
This is pretentious and pretty bad advice.

Does the author believe most people can afford to quit working for a period of time, let alone afford to travel around the world? Does this author look down upon those who aren't so well traveled, view them as lesser or less deserving?
I’ll belive it when I see it. SRV has been around for ages, and the arguments given for not using SRV in HTTP/2, QUIC etc. have been weak and unconvincing, despite its obvious benefits.
Application Layering – A Pattern for Extensible Elixir Application Design
In the case of Optical Phase Conjugation that is correct. Which is why I said "apparent" in my original post.
Physics allow for -t in many places.

However in the case of psi it is about time, that is effect happens before the cause.

"... PAA [predictive anticipatory activity, an other term for Presentiment], the predictive physiological anticipation of a truly randomly selected and thus unpredictable future event, has been under investigation for more than three decades, and a recent conservative meta-analysis suggests that the phenomenon is real. ..."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3971164/
It is a shame.

Do note that SCTP is heavily used in telecom. Every network element in that world needs to be redundant, along with the multiple routes to get to each of those redundant elements. SCTP helps hide some of that from the application layers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIGTRAN
>Well, your initial argument was different (and nonsensical). I quote:

>> He said that an underage sex trafficking victim's "plausible" apparent consent means that the people who raped her did not commit sexual assault.

Well, first of all, this is a factual claim I'm making on the basis of evidence, not an "argument". Either RMS said it or he didn't. I'm describing it as rape because that's what it legally is, and that's also what I believe it is ethically, but that's actually irrelevant to the point about RMS. If you insist, you can read my statement as "the people who had sex with her did not commit sexual assault".

If you want to get technical, "who raped her" is a clarifying statement of fact (which "people"? those who raped her), not a claim about what RMS thinks. Obviously he doesn't think Minsky raped her, because he thinks (it's plausible that) Minsky did not even sexually assault her. That is, I'm saying RMS said the people [the ones who raped her] did not commit sexual assault, not RMS said "the people who raped her didn't commit sexual assault." (I think I was a good bit more clear than this in the OP, but I'm doing my best to draw out the ambiguity here.)

>I believe this is what Stallman was arguing against - if you dislike Minsky's conduct, be explicit in what you dislike about it.

Well, as I've pointed out so many times already in this thread (not exasperated at you specifically, but the piling on and trollery is getting quite old), my point is not about whether Stallman's claims are correct or not. The point is that I claimed in my OP that Stallman said P. A hundred people have come out of the woodwork to tell me he did not say P, but have consistently provided zero evidence, while I've been quite clear, providing links and analysis of his actual statements. And I've been downvoted to hell for saying these things about a community hero.

For the last time, to be as clear as possible, the only thing I want to defend in this thread is that RMS made this argument:

1. If X has sex with Y, but X does not coerce Y to have sex, X does not sexually assault Y.

2. (Assume) M had sex with Y, but Y presented herself as entirely willing to M.

C. M did not sexually assault Y.

So it's a defense that even if Minsky had sex with her, he (probably) didn't assault her, because she (probably) presented herself as willing.

That is what RMS said. That's also what I said he said. It's something many people think is a very offensive and false statement (which is why he was fired), though I'm not really interested in defending the fact that it's offensive and false. (I said I thought this was irrelevant in my OP, go check.) I'm only interested in defending the fact that this is what he said.

(You've been downvoted, but not by me, you can't downvote replies. This thread is toxic as hell, but someone will probably be along to upvote you shortly.)
Unfortunately they will probably point to the poor sales of this model as justification that this pro tower market really is dead. “Sorry guys, for some reason only Marvel editors bought these so were canning the line”
>Our hope was to decrease the pressure normal people feel about sharing their lives with their friends and family.

My question is: do you honestly think that people should share their private lives with their friends and family through a public, global platform owned by a giant corporation? Maybe that's part of the problem.
That's orthogonal to the conversation.

The conversation was clearly about organised religion, i.e. specifically the Catholic Church (in Poland or Germany but also in general as a larger entity). It doesn't get much more organised than the Catholic Church.

It was also clear that "church" in this context is used in the sense of "a formal religious organisation", especially because churches as formal organisations are legal entities in these countries.

What the term _originally meant_ is interesting but utterly irrelevant given that the meaning clearly doesn't match the intended meaning and the intended meaning is widely enough understood (and matches the Polish and German equivalent terminology).

That said, linking to a website operated by a conservative Evangelical ministry that preaches Young Earth Creationism and considers Catholic "non-Christians" ... in a conversation that's primarily about the Catholic church ... is "funny" to say the least.
If this draft RFC keeps the “priority” and “weight” features from SRV, it also means that most people would’t actually need a CDN.
> Software is created by "creeps" like us anyway, not by social activists

Maybe it’s time to change things up a bit?
I'm struggling to think what super high end content studio hasn't moved on by this point? All these tools are available on Windows, and no one still in business was waiting 12 years for a worthy upgrade.
I believe that's my position. If the social structure of humanity is based on genetic necessity, I wouldn't think to frame it as any one group of individuals making decisions that harm others.
I agree that named parameters are a better solution in this case.

A problem I have with the types solution is that, although it's easy to tell if the code is wrong, it's often a bit of a puzzle in my experience to figure out how to write it in the first place: "Hmm, this takes a Foo and a Bar. Can I construct a Foo from a string? No, but I can construct it from a Baz or a Quux. Can I construct a Baz from a string? No, just an int. How about a Quux? Yeah, there we go. Now, how about that Bar?". And I've seen other people have that problem too, especially novice programmers. I'm not a novice but it's still a problem for me in a new type-heavy API.

I realized I was creating that problem in Yeso, and I couldn't figure out how to simplify the API, so in addition to starting the documentation with complete examples, I made a graph with graphviz that shows the type structure of the API: https://gitlab.com/kragen/bubbleos/blob/master/yeso/README.m...

I don't have that problem with named-parameter interfaces (I just look at the list of methods and parameter lists), and maybe I could run into it with fluent interfaces in theory, but in practice that hasn't been much of a problem in my experience.

The article author was writing in Golang, which doesn't have named parameters, but in languages like Python, Lua, Clojure, or, as you say JS, named parameters are straightforward. In Lua it's even simpler than in JS:

copy {from='presentation.md', to='/tmp/backup'}

I would never claim that Lua isn't bug-prone, though!
See, all the innovations are about code management and tracking. There has been nothing new for users for many years. In 2004 Gmail made AJAX popular and updating pages without reloading was a big deal. Later we had rounded corners, video without the Adobe Flash player, then came the websites that fit the screen size(the responsive web stuff) and later, we got some WebSocket stuff making possible real-time communications even snappier than AJAX.

That said, this is 15 years of time and the innovations came as browsers got better, IE died off but all these JS frameworks were always about making the codebase nicer.

Is there anything new for the users here? If not, why keep spawning new frameworks? Do these frameworks make anything better for the developers? In my experience, the JS world is a giant mess mostly because of the excess of frameworks that do the same things essentially.

That's why I felt burned out of web dev. I found out that all these frameworks that are supposed to make something easier to do are only making problems infinitely complex.

There's nothing new that you couldn't have done with 10 years old frameworks but now you need specialized knowledge on tons of tools.
The hard part - at least in languages I've worked with - is how hard it is to create a new string that acts like a string should act but isn't a string. In many (C's typedef) you can create two new types, but nothing stops you from using mixing them up as they freely convert to each other without even a warning. In some object oriented languages you can often create a new string - but only by writing by hand every single member function.

Of course none of the above are unsolvable problems. I've never seen anything that actually makes it easy, but I won't claim to have seen everything.
No, it should be implemented in hardware instead.

(This is partly a joke and partly a description of what actually happens with TOE "TCP Offload Engine" network cards.)
I have not actually addressed the comments RMS made about the use of the word "assault" - I haven't used that word in any of my remarks. And I don't think that in any of my comments, I have denied any quotation you have attributed to RMS. Straw man.

FWIW, he evidently said that he thinks it's wrong to use the word "assault" when no coercion is involved. I think he may be wrong about that, if the word is being used as part of a term of art in law. It might also be something that depends on jurisdiction. RMS is instead complaining that the use of the term "assault" to refer to an act that (if it occurred at all) Minsky believed to be consensual, is prejudicial and unfair.

I was once told that in Common Law, "assault" occurs when you ball your fist and wave it in someone's face; "battery" occurs when you hit them with it. So in common language, assault means a physical threat of force. In the context of sexual assault, however, things look different. If you fiddle sexually with a three-year-old, you commit a serious sexual assault, even though no threat might have been involved.
> he outright fired a transgender woman from the FSF for reporting her transphobic coworker who kept harassing her

Would you mind providing a citation for this? I am legitimately curious, Leah for example retracted their comments on the issue.

> Not to mention his refusal to respect the pronouns of trans, queer, and nonbinary folks.

Please elaborate. This is the first time that I hear of such an accusation.

> See also https://mobile.twitter.com/_sagesharp_/status/11736371384133....

I don't see anything wrong there. What is wrong with believing that victimless crimes should be legal? Also, asking someone on a date is harassment now? What?
The idea that we are not all that dissimilar from our animal counterparts is one of the central arguments put forward by John Gray in Straw Dogs.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Straw-Dogs-Thoughts-Humans-Animals/...
I keep trying them all - and I keep hating my answer. I've been trying to like Evolution since 2000, this year I've tried all the flavours of mutt/neomutt and combinations of things like offlineimap. I've tried KMail, Geary, Outlook in Wine.... It's just Thunderbird.

Thunderbird is the only thing that works. It's not awesome, but it can keep up with my 5 email accounts that get checked in parallel.
Very recently went through 5 rounds with a company before they told me my salary ask was too high.
SV in a nutshell, folks.
Is "content marketing" an euphemism for "spam"? The article has lots of words, but little real information.
One aspect that stuck out to me: OP states that he/she is more or less coerced by HR to conduct such interviews. Great example of the lunatics taking over the asylum, in my opinion.
I think people in these discussions over-assume that patriarchal is consciously intentional. So we're confusedly agreeing?

> The social structure that results is emergent, not designed.

... yes, and the undesigned structure that has emerged we are labelling "patriarchy".

> the social structure of humanity is based on genetic necessity

... requires a lot more unpacking. Is this asserting that culture doesn't exist and material conditions are irrelevant? All behaviour is only genetic? I don't think that's what you're claiming, but I can't parse it otherwise.
If you're going to travel the world many times, learn to sail and favor trains. Or define "world" as smaller than the actual globe.

The benefits of travel are numerous. They were there before our understanding of global heating and pollution. Times have changed since sentiments like in this post.

We have to factor our new understanding into our models for a good life. Seeing as how billions of people before flying led happy lives, flying around the world four times isn't necessary.

(To clarify, Derek didn't say you have to fly around the world four times. He wrote it generally enough that you could interpret it several ways, but I expect many people will interpret him to mean fly around the world four times.)
Yea, essentially what I'm saying in my a vs b scenario.

> Or you can only list the product and make the buy button and items available come from an api, doable, but then you start to loose the simplicity of gatsby.

And you still haven't solved the issue of delays between content changes and deployment... What if someone has made a bad mistake in content editing and you need to revert it? You're exposed to the whims of your build processes and infrastructure... There's no way I can sell to anyone who's played with Wordpress or Shopify "well, your changes might take anywhere from 3 to 15 minutes to be live..."

That's why I'm asking, how can product and engineering teams justify this kind of thing? I'm not being facetious, I'd love to hear their perspective.
I felt the same way when I discovered Vue after a long time using React.
Dammit NA, would you hurry and finally upgrade to 230V already?
Government can just declare your cash worthless, or devalue it though.

The trick is that government is actually people, so make sure it's the right people
> The problem is then how does the network know where my IP address is. When a packet aims at my loopback, how does it work its way to me?

Mobile IP:

> The basic idea behind the separation is that the Internet architecture combines two functions, routing locators (where a client is attached to the network) and identifiers (who the client is) in one number space: the IP address. LISP supports the separation of the IPv4 and IPv6 address space following a network-based map-and-encapsulate scheme (RFC 1955). In LISP, both identifiers and locators can be IP addresses or arbitrary elements like a set of GPS coordinates or a MAC address.[2]

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locator/Identifier_Separation_...
The dynamics of collective social behavior in a crowd controlled game
https://neurosphere.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/physical-consci...
AOL.

Arriving in India with a six-week-old child after an overnight flight taught me something about travelling with children: Problems evaporate.

Everyone was queuing for passport control — our whole flight and several others, probably close to a thousand people queuing in a very large room. One of the minders saw me carrying the baby and waved us out of the queue at once. Would we please go over to the VIP&Diplomat queue. So we did, and another minder waved us out of the queue again. No, we should not queue with the VIPs&Diplomats, we should go straight past that queue and be processed immediately. The whole thing took about a minute.

That was how the trip started and that was how the rest was, too. 10/10 would do again.
Not necessarily, you can use coerce or Newtype instances, so you'd import one thing to deal with all the boilerplate wrapper types in all the modules they come from. This is specific to Haskell, but you could mimic it in other languages.
Agreeing with the general tone below. The post gives the impression people should conceal even innocuous interactions. The basis is, of course, to have several email addresses and give the impersonal one, which receives most of the spam, to forum/club mailing lists.
If you think GMail is pain free you'd be even more pleased with Fastmail. I simply cannot self host my mail/contacts/calendar because nothing that exists -- free or not -- can compete with the usability and available power user features of Fastmail.
They need Lin Clark[0]'s help. Explaining progress to a non technical audience is a critical skill that many developers lack.

0: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2018/10/webassemblys-post-mvp-futu...
WeWork's Neumann voted to oust himself as CEO after failed IPO, sources say
> government control over all your assets is becoming a real possibility

Isn't this already the case? it's just in day to day life they don't exert that control over you, but they can. Which of your assets are currently out of reach by your government?
Any sentence under threshold will become spent. Some crimes will still show on DBS checks.
Then you must agree that you are allowed to vilify someone for bullying autistic folks. After all people who do this are literally attacking other people over who they are and what they cannot change. Right?
The IT industry must grow up and accept people who are not neurotypical.
I don't care if the police officers were lying or not, you just showed me an absolutely shocking number of people resisting against police with their firearms. I'm sure many innocent people were killed by the police in the USA but the number of guilty people is even bigger.

If you have to build a law enforcement system that absolutely has to be able to deal with armed criminals then the end result is that violence escalates even when it could be avoided. You won't find meaningful gains in changing the behavior of the officers in such a society.
Thunderbird works quickly for me even with multiple IMAP accounts, much faster than any webmail solution.

Try compacting your folders:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/compacting-folders
I have a hard time imagining that was actually written by a human. It has the feel of AI-generated text.
This is probably survivorship bias at work. A lot of startups have strong sense of self worth because they believe they are hiring/have the best candidates with their process. Let's be realistic, you can probably build a really good team out of just about any sampling of 1000 applicants with just a regular couple-hour interview process.
I don't care much about it either, but thanks for the link. It seems there's a close-in-age exemption that wouldn't have applied in the Minsky case anyway.
If your file operations are designed for it they can recognize the copy situation above and fix it. I don't think it is practical to implement it, but I can design a toy language that would do the above. (Toy because to make it possible to do the above I would have to compromise other things wroth having)
> So we're confusedly agreeing?

Definitely. It feels like there's a difference in our interpretation of the context of the word "patriarchy". I have most often heard it used as a condemnation of a group of individuals who are also disadvantaged by the social structure. Similar to the way "idealism" is commonly used to disparage positive future thinking.

I would sure rather a society where no one has to feel like they're in a fight for survival where the only way to win is someone else losing.
mutt + offlineimap with EDITOR=emacsclient, but also gmail

At work I also use mutt instead of outlook for some tasks, as outlook is very poor.
I think I'd rather have a government with decades of fiscal management, bad or otherwise look after money than an organisation that has absolutely no accountability whatsoever.
“anatomically modern” refers to gross anatomy as evidenced in the fossil record.
My point is that this Stallman's comment is not 'defending aduls havings sex with children', but statement about empirical facts.

There are Stallman's statements defending non-coercive sex with children, but they are older:

https://stallman.org/archives/2003-may-aug.html#28%20June%20...
Since you said a hypothetical person who wants to be called by a ridiculous pronoun doesn't share your definition of respect, I'm wondering if you have an opinion on which desired pronouns are repectable and which aren't.