skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, at the end of the article I thought "Wow, he found an example of a set containing at least 8 elements!"
I wonder if some people's attitudes towards sex work may change if we get realistic sex robots.
TIL Masayoshi Son has the distinction of losing the most money in history (approximately $70bn during the dot com crash of 2000).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masayoshi_Son
> Copy is a high level concept

My point is that the high-level concept is not always appropriate. Sometimes it's overkill. Sometimes it's outright wrong.

> sending an email (who is the sender and who is the receiver?)

The sender is already encoded in the message itself in that case. The receiver is specified as a specific SMTP message, last I checked. So this problem wouldn't really apply here.

Even if it did, though, the separated functions would still be useful here:

msg = NewMessageFrom("sheev.palpatine@senate.gov")
AddSubject(msg, "Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Plagueis the Wise?")
AddBody(msg, "I thought not. It's not a story the Jedi would tell you.")
Send(msg, "anakin.skywalker@jedi.mil")
That reminds me of the flavor text of this Magic the Gathering Card (https://gatherer.wizards.com/pages/card/details.aspx?multive...)

There's an experience worse than blindness—it's the certainty that your vision is perfect and the horror that there's no world around you to see.
Totally right, I misremembered the concept. That makes some of the explanations much easier too.
That’s isn't something I missed, as it happens.

Given some of the answers on the Physics StackExchange, I think my error is using a static approximation like the Schwarzschild solution for a dynamic situation — given my grasp of the Einstein field equations is “ooh pretty symbols” this isn’t a huge surprise, though my lack of detailed understanding is a personal frustration.
Either it's different this time or it's coming eventually. Those are your choices.
Every book is based on a belief system of the author.
I just now found the Forget Me plugin for Chrome, which seems to work to wipe the NYT's tracking cookie and reset my access. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/forget-me-clean-hi...
Here's a threadreaderapp version https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1034492056968736768.html
I think the viewer ought to be smart enough to figure that out on their own. If the writer finds value in it, the ideology of it may not matter.
When I am performing my duties as a supervisor employed by the state, what do my personal first amendment rights have to do with anything?
Depending on what the hazard is, disinfection tablets can be effective and much cheaper than buying water.

Or SODIS sunlight disinfection.
The problem with their testing wasn't just that they tested against the best pilots. They simulated MCAS failure as just the stabilizer trim running away, which of course their test pilots caught. Real-world MCAS failures were accompanied by a bunch of warnings about loss of accurate airspeed and altitude (because those also used the angle-of-attack sensor), which meant that in reality pilots were occupied trying to sort through that and figure out if any of the conflicting airspeed and altitude readings could be trusted. That is, as I understand it, hard enough to deal with and demanding enough on its own that even well-trained Western pilots screw it up, occasionally with tragic results. Then whilst all that's happening they're meant to notice that the trim wheel is moving in an uncommanded and unwanted fashion, turn electric trim off, and manually wrestle the trim wheel back into the correct position (whatever that even is). Boeing didn't simulate any of those added complications according to the NTSB.
Hedge Funds Struggle to Replicate Warren Buffett’s Reinsurance Success
It is hard to be perfect at one’s job, and no one expects anyone to be flawless executives. But I think we underestimate how much more high-level executives are compensated in relation to their actual duties, and that even a severance package that seems small to an executive is probably pretty large compared to the salaries of most workers, who also do a lot of important work beyond sitting in on meetings and enforcing a set of abstract values.
I don't know why you got the impression that I'm somehow bashing Microsoft here. I don't think Microsoft have much better approach, having decide to move on from IE and their previous generation stacks.

Anyway, running IE within Edge doesn't solve the problem of users wishing to ditch IE but can't because of compatabilty - it is still running IE process. I'm not sure if this is the same thing, but it seems to be similar to the IE tab extension for Chrome, which exist for years. It just covers instance an IE instance within a Chrome tab. It is better from user perspective comparing to running IE in separate application but from security perspective it is just the same.

Edit: It still not clear how much will actually work, and the support is actually worse than I thought. currently only IE 11 fully support SharePoint, even in the latest 2019 SharePoint version.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/install/browser-...
Comex himself has spoken! It turns out I definitely didn't understand it correctly. Thanks for the clarification!
Like many others have pointed out, "average" is not bad enough. They need to be trying it with the worst pilots.
California's ‘Surprise’ Billing Law Is Protecting Patients and Angering Doctors
A php stack is the right stack for 2017 or 2019 for a company like Wag. What would a javascript framework offer them? Their core product is connecting people and dogs. A php stack with laravel means they have a working website with authentication on day 1. What would a javascript framework offer them?

Emailing tests or documents is very common during the interview process if the company is a startup. Offer them a github link with the code if you want to standout.

Why apply without knowing the stack?
I know lots of people who buy it because they believe it's higher quality. They don't care about the container.
> That's not how men process things. Men process things by trying to eliminate perceived unnecessary information and take action. Women are more inclined to want to sit down and discuss all the details of whatever is going on, many of those details the man would not perceive as useful.

I'm a man. Sometimes I do the former, more often the latter. And I do feel shamed for that, sometimes.

Expecting men and women to fit into neat, stereotyped boxes like this is a big part of the problem.
Have you never tried to use a tool from a cs paper and found that their code didn't even build or barely worked? This isn't a question of rigorous and non-rigorous fields. This is a challenge with artifact evaluation in all fields.
I think the point is that it’s irrelevant, because type checking or type assertions would take place at the parameter ingestion step specifically to render transposing the arguments impossible.

Any solution could be screwed up on purpose if you’re imagining someone at an interpreter prompt getting the arguments wrong or omitting unit tests that verify a certain file is used as source and a different file as dest... which is why this kind of objection just totally doesn’t matter.
I'm curious... would that car get incredibly hot parked in the sun?
It's not just the overt attempts in ad traffic... there's tweaking to how your feeds work from Twitter, Facebook and Google/YouTube themselves. There is definitely a LOT of meddling going on, much of it to shape the elections next year.
Even if everything were as you say (which I don't believe), it still would speak volumes that nobody saw a problem either with the message being delivered, or with Biden being the one to deliver it. Surely someone in the Obama administration understood the concept of "conflict of interest"... didn't they?
I have just started playing LOTR Online a few days ago after getting completely burnt out in WoW, and I'm finding it to be much more fun than I was expecting. The game engine is a bit less slick than WoWs, as it clearly has not been as updated as often as WoWs has been, but the environments and heavy story based questing more than make up for it.
There was last time I checked.
I also think pressing in this manner is likely to select less for the honest and more for people able to bullshit their way through better than the interviewer can keep up. Even if the interviewer has a high opinion of their ability.
just a note

i accidentally stopped reading after the “ADD YOUR NAME IF YOU AGREE” banner because i thought it was the end of the article

seems like every page is like that, and it might be better to either redesign it or move it to the end of the page (idk just my observation)
So you're telling me how I process things? Really....
> The writing is charming and approachable, while still packed with an impressive amount of knowledge.

It's actually the best technical writing I have ever seen, and I have read a lot. He can explain a complex thing really easy, and bring it very personally, as if he's a good, relaxed and funny friend explaining things.
Sorry, I didn't mean checkout as in checking out from the hotel. That was checkout from the booking site, when you're ready to enter in your billing details (shopping cart style) to pay for the room you just browsed on their site. The issue is the browsing experience on the main site and Google results shows $60 but at payment time it's really $100-150 because of non-avoidable resort fees and taxes.

It's one of those "dark patterns" that feels scammy.
Of course it is a specialty. In romance languages (at least Catalan, Spanish, French and Portuguese) we call them otorhinolaringologists - otorrino/otorhino for short. I have to say, the ENT doctor thing has always seemed very silly to me.
> I'd rather not be classified as insane, thanks.

What would I be classified as if I started worshipping, say, Thanos, and began preaching to everyone about him?

> the research suggests religion has positive effects on children. Your response to the corrected findings?

If it was safe for me to do so, my response would be to go out in my own religious country and film for you all the children throwing stones at animals (which they're encouraged to do so by their elders), all the beggars sleeping next to literal mounds of garbage, shunned by everyone, and the many other problems that religion is supposed to fix.
This is one of those comments that's on every mans mind but no one wants to be the one that says it
> I've found that women often appreciate and find men who are authentic, emotions included, attractive.

I have found they are attracted to the idea of that, until they get it. Understand there are consequences and approach objectively.

The same idea of a lot men liking the chase more than actually being with a woman.

Let them chase an idea of a man sharing feelings, let them chase the idea they can change a man into sharing. But be aware there are often consequences that don't involve them being interested in you any longer if you actually share.

No its # not all women, no its not collaborative or mature. But I guarantee you can keep the sexual companionship of many more women for longer if you shut up and dangle an emotional string just out of paws reach. If you’re looking for a more mature life partner? Keep looking! But if you like consistent sex with people that think they’ll change you into a life partner that they wont be attracted to, be aware of what is happening and understand a lot of the relationship power imbalance in your favor comes from this and continuing it. A lot of women don't consciously know they do this, just one day after you open up or do something less masculine, they don't see you the same again.

Enjoy a satire on this concept that many might find relatable but never had spelled out for them:

https://local.theonion.com/girlfriend-changes-man-into-someo...
Great book. I also recommend "The Effective Executive."
Unexpected diversity in electric eels, strongest living bioelectricity generator
> Does that make sense?

no, it does not. just add more bits of entropy to your password if you want more "unguessability". there's no benefit to putting it into the username.

the username and password fields can be imagined as a single field; whether the entropy is at the start or end of the field makes no difference. we just split them up for database efficiency reasons. (and because the username ends up displayed some places.)

> I do not imply that password should not be complex etc.

I do understand that's not your implication

> I am merely pointing out the benefits of having a difficult to guess username.

i'm saying that if your password is good enough, it doesn't matter what your username is.

the same way that if the last 50% of your password is "good enough", it doesn't matter if you plaster the first 50% of it onto billboards.
A few cs conferences have artifact evals. Most all research in cs doesn't actually have any sort of code review at all. No field is implementing the thing you are expecting.
Being vegetarian or vegan doesn't mean not eating anything that contains molecules that previously were meat. It means not eating anything that is an animal product.

By definition decomposers are converting the animal products into basical minerals and nutrients because THEY are eating the meat.

Otherwise plant matter couldn't even be eaten because some of the carbon has been through the carbon cycle and was previously an animal.
>Clojure didn't offer a great variety of jobs, especially remote

Things have changed. Today there are more Clojure jobs than of
Haskell, OCaml, F#, Elixir, Elm.
Especially remote jobs. There are few channels in Clojurians Slack where people post jobs and resumes and discuss them. There's a new posting almost every day.
Care to share more info?
The Boy Scouts still are mostly single gender dens.

I hope you are merely misinformed and not intentionally deceiving people with misleading comments.

https://www.scouting.org/about/membership-policy/
This is exactly the problem that anarcho syndicalists are eager to solve via worker cooperation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-syndicalism
What is illogical about discussing feelings?

Is it illogical to ask for food if you are hungry?
There's probably plastic involved in the process of extracting/bottling the water.
Can confirm: I love my Model 3, wouldn't trade it for the world - including all the feature that "tech-experts" on HN love to complain about such as being locked into a touchscreen with a proprietary OS.
Undocumented immigrants are about 5% of the workforce, so that could account for most of them.
Malwarebytes Analysis of Checkm8 iOS Bootrom Exploit
Any special abilities you may get disappear on reboot, so this isn’t a very practical activation lock bypass.
It's the conclusion I've come to after spending literally an entire life in a religious culture.

What would be your argument and which experience is it based upon?

> not something you'd say in mixed company in real life either.

Some people here criticize religion in private company, but would not dare to do so publicly, because of the very real threats to their very life they would face precisely because of religion.
I buy 2.5 gallon plastic jugs of water from the store. It tastes much better than the many "fill" services/stations around the city that exist because this cities water tastes absolutely terrible, and that's what they're filtering.
There is none. Microplastics are in absolutely everything now. They recently found plastic in falling snow.
I use Thunderbird on both Linux and Windows. I'm very happy with it, but I haven't experienced the symptoms you describe.
Either the advice is accurate, in which case the religious roots shouldn't matter, or it isn't - in which case the religious roots still shouldn't matter.
Your argument doesn’t work. Python affords you tools like metaclasses, __instancecheck__, __subclasshook__, properties and descriptors exactly so you can use the type system to determine how duck typing is handled in whatever cases you want.

Using inheritance and metaprogramming to enforce how and when a given instance or class object satisfies the contract of some interface is a core, fundamental, first-class aspect of Python.

Just because you don’t need to use it very often doesn’t mean “it’s the wrong choice for Python” or anything like that at all.

It is a thing Python goes way out of its way to enthusiastically support, so therefore it is absolutely a Pythonic way to solve problems.
No need to worry about Telegram then, the Russian state has a plenty of experience in fiscal management.
Serious question for you, or anyone else for that matter – what is the most memorable answer you have received to this question?

[Broad details are fine, assuming you feel comfortable sharing them.]
Architectural Implications of Function-as-a-Service Computing [pdf]
I beg to differ - Clojure is like specifically made for distributed teams. I have never had such nice experience in other tech stacks when working remotely. There are many more remote Clojure jobs today than non-remote.
You could've just said "in the civilized world".
How do you protect yourself from someone that somehow rolled a 30 for charisma and also has no scruples? Calling people idiots when they've fallen under the spell of such a person isn't helpful. What would be helpful is this: suggest ways to adjust the system so that cults of personality can't gain traction when the stakes are high.
Nuclear pulse engine can significantly cut the time.
I think that is overly alarmist. These guys: https://torrentlab.com/drinking-and-storm-water-quality-test... make it easy to get a water test done.

If you're worried about chromium 6 (hexavalent chromium) install a reverse osmosis filter.
I was around then too and what's happening now is so much worse than then it borders on the absurd and the coming crash will be unimaginably and absurdly worse.
I think we can agree that this site's existence is overall a good thing for privacy and security awareness. More people will look into how targeted advertising on the web works.

It's very creepy but relatively harmless. It's simply democratizing what anyone can do with a bit of effort thanks to ad networks.
Whoever controls the ad networks themselves however, can achieve far more invasive and nefarious things.

Those are a far more dangerous threats to individual freedom than the distrust in ads and random web articles that this site could cause.
It is not "typical" human behavior. See all the societies that are doing just fine without pervasive religion.

Curious: why create a new account to post this comment? (unless it's your very first account on HN)
I thought it was satire. Satire died in 2016, but I still haven’t learned.
Wirth's minimalism is, IMO, driven by some semi- or full understanding of formal semantics, wherein simplicity is essential to correctness in implementation of the language (as the language designer), and essential to the correct use of the language (as a programmer). This is my opinion formed from what I read so beware.

C.A.R. Hoare has excellent stuff to say on this and hardware design - here's his 1982 turing award lecture https://dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=1283936&type=pdf and it's well worth reading (quite short).

Extracts:

" [...]in May 1965, Niklaus Wirth was com-
missioned to collate them into a single language design [the successor to algol 60].
I was delighted by his draft design which avoided all the
known defects of ALGOL 60 and included several new
features, all of which could be simply and efficiently
implemented, and safely and conveniently used.

The description of the language was not yet complete.
I worked hard on making suggestions for its improve-
ment and so did many other members of our group. By
the time of the next meeting in St. Pierre de Chartreuse,
France in October 1965, we had a draft of an excellent
and realistic language design which was published
in June 1966 as "A Contribution to the Development of
ALGOL", in the Communications of the A CM.
It was implemented on the IBM 360 and given the title
ALGOL W by its many happy users. It was not only a
worthy successor of ALGOL 60, it was even a worthy
predecessor of PASCAL."

But people wanted as much as possible in so instead...

"Three months came and went--not a word of the
new draft appeared. After six months, in October 1966,
the ALGOL working group met in Warsaw. It had before
it an even longer and thicker document, full of errors
corrected at the last minute, describing equally obscurely
yet another different, and to me, equally unattractive
language. The experts in the group could not see the
defects of the design and they firmly resolved to adopt
the draft, believing it would be completed in three
months. In vain, I told them it would not. In vain, I
urged them to remove some of the technical mistakes of
the language, the predominance of references, the default
type conversions. Far from wishing to simplify the lan-
guage, the working group actually asked the authors to
include even more complex features like overloading of
operators and concurrency."

[...]

"At last, in December 1968, in a mood of black
depression, I attended the meeting in Munich at which
our long-gestated monster was to come to birth and
receive the name ALGOL 68." [Edit: added this para]

I think Wirth (or Hoare?) said algol 60 was an improvement algol 68. [Sentence edited]

He then goes on to describe the creation of PL/1 which is an even worse experience.

Anyway, the whole paper's well worth reading. It has a lot of good stuff and is only 9 sides long.
I had to stop using KMail years ago because its IMAP support was thoroughly broken. Has that been fixed?
> The Thing -- you'd think something, anything will be explained by the end of the movie

Because its explained in its entirety at the beginning: "Se til helvete og komme dere vekk. Det er ikke en bikkje, det er en slags ting. Det imiterer en bikkje, det er ikke virkelig. Kom dere vekk, idioter!" ~= "Get the hell away. It's not a dog, it's some kind of thing. It imitates a dog, it's not real. Get away, idiots!"
Test with an average pilot, but have an expert backup pilot on board who can take over, just in case.
I was just about to mention Xenimus. I used to play it after high school every day, the game has been around for over a decade (maybe 2 decades at this point?). It's amazing EJ Thayer has kept it going all this time while going back and forth with having a day job. The graphics may not be AAA but the game play was always pretty fun and the networking code, especially for a single person, ran pretty well.

I kinda miss my old character that got de-leveled well over a decade ago. I let the account expire and when I tried returning some years later I couldn't get back into it.

RIP Mythical Mage III
That would be me and my family over the last decade.

We buy bottled water hoping it would benefit our health over tap water.
"for a 20 person company (US) for seven years"

That's an odd way to phrase it, since it doesn't seem like a particularly large sample as you state it. So how many individuals are you talking about, given your turnover?
Yah. If I'm holding massive backpressure on the yoke, my thumb is on the trim switch to ease that up.
Do you have iBoot's source code from the leak a while back?
> My favorite bragging point: the code in the necdsp folder (and the CPU core itself at component/processor/upd96050) there was used by Stephen Hawking when they emulated his old voice machine that used the same chip

Wow that really is amazing. The diversity of uses cannot be foreseen and is a good argument for both documentation at the time and emulation as useable history.

I’ve followed your work for a while, spent many hours playing Super Mario 3 on your emulators and reading your dev blogs.

Thanks for all you give.
This is where the fakery in most MMOs kicks in - they are not really 'Massive'. Most of them have sharded servers where only a few hundred players are actually in the same world together. Players think there are a lot more as the underlying chat system (originally just IRC in a lot of cases) runs on a separate server for all the players.