skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Furthermore:

"Injuries were not significantly related to race running speed, training surface, characteristics of running shoes, or relative weight."
Yes, but those plugins will now require more expansive permissions requests when enabling them, correct? It used to be that when you installed an ad blocker, you'd have to agree to allow the plugin to "view and modify all content from all pages" (can't remember the exact wording), now, you don't.
Just because it differs from yours doesn't mean theirs doesnt exist or isn't well defined.
Sure, it seems like an obviously analogous scenario to me. Did you have something in mind about how they might differ?
It doesn't take 30 years to build, but it takes 30 years for enough people to sell land and enough builders to buy land and then build to make any difference.

I was reading an article about a city that was upzoned in the 70s which I can't find now, but the gist of it was that everyone was worried the upzoning would change everything. In reality, in the 40 years since, only a few single family homes were torn down and replaced with multi-unit dwellings. Most of the land sales were still from one single family owner to another.
> If the government gets your information, and decides not to bring charges, you should have the right to know about that at some point.

Disagree. There are numerous cases where it takes multiple investigations to "get" a career criminal (think organized crime). If each batch of subpoenas or sealed warrants were exposed even when there is no charge this time, that gives said suspect a very nice opportunity to clean up loose ends.

TLDR: If people know they are being actively looked at they will attempt to destroy/suppress/hide evidence.
That's because you are not supposed to rebase other people's code on top of a changed base. That can effectively modify the behaviour of their code change. So it's good that the resulting commit won't be signed anymore.
And if you are rebasing your own code, then you can sign it again.
I've read that. But I don't think that's what many people think of when they think of cyberpunk. I was thinking more along the lines of works like Neuromancer and Snow Crash, and all of the writers who rode William Gibson's coattails (or parodied the genre as Neal Stephenson did). Not to mention cyberpunk RPGs like Shadowrun and Cyberpunk 2020.
>huge marketing campaign advertising a car that doesn't exist

Audi did the same thing. I think they do it for the green image, not sales.
Quick answer: Julia is often faster than Python and other high-level languages. Rather than writing high-level code in Python, R, or Matlab and performance-critical code in C, the idea is that one writes the whole thing in Julia.

Edit: I agree that the "...more interesting" comment above sounds condescending. I have not found the Julia community to be condescending.
Famous last techie words
They are. Frangibility was a huge part of the resulting design.

You might say _impact on others_ was one of the most important things they had to address with the FAA.
Yea it’s not new. Money converts freely and losslessly into speech, so it’s difficult to distinguish truth from a paid message. When you see a tweet or watch a YouTube video or read a comment on HN or hear a product endorsement from an acquaintance or hear a journalist tell you that something is “science“, how do you know it’s not paid for?
Ah I did not know that. I figured he was still hanging out and getting a kick out of refusing to open on Sundays, given how much of meme it has become.
Tell whoever informed you that they are wrong.

The past might be "constantly interpreted", but it's the winners of each period who make the re-interpretation...
If you use Netlify to deploy your static site, they have a nice Preview feature you can use.
Maybe not, but this seems like a terrible way to advocate for something better. Thousands of people get unjustly fired every day for much worse reasons than this. Why is this one the one to fight?
The article doesn't mentions that the judgment would force Steam to facilitate game resell though.

You can be allowed to do it, but it can still be a pain in the ass to do it (giving access to your account, etc...).

Same goes for a marketplace that would use that rule to allow people to rent the games. None of theses games has to facilitate the resale and they aren't forced to sell license to the marketplace either (though they could buy license through Steam or anything else, but that would still go with the "pain in the ass" argument).
One unexplored dimension of this study is that the quality of predictions might get worse and worse as you add more data (individuals).
Oh, I understand. I misread. Thanks for clarifying.
I am all for science but I am really curious why we need studies to prove things that are this obvious and simple. Hell just with thought experiments, basic thermodynamic principles and a little Anatomy and Physiology alone you conclude most of these things.
Capacitance is a major reason; the capacitance of the very large line doesn't need to be charged and discharged at very high voltage 100 or 120 times a second (per half wave of 50 or 60Hz).

Also, an X volts RMS AC line is 2.8X volts peak-to-peak. The peak voltage is limiting with regards to breakdown voltages, and so DC can reach a higher equivalent voltage on a line with the same maximum voltage.
Not a summary (which would be from one perspective or another) the PDF's cover much and can wordsearch down into the details that pick your interest. http://www.ti.com/product/AM5729/technicaldocuments

As for tooling, could not say, but as a previous comment stated - the NVIDIA offering for the same money, makes this hard to stick out for many. Though i'm sure it, as most boards do, have a niche - what that niche is beyond already invested in the beagleboard environment and comfort level, that would be the only uptick for some that i'm seeing from initial glance.
> The people who have the freedom and interest to travel the world are not “typical” citizens in any country.

That didn't sound right as in my experience most people do a foreign trip at least once a year. Turns out it of course very much depends on the country: Finland travels the most while US is among the least foreign-travelling westerners. That according to https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-whose-citizens..., which says every Finn does 1.7 foreign trips per year on average.

Sorry for the spammy site but hard to look for hard source data on mobile.
This probably isn't the earliest source of that, but it's from 2007-08-30 and a good plain text copy of it: https://www.craigslist.org/about/best/tpa/409930561.html
Without advanced systems of agriculture where I was dependent on thing likes mass herds of Buffalo migrating through my local regions I'd see it as sick too.
Walk with me here: What has she really accomplished? Yelling at adults that they are bad for not being pre-occupied with something that they individually have zero control over?

This girl is a show-puppy for the media points. It annoys me.
Well, if you're writing an FOSS project that happens to be picked up by the Chinese you're SOL. It's not as if the PRC has a history of giving a shit about your IP.

If you're talking about writing bespoke software for them, that's a different matter than this particular situation.
I'm not going to say this isn't exploitative to some degree, but I will say that this is similar to sweatshop conditions: potentially an improvement over what they were previously doing. It's hard to jump from sustenance farming to a large income.
Stephen Wolfram also has the same. Here it is in action: https://blog.stephenwolfram.com/data/uploads/2019/02/05-trea...
> in the same way as agreeing to receive phone marketing should imply they can track whether you answered the phone.

But agreeing to receive a snail mail does not imply consent to track if it was read. I feel that email is closer to that.
I keep reading about ayahuasca. Care to elaborate on how/where, etc.

I've been using thc as self-medication for a decade and decided to quit cold turkey, and my anxiety and self-doubt is through the roof. I know the baggage is coming from childhood, but I'm not sure how to solve it.
Presumably because there's no profit in it. With competition so tight in the rideshare space, Oracle's entry would just be another one that makes no money.

"Enjoyable and helpful and fairly priced", when flipped around to the corporate POV, usually mean "Attention-commanding, demanding, and no money in it for me." This is perhaps why Oracle is as shitty as it is to customers: Larry Ellison purposely seeks out businesses where he can get away with that shit, because it means there are no other alternatives on the market and hence he can charge high prices.
Maybe we should support gas flaring, rather than opposing it. Flaring turns methane into CO2 + water vapor, which are less potent greenhouse gases.
You lead with the idea that people in power have made a secret decision to do away with democracy and deploy totalitarianism. This is by definition a conspiracy. The rest of what you said, plus what you just said about departments of people already looking at this I find quite realistic.

Someone else just posted this 10 year old video on the geopolitics of climate change. I wanted to make sure you saw it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mc_4Z1oiXhY
Seriously, we need to kill off this warrant workaround that the US gov has decided is valid.

Almost every product you buy now ends up sending your data to some company, and the government has decided that means you have no expectation of privacy, which is clearly nonsense.
I could easily see this as setting the minimum sale price as the current new-purchase price, Valve taking a 2%-5% cut, and then putting the balance of the proceeds in the seller's Steam wallet just before throwing out an offer to use it to buy the top game on their wishlist that costs less than that amount (maybe after a 5% post-transfer incentive discount).
There's more than enough space, there's tons of space that we need to make more dense with infill housing.

This isn't just a social issue, it's also a climate issue. Even if we assume extremely ambitious goals of 100% EVs and 75% of energy from renewables in 2050, we need to drastically reduce the amount of vehicle miles traveled in California, which means denser housing with mixed uses.

Right now that sort of necessary housing and business is illegal in most of the peninsula. We need to change that.

It really is just gate-keeping to keep others out.

Distributing jobs is not a solution, because sprawl is not a solution. We must make better use of existing land, rather than consuming more farmland or nature.
If they are enforcing harshly it might be difficult for them to find and remove people.

Ideally they need to work with the community. The problem is the community and certain safe cities make their jobs more difficult because they don't agree with the policy.

The smartest route would be to target businesses charging them additional taxes. Use that money to support the legal route by increasing limits and make that path more attractive.
They did, the papers behind their tech are published and available free of charge (someone else here linked to https://deepmind.com/research/publications/safe-exploration-... )
This is basically Bentham vs Mill utilitarianism for anyone that wants to explore how at least humanity’s great balancing act has been recorded over hundreds of years.

But to summarize — you should optimize for things like quality of happiness rather than happiness units. And this gets messy and you will make bad calls, it’s a moral framework for decision making no one has a perfect system. But be optimizing for great happiness and make those long term investments.
> GP currently has the ability to buy a product in a way they like (not purchasing resale rights that they don't want.)

Why is GP's freedom more important than my freedom to buy the product in the way I like (purchasing resale rights, or even having them included by default)? On top of that, the fact that GP has the "freedom" now doesn't mean that having the freedom is an inherent good. Remember that slave owners previously had the freedom to own slaves, and now they don't. Taking away a freedom somebody once had is arguably the foundation of civil society and the state if you subscribe to the idea that humans without the state exist in a state of anarchy.

>You're calling their view Orwellian because French Big Brother knows what ownership rights they really want to purchase?

No, the Orwellian view is that there is freedom in companies being able to decide what you can do with something after you've bought it from them. The person you're replying to, in my reading, views the whole notion of such a freedom as being profoundly anti-freedom. This is the sense in which it's Orwellian - freedom is confused, at large, with its opposite. As such, the way you're using the term "freedom to do business the way they like" is itself an expression of that unfreedom, just as in 1984 the usage of the word "freedom" by the Party actually refers to its opposite. From Marcuse:

>Thus, the fact that the prevailing mode of freedom is servitude, and that the prevailing mode of equality is superimposed inequality is barred from expression by the closed definition of these concepts in terms of the powers which shape the respective universe of discourse. The result is the familiar Orwellian language ("peace is war" and "war is peace," etc.), which is by no means that of terroristic totalitarianism only. Nor is it any less Orwellian if the contradiction is not made explicit in the sentence but is enclosed in the noun.
I really wonder how this will work with VAC bans and cheating. You can be banned from a game by various means VAC is one of them and Battleye is another popular tool. If a person gets banned from DayZ then they sell their game to buy a new copy that isn't banned does the buyer of their original game remain banned?
I remember it being more invasive in the past and while I can’t find an old version to compare, there is this article outlining the changes in ~2017 to that question: https://www.keepyourclearance.com/news/sf-86-psychological-h...
Signing up for a recurring monthly service one time with a user name and credit card number takes 5 minutes. Folks are now just making excuses to pirate because they like free stuff without any consequence of getting in trouble. It would be a lot easier if folks would just admit it vs. all of this pretzel logic that's getting harder and hard to believe as the years go by and content is easier to legally obtain (but have to yes pay for).
1984 has newspeak, doublethink and a protagonist who's job is falsifying the newspaper archive. But everything is state owned, so it's "us vs the system" not the cyberpunk "Walmart vs Amazon" happening here.
This is an excellent and deeply disturbing article, but all I can do in response right now is suspect that if J. Edgar Hoover were still alive to see what shenanigans the modern FBI gets up to when nobody is looking, he would wholeheartedly approve. It's obvious that the agency has learned all the wrong lessons from the exposure of COINTELPRO.

The FBI is still The House J. Edgar Built, and Congress ought to tear it down.
How to Survive Digital Disruption
Yes, most of the posts are very good.

But he consistently misrepresents information about healthcare in other countries.
Well, I mean... gestures vaguely at everything

Life is hard enough already, and there's tools out there available that can help. If you have access, you should take advantage of it.

I get that there's still stigma in some areas and cultures. Perhaps ironically, with some better social-mental-emotional-physiological tools, you might find that the stigma just doesn't concern you.
Can you elaborate? The parent post is making the argument that the GP's position is the lack of a code, rather than just a different code. I.e. there's a reasonable argument to be made that "I don't care what anybody does" is not a moral code, or else we perhaps risk stretching the definition of "moral code" to the point of meaninglessness. You're disagreeing, apparently, but without a lot of detail.
Morality is subjective...It seems that you're saying because his moral code isn't in alignment with yours means it's invalid? Scary.

A lot of politically charged comments in here.
Not exactly.

Developers ultimately have judgement over which projects they contribute to, and if they feel that more harm is coming out of their work than good, then they have every right to cease development.

Open source, compared to other development models, suffers the least from this problem in that there is no single developer that has jurisdiction over how the product is used. FOSS projects can always be forked, if need be.
> they weren’t breaking the law

Well, whether or not they were breaking the law is purely subjective: there was no law to break, so they didn't.

I think what you're trying to suggest is that they were behaving immorally by aiding an immoral regime - but that's still not a reasonable comparison, since the Nazis were engaging in genocide, which I don't think anybody has ever argued is not immoral.
Hm. Maybe it's taking the "punk" part to literal that prevents getting better stories. I mean, the point (as far as there is one) of punk is anti-corporatism, anti-fascism, combined with direct action.

That'll end up in street warfare one way or another. I'm honestly not sure how an actual punk story involving psy-ops would even look like. (Sure, the setup might be different, but sooner or later, heads are going to be knocked)
It's one thing to allow some of "self" determination, which would probably be a good thing if it was done. However, that's not what the current process is, it's most definitely note self determination. It's set up to allow a tiny number of people to say "no" to things. It doesn't poll the public to determine what to do. This one-sided input process has predictable results, with massive damage to the general interests of people who live in an area.
You don't win wars by fulfilling only the "basic requirements". I would agree with you if there was more stability and harmony between nations but that is not the reality today.
> binge drinking. The way to tackle that is to create and encourage a culture of moderate drinking

In scotland?? Drinking culture is tied in to masculinity at least in the UK midlands ('beer or queer' - that kind of shit though thankfully fadin) and I'll bet it's the same in scotland. And you've got an entire drug industry, the drinks industry, working hard to get people to abuse, NOT use, to ABUSE to excess, their product.

It's a deep problem with very difficult solutions. Externalised costs of capitalism, shitty lives, poverty, people who can't see a way out and if offered won't take it...
High interest is only for high risk when the lender is forgiving more of their loans. That's the risk - too much forgiving means they need to make up the difference with a higher rate for the fewer people who do pay it back.

The parent is arguing (correctly) that you can't have both high interest rate and a low/zero rate of loan forgiveness while claiming to be ethical.
Additionally, three overlapping 14-day term operations of atleast $30 billion each.

Adding it together we can see the fed is going to be providing a minimum of $165B in total liquidity to the market while all the operations are undergoing.

Curious how this will play out in the long term. Are we going to add even more liquidity when these operations end?
>Every drone is going to record everything using multiple cameras and send them to their backend.

Certainly not in the near future, and probably not ever for delivery drones. Such systems would require unreasonable additional payload.

Everything a drone can see is in public, same as any other camera man, airplane, helicopter, or satellite.
> I don't see what optimization requires that.

From a single commit ID you cannot tell which repo it came from. A "repo" is just a tree of commits.
The ICE vehicle bans don't seem realistic. If they set a goal like 10% sales first year, 20% next year etc, then I can understand a goal for a total ban in 10 years. Sometimes politicians set unrealistic goal expecting they won't be involved by the time the deadline reaches.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-out_of_fossil_fuel_vehic...
You can usually find a therapist for a similar rate ($80-$100)/hr, or if you're lucky enough to have insurance that covers therapy, you can get it for less. I currently only pay a co-pay of $25/hr.
Well yeah. But if they are forced to allow reselling of games, I bet they won't allow that. Only games you bought with real money could be resold. They can set more rules too.
Smoke and mirrors and games...
Facebook Says It Has Suspended ‘Tens of Thousands’ of Apps
I think there is a difference between "people I added on a whim and don't actually know" and "my cousin that lives out of state", for example.

I pretty aggressively prune my facebook friend list. I think I'm at something like 68 friends right now. The majority of them are actually older family members who like my random rants about the antics our kids get into.

Basically if I add someone on facebook and they aren't actively part of my life or social / family circle, they get culled.

It seems like a nice compromise.
The common here is the set of customers willing to sign up for a subscription nobody owns these people. Staring another service (adding another cow) is a gain for the service owner, but the set of people willing to pay for subscriptions goes down.

If your favorite show goes from service A to service B, you might switch, you might maintain both subscriptions, or you might decide neither is individually worth it, and either stop watching or start pirating.

Even if service A does not lose shows, its no longer getting shows at the same rate, so the quality of that service goes down, with nothing of similar quality to replace it. So again some customers will stop paying and the commons shrinks.
Fiber is encrypted you know...
Why do astronomers believe in dark matter?
Compared to what, Americans, who are all about net worth, work, business success, making it big, personal branding, and so on?
> deleted all my tweets. Killed the app. Killed the Reddit app. Killed Instagram. Killed Facebook.

I agree with the bulk of your comment, but I couldn't help but notice...

If the solution is to not use all these apps, apps that are being developed by those very same anxious workers, what does it say about silicon valley's sunny optimism that they are changing the world for the better?

Does anyone else feel it's paradoxical?
What getting shot taught me about practicing medicine in the US
Oh, definitely. But even for randomly generated games that term doesn't usually get surfaced (with the notable exception of minecraft). So I think it getting surfaced more often is a sort of a sign of influence from the randomizer community
Besides the absolute inhumanity of mass genocide, your comments rings of hyperbole unless you are willing to lead the charge by offering your own life before anyone else's.
Did you get upset those times because you cared about your job or coworkers and would you still care about the same things if you were in the same situation again? I ask because I think it takes time for people to get perspective (managers included) and employers often work on getting their employees to lose perspective.
Bangeronomics make most sense only if you are willing to work on your own car.
I think this is outside the scope of HN's purpose.