skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I use a similar stack of React/TS and Node/TS using the Next.js library. It makes it really easy to get started because you don't need any configurations files. I made a template if you like the idea https://github.com/alepacheco/landing-template
Can you share me the details of your service?
I need simplest solution for Customer registering order, Verifying order against stock availability to create invoce and delivering it.
An affiliate/reference management will be plus.
Humour de guillotine ! superb !
Instead of complying with the law they are wasting time lobbying. If they don't comply on 1st of JAN what excuse are they going to have?
I like the question based structure of this article. it does lack the one question I have though:
"How does it affect everyone else that is not a bank?"
China, Quantified Country
Those who fail to learn from Dilbert are doomed to repeat it
Is anyone selling an anti-drone drone yet?
- ubuntu droplets at digitalocean, running .net core.
- C# coded in visual studio.net on Windows.
- git

Effect on success: knew the tech well so did not have to spend time learning the tech in addition to all the business learning.

Making a business is very involved. If you can simplify the technology side it’s a good idea.
Web analytics tool.

React + bulma. Java 12/latest with homemade minimal stack. MySQL database. Digital ocean box running a tomcat servlet container.

I know it well and it is very fast to work with (fast edit / test / deploy cycle).
I’d personally say that the concept of users and user groups have failed, at least on systems that have only one user.
There is nothing there about "feminist popes", or Galileo.

Your thesis, as presented here, is internally inconsistent, weakly supported, and depends on overgeneralized extrapolations.

As I wrote earlier, if your #1 is, then it "means that Stallman should have been kicked out long ago because he was being surrounded by enablers and yes-men who didn't provide the feedback he needed for his position."

Which is one of the arguments presented in this link.

Your #2 is unsupported because you haven't shown that most women thought Stallman was ugly. While I've been able to demonstrate places where women thought Stallman was a creep.

Your #3 is irrelevant because Stallman is not being silenced. He can continue to speak as he wishes. He is just not able to use his associations with MIT or the FSF to support his speech.

This is part-and-parcel of the right of free association, which is an essential liberty.
Just stop. Absolutely stop equating these things.

The world as we know it, the progress in art, science, and humanities. The cures for polio, infant mortality and poverty dropping.

The website you are currently using to spread poison.

Those are all “_What USA does_”

Cut it out with this evil language.
The reboot made 960 million dollars. You could argue about artistic merit of reboots and sequels, but he'll be getting a hefty paycheck for these.
It's part of his comedy schtick. If you watch enough of his videos you realise how developed and deep his personality actually is.
"Fewer distros mean more active developers per distro" is just as much a fallacy as "Less music piracy means higher profits". Many distros exist exactly because their devs don't want to touch something like Ubuntu.
Cars are definitely much more common in cities now that horses were around, say, 1900. Most people just walked.

Cars also seem to have exerted a much greater impact in terms of getting cities to design themselves primarily around themselves (probably because of that popularity).
Ask HN: Do We Need Folders?
Our digital filesystems are designed from the idea of how we used to store our data before computers: sheets within folders within drawers within buildings.
Everything follows a child<>parent relationship

Has anybody experimented before with a different approach for organizing data in a computer?
The thing you can spend your money on which would have the biggest effect: condoms (and other contraceptives).

Sounds snarky at first, but really, it isn't. That doesn't mean you shouldn't have any children, but maybe one or two are enough? Also, condoms do not only help you (as in generic you, not OP specifically) in your family planning but may help people who are less well off, too, with the side effect of preventing some STD infections.

Corollary: avoid any charities that oppose directly or indirect family planning and/or contraceptives. That includes anything Catholic and a lot of other Christian charities.
He didn't purchase lab grade HF, it's "just" commercial "Whink Rust Stain Remover". In all countries, buying customer chemical products is always a way to bypass the regulation and get otherwise hard-to-obtain chemicals, as long as you know where they can be found.

Though, selling chemicals in general is less regulated in the U.S, getting the same "Rust Stain Remover" in other parts of the world is certainly more difficult.
How is AWS not black box computing? Isn't it worse than a black box? Because it's a black box that's sitting in a black building that you don't have access too?

Disclaimer: I'm a n00b when it comes to web stuff.
> Also I hope this explains why people own many guns. Because once you build one for in particular style, you then start wanting one for a different style. Again, think women and shoes. Why do women have many pairs? For precisely the same reason people have many guns.

It's true that women purchase many styles of shoes, car-heads collect different types of cars, computer nerds collect various laptops tablets desktops, etc. But no one buys three toasters or lawnmowers for different uses. What separates these? I'd suggest that there is an implicit status or power conveyed through these collectibles. In particular, gun owners often see guns as a proxy for protecting their own freedom, just like a watch collector may appreciate the status conveyed by a rare luxury. However, barring the zombie apocalypse, the connection between gun ownership and freedom is false.
A Marlin Is One of the Fastest SNARKs in the Ocean: Fast Unbatched Verification
Compare data hour to hour, day to day
I would count the stages of success like this:

1. Brute force it. -> That is actually the most important step. In regards to this one specifically, I would be surprised if interviewers expect more than O(n^2).

2. Guess what the best runtime would be. -> If you can reason why you expect what to be the best runtime, it should bring you through all interviews.

3. Get good solutions, but memorizing won't help you in the real world (though it might in some interviews). Interview situation is pretty unique. In a normal work environment, you can search the internet, argue with collegues, sleep over it. If runtime is essential for the program you are writing, it cannot be expected of anyone to come up with best solutions on the fly.

Regarding brute force solutions, they can still vary in quality. Is it correct, easily understandable, without side-effects?
Yeah, I left my comment before reading the rest of the conversation in here, you’re correct on that one
Or are at least misnamed. (Not that I have a better suggestion!)
I run Pinboard. I have my own hardware running Ubuntu. The site itself runs PHP+MySQL, with perl scripts for backend tasks. I make heavy use of Twitter to talk about unrelated topics, and eventually people take pity and sign up for the site, using either Stripe or PayPal.
> for some reason perl golfing is bad but writing extremely terse functional programs is not

Because the Haskell has types checking that you're not doing anything completely stupid.
Women and men are different, the sexes are two and not, you can not choose
Follow this. It's a really interesting topic.
Web bits: Python 3 and Django with Celery running on Heroku. Postgres (source of truth) and Redis (caching and queues). S3 for storage. Front end is HTML and basic JavaScript. Pretty happy with it, it's really quick to make new stuff in. Starting to consider adding types to some bits Python with mypy as it's got to a size where types would be useful.

App: React Native with Redux. Flow for types (would use TypeScript if starting again today). RN is a pain but seems better than the alternatives for what I need.

That all allowed me to get a prototype together at the start and to iterate very quickly which was essential for making the whole thing happen at all. Some of that was the technology itself but a lot of it was just that I was very familiar with it.
By that logic, you could describe WWII as just a bunch of terrorists who disagreed.

Which of course, nobody does.
On a side note it's very interesting to re-watch Rambo III, where he teams up with local jihadists in Afghanistan to fight the occupying Soviets in the area. Hollywood propaganda at its finest, but brutally ironic today.
> So, if you imagine a post-beef world, we will need only 10% of the field corn & soy to produce similar amounts of artificial meat. Corn, by the way, is the US's largest crop.

The US produces 14 billion bushels of corn, but only 36% of that, 5 billion bushels, is fed to animals. Your numbers suggest we could reduce those 5 billion bushels to half a billion bushels, but that only reduces the corn crop to 68% of the current size, not the 10% your comment might lead one to believe.

And if we're talking about carrying capacity, acres start to become relevant. Not all corn acres are created equal. While individual fields can easily push 300 bushels per acre, the US average yield is only 170 bushels per acre. When the pressure is on due to less need for corn, it is is the lowest yielding acres that will give up first. Instead of only needing 68% of the acres, you might need more like 75% of the current acres.

Having said that, corn is fed to more than cattle. In a post-beef world, it is likely that people will still want to eat pork, chicken, etc. I was not able to find any hard information about how much of that 5 billion bushels is directed to cattle, but we might be looking at needing more than 80% of the current corn acres in a post-beef world to feed the animals that don't result in beef.

> what happens to all the corn & soy farmers

Probably the same as usual. These cash crops are typically planted before the market need is understood, so even if the market cratered due to artificial meat, they would be planted anyway. Then, with so much surplus product in the ground, the price will crater. Once the price craters, opportunists (possibly with help from the government) will start to take a hard look at what they can do with this corn and soy being practically given away for free. New markets will emerge, and eventually the price will recover. There will no doubt be some casualties along the way, but at the end of the day, not much.
I run a SaaS that building and hosting developer hub https://www.docsapp.io using the following technologies.

Backend: Scala and Playframework

Frontend: Jquery

DB: RDS, Postgresql on AWS

Hosting: Baremetal on Scaleway

DNS: AWS Route53

Object Store: AWS S3

CDN: AWS CloudFront

Infrastructure: Ansible and Kubernetes

Monitoring: CloudWatch and Influxdb + Grafana in k8s

Logging: ELK in k8s

Scaleway is a great hosting with cheap price. Instead of finding reliable but expensive hosting, I prefer cheaper hosting, but more servers and build HA to handle server issue. Server die all the time.
Now imagine

“France knowingly harbors 911 terrorists.”

“French leaders take credit for car bombing which kills 23 civilians.”

There’s a historical reason for this discrepancy.
I commute by bike to my office every day and heavily use german train connections. Haven't touched my car for a long time. If I could I'd invest in an electrical freight bicycle, so that I can transport also heavier stuff.

A friend of mine has invested in a sustainable fond that supports green and sustainable project across Europe.

I, myself, have put an amount of money to found my own company that is focussed on green and sustainable web design/development/ux to create energy efficient websites and webapps as the internet is becoming a heavy factor in carbon dioxide emission. With https://www.surfgreen.dev you can test websites regarding their sustainability. It's still in beta and not finished yet, but already working.

Best,

Carl
Because you seem to be missing that it's not the "sanctions" that radicalize people, but the "starve to death" part, or in general, the "death" part. In so far as heavy sanctions breed resentment and further violence, bombing people's families into tiny pieces does that even more.
Think of it as a tax just like on land, but for buildings.

The reasoning is that housing represents an asset that should not be bought just for speculation, i.e. buy it and let it sit empty until the price is high enough for the investor to make a good profit. Of course they're free to do just that, but all housing which people can live in, are taxed as if you had that income.
That’s just a way to say “land use tax”. The hope is to keep land ownership efficient; I.e prevent the comical edge case of ownership where one person buys everything and puts up fences. In many parts of the USA, for example, this could be possible.

Some libertarians believe a land use tax is the only valid tax one should levy.
Nsh: A More Secure and Convenient Remote Shell Than SSH
I always thought SQL would make a nice filesystem interface. People have experimented with doing it - http://etia.co.uk/
I have spent a very, very long time thinking about it. Now, I can't give you a detailed report with numbers, but my hunch is this:

After having made personal adjustments and having moved your investments from fossil to renewables, the most efficient way to spend money is to donate to XR [0], and then take some time off (opportunity cost) and join the movement on the streets.

[0] https://xrebellion.org
Yoi Carrera • Revolú Remix ( Feat. J Alvarez) – Official Audio
I’m interested to know how this improves on Moby and ContainerLinux, both of which are “designed for containers”
Haskell is not boring.
I love to see a rather esoteric math problem that applies to daily life.

God knows quite a number of us split pills.
just saw this app on the front page https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21013117
not sure if it's been made yet, but it occurred to me that a much better version can be made now with on-device ML based OCR. Clearly there's a large user demand.
Move fast, break teeth.
It's somewhat heavy, but not extraordinarily so. The average smoker consumes just under a pack a day. A heavy smoker might go through two or three packs a day.
Yes they are. All across the world.

Sadly, many of them already have (or plan to) do a "digital transformation". In a nutshell that means: Huge open space developer farms, firing old (expensive) engineers, forcing everything into Kubernetes, doing "sledgehammer agile (e.g. forced agile). This in turn leads to massive turnover.
Run a Local Process in Kubernetes with Telepresence
I find a great way to find the rule for a numeric sequence when only having a few examples is to plug it into to OEIS:

https://oeis.org/search?q=0%2C1%2C3%2C11&language=english&go...

https://oeis.org/wiki/Rational_sequences

OEIS tells us that E(n) is the harmonic numbers.
> Saving the environment is simply saving ourselves. Nothing more, nothing less.

I disagree. I think nature has a value in itself, in all its complexity and beauty.

I think few people would argue that if the Louvre was destroyed it wouldn't be considered a loss for the world and for humankind, or that we don't still lament the loss of the library in Alexandria.

Of course, nothing of this matters from the perspective of the heath death of the universe. But that is a cynism that I consider juvenile.
Ukraine was dirt poor even before the war and their corruption index was higher than Russia's. Today Ukraine is in war and the most industrialized part of the country (eastern Ukraine) is partially occupied.
Ascertaining identity is not stalking, but ascertaining identity via stalking (unrestrained targeted data collection) is stalking.
Would something like this work?

1. Find the ways most people try to fight climate change but are wrong.

2. Create compelling article that would make people stop the useless behaviour, and reveal better alternatives.

3. Spend money on ads to direct people to the page.
If they run them over roads, I honestly don't think it will be a big problem.
Good you mention cures for polio. The US does both cures for polio and ensuring polio exists and spreads, by virtue of CIA pretending to be agents of vaccination charities, which killed polio eradication efforts in some places.

Point being, the US does a lot of things. Some good, some bad. You don't get to trade the good things for the bad things. There could be progress in art, science and humanities without indiscriminate drone bombings of innocent civilians worldwide.
I run a SaaS page builder that generates amp websites for my customers. It's targeted towards small agencies that currently rely on wordpress.

--

Backend: Node.js hosted on AWS ECS (Docker) and Lambda
Frontend: JavaScript, React
Database: Postgres (AWS RDS; thinking about switching to serverless aurora)

As for delivering my clients sites I recently switched from cloudfront to stackpath (DNS, CDN) because the pricing model makes more sense for me and it doesn't have arbitrary limitations like the distribution limit.

Other tech I use:

- Terraform for my whole infrastructure

- AWS SES for sending mails

- AWS Cognito for authentication and managing user accounts

- AWS Cloudfront combined with lambda@edge for delivering
images in the right size for the requester (src-set)

- Github

- AWS CodePipeline for CI and deployments (source input through github releases)
Google slams Aussie threat to 'directly intervene' on Android app defaults
How sure are you that it works? I know that this sounds really flippant, but I have seen a number of well regarded models that when we / I took them to bits were discovered to actually not be doing better than dominant class prediction, and in a couple of cases had actually become arbitrary.

When did someone last really pick it apart in its operational environment?
This is actually a decent idea as it would make spotting webshite-obsessed hipsters even easier.
So you've written, multiple times, with no citation (e.g. a bill number andvrev).
I wonder what's the incentive there. I know ISPs in the UK have to block certain sites (involved in copyright infringement) but as far as I know no VPN services are included in there.

What do they gain by banning VPNs considering they already comply with the law by blocking direct access to forbidden websites?
I mean - the US can simultaneously do very good things and very bad things.
Why isn't a 2-way/3-way/4-way/6-way IBM 3090 with the optional Vector Facility installed a "parallel supercomputer"? Non-uniprocessor models of the 3090 are parallel computers, and the Vector Facility was one of IBM's many attempts to address the supercomputer market (even if that particular attempt wasn't very succesful). And this was in the mid-to-late 1980s, not 1993.
I don't see how that prevents an organization from doing terrorist actions. In fact, it's fairly common, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah_social_services
Related: I have recently watched a video by Louis Rossmann whose title suggests that it is about eliminating procrastination: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UwOdFzPTH4

In the video he analyzes why people procrastinate and mentions that it is a natural response against oppression. He suggests that the first step against it is to realize that you are a free person and can do whatever you want. He adds a lot of context and examples.

It seems to me that procrastination is one of the symptoms of burnout and that the suggestions Louis mentions in the video may also be helpful when dealing with burnout.
> high consumption of America’s “poor”

this is actually a huge negative and flips the result on it's head if you look at it from a climate change perspective.
EDIT: if they have to consume so much more, surely they are not having it better
How dare people criticize the U.S. They certainly created art, science and the humanities, not to mention put them in books to civilize all those shithole countries?

I was not aware that curing polio is a global absolution of sins.
Perhaps you are confused with the term "terrorist". s/terrorist/freedom fighter/g. Is that more palatable ? Or is the narrative contextual, depending on which side you find yourself on ?

All three of your assertions are wrong, regardless. And you have no business judging 'appropriateness'. Of course there are criminals that take advantage of situations, I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that they are not the types that blow themselves up to make a quick buck.
I thought this was going to be a gritty memoir of MJD struggling with addiction, and I feel bamboozled.
That would affect your margin, though...
I understand brand awareness - just was skeptical that companies went out and out to be annoying to stick in the memory - but I think you are right some do.
You imply that they don't. If the Wikileaks/Snowden story, the AT&T (room 641A) story taught us anything is that we cannot place any reliance to any due process and that 3-letter agencies harvest anything they can, any way they can, without any respect to privacy (big laughter here) and due process.

I am not trashing security agencies. I am merely stating that lines in the sand never seem to stopped them before and most likely won't stop them now (or in the future).

Whether it could be the AT&T case, or a bribed sys/net admin, "they" want it all and they got the budgets to get it done.
Except that to some extent, they do. When my country was occupied by the Nazi Germany, people who fought back were called freedom fighters by us. They were called terrorists by the Nazis.
Actually yeah, it's all a matter of scale. Of course we are animals and what we do is perfectly natural, like a volcano blowing up, any other species that had been so successful evolutionary speaking as ourselves would be doing the same thing. But that does not mean it is good for us or that can keep going on forever. It is probably what made us successful that will destroy us.
I think the best suggestion here is total cooperation. 'Cause problem is very big and one man isn't relevant.

There's a good movie from DiCaprio & National Geographic https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLivjPDlt6ApToQx3tYIte... , highly recommend.
Trying to be a celebrity is a very different career path than working at a big company. They shouldn't be similar.
If you look deeply into how carbon offsets work then actually planting trees can be a more tangible and rewarding endevour than buying carbon offsets. If you don't have the time to plant trees, then there are non-profit charities around the world that will do it for you with your donations.

Edit:
I would link to one but I don't want to endorse one either way. Please search for: tree planting charity

and make your own critical decision
I haven't done any calculation, but if I were you, I'd invest that money in companies that push clean energy infrastructure. That money will go directly towards making clean energy sooner. In the end you'll make money because these technologies actually generate cheaper energy than fossil fuels. And from that extra money, you can compound your investment.

Putting $2500/month in research or protest is not going to move the needle one bit.
My problem is with any issue or article about these companies is not evaluated on merit. It's all conflated with one or the other issue. There are many people happy at these companies as well and some who really like the culture.