skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You could rather easily manage this flow with ansible.
K8s abstracts a lot of the pieces in your ansible plays away, but comes back at you in form of a rather complex stack.
Say you want to host instances of this app in a DC/cloud, k8s would be more appropriate, and perhaps then it would make sense to go single node “micro-k8s” style (for single server locations), to give you a common api for managing deployments, network configuration, security etc.

Win with k8s is that once you’re tuned, a lot of “config crap” is abstracted away, basically.
But - there's a reason ansible is supported specifically through the “operators” SDK, something we use to manage seamless upgrades of a k8s deployed app:

https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-sdk/blob/mast...

Edit - forgot that if meteics based autoscaling of the app is a requirement my experience is that k8s makes this a breeze. Probably not a req if using single node hosts though...
Depends who you mean by "we". Seems there are regional shortages [1], but the US only hits supply constraints occasionally.

[1] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/world-facing-g...
Super great! Perhaps you would actually release your GPT-2 774M model instead of the "OpenAI way of just talking about it" for media exposure purposes :)
People are looking.
You're circling around the point.

> Like most things, you need to comply with the laws of every country you do business in

How do you know if you are doing business in the EU without verifying the citizenship of the people who buy from you? If I'm selling a digital product, how do I know whether or not EU citizens are buying it?

You suggest below:

> As long as you don't target EU residents, you don't need to comply with the GDPR. Just don't advertise to europeans, don't talk about having european customers, don't ship to european adresses and/or don't localize to languages from countries where you don't do business.

This is the COPPA strategy, choice #3. It suggests that as long as you can pretend you don't know your customers are EU residents, it's fine to collect data on them. If that's the case, that's a much less effective law then we could otherwise have.

In regards to COPPA, you bring up the central problem yourself:

> COPPA is IMHO a flawed law, the general privacy protections should have just been extended to everyone. Age verification and consent validation were never going to work and it seems patently ridiculous to require companies to collect more data to protect privacy.

You're right, age requirements are a joke. We still don't have a reliable way to validate age without violating privacy. These types of laws only work if they're based on one of the three choices I listed in my post:

1. Universally applying the law to everyone, regardless of context.

2. Accepting that validation requires collecting and managing data, and being OK with the fact that we're going to collect and manage data to do validation.

or

3. Trusting consumers to self-validate and self-sort themselves.

The first option has sovereignty problems -- it doesn't work in a multi-nation, multi-state world. Even with something like COPPA, this strategy falls apart because a big part of COPPA is parental consent, and there's no way to universally apply a parental consent law. At some point, you have to decide whether or not you're going to validate the relationship between the child and the parent.

The second option is fine if you want to control your data, but means that we need to give up some anonymity -- maybe make a national database, or have some kind of proof-of-age or digital passport or something.

The third option is fine if you want to stay anonymous, but means that data protection laws have fewer teeth, because consumers will lie, which gives companies plausible deniability over violations.

What we can't do is have both 2 and 3. We can't say, "we won't require anyone to do any invasive validation, and also the validation will be really good and accurate." With GDPR, we either accept that many EU residents will unwittingly (or deliberately) do business with companies that are not beholden to GDPR, or we accept that businesses will need to validate the citizenship of their customers.
Apart from giving a better negotiation position, viewership numbers tell you what people want to watch.

If you (think you) know what people want to watch it becomes easy to cheaply produce new content guaranteed to sell.

This is almost certainly the nexus for much of the original content coming out of Netflix.
I completely agree, the only monospaced font I've used for the last 5+ years. I am however, giving this one a full go.
None of them required extra authorisation to get data. (even transactions going back 5+ years) They did have the SMS validation when adding new transfer targets, but not for executing transactions to existing contacts - which is potentially an issue if you can pay off a different credit card just by changing the reference field.
This. This. This.

Chances are you need more water cooler social interaction than you could have ever imagined.

I went into remote work thinking I was leaving all that behind - good riddance!

Turns out it was a very important part of a healthy psyche. Casual conversation, social queues, all that stuff needs to be exercised on a semi-regular basis. It's all too easy to work an entire week and have only made basic trips out of the house to places like grocery stores or a gas station.

Compound that over years, and you'll do a serious number on your mental health. Work environments provide a social outlet that is often taken for granted.
This explains it, I think that California took same diction.

Giovanni Buttarelli, European Data Protection Supervisor “There might well be a market for personal data, just like there is, tragically, a market for live human organs, but that does not mean that we can or should give that market the blessing of legislation.”

Privacy is fundamental human right that you cant trade for. Same as you cant sign a lawfull contract that you want to be someones slave, even if you want to.
Why does it work with gcc?
> There were also file systems with integrated revision support on VAX/VMS and other "midrange" systems such as Norsk Data/SINTRAN.

Versioned file systems were developed for source code management and go back to ITS and TENEX in the late 1960s. So version control as we know it, as a widespread (at least in the DEC world) practice dates back to the 1970s.
A new(ish) Linux distribution is reported on -- and the comments are mostly about the logo? (checks calendar) Oh, I see...

"Mais, où sont les neiges d'antan?"
Can you sell your education and get it's cost back?
> For most Americans life expectancy and qualify of life are dropping measurably.

Half of that is easily demonstrably false. Quality of life for the majority of Americans continues to improve.

The US welfare state has improved considerably in the last 30 to 50 years.

- Homelessness has been slashed by 20-25% in two decades thanks to housing programs the Bush and Obama administrations pursued. Homelessness nationally is sitting near the lowest levels in US history.

- Childhood poverty has collapsed by roughly 45-50% in 40 years.

- The overall poverty rate at 11.8% is near an all-time record low. That figure is lower than in either Canada or France today. In 1960 the poverty rate was 100% higher than it is now.

- The poorest 25% of Americans now get free healthcare, that was not true at all at the supposed peak of US well-being and financial per capita outcomes in the ~1965-1980 time frame. The fact is, the bottom 1/3 are far better off today than they were in the 1960s and 1970s. The homelessness and poverty rates demonstrate that.

- The middle class is expanding at the fastest rate since the 1960s. More income as a distribution share is finally beginning to shift from corporate profit to labor.

- For the last several years wages for the bottom 2/3 of labor have been rising dramatically faster than wages for the top 1/3.

- The US savings rate is strong at 8%. Household balance sheets are similarly strong. The share of household income going to debt service costs is near 40-50 year lows.

Several of those are entirely due to a continued resource shift via the rapidly expanding US welfare state and increasing progressive taxation.
How do you test them more, with which nonbiased dataset that does not exist?

What you could do is actually describe the kind of errors the network makes. In the example of CT, false positive, false negative, wrong diagnosis. We can try to analyze what the network is detecting, rather than accept a result on some test set as real.

The millions of trials is an overstatement, but indeed few hundred thousands are needed to actually discern a winner, presuming the network did not cheat by focusing on, say, population statistics - say, certain cranium sizes being more likely to present with problems. Relying on population statistics derived from a small sample (even if representative, which it's not) is very risky...
GCC just so happens to not select any instructions with alignment requirements at `-msse -mno-sse2`, while clang emits calls to soft-fp functions that aren't implemented in the kernel. At -msse2, clang emits sse2 instructions with alignment requirements. You'd think their 16B-aligned-stack driver would be ok, but its caller (the rest of the kernel) has a different ABI (8B-aligned-stack) which is kind of insane to mix TUs with two different ABIs in the same executable and make calls between them.

Then again, all x86_64 processors support sse2, so I'm not surprised that Clang at -mno-sse2 doesn't work better. There's numerous bugs filed against Clang where it crashes when -mno-sse2 is set, but double precision floating point is used.

(I've spent almost all of this week debugging this, and working with CrOS and AMD engineers on this. It's not clear to me at this point whether the 16B-stack-alignment ABI change was well intentioned or a stroke of luck).
It is far worse than that. Market capitalism can not move us from local maxima even when we know far higher maxima exist.
This is how you create terrorists.
What do you think the children and friends feelings towards the US will be from now on?
People get radicalized for much less than that.
Clearly, it’s easier to grow when you start out poor, as you can play catch up copying the solutions and technologies from rich places. It gets much harder when you’re the leader, and not only you cannot copy tech from others, but you can’t even depend on them using you for cheap labor.
Dennard scaling is a pretty fundamental part of Moore's law.
i recommend this series

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNk_zzaMoSs
What i am looking for is a distro where the only UI is through webpages.

I had idea about installing a local Prometheus agent, cockpit and other modern administration tools, but it could'nt match all the features of Gnome 3. Especially, I couldn't find a webtool to manage hardware, such as Wifi, keyboard configuration, display, mouse, etc. Also, a very good, fast, and stable web terminal isnt easy to find
I'm seriously considering moving back to Windows from Arch. I miss some software. Can you give some downsides of WSL2 so I know you're being impartial (I am) and to help me make a decision. I wasted a few days with WSL1 and don't want to repeat that.
Reading those chats (and knowing absolutely nothing about Lamo other than what's in the NPR article) I can't really blame him for turning Manning in. A stranger reaches out to you over the internet and offers you free reign on classified military networks? 99.9% of the time that's a honeypot...
I think there just aren't as many homeless perhaps, and everyone, including most businesses, have restrooms.
The issue with an eVTOL is that you have an unobstructed noise source at altitude. Cities are not designed for this.

In a well-designed city noise sources would be under the ground or at a ground level, behind a sound barrier. They wouldn't be placed at altitude.
That’s neat, thanks! I usually just refresh once an hour or so.
As a linux user, the upsides of not facing toxic users who are constantly ranting about M$ beats most other things.
This is where K8S becomes messy because of its rapid development history.

Applications should just be a `Deployment` manifest with the type of distribution being a child setting (X replicas with affinity or 1-per-host). There's no reason to have competing ReplicaSets and DaemonSets just for this detail.
The more sinister thing is that many ISPs seem to basically shadow ban VPN websites e.g. you don't even get a Christianity bait message like pr0n site or 4chan(...)
Check the wording on the bill... I think that isn't actually allowed.

I seem to remember that your rent in Jan 2020 must be lowered to what it was in March 2019.

Edit: text from https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml...

"...The bill would provide that these provisions apply to all rent increases occurring on or after March 15, 2019. The bill would provide that in the event that an owner increased the rent by more than the amount specified above between March 15, 2019, and January 1, 2020, the applicable rent on January 1, 2020, shall be the rent as of March 15, 2019, plus the maximum permissible increase, and the owner shall not be liable to the tenant for any corresponding rent overpayment..."
France's GDP per capita is definitely lower than the US, by a substantial amount.
But the other side of the argument is that if somebody worked hard, and obtained monies, they should be able choose where to live using said monies. If i found out that wealth gained means nothing, and that the 'mob' penalizes wealth, then people would tend to create less wealth. Would society be worse off then?
I see how a house can be considered an asset but if you sell your house where do you live? Sure you can downsize but it's still not purely an asset, you are using it at least in part to fulfill a basic human need.
Except those few times when they e.g. want a new profile picture for their Facebook/Instagram, find that photo on which they look really good but are only part of the whole shot, try to crop it (e.g. with the cropping tool that's available on most social media platforms when uploading a profile picture) and then they discover the result is a blurry mess.

Or, they want to print the photos they made on their phones into a family album, and the result again comes back as blurry mess that looks nowhere near as nice as it did on the phone.

So I'd add: manufacturers optimize for great pictures for the 95% that look great when shot, not when later used.
No license: can't use.
Extending people's commutes by pushing the working class farther and farther from job centers is awful for the environment.

And besides, no rent should be jumping past 5%+inflation in good faith, especially while wages are stagnant. The name rent control is confusing as it implies some sort of stasis.

In this case, it just helps prevent gouging.
Fake negative are one thing.

Fake positives are much more common with products.
> Otherwise TV maker has no incentive to pre-bundle your app

The big one is "supports popular services out of the box" is a selling point to consumers.

Even if it boots up to a store page where you can download them all, a whingy answer for "Does it do Netflix" will drive buyers to the next TV.
But the money obtained through work has a meaning. "Entitled" means to demand without having first "worked" to obtain the necessary resources for said demand.
This is an excellent way to cause more terrorism, well done Team USA.
Sadly C# is still missing a few important ML features that making functional programming more difficult than in a true ML.
Maybe not consistently year over year, but bursts of rent increase can happen to people and blindside them financially. Preventing price gouging is what this law is intended for.
is there a better technique? please share. independent cyber-merc "white hat; with blood stains"

my best approach -- marking people "declined to participate" and naughty list; or for shaming them for not participating in the drill?

?? as i see it; i'm a good guy by paying them a courtesy by informing them of the intentions; working with them; they are the unprofessional ones. perhaps this is my low EQ; and it's why I have assistants.

I have no patience for bureaucrats (i.e. election officials) telling me their system is secure while I know damn well they aren't .. usually I suspect corruption/secrets they would rather not be public ... and the funny thing is ... most of the time I'm right and they turn out to be real pieces of shit that I just happened to get caught on my boot.

Too many of our systems relying on closed source software vendors hiding behind the law pretending (i'm looking at you Oracle) .. ignoring that 90% of North Koreas income comes from hacking; cyber-terrorism cyber-ransom funding radical terrorism scares me.

the small terrorists cells usually don't have a hypermind *(180+ IQ); but nation state [even small ones] probably have at least one or two on the payroll.

iran is a good example of this; we've been talking about these types of attacks "in theory" for years; literally 10 years -- more importantly; due to the success how long before this type of guerilla warfare expands to schools in the USA.
I am rooting for Windows Terminal to succeed, but currently it's definitely not fast. Complete redraws of the content are in fact painfully slow for me at the moment.
Yep, prop 13 and insane property prices serve that function in the SF Bay Area. If you buy now, you pay $2M upfront and ~$20k/yr property tax for a small ranch house, while your neighbor who has lived in a similar house for 40 years pays <$2k/yr, less on an inflation adjusted basis than when they moved in, thanks to prop 13. The cherry on top is that after paying a small fortune for your house, your municipal (and school) budgets are stretched thin, despite some of the highest land values in the country, because so few of the long time residents are paying anywhere near the nominal 1.x% rate. And then the long time residents loudly complain that infrastructure is buckling, and we can't afford to improve it, so we can't expand housing. It's maddening.
The type of noise is completely different from a drone.
From Chapter 6 of the "Population Bomb," titled "What If I'm Wrong?":

"To cover this contingency, I would like to propose an analogue to Pascal's famous wager… If I'm right, we will save the world. If I'm wrong, people will still be better fed, better housed, and happier,thanks to our efforts. Will anything be lost if it turns out later that we can support a much larger population than seems possible today? Suppose we move to stabilize the size of the human population after the "time of famines" at two billion people, and we achieve that goal by 2150. Suppose that in 2151 someone invents a machine that will produce nutritious food or anything else man wants in limitless quantities out of nothing. Assume also that in 2151 mankind decides that the Earth is underpopulated with just two billion people. Men decide that they want more company. Fortunately, people can be reproduced in vast quantities by unskilled labor who enjoy their work."

And this quote from an earlier chapter:

"What will be done with leisure time and money when all vacation spots are crowded beyond belief? Is it worth living in the Los Angeles smog for 50 weeks in order to spend two weeks in Yosemite Valley - when the Valley in the summer may be even more crowded than L.A. and twice as smoggy? What good is having the money for a fishing trip when fish are dead or poisonous because of pesticide pollution? Why own a fancy car in which to get asphyxiated in monster traffic jams?"

Live in Los Angeles, can confirm.
There's really only one insect we care much about - bees - and the keywords there are colony collapse disorder. Given that bees are given homes and food, it makes you wonder what is happening to the rest of the insect ecosystem.

Even worse, there is a whole universe of microbes which we know even less about than insects...
But everyone in the finance community has been saying that loudly since mid 2017 when we reached an 8 year bull market. As they say, economists have predicted 12 of the last 5 recessions.
And x86 assembler is perfectly capable of expressing pure functions. Such algorithms are still expressed using subroutines, subroutines that save and restore all state to its start state.

The question isn't whether a language can express an algorithm, Church and Turing already proved that. The question is whether the language can do so scalably. We want to see nontrivial examples of FP applied to messy, side-effect-laden domains in a way that rivals other representations for clarity and maintainability.
My comment on this would be that the winner of a particular competition might not be the best model (in fact they are likely to be sneaky, e.g.extract information about the distribution of the hold out set and tune for that), but they are a great way to get a survey of the state of the art by looking in general at the types of approaches used by the top competitors. There is definitely information there.
> entitles anyone to own land in the first place?

by fiat, land can be owned.

The first land was obtained through war and conquest (from native american indians). Those who worked and produced wealth used it to purchase the land from the crown (or whatever gov't that did the conquering).

If you want to change this, you either must convince everybody (including existing land owners) that your system is better. Or, raise an army, and take it by force (as what was originally done to the native american indians).
As scary sounding as the anecdote was, DDT is known for relatively low human (and mammal) toxicity. They did absolutely insane human studies with it in the 1950's, and dosages of up to 380mg/kg were tolerable. There was also no evidence that it produced cancer at commonly exposed dosages: http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/extoxnet/carbaryl-dicro... < some more info here.
You realize that the latest global 2050 population estimates while being more or less unchanged in total (11B+), had an upward prediction for Africa as a direct consequence of the Trump administration's changes in support for birth control programs in the region?
And the US ranks ahead of both Germany and Sweden in median household net wealth. Those two are almost universally held up as extreme achievers on quality of life and both have notoriously good economies.
Love that dude's humor sense. So cute, serious and satiric at the same time.
You're making a critical mistake. Why make a network for a competition that won't produce great results without major modifications on real data?

That is the main problem, and the lack of systems thinking is on your side. There is a strong pressure to cheat and overfit. Sharing in fact makes this even stronger.

We've had some fun with that when trying to use ML for something as complex as music rhythm envelope extraction. (Which is easy in comparison to CT test.)

Best results were approaching 90% accuracy on the big suite, but real results were closer to 40%. A slightly worse solution did reliably 70%. (And was not a neural network even, plus possible to improve.)

General best approaches sometimes indeed work, but sometimes (often?) they are overfitted in architecture, not even dataset.
Can they wipe out thousands of species?
> No one will ever print those in 20x30in and frame them, hence no one cares about edge to edge sharpness or raw files.

People still want to hang pictures on the walls and have family albums. Maybe it's a diminishing use case, but the sad thing is, it's not this that makes camera optimized for quick, ephemeral snapshots. It's the optimization for quick snapshots that's pushing out the more permanent use of photos.
The right to bring in a 3rd party for security assessment is sometimes part of an IT service contract; the state might have had this (or thought they had this) as part of its electronic records integration with the county.
Our biggest renewable energy purchase ever