skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> How many of those organisations feature smiling attractive women in their product advertising?

I don't know, but I also don't know if this woman is smiling because they cut off her head to get more breast in frame.
The USA and the Chinese governments are not so different. All that ideology bollocks is window dressing; the API. The back end is the same.
Well, considering the PLAs only major combat action in the last 30 years has been in Beijing, they probably aren’t eager to publicize that. Thought I have a hunch that it is true for the PLAs entire existence (they never killed many Japanese, and the Siege of Changchun claimed at least 500k compared to anything that happened in Korea).
US tariffs are 2.5% on cars and 25% on light trucks, while in the EU it is 10% on both. Most vehicles (66% [1]) sold in the US fall under the light-truck category. What Trump has threatened to do is to impose a 25% tariff not only on cars, but maybe more importantly also on auto parts. So far it has not happened.

[1] https://www.aei.org/publication/the-anti-consumer-25-chicken...
"Uber has an app my cat could have written." -Larry Ellison

Then why hasn't Oracle written it and become a competitor? Surely with their 11b in profit per year, Larry's cat could have all the sardines it wants in payment.

I don't use Uber very often but it's usually an enjoyable and helpful and fairly priced experience to go wherever public transport wont take me.
That's interesting and totally valid. My experience with conferences in multiple fields has been pretty lukewarm in terms of learning, but they're great for meeting people and networking.
That's not what these particular aircraft are capable of.
If game companies could just raise prices today and make more money, why wouldn’t they, regardless of what happens in this case?

If anything, allowing resale would cause demand for new product to go down causing lower prices.
Awesome tool for setting up a Tailwind config.
India Plans to Ban E-Cigarettes, as Global Backlash Intensifies
> China is actually by all measures a much better place to live than the US.

I think that's an overgeneralization. There are many things that do "work better" or "improve faster". Mass transit and metropolitan cleanliness are good examples of this (with exceptions, of course).

However, the lack of a strong regulatory body for things like food quality and water quality still make it a much riskier place to live IMO.

That's not to say China won't, for example, achieve a one billion+ person version of Singapore in our lifetimes, but I still have a "wait and see" attitude towards this.

Note: I have lived in China and travelled nearly 6K miles by mass transit to all kinds of places there.
Mcrouter Operator – Demonstration of K8s Operator SDK Usage with Ansible
> Both in the sense that immigration law is more likely to be enforced against racial minorities

Is that a "more likely to be enforced against people who do something else, such as crossing the border illegally, and those people happen to have racial makeups different than the US" or "more likely to be enforced due to a person's race"?

I really have to assume the former.
Every person does but it may not be the same as the author. My moral code would allow me to develop anything for anybody anytime.
Uh, melting permafrost?
Then you have to give the money back.
Extending the license is easy. Enforcing it is a whole different question.
How is that not what Nineteen Eighty Four is partly about?
They might if you weren't a lurker ;)
Maybe people shouldn't be working in front of a computer for 8-14 hours at a time, with only occasional breaks to use the toilet, get something to drink, or get lunch. What if the working conditions in tech are more inhumane than we've realized?

Maybe we need to update OSHA regulations to cover inherently sedentary office work and boost the agency's enforcement budget so that they can do their jobs and protect workers like us.
Doesn't sound like much of a code at all.
After I experienced a couple bad bookings I found out about:
airbnbhell.com
It's full of horror stories from both owners and renters. And the gist seems to be: once Airbnb has your money (fee) they really couldn't care less about what happens.

I recently stopped using them after they asked to send in facsimiles of government ID to continue using their services (after being a customer with all 5 star reports over many years).
The Mystery of the South Pole’s Only Murder
Truck prices are already out of control, and the superior towing (if they do the torque right) should put in the class of superduty trucks.

Plus these will have tons of commercial customers who get to depreciate it on schedule, and the longer term lower maintenance and fuel costs come into play more.

... assuming the design goes well.
"This repo was inspired by Ali Spittel's tweet"

Trying to open https://www.alispit.tel/
Find that the company proxy block it as a gambling site...
For the past ten years at https://freeperiod.co.uk I have been doing php/mysql/jquery. Somewhere down the line I got into bootstrap as well. People were telling me my idea and execution of it were rubbish ten years and I guess I am still here.

I wouldn't worry too much about the stack of the day. Crack on and make something you can call your own.
iOS 13 has a saving grace: now the phone app has a setting where you can flat out ignore calls from numbers that aren’t in your address book. It’s under Phone, Silence Unknown Callers. It’s been a godsend.
I say the same about gun laws; they are immoral and should be disobeyed. At least guns are a constitutionally protected right, unlike immigration. Perhaps common ground could be found. I’d favor getting rid of all immigration laws if we can get rid of all gun laws.
"Minimum unit pricing" Just means making alcohol more expensive. Headline from 6-19-2019 "Alcohol sales in Scotland hit 25 year low after minimum unit pricing introduced." Here's their governments website: https://www2.gov.scot/Topics/Health/Services/Alcohol/minimum...
If that were true it would be even more terrible. I did find it a bit hard to believe so I checked, and your claim seems to be based on a misunderstanding, according to https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/09/us/politics/fact-check-fa....
> If you host software for free and you don't like what people are doing with it, then I think you should be able to stop hosting that software.

GitHub was the host, he just deleted the project from his profile.

But you're right, Chef should've precluded this as a possibility a long time ago. The only reason this was possible was lack of proper Continuity-of-Business setup, but even then they had a new repo up within the day so it's not all that much impact.

Free PR for the involved, and free ad-dollars to those who choose to report on it.
What exactly is your threat model?
Is working worth the gym membership, video games and travel? Perhaps the solution is to work, do and own less more generally. Trying to find a trick to fool your mind into liking an activity you don't only seems healthy for the corporate balance sheet, not you as a individual.
My fav so far https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GaWX-n82P9LU2QMEwxmq2XEJWjR...
There's been quite a few options around if you Google color palettes. Adobe's color and coolors are some popular ones:

https://color.adobe.com

https://coolors.co

Or just use a good default like https://clrs.cc for base colors.

Color palette are always one of the first things to set up with CSS variables when starting a new project so you don't have to think about specific colors (or use the color picker) when building UI elements. ColorBox looks nice for adding the 1-10 shade variations (light->dark) for each color, which some of the palette sites downplay.
There's an accompanying blog post here, surprised it's not higher: https://design.lyft.com/re-approaching-color-9e604ba22c88
You can't change the law unless you convince other people that there's a problem, and you won't convince people that there's tax loopholes, without demonizing the organizations that exploit them.

Telling people to stop complaining about abuse of the law is one of the best ways of preventing the law from ever being fixed.
Had you ever tried any of the typical anti-depressants before deciding to use one not developed by Big Pharma?

I don't doubt that a lot of these psychedelics, about which almost every person who tries them for depression raves, are effective for some people. But like any strong drug affecting the brain, I'm wary that they could just as easily cause even more anxiety and depression in those already predisposed.
Because they would have to spend years in court litigating whether or not that was slander. Consumers have also been shown to respond better to positive causes than negative ones, and a non-profit funded by these guys is better equipped to spin it as a positive "working for a better future" type thing than them all running "Amazon bad" ads.
> many governments are banning ICE vehicles anyway

I'm going to hold off on giving these governments credit until one of these bans actually goes into effect. Even the most aggressive of the measures that has passed still has a decade in which to be weakened, delayed, or reversed.
I think you underestimate the threat potential of extensions.

Yes, ad networks can track you across participating networks. But an ad network can only attack the sites that use it.

An extension can access everything.

And how do you "vet" an extension? By checking if the author looks like a trustable person on their Github photo?
Sure you could but then it becomes risky to use as the moral code may be hard to qualify.
I'm going to have to say yes on this one. If you have no contract with the developer, you're SOL.
The whole promise of Kubernetes (and, coincidentally, containers) is that you are not locked to a platform/provider/OS.

Reading this comment made me realise that often new technology is adopted because it is optional and promises options. But those options quickly shrink away and suddenly you’re locked into it.

Not to invoke a controversial name. But this is what happened with systemd.
Quelle suprise!
I do agree that answers in the vein of "doing more stuff" doesn't help when someone wants to spend money, not time. But with a mindset of incrementalism, vegetarianism and veganism can be mostly effortless. Mentally/spiritually grappling with and letting go of the social incentives and punishments around having children (called "natalism" by some) may take effort, but if you are already in a position where these don't really affect you, it's effortless: it's not doing something.

What's more, I can frame purchases within these lifestyle choices what OP wants: buying more expensive substitutes for animal-based food I'm used to is investing in the environment and the well-being of sentient creatures. Purchases for hobbies, adopted pets, and experiences is money I would have spent on child-rearing.
Yes, I fly them professionally. The sound is related to the size, pitch, and profile of the propellers as well as the speed they are spinning.

The reason the guy down the street is probably loud is he is flying a race drone and hitting very high RPMs with it.

It seems that due to frangibility concerns, Project Wing uses much smaller motors and props now which requires a higher RPM to beat the air into submission.
I don’t think it’s a mistake, but a prerequisite. Oligarchs and autocrats only have their own interests in mind.
Also, `git tell` the story.
Protesting Climate Change, Young People Take to Streets in a Global Strike
My primary motivation is learning things and doing things the right way. In tech, I feel like I will never know everything, and in fact I never know "enough" - there's always some little setting or error or gremlin that will get me. Thus I can't do things the "right way" because my programs will break. This is a source of great anxiety for me.

Yes I know there are software principles that help with this like KISS and YAGNI, but I have a hard time internalizing them.

I used to work in construction, and tasks were largely repetitive. I knew the "right" way to do nearly all of my tasks, and I was able to complete them well. That drives a feeling of accomplishment that I don't have in tech.
I don't think the law is harmful. I'm considering the absence of opt-outs and the general prevalence of opt-ins evidence of people not being eager to opt-out.
Yes, print money and pay for student loans!
Yes! This was the biggest thing keeping me on Chrome.
I'll use this to generate additional colors for a demo that needs more colors than the 3 they provided to me :)
You are correct, these particular aircraft do not rely on cameras for navigation.
I was trying to stick to the topic, rather than going off on a tangent about corporate newspeak. Not to mention the doublethink we all engage in just to remain employable in the tech industry.
How to have strong muscles, limitless energy and general health
Sounds like you don't have a moral code, if that's the case.
Is it moral for citizens of this country to have their jobs taken away by people coming here illegally? I know several this has happened to, and who can no longer provide for their families. Where is your righteous indignation?

Is it moral for people who are working with the legal processes to immigrate to have others flout the law? Are you going to stand up and protect their rights?

Is it moral for people who are not citizens to come to our country and commit document fraud? To avail themselves of our safety net that we pay for? Our schools that we pay for? Why should citizens have to compete for these services against people who have not paid for them, who have jumped the line?

What moral right does someone have to make a claim on our jobs, our resources?

On the other hand, our government has a moral responsibility to protect the rights of the citizens of this country. To protect our jobs, our way of life.
I can't follow your reasoning. How does Google's business model justify allowing 3rd party Chrome extensions to snoop on user traffic?
This is what happens when you rely on a mutable package repository.
"All's well that ends well". There will be no justice, because justice would require repudiation. The main job of the President is to be a garbage bag for public outrage, tied off and thrown away when full. The truck comes around every 4 years, but the trash hasn't always started to smell.

Err I mean... Didn't you hear that GWB is actually a pretty down to earth guy now that he's out of office, and is even friends with Michelle Obama? Who knew he was so personable?

Trump is not president in spite of the problems you have listed - Trump is president because of them. Abortion and how people pee are of the same exact vein - deeply personal topics formed around dividing people. From the perspective of someone supporting Trump, the other team being frustrated is a feature - consider the past 8 years when they were in that position, as told by their media.

Continuing to draw attention to deliberately polarizing topics (as the media does) plays right into the hands of the status quo, by distracting from discussion of longstanding overarching policy (see: bikeshedding). The three letter agencies certainly form their own entrenched interests, but they're also fully supported by the larger economic interests that put on those political races ("propaganda is to a democracy what violence is to a dictatorship"). Specific companies may do better or worse depending on which team wins the race, but they all agree that ever more centralized control is needed. The immediate goal is maintenance of the US economic empire, but it is also insurance for keeping the mobs at bay in the face of rising inequality.
The Constitution is only a piece of paper. Lots of people tell you this, usually when they're arguing against gun ownership; but they completely miss the point of what that means. In their minds that means, "So we should just do whatever we want."

Everything "enshrined in The Constitution" is no such thing. It's enshrined in our culture, and individual hearts and minds. That's why it's so incredibly stupid and naive to push for things that are unconstitutional: it means you've dismantled your respect for the ideas in the constitution in your own mind, and you're cool with others, even your enemies, dismantling it in theirs. Usually you do this for some short-term, inadequate political reason (vague promises about controlling guns or banning abortion or taxing rich folks).

The Constitution isn't inadequate. We are, because we have no respect for the rights of others when it comes to what we think is best for everyone. We are, because we believe the lies that are pumped at us 24 hours a day. We are, because we argue that the Constitution is just a piece of paper when it gets in the way of what we want.

It's not about The Constitution. It's about people generally having the government they deserve.
Maybe republicans should have shone light on it then... Instead of chasing a birth certificate...
That's what postmodern era is. End of belief. IMO that's the fruit of scepticism as a way of life which has become well entrenched in the modern, well educated societies. As if we're in another stage of consequences of eating the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge (as a society).
Except that "Quantitative Easing" is NOT "printing money"... it's just media who dubbed it "printing money" as it is a more clickbaity term that works better for driving traffic to the advertisement infested pages.
Ted Talk: How craving attention makes you less creative – Joseph Gordon-Levitt
Of course, everyone should have a moral code. And moral codes can differ substantially, and be used to justify pretty much anything.

Many think selling to ICE is wrong, but many others think it's entirely moral/justified.

And the same goes for everything else. Almost every political/moral position you can think of can probably be justified using one moral or ethical code or another. Are their actions right or wrong according to utillitarianism or deontology or virtue ethics? Well if you ask ten different people you'll get ten different answers.

So I'm not sure what to think there.

P.S. The whole 'right side of history' thing is super tiresome to read about, since the right side isn't necessarily the 'moral' one, but merely the one with the most cultural mindshare at the time.
What about in humans at normal doses?
Reduce makes it harder for people to come out of poverty.

Recycle costs energy.

Reuse should be ok, as long as whatever it is is in fact reusable.

But these three hardly cover all possible actions.
>Aircraft need to be able to see other aircraft so as not to collide with them. Especially so if you foresee a future where delivery drones are as common as cars.

Cameras are not being used for this job.

>They also need to avoid obstacles that aren't on their digital maps, like newly erected cranes, and moving things like birds, parachutists and gliders.

Cameras can be used for these, however it's better to use other sensors as the primary means of detection.
FTA:

> Saudi Arabia’s state-run media apparatus were found to be “engaged in coordinated efforts to amplify messaging that was beneficial to the Saudi government.”
It’s odd how that goes. We are never going to subject as many monkeys to coke as people drinking the stuff. So we need to compromise, but rats are not a great model resulting in some false positives. However, presumably some false negatives exist that are silently killing hundreds of thousands of people.
>Kenyns were the first to benefit from digital loan apps–now they call it slavery

That's like saying: "Kenyans were the first to enjoy cigarettes, now they call them harmful", and wanting to imply that they are somehow hypocritical or crazy to do so.

Just because you run to adopt something, doesn't mean it is good for you. You might find out that it's cancer (in the case of the cigarettes) or slavery (in the case of the digital loan apps).

The word "benefit" in the title is a weasel word, that presupposes what the article should instead prove. They might had first used such apps, but whether they "benefitted" from them, and even more especially, benefitted long term, remains to be proved...
The words "society" and "justice" have become triggers for a certain type of person
btw, how do you bypass the "Blocked because of Ad Blocker"? I did whitelist the website but I am still unable to see the content (and I am not going to uninstall my Ublock ;)
Don't forget the good old.

> The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.

Source: https://stallman.org/archives/2003-may-aug.html

Just ctrl+f for necro. You'll find it.
Morgan Stanley Robot Learns by Reading Unreadable MUNI Documents
ADS-B out is only required for manned aircraft flying in and out of controlled airspace.

There are some other exceptions as well IIRC for gliders, ultra lights and some others.
Going to a therapist that you don't like isn't a setback. It's getting closer to being aware of which kind of therapy is good for you. It's perfectly okay to jump around.

The first appointments are usually going to be freeform discussions, so you'll be able to see if there's a connection.
Can you explain how you get a solid looking template and what you do to customize it and where Material UI comes in?
Lastpass: Bypassing do_popupregister() leaks credentials from previous site
Anyone at Google who's being honest and not just toeing the HR line will tell you that the easiest way to get promoted is to quit, go to another FAANG for a year or two, and come back at the higher level.
That's kind of another aspect of the social-IQ divide.

Programming is very democratic and blue collar as white collar jobs go: you can get stuff done without a lot of formal education (OR the formal certification of (ahem) REAL engineering professions).

So either you ivory tower and sniff at the lower classes and use FP and higher tools, or you "get stuff done" actually making tools (like the dude who make the OSX package management getting stiffarmed by google).

The old CS vs no CS divide actually fissures quite dramatically in alignment with FP vs no FP.
Conferences aren’t where you go for deep thinking, but you can at least learn about new things, even if you don’t have the time to get the details. A talk is basically an advertisement for some new thing, the goal of the talk being to get the viewer interested in learning more. The consumer of the talk is hoping to learn about new things, so when they get back from the conference they have more chew on for career/intellectual development.

A conference is a horrible place to be seen. Maybe a great place to see your colleagues/friends in industry, networking is definitely important.
No link to a peer-reviewed paper, let alone any explanation of where this "new data" came from or why we should consider it reliable.
Ehrlich's timing was not great and his book is almost unreadable but the things predicted therein have come to pass. It really is more crowded in Yosemite than in downtown LA, and the air quality is worse. There really aren't any non-toxic fish left to catch.
Not even sure what you're trying to say here. Of course he's going by his own personal moral code.