skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's an incentive to make the differences between the planes seem as minimal as possible and avoid pilots being properly informed about all the details of the system, leading to pilots not knowing why the plane does what it does and how to fix it when it goes wrong?
Why are you sharing caches between customers?
"Just"?

Both Antifa anarchists and fake right white supremacists have been labeled domestic terrorists and threats to national security as far back as 2017...

Proof: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/antifa-dom...
Due to more gerrymandering I believe he could lose by up to 8 million or so votes and still win because of the electoral college. It's pretty depressing when you think about it.
I'll try that then. It sounds interesting. I think my biggest fear is that I wouldn't be doing it right and wouldn't get the benefits, but it's not like it hurts to try!
Um. I said nothing about that. My point was, the gov pushed to rebuild - because it's good for votes / donations. And they even put a spin on it. There was zero discussion about perhaps not rebuilding. There should have been. It was obvious there should have been.
Not that you should replace Rust with Haskell, but Haskell would've been a better choice than Scala.

It has its own runtime, but it's not difficult to call Haskell code from C or ATS or whatever.
I speculate that these bubbles (and the other bubbles) are gigantic elementary particles emerging from the black hole.
This is very cool stuff. I really appreciate the link.
Soviet Officer Stanislav Petrov, 'The Man Who Saved the World' (2017)
yeah, the thing is NOBODY knows. If anybody ever knew the market was going down, they'd keep it a secret and short it. And if they KNEW it was going up they'd keep it secret and buy.

A good thing to keep in mind while the "experts" are bombarding you with their theories.
This is an example.

I never worked with Unity myself but I worked with people using Unity as their game engine, they all had problems with stuttering caused by the GC at some point.

You can try to search Unity forums about this subject, you'll find hundreds or thousands of topics.

What really bothers me with GC is that it solves a pain I never felt, and creates a lot of problems that are usually more difficult to solve.

This is a typical case of the cure being (much) worse than the illness.
Yeah dude doesn't realize there is the catch all part of independents who make up more registered people than either dem or republican party.
> (1) take advantage of modern hardware, (2) fit on a single floppy disk

I did laugh at this.
Funny, I had the opposite voice in my head telling me I needed to definitely take my money out, even though I was sure at least a portion of the predictions about yield curves was hype and people making noise to get attention/clicks.

My intuition seems to think that even if the market recover/gain some more in the near term, it's not going to go much further before hitting a correction/recession. In addition there is simply too much uncertainty around Brexit, Trump, Iran/Saudis, China/Hong Kong, climate-driven black swans, tech bubbles (e.g. AI, blockchain).

I ended up taking money out at the end of July and am not sweating my decision, even though we've recovered about what we lost in August at this point. This shit is a house of cards, I don't have a problem missing out on marginal gains if it means avoiding a major crash.
Oh wow, I wasn't aware of that. Intel really has fallen quite low. I worry about it's future as AMD, Nvidia, and TSMC pull away at it from all sides.
Typical fallacy in entropy considerations is to consider system as isolated in the model while it is strongly connected to the environment in reality. The oil/vinegar (similar to the pennies and dimes
mentioned in the article - when shaken in a jar would "magically" separate with pennies on top) has exported the entropy to the environment through the work of gravitational force in full accordance with the 2nd law - the system transitions following the gradient and thus increasing total entropy of the whole system. A similar mistake for example is when "life" is stated to be "anti-entropic" in any sense while it is a really a form of matter organization which generates even more entropy than the same amount of dead matter would.
I implied that he chose C for strong typing, which is not. C is weak typing. You want strong typing, you go with Pascal instead for example, that's a strong typing language.
I can’t decide if Rust Evangelism Strike Force sounds like an awful or awesome cartoon.
Is that really the case though? I mean the 'catastrophic' part, not the 'climate change' part as that has been clear from the get-go - climate change is happening and has been happening for as long as the planet has had an atmosphere. We're in an interglacial, on the far end of the high point (the 'interglacial optimum') on the curve and with that on the way down to a new glacial in a few thousand years. The interglacial optimum is the period within an interglacial that experiences the most 'favourable' climate and often occurs during the middle of that interglacial. For the present interglacial, the Holocene (which started about 11.700 years ago) the climatic optimum occurred during the Sub-boreal (~3000 BCE - 500 BCE) and Atlanticum (7000 BCE - 3000 BCE) [1]. Our current climatic phase following this climatic optimum is still within the same interglacial. That warm period was followed by a gradual decline until about 2000 years ago, with another warm period until the Little Ice Age (1250–1850). The current interglacial is actually relatively cool compared to the previous known ones, the maximum Antarctic temperature during the previous interglacial was about 6°C higher than that registered during the current one [2].

Can you point us at some non-politicised sources which can refute these findings, which prove that anthropogenic climate change is such a strong force that it counteracts the natural glacial cycle?

For those who wonder why I ask this question please note that this is a serious request. The debate around climate change has been so polluted by politics that it is nigh impossible to find objective sources. Those objective sources which I know off fail to show the climate catastrophe which we're all being warned about.

[1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holocene_Temperature...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ice_Age_Temperature.png
Not sure how then, but in Chrome on my laptop, the ISS passes over a view of the front of my house.

The implementation is just magical. Well done!
Well this one already had more comments than the other three combined.
Lots of languages are well-suited to compilers. See e.g. Haskell accelerate.

I don't really know why you'd use Rust instead of a GC language from the ML family.
Totally cool, thanks for building.
D'oh! Different person! whoops! So that really underscores my point, then. The "Why I Write Games in C" guy doesn't mention Rust anywhere!
Sure, we might not hit a recession, there seems a decent chance we won't, but for every slightly positive benchmark cited in this article there's at least one negative, be it trends in car sales (especially new truck sales, which tend to be predictive) or a jobs report that looked positive only because it was propped up by thousands upon thousands of low-paid temporary Census workers. The positive indicators are, well, positive, but "trouncing" just raises the headline to the level of click bait.
Clazzy. Is there a name for this design pattern when the name you wanted was already taken by a language keyword?
> Interesting to note, our eyes can only pick up certain light wavelengths as seen below in the visible and invisible light.

Light by definition is the "radiation that is considered from the point of view of its ability to excite the human visual system" thus there is not such a thing as invisible light.

http://eilv.cie.co.at/term/659
This is different from Julia.

I don't really know why you'd write a project of this sort in C.
This is a surprisingly eloquent essay on the state of modern programming languages (and obviously why the author things that sticking with C is a better choice... and I'm fairly persuaded.)
Why is China so Uncool? (2017)
Sabbath: A Community of Servants
Older opportunities only looked easy because they'd be easy for us in our more powerful position of knowledge and resources. It wasn't easy for an uneducated medieval peasant to discover the laws of electromagnetism. Even the most advantaged people didn't know what to look for. Plenty of failures happened in alchemy/witchcraft/religion/etc. that people dedicated their lives to for nothing because they didn't have our advantage of knowledge.
I’ve been trying to convince my coworkers that we should have a cache per node, but so far they aren’t biting.

Alternatively I think within the decade we are going to expect every service to contain its own fault prevention logic instead of just the web tier. At which point every service has its own reverse caching proxy in front of it.
Reddit adding image hosting couldn't have helped them with anything other than bandwidth costs.
It's much more complicated than that. For one, healthcare gets more expensive with per capita GDP. This is the pattern across the developed world. Healthcare spending in the US is about where you would expect based on this pattern, given US per capita GDP is significantly higher than that of most developed countries. Medicare in the US is similarly much more expensive than comparable programs. For another, there are things the US does better than other countries, like treat heart disease and cancer.

Also like I said, other countries get to utilize medical innovation produced in the US at subsidized rates.

And yes, for-profit healthcare should be allowed. Healthcare workers aren't all volunteers. They're doing it for money. The same applies to investors. Having laws limiting investment to philanthropy and taxpayers is totally destructive.

Healthcare costs are going down in cosmetic surgery, unlike other healthcare fields across the developed world. Cosmetic surgery is driven by price conscious consumers and profit-motivated practitioners. Self-interest is a powerful motivator and ignoring that leads to misguided bans on for-profit healthcare and inefficient, rent-seeking government-run healthcare bureaucracies and government-permissioned private industries shielded from competition by regulatory barriers.

>>Also we're paying for a lot of bad habits like overeating and not exercising. Lots of preventable diseases go into that mix, I dare say it's the majority of expenditures. There is virtually no governmental or social efforts being put into stopping those preventable diseases.

Agreed. I think health outcomes are mostly a result of non-healthcare factors. Having safer, denser and more pedestrian friendly cities would go a long way in improving health for example.
Maybe you can, maybe you can't. If you don't want to support the people you work with then they have little motivation to support you in return if you find yourself treated poorly by the firm or a bad manager. I suggest you revisit the context in which the question was asked in the first place.
My OnePlus 5 took a nice dip in a hot tub. Still works fine 18 months later and so does the headphone jack
Demand can also be broken up into those same categories.
Did they have to write the runtime in the same language?

They could've used an ML with GC and it would've been better (for a compiler).

It doesn't really have any functional programming paradigms. Pattern matching is present in imperative languages like past versions of ATS
This line is pretty funny: "C++ is still the most common language for writing games, and not without reason. I still do almost all of my contract work in it. I dislike it intensely." hahaha poor guy
I’d be interested in knowing more if you care to write more about this. I’m currently costing/scoping out what’s required in writing software at that level but don’t really have some real industry insight into what other people do

Static memory is something we already do but we’re pretty interested whether industry actually adopts redundant code paths, monitors, to what extent watchdogs (how many cycles can be missed?), etc.
Implementing a Content Security Policy in Haskell
Understanding Data Throughput in a Docsis World
Show HN: Kung Fu Chess
I take it you couldn't be bothered to read the links or look at the research behind the theory before ridiculing it? The idea is that after a certain point, financial motivation doesn't lead to better work - to motivate you need to fulfill higher-level needs like ownership, purpose, autonomy, etc.

Your statement about management not being skilled work makes no sense. Do you have some evidence that paying managers more leads to better performance?
The more I read anecdotes like these, the more I think Andrew Yang's freedom dividend is the way to go.
My daughter had voices in her head for a bit as she grew up. The professional advice we got is that it is common in children, but diminishes as they age. Most adults do not hear voices. And even the ones that do are normally just verbalization of their own thoughts.

But we were warned that if they didn't fade, or they were being negative or harmful, that is a red flag that should invoke some action.
Noumenon
Sounds very similar to NASA C programming guidelines. Each module during the initialization period would allocate its static memory size. Every loop had a upper bound's max iteration to prevent infinite loops.

I think they posted the guidelines and it was a wonderful read about how they developed real time systems.
I agree it is a positive for gas to supplant coal (at least simplistically, from a pure plant emissions perspective). It's the lesser of those two evils. But we've still got to cease use of gas for electricity at some point.

However, it's not a net positive for carbon emissions if it replaces nuclear, which is what's described in the article.
This sounds a lot like the main idea behind the book "The Untethered Soul". Highly recommend to anyone interested in meditation, mindfulness, or letting go of everyday stress.
The street-view feature is very impressive, and very useful, especially when combined with the schedule. Thank you for building this.
Love it. It's pretty close to my answer - my hypothesis is that it's a simulation which creates itself. I'm not sure if you can call this the 'base' - but essentially, it comes down to a self-recursion. It's information which calls itself and which calls itself, and which well...I'm not sure if you can define a base. 1 = 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... so mathematics itself is actually self recursive.
Funny I just looked up this phrase too, someone said it on Succession.
I've never used AWS so perhaps I'm mistaken, but api gateways normally provide extra functionality on top of just proxying the request. You can still set up a server listening on port 80 or 443 with a public IP and make requests to it without being charged per request.
I mean, you can tilt toward value or hedge your portfolio with options or something. I wouldn’t actually do the latter though, put options are pretty much always overpriced by at least 50% or more. Tilting toward value until the next election would be a reasonable move. Or you could try a 60/40 equity/bond portfolio.

Personally though, I just invest in a 3x leveraged S&P 500 ETF and roll with the punches. Unless there’s some cataclysmic event, that 3x leverage will almost always outperform the S&P, even with the volatility drag.
I'd recommend showing this + the time zone (e.g. "browser local time, UTC+2"). My guess was that it's the local time of the location entered, which can matter when telling someone "hey, you'll be able to see a cool satellite looking out your northward window at 9 pm!". If you're worried about keeping a clean look, at least add a tooltip.

(I've also been trained to distrust any time that doesn't specify a time zone, because I've seen sites that default to some random US timezone, use your local time, use UTC, ...)
Unfortunately it is the job of those sympathetic to a cause to support it, whether they are victimized or not.

It's not "fair" or "right", it's just a reality that causes are advanced by those who care about them. Life is tragic that way.
[..]
If he was ready to stab this woman, it is what it is. The lunatic who did the stabbing didn't get his way for free either. May they rest in peace.

All I did was summarize your comments above for the sake of brevity. I do think it's nonsense, and callous nonsense at that. What sort of sense am I supposed to have found that I missed?
I'm not saying this necessarily applies to you, but many people find that it takes them quite a bit of intensive meditation practice to even discover that they've been overlooking a lot of chatter in their minds.

> Beginning meditators often think that they are able to concentrate on a single object, such as the breath, for minutes at a time, only to report after days or weeks of intensive practice that their attention is now carried away by thought every few seconds. This is actually progress. It takes a certain degree of concentration to even notice how distracted you are.

—Sam Harris
Your scenario fails because there's no reason you can't have both. No one forces anyone to install extensions. Apple could make it available to turn off and use a custom extension without much ado. Instead they act like authoritarians.
They just mean the Save icon.
Eh, just because everyone deserves is doesn't mean it's not wealth. Lack of health care is anti-wealth.

Maybe you should consider that everyone deserves some wealth in general.
Perfect use for tech—bravo!

Can you do this with airplanes too? Might be fun to "see" where they're from/going.
This isn't responsive to the parent comment in any way.
Yes they are, but that's not a bad thing because there are less swings in emotion and more stability. Usually I'm not happy or sad, I am neutral, which is such a weird thing for Western society to be in because we strive to be happy constantly. I feel like the more I try to be happy the less happy I am, whereas when I am in the moment I find contentment.
Does Go really let you use closures, arrays, slices and maps when you disable the garbage collector? If so, does that just leak memory?
We see articles not so different from this concept all the time on HN. Recently it's about ORM vs SQL.

The core interfaces are really not terrible at all. They do have danger zones, but their complexities are relatively low. As the author of this article suggests, it's within the realm of something we can remember. That's a BIG deal.

I haven't done C in a very long time. But with C, my recollection is that the biggest issue is to make sure you keep track of your memory allocation and releasing. Sure this is significant, but it's a direct concern. And if you abstract by one level your management of memory, it's a lot easier (especially if you include some testing).

I think it's important to periodically evaluate if our efforts to simplify a situation have actually alleviated or simplified real issues that were hurting us.
Citation needed, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget does not agree with this statement.

I'm assuming you are conveniently forgetting that the 'Social security', 'Medicare' and 'Other spending' slices of mandatory spending go to rich and poor: these programs pay out their benefits to all people regardless of how wealthy they are.
I normally agree with this, but it can be distracting to an audience which may not be completely familiar with the ins-and-outs of the details.

It's the same as when people say that Elon Musk is the founder of Tesla, and most people have never heard of Martin Eberhardt (who I think had another partner who's name I can't remember!).
As a dev from flyover country what was something that surprised you? Getting rid of misconceptions is the sort of glue that could prevent this.
Not everyone can say they saved the world (and it be true).

RIP Mr. Petrov.
There was recently an error where AWS send the bill twice and then sent an apology e-mail. It may have something to do with this.
No sorry, this is from more than 5 years ago and it was never FOSS, but I only implemented rudimentary operators anyway, you could easily adapt existing libraries or write your own, the above concept is more valuable than any specific implementation details... the core concept being, never implicitly generate objects, e.g operate directly on parameter objects, or re-use them for return value, or return persistent internal objects (potentially dangerously since they will continue to be referenced and used internally).

All of these ideas require more care when using the library though.
Based on your input, the latest version has a preview window: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3226564/65380182-6...

I hope you like it!
Hint: Those tabs aren't really tabs, they're pretty much just text links, they are not loaded into memory. 99% of them NOT running. If all 500 of those tabs ran in parallel you wouldn't be able to use your phone.
I meditate daily for about 10 minutes, which research suggest is the optimal time for cost/benefit. I started meditating with an actual Buddhist, but have found that Waking Up is a great app. There are good alternatives out there app-wise but all seem to be solid choices.
There's also a tremendous amount of stock buy back happening, which means less money is being distributed to investors and more is being used to prop up the prices.

There's plenty of other places to put money though.
indeed, I thought this was a post about the crypto stuff :c
The PBS documentary is linked in the above article:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oyWZjdXxlw

with this quote:

"There is a scene in the first episode of a five-part 1996 PBS series on the making of the 777, Boeing’s first plane to employ “fly-by-wire” technology, in which an engineer discusses the company’s philosophy of computer-assisted aviation:

One of the things that we do in the basic design is the pilot always has the ultimate authority of control. There’s no computer on the airplane that he cannot override, or turn off if the ultimate comes, but, in terms of any of our features, even those that are built to prevent the airplane from stalling, which is the lowest speed you can fly and beyond which you would lose the control. We don’t inhibit that totally; we make it difficult, but if something in the box should inappropriately think that it’s stalling when it isn’t, the pilot can say, this is wrong and he can override it. That’s a fundamental difference in philosophy that we have versus some of the competition.
Pedantic remark on your pedantic remark – in the title it's used (still incorrectly) as a verb, not as a noun, so it would be the correct form for a programming computer is "to program".
ClearBridge Recession Risk Dashboard (interactive, you can manually adjust the input metrics to see what effect it has on the overall risk estimate): https://www.leggmason.com/global/campaigns/clearbridge-aor-r...
Very inspiring, I am embarrassed not to have known of his story before today.

It's worth also referencing Vasili Arkhipov, who also showed us the importance of individual action:

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/oct/27/vasili-arkhi...
Either way, it wont suddenly turn "on" overnight. These things ramp up and down instantly on cosmological scales, which means many thousands/millions of years in our world.