skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It sort of depends, if you’ve worked in a couple of corporates where you have to know a handful of various tools at each it quickly adds up to having enough knowledge to quickly deploy even what hacker news considers ‘heavyweight tooling’. Most of these tools have QuickStart guides that do get you most of the way there for a basic use case. I’m running a similar solo project with an almost-but-not-quite similar spreads of technologies.

But as I said, it depends on your history and what you work quickly with.

In the article the author says they chose Ansible because docker felt too heavyweight and unnecessary. It’s true that docker has a lot of stuff you don’t need in there, but trust me when I say Ansible is no picnic. In fact I find it easier to take what I need with Docker and Kubernetes and get running way quicker than I would ‘naked’ Ubuntu machines that I need to semi-manual previsioning with shell scripts or Ruby scripts. I got up and running with Kubernetes on DigitalOcean in less than a day, and Dockerfiles using familiar technologies I’ve used before take less than an hour to iron out.

You’ll get people who say that Docker is overkill and unnecessary and far too complicated for a solo project, but then you’ll get others who believe it’s a small file with 20 lines of declarations, sat alongside a 30 line yaml file that can provision all of your infrastructure instantly across any cloud provider you choose.
Show HN: Salaries, location and companies sponsoring H-1B in 2019
Call me crazy, but Windows 11 could run on Linux
There are some high-profile FOSS projects using GitLab, but they're not as visible as they would be on GitHub because they host their own instances:

- https://gitlab.gnome.org/

- https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/

- https://salsa.debian.org/ (AFAIK this is an ongoing migration)

Others are considering a migration:

- KDE: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/24900

- GNU Emacs: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/28152

Maybe someday we'll have federation to work around this: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/30672 :-)
Yes, and if you are 3x older than your coworker you should make 3x their salary.
That's one media outlet of very few one's but there's a lot of other ones that have a lot of "he said she said" thrown around. It becomes harder to form a conclusion without sources.
Kids Are Not Hurt by Screen Time
The great thing about this country is that others cannot define your own tolerances or lack thereof. The university had it's tolerance tested, and Stallman lost. If you don't like it, I encourage you to speak out like you are now. But it's not unfair, and it's not a violation of free speech or thought.
"Whaddya mean 'we', paleface?"

I'm a happy non-Prime Amazon customer. I buy plenty of things from them, and I basically never need anything faster than their free shipping (which I'm pretty sure they deliberately slow down, holding back dispatching in order to incentivize customers to get Prime). I could easily afford a Prime subscription, but I don't see how it's more worth the money than a hundred other things I could drop ~£100/year on.

Are there really so few other people who feel that way?
The end of the lunar space elevator wouldn't be traveling at geostationary orbital speed, it would be going 28x slower. A rocket could sync with the end of the elevator at this lower speed, which would significantly reduce the delta-v budget. [1]

Not sure how practical all of this, but that is at least the theory.

[1] Credit to mnw21cam: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20996246
That article is an exaggeration that doesn't reflect the truth.

This article explains the real events factually (letting for you to decide what you think is right or wrong) and without hyperbole: https://itsfoss.com/richard-stallman-controversy/?fbclid=IwA...
>"Making it" in a big city seems like it requires losing what is important.

I also hate city life, but I find it depressing that this is just another instance of everything absolutely having to be an us-vs-them scenario. Why can't people just enjoy the qualities of city life or suburban life or rural life without needing to broadly label the other options as somehow awful?
I already think that Uber and Slack are not really Silicon Valley: those are businessy companies but not really tech companies.

WeWork is even taking it one level further. They still have close to thousands software engineers to build... Things though.
I (unfortunately) cannot access this paper because it is behind a paywall, but surely it must be satire?
Exactly this. People don’t understand the amount of dedication RMS put into his work. I’m sick of this shit. I’m so fed up.
>This is a man who said something wildly inappropriate in an MIT forum and got fired

In my opinion, you are conflating inappropriate statements with statements to which you disagree.

The university campus is where minds should go to get challenged by different and somewhat uncomfortable opinions. RMS presents different and uncomfortable opinions in spades. But he does not present them in an inappropriate way. The thread RMS was responding to was explicitly political and opinion based. It was absolutely fair game for his response.

As an example, when I attended university, I took a class (Anthro 2A) where the material presented pedophilia as normal behavior in the context of certain cultural customs. I personally disagree with that research, but I didn't call for the instructor to be fired. Cultural relativism is an important concept that should be thought about even if one disagrees.

But the actual Stallman/MIT kerfluffle is actually not that big a deal IMO.

The bigger deal is the mob acting on deceptive reporting by Vice & DailyBeast. It's one thing to say that Stallman's factual statements on Minsky were inappropriate. It's another to conflate them with statements on Epstein. The vast majority of the outrage is based on the reporting that makes Stallman appear sympathetic to Epstein which is a complete fabrication. It is literally 'fake news'.
Yeah, but if Github goes down the developer world basically comes to a standstill, while if Gitlab goes down, most developers will only read about this on hacker news.
and yet, a lot of vanilla PHP is a mess of code whereas when i had to work on a laravel application i found it a pleasure to work with (even without having any prior PHP experience)

pick your poison i guess.
> Can you tell me why it is difficult to fix the projects and ghettos?

Because “the projects and ghettos” aren't a statement of a problem, and to the extent that there is an agreement that there are problems around those things, there is not consensus on what the problem is, much less the solution, and the lack of consensus is not only about empirical fact, but includes a fundamental clash of ideological principles.
Please do not flame the discussion with strawmans. This is a very uncharitable interpretation of what OP wrote. It is not about hatred, it is about minor subconscious preferences that if they exist, the can cause noticeable effects in aggregate.
You'll be asked what may be a bunch of superficially dismissing questions. They're in fact optional...

"""
Option 1, Credit Monitoring: Free Service or Cash Payment

Option 2, Cash Payment: I want a cash payment of up to $125. I certify that I have credit monitoring and will have it for at least 6 months from today.

Current Credit Monitoring Service: Self

Cash Payment: Time Spent
No spent time

Cash Payment: Money You Lost or Spent
No money lost or spent

Supporting Documents
No documents selected

How Would You Like to Receive Your Cash Payment
Check
"""
A thank you from me as well. I self-host gitlab and all our projects are on there.
Yes, unfortunately there are a number of people, some in positions of power and authority over some sporting bodies, that believe there is no meaningful difference between sexes.

The most notable result I've seen is a transgender (recently transitioned) MMA fighter fracturing the skull of an opponent in an appallingly one sided and brutal fight.

Denying the most basic facts of hormone effects (muscle and bone density effects of testosterone and then the bone density sparing effects of estrogen) that have not even been questioned for decades is now unfortunately a thing.
I would like to point out that the court documents have written on them:

A woman, testified that Epstein told her to offer sex to Minsky.

What it DIDN'T said:

That Minsky accepted the offer.

Also there are a witness (someone that was present, Greg Benford) that claims that Minsky didn't accepted the offer.
The difference in your example is that McCarthy was a government official, attacking political ideas, making what he did an absolute violation of free speech from the perspective of the first amendment. Is this really your best example?
> so if it had not affected women this author wouldn't have given a shit? typical.

The author does not seem to make this assertion, and what you have quoted definitely does not support your claim.

> Then the author proceeds to spew out so-called quotes with nobody being held responsible for any of the quotes.

It's understandable why those people may want to remain anonymous. Are you trying to imply the quotes are faked?

> referencing the pound-me-too movement shows just how anti-male this woman is.

How does it show that?

> or perhaps she just hates how "white" Stallman is?

This is quite a reach.
Won't they be paying Stamp Duty?
> If person is 17y 354 days old it doesn't matter what the minor person acted like, because law treats it as a non-consensual sex, so it's statutory rape

That's why USA are the motherland of mass shootings then...

I'm 18 today, my girlfriend is one day younger than me, it's rape.

What a lovely country.

> If both persons involved are living in Serbia it is OK

But is it OK for you?

Because you implied that I was ok with it...

I'm curious now.

> No one said he did. But he, completely uncalled fo

Like he always did?

Did someone called him to invent the GPL?

> defended someone who did

But he did not.

That's utterly false.

> and he did it by trying to put the blame on a victim

He was arguing that it wasn't not pedophilia but statutory rape.

I don't know why you people love so much to put words in the mouth of RMS, he's perfectly capable of shooting himself in the foot.

It won't be the last time.

It still does not make him someone who argues in favour of rape.
What could it be other than punishment? RMS committed no crime. What he did was offend certain people by having the audacity to speak up on behalf of his dead friend. That was his 'act.' Inconvenient enough?
IMO at that point since you have to rebuild everything anyway, just rebuild it with a different vendor. No reason to stay with a company that treats you like that.
> why assume their apparent solitude is because they are “taking risks and exploring” instead of having nowhere else to go?

Pretty sure the point was to note that the "taking risks" part of that could have been the initial aggressive stance that got them ostracized. As the GP noted, there's a specific risk/payoff to behavior in a social group that might pay off well (more social status) or be very detrimental (ostracization), and given how detrimental being ostracized could be, I think many would consider that "risky behavior".
> That sounds awful, but apparently this is what the world wants: carefully filtered speech that doesn't stray far from what people already agree with.

No, it is sufficient already to not blurt out controversial things at bat-shit-insanely-bad timings. Similar to how people would be mad at Einstein if he pulled a non-ironic "Yeah, but to be honest he wasn't THAT great" a friends funeral.

I don't like mobs and I lament the fact that one such important figure in computing has such difficulties making himself understood. But that does not mean that the world has a problem somehow. It just happens to be a world that is not fine-tuned to Stallman-communication and that values reducing sexism higher than technical accuracy. Some people don't work that way, some people get therapy to allign themselves, some withdraw from society, some manage to get by. Stallman happened to fall on the friction side of things this time.
Well, organically is a vague term. My usage of it was: go to GitLab/Hub and type into global site search box to find a project.

This seemingly simple action does not work on Gitlab.

To answer your question, I do the above often on Github. Probably found projects that way as recently as last week.
Google also knows how many Android users search/download the app. I don't use pinterest, but if they use Google analytics or ads then Google also has a fair amount of data on usage.

Google is very much a panopticon, I doubt any other single entity has as much knowledge of the internet as a whole. Now whether this reflects in Google analytics I don't know, as I've never really used their analytics for anything serious.
> He was defending his friend who, at the age of 74, is accused of having sex with a 17 year old girl on a billionaire's private island.

Where I live (the UK), that is perfectly legal and I believe any man would jump at the chance to do the same with a willing 17 year old.

Your repetitive statements of fact in this thread look like nothing more than jealousy to me.
Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft workers have all pledged to strike on 9/20
> This gives consumers who want a way ...

The title is "commercial" not consumers. This isn't for residential, which was already soft-launched months/one-year ago.
It literally does not and I’m not sure how you interpret “some behaviors” as “all behaviors”
Eh, those same folks against density happily vote in another office park that brings in 20,000 new jobs. So I'm a bit hesitant to say they're getting density pushed on them. More like they're finally expected to pay for their free lunch.
I thought the Github support department is called "Stackoverflow".
Yes I change my mind on a person who changed their values. Although it’s not as if I change it to be completely 180° from my original estimations of the person.

I think it’s soulless to never allow a person to grow or change when presented new information no matter what age they are.

Or, are only young people allowed to change their minds? Or is nobody?

I mean I’ve had pretty stupid ideas about things ranging from communism as a good political ideology to believing that the UK would be better outside of the EU. But when presented with new information I changed my opinion. I would hope people don’t treat me as a communist or a brexiter.
> Income tax payers have had enough and don't want to pay for infrastructure that benefits others

Had enough? What does that mean exactly?

The people who will benefit from crossrail the most are the main income tax payers who go to work every day on the tube. Salaries in London are 2-3x higher than outside and income tax gets disproportionately higher the more you earn.

Can you imagine if the tube was never built because it would benefit rich landowners in London more than other people?
The elevator is not positioned in an orbit, so one does not need to reach any orbit to get there. Up to a point, sending things up is easier than sending them into orbit.

Despite the really bad article that carries no information, I estimate the trip to the elevator takes ~9.5km/s (plus atmospheric losses). That isn't much more than LEO, and takes you all the way into the Moon.
>Urban areas are more efficient for almost all resources.

I don't know that voters conceptualize it this way but it seems to me there is a growing movement against this sort of economistic utilitarianism. Some people have come to understand that they/their family/their community already was 'sacrificed' in this manner or that they're on the chopping block. I don't think a doubling down is going to work here.
I interpret it as the burning desire to impose those consequences, without sufficient thought as to whether it fits the crime. People want to be a part of something, even if it's an angry mob.

Whether it's good or bad for society is a complex topic, but spending your time riling up a digital mob every time someone says something controversial can't be a personally healthy way to live.
Knowing the common predispositions of genders is useful if you need to make an educated guess about the expected behavior of a random person.

Sometimes the problem lies in trying to raise boys or girls to fit these "expected predispositions". Or judging someone who is "outside their gender norm".

So, yes if I pick a random boy and girl out of a crowd, I would expect differences and could make reasonable guesses about those differences.

So, it's not bad if you know these common gender differences as long as you are able to quickly discard them when you're getting to know someone at a deeper level than their gender.
Something like MINRES or GMRES or CGSTAB. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the covariance matrix in GPR should be diagonally dominant, so the diagonal of the matrix can be used as a somewhat effective preconditioner.
This is hacker news, not reddit. gtfo with this garbage.
Yeah, Linkedin was planned, until I discovered they don't provide the profile via API unless you are an aproved developer :(

No, I'm not concerned at all with that! There is a full sample preview of each template once you login. I guess I need to put it in the landing to?
Those snippets are just not enough information, to judge someone "normal" or not.
(assuming "not normal" means sick in a clinical or criminal way)

Because, to that sentence:

“it is morally absurd to define ‘rape’ in a way that depends on minor details such as which country it was in or whether the victim was 18 years old or 17.”

I would agree.
I simply define "rape" as sex that was enforced, usually with physical violence or threat of it. Or maybe existential threats of other kind.
Mixing that term with consensual sex with a 17 year old is not helpful to actual victims of rape, I believe.
Consider a couple of both 17 ... all ok. Now one of them turns 18 and now their relationship is rape? That does not make sense.
Now there is surely a difference between 17 with 18 and 17 with 70, but I really believe it is not the same category as "rape". Exploitive maybe, depending on the situation. And if in the concrete situation it was actually not consensual, than it also actually might have been rape. I simply don't know that situation and trying to make sense of it. But that small sentence from RMS alone does not justify any witch hunt.

And to those claim:

"Stallman insists that the “most plausible scenario” is that Epstein’s underage victims were “entirely willing” while being trafficked."

I would like a actual quote from RMS, that he actually said that.
Lot of talk about how

1. a Moon elevator is pointless without an Earth elevator, and

2. we can't build an Earth elevator with today's technology.

However we can build an orbital ring around Earth with today's technology, and it'd be much better than space elevators.

[Video] https://youtu.be/LMbI6sk-62E?t=254

[Paper] https://jenda.hrach.eu/f2/Low%20cost%20design%20of%20an%20or...
Most slave shipwrecks have been overlooked–until now
You're right, it doesn't apply to everyone. I wasn't meaning to speak for anyone but me.
The patriarchy strikes again.
Not answering your question exactly, but there are many people, especially in academia, who believe that there are no biological differences between the genders that account for our interests:

8:10 and 33:00
https://vimeo.com/19707588

(The whole piece is excellent though)
Those are pretty general, nonspecific traits, unlike “enjoys tar pits”
Fossilization of bone generally requires animals to die such that they're buried pretty quickly. The swampier parts of swamps, river banks, tar pits, that sort of thing. Risky areas for megafauna, not places they're going to be, say, sleeping if they can avoid it. The exceptions are when there were, for example, flash floods that quickly swept & covered ordinarily-safe-and-fertile flood plains, or when predators dragged carcasses to such places for whatever reason (big crocodiles, maybe), volcanic eruptions, stuff like that. A large land animal killed not by some disaster, that ended up fossilized, probably didn't die of old age or of predation by something common to the animal's preferred habitat, unless they were (for example) swamp dwellers to begin with.

[edit]

> Are they trying to claim that females who die are less likley to turn into fossils, perhaps because of the locations the deaths occurred in?

Yes, I think that's it.
I wonder what is wrong with single page apps? As I see it you can largely write the same code, you just have the additional option of modifying the page on the fly.
I don't think this is ever going to happen, at least not to any appreciable degree. People are powerfully stupid enough on their own, especially when it comes to status quo bias, and especially especially when it's in their own interests. There's a stable equilibrium in which road travel and sparsity aren't heavily subsidized, but I don't see any path there that involves trying to convince people first.
There are some interesting challenges with projects like this in London:

"It's estimated that there's about 17,000 tonnes of bombs that were dropped on London in WWII and the rule of thumb is about 10% failed to explode,"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23518137

[I guess UXO must be an even bigger problem for German cities].
The sentence about misogyny not being the cause is the start of the second paragraph. The sentence you're quoting is in the third paragraph.
I still use an SE but I really don’t get this complaint against upgrading. Just keep the dongle permanently on the end of your headphone cable, and use one that splits out to a lightening charger as well. I’m seeing one for under 10 bucks on Amazon.
Really a non-issue.
Too rhetorical, and not informative.

Forecasts of whether you'll make good on a promise to pay money are the product they're selling.
I dont necessarily disagree with your assessment, however i am sure someone could also tell you how sex before marriage has an absolutely horrible impact on the people involved or how your assessment would also be true for prostitution in general. You likely heard "the speech" before when it comes to abortions.

In the end its weighing off protecting people from a presumed risk against infringing on their self determination. The question is clear cut when it comes to kids as we as a society accepted that their self determination isnt that great and infringing on it is fine most of the time. They have to brush their teeth, they dont get to drink alcohol and they cant work in a brothel.

The question here is does the same rule for a 8 year old apply for a 17 year old. Most European societies see a huge difference when it comes to age and that the ways in which the self determination of a 17 year old can be restricted are a lot more limited. In the end infringing on someones self determination is just too grave of a violation to do it unless its absolutely necessary.

What is instead illegal is not the action of the person presumed to be needing protection but make sure that exploiting that person is illegal. The Switzerland example still had it illegal to encourage or coerce girls to work in a brothel, which in practice means there was no one willing to risk running such a brothel.

And again, this discussion misses the point. Its not why did Eppstein run a brothel on an island but how come he was able to engage in sex trafficking, coercing of minors and all of that under the nose of quite a lot of politicians.
Usually the jobs are better which drives prices up?