skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thank you. That makes sense. I know some crazy high resolution lightfield cameras exist, but the hardware is so heavy there's no chance of getting it on your head. (In principle you could address this with a huge array of tiny cameras on a headset, I suppose? Like this: https://www.deccanchronicle.com/150421/technology-mobiles-an... or this: https://newsbeezer.com/austriaeng/lg-patent-shows-smartphone... )

Apparently display technology is also a limitation.

Here's one attempt to pass-through AR (thank you for that vocabulary, BTW):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNbTCpURpQs

Are you aware of any who do it better?
I am glad to hear that game is still played -- I had the impression that it had been replaced by pool in most venues. May I ask where one can find it?
The embedded video in the article is logical in its assertions and therefore doesn't leave room for argument (obligatory replies to this comment aside).

Unfortunately, logical arguments in an emotionally charged topic are usually heard as inflammatory, as many logical married individuals can attest. So this political tug-of-war response should come as no surprise.
That would make sense if both parents were the only ones facing equal repercussions but alas an innocent child potentially has to suffer in the process.
On my wall the numbers only go up to the actual values bitcoin has traded at. And $10k today is only half the peak.

Anyway, the point is, it is a coincidence, nothing more.
i love the work you've done on your emulators and your writing--i look forward to the new site and more good content!

if i may offer a suggestion for getting more people involved, i would say please give serious consideration to a UI paradigm rework. i would love to contribute to higan but i find its interface completely impenetrable! in older versions, i was able to sorta figure out how to use icarus to import a ROM after a while, but i tried again a few months back and i couldn't for the life of me get anything to run.

you are a treasure to the emulation community so keep on doing what you love however you want to do it. i just wish i could figure out how to use higan!
Restaurants and construction were for years the only places ex cons could find work. If those go away from overzealous screening where will those folks find work?
It's not "flipping the table over", it's stabbing your eye with a pen because you can't get your way. Self inflicted injury.
They forget all the manslaughter by mothers who miscarry, plus all the fratricide when one twin absorbs another. It's a god damn slaughter in America's uteruses!
I think people cling to their narratives of lazy people like it’s a religion, and ultimately it doesn’t help people lose weight.
You mean 8chan? I don't know about gab but you can not say whatever you want on 4chan...
Small time farmers are not trying to save money so much as time. When you are in the middle of nowhere with a broken part no amount of money can get you back in the field in 20 minutes (if the welder is sitting by the phone waiting for your call he can just barely get there in that time, but he hasn't looked at the part yet). 1 minute with your own welder and you have a repair that will let you limp to the end of the busy season where you can decide if it is good enough or you need to repair it right.
You can pick up a lot of wood and metalworking skills from just watching YouTube and SAFELY experimenting. You’re not going to become a master tradesman or anything but you can pick up a great deal of know-how. Just get a list of things you want to learn and spend some time in dad’s workshop with a laptop showing YouTube.

I currently feel comfortable doing basic home plumbing, electrical, my own auto maintenance, building small pieces of wood furniture, and light metalwork (bending, drilling, riveting, etc). Next up that I’d like to learn is welding and fiberglass. With so many resources out there for free, your only limitation is time and access to basic tools.
It doesn't. The original problem statement is "generate a list of random tweets, without duplication". If you can't store the list, you're stuffed no matter what.
I have no particular sympathy for Julian Assange but to me he clearly is a political prisoner. Obviously all of this is perfectly nested under the cover of sound laws and sound verdicts in typical fashion of our western democracies to accomodate their caricatural moral superiorities.
With sufficiently good cameras you can already pass through video. Setting up boundaries in the Oculus Quest has you do so doing exactly that.

The current issues are:

* A limited field of view. AR headsets are more limited but don’t interfere as much with normal vision.

* Latency of video display causing a noticeable mismatch to head movement.

* Shutting the rest of the world out. No one can see your face properly so it’s much more invasive than AR might be.
This... this is fascinating. Do you have any good sources?
I believe that pcj50's point is that the debate has not been "going" downhill. It's been down, at the very bottom, for a very long time, and there's nowhere further down to go (short of a real shooting civil war).
> Those schools are often actually cheaper than public schools for people without much money.

While this is true on paper, it's not always the case in practice. I was able to get multiple acceptance offers to Ivy League schools, and poor enough to have the sliding scale of tuition slide all the way to $0. But all of them had an estimated cost of attendance[1] so optimistic about ancillary expenses during the school year that it was infeasible to actually go to any of them. There were other implicit barriers to acceptance as a poor kid as well, but the way the sliding scale was implemented was the biggest.

I chose a state school instead. Despite a higher paper cost higher than the Ivy League schools offering free tuition, the total out of pocket cost for attendance of the state school worked out significantly lower.

[1] Federal loans and many scholarships won't pay out over the university's estimated cost of attendance. By zero'ing out tuition and room and board, that just leaves the "books and personal expenses" line item,
Agreed on all points. I've lurked HN forever and consider it one of my very few feel-good places online. This post, and (already) some of the comments are not appropriate to my understanding of the site.

Edit: to be clear, by "feel-good" I do not mean "positive," emotionally, just not subject to the same level of useless vitriol common elsewhere--which is where this thread is going.
Yes, what you said is correct. If you could control your appetite, or response to it, you could lose weight on a calorie restricted diet of "fattening" foods.

While I'm not a proponent of Jason Fung or his book, I have read it. From what I recall, where your as-long-as-I-could-control-my-portions diverges from Fung's book is that he believes its nearly impossible for people generally to ignore their appetite in the long run, without correcting the issues that are continually increasing their "set point" and appetite.

He defines your "set point" as your level of secretion and resistance to insulin, which is continually, but slowly, increased by frequent meals, snacking, sweeteners, poor sleep, stress and consumption of mostly processed foods.

He believes insulin levels strongly influence appetite and metabolism. Inject a thin person with insulin, and they will invariably gain weight. Suppress insulin, and people lose weight. He lists studies to that effect.

He rejects calories-in-calories-out, not because it's false, but because it ignores people's inability to ignore their appetite in the long run.

His solution is both correcting the frequent meals, snacking, sweeteners, poor sleep, stress and processed foods. He also advocates fasting, which he claims is safe and reduces chronically high insulin levels better than any other (non-drug) intervention. He provides more studies supporting those assertions.

As to the 6 months, I vaguely remember him mentioning "6 months, or a year" in the contexts of most diet's plateauing effectiveness, but his general thrust was, most diet's don't work in the long run, because they ignore insulin.
>What's your basis for believing this?

I don't know. It sounds reasonable to me that as time passes more people become transgenders because it's more acceptable. Similar to homosexuality.

>If n trans people are killed one year and > n trans people are killed another year, the number of trans people killed has gone up, regardless of the size of the population itself (which, for reasons stated in the article, can't be accurately measured anyway.)

Yeah but the headline makes it sound like it's a problem that's worsening but if the % is not going up then the problem has the same severity.
I made this account to respond to exactly this question.

The FDA's legal basis to regulate medicines is actually incredibly weak and really hasn't changed much since the 1930s. One of the examples is exactly this case. The FDA only regulates finished medicines in two cases a) brand name or b) generic equivalents. Leaving aside brand name drugs for the moment getting approval to sell a generic equivalent doesn't look anything like what you would expect. What people generally think is that generic drugs are 'copies' of existing brand name drugs and the FDA cares about making sure the generic guys are producing the same drug as the brand name one.

This isn't what happens at all. A manufacturer has to demonstrate similar blood level uptake as the FDA approved equivalent drug using a very similar approval process for the brand name drug. This requires an incredible effort that is substantially the same as getting an original drug approved.

The bottom line is that the FDA doesn't examine the on-going manufacturing of the drug much or supplier reliability much at all. If a manufacturer can pass blood level equivalence nothing else really matters. This equivalence is only valid for the direct manufacturting producer of the drug, not the company marketing it. The reality is that if you want to get FDA approval for a generic you might as well partner with a firm outside the US that knows how to handle this process because its a waste of money jumping through FDA hoops to certify a new facility in the US.

Once you have proved equivalance you can start selling the drug. At this point, the FDA is basically done. The FDA basically dones't care anymore and has very weak sanctions to enforce safety compliance.

The FDA can't do anything about this situation on its own; the way drugs are approved is directly established by law that dates back to the 1930s. I notice a lot of people in this thread suggesting that FDA leadership is bought off and does the work of the drugs companies. I assure you this is not the case.

FDA oversight of pharmacutecial ingredients is accomplished under an entirely different legal regime that has nothing to do with drug approval whatsoever.
By many you mean 4 [0] out of 833 [1]. I agree that the fact the number is not 0 by now is somewhat unsavory, but at this point with all of wework expansion it's basically a rounding error (those 4 locations were among the first for weworks).

[0] - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-14/wework-ga...

[1] - https://www.wework.com/locations
Taking responsibility for being raped?
That's exactly the reason. Software engineering is about writing code, devops is about writing yaml files and keying into functionality that was implemented by software engineers.
I am not from US so can someone explain why the antiabortion thing seem rise in this last year? Is there some elections and some party is trying to gain votes or some social media trend?

My question is about the timing(why now?) and not on "who is the good/bad guy" here.
Globally? In the United States, this is not true[1]. Anti-choicers can claim whatever they want but we still shouldn't be repeating false data.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_statistics_in_the_Uni...
$39 Rock Pi X Will Run Windows 10
Running AWS Infrastructure on Premises with AWS Outposts
> On average, people live longer, yet it's not that they die "less".

Yes, they do. Previous generations had more children. The higher birth rate did not yield a higher population growth rate, in part because the death rate was also higher. If we had death rates approaching the past, without a similar increase in birth rate, we would be in steep population decline, not the low population growth or slight population decline that most developed countries find themselves in today.
Same goes for ASD and Aspergers, or whatever other uninformed self-diagnosis is popular today.
This comment has it correct; she defines abortion in a specific way (a common practice in documents / research papers / etc), and then makes a claim using this specific definition. The definition is left out of the headline, understandably and predictably, leaving a flamewar about a straw man.
I like to comment DevOps from a security perspective, a trend I noticed in my day job.

Windows is/was often bashed for being insecure. Lots of that stems from the decades of development related to centralized management solutions. A default windows workstation in a domain setting will open a bunch of ports, a bunch of which can be used for command execution. The attack surface for this system includes, but is not limited to:

- Remote access with local admin users via tools such as SMBExec, wmiExec, DCOM, Psexec, Powershell remoting

- Remote access domain admin users access via the same

- Local/domain admin access via RDP

- Remote domain admin access via group policy

All these have had their own associated vulnerabilities over the years. Examples are SMB relay attacks, which enabled an attacker to abuse flaws in NetNTLM and obtain access to machines by relaying other people's credentials. And then we're not even talking about the 'real' exploits, Eternal Blue, Eternal Romance, Blue Keep, MS14-068, MS08-067, and on and on.

Pentesters, researchers and Microsoft have been hammering away the kinks for years now. The 'fixes' and root causes for each individual issue are well understood and each new domain functional level increases the security of a default windows Domain by leaps and bounds.

When you look at the Unix/Linux side you'd see that no such attack surface ever existed. You manage your systems over SSH, and this can still be bad, an easily guessable root password shared between Dev, testing and production is still a death sentence. But by default there were no tier0 systems in your network, apart from those of sysadmins.

But now with DevOps things are changing on that side. With Ansible, Puppet, Terraform, your various container management systems, the CI pipeline, jenkins and numerous development teams able to push both to infra repositories and your actual products this has changed:

You use an automated CI pipeline? Any system in the chain is a tier0 system.

Your developers are maintainer status or higher in your source repositories? Then they are domain admin or equivalent. They can disable protected branches, push a backdoor, and watch their attack propagate through the pipeline.

Did you make it inconvenient for your developers to access various build systems? Then they are sharing credentials to these systems over your company chat.

It seems, from what I've seen so far, that while the 'architecture' of modern mass centralized IT management and development is more secure. You can't relay an SSH key for example, like you can in NetNTLM. But the institutional knowledge isn't there yet. New attack surface has opened up, and infosec people have not yet completely caught up with the new 'eggs' in the basket, even if they are aware.
No, because it's BS. Five seconds on Google:

https://www.lemonde.fr/cinema/article/2017/11/15/l-ecole-de-...
First let me say congratulations! I'm curious what triggered the change - I recently gave up FB and IG as well and honestly wish I had done it years ago!
The thing is FB is not fact checking leftist videos the same way they were doing with the right. Untrue facts about guns for example are never pointed out. Like almost every guns are semi-automatic. Including revolvers and handguns. Making banning semi-automatic weapons in profit of handguns a non-sense.
Honestly, I don't think band-aiding a broken system is the solution here. "Hoping for a better outcome later" is not what I want to see when we're directly subsidizing our biggest competitor, economically and democratically speaking.
Nobody, (in most cases) forced the woman to get pregnant and not use birth control, and wait until you were a full developed baby who could feel pain.

Pregnancy is the equivalent of pressing a magical button and teleporting another person against their will into your body.

If this magical button existed in its literal form it would obviously wouldn't be legal for the person who chose to teleport you into their body to then kill you at a whim.
Close relatives of humans didn't have to sustain societies, and as animals living out in nature are much stronger and more resilient. Plus they could die in droves, and nobody would care (in fact, other apes, living further away wouldn't even know it).

So, if you mean we get to enjoy living in conditions fit for apes, then you might be on to something, but I wouldn't exactly rejoice about it...
I suspect the top 0.1% would realize that they are the cream of the crop and wouldn't be so easy or cheap to fly out by "throwing some Euros".

If there was any price differential between the best welders in these two countries, it would be rendered nil by the cost of flying and housing a team.
Potential legal minefield, too. Take drone flying, for example. It requires that you maintain visual line of sight (most of the time, without special exceptions). But, as a drone flyer in a commercial setting, you frequently want to see through the camera also. Given that, AR suits nicely, since you can overall both. VR doesn't because it is blocking your true visual line of sight.

In a perfect world, I agree with you. VR would be nicer, especially once the Cameras include thermal/night vision/other.
As I understand it this problem isn't unique to the US but all countries and china.
The Supreme Court's rightward shift under Trump is likely to have significant impact on the legality of abortion in the US.
Nothing ever optional became mandatory.
I empathically agree with your paras #2 and #3.

"any story you read is editorialized to some degree"

The opinion is the value add.

I used to read The Economist, because they challenged my views. I read Tyler Cowen today because I disagree with him and because he argues his case.

The rut we find popular discourse in today is caused by two things. The New Deal consensus we once had has not been replaced with a new consensus. The reluctance to distinguish between blather and discourse (debate).
There may not be more transgendered people, but there may be more people who actively identify as transgendered, just due to the increase in publicity and information surrounding the community. As something becomes less stigmatized, more people are open to speak publicly about it. If 100 people are killed, 20 of them are trans, but only 10 are "out" then only 10 are reported as trans. If all 20 of them are "out" then 20 are reported. That doesn't change the number of people who were killed.
The most I've ever seen it evoke from pro-lifers is something along the lines of "ya hate to see it"
This thread reminds me of the Frost poem 'Home Burial.'

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/53086/home-burial
The US is just much much larger than all other Western democracies. Sensitive topics are going to be much more political and take their time to resolve. It's like comparing how a group of 10 people resolve issues versus a group of 300. The dynamics are very different given the information asymmetry.
Just to recap:

-One person lamented discourse relating to abortion "going downhill".

-Someone pointed out that its hard to say its going downhill when its been happening since the 70s.

Your takeaway:

"SO YOU THINK ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE PRO LIFE DO THIS?"

Its simply impossible to have those inputs and create this output without having a massive, obvious agenda. Maybe take that elsewhere?
It's not just now? Anti-abortion has been a huge part of the Republican platform for a very long time, maybe at least the 60's? At least since Roe v Wade (1973). The reason is that there's a large swath of voters who only seem to care about abortion abolition, and will vote for anyone who pushes it, no matter what.
> Switzerland is planning on charging receivers for the extra postage to make up for the huge losses until the postage union changes the rules.

I'd like to know more, do you have a source? Could not find via Google.

Many postal services have a charge for customs clearance services, but I haven't heard of anyone charging extra postage yet.

> Why doesn't the US do something similar?

The U.S. STOP Act of 2018 established a fee of $1 for inbound EMS parcels starting in 2020 to cover customs processing costs. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr5788/summary

But as noted, customs processing fee is a bit different from charging extra postage. And I believe small letter post items are the bigger issue, not EMS.
For me I have a retirement plan that is maxed out. I plan to keep busy in retirement, but I'll be working for myself. I plan to buy a better welder and some days I'll make a model of some weird thing that catches my interest. Other days I'll stay inside and write some code. At nights I'll practice piano, if I'm lucky I'll advance to the point where I sound okay.

Today software puts food on the table.
CICO is mostly nonsense, because you can't control neither CI no CO.

CI is based what people eat, but how much and how often people eat (if you don't expect perfect and infinite willpower) is based on how hungry they are, and that is hormonally controlled, based on complex feedback loop that includes insulin levels (so what you eat and how often) and activity levels.

CO includes many things you have no conscious control over, like heating (ever stopped being cold after a meal?), muscle repair and buildup, brain, etc. Only small fraction of that is exercise.

People saying "it's just CICO" are as disgusting as millionaires saying "just stop being poor, it's easy, you have to make more than you use" while knowing nothing (and not caring) about student loans, healthcare costs for non-insured people, housing crisis or anti-labor practices that suppress wages.
Just double checked since I never noticed one, I don't see a captcha, Google or otherwise on the login page (Chrome, both on mobile and desktop).

Is anything weird about your connection / ISP / browser that might trigger this?
What Are JavaScript Programming Paradigms?
> WeWork isn’t even close to the size of Regus.

They both manage ~45 million sq feet of office space. Regus isn't chasing tech IPO valuations as they went public in 2000.
What's stranger is that the person claiming there's no medical reason for termination then goes on to list an acceptable medical reason for termination (ectopic pregnancy).
A Survey of DevOps Concepts and Challenges
A relative a mine works for an engineering firm that hires a lot of pipe fitters and welders for jobs they bid (beverage industry). The hourly and (frequently) overtime wages they pay welders often sound good, but the work is also somewhat intermittent and almost always involves significant travel. The welders they hire have pretty significant wage variability year to year.
Kind of curious what you'd use the monitor-type for in this case. For example, the gameboy one, you'd want to be able to see the jank oversaturated colors that are only there to make the actual screen display slightly better? Or maybe that one is just a bad example?