> I feel like pulling money out while you're engaged in behavior a reasonable person would assume might lead to future litigation... stretches the "We didn't know!" defense.

As the sibling comment says, anyone or any corporation with assets is a target for potential future litigation, with or without merit. That cannot be the basis for what makes profit-taking fraudulent, or companies could never pay owners a dividend.

> They and others were engaged in massive production and sale of opiates, even as the news reported increasing number of opiate deaths.

I basically disagree with this premise. The media reporting on opiate deaths is misleading.

* IMO, production and sale of opiates is broadly a public good. To the extent that people are suffering, and opiates are an effective treatment for that pain, having opiates available is a boon. Some of the recent restrictions on prescribing due to the "crisis" are overbearing for the majority of doctors and patients, and probably cause net increase in suffering in the country.

* Rate of conversion from on-label opioid prescription to addiction ("opioid use disorder") is lowish; this metastudy[1] claims 8-12% on average, but the 95% CI is anywhere from 3-17% and I'm not sure what they're measuring the percentage of (i.e., long-term prescriptions might both be more represented in the data and have higher conversion rates) — I doubt 8-12% of people who get 3 days of vicodin for their wisdom teeth extraction develop an opiate use disorder. They also point out that some studies showed misuse rates below 1% and "significant variability remains in this literature." We should expect these rates to fall as tighter prescription quantities from the last several years impact "leftover" pill rates.

* The rate of conversion from prescription opioid addiction to heroin is low; 4-6% per the government.[2]

* Overall opioid-involved overdose annual deaths in the US rose from 8000 in 1999 to 47600 in 2017; of those, the prescription-involved number rose by 13600 deaths (+300%), from 3400. Conversely, the non-prescription-involved deaths rose from by 26000 deaths (+465%), from 4600.[3](Figs 3-4) 26000/39600 = ~66%. (The population has also grown about 17% over that period, but that doesn't change the calculus too much.)

* Therefore: the overall growth pattern in opioid deaths in the last two decades is largely accounted for by heroin and other non-Rx use, which are a tiny population with a very high (and rising) death rate. The rising death rate is mostly due to the surge in black market sale of fentanyl as "heroin."[3] (esp. figures 4-5 and associated text) (Perhaps as a result of DEA and other restriction on the supply of the relatively safer, but less dense, heroin, and restriction on supply of the vastly safer prescription opioids.)

* Notably, the number of non-fentanyl-involved prescription opioid-involved deaths has actually been in decline since 2011![3] (fig. 4.), despite a rising population. Let me echo that since it's really important: prescription opioid-involved overdose, ex fentanyl, both in number and per capita rate, HAS BEEN IN DECLINE SINCE 2011! Why doesn't any news story on opioids in the US headline with that? The primary reason the overall prescription opiate-involved death rate hasn't tracked that decline is rising co-(ab)use with illicit fentanyl, and its relatively higher death rate.

If we could wave a magic wand and wipe (illicit) fentanyl off the earth, our annual opioid death rate would fall by something like half.

Given we don't have a magic wand, what can we do? Obviously we can't stop fentanyl from entering our borders or being synthesized illicitly here. We can (and have) leaned on illicit fentanyl-producing countries like China and Mexico to make those businesses less lucrative. We can do harm reduction things for the vulnerable population — which is mostly heroin users. We could legalize heroin with a prescription for existing addicts?

Harm reduction stuff: Provide free/cheap testing for fentanyl adulteration? Make naloxone available without prescription, on the shelf, for cheap or free, and encourage businesses and residents to keep some around, even if they aren't users and don't know any users? Maybe provide monitored, safe injection sites where addicts overdosing can be assisted immediately if needed but are not arrested or forced into any overbearing programs. Maybe even supply quality- and quantity-controlled heroin to these addicts for use on-site to reduce likelihood of overdose and even allow people to taper off if they want to.

/rant, sorry. Finally:

> I'm not in favor of pinning everything on the last unlucky bastard standing around, but taking profits now when you can expect future corporate liabilities should be illegal.

(Emphasis added.) Totally agree. The article does not say anything about taking profits now; its last figures on taking profits are from 2016.

[1]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785523

[2]: https://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/opioids/opioid-overdos...

[3]: https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics/o...