skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Your post is so wrong it warrants a long reply.

First of all, tcl might be anything, but certainly is not dead. The name tcl stands for "tool control language", which means, it was developed as a language to script tools, that is applications. So it is less a language to develop applications from scratch (but it is often enough used for that too), but to script applications. And it is an excellent language to do that, as due to its syntax - which rightfully seems to be odd - but is excellent for this task. If you write a command extension "do_something" for you application in tcl, you can just call it as:

do_something foo bar baz 42

No quoting or syntax required, unless your parameters include spaces or make references to variables or should be evaluated in any other sense.

Ironically the "tools", tcl was designed to control are the eda desing tools which are used to design e.g. cpus. So this conversation wouldn't happen without tcl being involved.

Beyond that value, tcl comes with a bunch of excellent tooling, which makes it worth knowing. The here described expect is one of them. Another very fameous tool is Tk. Tcl/tk was the first true cross platform solution for producing GUIs. And till today is probably still the easiest solution for that task. Also, it still is the standard GUI toolkit shipping with e.g. python. And has bindings from many other languages, ranging from Perl to Common Lisp.

Never mind, that tcl had event based IO long before node.js made that concept popular. It is great for writing small servers. It had utf8-support for a long time, and even has a robust mechanism for multi-threading. And many more cool features.

So, not only tcl isn't dead, but it is really a tool I can only strongly recomment to anyone to learn about.
All iOS browsers have to use Safari's engine, so users who download Chrome gain nothing in this regard. The only choices available are either to ignore iOS or support Safari.
What is the rationale behind using Windows on the servers? I'm wondering because the argument I usually hear is that someone high up in the ops team hierarchy declares "but we need everything in the AD, including all the servers, otherwise I can't sleep well". In your case however this apparently doesn't apply, as you do not register them in the AD.

Is it so the game devs don't need to write cross-platform server code?
Downloading these mp3s isn’t too hard, it’s loading them onto my phone, and bookmarking the last paid position that’s irksome. Although there are paid ways around this.
I think the upside is mostly to do with doing projects for clients who aren't themselves in the tech industry and who don't really care how their projects are implemented and who implements them.

When doing tech work for tech businesses you will often find that they already operate their own network of tech contractors and membership in such a network basically implies being a lone-wolf freelancer character for a number of reasons (a) They work with people not headcounts. They will do extensive individual vetting to decide who they work with, and after deciding they want to work with you won't allow you to switch yourself out for another personnel resource. (b) They will want to keep each individual contractor's bargaining power in check, so even when they need more than one headcount, they might think twice about picking up a headcount greater than one from something that's already self-organizing as a business entity of some kind.

Also, I feel quite strongly that if, in practice, there is a client relationship that you have 100% ownership of, then you want to make sure that this is also the case on paper, rather than having an indirection where you are 1% of some coop and 1% of that coop's revenue happens to be your client. -- And much of the upside described here can also be realized through a consortium of sole traderships (or otherwise 1-person businesses), rather than through a coop.
> What I'm saying is you don't have to see eigen values as something of different nature than the wave function. They represent very condensed wave function.

They do not represent very condensed wave functions, have you taken even a single course in quantum mechanics? You should have learned about the Double slit experiment in high school at least, how do you explain that using only the schrödiner equation?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
> This guy was raping underage teens and possibly pre-teens

FTFY. An adult can’t “have sex” with a pre-teen.
Teutonic Knights, and Charlemagne; would you care to elaborate?
I can't follow, what do you recht to say? That quantum physics doesn't exist?
A little, but much less. 2Fe₂O₃ + 3C → 4Fe + 3CO₂ consumes a much larger amount of carbon than the 4% in pig iron or the less than 2% in steel.
It is more work to emulate what you get for free by using cookies. You need to handle expiration etc yourself. Plus, you don’t have the protection of http only cookies if you go that route.
it might have been free

"Free". No, not free -- paid for by other taxpayers, at full retail cost for the provider.

but a number of red States didn't expand Medicare

If you don't know the difference between Medicare and Medicaid, perhaps broad policy comments should be avoided.
There is unfortunately a large learning curve for production Haskell. It's a very different language to most imperative object-oriented ones, that are all broadly very similar. However, the concepts that folks will learn (Monads, Monoids, Functors, Profunctors etc etc) are taken from math and will likely be around for another 100 years. This is not disposable knowledge, and for me at least, it made a refreshing change from learning ad-hoc concepts from each successive OO fad framework I had to deal with.
They probably copied it from Google?

https://support.google.com/maps/answer/6291823?co=GENIE.Plat...
Three best practices merged to deliver ultimate manufacturing uptime outcomes
The important question here is how do you know you find yourself in the cat universe more often? How can that possibly be measured? It's a difficult question when it comes to conscious experience.

Imagine instead of a single experimenter observing a billion possible outcomes, a billion experimenters observing a single possible outcome.
What's wrong with the interact function?
I think more concisely, we don't understand it yet.
"If you don't want to get shot in the US, don't go into public spaces" has about the same energy.
What I took away from that chapter was two things.

First was that Asian children, at least those who speak languages that function this way, grok the concept of addition faster than their Western counterparts because the counting systems are extremely regular, so they pick up on the patterns easier because 11 isn't the arbitrary "eleven" instead it's simply "ten one".

Second was success in math is in part a function of perseverance. Impossible problems were given to groups of kids and something like the American kids gave up after 9 minutes on average and the Japanese kids gave up after 14 minutes on average. My memory is fuzzy on the details but that particular metric correlated really well iirc. Been a long time since I read it.
> excellent predictions

Sometimes QM provides us with no prediction whatsoever as to what will happen next (eg. photon splitting experiment.) I would not call this "excellent."

> chaotic nature

Chaos theory is something else.

> results out of CERN

Particle physics is also not particularly relevant to this discussion. Fundamental particles is a separate issue to interpretations (foundations) of QM.
Said reshaping is the hard part, basically everybody who have studied a bit of physics understands the schrödinger equation and the wave part, the hard part is the particle like behavior which causes the wave to break down. Meaning it isn't a wave, waves doesn't break down like that, waves doesn't just gather together into some coherent state randomly. That is the hard part, if you can't explain that then don't say that QM is easy.
Yeah, I can't even read the article because Medium says I've used up my free quota already
IA is fine.

Archiveteam, which my comment references, has been doing it against user wishes.

https://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Mastodon

https://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=robots.txt

They're not the same entity, although people often assume they are.
unbrowsable
It wasn't my opinion. It's what the charges mean.

If it was child abuse, they would have charged him with abuse. They basically called her a "prostitute" from the charges suggesting that she was at least partly to blame.
Could Letting Drivers Communicate via LED Screen Help Quell Road Rage?
Sub-header clicking into it says:

> by Michael Dean (Adaptation), Andy Hopkins (Editor), Jocelyn Potter (Editor)

Also in tiny text below the description:

> Paperback, 71 pages

...that seems really short. Not sure this is the full novel.
Go: Overview of the Compiler
>* Though consciousness and its observations seems to follow only one path. This is a peculiarity outside the realm of physics.

Of course physics can answer this: the human minds on the different branches can't physically interact. They can't share memories. Each one is going to remember experiencing only its own branch.
Never.

I moved from Lastpass to pass(https://www.passwordstore.org/). It's by far the best decision I've made in a long time (I've moved a lot of services over to my servers and self host pretty much everything)

I use Mac, but it works on any machine to my knowledge and the great thing is:

1. Use your keys, so ONLY YOU can only decrypt it (gpg keys)

2. Has Chrome/Firefox extensions that automatically fill out passwords

3. Can upload the encrypted passwords to git to use on other machines (presumably)

4. Dead simple to use (go on terminal and generate random passwords, bunch of other goodies)

5. As said previously, it's all on your machine, no one else having access.
Even using the quoted 83.6 kWh figure as comparison, tesla gets 50% more miles per kWh. That is still pretty stark difference.
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/modules/expect_modul...

https://github.com/ronniedong/Expect-for-Java
Show HN: My Take on the Jupyterlab Container
https://github.com/pexpect/pexpect Python module for controlling interactive programs in a pseudo-terminal
I always think of ML https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_(programming_language) when people abbreviate Machine Learning to ML :(
Aren't articles like Trump write protected? If you want to edit, you shouldn't be able to, unless you have an account that's not brand new. You will be banned very quickly as soon as you start putting goatse on most visited pages.

Also, the white house PR team is actively watching and editing political figures articles. They will sort it out too.
> How is it unfair? Have you ever been put in a position at work where it even crossed your mind that associates of a guest your boss invited might be sex trafficked? Have you even heard of that happening until now? We are talking about a truly extraordinary situation; can we not agree that if you have to even consider the question, something is very wrong?

Of course i've heard of that happening. People speculate all the time that older men out with younger, attractive women are being "trafficked" in the sense meant here. That sense being: they're prostitutes / escorts. Sometimes it's true, sometimes it's not.

> The focus on whether or not they were correct about these particular women being trafficked is myopic. It’s 2019, and we have the benefit of hindsight: Epstein was indeed still sex trafficking. This instance may or may not have been an example of that, but ultimately the Media Lab employees’ fears about him were borne out.

The entire point under discussion however turns on the question of whether or not the evidence of him engaging in this behavior warranted him being exiled by MIT at the time. Not the evidence today.
My understanding is that yes, to a very large extent, since they are dialects of the same language foundation, which is sanskrit and later prakrit.
> guilt trip about how poor their family is

Coercion is the practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats.

"guilt trip about how poor their family is" does not qualify as "force or threats".

Watering down term "coercion" makes real coercion less noticeable.
Isn't that what interact is meant to do?

https://wiki.tcl-lang.org/page/interact
On how to practice, I read once about the difference in the ways good amateur pianists practice and how top professionals typically practice. The amateurs will practice all their scales and pieces from start to finish by rote every day.

The Pros identify the specific scales and short sections of pieces they hit problems with, and focus almost all their practice on those tricky parts. As a result they get as much as 10x or 20x or more utility from the time they spend on it.
Note that eigenvalues are wavefunctions just like any other state (and obey Schroedinger’s equation just like any other state). The issue is with the process taking you from one state to another, not with the states themselves.
Unfortunately not and that is one of the main issues. Even if we had limitless carbon-free energy there would still be significant carbon outputs directly from the production process. The article shows one possible way of reducing this for steel, but cement is currently a different ballgame and is a substantial emissions source from its non-energy inputs.
Intel Is Suddenly Concerned with 'Real-World' Benchmarking
There are multiple instances of them announcing them and implying they are follow-ups of previous discussions on 8chan.

These include the Christchurch shootings, the Poway synagogue shooting and the El Paso Walmart shootin.

The Christchurch shooter shared his Facebook stream to 8chan before the shooting started, and it was spread from there.

The Poway shooter blamed/thanked 8chan for his views.
If you are not already going to a large academic center in a large city, I would start there. Also depending on your condition and specialty it is fairly regional. For example, most of the good geneticists are on the east coast.

In large cities with rich people there are cash only and concierge doctors who will spend the time needed with you because you pay them for it. The going rate now here in Los Angeles seems to be $1000/hr for an appointment, though they do spend time outside of that on your case of that which they don't charge for.

If money is truly no object, there are services that you pay money who will do research, have connections to top doctors, and ensure the correct diagnosis. The best known one is Private Health Management. There are some smaller firms often started by people who used to work there that are more affordable. Years ago when I talked to some of these my personal case was around $50-100k which I don't have.
> Are you arguing that he did nothing wrong? In that case why did he hide his actions from MIT, after it had explicitly blacklisted Epstein as a donor?

Yes i'm arguing that Joi (not Epstein, obviously) did nothing wrong. I don't believe he did hide what he was doing from MIT - he hid it from the public, by not listing Epstein as a donor.

> Maybe so, but they had good reason to. Epstein by that point had already been convicted on the sex offender charge. And then he was going around accompanied by young European women, and there's nothing suspicious about that? Come on.

If these European women were underage, sure. If they were adults, what's the problem here? If they were underage, or the other employees of the media lab suspected they were underage, that would have been made explicit in the article. But it wasn't, therefore they weren't. Which means the only explanation for the term 'trafficking' in this context would be that Epstein was holding them against their will, something I don't think he's ever actually been accused of.

Which is all a long-winded way of saying that the notion that the employees at the media lab were worried these European women were "trafficked" is bullshit. What they were actually made uncomfortable by was that these women were essentially prostitutes, and that I understand. That'd make me uncomfortable too. But it's not the same as bringing non-consensual slaves to your MIT meetings as implied by the phrasing of the article.
Real reasons for:

* One platform to develop on; back-end coders tend to go back and forth between client and server programming.

* Faster iterations. (just hit F5 in visual studio)

* IOCP

Stupid reasons for:

* Old IT Director denied the use of virtualisation software. (mac address randomisation wasn't great and it caused a switch crash if two people had the same mac)

* Windows licenses are really cheap compared to developer time. (until we went to cloud, where Microsoft charges insane amounts for licensing)
Your Computer Is a Graph
Seems to have been a busy family.

The 'other' brother/son was a scientist that discovered silver iodide cloud seeding.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Vonnegut
The problem with planting Sunflowers in places with high radiation is that it will usually be always after the place is filled with radiation and people left so there will be no one to save.
DoiT International | Cloud Engineers (CORE/DATA) | Santa Clara-CA, Austin-TX, NYC-NY, London-UK | ONSITE | Full-time | Must be authorized to work in the US/UK.

Consider yourself a world-class Cloud Engineer? Curious and excited about tackling the hard problems in technology?

DoiT is Google Cloud Partner & Amazon Big Data Competency Partner. We work with some of the most exciting startups and businesses worldwide. We build, scale distributed systems and machine intelligence, and solve hard problems which are changing the lives of millions of people every day.
We also allocate 30% of our engineers time for learning new technologies, contributing code to open source communities or building our own, as we do at https://github.com/doitintl.

This is us: https://www.doit-intl.com/
Meet the team and apply: http://careers.doit-intl.com/
I'd still use expect instead of docker/ansible/salt ... if I could get away with it.
If I understood correctly, you may be able to do that using pexpect and the interact method.

import struct, fcntl, termios, signal, sys

def sigwinch_passthrough (sig, data):
s = struct.pack("HHHH", 0, 0, 0, 0)
a = struct.unpack('hhhh', fcntl.ioctl(sys.stdout.fileno(),
termios.TIOCGWINSZ , s))
if not child.closed:
child.setwinsize(a[0],a[1])

child = pexpect.spawnu("sh", args, encoding='utf-8', logfile=sys.stdout)
signal.signal(signal.SIGWINCH, sigwinch_passthrough)
child.expect_exact("...")
child.logfile = None # Otherwise, interact raises an Exception
child.send("...\n")
child.interact()
JHipster 6.2.0: Last bug I reported got fixed
Good point. Well, I guess we need to wait 7-8 years until the batteries from other manufacturers become worn and see if their claims stand.

Battery reliability in the long term as well as sustained performance should not be underestimated.
How to Find Potential End Users?
It’s nut really a problem.
On the other hand it was impossible to grow up in my country not knowing about it because the double meaning was subject to a very popular song: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutter,_der_Mann_mit_dem_Koks_...
> It'd be nice to have an "I've already seen this" button that will mark an episode/season/show as watched so it doesn't keep coming back up.

That's not just nice, that is the most obvious "feature" a normal person would design. I've stopped watching Netflix because of nonsense like this. They know I've seen it before, because I watched in their player. Also, even the tiniest, most modest application of analytics would discover that I always watch one series at the time, from start till end, or whenever I'm bored with it. In the past years, I have never ever watched a thing twice. Still, it was constantly showing me things I've already seen.

The only conclusion I can draw from this is that Netflix does not have have my best interest in mind when designing their algorithms and that they don't respect their customers. So I canceled.
Same way I feel about security domains at work: you either have to trust encryption, or never use any network. It’s that binary.

At work I’ll see people — the security team, usually — taking some already-encrypted thing and re-hardening it to the nth degree. I think that’s stupid. If you don’t trust your encryption, don’t bother using it. If you do trust it, stop there. It’s maths. It’s proven.

I feel the same about 1Password. I trust that they encrypt my stuff with trusted encryption. That’s it.
i wonder what do they do about radiation from cosmic ray exposure at that altitude
Cats 2.0.0-RC3
I'm well aware of the author's credentials, writings and views - and would have thought that being in a position of popular renown would have made him more cautious of playing to the crowd with titles that indicate mysticism is the acknowledged heart of the scientific project.
Exactly, I find it impressive what they did achieve within their budget.
It's opening ways to create more affordable space missions.
CVSS v3 Creates New Challenges For Developers (2018)
Yeah, I would think the biggest benefit here would be insurance/benefits (and possibly taxation) related, which doesn't seem to be mentioned at all.
Sbt 1.3.0
The “no predictive power” is beyond what is predicted by standard QM, because the MWI is supposed to recover the same predictions. And it’s not clear how does it so, because if standard QM has an issue with “what a measurement event looks like and conditions when it occurs” then exactly the same problem remains in the MWI if the same predictions have to be recovered. Even though there is no collapse in the MWI it looks like there is a collapse, even though you don’t have to specify when the collapse happens you have to specify when does it look like a collapse does happen.
Show HN: ClassPass x Instagram for fitness built with no-code via Glide (YC W19)
Sometime ago, I bought 1Password for iOS, then Mac, mostly for convenience and I was happy with it until I got no viable way to use it on Windows simply because their client still in early development sucked. After some time again they stopped caring about the local db feature and for me that was it.
I Moved immediately to Keepass and never looked back. The reason was because I can find a client for nearly every platform possible and because I store MY OWN database where I want.

I prefer to store KeePass encrypted dB on Dropbox than going for 1Password cloud.

Plus Keepass is opensource...
The London PyData talks are held close to what was Steelyard. Although thinking about that can be distracting.
It might be that they are given pause for thought by the comment of the Secretary-General of the WMO (World Meteorological Organization) who has said that the alarmist narrative on climate change has gone off the rails and has criticised the news media for provoking unjustified anxiety.

They might even read this and start asking some questions:

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2019.0022...
> A lot of physicists also don't see any value in MW's interpretation since it offers no predictive value

David Deutsch (in many ways, the father of quantum computing) initially imagined quantum computing as a way to test MWI: if a problem could be solved that required more gates than there are particles in the universe, then it would (so the argument goes) prove that the problem was being solved in the multiverse.
Yes I think that was the intention. You reduce the attack surface for injection attacks because the injected code must route all requests through example.com. Example.com will implicitly trust api.creditmerchant.net as it does today, but that dependency once loaded won’t be able to make requests to untrusted resources categorically because it must route thru example.com.

It seems like a spoiler for chaining attacks.
Kafka Streams, the Clojure Way