skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I have acted as my own agent, but you are not required to be a real estate agent to buy your own home. Realator is a corrupt predatory orginazation, proporting to represent real estate agents, but mostly just control listings.
>Deployment doesn't overlap. Erlang releases bundle up your code but you still need libraries like openssl, to have a nice bundle that can actually just run anywhere Docker is the way to go.

And with Docker you still need libraries like, y'know Docker for your code to run.

>Packing containers (processes) efficiently into a cluster of nodes is not something Erlang does.

How much have you used BEAM? It definitely does do that. Scalability is one of Erlang/Elixir's primary benefits, and node clustering is exactly how it does that.
Fancy coffee becomes a must-have office perk
$50 gets you two 16oz steaks (two adults can each eat too much steak for lunch AND dinner with that) and 15 or 20 _pounds_ of fresh vegetables at whole foods in the 94107 zip code according to Prime Now. And that's not even accounting for the umpty servings of dry goods like rice and legumes you get per dollar. What do you consider exorbitant? How much food can you eat in a day?
1.5% is definitely high, but I have a difficult time believing that it's a larger impediment to owning than the generally high price of property due to lack of supply.
Show HN: Scrape Linkedin with Python
At these speeds, millennia.
Caned Heat = Battery?
Hi, I am Japanese,not English native.
I am ancient otaku, that's all.

Having a good day, GLHF : )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3doBiU6nN0k
We saved billions of dollars with automation! Why is no one buying our products anymore? Hmm, it must be because they are spending all their money on avocados!

I think the only way to go is to do basic income funded by an automation tax. Henry Ford knew that people needed enough money to actually buy his cars and made it happen with high wages.
Stripe Sessions Keynote
This may not change the argument, but he was referring to the landed gentry who owned farmland rather than people who build and maintain buildings.
I can make very good money driving for Uber up to 25 hours per week in my city. This is after maintenance, gas, and depreciation costs. Lots of breweries here and people who like to have a good time and tip well.

Rideshare insurance is an extra $10/month. Basically nothing.

I have to pay for my own healthcare when I have a regular job too. Buying on the exchange is pretty much the same thing with more choice.
That’s a tough story.
Ask HN: Increse Karma
how to increase Karma point, its give from any user or only post something ?
I have full faith that, if I had left a computer running, in the corner of my home, with an IRC client open, it would have been able to maintain a connection to Freenode (not continuously, but just work) for fifteen or more years.

Personally I don't think IRC will ever be replaced. Well, it will, but it'll happen when my generation dies and gets fully replaced with the New Shiny.

I _hope_ that some sort of real, proper standard, that doesn't endlessly reinvent itself, that isn't subject to some for-profit bollocks, that on a very basic level, has like, a standard, has _clients_ (not just one wanky proprietary web frontend) that just sits and gets the job done like TCP, comes out of all of this.

Meanwhile, I'm fairly sure IRC will still be there in another fifteen.

Hell, at this point, IRC has been a constant in my life for longer than everything other than family. It actually feels like a friend. A portal to another quirky world, just as it did all those years ago.

I think it's almost two decades now since I first logged in. My my. The years are short, indeed.
Right, they do, that is why containers are still useful to releases for deployment.
...when student loan delinquency increases and consumer spending decreases
I feel trapped living in SF yes. You can’t purchase anything because it’s too expensive and if I want to move to a different place next year probably the prices will have increased.
I am very curious to see how this will be implemented.

Will drivers be entitled to minimum wages from all of the apps they have active, or only when they have a fare?

Will there be a single union to bargain with all of the apps, or individual unions?
Not just in MacOS. Over time, Docker can eat all your storage.
Vacancy rates are empty units that are available as a percent of all units available for rent. It doesn’t typically include units that aren’t available for rent.

The estimate is there are 100,000 empty homes in the SF area.[1]

I’ve seen an estimate of 20,000 for SF proper.

This [2] report to SF Planning states the number of empty units has doubled over time.

[1]https://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/An-estimated-100-0...
[2]http://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/uploads/CR_Final_2.3.19.pdf
Miss me with that interstellar travel, bitch.
> I know several people that do that: luck into a sweet rent control deal even though you were wealthy enough to afford market rates anyway, never, ever give up the lease even after you've essentially moved away anyway and then sublet the unit out at market rates yourself.

If this is in San Francisco, report them to the landlord or the city so they can be evicted. Tenants who abuse the system worsen the housing market for everyone.
It supports encryption but navigating what your client supports vs what the server supports is sufficiently finnicky that it can easily eat 5-10 minutes trying to set up, vs. plaintext which is easy. If someone non-technical had to get in, I'm not sure they could figure out enabling encryption on IRC in e.g. Pidgin which I've found to be a great client.
As a landlord this doesn’t make too much sense. The value of the property is net operating income divided by cap rate, so vacancies would lower value. It doesn’t matter what the gross scheduled rent is in that calculation.
Apparently some people raise objections and were ignored, and some staff were convince of the possibility Epstein brought trafficked women with him when he visited. It's not like those people wouldn't talk to others, their friends there, etc., the frustration and disappointment simmering beneath the surface. Sure, not everyone may have felt it, but it doesn't mean it wasn't there.
Correction, water “was” found. This water was there 111 years ago.
My guess is to implement a higher tax on properties where the owner does not live on the property, or put a limit on how many rental units a landlord can own. Something like that could dis-incentivize large tracts of rental properties.
Look into the history and development of Vienna’s social housing system as a start. 62% of people live in housing under this scheme:

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5b4e0b12e4b0b15aba88c7b0
Should it not be the other way around, turn housing into more of a commodity? We have no shortage of most commodities, for example foods, because typically the higher the demand for the commodities, the more is made. Those markets benefit from things like economy of scale. Housing seems to be the opposite right now, there's very high demand and yet development is not able to keep pace due to artificial restrictions like zoning and height limits.
Even easier is to stop digging stuff up and burning it. But we can't even do that.
If playing a key role in connecting everyone on earth doesn’t make someone a hero, what does? IMHO that seems like just about the greatest possible human accomplishment.
based upon some of the work you've shown on your blog
https://blog.jonlu.ca/posts/illegal-streams I'm glad they are compensating you fairly.

Most people could not do this type of mental work.
People are going to like that as much as they like devaluations or high inflation.
The supply problem has nothing to do with rent control.
It's closer to $6,600, and that's without spending a dollar on retirement or benefits.

> Do people try not to commute?

Spoken like someone who's never tried to commute in SF. Public transportation options are extremely limited, owning a car is extremely expensive.
It's low no matter what measure you look at.
We hit security concerns here in two directions:

-- When our sw gets deployed on-prem by our users (or in their cloud, or wherever), our customers rather not deploy our SW with root for no good reason. Some of them have to do things like fill out forms ahead of time or on use due to this (!).

-- In turn, when we run third-party code, say as a normal dependency or a user-submitted script, we have no reason to trust it. That means we want to limit what it can do, and especially if something breaks out, have defensive layers. (Browsers & NodeJS are Technology From The Future in this regards.)

Note that almost all "docker exploit X FUD" articles, in fine print, make assumptions around running docker as root / privileged / etc. It's 2019, we know better.

Also, we happen to run an increasing amount of our stack as GPU code, which adds a (not so) funny layer to all this.
> part of the subconscious knowledge someone in the industry has which someone outside doesn't

Yeah, when you watch a lot of stuff with an analytical eye, you start to see patterns. Eventually you get to the point where you can pause it, make a prediction about what's gonna happen, and be right 90% of the time. Which is either super annoying to the people you're watching it with, or a really fun game if everyone involved is this genre-savvy.

Getting close to that level is pretty much a requirement for getting a job like "editor" or "storyboard" or "script-writer".
You probably live in a bubble. Have you visited the bible belt in the US?
A consensus of opinion is irrelevant. And among those articles is hardly a consensus. One wants regulations limited to an extent, another wants vouchers instead of rent controls.
It's interesting that some people in this thread are claiming rent control hurts landlords, while others here are discussing how it helps landlords increase profits.
It's about time.
I love getting H1B programmers writing shit code for cheap so I can scam them for fake food.
Hopefully this'll shut that crap down for good.
Its a lot to come up with with when you are struggling for a downpayment on your first house.
Yea this was my impression too. I've worked with HIPAA data and usually I had to remove far more than just like a "name" for it to be de-identified.
You're correct- what I had meant to say is Rust is smarter with more runtime checks over C for several cases, like RefCell. Therefor, Rust can be slower than C because of safety (but not because of type checking itself).
They did parse it, albeit indirectly, by Racket’s reader. Co2 is a language, not a bunch of function calls, so it’s not quite the same as building a library in your favorite language. The article even gives examples of new syntax they produced.

Parsing Lisp in Lisp is so easy because it’s free.
This is wrong. Because the landlords are still making money. If they were renting at a cost they would have sold their places a long time ago.
It’s not so easy, how do you prove this?

What if someone’s on vacation or has mail being delivered there etc. or comes in once in a while or Airbnb’s it’s much harder to impliment I think than it sounds.
Download Zipper Tools 1.0.15 APK Free on Apksum.com
Be careful posting National Interest content. They have a lot of fake stories on the site, and the last thing we want is improving the Google indexing of Pro-Trump content
Wasmer is an application-based container while Docker is a OS-based container.

Because of that some of the things that you posted are a bit hard to compare.

We believe that by having a VM (based on a industry adopted specification such as WebAssembly) we can control much more granularly both execution (CPU, memory) and the runtime interoperability with the system (networking, file system, ...), solving most of the issues that Docker containers have
I love C, and have written tons of C++:

What the parent is saying is essentially right. C++'s compile time polymorphism and lamdas can allow faster than C given the right subset of language chosen. For instance std::sort regularly outperforms qsort(3).
They could already do that. Nothing was stopping them from forming an oligopoly or landlords association/guild or whatever you want to call it and raising rent in lockstep by 7% each year. The entire point of the 7% cap is to stop that from happening above 7%, because certain hotzones experience that already, not because of a formal agreement, but because the demand outstrips supply by that much and supply can't (or won't) catch up.

However, there's an issue with how you're calculating the market rate: You're assuming that tenants can/will bear that cost indefinitely, so the market rate can be "whatever the landlords want to make it". That won't always be true, not just from landlord defectors who might try to undercut the oligopoly on price, but because the tenants can move elsewhere and effectively remove demand.
Many landlords are not paperclip maximizers. REITs are, but small time families often charge below-market rents to the long term tenants they personally like or can’t be bothered to replace. They feel comfortable doing this because they can always revert to market rate later. With that long-term optionality going away, some will revert to market rate or as close as legally possible right now.
You'd have to form some kind of trust, the "Swizec is in space for 200 years trust" to handle your investments for you with a constitution that lays out how long it is expected for you to be gone.

You might come back to discover that after several generations without oversight your trust has invested in bombing children and enriching the fund managers. I dunno.
The market solution is rent control + more housing. We got one.
If the ship travels tens of billions of light years will it eventually be traveling away from it's starting point at greater than c due to the dark-energy expansion of space itself? Or will the ship just red-shift more and more but never disappear from an observer with a very good telescope who stayed home?

And what if you drove your ship straight into a super-massive black hole?
you didn't have to make that response before the law, as a hot market that drove up rates by 15% could be addressed shortly. If you loose the option to make quick upward decisions and any downward movement is essentially irreversible, game theory suggests you'll try to minimize how much increase you leave on the table.
I'm a renter in Oregon and I've been outspoken about this long before the laws were passed. From my experience, people who support heavy laws, regulations and taxes don't spend enough time considering potential side effects. They feel like with enough support, they can just force anything they want to happen, while completely disregarding the market.

I feel like an amount of the general public just wants Big Daddy government to come in and authoritatively force everyone into an unnatural framework, which is pure ignorance.
What units go into the vacancy rate? The comment seems to be saying these units aren't even listed as available. Would they still show up in the vacancy calculation? How do they get in there?
The only solution to higher rent is to build more, a LOT more, housing.

The rest of this is just distortion on the economy that will lead to all sorts of bad outcomes
This is where the engineers have an opportunity to hide the best easter eggs.
This tends to happen with new apartment buildings for the first 2 years or so, and its an artifact of real estate finance. For finance purposes, the building is valued on the theoretical sum of its leases when its at full capacity. If you have a 100 unit building where each unit rents for exactly 2.5k/month, then your building is valued on a multiple of of the $250000/month it generates. That value is used as capital for the real estate company that owns the building to use to get a loan to build another apartment complex. Where this gets tricky is that the max cashflow a building can generate is decreased when you lower rents in leases for for finance and accounting purposes,but when you give someone 1/2/3 months free rent the "max theoretical monthly rent" remains the same as if you hadn't given them the free rent. Thus, while the 2 months free rent is an effective ~18% rent decrease for the tenant, it doesn't impact the ability for the development company to borrow, and thats why it is widely used.
The quote refers to the land itself, not to the structures built on it. In other words, it is an argument for a land tax, not for the confiscation of buildings.
It'd be interesting if the trading interface could silently flip the chart & swap the puts & shorts during a deflationary period, so that you could keep trading the same way, while taking into account a bear market.
What you're ignoring is voters resoundingly rejected Prop 10, the rent control measure that went on the ballot LESS THAN ONE YEAR AGO. Which was pretty close to AB1482.

Yet, despite the majority of voters saying no, the legislature felt it necessary to push forward with legislation anyways.

Above all else, the government ignoring a direct vote from the people is most disgusting of all and reason enough for why this should be vetoed.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Prop-10-Califor....
The BusTub Relational Database Management System (Educational)
Your point that other laws might (or might not) apply is a good one that people should note. "Trespass" is one. LinkedIn apparently alleged violation of the DMCA too. It chose not to press those issues in the appeal, so the opinion isn't direct authority regarding those other laws.

Where I disagreed is with your statement that the case "does not purport to provide any precedent on the legality of scraping." It does. It is persuasive precedent that the CFAA does not bar scraping publicly available data.

The first quote you mention ("I emphasize...") is from one judge's concurring opinion, not the court's full opinion. Further, the "little guidance" part of that quote doesn't mean that the opinion provides "little guidance" in general. The concurring judge was making the point that the parties shouldn't have delayed a full trial while waiting for the appeal. By "little guidance," he meant that the appeal provides "little guidance" to these particular parties about how a full-fledged trial will play out.
What's normal shouldn't really matter. If anything, the "normal" way of receving Android updates from your manufacturer is kind of bad. I bet if laptops followed the same model, you'd see exactly the same things, like late security updates and devices losing support after two-three years. In general, I think I'd rather see my OS distributed by people who make software rather than people who make hardware.

> I agree and that's why I said I'm not calling them out

You kind of are. You've mentioned that you don't want to download OS updates from forums a number of times in response to people mentioning LineageOS, but official LOS ports are not distributed through forums (or torrents for that matter.) You also brought up an old, somewhat embarrassing name that their development team apparently used to call themselves. It seems a lot like you're trying to discredit them.
Not saying it's correct. But given a world of infinite choices, sometimes it's helpful to look around at what's rising in importance on it's own. Even if there's no good reason.
If you have a tenant paying $1000 per month when market rate is $3000, an empty units drastically increase income and thus the value of the property.

It also opens it up to people who want to buy the building and move in.
We were using Docker-in-Docker in our cluster to run user-defined containers, and something about it resulted in the outer container disk usage blowing up to like 20GiB per container. I think something due to the overlay filesystem driver. We were under a time constraint so we just grew all the host root filesystems, but it was pretty inconvenient and not inexpensive to do so. I have to assume this also had a drastic negative impact on storage I/O performance in the inner container as well.
People will cry foul this will drive costs up in the long term. But we are far removed from free market economics since cities have put restrictions in building new housing thus keeping real estate prices artficially high. Now the state puts rent cost restrictions that will drive the prices of real estate down.
Rent control seems to be used as a means to an end rather than a goal on itself because politics.
GNOME also has a Matrix client written in Rust: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/fractal
What exactly is the purpose of a CS degree?

If you go into your CS degree as a young hacker, adept at *nix with a penchant for assembly language, with enough experience to appreciate the CS concepts, you're going to be disappointed. There's a strong chance that you'll know more than the professors.

Alternatively, if you go in knowing nothing and really work hard to sponge up everything the degree program wants to teach you, you're going to think you've learned something but you won't actually leave with any useful knowledge. You'll have dated and often half-baked understandings about how computer systems should theoretically be designed. You might have an idea how a basic OS kernel works from your OS class, or how to write a sorting algo from your data structures class, or maybe a parser from a language design class. None of that is useful at all, other than maybe to get you interacting with your machine, in the hopes that you'll learn how to use a computer (which is a completely different set of knowledge) by the time you graduate. And if you did ever want to write your own programming language, you can throw out everything you learned in class and start over by Googling it and following the best practices of today, like we do for everything else.

The only point I can see is to be able to say you have a CS degree, and hopefully that's losing value.
I don't understand how that's possible. Housing is a good/service, how can that be decommodified?
Progress in physics was much faster in the early 20th century when it wasn't so fascinated with deep space. Yes, you needed to observe eclipses to verify relativity, but that was a tool, not the end in itself.

Cosmology involves distances that are so great that it seems like it's pouring a whole bunch of smart people's efforts down the drain in an ultimately futile waste of brain power that will never amount to anything much at all. Besides, when we get faster than light travel we can just pick up exoplanet research where we left off and it will actually be practical and probably far more efficient with the computers and such we will have developed by then.
How different, for one.

Are they running the same OS? The same architecture? Do they have any software installed?
I don't know exact specifics of typical PM agreements, but usually yeah the PM follows whatever the landlord specifies. If the PM doesn't like the landlord's terms, they will just decline to do business with them, but ultimately they're just the landlord's agent.

I'd hazard that the PM charges a percent of the gross rent, but has a minimum irrespective of the rent actually charged, so the landlord will then just tell them that they don't want the PM to rent at a price where the PM's minimum fee is more than the fixed percentage. (or in hard numbers. If the PM requires the greater of 10% or $100, then the landlord will just say "don't rent below $1000")
So ... you are arguing rent control is good? Or that this isn't rent control? Or that some rent control is good, but more is really bad?