skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Even if it's found to be ambiguous, that would only limit the federal governments power, not increase it.

> I'm more of a Jeffersonian in this: a Constitution perpetuated this many generations on is a form of tyranny by our ancestors.

Then you must believe secession is constitutional and legitimate.
Based on the wording, it's my belief that CircleCI was referring to Segment, but I have 0 inside information to confirm this.

Even if it was though, Circle discovered this issue on their own through an automated notification of an action taken; they do not seem to have been notified directly by Segment. It doesn't seem fair to assume that _if_ Circle is referring to Segment, that either company did anything wrong in their response here.
This is actually the fastest, always responds under 100ms! I put this in, thanks!
Yeah. Thinking about it, the appeal really to me is that I don't have to give a shit about fonts/colors/etc. I only care about the data. I'd live my entire life this way, if I could.
> (I can't comment on Scotland and NI but I very much doubt they have different systems)

I can comment for Scotland: it's almost exactly the same. The territorial boards greatly prefer midwife-lead care, so the only times we saw a docter were: months before delivery, saw the GP once to confirm the pregnancy test results; a pediatrician a few hours after delivery to count fingers and toes. Everything else was midwives, and handing over to the health visitors 2 weeks after delivery.
> in that case is there a distinction between index funds and actively managed funds?

Yes. Active managers can choose what to sell based on prevailing market conditions. Index funds must sell across the board. That could involve getting hosed on names in a short-term squeeze.

> this only affects people who are trying to sell at the bottom

There are lots of index funds. For a broad-market fund, you're probably right--a patient investor can ride out the bloodshed. For leveraged or specialized funds, on the other hand, a rout could permanently impair the portfolio.

Equity market collapses, furthermore, have a habit of transmitting into the real economy. A sustained downturn could impair funding conditions, which in turn could affect the fundamental characteristics of a portfolio.
My i7-2600k @ 4.4GHz agrees with you. The only reason I would upgrade would be for better USB 3+ support (I have a hard time with anything more complex than a SuperSpeed flash drive).

SSDs are by far the most cost-effective upgrade you can get nowadays. HDDs tend to be the bottleneck for boot times and general "snappiness" nowadays.
Let the callers of your API control allocations
Baseband processor has access to absolutely everything on all but Purism phones. Android is a guest OS.
financial engineering :facepalm:
Big chipmakers are turning to architectural improvements such as chiplets, faster throughput both on-chip and off-chip, and concentrating more work per operation or cycle, in order to ramp up processing speeds and efficiency https://semiengineering.com/chiplets-faster-interconnects-an...

Scaling certainly isn’t dead. There will still will be chips developed at 5nm and 3nm, primarily because you need to put more and different types of processors/accelerators and memories on a die. But this isn’t just about scaling of logic and memory for power, performance and area reasons, as defined by Moore’s Law. The big problem now is that some of the new AI/ML chips are larger than reticle size, which means you have to stitch multiple die together. Shrinking allows you to put all of this on a single die. These are basically massively parallel architectures on a chip. Scaling provides the means to make this happen, but by itself it is a small part of total the power/performance improvement. At 3nm, you’d be lucky to get 20% P/P improvements, and even that will require new materials like cobalt and a new transistor structure like gate-all-around FETs. A lot of these new chips are promising for orders of magnitude improvement—100 to 1,000X, and you can’t achieve that with scaling alone. That requires other chips, like HBM memory, with a high speed interconnect like an interposer or a bridge, as well as more efficient/sparser algorithms. So scaling is still important, but not for the same reasons it used to be.
That's true, but it may take a while for the company to fail, and in the meantime, perhaps no one wants to buy your stocks. I think there might be some way to give them back to the company if they want to, but not being able to sell them, even for a loss, keeps the loss from being realized and therefore deducted as a capital loss.
> I'm a side sleeper and I use a tubular pillow to reduce stress on my knees.

Care to explain? I don't understand how using a tubular pillow would reduce knee strain... Do you keep a pillow under your legs while in bed?
The point of the larger nonce is to allow safe use of random nonces. You don't do a larger nonce and then record nonces. Among randomized AEADs there seem to be three main strategies for security:

1. Nonces large enough that you can safely use random nonces (XSalsa being the best example).

2. Stateful nonces, such as in systems where the nonce is tied to another protocol, or recorded in non-volatile storage.

3. NMR systems where the nonce isn't necessarily large enough to safely use randomly, but the system doesn't fail catastrophically on the rare occasions they collide.

If you're trying to do cryptography on systems with no functioning random number generator, my presumption is you have bigger problems than which AEAD you're using.

I don't have much of a stake in this story. To the extent I do, I guess what I'm here to say is:

* "Performance" and "overhead" aren't good reasons to use a smaller nonce with an AEAD.

* FIPS is bad, and a requirement to be FIPS-compliant will ultimately harm the security of a cryptosystem.

That's it.

You will better answers on Crypto Stack Exchange than on HN, though.
As a new doctor it was easy to be influenced by the opioid industry
vesseltracker.com paid service
My significant other deals with some insomnia and anxiety, we think it's been helpful. Mind you, not a cure-all but she likes the blanket.

We got a bearaby. Ridiculously expensive ($300) but it seems to be enjoyable for her. I look forward to that one coming down in price. I justified it as a really expensive throw if it didn't work out.

Personally, I can't sleep with it. I move a lot and the weight of it has lead me to feeling a lot of pain in my joints when I wake up. (pressure on my shoulders from sleeping on my side with it, knees and feet hurting from being compressed down when laying on my back)
There are definitely upsides to this, like being able to put your general geographic area than your exact town which you might have on Facebook, for instance. But I'm curious also if it is usable to be downright dishonest.

For one, I think people will be less willing to lie in a form where one company can see both profiles, but on the other side, it comes down to what Facebook lets you change. Hopefully they won't let your profile specify two different ages, for instance.
Here's the thing: Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists opposed a standing army and saw it as a tool of oppressors. If you want a second amendment, you need to also support defunding the military and a return to militias and mercenaries. But that's not usually the argument presented. Also there's been a federal standing army basically since the US was founded.

Now, let's go to Madison, the father of the Constitution and all that. He firmly opposed a professional (i.e. standing) army when he wrote the constitution. Tool of tyrants, yadda yadda. However, President Madison who exists 30 years in the future, comes out and says "I could never have believed so great a difference existed between regular troops and a militia force, if I not witnessed the scenes of this day." in response to 2 state militias getting demolished by the British Army.

IDK. They put the 2nd amendment in, and then immediately undermine the philosophical point of governance it's meant to make. Democracy is weird, government is hard, and coming up with 100% accurate statements about the unified sentiments of a group of dozens/hundreds of people from 250 years ago is impossible. I guess that's my point?
He is saying when people exit and index sells all their stocks equal to current market cap rankings that the opposite side of trade buy demand for all those won’t be equal. Bad stocks may go down further than solid companies. A shift in value vs growth preferences caused by the downturn itself could be the cause of that. The entire index and all holdings would then HAVE to readjust for this discrepancy and lead to more forced selling of bad stocks and buying of solid companies creating more liquidity crisis.
I agree.. doubtful, though these are the only vessels passing through the polygon based on AIS
Any packages from Amazon that have been delivered by its independent contractor delivery people have always been photographed sitting by my front door.

Do yours not take photos?
It's pretty hard to get the data from every year
That's a common mistake. Ads don't always (and you could argue rarely) show their target demographic.

Easy example: ever seen an overweight person in a fast food commercial?
Maybe all of your talented engineers are doing exactly that, and everyone else left over is doing things like building airports.
Screen readers have a lot of commands for reading different sized chunks of content. In general there's probably around 50 keystrokes I use on a daily basis. It's not as straightforward as reading from top to bottom, though it can be. I can usually do a Wikipedia article without pausing at 450 or so.

If anyone is curious, here is the NVDA keystroke reference: https://www.nvaccess.org/files/nvdaTracAttachments/455/keyco...

As an interesting sidenote, screen readers have to co-opt capslock as a modifier key, then there's fun with finding keyboards that are happy to let you hold capslock+ctrl+shift+whatever.
Have you gotten in touch with the developers? They recently redesigned their website, and are trying to make the project more approachable in general. If you have any remarks or suggestions for improvement, I'm sure they would be appreciated! (There's a contact page: https://gnunet.org/en/engage.html)

But yes, most of the sub-projects seem experimental, or on a low level and lacking a pleasant way for people to make use of them. It seems possible to integrate the GNU Name System into a web browser, though, and re:claimID (https://reclaim-identity.io/) has an add-on in development. GNUnet news list some ‘major design issues’ they're aware of, so hopefully stuff like filesharing will work well enough once those are fixed.
> it is not as drastic as 5x on this site

Those are deltas-v from low-Earth orbit to low-Venus and low-Mars orbits, respectively.

Going from low-Venus orbit to the Venusian surface costs as much as getting from Earth to low-Venus orbit plus getting from Earth to Mars almost 3x over [1].

[1] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2679107/Mind...
"Enforced mandatory Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for all employees when accessing Segment-owned workspaces and performing administrative actions in the Segment app."

This should always be step #1, don't wait for an incident.
Perhaps the best evidence for this is that it never makes an appearance in scientific journals.
I now tend to prefer to go to the self service, because it's usually faster than the normal checkout.

The exception is when I know I will trigger an age check.

But to the car comparison: If that happens enough that people won't use them, then they're not good enough unless it drives the cost down enough that people decides it's worth the wait.
Measuring actual vs. feeling of learning in being actively engaged in classroom
Read my book - The Remote Project Manager - on Amazon. It covers the challenges of managing teams remotely as well as how to best use the available Technology. Gren Gale
Location: San Jose, CA

Remote: OK

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Java, Distributed Systems, Linux Kernel + eBPF

e-mail: farid dot m dot zakaria at gmail dot com

resume: By request
Pressures are not the same as force. Like all other choices in life, there are trade-offs. For some, the things Facebook gives them mean more to them than whatever reason they don't want to use Facebook, for others they don't.

It's a bit like saying you'd like to stop eating veal, but you're forced to keep eating it because it's so tasty.
> Given that I wish to pursue my own ideas and designs...

Then pursue your own ideas & designs. Next find a buyer. Figure out a way to get to market.

Tangential story-- how James Dyson did it. >https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/955045.Against_the_Odds
Incorporation doesn’t say anything either way. The fact that the first amendment didn’t apply to the states until it was incorporated via the 14th says nothing about whether it was initially viewed as a collective right or a personal right. Same for any other right in the bill of rights.

Most evidence points to the fact that the second amendment was viewed from inception as an individual right. Especially if you look at the state proposals for the second amendment, which allow exceptions for things like individual circumstances (e.g. people who had participated in a rebellion).

McDonald said nothing new, or what wasn’t already obvious.
> if the indexs see a sell off they won't find the liquidity in the market to cash out their positions and will drive the market down

When investors sell that amount, it doesn't matter whether they hold the underlying assets directly, or via index funds or ETFs, or via actively managed funds. The market will go down. So, which part of the problem is uniquely due to index funds?

Burry hasn't made that point very clear.

There might be issues with (liquid) index funds that give exposure to inherently less liquid assets, such as bonds or real estate. There might also be issues with index funds that do not hold the assets themselves, but replicate the exposure synthetically by entering a swap with a third party, giving rise to tracking error, counterparts credit risk, etc.

However, as I said, Burry hasn't enunciated these concerns very cogently (at least in the extracts quoted by Bloomberg). This article here does nothing to address those concerns.
Don't look for a silver bullet. Find the largest cause of chaos and try to solve it in the simplest way, which may be a manual process. Some things that cause chaos are: no CI, no tests, no code review, etc.

Trying to add some kind of process or framework is likely to just suck more energy out of the system and make the ICs think you're wasting their time. If anything, they know what they need to do, but probably are being pushed to ship or do something else. Nobody likes to live in chaos.
> Fundamentally, Google's initiative on differential privacy is motivated by a desire to not lose data-based ad targeting while trying to hinder the real solution: Blocking data collection entirely and letting their business fail.

We don't usually call something infeasible "a solution", especially it means a fundamental structural change without giving a viable alternative to power a 300B market. So tell me, what is your proposal to give an approximately similar amount of efficiency to the market? If you don't have the one, that's fine but your criticism doesn't really resonate since at least Google tries to improve the status quo.
I worked at IBM Austin on the performance team when the Mach-based IBM Microkernel/Workplace OS was ongoing. (Ask me anything! :-))

Performance was the big problem. (At one point, a disk read was CPU-bound.)

1. The Mach Interface Generator (mig) generated code with wildly different performance, with no obvious relationship to the mig spec.

2. Context switching is always the big topic, but it's a red herring. Our problem was primarily data transfer; copy-on-write took so long to set up that it was frequently cheaper to just do the copy.

3. Making a syscall to get the current PID is a stupid idea.
I wonder if any of this boost, or even a significant portion, comes from just being happier and relaxing after playing a game for 8 hours. Rather than some perceived brain training.
The S&P 500 is basically a group of largest established 500 market cap stocks traded in the US proportioned to market cap. There is no active management determining price and weights here.
I've been meaning to spend some time with D3.js for a side project. Bookmarking this, casually scanning this it looks like it's exactly what I needed. How's the book different from the web intro?
Apparently the two companies are roughly the same size in terms of square footage under management. (IIRC IWG is a little bigger.)

So not likely IWG could absorb significant percentages of WeWork customers on short notice.
A bash script for the same thing (which I thought originated from Cloudflare, but maybe not):

https://gist.github.com/benkulbertis/fff10759c2391b6618dd
its UI is not very responsive
The point of this would be for two situations:

- awkward roads with cones, tricky parking etc

- high speed collision avoidance where the car transfers legal liability to an offshore contractor immediately before impact
Kneading bread is one of the greatest stress relievers there is. It's very tactile and you work out so much stress.
> it's that there are very different faces of ourselves that we show to the professional world, to our friends, to partners, and to the world at large

I think Facebook's goal is to make it so that you have one persona you show to everyone. To me, that seems like a cultural thing unique to Silicon Valley that the rest of the world does not necessarily want.

It seems like a mistake. If you have one persona, that means that you need to optimize that persona for your career and ironically it feels more stiflingly conformist. Just my personal feelings on the matter, though. I'm not trying to call out anyone who likes that way of life (and perhaps has a personality that's well suited for it), just that it should not be imposed on everyone.

I kind of like the old model where you pretend to be conservative at work, and are free to be as weird as you want to in your own time.
Also contributing yet another Cloudflare DDNS updater[0]! It was a neat experiment to play with the API. I've ran it in cron and as a systemd timer.

[0]: https://github.com/wyattjoh/cloudflare-ddns
Same with why the Internet is still obsessed with many things: it reduces very complicated things to simple, easy to consume buckets. Instead of having to understand and relate to an individual, you can lump lots of people into one of a relatively small number of piles and treat them the same under the guise that it's 'scientific'.
I don't know exactly where you live, but around me 5-10 MPH over is still 5-10 MPH under what even the police go.
I remember there being a similar 2-way matching "app" based on your FB friends back in 2009 or so. People gamed the system by adding their entire friends list.
Depends on what they're built out to do. Highway traffic monitoring cameras don't (and usually aren't placed for a good angle to see them), toll enforcement cameras obviously do. Speed warnings signs are generally not cameras, I think, but radar, and hence don't.

Also, only the government can generally turn a plate number into a person's identity reliably (I doubt Google knows my license plate, though I'd be interested to know if they did), and even then, a license plate is far less likely to always identify a given person's movements than their phone's GPS.
The schadenfreude when this one fails is going to be great. Not as gratifying as Theranos, but how can you top those clowns? The only thing that would make these flameouts even better is if the arrogant wealthy swindlers actually lost their fortunes and ended up in the soup lines, but unfortunately it never happens.
>That said, it's odd that the narrative persists of M-B having been discredited, when, as the article mentions but doesn't explore, the opposite is true.

What? The article directly says M-B has been discredited:

>In academic circles, however, the test has long been discredited. While the Myers-Briggs test lumps people into “types,” most modern personality tests measure traits on a continuum. Another objection rests on the test’s inability to predict meaningful life outcomes. “Basically, there isn't an algorithm that translates how people answer into how they're likely to behave,” explains Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, professor of business psychology at University College London. Today, this is considered a crucial element of a personality tests. The backlash against the Myers-Briggs test has been powerful – beyond being shunned by academics, a steady drip of articles over the years have condemned its shaky scientific grounding. But this hasn’t stopped diehard Myers-Briggs fans seeing themselves within the test’s categories.

You're falling into exactly the same trap that horoscope enthusiasts have, gesturing to vague correlations and associations with no scientific grounding or basis.

You're simply wrong. M-B is pseudoscience.
As the author mentions, these sort of decisions can be very nuanced (thinking about valuation, dilution, liquidation preference, exit value, etc.).

Happy to help anyone thinking through these situations.

Put together some helpful resources and tools here:
https://withcompound.com/equity

Some other useful guides:

https://www.holloway.com/g/equity-compensation

https://fortune.com/2016/09/27/the-complete-guide-to-underst...
Hardware matters.
It's a lot easier to hire someone to drive a box truck than it is to hire someone to drive your Kia.
This is definitely a good approach, totally agree with it.

It is bad to introduce too much process too early, and a good measure of when you need it is when the pain of not having it exceeds the pain of the process. I really dislike unnecessary process, but as you grow different processes become necessary and they make life easier and more predictable.

It isn't rare to have the wild west at a startup in the early days and it isn't rare to lose a few people when you start putting in necessary processes because they don't want the constraints. One of the most valuable lessons I have learned over the years is that it is healthy when people leave that aren't on the same growth path or maturity of the organization. Don't fight to keep people when this is the case, it just adds stress to the organization and people internally know that the person isn't a good fit anymore. So let them go. Hard thing to do sometimes, but necessary as companies grow and mature.
What is a BSD syscall on the same hardware?
Right, but consider that the sub-prime mortgage market was a tiny portion of the overall mortgage market in 2007.

Derivatives written against sub-prime holdings tipped the balance when the fan was hit. There are tons of derivatives written against the indices, thus indirectly against those funds.
WeWork and its parent don't hold the leases in the buildings. They have special-purpose entities for each building, so they can go bankrupt piecemeal. That will probably start when the recession hits.
Some pictures (/mock-ups?) here: https://social.librem.one/@purism/102740815257018934
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Post_Office_Railway
> I see this being huge for older adults who are divorced or widowed

Go to Facebook Marketplace and search for wedding dresses. It'll show you recently divorced females in your area. From there you can filter by size.

Hacker.News.
Huh. didn't know this existed! Thanks! Is there a list of other pages cloudflare serves outside of this one?
The populace isn't allowed to own tanks, military fighter jets, bombers, bombs, and especially not nuclear weapons.

The most effective ways of fighting a modern military are bombs (IEDs), air superiority, and nuclear deterrence.