skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's what I did at the time. I only got rid of my series of Java 2, Motif, Xlib/Xt, etc programming books when I moved a few years back.
That is the symlink target, not the ln target, which is exactly why the "target" nomenclature is confusing. Also note that not every "ln" has a "--help" or uses that help message as the output. For example, try on OS X `/bin/ln -h`.
I couldn't understand the article's logic. The restaurant owner didn't lose anything, actually Google help bring more ordering to them, except the owner don't need to worry about delivery.
Desktop Application Development in ElectronJS Using Angular
Yes, and the rotation of the probe resulted in the engine pointing downwards, which means that it may have been intentional.
It's a shame my irrational hatred and distrust of all things google prevents me from reading this document.

Also is it really that insightful? Code reviews have been standard at competent companies for a long time.
Could it be possible that all the dust being kicked up in the "air" during landing could act as some sort of chaff that blocks radio signals?
If you loose control of the private key it limits the time an attacker could use it.
The Nomadic Programmer (2009)
I personally just use "site", "inurl" and the minus sign.

Example: site:news.ycombinator.com -inurl:item google operators
And before that “Thoughts on Music” in 2007.
>Was it later revealed who the targeted demographic was?

It is speculation based on list of targeted apps (listed in implant teardown post)

>I guess what it is actually supposed to say is that the exploits were developed over the course of two years; not that they were actively used for two years.

I don't know what evidence Apple has, but Google definitely meant that it was exploited for two years: (from exploit chain 1 post)

>This exploit provides evidence that these exploit chains were likely written contemporaneously with their supported iOS versions; that is, the exploit techniques which were used suggest that this exploit was written around the time of iOS 10. This suggests that this group had a capability against a fully patched iPhone for at least two years.
100 km/h is not particularly fast, not even for a highway (my German friends recently discussed their preferred Autobahn speeds, and that varied from 110 to 190 km/h).

A 747 cruises at 893 km/h.

Concorde cruised at 2140 km/h.

The ISS orbital speed is 27580 km/h — or 36 megameters in 1 hour 18 minutes.
The problem in the second case is not null-hypothesis testing, it’s sample size.
How do you do this if you no longer have a Facebook account? I am sure they have my data but I deleted my account several years ago and I don't plan to reactivate it.
Right, except we were talking about moving everything to microservices a decade ago, and many things started moving in that direction. Enough so that the pendulum has swung back with articles talking about the downsides of moving to MSA.

Did Accel recently discover these companies all have APIs?
Can't say I recall any single question that stood out over the years, but the worst one was - "£21,000 - that's a lot of money for somebody your age" HR person interview prior to interview with the technical boss and guru's, which went really well and for me did have a few good questions.
"What do you know about postcodes and barcodes", which at the time was 7 formats of postcode and area I knew much about as also barcodes and why kyocera laser printers did well in many industries as they had the ability to print them built in unlike many other more expensive models. Then I also outgeeked the guru's and ended up showing them how to use hidden debug mode in dataease that they didn't even know about. Aced it, got offered £25,000 and turned it down due to the HR interview. More so took another job at a software company doing new things for less money. Was more focused on learning new stuff back then than the money. But sometimes it is worth it in the long run.

But overall - may favorite questions would be ones in which you have to give a technical answer - tests I love. Though not keen on psycometric ones as they always mess up with people on the autistic spectrum and if you able to be proactive and equally reactive when needed - they get way confused. Spent 5 hours in an interview going around in circles over that one, nightmare for all I suspect in the end and didn't help that I was more suited for the job they had offered out the previous week to the person doing the interview who I would be working for. That I would put down as a messy interview and did nobody any favours as ended up sticking my head in one pidgeon hole and my rear in another when they were looking for somebody who fitted in just one of those.
Also had tests which you could draw parralel lines across the sheet as the answers patterned out that way and turned out, that was how they marked them and got upset that I spotted that pattern based upon the right answers, so they voided my whole result even though I'd done it honestly. Luckly techinical person in interview spoke up and said that is the type of person I want, somebody who can see the patterns and swung it.

But with everything, no single cookie cutter question you can ask for every area, but plenty you can ask that can go down the rabbit hole. With that, everybody will have a favorite question and that favorite question is bound to be somebody elses worst question. Gets down to experience and as individuals - we will all have different perspectives upon bad and worst questions going by how we handled those questions in the context of that role.
Amusingly tax policy also allegedly gave us brandy. When you're taxed by volume (such as by the cask or barrel of wine) you may wish to dodge some taxes by distilling your wine product into brandy ("burned wine") to concentrate the volume, with the aim of re-constituting it with water for consumption, later.

Then of course you find out the reconstitution tastes nothing like the original wine, and you also may discover that leaving it in the wooden casks makes a pleasant drink on its own...
all I'd ask for is a few blind predictions on some reasonably interesting molecules, where no existing method can make an accurate prediction without a very expensive calculation (QM on supercomputers is common, you could easily generate the energies for a bunch of modest molecules from a diverse set).

I say that as somebody who has evaluated VC pitches for O(n) approximations of QM as a startup idea.
What was so great about Wunderlist? For $100MM, I think the previous owner could build a new one... it's just a to-do list. If you built one for your school project, you'd probably get a C+ due to lack of originality and difficulty.
They're all just staring at their screens, just waiting for their craft to come back and say something. :(
Timeline, Google said 2 years, Apple said 2 months.
2014 was so different. I see Apple rejecting developers more and more like Google closing business accounts without any explanation. The damage done to an innocent individual can cost their livelihood. Those giants need to be regulated asap.
Certbot is awesome! It really gives you no excuse not to provide https on your website.
Increase the supply and the price eventually has to drop. Basic supply and demand. That said, this problem has been allowed to grow exceptionally big and there is an fantastic amount of pent-up demand that would have to be satisfied before prices really started to normalize.
4:42 EST - Some communication between lander and orbiter

4:47 - Official statement => Communication between lander and ground station was lost at 2.1 km altitude. There was no mention of earlier communication between lander and orbiter.

Edit: Source: Parroting the Youtube stream (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6VmPU6Us00)
They said in the video when they were informing Modi that it was 1km from the original landing site at last reading at 400m.
It's minor and maybe I'm being petty, but my sympathy for Docker ended the moment they forced you to register an account and log in to download Docker CE.
>Since it's on nights/weekends, it shouldn't be employer #1's business

I agree that it shouldn't be their business, but I would be careful with making a broad assumption like that. That applies to everyone regardless of their immigration/citizenship status.

As discussed in another thread yesterday [0], at least one of the FANG companies (Google) owns all the code you write while employed by them, even if it is written completely on your own time using your own resources and doesn't bring any revenue. It's a bit more complex than that, but, that's the gist.

0. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15592968
FWIW, even highly accomplished software developers / hackers like Jonathan Blow[1] have said that in almost every case, you should just use an array as your data structure (or some variation of an array), unless you actually have a good reason not to (that will get you a lot of value)

Of course that doesn't mean you shouldn't know how advanced data structures work and be able to work with them, it just means you shouldn't reach for say, a fibonacci heap before you just use an array.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Blow
Yeah, but then they're always lenient with the existing major players and harsher with the smaller players, effectively creating a segment where true capitalistic nature doesn't apply. This is similar to a communist party in a way, where once you're elected, you can't be removed from power until you die under your own accord.
Is an answer to the question, what is the sum of three cubes?
These questions and similar ones can be prepared, there's nothing really new here.

What's terrifying is the quick interpretation of the answers and how sure they are, this reads like a horoscope:

8. Looking back on the last five years of your career, what’s the highlight?

“For example, if they tell me about a personal accomplishment, then I know personal career development is a huge area of focus. If they tell me about the accomplishment of a direct report or the team, then I know they care about developing people,” says Vaughan. “If they tell me about a company feat, then I know that they tie their own success to the company's success — which is a great mentality for weathering the early stages of a startup.”
Is Google Down?
I am reminded of a post entitled "older and wiser" to the listserve:

The archive of the comment is here:

https://thelistservearchive.com/2013/09/13/older-and-wiser/

("the listserve" was an experimental mailing list where a member was chosen at random to post to the rest of the list)
https://cybermap.kaspersky.com/#startcountry=NL

Logs (real-time) from #wikimedia-operations IRC channel can be read at https://wm-bot.wmflabs.org/logs/%23wikimedia-operations/2019...
> Yeah, but no publicly trusted certs.

> (Over 1.5M expire in the 2040s alone!)

I doubt ~75% of the self signed certs expire in this dataset expire 21-30 years from now. Surely the author is correct that there are a good number of public certs with a very long expiration. Would need to download and filter the dataset to know for sure though.
Ah great thank you!
You can search the list here:

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/sdn-list/...

Some entries have specific domains associated with them, but we are obligated to not serve any domain directly associated with (i.e. controlled by) an SDN entity, not just those listed.

If we become aware that we may be serving an entity on the SDN list (often via someone emailing us) we have to conduct an investigation which may result in termination of service.
Please don't turn "API" into the next "blockchain", where I have to fend off VCs asking me how I incorporate APIs into my product or if I'm currently developing any APIs. That would be like me asking them about spreadsheets.
rapid unscheduled disassembly, looks like.
I think you probably have an unrelated grudge here, at least judging from the contents of your comment before you edited it to make it less offensive.
Alive and kicking at my end. (Canada)
What Dawkins says is not true of all atheists. Also, there is the difference of positive and negative atheism. Dawkins also has the scale of atheism 1 to 7, and he himself ranks 6 on that scale apparently. Some religious people are good people and some non-religious people are good people. And then, there are also agnostics, ignostics, and meta-agnostics. And then, there is Tom Swiss.

In terms of your "either you: 1) 2) 3)" there is the fourth possibility that the question isn't very meaningful, and you forgot that one.

Also, some scientist and mathematics and computer programmers are religious, but some aren't, and as long as it doesn't interfere with your work, it is OK.
Lost comms after landing, suggesting maybe a crash landing. But not all is lost there is still an orbiter where most experiments are supposedly going to run. See https://twitter.com/ChrisG_NSF/status/1170072433115762688?s=...
"Product lead of monetization at Slack" ...hmm
They could pull a cloudflare and stop granting certificates to people that are out of moral alignment with them.

Or the government could lean in on them require them to not grant certificates to some foreign institutions. Even worse, they could be forced by NSLs to issue fraudulent certs (CT log verification isn't mandatory yet, is it?)
Reading the man page instead of Googling this will make you a better engineer, and it will also cost more of your time while you figure out what the man page is trying to say. This knowledge may save you time later, if you use it again, or not. So the advice I would give is, never Google if the answer can be found in the man page. Unless it's a tool you're unlikely to ever use again, of course.
I am not sure what's more exciting: passage through an unstable Lagrange point, or effects of a solar wind on the massive area of such cable.
I'm very glad they published it because up until now I have been fretting over whether my phone was affected and whether I needed to reset every password in my keychain. As far as I knew until now, all iPhone users were at risk and Apple had secretly patched the affected devices without notifying anyone. I'm glad that doesn't appear to be the case.
Writer Does Twitter Takedown of MIT Media Lab for Taking Money from Epstein
Again, I'd argue that

(1) Evidence of a crime

means "We have reason to expect John Doe of Whereveristan has committed an ITAR violation. We believe He did so through his Android device. We need the information associated with his account... So on and so forth."

That is tightly constrained, states the desired information to be turned over, the subject (individual) of the warrant, and the alleged reason why it is necessary.

"We want all users account information containing entry XYZ because maybe, possibly, some subset of that corpus of individuals may have committed a crime" does not meet that standard.

By allowing this type of fishing expedition it completely upends the notion of presumed innocence, and encourages broad, sweeping warrants to be considered an acceptable investigative technique. Something that has been continually rebuked over the last century, and has only started to crumble since the introduction of Third Party Doctrine.

>Nor does an individual need to be identified. "John Does" are commonly enumerated as defendants in criminal indictments, and warrants can be used as a means to locate them.

Huh. I knew of the John Doe practice, but I didn't realize it was used to conduct legal proceedings in absentia the individual in hopes of eventually finding an individual that "fits" the allegation.

Not sure how to feel about that.

Thanks for the input though! Today I learned!

EDIT: On further reflection, I suppose it shouldn't surprise me. Obviously there has to be a legal construct to enable the legal system to move forward and react to ongoing criminal developments in the case where the perpetrator is highly effective in covering their tracks, and law enforcement has to piece things together from the effects of the crime until such time as enough coincidence occurs to narrow the list of suspects to a particular individual.
Barro means that it gave us White Claw in the sense that we don't instead have canned vodka tonics (in effect: alcoholic seltzer), because vodka is distilled, and White Claw's cane-sugar-brewed alcohol is a tax workaround.

We have the product category itself --- alcoholic seltzer --- on its own merits, according to Barro. There's no escaping it.
Five Alternatives to Google Search
it appears to have stopped listening now
How are you going to trust that decentralized org? Is it just voting? Can we all vote to revoke anyone's cert at any time for no reason? What happens when someone performs a 51% attack and takes over google.com's cert?

CAs exist solely because you CAN trust them, otherwise what's the point? We'd just have every site self-sign and let the users choose who to trust.
Yes - it feels like the wave has passed, or rather is in full effect.

Twilio, Stripe, Lob are all relatively large companies now.
Unlikely. In the absence of air dust particles are ballistic and cannot form a cloud.
Nobody actually checks certificate revocation lists so a compromised cert that’s valid for 5 years can be used maliciously for the full duration.

90 days was what they decided the best compromise for usability and security.

Taken to the extreme ‘immediate’ certificate expiration starts to look a lot like Kerberos which is maybe what we always wanted.
Setting off a not-clearly-marked death-trap outside of what should be a safe space is not something I'd classify as "your fault"... at least not with the provided data.
As if you can't have both humor and hostility.

Psst, your implication about where I'm from is wrong.

> (Edit: Not you. The author of the article is the New Yorker.)

Edit: I'm not talking about that. I mean the implication that I'm not a Midwesterner, which is causing me to "mistake it for hostility".
Apple Disputes Google’s Claims of a Devastating iPhone Hack
>Any physical model gained by fitting data which purports to be faster than those based on a computable approximation of the laws of physics is so constrained.

Constrain the model so that there aren't any superfluids, semiconductors, plasmas, metals or Bose-Einstein condensates and you can still simulate any medicine I know of.
We are talking about a thing attached to a cable and going up. How are those other speeds a reference?
There are a ton of places in iOs that report back to Apple. When you first set up the phone it asks if you want to "share your usage". You also agree to let them have stats on how long you use each app as part of the app store agreement.

Apple's selling point is that they don't make money selling your private data (or transitive access to it) to third parties, but they don't make any claims about not doing it themselves.

I don't see anything that would preclude them from installing some telemetry for this specific attack. And I think it would be perfectly justified in the name of security too.
That entities are choosing to accept negative rates is certainly true (at least until paper currency is phased out, then it perhaps would be more debatable), but as far as I can tell, this is a nonsequitur. European banks are offering negative rates to savers because they are mandated to maintain reserves with the ECB, and the ECB is offering negative rates on reserves. The rate on reserves in turn drives the rate of inter-bank lending. So, it seems reasonable to me to ask what the market rate would be were the central bank not offering any interest on reserves, nor trying to set the rate of inter-bank lending, nor any similar rate. Would the market rate be negative, or zero, or slightly positive, or substantially positive? Have any economists taken a stab at the question? If not, why not?
That is a valid point. There is people doing bad stuff and they say by religion or by God (not all people doing bad stuff is, but a lot is). And, yes, you should challenge it and try to stop such bad thing. Yes, I believe you, so much money and time is wasted in those mega-churches that could be better spent actually helping those in need. (Some churches maybe do help those in need sometimes, but many don't. And you don't need to be religious to help someone, anyways.)
I like the reset buttons that have a little dimple in the center.
This has been known by outdoors people for literally centuries, probably millenia, because disturbing birds can ruin your hunt. I was just browsing this[1] book on my bookshelf where it is talked about extensively, and it is far beyond just a statement of fact.

[1] https://www.amazon.co.uk/Walkers-Guide-Outdoor-Clues-Signs-e...
Got it, thanks! Wish I could delete this now.

We're based in Boston and the whole office isn't able to get on Google.

Error: This site can’t be reached www.google.com’s server IP address could not be found.
DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN

Edit: It's a DNS issue from our ISP. :(
You can enumerate all syntactically valid proofs too, and just check each one to see if it proves whatever proposition you’re curious about.
Wikimedia Italy confirms it's a DDoS: https://twitter.com/WikimediaItalia/status/11700615053096960...
Alas they've lost communication :(
cool thing had the same idea but never published it, funny how often you google the same thing? like "explode in js" ;)... i never deactivated the complete history of google since it exists.
You don't have to believe it's the government's role to police private choices to support sin taxes; another coherent way to look at them is that they internalize market externalities.

Sales taxes are in some sense fungible, in that vendors could eat the cost to consumers by reducing their prices, in the same sense as a direct tax on those vendors would also be fungible, in that vendors would raise their prices to account for the taxes. Arguably, consumer-facing sin taxes are cheaper and simpler to administrate, and are the superior solution.
was about to say a similar thing.

ask the question, but simply choose the answers with the rough edges that might merit a bit more thought and discussion vs those that 'ace' the answers.
Confirmed on the feed the signal was lost at 2.1km from surface. "The data is being analyzed".
No this is the original meaning of collective as a noun.
I have already developed a few things on android, and i know iOS and android aren't that far away in the concept. However the main issue is that i don't have time to develop two apps. It's as simple as that.

I'm not planning on using react or flutter to avoid knowing about android internals. I'm going to use them to only develop specific code when it's absolutely needed, and not for 100% of the code base.

As an independant software developer (or even for a modest company) i think it's now the only sane choice.
Microsoft Hosts First Windows Subsystem for Linux Conference
Just to check, are you asking about a tiny cable on the surface of the Moon, or a 1-light-second-long cable where both ends are “the bottom” in local gravity even though they’re on opposite ends of the straight cable?
They didn't get enough donations
Guy just said nominal performance up until 2.5 km altitude then signal was lost.
You're not the only one... Get some weird and embarassing search results.
I did a pretty reasonable chunk of C++ code once years ago. I was junior level. Wanted a good review.

I got 21 comments to remove blank lines and none about the code. Thanks. Really useful. This was the team of "experts" on the code base.

Then a principle engineer reviewed some other code and oh look, actual useful comments.

Nitpicking can be worse than useless. Obfuscates or ignore real issues in the code. Seems to usually be a sypmtom of the reviewing not being competent enough to actually review the code properly.
even the monitoring page is mostly down:

https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/000000479/frontend-traffic