skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> (At least if you are comfortable terminating your SSL at the load balancer. If you plan to use SSL between the AWS LBs and your EC2 instances, then AWS certs don't work there and you'll need to provision them yourself using something like LE).

Interesting note - ALBs/ELBs (NLBs with SSL termination as well, I would assume, but I am not sure) do not perform validation of your backend certificate. You can terminate at the load balancer and use an expired self signed SHA1 cert for all AWS cares.
My takeaway from all of this is that if you have kids that are going to play hide-and-seek, you probably want something more durable than IKEA furniture.

I think IKEA realizes this as well.
What's going on here: https://twitter.com/UKDrillas/status/1170074170211934208 ?
It's been confirmed on IRC. It's a DDoS.
> It would also reduce the concentration of trust in one entity.

No it wouldn't. If there are 9999 CAs, you need to trust every single one of them.

A better argument for having multiple CAs is that it would increase resilience (against takedowns, bugs, money running out, etc.)
> There's a lot of things you or I could be doing for money

Not for the amount this gig offers that aligns with my skills.
I’m surprised that Wikimedia doesn’t have links large enough to absorb common DDOS attacks.

https://www.peeringdb.com/net/1365
The Problem with the Gig Economy
Does this mean that Firefox will essentially be bypassing my DHCP-configured DNS servers by default (unless split-horizon gets triggered)? What if mycompany.com is resolved internally differently than externally, a common need when dealing with things like application gateway proxies and such? What if I want to use a Pi-Hole or other such DNS-blackholing technology to protect myself?
Many of other people's choices cost you money. In fact it is quite difficult to decouple any choice from affecting the rest of the population.

How do you decide the role of government intervening?

Is the role of government to maximize each individual's contribution/cost ratio by force of law, how do you balance that against personal freedom?
Google's Cookie Matching
Good practice says that you should be renewing your certs when they have about 10% of their lifetime left, just in case this exact thing happens with whoever your provider might be.

It's unlikely they would be down for so long that certs would actually expire.
This is really useful and interesting. Thank you!
Huh, I've had the opposite experience when setting up DNS on GCP App Engine. Things seemed to be quite snappy to me.
The 14th amendment. The judicial system has consistently ruled that the government cannot make lists of potential criminals without due process.
Hear that, folks? In a world that's increasingly focused on sustainability and funding for software development, programmers with business aspirations should take note:

If you're working on something that you hope to (eventually?) make money from, but you also want to benefit from the collegial atmosphere of open source, then choose the GPL. This simple decision instantly eliminates a whole subset of would-be competitors, who you now don't have to worry about undermining your business or otherwise threatening your source of income while they rely on being able to use your own work against you, since the GPL automatically places your work in their do-not-touch category.
What’s new is that brewers now have legal teams to help them figure this out.
Googling too much is an indicator that your environment or process isn't working well. It's not a point of pride if half your job requires looking up how to use tools you don't understand.

The problem is that people naturally blame themselves for not knowing everything rather than accepting that we have built monuments of trash code that nobody should be expected to understand and that therefore we should stop doing that and stop using that.
> What motivates you to work?

Interesting projects.

Money.

Interesting projects for myself. I like a good challenge and something I find interesting.

Money, not because I need more, but because I know that if we're successful, we'll be making money and the E team will take theirs so I want mine. I'm tired of the "Oh, we're a family so take one for the team" BS when things are flat, but then not hearing, "Because we're a family and we did great, here's yours!"
That implies you are not learning new things, or you are getting that info from books or some other source. Or you bookmark all docs pages or something?
They have so many off-label uses.

Binder clips, ziploc bags, twisty ties, a letter opener, post-its, sharpie, scissors, wire cutters, ... life's problem solvers.
VCs need more places to stuff their money.

Many companies aren't companies, they're features.

Rebrand these vulnerable "feature" companies as "API" companies and go bull on them.
But do cats make that chattering sound to lure birds with a false sense of safety?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plPcu0Le1Ts
Perhaps you could try imagining that they want to stick at what they have been doing for doing for past 76 years: Selling furniture.
To add to this, songbirds also sometimes engange in mobbing when predators show up. Different species will all flock together and bombard the predator. I've watched it happen to my cat before when he was chasing chickadees around. All the birds in the yard ganged up on him and chased him off. He's not a very good hunter, so the birds weren't really in danger either way. One of my biology teachers mentioned if you make the right noises while walking through the forest, you can trick the song birds into thinking you're a predator and see the phenomenon for yourself.
> and there's a discussion to cap them even more.

For reference: https://gist.github.com/ScottHelme/5531ed88b1ff0c1e8ce8af565...
With you reasoning there shouldn't be any alternative browser, calendar, notepad, map, email, alarm clock, calculator, etc because similar functionalities are provided by apple apps.
Are you somehow supporting the hospitals separately from the taxes that everyone else pays? All of our stupid pointless wars cost me money, as well as being deeply evil, but that argument hasn't stopped them yet... in the meantime keep your hands off my consumption of beverages.
p=0.05 is an absurdly low bar even with an extremely well-defined hypothesis. Once you open things to p-value hacking (i.e. trying a bunch of hypotheses until one seems significant), p=0.05 is almost guaranteed for one of your hypotheses and is hence meaningless.

The physics community is pretty good about dealing with both of these shortcomings. You often need a lower p-value of around p=0.003 (3 sigma) or lower to say something was significant, and a few more sigmas to claim an actual discovery. And in addition to this, you're expected to include a trials factor to correct for multiple hypotheses. It's not perfect, but it makes claims of statistical significance more meaningful.
If this works as described and there are no tricks (such as Google changing your account password from their servers to a known password and then logging in), then that is a great step in the right direction.

A very important next step would be to make this a required feature for all handset developers who wish to use Google services such as the Play Store. As long as it's a niche feature only used on the Pixel, it's more of a good gesture than a substantive benefit for users.
Companies buy other companies to eliminate competition all the time, it's normal, fair and expected. It's also not the only reason to make such a purchase, removing competition is just one variable out of many.

I think the only time one can argue this shouldn't be allowed is for monopolies. Was Facebook considered a monopoly in the space where Instagram was competing in when it made the purchase?
Yes, some religious people have done some good science. "There is no evidence of a god", but, what counts as the evidence of the gods existence? How, even, will you define the specific meanings of "God" and "exist" in this case? It is difficult.

I fail to see how Dawkins is "lying by ommission (which he already does with evolution)"; maybe you can elaborate how that is.

I agree when you say there is no proof of non-existence of a supreme being.

Also, I think that faith as "belief without evidence" doesn't applies to atheists more than religious persons. I have seen argument of such thing but fail to see how it is good. How is that?

I have seen many arguments for and against the existence of God, and they are not valid. There are different problems with them.

Also, believe or not believing the existence of God doesn't make you irrational. (Although a lot of both atheists and religious people will do many irrational stuff sometimes.)
Regex is one of those things I have memorised albeit without the back reference stuff I rarely use. I think it’s worth memorising and if you use it to help you find replace in your editing you soon will.
I know how much you like Voat and the chans and how much you enjoy your freedom to engage in let's call it "wrongthink shenanigans." But you can't really "belong" there. You can't belong in a place where you have no identity. You're just words in a textbox attached to a nonentity no one knows or cares about.

If all you want from a community is amoral irony and a lack of social consequence, then fine. Perhaps if you have no faith in people or society, you have no expectations of others beyond immediate emotional gratification, and the world is nothing but an endorphin pump to you. But "belonging" is a social process. To belong is to adapt, and meaningful interaction requires both sincerity and empathy.

If you can't keep yourself from expressing... "wrongthink" opinions even when you know you're around people who won't tolerate them, then the problem isn't where you are, it's who you are. You aren't even trying to belong - you want to be tolerated but you're unwilling to tolerate.
The trigger was Adobe was whining to the press and badmouthing Apple regarding Flash
I've had this setting disabled for I want to say over a year now. Was I part of some early pilot or something? I followed the instructions here (https://www.facebook.com/help/www/187272841323203) and it was already set to "No". What the heck?
Why don’t they write a blog post thanking Project Zero!
> In other words you agreed with what I said, thanks.

Let me be clear. This is not a situation where you would bring up dishonesty if you had proof, and there is no proof.

I agree with what you're saying about Bernie Madoff's autobiography itself, but strongly state that it is not analogous to this situation.

So if your 'what about' was a total tangent, I agree with your post. If you were trying to use it for an argument by analogy, I do not agree with that argument.

> You assume the reason someone used such language was because they simply disagreed.

More that they lack empathy! The comparison accused of being 'disingenuous' is not an inherently ridiculous one. All it takes is strongly valuing the second amendment to make that comparison. It's not in the same ballpark as a modest proposal. Anyone who honestly believes that the statement is far from a rational argument is not even trying to understand.
Hmm, good point, I hadn't considered that. EV charging is totally unattended.

Makes me wonder what benefits there are to convenience store sales in states where "full service" is required.
Another interesting angle - is it possible that there is a continuous void between the earth and moon that never intersects any space debris already in orbit?
I didn't even thought about that joke, seems out of character for Stallman in my view. But nice.
I once had to implement ridiculous password rules for the Intuit api. Rules that Intuit themselves didn't use.

My favorite was "Verify password is not contained in standard dictionaries (including foreign, non-English dictionaries)." So I have to search every word that humanity has ever used??

---

Letters [required 1]:a, b, c, d, e, f, g, … x, y, z, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, … X, Y, Z – AND

Numbers [optional 1]: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 – OR

Symbols [optional 1]:~, !, @, #, $, %, ^, &, *, (, ), -, _, =, +, [, {, ], }, \, |. ;, :, ‘, “, ,, ., <, >, /, ?

Verify password is not contained in standard dictionaries (including foreign, non-English dictionaries).

Verify password is not the same as, or a trivial variation of the username.

If Account ID is ‘fred’, then password cannot be ‘fred’ ‘fred1’ 1fred’, ‘fr3d’, etc.

Password check should look for Account ID string in the password

Password system must support mixed case passwords (Password1 should yield a different result than password1)

Passwords will expire no later than one hundred twenty (120) consecutive days after issuance.

Products must accommodate Account ID lockout after 10 consecutive failed password login attempts.

The failed count (if currently under 10) should reset after a successful login

If the 10th consecutive failed attempt is reached, the Account must be locked out for a minimum of 24 hours

After a password expires, the user must select a new password

The password system must remember the previous 5 passwords for each user

The user may not select a new password that was one of the previous 5 passwords for that user

The user may not change their password more than 1 time per hour

---

https://developer.intuit.com/app/developer/qbo/docs/legal-ag...
Joke's on them, it was 4,000.
"To continue using TechCrunch and other Oath sites and apps, we need you to let us set cookies to collect your data."

No, dear TechCrunch, for you to publish in EU markets you need to obey the fine law. Otherwise, feel free to withdraw, the sooner the better.
I think compounding the issue is a lot of devs jump complex technologies pretty quickly so we're constantly trying to overcome a deficit in knowledge but never stopping long enough to do so.
This is also a reason not to drink cask-strength whiskey straight: to wit, you're not meant to; you buy cask-strength so you're paying for less water, since you can provide that yourself.
honestly, the taste of alcohol is repulsive to me, but I enjoy drinking with friends. I find myself physically unable to drink hard liquor, and beer becomes tough after a couple drinks.
The stars were probably aligned for you. Given DNS TTL there's a bunch of uncertainty here. My main feedback to
Google is that having them periodically check back at an unanounced schedule, with no abilitity to force an an immediate check.. shows a total lack of understanding of customer needs.

I mean, like... Yes, I understand that by default Google does things at scale, but sometimes you need to do things by precision/on demand, too.
The ZDI disclosure is rather vague, but I suspect this is a vendor-specific vulnerability and the speculation otherwise in the Ars Technica article is just wrong. There is no single "v4l2 driver" used by across all of Android - every device has its own v4l2 driver with its own implementation of the userland-facing v4l2 APIs, and vendors being what they are some of them are of pretty poor quality.
Lithium?
Karma strikes India: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/apr/02/a-terrible-t...

Though I'd much prefer watching a success but I can't really feel bad for a space program that chooses to not care.
I like this. It's in the same vein as the blog post, but it addresses the only aspect I was truly uncomfortable with: the word "tribe" implies exclusivity, whereas I tend to think of myself and other devs as points in the triangle whose vertices are these tribes.
The maven package format is the defacto standard in the java world. Luckily gradle consumes and publishes in that format too.
How did I know this would be written by a venture capitalist before even clicking on it?
Distillation laws don't make a lick of sense and we should change them.
I'm not an expert in this problem (nor do I ponder number theory that often), but here are my thoughts: Countable doesn't mean finite. It's possible that there is a sum of three cubes with "big" magnitudes that sum to a "small" integer (just see this solution for 42).

The tweet chain gives a type of integer that we've proven cannot be expressed as a sum of three cubes (9k+4 and 9k+5), but that only means we've proven anything for 2/9ths of the integers, and it's only conjectured that the rest can be expressed as such.

There are some trivial other things can we can prove, such as any number that is 3x a cube, or 2x a cube plus/minus another cube. But that doesn't get us to full coverage.

As of yet we haven't proven a result for enough patterns such that every integer belongs to one of those patterns. I suppose to answer your question is that no, we don't have enough small numbers proven and/or we don't have a recursion pattern that covers the integers with the known numbers we have yet.

That's just my layman's understanding though. As it stands now, we do know that there are infinite numbers that cannot be expressed as a sum of three cubes, but we do have a useful finite set of integers that can. So a full solution to the problem will be good to know, but we already know that an answer is "some can, some can't."

Edit: I realize that someone is going to take issue with my changing GP saying enumerable to me saying countable. There's a difference, and I guess it could matter, but I'm too honest to change my original wording. Sorry in advance for getting it wrong.
"professional software engineer"

> writing cookies

> string contains

> how to see request headers in chrome

I mean, obviously I'm trying to be snarky here, but I'm not sure how a professional "software engineer" focused on web development types such generic queries into the browser after working on it long enough to be "professional".
In my opinion the bigger threat is "gig cancer", the largely-invisible creep of normal jobs turning into gig jobs on paper, when in reality the only thing that changes is workers losing benefits and worker protection regulations. Many of the jobs you think of as very traditional like hairdressers are now independent contractors.
My experience with lxd is very limited. Actually I worked with liblxc which is the underlying paradigm, and i kind of disagree with you. The paradigm of lxd is much more foreign to me than docker. I am pretty familiar with my application and the distro of the container in a user perspective. I am definitely very insecure about cgroups and kernel namespaces. In the end my application is connected with my business/work orders. Kernel minutiae is not and the technical skill requirements is much higher. That will put a higher price tag on my team's human resources.
Its forgivable because with software dev the gigabytes per year of new information to remember in your head is much higher than other disciplines. It’s darn ridiculous!
How would adding additional CAs improve security? By the very nature of the CA trust system, each CA is itself a single-point-of-failure/exploit (though certificate pinning and other measures improve this somewhat).
I believe this is way more limited by acceleration.
‘Microsoft the Musical’ feat. interns in a singing, dancing romp across campus
If someone is this high-maintenance as an interviewer, they'll be unbearable as a manager, and I do not think I'd last a whole interview bothering to pretend that this was a normal human interaction.
It is pretty dependent on what the search results look like after the first search.

In the above example, I would probably filter out results having to do with other react hooks so adding `-useState` would help accomplish that. If I am googling specific syntax or an error log, then wrapping it in quotes will do a phrase match and filter out results that don't contain the phrase.

I don't use the `site:` search pattern because just adding `github` does a good enough job and

Another pattern I use is `filetype:pdf`

:thinking: and lastly I nearly always use the tools to filter by results within the past year. That does an okay job filtering out older documentation, tutorials, articles etc
Yes, it would be platform specific as the OSX ln command would not be the same program as the GNU coreutils ln program.

For GNU ln at least I don't find it confusing at all particularly considering the only other option is LINK_NAME. I guess YMMV though and it seems kinda pointless to argue whether it is or is not confusing. Perhaps a poll could quantify it.
Most "modern" C++ involves template metaprogramming of a sort that is in header file, so the modern aspect doesn't stand to increase the need for LTO that much.

I would imagine that Rust programs benefit from LTO by removing static assertions necessary for memory safety that C++ programs simply omit, and by unraveling functional style code that Rust programs often get shoehorned into. Or maybe not, but that's one non-LTO that's needed.
Take CRISPR/Cas9 outside, use it like a hand-held search engine for wild genomes
As someone who wrote a lot of charts in d3.js I must say that just using React instead of d3.js is a lot less overhead. But that's my opinion.
Busybox's ln --help is straight to the point

Usage: ln [OPTIONS] TARGET... LINK|DIR
Create a link LINK or DIR/TARGET to the specified TARGET(s)
> If Google finds a vulnerability in Android, what percentage of the phones would actually receive the patch?

100% of the vendors that have solid update in their pipeline.

That means: all Google flagship phones and tablets. A lot of phones from companies that take updates serious.

But also: hardly any planned-obsolence phones. And also hardly any phones that ship with a FUBAR Android "theme/skin/variant".

The latter is, by definition of Open Source, out of Google's control.
Did not know about inurl - very cool! Thanks
Bitcoin was Facebook’s first choice says Abra's CEO
I don’t understand why you think that’s a problem.

The cars are limited by human reaction time, the aircraft are limited by air resistance, the ISS is a space station and all the constituent parts had to be brought up to that speed in the first place from the ground by rockets.

The main advantage of the category that space elevators are a part of is that energy and reaction mass doesn’t need to be carried with you as when you use a rocket, which makes them much easier.
In my view, an opportunity (in a business sense) is when you find a need people have that isn't being adequately fulfilled. You capitalize on the opportunity by fulfilling it. 99% of the time, you don't need a few millions to do this.

I'm not talking about "getting ahead" in the sense that you seem to be. That's a different, and much more complicated, topic.
Looks like an interesting book, do you like it?
Please

Wait, no. You're the one who's typing giant walls of text at me that I didn't ask you for and aren't at odds with anything I said. Also, you're the one who's running with the assumption I apparently know nothing about the Microsoft case. I don't think it's a personal attack but I do think it's weird and inexplicable and it's even more weird that now you're apparently pleading with me to what? Keep typing huge walls of text at me? Let's call it a day here.
More likely part of the gov't of PRC