skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Intensively reared supermarket poultry is hardly a standard. Not in the UK anyway. Various respected media outlets have done undercover investigations in to the poultry supply chain. High-profile chefs have done campaigns to increase welfare and change buying habits. The RSPCA have serious concerns about intensively reared birds.

https://www.rspca.org.uk/whatwedo/latest/details/-/articleNa...

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/chicken-supe...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/23/-sp-revealed-d...

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/sep/28/uks-top-sup...

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/sep/28/uks-top-sup...
What does the Paleo community think of Beyond Meat? I think they would highly object to the canola oil in Beyond Beef, which is not considered a good vegetable oil.
I mean Basecamp is $99/mo. And it has a bunch more features. I don't know about you but I'd say they run a sustainable business.

CRMs are usually ridiculously overpriced.
No, the shuttle rockets where expendable. The only reusable part was the shuttle itself and every launch was very expensive compared to SpaceX.
Do you have any source for the reusable rockets used in the space shuttle?
Ambrosia Software, maker of Escape Velocity apparently out of business
You still cannot, for any meaningful concept of a "gun". You can kinda print a (rather fragile and crude) lower, but that's it as far as I've seen.
Suppose you have a service A, that uses two classes X and Y. Then you realize that it would be better for A to use X' and Y' (with different interfaces). If you have unit tests for X and Y, you will have to change these tests as well. If you do a lot of refactoring, you will spend a lot of time maintaining the unit tests. On the other hand, if you rely on integration tests (which test A), you still test X and Y, but your tests are less likely to change over time.

I'm not saying unit tests don't have their use, but as far as refactoring goes, I think they are a hindrance. Unless we talk about rewriting just a function.
As you can plainly see from the paper, this is a form of full-blown obfuscation --- it's post-compilation program transformation to inject small proof of work functions entwined with program logic, to inject new branches and jump tables, and other things. Their goal isn't to make static analysis impossible, but the underlying CS they're invoking to accomplish their goal is the same as obfuscation.

Nothing that they're doing would be a "minimal" hindrance to people employing fuzzers. Rather, it all seems like an extreme pain in the ass, and it would doubtlessly deter people from fuzzing.

My guess is that the authors likely share your opinion of the utility of anti-fuzzing. This is (literally) a science project, not an advertisement for a product. In the scientific context, that the most popular current-generation fuzzing tools can be straightforwardly retarded through these techniques is an important observation.
Some do, some don't. The ones I know in our family's congregation refer to it as a "church". I wouldn't be surprised if the pastor referred to it differently in formal public situations but people I know in the congregation call it a "church".

There's variability among UU congregations and individuals. It's like any religion in that way, although I think UU is maybe a little more heterogeneous than some.
The history lessons that I grew up with told me that my country was great, and that everything which was bad in the world was the fault of some other nation. Asking for data is one way to get past that.
Here’s something similar for Firefox (just the pretty image part): https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pretty-new-ta...
"The purpose of this study is to assess the content of 8 fast food hamburger brands"

It is unclear from the abstract whether they were measuring the entire hamburger, including the bun and other condiments, or just the burger portion.
> We also know that the winning margin of the 2016 election was only 79,316 votes[1].

The smaller the number, the less clearly one can point at a single cause though, right? I mean, to an extreme, say it had been a 1 vote difference. There's millions of factors that can make a vote happen or not (that one voter could've slept in because their alarm broke, that one voter could've gotten sick that day, etc). One vote is an extreme case, but for 80k I can think of a lot of factors that would normally be "small" but suddenly play a sizable amount of importance.

- That's 80k Democrats who didn't go to vote.
- That's well within the territory of gerrymandering.
- That's a tiny fraction of the African American population, where Hillary was notoriously weak.
- That's well within the viewership of many Fox News shows and segments.
- As the article stated, you could fit these people in a mid-sized football stadium. That's within the territory of having a weak last month of campaign touring, or aggressively getting more rallies done.

Just to mention a few. And yes, also means it COULD have been CA— perhaps they weren't as influential as they claimed but 80k is not a large number, they perhaps could've influenced that many people.

I'm just wondering if there's a lot of attention being put on this factor, vs other factors that at this scale could've feasibly swayed in the election.
Keep in mind, Redwood City will be literally underwater along with the rest of the Bay Area in a few decades.
> filled with carbs

And that's bad? After working on my property cutting down weeds and dead trees carbs are super healthy. Carbs are only not healthy if you live a sedentary lifestyle. Carbs are our main short-term fuel source.

And yes i do intermittent fasting.
I've seen this time and time again where someone who was just under the threshold to be cut off, would intentionally not work extra hours, or try for a raise because unless they doubled their income, they end up losing a lot more money than the free benefits make up.

If you make 20k a year, and the cutoff for benefits is 22k, the second you make $22,001 you lose all benefits and are left to fend for yourself.

There should be a better sliding scale to assist those who do want to better themselves without de-incentivizing them to do better because of the fear of losing everything.
> I don't understand the confusion over this.

Propaganda by people trying to sell the same thing as "healthier" has convinced a lot of people that it is true. It helps that the idea of a large corporation selling sawdust as meat is incredibly believable though.
Have you looked at Medicaid eligibility requirements?

It is a common misunderstanding that if you’re poor you get Medicaid. Eg. In Florida no matter how poor your are you don’t qualify unless you’re disabled, have children, or are pregnant. In other states there are hard income limits which are incredibly low, and earns a dollar more, you don’t qualify. You go from having free Medicaid to needing to pay $1000 per month in premiums which obviously you still can’t afford.

Edit: actually looks like it’s the same thing in Texas, if you’re poor you don’t qualify. You have to have kids or be disabled. These are all the states that refused the federal funding for Medicaid expansion I guess.
5. run them long enough to stabilize thermally so you don't have bursts of performance (potentially minutes), and/or use something like perflock to lock down your cpu speed: https://github.com/aclements/perflock (general tactic, this is just the last tool I heard of)

6. for similar reasons, run them in a random order each time
Can't view the post, it says I'm rate limited (I'm not logged in and I haven't clicked visited twitter yet today (fresh IP every night because Germany)).
I learned more about human biology, how to read research studies, and to self-experiment rather than just "reason".

Having low testosterone, constant pain, mental health problems, etc. before and during my vegetarian/vegan experiment seemed like it was "NORMAL".

I read a little bit about the foods I was eating causing inflammation, which has a high impact on all of this, and how keto & carnivore diets were low inflammation, and affected biomarkers that I do not even understand.

I switched to low carb vegetarian, but this did not help much. And it was not satiating. And it's expensive. And, from what I've read from the authorities I somewhat trust, it is not as healthy.

I then switch to all meat (literally steak, eggs, butter, and salt) for a couple of weeks and my mood and body composition improved immensely. I wouldn't recommend that diet long-term, but it made me realize that life did not have to be as miserable as it was on the vegetarian diet...
Let me guess: You're eating a lot of meat?
Despite my love for his channel, content, and personality, I think he was hugely in the wrong here. His example setup provided no better quality than my experience with a cheap analog capture device from ebay[0], though his is more pliable for other devices.

[0]: https://www.ebay.com/itm/USB-Video-Capture-Converter-Analog-...
Another thing fun for kids is panning for gold out west. The sunlight glitters on the gold flakes and catches your eye.

I think there are even places you can buy a bag of dirt to be shipped to you.

Another interesting thing you can do is buy unsorted/unwashed roman coins from europe. There are techniques to soak and reveal the face of the coins. Where else can you uncover 2000 year old human artifacts?
Perhaps because vegans and vegetarians are substantially more likely to be thin and, well, less traditionally manly, both in appearance and in values. It's a different set of cultural values and it isn't invalid just because it differs from yours.
> You can always do better. But I'd like to see a well-grounded argument that KFC-grade chicken is somehow "shitty".

I'd say if you buy your meat from a local butcher and you know the actual source of the meat, then you'd likely say that raising chickens in high capacity growth sheds doesn't put out what many would define as quality birds. [0] The chicken is likely fine for consumption, agreed. But if you were born, pumped full of feed to make you as fat as fast as possible, and barely had room to move during that time - would you qualify yourself as healthy? Just as an athlete vs a couch potato have significantly different body composition one could assert this is also true for chickens. In the grand scheme you get what you pay for. In a race to the bottom of cheap meat you need scale and it's much easier to throw lots of chickens in a small place than it is to free-range them.

Finally, while subjective, it's a common pattern to leverage MSG in products that are of generally low quality. I don't know anyone who puts MSG in recipes using pricier butcher cuts, I know I never have. KFC has Monosodium Glutamate in most things they sell.

I guess if you want to stand on a soap box and call out that KFC meat quality isn't "shitty" just because nobody has proven it to you, then more power to you. But, it's hard to argue that there isn't a difference of quality by a mass producer of chicken vs non-mass producing vendors. I mean, it's why people pay more for a friendlier and healthier growth environment for said meats. "Shitty" in the sense of this argument seems rather subjective anyway. But I will say it's hard to argue mass produced chicken isn't "shitty" for the environment. [1][2]

[0] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2999689/The-35-day-...
[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221431731...
[2] https://academic.oup.com/nutritionreviews/article/77/4/197/5...
Just anecdotal, but I was once chatting on a plane with a guy working as a meat buyer for a major dog food brand. He told me his work was to negotiate the cheapest thing that would pass legally as meat as possible, in the biggest quantity as possible. He then mentioned in passing that his toughest competition was Mc Donald's.
I generally agree that there exists a point where keeping someone alive is mostly just because we feel weird about letting them die; there are people kept artificially alive that aren't 'living' in any meaningful sense. But that's not how Emanuel is framing it:

"Older Americans live too long in a diminished state, raising the question of, as he put it, 'whether our consumption is worth our contribution.'"

What an absolutely despicable way of viewing people living into old age; the moment you aren't contributing, its time to get the axe.

I don't think its a coincidence that he's an American: we place an unhealthy amount of value on the labor someone does.

"These people who live a vigorous life to 70, 80, 90 years of age—when I look at what those people “do,” almost all of it is what I classify as play. It’s not meaningful work. They’re riding motorcycles; they’re hiking. Which can all have value—don’t get me wrong. But if it’s the main thing in your life? Ummm, that’s not probably a meaningful life."

Note that he's not talking about people who are ill and lying in bed; he's just talking about people who, after 50+ years of contributing their labor to society, get to enjoy "play". They get to see their grandkids grow up and get married, while not working for the final decades of their life. Claiming that those years don't constitute "a meaningful life" is so patronizing and presumptuous.
To answer both my own questions. Rust does not seem to have this same problem:
https://godbolt.org/z/JpwcRN

But iterating over the loop with .iter_mut is different than iterating over 0..v.len(), which is interesting.
- Auto-summon of the Password Manager on password prompts

- Grep for things that look like IP address and color them in blue, or MAC address in green, or errors in red

- Auto-Complete based on the text in terminal (this leaves people watching me `docker rmi f7<Cmd-;>` breathless)

- Broadcast same keypresses into several panes (having SSH sessions to several servers)

- Making an icon jump when a long running command just finished

- etc.etc.etc.
Say I want to whispersync The Way of Kings. I already own the audiobook but now I have to buy the Kindle version for full price, which is $9.99 (I double checked in a private tab to make sure amazon wasnt giving any discounts)

Two different things. One is an audio performance, which you bought. It contains elements not in the print/ebook version.

The other is a print version of the same work. The purchase includes the formatting, editing, etc., that went into producing the print version which are not found in the audiobook version.

Why is it people get paid twice for contributing nothing to bring it to another medium?

Why is it that programmers get paid six figures to create just another database application? Aren't they all the same thing? No!? Well, it turns out that creating an audiobook and creating an ebook are two very separate things that each take a fair amount of work and that each deserve to be paid for.
This is part satire part rooted in deep truths and I am conflicted about this.
What do you have in mind in terms of the writer needing to test her assumptions? I don't know what that means, both in terms of the assumptions that she's obligated to test, or what that "test" would look like in the article.
Japan is also having a concentration effect. Japan might be shrinking, but tokyo is growing as everyone moves there. There is no signs of this general trend abaiting. Recessions are also only a few years long, the growth trend is the status quo for the majority of the time.
Serving Deep Learning at Curalate with MXNet, AWS Lambda and Elastic Inference
The innocent explanation is if they see it as reducing the risk in their pool - the equivalent of it is cheaper to give away flu vaccines than say 25% reduction in flu hospitalizations it is a win-win. Assuming it is always the case is naive however.

However the tracking is suspicious. Insurance companies have a bad habit of trying to never pay what they promise out of greed - despite doing so sawing at the branch they sit upon.

As a rule of thumb if the insurance company learns nothing from what it gives away it is probably trustworthy.
There is a somewhat recent theory that supports this idea. It is unclear whether or not things actually fall-in, but the idea is that the entire surface is a hologram, and the surface alone is sufficient to describe the entire contents. (Thus preventing any information loss).

Much better described here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DIl3Hfh9tY
From the no-op garbage collector linked in the article they list a few reasons why you would want to use this garbage collector. See https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/318 under section motivation.
Obama and Romney both had GOTV platforms that used data to target GOTV efforts (and had matching sea animal code names), so it's not a Republicans v Dem thing. The CA scandal coincides with a lot of doubt about trusting large tech companies, which is why it's a big deal now.
Really curious on your thoughts regarding RightNow Technologies/Oracle Service Cloud.

I used to use it as a customer and was a consultant for it until a lot of the work in that area started drying up.

Seemed to be the CRM of choice in 2010; nowadays, Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Zendesk seem to be the frontrunners in that space.
Glad you enjoyed it! Originally I read about it on Wikipedia, and studied it just because it was super geeky and cool to me. Later I started attending events and met people, and at this point I have lots of international friends through the language. I wrote a bit more about this on my blog, which you may find interesting: https://martinrue.com/zamenhofa-tago-18
"Just Facts"

"Your source for reliable research"

"A resource for independent thinkers"

Starts off with a made up study that links to itself. Can't get published in any journal, and no peer review. Proclaims the article meets "academic standards"... spends half the article railing against the NY Times. That's something you see all the time in research papers -- rants against a newspaper. /s

This site sets off my fake news alarm. If you want to write an article, write an article. Don't make up a fake research paper. If you're going to lie about this, what else are you lying about. You know who needs a fake research paper to lend their writing credibility? Fake news. I don't trust a single word on the page.
I've been using this one https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/new-tab-art/oldcmm...
Open a new tab and see a piece of art from the Metropolitan Museum of Art or the Cleveland Museum of Art.
I'm sorry, is there some kind of simulated nutrition I'm not aware of? Say, something that can legally be labeled as protein which is not, in fact, protein?
What's the pitch in using Clojure for data science instead of Python, production workloads?
Prop 13 was a reaction against confiscatory taxes that broke an important social contract.

The contract: If you save, invest, and pay off your home mortgage so that you own it free and clear, later in life when you are retired and living on a fixed income no one can come along and confiscate the property that you bought and paid for fair and square.

The contract breech: Property taxes going up so fast that the only possible solution was to sell your home. Now, of course the value of the home was going up, which was what was driving the taxes. But forcing pensioners to sell their homes, disrupting/destroying a life-time of plans and work was never going to be a smooth ride -- who could have thought that it would be?

The government pre-Prop 13 was viewed as kleptocratic by a sizeable portion of the population, with arguably good reason.

So, do you have a better solution that has empathy for pensioners that played by the rules all their lives and have plans to settle into modest enjoyment of their so-called "golden years"? Prop 13 was an attempt to stop perceived thievery, a crude bludgeon, perhaps, but a sufficient number of desperate people saw it as a solution to get it enacted.
All dogs are service dogs when you're not allowed to challenge it.
Because meat-products are inseperable from our food culture in many places.

I'm from NC, so to me "BBQ" means something very specific and that meaning is a point of cultural pride. We like to trash talk our neighbors based on the sauce they use (eastern NC is vinegar-base, Western is ketchup-base, and South Carolina is mustard-based) but we still all agree that the meat is pulled or chopped pork. In Texas and Kansas City they call brisket and ribs "BBQ", and in other places, "BBQ" can just mean a outdoor get-together with anything grilled!

All that is to say that, becoming vegan or vegetarian in NC means losing a fun part of your culture if you throw out meat alternatives. Luckily, there are enterprising folks making amazing meat-free alternatives that still feel authentic to NC-style BBQ (I highly recommend "Fiction Kitchen" in Raleigh for eastern-style).
"Thank You From a Land Speculator"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqQhoZgFZgk
A fair amount :) Put your money where your mouth is goes both ways...
They haven't used ammonia wash or "lean beef trimmings" since around 2011.
Interesting; I wonder if the kids thing is why I always hear from conservatives that medicaid is all we need in this area. "It's your fault for not wanting to start a family like a normal American."
Article is mostly Gonzo garbage about the experience of eating at the restaurant the interview is at.

Nothing newsworthy for HN, it's a puff piece introducing Reddit to the FT audience.
I second that. I grew up poor in the US as well and received entirely free healthcare. I have a few poor relatives that receive free healthcare now due to their low income status, it's quite decent. They get access to exactly the same system as anybody else until you get into the top ~20% or so that are buying another tier of healthcare (easier access to the best specialists and latest medtech & biotech is the primary gap).
Amusing that you should mention Canonical "snaps". I made a snap of monolith and contributed the yaml upstream. https://snapcraft.io/monolith - it's in the edge channel because upstream haven't done a stable release yet. It's a strictly confined application.
You're not entitled to a sheet music when going to a concert either.
Very cleverly written, manipulator students take note [1]. The data in the article is compelling but it is definitely conservative/libertarian (which they are not hiding in the about us page.)

[1] One example: The quoted "green energy". A pedestrian interpretation would read these quotes as a euphemism equivalent to air quotes, implying so-called green energy. Yet it's also plausibly deniable as the "caused by" link refers to "green energy", so perhaps the quotes are in reference to the link. Very clever indeed, à la Ben Shapiro.
> a) the language designers decided to cram several paradigms into it, including a heavier than usual dose of functional.

Rust is actually really close to JavaScript in that regard, with its mix of OOP-without-inheritance and the whole collection of functional method on Arrays and iterators (map, reduce, etc.). And while People have a ton of complain about JavaScript, none of them is «the JavaScript language is too complex».

> b) most people don't want to get pedantic about resource management

But Rust is explicitly aimed at people who do! You can't use Python or JavaScript to write a web browser, a kernel or anything where performance is paramount.

> c) the syntax is weird for people coming from the C language family

What ? Do you mean “ not coming from the C language family”? Because its syntax is clearly in the C-family (semicolon, braces).
Not familiar with the advice given in Cooks Illustrated over the last 20 years is it related to sport's illustrated where they show you cooks wearing swimsuits.

Brining if you can call it that is only step 2. Here's the steps they use to prepare.

https://gizmodo.com/this-is-how-kfc-actually-makes-their-fri...

Are those the steps Cooking illustrated gave you? Are you cooking your own kfc at home now?

You seem like the guy who went to the coke/pepsi taste test challenge and said they both taste the same.. they taste like 7up.