skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Three things I have found that help to cut down food waste (and times pent at the grocery store):

- Develop a notion of cadence: how much food could you get through in a given interval (3-7 days), and how will this be affected by visitors, eating out, and travel. This might seem obvious but it's not — a lot of people have a "stocking up" mentality — if I buy a lot now, I won't need to go to the store for a while--that leads to suboptimal nutrition, more trips to the store, or eating out more b/c the fridge is empty. Using a standardized interval makes it much easier to learn adjustments.

- Develop an inventory of "endgame" meals that are less perishable that you can always have on hand so you can maintain your cadence. Examples: Halloumi (grilling cheese, good for months), tacos (canned beans; refrigerated tortillas, cheese, peppers and onions are good for weeks), pasta (olive oil and parmesean). Things like charcuterie, esp smoked and jarred meats, and fermented foods were originally invented by peasants to last for a long time and they still have their use, whether you are peasant or not. By contrast, there are "opening" meals like fresh seafood, which really should be eaten on the same day as the trip to the grocery store.

- Have so many food-safe containers on hand that any leftovers get stored without a second thought. Then your endgame meals get pushed back.
The alternate naming of "libre software" exists though is not used too much.

From https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html

> “Free software” means software that respects users' freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. Thus, “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer”. We sometimes call it “libre software,” borrowing the French or Spanish word for “free” as in freedom, to show we do not mean the software is gratis.
One reason is that you don't have a bakery around the corner. If it takes more than 10 minutes to buy something, I'm probably not going to do it every day or two.

Another is that you consume significantly less than even a small loaf of bread. I haven't been to a bakery that will sell you individual slices of bread, or even parts of a loaf. Maybe this is different in other countries (I live in the US).
Did you mean this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arturo_Benedetti_Michelangeli

You linked to the main page!
They have proven not to be. Here you sign them and add phone number or email. An advanced state could copy my signature but they verify I am a voter so double voting would be detected.
The term for this in English is allotment [1]. Quite common in Europe, rare in the U.S.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotment_(gardening)
> What's more, over the course of his 55 years in the profession, he [lawyer Marc Moller] [has] learned that every plane crash can be traced back to a single, simple cause.

I don't know, that strikes me as nonsense. It's precisely the interplay of many factors that lead to an accident - and if any one of them had been different, the outcome might have been different. See Reason's "swiss cheese" model of accidents - all the holes have to line up [1].

How you can go and designate one of these holes the hole, the "single, simple cause" is beyond me. This doesn't do the complexity of engineering justice. Might help to win cases with juries, but I don't see how it could help to make flying safer.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_cheese_model
I tried to use FF, but Im really used to the Chrome experience. Brave is literally the same experience (maybe the only difference that I notice is the height of the tabs, which seems to be a little smaller than Chrome).
I dont use Chrome because generally I try to avoid Google products when possible.
Yeah, the regulatory incentives seem to be a substantial factor here.
Lean Canvas Editor Online
>all of the language in this article (until #8) is centered around you. You are supposed to take full responsibility for burnout. It is your choice. Your lack of self-management is causing your burnout.

Yes, this! My company seems to be halfway there: acknowledging that burnout is a problem, but then turning that into helpful advice (eat healthy, take breaks, go work out, etc) that is focused on the individual, ignoring cultural factors and the total amount of work that gets taken on and needs to be done by X people in Y time.
I've battled severe burnout after my first startup :( Almost 8 years down the road and numerous other startup fails now I believe teams can do a better job with burnout symptoms within colleagues [1]. Please be mindful for your buddies. They may not have the energy to pull out themselves \/

[1] https://medium.com/camplight/what-can-we-do-to-prevent-teams...
because those who won't use non-free systems haven't reached those magic 3% yet.
>That kind of stuff requires government action, as free markets reward the exploitation of externalities.

It's conceivable that the market could price in externalities too, possibly with government oversight.
Right. I mean it's basically that the distance here is defined quite strictly when it really depends on the individual.

I could be 200km from the nearest grocery store, and it'd just mean I need to stockpile a bit more, because as you say, assuming there are roads etc, I can jump in the car whenever and go there.

By contrast someone who's poor and severely disabled might feel they're in a 'desert' if the nearest store is 200m away and they can't walk.
The compatibility definition document for Android gets it pretty secure, but realistically the only secure Android devices are Pixels in my opinion.
The high pressure pre-distorts the lattice making it easier for cooper pairs to form. A cooper pair allows an electron to essiantly be in two places at once, which causes superconductivity:

An electron in a metal normally behaves as a free particle. The electron is repelled from other electrons due to their negative charge, but it also attracts the positive ions that make up the rigid lattice of the metal. This attraction distorts the ion lattice, moving the ions slightly toward the electron, increasing the positive charge density of the lattice in the vicinity. This positive charge can attract other electrons. At long distances, this attraction between electrons due to the displaced ions can overcome the electrons' repulsion due to their negative charge, and cause them to pair up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair
Well, actually, many do (edit: sell slices); that of course doesn't mean that I'd consider that a particularly convenient set-up.
but not cheese
I’m not a C++ developer but I know that it’s big in video games. Seems like that should make it easy to make a few portfolio pieces (i.e., just make clones of a few old games).

Edit: to clarify, this would just show that you know the syntax and can put a working program together. You don’t have to be looking for a game development job.
Also paper ballots make it possible to recount or verify something if the race was really close.
Yes, yes, the author probably is that obtuse.

Articles like this are part of a tendency among some people to think that by taking a contrary position they are somehow more insightful.

It's worth noting that Levandowski did not steal secrets and give them to a struggling startups - which is still wrong, but a lot more sympathetic.

He stole from one goliath and gave to another goliath - this behavior does not stimulate innovation.
2 researchers from the Brown university were able to reproduce the full, and never released GPT-2 model a couple of days ago. They wrote an amazing blog post and released the weights!! Here's the blog with all the details: https://medium.com/@vanya_cohen/opengpt-2-we-replicated-gpt-...

For those of you who don't know what GPT-2 is, here's the simplest & fastest way with a bit of humor: https://blog.floydhub.com/gpt2/
What can be sustained for a short effort is not sustainable over a longer haul.

High-intensity long-haul efforts can require months of recovery, or be permanently crippling.

The 100m world record is 9.58s. The world-record marathon pace, 17.2s/100m. The Race Across America 3,000 mile bike race record, a sustained speed of 12.57 mph, or 17.8s/100m.

The specific physiological mechanisms for physical and mental exhaustion differ, but the general principles are similar: metabolites, waste products, side-effects, and damage accumulate. Absent a period of rest and recovery, these will eventually prove damaging.

In sport training, there is a carefully calibrated set of activities and rest and recovery, ranging from in a given motion (power and recovery stroke in running, cycling, swimming, rowing, or virtually any other action), to exercises, efforts, sets, workouts, seasonal, and lifetime scheduling.

Speed, skill, and muscle aren't created on the track, in the pool, on the road or trail, or at the gym, they're created in bed, when you're asleep, during recovery, given adequate nutrition. Training is stress, but a stress that's calibrated to trigger a conditioning response.

If you don't get rest, you'll simply break down.
That might have been me: https://twitter.com/zekjur/status/1154934952477093888

> Oh, wow! Setting GOPROXY=https://proxy.golang.org results in a 7x speed up for module installation on the hotel WiFi: from 17.7s (no proxy) to 2.3s (http://proxy.golang.org)
> As to reliability--while in theory transit should be highly reliable, in practice it isn't.

In practice it is, just not in the US, which has a problem with chronic underinvestment in and incompetent management of transit infrastructure.

> As to time savings, transit commutes are significantly longer: https://www.geotab.com/time-to-commute. 30% of public transit commutes in NYC are over 1 hour, compared to just 10% of car commutes. 28% of car commutes are under 30 minutes, versus just 6% of transit commutes. In Dallas, a place without the geographic constraints of NYC, 57% of car commutes are under 30 minutes. People in Dallas are accruing tremendous time value savings by driving as compared to people taking transit in NYC.

Better transit improves commute times for both drivers and public transit riders, since people will switch from driving to taking the bus/train, which reduces congestion. More roads improves commute times for NEITHER drivers nor transit riders, since any temporary improvement in congestion will just cause people to drive more (switching from other modes of transport) until the roads are just as clogged as before. That's why investing in transit is generally superior to investing in roads, even if the current transit commute time is longer than the current average driving commute.

You are also making an apples-to-oranges comparison by comparing average car and transit commute times, since the two demographics are making _different_ commutes entirely. If everyone could get to work faster by driving why does only 22% of Manhattan own a car? It's certainly not because only 22% of the borough can afford a car; it's one of the richest cities in the entire country.

> The US has some of the fastest commutes in the OECD

You are completely misinterpreting that statistic. The US has fast commutes because a large fraction of the population lives in smaller metro areas, which have shorter commutes than large metro areas. It has nothing to do with everyone driving instead of taking the train. Fully half of Korea lives in Seoul metro, which has 25 million people, of course the average Korean commute is going to take forever. If EVERYONE in Seoul tried to drive to work, the average commute wouldn't go down to 48 minutes, it would go up to 300 since the roads would be permanently gridlocked.
You can also use the neural net between your ears
The fullPage.js model IMO is the best way to fund an open source project, if you’re not getting paid by an employer specifically to maintain that project. Make a free option available for copyleft-compatible cases, and then charge in cases where profit is involved.
The plane in question is the 737 Max, which is the renewed version of the 737 series that started production in 1968. The whole family of planes does not have fly-by-wire.
A 'stick in the mud'?
Just tested and this is not the case. In iOS 12 and iPad OS 13 it definitely works in the camera app launched from home screen.
One thing to note - the author did not provide true causation. His theory that HS sports are no longer providing outlets for low income families isn't tightly bound to the outcomes seen. There's a lot of correlation and not a lot of causation.
Can you really say that about Dan Abramov and Ken Wheeler though? Some of the nicest and most inclusive people in the community. I've seen them both engage people all at different points in their career and be encouraging and positive. They are allies in this case but they are being turned into enemies for no reason. This reminds me a lot of BLM verbally attacking Sanders when he was the only person in their corner at the time.
> RISC-V simplicity simply means less bugs

Fewer bugs in your code, or fewer bugs to encounter in the platform?

I've found that my bugs are usually processor-independent, and that most of the bugs in SOCs are not with the CPU cores, but the support components around them (e.g., DMA engines and timer registers with bizarre behavior).

Well . . . and cache coherency issues. But everyone has cache coherency bugs. :-)
I think, as a lawyer, he's using the phase a "simple cause" to mean "a singular responsibility, culpability, and liability."
It comes down to trust. You trust those who are in your group, and whom you believe will consistently act in the interests of your group.

Consequentialists are distrusted because they deliberately choose to disregard social group weighting and circles of loyalty in their moral decisions.

That's not to say that all consequentialist actions are disliked; only those that come at significant cost to your group (of any size - even 2).

The article says that people like a consequentialist political leader, but that's not entirely correct. They like a political leader who is consequentialist for entirely "in-group" decisions. The moment he prioritizes outside peoples welfare at a high cost to his own, no matter how much objective "good" it brings, he'll soon find himself out of office. A leader who is too deontologist with his in-group decisions will be seen as corrupt for helping out his cronies.

In fact, this whole "consequentialist vs deontologist" kind of misses the point. Deontologists ARE consequentialists for entirely in-group decisions, and that's how social creatures like it, and how evolution would have shaped social animals.

Trump's appeal comes in a large part due to his motto: "America First", even if it's at the cost of everything else.
It seems like articles like this from BBC suffer from memory loss here and attempt to attract towards the survivorship bias in the Fortnite/PUGP tornaments to convince you that you can get a better job when playing games and not even mention the health risks that comes with playing video games all day long.

> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-39232620

The Nintendo Switch is at least trying to improve how we play games (The Wii was a step in the right direction in terms of improving our health) but these tournaments are really just encouraging unhealthiness in sitting down for too long for a live-stream / tournament for the 'chance' to earn viewers or money.

So, I do not think that it is worth playing video games for e-sports all day to get you a better job even if money was involved (As tens of thousands of teams are competing anyway). I would either use video-games as for training / assessment or relaxing purposes but not to do full time. Perhaps a better skill would be building AI bots to play games and may the best AI win.

Nice try Beeb, but HN can detect bullshit articles like this in nano-seconds.
Yes, see also https://youtu.be/WDbbIS7m9bU?t=298 (sorry, slide deck not yet available it seems)
C++ is more stable and probably supports more architectures. But Rust is strictly better for security and correctness concerns.

However, I imagine it would be a huge undertaking to restructure Kernel code in a way that the rust compiler finds palatable.
Git Exercises: Navigate a Repository
if this is a state actor organized attack as the article implies then perhaps the target list would be very narrow and Apple wouldn't want to go into details. Or perhaps even they don't know who's infected.
The Long-Term Stock Exchange Raises $50M in New Funding
Got a link re: German law?
These are really great questions, thanks for asking!

1. Every transaction is stored in its original currency. The conversion to your primary currency happens on demand.

2. We fetch daily currency rates so it should more-or-less accurately reflect the market. We have gotten feature requests for exposing this and allowing manual override of currency rates. If this would be important to you, feel free to let us know and it'll get bumped up on the priority list!

3. You can feel free to change your primary currency at any time and as often as you want in the Settings tab. There is no risk as it will have no permanent effect on your transactions!

4. Bank transactions show up in the currency that the bank account is set to so if you transferred -US$100 to +CA$133 to a CAD bank account, it will show up as two transactions in their respective currencies. However, to your point, in the totals, the currency rate might fluctuate a bit and it might add -US$100 and +CA$133 up with a few cents discrepancy. This could be solvable if we allow manual override of currency rates.

5. When it comes to multi-currency monthly budgeting, we use the currency rate from the first of the month to normalize everything to your primary currency. You can set a budget in any currency. For example, you can budget 10000yen for restaurants, and in your budget summary, you will see US$93 expected spending.

Hope this makes sense and feel free to reach back out with any more questions.
There's some truth to this, but there's also truth in that low-income homes often use (free) school sports as a sort of after school day care for their kids. I know this to be true because I experienced it first hand.
They are probably not a utilitarian. They are probably suffering distorted deontology of an anti-self sort.

Pure consequentialism is computationally implausible. There are seven and a half billion humans. How can you consider them equally? How could you even have enough knowledge to try? I think that people who try to be consequentialist are emulating it and generally poorly.
Show HN: A cross platform COM interop library for .NET core
No, it's almost always roughly aligned with the axis of Earth's rotation. I believe that's because it's related to the rotation of the internal molten iron core.

Though every few million years, the north and south magnetic poles swap, for unclear reasons.
Where and how specifically does Jira build in stress and burnout metrics and avoidance mechanisms into its tools and techniques?

And when is it going to mandate a change of langauge in Scrum from "sprint" to some word vastly more reasonable in designating a staged, sustainable, work effort?

The English language is in dire need of an idiom connoting the fox advising the henhouse. This post lacks all credibility.
First off, the upper middle class has heard, a lot, that it is well to encourage children to play sports. They have heard that private middle schools and high schools look favorably on it, they've heard that selective colleges want well-rounded kids. So, willy-nilly the kids strap on shin guards in the fall and pick up bats in the spring.

Second, apart from a bit of intramural sports, I never really played an organized sport. But I was out playing driveway basketball or touch football on lawns an awful lot. No, it may not have been once a day, but it was frequent. And the kids of the less well off may be down at the playground a great deal shooting hoops or playing soccer.
1.5% of a big number is still a big number. Western Digital's revenue in 2018 was 18 billion. Even if only 0.15% of their revenue went to ARM, that would be 27M or enough to hire 100 chip designers at 270K each.

That would be enough people for a very advanced chip, but WD doesn't need to build the next supercomputer. Instead, they want a chip customized to handle their specific workload with high throughput and probably some specialized instructions to put some algorithms in hardware. Moreover, their RISCV chip design expense should reduce over time both because they don't need to change chip micro-architectures very often and because as more companies switch to shared, open hardware, the costs are reduced

Another example is Nvidia. They continue to hold an ARM license for several ARM designs and another license for their own custom Denver/Carmel designs. Despite this, they still opted to use RISCV in their GPUs.

These companies manufacture chip designs for a living. They certainly understand the costs involved and have determined the immediate and long-term costs are lower vs the provided benefits.
Registered with whom? How does one register their website like that?
Google+Microsoft+Facebook contribute quite a lot to open source though. React, Angular, TypeScript, Kubernetes, TensorFlow, etc etc....
BPF port-based firewall for systemd services
The bigger problem is if they're scammers they wont care about a do not call list.
Outside of "use something that is not multi-threaded" not.
I think this argument is quite facile. These people are scientists trying to understand superconductivity at a basic level, and this theoretical research (as well as the experimental results posted on this forum earlier this week) are a genuine advancement in that field. You are judging this research based on how it is directly applicable to making handheld devices with room temperature superconductors when that is not what these people are attempting to do at all. The fact that a superconducting state can be maintained at these temperatures at all is, indeed, "record shattering". We do not have the ability to simply engineer a material that can superconduct at ambient temperature and pressure at will. I don't mean to be to confrontational, but reading the comments on these articles it really pisses me off to see the hard work of actual scientists judged by the rubric of whatever science fiction garbage internet commenters think should be possible.
And if you're not a shy programmer who has shown schedules, estimates, timelines, and are also trying to prevent those you manage/mentor from being burntout? Or what if your direct manager actually agrees with you! But your combined arguments are being shot down for reasons of growth, culture, or they decide to change the metrics so when you do say no, your performance plummets and they now have more power in conversations? Yes, signs of a toxic culture. No, you cannot always just leave.

It's unsurprising to see comments that revert to pinning the blame back on the employee. That's how the narrative has been formed and controlled. It's also a product of the "self-made person" idea where you ultimately have all the control over where you end up in life.

As a side note - not everyone is speaking from the position of being a programmer. Burnout is affecting many other careers. This forum just happens to be tech centric, but I do hope that stereotypes and assumptions can be minimized.
Ever worst part is this

“they really do POST everything via HTTP (not HTTPS) and there is no asymmetric (or even symmetric) encryption applied to the data which is uploaded. Everything is in the clear. If you're connected to an unencrypted WiFi network this information is being broadcast to everyone around you, to your network operator and any intermediate network hops to the command and control server.”

So not only your photos, contacts, msgs are stollen but then they are sent to attacker on http so the data is logged probably on every router, modem and wifi sniffers.