skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The "most desirable society" is subjective.

Yes, I agree. That's basically why politics exists.

> Market failures are only made worse by government intervention.

This is a blanket statement that doesn't really make sense. There is no way to correct externalities without regulation, right? Genuine question, I am obviously not an economist. Government intervention distorts the market, which is desirable in some cases. This seems like a pretty uncontroversial statement. There would be a market for paid assassinations, but we've made that market "worse" by outlawing them. I feel like it's impossible to argue that the market is always "right".

> Unforeseen negative consequences distort the market which causes more problems.

Government intervention doesn't have to be unforeseen. Good regulations are announced in advance, and businesses are informed during the legislation process and given guidelines to adapt and comply.
Please do!

The more apps that politely say that IE11 isn't the right tool for browsing anymore, the quicker the user base will dry up.
I would like to add to the list software_reporter_tool.exe which spontaneously consumes 100% CPU on windows machines
I agree, you would definitely be going against canon there. They both clearly died, and a "prequel" to Reloaded would feature Neo and Trinity almost 20 years older than when Reloaded was filmed.

I would really hate for them both to have been miraculously "saved" for the sake of a sequel.

edit: If they decided to pull a Disney/Star Wars thing, just break canon, and pretend the original sequels never happened, I would be OK with that though. Although Neo's relationship with Smith was a central focal point of the story, not sure what they would do if Hugo Weaving weren't a part of it.
Your browsing history, as a rule, is not actually valuable in any meaningful sense. If it were, then your cost would then have to be an opportunity cost, the lost opportunity to sell which you didn't take. Except if that's the case, it's not the autocomplete that stopped you; you could sell your history still anyway, autocomplete or no.

Also, your aggregate value argument is quite apt: It's valuable to know what percentage of a city speaks English, but the fact that you personally do or don't is of no real value at all, specifically because it's "your" individual data, not despite the fact. And insisting that you've been hypothetically robbed of your entitled half penny for disclosing your language preference to the McDonalds cashier is precisely as sensible as complaining about the value of your half-typed URLs.
I always try to keep in mind that having any strategy at all, even if it's not the actual best strategy, is usually good enough. So while yes, a lot of the advice you get is bullshit specifically, generally following some system is almost always better than not following any system at all.

This is also something I try to remember when making a tough decision; how substantial is the difference going to be, actually? Usually it's not anywhere near as substantial/irreversible as I thought.

I've stopped fighting a great many work battles for this same reason, as well.
At least it's not a freakin' reboot.
It's not like Neil Young can hear it anyway. Dude has had tinnitus for decades, and there's no way he doesn't have major noise-induced hearing loss from standing in front of those cranked Fender Deluxes for all those years.

From https://www.audiologyonline.com/releases/by-time-we-got-to-3...: "It was guitarist Neil Young who suggested Stills try a new modern-design, behind-the-ear hearing solution called Dual."
I'm unsure.

A significant quantity of stuff sold with the Kirkland label is just whitelabeled, with varying degrees of hidden-ness. Their recent beer for instance is labeled Kirkland up top, but also have the company (Hopf Malz something), and it's a pretty trivial amount of digging to get to the underlying Gordon Biersch.

I don't know where you draw the line though

* white labeled but not really because it's still got the original name on it

* white labeled without the original name

* self produced

Probably you could get finer grained than that too.

So it's entirely possible that you could pass a law banning large chains from doing whitelabeling, but actually you'd still get the same stuff on the shelves with their original labels and it'd be fine.

Or it's possible you could pass a law banning chains from selling their own produced stuff, but still have whitelabeled "house brand" be ok. But then if you were equitable about that in online space, - amazon couldn't sell fire phones or echo dot alexa things, but they could sell an "amazon choice" if it's just whitelabeled. So idk.
> Also, without some additional measures, neither plain arrays or vectors support referencing individual objects.

Uh, isn't this just subscripting?

> But, as stated above, we don’t care about the order.

Maybe std::unordered_set might be what you want?
In the US, a lot will depend on the price point.
GP's points still stand, if coming from the perspective that Google is a successful, multinational corporation, with a reputation to protect, and staffed with thousands of engineers who also have their own job standards and individual reputation to protect.
Unless you can show healthy engagement clicks more ads than unhealthy engagement the people who pay the bills won't care what kind of engagement you have.
I'm in the same boat. And Mercurial support was the key differentiator for me, I'll probably convert the repos to git (hg is almost sure to die after this) and move to GitHub in the process, including the git repos I have on Bitbucket.
I suppose, in my experience, the amount of code you need to write to get all that stuff to happen without manual intervention is usually much greater and more complex than just creating a couple instances and ansibling your code onto them. The "you don't have to manage infra!" wave is technically true, but it's not that you have to manage less, just what you manage is different.
Didn't they do a number of short-pieces in various styles in Animatrix? That was interesting enough (for at least some of them, and a few tied into the video game "Enter the Matrix"). I don't know why they would extend the franchise to a major sequel after killing or neutering all of the main characters.

It reminds me of the Spider-Man 4 news I just heard, with the 44 year old Toby McGuire, because Disney and Sony couldn't come to terms on the MCU license rights.

Maybe everyone should think about developing new content. This is starting to get tiring. (Although I did enjoy Abrams' first Star Trek reboot).
The 16th Amendment doesn't prohibit anything; it only allows things.

You could argue that the preceding parts of the constitution prohibit a wealth tax, though, and that the 16th doesn't carve out space for one.
That's what email rules are for. If there is a long email chain and I am not directly @mentioned in the body of the email, it automatically gets filtered away into a separate folder and stays unread there, while my inbox stays clean and up to date.

If my participation is actually needed in the thread, I will be inevitably @mentioned by someone, and the email stays in my main inbox folder.
Gaaaah!! Perhaps there aren't many of us out there, but I've only seen the first film. The sentence would've been just fine without the spoiler. But perhaps I should thank you instead; you've just saved me several hours of viewing ;-)
The Wikipedia article is far better, even though National Geographic has done all the work:

“Genome-wide DNA study of skeletons from Roopkund by Harney et al. 2018 revealed that the skeletons belonged to two distinct groups; one group is composed of individuals with broadly South-Asian related ancestry from 9th CE, and the second group is composed of individuals from 200 years ago with genetic affinity with east mediterraneans”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roopkund
It’s also never a convenient time to buy a new physical server and set it up in a colo facility while managing DR. Especially when your bread and butter is a CRUD app.
> Why is it better?

Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but being remote does not exclude having face to face meetings. There is (finally) easy and reliable technology that facilitates that very thing.

Highly diverse timezones can be a problem, but I've never know anybody working remotely to resist attending a relatively rare video conference call in order to quickly hash something out.
The point is that plenty of companies did all the things the advice tells them to do and still failed.
Please don't ruin it with forced SJW crap. Don't touch my childhood.
You asked the question as if the answer were complicated. It's not complicated: Prices would rise across the board. It would suck, and suck most for the most financially vulnerable, but the answer is still the answer.
It is also thing with many if not all dictatorships go very "local optimized" PR even if it makes them look like completely delusional idiots internationally to those outside their target audience.
I too am quite skeptical, but I do try to find the "best practices" contents in areas where I am new. I find these articles often provide some insight from the perspective of someone who actually has experience (extra credit if he/she is part of a team), and even if I eventually change my practices as I learn more, I start down a good, if not perfect, path. In short, it speeds up my learning process.
You know, there might be more to that than meets the eye. If you are adding batteries to the trailer you might as well add a pair of electric motors and make it almost self propelled (like a multiple unit train). It would avoid needing to make the tow car overpowered.
> Why??????

Moooooooney.
Most scientists work on topics that are quite niche. Most of those topics lead to nothing. A lot of good research took years to ripen enough to be of actual value. A lot of popular topics started out in a niche. Most of mathematics took dozens of years to fully come to fruitition. Can you decide beforehand which one will be the next big thing?

Today, most scientists go for the popular topics and whatever is on the government research plan to get funding.* Whenever the wind changes direction they change their topics because they need that funding.

*: This might seem to contradict with the statement that most scientists work on nice topics. But only on the surface. In order to get published you have to do something novel. So, you choose a popular topic and then research a rather unpopular side aspect on it like how a specific chemical behaves when applied to the popular topic. If you're successful you publish and continue. Citations come later or they don't but the next round of funding comes with publishing. After a few years without many citations you move on to the next thing.

On government plans often you need to publish and then it's done. The citations only matter long-term if at all. Most scientists don't achieve anything of greater value. They are happy if they can publish at all. If the institute has a few scientists with a high citation count it carries all the rest of them.
Sourcehut Q2 2019 financial report
Totally agree.

The big outs I can think of are: (a) prequel and (b) there are other reasons to appear rather than being alive.

One potentially interesting idea: what if machines OR humans tried to revive Neo or Trinity, a la something like the "partials" of some people (especially Korzenowski) in Greg Bear's _Eternity_, or the Dixie Flatline in Gibson's _Neuromancer_?
There's no immediate mention of this on the site, but -- why did they select the package formats that they did?

I'd love to be able to host wheels for my python projects, or {rpm, deb, flatpack, etc...} for effectively arbitrary code. Is that in the works?
The line between "own produced" and "whitelabed" is also tricky (or maybe it's not, if you're an expert in the industry). Is it "own produced" even if it's by a contract manufacturer, as long as that particular product isn't produced for anyone else? Large retailers demand unique models of things like electronics to prevent comparison shopping/price matching.
It's easier to audit low income folks. They have simple forms and simple evidence. Generally they can be done via machine [here is the source: https://www.marketplace.org/2019/04/15/study-where-irs-audit...]

Whereas rich people have complicated forms, requiring more man-hours and actual human eyeballs to get involved.

That's why it happens. Not sure why you disagree, these are facts.
Here’s a real life example from grad school:

Professor (who has already landed a position at another school and is negotiating a faculty position for his wife): “You’re going to have to work much harder than you have at any point up until now”

Me (tired of the hot and cold and turning to face him): Ok, we’re going to be taking this one week at a time here, alright?

Third professor in the room of Russian origin who is a co-advisor: ???

Unstated messages:

Him: I’m checked out. Fuck this.

Me: I gathered. Fuck you.

Russian origin prof: WTF?
> People do a lot of things that actively harmful to themselves and others -- my argument is that purposely acquiring karma, for the sole reason of increasing one's score, could very well be one of those things.

You are making a random and unsubstantiated claim that acquiring karma is somehow "harming" the person acquiring it. Onus is on you to backup your claim.

Why would one assume that its obviously true.

> That's begging the question

I would say your point is this.

"Begging the question is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion"
>>Trinity and Neo both die for the cause, the ending feels meaningful and powerful. And now...they are back?

Their physical bodies died. This is a world where strong AI and beyond has been achieved. The AI machines are basically immortal. You could easily create a plot where the machines scanned and digitized their consciousness.

Given that the machines know how to connect a body to a VR environment they probably already know how to digitize the human brain. They probably learned how to do it when they were doing experiments on human beings to find their weaknesses.

Remember that there are multiple competing AI agents. It could have been one of those AI agents sympathetic to the humans that brought them back.
> Watching Netflix via a surveillance device or watching VHS rips of old shows is a false dichotomy

My wife does not care about "how" or "why". She wants to have a show from Netflix on our TV downstairs with one to two clicks. I want her to be happy because happy wife means happy life.

"Free" + unhappy wife < non-"free" + happy wife.

FSF's obsession with 100% "free" got us Hurd which in 2019 looks like it is from 1994.
Isn't the price tag pretty amazing too?
That's why you need some sort of productivity journal.

Show that you were completing X number of tasks per month, and after a couple months show them that your productivity is down 10-20% in terms of tasks completed.

Make it extremely easy to present, and if your Manager agrees to work with you on it, make it look like the work to compile this report was all theirs. In other words make them look good and do their job for them.

My FAVORITE EXAMPLE in the road map for Star Citizen. That game's development is at an agonizingly slow pace, but if you were the Manager who put together their roadmap it would be instant promotion. It's goddamn BEAUTIFUL. And their is no way the team could be fucking up if the Roadmap looks this good.

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/roadmap/board/1-Star-Citi...
Write a Sales Email Without Sounding Salesy
The difference is the prior.

There's strong prior reason to believe not paying payroll tax is not going to end well. The theoretical basis is simple, clear, well-reasoned, and supported by strong evidence in adjacent realms (i.e. the IRS takes taxes taxes pretty seriously).

Whereas the prior on the validity of something like "early-stage founders should live with their customers" is much weaker.

Even though the advice for each presented example is based on sample size n=1, the resulting belief can and should be quite different depending on your prior.

The real meta-advice is to be able to understand and evaluate your prior for any given piece of advice you receive. This mostly comes down to thinking rationally, being knowledgeable, and critically considering each piece of advice for whether it's worth heeding or not.

Which is not so far from the author's message I think ("figure everything out yourself", "I don't mean to say don't take any advice").

(Obligatory shout-out to Bayes Theorem)
Not sure how 20-year-older Neo and Trinity would work with canon, but I'd welcome a reboot if Wachowskis are allowed full creative control. WB wanting more action was a big part of what killed the quality of the original sequels.
So how do you know we're not at the point of diminishing returns?
I do like JS, served as VanillaJS.
Ground heat pumps are common here where there is large temperature variation. They are a more expensive investment but much more efficient.
The local majority.
The movies are old enough to drive... Spoiler warnings have long expired!
The lack of "the" makes this read a bit weirdly:

>GitHub Package Registry allows you to develop your code and host your packages in one place. You can use packages from GitHub Package Registry as a dependency in your source code on GitHub.

"Package registry" is a fairly generic term, so to me it would be natural to refer to this product as "the Github package registry" (capitalized or not).

Is there a name for deliberately avoiding "the" in this way?
Your friends have your friendship to protect, right? If multinational corporations have your interests at heart more reliably than your friends then maybe it's time to meet new people!
Any plans for a behind-the-app / how-it-works sort of blog post?
python, because solving basic number issues is still fun as of 2019
I think Red Hat isolates the Red Hat Linux development from CentOS to better differentiate it to their corporate customers. Basically they post the source packages and the CentOS team does their own thing.
I've wondered before if there could be a well defined set of numbers between the integers and reals (perhaps with its own class of infinite set) that nicely excludes the uncomputables. If there is, I suspect that it might be what the universe is actually using and if I was going to go looking for it, I'd follow the breadcrumbs from umbral moonshine and go sniffing around the monster group.
- Gov't enforces price controls on basic goods (eg. gasoline)

= Nobody delivers gasoline into high-risk areas. Shortages persist.

- Prices allowed to float higher on shortages

= Lines of trucks can be observed from *orbit*, attempting to enter the area to supply the demand; prices drop almost immediately.

Which would you prefer?
I'm sure that strategy of "simply not paying" works great, right up until the day it doesn't and you find yourself facing huge fines and prison.
I strongly suspect there will be CG de-aging of the two main cast members. The rumors are indicating that another actor may be cast as a younger Morpheus, so it could be a prequel.
MoviePass exposed thousands of unencrypted customer card numbers
I have a washer-dryer. :-)
I don't think "bulldozer done right" is the correct way to describe POWER9.

I see it more as a single big massively wide OoO core with 23 execution units (putting skylake's 10 execution units to shame). The slices are more there for design reasons, to simplify the design process by making it more symmetrical.

Bulldozer is clearly two integer cores sharing some execution units between them, a thread can only exist on one of the two integer units.

In contrast, a thread on POWER9 can simultaneously use all 4 slices, all 23 execution units. The dispatcher can dynamically mix and match which slice it's sending a threads instruction steam to based on slice utilization.

That single difference puts it in a complete different class of CPU architecture to bulldozer.
> The article says only 16% can hold a fulltime job

That’s 16% of those diagnosed with ASD. For one, the vast majority of the current workforce came of age before the DSM reclassified autism as a spectrum disorder. So many of those with milder symptoms who sought out therapy as kids could easily go undiagnosed. I know this personally as someone diagnosed as an adult who grew up as a child of a psychologist and was sent to multiple therapists. I’m perfectly capable of maintaining a career and wouldn’t have even thought to seek out a diagnosis as an adult had I not had a conversation with my mom about the reclassification.

Having worked in tech, I can tell you there’s a huge group of undiagnosed ASD workers like me who are quite able to hold down a job and excel but still exhibit milder symptoms of the disorder.
This sounds like an invitation to AI consumers, Douglas Adams talked about clones to buy things culminating in the shoe event horizon.

However connect up some AI’s with bitcoin and a penchant for personalising their avatar funded by web extortion and you’ve got something which is far more buzzword compliant.
marketing?
GraalVM 19.2: New Tools
Alternatively you are projecting a whole lot ;). I am saying how I have used it.

Maybe it won't be fun stuff. That is why I ask. But the reason I do ask, is because I believe it may be and an opportunity for skill progression.
Show HN: Dashboard – self-hosted accounts, orgs and subscriptions for web apps
What? These are perfectly valid questions to be asking and do not inherently stop you from researching what you're working on.

I know some scientists that define their research direction by asking these questions first before pursuing an idea. Many great inventions like optogenetics or expansion microscopy came from this investigative strategy. It can help keep your resources and energy in check.
The Data Model for Data Programming
Audit based on size of underreporting? That's like saying only buy winning lottery tickets. You don't know how accurate a tax filing is up front; that's why there are audits.
That's actually a pretty great video. The tldw version: advice on how to buy more lottery tickets is useful; advice on how to win the lottery is not.
I am dubious. Jupiter Ascensing and Cloud Atlas were...not good films.
>I'd naively consider a keylogger to be software that captures your keypresses universally.

On Windows asking for a handler for all key presses will often trigger the antivirus, while asking for a single application often will not.
There are times when a face to face sorts out problems like nothing else, but there are a lot of people who value face-to-face over all else who are using those situations in bad faith. They know some social engineering tricks and they use little meetings as a stopgap for big deficiencies in other areas.

Developers are smart. You might con them into a bad idea in that 15 minute meeting, but someday they'll figure out they've been had. Most won't take it lying down.

In my experience, and talking to my peers, engineers don't come straight at you when they feel slighted. Especially if you're a big talker. They may not even gloat when they feel that the odds have been evened up. Not all 'bad luck' in companies is just bad luck. Some of it is work stoppage or malicious compliance by someone with a grievance who doesn't enjoy confrontation.
Volcker Rule Trading Revamp Approved in Win for Wall Street
I will always upvote any reference to this paper. It is a precious nugget of sanity in the riverbed of nonsense.
Batching Data by Timelabels in Data Programming
While this article points the elephant in the room, some of these countries never had free speech.
No I'm talking about at the individual stations. There are hand or battery operated pumps that could easily fuel trucks for refueling places like cell towers or other critical places with generators.
There is such a distinction to be made.

However I personally found it very helpful in real analysis to be able to take any question about the reals back to how it relates to this construction. This greatly helped my intuition.