skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Personally I would not say anything of substance at an exit interview. And I know many people wouldn't either.

Maybe wait until 2 weeks after the person has left and invite him or her out for a beer or a coffee and then have an informal chat.
“Trunz, who earlier today resigned from his position as an executive director at J.P. Morgan, said he “learned to spoof from more senior traders, and spoofed with the knowledge and consent of his supervisors,” according to the Department of Justice.”

Seems like a systemic issue and this guy is just a little fish in the sea
I hate to say this, but this whole piece just reeks of reactionary postmodern celebration of a lone, absurdist contrarian. I stopped reading when the author doled out the painful phrase “It must mean something that only 12 humans have walked, laughed, and even danced on the lunar surface, and all were white men”. Beg your pardon? It certainly doesn’t need to mean anything beyond that we collectively abandoned our ambitions before the modern drive for equality kicked in – and that means that the moonshot was a throughly modern, as opposed to societally self-absorbed post-modern enterprise. Trotting out a theologian, if the Catholic vein who allegedly believed in a personal and very much masculine God in the Judeo-Christian tradition and using his words as an excuse to segue into this kind of tacked-on, post-hock drivel is nigh unforgivable.

Should’ve people of other races and genders walked on the moon too? Certainly. Because we shouldn’t have stopped going there once the symbolic victory was attained. But to disparage the achievement by draping it in the cultural terms of our time is just... hideous revisionism.

I’m beside myself with contempt for the author and the editor. Stuff your revisionism and woke virtue-signalling where the sun doesn’t shine and at the awkwardest angle you can devise.
Example:

1) Spoofer places an offer to sell a small amount at a high price.

2) Spoofer places a bid to buy a huge amount at a lower price.

3) The huge order to buy makes other buyers think the price is about to increase significantly, so they immediately buy at the Spoofer's higher price even though they would otherwise prefer to wait for a lower one.

4) Spoofer immediately cancels their large order to buy before anyone takes it.

5) Spoofer waits awhile and then goes back to 1), but reverses the buy/sell orders so they can capture an illicit profit.
I download entire seasons of TV series with my Android Netflix client all the time. It's fantastic for travel.
Watch Car Thieves Steal a Tesla Model S in Under 30 Seconds Using a Relay Device
Information is not equally likely to be valid regardless of the source it came from.

This is the curse of being an expert (on anything) and engaging with kooks who think they are experts because they read something on the internet.

If you had direct experiences and you share them, those shouldn't be ridiculed, but if you pass on information that is not from your direct experience and which people who have direct experience believe to be false... that's also, as you say, "not a good look".
Wouldn't this just mean that we happen to be in a young universe?
Unearthing a masterpiece: a rare Minoan sealstone (2017)
Somehow I managed to keep most of the code I wrote in TP7 as a kid (mid-nineties - I wasn't very up to date). It's stored safely in Cloud backup today having survived on a single 3.5" disk for many years prior to that.

Sometimes I like to fire up some of the stuff I wrote back then or even just look over the code. Brings back memories of the thrill of getting some of those ideas working for the first time.
> but often it is simply used get the employee to sign a waiver relieving to company of any legal blame

Why would anyone sign anything when leaving a job?
Or die broke because you gave everything away before you bit the dust.
> Just a blanket fearmongering piece

Nailed it.
This is a startup community, and there’s frequently a focus on having diverse revenue streams so as to offer financial stability. Suddenly a YouTuber who has 15,000 followers does it, and they’re a horrible person? That’s literally what you’re saying.
'Relay Hack' Lets Thieves Steal Cars Using $22 of Electronics
You are mistaken because you do not know the scriptures or the power of God. Christ spoke many times about baptism, even in the very final climax of the Gospel of Matthew.

Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey all that I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age." (Matthew 28:18-20)
>More specifically, spoofing tricks others into thinking that their transaction costs will be higher or lower than reality.

How so? If you want to market buy 100 shares at time t and the "spoofed" limit order is up at time t, you will buy into the spoofed order. Only if the spoofer somehow has knowledge of your intention to buy at time t and quickly pulls the rug from under your feet at time t-t1, where t1 would have to be an unrealistically small amount of time, can they mess with you. So clearly this argument against spoofing, i.e. that it's creating a false sense of liquidity, doesn't work in an environment when the quote can flicker dozens of time per millisecond.

It's more likely that spoofing is used to, say, protect a margin position from liquidation by flashing a wall above/below it hoping to scare away other market participants. In which case it shows the latter don't really mean their move to begin with, or that they are merely trading to squeeze gains on short timeframe, which has hardly anything to do with "facilitating the efficient exchange of assets".
> so does the administration have the right to moderate a campus newspaper.

Nobody disputes that. At the end of the day, the university has the right to do as it wishes with its college newspaper. It can discipline or threaten student reporters, it can close the paper, it can do as it likes.

In my mind, the issue is: should universities exercise those legal rights? Would it be right, according to the standards they claim to uphold?

Liebson was reporting on a faculty senate meeting. Since I've served on my own university's faculty senate, I can tell you what they're like: they're boring, there are lots of people there (who usually aren't paying close attention), the doors will be unlocked and no one is paying attention to who is going in or out. In other words, what Liebson learned was more or less public information.

Now, to Stony Brook's credit, it doesn't seem like they went nuclear. Someone in charge of PR tried to silence her, but failed, and apparently didn't follow up in any serious way. Indeed, Liebson reported not only on the senate meeting, but also on her own experience with Stony Brook's PR:

https://www.sbstatesman.com/2019/04/28/ive-spent-the-past-fo...

They could have coerced her silence, and didn't. (It may be that Media Relations tried, and didn't get the backing of others in the university.) So hats off to them -- at least in part.

I apologize for being so negative. But, at the end of the day, I confess to having very little sympathy for universities fretting so much about "liability and risk". A lawsuit is very unlikely, and if one does occur, then Stony Brook has a nine figure endowment in the bank. (And big university lawsuits generally involve grossly unethical and/or wantonly stupid behavior on the part of somebody powerful. The recent Oberlin lawsuits, as well as the Sandusky and Nassar cases, seem to be representative examples.)

Stony Brook runs a journalism school. They should have the courage to allow their students to practice journalism.
This statement is in response to the broad claim of inconsistencies in the accounts. If anyone needs to elaborate, it is the original claimant.

Is there a claimed inconsistency you would seek to have explained?
> Continue Reading This Article Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including E-Guides, news, tips and more.
> Enter corporate e-mail address.

What an especially annoying piece of reading filter.

https://outline.com/antxj9
I may take your comment wrong, but i feel like everybody’s becoming a bit hysterical regarding climate warming. I feel like media are surfing on population fears ( as usual) but that for some reason, the scientific minds are completely unable to take a step back, and keep their cool.

Why do you think a small percentage increase on natural forest fires happening every year or so will have any kind of meaningful worldwide effect on temperature ?
Plan to build things to fend off conservationists.

And the data of increased deforestation is official. And increased deregulation.

And any of these articles sources are more reputable than you insisting that there is no proof of deforestation.

Amazon rainforest destruction increases rapidly as Brazil’s far-right president Jair Bolsonaro slashes protections
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rai...

Besides a news articles is what I am whiling look for, you can demand whatever you want. You wouldn't even understand an official document. That's why we have journalists, to investigate.
But if you have the time you can google them yourself or follow the sources in the articles.
That assumes that for a "thought/cycle" to occur, information would have to traverse the system from corner to corner. It is possible, that most thoughts can come about in localized areas independently.
I think its unfair that the source of these gross profits is due to limiting supply to the market and avoiding as much tax burden as possible. Fair would be if anyone could build anything anywhere however high and were taxed according to todays value. Real estate is not a free market, demand is massive and building supply is continually opposed to keep prices high.
Free != $6.99/month
You could pool resources, and start with smaller investments.

Personally I don't believe it is really so easy. But that is the narrative of the leeching landlords.
Clearly all it needs is a blockchain component to succeed.
This article reminded me of Napoleon, who was a smarter and wiser man than most anglophones give him credit for;

> There is no such thing as an absolute despotism; it is only relative. A man cannot wholly free himself from obligation to his fellows. A sultan who cut off heads from caprice, would quickly lose his own in the same way. Excesses tend to check themselves by reason of their own violence. What the ocean gains in one place it loses in another.

The part that sticks out for me is, "A man cannot wholly free himself from obligation to his fellows." It's a simple statement, a simpler lesson, but a profound statement that we've forgotten. Society wouldn't exist if it weren't for the consent of those around us. Society wouldn't exist without the agreement of those with us. Society is in its essence a bond and a privilege - it gives us the permission to do more and ask for more by the virtue of its existence. We have mutually agreed to not rape and kill each other for scraps, but to let each other do their own thing unless it hurts others (or abrogates their contract with one another).

That's why taxes exist. For me, they're the subscription fee for civilization. There has never been a civilization that hasn't had some form of governemnt. There has never been a civilization that has acted and organized purely on "self interest." Someone has to dig the ditches, run the sewer lines, lay the roads, and stop people with a crowbar from coming into your house and killing you in your bed. Someone has to pay the fee that allows the contract to exist.

Each time this covenant has been breached, it has been met with a short and bloody end. No despot has ever been absolute. Stalin couldn't get out of bed without fearing a gun to his head - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#Assassination_and... . Pol Pot might have met an ignominious end - https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/jan/21/cambodia https://web.archive.org/web/20110918095455/http://articles.c... . And Hitler died alone after putting a gun to his head.

If they couldn't rid themselves of their obligations, how can we?
I take issue with the fact that your map of reality is precisely what causes people to slip through the cracks into homelessness. Thinking about the issue as a sickness is actually just an avoidance of the problem. You are trying to reduce and abstract it away to the domain of medicine rather than to address it head on as a complex system of systems.
I knew I was gonna find this here.
Imagine being thousands of miles away for earth floating in the space at 10000 m/h speed , witnessing endless darkness of space, witnessing biggest mystery of life...and still being worried about financial situation back on earth.

Human mind is funny.
> Most modern vaping devices use coils made of 316 grade stainless steel

No they don't.

SS316 is an option, but not the most common. NI200 is still by far the most common coil material.
My suggestion:

- use Clubhouse.io.

- If you have no choice but to use Jira - use go-jira (Jira CLI tool).

You are a programmer, dealing with Jira is only a part of your job. Reduce the frustration, don't let it become your [main] job.
But wouldn't that be more of a loosely connected and mostly independent set of localized "brains", as opposed to some sort of "galactic brain"?
You state the problem yourself

> [...] you just have to spend a little bit of time learning them

I can still remember the many times I tried to learn shell scripting and gave up too quickly. So 'little bit of time' might be an understatement. Actually, you need a good use-case, sufficient motivation and enough time at hand to bite through the first problems...

And show me a serious, modern programming language that is so susceptible to whitespace usage. Yes, there are some that care about whitespace (e.g. Python), but rarely it will cause a syntax error to not place a space before a bracket.

Another problem is that those text formats are a bit brittle. I am talking about having to use IFS="" and ls giving back something different to humans than to pipes. Most of the time you can solve it one way or the other but having to search frequently for solutions to such problems just sucks.

I am not saying that the old tools aren't worth learning. In fact, I love writing shell scripts (for the good parts) and can't remember the last day I haven't used a shell. But saying there are no problems to be solved is just wrong. So I think a little discussion about what could be done and some prototyping shouldn't hurt anybody.
Video is still pretty constrained by bandwidth. I still have songs buffer at times. So I wouldn't even say our current media isn't constrained. Additionally we'll probably see new uses for that bandwidth, just the same way we have found new uses in the past and every people again said we already have enough. That notion is ridiculous.

We can already guess at some use cases. AR, VR, or other types of environment simulation. Data processing for vehicles: cars, trucks, drones. And I'm sure that people will figure out more things they can do. But the notion of "there isn't anything else" so why do we need more, is like saying 640K is all you'll ever need (I know he didn't actually say that, but the myth stands)
dupe [0] from two days ago that doesn't contain a discussion but links to the actual paper [1]:

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20770214

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-11786-6
For money. Companies will withhold severance and/or extra healthcare pay.

In fact from a contract law perspective you have to exchange consideration for an agreement.
The population density in London is an order of magnitude higher than in Denver. That has an obvious impact on air congestion, which is one of the primary limiting factors on cellular network performance.
If it is a perfect system, again, why doesn't everybody do it? Just because of the property taxes?

Everybody is free to buy land, no?

Also I don't think people can just ask for arbitrarily high rents wherever they want. It is a gamble to buy in a location where rents will rise.

People then only see the winners and not the losers and get envious.

Take some risks of your own, then complain.
Damore didn't say that, but that didn't stop lots of people lying about what he wrote.

I guess those few of us who actually read his memo will have to keep repeating this over and over against the wall of lying about it, but one more time - Damore argued women were less interested in computing, and that's why they are "underrepresented". He explained why they might be less interested and showed that this isn't controversial at all, neither with scientists nor anyone who ever tried to interest a pretty girl in the merits of AVX512.

He explicitly didn't argue women were worse at computing though. He said that very clearly.

You ask what liberal opinions get you fired at Google. I'd also like to know that. Here is a petition by nearly 1500 of them which claims border control is comparable to the Holocaust. That's unbelievably extreme, but apparently nobody was fired for it.

https://medium.com/@no.gcp.for.cbp/google-must-stand-against...
Don't worry about it. This is a natural response to wrongness. You're not a bad person for wanting to help others see truths. Just don't forget that you're often wrong, too.
I've had bed bugs in my apartment from library books too unfortunately. I'm not sure if there is an easy solution for public spaces - especially libraries where you have air conditioning, electricity, washroom facilities, and comfortable areas to sit and read.
It seems the cap is not a universal constant - my cap with Comcast is actually 1024GB. I honestly thought 1024GB was enough that I'd never actually get very close to it, but wow, I don't have a single month under 200GB. In fact, most months are above 500GB for me.

Of course not everyone uses 500GB a month. But still, I think the data cap story has to change if 5G is really to compete with other last mile options.

Also, Today, wireless providers segment the crap out of their market, upcharging for basically anything, including "tethering." With Comcast, for all of their many faults, I can at least use my own modem, connect my NAS and have it accept connections from the open Internet, and of course connect a boatload of computers and network devices with no problems. Wireless providers, to gain parity, would have to suddenly cede control and offer plans that essentially offer no restrictions with dedicated IP addresses. It isn't clear to me that this will be priced any differently from existing last-mile providers. It's not like good wireless plans are cheap today in the U.S. as it is.

5G may in fact improve wireless speeds, but the hype has been that it will be game-changing and industry-shifting and I just don't see it. I'm sure the market will get segmented up such that many people will basically pay the same amount or possibly even more than they did for effectively the same outcome.
By design, 5G uses many more and smaller antennas, so it solves exactly the problem you are pointing at.
How is this any better than Google Forms, or Glassdoor?

Are employees answers anonymous?

If yes: How do you deal with employees not trusting your word on this? Especially given that, since it's an app, people would presumably need to install it on their own devices?

If no: How do you incentivize employees to give honest (both truthful and complete) answers?

Do you have any answer to the scenario where management ignores any feedback?

Do you give provide any analytics to employees that anyone is actually reading and acting on the feedback, or is this another one-way street?

I'm skeptical - I don't think this is a problem that can be solved by an app -, but I wish you luck. In the unlikely case that you succeed it'll be great.
You've provided no additional insight and answered none of the questions you quoted. Your reply is at best dismissive of the questions raised by the poster you replied to. You've complained elsewhere about the replies in this post, but yours here sets no example.
How about instead of wondering how to evict the homeless you tackle the issue of homelessness. This is far from a hard problem to solve with a bit of wealth redistribution.
Good question. The state of js survey was self-selected, with 20.2k responses. The data is available if you’re interested. The npm survey, on the other hand, was sent to 800k registered npm users and received 33.4k responses, and also found 46% TypeScript usage. I imagine there is significant selection bias in a number of ways. And, while the state of js survey found 46% “have used ts and want to use it again”, the npm survey did not ask about preference. Still, a decent number of responses that I think is pretty interesting, regardless of your own preferences!
Even though the companies are required to pay you out your last check and unused PTO, many HR departments will hold the envelope with the check in front of them and give you the paper to sign. They will not use words, because that will be illegal, but they will let you think that if you don't sign you don't get the money. It's up to you to know that you don't need to sign to get your money.
At will doesn't mean you can test out more employees. It means you don't have to pay anyone any pay when you let them go.

It has side-effects. A worker will bolt at the first better opportunity or when your company looks like they are in trouble because they have to. It also raises wages as people changes jobs more often.
Fancy new names is basically the antithesis of Fowler's approach (it's driving shared language/canonical definitions).

And personally in the mid-2000s I found Fowler's material to, contrary to your assertions/experience, actually be a source of simplicity (by at least explaining pros/cons/alternatives in a comprehensive/vendor/platform agnostic manner) vs the other "just run this huge EJB server, np!" approaches there were mainstream at the time (and personally who I think would be a better target of your ire than Fowler and ThoughtWorks).
In this case I really think it mattered more that a bunch of people who didn't see the film had preconceived notions about it and took it upon themselves to make a stink. Certainly that could happen in the Muslim world as well, as happened with the Satanic Verses. But that didn't have to happen (although it might have been good for publicity).
Do you have a source?

Counter:

https://www.army.mil/article/109852/drowning_doesnt_look_lik...
Can we convince these people that sound is phononic RADIATION and they should therefore stop talking?
Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Truth_About_Hansel_and_Gre...

The book is still available on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Die-Wahrheit-über-Hänsel-Gretel/dp/34... (and the movie listed on IMDb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093684/)

Wish I could read German; seems fun!