skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
All that you’ve said resonates with my experience, but:

“Because K8s (depending on how you install it) runs a bunch of little containers handling various back end things, you might not deploy anything to the cluster and still be WAY over that 10 container limit. ”

The way we manage that is to explicitly filter for containers. Don’t monitor all containers by default, make it opt-in and you’ll be fine.
Boom and bust cycles in the tech and real estate industries definitely play a role in SF's situation, but the real bubble here is sprawl. As we wake up from the automobile-futurism fever dream, the few places in the US whose built environments aren't wholly given over to it are seeing the same pressures.

If you can make driving your SUV from the cul de sac to the strip mall to the office park cool again, there are many millions waiting for you at GM, Ford, and Lennar. If not, then no you cannot "reduce demand" for SF and places like it.
>We elected officials to administrate it only, these ideals are done by everyone.

That's mob rule / vigilantism.
If you are interested in learning how to roll a timeseries database, and if you're not already familiar with it, I'd second the suggestions to try KDB/Q. Even if only to be inspired and understand what "good" looks like in this space.

I say this as someone who is generally averse to proprietary enterprise software. More often than not, it's a horrible pile of crap that's sold on the golf course, and there's almost always a path through open source and custom build that does an infinitely better job.

But, in the case of KDB, whilst it was pressed upon me in a former role of mine, I found it to be an _extremely_ impressive piece of tech once I got over the initial hurdles (my biases, and basics of Q). It's not without its warts, but the amount of power and expressivity it packs into a small number if chars is quite mind blowing. I watched other teams on flavour of the month tech struggle with queries over "millions" of rows, whilst our stack routinely served complex queries over billions of rows.
Limnic eruption: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limnic_eruption
Tex was implemented in Pascal and uses web2c to generate C code.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeX

Had he implemented it directly in C he would be sending checks every day.
Yes, there is a huge amount of profit to be made by just serving the traditional 'boring' industries. A company can be extremely well off without ever dipping into consumer market.

See for example Oracle as an example closer to programming.
Maintenance is either the one thing everyone forgets in these conversations, or it’s the one thing everyone says no one will want to do.

If there were a return to pride in and appreciation of a job well done, there would be no shortage of people willing to do the work, in my mind. The reason most people are so unwilling to do these things is because they feel like it is beneath them, and that doing them is a demonstration of their low status.
The truth already exists without our perception of it. Think about this - if there was no absolute ground you couldn't have so much as a single perception.

The problem becomes the human minds limitations, aka the problem isn't with the universe but the minds of human beings and their relationship to what actually is.
Thanks!

I was about ask: Why is cloning a problem, but not a downconverter crystal (specifically a Type-0 SPDC [0]) that creates two photons with the same polarization as the input?

Then I realized: the two output photons are also entangled so you can only make 1 independent measurement of the pair.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_parametric_down-co...
Propylene glycol.
You keep missing the fact that there is no security/privacy advantage to what Google did, since the API for an extension to see every URL being accessed and use it in arbitrary ways still exists. They only removed the part where the extension could block that request from happening.
To be fair, that does sound pretty cool
“And its expensive. Maybe its comparable to something like New Relic, I don't know, but relative to StackDriver or CloudWatch? Its in a totally different league. ”

To be fair to Datadog, their UI/UX is also in a totally different league. Stackdriver Logging is a total PITA to use when trying to investigate and correlate historical logs.
This explains how I got scammed on Shopify last summer. I’m not talking about a missing product label or receiving a counterfeit item. I paid $1200 for a Shopify product (drone) and received a box with a poster tube inside of it that said “the world is yours”. Nothing else. The merchant was gone that day. The real scammers live on Shopify.
Sorry yes £25k for agricultural land but goes straight to the millions with planning permission.
There are people who are mentally ill, addicted to drugs, and/or abused. The streets are no place to heal these wounds, they are a place for them to fester. Modern asylums and rehab centers should be built, along with shelter space with counseling and medical services.

Leaving people to rot on the street for even an instant longer is abhorrently inhumane, and the local government officials in charge of our west coast cities should just resign, since they so clearly lack any empathy or rational thinking.
books, movies, music and blog posts are information. Information is consumed when assimilated. That's why you have every decade more profit from movies, people are hungry for more information/entertainment. That's why you have relative bad songs that break into billions views vs old songs that are very good and barely have millions view - people are hungry for more information/entertainment. That's why relative bad books like Twilight get screen time and make billions vs Alexandre Dumas who is public IP and yet no new movies based on his books are made - people are hungry for more information/entertainment. And blog posts, ohh, I read several (The old new thing, Schneier, etc) and you know what I always say about those? They post too few - I am hungry for more.
The first ad company that brings ads in house to the website they are serving will be the Google killer. It is an ad company that has no people behind it, paying content creator's pennies on the dollar, with no customer support on any end. Google should be employing big blue numbers in just customer support. But they don't have to since we have all been hoodwinked into it's monopoly.

And I'm a fan.
So you are saying that this was a totally fine way to write? But it sounds very awkward and sloppy to me. Maybe, it’s just me.
And Thomas Piketty was right...

Also, this isn't exactly a revelation for those who are in businesses that hinge on physical location (retail, restaurants, etc...). Landlords provide little of value, in most cases did nothing to earn their money (around here the landlords in downtown business districts are the descendants of those who owned that property 100+ years ago) and merely act as parasites.

In the case of those who own residential properties, they merely bought at the right time, and due to the scarcity of land are earning far more than whatever value they're providing.
An interesting exercise. OP is still creating something for consumption, though. This is an old argument:

SOCRATES: You know, Phaedrus, writing shares a strange feature with painting. The offsprings of painting stand there as if they are alive, but if anyone asks them anything, they remain most solemnly silent. The same is true of written words. You’d think they were speaking as if they had some understanding, but if you question anything that has been said because you want to learn more, it continues to signify just that very same thing forever. When it has once been written down, every discourse roams about everywhere, reaching indiscriminately those with understanding no less than those who have no business with it, and it doesn’t know to whom it should speak and to whom it should not. And when it is faulted and attacked unfairly, it always needs its father’s support; alone, it can neither defend itself nor come to its own support. -- Plato. c.399-347 BCE. “Phaedrus.” Pp. 551-552 in Complete Works

tldr: Debate, discourse.
or they don't have a good place to park their money, looking for the NBT.
Your solution to what? To People who don't need an Internet but have other important issues to deal with? You're hoping that by putting them on the Internet you're going to create a new market?

I don't understand the point of this. I thought the people who cared about being on the Internet already were.
Especially annoying is seeing paperbacks listed for a book that only exists in hardcover
Remarkable book. What I find as remarkable is that it has been translated! That must have been hard. (In the German edition, this puzzle, btw, features S,T,H,M and A-A.)
The “10k-hour rule” was debunked again
if "IoT/Robot/AI" or whatever it becomes can adapt to their needs, the people who don't need the internet, maybe there is a market there.
Yes, and you can see a few hundred libraries here https://www.swi-prolog.org/pack/list
Why are your cases lasting only one/two years?

I've never had a case not outlast a phone, they keep up well, rubber cases I mean.
How could you possibly battle drug addiction or mental illness while sleeping on concrete exposed to elements and crime? It's constant stress that makes these issues worse, not better, every single day you live on the street.
Some science is clearly political and other science is clearly not. It is important to keep as much original evidence in the open as possible (without abstracting it away behind rules and principles) so it can be challenged.

That all being said, I'm not sure this really goes to the article; which seems to be more about how the capitalists were more effective at managing a complicated relationship with truth and reality than the communists, and that was an advantage for them.
Yeah, those sentences are too close together.

I'm trying to elicit more of a response from the comment author. I think they make some good points. I would like to learn more about their ideal system.
Amazing Google still has 6,160,000,000 hits for the prior. IMHO, it is a new word due to large typos.
Hello, I am an AIDS patient. I have been receiving chemotherapy for 2 months now. I may have to leave this beautiful world soon. I have only one wish. I can make it better. That is, it belongs to me. Apps/games, I know that my apps/games have a lot of deficiencies, but time may not allow me to optimize them, I will try to optimize him according to Apple's review terms, but I really want to see my own Welcome. To AppStore Email
Demara reminds me of the 90s show The Pretender, I'm going to assume Demara was the inspiration. That show was lots of fun.

And there was an episode of M.A.S.H clearly inspired by Demara. Someone impersonating a surgeon, getting caught then changing identities to a chaplain.
What are the sites that are not "working" with your setup?
> The key flaw of UNIX philosophy is destructuring deserialization and reserialization based on lines

not so sure about your assertion there eugene :o)

interfacing with funk formatted lines of text is waay more easier because (imho) of the 'wysiayg' principle, and encourages, for lack of a better term, 'tinkering'

> Settling on a common data simple/universal format robust enough for all purposes...

output from 'ls, gcc, yacc/bison, lex/flex, grep, ...' should all follow the same fmt, sure...the good thing about standards is that we don't have enough of them to choose from, f.e. xml, sgml, s-expressions, json, csv, yaml, ...

having said that, when dealing with copious volumes of data, structure doesn't hurt, but in such cases, my guess is, there are only a handful of data-producers, and data-consumers for automatic consumption, and are all tightly controlled.
People can still do science on their own. Grant giving institutions as a driver of science is a relatively recent phenomenon. There's nothing wrong with a garage laboratory to test your ideas so long as you document your methodology so it can be repeated by others and scrutinized for following the scientific method.
No, not job interviews. But I did ghostwrite parts of medical reviews, and of briefs and expert reports in litigation.
Free online tool to embed the diagram of any music scale on your website
Well, this is the general idea:

People can either afford the Internet or not. If they can't afford it, there are good chances they can't afford to pay any other bills.

These people are usually not in developing countries, but the developed ones. The developed ones where no amount of government laws can bring affordable Internet to the public, nor any places with free WiFi nor good libraries with free browsing facilities.

So clearly, there is something bigger at play, and it is about artificially pricing people out of a market being the ultimate goal.

The people who do really need to be on the Internet in such a society would have already worked their way around it. And if not, they have other issues to take care of before they go to artificially high priced internet.
It seems that Americans are the ones who didn't know about this wonderful content for decades... only to rediscover now that it so important to restrict imports (when the country can't compete anymore, of course)!
The question needs to be asked whether it’s necessary or even advantageous to bombard a civilian population.
Interesting to see reference to Phaedrus when so much of what’s being discussed in this thread takes me right back to thinking about Robert Pirsig.
More homeless die of hypothermia in Los Angeles than in NYC.
>As frustrations mount, researchers and the major foundations that fund their work fear that the ambitious project may not survive, multiple people told BuzzFeed News. A source with knowledge of discussions between the key parties involved in the project said the funders — which include the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, the Democracy Fund, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Charles Koch Foundation, Omidyar Network, and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation — are now discussing ways to increase the pressure on the social media giant.

>“[Facebook has] definitely thrown major talent at the issue; but ultimately, the proof is in whether we ever get to eat the pudding,” David Lazer, a distinguished professor of political science and computer and information science at Northeastern University, and one of the researchers due to receive Facebook data, told BuzzFeed News.

Why do these researchers feel entitled to my personal data? Is Facebook willing to hand me data on the propaganda networks the media uses to manufacture consent?
That is describing Miranda and Haskell.

F#, Standard ML, Caml Light and Objective Caml would fail that bullet point list.
Evil is a little extreme. The drivers are still doing it, so they clearly prefer giving you a ride to not.

To add in some more anecdotal stories — the only times I really take a lot of Ubers and talk to the drivers are when traveling, and I’ve found the opposite. In Austin and Portland recently I talked to quite a few drivers that were happy with the job. And they all mentioned the flexible hours as a perk. One guy was retired and just liked getting out of the house and meeting people and making a bit of extra money to spend. A lot of people did it as a second job, but emphasized that if they don’t feel like it on any given day they can just stay home, which is very unlike any non-contract second job you could get. Obviously there are also some miserable drivers, like the ones picketing and wanting to be employees not contractors. But even though I’m pretty liberal on a lot of issues it’s hard for me to jump on the progressive bandwagon on this one because it seems so clear that most people, riders and drivers, are much better off than if Uber didn’t exist.

I do suspect that the cost of living and housing in these cities I mentioned has something to do with it. They’re still low enough that driving for Uber can make you real money, compared to somewhere like SF where everyone who doesn’t make like $150k or more is screwed.
I really like their Pro-Trek series for outdoors usage - besides typical watch functions and the rugged G-Shock-like case they have an altimeter, barometer and compass. Some models also have time synchronization and are solar powered.

Unfortunately the latest models are a catastrophe. Google is giving their watch OS away for free and have probably ruined the market - manufacturers don't invest in their own software, they slap Google's OS on everything, so now a Pro-Trek watch has a battery life of a few hours under heavy usage or two days under normal usage, WiFi, a color screen and other useless crap.

Only two companies that I know of still do their own thing: Garmin, which requires app/cloud sync and Suunto, which can function standalone. Both have a battery life of about a 5-10h with GPS under heavy usage/a week with normal usage.
> shells have always been portable across many operating systems

Most shells work on just one of either Unix or Windows; the blog post specifically mentions Windows support as being something on the radar of the developers, which Rust is arguably a better fit for than C/C++ (which most shells are written in) due there being a single compiler, standard library, and build tool with first-class support for both Unix and Windows in the Rust toolchain.
When I was there talking it was already abundantly clear an IPO was in the works. So, no. I don’t regret anything and am totally fine with the outcome.
Unfortunately, historical data suggests that ads are the only viable way to run a highly-profitable content delivery business. Look at newspapers and television - major, profitable ones have always been ad-driven,and that is despite the fact that they also had a physical cost.

Newspapers especially fit your model of micro-payments: each newspaper is usually a minuscule amount of money, but that is never enough to sustain it.

There is also the problem of incentives - even if your customers are paying to access the content, if you can then ALSO mix ads with the content, you are guaranteed more money, so businesses will usually be inclined to do so.
There's a point about fuel consumption when travelling downstream though: you can't just switch off your engine and drift downstream, because you'll run aground fairly soon. The ship needs steering, and steering needs engine power and relative speed to water.
It might feel demoralizing but writing and testing out throwaway code is part of figuring things out. Writing that code helped you get to a point where you have better insight.
I mean, you're trapped in a confined space with the driver. The same is not true with cashiers, receptionists, or janitors. That is why it feels different. "This is awkward, I'm out," doesn't work at 60mph on the freeway.
Yeah, the problem is that most games fail to have compelling enough mechanics to warrant replays. If things are "missable" it kinda feels like a f*ck you from the developer, or at the very least like they didn't try hard enough to have a cohesive narrative (too many hangers-on narrative ideas). Depends on the game of course. But for instance, with Nier (haven't played it, not my favorite stylistically), if you really haven't encountered 70% of the content with one playthrough, I wouldn't consider that a true playthrough.

The Witness blew me away too. At the time I played it (release), I felt the same way about it as Outer Wilds. Baba is you was recommended by a friend recently, and I'd definitely like to give that a shot at some point. I'm pretty hawkish about style, and I tend to strongly dislike tactics type games, as well as RTS. A lot of newer RPGs turn me off too, especially ones using the ATB concept (FF7 is one of my all time favs as well, but I have almost no interest in trying the new one; I reaaaally wanna vote with my dollars for new IP).
Where in your comment do you show any indication you understand your views are very much both subjective and opinion and based on your necessarily limited lived experience?

In the few concrete examples you have, your wording implies a one sided take on various controversial topics.

People who think like that aren’t creating a “just world” by any definition I agree with. It’s more an example of the truism that the most dangerous people are the ones who are convinced they are acting from a place of moral correctness.

These people aren’t the solution, they are the problem.

And they can’t be reasoned with because they can’t see that, which is why they can’t stamp the problem out.
One out of eight money units sounds pretty reasonable. I think I capture more than that from the college students who rent with me. But actually property developers do have the option to go outside the law, just like uber. Or maybe not them, but people do anyways. The only way to force political action is actually by ignoring the rules. Building dwellings where they should not exist, using non residential space inappropriately, etc. Build your own slum. People will become homeless if government evacuates them and finding these is hard. so government doesn't like to and cannot do very much.
Completely agree re competitors. If you look at when Uber and Lyft left Austin, almost overnight, competitors willing to follow the local laws sprung up and soon began providing equivalent service. In my opinion, it's going to be impossible to establish a moat (aside from incumbency) in ridesharing (absent some kind of regulatory change heavily favoring incumbents). The second someone thinks they can do it better, they will try (provided the capital is available).
> Keep in mind that “vapor” is used to disguise that, in all cases whether nicotine or pot or etc, people are heating up a substance to its smoke point and inhaling that smoke. They use “vapor” because it sounds like “water vapor” - which is harmless - but it’s definitely not that.

This is not true. It's producing an aerosol, partially by condensation of vapor produced by heating the glycerine and propylene glycol mixture to its boiling point.

It isn't combusting, at least not when everything is working the way that it should, and so is not properly a "smoke".
I think the today's adtech is more like video cams installed in everyone's house and squads of criminals that do targeted raids based on information obtained from those video cams. First people figured that such cameras exist. Then they started installing steel doors. Now they're removing those cameras.
State Attorneys General Said to Be Near Formal Investigation of Tech Companies
Python functions are objects, instances of the function class, as this little snippet shows.

def afunc():
pass

print(afunc.__class__)
print(dir(afunc))
Many of my teammates are immigrants. Visa related uncertainty and progress are major parts of their lives. The H1-B renewal lottery colors all future plans. Finally getting a green card is like having a child or buying a house. When the President tweets about blowing up NAFTA, my colleagues on TN-1s can no longer be sure which country they'll live in six months from now. We tried to go for drinks and couldn't get into the bar: my work friend's driver license is expired and she can't get a new one while her visa application is in a queue somewhere at DHS.

If we know each other at all as people, immigration policy certainly comes up.
Red Sky at Morning: Horror and Heroism Aboard the USS Franklin
Ironically, if the drivers were actual employees, it’d be an actual barrier.
Why all the Jira hate? I’ll tell you why
I'd admit my brother if he were doing this. Say what you will about the ghoulish hollywood history of asylums, but surviving on the streets is no environment to improve your mental health.
I used to record my desktop all the time, and then even after a short interruption review it to mentally retrace my thought flow. Now I just use IntelliJ's Ctrl+Alt+Left/Right shortcuts to jump around the places I was looking at / modifying. Though reviewing footage was more effective; I might start doing that again.

(For context, I am a game designer at AAA studio and I write a lot of code.)