skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The concept "toxic masculinity" is just the opposite of "female hysteria", actually. Hysteria historically was basically always been used as a crutch by the medical profession as "there's something wrong with this woman due to their inherent female-ness". Literally, "women are crazy because they have uteruses".

Contrast with toxic masculinity, which focuses on external, societal pressures which force/encourage men to behave in ways that are harmful to themselves and others, rejecting the idea that men are "just like that".

(As for ADD being the hysteria being the new hysteria, I can totally see the resemblance)

Also, the website for your source is run by a fundamentalist, anti-LGBT hate group [1], so you might want to consider picking a different one.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Family_Association
>and we survived just fine

No we damn well DID NOT. This is one of the most infuriating lines used all over for dismissing concerns about modern things and developments. "Oh why do we need vaccines/antibiotics, we survived just fine without them" except, you know, for all the hundreds of millions of deaths. Minor detail that. Mere "survival" through gross inefficiency is not a real yardstick.

By the same token, "it used to suck really badly" in programming and the result was awful practices, crashing, and security problems out the wazoo. We sort of "survived" that by a mixture of just plain eating the heavy losses and having them be somewhat mitigated by virtue of simply having less surface area for damage since less stuff was tech based or connected. Infrastructure was less built up. But times have changed and standards for, and value of, security/stability/supportability have increased dramatically.

Yes in a sufficiently large group I'm sure you'll be able to find individuals engaging in hyperbole about any such thing on the internet. But that doesn't in turn mean that there aren't very real, very serious concerns raised around the context of modern practice. Dismissiveness based on bad historic practice is not merely uncalled for, it's just plain weird.

Edit to add: another issue a lot of this dismissive comments tend to ignore is cost & skill. Yes, great things have been done with options we'd now consider subpar in the past, that's what they had to work with. But those things were done by the best of the best, with huge budgets, lots of experience and so on. A very important part of advancement is allowing the "same thing" to be done more cheaply by more people, and in turn be used for wider array of applications.
Its a bit like wikipedia, it doesnt look like much initially but going in with purpose shows you just how much more in depth they are. Examine also updates their research regularly, that alone puts them above "any old health site"
Modern PHP is one of the fastest dynamic languages, has one of the best gradual typing systems (IMO almost competitive with TypeScript - TypeScript type system is better at static typing, but doesn't catch runtime errors), and a fantastic community around Laravel/Symphony.
A Top-Secret Factory Where Scent Is Made
I'm surprised that coffee shops/bookstores haven't started to target this demographic yet. Buy a coffee, an hour or two of quick charging, and read a book for a couple of hours in a comfy seat while your car charges. Considering how many people will go to those establishments already, it seems like a pretty easy hook (and probably has a lot of demographic overlap).
Same. Test drove a Volt and it felt like a plastic toy car, meanwhile the Bolt actually has headroom.
No, there isn't.

I guess you're alluding to DockbarX [1] and xfce4-dockbarx-plugin [2]. Those, and specific dock apps (there are quite a few) are the alternatives as of today.

[1] https://github.com/M7S/dockbarx

[2] https://github.com/TiZ-EX1/xfce4-dockbarx-plugin
Haskell's type system most definitely does catch some of your logical errors. That's exactly why it is so revered.

An effective use of a type system such as Haskell's Hindley-Milner can result in a vastly smaller surface area for possible problems and thus can cut a big number of otherwise mandatory unit tests off your todo list.
Reminds me of this 1958 essay by Hans Magnus Enzensberger called A Theory Of Tourism - (PDF, 2MB) https://elearning.uniroma1.it/pluginfile.php/541204/mod_foru... I think it's overly negative, and when, in the second half, it started to link tourism to the Holocaust it lost me. But there are some excellent points in the first half about the logical progression of tourism, which I found fascinating and prescient given the date it was written.
For me it has become habit to read comments about articles before actually reading the articles. The deliberate miss-titling of stories to sucker in readers is now commonplace and I appreciate when I'm afforded a chance to avoid it. Here we're allowed to believe the story might investigate why building infrastructure in the US costs several multiples of what other countries pay, or what the US used to pay for the same result. Instead what appears is yet another naval-gaze about the evils of roads, cars and suburbs.
I knew a kid in college who would get a ticket, and then look around the parking lot for another Black Nissan Maxima. Most people don't actually look at the plate number, just the make model. I think he got one ticket paid this way ... guy was kinda an asshole.
Pretty fair IMO to abbreviate something that's so core to a language's vision.

When talking to the faithful, sure. Language communities need to constantly fight against a tendency towards navel-gazing and only wanting to talk to the faithful.
I was in a similar 'unpredictable income' situation when I had my kid. Since you're on HN, I'm assuming that your income comes from some kind of knowledge work, and you have to be mentally sharp to be productive.

The best investment I ever made was to get a night nanny. This is someone who comes to your home at night and changes diapers, feeds the baby (or brings them to the mom to nurse without waking you up) and may also do basic domestic stuff like laundry and dishes while your partner adjusts to their new routine as a parent.

The cost is going to vary dramatically depending on where you live and whether your kid has any kind of special needs (e.g., if they're a premie you might want a night nanny who is also a registered nurse).

They will basically double your productivity during your waking hours since you will not be suffering (as much) from sleep deprivation.
Why would you need to do it every day? EV ranges are rising above 200 miles, that's an order of magnitude higher than most peoples commutes, so for most people once a week would be enough.

Shops would do it because money and footfall.
Sure, but the idea seems to be that using git, as is, would mean relying on more GPLv2 software; my point is that it doesn't.

By all means, if OpenCVS or Got were actually brought to a useful state, that'd be great, but there's no great crisis of new GPLv2 reliance in using Git.

I, for one, would welcome a git clone (hah!) built to the core OpenBSD quality standard, but it seems unlikely that anyone cares enough to do that.

In the mean time, justifying not using Git for OpenBSD on the basis of license falls flat, when you realize you're using GNU CVS anyway.
When I get the choice I use Nix and ignore as much of the "python" packaging infrastructure as possible - it's all a vague and unreliable toy compared to a real package manager. It all particularly falls apart when it comes to non-python dependencies.
My problem with this is if 'I' (or in code, the current program) actually loads the washer and cleans the kitchen, then these things run in serial.

If I do what I've always done in rust, which in use threads, I get lovely easy parallelization. Async only seems useful when your program doesn't do anything non trivial, but just dispatches to other things, as any one function that takes a long time blocks all other async functions until completion?
Because the unit tests are not to "check types", they are to check that incorrect values (e.g. a string instead of a list of strings) do not occur. They are no different from other kinds of incorrect values, like attempting to cluster an odd number of items into pairs.
Video App Kuaishou Is Turning Chinese Country Folk into Hollywood Directors
This is a good point - not all services need both identification and authentication.

I've noticed some sites using identification only (like the days of IRC), so you can have a consistent identifier to interact with people but a username isn't actually secure or owned. The converse should also be possible, in the same sense that a bank PIN is used to authenticate with no public identifier involved.

That said, for many offerings we should consider "a company employee" to be a third party. There are already employees with access to my data, but the outsourced call center employee who answers the customer service number probably isn't one of them, and I want them to be able to look up my account details without being able to impersonate me.
We just got one in my area. It's obviously the first time many people have seen one. And as you said, they are too hard for some people to figure out on the first time. I've seen people stopping in the traffic circle in places that don't even make sense to stop, under any circumstances. There is too much signage, if anything, and the left lane sign indicates it is for a left turn (not a sickle shaped, 270 degree left turn). Thankfully I haven't seen anyone making a left.

One problem with traffic circles is they require a wider carve out in what would be the corners of a 4-way stop. This involves eminent domain or prior government ownership; either making retrofitting difficult.
Yeah, exactly. I believe you're correct that you just need to know what the stack looks like, not really change it much if at all. Any tweaks you may need to make are probably already available for things like split stacks or green threads.

The problem is that LLVM doesn't even let you see the stack layout until very late, and then only as debug info. You could probably hack something on top but it would probably wind up looking a lot like C++20, with a lot of extra allocation, or like Rust, with all the stack frame layout optimization duplicated into the frontend.
Not everyone has time to "get a coffee or read a book" when the car runs empty. Some people live years without a free hour to "just go read a book", for example: anyone with young kids.
That number seems 20X higher than what I would have expected. Either the bar to be a nomad is meaninglessly low (e.g., works occasionally from local coffee shop) or I've grown out of touch.
According to the WLTP standard for measuring gasoline consumption the new Toyota Corolla hybrid does 22 km/l whereas the comparable VW Golf 1.5 TSI DSG does 16 km/l.

Seems to me a quite substantial improvement.
Tools, tests, and logging are the cure to those troubles. I've not experienced substantial problems with projects large or small.

If a project is known to be huge up front and/or some developers will be inexperienced choosing a language with additional guardrails would be prudent.
First, that is not accurate. CreditKarma makes money by showing you ads for credit cards.

Second, that is also not accurate. You are no more or less legally responsible for the contents of your credit report based on whether you have recently pulled a copy.
"Thin ice"? I doubt it. As long as this has nothing to do with his employers business, he's probably fine. Remember even if he's technically in "violation", the company has to care enough to go after him. Most of the time it won't be worth it.
Readably Display Arbitrary Python Data
The year of Linux on the desktop seemed like an inevitability for a lot of people. It never happened. I'd love for the future you envision to come true, but I don't see any reason to think it will, given how little movement there is in that direction even in a super EV-friendly region like Southern California.

To be clear, there are chargers at my work...but only two, and they're for-profit, so the converted cost per mile of range is more than it costs to put gas in my Prius. It was the same at my last workplace.
The comment I was replying to was talking about machine learning.
>I think that is a very negative notion. It completely omits the part where people meet each other, talk and learn.

If people really wanted to "meet each other, talk and learn" they could do it in their towns. Heck, in their neighborhoods. There are tons of stories there, people of different races, perspective, different political views, social backgrounds, etc. Even from different countries (immigrants etc). But you need to care and engage to do that.

So instead, they "meet and talk" as tourists, ie. in some place they'll spend 10-20 days and seldom if ever go back, with people they'll never see, and don't really care about.

And usually for trivial matters (since they don't share common causes or engage in some shared project, like they could with people in their home towns, so they just go for trivial stuff, and "aren't we all the same", etc).

That is, if they even engage. Usually they'll just look for either the more exotic token people to photograph, or the more like-them people (e.g. young hobos) to hang around in some generic touristy-bar. Plus tons of photos and videos they "have to" take, that nobody looks again at or cares about.
Non-EV requires SmartScreen trust building though, right?

Register a company, buy an EV cert, sign your malware. The only barrier is $ because there’s no limit on creating cheap companies.

The whole “trust” industry is ripe for disruption if someone can get Microsoft on board.
Because, in dev speak, the parts of the code base that get the most love are the ones the devs enjoy working with. The car that was produced begrudgingly as a means to get back to the cars the engineers wanted to make doesn't exactly inspire confidence that parts will be available and cheap, mechanics will be able to service it in a decade, people will make 3rd party parts, etc..

In cars there is a lot of hidden value in buying popular models.
I'll give you 999 guesses.
I read that someone tried to register a license plate with a random sequence of Os and zeros (e.g. "OO0O00"). Unfortunately, it worked too well because the person doing data entry at the DMV ordered him a plate with all Os. :)
The interface may have improved, I haven't paid attention to mp in a long while. If I'm reaching for mp I generally just accept that I'm using the wrong language.
There's been a long history of refinements leading to this.

Fantastic work! Look forward to the async/await simplicity
One would hope so, as there are several mentions of the compositor in the changelog: https://www.xfce.org/download/changelogs/4.14
Things made as a result of cynical box-ticking are never good. It's better to fill your life with things designed by people trying to make something great. Even if they didn't fully succeed, you can appreciate the effort. Whereas something made grudgingly will depress you with every detail.

> What counts as a trick? Roughly, it's something done with contempt for the audience. For example, the guys designing Ferraris in the 1950s were probably designing cars that they themselves admired. Whereas I suspect over at General Motors the marketing people are telling the designers, "Most people who buy SUVs do it to seem manly, not to drive off-road. So don't worry about the suspension; just make that sucker as big and tough-looking as you can." -- http://www.paulgraham.com/goodart.html
You're not wrong. I'm interpreting it more from the asset manager's perspective than the company's. You're correct in that they are making a conscious choice to maybe forgo a profit on oil in order to bet on something more speculative. That's just the thesis they are going with and may adversely effect performance.
The space program was dual-use for getting better at making ICBMs, and we desperately wanted to keep up with the Soviets in our capacity to eliminate all human life on the planet.

It's great that we did something amazing in the process, but that kind of political will came from a very specific arms race.
The grocery store won't be giving away the electricity for free. Maybe they'll subsidise it a bit if they realise that offering charging brings more traffic to their store. But it won't be free any more than gas stations give away free gas!

The electricity grid already extends to most workplaces, most urban streets, most parking lots. Destination charging, where you're plugging in for hours rather than minutes, doesn't need a huge industrial grid connection like super-fast charging hubs do. Sure, infrastructure needs to be developed, but it's manageable and it will happen easily enough once the demand is there.
Hail Eris Discordia!
The saucer section can still maintain a warp field for a little while after separation at warp, it could potentially coast quite far out of harms way.

Tactically that would only make sense if the engineering hull could keep an enemy ship entirely occupied, if there was more than one enemy ship engaging then its going to be difficult to keep them all from pursuing the saucer.

You are right though, if you did suffer a warp core breach you aren't going anywhere quickly. But in almost all situations help is only one subspace call away.
But it doesn't pollute the signatures of the consumers, that's the whole point of this subthread.

If you don't want/need to expose your async-ness, you just synchronously block on your async callees instead of awaiting them.
Best database admin interface for startups?
Come on, this not a blog post. It's a page on the internal dev wiki.
It looks awesome, but I can't get in the US. :(
Yeah, the challenge for me is that they don’t sell them locally and my state doesn’t do an incentive. Would have been hard to beat $12,500 without a bunch of hassle although I’ve read that there are ridiculous deals happening if you qualify for all of the incentives available.
Here's a proposal for fixing this. I'll use the national parks as an example.

Yosemite is hugely popular and we need to find some just way to limit the number of people going in. There are three ways to visit Yosemite. PATRON ticket, MERIT ticket, and LOTTERY ticket. All are non-transferable.

The PATRON tickets are auctioned off. This raises a huge amount of money to maintain the parks and make the other tickets completely free.

The MERIT tickets are earned by visiting the less popular parks. You get park-points and eventually you earn enough to earn access to the really cool stuff. And you've also learned to appreciate what you're going to be looking at. If you've climbed some of the less popular climbing spots in the US, it should be easy for you to get access to half dome.

The LOTTERY tickets are free and open to everyone. Enter as often as you want. The lotteries are far enough out that you'll have time to plan around winning.

There are a lot of persnickety details, but I trust the Parks Service to be competent.

The same basic system could be used to fix basically any over-accessed place (famous galleries, Everest, Galapagos, etc). I think that everyone can get behind at least one of these principles (patronage, merit, persistence) and the vast majority of people can get behind the idea of needing the balance all three.
The appearance of good practices matters more than the actual situation.
My experience is that there's a small handful of tourism hotspots, usually only a few blocks in diameter (because people don't like to walk too far). The space between these ultra famous spots are essentially empty of tourists. If you go just barely off the Instagram path it'll be just you and the locals. If you're having a bad time on your vacations, maybe you're just going to the wrong places?

I stayed in Bletchley Park this weekend to see the both the code breaking museum and the computer history museum. It was amazing. There was hardly anyone else in the computer history museum while I visited. I was able to talk with the guys who restore the computer equipment and spent some time listening to the hams in the national radio centre talk about the hobby. The few other people seeing the museums were deeply into it, trying out the codebreaking challenges or asking for nuances on how they were able to break Enigma. I felt like I was with kindred spirits and I had a helluva time.
That is why we have syntax-case.
I actually saw a car with a license plate like this last week. Some combination of I's and 1's. White Ford Mustang driving around Santa Clara.
I think infrastructure in some places in the U.S. ends up looking a bit like a ponzi scheme.

Example city--Charlotte, NC. Down south in Charlotte there is an area called Ballantyne. Ballantyne has good schools, new everything, etc.

Ballantyne also has high taxes.

So what do people do?

Move 5-10 minutes down the road into South Carolina where there is abundant land. They start developing. More people move in. Schools are built. They fill up. They build new ones. People complain about the old two lane country roads so they are expanded.

Taxes go up to support this.

Then either people keep playing the move game to a new undeveloped area or the ROI calculation that nobody does on infrastructure catches up with the town. Some can support it, others can't and it's a downward spiral.

I'm not sure I've explained this well. I mostly think about this from the human POV, which I didn't even mention above. The rational thing for someone living in the high tax area is to go to the new area as it is developing and everything is new and then to decamp before things go so far downhill that property values drop.

Game theory? Tragedy of the Commons? What all is at play here and then as importantly, how do we do better?
Can we get a link to your website?
My question would be - does frequent short charging sessions cause issues for the battery packs? Versus longer full charging sessions?

I know that lithium cells with their different chemistry are more forgiving of charging and discharging (vs NiMH, NiCd, or Lead Acid). I wonder though if that doesn't cause other effects, such as perhaps longevity issues that might cause overheating or something?
I use Adobe XD.
Compared to Sketch, it doesn't have as many plugins.
Compared to Origami, the animation controls are not as fine.
Compared to PaintCode, it can only export styles.

However, it's free, plus there are lots of templates out there, plus there are auto animate and integration with other Adobe tools. It's not the best at anything, but is good enough at everything for my needs.
I wouldn't necessarily ascribe too much journalistic merit regarding your source link; it's quite clearly a biased source by design.

A cursory glance at their home page reveals as much, and they spell it out clearly themselves.

From their FAQ [1]:

>What is OneNewsNow.com and who operates this site?
OneNewsNow.com is the website of the American Family News Network (AFN), a national Christian news service. Our goal is to present the day's news from a biblical perspective. We not only feature the latest breaking stories from across the United States and around the world, but also news of the challenges facing Christians in today's society.

[1] https://onenewsnow.com/general/faq/#1
The right motorcycle with two riders can get over 120!