skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fair enough. =]

Handelsbanken allows both. I think the mobile app is pretty static, however, after you sign in with Mobile Bank Id. I still wouldn't call that a "disallow", more of an intentional UI convenience for users that want #easyMode.
I have a side hustle, www.cinegrain.com which has been very beneficial for my regular job, lots of lessons learned from each that apply to the other. I would strongly recommend anyone start a side hustle instead of a video game habit, or taking up golf.
Minimal in terms of were we need at least reduce too. = max one portion per week
> Faster, smaller, and more secure, yet the say it's the backup plan. Something's rotten somewhere.

Yes, and that rotten thing is the app ecosystem. Without apps, nobody will use your smartphone. From what I've seen, HarmonyOS tries to be compatible with Android, but knowing the difficulty Microsoft and Blackberry had with getting the Android API to work a few years ago (before the many complications that have been layered on top since), I don't expect much from it.

I think a switch of mobile OS will go down about as well as Windows Phone. Only if they port most important apps and games (phone gaming is big in China), their custom OS just won't get the popularity to get its own full app ecosystem.
From the equations and models of modern physics there is no time. The universe is just a curved 4D surface with one of the dimensions having different properties than the three others. This surface has at least one strange point with singularity where meaningful physical quantities go to infinities. Intuitively this seems wrong, so the suspicion is that those points are just artifacts of our models.

As for why we perceive the time with notions of before and after, nobody has an clue. There are philosophical speculations, but nothing that can tested experimentally.
I am happy to ignore the word of the law here, and focus on intent. The whole ethos of the website implies that it is just an HTML page. Pulling in google is misleading. I don't like it.
> There was[0]. Maybe you can revive it, since it is a pain-point?

No. This is a problem that was intentionally caused by Finansiell ID-teknik, and I'm not going to get into cat-and-mouse game to fix their for-profit product.

> Having read the BankId specs, they're "different" APIs in only in how the session is initiated. You're still challenged to enter the PIN for the certificate, which prompts the response to the authentication request. In other words, BankId and Mobile Bank Id are presenting the same exact set of data back to the session initiator.

They're different in that a service that takes Mobile BankID does not automatically support the desktop version, or vice versa. Whether the API is similar after that doesn't matter.

> I have, as of yet, to run into anything that would not take BankId or Mobile Bank Id.

Off the top of my head, Swish and Hemfrid only accept Mobile BankID, with no alternate authentication options. Swedbank accepts Mobile BankID or their custom OTP hardware token, but not desktop BankID.
Amphora
I would be particularly interested to see how many sites use HTTP push.

You serve HTTP2 to the user by default when using ALB, but there's no support for push
During my business/tech econonomics class in college in 2010, one of the main course assignments was to argue for or against the ITA acquisition from a judicial perspective (i.e. would it create a monopoly).

No one in the class could really argue against it because as far as monopolies that Google could possibly create, that's pretty minor. A decade later, almost everyone seems to have forgotten that Google did it.
The title says "probably", and you are misrepresenting it as two extremes (a "hint", and "calling it") and expressing this misrepresentation like you're appalled.

What is your motivation for this?
I’m not sure how that follows.
> I doubt that a black-hat attacker is going to file a lawsuit

If you tell someone requesting their own data under GDPR “tough luck, you lost your password,” that could invite remedies under the law.
Facebook hahas more worse behavior. It's Twitter that constantly gets people doxxes, harassed, and death-threatened based on misinformation.
Tailwind makes it very easy to change theme by changing just a single configuration file: https://tailwindcss.com/#designed-to-be-customized

It is very liberating to use Tailwind instead of creating unique CSS classes for every div in a page. The code is much more maintainable - in a single stroke Tailwind gets rid of selector specificity issues, design inconsistency, and naming woes.

From a programming perspective, the conventional style of "semantic" CSS classes creates deep and fragile coupling between markup and CSS. It goes against everything good code is supposed to be - when you change the structure of the HTML you're forced to change the CSS, and if you truly use the power of CSS selectors, then modifying CSS becomes a difficult enterprise: one change can create multiple unrelated changes at a distance.

Tailwind solves all this, with just two downsides: until you spend a few hours mucking with it, the markup look will look unwieldy, and you have to be ready to really think about semantic CSS and "separation of concerns" dogma we've taken for granted for so long.
New Dragonblood Vulnerabilities Found in WiFi WPA3 Standard
I felt similarly to you when i first decided to try eating mostly vegan a few years back. One of my go-to meals was a cheese sandwich. It tastes great, you can't beat the speed of prep and it's not completely unhealthy. But now i realize there are plenty of other fast things that hit the spot that actually i already knew how to make but i never really saw as go-to meals before.

Here are some examples.

I know it's a punchline these days, but i grew up in the 80s eating avocado toast. You want more flavor? Just spread some marmite or vegemite.

The Tex-Mex take is to smash that avo with corn chips and salsa. Miss the cheese? Put some silky tofu. Think of it like queso fresco. Hey, you can also slice it on tomato with vinegar to make caprese salad.

What about beans on toast? If you're not a bread person, something i used to cook in my student days is can of beans, can of creamed corn, garlic, chili, soy, the end. It's hearty. It only takes 10 minutes. I still cook variations on that, sometimes with no corn or different beans. I like using sesame seeds to thicken it up, or pumpkin seeds for a different texture.

I also leverage peanut butter when i am feeling lazy. Spread it on some seaweed rice crackers for savory. You can put it on bread with sliced banana for sweet.

Real peanuts are great too. They are literally the first thing i throw in the wok. Oil. Peanuts. Garlic, ginger, chilis. Then the vegetable or mushroom or tofu or whatever. Or not, because just seasoned peanuts will go fine on top of whatever other vegan thing where you feel you're missing some crispy, oily, goodness.

There really is so much, and i think a lot of it is stuff most people already eat. I think the problem is that people tend to think of incidentally vegan dishes as somehow not being "real" meals, but that's a cultural bias that can be unlearned.
Not to mention anything that requires the provision of real-world goods and/or services. If a data protection law ever had sufficient teeth and regulation to cause Uber or Seamless to force a user to type their credit card information and home address every time they wish to make a transaction, it would be wildly decried as paternalistic by the public. And those companies are equally vulnerable to this type of social engineering.

GDPR identity verification as a service would be an amazing thing to have. Articles like [0] bring up a sad irony: in order to verify someone's request to delete their information, you need to obtain information from them in an unusual way that you may not have built infrastructure to easily or automatically delete.

[0] https://www.braze.com/perspectives/article/gdpr-compliance-d...
The Essential Guide to JavaScript’s Newest Data Type: BigInt – Smashing Magazine
I'm not sure if that's the case for drugs, but you're quite right that it's the case for medical devices. The producers are effectively competing for a government contract to be one of the few Medicare-sanction producers for that particular medical device (and being sanctioned for Medicare rebates means that your device will be used by the majority of people who need such a device -- otherwise they won't get coverage for it through Medicare or even private insurance in most cases).
AES-GCM or even CBC for that matter is not vulnerable/broken. Why did they recommend Secretbox? Is there an implementation error? I am not talking about the potential of making mistakes and using platform supported constructs.

Does it make sense to make this recommendation even if the dev did not choose a vulnerable algorithm and there aren't any issues with implementation?
Top 3? Go bears! ;)
> In Haskell, not so much, which is the entire point of this thread.

Yes, that's my point, too. I'm not sure what you're arguing with.

That you don't understand even the most trivial snippet in the code base is only a point in my favor. You're picking beef with an irrelevant detail and confusing it for disagreement.

Remember, I was replying to someone who is trying to show that Haskell isn't so hard once you break down a snippet. I pointed out that the snippet was the most trivial selection they could have picked, that the rest of the code is even harder so it's not a very big consolation. You chimed in that even the simplest snippet was still alien to you.
Hey now. Mass surveillance, data breaches, and non-consensual data sale are absolutely issues, and will continue to be. This isn’t a boogey man, this is real, and it’s entirely the technology industry’s fault. Maybe we wouldn’t have to deal with the GDPR if we treated data as a liability from the beginning.
> Why would any random service request, process or more importantly store these?

So they can identify users for purposes of complying with GDPR? (For example, to handle the data requests highlighted in this post.)
Humans aren't the primary host so exceptional virulence isn't necessarily contained by evolutionary pressure.
M44 (Cyanide Device)
Malaysia files charges against 17 current and ex-Goldman Sachs bosses
Adobe’s next big bets are on AR and mixed reality software
These kinds of issues are what we've solved at QALocate.

There are a number of different issues here, which I think are only partly explored through the article.

Let's take as given that you need to direct a person some place. In the article, they are directing someone to a restaurant. But this gets complicate fast. Is this person a patron rather than, say, a deliver driver there to pick up an order, or a plumber there to fix and appliance, or an inspector there to observe the kitchens, or ...?

By using a lat/long, or any geo-coordinate, we lose the human-value of context. Each of the folks I list above has a very different place they potentially need to navigate to. And even if their destination is the same, the routes they took may NOT have been. Where they park, or were dropped by ride share, and which doors they use are also influenced by their role.

Using a geo-coordinate to drops the rich meaning that humans in all their roles require. A better solution is to use a real identity and then, when and where coordinates are needed, derive them based on the persons role, whether it be patron, plumber, or paramedic. As roles change, or as the structure itself changes, then directions change to meet them. I find this a much richer solution than just blindly telling my maps app to direct me to some GPS location.

Another issue hinted at but not deeply explored is that often what we want to specify is a region or volume, not a coordinate. Things in the real world consume volume. Coordinates are idealized points and do not. This may seem a trite observation, yet, the majority of our tools think in terms of points. With the rise of autonomous vehicles, especially drone delivery, we need to move towards representations of regions and/or volumes, depending on needs. I'm not convinced that geopolys are quite right for this task and instead we need something that is comfortable with the fuzzy and complicated boundaries humans have to deal with.

[1] http://www.qalocate.com
And put in an Audi E-Motor and it would be even more faster. Tesla doesn't have the fastest engines, the Germans do. There's quite a difference in technology. Tesla's are quite pedestrian compared to a Kessler e.g.
But you wouldn't be able to afford it, and they do make about 30 a year though.
Used to work on a product doing OCEAN pre-hire testing.

The way these systems have classically worked is a company would have some researches put together a corpus of around 200 questions, most directly mapping to an OCEAN category, a few attention-check questions to make sure the user isn't just hitting "Very Likely" all the time, as well as a few questions that are the same as earlier questions but phrased differently to try and catch liars.

This corpus would then be surveyed against ideal candidates, how they determine that is a mystery to me, for a given job, e.g. "Insurance Salesman" or "Grocery-Store Cashier." Then when an applicant comes in they will be tested against this model of an ideal. The population surveyed might be "All cashiers in the country" or "All cashiers in your company," depending on where you got your software and how much you were willing to spend.

Newer software in this space will provide tools like employee analysis, e.g. Bob is more (A)greeable than Joe but also less (E)mpathetic. Usually these will also allow for arbitrary groupings and analysis, so you could compare two existing or hypothetical teams, etc. This would allow a manager to take their best performers and look for comparable candidates, personality-wise, or alternatively look for similarities to the bad-apples.

Personally, I think there is something to it from a "culture fit" perspective. If you take someone who is very (C)onscientous, very (N)eurotic, and throw them into a team filled with the opposite, you'll run into issues. At the high-end, low-applicant jobs like software these systems might be used to spotlight possible problem areas so that you can further assess the candidate. In the low-end, high-applicant jobs like a grocery-store clerk it becomes an automated HR tool to filter out candidates based on some statistics.

At the end of the day it's a tool with some amount of scientific backing and legal defensibility, how a hiring manager uses it can be good or bad and says more about them than anything else.
It's can't versus should. Sure, you can discuss politics at work, but should you?
I saw a post on NextDoor where a woman was complaining that a retired couple had asked her not to let her dog poop on their yard. She expected them to put up a fence to keep her dog out. Apparently being asked was not only not enough but also an affront. She called them “entitled” because they drove a Mercedes and had a house.
It's impossible. You'll make little progress, very slowly. You'll be very tired and frustrated. If you have an idea, quit your job and do it full-time. How many hours a day do you really have after work? 3? And these are the worst hours of the day, say between 7pm-10pm.
Anonymity plays a part even if youre not anonymous on FB. A lot of (most?) people treat their online worlds as different from the "real world" for some reason, and even though they are not anonymous, they believe that what happens online cannot affect their real day to day life.

In addition, besides anonymity, people are far worse online because there is no real person they are interacting with. They are interacting with a caricature of a person they've built up in their heads based on a highly limited set of information.

Finally, you lose all sorts of body language, tone, and other cues, that prevent you from actually interacting with someone, and instead has you interacting with your vision of them, which is highly influenced by your emotional state and preconceived notion of what you think they're saying.
Is it?

There's no part of you that looks and that and wonders why it's stuffing return into every leaf of a branching structure instead of just leaving it at the root? That's just objectively redundant.

And there's no part of you that's wondering why it's using nested branches to implement the railway oriented programming pattern? That's just objectively more convoluted than using the combinators that abstract that out and coalesce all the failure branches into one spot.

My second version has an extra really nice property. It consists of three subexpressions that can be understood in totality in isolation from the rest of the code. It is compositional code of the sort we all claim we want to work with.

What my code does have as a real downside is a much higher burden of knowledge to understand. You have to know much more of the contents of the base library. You have to be familiar with how idioms like the aforementioned railway oriented programming work.

But that knowledge has its rewards. You get to reduce manual plumbing in your own code, replacing it with standard library plumbing. When you know Haskell, the standard plumbing fades into the background. I guess it's like what lispers talk about with their parenthesis.

So yes, there is an additional burden in understanding my versions of the code. But that burden amortizes very nicely over a lifetime of getting the advantages of having all that plumbing just there when you need it.
This is actually more interesting of a question than it seems on the surface. I think it's weird when people post on linkedin, and am trying to figure out why.

On most social networks, I think there's a surface reason why people are "supposed" to post that makes it not weird. I'm just chatting with friends. I'm engaging with my community. But the emotional reason people post is to influence people to think like they do ("I want people to see me as a thought leader"/"This person is wrong") or to make people see how great you are ("Look at this cute cafe I went to in Paris"). It's a hunt for validation.

On linkedin, people post for the same reasons, but it's not hidden behind a supposed surface reason. You post on linkedin to make yourself look like a better person to pay for stuff. It's like how on a resume you really ought to brag, but you shouldn't with friends.
Irix even had "virtual swap" which had no (or very insufficient sized) backing store for it, just to handle all the superlarge allocations from which it only uses a tiny amount.
Heh, true, I just added "from their prime" because I know not all of them are still alive so would not add much to a development team in their current state.
Most people still don't really care that much about privacy, and polls continue to bear this out. The bulk of complaints are based on its direct effects on user's mental well-being, as well as perceived damage to the health of civil society.

The upshot is that people don't really see a problem with obtrusive monetization directly (FB ads aren't particularly egregious from a UI perspective), but rather attempts to increase engagement, which of course substantially predate their monetization efforts. The News Feed and related controversy are an easy, early example, as is the promotion of Farmville-style "games" (ca 2009/10), which also substantially predates Facebook's mainstreaming and the bulk of their user growth.
Vuejs/Vue-router: The official router for Vue.js
This app exists, it's called indrive
ta. 39 mins in.
I will agree with you when they start toting around service Clydesdales.
Open Source Minecraft Clone Built with ThreeJS, ReactJS, GraphQL, and Node.js
We see what Muslim is doing to its China minorities.
In the universe of The Stars My Destination, in which all humans have the power to instantaneously teleport ("jaunte"), land vehicles become a symbol of money, power, and status.

The same will become true of human barbers in a world where home robots provide perfect haircuts for the cost of energy and upkeep: those with disposable income seeking a personalized, artisanal, handcrafted experience will frequent a barbershop while most of the hoi polloi will take advantage of the robots.
Mobile phones. You can't modify the hosts file on an Android phone without rooting the phone. I'm not even sure how you would do it on an iPhone.

Both of them, however, allow you to manually specify the IP of a DNS server in advanced network settings.
Great observation - the force sensing isn't there yet. It should be smooth contact all throughout. Definitely working on it.
I keep hearing on Hacker News how easy it is to be GDPR compliant and that any company following good privacy practices should have no problems.

Then I see stuff like:

>if they had done so, then they would have had assigned a data protection officer who would have long ago asked themselves the question "what do we do in case of a personal information request?"

If I have to hire/create an entirely new position at my company these laws are not straightforward or common sense.
You can extend that argument to almost anything. I'm not sure I'm saying you're wrong, either, but simply being alive seems to adversely impact the environment. I don't think you or anyone is saying people should start offing themselves to stop hurting the environment - we all seem to understand there's a continuum and where people put their own personal line ultimately ends up being a personal decision.

I believe I'm healthier eating meat than not eating meat. My blood tests, blood pressure, and weight corroborate that. For whatever reason I could never find a vegan diet that didn't balloon absolutely everything while also sating my unreasonable appetite. I'm not saying this is a good thing (eating meat or eating junk food that happens to be vegan and thinking it'll be appropriate), but I am saying that no amount of quinoa or lentils ever hit the spot or made me feel full, not even when I was legitimately so full I wanted to throw up from all the food in my stomach. I was mentally ravenous, and it was turning me into a vicious beast. I could _nominally_ stay vegan if I ate deep fried _anything_, but that's clearly madness (which, again, showed itself pretty convincingly by all measures available to me).

I'm not going to kill myself to save the environment. I wouldn't expect you to, either. But at the least I can not have children - surely avoiding 1..N generations of 1..M descendants per generation is of FAR greater positive impact than eating burgers and steaks.

All of that said, I'm really holding out hope for lab grown meats, and I only eat meat when my body begins to demand it. It doesn't have to be an always food, is what I'm saying.
Voting, since DIGG popularized the entire idea, will always be an agree/disagree button. Not the intended see more of / see less of.
I agree, and I follow a few people who do it well and I get value out of following them. But, my comment about the people doing harm to themselves (or their brand) are the people who are bothersome and are posting what amounts to spam. It doesn't sound like you're in that camp.
Someone TLDR this I am not subscribing.
There is no good way to solve it using Tailwind classes alone. You could parse the markup first and add Tailwind classes before rendering them, but that is too much pain for very little reward.

The best trade-off I've found is to give a unique CSS classname for the container which has user-generated content, and then style it using nested selectors. Here you can use Tailwind's @apply so you're still able to rely on Tailwind's design system.
A flatbed bike trailer can carry more than a pickup truck. We moved house by bike. 20 friends makes easy work.
Dimensional Weight
Why is nuclear power a problem? It's one of the cleanest energy sources currently.