skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
See also the anglish wiki which imagines a more Germanic English with made up Germanic words replacing French, Latin, etc. https://anglish.fandom.com/wiki/Main_leaf
Most likely, Project Treble is just a in-between step until Fuchsia is production ready.

As for freedom, that is the outcome of the anti-GPL movement, and push for BSD like licenses.
In France: The Economic Committee for Health Products (CEPS) [...] is mainly responsible for setting the prices of medicines and the prices of individual medical devices covered by compulsory health insurance. [0]

And according to the WHO, most European countries set drug prices [1]

[0] https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/ministere/acteurs/instance... translated with DeepL

[1] https://www.who.int/medicines/technical_briefing/tbs/TBS2016... slide 23
The OP could be meaning seizure as in 'to stop' rather than 'to take'?
I mean its not like science could ever be politically biased /s
Marvin Minsky
> A lot of people have a problem with eating dog meat.

It's now illegal in USA.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/13/eati...

Though I don't think it should be illegal unless slaughtering other animals is illegal too. I think our disgust with the idea of slaughtering dogs highlights our arbitrary ethical inconsistencies when it comes to eating meat.
The Android bootloader is LK.
Looking from the context, it is easy to expect that all available cores will inevitably be used by newer dynamic workloads. From the context of the “640k” sentence, the same thing applied. Apply it to now, and the same effect will be noticed.
Not OP, but as a student I had a free public transport card which made it feasible. Now that I have to pay €18 for a return ticket to Amsterdam plus the hour wasted on travel it wouldn't make sense to go for free pizza.
A little personal anecdote:

I grew up in Central Europe and in a very meat heavy society. When I grew up I would have had three proper meals every day with meat in them. Meat was THE main component of every meal. A sandwich without some ham or bacon? Unimaginable! Lunch without meat in sauce, or steak or some ribs or some chicken? I would have taken this as an insult. Are we beggars now or what? Dinner... same story.

In my early twenties I was convinced that meat is part of a well balanced diet. People who don't eat meat are weak. They get ill and they certainly won't have much muscles. I was an ignorant prick, let's put it this way.

When I was ~25 I met my wife whilst travelling. She's British Indian and grew up her entire life on a Vegetarian diet. We got together and so on, but the point is I was confronted to compromise with a Vegetarian person from one day to another without any warning.

Initially I continued to eat the way I always did, just taking her preferences into account and try to be the loving supporting boyfriend/husband that we all want to be. I'd cook my meat in a separate pan and I'd use different knives and forks to handle meat and the veg in the house. My wife asked me for only one favour: If I could not buy beef and store it in the house then she'd be super grateful. I was okay with that, I thought cooking a good steak takes some skill anyway and I can happily just eat steak outside and cook other meats at home.

7 years later and I am 99% Vegetarian. The other 1% is sea food. I look back at myself and think how stupid was I. I feel healthier today, get less ill and feel physically in a pretty good shape. I don't take any protein shakes, supplements or other crap. I actually prefer to eat veg over meat. It all started with me trying some meat replacements like Quorn when making a stir fry, or Quorn mince pieces when making spaghetti. Then I'd start cooking more beans, lentils, chickpeas and other high protein ingredients. The taste is amazing and our meals are rich in nutrition, vitamins and carbs.

I was the guy who would have sworn that I could never become Vegetarian and today I'm almost the opposite. I don't like the look, smell or consistency of meat anymore. I don't like that it's so easy to get seriously ill from meat when not cooked properly, or the utensils which were used for preparation were not cleaned sufficiently.

Long story short, if I was able to make such a drastic turn around on make meat intake then I know that anyone can. It just takes a strong incentive to implement change. For me that incentive was being in love with a girl, but for others it might be something else. Tax, regulation, laws are an effective tool. Personally I believe that nobody will miss the meat in 20 years time if implemented by a government. It's just too difficult for people to imagine that is true and I consider myself lucky to actually have experienced this myself so I can say this today.
But don't you enjoy being reminded of each of the work anniversary of your 600 linkedin contacts?
Here's my approach. Do your best to aware of as many tools/techniques as possible, know where to look for information on the ones that look/become promising or useful, and build deep knowledge on the ones you wind up regularly using.

It's very useful to have enough exposure to things to be able to tell generally what's going on and to know what you need to look up.
At least in the US, you could make a compromise along ADA lines.

Maybe I'm ignorant of this exact situation, but if it's only one road that's closed, shouldn't the other roads be close enough? What stops a car from entering an alley so someone with limited mobility can enter it?
I disagree that the frontend will be specific in even a "vast" majority of cases--if only because of the obvious proliferation of mobile. And while I agree that you can often make a good-looking server-side-rendered, templated application, I will contest that you can ever make a server-side-rendered, templated application feel correctly on a mobile device.

Even in the case where you do have a specific frontend, I contend that there's still value in the separation because it very strongly encourages (coupled with tools like, shameless plug, nestjs-data-sec[0]) the writing of very clear viewmodels where thought must be put into what exactly should be exposed over the wire in a way that commingling database objects and template logic doesn't allow.

I think server-side rendered pages are properly rated at this point, not underrated; there are places to use them but they're shrinking as other tooling get better. As an example, even I write React almost exclusively because I write React faster and with fewer errors than any templating language I see in common use except maybe Razor (and Razor implies buying into ASP.NET, which, no). React/TypeScript are hard to get wrong and easy to burn through quickly. And I would call a React page rendered through NextJS a "server-side rendered app"--but I get the feeling you would not. ;)

[0] - https://github.com/eropple/nestjs-data-sec
Not a superset of OP -- only five titles under "Computing".
Your kids could be the ones who innovate and fix the environment problems, therefore your argument is not valid
"Quack's book has re-release." Adorno largely deserves to be forgotten.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Authoritarian_Personality#...
Linkedin is a platform that seemingly no one except recruiters and "entrepreneurs" actually use as a social network. Linkedin is a great resource when used as a kind of living resume, but it falls pretty flat as a social network because it doesn't really fill any niche that other social media platforms don't.

That said, there is definitely a slimy underbelly of Linkedin that's filled with narcissists and braggadocios who spin self-aggrandizing tall tales. They're mostly harmless, but I could imagine it devolving into something more toxic if it's left unchecked, the way that many other social media platforms have.

There's a great twitter account @StateOfLinkedin that catalogs the most ridiculous of the blow-hards that's pretty entertaining
Thanks, I'll try to clarify.
Oh, I'm sure they have "crossed lines" if by that you mean, gave data to the intelligence agencies or allowed them to mine all that data in some fashion. I'm sure they have.

I am deeply suspicious now of all these social networking sites. We're constructing a digital tyranny the likes of which the world has never seen and you, but more likely your (our) children, and your (our) grandchildren are going to curse us for doing this to them.

But if you want less "tinfoil" of a response, I think LinkedIn is a lie in many ways. They make regular people think they can network using this online tool and that networking is easy but the reality is that it is of limited use and that real go-getters network the old-fashioned way.
LinkedIn is really bad at having a decent discussion.
There is a limit to the comment length. It’s really hard to keep track of discussion.

I find my feed relevant but the mobile experience and predictability of the timeline needs some work, imo. I’d love to have some discovery options but my timeline should be predictable.
Also, there's literally a government regulator that controls entry.

It isn't just patents either, the FDA will grant exclusivity periods for other reasons, and so on, but it then doesn't have much power to examine pricing. It's because our Congress is stupid (I mean, that's the terse summary of it).
> Ebola virus is a microscopic parasite that replicates inside the cells of a host

A lot of the terminology used in this article is confusing. My understanding is that you get viruses (dead and tiny), bacteria (alive but small) and parasites (alive and usually bigger than bacteria). The author also talks about particles a lot as if the Ebola virus was only the rna and the particle was its trogan horse. I thought that a virus was the whole thing.

The summary was as follows: Once the Ebola virus jumps from bats to humans it mutates differently to what it would in bats. This can’t be studied because we can’t experiment on humans so the scary thing is that we have to just wait and see when there is an outbreak and every outbreak is different.
I like to cheer on any company working towards transparent systems and privacy-first technology, but Mullvad has a special place in my heart for always being on the front line. Thanks for the article.
It doesn't really seem to do justice to the problem that all moderation has:

1) Moderators always assume the worst of people.

I remember asking one time about car repair online, and at the time, I had a repair that needed to be made to make driving at high speeds safe. But moderators and others seem to assume that when you can't do something 100% right immediately, you are therefore going to do something wrong. I simply wasn't driving at high speeds to make up for the issue - not everyone has access to the money they need all the time. I mean why would I even be posting such a question on a forum otherwise.

2) Downvotes are based upon agreeing with your answer and not especially geared towards how qualitative your answers are.

I've gotten upvotes for basically stupid answers, which have no business being upvoted ad infinitum for essentially being a dumb meme. I've been downvoted (rather than debated) for answers that others outright disagreed with. At this point, it really feels like online forums are a place to beat people's opinions into submission, which is something I strongly disagree with. There's a famous saying that states "If everyone is thinking the same thing, then someone isn't thinking." I hold fast to this comment, and I look forward to hearing why people think and believe different things, especially when they are able to articulate why. No forum I have ever been to has really appreciated this, especially in the face of controversy. This feels too much like a new breed of close mindedness, which I am supposing is not too different from the thought crime, which if I recall correctly was conceived in the book 1984.
The insurance part is the most important. The more things cost, the more value insurance provides, which is especially valuable to insurance providers because they pay for things at a discounted cost. The more value it provides, the more they can charge.

The economically rational consumer is best off getting drugs through insurance, but in doing so, builds a system that makes any alternative less affordable.
Yeah the recruiter spam is terrible.

I'm interested in opportunities... I have zero interest in most of the recruiter contacts I get that are just "spam everyone with a single keyword that matches this job / waste their time".
Last year in school I also worked for a car dealership one day a week. One of their employees transfered a task to me. She showed me a spreadsheet in Lotus 1-2-3, in which they had a list of cars with the day the received the car and they day the sold the car. She was counting the number of days in between and entered that number into the next cell. Took here 2hrs each week. During the explanation by her I already showed here how to do this with a simple formule. She was ecstatic.

Second thing I automated was automating their invoices. There was AS400 system that generated a CSV file which they printed. Then they opened a template Word-document and manualy copied the data from the print into the document, printed that and continued with the next. With some simple marco's I saved them about a days work every week.
Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20190805092033/https://www.huawe...
As suggested by the other reply, I feel like this is kinda what Beyond Meat is already doing.
is this asmr?
This master slave wording has to change in tech. It's 2019
Personally, I don’t talk about LinkedIn because I assume if I say its name aloud all of my acquaintances will be cursed with a lifetime of spam.
All R&D is the same, whether you’re building life saving drugs or web advertising platforms. You throw gobs of investor money at roomfuls of Stanford PHDs and progress comes out the other end. It’s the most effective engine for innovation humanity has ever conceived. The fact that life saving drugs are more important than web advertising platforms isn’t a reason to turn drug development into charity. It’s an even stronger reason not to fuck up the incentive structures.
Here is the interesting thing about reading books, I once thought reading books and remembering everything about the text is the goal; However over time I’ve learned there is value in having read the book, understanding the material and then you know where to reference the information should you need it in the future.
Hey look over there, there's multiple recent drugs that cure Hep C!

Why would drug companies develop those cures? Because they can market them at quite high prices and still save insurers money (and it is an improvement over the long term treatments that exist, and so on).
Read the whole stuff. Really a descriptive guide of all stuff one can do to gain subscribers to their SAAS product.

Keep sharing more of such :)

Very few open up about their marketing/growth hack plan.
America’s Obsession with Beef Is Killing Leather
> I have mixed feelings about Beyond Meat: my wife and I love the hot Italian sausage and burgers, but it is really not that healthy.

I totally get this, and have similar feelings. But I try to remind my self what Beyond Meat and Impossible Burger are competing with: meat. They have similar saturated fat profiles to their "real" alternatives.

I look at these meat alternatives as mostly beneficial for:

1. Meat eaters looking to eat more sustainably, but continue eating burgers and sausages and whatnot occasionally

2. "Cook out" situations where you can bring a good veggie burger and not be a total social weirdo eating grilled corn by yourself. And it's a good conversation starter, and others are usually intrigued enough to try, and impressed after having done so.
OCSP side-channel leaks in OnionBrowser
Did the author think about the implementation? If we assign semantic meaning to the number of decimal points, now we also need to store the number of significant digits side by side with the actual number. We shouldn't round off internally because we might use it in as an intermediate result in a calculation.
Yes, I know they're work related. I'm raising the point that the emissions may or may not be necessary for their positive influence on society. For instance, I think we'd have a hard time substantiating a claim that people only use private jets when the added productivity (or satisfaction, comfort, etc.) increases their positive influence by an amount proportional to the extra emissions of their private jet flight compared to a normal commercial passenger flight.
Marvin Minsky: Consciousness is a big Suitcase
I disagree. I use it as a way to stay in touch with ex-colleagues who have moved on to new organizations and I wasn't close enough to have their personal contact details but they will go for coffee with me so helpful networking.
I remember /shun.
It's the first thing I check when I wake up in the morning!
Not just lat/lon. I find myself amused when The Washington Post's education columnist Jay Matthews--quite a sharp guy from all I can tell--runs his high school "challenge index" (AP tests taken / size of graduating class) out to six decimal points for small schools. Somebody give that man a slide rule.
People are talking about LinkedIn.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19590585
You seem to need to study programming before being able to do real DevOps. nix is kinda advanced in this sense even if it is has a small language. In my experience, very few ops are able coders.
How to hire a software developer in a candidate-driven market
Yeah.. I have no idea what that person was referring to. Besides, just because people in history did stuff doesn't mean we should now.
How often are you convinced that the criminal system is 100% certain it has the right person? How many times have they got it totally wrong? You have erroneous shit happening all the time. Fingerprints are sometimes identical. People don't want to admit it because it erodes at the idea of justice. But when big screw ups are as common as you've seen in the news, how much do you really really know about who is committing crimes?

If someone picked me up based on fingerprints, I would much rather them say "We found prints matching yours at this crime scene. Statistically, there are 5 other people with prints like that in the area. We have circumstantial evidence that points to you as well. Since we aren't certain, but we have your prints we'll fine you 1/5th of the full amount for the regular violation." Currently, we make mistakes that lock people up for years based upon uncertain accusations - it's always all or nothing. This puts way too much pressure on investigators to get it right and in the case of murders, put someone away no matter what.

I'll tell you what - if they're going to make the mistake anyway, I'd rather have 1/5th to 1/20th of the time to serve.

Edit: This is the 21st century. We're also not restricted to simply imprisonment. Other factors can be affected. It would be interesting if labels could be placed upon those who are suspect, like "suspicious". This could prevent certain purchases and types of travel which would make the kinds of crimes they are suspected of committing more difficult.
Isn't there a massive conflict of interest being ignored on the government's part? Namely that addiction seems to be the camel's nose into the tent for oversight and power on them.

To be frank claiming that private interests having influence is reason for giving power to the government is like saying that chickenwire is unfair to the foxes because the farmer is exploiting the chickens.

They are chosen to be our servants - not our masters - the power should be separated for a reason.
Hey Josh! Loved the website and your work! ;)
Ireland is not in Schengen
I usually go with 6 decimal places.

Geojson format advises it also

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7946#section-11.2
I would say the most important knowledge is the one that allows you to ask the questions of "why is it still not done?" or stating "well, they did it, but it won't work well in situation X" and then either finding the products that do exactly that, or knowing that in a few years there will be an industry providing exactly that kind of service.

Saying that you can't move between cloud providers because you need to learn something new probably implies you don't understand the fundamentals constraining the design of e.g. databases provided by cloud.
It's depends on which society. It certainly damage the society who perfer to eat meat.

Right is something that you or someone else has to fight for it. If you prefer to eat meat you have to fight for your right, likewise with the non meat eater.
Quick note: Burger King uses the Impossible Burger, not the Beyond Burger. In my opinion, the Impossible Burger isn't any better than a MorningStar Farms Grillers Prime (at significantly higher price). The Beyond Burger though is easily the best meat-free burger I've ever had.

A&W and Carl's Junior are Beyond Burger joints.
You don't need to store anything extra if you are just filtering down to a standard number of digits on output.
I had a linkedin recruiter tell me about part time job positions at Target, via text message. What part of my resume says I'm looking for part time retail work and wanting it texted to me??
Interesting. I've not thought about this before, but it seems at first glance a rather inconsistent set.

Resolved by removing both: O and 0; I and 1 and L (l); S and 5.

Resolved by removing the letter: Z and 2; A and 4.

Not resolved: B and 8; G and 6.

I wonder if it was just a quick idea someone had, or if there is some research behind it.
> I get so much connection SPAM from LinkedIn that I consider LinkedIn one of the biggest cesspools on the internet. (Mostly recruiters who I've never worked with trying to connect, but sometimes people trying to connect as a way to promote their business.)

In my case it's mostly the latter that drives me nuts and happens very frequently.

LinkedIn's official Community Guidelines[1] have this to say under the section "2. Be Professional" -> "Honesty and Authenticity":

> Do not invite people you do not know to join your network

You used to be able to report people for abusing that policy by saying "I don't know this person" after you declined the invite. However, LinkedIn are phasing that functionality out[2].

If LinkedIn wasn't overflowing with incessant spam, then it could actually be a valuable service for professionals. However, it's mostly a waste of time because there's zero quality control.

[1] LinkedIn Community Guidelines - https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/answer/34593?lang=en

[2] Removal of "I don't know this person" -
https://www.reddit.com/r/linkedin/comments/ccaky7/linkedin_r...
> But what are they, apart from one of many Android OEMs that make no money?

Yeah, about that: https://www.huawei.com/en/press-events/annual-report/2018

=> Net profit 59,345 CNY Million 25.1%

I believe that's about $8bn. And the 25.1% at the end is the increase from last year.
Any trick you do to reduce resource consumption from spaces (such as suspending and evicting) can also be applied to normal windows. Even the currently shown page can be evicted if your browser is hidden, should one want to do that.

However, listing this as the only difference when asked make it sound like you're selling "spaces" as only a slight performance improvement and nothing else.
>We didn't have universal healthcare when we stamped out polio, smallpox, or yellow fever.

And they affected millions before they were stamped out (by universal vaccinations). So there's that...