skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Instead of an impossible to implement link tax, how about we just made it illegal for search engines to provide these kinds of "pirate" snippets without an opt-in... Either show meta desc, or don't show it at all. Adjust results by relevancy and pagerank (as they used to do) and everyone is happy.
Which is exactly what people do. My family reuses the same 'reusable bags' we've had for years. Almost all the bags I've seen are sturdy enough to last several years.
These are cheaper than 555s, more easily available in various footprints, need almost no supporting passive circuity or glue logic, lower power usage, and more flexible to boot.

Popularity of the 555 waned a long, long time ago.
Is it fair to wonder why they are using people when automagical Ai transcription should do this for them like the man from Google/deepmind/amazon/IBM/Microsoft said? Or is FAIRs really not up to much?
At first I thought you're talking about disinformation in our countries.
I have to ask, using it to do what?
At least among the well-heeled and the culture-class that Waters cites as his markers of acceptance. Should you take his films to a Baptist lock-in you will surely be in trouble.

Widespread acceptability of formerly fringe-lifestyles and a rejection of socially-conservative values ranging from widespread availability of high-grade marijuana to drag-queens showing off their twerking capabilities at public libraries. It's in, it signals you're not "part of the system."

In a way it reminds me of the path that "shock rock" has taken, from Alice Cooper to Marilyn Manson and beyond. There was a good show on the history, I believe "Metal Evolution," which featured an interview with Till Lindemann of Rammstein who remarked, when asked about what he could do to shock at this point, "Suicide on stage." Which I think is a fair statement from a band famous for simulated sodomy on-stage. Perhaps they should try the real thing for sport.
Pizza is already being delivered by bikes and scooters just fine where I live.. Though the largest pizza is about 40cm diameter. 3 feet, that's like 1m. That might pose a challenge, but damn are people actually ordering that much pizza? :P

I mean, just order 2 40cm ones in that case. Problem solved, no?
Or "deregulation". The fire hazard thing is due to consistent efforts to "develop" land into rural mcmansions for rich retired people. Why should taxes go to defend retirement mansions knowingly built in fire zones? Or on a beach? (rising water levels etc). Fire insurance covers damage, not the cost of firefighters, and we cannot ask firefighters to just let everything burn. That isn't safe (idiots don't evacuate) humane (pets) or even healthy (pollution).
That's depressing, but I will remember that when I come across an unnecessarily AMPified URL, I shouldn't blame the publisher for making this possible in the first place.
I always seem to forget my reusable bags.

Me, too, and the only reason it is an issue is because you and I grew up with stores that would provide you all the bags you need (and in fact would have stared at you oddly had you brought your own bags). Think you’d forget if no grocery store had ever given you a bag?

Time for you and I to both develop some new habits. I started by always keeping bags in the car; if I forget, I just have to walk back across the car park. Hell, I’ve taken to keeping a bag in my backpack should need to make a purchase on the electric push scooter.
In this context, what is a lab setup? A LAMP stack? A tensor flow training server?
Glad the first ranked response was this. It's what I came here to say. These days you simply don't need to click as often to get what you need out of a search, and Google's business model doesn't rely on click through to web sites, but for display & click through of ads.
what were the errors? Do you mind shooting me an email at max[at]yack.io
Right.

To avoid the confusion, I should have emphasized the lack of publisher as marker of high quality. A Sage journal or an Elsevier journal is probably better than random-publisher-I've-barely-heard-of... but I'd never heard of a field where publisher specifically was a criterion for paper/citation-counting.
http://liza.io

I mostly write about snails, but sometimes general life things too.
I type relatively quickly (95 wpm) and I didn't even notice the delay until "really not great" (100 ms) and it didn't bother me until "we're done here" (200 ms). I think it has more to do with expectations than it does anything else... A "slow" text box just isn't that annoying. I'm usually waiting for my fingers to catch up with my brain anyway, so there being an extra few ms doesn't change much. It's a little disconcerting to see the text all catch up at the same time and back spacing at the slowest setting was annoying. But still not seeing what the big problem is.
What a low quality, agenda-pushing article.
Fear-mongering at best.
Not only that, the US leads GHG reductions.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2017/10/24/yes-the-u-s-...

Everyone knows China and India lead GHG growth by country, and they have no real interest in increasing the costs for their poorest and most vulnerable, and neither does the West (see "yellow jacket protests"). Increasing energy costs under the justification of protecting the poorest in the world from environmental catastrophe, which only leads to highers costs to those very same people is very sordid "logic." It's almost a thought-crime situation.

I heard a pundit on NPR this morning point to flooding in the midwest this spring as evidence of GCC, despite the problem going back 200 years[0]. Of course, addressed by our benevolent government with 12 separate Flood Control Acts[1], costing billions of dollars. It started, coincidentally, in 1917 (i.e. Lenin's Russian Revolution).

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Flood_of_1844
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Flood_of_1881 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Mississippi_Flood_of_192...

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_Control_Act
I always wondered how the death penalty passed this test and I guess this is how. You can certainly say it's cruel but obviously not unusual.
"The difference being hockey is a giant sport..."

Your choice of metaphor. But you're clearly not getting the point; what you imagine is "obvious" about your rightness really isn't.

"Just that the claim 'there exists a better supplement site than examine.com'..."

This is not a point I've seen anyone here arguing. It's definitely not a point I'm arguing. However, it's clearly a point you and the otherthe boosters of this site want to argue against - that's what's called a strawmen argument.

It's you boosters of this site who have been making the claim - without offering a bit of evidence or support - that this is the single best supplement site, that it's great and useful, etc. Not even not-terribly-convincing evidence, not even flimsy evidence, no evidence at all. Just your curiously consistent demands that we prove you wrong

It doesn't work that way. If you make a claim, then you back it up. If you try to punt the burden of proof to the people questioning you, it's obvious what you're doing.

Hell, for all I know, no good supplement sites actually exist and every single one on the subject is a crap site that deserves search blacklisting. So, it would be a complete snipe hunt to try to find a "better" site than any random worthless site. This would not prove what you imagine it proves.
> For example, Office 2010 support life comes to an end on Oct. 13, 2020. There will be no extended support unit, ala Windows 7, for it. When it's done, it's done.

I don't see a problem with this, it came out in 2010. They have send out free updates for it for 10 years. That is above and beyond in my book.
edit/corrections:
E5-2650Lv2 not E3-2650Lv2
1Gbps not 1GBps (I wish! :)
The Responsibility of a Developer with Regards to Climate Change
I'd call this a clutch pencil or leadholder, if anyone is guessing at the term.
I don't know too much about this so apologies if this misses the mark, but how much of this was due to it being opt out? Or hidden behind confusing options?
We Made Amiga, They Fucked It Up (2015)
At any given crossroads in a business endeavor, you encounter a problem.

Now you have two choices:

1) You select and articulate your assumptions. You select and articulate your requirements. You also may try to capture and articulate your Black Swan list of unknowns and risks. The key thing is that you are clear. Clear what you know and clear about your concerns and risks. You then articulate your solution, holding it accountable to your assumptions, requirements. And then you move forward.

- or -

2) You come up with some solution sketch. You have a general vague notion that it isn't ideal. You're not sure why but it just doesn't feel right. You need a way to psychologically contend with this vagueness. So you give the vagueness a name. The first thought that comes to your head is: "Vague Notion That This Design is Not Very Good". This is not very flattering to your ego. So you think a little bit more and come up with: "Tech Debt". And you like this, because it sounds quite nice. It sounds like you're back in control, that you know what you're doing. You proceed to blame the design deficiencies over time to "Tech Debt". Everyone nods their heads.
I've done my share of sculpture in my life - the problems you run into when carving an item down to a desired result is often less about being able see what needs to go, and more about the structure of the underlying material, and whether it will break/crack/shatter when you try to take a specific piece off.

AR could still help - if an app could visually inspect the surface of your material, or the branches of a hedge, it might be able to flag warning signs.
I thought the buttons at the top ("Fine", "Could be worse", ...) were survey answers. Nope, they are how you choose the input latency.

The "We're done here" button is only 200 ms, and "Surprise me" only goes up to 500 ms. I have experienced far worse and variable latencies over Windows Remote Desktop and SSH due to bad Internet connections - like multi-second delays. This demo pales in comparison to the real world.
Maybe these help but let me know if you got any question
https://docs.blockstack.org/faqs/allfaqs
You could require a specific digital signature on your exe to register as a CTF service, and verify the thread IDs when clients connect.
Google has turned an Ocean into a pond - I think we'll all be the better for it once they're gone.

Regularly cannot turn up results that I know exist - a modest change that has no relation to the query meaning and the results often turn up.

This is not the Google Search Engine I remember.
This title isn't great. Users knew their audio was being collected and transcribed. The issue is that users (might have) thought that the transcription was automated vs being done by real humans.

Apparently FB, at least in some instances, had people do the transcriptions (possibly just to double check the automated transcriptions).
For the push button example I can envision using a pair of 555s or a 556 as a timer for the flashing and a latch to store the success condition, but how does it count to 5? You need more logic in here, so why not a cheap programmable chip?
At least try the product before bashing it. You dont need sign up
Why do you think Python is better than TypeScript?
> This project has received too many requests, please try again later.

Is it possible to describe what it is without spoiling anything?
Funnily enough, Deliveroo has just announced today they are exiting the German market.
It's interesting how in so many places there's just one big player left (in Austria there's mjam, in Germany there's takeaway/lieferando). Maybe the market is not big enough for several competitors?
The logic you'd need to add to a 555 to flash an LED exactly five times would likely cost more than doing it in an MCU.
Utter self-delusion - either by the author, or by Google employees, or possibly both.

Google has been evil from... well, depends on how you look at it, but if not from Day One, then certainly by the time they started GMail. The whole point is to maintain a vast surveillance network over as many Internet users as possible (later also mobile phone users), to try to capture as much of what they do. The use is for deeply personal and intrusive ads, but also for mass government control (NSA gets copy of everything, remember), individual government control and intervention (through subpoenas by less-secretive agencies), and gradually - the shaping of public opinion and knowledge through more and more targeted changes of search results and content recommendations. And of course - nothing is ever erased, nor will it ever be.

Oh, also:

> To invent products like Gmail, Earth, and Translate, you need coddled geniuses free to let their minds run wild.

Google didn't invent any of this stuff. They were just able to put a lot of compute power and storage behind it before others did.
I'm not related in any way to that scene, but what would you tell to marketing when they tell you that that while the mailing list pupup is obnoxious and annoying, it results in X users enrolling and later on Y of them actually ends being customers?
Milky Way’s Black Hole Just Flared, Growing 75 Times as Bright for a Few Hours
You can get a Tyan Tomcat EX or one of the ASRock Rack AM4 boards that have an Aspeed AST2500 chip to provide remote management. However, it might be difficult (and expensive) to get 4 32GB UDIMMs to work properly.
Euronav's Giant 'Oceania' Starts 12,400-Mile Trip to Fuel-Storage Zone
since the 2008 recession Google has tried to avoid sending people to sites, preferring ads and Google sites instead. Each year /update they have tightened the screws. No doubt Google execs are saying, look we still send about 50% of people to other sites, there's a lot more growth opportunity.
“Kochland” Examines Koch Brothers’ Early, Crucial Role in Climate-Change Denial
This is great ! Just works out of the box...really good work. Waiting for bootstrap version
Of course wanting to win your tennis match / soccer game / ping pong tournament isn't inherently toxic. I don't want to get in a match of word definitions here but the point of the "toxic" part of the term is that it's the part that does harm.

The specific usage that I was trying to point out was not correct which I stand by is the "I assumed from the phrase 'toxic masculinity' that it means 'masculinity is toxic'" and the accompanying weird anti-feminist-backed-by-misguided-logic mindset that seems unfortunately common on HN
Age between 25-28, exact date I won't share to maintain a bit of privacy through obscurity.

I can definitely think of a few reasons why Americans 18-29 are less trusting overall. I would pin it to a several factors. I think the people who experienced the mid 2000s recession during their formative years are less confident in government's ability to solve problems and the stability of government services. Witnessing a significant number of government agencies downsizing (read: the government laying people off), and reduced services will do that. I, and many of my friends are believe that social security will be gone or effectively gone by the time we retire (this is also probably a factor in why concern for the elder is reduced). Restricted job opportunity instills a more competitive approach to life, and higher prioritization of one's own security before others. Less concern for elders is a secondary effect of this.

Part of me wonder whether this is just as shifting in the baseline expectation of trustworthiness. For example, "most of the time, people just look after themselves" is something I'd not only agree with, but I'd also question why it's being portrayed as demonstrating a lack of trust. A lot of our social mechanisms operate off the assumption that people are mostly self interested, and it works because most people are self interested. I'd not only openly say that I mostly look after myself, I'd tell other people to look after themselves first and foremost - taking care of others is a secondary goal that comes after securing your own wellbeing.

Similarly, I think we don't really trust people as much because we have less need for trust. Back in the day, if you wanted to know whether or not a product was good you had a couple sources like a magazine and some acquaintances. Nowadays you have a plethora of information and you can form an effective opinion without allocating too much trust into any individual source.

Personally I think that lower amounts of trust is not necessarily a bad thing. Trust allows people to collaborate without an effective means of ensuring commitment to obligations. But on the flipside the more trustworthy a society is, the easier it is to abuse that trust. There's a good reason why scammers disproportionately go after the elderly, as they're the most trusting on average. The fact that we have built technologies and institutions that can function effectively with little or no trust is a good achievement.
Just don't use a NetApp or Sonicwall firewall...
Dam Removal
I've never maintained a large OSS project, it's mind boggling to me that the community have somehow managed to push the maintainers towards burnout instead of being grateful for the free gift they are receiving.

Expecting the maintainer to keep pushing updates forever is insanity imo. It also rubs me the wrong way when maintainers demand monetary compensation I feel like this muddies the water. But maybe this is the reality we are living in now.
The problem is that there is no "proper" way to dispose of plastics. That's why plastics have become such a problem. They simply accumulate in the environment.
None of yours are Ryzen, though.
Love the work that you guys are doing here - coming up with permutations of natural basic organisms that may result in synergistic effects for human consumer benefit!

Have you found any interesting, but not marketable interactions while looking for viable solutions?

Is Boost Biomes planning on granting academic or other licensing to other parties?
This is going to sound like a troll but I'm a long-time Java developer that hasn't written Java code in over a year because I've switched to Kotlin.

Practically speaking, I'd start with whatever stack your new employer already uses. Having a solid understanding of the existing components will give you a baseline understanding of what was chosen and why.

One framework that's caught my eye recently is Micronaut which is basically a simplified version of Spring with added benefits like using little to no reflection.
Turkey Will Declare a Holiday Dedicated to Planting Trees

https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/turkey-will-declare-a-tree-p...
Staying Afloat on an Island of Wealth
Not at all. Your identity is encrypted with the master key just like when you make a BTC wallet. You can save it and use it even if our servers go down; you can have or use another node.
Also, you can choose or make another storage provider to host your docs. We are cool; we want to give people a more secure option ;)
Yeah, the trick to remember is the await in the line before (and in general, anywhere you would .then() you can await, .catch() you can try/catch). You'll notice you can even `return await`, and that may have been the particular missing part you wanted. Where promises typically auto "flatten" their returns (return a Promise<T> in .then() and the return of .then() is a Promise<T> not a Promise<Promise<T>>), async/await does not flatten the promise automatically in case you meant to do that.

If you are writing a lot of async/await code, you may want to take the time to configure your linter for promises/async/await or try Typescript, as either or both can be very useful tools at spotting cases where you missed an await before a Promise.
Don't get lost in the weeds here. The main thing to understand is that if something has value, there is a market-based approach to get that value.

I don't need to argue that the environment and endangered species have value. They clearly do. I'm arguing that activists should act more like entrepreneurs and find a way to use market forces to extract that value - in this case, protecting species and their environments.

I've thrown out hypothetical examples, but I'm not an environmental activist, I don't pretend to understand the market. But I know the market is there, because this thread is dedicated to discussing the market opportunity.
Wow. The grid in the US sucks.
Orchestration with Kubernetes Coming to macOS
Best of luck. Something like 25% of food that’s grown won’t be eaten because of, among other things, spoilage. Keeping food fresh for longer would mean not using as much land or as much fertilizer for agriculture.
NYT, please stop disinformation too! Yes, there are fake news flying around in China, but at least you could do better, don't you?

Video taken today in HK of the protesters: https://twitter.com/CarlZha/status/1161334705570009089?s=20
> sometimes the US government

Yeah, but that's a huge opportunity b/c they have tons of money and constantly overpay massively for things.

> If we only released secure software, that $300 billion market wouldn't exist

This is the broken window fallacy [1]. In fact, what you are saying is that there is $300 billion of value to be created by making secure software.

1: https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/08/broken-window-fa...
What I find truly disgusting is how, as a business, you basically have to by adwords against your exact domain name, lest competitors buy it and show up above your organic positioning in search results. Can't think of a better example of a "Google Tax".
Careful what you wish for, looks like they might add in the brute force option soon:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/chinese-military-ama...

>"Beijing’s latest response to protesters came as a grave threat issued Tuesday morning through state-run media, saying Hong Kong citizens are "asking for self-destruction,"