skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The first time I got high was when a camp counselor shared a joint with my friend and me. There were no photos, and no parents ever knew. Everything was just fine that way, too. Who knows what my parents and siblings were up to while I was gone.

It was such a relief to get away from my whole family for a week when I was a teenager.

That was in the 70s. I would have gone nuts if I'd been raised by the helicopter parents of the 90s who were always on the verge of calling social services on my wife and me because we didn't always supervise her every waking moment. Hell, sometimes we didn't know where she was when she was a teen. And the psychotic version of obsessively intrusive cyber-stalking parents that exist now makes me not want to know young parents.
>Someone called Neal Stephenson

This is such an interesting way to refer to an author.
I'm confused by this reply. Like I said "Not at all.". But the point is, if you have some data that you want to communicate, it is also a good idea to store the precision.
I'm very familiar with their sales tactics and they are legal. They don't commit felonies on every single call. If I knowingly found out they were commiting crimes and did nothing I am guilty.
Why Most People Never Get What They Want
> At least with a bot you'd be able to explicitly prevent them from doing so.

Not really. They're really good at finding a proxy for the banned characteristic.
Not just corrosive, but calcium devouring.
It was in a great blog by a guy who seems to be former NSA or similar - CyberSecPolitics

Looking for it right now tho is beyond my capabilities - I am on mobile and it’s 4Am where I live..

Most of the talk is centered in which cyber capabilities each country has and how they use them. He said interesting stuff about the Russians allowing a lot black hat hacking to go on - as long as it’s directed elsewhere. Then the state uses them agaisnt adversaries when needed. Lots of interesting stuff.
After searching for documentation on this feature of COM, I have another theory as to why people do not use it. And it is very similar to the reason why Arthur Dent found it surprising that his house was being knocked down to make way for a bypass.
Wow, thank you, I had no idea. It doesn't appear in the language dropdown list, so I assumed it didn't exist.
That is simply false.

In most countries with socialised healthcare, you can buy extra private health insurance that allows you to be transferred to a private hospital, for example, to receive better care if that is what you wish.

In this type of scenario, the government would still pay what it deems is the price of the service, then your health insurance will pay some % on top of that and the rest of will be from your own pocket.

Finally, even if you can somewhat argue for some potential benefits of private health insurance, in Australia I can buy the very best health insurance for me and my wife for the price of $AUD125 per week with no deductible and very small waiting periods.

In the USA I would probably have to pay triple that amount and have a 10k deductible on top of that.

Finally, not having to think twice before to go to the doctor is amazing.

My wife has a lot of health issues and even though I would love one day to emigrate to the USA for potential career opportunities, I know that not having a proper healthcare system is a deal-breaker because I want my family to be treated properly when they are sick no matter what kind of income we have.
I keep JS off by default* and it's teriffic. Using a browser with it enabled is tedious, slow and distracting in addition to the obvious heka-less-secure.

* http://surf.suckless.org/
I don’t know of any books. This talk was in featured in a blog called CyberSecPolitics which I follow.
Can the man who found the Titanic find Amelia Earhart?
Snowden didn't know everything then, and he knows even less now. Also, asking a company for data or even stealing the data through subterfuge doesn't make you an owner of that company.
I fail to see how this would by definition, not be true, in any country with any form of government.

Any entity that wields power, is a potential threat to a monopoly power holder (the state), and as a result, has to be collaborated with, or fought against.
We already depend upon layer after layer of highly complex software. I'd argue that the complexity of k8s is not out of line with its scope. I don't want to get into a debate about specific things like netfilter. Yeah it's an odd setup and full of warts, but it's completely pluggable. On GKE for example you can now run in a mode where the pod networking is handled as a VPC subnet with load balancing directly to pods. And that's sort of the point: it's the maturing abstractions that are valuable, not the specific implementation of a part like networking.

As for struggling to run it, our experience has been different. Granted we're a small user. Our largest cluster has just over 100 nodes. Our highest volume service hits about 15k req/sec at peak. We're on GKE which is a well-managed implementation and that also makes it less risky. In two years of production the platform has been extremely reliable. Moreover we've been able to do things that would have been a lot harder before, such as autoscaling the service I mentioned above so that we're not paying for capacity we don't need off peak.
The interviewer did a good job. He wanted to see how they think and see them try to work through the problem. They didn't even try at all.
The ability to abstract everything in the language, is what I got from learning Lisp. You can just keep abstracting and abstracting until you're working on an entirely different kind of plane where you're now measuring programs themselves in their entirety and assigning a type to their 'behavior'. Anyway, that's what I got from it.

As for pattern matching, try something like this https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~plragde/flaneries/FDS/index.html you'll see how patterns you find by yourself can just be specified and matched, making it much easier to take apart things like suffix trees.
How the Impending Economic Recession Will Affect Bitcoin
What You Should Do to Find Out About Iptv Free Before You’re Left Behind
Haha, I know what you mean.
The authors of the paper are quoted in the NY Times story.
what other trees are there? giant sequoia required dry summers + snowy winter
I first learned about the Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico from a charming little doorstopper called The Illuminatus! Trilogy. It was certainly an influential work for me as a young man. It goes to show that reality is far weirder and cooler than commonly thought.
Sorry but this is flat out ridiculous. It's no different from saying "if you supported any of the US wars since the Korean war, you fall for propaganda and it's time to rethink the idea that everyone gets a vote." or "if you fall for advertising" or "if you become a slave to a corporation" or "if you live beyond your means" or etc etc you get my drift. Most people are seriously flawed and easily fooled. You are just saying that you don't believe in democracy.
Will they also offer Fox Sports channels?
That would be amazing!
A Test Suite and Manual Evaluation of Document-Level NMT at WMT19
Fair enough. I see where people can get that interpretation from reading what I wrote. But for last clarification allow me to say that I am not arguing that pie is going to be fixed size nor arguing that it can’t be grown. There are many attempts in progress for Korea but they aren’t turning out to be successful that’s all.

Some of the difficulties for growing the pie is listed under what you mentioned as possibility for Korea.

But until Korea can figure out a solution, people will end up fighting for a pie.
Maybe he thinks the original is the transformed version
How many books have been produced? What is the goal/hope?
And I thought there was a problem with my DNS that prevented YouTube from loading. (I assumed that chrome was using some special settings)

This is really the shitties thing I have seen from Google, especially first hand.
I believe the age of the anonymous internet is over. It's time for real world identity linked accounts for participating in online conversations.

This is necessary for 2 reasons. First, it gives us confidence the people we are speaking to are (probably) not bots.

Second, it reduces the need for online censorship beyond what is required by law. So much of the hateful garbage posted online is only posted in the first place because of anonymity. Remove that, we probably don't get that posting in the first place so we can avoid the messy issue of enforced top down censorship.
I will pop on a Hong Kong style facemask and push this thing down a staircase.
Even if there were such laws, they would be very difficult to enforce. Monsanto certainly isn't the only company that does this. I'm sure that fake book reviews are very common.

Worse, there are entire subjects that have been pushed aside by interested parties systematically building a consensus through media that some topics are "discredited" or "unfounded" or "unproven" theories, or even "conspiracy theories," to the point where most people will automatically dismiss them if they are brought up in conversation. The difficulty is that if you don't have a direct interest in the subject, you are very unlikely to spend the energy to investigate the subject yourself and make an informed decision, and those who want to suppress backlash know that.

"Roundup? I never use that stuff. Who cares?"
It's a good comment, except that you complain about being downvoted, and I always always downvote that kind of meta whining.
You're not a hypocrite. I still like to know the level of dogfooding someone practices.
Authentication in SPA (ReactJS and VueJS) the Right Way
Now they just need to use this same tech to try and fix the sonic the hedgehog trailer.
Be Happy No Is an Option
> So, I know literally nothing about Haskell, and I would rate my knowledge of functional programming theory as 'beginner' at best, but I still get baffled every time when reading Haskell code that implements anything other than something trivial like a fibonacci sequence.

Then perhaps you should fix these before indicting the code?

Haskell isn't just a different language to learn because it's different, it's also a different language because it has a community that values math-driven models of things. As such, you're going to end up at a disadvantage trying to understand every aspect of it without any prior consideration.

Sorta like how templates often baffle new programmers but are considered absolutely essential by folks who get a year or three of C++ experience.
Actually just realised. The CyberSecPolitics blog has book reviews. The guy clearly knows what he’s talking about so I have no qualms saying he probably can do better book recommendations than I can.
This so much. My trial just expired, but I will be waiting for my first paycheck to throw money at them.
https://cybersecpolitics.blogspot.com/2017/04/fusion-centers...

Here it is, just found it. My description was completely from memory so I hope I told the story right!
What about gay teenagers growing up in disapproving community, people in abusive relationships, etc who need advice and support?
I asked you what you thought were meaningful benchmarks illustrating your point

I'm not lying about what you said. I even copied the longer section of your quote in the prior post aside from the entire thread being right above on my device and yours.

I'm also not lying about the availability of evidence to prove your claim just asking you to provide a link to such.

You spoke with authority and then get upset and wave your hands about yelling LIAR when asked for supporting links.

Perhaps begin again respectfully or cease discussing.
I would assume No, It's interesting since Disney bought 20th Centuy FOX. But did it also buy FOX News and FOX Sports as well?
This so much.
My trial just expired, but I will be waiting for my first paycheck.
If both languages have the same semantics, why choose the one with more complex syntax?
Thank you so much for sharing this. As hard as it is, we all need more brave voices like this, and we as a society should be embracing those who come forward.
I always think of it as such when crossing it. There’s at least one petition out there to officially name it that, which I think would be awesome.
How to Build a Web App with Vue, Vuetify and Axios – Fullstack News
It is always nice to see projects like this. Creating a simple interpreter isn't a hard job, but it's still pretty educational.

One thing that you'll benefit from is documenting the instruction-set, and usage a little more clearly. For example my own toy language was written in C here:

https://github.com/skx/simple.vm

And I think I did a good job of showing how to use the instructions. Then for fun I rewrote it in golang https://github.com/skx/go.vm which showed some interesting differences.

Your own tastes might differ, but I'd think after the interpreter a compiler/decompiler would be good next steps. Makes it a lot easier to write code/programs in your assembly!
I actually find Google Flights pretty confusing. Haven't tried it recently though. Kayak works pretty well for me and I usually go to the airline's website to book directly when I find a good deal. If the price is the same I book via the airline website. For domestic flights I also check southwest.com since they don't work with Kayak and other travel sites.

Don't be surprised that many other travel sites cannot compete. After all, most of the sites are owned by either Expedia or Priceline. They are not startups. Also, they focus more on hotels since that's where the money is.
This is a rather cryptic comment.

Are you saying there's some sort of group or club where you pay 15 cents for a mask and then put it on to get well-acquainted to psycologically aberrant individuals from a comfortable distance before they go prison?
My point is that the word "barren" was appropriate maybe 100 years ago, or even 50 years ago. But I can very, very clearly imagine the different looks on a woman's face if you asked "Are you unable to have children?" vs. "Are you barren?"
$25 USD was not pocket money in 1859. Accounting for inflation, it's about $750 in 2019 money.
Would it make you feel any better if Huawei was owned 100% by a 27-year old college dropout wearing a hoodie?

Honestly. I find it hard to see the big problem here. Huawei is run by Ren Zhengfei, who is also the public face of the company, and besides running its daily operations also formally has veto rights.

Then there is a share scheme running through a union where the shareholders have no practical say but get a share of the company dividends. These shares are good enough for employees to take loans in and the issuance of shares has been a way for Huawei to finance itself.
I believe it does, yes. "All Causes". The problem with excluding it is there's not enough underlying data to get WISQARS to cough up a county-level breakdown. Explore it yourself by starting at https://wisqars.cdc.gov:8443/cdcMapFramework/
The Difference Between a Framework and a Library – Freecodecamp.org – Medium
I'd be interested if you can remember any more details that would help me find this study. I tried searching based on the terms you used here, but didn't find anything that seemed to match.
Weird, I thought the point of this thread was how to bikeshed looking up environment variables while folks look at the proverbial camera and appeal to the hypothetical audience that `if x == null: ` would surely be morally superior.
One of the good test case for any flight booking website is Bhutan. Kayak seems to do good job while G Flights says nothing available. Also later doesn’t seem to allow flexible dates, a critical feature if you ask me.
I feel the same way. Elixir users keep banging on the macro drum but most Erlangers don't want them.

I can read any Erlang program I wrote 10 years ago with ease. I have difficulty understanding a small Elixir project I wrote just a few months ago.
Also speed, it is much faster. But it has all started with the purchase of the main route planning software (ITA), essentially a purchase of a monopoly.
You and the original poster have described the exact way China has, up to this point, effectively leveraged a balance between state directed means of production and corporate capitalism. It is simultaneously brilliant and terrifying. The real question is how long the communist state apparatus can restrain their desire for absolute control. If they can maintain this balance for the next 20 years, China may become the dominant superpower in the world. However, if they cannot control the party's baser instincts, the Chinese economy may collapse under its own weight within the next decade.
It is a slippery slope from regulating "hateful garbage" (to be explicit, I interpret this to include speech that is not necessarily hate speech) to censorship of whatever the state determines to be wrongthink.

I'll take my anonymity where I can get it, thanks. And as an aside, it's somewhat ironic you post this on a throwaway.
Huawei is a private company with an opaque management structure. None of its claims can easily be verified using publicly available information (nor can claims to the contrary).
It seems like the same argument could equally well justify reading the entire contents of your spam folder.

FWIW I agree with your take, but practically speaking I use whatever “metadata” I can (is this a bot, is the writer a pseudoscientist, is this thread a flame war) to help deal with the fact that it’s so much cheaper to create bull%^*t than to critically evaluate an argument or idea.
Mux is hiring great people to keep building the best dang video infra on the web
San Clemente’s man-made reef, likely the world’s largest, is getting bigger
>As U.S. policymakers remain indecisive over how to prevent a repeat of the 2016 election interference, the threat is looming ever more ominous on the horizon.

That interference is specious, I think. In any case, the US interferes in every election it can, so is it unreasonable to believe every other country that can interfere would?

>You probably know enough to avoid following small, suspicious accounts on Twitter or browsing links to sites of which you’ve never heard.

I suppose ''surfing the web'' is truly dead, then. This seems to me like an article written for sheep.

>The second vulnerability is a legal system with numerous blind spots that lawmakers should close. Reddit is the third-most-popular social media site on the Internet, surpassing Facebook among American Internet users. It is also shockingly vulnerable, requiring only an e-mail address to register an account. Consequently, anyone could theoretically register an unlimited number of accounts and, being careful not to stand out to system administrators, effectively control conversations on whatever topics they want.

So, here's the meat of this garbage, then, in which it reveals its ulterior motive. Yes, Reddit is the Wild West, only requiring an email instead of the socially acceptable email, phone, government ID, etc.

>The third vulnerability is online anonymity. While we absolutely do not advocate for de-anonymizing the Internet, it is now so influential over American society that legislators should not leave regulation to social media platforms alone. Congress should put more pressure on social media companies to ensure their users are, at a minimum, who they say they are.

Well, what I was going to write about this issue, after reading just the first few paragraphs, should then be a response to this nonsense. As an aside, there is no ''Who they say they are'' in a truly anonymous system.

I was going to suggest anonymity, true anonymity, as a solution to this issue. I prefer those venues where there are no names attached and one can't tell even if multiple messages are sent by the same person. When you have a discussion in this way, you only judge each message on its own merit. There is no ''Gee, this can't be a bot or government agent, since this guy has a history.'' or any such thing. So, if it seems a great many messages have been made in support of something that isn't usually in the venue, such as a political candidate, say, it seems fair to regard it as astroturfing. When no one or few have a face, it's harder to astroturf, if only because everyone will constantly be on edge and are less likely to be swayed by a few messages. Not only that, but since none or few of the real users have identities, you can't target them with specialized messages or track them or other such things.

Anyway, what a terrible article, ironically submitted by someone with an account less than a day old. I almost wish I could make a living writing such cheap garbage, but I figure it would eventually get to me.
Isn't there a bunch of methane trapped in icebergs or something?

I'll be honest, I'm convinced humans have a big hand in climate change, but I can't seem to determine whether I merely need to lobby my rep for green legislation or start taking survival classes for an impending collapse of JIT supply chains and society in general.
Well said. I always bristle when I read an articles drawing such conclusions.
To be fair, most of innovation in America also comes from the public sector not the private one. Economist Mariana Mazzucato famously wrote about this and more in her book "The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths" which I highly recommend if you're interested.

I think it's a little misguided to say that China's innovation is solely due to corporate espionage. States have always been effective at spurring innovation when it's needed. We only need to look as far back as America's highly productive and innovative war economy to see that
It might be in Python, but it's sorta oranges to apples for you to just not do the same thing your Rosetta code is supposed to do.

What's the value of your exercise if you just redefine the problem to get rid of the tricky part?
Probably because they're all right.
I ran a small fab on the peninsula back in the day, and we certainly didn't dump any trico down the drain. We did put a small amount of propanol (used to switch from a water rinse to trico drying) down, but that's pretty harmless. The trico was taken away by a reprocessing company. It was still essentially pure - some of it contained a bit of dissolved photoresist or beeswax.

I read through the OP - he's making good choices and doing it much as we did fifty years ago. I would have killed to get that maskless photolith setup, though.

For a small fab (three furnace tubes, two fume hoods), the main issue is acids from photoresist ashing, wafer cleaning, tube etch cleaning, and metal etching. These are easily neutralized with a vat of marble chips built into the plumbing under the fume hoods.

If you are doing this, avoid epitaxy, which involves arsine and phosphine. I would say never attempt those! You can buy epi wafers. Either use spin-on dopants like he did, or use oxidized boron nitride wafers and small amounts of phosphorous oxychloride like we did.

The effluent from a plating facility or a dry cleaning establishment would be far more concerning.

Our furnace and photolith operation fit in a 20 x 30 ft room. It was one of the leading operations of its kind in the world at that time.
Yeah it seems more like it.. fluoresces (?) around the infrared spectrum. Fluorescence might actually the right term for what is happening.
Sure enough, there are angry customers accusing Coinbase of stealing their Bitcoin Gold:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CoinBase/comments/7jtlgz/coinbase_s...

IIRC BCH and ETC forked before BTG. They probably did two of them and then asked themselves "Why are we doing this again?"
You could technically do that in China also, just without an independent judiciary you wouldn’t get very far.
That world has very little to do with commerical Haskell though, now does it? Why, we even discourage the use of Singletons and if you import a unification library everyone will immediately demand to know why.