skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What is a workable answer when it comes to behavior and speech other than a rules based society with limits? I don't see truly oppressed people talking about this problem as the concept was meant to protect, I see people who want to be allowed to do and say whatever they feel like despite how it affects innocents. They hijack the intent for nefarious purpose. It's proven over and over that bad people abuse and take over platforms and societies that are entirely open. You cannot have entirely "free" speech without this problem. Any civilized society has to have limits and rules otherwise regular, calm, peaceful people are always suffering the effects of the aggressors.

I've used the example before of a town with one place to eat. Someone comes in screaming and throwing poop at people. You cannot just "ignore" it. It ruins the place for others. So you choice is to suffer it or never go out to eat and socialize with other calm folks. Is that a proper price to pay so the screaming poop thrower doesn't feel oppressed? Is that really sensible? Sure long term you can build another diner at your own expense...but the screaming poop thrower will come there too and if you kick him out you are "censoring". You can also stay home. But you lose out on experience and peace to avoid the problem. But this seems to be the idea people who are entirely against any censorship or rules propose. "If you don't like it ignore it or move on". That doesn't work in the real world.
All these proposals have their justification. Surprisingly only incomprehensible complications, is it easier to use

cpupower frequency-set -g performance

and use intel-speed-select tool
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/lin...
I think in regards to OP, it'd only be called tax fraud if it was prosecuted criminally, regardless of the phrasing.
I've seen one that pairs people to meet up every week.

It's just hard to incentivise.
I wonder what would? Would being payed work?
Natural ecosystems are notorious for unintended consequences of intervention.
So deet?
Regex is one of those topics I just can't seem to commit to memory. The concept is easy enough, and every time I need one I can usually work out what to do after a short amount of research, but I feel like I forget immediately afterwards. It may have to do with how regexes of any complexity look like machine code to me.
Because we are tantalizingly close to eradicating it. The low death rate is a sign of success not a signal to stop.
vote for mailcow.

Have it running about half a year and am really happy about it.

If you have the time imho migrating is worth it.

You can transfer your old mails via imap to mailcow, so migrating is easy
Ha that's funny. I literally gave a talk with that title. But no, I didn't review that book. But yes, it was similar popular science type stuff.
Chhotu – An Inspirational Story
What exactly was bogus about sokal squared? They made stuff up, they got it peer reviewed and they got it published. Yeah the journals weren't great but none of them were publication mills and not everything published gets published in Nature.
Technical books tend to get peer reviewed.
Note that by not setting rel="noopener noreferrer" on the links you let the linked sites control the opener window (and of course see a detailed referrer header).

https://www.jitbit.com/alexblog/256-targetblank---the-most-u... (This applies to more than just target="_blank")
The idea that minimizing the media coverage would make the problem go away isn't supported by evidence. China tried just doing a complete news blackout on the protests in Hong Kong but it wasn't effective. In a less rigidly controlled society other news outlets offering more detail would simply fill the vacuum.

Even as things are, the US media omits a great deal of information about terrorism and mass shootings out of a mix of sensitivity and caution.
"Europe has already done to it's own forests"

Europe has done that to other's countries (colonies) forests as well.
Thoughts and Prayers (2016)
Oh I agree about that, and I agree that NaN is a good default for an uninitialized floating point variable.

My point was that you don't always, with every variable, need to be able to express an "undefined" or "invalid" value. The type system should be able to express if a given value is nullable or not.
Terrible article, terrible writing, terrible family.
I personally got an 8 for my work phone. No notch and Touch ID for less? Yes please. If only it had an earphone jack.

I already dropped Apple from my personal devices earlier this hear. Cheaper OnePlus 7 Pro? Yep. Only took a few days to get comfortable after iPhones since the 3G.
Don’t Facebook buy purchase history off credit card companies anyway though if you actually get as far as purchasing?
Can you point to any other species we’ve eradicated that has resulted in a massive human death toll? From my perspective we seem to be pretty good at killing things and getting away with it.
Flea and bed bugs really drive people crazy. The nice thing about fleas is that in my experience they are easy to deal with (just fog them once, if it's really bad fog them twice, and they are gone).

But bedbugs -- I don't think that fog works on them. A friend of mine had to throw out a brand new bed couch to get rid of them. They really suck.
It has been a long while since we've had usable news sites.

There are so many mixed in signals when it comes to the "decline of news" that it's hard to pinpoint causes or use it in arguments.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20598138
This is intended to be humor. Don't take it too literally.

eating-uncooked-instant-noodles-straight-from-the-packet

My sons learned that from me. I began doing it during my second pregnancy when even saltine crackers were not plain enough for my level of nausea.

Yes, it's mind bogglingly messy.
That's not a high bar to meet when you seriously start considering building a defense at $400-$600/hour.

I took a small court case almost to trial, eventually settling out of court. My lawyers got over $100k.
Pretty interesting knowing mosquitoes were weaponized in the past. The irony in the fact this took place in the modern era, and not in medieval times, where they were known for catapulting diseased carcasses.
It would be difficult, for them to work they must have the correct angle of attack.

The way the device is controlled is by constantly changing the angle of the jets, so the wings need to be angled precisely otherwise it'll counteract the control input.

I suspect body position would make a much bigger impact. https://www.businessinsider.com/why-ski-jumpers-fly-in-a-v-s... Obviously there are no skis.
http://archive.is/UCSof
Speaking as an old fart, it's not about getting one framework but not the other, it's about the concept of the framework.

For me, coming from a heavy Ruby on Rails background, I learned to just "trust the magic" with Angular (which is what I've used). Change the variable here, trust it will update in the component on the screen. Don't ask why.

The other part about frameworks that was hard for a bit was, "But what part runs on the server?" - as in, that idea that the code on the browser is generated by something on a server, and whatever that server part is actually talks to the API.
كلمات اغنية شبيه القمر عيضة المنهالي
But do many countries treat them as secrets? Where I live, my number is a unique identifier for me but it's not secret. Because, you know, sharing secrets isn't smart and leads to the recurring issues we see in the US.
Indeed. Thank you, friend!

I'll keep you updated.
I always figured that AR had much less of a latency problem. Because you still retain the actual world as a visual the mismatch between inertial and visual movements is less bad.

This means less nausea, better balance for users, and a much less visceral impact of glitches.
You probably wanted to link to:

https://komiser.io

since the link you provided gives no information whatsoever what is going on :)
For context: Bitkom is pretty much a lobby organization and usually takes the most company friendly standpoint they can find, that's quite normal at this point.
Yup exactly correct. I've also been a reviewer from time to time on various ACM and IEEE papers and there are clearly authors who are trying to get reviewed by their 'friends' rather than by objective reviewers. And there is also reviewer biases, I reviewed a paper where one of the other reviewers was extremely harsh, and that reviewer turned out to have a stake in the outcome. Now a good journal is supposed to curate these sorts of conflicts of interest but my experience is that isn't always the case.
Ah, yes of course. I actually do this often to look for missing runtime dependencies. I hadn't thought about preload in that context - or ldd as a way to run executables "by hand".
Or hire someone for a few bucks to give it the once over. Because it's really hard to edit your own stuff.
It may not be popular,but it's an opinion nonetheless.
I don't disagree with working extra hours on stuff per se, especially if one is passionate about it. However,this is often abused.What is one man's passion,is other man's nightmare. These things are also very hard to balance from the management point of view. Also,60 hours a week of pure work is a lot and unless it's your own business,I would neither want anyone to do this in my own team nor myself. I'm a fan of "work smarter" not "work harder,aka longer hours". Even if you are out of school, there are many ways to shine and develop portfolio without grinding long hours.
The company that is not worth working for isn't the one that allows people,who have a lot of time and motivation to do extra hours, to work longer,but one that finds it's not normal to become pregnant or go on paternity leave.
Aa for paid paternity:I imagine you are commenting from the US perspective,while I do it from the European,so this needs to be taken into consideration,as on tbis side of the pond is not an option not to get it, it's more about what company can offer on top of statutory pay.
As for consulting, I'm in a very similar situation,only my daughter is much younger, that's why I'm having a job that pays substantially less compared to what I'd get in consulting. And no, the requirement to travel doesn't make the job bad,even though business travel is a tiring experience,but,as you said,it could be a perfect fit to a lot of people.
So you have to be a generation ahead of your time for your work to be truly enlightening. Rejection is therefore to be expected if your work is really good rather than something churned out. Science progresses one funeral at a time.

A simpler and more elegant solution is hard for the old guard to take in. You are sweeping away years of knowledge that they have built up about their earth-centred universe to propose an all new sun-centred solar system.

If you are in the position of having written some work that is ahead of its time then how do you know that? Rejection isn't good enough. The reasons why are important. If you have not presented your work neatly or used language that others don't like then that won't help. If you haven't talked about some of the smaller points that the learned people think are important about the topic then you could be done for. We need something more than 'rejection', failed for presentation reasons could be helpful so we can know if the jury is out of some 'rejected' ideas.

Nothing ever gets rejected for being twenty years ahead of its time. It would be helpful if this was an option.
I don't know, it's one of those things that you read more and know less, ie. first google result for "software patents in europe" says "yes, but no":

>> "The European Patent Convention states that software is not patentable. But laws are always interpreted by courts, and in this case interpretations of the law differ. So the European Patents Office (EPO) grants software patents by declaring them as "computer implemented inventions"."

...but it's interesting, ie. what would it mean exactly if bitcoin was built on something patented? It's completely distributed so nobody to sue. Would the repo be banned on github? Let's say it would and the development would move to linux kernel like development, then what? US based exchanges would probably have some premium fee and that's it?
Sigh. The article doesn't say anything about how this compares to the "meltiest" day of years past nor does it provide any usable numbers which would allow the reader to put those 11B tons into any kind of meaningful context.

"Roughly 197 billion tons of ice from Greenland melted into the Atlantic Ocean in July, Ruth Mottram, a climate scientist with the Danish Meteorological Institute, told CBS News Friday. That's about 36 percent more than scientists expect in an average year."

Ok, ok, we get it. It's melting more than average. Now please provide some actual year-over-year numbers and include a projection for this year so can do an apples-to-apples comparison and start our manmade-vs-natural-cycle discussion.
The pattern is kinda nonsense.
The first part [0-9] matches one digit in the given range 0-9.
The second part obviously the same but the * quantifier means the set can occur 0 or many times.

The whole pattern therefore means one digit 0-9 followed by zero or many digits in the range 0-9.

so
"3" would match
"21" would match
"123456" would match
"" would not match

The obviously "correct" pattern for this behavior would be [0-9]+
The + means 1 or more and thus makes repeating the set obsolete.
I also have an SE and still get comments about having an old or retro phone.

My biggest worry is more and more sites and apps clearly haven’t been tested on a ‘small’ screen, and I simply can’t access a crucial element of the UI.
There isn't an organized group with a hierarchical chain of command saying 'launch an attack here' or 'units X, y, z, carry out an attack next Wednesday'.

But there is absolutely crowdsourced coordination on identification of targets, weapon platforms, and methods. And as everyone on HN already knows, crowdsourcing is a highly effective tool for getting things done. It works just as well for terrorism as anything else.
Governments would never use this data for nefarious purposes like selling it to your competitors for money or killing religious minorities
.
>Every single chip function cited here is available in any given wearable/hearable chipset

All but one - low power. A typical pair of true wireless headphones runs for three hours on a charge; a typical hearing aid runs for a week on a zinc-air cell. Any Turing-complete processor will do whatever kind of DSP you need it to do, but the trick is doing it incredibly efficiently.
Author here. I actually did not know this. I used this very old book (Unix Power Tools) and after finishing the chapter on regex I didn't recall seeing a `+` operator (maybe I forgot to add it or skipped over it). But indeed the `+` operator seems to make significantly more sense here.

Thanks!
Assuming you would use salt water on existing land, but wouldn’t it open up for growing crops in new places, on/close to seawater?
Think,Write,Execute,Achieve,Win
It can be very difficult to find them all. Very small amounts of water can host larvae as long as it is persistent. Potted plants that are watered often and outside drip lines for AC's are really common spots for unintended mosquito farms.
> Unfortunately, crops need incredible amounts of water. So, growing corn etc with desalination would case food prices to ~quadruple.

Raising crops and live stock on deserts or other marginal farmland is a huge part of this.
All true if you think terms of taking and holding territory, not true at all if you step away from the geographic paradigm. The US military is very powerful against other states but ultimately it's a force that clings to Clausewitzian doctrine in a Boydian world.
You could use s! As an alternative to startpage (which serves google results but without google directly tracking you)
Bulgaria's GDP is comparable to brazil's and about world average. It's not poor. It may feel that way, being so close to much richer countries, but it's just not poor in any absolute way. In PPP bulgaria is even well above average and median: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)...

---

As to sanctions, and the fairness and perception thereof:

I don't think that fairness matters; nor should matter. There's no good way to figure out what's "fair" and what's not in the first place, and different people have different perceptions. Waiting for fairness simply implies not acting; and that's too costly. The whole situation isn't trivially generalizable to other countries anyhow; deforestation of the amazon happens in the amazon basin, i.e. largely in Brazil. This circumstance applies here, not elsewhere, and circumstances aren't always irrelevant.

Furthermore: the only reason to apply sanctions in the first place (and I hope I wasn't the poster to use that word?) is to induce change. If the sanctions are too mild and change not induced, they're merely harmful. If sanctions do induce change, then there's no "sanctioning into irrelevance" to speak of anymore, right?

But personally: I'd hope that sanctions could be applies precisely enough to induce change without impacting quality of life very much for the vast majority of brazilians that aren't chopping away daily. E.g. by prohibiting the trade in goods that encourage chopping as long as chopping persists (beef and vegetable oil IIRC?); If you want fairness; how about a simultaneous push to lower tariffs or other barriers on other goods. The aim should not be to punish, simply to force change.

---

Finally, I'm going to emphasize that I really think aiming for international fairness is a terrible idea here - but... if indeed a similar issue were to face the US or EU, I'd vehemently agree that sanctions are warranted. And there are issues where it'd be only fair to apply pressure even today. But the thing is: it's not a tit-for-tat game; the point is to cause change. Sanctions that don't cause change are worse than pointless; they're damaging. And however unfair that may be, I don't think it's going to be easy to leverage the US like that anytime soon. Maybe china, you're right... but then the question is whether they'd do that even if it's in the rest of the world's interest - after all, sanctions typically hurt the sanctioning country too (both directly and indirectly), not to mention cause diplomatic damage. If if china had the leverage, would they "waste" it on something like GHG, or instead prefer to "win" the next trade war?

Which brings me to a small dose of realism: it might be benevolent and selfless to apply pressure on Brazil wrt. the rainforest today, but which country is going to waste whatever leverage they have over Brazil and squander diplomatic goodwill over a rainforest that's everyone's problem, most specifically Brazil's too? Brazilians might even be better off in the long run - but countries aren't easily that selfless, so it's not going to happen. This whole discussion is likely going to remain hypothetical.
Can you explain how you can say "up to 50% loss of electricity when transporting over long distances"? That seems very high, and in my opinion disinformation.

The first search result I found [1] says an average of 6% among US states, broken down as 2% loss in high voltage transmission and 4% loss in local distribution. The spread among states is from 2.2% total loss to 13%, so even given that wind farms may not be sited as close or optimally as fossil fuel plants, your figure of 50% seems implausible.

[1] http://insideenergy.org/2015/11/06/lost-in-transmission-how-...
No, I still don't find anything intuitive about it. It's not hard to memorize, but I still don't find it an intuitive or sensible method for exiting.
Excuse me for assuming, but you must be quite young to not know how to send a text on a burner phone. I can still T9 type like I'm still a freshman in high school, possibly as well as I can type on a smart phone.
Cheers for the recommendation. Your previous comment has piqued my interest in Rankin again so I think I'll backfill the ones I'm missing.
Why I don't mock:

https://blog.metaobject.com/2014/05/why-i-don-mock.html
Nokias, especially the 3310 model, had stellar UI for text and voice calls. Contextual menus always spot-on, two actions max for getting anywhere, T9 typing...
> And hell, can't you potentially do this with a technical interview? Nobody who interviewed you is actually going to see you again and I don't recall an ID check at any of my interviews.

I don't think this is reliable. One of my interviewers became my manager; we make it a point to hire for a specific team and get someone on that team in the interview.
> I think the S in SMT is for symmetric

It's definitely for simultaneous. You are probably thinking of SMP (symmetric multiprocessing).
Kicking them out might not mean instant homelessness, they can get a job before leaving the house, crash on a friends couch.

However they're at a much greater risk of becoming homeless.
So we would have more freedom of speech if journalists refrained from publishing and people with political opinions refrained from expressing them?
If the link is for users to click and like this page on Facebook, then Facebook will be able to know the source URL regardless, no?
In California we grow water thirsty crops like rice and almonds. By substituting out for less water intense agriculture such price shocks could be reduced. There's also the whole issue of producing animal feed, which is inherently less efficient than just having humans eat the feed directly.
Art dealer to billionaires gobbles up space in NYC’s Chelsea
Kim Stanley Robinson posits using salt or brine to keep the North Atlantic thermohaline cycle from stalling by dumping it into the subduction zone.

But that’s a lot of shipping. And I wonder if a better way is to capture the glacier melt runoff from Greenland before it can enter the ocean currents, and desalinate that brackish water. I’m not sure what the ratio of brine to fresh water is (ratio of boats in each direction) or the desal versus shipping costs.
I have some vague memories of this. I worked for a MS Gold Partner and half remember getting access to all sorts of pre-release bits.
Please don't take it badly, and only answer if you want to, but how old are you? What you call "intelligence test akin to solving a Rubik's Cube" is what absolutely everybody was doing before the release of the iPhone (so up to 2007).
I used to do that at school, but I'd add the flavoring packet. Ahh nostalgia.
Not quite greyed-out as in disabled. Not sure merely using a b/w logo without logotext will work out with today's flat designs and usage habits. I remember it being used when minimal design wasn't as common as today, and the icons would stand-out (or rather fade into the background).