skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Meanwhile there are martial arts and other physical disciplines where you go slowly to make sure you train the muscles along the entire movement instead of going in jerks and starts (which is how you damage yourself).

Fast iteration isn't about doing things faster. It's about requesting feedback more frequently. Which often means doing less, not more, and then evaluating the effectiveness of that small amount of work. Then adjusting your plans.

In writing, doing an entire book before your editor can tell you you're accidentally stealing a storyline from another author is bad. His analogies seem to be equating to this sort of behavior but missing the cause.
Eric Berger (Ars Technica) on this:

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/08/spacex-enters-compet...
They’re a VC. Managing risk is what they do.
Study political science, propaganda, psychology of advertising, this is something that can make you resilient to propaganda. Just being aware that you may get manipulated can't help you much as you have to be able to spot it effortlessly everywhere.
Almost all their tech products are garbage. How cool can the internal tech stack be? They can't even produce decent tech products that don't require a giant team of AWS experts and constant tech support to work. And then there's the random bugs that make it hard to know if it's just a regular shitty product or you've hit a crazy bug. AWS is the worst part of my job, hands down. I wish they never existed. I'd rather be on a VPS somewhere or even putting in hardware servers in a coloc.
HN is written in a lisp.
Also, use a scheduler to download this at night when you are a sleep or not at home.
Then you'll learn that your username is one that's under attack and that it's even more important to have a strong password. Put some useful documentation on the login page that explains it. What's wrong with that?
I'm French but living in the UK for the past 12 years.

British people have no problem saying "no" in my experience, and I don't think there is a large difference between France and the UK. In both countries, it is mostly class, politeness and social norms that influence the willingness to say "no".

The illustrative argument about the citizenship application rings true to me. But my interpretation is that you are just faced with the legendary disorganization of the French administration. It is at times Kafkaesque.

Years ago my Mom was faced with some weird catch-22 issue at the local benefits office. She had been on long term disability allowance due to Cancer (she's fine now) until one odd day they requested her to re-submit all her pay-slips from 5 years prior (i.e. before she got sick). As she was doing lots of part time jobs with different schedule back then, it was actually a difficult task, and she ended up missing something like 2 or 3 pay-slips among the 20 pay-slips she submitted. She went to multiple appointments every-time seeing the same clerk with no compassion. No other documents would do. Her employers did not have copies. On the last encounter the clerk said he would have to stop her allowance. She snapped and made an epic scene. After 10 minutes she was allowed to meet the manager. He apologized, clicked on a button on the computer, and that was that. She never had to resubmit any documents and has since retired.
There's 0 negativity in this post and literally describes how a majority of 8chan's Pol board got a wave of user's same when people were getting banned on 4chan's /pol/ they just got routed to a different site.

These individuals dont disappear and it really doesnt take long to route to a new site. Fixing the udnerlying problem is a better idea than covering it with a band aid
Another sort of immoral act is to rile up a mob on twitter to pressure a company to drop a client with PR threats.

No one argues against the right of a company not to host Nazi forums. But there is an ongoing trend were companies that wished to be apolitical are forced into political decision.
m5.4xlarge currently but we are migrating to r5.2xlarge. (it will fit better our memory/cpu ratio).
I'm sorry. Refusing service to whom?
Oh, that's not really an issue, he shows very similar levels of incompetence in both areas.
So, essentially you are saying: Because we can't enforce the law against DDOSing -- because that's how the site gets blown away without CF -- we have to encroach on the right of association of CF.
Why should people tolerate things which they don't think it's in their interest to tolerate? If, for example, people believe it's harmful to their children to see people performing sexual acts in the street, why should they tolerate that behavior?
> The task is to find a cost/benefit trade-off that most people are comfortable with.

And those peoples children. And their children. And their children's children.

> just own up to your value system and acknowledge that this is the cost of the way you frame/uphold your values and you are prepared to pay it.

And our value system is that while I may not agree with what you say, I will defend to death your right to say it. And sites like 8chan is the cost we have to pay. I don't believe attempting to silence it would stop shooters, like other commenters say, they would just move into tor and telegram groups. And I think having hate speech be allowed publicly is a adequate cost to ensure that what I say today doesn't have to agree with what someone thought was okay 200 years ago, and that 200 years from now the current political opinions won't affect other people's rights to speech.

> and you are prepared to pay it.

You'll pay it, but also your children. And their children. And their children's children. Except it's shown time and time again that the way values are framed and upheld changes, while the "payment" of it doesn't.

> arguing that nothing should be done

It's not doing nothing, it's the exact opposite. You suggest we suppress it, I suggest we encourage anyone be able to speak their mind and then decide individually if they're worth listening to.
The exception in this standard is for "likely" and "imminent" violence. There are also exceptions for the commission of a crime, but then the crime has to be committed, and thus the intent.

Episode 8 of the "Make No Law" First Amendment podcast has an excellent explanation of the difference between the two. That episode is a Q&A and covers other great topics as well. The entire podcast is excellent if you want a good, baseline understand on the exceptions to US first amendment law and why/how they are so narrowly defined.
"Apps may not require users to enter personal information to function, except when directly relevant to the core functionality of the app or required by law."
the peaks are higher, that's when you want AC
The Criminal Mind, Mass Killing and Second Amendment
Absolutely: refusing to provide service to gays, when you provide the same services to other people just because they are not gay, is indeed literally intolerant, without your scare-quotes or any other qualification.

What's so hard for you to understand about that?

If you're trying to argue for some slippery weaselly nuanced non-standard definition of "intolerant" which excludes bigoted bakers that you just pulled out of your butt, remember that it's a double edged sword that cuts both ways, and also excuses gay couples for not tolerating homophobic bakers.

It's not my responsibility to provide you with the standard definitions of common English words, when you're obviously capable of googling them yourself, and obviously misunderstanding them on purpose, and obviously not arguing in good faith. Look it up on Wikipedia yourself.
I would say that there is a difference in principles on whether a site/platform is explicitly welcoming or not.

Twitter claims to be a public square, the WSJ does not.
Heh, is that supposed to shut this conversation down? Genocides get started, because people can express themselves freely? Really?
To black people who they referred to via a racial slur.
Thank you bristleworm
i ended up completely removing the search link underneath the products.

i will later add a search bar instead of the link there was before :)
Baseless gut-guess: Any move clearly associated to Satoshi, including use of any of the Bitcoin value, would receive such unrelenting scrutiny that there are only two likely outcomes.

A) Satoshi would be identified as a unique individual and any number of bad things would happen since they are such a high value target.

B) Satoshi would be identified as (effectively?) a pseudonym for one or more nation states and whatever value they derived from creating Bitcoin would evaporate.

Given we are currently in a superposition between states A and B, as well as a possible state C where the pseudonym Satoshi is either effectively dead (lost the credentials) or actually dead (end of life); one can infer that the value of Bitcoin continuing to exist as it is either outweighs any change of state or that such a change of state is no longer possible.
I agree that Amazon engages in anticompetitive behaviour but I'm not sure that it can control prices or exclude competition to that extent?

Has Amazon come up with a way to dominate markets without controlling prices or excluding competition? Right at this moment, my answer is, "maybe?"
I'm guessing your comment got downvotes because:

1. this is obviously not going to stop the actual issue; calling people delusional over a strawman is pretty disingenuous.

2. Clearly there's mental illness and lack of gun control at play. There are candidates who try to address this in their platform. There are media outlets mentioning/discussing this. People want free healthcare, i.e. free access to mental health resources.

3. Talking to these people over the course of hundreds of years hasn't helped, but you're welcome to stop by *chan and have a logical debate with them. These are people who think their race is being targeted and that their race & culture is being destroyed, so I'm excited to hear the results of your well-reasoned and perfectly-logical debates.

While you're having your debates, I'm sure people will be happy to have these extremists congregate on an easily-available website like 8chan (not applicable at the moment, obviously) and also hope they don't have to dodge bullets while they're celebrating garlic, trying to get groceries at walmart, or wherever the next shooter is gonna bring his toys next.
To clarify the Death Note rules discussion, this would be possible, but would need to be adjusted such that it's something the company heads would have reasonable done. So something more akin to

"Ceo Ceoson, overcome by immense guilt over environmental destruction, writes down 'Companies 1-16 are responsibl for the dying environment and we don't deserve to live.' having a heart attack."

It needs to double up as a stand-alone action as well as a threat.
I don’t think insurers ever get money from launch providers.
SEEKING WORK | Washington DC | Remote work a possibility

Hi, my name is Pete. I am an expert in creating web sites and apps. I have this expertise because of my experience creating Django and Wordpress sites. You will like working with me because I over-communicate to a fault, I charge a reasonable rate in exchange for the value I deliver, and I guarantee I will get the job done.
I look forward to hearing about your project!

Email: howdy (at) PeteOG (dot) com
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ogpete/
Web: https://peteog.com/
My favorite is when they truncate it without telling you. It's a better UX though!
OP, what evidence did you view/receive/etc that led you to post this?
Show HN: Vue-plugin-boilerplate: A well-documented Vue Plugin boilerplate
Take a look at the Nikkei 225, it still hasn't recovered from its high in 1991.

Your assumption is we have infinite growth on a finite planet, which unfortunately is not the case. Eventually the party will be over, and you'll be left with the tab.
My underlying point is that there is no singular "platform".

Technology is not standing still. Tor isn't necessary. We're seeing the rise of distributed, federated, encrypted, and anonymous networks that take little more than an app install or website link. They are only getting more hardened against these mitigation techniques and the approach of "just shut it down" will soon become an infeasible solution.
The person is capable of writing down X, it's a handful of digits. Moreover it is not unreasonable for an amateur mathematician to do so.

The fact that they entirely lucky that the series of digits indeed satisfies the mathematical condition we want is incidental but I believe abides by Death Note rules.
Starlink sats can maneuver to different orbits. Their original test sats launched on an SSO launch.
Reminds me of programming tests at my college.
Wrong orbit.
I agree. The complete solution involves many things at the societal level, and no one solution (that is actually practical in achieving) will be the ultimate fix.

Unfortunately, in today's political environment, band-aids might be our best hope at making progress right now, in the short term.
Why is a WiFi lock so bad? It opens you up more, but the number of people who can hack even the most insecure example is vastly smaller than the number of people who can kick down a door or break a window. Household locks are almost always just about deterring casual criminals, and internet vulnerabilities don’t move the needle much on that.
The didn't. If you fell down into a crevice, you died. You could apply the same spurious argument to anything - how did people ever get by for thousands of years before antibiotics/vaccines/electricity/water purification existed? They didn't, they lived their nasty, brutish and short lives, and died.
Fyi 'the fire rises' is a reference to Bane from Batman
No company is ever entitled to work you do on your own time without using company resources, although it might get messy if said work directly competes with the company.
It's true that a third party report helps, but also, always make sure that you have the permission of the person you're reporting on behalf of.
The United States, Suriname, Papua New Guinea, and a few island countries in the Pacific Ocean are the only countries in the United Nations that do not require employers to provide paid time off for new parents.[1]

Parental leave policies in the United Nations [2]

[1] https://www.npr.org/2016/10/06/495839588/countries-around-th...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_leave#Americas
CAMEO | https://www.cameo.com | Engineers and Product Managers | Los Angeles / Chicago | Full Time | Onsite

Named one of TIME Magazine's "50 Most Genius Companies of 2018", Cameo is a marketplace where users can book personalized video shoutouts from their favorite athletes, influencers, actors, musicians, and celebrities. From Snoop Dogg to Tony Hawk, Charlie Sheen to Jennifer Love Hewitt and everything in between - our mission is to create the most personalized and authentic fan experiences in the world. We just closed a $50 million Series B round led by Kleiner Perkins and are scaling up big time in 2019 with a ton of interesting challenges on the horizon.

Here are our open roles:

* Software Engineer, Fullstack - LA or Chicago

* Software Engineer, Frontend - LA or Chicago

* Software Engineer, Backend - LA or Chicago

* Senior Software Engineer - LA or Chicago

* Engineering Manager - LA or Chicago

* Senior Product Manager - LA

Tech Stack: React/Redux, Node.js, React-Native

If you are interested in applying, please visit our careers page at https://www.cameo.com/jobs and mention HN
i think you're getting the trust causality somewhat backwards. people don't simply fall into trustworthy or untrustworthy buckets, but rather it's mostly context dependent (with rare exception; e.g. sociopaths). a trusting environment can reveal the latent trust inherent in the team members.

and trust takes time to build, so it's often not something you can just hire for (unless maybe you hire a whole team at once).

teams also require a blend of skills blanketing the problem domain, diversity of thought and background, necessary resources, clear goals, and the autonomy to make decisions toward those goals.
2FA and be done with it.
Should have added, I worked one place we got acquired by a giant company that most here would say is really f*cking evil (TM) and even there I never detected any of the toxic stuff these Google stories talk about.

That place was actually Evil enough I quit within a year to go back to another small company but it was nothing like what you read about Google. A different axis of evil.
> We need to allow people on the edges of the spectrum to say what they want even if it is without merit

Those people can say whatever they want, but no other individual or company needs to allow them the soapbox to do it.
> We provide forecasting tools that show you how much your equity is worth, display tax implications (AMT exposure, capital gains), and model exit scenarios.

That sounds like you would be cannibalizing your user base if you do a good job. Every time I (or friends of mine) started modelling exit scenarios in the past, it became very apparent that none of the realistic exit scenarios would yield any significant payout. Often times this was one of the contributing factors to leaving the company, and sometimes leaving the startup field entirely.
That's awesome! Are you using any video surveillance? What about alarm system?

Been looking for that for a while but no way I ever trust a cloud connected one anf everything passable connects to cloud.
I don't think Mao or Stalin were ever lacking free speech, and I don't think any of those killed ever voted to abolish it. Saying "look communism bad lots dead" doesn't universally work as an argument.
This sentiment is not at all applicable to 8chan, most people are very serious.
Are we talking about the comment? The one I'm talking about is flagged/dead.

Yea, I wouldn't pretend to speak for the community - for some reason our OP insinuated I do by asking if I'm a moderator.

What I'm trying to say is that a negative karma post has been shown the door by the community. That statement remains true from my perspective regardless if I upvoted, downvoted, or did not engage with that comment.
This seems like the sort of thing that will get used in many small teams' internal communications, and occasionally cause awkward situations when someone outside the team gets wind of them.

They're definitely not appropriate for all workplaces, but for small, more informal teams, this sort of thing can help build a culture and encourage teamwork.

It really depends on the company and unit culture.
I don't see a reason for discounting Siemens' own PR department as a source for what the decision-makers at Siemens think of deals they make. Whether they were bribed to agree is a different matter. In any case, it was public knowledge that technology would be transferred, so still not something I'd call "theft".
> clearcut in a you know it when you see it kind of way.

"clearcut" and "you know it when you see it" seem like polar opposite concepts to me.
> A majority of the US population was tolerant of refusing service to ...

But the refusal of service to certain specific races itself is intolerance. That is precisely what Popper's view is: tolerance (by the majority of Americans) of intolerance (towards non-whites) is bad.
Lumo as well.

https://github.com/anmonteiro/lumo
Perhaps you'd like to explain how people driving through the country, or anyone else in fact, drives down ADSL speeds to single-digit or low tens of Mbit/s. Or indeed how population fluctuations of about 1-2% might cause cellular networks to develop dark patches or to regress from LTE to 3G or EDGE.
The nice thing about mental models is you have so many to choose from[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].

[1] https://medium.com/@yegg/mental-models-i-find-repeatedly-use...

[2] http://www.defmacro.org/2016/12/22/models.html

[3] https://fs.blog/mental-models/

[4] https://nesslabs.com/mental-models

[5] https://amzn.to/2KiKQEg (Don't recommend)

[6] https://amzn.to/2GOHoz4 (written by DuckDuckGo founder Gabe Weinberg)

[7] https://amzn.to/31lfK4Q (A classic)

[8] https://amzn.to/31tX17l (Haven't read but recommended by others)
> You have a right speak freely. You do not have a right to be heard.

"You have the right to speak freely as long as you can't effectively do it"? Not much of a right then, is it?

I wonder what would have happened to the civil rights movement or the women's right movement if people with that kind of attitude had existed back then? Those were widely opposed movements back then too.
Would you advocate tolerating, say, parents neglecting their children in various ways that we think are harmful to development? Or would you instead try to spin those forms of child neglect as acts of intolerance?
I think the theory behind it is that when you're dissatisfied with an organization, you have two options: Voice (speak up and hope to change things from within) or Exit (leave the organization and find or found a new one).

And at least when I was there, ~5 years ago, Google executives really, really wanted you to choose Voice. Because the history of Silicon Valley is basically built upon talented engineers choosing Exit and creating the company that eventually replaces you. Google itself was mostly built by people who did exactly that - its early (pre-2005) employees were practically a who's-who of alumni from Xerox Parc, Western Digital, Bell Labs, JPL, Netscape, Sun, and academia.

I dunno if it's the same today - I chose Exit 5 years ago (and my grievances were a lot smaller than most of what I hear in the press today - I generally enjoyed my time there, I just didn't feel like it was a place where my professional goals could be accomplished), and a lot of the people I see Exiting recently are folks I thought were very committed to exercising their Voice when I was there. As a Google shareholder this makes me a little uneasy, but perhaps it's the nature of a corporation that internal dissent just doesn't work when you get to 100,000 employees.
Legalize prostitution. Being completely serious.
There are only five Lagrange points, so L-6 and above are not Lagrange points. :-)
I'm in the same boat as the parent poster in terms of time spent on 4chan and 8chan, and I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic. I understand the nature of irony on the chans, and that a lot of "-ist" comments are "kidding" (to varying degrees of success in terms of comedy and responsibility for the message one is putting out there), but:

1. To be so sure about the numbers seems presumptuous.

2. Does it matter?
Part of me dislikes the availability of equipment that puts you in contact from pretty much anywhere--in part because it creates the expectation that you'll avail yourself of such equipment.

But, if I'm being sensible and I'm off by myself in a remote area, yeah, I'd probably take one.

ADDED: And, yes, it's nice to be able to call for help if you really need it. But way too many folks think they can just get in trouble because they're really not prepared, call 911, and everything will be great. A number of states actually collect costs from people if they were negligent these days.
Sure, but I would be worried about taking blame if 9/10 white supremacist terrorists turned out to be active on my forum.
I feel like this is the case too. I wonder though if 3C is enough to push hot into uncomfortably hot. Especially if at night its 3 degrees warmer so the house never really cools and humidity is higher.
LockPickingLawyer also picked the same lock in OP's post. If you search for the MicaLock on Amazon, the page says it's just a FB50.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeCGTosv-_c
Small correction, EE and I bonds are long term bonds (20 years to get the value doubling on EE bonds, which is the only reason to own them, but the implied ~3.5% of that makes them very competitive with other long term options atm). But the general point of your comment is right, 3.5% risk free isn't bad at all compared to most options.