skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Many spam traps penalise recently registered domains. Wait 90+ days after registering a domain before you start using as your primary sending email, and(as others have said) ensure you have SPF and DKIM set up and working.

Also ensure your sending IP addresses are not in known 'residential' blocks (ie you'll need a VPS at least to use the IP address) and not blacklisted by previous owners.
I'm not sure I see why the cleaning company was the problem.
People don't know what that means though. It is only helpful after explaining to shoot for deeper yet simpler rules for your system along with identifying what can be separated from execution as static data.
At least 1st party javascript usually fixes white screen, but sometimes blocking styles does. What I also found interesting is that disabling javascript with CSP can sometimes fix websites too that are hostile in their <noscript> tag and CSP prevented javascript doesn't run <noscript>.
Data diodes.

Call me when you bypass them, I have a job for you.
Wish i could read this. Ugh, Medium is the worst.
> I'm always amazed Google management tolerates things like internal message boards aimed at letting employees create Memes on company time.

See The Circle, the Emma Watson film.
> I apologize if you took it that way

Placing the blame on him when you were the one being hostile is hostile.
For me it's a treasure hunt I never asked for.

- Was it left at my apartment door?

- Was it left in the 2nd floor mail room/lobby?

- Was it left in the 1st floor main entry/lobby?

- Was it left outside?

- Was it left in some side door?

- Was it left halfway between the 2nd and 3rd floor on a random stairway?

- Was it left in the office?

- Will I have to wait 3 more days so I can report it lost/stolen and try again?

So fun.

Not to get into the "Prime 1-day", which when I order three 1-day things at the same time means one shows up tomorrow, one the next day, and one the day after.
No because fewer than 20% of households in Los Angeles have school-age children. That puts a ceiling on your worst case right there.
Docker Basics for Amazon ECS – Amazon ECS
I should have quoted you directly - I just didn't look deep enough.
True. With all binaries you’re going to be running software that’s bundled and you’re unsure what’s going on fully.

Send me the source for an Adobe Air application though and I still need to download Adobe Air proprietary tools to run it.

For an Electron application I can run it directly from open source tooling.
i'm sorry but i'm really not convinced by this argument. there are many frameworks available in various languages/platforms, some created specifically to be light and fast (in the PHP example above, lumen is a possible choice). my other argument would be- why are you spending so much time on plumbing when you could be concentrating on the parts of your application that make it special?
Discussion in mozilla.dev.security.policy (mailing list to discuss TLS implementation in Firefox/NSS): https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.security...
Anyone take the reasonable approach lately? IMO, it involves taking the CDN version of a framework such as VueJS and slapping that bad boy as a script tag in your HTML file. No webpack, babel, sass, etc etc.

I'm developing a dashboard, nothing fancy but nothing simple. I am also reasonable and think one can build off of all the well established UI components out there such as Vuetify. I now have a lot of free time to spend on the backend API, which is what I happen to enjoy doing.

As a fan of end to end or integration testing, I could care less about test driven development on the front-end.
You're right that obesity causes low testosterone, but low testosterone also causes obesity (plus factors that lead to obesity, like lethargy). Chicken/egg problem?
Most "enterprise" application backends are still written in Java (and probably C#) combined with a frontend based on Angular, sometimes Reacts or older technologies. I am not aware of any Node-based backend at any of our customers (medium/large German companies), except maybe for some smaller parts of the backend (microservices architecure etc.)

Ah, also, not sure if you were joking, but I don't think using JavaScript (TypeScript, that is) in both frontend and backend is a bad idea. Having a shared (domain) model can be a real boon. Admittedly, JavaScript lacks a few things that is offered by Java and the like that makes not yet fit for larger applications though (say DI, modularization and so on).
Great read, but I take issue with a passage unrelated to the issue at hand

> This would explain the obsession with mixing wine and water when it is is unheard of today.

In Italy we still mix water with wine, especially when drinking during a meal. It's not like we do this all the time, but it's a thing.
For anyone who hasn't clicked through and are wondering how much of a "deep dive" this is, the article seems to be hosted on the Medium platform, which means there's an estimated read time metric at the top. It's the biggest one I've seen: "100 min read"
> Climate science, by contrast, has no track record of accurate predictions.

Are you serious?
Did you hear about drilling into the ice to get the samples?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/mar/29/scientis...
What about the other missing $0.06?

Oh, I get it, they sell antidepressants for the society they ruined.
Alas, about 50% of mine.

Many government and healthcare organizations STILL using Internet Exploder, presumably until its 2025 end of life:-(
Explanation by the co-authors here: https://twitter.com/mlbiam/status/1159164155255021569
And learn some markup language rather than Word, this will make their documents text based and they will be able to use all the benefits around text based documents. The problem is that they use Word and moving from Word to text based system is more cultural than technological change and not easy to do.
I'm a fan of that idea and I'm taking it even further:

Erase existing software, so we have less amount of shit software.

I'm actually applying that technique at work with great results (really!)
I use JavaScript on some password fields for client-side password hashing (reasoning: https://security.stackexchange.com/a/201099/10863), but I agree that this might be a useful thing. I can think of a few ways this could work:

- Blacklist or whitelist access: <input type=password nojs> or <input type=password allowjs>

- Specifically set a method that is called upon form submission: <input type=password onsubmit=hashPassword> <script>function hashPassword(value){ ... }</script> The catch here is that the browser would have to error out on reassignment of the hashPassword global variable, since that is what malware would do. This sounds easy, but it might be quite a bit more complexity for the browser's JS engine, since it has to check every assignment in the global scope against a list of functions that are used for password fields.

- Only allow access from the code path starting with the form's onsubmit event, so <form onsubmit="return validate(this)">. The catch here is that most modern websites do $("#myform").onsubmit=function(){...} which any malware could do as well, so that would have to be disallowed. A lot of devs wouldn't be happy about that.

Though for backwards compatibility, the opt-in method would probably be the only candidate for actual implementation in the foreseeable future.
There’s no path, the guy is making invalid assumptions
How to understand a component’s lifecycle methods in ReactJS
>"I also didn't like the idea of (reportedly) being stack-ranked, and having everyone's metrics thrown up in a meeting, for a bunch of managers who excel in Amazon's metrics-driven corporate culture to debate amongst themselves."

I've heard on numerous occasions that the culture at Amazon is toxic but I'm surprised to hear that they used "stacked ranking" to evaluate employees. Isn't this kind of a ancient dinosaur corporate idea from GE? I thought this had fallen out of favor. Can anyone verify?
Become a developed nation and make children a cost vs an economic benefit. You don't even need to be a developed nation, look at Iran if you want an example of how to do it.

A combo of education, women working in the workforce and easily available birth control and birth rates drop below replacement rate naturally, no special laws required.

After learning this, I'm really not worried about overpopulation as an environmental problem. The solutions are relatively easy to achieve compared to something like global warming.
Mostly I grew up along the Ouachita, but I lived in Church Point for a time, and I don't remember the soft "uh" sound.

Not sayin' I'm right, just that I never pronounced it that way and don't remember it commonly being pronounced that way. That was... about 35 years ago, though. The way I remember it, there was no vowel before the CH sound.
I bought the book, and so far it's a good overview of big-O notation. However, I'm halfway through the first chapter and I've already found a handful of typos. I commend OP for taking the risk and self-publishing but please have someone proofread your work before you start selling it!
It would require recertifications
> Now that MoviePass is functionally dead, there is little stopping AMC from raising prices to the extent that basically kills this model for the average consumer.

At which point, someone "rediscovers" MoviePass 2.0 (probably with some artificial twist to let everyone know that THIS IS NOT MOVIEPASS), an obliging VC materializes to huck a couple more unicorns on the fire, and it's deja vu all over again. I mean, nothing in this article suggested that the practice is going away any time soon...
I wouldn't suggest we have a conclusion either, but what is the acceptable risk, in your family, for example, would you eat glyphosate?
I expected that to be done by the airport and independent of the airline
What's odd is that there are many instances of odd use of color in descriptions but there is no normal (to us) usage, and from what I've read the same applies to other ancient sources. Honey is green (in Homer), but there's no green trees, green leaves, grass, etc; there is no blue sky or blue sea. The linguistic analysis of when separate colors were introduce into languages also shows they were added at very different times. William Gladstone wasn't very careful in his phrasing when he wrote on the topic and so it from the start got a bit of a reputation of a crazed theory, but there is something odd about the whole thing. I think it's not resolved because serious researches familiar with ancient egyptian and sumerian languages don't find this interesting enough to research it? Perhaps there's too few of them and too many other, more important and unresolved questions?
Sdrxgxdrfsbgxsfg
https://www.reddit.com/cnbn9n/

https://www.reddit.com/cnbnat/

https://www.reddit.com/cnbnay/

https://www.reddit.com/cnbnbo/

https://www.reddit.com/cnbncr/
One of the proposed explanations is that the ancient Greeks didn't have a fully developed mental model of colors and used them more along on a light/dark axis than dividing the colors into strictly separate color terms (also remember that bright pure colors weren't a thing).

I can relate to this idea as my memories are not filled with vivid colors. They are also not completely colorless as I remember there being colors but pinpointing what color certain objects had is sometimes difficult if the color was not a significant property of the object.

For example, remembering/picturing that grass is green is not a problem. Or that the sea at the beach was of a vivid blue because this was the memorable impression. But remembering which exact color the dress somebody was wearing had, this might be difficult. I'll remembering that it was a brightly colored dress and therefore will be "seeing" in my mind a bright dress that is colored, but without "seeing" a specific color but also "seeing" it with some excluded colors (like dark gray, brown, jeans blue) that are not bright.

It might be significant that Homer's stories were told for a relatively long time before they were written down. Oral poetry has other requirements than written poetry as you have to keep everything in memory and can't rely on an external source.
It's unusual but certainly not novel. There have been similar attacks against e.g. server network cards >10 years ago, where (IIRC) a magic pattern used for factory testing could put the card into firmware download mode, and from there it had access to RAM, so game over

It's only in relatively recent times that shared memory interfaces have fallen under the security spotlight as new scenarios arise where a trusted driver may not be speaking to a trusted piece of hardware (e.g. virtualization), so there are plenty of attacks around that involve hopping across an interface assumed to have been free of trust boundaries (Firewire is another example kinda like this)
Air Disasters did an episode on this flight with interviews from the people that diagnosed the problem. https://www.smithsonianchannel.com/shows/air-disasters/free-...
Sure, so I suppose it can noticeably extend your time between charges if you rarely use your car, leave it outside in the sun for long periods of time, and don't have access to charging anywhere you regularly park your car. Seems like if that is the case though, an electric car isn't a great fit - regular access to charging is pretty critical unless you want to wait around at a charging station for an hour every time you need to fill up.
ML/AI: Feature Engineer Optimization in HyperparameterHunter 3.0
How to Load Environment Variables from a .env File in Node.js
I wonder if it's practical to stick a couple of Space Shuttle external fuel tank-sized liquid hydrogen tanks on a typical container ship and then run it on hydrogen. One of the problems with liquid hydrogen (not the only one) is that it's impossible to keep it from slowly off gassing. However, if the tank is large enough it would off gas slower than your engines would be consuming the hydrogen.
not sure game of thrones is a good illustration of your point. once it became a juggernaut, they were locked into overshooting the runway that george rr martin had meticulously contructed over decades (but didn't finish) and disappoint fans.

if they had ended in season 5 with the material already written, none of the storylines would have been resolved. therefore, some amount of additional story had to be developed, so if you're doomed to disappoint fans, why not write 3 more seasons and make a bunch of money in the process? in a deadline-driven environment, no army of writers was going to produce a satisfyingly detailed and consistent ending to match martin's prior work (it seems even martin himself is having trouble with regard to the book series).
Consumer grade GPS actually won't work at 30,000+ feet at speeds the plane would be flying. This is to prevent someone from using the GPS system to steer a ballistic missile.
Rob Paravonian's Pachebel Rant I think predates this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdxkVQy7QLM
Yeah, you're wrong.

It's bad, but it's absolutely not unprecedented. The first time a similar issue was discovered was by Prozect Zero:
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/04/over-air-expl...
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/04/over-air-expl...

It has some pretty damning facts, including that most mobile devices have some form of IOMMU in theory, but they don't use it.

Later there was the Broadpwn vulnerability, which was very similar. I believe there were more of them later.
Given in the US that corporations are allowed to contribute to political campaigns, and that one party has a very strong sense of "regulation is bad", there is intense pressure to deregulate as much as possible. And with the current administration and its choice to not staff many positions while cutting budgets (and while enacting executive orders to eliminate some regulations), the FAA is really unable to do anything.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisagarcia/2019/03/18/did-tru...
That really depends on how quickly you can deprecate browsers that don't support modern features.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Edge

Edge is supposedly an option even back to Windows 7, though I don't believe it's a required security update. I haven't used a Windows 7 system in long enough that I'm not sure.

https://caniuse.com/css-grid

At this point it is reasonable to tell people they NEED to install a more modern (and more security up to date!) web browser, be it Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, or Mozilla Firefox.
Green/Yellow are grouped together which explains the description of Honey as yellow in the greek text...
I encourage everyone to check out Citizens Climate Lobby. Help us lobby for a carbon fee plus dividend.

https://citizensclimatelobby.org/carbon-fee-and-dividend/
Not that I disagree with your approach technically, but if I did that, I would have felt like I wasted my time. No job is secure and you did hardly any Resume Driven Development.

Also, if I were a team lead, I definitely wouldn’t have chosen that stack because it’s harder to recruit career driven developers who don’t want to work on tech that doesn’t help then build their resume.

When it’s time to land the next job, using $cool_kids_stack of the day, you will be at a disadvantage.

For context, when it comes to modern front end development, I’m barely above “not eat the chalk” level of competence so this is definitely not meant as a technical critique.
You might want a pad of paper and a pen. (That's all I'd bring besides cash)

Keep the alcohol consumption to a minimum, if at all.

Don't forget to actually burn that phone and laptop once you leave and never connect them to a trusted network.
so what? Bazel spawns a server, the next invocation is really fast.
Solar could work on very big multihulls. Or perhaps unroll a solar tail.
>It is used to contrast modern humans with our quite complex behavior vs. archaic humans with their (apparently) much less complex behavior.

Yes, I know - that was my point. You seem to be assuming that we in the West are at the apex of development while the Khoi San are to be evaluated by the degree to which their society resembles Western societies. Who knows - perhaps the Khoi San think that they are more modern than us and are waiting for us to catch up.

We all have ancestors going back to the first humans. No present human society is more "archaic" than any other, unless you think that human societies are somehow predestined to develop along a certain course.

So I do object to calling the Khoi San "pretty modern", as if they are somehow being stick-in-the-muds by not developing along exactly the same path as the West.
The main reasons web development is complicated:

* Javascript has evolved from simple requirements e.g. flashy text to a full blown application environment, but there is relatively little base functionality included (e.g. compared to what you get in Java or C#) so people need to write those libs separately.

* The separate libraries above need to be included in your code, and copy/paste is not maintainable so some kind of module system is needed but JS doesn't come with one, so various people rolled their own and they competed for mindshare. 10 different standards.

* As above for UI frameworks. JS only has a basic framework included: the DOM. It's pretty good but doesn't scale "naked" to more complex apps, so again the community creates a whole bunch of those.

* As above for application frameworks (UX frameworks)? such as routers so that you can press the back button.

* Ah the back button - an example of where apps on the web have to care about something that desktop apps don't. There are other examples. Mixing http/https. Mobile responsive.

* CSS - I imagine originally designed for "documents" - now has to work well with "web apps".

* Javascript again - no static typing, many devs find it too easy to make mistakes, we have Typescript and other compile to JS languages.

* Because of the above complexity with have Babel, Browserify, Webpack etc. (one is never enough!)

* Then some genius decides to use JS for the back end and we have Node, NPM, and then because Node is so useful it becomes the front-end tool chain provider. So you use NPM to install Webpack, and the newbie has to figure out difference between dev dependencies and ordinary ones etc.

* git clone https://github.com/... and who knows what stack they've used. Oh they are using Browserify. Never used that. 2 hours reading the docs.

* Each framework then finds ways to get more complex organically. React, Redux etc. and all that.

* Again every other programmer is using 10^10 different combinations of frameworks and techs. Compare to C# Desktop development where it might be they are using Winforms or WPF - that's your only problem!

I could go on. I still copy and paste my favorite templates for getting started with NPM/Webpack/Typescript. Not sure I could demo how to get there from scratch again. All the recommended ones online seem to have beartraps in them and stuff I don't understand.

But remember you all you need is a <script></script>! It's easy!
I'm a law professor who has taught some basic coding (along with stats) to law students[1], I have a slightly different perspective on the lawyers learning to code thing than a lot of what has been expressed here (though it's similar to the "Dr. Doolittle" idea in the post).

For me the key goal is flexibility and uncertainty management. Lawyers have traditionally been extreme generalists across non-law domains (consider the fact that lawyers think of themselves as qualified to question expert witnesses from all kinds of hard sciences in a courtroom) who have exercised a consistent social function in the face of all kinds of social, political, economic, and technological changes, and the lawyers who have been best able to insert themselves at the joints of those changes are the ones who have succeeded. Having some understanding of the ontology of the various systems that are likely to be important in the domains where the law operates is pretty much a general good. And right now, code plays such a huge role in the economy that lawyers who have some clue what's going on are better positioned to adapt to changes in the economy as their careers move forward. (It's for similar reasons, I think that Harvard Law School recommends students take a class in accounting, or at least used to do so back in my day.)

With a minimum base of skill in slinging around code, it expands my students possible options. They might never use it again, relying on legal tech/document management/whatever vendors for any of the things noted elsewhere in this discussion. Or they might see a need and builds something that becomes one of these legal tech/document management/whatever companies. Or they might win a client a decade down the road by being the only lawyer in the vicinity who speaks their language. Or they might be working for a nonprofit who doesn't have the resources to buy solutions, and build something in-house that increases their capacity for service delivery to people who really need it.

TL;DR: lawyers have their hands in a lot of stuff by the very nature of the profession; it behooves them on general principles to become conversant with anything that occupies a large amount of territory in said stuff.

[1] version 0.1 of the course: https://sociologicalgobbledygook.com
Which is more hipster: using the latest modern web framework, or bragging about how you don't use modern web frameworks?
Me too. I love bazel, for the plain syntax, sandwiches (deps between languages), determinism, just plain good stuff. I use it for all my new personal projects (linux/windows).
Google can claim many firsts, but hopping from a baseband to an application processor most certainly isn't one of them. I'm sure you can find presentations from e.g. CCC much older than 2017
Tardigrades crash-landed on the Moon and probably survived
That is a completely different line of business, though.