skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It is, but he or she said "mostly" because of the catholic church and that might be true, because they are the oldest and still most powerful single organization of the abrahamic religions.
Also price.

I don't think it's as bad here as in the US, however I see more and more of this type of foods in the store and it's usually quite cheap compared to food made from fresh produce at home. And this should really be an alarm bell as there is far less processing needed for fresh foods and it should be cheaper.

Personally I stay away from them and make almost all of my food from scratch. It seems quite scary to radically change the diet of the human in this way in so short of a time.
Wolves are actually... different in terms of intelligence. IIRC, there's study about how wolves tend not to rely on human help regardless of how long the wolves have lived with humans. They just ... don't get it. They can't tell that they can cooperate with humans. e.g. if there is a door and the wolf can't reach the latch, it won't seek help from the human at all, whereas a dog likely will.
FYI, there is an existing solution that does pretty much what you describe: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=bsoule.tagtime...
JavaScript Loops – Comparison and Performance
Why Singapore Airlines Business Class Is Best in the World
"You can use a fake Email". Curious! Why not just make it an optional field?
I'm in the UK...

I just went to amazon.de and while the interface isn't the same (they make it harder to find the contact us form it seems), I still had the option to pick "call me" and then pick a german number.
Sixteen-Year old just won 3m$ from fortnite
Make it open source so I can host it on my own server. Why should I ever send you my browsing data? That's the most valuable thing to marketing companies and don't underestimate your greediness levels. I would probably sell then myself and get a new car.
Agile Methodology – Your Thoughts?
Thanks, that's interesting. And what do you think of this PFS?
https://www.share-talk.com/european-metals-hldg-aimemh-pfs-c...

People in .cz think this is a gold mine but investors don't seem to agree
Ohio passes energy bill that bails out nuclear and coal plants, guts renewables
That's definitely not what I'm saying.

Some people don't have a strong intention to die but use a method with high lethality and do die.

> It can't hurt to try, at worst you'll only live a little longer.

Some people have abusive families that increase risk.
No, not writing everything in assembler, this isn't about high or low level. It's about writing things yourself for what you actually need.

Because most of the complexity comes from code (esp. libraries and drivers) trying to solve a larger problem than you actually have.

That's the same reason why, when you follow that logic, you eventually write your own Forth. Not because it fun. Not because you want to learn about Forth or compiler. But because my Forth solves my problems the way I see fit, her Forth solves problems the way she wants, and your Forth is going to solve the way you want.
> Even PHP gets this right. It's not hard.

PHP had the luxury of coming out with a package manager (Composer) later, and learning from others before it. (2012 vs 2010 for npm).

Npm similarly improved on a lot of package managers that came before (e.g it's superior to Pip, which doesn't resolve dependencies [1]).

> It makes me wonder why npm hasn't already moved to namespaced package names.

Also, npm does have namespaced package names, the problem is that it was introduced later, so isn't mandatory. I'm not sure how they could make it mandatory without breaking everyone?

[1] https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/988
They're not only common on the Mississippi, but also the Rhine area in the Netherlands and Germany as hinterland operations for the port of Rotterdam, as well as the Danube area in eastern Europe.

Both self-propelled barges and push barges have been used for ages already in inland shipping in Europe, but have not been used a lot in the rest of the world. They also seem to only be suitable for river transport. With small scale transport over sea you have so-called feeder ships, which have an entirely different build, and never push extra barges/ships.
Thanks to mandatory military service almost every household in Switzerland has a gun.
Terrifying, I’m starting to hope we do more with climate change so we can not only survive, but stop talking about it.

I wonder if in human history there has been such a long running dire topic to endlessly discuss without any solution in sight ?

Maybe the Cold War ?
> but just I myself alone is not enough

Sure. Start talking to your friends, family and colleagues. Join groups of like-minded people.
And in practice: `cd my<tab>`. I strive to make the first three letters of a filename a unique prefix in each directory; and if I were to use a space like this, I’d be making sure “my” was a unique prefix. This system becomes a sufficiently ingrained habit that I can’t cope with Zola having a directory “content” beside a file “config.toml”.
You appear to be making a straw man argument that the planes are safe by claiming to refute the 'sudden-unavoidable-death machines' argument which no one is making.

The probability of a total loss of an aircraft is basically proportional to either its flight hours or number of takeoffs and landings (which are (handwave) correlated (unless you are Aloha Airlines)). A fleet of thousands of planes (especially a 'mature' design), flying thousands of hours per year, in service for decades should have very few losses due to fundamental design issues. It would be nice to say it should be <1, but the reality is the stars sometimes align and several weaknesses conspire to make a fatal event. With MCAS, the 737 Max 8 was already at a rate of 2 events in less than a year with a fleet that was a tiny fraction (<6%) of its ultimate fleet size.

Assuming nothing else changed, at full fleet size, that would be over 30 losses a year, or well over 1000 losses over the fleet's lifetime. They misengineered the system by at least 3 orders of magnitude. This is, at the very least, profound professional and managerial negligence. I'm not not yet convinced it's not also criminal. At the very least, all management who touched this subsystem or were part of the no-new-training-at-any-cost push should have already been shown the door up to and including the CEO.

And yes, things _are_ being done and they are adding 'nines' to the reliability as quickly as they can, but again, they are starting from a subsystem that kills everybody on board every 800,000 flight hours or so.

They appear to be dishonest with the public (and perhaps themselves) about how much risk is eliminated with each change and, similarly, appear to not be factoring in that some of these changes introduce other risks and failure modes.

What we have here is a giant fucking mess and a management organization that fosters no confidence in its ability to navigate itself out of it. In the end, I do expect Boeing to somehow glue-gun 3 more 9's of reliability onto this airframe and stop bleeding valuation, but it won't be pretty and it probably won't be fast.
I found it endearing that older folks have someone to be with.

It makes me happy - the same way a story about a rescued cat makes me feel warm and fuzzy.

Perhaps it is not at all related to Hacker culture, but then again this is a free forum and if some cat rescue stories slip in every now and again, I don't mind :)
Well yeah that's pretty much the default, UNLESS they choose to get married with the stipulation of shared ownership and finances etcetera.

the Netherlands recently passed legislation that changed the default marriage agreement to no longer have the shared ownership stipulation.

And even then, that's only one option (marriage, that is); there is nobody (except maybe family, church, etc) forcing anyone to marry. There's other options as well.
Well Ted Cruz says in Texas it's used for cooking bacon.

https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/08/03/42901...

And here you have a more Soviet styled recipe for eggs:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojg_def2mzM
Breed slightly too much intelligence into them, and suddenly your security guards are going to take that village hostage unless they receive double food quota...
You've left the realm of rationalism and are firmly seated in theology. The correct theological interpretation here isn't that God can't do something illogical, but rather that God can remain strictly logical, and still be God. God isn't constrained by formal logic, but chooses to be because it suits Him. In fact, the entire field of theology is built on this. Theologies are imagined descriptions of God, these imaginations are accepted by God because God wants us to believe in Him.

The problem of evil is the same way, ascribing a kind of logic to God. Theologians think a lot about theodicy, and have broken away from their churches over it.

One interesting way to think about it is that God has three basic attitudes about the things humans do. God either wills a thing, accepts it, or tolerates it. If God wills it, it creates more goodness in the world than it takes away. If God accepts it, then the balance is roughly equal. If He tolerates it, then that means God has to balance the scales personally. This can happen through the mechanism we call karma.

A rationally-aware theologian would state that God accepts any rational regime you want to put on him, and the Book of Job puts this into story form. Just because God is rational and good doesn't mean He's going to appear that way all the time to all the people.
Absolutely we should expect them to solve easy/valuable problems first. Maybe that's fancy organic vegetables in a greenhouse, which certainly sounds much easier than 5-foot weeds growing in a thousand acres of deep mud!

But we farmed for a long time before inventing weedkiller. First by recognising weeds & pulling them out. Later by plowing, which is really just substituting mechanical work (from oxen) for human labor (and smarts). I don't see a fundamental reason that robot-weeding couldn't ultimately replace most chemicals & most plowing, but obviously not next year.
> A transatlantic flight produces about as much carbon dioxide as a typical European produces in a year

Yes, that's the usual 'argument' except that this does not even seem to be true (return flight from London to New York seems to emit about 1t per passenger when a typical Brit otherwise contributes 7+t, so that's 1/14th of personal annual emissions per flight).

In any case, not everyone flies over the Atlantic every year, so that overall and in the grand scheme of things aviation should not be held as a priority.

Focusing on aviation is a distraction.
Interesting! I thibk this is a good start but I guess it would still need some thought to be resistant to sybil attacks.

BTW: I used to think the dependencies that came as part of for example the official Angular packages where vetted.

Can anyone confirm or deny this?

Anyone can
The programmer has created a site where you need to pay for likes
> being aware of those incentives is crucial if we’d like to actually change corporate behavior.

We are aware how the hierarchies function: "I was just following the orders"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_orders#Nuremberg_Tria...

I agree with you that it doesn't have sense trying to discuss about the abstract evilness, but I claim that the Boeing's top brass should be brought to the court!

If those who make decisions aren't held accountable, the results are provably terrible.

"I was ''just'' securing the profit for my shareholders" shouldn't be an excuse.
Why are they showing the compensation vs Boeing revenues in the beginning? Does Boeing pay for compensation directly? I thought this was rather paid by insurance companies, and had nothing to do with manufacturers?
The article says "a wide range of applications, from those that require as little as 100 watts, [such as] a lightweight unmanned aerial vehicle, to 100 megawatts"
Why warn? It’s perfectly reasonable behaviour to learn. I’ve used it for years.
I would, why wouldn't i? If all you need is to write some formatted text with a bunch of images and perhaps a table or two, composer does the job perfectly fine and the page you get works on any server and client with practically zero overhead and resources.
diff -Nur admin.orig/daemontools-0.76/src/supervise.c admin/daemontools-0.76/src/supervise.c
--- admin.orig/daemontools-0.76/src/supervise.c 2010-02-19 11:08:15.000000000 +0100
+++ admin/daemontools-0.76/src/supervise.c 2010-02-19 12:53:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@

const char *run[2] = { "./run", 0 };

+int flagfailed = 0;
+
void trystart(void)
{
int f;
@@ -94,6 +96,7 @@
case -1:
strerr_warn4(WARNING,"unable to fork for ",dir,", sleeping 60 seconds: ",&strerr_sys);
deepsleep(60);
+ flagfailed = 1;
trigger();
return;
case 0:
@@ -153,6 +156,11 @@
}
}

+ if (flagfailed && flagwant && flagwantup){
+ flagfailed = 0;
+ trystart();
+ }
+
if (read(fdcontrol,&ch,1) == 1)
switch(ch) {
case 'd':
diff -Nur admin.orig/daemontools-0.76/src/supervise.c admin/daemontools-0.76/src/supervise.c
--- admin.orig/daemontools-0.76/src/supervise.c 2001-07-12 18:49:49.000000000 +0200
+++ admin/daemontools-0.76/src/supervise.c 2012-12-23 21:54:20.437771704 +0100
@@ -97,6 +97,8 @@
trigger();
return;
case 0:
+ setsid();
+ setpgid(0,0);
sig_uncatch(sig_child);
sig_unblock(sig_child);
execve(*run,run,environ);
@@ -158,7 +160,7 @@
case 'd':
flagwant = 1;
flagwantup = 0;
- if (pid) { kill(pid,SIGTERM); kill(pid,SIGCONT); flagpaused = 0; }
+ if (pid) { killpg(pid,SIGTERM); killpg(pid,SIGCONT); flagpaused = 0; }
announce();
break;
case 'u':
@@ -173,29 +175,29 @@
if (!pid) trystart();
break;
case 'a':
- if (pid) kill(pid,SIGALRM);
+ if (pid) killpg(pid,SIGALRM);
break;
case 'h':
- if (pid) kill(pid,SIGHUP);
+ if (pid) killpg(pid,SIGHUP);
break;
case 'k':
- if (pid) kill(pid,SIGKILL);
+ if (pid) killpg(pid,SIGKILL);
break;
case 't':
- if (pid) kill(pid,SIGTERM);
+ if (pid) killpg(pid,SIGTERM);
break;
case 'i':
- if (pid) kill(pid,SIGINT);
+ if (pid) killpg(pid,SIGINT);
break;
case 'p':
flagpaused = 1;
announce();
- if (pid) kill(pid,SIGSTOP);
+ if (pid) killpg(pid,SIGSTOP);
break;
case 'c':
flagpaused = 0;
announce();
- if (pid) kill(pid,SIGCONT);
+ if (pid) killpg(pid,SIGCONT);
break;
case 'x':
flagexit = 1;
Brazil's Bolsonaro says Greenwald could 'do jail time'
Why should Boeing and Wells Fargo executives be afforded sympathy and mercy routinely denied to people far less fortunate and whose actions have far fewer consequences?

Carrie Tolstedt of Wells Fargo is as close to a comic villain as you're going to get, designing a system which forced multitudes of employees into unethical actions. And even after clawbacks Tolstedt ended her career tens of millions of dollars ahead.

Executives are already so coddled and protected from failure that terrible actions are rewarded and inevitable.
Challenges of Buling a Proptech Solution
Money doesn't exist anyway. But wait, what do we mean by 'exist'?
Looks nice! But why is it in dutch? Does it load language settings based on location? Why can't I change it?
Its an empirical claim. Even in the domain of crap, I'd wage there are differences between categories where you would see more crap in some than in others.
> Are share buy backs a common strategy for large companies?

Yes. They’re a transfer of money from the company to its owners but they have tax advantages over dividends because instead of all owners paying tax twice, once on profits and again as income they’re only taxed as corporate profits unless you’ve actually sold your shares. The owners who don’t sell have a larger share of the remaining company by virtue of the smaller number of shares outstanding.
> culturally similar

This is the crux of it. The purpose of the repressive Australian laws is to ensure that Australia's culture remains on course per those who are planning it.

Find yourself in a non-mainstream culture that wants to discuss your problems with the mainstream culture privately? Well, you can't do that without incurring the wrath of the PTB.

Is this a healthy state of affairs? I don't think so. But Australia has not been a healthy place for a long, long time.
The problem is not liars, the problem is being unable to prove they were lying. With 2FA, the logs would prove it.
I was thinking something like that when changing some settings in Visual Studio Code this week-end. Before version x it was just a json file, now there's a GUI that wraps up that json file in a bunch of drop-down menus. I have like 5 settings in the file but the menus make it look like I am playing flight simulator or something. Thankfully I saw the curly brackets button and I can still edit the file manually :).
Ask HN: Could you combine photovoltaic with fusion reactions?
Imagine photovoltaic cells that receive gamma rays from a fusion reaction.

Why are current fusion experiments focused on kinetic energy to heat water to push a turbine instead of photovoltaic harvesting of energy?
Maybe I'm wrong but it feels a bit simpler than people being evil or malevolent. It's more like squeezing a juice out of a lemon: at first, it only requires light pressure to get the juice, but as you want more and more juice, your grip must get increasingly tighter. At some point it becomes clear you need a new lemon to get more juice, but for some reason it seems cheaper/more effective to keep squeezing the one that has nothing left to give.

So it is with businesses extracting value (/making as much money as possible).
You don't need to steal you're readers personnal data to display ads on any website.

The fact that you don't consider this reasonable says a lot about the state of our industry.
How to build a real time multiplayer game in web
How financialized are mines, for want of a better term? i.e. Are people buying the mining company's shares assumed to be taking the gamble on what prices will be in 5 or 10 years, or do mining companied buy a ton of futures to try to even things out?
How to build a real time flight map in web
Will it scale? Let’s load test geohashing on DynamoDB
How Affiliate Marketing Is Saving Online Business
I'm not a real engineer, just a software guy, but situation feels similar. Responsiblity of outcome and to save money is placed on management who pressure the workers to save money without sharing the bigger picture.

Would it still happen, if responsbility was placed directly on the worker? Why isn't there a review teams were senior enough and given the time to critique an outcome?

Why is it management doesn't understand the consequences of these actions, or are too shameless to admit them and plow ahead?
> Moreover, the compiler can “derive” implementations for regular data objects.

When defaulting the spaceship operator, the same happens for C++ (by comparing members). In this special case, the equality operator is also effectively defaulted, so as described in the article

struct A {
…
auto operator<=>(A const& rhs) const = default;
};

gives you automatic member-wise comparison "derived" by the compiler.
> from short jobs to long walks

I fail to parse that
Boeing voluntarily paid compensation to the victims and their communities directly. This is in addition to the travel insurance claims that the victims could file for.

[0] https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2019-07-03-Boeing-Pledges-Suppo...
Sounds like they earned the right to strike at that point ;)
Have you seen that cool animated video?
Go Language Team Rejects Its Try Proposal ahead of Schedule
This is easily fixed by governments doing their jobs. In this case, FAA (or whoever the regulator is) should verify if the "minor change" is a new coffee machine on board, or has the engine been moved.

And then, progressively larger fines (comparative to potential damage caused in the event of failure) to offset the "savings" by misdeclaring the scope of changes.
I’m talking about creating new torrents, not finding existing ones.
ask complex as cancer can be, it doesn't cross the whole system's layers
Share buybacks are a more "tax efficient" way of returning money to shareholders than dividends, that's all.
Data acquisition! You know who is downloading and what is being downloaded.
Running Single-File Programs Without Compiling in Java 11
Speaking morally, I believe in having empathy for everybody. The fact that some people don’t behave that way doesn’t cause me to act in kind towards them. That said, empathy (which is what I’m suggesting above) is not “sympathy and mercy”. I haven’t suggested at any point in this thread that we should feel sympathy or mercy for anyone at Boeing (or Wells Fargo).

Speaking practically, treating execs as comic villains gets in the way of actually fixing their behavior. There are a variety of ways to force corporations to behave differently, but they all start with actually figuring out why they act this way in the first place. Otherwise we end up making the same mistake as Wells Fargo and Boeing: if we apply pressure on them to act better without clearly understanding why they’re doing what they’re doing, we’re just going to incentivize them to misbehave differently to get around the new rules.
Australias law enforcement community have a strong influence on Australian culture, and it is they who are lobbying for more restrictions on Australians' free speech, censorship, and use of cryptography. There isn't really any legislation which protects free speech in Australia, like there are in many other western nations - there is instead an 'implied right' granted to Australian citizens by the sovereign, but this is mostly an untested grey area at the moment - and Australians in general don't care about their basic human rights as long as there are avocados to smash.
There's no such thing as a free market, except as a hypothetical construct. Markets are always regulated, if not by governments, then by large market participants who can use their clout to create conditions favourable to themselves.
'People are dying': how the climate crisis has sparked an exodus to the US
>We have always held true to our values of safety, quality and integrity and those values are complementary and mutually reinforcing with productivity and company performance

It says something very bad about the state of accountability in this country when someone's negligence can kill hundreds of people and they have absolutely nothing to fear from putting out a completely horseshit statement like that. Half a dozen different Boeing executives should be in prison for the rest of their lives on 346 counts of manslaughter but I'd be amazed if Boeing faces so much as a monetary fine.
Microsoft has done a '$1bn' deal with OpenAI
Anselm defined God as "that which nothing greater can be thought." Introducing a devil into this mix doesn't change this reasoning, and basically boils down to "is evil greater than good?", which I don't think anyone can reasonably argue.

It's not the most interesting argument for God I've encountered, but it's not trivially invalidated by elevating evil to the same status as good. That hasn't been a serious element of any real theology since long before the ancient Hebrews.

Theology is the art of imagination, the same way that politics is the art of the possible. Imagining absolute evil is only interesting when you want to attack the idea of absolute good. Absolute good remains interesting without a foil. So therefore people will be willing to believe in it.
Putting plastic in a landfill is not a crisis. Sending it to Asia to be processed out in the open where storms carry it off to sea is. Just throw your plastic in the garbage like I started doing after watching Plastic China.

Spread the word.

If you could be assured it would be burned, then separating it would make some sense, but as long as we're looking for a cheap feel-good moment from the recycling bin, there is no assurance of what will happen to it. A properly designed landfill is the best place for plastic right now, unless it can be shredded and mixed with bunker oil to provide a cheap fuel -- that might actually make it more valuable.