skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Then the shard _is_ the secret key. The court has no more power to compel you to give it up than any other secret key. I'm not sure what you're proposing here.
I am Deaf myself and I studied Bachelor of Law at the Swiss Distance Learning University (https://distanceuniversity.ch/). For the mandatory attendances (six Saturdays a year in Fribourg) I hired two Signed Language interpreters.

Ask me anything.
Nice work.

Obligatory question: how does it compare to DevPI?
Love it when the code is presented up and center as in Figure 3!
The p-zombie concept always struck me as stupid solipsism. If you can't tell the difference doesn't that mean there is no meaningful difference?

Likewise if they fear the loss of priviledge that implies some degree of consciousness /somewhere/. If some absurd set of state and pseudorandom random number generator capable of passing every metric of consciousness in response to inputs then it is a consciousness even if it is made of a bizzare set of equations and state.

Anyway for the consciousness somewhere - take a hypothetical hyperintelligence or supercomputer capable of simulating a human brain completely calculation by calculation in various events like say being flayed alive. It isn't torturing anybody because the actions are simply calculations that it itself is running. The victim may not be real but there is a real intelligence somewhere behind it - and it may or may not care about the simulated suffering. Where it is "run" is material like the difference between acting out a murder and actually murdering someone.
what is an "intellectual"? seems a very nebulus and vague concept.
perhaps someone who thinks like writers who contribute to nytimes? in that case ... .
I think a lot of this stems from a trick of sorts. Nothing that we are is "magically" consciousness. If we had a machine and emulated every aspect of a "mind", would it be conscious? If you're answering no - then why? What's missing? I think the answer is: the only thing that's missing is that you couldn't possibly believe that that thing could be conscious. And this is simple because you believe that you are "conscious" to an extent which you really are not.

In other words, we think we're this thing called "conscious", but that thing isn't what we think it is!

When you look a bunch of different things: the left brain/right brain separation and the prefrontal cortex - you realize that you're not even just one brain, but many? Which one is you? And I seem to recall an article recently that challenged the existence of an unconscious. How does that relate to this?
I'd argue that you're playing dumb when you're saying that it's equally likely to interpret "Plans" in this context as any of the examples you mention rather than "Pricing Plans". Come on. Do you see a lot of similar pages that link you to their "Plans" and you end up in their public roadmap(s!) because they meant project plan(s!)? Or their testing procedures? No. Because landing pages are customer-centric.
There are, although a bit hidden in the wiki: https://github.com/cosmonium/cosmonium/wiki/Screenshots

Good thing you mentioned it because I couldn't find them either earlier.
I think that this CVE issuance problem is getting worse recently where as in prior years there was just a smaller volume of CVE's being assigned. This VLC issue is the kind of CVE that could have been resolved by looking into it (or better assigned/described), and instead turned into a problem. There are also a string of people using security fuzzers to find issues but instead of them being triaged with security in mind they are getting CVE's issued. Some of the CVE's after investigation are test/utilities, pieces of code that are uncommon to be distributed, and a couple times code that is never called at all and was a function that never got cleaned up but when isolated had a stack overflow.

As someone who was recently a security engineer the treating as gospel is a real problem. In reviews of new CVE's you always ended up having to do the legwork to see if it was even relevant. Older CVE's I felt like usually were at least tied to something mostly concrete but the number of times I find the security report and it's just basically a valgrind/fuzzy lop output I am frustrated in the quality of reporting.

The other half of it is the journalists chasing clicks and researchers who name vulns to increase their status. That practice has really been a lot of crying wolf and it's starting to show. We had to create a special categories for vulnerabilities that were named/publicly visible and may or may not even be relevant to us just to respond to inquiries (especially things that were named but mediums on a NIST 90 day timeline but people expected resolved day 0-1).
You can prove some code in Turing complete languages.

You can construct non-turing-complete languages which all code can be proven, and that is the point the parent is making.
Other courts have ruled the other way on that. It is not settled law.
> like on lineageOS?

Android/LineageOS is Linux.

Just type adduser and sudo, it's not too bad.

You'll probably find, however, that it might not be all you were looking for. It can still steal your source code and credentials, which might have been what you were worried about.

You will also miss out on your editor, compiler, zip utilities, and whatever else that's not included in your git client. Anything useful would probably look more like privileges (where opening a file can be ok but a network socket forbidden). There's been a ton of research in this area and some very mature systems such as SELinux.
What do you want to accomplish? Do you want good implementations of cryptographic primitives, or something else?

As a general rule: OpenSSL, BoringSSL if you can get away with it, don't use NSS or LibreSSL. But that presupposes that using a library like OpenSSL was the right answer to begin with :)
Or, you could check to see if any of this applies to you, rather than panicking. Blogpost would have been helpful had it provided more detail:

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202837
The takeaway for those in the US: To detect nascent authoritarianism, look at who in particular is getting persecuted in academia. Another good heuristic: Look at who's over-serious and who is best wielding ridicule.
Because the literal amount of nuclear missiles you have does not correlate with the likelihood of you going to war and using them.
Your type of attitude scares me.

Developers making up arbitrary requirements based on what they want has causes me many a headache.
Wouldn't it depend on the type of accident? From what I understand the most common case is that an autonomous vehicle will not proceed when a human thought it would (eg. at an intersection), resulting in the human hitting the back of the autonomous vehicle at low speed. That type of accident is preventable through patience and not very severe. It seems fine to me to have more of those if it results in any decrease in more severe accidents.
James Lovelock’s Novacene – are humans a step to a higher intelligence?
Curious article. Even before its publication, the US Navy has discovered the reverse of what the article claims -- that a tiny crew of generalists like the crew of the USS Gabrielle Giffords DOESN'T work and probably never will.

In peace time, these minimalist crew complements are fragile to injury and breakdown making them exceedingly vulnerable. But in war, when support from base or repair craft will often not be forthcoming, the crew's lack of knowledge about ship systems will make them unable to do even basic repairs, much less quickly jury rig a fix, as is often essential in war for survival. In peace, this staffing model has not only failed, but in war will, will exacerbate to catastrophe.

Yet this article not only suggests the promise of such an approach as a new model for war (and the tale definitely is interesting), but it disregards the serious problems with its implementation to date and then takes the next step, claiming that the value of expertise outside this narrow (failed) example domain is also moribund. Whhhaaaaaaat?

In anything, the lessons in the article imply the opposite -- that expertise is alive and well, and given the rising levels of sophistication in the world of technology, will almost certainly require ever more specialization and expertise -- especially in a US Navy that doesn't want to scuttle its ships every time an on-board system blows a fuse.
Populist uprisings against educated people have happened many times throughout modern history from both left- and right-wing movements. Remember this when wannabe autocrats like Trump rail against educational institutions and "coastal elites": It could happen here, too.
Stuart Kauffman (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Kauffman) has long maintained that the complexity of biological systems and organisms results from self-organization, far-from-equilibrium dynamics, and the inherent fundamental properties of chemistry, particularly carbon chemistry. In his view, the origins of cellular life are baked into the fabric of the universe.
> Not sure why you are downvoted, about 10% of the article addresses it's headline and I frankly do not get the point either. The proposed solution is in the first numbered list and between that and the conclusion list is a bunch of prose on non-JSON payload.

The proposed solution is not in the numbered list. The numbered list describes how to sign a JSON blob from the outside. The rest of the doucment describes what you do if that's not an option, and you need to sign the blob in-line. The very next paragraph after said numbered list describes how to do that.

(I'm the author.)
Well, it's more of a linguistic/english lesson. I meant the median and just forgot that average and mean are synonyms. But thanks for pointing that out.

I actually edited out exactly the same argument that you wrote, because I (and you) have nothing to actually back it up.

Counterexample: if 60% of people earn very close above the average and 35% earn 30% below average and 5% earn (on average) double the total average, then the majority earns above average even tho the right hand-tail gets high. This is just one possible scenario that is not even completely unrealistic.

Also remember that most crazy incomes are not salaries.
I'm really confused by some of the assumptions in this whole thread, sorry. In what scenario would a client touch the string it authenticates and parsed JSON from before sending it back to the server later? This argument seems to assume that I have to throw away the string I've parsed or somehow reconstruct the same JSON and create the HMAC myself locally, which seems odd.
Python 2 End of Life Countdown
The era of fascists like Erdogan will come to an end as well.
I truly don't understand why a payroll company would need to raise 200 million dollars and what they could possibly do with the bulk of it aside from buying 24k gold toilets. You're not going to hire 200 million worth of people, or buy that many ads, you could build your own server farm for a fraction of that and cloud services would take quite a long time to burn through that. So why?

Why would you sell that much of your company to investors?

Why would you invest that much money in a payroll company?

I can sometimes understand it, say a company was working on some sort of energy generation and needed tens of millions of dollars of equipment/infrastructure to even start truly testing their idea, or you were going to sell some physical good that was going to sell for hundreds or thousands of dollars per unit and you've already been selling other versions but need a large amount of cash for the MOQ to manufacture your new hardware in the best setting and banks are hesitant to pony up, but for a payroll company?!

This stuff always blows my mind.
I'm co-founder of Missive [1], mentioned in the post. If any of you have questions, I would be happy to answer them.

[1] https://missiveapp.com/
A couple of facts that should at least provide a baseline for costs (like the best case scenario):
Shenzhen metro: 198 stations, about 180 miles of track (soon to be more like 250 miles), majority of it built in past 10-12 years. All I can find so far on cost is the phase iii cost which says it will cost about 20 billion. Phase I was quite small. So maybe they have spent about 30 billion to get almost 200 miles of rail and lots of stations? I’ve used the Shenzhen metro and it’s pretty nice. Also used the Shanghai metro as well.

Often in the US, stations are cited as a big cost.

Would be interesting to get a pie chart for costs between US and China like land acquisition costs, labor, raw materials, management, etc.

A bit disappointing that the report essentially ended in a “it depends” type of non-informative report.
Keep learning, ideas are easy it's about executing on your ideas and making sales.

Keep your day job and keep learning, start a small project you can complete with your current programming skills and learn selling, marketing.

Check out the StartUpsForTheRestOfUs.com podcasts, start in the archive. Lots of good info on stair stepping with small projects up to a SaaS.

Follow your dream but keep your day job for now.

Also check any agreements you signed with your employer regarding IP who owns what you work on outside of work. Don't work on or even visit websites of your projects from work. Don't share your dreams with co-workers/employers.
It seems useful to denote REPL input vs output, and to be able to identify output relating to input.
Sorry, being fast is an arbitrary requirement? That's the entire premise of this article and discussion. The point being that most ARE NOT taking it into consideration and making it one.
Call me dumb if you want, but I was genuinely expecting to see a roadmap, because I would have never expected someone to try to charge for something like this.
If you believe philosophical zombies are impossible, as many philosophers do, then the Turing test is the consciousness test.
There was a really easy fix for this. Remove the message that says "100% of your tip goes to your Dasher". Stop lying to the customer. It's that simple!

As usual, the reality of the financial situation is fairly complicated. Doordash guarantees minimums that other such services do not. In other words, in many ways, Doordash was more friendly to their 'contractors' than other services.

If they had simply chosen not to be unethical and lie to customers about where their tips go, they could have had it both ways.
Literally drinking the kool-aid.
“The Great Hack” is a misinformed documentary about misinformation
Interesting, how does one bully Intel? I wanna bully Intel too (/s)
Why did you capitalize "Deaf"?
One solution is just to stand up, and wander over to the counter where the credit card machines live. This always gets their attention, and it's quicker for everyone.
Do you have a good reference for more info on parallel construction?
"People have had enough of experts" - Michael Gove

God help us
winamp played my files without glitches too, but made my PC barely usable with nearly 100% cpu load (AMD K5-133 / playing 128kbs stereo mp3-s).

On the other hand: mpg123 on Linux played the same files with less than 50% cpu load! ;)
In my opinion, the most provocative point that this paper makes isn't just about general reproducibility issues or problems with comparing to a weak baseline — it’s that a number of these papers used improper methods to obtain their results in the first place.

For instance the NCF and MCRec papers tuned model parameters on the test set and the SpectralCF paper used a non-randomly sampled test set for evaluation.

That to me is even more surprising than their revelations that a well-tuned statistical baseline outperforms these models.
Or look at how minorities talk about white people in every western nation. The underclass revolting against the white upper class.
My favorite quote is quite apt here "Assigning single factor causation to the output of complex adaptive system is a triumph of hope over experience."

Otherwise known as "magical thinking."
I think we're more likely to make intellectual progress on consciousness by either redefining it in a more objectively rigorous way, or (more likely IMO) abandoning it as a philosophical construct analogous to "the soul" and focusing research on a subset of phenomena that can be rigorously defined.

It seems to me like discussions of "consciousness" here on HN seem to frequently devolve into arguments over the semantics of that particular word. That feels more philosophical than scientific to me.
We are currently working with a few delivery platforms to get affiliate fee. Just to give you some numbers, delivery platforms typically get ~20% of the order value and ~15% of the courier fees. At the beginning, we expect to only get a tiny percentage of their net revenue, but we anticipate us getting more negotiating power over time. Totally agree with your point that users might not like it if we a series of dishes or restaurants disappear.
Senior Google Engineer denounces political bias
Can confirm. New York crookedness is so advanced I can’t help having a grudging admiration. It’s been like that longer than any of us have been alive too.
> The p-zombie concept always struck me as stupid solipsism. If you can't tell the difference doesn't that mean there is no meaningful difference?

That's a very strange argument. If you hold your nose and you taste a piece of potato and then a piece of apple, you can't tell the difference. So now suddenly the difference is meaningless because the sense required to tell the difference is removed from the equation? The apple is still (in a, to you, non-observable reality) an apple, regardless of how your perception changed.
I've seen professionally-oriented PHP forums and they are no better than any casual-interest oriented PHP forum.

Tons of visual clutter with all kinds of rectangles nested inside each other all over the screen with little apparent purpose for any of them. Join dates of users are given higher visual precedence to the date a comment was made (why is the join date of a user even visible on a discussion page at all?? That's pointless clutter!) 90% of users attaching signatures to every comment they leave with the signature body being longer than whatever remark they left, and often being filled with shitty animated gifs that look like they were stolen from somebody's geocities page.

It's a trash medium. Fundamentally flawed. Trying to fix typical PHP forums is like trying to polish a turd.
You've probably taken 6 months to a year, at a lower salary - possibly longer.
"done right" is a nice phrase to toss around, but unless you're also looking at companion requirements then it's completely subjective.

if it works but slowly, then it was almost certainly done correctly by my book. you've implied as such - otherwise, you'd be making it done correctly first and foremost.

"done fast" more often than not involves non-measured details from parties often hovering outside the orbit of the customer, and you can bet trying to hit both targets leads to delays in shipping v1, which appears to work.

i praise those who ship software that works correctly, understanding that requirements, deadlines, and project timelines are completely lost when the source code is read on its own.
Right now there are people who have stated criticism of political bias (pro-conservative, conservative-leaning speakers, center-left, etc) that are being punished in the US academic world.
It looks very similar to Medium.
Teenage hackers are offered a second chance under European experiment
Interactive staging (add -p) can be very useful with a GUI.

Otherwise I don't know. Command interfaces familiar to you are hard to beat.
Centering Literally Everything with CSS
There's also Celestia which has been around for a while: https://celestia.space/
Why tarred and compressed though? If it wasn't, one could point a compiler directly at it.
I agree, it's not that Impossible is anywhere near a good real hamburger, but when it comes to fast food, the bar is low. With all the low-grade beef, fillers, and flavor science involved, I bet I couldn't tell the difference in, say, a White Castle burger or a Taco Bell burrito. They might not be there yet, but they're damn close. That's the market the industry is rightfully concerned with.
Yes, you can use --index-url.

I assume you're referring to how --extra-index-url means that pip will randomly choose which index to try to install from, potentially installing a public package by the same name instead of your private package?
Do you mind following up with the results? I'm about to release an update to my site and wanted to start getting outside feedback on it.
Fair points, but not really relevant to the point that I was making.
Nuclear weapons provably kill people. AGI doesn't. Be careful about your hyperbole.
The v5.666 build (Dec 2013) works just fine even now. Never makes an Internet connection, blazingly fast.

I personally love the keyboard shortcuts for finding music, queuing it, pause, play, etc; Very intuitive.
I think Illinois gives NY a run for their money. Remember Blagojevich trying to sell the senate seat?
Give Me Jeans Not Shoes: How Bert Helps Us Deliver What Clients Want
I am Deaf myself and my Signed Language (Swiss German Sign Language) is special, so I don't know whether my experience is generalizable.

It is very possible to agree upon a language with your interpreters and colleagues who are also Deaf. So you create something not official but what works for you and your situation.

This approach often works fine for me: try to convey the meaning into movement and dynamics. Signed Languages are very powerful and are conceptually more capable to express something at its core instead giving it a name. Add to this "core" sign a few modifiers like fingerspell the first or the first few letters, and what works very well in Swiss German Sign Language, mouthing, i. e. move the mouth as if you would verbalize but don't make a sound. These mouthings are linguistically known as "mouth pictures". Exactly as loan words, and often the loaned words are mangled horribly but they are just an expedient for communication.
I disagree, I think the threat is very real. Soon every burger chain will be offering a non-meat burger. Burger King already does.
Really? Are we sure we can't figure this out? Who believes that?

Private contractors seem to be very expensive. No-bid contracts are obviously not competitive. And when the tax payer is picking up the bill, is there really any incentive for a contractor to keep costs low? Who advocates for the taxpayer?

And how much corruption, kick-backs, lobbying, political favoring, porking, and other questionable activity goes on behind the scenes that increase costs?

This isn't rocket science, it's mostly about accounting and accountability.
Those 1970s/1980s conditioning systems specifically evolved from the inheritance-based type systems originally developed for object-oriented systems.

Computer science is a field that notoriously ignores the past, so these folks are far from the only people to reinvent something already well developed.