skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Reaching zero emissions is just a start. We need to reach strong negative emissions in the next 2-3 decades.

Consider the following points:

1) Climate lag. There is a 40 year delay between emissions and effects on the climate so the effects we are now seeing are from the emissions from the late 70s early 80s. We have emitted more GHG in the last 40 years than between 1850 and 1980. Even if a miracle happened and we reached zero emissions today we have a huge climatic bill ahead of us in the next 40 years.

https://skepticalscience.com/Climate-Change-The-40-Year-Dela...

2) Self sustaining climatic systems commonly called feedbacks. These systems once triggered will keep affecting the climate even if we reach zero emissions. Eg: melting of Arctic ice, permafrost methane, etc.

https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/08/why-positive-climate-feedba...

3) There are currently 405ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere which will remain there for centuries and will keep having an effect on the climate unless we remove it.

From the last IPCC report:

> There is sufficient uptake capacity in the ocean to incorporate 70 to 80% of foreseeable anthropogenic CO2 emissions to the atmosphere, this process takes centuries due to the rate of ocean mixing. As a result, even several centuries after emissions occurred, about a quarter of the increase in concentration caused by these emissions is still present in the atmosphere.

4) It is usually stated that we are at about 1ºC of warming right now, but until recently the cooling effects of aerosols in the atmosphere were not well understood. A recent paper from 2019 showed that it's likely there is a lot more cooling going on and we could already be at about 2ºC of warming. This would mean we are in a much more difficult position than commonly believed.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6427/eaav0566

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/01/190122104611.h...
How am I going to prevent myself from eating after 2 or 3 PM?
Has anyone done the calculation about how much landmass with trees it would take to reverse the CO2 pollution in a reasonable time frame (<100 yrs? <50 yrs?)? It seems like the square mileage would probably be quite large and possibly encroach on land that we need to devote farming to feed the growing population. This is entirely baseless speculation, I haven't done much research into this.
There is unwillingness to accept sacrifice, and that limits what government will do. I think that we should have spent more time pursuading people of the moral importance of defeating climate change. Dry arguments about science are not effective enough.

Of course government intervention is absolutely necessary. Without guaranteed payments it would have been impossible for large scale renewables to start up. The government created the market. And that volume of construction has reduced costs.

Also, China has built more solar and wind power than anyone. And they have an active nuclear program. And their per-capita CO2 emissions are about half that of the USA.
> Airplanes, for instance, 'have' to emit CO2 via combustion of fossil fuels:

Batteries may be out due to weight. Hydrogen on the other hand has a higher specific energy than gasoline

> Emitting 10 tonnes and sequestering 10 tons is the same as emitting none.

Emitting 10 tonnes of CO2 and not sequestering will improve people's lives today even more since they don't have to pay the cost immediately. The moral hazard is being lazy because theoretically someone in the future might pull off heroic efforts to save the planet.
If it helps, the next IPCC report will include a section on mental health... :(

This study might be related:
"Empirical evidence of mental health risks posed by climate change" https://www.pnas.org/content/115/43/10953
This is true about vanguard fees being low. Ideally your advisor would only use Vanguard, but if they try to get you diversified into more exotic etfs or mutual funds, expect to pay a fee closer to 1% to be invested in that fund.

> But you're right. If manager charges 0.5% and fund charges 0.2% I'm still losing 0.5% of principal and 0.2% of my gains per year.

Be careful with your math here. It sounds to me like you think .2% fee is only on gains, however it also it on your principal.

Here is a concrete example.

You hire an advisor at .35% per year. In one scenario, they invest you in Vanguard S&P 500 for .04% a year. You will pay .39% a year of your principal in fees. In another scenario they invest you in a hedge fund fully, where the hedge fund charges 2% on principal and 20% on gains.

Here you will end up paying 2.35% per year, EVEN if you are losing money. And if you gain money. The hedge fund will take 20% from that. So best case you are paying 2.35% in principal fees, and pocketing 80% of the profit. Worst case, you pay 2.35% to lose money.

Two extremes of the fee spectrum, so likely you will end up somewhere between the two.

Be wary if you advisor tries to push you away from Vanguard and into a different brand (they can have incentives that don’t perfectly align with you). For instance A Charles Schwab advisor might push you to use a Charles Schwab branded s and p Mutual fund with .25% fee on top of his .35% fee. When the actual fund is exactly the same as the Vanguard one that is only .04% fee.
On my recent vacations to Athens I visited National Archeological Museum where the Antikythera is displayed.
I highly recomend seeing this device and its recreations live there.

Especially seeing the recontructioned devices gave me completely new perspective about ancient Greece.
Is it a CPAP or an APAP?
Maybe fixing the structural root of the problem is more effective than coming up with fun punitive solutions that don't really work.
Is this a serious comment? Have you really never heard of stage names? Or even bothered to look at any of their Wikipedia pages?
Title says "appear to...", not "does...", so there's that. Semantics counts.
Does anyone know if there is anyone researching on CH4 (Methane) sequestration? While it's concentration is vastly lower than CO2 (around 1.6ppm vs >400 ppm CO2) it still has roughly a quarter of the impact of the atmospheric CO2. It has a rather short half-life (8-12 years) in the atmosphere yet the concentration is still is rising, even at an increased rate recently with no definite explanation (might be wetlands emitting it at a higher rate, might be melting permafrost soil in the arctic, might be a result of fracking). I don't think it is commercially viable to do it but it might become a sheer necessity if we run into some positive feedback loops so having at least some basic research going on in that field might not hurt.
That website looked very interesting, and then I kept reading...

> Window farms are a great item to show off to casual dates you meet from websites such as Meet N Fuck.

What the meet?
Communism and Nazism Are Now Legally Synonymous in Ukraine
I hope society will one day reach a level of honesty and trust where we can just leave stores unlocked and unattended at night.
An LED with 0.5 mA going through it is definitely visually distinguishable from one that's off, but it's not “lighting” either, except maybe for Borrowers in a romantic mood, or ants.
Just install noScript. All the really nasty stuff ads do gets blocked but people being sane (things like what project wonderful used to do) still works.
How to Watch UFC 240: Live Stream
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFC240MmaLivexx/comments/cimrpz/ufc_240_live_free_by_redditcris_cyborg_vs_spencer/

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFC240MmaLivexx/comments/cimrqf/ufc_240_live_free_by_redditcris_cyborg_vs_spencer/

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFC240MmaLivexx/comments/cimrqy/matchthreadcris_cyborg_vs_felicia_spencer_live/

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFC240MmaLivexx/comments/cimrrk/fightufc_240_cris_cyborg_vs_felicia_spencer_live/

https://qiita.com/ufc-240x/items/0224abfdc251ff1017a1

https://medium.com/@mostak1920/ufc-240-live-livestream-hd-izle-ufc-240-live-27-july-2019-tv-broadcast-today-ufc-240-fight-c280ab946a35

https://medium.com/@mostak1920/fight-ufc-240-live-stream-ppv-fight-reddit-ufc-3ccc24de0b71

https://medium.com/@mostak1920/watch-mma-ufc-240-live-stream-reddit-channels-holloway-vs-edgar-tv-broadcast-today-ufc-240-fight-1202f43477fb

https://medium.com/@mostak1920/live-ufc-240-cris-cyborg-vs-felicia-spencer-live-stream-69d467eb268f

https://qiita.com/ufc-240x/items/0224abfdc251ff1017a1
Thanks, I just subscribed.
Some of these may be outdated now.

We had an issue with anchors in the YAML, but that seems to have been resolved.

The remote interpreter only started the one service. In the case of the example you linked, the db container is not run.

The other issue I recall was due to PyCharm needing to install its own debug tools. These were not available to be installed at image build time.

Again, it’s been a while since I’ve used PyCharm and Docker together, so these may all be resolved.
The famous bug that remained undetected for 20 years
C++ contracts are what Animats describes. Constraints and concepts are more like what's described in the article: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/constraints
Okay, sorry dang.
It can come from defence and foreign aid budgets since these interests are directly aligned.
Yeah they really buried the lead here.
Smalltalk? (ed: perhaps not quite fair, as message passing/oo is arguably smalltalk's sole paradigm. Common lisp CLOS is another that's also rather clear, but also rather explicit.)

Ed2: there's also Dylan, but again rather explicit:
https://opendylan.org/documentation/intro-dylan/objects.html

As I understand it, rust is rather low on ceremony:

https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch17-01-what-is-oo.html
Used fire before and find it works quite well. Especially after dealing with click and having difficulties with it.

The neat thing about fire it maps a python file directly to a CLI. If you're in a pinch and want to be able to test a script easily (without having to wire in tests), this tool can help.

The docstring parsing will be very helpful. Especially since fire works by reading through a file.

Also nice work on the NamedTuple support (https://github.com/google/python-fire/pull/161)

I never knew fire had support for completion. Nice!
I went to considerable trouble to evaluate and obtain a small stockpile of some well-supported Coreboot-friendly hardware, while it was still easily available on the used market. (For example, in the past, old ThinkPad models tended to dry up, as the used pipeline emptied of corporate fleet e-cyclers.)

I'm thrilled to see more new and old boards possibly being well-supported by Coreboot, though I'm not assuming that's going to be a thing.

https://www.neilvandyke.org/coreboot/
I always tell myself, my coworkers, and my kids "If you don't sleep, eat" (else you might go totally bonkers).
If I interpreted this argument correctly - regulation is bad, costs money. How much is a human life worth? Clear to me is that Boeing did that sick math and rolled the dice and F’d up royally and fatally.

FAA was gamed, but If you think Boeing would self regulate, I think you are on a different timeline where stockholder dividends are not the prime directive.
The actual reason is that sysadmins don't have arcane requirements of what you can install in your Docker images. It will continue to be popular until sysadmins accomodate developers, or until the sysadmins catch on and start restricting docker environments.

Ok, that's kind of cynical, but still true to a large extent if you ask me.
Why is it an unlisted video?
Yeah, there's quite a few prophets in the Bible by that same name. So many that they changed the language Jesus' name is rendered in to prevent confusion.

Jesus is the Latin form of Yeshua/Joshua.
OpenGL is more than 25 years old (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenGL) IrisGL predates it and is from the early 80s. Neural networks are from the early 40s and back probation is from the 70s. Graphics programming has changed radically in the last 20 years, increased compute and data has actually made neural networks effective for industry usage, etc so I get what you're saying, but in some ways it supports OPs original comment. A lot of stuff is advancing incrementally but there aren't as many radical new ideas in software, and in some ways many things are worse.
If you want to understand this article you'll need to learn a programming language like C. Once you know what the stack, the heap, and records/fields are you'll be able to ask meaningful questions.
Pretty much all of the standard electrode potentials are like a volt or two. You aren't going to find a room-temperature molecular chemistry that gives you 10 or 100 electron volts of energy per atom. Lithium is pretty much the extreme there.
I screen out calls from you anyway, @mgkimsal!
Doesn't seem to be the opinion of news websites when they were cut out by google
A bit of nitpicking on that: Even Javas nio API isn't very efficient. select() introduces a ton of garbage due to dynamically allocating lists for selected keys, and keys have a lot of synchronization overhead. That's why frameworks like Netty gained a lot of performance by building their own selectors using JNI.
> The goal of mindfulness is to make you realize you don't exist, and to try to reach a state where you don't exist, and teach you that your thoughts aren't your own and you have no free will.

You have spent billions of years not existing, you will spend billions of years not existing, yet you also want to achieve this state of not existing within your comparatively short actual lifetime?

What a waste.
> Seems to me that tech is going to be much better at solving this problem than the government. After all relying on the government to force the changes necessary hasn't panned out for the past 20 years.

Governments are the most powerful entities on this planet.
22 million people have government jobs in the US, which is 7% of the population. The money spent by the US government in 2019 (including states and local governments) amounts to 7.6 trillion USD [1]. This is 38% of the GDP [2]. If you just focus on the impact that all of the government's office buildings, cars, airplanes, etc. have, you get a huge opportunity for improvements. And of course the government doesn't just don't have influence on its direct business, it can also pass laws to incentivize or even force everyone in the country to become more energy saving. This is nothing that any other company can do.

I understand your frustration that there is little success in getting US congress in particular to pass effective laws that fight climate change, but one shouldn't underestimate the power that the US government holds. Tech is having a hard time when the government is funding oil companies.

[1]: https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/total
[2]: GDP is about 20 billion. I'm not an economist, not sure how comparable the two numbers are.
Ublock origin (in advanced mode), umatrix, and noscript each enable this functionality. Umatrix has the best UI of the three once you get used to it in my opinion. Go on YouTube and look for "the hated one" for great tutorials on JS blocking with umatrix and ublock origin.
Comparing the shortcomings of rootless podman (https://github.com/containers/libpod/blob/master/rootless.md) and rootless docker, they seem almost the same. So this argument may not count, the daemon argument however applies.
I guess you can start here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishnu_Sahasranama#The_Thousan...
I think there's more involved than simply undoing a change. Apart from the obvious tedium of chasing upstream code changes, the extensions themselves have to be installed from a willing (and trusted) repository. The chrome web store can omit extensions that use an API in an unsupported way.

Brave already integrates ad-blocking at a lower level than the webRequest API, so this is less of an issue, but you sacrifice your choice in blocker.

https://brave.com/improved-ad-blocker-performance/

The recent Chromium’s Manifest v3 controversy around the overheads of the various extensions using the WebRequest API to inspect and potentially block undesired requests did not affect Brave as requests are processed natively, deep within the browser’s network stack.
I was referring to the automatic formatting that QBASIC did.
That's because international law is largely a fiction. Sovereign nations can't be made to do anything except if threatened with economic sanctions or a war.

As you point out yourself, emissions by the United States are declining (and, broadly, the trend continued under Trump, indicating this is an economically viable, rather than regulatory, decline), but when you let the largest emitter by far to continue spewing more than 2x the US CO2 into the atmosphere, there's very little we can do about CO2 for the planet as a whole. In fact their 2018 grew at the fastest rate in the preceding six years.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/05/brutal-n...
I'm not aware of any major stores that provide a self-checkout discount.
Tell HN: Manually cancel your iTunes subscriptions even when you delete accounts
I signed up for a couple of dating apps Dil Mil and Bumble which require you to register accounts against their own systems to actually use the app. While checking out the apps, I noticed signed up for the trials using my iTunes account but then deleted my accounts altogether. I just wanted to see what benefits are offered by their trials.

Much to my surprised, I am not $150 in hole because I received a charge from both of those services.

My understanding was that when I delete my account on a given platform, they would go ahead and cancel my subscriptions and if that is not happening, Apple would facilitate their process to ensure that their customers are not paying for services not received. I am unable to even submit a report on iTunes!

TIL: Always cancel your iTunes subscriptions manually as there seems to be no rules placed by Apple to ensure that subscriptions are actually providing the promised services.

I kind of understand that this is likely a fault of the developers but the fact that I cannot even get an audience from Apple is messed up. Shouldn't they be enforcing this? I see my iTunes account as a payment provider.
So don't answer the phone that way.

Sure, I could do that. At this point, the way I answer the phone is more habit than any deeply considered policy. And honestly, more and more, I find that I rarely answer the phone unless I recognize the person calling. Everybody else can leave a voicemail or send email (which is more my preferred way to communicate anyway).
The word mindfulness itself is a poor translation of the Pali word 'Sati'. The Pali word actually means 'remembering to be aware of the objects that your mind is attending to'. There is no word in western languages to capture that phrase and hence word 'mindfulness' was used to convey in a confusing manner what 'Sati' means.

I have been meditating for 1 hour to 1.5 hour every day for several years and I finally got into a stage called 1st Jhana, where your mind becomes temporarily free of all 'wants' and is completely at peace. In that state the awareness becomes super sharp, breathing becomes very shallow (less than 5 breaths per minute) and experience of time distorts. Your awareness can clearly watch thoughts coming up like 'lava bubbles' from your subconsciousness into your consciousness. It is at that point you get a glimpse into 'anatta' (non-self). The idea that there is no controller (or soul or self) that is creating ideas. It is an automatic process that is happening due to your past Karma (conditioning due to repeated practice).

It takes a lifetime to develop the wisdom and compassion that Buddha talked about. It cannot be understood purely using logic. You have to get the experience of a calm unbiased mind.

Even though people like her are well-intentioned but they should stop to think of the possibility that they may not understand what they are talking about as well as they think they do.
I just learned myself it’s actually spelled ‘lede’ not ‘lead’.
One other program I am looking into at this very moment ¿
ChatSecure anybody ever used¿
And a few more no particular order¿
Vim Touch,
A hackers keyboard what ever that is I am going off basic list of tools some use shown not all no idea, what I am doing ¿
OI File Manager,
vt view source,
XAMPP,
WAMP,
Super Su,
Busy Box,
So that's a start on how to get my Androids to Advanced facial recognition¿
Tell others and me your favorite program's for smart phones¿
This is like a parody of every content-free guilt-by-association argument I've ever seen. Zero attempt to engage issues, obviously incoherent comparison with half-real historical bogeymen backed up by no attempt at argumentation... And really, you think early eugenicists were afraid Africans would become smarter than them?

A fallacious, inappropriate personal attack backed by implied, unjustified, blatantly wrong comparisons.

Make an actual argument please.
I've only seen capture at the point of production for methane. See Lanzatech, for example.
What really annoys celebrities is when you have no idea who they are and don't care.
There are lots of options. One is forming a co-op organization and using that to build, then the board of the co-op is in control of that kind of thing. Units are mapped to shares of the entity and there are no other shares. Buying a unit means buying shares. Building upkeep is handled with a regular fee. A significant portion of owned apartments around the world are operated in a similar arrangement.
You can switch to a reader view, if you are fast enough.
Pre-paid card vs check? Which option did you go with?
Spot on. In my case, mindfulness practice (at the moment with the Waking Up app from Sam Harris) has transformed my life in three short months. I thought I was insightful and deep before, yet was a victim of ephemeral thoughts and emotions far more than I realized.

At no time have I given myself a pass or shirked responsibility in the way the article implies...rather, mindfulness practice has given me the time and quiet to turn these thoughts around, examining them and their source.

I can't express in words how much I feel I've gained from practicing, and I encourage each of you to do so. While I still can't say I always look forward to it, I'm always glad after the fact to feel it's affects. If everyone practiced mindfulness, the world would be a FAR better place...
Mobile Schooling: The Future of Home Education
Not sure why you're getting downvoted, I think you have a point. Perhaps it's because folks could be skeptical that $1T will lead to the the creation of next gen good cybersecurity tech companies rather than abject cash grabs that ultimately fail.

Regardless, infrastructural tooling for usable organizational and societal level security is still not where it could be, and I don't know what it will take to get it there. Just throwing a wild gut feeling out there, it feels a bit like healthcare to me. There needs to be some kind of standardization and some kind of a standards body (likely governmental) that coordinates security as if it's an existential societal risk if done poorly, in the same way that epidemiology is done with respect to public health. Security hygiene and literacy needs to become a basic part of societal culture for any of this to change; not just that, but catastrophic adverse events that occur as a result of infosec braches ought to be rectified more thoroughly, and insurance taken out to fully indemnify against them. I don't see any of that happening, so I don't really see the foundation for any change towards a more digitally secure society. I hope I'm wrong.
I don't like their idea of what a docker-compose replacement should be. And reading issues and limitations about podman pod commands is very discouraging. I would love to hear what others are using and their experiences though. I avoid anything Kubernetes because of a personal bias.