skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Unless you talk about the sentient, human level kind that managed to become uncontrollable

The poster I responded to claims 80% human job elimination by AI. That implied AI that is better than human for the vast majority of jobs. We’re well past the threshold for Westworld style general AI if we get even close to endangering 80% of human jobs.
I understand your own quirky morality, but when you live in a society with other people, you'll have to find common ground.

I'll note that "50% of regular Joe's income" has an enormous number of hidden assumptions, all of them similarly socially negotiated. So the theoretical purity of your position is mainly an illusion.
$21000 in out of pocket expenses for a cancer not attributable to lifestyle choices?

US healthcare is positively barbaric.
That sounds a lot like noscript's functionality.
> the many ways in which manufactures hide artificial sweeteners in food.

Likewise for soy and for msg.
Except that then you lose MacOS and Windows compatibility which is somewhat important to Docker.
Measuring entrepreneurship by number of small businesses seems inaccurate.

For example, if Google buys 20 start-ups, they are no longer counted as small businesses.
One, your numbers for "already happened in the US" are at best erroneous. The question of who gets what from labor is complicated, but the one thing for sure is that there are no easy answers, because labor itself is deeply social.
Depending on how heavy you were lifting, you should be able to get back to your old strength by dropping the weight significantly and working back up to it over a few months (maybe do something like Starting Strength).
The retrospective nature of this seems most problematic: the question is being introduced now but applies to the past 5 years, including to pseudonymous accounts such as Reddit. And whatever service isn't on there now that you feel safe using could be on there tomorrow, just as retrospectively.

That means that services which the user may have considered as platforms for anonymous free speech are being now retrospectively turned into identified speech. This seems to, either by intent or as a side effect, significantly compromise the whole idea of anonymous speech on the internet. For example, there must be many people who, prior and during the 2016 election campaign posted some pretty extreme comments about Donald Trump. Having those now re-interpreted as public statements on their visa applications in the light of him being president could be extremely worrying. There will be people already living in the US who have to fill these forms just to stay and their entire livelihoods could be threatened by not receiving a visa renewal.

In other words, it seems like this decision could have a massive chilling effect on speech everywhere, which is a really big concern.
If I buy the paper version of the New York Times the ads are on every page but I don’t mind them. They are not watching me. Nor would I mind ads on a page, if they are rendered as plain HTML. Just no Javascript
Not that I know of but it is definitely much faster on Linux.
How to Host Your Personal Website for Free with AWS S3 and Cloudflare
evolution does not prepare you. evolution does nothing. the changes that occur in order to adapt to the environment are what we call evolution. The problem is that the environment does not change (most of the times) suddenly so the fitness function of the individuals can be verified (again most of the times) against the environment for many, many generations. Once you start throwing away validation and you also have a species that has a long lifespan (ie humans) you are throwing away the validation safety net. Sometimes 10 years will pass until you notice something is wrong. Sometimes 50. Even worse, the genes that you are experimenting with will live in the wild and will also get to reproduce/mutate freely. New diseases? Zombies? Superhumans? who knows?

My point is that we are not knowledgeable and qualified to play God yet. We will definitely do it and we will invariably fuck it up. That does not mean we should actually attempt to do it.
The US government has investigated things like Russian activity on social media and the media refers to it as "hacking the election". There was a whole Cambridge Analytica scandal about it.

If the dismissive view of "nobody forced those people to use social media" and "the government should not force preferred terms" arguments were generally favored then none of those incidents would have been treated the way they were.

It is already the mainstream view that that the US government play some role in "securing elections", which means ensuring that social media platforms are not "taken advantage of" by biased interests as they allegedly were in 2016.
It depends. Your credit card company knows what you bought and when, while the ad network knows the phone number linked to the PC where the ad was shown. Join the two tables and we can track you to the grocery store.
Foreigners do not have a right to free speech.

It is a grave weakness in the American constitution that the rights of foreign nationals have not been declared or compared to the actual nationals. On this particular regard the Argentina constitution really upended the American one with its preamble declaring: this constitution is made to protect the liberties [...] of all those who wish to live in Argentinian soil.
But also a pretty solid testament to the credit of RedHat's documentation, which I'll echo myself. My OpenShift experience is limited to 2017, but I've never heard anything but positive things about OpenShift's documentation, and I heard it has moved a lot closer to mainline Kubernetes since.
Amazon executives on why they aren't following Netflix
What if there was a GDPR removal request?
A while back I tried to sign up for Airbnb, but it was impossible to verify my identity without providing social media accounts. (At the time I didn't use Facebook, LinkedIn, etc., and the photo ID upload verification failed.)

Due this experience, I later created Facebook and Instagram profiles populated with minimal personal information and a few friends just so I could prove I existed..

For these new visa requirements, at what point does NOT having social media accounts become suspicious, a red flag warranting more in-depth review? And how useful is the requirement if the natural response is to just create filler social media accounts?
Will my Visa be Rejected, if I do not share Social Media accounts?

You need to share your social media accounts details for past 5 years. You are not sharing info and they discover your info, you may be tagged for not telling truth and maybe subject to visa rejection.
> targeted psychological manipulation to you

This seems exceedingly hyperbolic. With advertising, we can enjoy many services free of charge.

Using google as an example, google maps, search, android, etc all provide tremendous value to their users while being ostensibly free. Without revenue, they simply wouldn't be able to exist.
Heidl: Learning Linguistic Expressions with Deep Learning and Human-in-the-Loop
10 hours and under they don't require any proof, as per the directions on the form. The $125 is available to anyone who was in the breach. Since my husband and I signed up for LifeLock shortly after the breach, and (to our recollection) spent at least 10 hours going through our bank accounts and financial records to check for fraudulent charges, we should be getting around $800 each. You only need documentation for time spent if you go over that 10 hour mark. For LifeLock documentation, we just submitted our LifeLock billing history page as a PDF.
Should set background color to something that contrasts with the text color as not all browser consoles are a solid white.
IG is monetized quite a bit. It could be monetized more, but I doubt we are going to see a major difference from the current trend it is already on. Under $2B rev in 2016. Projecting $14B for 2019.

FBM and WhatsApp (which you mentioned) are the things to see if they can be even semi-monetized. They both have over 1.5B active users. If they can average a couple of dollars per user per year a piece in the next 5 years, that’ll prevent any major blows for the company as a whole. Or say they can only monetize them at a combined $5B rev a year with $2B profit and Facebook l.com profits and revenue decline in equal part while IG grows. That’s not such a big deal. We don’t know what else they can buy or come up with.

And FB as a company right now is the 5th most valuable company in the world. If their market cap, including inflation, drops by 20-25% over the next couple of years...they’ll still be a top 15 company by market cap in the world. If not possibly in the top 10. I haven’t checked this second so I might be off with some, but once you get out of the top 10 largest market cap companies, you get to companies like P&G, Disney, and some financial companies like BoA, MasterCard, maybe Wells Fargo. A bit farther down would be the telecoms like Verizon, Att. All ranging in the $2XXB range. All top 20 or so companies by market cap. FB is at $575B. Their P/E is 33 it seems. If their growth stagnates as a whole and their P/E drops to ~15, they’ll likely still be a $300B+ company.

I’m both those case FB as a whole is still doing pretty damn well.
> A few years ago it was reading [Marcus Aurelius] and the stoics

Well, Stoicism turns out to be difficult.
Want to live longer and better? Do strength training
I'm in that boat too. Before meditation, I used to practice self-hypnosis and at the beginning, I thought they were similar. But self hypnosis helps you change your thoughts, when meditation is simply acknowledgement of thoughts, which feels useless to me.

In a sense, meditation seems very shallow, it's the very first step. Then come the techniques of self-hypnosis which lead to change and the real self-help. I don't think that acceptation is enough to make your life better, just a little less miserable.
Property Cape Town – Lake Properties
Betterment wants your bank account as well as your investments
Socioeconomic status comes primarily from your family's money.
I wonder why the US sees everyone who is not from the US as having a lower worth or being a lower class or something like that. Even the laws are constructed around that...
> Foreigners do not have a right to free speech.

Nope, everyone does https://takecareblog.com/blog/the-first-amendment-belongs-on...
Electric car catches fire and explodes in Île-Bizard garage
Five myths about consciousness – Christof Koch
Write c/C++ packages for xmake-repo
The only silver lining is that they still have to ask. In the direction we are going, in a few years they will both know and have access to all your social media accounts.
Most rights in the US constitution, including the free speech right, apply to foreigners physically present within the US as well as to US citizens worldwide.

I do wonder if those rights would apply to those foreigners who apply for a US visa while physically in the US (or who are there during the relevant processing stage). Possibly yes because of their location at the time, but possibly not since the visa is not finally adjudicated until the foreigner leaves the US for a visa interview.
> Foreigners do not have a right to free speech.

I’m not sure if any more recent decisions or legislation has changed this, but according to this essay from 2015 [0], you’re probably wrong.

[0] https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=19...
I've been doing IF and LCHF for a few months now too. Previously, I only did Keto (no IF) and lost 70 pounds but later put some back on.

The biggest benefit to me from IF isn't the weight loss, it's the increased energy level. I don't know how it works, but I have way more energy, consistently, after routinely fasting.
Perhaps it is simply culture, that is, in modern corporate culture, there is only one (usually) legitimate excuse to not do something you are told to, and that is that it is illegal.
> If we had to pay a tax on each gallon of gas for this sequestration, it would be $1.50/gallon. That’s a little steep, and would have a serious impact to the short term economy.

The simple answer for preventing the economic damage is to return the money to everyone as a dividend. Then the average person pays $1000/year in carbon tax and receives a $1000/year dividend, which cancels out. On average. But if you reduce your carbon footprint to below average then you get more than you pay.

(This also helps the poor because they already burn less carbon on average but would receive the same dividend.)
> Foreigners do not have a right to free speech.

This isn't really true. From wikipedia[1]:

>> The government may not criminally punish immigrants based on speech that would be protected if said by a citizen.

Non-citizens can be denied entry to the U.S. based on things they've said that, if said by a citizen/permanent resident, would be "protected" speech under the first amendment. (Which is why the government looking at someone's social media history before deciding whether or not to issue a visa is troubling.)

There's also some grey-area with respect to people on short-term visas and undocumented immigrants because a non-citizen/non-permanent resident doesn't have any permanent "right" to be/remain in the country.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exce...
Spaceman Diff: Diffing Images on the Command Line
That article doesn't cite any cases showing that the first amendment or any similar constitutional provision applies to non-citizens abroad, and it makes an argument about the Muslim ban that has since been rejected by the Supreme Court's upholding of the ban.

It's definitely true, however, that foreigners in the US have that right, as do US citizens abroad with respect to US government actions where the US government knows or should know that they're a US citizen.
Spam call numbers are randomly generated. Blacklisting can’t work without collateral damage.
> I don't understand how climate researchers can seriously have concerns about sequestration technologies distracting us from the efforts to limit emissions. It seems an argument that is easily dispensed with, with a bit of simple math.

The people who need convincing aren’t there due to math: it’s become a political loyalty test for Republicans in the U.S. and some other groups internationally, for many people accepting that climate change is real means major changes in their lifestyle and business, and there’s a huge industry supporting fake experts, think tanks, etc. pitching the message that you don’t need to do anything.

In that light, it’s not unreasonable to worry that people will use it to push the “no need to sacrifice now, new technology will fix everything” message, not unlike the people hoping we can avoid making simple infrastructure fixes because self-driving cars will solve everything real soon now.
The props of quantum mechanics
1) OTA still can be disabled only by hacking the source code
https://github.com/mozilla-iot/gateway/issues/565#issuecomme...

2) Mozilla VPN is recommended for tunneling, this is where most of data harvesting will occur. The same idea that Opera and others came with (many years ago)
It’s mystifying how something so simple can be turned into something so complicated. Just pay attention, that’s confusing now?
I'm curious to know what your starting weight was and what is your goal weight is, if it's not too personal.
I create random usernames/accounts all over the web. Rarely do they have the same names. I also regularly (yearly or so) scrap all of them and start again, sometimes deleting the account if it has that feature, other times just abandoning it and starting new ones.

I've done this as long as online accounts have been a thing, even as far back as early IRC days.

I honestly wouldn't have a clue what half the accounts I used last year were, let alone going back further than that.
Neither of my parents finished high school and didn't value education but they did value hard work and they encouraged me to get a trade. I joined the military, got a trade there, and now in my early/mid 30's I'm completing a CS degree.

Working for others isn't such a bad life if you have the drive to establish a life that you want for yourself.
I don't understand the emplace_back example. I don't see any copies (or moves) happening there at all, so yes, no copy elision can happen. But it doesn't make sense to want copy elision when you already have no copies.

But yes, I don't think push_back can do full copy elision, but I don't think there's a real need, because it can use move instead of copying.
I prefer to self bag, mostly that I don't need some teenager just throwing the fresh chicken or detergent in with the loose vegetables.
It's possible, but OTOH how many sites have lost their users and won them back? MySpace, Digg, etc, went down forever, and new users (teenagers) don't seem generally interested in Facebook.
I'm not sure I would put much stock in an economist's assessment of a geneticist. Brilliant people have a terrible habit of assuming that their brilliance in one area implies an elevated ability in other disparate fields as well. Criticism of Gould among biologists is rare and far between from what I've seen.

>"That intelligence, like almost every other trait we have measured, has a very large heritable component"

The problem is what do you mean when you say "intelligence". We can easily measure physical traits like height, weight, strength, etc. But intelligence is practically impossible to measure and define in any meaningful way. IQ tests have been thoroughly debunked as highly dependent on cultural biases and assumptions of learned knowledge. There is no one single measure you can look at and determine the intelligence of an individual which could possibly be predicted by genetics alone.
Many sports, each has such nice exercise stratagem. Even though swimming is my most favorite since I've been swimming for decade,

cycling: the most enjoyment of scenery, 26km (how I do per day) gives you a lot of different views; mountain, river, road, smell of air along the ways. These are also good for brain.

basketball: it just nicely exercises agility, muscle memory (imagine you nail it 10/10 shooting continually, how nice the muscle is!), reactivity, quick decision making as a team.

table tennis: it is incredible how you can control the small ball in very fast interaction, in very small area (table). Little skills you gain from this is mind-blowing to me.

I play a lot of other sports, I'm very satisfied what my body can do, and breaking current limit is also fun.
I literally could not fill this out without perjuring myself. They say you need to list even unknown/closed/deleted accounts for the last five years. I don't know them all.

This either feels like an out of touch attempt by an older generation who doesn't understand social media (only uses Facebook, etc), or a huge honey trap tricking people into inadvertently "lying" to the USG. They can then use these mistakes to then revoke anyone's status after the fact at a whim (inc. for political reasons).

It reminds me of the pre-ACA health insurance forms, they were designed as huge "gotchas" so they could revoke as needed ("undisclosed pre-existing conditions"). This has that exact same feeling.

Also I wonder if a low/no social media presence will be held against you? I'm assuming it will.
It's not like that, Within the U.S itself some people have higher worth than others. Look at their medical system for example.

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
There is a really cool LEGO version someone built and you can see on YouTube.
It’s never uphill though, while rotating “halo” looks like it bends upwards, force-wise it feels flat.
> setting Do Not Track in your browser does virtually nothing to protect your privacy.

It sends another signal, that this person is an aware contrarian, and may be receptive to this or that source or style of engagement.
I can't use most of the sites at work because of ads and I can't install an adblocker because it would have access to corp data. When I search for something related to work, I know that most of the sites would display inappropriate junk on half screen with my colleagues probably watching behind. The solution I use us to search on stackoverflow only, but it too displays some garbage, and I have to scroll the page so the ads won't be in view. It's a hilarious situation.
Exactly this is why I block, and I also would not object to your "less intrusive" ad. I would still block, but I wouldn't mind at all seeing such a static, self-served ad.
> I honestly wouldn't have a clue what half the accounts I used last year were

What's scary to think about is whether you've associated your phone number (which they also ask for) or other PII with any of those old accounts. I don't think it's a stretch to imagine the government having an easier time figuring out your list of old accounts than you would.
Authentically Curious Founders
Is the spec specific about which cases it's required and which cases it's optional? Because simply saying "it's required if the compiler can determine it" is quite open ended.
To short it :-)
I'd highly recommend Radiolab's "G" Series of mini-podcasts that cover material pretty pertinent to the discussions in these comment sections. I really enjoyed the entire series. Here is the abstract for it:

Radiolab’s “G” is a multi-episode exploration of one of the most dangerous ideas of the past century: the concept of intelligence. Over six episodes, the series unearths the fraught history (and present-day use) of IQ tests, digs into the bizarre tale of one man’s obsessive quest to find the secret to genius in Einstein’s brain, reveals the ways the dark history of eugenics have crept up into the present, looks to the future with a controversial geneticist who has created a prenatal test for intelligence, and stages a raucous game-show throwdown to crown the smartest animal in the world.
A treatise on why founders need to "scale" with their startup.
A stretch, yes. But gone from "ludicrous & delusional" to "proof of concept".

Now apply government intelligence service funding, plus no limiting accountability, plus motivation/target.
You simply don't know that is my point. By continually asserting it you are demonstrating a lack of actual scientific thinking. It is convenient to trust one's memory and the physics of the universe as consistent and indubitably pure. But you have been around less than 100 years in a universe of billions of years. So claiming any kind of self assuredness about the universe or consciousnesses's patterns is total foolishness. A glimpse doesn't warrant authority to describe the entire landscape.
For people that want to try this with a good quality 3d printer:

https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1821540

I recommend 0.1 layer height and conservative settings for a slow, but high quality print.
> Yeah, I put on 10 kg as well once I hit 33. I don't know what happened, everything I've read said your metabolism doesn't slow down until much later

I remained trim eating 4000ish calories a day of junk food from about age 15 to age 22 or so. Attempted to crash diet to a strict 1400 calories a day to make my comes-and-goes six-pack a bit more permanent. Kept it up for about two months. Nothing (more or less) happened. Stopped since it wasn't working. Promptly put on ten pounds. Have struggled to keep my weight under control ever since.

Metabolisms are weird.
Bergen County NJ, Montgomery County, MD. Then somewhere there is TJ and I can't recall where that is. NYC has the specialized schools as well.
The other poster is correct. The prices are complete fiction at any scale that has any impact at global levels.

The price is literally infinite at that scale as the resources do not exist.
I don't understand the momentous burden shouldered by others and their fleeting and superficial social interactions but I suppose that is due to my naivete. For me they are simply the lowest-stakes social interaction you can undertake and another chance to work on my ability to charm an audience.
Don't follow the leader: How ranking performance reduces meritocracy