skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Doesn't seem that off to me. Perhaps you're just thinking about it from the wrong perspective.

Jetbrains has a price in mind for what they want to sell their software for, $X. You can buy it whenever you want for $X. To demonstrate that you may want to buy the next version of their software, they'll let you use the most recent version of their software for 12 months after your purchase, at which point they will stop and you will have to use the version you purchased.

Alternatively, as a different service, you can subscribe to the most up-to-date version of their software for a monthly fee. In an example of great customer service, Jetbrains will treat you at the end of each rolling 12 month period of subscription as though you had bought their product 12 months ago, and they will give you a free copy of that product!

If you're bothered that you can't subscribe to their latest-version service and then end your subscription and keep using the product, that's just silly. The price of the product is not $X/12, it's $X, and if you want it you can freely pay $X for it.
Things that will interest future generations go beyond intentional creative productions. As I point out in my other comment, Facebook captures a lot of people’s and communities’ everyday lives.
> I can bag it as I want it bagged

This exactly, in the US the norm is for cashiers (or baggers) to put just 2 or 3 items in a single plastic bag, and if you bring your own reusable bag they usually have no idea how to deal with that, unless you get a pro-level cashier who will then pack things in nicely.
That would help on the quality side, but it is not going to help on the revolving door problem.
It's almost insane how social conditioning plays into every aspect of work life including how we take vacations.
Traffic shaping, congestion control, etc. is irrelevant to my question though.

My question was not how well a full pipe is handled, but What can you even possibly fill it up with?
Rise in new signups might be a side effect of Facebook removing fake accounts as a part of its purging fake news initiative. Those fake account holders are creating new fake accounts as their old ones are dead.
It's for this sort of reason that I like Privacy Badger. It tries to block tracking and trackers algorithmically, rather than ads per se.
Maybe a gofundme campaign? The platform already exists and is familiar to most people.
This brings to mind an illustrative example made by the Buddhist teacher Alexander Berzin:

“You’re driving down the road, and another driver is doing something crazy, swerving about and you almost have an accident, and you think what an asshole!

Having the thought that the other driver is an asshole is the first obscuration that prevents omniscience. Believing this thought to be true is the second obscuration (paraphrased) that cements the prevention of omniscience.”

It’s not that “you” don’t exist. It’s that the conditioned and conventionally accepted ways that we think we exist (and by extension the ways that we project that others exist) are ultimately false and don’t correspond to reality.
I’m on iOS. Never actually tried to look at source in iOS Safari.

However, before getting there, I was able to read it just by clicking the reader view in the address bar.
Have travelled there several times in the last years. People are lovely and so welcoming!

Last time (May ‘18) we travelled with an entire group (~30 people) all US citizens going there to learn more about the country their president was not so fond of.

That was just amazing.
Nobody disputes that. But then there is website and website.
For the trivial case a child process would work. But ultimately docker does try to be closer to an init system or maybe screen since you can detach/attach to processes. Since reparenting to arbitrary processes is not possible in linux it's also not possible to retain the parent-child relationship for spawned containers.

If you want the fork-exec model then docker is indeed the wrong tool for the job.
Apologies for the confusion, I meant Bob Einstein my pediatrician growing up.
I imagine that even if Facebook goes the data will be bundled up and sold to third parties - a somewhat scary thought. Not that Facebook has been a good steward of the data so far but its hard to imagine vulturous third parties being better.
Here’s what I don’t understand: my payout with credit monitoring is worth $125, and without credit monitoring its “worth” over $800. If you multiply $125 by the number of people affected, that value exceeds Equifax’s market cap. Why does Equfax deserve to survive if they literally caused more damage than the market thinks they’re worth?
My point is that the UK is a bit of an outlier in the EU and was resisting many of the “unification” policies (including also the common currency, again in the company of Denmark — and Sweden that’s supposed to join but it’s just not doing it). UK citizens distrust their government and even more a supranational government and in the same way that UK citizens don’t like being controlled by their government the UK doesn’t like being controlled by the EU. That’s what I meant by “this kind if attitude” and apparently these are hills a majority of people chose to die on.
The uh, seedier parts of the web never stopped using popups it seems.
Mega platforms are powerful enough to influence political and regulatory processes to their ultimate advantage.

Ease of regulation isn't really a good reason to enshrine monopolies.
There is too much noise in facebook, and there is just so much data that it would overwhelm archive.org. I think whatever is important leaks to other, more public social media like reddit. Gossip and petty politics is not important.
The best interaction I had with one of these machines went like this.

It said 'Press button to start'. I did. It stated 'now giving back change' and proceeded to dispense 17,xx€. I was then able to scan my items (2 jars of jam) and pay for them (~4€) (and got my change back too). Fantastic interaction, really.

I gave the wrong change back to the cashier in the other lane though. I'm not sure how often that happens, I could have taken the money and just left, easy.
It does work, I assure you. I tried it in my cat’s litter box when he was asleep.
China will be the world’s used car salesman
That's a bizarre way to interpret the numbers.

They aren't dying. They just aren't growing at the same rate.

Which you would expect as you saturate the markets that have internet access.
FYI, on iOS, you can just read the story with the reader view. You get to it by clicking on the horizontal lines on the left side of the address bar.
Lightning video adapters feature Apple Secure Boot, run Darwin kernel
> Digital-industry group DIGI—which represents Google, Facebook, Twitter and Verizon Media—said lawmakers need to think carefully about unintended consequences that could affect competition and the range of products available to Australian consumers.

Seems a little disingenuous, pretty sure Facebook and Google aren't really concerned about competition, and the range of products available
I'm not saying that there aren't content producers who want that or would benefit from it. I'm saying that they probably won't make as much money that way. And if the only way to do it is to use pervasive tracking and digital surveillance (which users are increasingly blocking and lawmakers are becoming skeptical about) then it's a business model on unstable ground to begin with.

My experience, especially with media content producers, is that those ad platforms are never sufficient and it's always advisable to rely on partnerships or Patreon. Because, yeah, it's more work to create those relationships, but the alternative is relying on a low-revenue platform where a small update from the whims of Google might destroy you without warning.
I’m down nearly 30lbs in 3 months through intermittent fasting.

Here’s my M-F routine :

7am: weigh myself, text results to my father

Breakfast: Nothing, but I drink a flat white just because I want to.

Midday: large bowl of plain unsweetened Greek yoghurt (no additions, which is key - the addition of fruit or other things is what sets off my sugar-loving monkey brain to go seek more). This is low carb yet filling and satiating. I tried out every single one available in my area until I found the one I could settle with. Sometimes I eat a low carb chocolate, ive found a bunch in my local area which I like.

Afternoon: sometimes go for coffee again and add a snack to that

Dinner: whatever I want, which is nice, but generally it doesn’t involve anything deep-fried and is mostly home made. Sometimes it’s a rice dish, sometimes pasta, sometimes meat with veg.

After this meal I’m free to eat whatever I want. If I want to eat dessert, I can, but just need to remember ... I’m texting my weight to my dad tomorrow.

Weekends I can eat anything at any time but also need to remember that Monday is coming and I will be weighing myself. So, I indulge a bit but not TOO much.

There’s no real exercise component here, just the occasional run every week or two.

I’ve also learned not to self-shame. If you fall off the horse, don’t whip yourself into a lather. Just say ‘ok, it happened, tomorrow is another day. Let’s keep going.’

At first, I really struggled at around 3-4pm and was constantly snacking bad things. The thing that’s has helped has been to focus on redirecting my behaviour instead of stopping it. Which is why I now know every single place within a 5 mile radius that sells low carb snacks, the price of each one, and which is my favourite. I also started drinking kombucha for when I have that urge to drink something. One small snack (always less than 10g carbs) is generally enough.

The BEST thing about this above routine is how little mental energy it takes. I don’t track carbs besides paying attention to labels in the act of purchasing, I don’t have to think about lunch, don’t have to whip myself into exercising.

Each week has gradually become easier in terms of maintaining habits. I now know I’ll keep the no-breakfast plus plain yoghurt for lunch routine, but at some point I’ll need to stop losing weight .. so..
It think it will go that way but not because level of honesty increase but because the survielance tech becoming so advance that it can quicky identify you if you stole something
Or give up on the seal and pick songs with huge bass and that are mixed loud and then audio boost them to the max. For instance Lindsay Stirling and fall out boy seem mixed loud and are actually pretty audible through water.

I really only need beat to exercise anyway.

Experience: several hundred hours of swimming with headphones through the aughts and 10s
It’s still a control, just not blinded to the participants (which, yes, can result in bias).
Ive been enjoying Credit Karmas service. Great tracking and some cool tools. Their tax service is also very easy to use, much easier that when Ive used TurboTax's online service.
Agree!
Anders / https://pickuplineninja.com
No, they don't. New variants enter the market, such as the 737 MAX, which are easier to certify.

Boeing introduced the last new airframe for commercial passenger transport on 2009 (the 787). Before that, it introduced the 747 in 1994.

Which new airframes that enter the market all the time are you talking about?
that ... doesnt look healthy
That's a really good idea. A carrot instead of a stick.

I've heard of a few "sticks" in the last few months that don't seem nearly as fun/customer friendly as yours: facial recognition to identify/charge thieves after the fact and AI that analyzes body language and identifies shoplifters through their (supposedly) suspicious behavior in-store.

I'd also be curious whether the "honesty eyes" concept[1] would put a meaningful dent in self-checkout shrinkage.

[1] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5120662.stm
"Gossip and petty politics is not important."

Any historian would disagree with you. The gossip and petty politics revealed in small-town newspapers, people’s correspondence, or diaries represents a resource they find valuable for understanding the history of a place. With the death of small-town newspapers, Facebook city and neighborhood groups have partly filled the slot that they used to represent. Yes, there is now Reddit, but there are several years where Facebook has a wealth of content for community events but Reddit had not yet grown large enough to cover them.
Statically-known field offsets are at least as important as contiguous memory; you can have either without the other, though a major "achievement" of classical OO is that a single-inheritance class gives you both without really thinking about it.
Does engagement include interaction with FB messenger apps? Or just the social network part?

I could see the profile based social network part being downplayed by them in the future as they try to become the WeChat of the west - which is where you have to look if you want to see where FB wants to be in 10yrs.

WeChat is taking over the lives of the average Chinese person in ways FB only dreams about [1].

One big way WeChat has grown is through groups which act as mini marketplaces and mini newspapers. Both formed organically by anyone or any niche.

I doubt FB would care about their social network stuff declining if they can ramp up the use of mobile payments and groups. But I also have big doubts FB can rebuild the trust they lost with the early adopters to really pull off any big shift in payments. The group stuff I can see (continuing) to work with the older audience but the younger crowd is where the future is.

It’s too bad WhatsApp sold, they could be trying to do WeChat style stuff, with more privacy than FBs business model could allow.

1. https://www.wsj.com/video/series/moving-upstream/chinas-grea...
Except many ads are not directly linkable to purchases. Coca Cola won't track you to a local grocery store and an ad for a musical won't track you when you buy the ticket a week later.
How do they keep track of people?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20541345
Yes, Tony, that was hyperbole. Someone, somewhere has always done everything.
Well, the problem is rather simple. If you decide to only engage in mindfulness, you'll have a great time discovering things about yourself and your environment. You will feel better about yourself. That will work for a while and it might set you on a larger, longer path with more peril.

In (Mahayana) Buddhism you train more. Like the opposite: concentration. Think about the same topic for one hour, repeatedly. Who am I? Who do I think I am? What thoughts am I suppressing?

Fundamentally, it teaches you that all these things are like sliders on a big mixing console. Pushing one slider will bring the others down. Pushing mindfulness might reduce equanimity and concentration.

In the end, it is the art of letting go. If you want to hold on to something, you should be able to let it go.
So much for "MAGA"...
That makes sense. IDK how RDP performs, but high res, low compression video could theoretically consume a hundred Mbps.
Innocence Abroad: The New World of Spyless Coups (1991)
You missed it, right in the abstract :-)

> Methods

> Eleven adults with overweight practiced both early time‐restricted feeding (eTRF) (eating from 8 am to 2 pm) and a control schedule (eating from 8 am to 8 pm) for 4 days each.
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

Sanctions are duly enforced laws.
What about... reflection? To me it seems a far more effective approach to self-knowledge. Reflect on your life and experiences in a detached manner. Have a conversation with someone you trust or with yourself. Ask yourself unsettling questions. Answer them honestly. It's amazing the things you can learn this way.
Reminds me of the drama surrounding Genius co-founder Mahbod Moghadam after he penned "How To Steal From Whole Foods".

https://thoughtcatalog.com/mahbod-moghadam/2014/11/how-to-st...
Case studies can be very enlightening but there are also problems. Stories may be made up or misremembered. There is also a selection bias in which stories get told and which don't.

The big benefit I think is that people are... well people. If you do the same thing to an atom it will respond in the same way, while people may respond differently depending on any number of factors.

Appetite is known to be heavily entangled with psychology. People eat to celebrate. They eat to celebrate or because they are sad, because they are tired, because they are stressed out, because they are bored or maybe because they passed a bakery.

Case studies can help us understand how all these things interrelate and how to design studies that avoid pitfalls.
I wonder if critical systems such as this would become more or less reliable if a law forced the companies to release the source code to the public so that anyone could audit. Something like the rewards Tesla gives to the hackers that compromise their systems should be set up by the government for critical software.
Yep. I remember the joys of Usborne's programming books, where you'd have variants of the same program for the different flavors of home computer.
(2015) Not sure what the point of this article is. It seems to take a pretty narrow view of what constitutes entrepreneurship then curses it with privilege.
Yes. Many people had done so. This is covered in details in

https://www.drawdown.org/solutions/land-use/afforestation

https://e360.yale.edu/digest/planting-1-2-trillion-trees-cou...

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6448/76

and in many similar research papers.

[edit: formatting]
>> Why would you want a current investment of yours to go down? It doesn't make much sense.

It makes plenty of sense if financial gain isn't the absolute, single overriding principle guiding their outlook.

(Also, this is unlikely given that OP classified themselves as a casual investor, but it is possible they intend to short the stock.)
This is the point of sanctions. If you can still provide goods and services to sanctioned countries, they're not really sanctions.
The main premise of the article seems to be that 'you are not your feelings' in mindfulness covertly introduces the idea of 'no self'.

I don't find this compelling. If anything 'you are not your feelings' reinforces the 'western' picture of a self that has (but is not identical to) feelings.
Becoming Conscious: The Science of Mindfulness (Richardson, Kabat-Zinn, Jha)
Exactly the definition of mindfulness is literally being aware of your mental state.

If being carried away by emotions is like being lost than mindfulness is developing a good sense of direction. And mindfulness meditation is the practice through which one develops this skill.
This is mistaken.

Galli meant "castrado/castrated"

There is consistent effort apparently to hide this fact for it relates powerfully to the realities of "Galilee" and what it means to be "Galilean" and where that all really was.
Facebook is still growing though and the slow down in growth predates any of the scandals.

So based on the evidence we have the theory that people are impacted by privacy concerns isn't founded. Also you are piggy backing on the slow down when the more logical reasons are (a) market saturation, (b) competitors like Instagram and (c) the growth impacts from younger users as Facebook's average age increases.
Oh did I - whoops!

That quote doesn’t give the sample size (number of people studied and in each group) though?
I'm all for having good regulations. The dichotomy comes from those which say that all deregulation is good (which implies that all regulation is bad).

In this specific case, though, I suspect that measuring the "X% the same", and what the new training should be, is much more difficult than it looks at a first glance.
I know kids will be just guilt-tripped admitting menial stuff like "you looked at how your teacher peck-typed her password and changing her wallpaper", "you found out that the school Administrator account has the password `admin`" or "you downloaded a movie", I've seen such nasty manipulation happen. A lot of adults are really petty when their incompetence is revealed, due to that they probably have no proof and this "Please confess for less punishment" lie is their only way in actually messing up kid's lives.

This only feels like a weak attempt at making gullible young people make a mistake (from their perspective) by admitting they've done something illegal (from the accuser's perspective). Especially given there's no legal protection and there's condescension and prejudiced when whitehat ways are picked, that should be fixed first. I hope this endeavor fails because it's just nasty.
It is not pilot training. The root problem is that Boeing and Airbus are currently retrofitting larger engines into old airframes at the cost of pitch stability, when what they should be doing if safety was their primary concern is change the airframe to accommodate the larger engines.

Boeing in particular was under pressure from the more fuel efficient Airbus A320neo, and they needed bigger engines (larger fans) to compete on fuel efficiency. Those large engines don't fit under the 737 airframe, but getting a new airframe approved is time-consuming. So Boeing placed the bigger engines more forward from the wing, resulting in flight instability and pitch-up.

Boeing tried to fix that problem with software, but, as became apparent recently, weren't very successful with it.
Definitly. And hosting is very cheap. But i would argue, that if you were a band or a big company like disney, and suddenly you have millions of people interested in your stuff, because you have a new release or constant demand, that you then must have some kind of model, that pays for it all. Who can do this with their own pockets?

Ah. I see for example netflix. And now it splits up into many sites again, who offer their own things. The technology is now there, maybe it becomes more and more a commodity, organizing payment is easy, maybe it all gets more diversified again. Does no one remember, how popular internet shops once were? But then amazon became way more convenient.

Ah, iam ranting :>
How are 20+ min waiting to do it yourself desirable for the store? Especially if done on a routine?
I think you are also guilty of over constraining the solution space ... airlines want a new more fuel efficient plane with a certain size and passenger carrying capacity. Building a new plane for this need either involves training pilots on this new plane type or inherently unsafe engineering to deliver the new product without requiring the pilot retraining expense.

You suggest that we should sacrifice the rigor of pilot training to allow delivering planes without safety compromises ... I think there’s absolutely no justification for safety compromise in this scenario - the new plane will pay for retraining costs in a slightly longer amount of time than it would’ve had retraining not been required — oh well. That’s the cost of doing business and it’s absolutely without doubt that in this case - designing a plane that wasn’t inherently flawed would’ve been a better strategy for Boeing and for all of their 737 Max customers ...

The real question to learn from this tragedy is not how can we make it slightly less expensive to produce a new air frame — it’s how can we ensure that safety is not allowed to be compromised during the design phase of new passenger aircraft in service of _truly_ minor cost savings ... if we had a real regulator that was not captured - they should’ve had the flexibility to say no to the 737 Max very very early in the proposal process — and if necessary they should’ve been allowed to offer a tax incentive to offset some of the pilot retraining cost required by them not budging on safety requirements.

Building and deploying safe airplanes into real world use is more expensive than building unsafe airplanes — but that doesn’t mean it’s not worth the cost to society...
I was neck deep back in the days when the only acceptable API was SOAP. I still wonder if anyone actually designed their systems around that POS or if they all did the same thing we did, wrapped a sane protocol in umpteen layers of XML crap at the outer edge.