skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, but they hide the memory layout as an implementation detail, thus negating most advantages of an intrusive list.

You can't call `std::list<Node>::erase()` with a Node* , and you can't write a function that converts from Node* to `std::list<Node>::iterator` in standard C++, even though it's really just a matter of subtracting a fixed number of bytes from the pointer value. So you instead need to store the `std::list<Node>::iterator` in the `Node`, wasting memory.

You can kind of cheat by always using `std::list<Node>::iterator` instead of Node* , but that means you can't use normal methods, because the `this` pointer will lack access to the iterator.
And you always need to pass around a pair of `std::list&` and iterator, because the iterator alone isn't sufficient to delete the node or insert elements before/after it. Usually the code ends up being a lot simpler if class Node just reimplements a linked list.

And that's still the simple case where each node is only contained in a single data structure at a time, which (at least in compilers) is rarely sufficient.
> That information doesn't have to go anywhere into the tree though; a compiler can generate code directly from a macro-expanded top-level expression without constructing any class-based concoctions involving inheritance.

Sure, but then it does not use an Abstract Syntax Tree.

> Recursive walks of the tree

That's the parsing part. You can only macroexpand and walk the tree with knowledge of the Lisp language: special forms, calling forms, arg lists, environments, ... etc.

> All the nodes that are compound forms are clearly labeled and classified by symbols which denote the special operators.

(let ((a a)) (flet ((a (a) a))
(a a))

Nothing is labelled: without walking the tree based on the Lisp syntax you won't know what the 'a' symbols are - there is zero syntactic information represented. In the s-expression, they are symbols and not elements in a syntax tree.
He may be talking about publishing genomic sequence data, and the data on the treatment he/they created. Maybe some tools to come up with such a treatment.
It really isn’t. I’m an advisor and work almost exclusively with clients who have $10mm or more. At that point if you get in an accident or hurt someone and someone finds out that you’re wealthy, there is a reasonable chance they will come after you. I’ve seen it happen and heard it anecdotally.

A $5mm umbrella policy with one of the best insurance companies in the US is like $500/year. I just went out and got a quote on it last week. The best part is if that were to happen, the person suing will have to go up against the insurance company’s lawyers, who are most likely very good.

Even if the probability of that happening was in the low single digits, would you really want to run the risk over $500/yr?
Delete All Conversations from Your TextNow Account
The amount of heat we generate doesn't register compared to the sun.
Free Bootstrap 4 and Angular 8 Admin Template
Here's an article on Toyota's production lines:

https://www.thedrive.com/tech/26955/inside-toyotas-takaoka-2...
You can run GitLab on a local server https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/#self-managed
Doesn’t that just mean it’s Facebook with the negative connotation not secret?

Something like ‘Secret Facebook network architecture’ is rather neutral.
Embedding Facebook avatars enables tracking of Stack Overflow users
s/spiel/shtick/
I found this a great read: https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1591145244/

So much so I'm seriously considering reading the full version.

The biggest revelation was just how close the shipping battle was circa-1942. Without timely technical and tactical advances, it's likely Britain would have been choked off and had to reach some kind of peace agreement. The civilian supply situation was literally within months of being that dire.
FB Messenger is the standard messaging service in Denmark, nothing else comes close. At least for everyone I know, it has completely replaced anything else they previously used, and ordinary text messages are seen as old-fashioned and obsolete.

I've tried to get people to use Signal instead, but nobody cares enough to make the switch. "Everyone else is on Messenger, and I have an account already" is the most common reasoning.
What kind of organisms?

My experience of older mainland European houses is southern France. All the floor beams are made of ancient gnarly woodworm eaten hard wood, but it only really affects the outer cm of wood.

So I wonder if the problem is partially newer building techniques, thinner cut wood, less dense wood?
I'm sitting here in the middle of The Netherlands. It's almost 40c outside (104f) and 26.5c (80f) inside.

There's something seriously wrong with our climate and we need to take action now. Not in 5 years, not in 10 years. Now. The developed and developing world should be planning to decommission all coal power and replace it with renewables over a 2-10 year period. We should be ramping up the planting of forests now (we've got 50 years to work out how to sequester that carbon) to give us breathing space to solve the hard issues like concrete and oil.

I'm sure that even the far right can see the benefit of living in a world where we are free from the oil Sheiks and even totally free from the energy monopolies and government? Where we can generate our own energy and use it to power our transport, houses and lives?

We're moving to a larger house next year, I'm 100% going to get sun panels installed and the insulation improved. I'll also see if we can do something to actively cool the house (an airco is easy to install but it needs to be driven by the panels to make sense).
"Hey everyone who's learned about our 737 max plane scandal, we've just killed it, okay? It's dead and buried. We promise you'll never see a 737 max-branded plane in flight ever again. Good? Fantastic!"

Boeing proceeds to repackage and rebrand the 737 max under a different name.

https://news.yahoo.com/boeing-may-rebrand-737-max-210617942....
> Would you have sources about Toyota factories being less automated than their US competitors?

It's kind of a cliche at this point - but a good start is 'The Toyota Way', which talks about developing people. I'd also be interested if you can find an authoritative source. I just have a lot of news articles - a good overview is this one in industryweek (https://www.industryweek.com/operations/tesla-vs-tps-seeking...).

The basic principle is somewhat obvious - automation is efficient, but inflexible. That often leads to machines sitting idle, or the overproduction of unsaleable stock. So it's a kind of poison chalice - it looks like you'll reap huge profits, but if your car doesn't sell well, you're screwed. If you invest in people instead, you can react to changing economic conditions.
Anecdotal evidence tells me that spruce trees are really good at suppressing undergrowth due to their acidic needless so claiming a mature first is a net emitter makes sense to me. The trees may be growing, but nothing else is.
DT fusion would be terrible for spacecraft, since 80% of the energy comes out as neutrons, and those neutrons need to be captured and thermalized in a blanket to make more tritium. A fission rocket would have better performance.
> On the flipside, a lot of the current ML research does a good job at addressing consciousness by breaking it into concrete, communicable actions.

I wasn't aware ML had anything to do with consciousness.

> In such a case, we might in fact find a "thing" that deserves the label "consciousness"---such as Hofstadter's idea of a strange loop---but for now I think the term is used pretty much used in a way that's synonymous with "magic".

So you consider your experiences of color, taste, pleasure, etc. to be akin to "magic"? Because those sensations are what make up our conscious experiences.
> Don't buy a restaurant.

This is actually the BEST advice I have ever seen, and it works exactly like the (as well very good) advice before it, just like "where they call you is lousy", running a restaurant is a profession (that few people are able to do successfully) do you really believe that you can actually find these people (outside their own successful restaurant)?
A thermostat doesn't need to compete for resources to keep itself in good shape and make little thermostats. There is no evolutionary pressure, no learning from the environment.
Anti submarine operations were also done by Swordfish [1], they could take off and land in a very short space.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Swordfish
Social Media Is Not Important
Related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect
Google Chrome Labs released a very shiny typescript minesweeper on https://proxx.app
The source code is on Github
https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/proxx
It is an excellent point, genetic mutations may have wildly different consequences, but they are all the same fundamental issue: genetic mutation.
This is not a binary, though. E.g. Thrift has multiple transport/protocol settings, such that you can use JSON over HTTP for debug/testing purposes while still using a nice, compact binary representation over a raw TCP socket for production.
Nail Salon, Nail Designer, Nail Supply, Nail Artist – Nailex
Nailextravaganza - We are an online store to serve you for Nail Salon, Nail technicians, Nail Supply, Nail artist, Nail Designer.
> Just noting a somewhat less than universal interest in compliance issues.

Is there a compliance document that requires this approach?

Or is it that the compliance states reasonable safety whilst handling PII and security credentials, and that it is down to the interpretation by each individual company as to what that means.
The list seems awesome, I'll definitely go through it all.
It's worse today. I've given up working, it's too hot. And I need to cycle for 45 mins in this later to pick the kids up.

I'm going to do my best to join the Climate Strike in September (https://globalclimatestrike.net) even though it's going to be difficult with a newborn (due first week of September).
> Why do some many people hate Tesla and want them to fail?

My feeling is that the overwhelming majority of Tesla critics do not hate Tesla, and do not want Tesla to fail. Rather, they see Tesla as a small, unimportant, poorly run company that gets far more press (positive and negative) than it deserves, and who respond by needling Tesla super-fans. The super fans, in turn, react by treating this as shocking, but it's not really. Tesla critics are treating Tesla like a normal company, and most companies are not particularly well-liked. Nobody cares if Amalgamated Widgets rises and falls except it's investors and competitors.

> Do they also want SpaceX to fail?

No. But also, Tesla critics, I believe, view SpaceX as a VERY different company. Tesla is just another car company making just another car. SpaceX is something else entirely.

If your mental model is "Tesla is like SpaceX", this probably feels weird to you, and the way Tesla gets covered in the press - as if it was merely a car company! - must be maddening. If your mental model is "Tesla is like Saab", this seems pretty obvious.

> Most tech giants of recent times have done things I would consider to have made the world a much worse place.

I would never dream of calling Tesla a "tech giant". It's a car company, it's not making very good cars, it's not making them very well, it's not making very many of them, and it's not making a lot of money off them. I am incredibly tired of hearing about Tesla. Even if it wins, the Tesla end-game is to be another big successful car company, and I don't care about big successful car companies.
GitHub Applies US Sanctions to FOSS Developer of GameHub
Fusion has the disadvantages of nuclear. It will be very expensive. Nuclear is not competitive even if the nuclear island is FREE; the non-nuclear thermal power plant part is too expensive. Since fusion reactors themselves are unlikely to cost negative dollars, fusion power plants won't be competitive either.
I would respectfully disagree on the categorizing of McDonald's as "restaurant" (let alone "good").
You think that's bad? Here's Europe:

NL DE FR IT SP GB US International

32 32 34 38 0 4 2 XS

34 34 36 40 1 6 4 XS

36 36 38 42 2 8 6 S

38 38 40 44 3 10 8 S

40 40 42 46 4 12 10 M

42 42 44 48 5 14 12 M

44 44 46 50 6 16 14 L

46 46 48 52 7 18 16 XL

48 48 50 54 8 20 18 XXL

50 50 52 56 9 22 20 XXL

52 52 54 58 10 24 22 XXXL
Because it can go down in value. Plus purchase and annual taxes.

But yes, mostly correct. I don't really see rates rising in a long time.
I interpreted it more as a story about aging. I guess both!
In a way, that is what he is actually doing:

Over the next few months, we will start by asking our
collaborators to open source everything from Lydia’s
N-of-1— the process, costs, contracts, protocols,
assays, cell lines and data.
> These plants can't survive those that's why they were never grown en masse.

Now they can. That's the point of the article.
We generate a lot of heat, but so does the sun by shining on half of the earth's surface. That should not be a problem however, since it goes back into space in the form of infrared beams. The natural greenhouse effect obstructs just enough of those beams to keep our planet at a stable temperature that life has had plenty of time to adjust to. Now that the greenhouse effect has been artificially enhanced by adding lots of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, more infrared beams (from the sun, but probably also some from human activity) are kept in the atmosphere and so it warms. So ultimately, the sun is just vastly more powerful than human activity, and any excess heat would be emitted into space if it weren't for the artificially raised greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere.
An Introduction to Recurrent Neural Networks
I am not convinced that a successful agent in a competition driven environment could be an empty process. It would have values based on the utility of its actions . Sensations plus values equals experiential flavor.
If a program was created in machine language, it's binary IS its code, you don't need the abstraction. If you chose to share this data freely, it's open source.
Even if you just play on the words; You open a source of information.
New Similar Apps Features for ASO [July TheTool Update]
> as I read yesterday that the EU is ready to eliminate tariffs on US car imports.

where did you read this?
The latest I've heard, the EU was ready to go further with the tariff wars[0].

[0] https://www.financial-world.org/news/news/business/2659/eu-p...
It's a scary thought that such issues exist, regardless of how common or not.
The people responsible for the machinations (loosened regulations, underfunded financial oversight agencies, underfunded consumer protection, etc) are now/still in power.

Blaming the elites of old is a fallacy, because the elites of old are the elites of new. Brexit is a conservative issue, due to conservatives underfunding education, healthcare, fire brigades and the police and blame it on the EU and immigrants.

Trump is put in place by the same party that caused the GFC.

And Bolsonaro is probably even more corrupt than Dima et al. Yet people voted for him.

How, why? Because they were not aggressively authoritan. Trump openly flouts with totalitarianism. Let's see how Bolsonaro will fare.

(And I'm not trying to somehow wash the previous administrations clean. Clinton loosened the financial rules, he could have vetoed it, but I don't think that would have mattered, the lack of funding for competent oversight is the main point, and that was under Bush.

Similarly I don't have any love for the Labor govs in UK, but fiscal responsibility aka. let's underfund the stuff that only poors use is a classic conservative trope.)
Solar in space would be so much more practical.
I am in little dilemma about this , should we really aspire to suppress/treat every faulty genetic mutation however rare. One of the evolutionary natural balance we have is : unfit mutation does not gets passed around in form of further offspring. As carrier usually dies before child bearing age. If we suppress all of these faulty mutation and they in turn get passed along in their kids we may risk raising whole generation of pharma dependent generation.
If you can't get through the paywall, you can use the following trick:
Load the page and immediately press Ctrl+A, Ctrl+C (or equivalent for other OS than Windows). You can then paste the article elsewhere, e.g. pastebin.
The article makes the excellent point that, although various genetic mutations have wildly different consequences, the root problem is the same: Genetic mutation. Sounds like there should be a generic fix somewhere.
Well.. it is an excellent idea.
Thank Q, Next
Normal :) Same for the Boeing 787 back in 2015: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17907654
The excuse is that there are not enough seasoned software developers, and what used to be a relatively meritocratic discipline is now a shit show.

Problems started somewhere in early '00s when "software architect" became a dirty word, and one hit wonders like Paul Graham pontificated that "young is smarter".

And here you are.
Really there is something the author missed - just because we have a theory doesn't mean it is right. Amusingly all of the flaws listed to AI apply to Natural Intelligence technically.

I think it isn't truly artificial intelligence but fundamental theory vs practice in a long standing dance over eras.
I'm a Rust noob but I think skunkopalypse was making some good points. I wish people didn't vote down his/her comment to death and actually replied to it so I could learn why he/she wasn't right.
95% of people aren't billionaires whose social media presence is followed globally and whose every public comment is repeated by the media, and 95% of people don't accuse someone else of being a pedophile because they're tired or mad or "momentarily confused."

Like it or not, we live in a society in which words have social and occasionally legal ramifications. Elon Musk trying to ruin someone's life for bruising his ego isn't something society should shrug off and forgive simply because "people aren't perfect."
Sprinklers would've at least slowed the spread of the fire even if they weren't able to extinguish (this is a common misconception --- not all sprinkler systems are designed to extinguish fires.) Water has a very high heat capacity and large amounts of it will help keep the temperature from rising.

Yes, the water will cause damage, which may be why they decided against sprinklers in the first place, but arguably the fire damage is worse.
Yep, you just have to put the time into ensuring that convenient <Serialisation X> utilities exist that offer the (near) same functionality of curl/jq etc.

It's a pain, but it's a short term pain, and necessary.
National Self-Sufficiency (1933)
I know it's possible to download the entire Wikipedia database, but does anyone know of a way to download every article in this list? Preferably as a torrent.
Without reading the article it reminds me of the famous software glitch of the Patriot defense system, to work around a rounding error bug it was required to reboot the system if used for not so many hours...
When is 'full retirement age'? (US)
As an Italian who's been living at the equator for a while.. Would you bet a big part of your capital knowing that a snowstorm in January can wipe out 20 years worth of growing avocado or mango plants? As much as 2.7 degrees in average temperature rise, though dramatic, does not prevent the possibility of a month in a winter of rigid temperatures, where your whole avocados and mangos plantation freezes to death.
I'm not sure how you get from open sourcing "process, costs, contracts, protocols, assays, cell lines and data" to open sourcing a baby as "process, costs, contracts, protocols, assays, cell lines and data" is not a "baby" nor is it the source code of a baby.

If they licensed their Baby's DNA under some open source license then maybe we could say that they were open sourcing their baby, but:

- Don't think that is what they were doing.

- Not sure they own the copyright of their baby's DNA.

- Don't think that would be legal to do.
As the documentation says: "The /MP (Build with Multiple Processes) compiler flag specifies the number of cl.exe processes that simultaneously compile the source files. The /cgthreads option specifies the number of threads used by each cl.exe process." I've never used /CGTHREADS but /MP is working well (except for the precompliled header file).
I think part of the problem here is that the UI/UX of Signal (and Telegram) are just not very good.

Both are off-putting experiences and in turn do little to motivate people to switch to them.
I don't think that is true for baseline power provision, only for the peak demands during the day alternatives are viable.

For baseline, Fusion doesn't compete with PV and Wind, it competes with Batteries powered by PV and Wind, which is a whole different price calculation.

That plus the fuel is common and cheap to obtain, unlike Uranium or some of the rare earth metals for PV.
You might find similar statistics for Northern Ireland from NISRA - https://www.nisra.gov.uk/support/official-statistics

And for Scotland from NR Scotland - https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data
Using ETH-CLI to Interact with Contracts
Python Strong, Kotlin and Swift Have Brightest Future: SlashData
Yes, it's great. Unfortunately it doesn't have an abstracted-out renderer, there are deprecated immediate mode OpenGL calls all over the place, and moving the rendering code to more modern OpenGL is hard. It's being done, though.
The fusion effort is based on a set of assumptions that might have seemed reasonable in the 1950s when the effort got started, but are no longer realistic.

Fusion assumes the problem with nuclear power is that uranium is scarce, so the cost of nuclear energy would be dominated by fuel cost. In such a scenario, where reactors themselves are cheap, it makes sense to make a more complex expensive reactor to save on fuel. This was also the motivation for breeder reactors.

But this isn't how it worked out.

Fuel is a small part of the cost of nuclear fission power. The cost of building and maintaining the power plants, and disposing of them at the ends of their lives, turned out to dominate.

In that scenario, making larger, more complex, more expensive reactors just so one can burn deuterium and lithium is totally bass-ackwards.

The collapse of the fission breeder program should have been a sign that fusion wasn't going to work either. They were both based on the same incorrect idea of how things were going to go.
Sorry, was busy with work a few days.

Well, the answer is not as easy as "biofuels". Where do the "biofuels" come from (e.g. cow shit might have enough energy if filtered correctly, but we already have too many cows on this planet with direct impact on the environment)? How are the fuels processed? How much of the final output is from device and material production and how much from actual usage? Think solar power here. For quite some time (I hope not anymore) the emissions produced while making solar panels was bigger than the savings the solar panels generated.

So the problem is quite complex actually. It would really make sense to set shorter intermediate goals and show how they can be accomplished in a competitive market. If they become the goodest good guys and then lose for not making a profit the world isn't better off either.
Software engineering needs some significant improvements if we would like to keep using critical systems like aircrafts. It is getting to the point where serious software problems are impacting everyday life, not in a good sense.
Sometimes new techniques turn out to be a disaster. I-495 in Massachusetts was built using a new technique for concrete roadways. Concrete is normally not used to build roads in New England because it doesn't handle frost heaves. The new technique "solved" that problem. The result was that every inch of I-495 has had to be rebuilt. Even worse, the first "rebuild" was to lay asphalt over the concrete and then subsequently everything had to be ripped out and done again.