skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure, it's possible to setup a REST api with those features (return full objects for fields rather than ID's, client specifies which fields to return in the query). But then you've basically just built a graphQL api. Any syntax you pick for allowing the client to specify which (nested) fields to return is going to look like a graphQL query. And using graphQL gives you some nice tools to use on the client side.
It’s entirely self-consistent for a state governor to favor state government involvement in energy while opposing federal government involvement.
What did break in it? I'm using sculpt since it was released and the mouse is still alive.

But I can't say that about the USB receiver, it broke after 6 months (it stopped receiving anything frombmouse/keyboard and the plastic cover just broke).
The replacement keyboard has almost the same issue with the receiver (loses contact depending ontthe way it is inserted), so I put it in an USB hub so I won't need to touch it and break the contacts.
Besides that I love it, and I love that the useless numpad is not the part of keyboard (BTW.I why every 15 inch laptop keyboard is has those is beyond me), I store it in a drawer.
This. Even is Boeing had to drop out of the airplane game _entirely_, they have a ton of other lines of business.

If another 737 Max crashed then that would be the end of the Max, IMO, but I doubt older 737s would be dropped and Boeing would still be around easily enough.
Yes. In Denmark we call it ‘aktindsigt’.
Safer answer:

3 < age < 125
My real name is not uncommon. Many years ago, I decided to use it for professional posts on the web in order to build an online presence. There were no significant search results for my name at the time.

Shortly after that, two people (an actor and a prominent academic) with the same name completely overtook me.
This could be really good for electric cars. Toyota's current solar panel experiment is supposed to be capable of delivering 56 kilometres a day in ideal conditions: https://newatlas.com/toyota-prius-solar-roof/60461/

Sono Motors Sion can do up to 34 km per day from solar: https://sonomotors.com/en/sion/

The Lightyear One is predicted to do up to 72 km per day from solar: https://lightyear.one

Doubling that efficiency would be huge, especially if it's also possible to use the system to capture waste heat from the motor or the battery.
Creating compound battery (and other storage) designs to address capacity, cost, and instantaneous peak demand might be fruitful.

Capacitors and flywheels make lousy bulk storage but are excellent for smoothing power demand and spinning reserve.
This is a staggering amount of wheel re-invention...makes me feel relieved that we have HTTP so clearly dominant in TCP/IP land.

I think Wi-Fi Direct is the way to go in the future. We've generally mastered TCP stacks and building an application that uses simple sockets is far less legwork than dealing with the intricacies of 30+ Bluetooth specifications.

I should say I'm no expert on Bluetooth. Why do we still use it? Is it a matter of legacy or does it have some kind of killer feature that Wi-Fi Direct can't compete with?
Kurds have independent country only on part of their historic territory. Turkey being independent didn't hinder turks to take half of Cyprus where Turks were not even majority, unlike the territory claimed by Kurds, where Kurds are majority because Turkey was too effective in getting rid of Armenians and Assyrians.

You are correct that existing states are very reluctant to recognize new countries, but my point is that a mere glimmer of hope is enough so significantly reduce terrorism like it with Basque country for instance.

> Though considering the elections in April Erdogans party got more votes in south eastern Turkey than pro PKK HDP. It is very easy to see that Kurds prefer Erdogan over PKK.

That or maybe people with guns supporting Erdoghans party were effective https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Turkish_local_elections#V...
I understand that, but China is still industrializing and has an enormous abundance of labor. They have over 425 million farmers (and a decade ago, that number was 700 million). At achievable efficiency, that could easily be done by as few as 50 to 100 million, but then there just wouldn't be any available jobs for the other 300+ million people. China is already using workers in massive unneeded building projects and has an army of over 2 million soldiers and who knows what else, just to keep the unemployment down.

A higher produce efficiency is not only not needed, it is unwanted. Full labor market participation is of much more value to the Chinese right now than the efficiency of the produce industry.
Quelle surprise; Tim Cook has acted in a hypercritical and sanctimonious fashion to further the capitalist aims of his company.

I am disappointed in Apple. Very.
I had to look up what eight grade age was. It's apparently 13-14. FYI.

Kids brains are not developed well at that age, plus being given endless questions at school to which there are answers will accustom them to assuming an answer exists. Standing up to authority is something they aren't taught to do, in fact the opposite. I can understand what's going on. At that age I'd say what I think (and sometimes get into trouble for it) but most wouldn't - and as adults I still find a lot of people won't, which is beyond saddening.

Can anyone recall the study where adults were asked to estimate something (IIRC whether one line was shorter or longer than another) and when actors were there to give the wrong answer, some people were pressured into agreeing with something that was obviously wrong.

The question may also be thought of as a trick, per the old riddle: "A man stepped out of his tent with his rifle and walked 1 mile south, 1 mile east and 1 Mile north. Then he shot a bear in front of his tent. What color was the bear?".

Some of this problem lies with us adults I guess.
Power companies everywhere sell “green power” and of course they don’t hook me up to a hydro plant even though I’m paying to ensure my electricity is “100% hydro”.

If a company with renewable engergy production produces X kWh then they can sell that to N customers as renewable electricity even if they deliver it through a grid where coal power electrons are also distributed.

If demand for renewable energy increases (more customers get the contracts from these companies that produce renewable) then those companies can expand or more such companies can enter the market.

So it’s about production/consumption balance of various ways of producing energy, nothing else. This isn’t strange or controversial in any way.
Iron is extremely abundant. It's too heavy for most mobile applications, but might serve stationary needs.
The way I read it they are not detecting malfunctioning sensors, but essentially a computer fault caused by it's inability to deal with erroneous input. Rather than fixing the computer, they are essentially wrapping a great big try/catch around it....good God.
Haven’t tried it myself, but OpenOSPFD sounds exactly what you were looking for. Developed by OpenBSD.

https://www.openbsd.org/papers/linuxtag06-network.pdf
Much of the ice would vaporise on entry. Water vapor is a greenhouse gas.
Bluetooth LE has orders of magnitude less power consumption than WiFi. Bear in mind this is a totally distinct protocol to Bluetooth. Many products use a Bluetooth LE and Bluetooth connection in tandem to gain the capabilities of both.
Interesting, I didn't know that. There was a big period of confusion in the overlap with some keeping to patronymics, some using as a family name. I'm not sure if it was Christianity, or personal preference that made the switch, as Christianity wasn't fully rolled out to England yet, again Danelaw areas being late adopters. Parish records of births, marriages and deaths were still 500 years away, so maybe no one really knows.

Helpfully, the old Saxon custom of the eldest having a particular first name - which would be given to the next eldest if the older one inconveniently died, stuck around a good while too!
Only significantly so if the dart is going very slow
So, for example, where once people might say that blacks are X, Germans are Y, or Jews Z because of intrinsic qualities--godly design, genetics, or whatever mechanism du jure--today such people might instead admit, at least to some extent, the historical accidents and cultural forces that assigned the supposed group traits.

So where once upon a time people claimed that blacks were more prone to criminal behavior by their nature, today they might say that rap culture teaches and perpetuates violence. They might admit that slavery and Jim Crow is at the root of black poverty, but then they'll say something like, "but now they have equality of opportunity", implying that any failures to advance are personal failures.

Jews are good with money not because they're greedy, baby eating Jesus killers but because they were relegated to that role by limitations on the types of work they were permitted it perform in Medieval Europe. (Even many liberals believe this, and while I suppose it's infinitely more true than Jews being baby eaters I think that narrative is much more self-serving and misleading than people realize.)

Such thinking often starts and ends in the same places in terms reinforcing hierarchies, but it's circuitous. These are narratives that people engage with more critically, as opposed to passively receiving and internalizing ideas about intrinsic traits. They tweak them to incorporate their own lived experiences, and the narratives are generally more dynamic. Crucially, they recognize the role of extrinsic factors.

Or take the narrative about how women's bodies can prevent pregnancy after a rape: it's obvious people who espouse this narrative are attempting to resolve some serious cognitive dissonance about a woman's autonomy. But that means they've already internalized the legitimacy of a woman's autonomy, it's just that they're not prepared to let it displace other deeply held ideas about women's role in society.

Even the most progressive Americans and Europeans struggle with the "problem" of the hijab. It's less of a problem for Southern conservatives--the hijab is clearly a symbol of male religious domination that should be opposed. It's just so weird. You would think Southern evangelicals would better understand how a women could legitimately and voluntarily take up such a strict cultural discipline. Where I lived many evangelical women, especially the Pentecostals, wore ankle length skirts, plain clothing, and kept long, straight hair.

This is all progress, I think. In many, perhaps most places in the world these aren't questions you ask. People will literally say that racism doesn't exist one moment and the next moment they'll explain how group A are the garbage collectors and group B the shop keepers as if their society was a carefully and perfectly constructed utopia. They tell you the sexes are coequal while finding the notion of a woman CEO preposterous. And I suppose in some way they're right. Can there be racism or sexism when people can't even conceive of an alternative world, or at least conceive of it as being anything other than farcical?
WASM is interesting, but the market vastly favors JS. JS is simpler than WASM and transpiling, and any performance advantages WASM offers are relevant for edge case applications. A typical web-app will perform just fine with bloated JS these days.
Just default to saying no. If you find that something actually does break as a result, you can always switch permissions back on in the Privacy tab in settings.

For certain permissions (i.e. location), Apple actually does require apps to provide a string indicating what the permission is needed for. I'm not sure if it's required for the Bluetooth permission, but my guess is that since it's a beta nobody has updated their binaries to include that string.
Yeah, I can imagine him mentioning it among many other things, but of course there was no bus driving around with this painted on it. Still, good find.
> But then you've basically just built a graphQL api

Not really. The type of API where you specify what you want and the API itself included whatever data you need in an RPC fashion has been around for decades, I feel weird calling it a "graphql api".

Ultimately GraphQL gives you some tools. The developer just has to figure out if those tools make up for the additional overhead (processing, size, training, etc). Sometimes it'll be justified I just think more often then not it really isn't.
Venezuela?
This quora answer is pure CCP propaganda, why is this post on the HN home page?
It would be a not very good airplane. It has only 2 selling points: its type certificate, and its 737 footprint at the terminal.

Any new airplane would be a bit higher, it brings some downsides (ground operations people really like the easy access), but having bigger engines under the wings is such an advantage that it overrides all other considerations.
For knowing and using words?
what happens when things are actually crazy and it causes a crash itself?
When a single political party has the most involvement in curtailing voting hours number of voting booths the opening hours when a person is able to get an id etc. Then it paints a picture.
Though I agree its not as simple as that and there are multiple reasons apart from the above but the major reason is the peoples distrust of the government in the US which results in inadequate funding to fix the above problems.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Uploading a user's entire photo album to some private cloud would be cost and time prohibitive. If I give an app access to my photos, it's generally because it's some kind of photo editing or social media app, and I would expect it to access my entire library since that's what I'm using it for.

Apple already provides an alternative to the default photos permission: the photo picker UI. No app needs to request photos permission for that because it only returns the picture the user picked (or null if they canceled the dialog). I think that's a reasonable compromise.
This really shouldn't be a problem in the modern age when each person can be assigned a globally (or at least nationally) unique ID number as soon as their birth certificate is produced. It baffles me that the most technologically advanced country in the world still has difficulties figuring out who has the right to vote.
I still don't fully understand, what can people do with this kind of data at scale, esp. for politics. Can anyone share some concrete examples? Sure, maybe data can tell that I'm pregnant, so I will start seeing baby products, but how does it help getting some political outcome (e.g make someone elected)?
This.

- Boeing is certainly well financially engineered in many financial vehicles,

- It’s alone the #1 net exporter of USA,

- USA needs Boeing, whether it exports or not. Boeing also funds candidates, just mentioning.

- Existing conpanies need to maintain their existing planes, and they need Boeing’s consultancy for that,

- I’d say even Airbus needs their competitor, or they would fall in a dangerous monopolistic position.

As much as one would enjoy the spectacle of a corrupted eating the dust, it is probably too stable to happen. But ever heard of De Havailland? That’s probably to do with their 4 crashes in a row, due to its airframe shredding of metal fatigue and material constraints being concentrated on the edges of their square windows. Ever flew in a DC-10 or MD-11? That’s probably to do with their 4 crashes in a raw, for a bad doorlock. Just saying.
In fairness gp says less than 1%.
Yes we have implemented both plus Watson and at least IMO Amazon's transcription was the best, followed by watson and then Google. Which has honestly a big surprise to me since I was expecting something more like Google, Amazon, big gap and then Watson.

Also one thing I liked about it IIRC is that Amazon was the only service at the time that offered punctuations (to mark end of sentence) in English which is very useful in some cases.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Comet
Web Piano Demo by Omi
How does that help? I'm being serious in asking.
What do you mean when you say "since everything is presumably 'forced' there"?

If it is forced labor, even if paid, the distinction between forced labor and slavery is trivial compared to the distinction between forced labor and freedom.
A sufficiently malicious and well-funded app might perform on-device face recognition (which is getting hardware support on newer devices) and only upload the hashes.
> Imagine if your bugfix process was broadcast to the world

Have you heard of the site called github?
So it was set to stun, not to kill?
Because people are made aware that Boeing wasn’t serious with engineering since 2012. And the FAA paid Boeing consultants to inspect Boeing, which by all layman’s definition fall under the terms of “corrupted”.

Who wouldn’t pay attention to the little mention in Google Flights with the brand of the plane?
Freedom of speech I guess?
Housing going up 13% means most homeowners made over 60% return on their money.
> In return, I'd like you to consider the limits of your knowledge on the topic as well.

I don't think I understand much about tattooing at all.

> I'd say he's more than qualified to write an op-ed on this topic.

Why are we dwelling on that? I assumed we are in agreement about it.

> This is also not a scientific topic, so if you're looking for facts, then yes it's not the right article.

It could have been. It started out interesting enough. I'm deploring the wasted opportunity.

> On the other hand, I think you've pointed out your chief objection clearly: People should not write about topics they don't have nice things to say about. I think this is the implicit position people take, and I appreciate you being explicit about it.

Wait. Please rein in your presumptions. I asked why and nothing more. Had the author argued their position then that could have been interesting. Sadly the article was just a collection of general observations mixed with the distaste of the author. There wasn't much to object to except for the unsubstantiated opinions sprinkled about.

I don't even disagree much with the author!

> I don't think it's obvious to a lot of them how it's going to look later, even really nice, expensive pieces. And that's what he's noting there.

In a useless way: "for there is only one thing more pitiful than a tattoo on young skin, and that is a tattoo on old skin."

Such was the depth of the article!
Context: cz.nic are the producers of the Turris Omnia WiFi router, an OpenWRT-based SOHO router. ~US$300 buys you 2.4 & 5 Ghz wifi, 5x 10/100/1000 ethernet, 2 GB RAM, 8 GB flash, 2x USB, 500 MHz ARM CPU, lots of blinkenlights, automatic updates (not otherwise included with OpenWRT), and numerous hardware modular expansions including internal mSata disk, SIM card capacity, and a NAS enclosure. That's pricier than a proprietary router but considerably more powerful, versatile, and performant. I'm a happy owner.

https://www.turris.cz/omnia/

The recently announced Mozilla WebThings gateway also runs on the Turris:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20532763

The BIRD Internet Routing Daemon, a BGP routing service you can run yourself, is included in the available OpenWRT packages:

https://openwrt.org/packages/pkgdata/bird4

No, I don't run BIRD myself, though it could be fun to play with.
Anytime you give a person group the ability to distribute necessary goods, you will organically create a patronage system.

That patronage system will out-compete other, non-patronage systems, because it will have a stronger internal power base.

There are only 2 classes of solution that work here, where “work” = “not accidentally create/enable a patronage scheme”:

1. Impose power from outside, non-locally. This is generally frowned on, as it’s basically colonialism.

2. Withhold the flow of outside aid, as this takes away the resources the local power structure is free-riding on to sustain its power base. This is also generally frowned on, as it feels like useful resources are being withheld.

Because both solutions are unacceptable, the status quo and its power structures persist.
Except that, unlike de Havailland, Boeing is too big to fail. There's just no way the US will allow it to keel over, and leave Airbus the sole supplier. And as with the banks, you can bet that this implicit guarantee gets figured into what decisions people take.
Chromebooks usually have 4GB of memory, and many have less. For me, at least, it was a bit of sticker shock, but it’s been fine in practice.

It’s true that you won’t want to spin up full VMs, but this is a dual-Core ARM anyway. For comparison, I frequently use chromebook-chrome, Debian-container Linux apps (usually terminal and emacs), and Android Outlook simultaneously on my chromebook without trouble. That device has a comparatively beefy intel cpu, though.
use incognito mode
That's the full bill, not the claimed amendment.
People's refusal to fly in anything with "737" in its name.
You’re literally advocating for a two tiered justice system.
Inspect Presto Connection with Charles
> Musk makes a very good argument for his choice to not use LIDAR - nothing alive on this planet uses it. Every creature navigates our world on vision, even dolphins and bats use sonar as a secondary system. The proof of concept is everywhere, Tesla is just adopting it.

Nothing alive uses wheels, apart from us. Its a null argument.

I don't mind a gamble, what I mind is patent bullshit. If he'd been honest and said "Lidar is great, but its too expensive, and the manufactures are not willing to compromise" and left it at that, it'd be ok. But he didn't He dressed it up in semi prophetic _wank_. Now we have legions of "experts" blindly parroting that ToF sensors are dead and will be never used into the future.

I'm willing to be that a Lidar-like Time if Flight sensor will be shoved into a smartphone in the next 4 years. why? because it makes SLAM so much more easy/immersive/better. Which makes AR better, and more useful.

Once that happens, all bets are off.
I didn't realise the US court gave out rewards.
I am surprised with the talk about optical visibility. Are there no radars deployed for scanning the skies?
what does '2019 OK' mean, is that the rock name?

It would be good if your bot attached some sort of 'oh shit' scale, based on size and closest approach
The “maths” section of the Swedish SAT actually only deals with exactly this type of question (or at least it did last time I took it).

You get one question “how old is the shepherd” and then two pieces of information A: there are 125 sheep B: there are 5 dogs.

The alternatives for answering the question is whether it can be answered using A alone, B alone, requires both A and B, can be solved with either A or B, or can’t be solved at all.

This is a failure if 13-14 year olds are so used to being given questions that can be answered, that they are uncomfortable telling an authority that “it’s not possible to answer this”. It’s probably universal and I’m sure the same result could be found in Sweden despite our SAT’s (done later) have a whole section on finding nonsense.
Is that a joke? I don't know enough about the topic.
Of current renters, which often trails “market rate”.