skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fifty Five Year Old KATO Teaches Others How to Achieve Their Health Goals
I’m launching a series of videos on my YouTube channel to improve the success rate for a healthier life. I tell the truth about why we FAIL, and identify how to WIN! Now, at 55 years of age, I’ve taught people how to live more safely and healthier for more than 35 years.

First video just posted entitled “Video ONE – Introduction”!

Videos will be in Playlist called “Kato’s New Videos to Promote Great Health”

Ask me any questions and they will be answered on my YouTube page below the video. STOP listening to commercials that are telling you what you WANT to hear, instead of what you NEED to hear! I wish you all the greatest success in changing your lives, being healthier, getting rid of disease, medication and decreasing your trips to the doctor.

Also, WATCH THE VIDEOS IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER because each one prepares you for the next!
SUBSCRIBE to my YouTube Channel and click on the BELL to receive an alert as I post these life-changing videos!

Repost this to everyone you care about so they can live a healthier life!
https://www.youtube.com/katosansecurity

Related photos will be on Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/katosansecurity/
Huawei takes a hit from string of negative headlines
Until about 2014-2015, many large companies wouldn't have looked twice at Elasticsearch. The companies you list using Solr have been invested in search for 10 years or longer (predating Elasticsearch), and may have high switching costs.
Modern days slavery is still slavery... Blood diamond harvesting, US prisoners used as unpaid work force, sex workers, sweat shops in foreign countries.

Amazon work conditions suck, but not modern day slavery bad.
In an ideal world, correct. If this is the case:

> changes can take literally 20 times as long as they should while we work out what the existing code does

I imagine you have to sell the extra time to (aka convince folks this is the right path) _somebody_. Maybe I've been working at the wrong places :) .
> a defense of corporations and capitalism, with a bit of nationalistic pride sprinkled in

About what you should expect from that awful publication.
Tearing the bill assure uniqueness.

I'm not sure randomness is important here.
I get that, that’s why I said if you don’t have certain software limitations. If it’s to play games or something then I understand.
Hey guys, thanks for all the comments! I realized that it was not an ethical idea to post, so I decided to take it down. I did not get a cease and desist, but I would appreciate if you could refrain from reposting it.

If you are interested in seeing some of my other (more ethical) work, check out Delphus [1], an open research study management platform which I am working on at my new startup ;)

[1]: https://delph.us
Somewhat amusingly, the first comment under the article is from someone still using this exact form of technology right now, or at least was back in 2012.

So I guess this form of media can also be taken off the '100% dead, not available anywhere on Earth' list.
The worst thing is when you start typing Vim commands in programs that are not Vim.
Imba – Create complex web apps with ease
> There is a way to implement this in an objective way...

No. The post above you refers to assigning value, what you're suggesting is the opposite. So it definitely isn't "a way to implement this". It's a way to implement something completely different.
The title ought to be updated to specify the container types in question are privileged containers. Even if the original blog post doesn’t. A privileged container is quite like running a process with a user that has sudo permission. Being surprised that such a container can do bad things seems disingenuous. It’s like saying, “When you give me the keys to your house, I can rob you blind. I just need to figure out which key is for the front door.”
Yeah I agree with you. That’s why it’s “probably unavoidable.” But it’s still not “okay” to me that money=power instead of money=value of contribution. There’s just no getting around it, one way or another, because it’s ultimately always a subjective exercise.
"The landlord owns a very expensive illiquid property. He can't just sell it tomorrow but I could easily choose another rental."

It is not necessarily easy to move. It can mean a longer or harder commute. It can mean changing which school your children go to (which can be a hardship for them). It can mean losing a connection to some social circle or religious organization (yes, this matters to some people). Trying to stay in the same neighborhood can mean dealing with the same management company, thanks to local governments giving developers effective monopolies over entire neighborhoods.

Landlords do not need to sell their property in order to enter a new market; they can use one property as collateral to take out a loan for another. That is more or less how real estate developers operate.

"Its very expensive to fill a rental. A landlord usually needs at least a month to find another tenant. That's a month of foregone rent"

In the NYC region every landlord I have dealt with has included a clause in the contract requiring 60 days notice before moving out, and reserve the right to bring potential new tenants into my apartment to show it off before I even leave (while I am still paying rent and living in the unit). It is also more expensive than one month's rent to move, at least in my experience in this area, and landlords are notorious for keeping security deposits as payment for "repairs" to their units.

"Landlords also have an interest in the community as they own equity in that community that would appreciate if the neighborhood gets nicer"

I have yet to see any landlord voluntarily do anything to improve a community. In every case where a property owner has done something to improve a neighborhood, it has been because they were forced in some way by the local government. When neighborhoods decline in ways that threaten their profits, landlords seem to just demand that the government step in rather than taking any action themselves.

"I don't see your point."

It is not hard to understand. Landlords, especially larger management companies with many large properties, have built-in advantages over their tenants that are not corrected by market forces.
If I do not have car it will increase my commute time at least 3 times. I may manage to come late to work due to flexible IT job but most people do not even have that option.

Considering job situation in general in this country people have to commute wherever they get job. I feel this is just fantasy that all of us can live near public transit.
Or it’s the kind of vile right-wing strawman-bestrewn ass-covering FUD typical of Quillete.

If the sanctimony of this author utterly invalidates the reportage on the consistent testimony of dozens of similarly-suffering employees...well, there’s a lot more available from that outlet (and this author, published numerous times there)
Glad to hear a different side to this. There absolutely are not any robots that can do all of the tasks the people in the sortation center do as quickly as they do them. Not even close.
I actually think that deep learning systems can be trained for all or almost all the fixed tasks already, but there are no robots that have anywhere near the combination of mobility, power-to-weight, flexibility, speed and agility necessary to replace humans in those jobs.

I think that it's going to take a new type of more effective artificial muscle to get there.

But then absolutely all of those jobs will be eliminated.

I think Marshall Brain's books are pretty good on the subject.
That looks completely inscrutable to me. Like a sequence of magic words. I don't see the connection with JSON at all.
> Yeah, and no UKIP supporter would likely be able to describe any of it, except the bits on discriminating foreigners and closing borders. Because, frankly, that's pretty much the only thing they care about. Farage's latest outfit, the brexit party, smashes together old marxists and capitalist cronies, in single-minded pursuit of discrimination.

Well you've just changed the goalposts again. After being quite clearly confronted with evidence that doesn't support your assertions (a summary of a manifesto with a clear set of policies) you change the goalposts to the UKIP supporter being thick or bigoted.

Have you actually talked to many UKIP supporters? I've spoken to UKIP when they knocked on the door and they seemed like pretty normal people.

> Because it becomes tedious to do that after a while. The targets of dog-whistling are almost inevitably minorities, because they are the ones who cannot be attacked directly without falling openly into discriminatory language - commonly known as "racist".

Right so you have plenty of energy to throw endless accusations around, accuse me of all sorts because I don't agree with you but when asked for specifics it is too tedious. Okay with that I think I will leave you to it. Bye.
Oops, I clarified my point above while you were responding.

See last two paragraphs above. Fission is expensive because of radiation hazards. Fusion is expensive because of engineering/physics. The latter is easier to postulate solving.
I would also like to plug O&O Shutup10 here, allows you to disable (seemingly safely, in my experience) most annoying Windowz 'features:' https://www.oo-software.com/en/shutup10
It's a fridge running backwards. Gasses expand soaking up heat, then you compress them and it ejects the heat. Then you repeat the cycle.

You dump the heat outside if you're cooling (fridge or AC) or inside if you're heating.

The slightly unintuitive bit is that you can still extract heat even from something that would feel "cold" to a human as long as there's enough of it. Making a big volume slightly colder can make a small volume much warmer (or vice versa).
> There could be thousands of potentially amazing developers out there that will never know their potential because they either never experienced being taught CS at school, or it was taught badly.

In my eyes, the same way it found all of the self-taught developers is the same way it "could have found" the group of potentially unbeknownst developers you are talking about.

I'd guess the natural desire to understand how things work (taking apart electronic toys as a child) lead a lot of developers to developing. I find it hard to believe deep down there are generally curious tinkerers who haven't found their way to a programming language of some sort?
Dual boot is a hassle. If you want to use linux and occasionally need windows or want to play games under windows it's more convenient to go through the hassle of setting up GPU passthrough once so you can run it in a VM.
As far as I can tell, the primary fault there has been our failure to teach basic life skills (home cooking), learning skills (teach yourself how to cook), or problem solving skills (realize that you have a problem that can be solved by teaching yourself to cook).
You don't need debt to explain this:

* Median US home price, $227k

* Median US rent, $1400/month

* Median US household income, $61k

* Median US individual income, $31k

All these facts are one google search away, on the front page. No need for a study to explain it.
Don't think I was, but our CEO and CTO were.
So what you're saying is general enough not to be disprovable.

But there are two conclusions you might draw from that: (A) that intelligence and education aren't helpful, or (B) that those making horrible decisions were being selfish.

Given the trumpian sentiment of "not paying my taxes makes me smart", and perhaps the fact that other people were even smart enough not to say something like that (but still to act on the idea), I'm thinking you need to consider (B) as a serious component here.

That would suggest that intelligence and education might still be useful - but only when dishonesty and selfishness is not a dominating risk. I suppose there are measures one might take to at least reduce those risks, since obviously completely eradicating those is unrealistic.

For instance, if the educated are good at serving themselves but pullign the wool over the electorate's eyes, then perhaps more audits would help. A culture of much harsher penalties for selfish leaders, even where the selfishness isn't illegal, might help. But perhaps also the electorate itself should be smarter too - and that's not entirely impossible in principle too; e.g. you could imagine a pyramid scheme of elections, not too different from the electoral college today - just with more levels (not just two), and with explicit decoupling of the elector from their vote (so no more "republican" electors or "democrat" electors - they too are free agents), and with the explicit aim of voting for people who you think you can most trust - intellectually, morally, and as a planner - instead of those you most agree with (since with multiple levels, that's kind of hopeless anyhow).

...So I'm not really serious with that last suggestion, but I do think we need to be exploring options. A disillusioned electorate mixed with manipulative, egotistical, untrustworthy politicians, spiced with lavish lobbying, no funding transparency, and media so full of noise the signal is hard to find - that's a recipe for serious food poisoning. It may seriously simply help to switch electoral systems every once and a while, even if there's no single best system - simply to shake loose the manipulative habits that settle in after a while.
Repo man?
What would be the point? We got our "free PR", and nobody reads retractions anyway.
The Gell-Mann amnesia effect doesn't say "all news is bunkum", it says "the news media consistently make obvious errors when they report on physics, they probably make similar errors when they report on your field of expertise, so take what they say about other things with a pinch of salt". There's a world of difference between cynicism and scepticism.
C++: Converting from Boost to Std:Filesystem
This is what I use. It works really well.
Chetty is regressing against the wrong thing, which is pretty typical for economists, who mostly seem to be political ideologues armed with least squares fitting and dumb models.

He's basically suggesting school busing on a societal level, and we all know how well that turned out.
The Group Policy Editor (gpedit.msc) contains most of the important settings to disable (Cortana, having your searches uploaded to Bing, Windows Update, Defender...) and it's perfectly safe to use, unlike these scripts.
That's why motorcycles are becoming comparatively less safe; none of the many advances in automobile safety can apply to them. People on the front lines of highway accidents have noticed the changes in cars due to crumple zones and the like:

> I have been in the emergency services for a little over 20 years now. Back in the late 90's we were cutting people, out of cars almost daily, and they where almost all dead or very close to it. Fast forward 20 years, and at the same speed collisions, when we stop on scene, people are standing next to the cars swapping insurance info. It is truly amazing to see a car that has disintegrated, and the people are fine.

> It also smells different. Back in the day you could smell all the stuff that was in the car...batteries would rupture, fuel lines would leak, oil all over the road. Drinking and driving was also more common, so you could smell blood and booze. Those smells are all but gone -- only very high speed accidents smell like that now. --https://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/brg6uy/cop_car_didnt_s...
Yeah, on Windows 10. You probably have a lot more running than what would be running "out of the box"...
State propaganda is a key function of mainstream outlets like the New York Times. Same in all countries. People just grow up brainwashed into thinking that their country has made a break from history.
Am I reading that chart right that the average person with a mortgage pays around 15% of their income for housing? That seems implausibly low.
Anecdotal, but I have a pretty good before/after view on a community that got an Amazon fulfillment center.

As far as I can tell, there hasn't been much impact on wages in either direction in that particular local labor market. Without strong unions, the labor market keeps warehouse wages at "just high enough that you can have a slightly better life than what you could get working in the service industry". There's always excess supply because warehouse work -- although physically demanding -- is relatively accessible.
I'm confused. What picture does this paint?

20% of a $227k home is $45.4k down

Zillow estimates that mortgage (with insurance + taxes) to be $1,230. A $170 premium to rent versus own seems like a wonderful price to pay to not have to come up with a $45k down payment.

Are you saying houses are too expensive, or wages are too low?
I know what they were trying to say. It's still whataboutism. India and China have only been about consumerism for the past 15-20 years - and large parts of India are still too poor to partake in it. The developed world has been at it for much longer than that.

In practically any discussion about environmentalism, climate change, plastic waste, the go-to argument for doing nothing is "What about India and China?" It gets a little frustrating to hear.
Meanwhile, over 6 years ago, when the economy had barely even started bouncing back, Walmart was paying me—and other newish employees with short tenure—over $17/hr for this type of work. But look at mainstream attitudes towards the two companies and try measuring opinion about willingness to say something like "I bought it at Walmart" vs "I bought it from Amazon".

There's more, though. And I write all this as a pro-social, anti-libertarian leftist:

The obsession with trying to "help" the workers in these jobs—and in industries like Uber—mirrors a lot of the arguments you'll see in the pro-life vs pro-choice debate. People are fond of pointing out that conservatives care disproportionately about unborn fetuses when measured against how willing conservatives are to let infants be thrown to the wolves after birth. I see the public outcry that something has to be done about these companies (so as to help their workers, but comparatively little care for what's in store for those workers after the movement's immediate goals are met) as the left's own paradox (to call it by a charitable term; "hypocrisy" if you're less worried about hurting anyone's feelings).

Shouldn't be surprising. Most "opinion" is accounted for as a bunch of dumb trends and fashion and idpol talking points more than it is arrived at by thoughtful consideration.
This is a weird kinda escape. The only time I use --privileged is when I'm debugging, _because_ it lets me easily elevate access. Does anyone actually run privileged containers for production workloads?
>How could I possibly answer that sat next to my daughter? :o

i'm not trying to start a fight but i will never understand this. you're embarrassed to talk about your body in front of your daughter. what's the point? i remember my mom had a UTI and was embarrassed to discuss it with me when we were on a trip (so she suffered in kisilence). this woman whose body i literally was created in couldn't bring herself to tell me about something normal/typical about her body because of what? puritan culture? i will never get it.

Edit: why am I getting downvoted? What have I said that's so offensive?
Wow, that seems like an insane choice as the default.

I'm curious what the rationale was behind that choice.
Does AMD gain a lot by driving down prices heavily? Should make sense only if they expect Intel won’t match their price cuts.

If Intel follows, then they have both just lost money. Might make sense if ruining the market drives the competitor out, but that’s not likely with Intel.
I like the author's take on warehouse work, probably because it squares with mine. I went to high school with almost entirely white peers, was going to college without having to take on any loans, and I got the warehouse job because my dad worked in the offices. I met people who lived in completely different environments and believed completely different things, and it was awesome.

One thing I don't agree with:

>If Bloodworth believes Amazon is inhumane for looking askance at a worker who asks for a sick day during his first three weeks on the job, then he and I live by different work ethics.

If a person's sick, they're sick. If they're faking, they're faking. Days with the company doesn't affect the ethics.
This is interesting. I was using the ShutUp10 tool (I am not affiliated).

https://www.oo-software.com/en/shutup10

That lists what it considers "Safe" things to turn off and I generally keep to that.

I would however want to try this in a VM before running it.
D and
Is that adjusted for inflation?
Thaneks
I am pretty sure that was edited in after my comment, but it could just be a reading fail.
Those are a few hundred km above Earth. The moon is 384 thousand km further away, and there is no particular reason to watch it closely.
> the idea that you can just pay opex to run in multiple regions and lay off your SREs,

> That is not AWS's intent.

Yet that's what all their produced literature describes.

> its FUD to suggest that somehow cloud vendors want to make money out of reliability.

It's literally a selling point. Not sure how mentioning it is FUD.

It's FUD (and rightly so) to point out that your cross-platform solution is likely less production-ready and reliable than AWS (in total) as a single point of failure.
I have always had a "problem" of needing to understand how something fits into a larger system and "not being allowed to" ... because "Junior" or "new guy".

Yes, I do need to know "why" this is or "why" that is. "Just because" has never sat well with me, ever.

This could be my own "problem" but really: when I ask "why", give a real answer -- I'll even take a Cliff Notes answer, but just give a real answer. "Don't worry about it" doesn't do me any favors.
That sounds like a lot to me. Our Nissan sunny from 1991 costs around 500 euro/year for us.
I've tested with a lot of RAM.
paper from 2005: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/shivers/papers/loop.pdf
I run Windows on my personal laptop - not because I love it, but because it certainly used to have a huge strong-hold on media and games apps, which I wanted a way of consuming.

I no longer game, but as I understand it, support for Linux has greatly improved. Also I used to watch Sky (UK), which is only available for Windows users (first because they were literally using Silverlight up until about a year ago, and now because its only available as an Electron app...).

For my next machine I think I'll just move to Ubuntu. Having said that, looking at some of the apps I do still use (such as VPNs, Google Drive, Spotify), many of them would either work less well, or simply not work at all. It's a shame, but what can you do?
Too bad that magazine has fallen to the way side. I still purchase it every now and then (when I'm in a Barnes and Noble).

The letters from readers surprise me quite a bit: seems like it has decent circulation in the prison population. wonder why that is...
I need Win32 and DirectX.

I could do without Win32 but I'm a freelance, work from home, and sometimes I like to open a game to unwind for a couple minutes. That makes dual boot unfeasible.
> I didn't work for those

But your parents did.

> What if my parents are as broke as I am?

Sounds like they didn't work as hard/get as lucky as your parents?
Naam heeft je 2019 Vriendschap Uitdaging gestuurd Ga deze Uitdaging NU aan
Uniform structure of data favors static languages very well, however; look at how long science has been chummy with Fortran.
It's real income, so yes.
> Or it’s the kind of vile right-wing strawman-bestrewn ass-covering FUD typical of Quillete.

This is the precise type of commentary that is extremely off-putting to me. I consider myself a critical reader and what you wrote is the type of argument I immediately dismiss.
The Group That Approves Emojis Debuts New User-Friendly Website