skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Landlords also have an interest in the community as they own equity in that community that would appreciate if the neighborhood gets nicer.

Yes, but obviously people care most about the communities that they actually live in. "Absentee lords mainly want to extract cash" probably means that, as you say, a landlords interest in their community is related to their investment and the opportunity for the value to rise. People that actually live there have other interests, as the landlord does with the location they actually live. Someone renting out a room in their house or half of a duplex isn't absentee, and would have many non-profit interests in the local community. A landlord that lived a few hours away probably would not.
This isn't about modelling rather a programming technique, but check out Idris for its dependent typing. It lets you encode state machines in types, which means your programs literally will not typecheck if you try for example to withdraw money from an unauthorized ATM, or candy from an empty store. You can make verified network protocols and drivers like this.
Yep, this is the easiest & most reliable method.

Other techniques include tunneling over DNS, tunneling over ICMP, finding flaws in the HTTP parser, scanning the default router for open ports, scanning intermediate proxies for open ports, exploiting bad proxy redirect rules, finding protocols and ports that the firewall doesn't block outbound, and finding holes in the paywall's web apps.

Once upon a time there was a pre-paid mobile internet provider that sold USB sticks. It turned out that once you had initially activated the stick, even without an account, it would always default to a paywall until you had an account paid up. The HTTP parser of the paywall proxy was so bad, it only filtered connections with CRLF as the line-terminator for HTTP requests... so a simple proxy that converted CRLF to LF bypassed the paywall.
They do ask. It's one of the conditions in any loan you take out.
What if we took the “sufficient number of people” and unified them into some sort of power?
> One decade? How long can this go on? Two decades? Three? If one is in the middle of their professional career before they've mastered all the "vim skills" (or even more so, the more numerous) Emacs skills, then they'll never gonna master them all in time to matter anyway.

I think you're mistaken in thinking there's a solution to this problem, or even that it's a problem.

The limiting factors here are your rate of learning and when you stop learning. Continuing to learn well into your career is a feature, not a bug.

> And the point of internal vs third party is not if internal are numerous enough, but if they're productive, convenient enough. Internally vim has tons of features, but it doesn't have a linter, for example.

I have a linter. It doesn't need to be in my editor, and I rarely make linting errors anyway. When I do make linting errors, I want it to be a bit painful so I stop making linting errors.

I'd argue that the bugs introduced by your linter are worse than the problem they solve. And the more plugins you have, the more buggy your system is due to the interactions.

> In any case, things one still discovers "a decade in" are not really an argument for not setting up a good main driver vim environment with more than built-in conveniences. Those wont prevent you from learning vim built ins, and you could get immediate access to features, and in a more convenient form, that could take you a decade to chance upon as built-ins.

Chance across? Don't plugins have the same problem, that you have to wait to chance across them? If you're actively out searching for plugins to solve your problems, you'll find them, but if you just google how to solve the problems with builtin tools, you'll find that too.

Plugins absolutely prevent you from using builtins, and frequently break the builtins to boot. You're probably right about the very basic stuff (i.e. movement, deletion, insertion) but anything beyond that is frequently broken on systems with a lot of plugins.
What Is Cold Water?
Sunsetting Sip: A Post Mortem
Fusion reactors, unlike fission reactors, are best in the smallest workable units. That's because they are limited by the power/area at the first wall, so (by the square-cube law) their volumetric power density gets worse as one makes them bigger.
Please elaborate where there was ever a personal attack. Poster is willing debating the finer points of the topic. Debate is routinely attacking ideas; that is normal. Pointing out the trend of routine holes, inconsistencies, selectively addressing facts, glossing over arguments/facts, handwaving in the posters comments that demonstrate bias, blindspots, misrepresentation, poor judgement, dishonesty, ignorance, bigotry, sexism, racism, hate, nationalistic hate, or routinely lacking insight, experience, and informedness is not a personal attack. Those are features of settling debates instead of perpetuating misinformation, small mindedness, and uninformed/poor ideas. Please reflect on your post with the personal swipe I am to edit out, because it is not clear to me a personal swipe was made.
How is the USA expected to do anything when the same thing happens here?
Probably because this is a victimless crime...

What he did would be more akin to someone entering your property, having their lunch in your garden and cleaning up before leaving.
If memory serves, lithium is more reactive than sodium. ITER will have some kind of heat exchanging system to cool the lithium. But I don't know what that secondary system uses.
Yet again we see that the true cost not the listed price is. I wonder who approves these conditions in the company, or whether it is just some general company management culture embedded in the system.
If you want to help public servants, pay them more, don't give them special privileges.

Special privileges are anathema to equality under the law. When applied to government employees, it can start to get very bad quickly.
With respect, you have it exactly backwards. It's the US, with its predominately low density, car-dominant building style that has vastly more traffic fatalities than higher-density Germany or Japan.

It's true that low-density SFH areas often seem more peaceful, but in practice cars there usually travel much faster than they do in higher-density neighborhoods, and it's speed that kills.
> Tax-3 - a project for the creation of a closed intranet to store the information of highly-sensitive state figures, judges, and local administration officials, separate from the rest of the state's IT networks.

So, is this intranet used for keeping official (confidential) records or for blackmail purposes?
I expect a news conference with Trump saying Bolsonaro is his best friend, right next to Kim Jong Un and Hassan Rouhani.
Do you use any form of tracking protection (either as a built-in browser feature or via browser extensions)?
Ask HN: How strict is your company on shipping code with known vulnerabilities?
How strict is your company about pushing out code with known security vulnerabilities?

How does that vary for internet facing apps vs. internal network only apps.

What is the balance of power like between the business people and security people?
> What’s your motivation for doing this?

Maybe he, like me, just thinks there is no reason for history, form data, cookies and all that stuff to be saved after starting a new browser instance, except in rare circumstances.

> What would the benefit be of storing them in a third-party password manager

Decoupling, less dependance on a specific browser. "Unix philosphy".
You've literally just described LAs renters protections and tenants rights organisations in a nutshell...
That’s because you’re traveling in airspace covered by different Satellite than the one that covers The American continent. Top speed should actually be ~74MBps.

I was one of the people who helped build the system (not at Viasat)
Should Arsenal Ditch German and Buy Ziyach? [video]
Endless Mayfly’s Ephemeral Disinformation Campaign
> The definition of a market is haves and have-nots.

Sure, but we're talking about government force, not the market.

It's one thing if the market creates SFH-only neighborhoods, but why should the government be enforcing that as law?
And I assume that you’d be fine with your neighbour doing the same, irrespective of the impact on the value and enjoyment of your property?
If the cost of damages (including a punitive 2x or whatever) is really and truly $500, and Company B is willing to make their victims whole at that cost...I'm 100% sure there's a problem that needs solving.
Pacquiao vs. Thurman Live Stream
https://www.reddit.com/r/PacquiaoThurmanTV/comments/cfm9ml/officialthreadmanny_pacquiao_vs_keith_thurman/

https://www.reddit.com/r/PacquiaoThurmanTV/comments/cfm9nj/matchthreadmanny_pacquiao_vs_keith_thurman_live/

https://www.reddit.com/r/PacquiaoThurmanTV/comments/cfm9o9/boxingstream_pacquiao_vs_thurman_livestream_by/

https://www.reddit.com/r/PacquiaoThurmanTV/comments/cfm9pb/officialtreamst_pacquiao_vs_thurman_live_stream/

https://medium.com/@can2019live/livestreaming-pacquiao-vs-thurman-live-stream-by-reddit-52f4f417816b

https://medium.com/@can2019live/match-thread-mannypacquiao-v-s-keith-thurman-live-reddit-7492fb4f90e6

https://medium.com/@can2019live/%E1%90%88-boxing-tv-izle-pacquiao-vs-thurman-live-20-07-2019-e560f4af6f8f

https://medium.com/@can2019live/boxing-tv-manny-pacquiao-vs-keith-thurman-live-stream-cb13d4dbde7e
We have more of a culture of forgiving someone who served time in jail for a crime they admit they committed than forgiving someone who made a bad tweet six years ago.

This was one of the major themes of Joe Rogan's interview with Sam Harris: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZA106wrMUe4&t=2760s
The problem is with the structure of the VM and its bytecode language. There are additional problems with Solidity, but the VM itself is the problem. Solidity only amplifies a poor architecture: https://medium.com/kadena-io/the-evm-is-fundamentally-unsafe...
Agreed, what makes this worse is that the tax system is not set up to benefit those who work jobs.
But I think there are rational, non-racist reasons to want to prevent your neighborhood from becoming high density.
While overall the article is well-written (grammatically), the author uses too many commas in a number of sentences. I wouldn't say that their comma use is "unacceptable", but it's not proper. An editor would remove many of them, and an English teacher would ding them if grading it.
> Place ownership of the rain forest in private hands and let the market determine the most valuable use of the land.

I find it much easier to believe that this satire, because were it up to the “Market”, the rainforest would be gone, and every river polluted. Short-term profits are incompatible with environmental protection. Just because a few men get rich doesn’t mean the result is what’s overall best for society. The “market” (quotes necessary because it’s so much more complicated than that) has decided that continuing to burn fossil fuels is what’s best, and look how that’s working out.

The incentives have to change. Making money hand over fist typically only benefits a select few, to the detriment of the many. How many more examples do we need?
What?

Landlords do dick around with prices on small business owners, and Walmart has the scale to not get dicked around with. This is just another thing that helps them to be exceptionally competitive in pricing their goods.

The GP was talking about real estate and it doesn't have much to do with how competitive socks and toilet paper are.
That's not what the link says.
Maximum Medium.
> Particularly not when the people already living there tend to have the chance to be well-compensated by selling to developers if they want.

the developers have a significant amount of leverage in this situation. if they can build one large apartment building in a low-density sfh neighborhood, they can take a significant chunk of value off all the neighboring homes. if they can secure land to build several large buildings, they can seriously devalue these homes. when they start looking to buy property for the nth building, the homeowner isn't going to get anything close to the original value.

as a society, we should never have allowed this situation to happen in the first place, but now that we have, it's not going to be easy to solve. until you get to pretty high percentiles of wealth, homes tend to be a large fraction of a family's net worth. to suddenly remove the zoning would be a pretty big hit for these people; a lot of them could get upside-down on their mortgages.
It is, and I'm not sure why you got downvoted so heavily.

More housing giving people more freedom to choose where to live is good.

More housing helping make living more affordable is good.

More housing making good jobs in economically booming areas more accessible is good.

More housing density is indisputably better for the environment.

There's many good reasons to be for more housing density, and many fewer good reasons to be against.
The funding part is not really a secret and it's even on the Wikipedia page but the "military financed destabilization project" begs for evidence.

The more likely scenario is, I believe, as soon as any government got concerned about the stuff going on on the internet they assigned people to take care of it and those people started to look for a ways to exploit anything and the Tor project was a good target.
Or, you know, there's no shortage and it's just a narrative ploy from corporations in order to decrease wages.
It is theft of services. Ironical in this website since ycombinator companies are mostly about selling services via the Internet.
Maybe it wasn't there earlier, but isn't there a download link at the top of the article?
The bit about it being on a different plane is enough; Bolsonaro's response and that little anecdote are irrelevant. See for example Trey Radel, a former U.S. Representative who was arrested for purchasing cocaine after voting for a bill to drug test food stamp recipients: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trey-radel-drug-testing_n_430...
The 'scoreboard' at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryote#Classification makes for fascinating reading.
Doesn't using Chromium in the first place kinda defeat the purpose?
I mean, you'll thwart others' tracking with your methods (though you made no mention of blocking tracking scripts/images which is a huge piece) but you're still handing data directly to Google.
Those traffic fatalities are vastly more vehicle-vehicle collisions. I believe the EU even in the last decade legislated car design changes to address the risks of vehicle-pedestrian accidents that are far more prevalent there.
>this is a great piece of cryptographic engineering: faking a Banksy cert involves matching the tear precisely, and also requires that a would-be counterfeiter know what was written on the other half of the note, which is stored at Pest Control and is not made available.

1. Is a piece of paper torn in half really cryptography? Wikipedia says:

>Cryptography or cryptology is the practice and study of techniques for secure communication in the presence of third parties called adversaries

I don't see how this is any different than any other anti-counterfeiting schemes that uses a hard to duplicate physical object.

2. I get how the tear might be used for authentication purposes (hard to duplicate), but what's the point of validating the contents on the other half of the note? If you matched the public half the note exactly, it's not like the private half will help you authenticate it.
Random padding can be detected and the existence of encrypted files would be a giveaway that users use incognito often (which may not be wanted)

Iirc on *nix there’s a difference between inodes and vnodes that you might be able to take advantage of as well. The supervisor would create, open, and delete the directory before filling it. Holding the directory open gives it a vnode count of one and deleting it gives an inode count of zero thus making the current process the last thing to ever be able to reach the directory. You’d have to make sense of a full disk binary scan to guess what used to there if the disk wasn’t zeroed out, so encryption could help there too.
It’s not theoretical at all, and Walmart does dick you around, albeit indirectly. They dick around the supplier and force them to make cuts in quality to meet the price. And if Target/Amazon/Dollar General weren’t around, there’s no reason they wouldn’t increase prices and pad their margins.

In a landlord situation, their cost of goods is so small that they can afford to sit on an empty apartment while prospective renters need to put a roof over their family or business.
I'm not super familiar with F-Droid, but isn't that effectively the solution they have for Google Play and the iOS App Store?
DRM, high cost, and ironically, poor availability (I bought all the seasons of ER in 1080p off iTunes, there exists no Blu-Ray sets for the show and the DVDs are often more expensive than what I paid Apple for digital copies that I promptly stripped the DRM from)
Haven't looked at the proposal, and not commenting either way on the risk of using water in this context, but the water/reactive-metal issues have been widely investigated in other liquid metal reactor designs and generally intermediate cooling loops with some benign medium are used.

Edit to expand; having now looked it seems some of the intermediate loop designs have the SAME material (e.g. sodium). This at least means the loop at risk of mixing with water is isolated from the core (where an explosion is difficult to manage). I thought I'd seen other designs, just can't find them now.
> Unfortunately, rent control will have the opposite effect of what Oregon thinks, and only make housing scarcity worse.

Agreed. However, there is an orthogonal reason to be pro-rent control: housing stability.

Housing stability, as in people's freedom to remain in their home, even if their landlord, for whatever reason would rather they not. This is often a big reason why people in the US want to buy their own home, but there's no reason you couldn't give comparable stability to renters, as other countries have already done, by only letting tenants be kicked out for a handful of specific reasons (e.g. non-payment, destruction of property, etc.).

The one catch is that you can't have housing stability clauses without rent control, because otherwise the landlord could always "soft evict" by simply raising the rent until the current tenant leaves.
A lot of this goes back to 80s and 90s daytime TV and its sensationalization of a small number of kidnapping cases. An example would be the Johnny Gosch case which almost single handedly ended the job of paper boy. (There is a crime podcast called Faded Out that looked deeply into this one, starting by examining the sensational claims but later finding a much more likely explanation.)

The top risk to kids outdoors is cars. Strangers don't even rank. >90% of child physical or sexual assaults are committed by someone the child knows.
I won't lose sleep about either one of those.

Primarily, I want my justice system to administer justice.
I'm form different Eastern European country so I can explain it to you pretty easily.

Communism. It's pretty much same reason in whole Eastern Europe. Some countries managed to recover faster for various reasons whether it was more useful industry which was pretty much centrally planned in whole Soviet block from Moscow, so some countries where more industrially orientated and other remained pretty much agriculture only.

Second important reason is geographical location, especially presence of wealthy neighbors - compare Czechia with Germany and Austria as neighbors to Romania whose economically best performing neighbor is Hungary (which is economically worse off than Czechia itself).
Granted that's still a crime. You probably won't use the video recording of that guy to file a police report (unless you suspect he did something else on your property, which would be like the author also running aggressive nmap scans) just as viasat is probably not going to file a lawsuit.
No.

With "effectively TV" you had to sit down at a certain time and watch it at that time. You had a selection of shows you could watch on a number of channels.

What the person here is talking about is $140 for something that is not "effectively TV." They can watch it pretty much where ever they want. They can watch it without commercials. They aren't limited to the shows or channels available on their provider. They get instant access to movies they want to watch, when they want to watch it, without need of special, single use hardware.

> All of these values are insane to me.

It's a special kind of hubris to to assume that everyone else is insane and you are not when you admittedly don't understand the topic at hand.
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/public-vu...
Developers should have never left the web for some company’s garden. I wonder how the ~100B of the app economy compare to the web app economy
There is a sizable intersection between the set of populists and the set of racists. Often the naming of people close or in this intersection is a judgment call.
What is unbelievable in aiming "to aid democracy advocates in authoritarian states"? I think the State Department has funded plenty of other censorship circumvention projects like Tor.

But you have to admit the funding for Tor was also meant to get the upper hand in the shadow battle across anonymous networks. I still remember how LulzSec was busted by the FBI with a timing attack on Tor. Without the ahead-of-time research on Tor it wouldn't be as easy for the FBI to get the same level of power against anonymous networks.
What a dumbass analogy. They stole bandwidth. And bandwidth on an airplane is extremely limited.
As much as I hate to say this, we all knew it was happening, right? I'm still ninety percent sure they had to scramble to justify a non-tor-breaking reason they got Ulbricht. I don't know why people are still encouraging others to use it alone. You should also be using some kind of encryption of the content itself. Their goal is to figure out who you are and what you're saying; deny them either piece, and they're foiled (three-letters, that is).
> This entirely misses the point. The point isn't that every SFH-only neighborhood is affluent or even middle-class, it's that having all these SFH-only neighborhoods supports stratification.

Is that the point? Is stratification what we are trying to prevent by removing single family home regulations? I don't think it will work.
To add to that, the sun's average power density barely rivals a compost heap.
This would be the same Farage that made sure his anti-immigration message in the 2016 Brexit campaign had "the only prominent white person in the photograph obscured by a box of text": https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/16/nigel-farag...

Also, how can you brand somebody as "patriotic" when his party is a US-based corporation with links to the Russian government and tax havens?

Sad to see this rubbish on HN. Farage plays to the same racist tendencies as Trump and Bolsonaro do, with constant dog-whistling. He's absolutely controversial and hardly effective: he still has no MP in the UK Parliament after 15 years of trying, and has accomplished absolutely nothing over two mandates in the EU Parliament beyond annoying even his own allies.

It's not the "smearing" that build his success, but a situation of sustained economic weakness of the white working classes that fosters a climate of anger against migrants (who are seen as cheaper competition). That BNP fella was similarly successful for a while. Also, Farage's support is built on social networks, where his messages are spread without a debate, let alone "smears".
I see “modern day slavery” and I stop reading. There are no whips. No rape. No families torn apart. No slave ships. Grow up people.
Ask HN: TechCrunch Battlefield Applications
Has anyone gotten a response back about their applications?