skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This was in hunter gatherer times. There weren't any slaves. There much formal hierarchy as we'd understand it. Some people were known to be wiser and/or tougher but that wasn't a formal role. And if you didn't like how things were run you could always try to convince people to go somewhere else with you and split the tribe.

Also, where are you getting castration from? We know these people existed from the genetic traces of their descendants, and people who are castrated don't have kids.
HMA Pro VPN 4.7.212 Crack with License Key Free Download (2019)
The term meta programming in languages like Ruby and many others tends to
be taken to include the language ability to dynamically alias (or create) methods at runtime. I don't think I can remember having seen it used to mean something as restrictive as you suggest
Show HN: Given a Sentence, Extract topic(s)
How does Julia’s dynamic typing augment discoverability? Does it magically tie into a code completion engine somehow?
Abandon is ruining a match for 9 other players. So 10 looks like about right.
I believe in Berlin it's 6 Months out of the year or something (with caveats attached).
Which then in turn isn't really enforced and the commercial guys running multiple appartments as full time rentals find intricate ways around the rules...
Also, it might surprise some people just how many servers an email travels through to get to its destination. I just grabbed a random mail from a mailing list I'm on (generally a worst case scenario) and it had 7 Received headers. Every mail server is supposed to add a Received header when the mail passes through but there's no way to enforce that, so all I can really say is that mail probably passed through at least 7 servers on it's way to my inbox.

Each one of those hops may or may not have talked TLS to the next hop. Each one probably wrote the mail out to a disk based mail queue in plaintext. There is nothing preventing any of those 7 servers from keeping around that mail even though they forwarded it on. There is nothing preventing them from indexing the mail for spam or marketing purposes.
Using WebAssembly with React
A Few Thoughts about Deep Fakes
It will be tough, and next to improbable, to match python's ecosystem. Maybe a way into it would be to marry the two.
I don't see why it matters that the railroad came first. It's just a piece of infrastructure, not a native people. This happens all the time where a main road now goes through a town that has developed. A bypass is built so it doesn't have to go through the town anymore.
Next time you can cite the Notre Dame fire
I don't like the approach of questioning credentials. It would be more useful, in my opinion, to demonstrate the factual incorrectness of the blogpost by investigating its (scientific) sources. See where the information comes from and check if it is represented well. Spoiler alert: this article does not cite scientific sources, only other self-referential blogposts.

So let's see this article.

> While it would be fair to assume that 5G technology has been tested for risks, this is simply not the case.

False. Just a Google Scholar search away are many articles investigating the safety: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=radiation+safety+5G

> 5G millimeter waves [..] naturally cause the skin to rise in temperature

So? If the rise in temperature was large, it may be a concern. However, the rise is very slight. Moving from one room to another in your house changes the temperature more. Heck, even standing up from your desk.

> Many scientists understand that the electromagnetic radiation leaking through the doors of our microwave ovens are carcinogenic, and therefore, can cause cancer.

[citation needed]. If there are so many scientists, why not name a few?

> launch of 5G will be similar to turning on your microwave, opening its door, and leaving it on for the rest of your life

Laughably false. Your microwave oven operates at the same frequency as Wi-Fi and the power required is thousands of times higher than your Wi-Fi router to be able to heat the food.

> Radiation causes cancer.

True, but misleading. Certain types of radiation (ionizing radiation, which 5G is not) are carcinogenic.

> [..] radiation does one major thing to human beings and animals – it destroys our DNA

Again, not all radiation does this. Only radiation at much higher frequencies than any of the 5G bands will do this.
Whether they were Homo neanderthalensis or Homo sapiens neanderthalensis is actually a matter of debate. It looks like the first generation human/neanderthal hybrids were significantly less fertile than either alone given the sections of the neanderthal genome that have been systematically selected against, like all of the neanderthal mDNA. But still fertile enough to leave descendants, some of which were more fertile.
I'd hate this. I'm using random strings as username and other random strings as passwords whenever allowed, my password manager keeps track of them. I have a physical backup of my password manager (two physical devices) which I keep synced, because I realize how screwed I am if I lost them.. I would prefer the option to set an "I do _NOT_ want to be able to reset my lost password" when creating an account.
The Melanesians didn't pass anything on, that's chronologically impossible. They are the descendants of a migration wave out of Africa, through Asia, to Australia. If some interbreeding with the Denisovan (there is only one!) happened, the Melanesians are the closest extant relatives of whoever did the interbreeding. Outside Melanesia, that branch of humanity was later replaced by the expansion of another migration wave, and the again by the Han expansion.
Attaching cargo as in adding another car or tanker? That would be pretty difficult - those movements are planned. Sticking a bomb on a tanker, on the other hand, would probably be much easier, although you'd have to know beforehand what tankers are full, and I suspect that's more difficult.

But there's always going to be a level of insecurity around trains. A train yard can't be fully fenced off for obvious reasons. I know here in Oslo there was a teenager killed last year after he and a couple of others snuck into a yard one night and went into a maintenance tunnel and touched a high voltage line. They've rebuilt the fence they got in through, and made it higher, but someone determined to get in there will just go further to where the tracks cross a road.
I once wound up in the suburbs as a tourist. Not what I was expecting at all.
How do you deal with data you haven’t seen before? Importing a large csv for example where a lot of the data is the wrong type or the wrong format.
https://outline.com/ChrMFw
For a proof of concept, I've made a couple of years ago a "gateway" which was launching a local IMAP server in my XMPP client. This way you could use any MUA you like while taking profit of XMPP infrastructure (JID — XMPP identifier — are similar to email addresses) and its encryption (OMEMO can be used with that for instance). In other words, you could send messages from Thunderbird (or Gajim) to KMail by using only XMPP protocol (and thanks to IMAP Push, you got notifications immediately).
They keep their hives at about 35C, which is white noticeable when you open them up. Same goes for big clumps of bees. Angry ones balling a invader are considerably hotter it seems, and this article mentions 49C. I’ve seen other article noting that bees die at about 51, while hornets die at a fractionally lower temperature. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12649-honeybees-gang-...
Hey HN;
This is a simple lightweight (2.3 KB) node module that i use to quickly extract the main topic, or an array of topics from a string or sentence.

I think someone else could find this useful for a project.
Thanks for checking it out.

EDITS: grammar
The old ‘security is hard so let’s not do it’ argument. Emails are not properly encrypted in transit and are available for access at the provider if a court decides to grant a warrant. That might not be enough protection for everyone.

It is possible for a determined individual to withstand targeted attacks if he’s careful and willing to make the sacrifices that come with the territory.
That is one of the management's primary jobs to foresee this ... I know there are multiple layers of useless management in these institutions but this is basically saying they are incompetent at their job.
Security Keys Store Credentials
Amazon appeases German watchdog, but EU opens new probe
Oriol Vinyals on StarCraft and Artificial Intelligence
The island where astronauts train for Mars
Sadly this rule seems to be frequently broken.
This comment makes no sense because the Fourth doesn't apply to data/information that you've surrendered to the DMV and that the DMV owns.

Precisely from the same Wiki article that you linked: "...courts have found that a person does not possess a reasonable expectation of privacy in information transferred to a third party...".

So, the right "...to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures..." doesn't apply, here, whatsoever. The reason that the DMV can sell the data is a direct effect of the fact that they own the data that you've surrendered for the privilege of driving.

In order for your reference to have any standing, jurisprudence must first be reversed and that seems a dauntingly monumental and nigh-impossible task.

It doesn't mean or infer that I think it's a "good" thing (hint: I do not) but to simply dismiss it as being protected by the fourth negates the very premise that has already been established that it isn't (as in this case, with the DMV).
If your neighbours were smart, they’d give you lots of honey. This arrangement has a long history of keeping neighbours happy.
It’s a straight win and honey isn’t short - the new season is fast approaching for me, and there is still around 100kgs in the kitchen.
Does anyone know if this was a conscious decision? I mean IIRC in Java you're generally discouraged from throwing errors for control flow because creating the stack trace is a relatively heavy process. In Go this is of less concern and returning an error is pretty normal for control flow (as in errors are expected, not exceptional), and you shouldn't have to worry that an error path would be 100x as expensive as a normal flow because a stack trace is being generated.
Java also makes you handle every possible error condition, unless of course you chose to use an escape hatch. Rust allows the same.

By the way, Go is much happier to crash than Java - for example, a simple array index out of range will cause a program crash in a typical Go program, where it would only cause a request failure in a typical Java program. Not sure how Rust handles this.

Finally, choose that isn't tested (manually or automatically) is very unlikely to work. Maybe you can guarantee it doesn't crash, which is a much weaker guarantee, but I doubt even fully proven code (like seL4) is all bug-free before ever being run.
I think flexibility becomes a double edged sword over time: when you need to read, understand and modify some code with overloaded operators it can take longer to figure out what's happening.
House orders Pentagon to review if it exposed Americans to weaponised Lyme ticks
Build it however you're comfortable with and push it to Heroku however you're comfortable with.
I have used FORTRAN quite a bit and I assume that the situation with Cobol is similar. If you go into it with an open mind you will soon see common patterns that look crazy from a more modern language point of view but were widely used in that language. My FORTRAN code was full of GOTO which looks horrible today but that's how things got done and once you are used to it it makes sense.

Now the other question is whether it makes sense to get into Cobol from a career or business perspective and I am not so sure about that...
> Signal does a great job of supporting activists.

I don’t think it practically achieves this. Even now, Signal is an unreliable platform to communicate with. One can’t be sure if the message will reach in a timely manner (like a few seconds or several seconds) or even reach at all. The UX and feature set are also far behind something like Wire.

I’ll accept that Signal has a strong and reputed protocol, and has take some strong measures on security and privacy. But everything else about is truly meh, to put it mildly.

Please don’t dismiss these points about reliability saying it has never failed for you or someone you know. It routinely fails for people I know, and that’s all that matters when recommending a messenger platform to others.

Signal has made it seem like security is easy to focus on (though a lot of thought and work has gone into it), but has shown that UX or pretty hard and that running a platform is even harder (even at Signal’s scale, which I presume is a fraction of other platforms).
Ask HN: Is it legal to use Twilio/Plivo within India
Context: Want to setup a telephony solution for an Indian business with Indian customers. Would preferrably want a cloud solution with API access like Twilio.
But AFAIK Indian regulations prohibit VoIP to PSTN telephony in India. So have regulations changed or Twilio/Plivo have found a way to stay compliant?
Living in semi-touristic district, it’s funny to see how locals views differ from tourists. We have a special term for it: local resident syndrome. It’s when someone asks you if there is something interesting to look at here, but you don’t know, despite living here since forever. Well, I can show you where that expensive nightclub is on the map, does it count? I also see people making selfies with decorative street elements (simple installations and/or statues) that were installed, say, a year ago, and really mean nothing, but are perceived as if they had a history. Accidentally hearing what tour guides tell to groups about locals and their traditions is another story.
So far it just seems to me that it is you that are making an intellectual mistake to group some things that have very little to do with each other (except for the fact that you personally might be disagreeing with all of them, or that all of them are "controversial"?)

> 5G is dangerous
> Earth is flat
> Climate change isn't anthropogenic
> Moon landing didn't happen

These are just very different topics with different ways of finding the truth, different consensus, very different people believing in all of them.

In my experience there is almost no significant connection between people believing in any of these. (Except for a small percentage that just hop onto every conspiracy? But those are not the bulk of people discussing these issues.)
The comparison is meaningful setup for discussing decentralized cloud storage.

The comparison establishes the fact hat Amazon's price is not coming from the physical storage HW itself, its the everything around it. Then you can move to discussing how to get other parts cheaper.
The safety number is only partly per-conversation. If you compare safety numbers of different conversations, you'll discover that one half of them is always the same (which half that is changes depending on the conversation). This part is the fingerprint of your personal key.

The Signal blog states that "we designed the safety number format to be a sorted concatenation of two 30-digit individual numeric fingerprints." [1]

The way I understand it, you could simply share your part of the number on your website, but Moxie recommends against it, since this fingerprint changes between reinstalls.

[1] https://signal.org/blog/safety-number-updates/
No cheat detection code is perfect. Banning cheaters encourages the creation of new cheats (or just new accounts, since it doesn't cost anything to start playing Apex). Allowing cheaters to continue playing is a win for two reasons:

1. They don't know they've been quarantined, so cheat makers will get less feedback about which cheats have been detected.
2. Cheaters are more likely to try new cheats, so it gives a sandbox of users that can be used to find other cheats as they arise.
The Superhuman Controversy and the Shifting Ethics of Software
If the people from Signal start a conversation with you on the number you emailed, how do you know it’s actually them? Couldn’t it be a third party who intercepted your email?

You need to check their “safety number”, and now we’re back to the same idea as with PGP with web of trust and key sharing parties.

At some point you still need some kind of pub-key identity check if you don’t want to accidentally report your vulnerability to PRC instead.
Modelling the mythical man-month with the universal scalability law
It is a funny article, but this line puts things in perspective:

> Out of the million or so Japanese tourists that visit Paris each year, about 12 will fall prey to Paris syndrome.
How to Install and Configure Graylog2 for Log Management on Debian and Ubuntu
It doesn't even have to be graphical (although I guess that would be best), as long as the location is clear, or a map is on hand.
You are replying in a subthread concerning replacing the motorcycle camera operators with drones, not the helicopters. If you can precompiled the order and behaviour of the cyclists then you can make a lot of money gambling on the race this year...
I made this out of frustration of never having the right amount of coffee at the right time.

I don't expect the time investment to break even any time soon (I could place a lot of orders manually in the few hours I spent on this), however I think something better is needed in terms of subscription ordering of consumables.

If I've missed a trick and there's something better than this already, please let me know :)
Hang in there mate :) I really don't think you deserve a lot of the crap you've been given in this thread. Someone has to try something new.
I hadn't caught up with that. Duck.com is a relatively recent development: https://edgy.app/duckduckgo-search-engine-duck-com

None of the articles I found explain how DuckDuckGo managed to convince Google to give it to them.
This is one of the reasons I don't stay in airbnbs - the system breaks the social contract.

The reason hotels are more expensive is because they have to follow a bunch of rules that makes everyone's life a bit better by having insurance for risks and zoning and so on. However you have to pay a bit more.

So, if you ever find yourself complaining "I wish people did something in a not the absolute cheapest and effortless way" so that society in general would benefit - don't stay in airbnb.
You could also write the first function body as

Stuff thing1 = doStuff()
return doOtherStuff(thung1)

It's still easier to read without the explicit error handling.
Letsencrypt supposedly has deployed a system that makes the connections from different locations around the world to make this attack more difficult and also you can’t get a letsencrypt certificate for gmail.com or microsoft.com (or Gmail.* or microsoft.* for that matter), there’s a block list for high value targets.
And you know that, how?

The Cree, for example, raided for slaves.
Perfectly said. Removing "illegal" content does not solve the fact that the content exists. The problem should be tackled at the source.
For a real life metaphor, changing address in order to receive mail is easy; moving to a new house is the complicated and expensive part of the change.
Is it wrong to use openssl to encrypt files?

0. (Only once) generate key pair id_rsa.pub.pem, id_rsa.pem

1. Generate random key

openssl rand -base64 32 > key.bin

2. Encrypt key

openssl rsautl -encrypt -inkey id_rsa.pub.pem -pubin -in key.bin -out key.bin.enc

3. Encrypt file using key

openssl enc -aes-256-cbc -salt -in SECRET_FILE -out SECRET_FILE.enc -pass file:./key.bin

-- other side --

4. Decrypt key

openssl rsautl -decrypt -inkey id_rsa.pem -in key.bin.enc -out key.bin

5. Decrypt file

openssl enc -d -aes-256-cbc -in SECRET_FILE.enc -out SECRET_FILE -pass file:./key.bin
> Speaking from experience, it's very difficult to define what "better" means when you don't have exemplars of what queries are likely and what the results should be.

Better is a search engine that takes your queries more literal. This is what everybody means when they say Google used to be better. The query keywords and no second guessing.

When you insist on Google using verbatim mode or something, you often don't get results. Which is bullshit because I remember 10 years ago, queries like these had me plowing through the results, so much that you actually had to refine the query -- you can't do that in Google any more, at least it's not refining, it's more like re-wording and re-rolling the dice. But it all feels very random and you don't get a feel for what's out there.

I mean sure there is a place for a search engine like this, if it works well. And in its own way, Google works well.

I sometimes do want my query to be loosely interpreted like I'm an idiot, and I head straight for the Google. Ever since I saw the "that guy wot gone painted them melty clocks"-meme, for certain types of queries I have indeed found that if I formulate my question like I got brain damage, I get superior results. Because that is the kind of audience Google wants you to be.

But sometimes you don't feel like the lowest common denominator and you don't want to be treated as such. And there should be a place for that, too.
I don't feel like my ability to interface with the computer is a major bottleneck for me. If I'm writing code, for example, my typing speed is really not a factor. Even typing this very short comment, I paused several times to think of how to phrase things.

It feels like a huge rate limiting factor for me. Even typing 2x as fast would be a phenomenal improvement.

Speaking is even worse though. Communicating verbally with other humans is frustratingly slow and inaccurate. A new non-verbal means to communicate would enable us to understand others faster and better. This would solve a lot of problems immediately that arise from our inability to understand others or the amount of time it takes to arrive at understanding.
I'm amazed, it is even included in the latest MacOS release
But that's really just an aside. You just need a 3D map of the cathedral with the position of the fire detectors marked, blinking red when a fire breaks out. After all they already had a unique ID, according to the article. That's not hard. But they had too many years and too much money to implement a usable solution.
>However, the reality is that CockroachDB is not yet at the levels of adoption where AWS would be interested. So why did Cockroach Labs make the change?

Because it's too late once they get to that stage. The licence needs to be changed ahead of time. Because companies generally try to plan ahead more than a few months into the future.

I was following along with you until this point, but now I feel like you're trying to hard to paint these companies in a negative light and not give any benefit of the doubt.

I use CockroachDB and I have looked into your database recently. If I recall, your database dashboard was in the enterprise version only. I may look at it again now. I'll try to give you the benefit of the doubt (that you're not intentionally misrepresenting your competitors) even though you don't seem to be so charitable with your competitors.

Edit: Looks like dashboard is still proprietary. Also FYI, this page is unusable on my Pixel 2XL:

https://www.yugabyte.com/platform/#ee-1
I thought I am writing sci-fi when I wrote this story few weeks ago. After reading this article, I feel what I wrote is status-quo.
https://medium.com/@thallukrish/immortality-c0fac30a96e3
Wonder why the system didn't call the fire department itself. Why bother with the human element of the guard at all? This is Notre Dame we're talking about.
Someone on an Airbnb put me up in their place for next to nothing when I was fleeing a hurricane. Hotels were booked and upcharging people huge amounts. There are pros and cons to the system, anyone advocating banning it, however, is only seeing their own side.