skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, you know that if you Ketozol Review try to lose weight through conventional means, you'll actually be going backwards because its not just about eating healthy and exercising. If you have a mindset that tells you that your weight is who you are, you'll just gain the weight back.

You might not get time to exercise in the morning as you don't want to be late for work. But again; you may get tired when you return home and don't want to exercise. This way, you will not be burning the fats you accumulated. It is very important to drain out the excess fat from your body. If this happens daily; you must accept the fact that you are not going to do exercise. You must move to an alternative method for solving this problem. Otherwise, you will grow fatter and fatter each day. You must do something to lose those surplus fats.

But don't worry. These pills are made particularly for people like you. You may find many fat loss capsules in the stores which can be purchased without doctor's recommendation. But you should be able to determine the ones which are harmless for your body as some of these capsules cause side-effects. You should always prefer pills which are clinically proven and are made from green products. Also, asking someone you know; who are using weight loss pills would help you a lot; as these pills are used commonly by many people including athletes and T.V celebrities.

https://sleepingsupplements.com/ketozol-review/
I think that’s a particular New York City issue.
Unbounded Binary Search
They could not license the decoder for them to use in their respective software.
Rescue Has No Borders Food Fund – New York Bully Crew
Guns are also amoral but still manage to leave a bad taste in my mouth.

I think the reality is, this technology will be used against the public in negative ways. It's easier to get something banned than it is to change the nature of people.

I don't know where I stand on this to be honest. You are right that the real issue is "overzealous governments and wideranging police powers lauded over innocent citizens" but I don't know what the fix is.
Productivity Tools for Linux That Are Worth Your Attention
There is an alternative. Don't live in a big city! There are plenty of 2nd & 3rd tier cities where you can get both a house and land for a reasonable price and still have good schools and a vibrant cultural environment. Of course you won't have some things (international airport, professional sports teams, top rate museums), but you'll make up for it in "free" QoL for your family.

I grew up in a city of 75,000, in a house currently worth about $150k (purchased new in 1976 by my parents for $38k and sold in 1993 for $120k), on 2.5 acres. It was about 30% lawn, gardens & sports area and 70% wooded (with a creek, even!). I only had 1-2 good neighborhood friends but I did have a younger brother & sister and we were constantly outside doing something.

I think you need to think about how you define "city" and "suburb" a little more.
From the article:

> Only a full ban — a federal ban, covering the use of facial recognition by government agencies, in public places, and in public contracts with private entities — can prevent our nightmares from becoming reality.

Talented teenagers are irrelevant, this is a call for a ban of using that technology by government entities.
HSTS Preload is also nice. Common HSTS Preload configuration and opt-in link. https://hstspreload.org/
Exposure isn’t a bad thing. Eventually, kids have to learn. Growing up first in the city and then in the adjacent suburb, I would say kids who grew up solely in the city were much more mature by the time they were 18. Many kids who grew up in the suburbs were “looking for the thrill” versus being cognizant of reality. Too often in the US, parents seems to try and shelter kids form near-term dangers at all costs versus giving them exposure to situations, and letting them learn from it and grow.
> A talented teenager can already train a facial recognition model.

A talented teenager could also build a neutron source in 1990s [1]. That fact doesn't translate to the ineffectiveness of nuclear safety laws.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hahn
How to Use NonNull Annotation with Project Lombok in Java Applications
Everything can be justified by national security. You can't try and block something with "an end-less series of law suites" if the defending party doesn't even need to provide any kind of proof. "Why are we MTiMing HTTPS? This is un-constitutional! -- Because internet is a threat to national security which in turn has higher priority than your rights, Citizen!. Everything else is classified and will be discussed in a closed court." Take a wild guess what that court is going to decide...
Funnily enough, this comment thread is the third result I get.
The fix is laws that limit the power of governments/police. If governments are not willing to pass these laws, they probably won't be willing to pass laws preventing them using facial recognition to spy on citizens either.
We're using GraphQL at Papa. Elixir postgres, absinthe exposing graphql and queries.

It's great for our frontend team, makes things simpler for them. Mobile also benefits from less queries. Also it's great for aggregating data from multiple sources.

It does come with more plumbing, but you get better and better at it with muscle memory. If you're a tiny team, I wouldn't use it.

Learn about it here: https://pragmaticstudio.com/courses/unpacked-full-stack-grap...
Hooray for firefox! Why use any other browser?
This is especially true for languages with a lot of syntactic cruft. What immediately stands out is the equal focus given to the less important characters like brackets and braces.

Still, it's a novel idea.
Some more specific dangers other than "the rich will get richer" would have been useful to mention.

As with most AI scares, people forget that AIs only replace the even more faulty human brain. Bias in AI can be debugged and worked around. Bias in human brains is much harder. You get no insights into why your bank doesn't give you a credit. Is it because of your skin color? Because they didn't like your nose?

The scary scenario of an AI judging people's attitudes and ruling them criminals only because they had a bad morning: the scenario of a human mob believing somebody to be guilty is much more scary, and it happens on a regular basis.

It would of course be bad to leave the judging to an AI alone. Of course the whole justice system would still be in place. That is unrelated to AI. The surveillance camera is not calling a killer squad on an unsuspecting grumpy person on public transport. It could merely draw the attention of a human to the scene, who could then judge on needed actions.

The example of the illegal immigrants also seems weird. Isn't it a good thing to be able to expose illegal behavior? I sympathize with the plight of immigrants, but rather than tolerating illegal behavior, it seems better to improve the laws to make good, desirable behavior legal.
Yes, and one whose bags of money has given him a vastly disproportionate say over the actions of the government. You can call it extortion if you want, I guess. Provided it's in the interests of the American citizen to restrict access to the US labor market, I don't see why they should care what you call it. If you think it's not in their interest, I'd be interested to hear your argument. On the other hand, if you want them to forgo their own interests for some of your ideals, maybe start by pointing out someone that has for those ideals forgone their own interests for the benefit of the American citizen. Good luck finding some.
The Cost of Interruption for Software Developers
SZ wasn’t really planned as a smart city, and it rose on its connection to HK at first in the 80s. Perhaps a more apt comparison would be Ordos New Town (Kangbashi)?
No it’s not:
“achieved an overall return of 11.1% for the year.”
https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/10/15/1621269/0/...

See also:
https://techcrunch.com/2017/06/01/the-meeting-that-showed-me...
I bet you even support net-neutrality. Commie.
It's impossible to ban , but it's possible to prevent people from implementing and carrying out that idea. There's a difference here.
I think the comparison with smartphones misses the point,

>You can leave your phone at home, switch it off, or put it in airplane mode.

Makes it something entirely different. The core characteristics of facial recognition are

1) No need for a cooperative, consenting subject

2) Not alerting the subject being identified and no protection against being identified without noticing

3) Unchangeable identification characteristic

We already have reliable easy to use systems for characteristic 1 and 3, fingerprints, and I see how there might be a need for such systems at specific locations. For example at a police station or border checkpoints.

Then we have facial recognition which is a lot less accurate and its only additional benefit is point 2. Point 2 however has no positive use cases, its a purely totalitarian instrument aimed at its scale-ability. For not only being used in specific places but everywhere. You cant even make the argument which makes nuclear weapons a worthwhile technology to have, the possible usage for war against a foreign aggressor. Facial recognition is only beneficial to keep a population suppressed.
> they were engaged in shady SEO tactics then bitches that Google delisted them.

As someone who did SEO for many years, Google was very serious about eliminating the 'black hat' SEO tactics. They were cheap, they were plentiful. Google eliminated them throughout their index because bad actors were skewing the results. This article does sound like a pity party but it sounds like someone isn't willing to accept they dropped the ball when it was passed to them.
And that's exactly why this is being done in California, isn't it?
Interactive map of facial recognition surveillance and efforts to rein it in
Not an issue in the bay area

Why not?

Prop 13 protects the homeowners from higher taxes if the property appreciates, but as far as I know that doesn’t cover renovations.

Otherwise you could buy a beat up $1M, year it down and still pay the same taxes.
Forex trading is the most profitable and attractive internet income opportunity because you can Bitcoin Revolution 2 Review do it from home or office and from any country in the world. In forex trading, there is no marketing or selling or internet promotion necessary to succeed. Nor do you need to spend thousands of dollars. It is one of the fastest growing industries on the internet. Forex video training will allow you to understand the risks of Forex trading and strategies to minimize them.
Wish you could trade like the FAP Turbo or any automated forex trading software? Why limit yourself to trading with black box software when you can truly understand how the markets operate and trade like a professional in any market. If professional bank traders and swing traders can do it, then so can you. The secret lies in the right style of trading and money management.

While it is true that you can get rich overnight trading forex, doing so would be financial suicide. Trading involves risk and it is only through proper risk management that you can truly get rich trading forex. Professional traders and banks always manage their risk and so should you. A general rule of thumb is to never risk more than 2% of your account on any single trade. By doing this, you are limiting yourself to how much risk you face on any single trade and greatly put the odds on your side at truly making money from trading.

http://whatpeopleswant.com/bitcoin-revolution-2-review/
You may cite me on this -
1. first of all to ban the idea you will have to be specific enough in describing the idea in a law that can be referenced so that when people think they are encountering the idea they may reference the law to be sure. Any one who can reference that law will be exposed to the idea.

2. ideas are not static expressions, perhaps we can think of them as nodes in a directed graph of all human thought, if you want delete the node you should direct all the nodes with arrows pointing at that node or someone is going to notice hey there are a lot of arrows pointing over here at this node that is gone and come up with the idea all over again by what is implied by the arrows.

3. if we think of ideas instead of how memetics would describe them we have a similar problem to number 2, that idea evolved from other ideas, and it is evolving into other ideas as we speak. Perhaps at some point we will have the technology to get rid of a memetic infection but not yet. And considering how well we've done on getting rid of measels I doubt it.

4. Probably the closest we can come to killing off an idea is the destructions of heresies in the middle ages, for example the Adamite heresy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamites however the ideas still exist as evidenced by the Wikipedia page, just nobody cares enough to embody the idea.

So, instead of killing facial recogniton if a similar thing were done with facial recognition that was done with the ideas of the Adamites we should kill a lot of facial recognition researchers and people building facial recognition tools, and then hope that nobody new will care to do any facial recognition stuff (if you get brutal enough that just might be).

Making the idea unpopular might work, but I doubt it, because the utility and power the idea promises would be too great a temptation. Do you need a citation on the too great a temptation statement?
Never Give Up the Fight
I doubt HN is the best place to have discussions about design of societal/civil norms, culture and laws. Surely, there are people who are more expert than us who have well-researched, historically informed opinion on human behavior and intricacies of changing the balance of privacy vs centralized powers.

One thing is for sure. All of the technological advantages is creating asymmetry in information and hence power balance. This cannot be without serious ramifications to the society.
45+; blown health, definitely "cold dead hands." I'm an addict. When I can scrape up the concentration im making game mods now. It's a bit like programming in a bottle: how can I do $thing without string operations?
Isn't it the same thing that earn.com does? Plus you get a chance to read the entire email?
Create an app from a Google Sheet in 5 minutes, for free
You can already do this: GOGC=off [1]

[1] https://blog.cloudflare.com/go-dont-collect-my-garbage/
Could you provide an upside?
They also did a deal with Microsoft so not sure what to make of this.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/16/microsoft-wins-multibillion-...
I always code between 8 and 16 o'clock, sometimes until 17, but then stop.

Programmers and engineers have family and hobbies too.

Stop making the myth of the endurance programmer more and more inflated. It's proven and true that shorter working Hours have major bursts of productivity against longer ones.
Opmsg – A GPG Alternative
I wonder if open source browser projects can have a license that prohibits forking for the purpose of mass (state) surveillance.
So why would advertisers pay for this? Surely people will sign up for thousands of email accounts, subscribe them all to every mailing list, then collect free money?

Back when there were “get paid to view ads” toolbars, they wee full of intrusive code that would ensure that you are looking at the ads and not just leaving your computer running unattended. I don’t think this will fly for email, so fraud would be rampant
Isn't that use case just to save time on initial load? An SPA with SSR for load times is different from a webapp structured to have logic mostly in the server.
Sure, but good luck easily getting to Golden Gate Park if you're, say, coming from Mission Bay. And if you can afford to live in the hillier parts of town the odds are good you probably have decent (albeit small) neighborhood parks. The problem with SF is that the public schools suck, the streets in a lot of the "urban" parts are rife with squalor, and the city is a lot bigger than it looks when you're trying to get from one side to the other. I mean, if you live in the Outer Sunset you may as well be in a "suburb".... I think SF requires a pretty specific mentality for one to intentionally raise children there [for people of such means to be able to choose to stay or go].
Example: The growing or even selling of marijuana is not interstate commerce. No court has ever said it constitutes interstate commerce. It's only been deemed to possibly substantially effect interstate commerce, except when the particular product or participants are actually crossing state borders.[1] But that interpretation alone doesn't get you to the interpretation that the Federal government can regulate it; it's literally two steps divorced from interstate commerce. It's the Necessary & Proper Clause that was used to encompass activities involving marijuana.

Saying that everything can be interpreted as interstate commerce is misleading, and if it intended as a critique of constitutional law has the effect of suggesting that nothing can actually be done to change it as a practical matter, when that's just not the case. The Necessary & Proper Clause by its nature provides poorly defined boundaries, which means it's far easier to limit extensions than if the definition of interstate commerce had literally been made expansive--which, to reiterate, has remained much the same since the expansion of Federal powers began in the late 19th century and arguably even since the 18th century.

I grudgingly agreed with the argument that Obamacare was a valid use of Federal Commerce Clause power (as extended by the Necessary & Proper Clause) because of the precedent of Gonzales v. Raich from 2005 when two conservative justices agreed with the logic above with four other liberal justices. But Gonzales was new case law. At the time they could have legitimately and reasonably drew a line that said such activity was too far removed from interstate commerce. But they didn't. Apparently even for a justice like Scalia they'd prefer to complain that "everything is interstate commerce" rather than draw meaningful--and obvious--distinctions. But Scalia (along with Kennedy) didn't, not because it would overturn precedent--it was an unanswered question--but because he didn't want to throw the FDA and the War on Drugs in particular into disarray.

So when Obamacare came around and Scalia was apoplectic about Roberts siding with upholding the law (albeit on a tax theory), all I could do was roll my eyes.

My point being: let's be honest and fair about this stuff. By pretending that these extensions of Federal power are a fait accompli, then that's precisely what we'll get. Not because it's true, but because we're just being lazy. Even if one is committed to existing precedent, there will come a day when we see pressure to extend Federal power further, probably in entirely unpredictable ways. Honesty and vigilance will matter.

[2] AFAIU, using telecommunications in the transaction is a separate crime. It's not the buying/selling, per se, but the use of interstate infrastructure to conspire to buy/sell.
Yes, that's true. But what I meant was that if you're in the US, you need to have a dual-intent visa.
Never used twitter. Just made an account using work email to test twitter login. Didn't do a single thing yet. And my account gets blocked for 'suspicious activity' and they want my phone as well. What a shady company.
Also the CLJS you see is using the vectors and hashmaps of the language, meaning much more direct manipulation the same way you'd program any other datastructure.
Python Algorithms, Daily Update
Counterpoint, the ATF's gun database. The technology exists, and yet it's not digitized. It's purely a policy issue.
But they are not pre-emptable, and of course, they run in the same process space. So arbitrarily killing and restarting them is not as simple.

The comment was tongue in cheek, obviously, since it's different type of language and environment completely. But there is one interesting insight I learned and it is about how memory quickly becomes a bottleneck. It maybe be obvious to many here but it's still interesting to see it in practice.

I think the Erlang VM authors have arrived at that conclusion as well. There is a quite complicated allocator involved - it there are multiple carriers (large segments) for different types of memory, inside there are blocks. There are different strategies to fit the allocations (the blocks), different options share or not share free lists between different scheduler threads.

https://blog.stenmans.org/theBeamBook/#SS-Memory_Allocators
If you need custom data in the page on a per request basis then SSR is usually the fastest method to generate the final HTML but it isn't the fastest method of getting something on the user's screen. Its "time to render" that counts, and that means doing as little work as possible to send something to the user.

Serving the same static, "prerendered" HTML file with no customization to every user is always going to be the fastest method of getting something to display in the user's browser, so perceptually it's much faster to serve a static html file and then hydrate it with any custom data using frontend JS.
This source repo is really fantastic code. If you are implementing a new language this is a nice one to emulate.

They've got a Language Server Protocol Implementation, VS Code Extension, Code Mirror mode, and more, and the code and even config files project wide are all very well done.

Great stuff.
A similar assertion was made earlier today on Reddit. A few examples of technologies and concepts which have been banned or restricted, to greater or lesser effect:

https://old.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/cewumq/opinion_don...
Reminds me of Perl's taint mode
Berkeley first city in California to ban natural gas in new buildings
Disclaimer: I'm working on the Trusted Types project in Google.

To clarify, Trusted Types are not a replacement for XSS auditor. They are both related to XSS, but are fundamentally different and even target different flavors of XSS.

Trusted Types are an opt-in browser API that helps developers prevent DOM-based (~client-side) XSS by mandating that developer-specified rules are applied to data that reaches risky functions (like eval or innerHTML). We're working on having it available as a proper W3C spec. More info at https://bit.ly/trusted-types or https://youtu.be/1KQngEZ8qH4

XSS auditor was an opt-out Chrome only feature that tried to stop reflected (~server-side) XSS payloads from executing after the injection has already happened. It was an now outdated concept. The idea was nice - prevent XSS without changing a bit of code in your application, but now we know this just doesn't work for xss.
The idea that some brogrammers can come along and bang out a disruptor in this area - which has a few decades of extremely complex learning, patents, and optimisation - just because they can cobble together some ML...

It'd be sad if it wasn't so naive.
I lived in that kind of place. I also had my one nearby friend.

We would ride our bicycles more than 5 miles along US-44. It has 2 lanes each side for a total of 4 lanes, 2-foot shoulders, and traffic that often got to a decent highway speed. There could be snow on the shoulder. One of the older bridges was narrow, with only about a half-foot shoulder. We went anyway.

We had similar woods. We went out there and built a fort. We camped. We misbehaved. We went to the railroad tracks and put coins on the rails. We hiked a mile to a lake, carrying an inflated raft and fishing or camping gear.

Don't blame the suburb if you chose to play video games. I hear that cities also have video games.
I would go so far as to say it is just now getting truly relevant.