skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's subjective, but let's be real, you're probably right.

Moreover, I don't believe in such a philosophy between any two people, so to the extent it is I regret the tone of the comment.

If it makes any difference, the true source of the tone was based on thinking similar to, holy crap that person is backing up into a stove someone speak loudly and quickly... There is no evidence for you to believe that, but I hope you will, somehow, decide the intent was nothing more.
An old story in a new telling and interpretation is a different thing from a remake.
Alphastar restricted to lower average APM than MaNa beat MaNa's mass archon-immortal with mass blink stalkers :)

He blinked stalkers at once from 3 sides of MaNa army (which was several-screens-wide). Such micro wouldn't be possible for a human player, because you would need to know to move the screen to see a particular stalkre just in time to blink it when he has almost 0 hitpoints, and immediately move the screen so you see another stalker on other part of the map to blink it, and so on.

And the bot did this, making the strategy part of the game irrelevant (blink stalkers are supposed to lose vs immortals).
Except I don't think anything in the FCC ruling invalidates the sharing of inside wiring unless it's requiring the sharing of 'in-use' wiring.

The FCC press release states, "Agency Narrowly Pre-empts Part of a San Francisco Ordinance...The Commission preempts part of an outlier San Francisco ordinance to the extent it requires the sharing of in-use wiring in MTEs. Required sharing of in-use wiring...threatens the Commission’s framework to protect the technical integrity of cable systems for the benefit of viewers."

"to the extent that it requires sharing of in-use wiring" is the key here. Notice they cite "technical integrity of cable systems for...viewers". This wording is not accident - it's because DirectTV had petitioned them to require cable companies to let them run their signal over an _in-use_ home run from a traditional cable TV company.

Where are you reading that this agency ruling invalidates all of Article 52? Or specifically the part that SF requires building owners to allow residents to use a carrier of their choice?

I don't see that anywhere, but maybe I missed it.
So then the OP should ask.

I think they will find the company situation does matter, as does their relationship with them.

The only voluntary layoffs I have seen was when the company was already committed to doing some layoffs.

Generally this is not a thing you get to choose nor something you can engineer.
Isn't that inspired by Australian experiences with introducing fauna for agricultural needs...?
Yeah that’s a good point. It’s pretty strong stuff. I’ve used it to remove decals from cars and it hasn’t damaged the clearcoat but modern clearcoat is an epoxy anyway so it’s not all that surprising. It will destroy polystyrene based plastics and I’d be careful around others.

Having said that it works fine applied via a rag so you can avoid overspray issues.
You would probably be happy to get 25% back, but you'd need to have collateral to get someone to go for it.
If they're altering the beaches for free, the countries would enjoy a portion of the common benefit without any cost. In fact, the new 'green' (literally and figuratively) beaches would probably be a greater tourist attraction, so if anything I'd expect it to be beneficial, plus secondary economic benefits from the work being done.
But moving up your stack of desire, what alternate to mailman would you live with? Five a month is $60 a year. Assuming you value your own time at professional wages, this job is worth an hour of your time at most before the opportunity cost of complaint is cheaper than replacement.
Polls are trending Liberal.. stand by. It’s a long summer ahead and the Conservatives are short on real answers.
I'd love to see a VS Code extension that does this. Anyone heard of one?
No, there is no raw images (unless this version changed).

The github repo shows that the AI takes an Observe action, and it essentially gets data on every unit it can see in a machine friendly format.

The previous version got info on every unit it could conceivable witness, including units that were offscreen, but technically 'visible' according to the game rules. This version seems to have changed that to only return units that are actually /on/ the screen.
Are there many young hungry lawyers who go to startup school? I have always felt if I could hook up with a good lawyer who liked dealing with the bureaucratic stuff the sky would be the limit.
Of note, Apple has had its own malware detection and removal system in place since the Mountain Lion - Snow Leopard timeframe. Since this article speaks to removal, it's sounding like the Zoom local server may have had its signature added to that system.
Whole countries will experience food shortages due to climate change; moving a few miles isn't going to do anything about that. Rising sea levels covering inhabited areas, while a serious concern, isn't the most dangerous (to humans) consequence of climate change.
why do you need AI? just end your sentence with #f4f #followback
This is such a specious argument and yet repeated ad nauseam. Please stop. For one, it doesn't make the listening and harvesting of data ok, just because it may already be happening. Also, it's just condescending. You don't think the parent or other people of reasonable intelligence and valid concern haven't thought about that? Then, it also just misses the point anyway -- no, I'm not OK with my cell phone harvesting anything and everything it can get (cadence of my walk, say). Yes, I like having access to maps on the go. These concerns aren't mutually exclusive, and most of us choose not to live like Stallman. We still live in a rich and complex ecosystem of law and precedence, highly dependent on where we are on a given day, what nationality we are, etc. None of that invalidates the quite reasonable expectation to privacy (not to mention that solutions exist such as opt-in, but cavalier people working in tech choose instead the race to the bottom of privacy and chasing cost-per-click).
Thank you for the pointer, I've just filed a webcompat issue.

https://webcompat.com/issues/35084
I dont work at Stripe.
> I wonder if there's a market for an alternative "browser" that loads "native" code (or as close as practically possible) and runs it in a sandbox.

This is probably not what you had in mind, and I'm not sure how good it would be at sandboxing, but REBOL Reblets imho come close to this <http://www.rebol.com/reblets.html>
Yikes, $16, that's terrible. Movies in Cambridge, MA (includes many indie and foreign selections) can be had for $9 if you go to a matinee, or buy in books of 25, or patronize a local restaurant. They also have give away free ticket giveaways about once a month. The theater on the opposite side of town has a $4.75 matinee every Tuesday.
C -
ha. sure, one can see it this way. or you can read it, think that it makes sense and take it as a fact. i can tell you all day that's a hypotesis, when I'm focusing on the hypotesis you're going to go with it.

i also fundamentally disagree with speculating on what might have happened 10000 years ago. If you're going to speculate present at least 2-3 plausible scenarios.
I'm not sure about the prevalence of this issue today but about 10 years ago I helped create a fraud protection system specifically targeted at deposit return fraud.

However, at the time at least the problem apparently wasn't so much people manipulating return machines but rather bottles miraculously appearing out of nowhere from within the system (i.e. parties trying to register a bunch of bottles more than once or attempting to remove bottles in-between checkpoints in order to "reuse" them later on).
IBM Proposes Curbing Legal Protections for Internet Companies
Yes, if you leak resources, their destructors won't be called. That really has nothing at all to do with move semantics though. I think the important point is that move semantics don't alter the lifetime management of the moved-from object.
CNN debate rules: Mostly good. Only mostly
Yes I know.

Installing a self signed certificate is easy on Edge and Chrome. But did you ever try to do it dor Firefox? Firefox has its own certificate store implementation and only native code to manipulate it. So it’s easier to provide a valid certificate instead even if it means that the private key is exposed.

Concerning the extensions, this was not practical until the recent unification under web extensions. I never tried.
I'd assume that doing this would rarely (but sometimes) be successful, but that alternately, there will be people putting large accounts out there in order to tempt this sort of speculation, and that side wouldn't be risking anything other than being forced to hold assets in bitcoin.

It'd wash out in the end.

Those 99 that didn't work out gave everyone you tried it on a 1% return.
I like the idea of using the wrap plastic used for cars, maybe with fancy colours, skipping the stickers. When I am done with the machine I could remove the wrap and have a brand new looking case. Actual hard shell covers do protect the machine but they do get dirt inside that does add wear patterns.

Has anyone done anything really cool with automotive wraps and laptops? Not necessarily on Apple products but on PCs that don't have a tough aluminium shell?
You’ve asked for hard data, and then make a contrary assertion for which you have no data either. No, glancing at a website periodically doesn’t count.
Your statement begs the question. The OP said "Hollywood" doesn't produce as much original content as it did decades ago. When I point out that there is more original content being created today than ever (probably on the order of several magnitudes) simply because it's cheaper than ever to produce original content, the only thing you mention is "blockbusters". Clearly, the production of blockbusters has nothing to do with the amount of original content being created. Why differentiate Netflix from the rest of "Hollywood"? (Remember, Netflix won an Oscar last year.) For that matter, why overlook the dozens of smaller or independent shops that are producing original content in staggering amounts, regardless of how that content is being distributed?

But, if you want to talk about more traditional blockbusters, Netflix makes plenty of those (arguably more than many traditional studios).
The theme is that when an intelligent person goes insane, or is on the border line, they tend to experience a self-referential hall of mirrors sort of effect. I take that to mean that there is a very important part of the brain which must be outside of any feedback loop involving the "self" to be healthy.
First, I'm not an expert, maybe you aren't being silly, I don't really know.

Second, this is actually totally something to think about, and it seems to me like matznerd & co. are thinking about this very clearly and scientifically.

The reasons I think it's kind of silly to worry about olivine weathering triggering an ice age is that it seems to me (again, NOT an expert) that we would have enough warning to deal with it, now that we know it's something we have to deal with.

We could put less olivine out than we had planned, or remove some (make it into concrete or something), or even just burn off fuel or release methane to counteract the cooling.

Like I said, you are bringing up an important point: we can no longer pretend that we're not already "geoengineering" our home world.

"We are as Gods, we might as well get good at it."
No one said we were (_more_ concerned).
> There’s much less of a market, and much less information circulating, even though we have the internet and much better mechanisms for moving information to one another.

I think it is because of the internet and better moving information that there is a lack of a market and the "slow roll" doesn't work anymore.

If a movie is bad, most people will know after the first day. Also, back in the day you'd just show up at the theater and pick a movie after dinner, because it was a pain to look that stuff up ahead of time. Then you'd pick a movie that maybe you'd seen an ad for and watch it.

Now, you'll pull out your cell phone at dinner, see what movie starts next, check the reviews and tweets, and then pick another one if it's bad. Before you ever get to the theater. And if there is nothing good, you'll do something else.

You can't get away with making a bad movie anymore like you could in the 80s. I saw a lot of bad movies in the 80s and 90s.

I don't see bad movies anymore because it's so easy to avoid them.
I generally use a dedicated USB power supply so that should not be the problem. And I haven't yet had an "endurance" card die.
The surveillance problem is not black and white. A rooted phone may not help you if a state actor is after you, but it will help against companies that make money by building an invasive profile of who you are and what you do. Again how much a rooted phone helps in that depends on how many ties you want to cut with the digital-advertising ecosystem.

Here's a paper describing the privacy invasive and potentially harmful properties of pre-installed apps [1]. I specifically saved this paper in my files so I can have a comprehensive answer when people ask me why I go through the trouble of rooting my devices.

P.S. People who know more than me are saying that the baseband processor can be restricted with hardware practices such as IOMMU [2]. I don't really know how effective that can be.

[1]: https://haystack.mobi/papers/preinstalledAndroidSW_preprint....

[2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20151431
At least on iOS, they only show up if you have the Promotions category enabled. I don't know if this also true on Android or a desktop browser (I use uBlock).
As someone who worked at Square, my impression at the time was that the problem was lower than expected engagement with the order functionality at existing locations, which made it hard to show the value proposition (I didn't work on Order but it was a small company). I'm not sure failing to be a flagship product caused the problem, Square has other products (e.g. Caviar, which people often don't know belongs to Square) that have succeeded. This despite Order having a decent UX and some interesting features like arrival prediction.
Yeah it worth trying Goo Gone first and reserve this for the really tough adhesives. There can’t be many laptop stickers that can’t be removed with Goo Gone plus patience (which BTW also works wonders for removing road tar from car paint).
This is a great response, thank you. It seems like one issue with climate change is that the scale of the problem is so large, any significant mitigation sounds intuitively unrealistic. It's clear that you've put a lot of work into looking at the whole picture though, and I'm excited to hear more results as you scale up pilot testing.
"Any user may make an Escrovery challenge to recover any account by first placing an amount of money in escrow. If the original account owner responds to the challenge in a certain amount of time, they earn the escrow. Otherwise, the challenger takes ownership of the account and recovers their escrow."

Are you thinking the response has to be the same amount?
What if challenger puts down $1M - do I have to match the amount? Or will $1 work?

What would the time period be?
What if I miss the notification or the email?

With some refinement and supporting systems, maybe this could work for some economies.
«Presumably he/she/they won't respond and I'll get a million bitcoin»

Well, presumably Satoshi intended to abandon his keys, therefore they wouldn't have used the scheme in the first place. In general I think the scheme would be more useful with a long claim period, eg. the original owner could be given a month, or more to claim back his account.
I tend to believe you, but I'd love to see some material to back up your suspicions.
I learned almost everything I use on a day-to-day basis by clicking through pages on a website unsupervised. I use the things taught in my degree courses relatively little.

There’s a lot of social and other benefits I gained from having real classroom learning, but I think we underestimate the value of online educations.
> extremely fast reaction times are an essential and expected advantage of machines.

Not necessarily true. Yes, the machines are faster, but sometimes that is not a good thing: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.09765.pdf

Knowing speed runners and the like, I can imagine they will quickly find a way to determine if the player is in fact DeepMind via some sub milisecond method.
Driver getting angry for a few minutes vs wanton acts of sabotage, vandalism, and violence...

This is why most drives regard cyclists as irrational and why most people choose not to cycle or not to identify as cyclists.

And I say that as someone who both drives and bikes.
Demonstrating Poe's law probably wasn't the goal, but it was an inevitable outcome of what and how he chose to write.

I'd bet there are a lot of the author's genuine thoughts and feelings in this piece. But the best comedy has at least a grain of truth if not more. There's no way an author who is able to write like this didn't intend the humor in lines like "The moment was so upsetting that I absconded and immediately purchased a funnel cake, which I ate distractedly and tried to calm down, moseying for some time on the park’s vast, labyrinthine walkways."
I've been doing web development professionally for two decades but I feel exactly the same way. It couldn't be any simpler!
Is this trading space for speed or is there actually a speedup as well in some cases? With interpreters it's possible you be small and fast if you become perhaps obscure or more rigid in your structured definitions
I started hacking something up to invoke dc more easily…

$ . calc.sh
$ * 4 5
20
$ / 21 3
7

It’s a WIP. I’ll probably add floating point and a stack.
Which will mean moving away from `dc` to awk/python/something else running in the background, using sh co-processes.
i cant speak to GA but just dropping by to point to the docs https://www.netlify.com/docs/analytics/ for details on the numbers. it’s IP based, and some filtering is done as described

“The Pageviews and Top pages charts include only responses with Content-Type: text/html and a status code of 200, 201, or 304. We filter the data by status code this way so that we don’t count errors or double count redirects. This also applies to the Pageviews total for your site.
Unique visitors counts different IP addresses engaging with your site within a single day. If someone loads pages of your site on multiple different days, they will be counted as a unique visitor for each day. The Unique visitors total for your site is a sum of the daily numbers.”
Slack Down
تحميل تيوب ميت الاصلي للاندرويد Tubemate مجانا برابط مباشر
I think the case he's talking about adds about 150g or so. If you're an ultralight hiker who's counting the grams, there are probably better options on the market. Otherwise I don't think many would notice during their daily routines.
You're not wrong, but also, I doubt it makes much of a difference in absolute happiness levels.
I had the exact same symptom, also for the first time it'd ever happened.
Even if I trust them to do what they say they're doing with the data I may not trust every party who comes to possess that data. And I may not trust their possession/use of it in all future contexts - as their privacy policy slowly drifts into the unknown year after year.

If they're collecting it in a way that can be requested by governments (for instance) or could be leaked by hackers that's another layer of valid "concern" not related to my understanding of the ML aspect of this.
The escrow amount wouldn't be the same as the amount in the original account, it'd be a token amount.
It was the final straw.

While the above is obviously bad, how does it compare with the injury rate from plastic straws? With plastic it would not have been zero.
So the local server is not a regular price of software with a vulnerability, it is now considered malware?
Policy Driven Storage for Datacenter Operating System
This is a self-fulfilling prophecy---if you believe there's no strategy beyond moar marines and MKP splits, then you'll never find it.
It's been really interesting to see how quickly the original Zoom response of "there's nothing wrong with this, everybody does it" ended up being reversed.

I wonder if there's a known exploit for the Zoom server specifically, or if Apple discovered one while looking into it. It seems strange for them to go to these lengths in this case when it sounds like other software has been using a similar technique too. Maybe it's just the reinstallation aspect that makes Zoom's case exceptional?
Round 18 Results – TechEmpower Framework Benchmark
I think that's true for very simple CRUD apps (basically what this is designed to replace). For more complex apps, it gives you room to:

* Implement decent monitoring. I've had very poor luck trying to monitor SQL query performance directly, especially if you need to tie particular queries to a user action, and monitor the time taken to perform a complex action.

* Implement more sane resiliency, by giving the ability to connect to multiple databases.

* Alter your data storage format or backend without needing to change the presentation (i.e. the same REST call could suddenly go to Postgres instead of MongoDB, and the client doesn't need to change)

* Easily integrate with other apps/features. SSO is a good example of this, where you can use the same authentication system across multiple APIs relatively easily.

That's just a few. SQL is a really great interface to data. SQL is (in my opinion) a poor user interface to business logic. Something like "reset a user's password" makes sense in REST. It will likely continue to make sense, and probably even look exactly the same, for a long while.

That is often not true of SQL, unless you accept arbitrary constraints like "we can never use anything other than RLS for authorization". Not that RLS is a bad implementation, but things change. Leaving yourself some flexibility is usually a good idea (within reason, like anything you can shoot yourself in the foot trying to make your app too flexible).