skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You are confused. I was talking about stand alone licences, not stand alone vaults.

I will not use a 1Password.com account regardless of the country it is hosted in because I do not trust AgileBits or any government, especially not a Five Eyes entity.

Despite the lengths that AgileBits have gone to to hide the option of buying a stand-alone licence, there was one page which I can’t find now listing the benefits of each licence side by side, and it clearly stated “no wlan sync” and “no multi factor authentication” in the column for licence over subscription.

The rest of the language tries to make it sound like a good thing to have my secrets hosted on a site I do not control. In the end I bought a subscription — purely for access to wlan sync and OTP — because it’s about the same price I have been paying for previous paid upgrades and Pro features.

Also note that for 1Password 6 users who bought the Pro features, the upgrade splash screen states that 1Password 7 is a “paid upgrade” not a “subscription required for Pro features”.

For the moment I will be treating the 12 month subscription as an opportunity to explore other options before the subscription rates inevitably rise and the feature set moves inexorably towards hosting over private vault management.

Not. Happy. Jan.
I would consider your counter examples rather compelling, thanks for the details. I never particularly enjoyed move semantics, so you have a point there.
Does QSBS kick in if the company is valued at < $50M or has raised < $50M at the time of exercise?
If Unix were case-insensitive too, none of this would be an issue.
Which features are painful?

Aside from exceptions (Can't use them safely if RAII is not universal) and shared pointers, most new language features are pretty localized in effect. E.g. using a lambda in a function originally written in C++98 does not make the existing code less safe. Only your sense of aesthetics would force you to update the rest of it.
Our definition of intelligence comes from a set of measures which were calibrated to correlate with measures of success. Success is by definition a measure of societal “fit” and so the whole program is by definition socially constructed.

Doesn’t mean it’s not “real”. But I also would not say it’s “abstract” in any meaningful sense. It’s certainly not derived from first principles, nor do we have any kind of theoretical model of intelligence that’s good enough to construct measures around.
While at it, I feel like we could also squeeze the 224.0.0.0–239.255.255.255 multicast range to maybe 224.0.0.0/8 if not tighter.

For reference here is a list of reserved ipv4 addresses[0].

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_IP_addresses
I disagree that pre-11 C++ was bad. It would be bad now to make a new language that looked like pre-11 C++ but there is a reason it was so popular.
Gotcha! I skimmed too fast. I'm all for it then.
So, in 2019, if you want the execution speed and efficiency of C++, high level features, without the complexity of C++ or rust, how about Nim??
Selectively removing clay court titles is not good statistics. Djokovic has 10 hard court victories, and Federer has 11. You don't call Djokovic a hard court specialist.

6 non-clay grand slam titles - Only 20 people across history, other than Nadal, have more than 6 grand slams on any surface. If you add 2 for RG averaging 2 a grand slam, only 7 people other than him in history have 8 GS titles. I think that is enough proof that he is much more than a clay court specialist.
This is the usual pipeline problem, though: sometimes the bottleneck is the CPU, and sometimes the bottleneck is memory bandwidth. This just places the ball firmly in the memory bandwidth court...

(You can have a hundred worker CPU cores doing the necessary conversions, but just need to worry about the parallelization complexity. But, then again, this is exactly what already happens when we feed data to hefty devices like GPUs and TPUs.)
The “Pro-Life” Movement Is Silent About Children Dying at the Border
I see those bits being used in production happen but I seriously do not like the idea of giving IPv4 even more time.
I second the recommendation of Professional C++. I am just a self-taught programmer, and to be quite honest, felt I was getting in a bit over my head by buying a book aimed at professionals. But I have found the material to be perfectly accessible even for someone without a CS degree, and I am now using C++ for my personal projects. I cannot recommend that book highly enough. Just my $.02
I wonder how many people (i.e. what percentage of the US or world population) would have to be on the list for it to reach this inflection point.
The linked piece is excellent. I had not read it before. Thank you sharing it!
In my experience whether people like Federer or Nadal has little to do with who was successful first, and much more to do with playing styles, but equally, the marketing images that have been built for them.

Federer is presented as this sublime talent, to whom tennis is effortless and natural. Someone who is calm and collected, and is the suave beatiful exponent of the sport. Nadal is presented as the fighting underdog who is extremely passionate and managed to overcome his natural talent and skill limitations with grit, determination, and hard work.

Which is kind of ironic, because once you set aside their playing styles, they both are almost exactly the opposite of their images. Federer was a highly volatile young player who greatly underperformed when he first turned pro, to the point he wanted to quit the sport, and took a long time to win his first GS. Nadal, on the other hand, burst into the scene almost immediately with a GS win, stuff came extremely naturally. Federer also puts far more hours into training and the gym, and has modeled his entire life aroundtennis, while Nadal, until recently didn’t come close. In fact, Nadal is famously quoted as saying that he didn’t go to the gym at all (I personally believe this was exaggerated, but it does have a grain of truth, in that his off court efforts, at least initially in his career, wasn’t close to the other guys).
> (most?) people prefer Federer to him
Any numbers to back that up? Nadal is not sheer force. Coming into the Wimbeldon semi-final with Roger, he had better serve statistics than Federer himself. Being able to curve the ball back into the court from outside the net (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HD8BvwdlhI) is sheer creativity.

Nadal has adapted his game a lot over the years, and people just don't give him the deserved credit. The good thing is that he doesn't really care, and the record speaks for itself.
Would you normally recommend running tekton in its own k8s cluster, or within the same cluster that runs production workloads? (Particularly if running in something like gke or eks)
The \*.0/32 is always excluded from usable address range anyway.
VP finance embezzles $22M from Stylehaul for gambling and cryptocurrency trades
Tin foil time!
Cartohost – Managed CartoDB Hosting
If you are consistently more successful than your peers at school while doing less work, it's pretty easy for a kid to believe they're gifted when everyone is telling them that they are.
> That's not really relevant to this discussion, though

It’s tangential but still relevant to the discussion.

> once you do have a nullable column in your schema, it doesn't make sense in the Go layer to pretend you don't.

I agree and never suggested what this Go API was doing did make sense.
Besides the fact that Chinese and Japanese are not indo-European, how would you do a spelling bee for Chinese?
Double the movement: Inspire someone to explore free software
Are more than 5% of university patents commercially licensed these days?
https://sequoia-pgp.org/
This is a fantastic commit, contents aside, it's a great demo: the diff's tiny; the message is so much longer, and explains why the diff's there with even (very) historical context.
I think this must depend on your field. In mine, it’s generally free to publish, unless you want color figures or go over the page limit.
> Would any good startup take the money?

I would wager most grants given by the federal government go to universities or non-profits, so it seems like it would make perfect sense to make them release their research publicly.
Microsoft does maintain FAT, because they license it to consumer products companies.
Reminds me of that youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dy5xLVx2NGY
This 'security issue' is of the same category as a previous article about Trello desktop app storing an authentication token locally ... that is, a non-issue that let's the author pretend like they found a security issue in a major consumer product.

Google Photos is a consumer product meant to be used by regular by tech savvy and non-tech savvy consumers. You can always add more security-based workflows but then your grandparents will get frustrated when they can't see pictures of their grandkids you emailed to them, or can't figure out how to send you images that they took of their garden.

What is the alternative that the author proposes? Use Google account access controls? Great idea if everyone has a Google account and is logged into the right browser. But that's not reality. I see proposals in this thread about sharing encryption keys or passwords, or using Google accounts sometimes, but not other times. Suggestions that range from Kabuki theater, to frustration of regular consumers.

There is no issue here, and Google has the right idea.
Strictly scientific articles? I'm building something like this.
Also worth mentioning the mu editor: https://codewith.mu/ - it's an editor designed to learn with.
No. In my opinion, one of the biggest benefits of Python is that the code looks consistent. There is a single "correct" way to do things. Merging it with C++ would remove this. I use both C++ and Python on a regular basis.
Talk about:

* what you learned about the needs of the market

* how you adjusted the product to match the market

* what technical challenges you overcame

* how you adapted the product to handle a pivot

* dealing with not enough resources

Everything except the cofounders. Your opinion about what they did.

It is unhelpful to talk about the drama in this startup.

If anyone asks about why you are leaving - the short answer is the best one: product-market fit was not present. Do not be tempted to invite further questions. No matter what those questions are not positive for you.
Logically prices for everything cannot fall. If one price goes down that means another has to go up.
I'm building something like that, but I don't know if enough people read enough papers. Do you read a lot of academic papers or otherwise news articles online?
I’ll take all this feedback into account. It’s a beta app so it improves daily. For some insight all functionality you see right now was built in less than a month by only 1 person
So far no, whatsapp isn’t doing it as someone checked. Maybe in the future:

https://mobile.twitter.com/17haval/status/114997853789964288...
If you put data online for anyone to use, people will use it as they see fit. That's just how it is.

And TFA isn't about scraping for data to monetize. It's about finding an apartment. The author mentions that scraping is the only way to use the site's data effectively.

If it were about scraping to build an apartment-finding site, then issues about "what's right" would be relevant.
Plenty of other languages including a large percent of recent languages have the return type on the right.

Haskell, Visual Basic, Scala, F#, Go, (Rust), Kotlin, TypeScript, Swift.

Even c++ allows you to put return types on the right. Why? Because putting the types on the right allows return type deduction. I think it's better to have a single syntax (all types on the right) rather than 2 syntaxes like c++ has.

https://medium.com/@elizarov/types-are-moving-to-the-right-2...
When I first saw this silly article, I thought it was literally the 2007 Onion article, "Rafael Nadal Credits French Open Success To Living In A World Of Clay."

https://sports.theonion.com/rafael-nadal-credits-french-open...

> "I speak, naturally, of clay itself," Nadal added, luxuriating as he worked his handful of clay into his face, neck, and scalp. "Yes. Clay. Yes."
No idea. Found this:

https://bgr.com/2019/01/21/google-maps-vs-waze-speed-limit-f...

Also disclaimer: im a current google employee. Opinions my own.
Interesting point. Never thought about the area behind baseline, but it's a very valid point. I think you're correct that it gives him time, which given his speed lets him return even more.

I'm personally not a fan of the underhand serve (bit traditional in that regard!), but yeah, it does catch him out sometimes.
My point was that Newton's 3rd law isn't the right way to think about it. Newton's 3rd law means that if I throw a rock with 1 N-s of impulse, I will also gain 1 N-s in the opposite direction. It's a conservation law: "Equal and opposite reaction."

Yes, you do get pulled forward a little bit more, but you can reel in the kite with arbitrarily little "pulled forward a little bit more" (by pulling in slowly) or arbitrarily much (by jerking hard).

The force on me and on the kite is equal-and-opposite, but it was equal before I started reeling it in too.
When IBM called it (IIRC) light path diagnostics we were grateful: open box, see problem. In color!
Resepi Kuih Kastard (Karipap Kastard) Paling Lazat
sounds like a dev shop but without an hourly rate. Monthly payment for some unknown amount of work.
It is though I’d be more tempted to have that as it’s own table with more data attached such as the UID who deleted it, reason (if application supported that), etc. That way you can have more detail on “deleted” records without having to null several fields nor increase your table size for your main table with lots of “deleted” metadata when typically records wouldn’t be marked as “deleted”.

Though “deleted” isn’t really the right term here either because you’re not really deleting data, just removing it from view.
This one: https://techinquiry.org/
I see things where PDFs are watermarked with their school email and IP - would you consider that active or passive?
What do transients have to do with ownership? They are simply a way to gain new performance characteristics from an existing data structure.
wow; that is actually one of those comments of the internet that makes you think.

The thing here is cross universe communication and legacy hardware/software stacks.

This sounds like a great mental exercise.
Resepi Kuih Kastard (Karipap Kastard) Paling Lazat
Resepi Kuih Kastard (Karipap Kastard) Paling Lazat - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20430547
So this shop would take on all the risk and get almost none of the upside.. And customers would need to risk nothing, but might get a huge payoff..

Even better, since submitting ideas is free, a customer could submit a ton of vague ideas, then sue them if they do anything remotely similar.
A sort of "multiverse" concept can already be useful for IPv4 private addresses. I have to deal with multiple environments which all internally have the same 10.x.y.z addresses. So, 10.1.2.3 can be two different instances depending on whether I am connecting to environment 1 or environment 2. In practice, the distinction is based on which SSH jumphost I am tunnelling through.
> Amaroq developer John Gabelmann banned Gab to avoid potential problems with the App Store.

From Amaroq's app store and github repo: "Amaroq is a lightweight universal client for any Mastodon instance!". So that is now a lie, and should be changed to "for Mastodon instances that will not invite conflict with Apple's policy".

Worse than just censorship, is hiding it, so that users are unable to seek out censored stuff, since the very fact that it's censored is deliberately kept from them. It is a direct attempt to control users, and I see no reason it couldn't be described as hostile.
Too bad Seymour Cray is no longer around to pick on, or to inspire.

I was lucky enough to tour the Chippewa Falls facility early on - serial number 5 of the Cray-1 was undergoing final tests before delivery.

We were lucky enough to see Seymour in his office. He pointed to a pumpkin on his desk, and declared that it was the Cray-3. His daughter had grown it, and since she knew he was already working on a Cray-2, she decided this would be the Cray-3.
Where are Stanford, Harward, Caltech and other, reportedly progressive universities stand on that issue?
I can try to find something canonical. I heard it from our County's Medical Program Director (the physician who oversees EMS).
Amusingly, C++ also supports Rust-style function headers, and has since C++11 (which is well before Rust was ever on the radar; really both C++ and Rust were inspired by ML here). The following two are identical in C++:

u32 foo(u16 x, u16 y)
auto foo(u16 x, u16 y) -> u32

IIRC there are contexts where the former does not work and the latter is required, which I believe means that ML-style function headers are strictly more powerful in C++ than the original C-style function headers.
For any practical usage, this is a fundamentally broken implementation.

I spend something like 10% of my working hours un-fucking data that was poisoned by lazy, inconsistent, and/or incorrect handling of missing data.

This is what makes Excel such a dumpster fire for handling data. It is absolutely the wrong decision to make any new piece of software that handles missing data like this.
Assuming the technology is as described and I don’t know enough to comment on that, it doesn’t surprise me, the British government is terrible at exploiting technology that is come up with inside the UK.

Another example is the SABRE folks, honestly innovation in this country is “men in sheds” relies refusing to take no for an answer.
This is shameless pandering by Amazon and I consider it insulting to their employees who are software developers. The idea that people working menial warehouse jobs just need a little extra help to become software developers is ridiculous. Imagine if instead of "software developers" you replaced it with "doctors", that would seem pretty ridiculous wouldn't it?

The barriers to entry for becoming a software developer are already extremely low, you just need a computer and internet connection and that's all I had when I started learning. The reality is that it is a job most people simply are not cut out for much in the same way as other intellectually rigorous jobs.

If Amazon was serious about helping these people they would figure a realistic step up to train these people for and not some publicity stunt that realistically very few of these workers would be able to benefit from.
Perhaps inductance is the answer? Connect your lightning rod to a beefy primary of a transformer, with lots of tiny secondaries; each sourcing a capacitor.
I included the link for the opening statistic that more men than women die shortly after their spouse, not for the story.
A well designed and written landing page selling me on this with previous project examples would have gone a long way...
>legitimate arrays of heat spreaders and sinks

ah yes. The fabled colourful plastic heat sinks.

Why bother with copper when plastic with flashy graphics dissipates heat just as well.
HTTP/S proxies probably wouldn't want you burning their IPs on web scraping though - it might be against the license/lease terms of the site.
Hydrogen is probably a dead end. The net energy efficiency is terrible and not improving much. Meanwhile battery charging speeds keep improving every year.
Tools can use LLVM infrastructure to get ast. No need to parse it yourself.
Firstly, I’ve never said people shouldn’t have NULL. I said columns should default to be nullable.

Secondly, I’d already given outer joins as an example of why SQL needs to support NULL.

I would be nice that people like yourself bothered to read the comments your reacting to instead of jumping off the deep end (-4 on my original post now and people like yourself are literally just reiterating the same points I’ve been making. It’s insane)
Sharing a photo means the recipient could be careless or malicious Ok? That's not Google's problem. The issue was that these are public facing URLs but at the end of the day the URL itself isn't what the user should worry about.
But why?!??! Why would you want them to do any of that.

Of course Google could add more 'secuirty' controls on top of the sharing feature. They could require a password, or passphrase, or make the link one-time use only, or only available to Google accounts.... But for every extra control they add, thousands of users would get frustrated and essentially be shut out from the feature. Somebody's grandfather wouldn't be able to open pictures of their grandkids, somebody's aunt would get frustrated sharing pictures of her cooking.

Security is like marketing in that it can be a big black hole that you can dump more and more resources into with no benefit. There is a very real cost to security.
This would break a ton of existing applications
Every single pen drive I've bought or been given came pre-formatted with FAT32. Every single SD card I've bought or been given came pre-formatted with FAT32. Like it or not, it's the standard filesystem for removable media up to 32 GiB, and has the advantage that unlike exFAT, it works everywhere.
Point is I'm not going to create a FAT partition on my disk then go work out of it.
There are libraries based on Redis, however since Redis 5 to have scheduling is simpler, because now we have ZPOPMAX and ZPOPMIN and the blocking variants as well. So add the item in the queue as a sorted set keyed by the unix time, and pop stuff. Using some scripts it is possible to also backup the item currently being processed in order to be resumed on failure, however this is yet not a first class feature like it is for lists (see BLPOPRPUSH).
I doubt you could come up with a workable definition of "scientific paper" to decide what is or isn't copyrightable.
A single /8 isn’t going to meaningfully impact the exhaustion issues IPv4 faces. I believe it was APNIC a couple of years ago who said they were already facing allocation requests equivalent to an /8 a month.

It’s part of the reason hand-wringing over some of the “wasteful” /8s that were handed out to organizations in the early days is largely pointless. Even if you could get those orgs to consolidate and give back large useable ranges in those blocks, there’s simply not enough there to meaningfully change the long term mismatch between demand and supply.
I was thinking more about everything leading up to the brain, such as the composition of your retina and optic nerve.
By far the worst PC component I have come across containing LEDs is Kingston's HyperX Fury RGB SSD [1]. It's a 2.5" SSD with 75 LEDs! These LEDs generate so much heat (70°C+) that the drive thermal throttles and either prevents the operating system from booting or causes significant performance issues [2].

[1] https://www.hyperxgaming.com/us/storage/fury-rgb-ssd

[2] https://youtu.be/vnST5rA64Oc
I just love this bit:

'And there’s that familiar little second of shocked silence from the New York crowd before it erupts, and John McEnroe with his color man’s headset on TV says (mostly to himself, it sounds like), "How do you hit a winner from that position?" And he’s right: given Agassi’s position and world-class quickness, Federer had to send that ball down a two-inch pipe of space in order to pass him, which he did, moving backwards, with no setup time and none of his weight behind the shot. It was impossible. It was like something out of "The Matrix." I don’t know what-all sounds were involved, but my spouse says she hurried in and there was popcorn all over the couch and I was down on one knee and my eyeballs looked like novelty-shop eyeballs.

Anyway, that’s one example of a Federer Moment, and that was merely on TV — and the truth is that TV tennis is to live tennis pretty much as video porn is to the felt reality of human love.'