skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I was thinking youtube comments in general rather than this particular video.

Nice to see you completely ignored my advice though :P
The problem here is with the definition. Most people don't define a 10x developer as someone who is a team player and more like the lone ranger you describe.

See this recent discussion on twitter: https://twitter.com/skirani/status/1149302828420067328?s=19
In the USSR the cosmonauts were heroes.
Clean it of trash and you will receive less trash recommendations. Fully cleaning isn't effective as the average video quality is lower than most HN public would like to watch. Having mostly good videos you like makes it recommend more similar content to you.
Most of them seem related to beauty pageants, and the others are cosplayers, probably showing off their costumes.
Is that allowing for the time difference between when you get on and get off the train affecting the temperature?
Orwellian
The impact of cyber attacks is highly overrated
Alloys are most certainly metal, though.
That's only true for subdivision surface modelling which isn't the most common way to do it at any rate.
Are you saying that electromagnetism is a nonlocal theory because it has a field? That is not the standard meaning of 'nonlocal'.
Could be be done, but does not feel like the appropriate tool. Org mode translates to a basic latex only, that is a huge waste of TeX power.

I did my thesis entirely in LaTeX, so I have some experience in the theme, and it was a rollercoaster. There is always some really special table, graph, arrangement, extra space needs, that you can do only programming with the real stuff. Doing the same with org mode would have been stuff of nightmares (even if org tex has some nice qualities that LaTex does not have, like fast shrinkable text).

I missed only a thing. Being able to do in situ calculus in LaTeX (filling columns and totals in tables excel style), but is not really the right tool for that so you can't blame TeX for that. The team of R+Latex filled the gape nicely.

Apart of this, TeX environment has planned and build yet anything that you could dream when you write a PHD thesis. From basic, to really esotheric. Can be difficult sometimes, but is awesome.
> the icon looks like three menu items

It's a nondescript icon made of three horizontal bars, it looks like literally anything that comes in threes. My mom calls it the pancake button and my fourteen year-old nephew used to call it the button with something that looks like a fork but without a handle until he switched to the "meh" button once he became a nihilist (teenagers do that stuff sometimes). A menu with three items is very likely to be among the last things that crosses a non-techie's mind.

At this point it's been used enough that anyone with enough exposure to electronics knows what it does, but it's hardly a better choice than the "File" menu. The point of making something intuitive, as opposed to explicit (i.e. by using a symbol as opposed to spelling out) is kindda missed if you need to "well actually" it and explain why it means whatever it means.
There are regular SBCL releases, something that is fixed will appear in a month or less. If you don't have a working SBCL you can bootstrap it using CLISP or cross-compile from a different OS such as FreeBSD.
Good????? That smell is absolutely disgusting and I have to actively avoid breathing through my nose.
Governments should tax products for their disposal costs. Eventually everything needs to be disposed of so charge it at purchase time and remove the costs the individual pays later for garbage collection. This would mean products that don't use wasteful packaging become cheaper and people would buy less junk.
Aren't all cities one of those? Bigger=bigger impact.
Yeap.

I can think of two main uses for Integer: when you have type polymorphism (e.g. my own code often has maps of Object) or nullness.

I go on to describe a different approach to nullness that suites ints, for example.
Concepts like SOLID principles feel like meta-academic overkill, and get in the way of "getting things done".

For small programs, certainly. But I've witnessed the effects of not applying any kind of SOLID principle at all to larger scale software and it was never pretty.

Your only hope, as a senior engineer, who's been through it already, is that they have enough trust in you that when you leave code review feedback that says "It would be more clear and maintainable if you refactor that into a function/make the function return the value instead of mutating it as a side effect/etc etc etc" they trust you, even if they don't yet feel the real value of it)

This sounds kinda pessimistic. Why would you not hope for the best i.e. for a junior understandting what you're saying and most importantly why you're saying it, and why the refactored version is better? I mean, in the end that's what's supposed to happen. And even if that doesn't work out, I'd rather have them questioning my reasoning than just blindly trust me. I'm much more satisfied with a junior showing critical thinking, even if they just don't understand the matter, than just blind trust.
You would be very disappointed if you knew how medical software is made. For instance most of it can crash without issue (and in practice, it does a lot!): all you need is to assess the risks that could result from a crash and mitigate it (for instance: the device should be designed in a way that stops doing anything as soon as its software crashes).

I've been a contractor for a medical devices company for one year, and the process where really lightyears away from what you are describing. Nothing even forces you to write and run unit tests…

Yes, that's scary.
If you want an intro to the content of this book you can checkout Stepanov's phenomenal lectures on A9:

"Efficient Programming with Components" - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHxtyCq_WDLXryyw91lah...

"Programming Conversations" - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGvfHSgImk4Y1thqJLpcS...

I warn you though, this is a philosophical and painstakingly detailed intro in to this way of thinking that takes an entire series of videos to build up a single algorithm, in C++, bit by bit, episode by episode. It also happens to be one of my favorite lecture series.
A very simple bash script that installs some stuff through Homebrew, sets my default shell to Zsh and copies over some files into my home directory. It's open source: https://github.com/mijndert/dotfiles
Hey, I like your list. Now, tell us, from that list, is there a favourite language? Some you'd pick up to write simple tools for your own personal usage...
I don't even get any animation, just the intro text. Guess it doesn't support IE11. :-(
Multi touch attribution models: 100% garbage? (/r/datascience)
Throwaway account. Proceed with caution. This board was the only one which fitted our requirements for a commercial product. We actually found it more stable than for instance the people on the Armbian forums. But in the end we've moved on.

Lesson learned (probably sounds obvious, but hey): SBCs are nothing without software. The quality and commitment of the developer to kernel support is everything. All boards have issues, and they can be worked around in software.

The espressobin got a lot of community support, but even with that it still isn't quite enough.

We need more boards like this that aren't just a copy of the raspberry pi. For personal use I would buy one of these tomorrow.

With hard core documentation and support this thing could have been the start of something great. Lets hope that can still happen.

Not to take anything away from the hard working folk who are currently supporting this. And from Marvell. Your efforts are greatly appreciated. I just hope there is a way to get you more resources
I don't think I've ever seen a video with over 100 upvotes that didn't have any downvotes. That's just YouTube.
Overuse happens precisely because they are so good at what they do. Moreover, at a first approximation, overuse results simply in a return to a previous state of no good defense against newly-resistant bugs. So in the worst case scenario, antibiotics bought us a century of better health; that’s pretty magical.
Us sending our garbage to places like China, India, Indonesia has no bearing on us dumping our garbage in the ocean or not.

Those countries willingly bought our garbage and chose to dump whatever wasn't useful in the manner that they did, all by themselves. Insinuating that, if we didn't sell it, we'd also dump it in the ocean is more wishful(?) thinking than anything else.
Thank you for articulating these points so well. Possibly preaching to the choir here, but you should check out "Geek Heresy" by Kentaro Toyama.
Eating ants could protect against cancer, study finds
Why is it false?
oooh oooh oooh, what an interesting example! I recall an interesting comment on NH a while ago where the dev was describing their refactoring of some law code. The original code was if-then-else, and had the same 'shape' as the horrid law it was interpreting. Our intrepid dev redesigned it to use some kind of truth table instead, and was terribly proud. And then the next week the law was amended and a new clause added deep down in one subclause or something. It turned out that the clever algorithmic approach wasn't actually the most maintainable... So, using a sales tax calculator as an example, its possible for two different devs to take to completely different approaches, and for the betterness of one or the other to be in the eye of the beholder until the code has been maintained in production for a long time, by which time doubtless whichever approach was adopted is deemed to be the worse one as the other has no production experience so might be better ;)
The problem I have is that my recommendations are usually full of stuff I'm already subscribed to. Discovering new things is really hard and usually just happens by reading about it elsewhere.
This is just an observation more than an opinion - you know how it's common knowledge that women had no power not that long ago and were kept under the boot of men?

His wife not only cheated on him, when he found out she arranged to have him arrested and thrown in prison, and then was seeking to imprison him for life. As far as the article says, absolutely nothing has happened to her as a consequence of this.
I kind of like the periodic switching and "hands-free" experience, but the idea itself isn't too original[0][1][2] and I am not a fan of the video taking up about 25% of my screen estate, the rest taken up by an unrelated, distracting stock space video.

0: http://defaultfile.name/

1: https://www.randomlyinspired.com/noviews

2: https://www.incognitube.com/
That correlation ought to be pretty quick to spot once you remove or turn off the control system. The control system in your example sounds binary, so on / off sounds like the only input (to the control system) to correlate.
That's the company that was purchased by Apple, as described in the book I linked to above.
Flagged. This is an automatically generated spam site with incorrect information on both processors.

Suggest moving the discussion to Anandtech’s review or the review from another similarly high-quality publisher.
Absolutely. If you so wish you can take the train at noon and get off at 12:30 where any temperature difference due to the sun should be minimal.
He's internet rich, so we should all listen to his random political opinions.
I would recommend reading Seven Habits of Highly Effective People who which I derive the statements below.

If try to think about the world as a growing pie versus a fixed pie. In a fixed pie world, everything is limited so there's only so much success, money, jobs and accalades to go around. So when someone else does well, it's natural to be jealous because they are taking part of the pie that could have been yours and now there is less out there to fight over. It's scarcity mentality and most people thing this way.

If one thinks about the world as a a growing pie, it means that there is plenty to go around and it's possible to work closely with those who are successful to create a bigger pie i.e. there is no longer need to compete but to collaborate. This builds better relationships and generally a more positive, healthy attitude internally as well as lower stress levels. This is what is known as abundance mentality.

I do not know whether this stuff is scientifically proven but from what I understand, this trait is far more prevelant in self-made millionaires. Having made a move in a similar direction, I can report feeling better about myself and having a better attitude.

Further to this, the book also suggests focusing on what you can control and what you can do. So in this case, worrying about others success is a waste of resources.

I found it helpful to spend less time on social media and Linkedin. This helped me to reduce my jealously.
Paradoxically the old reddit on mobile is way more usable than the new one. The other sin is AMP. Every time I visit reddit from Google, I need to go through additional steps, to be able to vote, comment etc.
Don't you just click either side of the remote? A hint shows up on the screen if you hold your finger there.
Healthy lifestyle may cut risk of dementia regardless of genes
Um... this seems to be a stronger case then to ask what the hardware does. If the compiler can generate arbritray code, then the only recourse to understand what the resulting binary actually does is to look at the actual generated assembly. Understanding what the compiler was trying (and yes, this will change based on which compiler version you used) to do would presumably be helpful in that process. Sure, don't design around this behavior, but if you find yourself deploying an executable with undefined behavior, and you need to figure out the scope of the problem; this seems useful.

I don't get this hostility to understanding the tools you're using.
yea that'd probably be reasonable to try to reclaim then. probably only useful for private use unfortunately though, i bet there's a lot of stuff that'll improperly route them given the range.
I disagree. It took around two years of seeing hamburger menus before it clicked that it was a common symbol for a menu. Its getting worse and seems to be getting replaced by 3 vertical dots now.
>Clickbait in some respects. "Java should have been a different language from what it was, more pure in OO terms, and without the characteristics that made it understandable & popular for developers from C and similar backgrounds."

The description above is more of a strawman than the title is clickbait.

There's nothing in the post that would make Java less "understandable & popular for developers from C and similar backgrounds".

If anything, the simplifications proposed would make it more coherent and understandable.

>While the ideas are (somewhat) valid

What part of the ideas you don't find valid?

>it would have been a quite different language from the language that gathered traction and became popular as Java.

Not in any substantial way except that it would have more consistency in the treatment of value types, and 90% of it behind the scenes. Everything else, from a syntax, language, and API design perspective would be the same.

(Java with Generics, streams, closures, etc. today, and Value Types soon, is widely different already from the Java of 1997).
Immune cells reprogrammed to kill HIV-infected T cells
We believe it's insane and dismiss it out of hand because we all realize Mechanical Turk doesn't pay a living wage in the developed world.

But I dunno, I feel OK with the premise that this guy reduced his expenses and optimized his career as much as he could.

Say you did all that and had a few hours a week you wanted to use to make your household budget a bit healthier...getting paid for some kind of remote work via an automated system that'll accommodate your inconsistent hours has an appeal!
The comment above looks a lot like the Mighty Mouse is the mouse they're referring to when they talk about the computer they "just" bought.
Usability and beauty often clash. See Bang & Olufsen audio equipment from the 1980s and 1990s. They're works of art, but a pain to use.
I think many people do this not out of need but as a time waster that pays a bit. As the article mentions, 75% of 'Turkers' are American. The article's subject says, "I’d literally be sitting around bored half the day without it. Making money beats doing nothing."

Of course he wouldn't be doing literally nothing. Instead he'd be just mindlessly wasting time browsing Facebook, checking out the latest clickbait, posting on forums, and engaging in the sort of activities that studies are increasingly showing are destroying our collective mental health and social cohesion. Instead, he's using that time to make an extra thousand a month.
The old days seemed so much more intuitive when there was a crappy low res icon with text underneath.
Replace the system with one that chooses A only; replace it with one that chooses B only; analyze distributions; analyze original system.

Or replace A with known non-random source, and then B, and analyze.

I'm not sure what the argument is though. If something has an effect, there will be a correlation. Measuring the correlation may require modifying the system. We've known that measurement unavoidably affects the system under measurement for some time now. It's just a matter of degree.
The big difference is you don’t drag your keyboard around the table putting a strain on the connector.
Funnily enough that was mine's as well. Didn't stop us from hitting the pump once or twice anyways, though luckily we didn't break anything…
That's not true.

LAN traffic is still going through the router, where the firewall supposedly runs.

Regardless of other devices having a public IP, if the router blocks forwarding packets (which is one of the main functionalities of a firewall), then the device(s) behind it are just as protected as if they had private IPs.

It's just a bit easier to setup forwarding as it doesn't require NAT, and it's also easier to open up by accident but having a public IP does not bypass the firewall.
How much is a data gold mine worth?
I always watch youtube from a privacy window so most suggestions are related to what I'm searching at the time.
> because drugs go where the money is, i.e. not Portugal, goes to the UK and Germany.

What do you mean? Russia is one of the main drug consumers, and that's not where money is.
> remote than you can actually type with

Wouldn't that be a reasonably large remote?
Much can be learnt about an organisation from its restrooms
In addition to other comments, I try to find somewhere/project that I can use and practice the new skill.
I have regularly been doing these kind of searches for years and have always loved the spontaneity of the results I found.

We are far from the "SHOCKING: A WHALE EATS A BABY LIVE!!!" with the red circled preview image.
Your analysis might be sound, but I think your physicist example is off.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_multiple_discoveries#2...

Ctrl+F Albert Einstein.

Many things in history are discovered very close to one another--suggesting that maybe 100 or so average physicists (not sure what this means though, most people who get to that level are extremely intelligent), would probably work out what Einstein did. People have suggested discovery is "inevitable".

"But if you take that guy out of the team, then the other 9 could expend infinite resources and would never get anywhere." This leads me to believe the physicist example is off here.
Live geomap of images with GPS meta-data found online
And don't forget the -10x engineer. The guy on the team who creates something others depend on, hasn't got the skill to fix its bugs and has the "well there's obviously nothing wrong with my code" personality type.
A comparison of Cell with OOP
I'm speaking of broad interest categories. Obviously aluminum mining companies aren't going be in favor of aluminum recycling, but in general, lower aluminum prices increase economic growth potential and should be supported by other companies in general purely out of self-interest.
"Tu quoque, (Latin for "you also"), or the appeal to hypocrisy, is a fallacy that intends to discredit the opponent's argument by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with its conclusion(s)."

You might find the rest of the wikipedia article interesting. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
You have described many strange and fantastical worlds. And yet you claim these have actually existed? Surely, you must provide some proof!
Flutter isn't "native" as you would use that word in the context of UI design toolkits.
Bad Mentor but Great at Code: What the 10x Engineer Looks Like
It still helps you remember who you've shared with, and the likely list of people who can see it.
W evidence for core-mantle interaction in the source of mantle plumes
i mean live on their own land and have their own farm instead of being a laborer depending on a salary. and since it was expensive many put all they had into that and could not afford to waste any of it.
Sourcetree is a native app.
Peter Thiel wants Google to be investigated for spy infiltration and treasonous behavior. Are you pointing out that HN is so hypocritical for not following along?

It must be breathtaking to be so sure that Google should be investigated for spies and to see HN just turn its back to the issue. I also personally think the spies have gone too far and the CIA needs to do its job and clean Google's house. I am also speechless as to how the HN community, which sees the need to regulate for mere privacy issues, would then turn around on the serious matter of espionage.
It does, but you've still got to keep around the optimizing JIT compiler, its JavaScript metadata, and a hundred other things around even after the JavaScript has been partially compiled to native code.
Actually, PV energy pay back time has been studied to death. See e.g. this presentation from 2012, which says that the whole PV industry is already a net energy producer: https://gcep.stanford.edu/pdfs/symposium2012/MikDale_Symp201...

The energy flow is a bit similar to the cash flow of a SAAS company: As ROI takes a few years, the start of the rapidly growing industry looks like a net negative, but with the installed capacity constantly growing and efficiency getting better, even the industry as a whole is in the black now.
Location: Karachi

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: Possible

Technologies: Automation, Scraping,ETL Pipelines in Python, Spark, and Airflow. Web Development in PHP Laravel, Flask and Django

Résumé/CV: http://adnansiddiqi.me
Blog: http://blog.adnansiddiqi.me

Email: kadnan @ gmail.com
Something from Steven Pinker maybe?
OP should rename it to something more edgy sounding like "dapulse"
Not to mention half the time you load a page it fails to retrieve any data.
That is great. However did you guys have a debate about US poverty after every Apollo mission? What about after you buy every F35? The cost of this Indian mission is about the cost of 1 F35.
BTW, many decades back Indians also deliberated, and only then established ISRO.

Also, frankly, that's a question for Indians to debate and not a big fan of NY times casually questioning the judgement of that spending without giving it an elaborate treatment. I have seen this multiple times. India launched Mars craft, but there is poverty. India launches 100+ satellites in one mission, but there is poverty. Its irrelevant at that instant and seems only to diminish India's aspirations.

May be some of this journalists can take a look at Indian Budget, study it deeply, and find where the government can spend more wisely. I bet they will find more wasteful spending than the investment in ISRO and that may be helpful for the public to know.
The fact it took 4 days for anyone outside GNSS geeks to notice this tells you how non-impactful Galileo is...