I am a high-schooler and I understand dependent types. (I am not the person you are replying to, but I am the person who first mentioned typed holes.)

In type theory, there are things called "terms" and "types." A term is something like `fun x -> x`, or `(1, 2)`, or `1 + 1`. In short, a term is basically an expression. Each term has a type. For example, `fun x -> x` might have the type `a -> a` and `(1, 2)` might have type `Nat * Nat`. If a term has a type, it "inhabits" the type. "x has type T" is written `x : T`.

According to an idea called the Curry-Howard correspondence, types can encode logical statements such that terms that inhabit the type are its proofs. Therefore, by inhabiting a type, you are really proving a theorem.

With dependent types, the term and type languages are the same language, so you can mix them together. In short, types are terms.

Here are some types in Martin-Lof type theory:

---------
() : Unit

The unit type is a type with one inhabitant, (). It can be interpreted as the type of the empty tuple. In the Curry-Howard correspondence, the unit type corresponds with truth.

x : A y : B
--------------
(x, y) : A * B

A * B, the product type of A and B, is the type of pairs. It is based on the Cartesian product operation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_product In the Curry-Howard correspondence, the product type corresponds with logical conjunction (and). By proving A and proving B, you can prove A * B (AKA A /\ B).

x : Empty
----------------
elim-empty x : a

The empty type is the type with no inhabitants. If you have an inhabitant of the empty type, you can eliminate it to derive anything. The empty type corresponds with falsity, and its elimination means that false implies anything.

x : A
--------------
Inl x : A + B

x : B
--------------
Inr x : A + B

The sum type is the tagged union, meaning "this or that." The type A + B means that the Inl tag holds an A and the Inr tag holds a B. The sum type corresponds with logical disjunction (or).

f : A -> B x : A
-------------------
f(x) : B

The exponential type, the type of functions, means logical implication. If you have f, a proof that A implies B, and x, a proof of A, you can prove B by doing f(x).

With dependent types, the product and exponential types are generalized into the dependent sum (sigma) and the dependent product (pi) types respectively.

With the dependent sum type, or sigma type `Σ (x : A) B(x)`, the second component in the type is actually a function of A (meaning that B : A -> Type). The dependent sum type generalizes the product type so that the type of the second element of the pair is actually dependent on the first element. In the Curry-Howard correspondence, the sigma type corresponds with existential quantification, "there exists" or "for some." To prove Σ (x : A) B(x), you must inhabit A (show that A exists) and B(x) (where B is a logical statement about x, the inhabitant of A).

With the dependent product type, or pi type `Π (x : A) B(x)`, B is also a function of A that returns a type. The dependent product type generalizes the exponential type so that the codomain of the function, B(x), is dependent on the function's input, x. The dependent product type corresponds with universal quantification, "for all." To prove Π (x : A) B(x), you must prove B(x) for every possible x, where B(x) is a logical statement about x.

Why the dependent product type generalizes the exponential type and the dependent sum type generalizes the product type seems confusing at first glance, but it really isn't:

Σ for x = 1 to n, B(x) = B(1) + B(2) + ... B(n), and if B(x) is some constant C, Σ for x = 1 to n, C = n * C. The same rule applies to types, as multiplication (product) is just repeated addition (dependent sum of a constant).

Π is like Σ, but for repeated multiplication instead of repeated addition. After all, exponentiation is just repeated multiplication.

Another type that you should be aware of is the equality type, `x = y`. In vanilla Martin-Lof type theory, `x = y` is inhabited by `Refl` if `x` and `y` have the same normal form (reduce to the same simplest form). However, there is ongoing research in a field called Homotopy Type Theory, which redefines the equality type in various ways.

Finally, types themselves form a hierarchy. With dependent types, the types themselves are first-class values, and they have their own types. However, `Type : Type` leads to Girard's paradox (similar to Russell's paradox). The solution is for each type to be in a "universe" so that `Type l : Type (l + 1)`, where `l` is the universe level.

Read about Martin-Lof type theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_type_theory