skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes seems like the guy realized he had an addiction problem, addicted to the game. Like if he was dependent on drugs and realized he needed to quit. Then by chance one of the people he was taking drugs with was a millionaire who thought the guy was a fun person to take drugs with and started financing his habit. At the same time the rich guy bought some loyalty and gratitude which might be good for him later in the game.

What happened? Is the rich guy still paying the bills of this poor chap?
I was quite excited when I read the headline as the number of video editors are pretty limited for Linux. However, I was disappointed when I visited the website to read that it is still is alpha.

Can a product claim to be professional when it is still in alpha?

By the way, congrats on launching!
Monday: Manage your development environment when working with microservices
Here's my take on five years of split keyboards:

https://raymii.org/s/articles/Split_keyboards_a_five_year_re...
These fees are not necessary available in the different API use to build these aggregator websites.
The time they are, they are often stored in a blob of text that need to be parsed.
Same situation exist for cancellation policies.
So true about fluffy news, worse than adverts imho as add nothing and the media's equivalent of cat pictures. Which reminds me of a unintentional parody https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiPa44LxgxE
which has one of the most honest news headline, the World has ever seen.
> “If calculus is the language of the universe, then Steven Strogatz is its Homer.”

I saw someone reading this at a coffeeshop, it’s a new one:

http://www.stevenstrogatz.com/books/infinite-powers
Tell HN: I am letting people on the Internet control my life
I had this crazy idea of people voting on Instagram on what I should do and do whatever is voted the most.

First thing was whether I should quit my job and pursue my ideas full time or stay at my job and pursue my ideas in the free time. 52% voted the former and I quit my job.

Now i’ll put up every major decision as a poll and do whatever is voted the most while recording the entire journey.

It’ll be cool if you guys can participate too.

Instagram - https://instagram.com/fullofsid
I just hate those VR Burgers. It's like they have no taste at all.
This site undermines its own intent of providing a friendly and accessible introduction to calculus through poor and erroneous grammar. An editor could make it very useful. Some examples:

“OK, but how does calculus models change?” error: subject-verb number agreement. Try “model”.

“The fundamental idea of calculus is to study change by studying ‘instantaneous’ change, by which we mean changes over tiny intervals of time.”

So, a change is a changes? Stay with the singular: “by which we mean a change over a tiny interval of time.”

“It turns out that such [tiny] changes tend to be lots simpler than changes over finite intervals of time.”

Now we have a logical problem. Isn’t the set of tiny intervals of time a subset of finite intervals of time? In ordinary usage, “tiny” is finite, surely; a tiny thing is not infinite. So how can a tiny-time change be simpler than a finite-time change, when it is itself a finite-time change?

Errors of this sort lost my faith early on. I hope they’re corrected, because the promise of the article is appealing.
Possibly: testing and learning environments.
The anti-vaxxers think it is.

We need to be careful how we say this, because then you get generalities like the title and people who shun the basic of medicines such as neccessary vacinations.
Have you looked at nixos or guix?
It's not clear that this article makes a relevant point.

The existence of trash isn't under dispute in the article, only a very specific route for trash to reach the ocean. It's not clear that somehow exporting trash, alone, implicates western countries in its reaching the ocean.

Is it mismanaged trash collecting companies in developing countries that dump in the ocean? Is that the route? Or is it dumping in rivers, as the article suggests.
There is no need to add a third. The software update make MCAS to use both existing angle of attack sensors, and if they disagree MCAS will be disabled and a warning indication will be shown.
(IMO) this isn't intended to be a product, it's an experiment in different ways to run Kubernetes workloads
There's a difference there though. That's Fly-By-Wire in two different contexts.

One way to do it is indirect linkage to control surfaces, and using the computer to generate the appropriate signaling to actuate the control surfaces in a more or less direct mapping of pilot intent to control surface output. Depending on design philosophy, more in depth envelope protection may be implemented, (see Airbus) but there's no given that says Fly-By-Wire must be able to countermand and pilot commands.

The other way Fly-by-Wire is used (and to me personally is an anti-pattern) is as a pilot/plane babysitter like MCAS. The plane should be free of bad aerodynamic behaviors so that even with total electrical system casualty, a passive glide and controlled landing is possible. Once MCAS is taken out of the picture, the MAX doesn't have that. It does not meat the full set of airworthyness regulations for Civil Transport Aircraft as laid out in FAR 25.173.

I understand some in the industry may scoff at having to comply with the directive as written, but it's now been clearly demonstrated what happens when you don't.
The US government can save it, if it's possible to save it.

The government hires an independent contractor organization (I guess The Aerospace Corporation and NASA people and former-FAA people from the time the FAA had technical people, etc.) to do a blue ribbon commission style full analysis of the plane, at a huge cost in time and budget, and publishes the whole thing, scathing as it is to Boeing. Some people might get fired, in both Boeing and the FAA, but that doesn't matter.

The independent contractor organization gets carte blanche to declare any issues as "preventing certification", and to suggest any fixes, and oversee Boeing implement the fixes and the tests (what the FAA should have done). When they sign off that the plane is safe, the FAA signs off (as a formality, because we don't trust the FAA) and airlines based in the US start using the plane where jurisdiction allows (maybe only in US, maybe in friendly countries). After a while of no crashes, other jurisdictions will allow it and other airlines will buy/unground it.

Boeing pays the government for the work of the independent contractor organization, in equity I guess. The government holds the stock until the stock price rises after the fixed plane succeeds in the market, and then sells.

Note I know nothing about anything, so the above is fan fiction.
seconded this method for me. Hopefully more of the humiliating and less of the costly.
I'm not so sure about that. A big problem currently is people commuting to and from work causing traffic congestion time lost in traffic jams and traffic accidents. A true virtual office might be the solution to traffic jams.
A handful of European countries has actually banned putting household waste in landfills. If its not recycled it gets incinerated.
Some interesting arguments.

I think the argument that he has better things to do then think of taking a bag "everythere". You do not need a bag small in hand purchases and when you really go shopping you should and can easily bring a bag when you go shopping.

When it comes to regulations I would trust the US with nothing. The EU has probably way better regulations for landfills like for food and other things. While at the same time probably do a way better job at actual recycling.
Forces are forces and any upwards force from the engines can be counteracted by the control surfaces as long as they have enough authority. Boeing's entire problem is trying to do all this with only two flimsy sensors, and compounded by them inexplicably ignoring one of the sensors. The original design was stupid as hell but there's nothing wrong with the general idea of what they are trying to achieve as long as it is implemented competently.
It looks like he’s complaining about a feature not available for free. If it is that valuable, pay for it.
Tokens will be distributed 30 days after close of sale. The sale runs by default for 60 days. See https://stackstoken.com/faq/ for details and the circular https://stackstoken.com/circular is the source of truth.
Unless they were just acting completely reckless, which is hard to believe considering their previous safety record and the downside of failure, it's probably more complex than that.
I didn't think about it till now, but I went from checking reddit once a day before the design to never now. I don't go to reddit anymore, unless I see a link from another site. The only thing that did change was the new site. I had my own custom list of subreddits that I frequented and that's not even enough to get me to keep using it.
The CEO is also ignoring that a lot of the original hotels to impose "resort fees" were also actual resorts. Offering a diverse range of services.

Whereas there are Marriott hotels that offer no services at all and still have the gall to charge a resort fee. I'm talking inner-city hotels with no pool, no gym, paid internet, and a fee for printing/faxing.

It might sound melodramatic but it should actually be illegal. If the fee isn't optional it should be part of the price (ditto for "fees" on Cable/Internet/Cellphone providers).
Sometimes the parts are so many that we still need abstraction to make practical sense of things. https://xkcd.com/1988/
They're charlatans selling a half-baked, ego supplement to people with too much money.
I fully share this cynicism about recycling things that are not aluminum or glass. It also seems that by making people feel better about generating nominally recyclable waste they are encouraged to consume more.

I am at least familiar with arguments against US-style airport security and donating cans of food, but whats wrong with hybrid cars? I don't know of any arguments that they are net neutral / harmful.
Start from examples almost immediately. If you start with the foundation or background, you'll lose me almost immediately, because I lack the context to tack the new knowledge onto.

Show me what we're doing/how we're using this knowledge, and very frequently I'll start thinking "hmm I wonder how they do that, I bet that's why we have to do XYZ first." Then you learn about it, you've had a moment to think through it in your own, and now you have plenty of context scaffolding to stick to.
Gave it a try. Here's my feedback in no particular order:

- I couldn't get into my account to start playing around for a while because your email verification is flagged as spam

- Basic resources like AWS Security Groups are missing. The product seems to heavily lean towards Azure

- I like that you provide an infinite grid for free (cloudcraft only has this on their paid plan)

- I don't like the clutter of having all the Azure/GCP/AWS resources grouped by type ("Compute", "Databases", etc). 99% of companies are single-cloud and it would be more convenient if I could filter down to just AWS

- Lots of UI buttons are missing tooltips - I have no idea what your icons mean

- There's no account editing, you can't change your password & there's no 2fa support
Scientific American is getting very non scientific.

A couple of days ago we got the: "Fat Is Not the Problem—Fat Stigma Is", now this article. What follows, "Aliens may have built the Pyramids after all"?
My take:

Landfills should be utilized much less for municipal waste, but doing this would require much better waste separation.

It's probably better to burn or recycle things that don't decompose readily, such as plastic. Landfilling plastics just takes up a lot of space for a long time. Recycling or burning plastic also reduces litter.

Recycling paper doesn't matter as much, since it is very biodegradable. I suspect that recycling paper leads to energy savings in the pulp & paper industry.

Aluminum is one of the best candidates for recycling as it is very efficient and cuts down on the need for aluminum ore. Steel is somewhat less efficient.

Organics should always be composted if possible.
Tips are still accepted at these restaurants but they note that they’re not expected or required because there’s an automatic “service fee”.
In my opinion, index funds are overrated at this point. Over the past couple of centuries, England and especially the US have had exceptional returns.

Most indexes have zeroed out at some point, however. War, economic collapse, revolutions, etc happen. Even if we've reached "the end of history" and these risks no longer exist (which I don't think is true), then there's still the question of valuation.

Stock markets have grown faster than GDP in both countries, and as a result, valuations are much less attractive than they were 70 years ago. Maybe the reason is because real GDP growth has slowed. Maybe it's because stocks have simply become much more popular than they used to be. Either way, I'd make index funds part of, rather than my entire strategy.
Currently if you have only access to a namepsace on a shared Kubernetes cluster without cluster wide admin control you won't be able to:

- Create cluster wide RBAC ClusterRole or ClusterRoleBinding

- Create or get access to cluster-scoped resources (nodes, CRD)

- Use custom webhooks for example using sidecar injection

Many of the things that complex Kubernetes deployments are doing nowadays.
An aggregator could offer a checkbox to include fees or make users otherwise aware of that fact. Would definitely differentiate that aggregator for me!
With respect, your doctor’s response seems entirely reasonable. Spontaneous remissions, as this sort of thing are called, are known to happen, but the tools to understand why and how basically don’t exist, or at best are the purview of serious biomedical laboratories; certainly, your doctor couldn’t have mounted a serious investigation with the resources in his office. Meanwhile, the sick always outnumber medical practitioners, and there’s an essentially unlimited number of people in worse condition than yours who he could help; of course he would allocate his limited time to where it would do the most good.
Doesn't happen to me, because no matter how good other's have it, there's a large amount of others that have it worse. If you're not happy about your condition, do something about it. Want more money? Go make it, want more acclaim? Go get it. If you want it bad enough and are willing to put in the time and effort, you will get it.
I think this is an idea with great potential. Making it work seamlessly would be a challenge.

For example: Elastic Beanstalk for NodeJS gives you a good starting point for a web backend. However, I had to hand-edit the EBS environment configurations to add Redis, Postgres, force HTTPS, and so on. I'd love to add a CI/CD pipeline when I find the time.

Could I do these with your tool? Probably not today. It would be awesome to be able to drag and drop gateways, firewalls, set in/out ports. Conceptually this is all one should need to get an EBS set up.
I've long believed that once startups and tech companies get their hands on medical data (patient outcomes, medication treatment outcomes, mal practice rates, surgery outcomes) that a reckoning will take place on the medical industry. The level of legitimacy and respect that doctors and hospitals currently have is far too high, and hinges on branding and the exclusivity of becoming a doctor. Once all of this data becomes available, it will be obvious how worthless and expensive most medical treatments really are. Most prescription drugs do nothing, and the ones that do something are more so just covering the symptoms.

HIPAA laws are hiding patient outcomes and holding this whole sham afloat.
I'd say the amount of isolation to be sufficient, depends on the threat model. If you want some isolation but moderately trusted workloads (e.g. different departments in the same company) that's easier than the isolation required for "arbitrary customers can run any workload on a given cluster"

Multi-tenant, single cluster is tricky. You either need node pools per tenant, at which point why not run one cluster per tenant, or you need really good isolation of the workloads from the nodes, which requires PodSecurityPolicy or similar to prevent a breakout to the underlying node.

Also RBAC can be tricky in a multi-tenant setup as you need to be very careful with anything that would allow breakout to the underlying node or any cluster level rights.
What type of Business should I Start
India is sending a rover to the moon, and the country is pumped
My strategy is roughly: Figure out what is the hardest part and do that first. Spend a lot of time to do it right. Then iterate until there are no hard parts left. Or in other words, don't waste time doing things you are already good at.
Part of the problem with landfill is that the economics are largely 'profit first, cost later'. We don't really have a good model to ensure that long term maintenance and care of a landfill site post closure is always adequately funded so there's always a risk that an owner who might well have made all his capital investment back, and more, before the landfill closed just runs out of money and walks away no matter how you provide privately. This is a bit like the issue you have with defined benefit pensions and longevity, only you have less certainty on the costs.

Because the potential environmental consequences of just leaving the site unmaintained or poorly looked after are high, in the developed world government almost always ends up providing a backstop to this. This could be described as 'socialised losses and privatised profits' when it gets used, and we would be right to be very wary of this model, even to pay a premium to avoid it.
There's a lot of reasons, but at least part of the answer is technical. Most Google software is extremely dependent on a massive set of proprietary internal libraries, and it is so difficult to disentangle them that rewriting the entire thing from scratch is often easier (like they did to create Docker). I'm not sure whether it is possible to provide a contractual lease to an external company granting access to the entire Google codebase, but it certainly has enough challenges they would rather avoid it if they can.
This line of inquiry is generally referenced as the Ship of Theseus argument. The underlying philosophical question about identity holds even for inanimate objects whose parts are replaced.

But, this argument has also been extensively reapplied to brains, bodies, and minds as well. The Chinese Room thought experiment is one common reference for this, where a functional system is trained to translate Chinese texts but framed in a way to cast doubt on whether there is any understanding of Chinese.
Lithium battery production is extremely harmful to the environment.
> I think it's possible that the Max will never fly again.

Call me cynical, but I believe this is not possible. It may be upgraded, rebranded, recertified, and they may retrain everyone who may come anywhere near its cockpit, but they can't just drop the plane for three reasons:

1. They already sold too many. Those customers will want a refund, and will have a major loss of faith into Boeing. Unless there is a replacement plane to give but ...

2. They don't have any replacement. They don't have anything to put in that slot. And it's already a plane they had to rush because a) it's the main seller, and b) the competition (A320 Neo) is a very good plane in that slot.

3. Like said above, it's the major seller. It has how many thousands of orders and how many years of wait to get your planes already ? And nobody cancelled to move to airbus because they're just as backlogged. So neither Boeing, nor the airlines, nor the US government want it / can afford for it to disappear, they want it fixed, anyway possible.

Don't get me wrong, I believe in a perfect world it should be grouded forever and be remembered as a huge warning lesson, but this will never happen.

The real question is, why aren't Airbus and Boeing massively increasing their production capacity for those lines ? Feels like they've been been backlogged since forever, and it's only getting worse. I get that you can't create a new set of factory and their trained workers overnight, but we're talking decade here.
Mayo Clinic Data Breach
Their responses are unbelievable. OP had to ask the same question repeatedly only to get the same smug non-answers that ignored all of the most important points. The 1P team didn’t own up to or even acknowledge any mistakes.

I manage 3 paid accounts. Might not be much to them, but this event—the way they handled it more than the incident itself—was enough at least to get me to discontinue my subscriptions. Could not be more disappointed in how they handled this.

Edit: can anyone recommend a good open source manager with browser extensions?
> A normal size is 15.6

Citation needed. A normal size is 14" from where I sit, that's what most ThinkPad T series laptops had been for a very very long time. Yes there is a T5x0 series but the T4x0 always had more variants and the Anniversary Edition 25 is also 14". Also, a 14" laptop is small enough to fit across a carry on, a 15" can't do that.
Yeah I wasn't sure about that myself. Just thinking out aloud.
As someone who works on ML, in particular 'deep neural networks', I am always surprised when someone seriously mentions using them to solve complex (anything with humans in the loop fits solidly within this category) real-world (i.e. real-world inputs and outputs) problems. I am very surprised when the problem definition additionally involves potential injury and death.

And yet it seems that Karpathy firmly believes that Neural-network-based self-driving systems are not only reasonable, but within reach using something close to today's algorithm.

This always leaves me wondering whether (i) I am somehow using an entirely different class of algorithms from what these guys are using (ii) the AI/ML bubble has even the top minds in our field drinking a little too much kool-aid (iii) My colleagues and I are just not good enough at ML to unlock it's full magical potential.

(To be more exact, I am not debating the truly impressive power of today's ML/deepNN algorithms when it comes to statistical inference. Yet, does anyone here believe that you can get to Level 5 on today's roads without something close to general-purpose intelligence? How do you react to written roadsigns explaining temporary route alterations? How do you know to take special precautions in situation where context indicates the likelihood of unmodeled irrational behavior?)

I am genuinely curious, who here believes/doesn't believe today's AI can really generalize that far when (i) adversarial attacks are still a real issue [1] (ii) random seeds can sometimes have a greater influence than model architectures [2] (iii) we are not even sure how well these models approximate learning which takes place in biological brains [3]

[1] https://sites.google.com/view/lidar-adv

[2] "We do not find any evidence
that the considered models can be used to reliably learn
disentangled representations in an unsupervised manner
as random seeds and hyperparameters seem to matter
more than the model choice." - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.12359.pdf

[3] https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/fulltext/S136...
I think you are just describing jargon, which allows greater specificity when the audience is assumed to have a fundamental grounding in the topic being discussed.
Exactly. I think this boils down to the problem that games do not create actual value or if they do it is zero-sum, away from somebody else.

If what we do in the game could somehow benefit people who are outside the game THAT would mean it provides "real" value.

If the value it provides is only entertainment for other players then I would say it only provides VIRTUAL value :-)