skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem is called borrow checker, and that while the Rust team already has done lots of improvements with NLL, the use of widget data in callbacks remains a pain point.

"Appendix: What the proposal won’t fix"

http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2017/07/11/non-...

So one could say, it is a case of holding it wrong, and a Rust UI toolkit needs to be written from scratch. Which might be ok, but it does require some support for market adoption.

Having said this, Gtk-rs now has some help in the form of relm, exactly to overcome this issue.

https://github.com/antoyo/relm
Office 365 is a paid product, so I would hope so. I also don't recall them trying to be your personal assistant.

A first step to the answer to that question would probably be to compare all the terms and contracts.

If you really really want your privacy you're better off running your own. But then a lot of your contacts probably use a provider you didn't trust hosting your email, so there goes a large chunk of that privacy again...
Sitting on one right now, purchased it used a few years ago. Works fine, occasionally have to re-inflate it and pairing it with a cushion has helped.

I disclaim things a bit as I weigh a bit less than the average american male, but it looks like they now sell a larger version of the stool (ergo extra) which might be in response to earlier durability issues.
I was going to recommend Fastmail as well. I'm a paying customer and very happy with it.
Thanks for reading. I've added a section about this in the "logistics and risks" section.

I'm basically adding this to the list of hard problems to be solved, instead of providing a specific solution. I do not know if the existing airports can be remodeled or operated differently in order to handle more passengers. I do not know if a high-speed rail will be put in place that could quickly shuttle people to an airport in Bakersfield, etc.
It is a feature. It ensures they don't litter orbits forever.
That's probably because the first few steps are very incremental. It skips ahead faster after that. If you were to make a longer version of this that was more gradual, I think people would be able to pick up more advanced concepts correctly, although it would definitely be much longer.
As the top comment already noted, the email still exists in Trash, where messages get removed 30 days after they are deleted unless the user manually empties their trash. Emails in trash are obviously still indexed. (They show up when I search for "in:trash".) There are multiple other people who have said that deleting emails removes them from their purchase history.
I don't buy that they can't figure out how to make a game that's at least as compelling as its predecessor.
It occurs to me that there’s a simpler way to put it: wealth creation is not a zero sum game, but wealth allocation is.
I have a DX racer that I use when I work from home. I've been satisfied with it
Agree with the sentiment. I don’t know about Amtrak’s carbon foot print relative to airlines so I don’t know how the score tally out. The trains run on electricity but I’m not sure how it’s genrates. And fixed the link thank you
I really don't get this whole Russian interference moral panic. Like sure, maybe there are some people paid by foreign governments to target people on social media, but at the point people are susceptible to that they're already so addled by other factors it's basically irrelevant surely? I feel like I must be missing something obvious?

For instance here in the UK there's a huge amount of pearl clutching about Russian disinformation leading to the vote to leave the EU (Brexit). But I really don't believe some older folks saw a few adverts on Facebook and that was it. Radicalisation, such as it is, set in decades before through a news media that was overwhelmingly anti EU, incredibly biased to the point of being propaganda and often with no basis in fact.

The idea some Russian millenials in a St Petersburg basement lead to Brexit, or Trump, or whatever else they're being blamed for now seems utterly fanciful. Radicalisation for these people set in long before any of this and it was bought in the shop as a newspaper or delivered as part of your cable package.
I have an Aeron at home - great chair. I have very bad lower back issues (arthritic deterioration due to significant vitamin D and nutritional deficiency; I have cystic fibrosis) and can't sit on any kind of surface for long. I can sit in the Aeron for 8 hours plus with no issues. My new one was $1200 but I bought one at a used furniture store for the office - honestly can't tell the difference. Pretty sure I spent around $400-500.
Just spherical.
Amaterasu: Framework to build, configure and dispense data processing pipelines
Definitely have heard of it. I locked in my profit on AMZN at $63/share.

I'm not a trader, have no confidence I can time the market. I buy for long term hold (expect the company to take a major share of a growing market) and for dividends. In the case of the dividend investments, if the stock appreciates substantially (60%+) then yes, I do sell it and lock in the profit, reinvest in a higher yielding stock. But I don't try to time it.
Chadwick. By the guy that designed the Aeron. It's less body-encasing than the Aeron, made to move around a little, your back does a little more work.

It's great.
It would be possible to livelock the system but deadlocks are easier to avoid: don't use locks [1] at all in the runtime and don't expose them in the language.

The longer answer of how the possibility of a deadlock in user code in Pony is prevented:

* messages are handled FIFO so w/o selective receive or multiple channels, there is no way to skip or wait for a specific message w/o doing work (_progress must be made by receivers_)

* combined with the last one, the sender can't wait for a response as it has to be sent as a FIFO message back (which can come interleaved with other messages; _progress must be made by senders_)

* multiple actors cannot simultaneously modify anything (you can't create a lock out of shared memory + Lamport's bakery algorithm because memory can't be r+w on two threads and even then, your exclusion failure would require explicit looping, so the thread is technically livelocked/starved)

What this results in is a system that always makes progress when more than one actor is involved.

Now that doesn't stop hanging the system (imagine putting N actors in infinite loops, one for each scheduler thread in the pony runtime, which we should call a livelock rather than a deadlock) and of course you could call some kind of C code via the FFI that decides it wants to take a lock or similar exclusive operation. Or there could be a bug in the runtime [2] which is tightly integrated with the language design and its guarantees so it avoids using locks for common things and uses atomic operations which provide a wait-free properties.

[1]: Pony uses atomic operations exclusively last time I looked. Relatively clever and there is room for bugs but theoretically this allows for wait-free progress in the runtime (there's a lot more to say here about theory vs practice but generally lock-free properties are enough here anyway).

[2]: I believe there have been edge cases in Pony's GC which might fall into the bug category but it's been awhile since I've used Pony myself so I can't comment on the current status.
Well but underlying your point was an assumption that the 3 and 5 competed against the i3 at all. It's not a "miss" that someone in the market for a pickup truck passes on the BMWs, either.
> What we should do is being maximally trusting (to reap the efficiency benefits), and punish hard anyone trying to take advantage of it, way out of proportion compared to the magnitude of the violation, in order to discourage people from abusing the trust of others.

Are we doing that, though? It feels like we're generally very trusting and, organized in society, very forgiving. Hell, in lots of business cases, cheating makes money, getting caught and paying a fine is just the cost of doing business - and it pays.

I understand the theory, and I agree. I don't see it being applied however.
But why would you design cities for bicycles either? They're not people, right?
Funny enough, six months in I've found nearly the same experience with Rust. There's still logic bugs and interface expectations to deal with (accidentally broke an implicit contract in some code last week!) but my confidence in the code is extremely high.

I've found this to be interesting when jumping back to Java code - it's nowhere near as likely that the code just works if it compiles (though that was lightyears ahead of other programming languages).
"Bamboozle the target with technobabble. Target lacks the skills to independently verify the claim or even recognize the vocabulary is just plain wrong."

Ah yes, an adage of my old Staff Sergeant (who probably borrowed it himself) "if you can't convince them with brilliance, confuse them with bullshit".
The cost of enriching uranium used to be a problem, then gas centrifuges replaced diffusion and reduced the energy cost by a factor of 50.
https://github.com/shintoio/amaterasu
The world's worst video card? [video]
Nobody cares what users want. Users use what they have to. Developers just pushed web UI over their throats, because it's so easy to bundle website with browser and call it an application. People dreamed about it since forever: not to duplicate all GUI work over and over again for every platform and now when web is a platform, it become even worse, so when Electron became a thing, developers jumped and users did not really care, because those apps were good enough and that's all that really matters.

Given the choice I would prever native UI any day.
Thanks for that link. Very pretty boat, well maintained, looks just wonderful. Love all the interior woodwork that's got a nice coat of varnish on it to keep it shiny and new.

That's the kind of boat that helps the cruising community.
The funnier thing is that he potentially embezzled investors out of many millions of dollars for his bogus claims.

It's a wonderful world we are living in.
I wonder that programming language he used. Many ideas are lost because we don't have something to write it on. That's the good thing about the so-called 'scripting languages' that IMO reduce the latency between idea and its materialization.
YouTube engineer in critical condition after rampage during bad LSD trip
100 not true. All you have to do is pull a list of the daily additions and deletions and you will see that they have many customers that are not 'tech' people. Further you are assuming all the customers of theirs that are tech people even read and keep up with blog posts like this.
This says more about the stupidity and uselessness of the police than it says about whether he is Nakamoto or not.
Someone made a bot to post automated summaries from their site a while back and quickly got told to stop.
And more writable, since your editor can take advantage of the consistent structure via paredit et al.

FWIW, I split my time 2:1 between C++ and Clojure these days, and the context switch to s-exprs is always easier, even though I spend less time working in them.
Git commit hashes are pretty safe.
Very true, trust matters, but it might help a bit that many antiques aren't useful in themselves and aren't that easy to sell. If they were selling razors or baby formula, maybe things would be different?

Do you think they have cameras?
You guys are doing a bunch of research bringing affine types to mainstream, to the point that other languages are paying attention and copying your efforts to the extent their languages allow it, even if there are some bumps still.

My point was more towards to future generations being unaware of such ideas that eventually came into Rust. For example, as you describe Cyclone had its issues. Still if Cyclone did not exist, probably Rust as idea would never happen. Same applies to ATS, and all other languages that served as inspiration for an idea that eventually became Rust, and then took a path of its own.
I found a new method which is called “Don’t break a chain!”. For me, this is really helpful method. I have selected few things (for example, practice German, read a book and do sports) and I do it everyday, then I put (x - check mark) to my application. After some time when I see that I already did certain things for some days this motivates me more and I kept doing again and again. I have another rule that I can have one day “free x” per week which means I’m allowed to skip one day per week, but I can still put check mark to my chain. If I don’t have this rule in one day if for some reason I can not do the activity my chain will break and it will be very hard to start again building a
new chain.
One advantage of managed memory is that it can be moved, which makes allocation extremely fast.
If a guy who behaves like this was satoshi or one of them, it would be an embarrassing revelation.
UFC 239 live stream: Com
https://medium.com/@uefatv/fight-tv-ufc-239-live-stream-and-fight-tv-coverage-free-91c513e92fc7

https://medium.com/@uefatv/live-tv-jones-vs-santos-fight-ufc-239-air-free-match-6th-july-2019-35c8901488df

https://medium.com/@uefatv/livestreaming-ufc-239-live-online-and-fight-tv-coverage-free-1f27ed777b73

https://www.reddit.com/r/UF239C/comments/c9y91f/livestreamofficialfightufc_239_live_stream_ppv/

https://www.reddit.com/r/UF239C/comments/c9y93c/redditstreamofficialfightufc_239_live_stream_ppv/

https://www.reddit.com/r/UF239C/comments/c9y93y/fightthread_jones_vs_santos_ufc_239_live_stream/

https://www.reddit.com/r/UF239C/comments/c9y94m/watch_fightufc_239_live_stream_ppv_fight_reddit/
I am finishing a procedural generation pixel-art editor, aka you connect nodes to get a rectangles of colour. The cool part is the nodes you use are often other graphs also built with the tool. It is a bit like Houdini but for pixel-art.

It is close to be a niche but solid product. I can reproduce with it a reasonable amount of the pixel-art I see daily. I am currently writing the tutorials for it.

https://lbarret.itch.io/rectitude

The underlying engine is a restricted functional language and the architecture is based on streams of values. I am quite proud of the architecture because so far, I had very little accidental complexity to manage and that's key for me to stay motivated/productive on the project.
Does someone have a diagram that explains how all the "Apache XYZ" data processing bits relate to each other?
There is a Rob Pike talk where he praises the compile times of the Algol compiler he was using as a student for example.
You are reading this for entertainment and perhaps to learn but my point wasn't that it wasn't potentially interesting but more the actual business purpose of doing this.

One again using an example of lost luggage I don't really care (other than an interesting story) why my luggage was lost I just don't want it to happen and an airline writing a detailed story doesn't give me any more confidence they won't have a different problem happen again. If anything it maybe even opens up the door if something I read seems that it could have been avoided (whereby if they say nothing I might not know that it could).
Brain was doing the computing so that he can eat more Nutella bread. Bummer, he just left the Nutella bread and went programming the solution.

Maybe it should have convinced him to procrastinate instead. Now, I know where all my inefficiency is coming from.
What crime did the Japanese Americans commit.
This is literally the video the article is about.
Well, maybe. But I've learned that you can't take money out of "it". Even in places that strive to do so. If we could we could actually reach some utopia. Communism would become highly desirable.
Inferno and Limbo, for example.
Satoshi wrote the bitcoin whitepaper, a nine-page document:

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

can't you test Wright's claim by just saying "walk us through how you wrote this paper. the thought process, how it came to fruition. what was on your mind. you included a number of references, where did you get these? just, the whole process, etc."

presumably wright would hem and haw and not say anything.

--

EDIT: I'm puzzled by the downvotes. I've been accused of not writing something myself, and it's easy to defend by just showing my work, drafts, etc. anyone who's ever written anything can speak really easily, maybe after a quick glance to look at it again. talking about the creative process is a pretty solid defense of authorship in my opinion.
I was thinking for a while to do more networking security at home, from basic stuff like a guest's wifi, to white-listing content and ports.
How much time did it take you to set up Pi-hole to your liking?
The only reason it’s a panick is because they are contrarians. If they were astroturfing for the mainstream candidates, you wouldn’t hear much. Do we hear about other efforts that likely go on but are in support of non-contrarian candidates? I have not. I doubt it’s because no one is doing it. I mean I’d be surprised.

Now, I agree foreigners should not meddle in the elections of others, but some of that stuff is blurry. Would China’s mr. Xi saying he’d wish Bernie would win “interference”? Is a candidate delivering a political speech on foreign soil interference?
Docker protects a programming paradigm that we should get rid of (2018)
Pre-Prod HoneyComb LX2K 16-Core Mini ITX Arm Workstation Pre-Order for $550
We absolutely stand on the shoulders of giants here. Hopefully nobody will think that Rust invented substructural type systems.
What wenT unsaid wasn’t anything about expensive camera gear, but that phone thingy we hold in our pocket. THAT device will get much better at photography in very quick order, and the price change will be largely immaterial.

I fully believe this will be the death of all but professional cameras in 5 years or less. (Yes, I know cameras are already in sharp decline, but I’m talking true death - bankruptcies and firms leaving the market).
To verify old hashes, with a backup. But anyone with access can just push a new commit with an arbitrary author field. Without code signing it'd be very difficult to tell who actually pushed it. (Probably GitHub has logs you could check, but if the attacker could get on the corporate network it'd just be a NAT IP, and more sophisticated attackers can spoof or MITM)
I’ve lived in Tokyo for 14 years and think that this characterisation also applies here. Comparatively low Gini coefficient, very high level of community trust and susceptibility to endemic fraud.
HQ Trivia Lays Off Staff, Pivots to $9.99/Month Subscription Model for HQ Words
>a fiddly modem connection at 300 baud, compared to that what you get on smartphones is excellent.

No, both those examples are terrible. The 300 baud modem because of the low speed and the smart phone LTE connection because the round trip time is highly variable and TCP backoff applies a heavy penalty. Additionally, most smart phone internet connections don't have ports or even an ipv4 and are behind Carrier-NAT. Given that, I'd prefer the 300 baud modem.
My biggest fear is that Democracy in Western
countries might not come out well after
another one.

Not that observers disagree with that sentiment, but what specifically makes you say that? Is it something thats structurally malformed in the way markets are set up currently? Is it going to affect most mature markets -- since they are all so heavily interlinked these days -- or will there be survivors?
That's pretty misleading. The image is looking at cumulative fatalities over a period, and those planes are all different sizes.

The question here is likelihood of fatal accident, which is not addressed by your source.
Sure, but that applies to main memory as well. Ergo, having a larger cache will offer a benefit over memory correlatively; it's only diminishing relative to itself.
The Capisco is great, but I also like the more conventional H04 from HÅG: classic, timeless look, great build quality, but what I like most is their concept of balanced movement. The chair allows your body to move a lot and this helps to reduce strain. I tried an Aeon, but the H4 was much better for my back. It’s not cheap at 1000 Euro, but you can get them quite cheap used (I only paid 100 Euro).
>> We are lucky that they decided to vandalize instead of hiding something.

> We do NOT know this.

Well, at least we know that the attackers wanted their activities to be noticed at this point in time.

I have reasons to suspect that this is a compromised account, in which case there should be enough forensics info to figure out what the scope of the damage is.
The myth here, though, is not that companies are taken out by competitors with better technology or more ruthless practices or better PR, that happens all the time. The myth is that when this happens it is always in the customer’s best interests, or that the customer will even be allowed to become aware of what their own best interests really are. For a company there is no difference between genuinely benefitting their customers and manipulating their customers into believing that they have been benefitted. Making that determination falls on the customer themselves, and in the competition between global corporation and median consumer the consumer is wildly out-matched.
Saying you don't know at this point is like saying "he is or he isn't, so there's a 50% chance". Yeah, he might be. But it's not even odds, that's for sure.
Hah yeah bought my Arron at Tops almost a decade ago. If anyone is in the Austin area, I would highly recommend checking them out if only to get a feel for the range of high-end inventory.
You left Bitcoin because they care TOO much about getting media attention?
> It seems like it'd be possible to have a deadlock without actual locks

Yes, but not in actor model even by formal definition of deadlocks.
When you sign git commit, you do not sign your diff but the whole source tree as you see it. Effectively, you're vetting all prior commits on the branch.

Thus maintainers usually sign merge commits and it's their job to confirm that commits don't do anything shady and come from people they claim to come from.
I share most if not all of the objections mentioned in the article. But even if one grants that quantum physics or quantum gravity or even undiscovered physics plays a role, I still fail to see how this can be of much help in explaining consciousness. Quantum mechanics can be simulated classically with an exponential slowdown. Not that I want to belittle an exponential difference but in some sense it does not bring anything fundamentally new to the table. Quantum mechanics is - setting all the still unsolved problems aside - still just a set rules dictating - or describing - how things have to behave. And even undiscovered physics would have to have a very different character than known physics in order to provide something truly new and capable of bridging the perceived gap between physics and consciousness.

Personally I changed my mind quite recently and the following quote from the article now resonates very much.

Minsky called consciousness a “suitcase word” that lacks the rigor of a scientific concept. “We have to replace it by ‘reflection’ and ‘decisions’ and about a dozen other things,” he said. “So instead of talking about the mystery of consciousness, let’s talk about the 20 or 30 really important mental processes that are involved.

Just sit down and try to nail down what you mean when you say, you are conscious or you feel pain. Try to make precise what you think distinguishes you from a philosophical zombie. When the voice in your head says that this was not the best decision and next time you should do something else, is that really any different from one system monitoring and controlling another system? When you are experiencing pain, when you try to get away from its source, when you maybe scream, is that really any different from you car turning on the low oil pressure warning light?

Of course it is! Or is it? Maybe your brain just turned the I-am-special indicator light on...
That sounds like DRLs... In some cars they use the headlights at reduced power as DRLs.