skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My point is that it does break password manager workflows, since you have to go above and beyond the comfort level of a layman to circumvent the broken login workflow.
I doubt you're consistent with it. You'd probably wait 10+ seconds to post an HN comment for example.

Easy to say you'd bounce on a website you didn't care about. That's a bit of a tautology.
Some GPUs have integrated memory with the CPU and don't need to do the transfer, it could still speed things up there couldn't it?

Also, they didn't ignore the key detail, they mention it: "This is without taking into account the overhead of transferring data to the GPU."
This is the best argument in favor of strong privacy laws I have heard so far
Yev here -> we're taking a look at the sessions and possibly implementing a "hey are you still here"-type thing that a lot of banking institutions use. The thought being, if you've logged into your Backblaze account and left the computer open and unmonitored folks have access to your data (granted they also have access to your computer - but you can log in to Backblaze from any device to do restores - so we went with short-ish sessions).
Do these "life hacks" apply in other developed countries, or is the US special in this way too?
> You'd want to avoid having hatespeech or some attack being planned on URLs of your blog.

How could you possibly expect to control people saying things about your blog on a remote webserver?

There is no solution that is not worse than the speech.

This is not a problem that needs solving.
I don't believe that the framers were supermen, but I also don't know that it's the Supreme Court that's meant to overturn the fundamental decisions the founders made.
Shouldn't open aggregate listing and blocking of botnets be effective? How many 10k node botnets are there?

Also: egress hygiene should be a thing. Block subnets and ASNs if toxic behaviour is detected.
Were you logged into your Google account? That seems to almost guarantee a .9
So by "wrong in interesting ways" you mean "right, but in ways not relevant to my particular argument".
I can only imagine the new improved constitution. "If and only if you yell these 900 words and these 30000 phrases at an african american it's racism. But in these 90000 contexts these 1000 phrases are acceptable..."

Life is way too complex NOT to be governed (at the highest levels) by philosopher kings.

Supreme Court justices should (at least partially) be considered "problem solvers", not archaeologists.
Wikipedia says 393 have been produced, so more like 0.25%.
Reverse Engineering Cyclic Redundancy Codes
Designing the .Net API for Apache Kafka
Yeah, but integrated GPUs wouldn't be usable with CUDA.
XRumer (forum spamming) software had a feature over a decade ago that would reload a /register page on different proxies to generate a list of these sorts of questions. You'd run it for a moment, feed an answer for each question into XRumer, and then continue on your merry spammy way.

These ReCaptcha topics on HN really illuminate how few people have dealt with any real spam, much less targeted human or botnet attacks.
The article was great, I will be interested to see the documentary especially if they've got video footage from some of the shows.
Curious whether the owner thought that shooting across car hoods was going to get Google to stop routing cars across his land.

Did the owner know it was Google's "influence" causing people to trespass? If so had the owner informed Google?
The particularly red/blue states are where this matters the most. Imagining a state with 10 districts and a split of 80-20 along party lines (and this is relatively as extreme red/blue you can get; americans aren't that homogenous). Ideally you'd expect that state to send and 8 - 2 split to the house of representatives to best represent their population. With gerrymandering it's trivial to insure those 20% are silenced as far as federal influence is concerned. That's a lot of people and, I would argue, not an ideal situation.
You mean the phrase "intersection of Southeast Asian refugee identities and punk music"?

Are you seriously so angry about feminism that just looking at a word that resembles a word you associate with feminism makes you dismiss a whole article?
I think we need to set some terms here. What do you consider "failing"? Not that I'm really looking to jump into the mud and wrastle on this one, this seems like a perfect point for a -citation needed-
Maybe you aren't old enough to remember but plenty of people were up in arms in 2000 as well.

I can't comment on what popular sentiment was in 1888.
Migrate to an alternative app, such as Parler, ASAP.
Won't a phone with the latest tech inside cost more than double $300, regardless of the screen size?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOW_kPzY_JY
> I prefer people to be themselves rather than pretending to be something else.

Very few people are "themselves" in practice. There's a difference between how one feels and what one conveys. Communication is about conveyance.
Well that sucks. Bad luck. So much for that theory then.
> most business leaders still seem to treat analytics results in discrete blocks via monthly / weekly reports and seem quite content with reports and findings that take hours to run.

I would go further and even call long or at least not instant report generation a perceived feature. Similar to flight and hotel booking sites that show some kind of loading screen even if they could give instant search results, the duration of the generation itself seems to add trust to the reports.
How to Build Production-Ready Kubernetes Clusters and Containers
It specifically calls the other options out as less suitable for SAML users or having other downsides.

Option two: "This option prioritizes handling username/password login, and may work better with password managers, but requires some Javascript handling that could be fickle."

Option three: "It simplifies the page, doesn't require a lookup of the domain, but could be clunky for the platform's SAML users."

Twilio is clearly aware of the other ways of handling this.
Learning Unix tools is pretty good place to start. There are a lot of commands that can do a lot of processing. It’s been a while since I learned but the book “Unix power tools” from oreily is pretty good. It’s old, but honestly these commands haven’t changed much.

http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596003302.do

Python is slower compared to some of it’s compiled cousins, but it’s quick to write and a great skill to have when bash scripting can’t handle some of the complexity or you need dB access. We use it sometimes to call c programs to do DNA sequence alignments and process the returns.
Reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it
This is one big reason Twitter hasn't been (and may not be) acquired. Who needs this headache and expense?

This isn't as disturbing as Vimeo's takedown of Project Veritas, or the bias exposed in their video, but the trend is seriously alarming.
Me too - there doesn't even seem to be a way to generate a file that you could open on another computer? Having them sync via Firefox would be really good - even more so on mobile.
Can't fly?
I wonder if there will be a "good old games" service that lets you download movies and shows drm-and-spying-free and play on any device?
Well, most people here are corporate and/or state bootlickers. I'm sorry you've been duped by this website's name.
Regarding their USA-centrism, you shouldn't be surprised, after all it's mostly a Sillicon Valley hivemind, take that as you will.

I suggest searching greener pastures.
It bothers me that browsers leak info like a font list and extensions. Specify the font you want to display, and if my browser doesn't have that font it should fall back gracefully, perhaps with a warning.
Why does this decision change anything? They've been allowing rule-breaking material from politicians for a while, they just now let the user know and prevent the rule-breaking content from spreading.
This is one of those quotes that sounds great in the abstract but fails in any form of reality.

The chickens protest to the farmer that the fox is eating them. The farmer says, right but what can I do it's the fox eating you?

Everything is a political question...especially when you make it one.

The case in front of the courts was about redistricting being politicized. To use the fact that it is being politicized to claim you can't take action to protect people's fundamental right to effective representation is an embarrassing argument. It's willful ignorance towards a goal.
This is wrong information.

Publishers can show a cookie-free site to all visitors and offer a cookie opt-in for some kind of added value, e.g. "more information for membership".

There is no governmental force pushing anybody to produce a website that diplays a "cookie dialog" even before you see what that site is about or if you like it. You are producing a false and absurd story of "governments meddling into tech produces cookie dialogs".
Probably because gerrymandering has been used to reduce the relative impact of black votes on election outcomes.
The Boundary Commission. Yes, we do. But:

1. It would be harder to create such an independent commission in the US, because Americans (and especially Republicans) have worked tirelessly to make every corner of their lives another opportunity for partisanship. Americans elect _far_ too many officials, and those elections almost invariably end up partisan because a party has the muscle to win you the election. For example, in the US all those Supreme Court justices who wrote this decision and its dissents are in effect partisan, even though in principle it's not supposed to be a partisan body. In the UK the Supreme Court is just a bunch of judges that other judges and lawyers thought should be elevated, not a partisan issue.

2. Because Parliament is sovereign the Parliament has to actually enact those boundaries after the commission proposes them. Historically there is always a political party that thinks these changes are a bad idea conveniently for them because it somehow always seems to be the party that will likely lose seats. Because the Commission itself is impartial which party is angry about this varies, but in recent history it's Labour. When proposals to actually apply the current recommendations are coming up, I can always expect about one Facebook post a week from somebody who had no idea how boundaries work, or that there's an independent commission in charge of this, who has been convinced "somehow" that the party they don't like has conspired to take seats away from the one they do like via these boundary changes. Big surprise.

3. To be fair we got here because historically UK boundaries were left unchanged for so long that we had the Rotten Boroughs, a situation where some random land owner might own an area which was entitled to be represented by an MP even though literally _nobody_ had lived there for decades. You will not be surprised to learn that this caused _horrendous_ levels of corruption, bad enough that the act of parliament to fix it was routinely called the Great Reform Act (legally "Representation of the People Act 1832") and had to be rammed through by the same sort of extreme measures we've seen Democrats talking about in the US to fix its democracy.
Thanks for the links! I'll do some research before rolling out v2 of my extension.
"It is well within the power of Congress to fix the problem..."

Except that the Senate is controlled by Republicans and Republicans, on the whole, benefit more from gerrymandering. Even when the words and intentions of GOP are made clear, "we gerrymandered black peoples' districts to reduce their representation", it's still hard to remove that entrenched power. What's more, because of the pro-rural bias of the Senate, the rural allegiance to the GOP, and the electoral college disadvantaging urban centers, this entrenched GOP will continue to have a disproportionate share of power.

The Democrats try to play clean and fair, meanwhile the deck is stacked against them, and they still naively don't shift back towards gaining rural voters who they need for the Senate. Until the Fox News loving Silent Gen and Boomers die off, the GOP will cling to a disproportionate share of power.
This is a preview version (as mentioned a billion times in the article). Addons are planned by the end of 2019. This is for testing.
Sync works fine, at least for bookmarks and history, but I cannot choose what to sync, the check boxes are greyed out: https://i.imgur.com/atDU75z.png
Miniature brains grown in the lab have human-like neural activity
Once, when I was whining about what a "tragedy" my life was, someone told me "Everyone thinks their life is a tragedy." That stuck with me.

I consider genuinely listening to merely be good manners. I have had to learn to be more stand-off-ish because this is apparently not some universal standard of good manners.

In fact, it's apparently some bizarre aberration that signals "use me" or something. All manner of people imagine I am the solution to their problem and I am required to fix their problem, all completely for free while they don't do anything whatsoever for me.

This was true even when I was literally homeless and going hungry.

I don't get it. At all. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Like, don't you have a conscience? A sense of social obligation? A sense of quid pro quo? The tiniest inkling that simply using me up and never ever giving back is likely to either alienate me or kill me and, either way, I will stop being a resource for you?
You can probably use Firefox Lockwise [https://lockwise.firefox.com/] to sync passwords.
from the link

>the score returned here is not a reflection on your Google account or type of traffic

I got random scores as well.
It looks like this is just a sample of the data structure that the service returns, not the actual score.
Firstly I didn't reply to you.

Secondly I dunno where to start with this. Comparing homosexuality to Child abuse or implying that Brendan Eich is okay with it. The second is probably legally defamatory but IANAL.
That's a pretty slick solution there.
Because justified leads to inconsistent word and letter spacing.
The rules are a major part of the exam required to get a license so most hams know them well. The FCC and the ARRL make a big deal out of knowing and following the rules. It's simply part of the culture.
Do you know for sure that's the actual roadmap for the new version?
It is both funny and sad to read this thread.
Still no pull to refresh. They really don't want users to adopt their browser. Literally every single other mobile Web browser supports it.

Yet Mozilla has some ideological stance that it breaks web interaction (with what, the 0.0001% of browser that target Firefox above Safari or Chrome on mobile).
I thought _pmf_ was describing packages that he authored, and certainly if the contents of them are confidential, they would be in a private repository.

I don't think that the RPMs that I have created in my internal repository and deploy to my field systems are a 'known information' to anyone outside of my organization. If they are, I'm in serious trouble.

I think a more realistic use case for package-level encryption is deploying RPMs that have secrets in them (either keys/creds in configuration or trade secrets in application logic). Ideally of course we should encapsulate these such that they aren't deployed to field/embedded devices but in embedded there certainly may be some use-cases and requirements that those of us used to working in data center and cloud computing aren't immediately thinking of.
Maybe they care about the law.
The differences between digital cash and an e-wallet are as follows:

Digital cash is a public system. It is not run by a monopoly company. It is auditable by all. Fees are reasonable. Wallets are entirely in your control. Wallets are private. Companies and governments can't control your money. The system is secured by strong crypto.
Precisely.

What launched Dribbble into a high orbit was a combination of three things.

1. It was really well executed. It didn't just look good, it has zero friction in use. The UX was flawless. You'd think "I wonder if I can do this", click where it would logically belong and, lo and behold, that thing was there and it worked exactly as you'd expect. It was, to use pg's qualifier, delightful.

2. It was seeded with top-tier designers from the start whom Dan was able to recruit because he was well-known in respective circles. If I were to try and reproduce this, it won't work no matter who good the site was, simply because I am nobody with no street rep.

3. Invitation-only system that was completely closed to the public in the beginning. All you'd see are "leaked" screenshots on sites like PatternTap from the member of the cool boys club, and they looked spectacular. So when they allowed public in, still with no way to post, the whole thing just took off - it already had the community that was massively appealing and it was flattering to become a part of it. Invites were golden, the hype was over the top.

Regrettably, after it was sold to Tiny/Meta the quality of the site took a nose dive. They keep pushing out questionable "improvements" that clearly aim to improve their engagement stats rather than to be actually useful to the members. They reworked Pro accounts, bloating them with very niche and largely useless features and using that to raise the prices. What used to be an annual $20 no-brainer tip to Dan and Rich for their great job become an obnoxious $60/year subscription. They were getting an earful with every such improvement, so they now disable comments on every new announcement. I really wish Dan was back an the helm. He and Rich showed very unusual levels of restraint and common sense, and they did in fact listen to the people rather their analytics numbers.

* A Dribbble member since 2010.
> They did not include the time it took to transfer the input file from memory to the GPU

Fair point, it's more support for this HN post[2] making the case for memory-mapping files to GPU.

> This is a neat project, but there is a reason we are not using the GPU for regex matching.

I think it's more interesting that it's a general facility for running automata on a GPU, as it's opening up the universe of things that can be accelerated by a GPU. For instance, Numba[1] is a library to run arbitrary math code, and it has a feature for generating code to run on the GPU.

[1]: http://numba.pydata.org/numba-doc/latest/cuda/index.html

[2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11892030
The Little Legacy Code That Could
"(Corollary: pissing off someone important is a good way to find out whether you have broken the law)."

^this^
OMG your username :) I love that place. It is absolutely scary when government officials in India ask you for your sensitive information to be sent through WhatsApp and when you can't suggest them an alternative way or say them no.
Reproductive rights, as understood by liberals, do not have super-majority support [1]. Immigration reform, as understood by liberals, does not have super-majority support [2]. Gun control, as understood by liberals, does not have super-majority support [3]. Marijuana legalization barely has super-majority support [4]. No other drug reform, as understood by liberals, has super-majority support.

[1] https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx

[2] https://news.gallup.com/poll/1660/immigration.aspx

[3] https://news.gallup.com/poll/1645/guns.aspx

[4] https://news.gallup.com/poll/1657/illegal-drugs.aspx
Thank you, that's a good metaphor, I'll remember that. I feel like I got just to the point where the trees along the bank of a river had been cut down, so the soil had begun eroding and the water table was dropping. Luckily (in a way) I'm off that project and beavers have moved in and started building dams, and it may take a while but the ecosystem in my brain seems to be recovering, albeit slowly :-)
Tor users don't want to be running reCAPTCHA at all. There's a few privacy problems for people who run that or other ambitious cross-site snooping. Usual stuff (requests, cookies, JS fingerprinting, etc.), behavioral fingerprinting, and very detailed monitoring of what information you were accessing/reading and possibly even entering.
How the WSJ turned user data into a strategy to keep subscribers coming back
You defer to the most powerful. Right now you bow down to the United States. If the United States doesn't care about your case, you bow down to China. And if they don't care, you bow down to Russia.

If they don't care, best of luck to you... you're on your own.
Love your writing style, I'm not anywhere close to working in this field and I learned something.
EBooks Bought Through Microsoft Store to Disappear from July
> I'm aware that it wasn't illegal, but it doesn't mean it's legitimate.

Mind you, I'm no Trump fan, but "legal" is literally the only relevant definition of legitimacy in this context.

If the process by which Trump was elected was illegitimate, then the process by which all American Presidents have been elected is illegitimate. Americans have had two centuries to change the electoral college, and have not done so, because clearly voters have no problems with it when it benefits their side. Neither the presence nor the absence of a majority vote is, or has ever been, relevant.

We went though this with Obama, and a not-insignificant segment of the population believing him to be illegitimate. Before Obama, people on the left thought George W. Bush stole the election because of the debacle that was Florida.

It's a poisonous precedent to set, particularly in the radicalized atmosphere we find ourselves in, not to recognize the legitimacy of a government just because the "wrong" candidate won under the rules. How many more of these "illegitimate" Presidents are we going to go through before the losing side just decides to start shooting?

I hate Trump as much as any reasonable person, but Americans got exactly what they wanted, and deserved, with him.
YAML + mostly markdown: https://github.com/john-bokma/resume-pandoc

Creates LaTeX or PDF.
Option 2 in the article
https://jarhq.com/blog/100-productized-services-examples/
I agree with you. The answer should be to eliminate those barriers.

Sadly, we probably will not do so because those barriers (and the resulting suppression of votes) is politically beneficial to some.