skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I remember hearing about that as it happened. It was the first one I remember seeing that was widely distributed to the various news outlets.
That's exactly what I'm getting at! My idea here is strongly influenced by the thinking of Stanislaw Lem, who tackles this problem extensively in his works. He points out that it's very earth/bio-centric to assume that "life" on other planets would resemble in any way life on earth, and comes up with hypothetical life-forms that demonstrate this principle.

If we come up with some abstract definition of "life", then it seems like "life" is a fundamental thing of which "life on earth" is just one particular manifestation. Following that, we imagine that there are other specific instances in the universe that implement that general principle.

On the contrary, I think biological life is highly determined by its history and the geo-chemical particulars of earth itself, not by some fundamental principle. If we find extra-terrestrial "life" it's possible that the history and geo-chemical particulars of its evolution are so different from ours that we fail to recognize it as life at all.
In the Western US there is a huge variation in roads from very well-maintained gravel to high clearance 4WD with experienced driver to impassable because of rain or snow. The distinction is mostly lacking in the ur-databases. Somewhere like Death Valley Google Maps seems pretty good about not taking you on silly shortcuts even if you try to force it. I’m sure it’s less good in less travelled areas.
>I do not see how software augmentation can be permitted to compensate for a deviation from FAR 26.173. That section is titled: Static longitudinal stability. Software augmentation cannot cause an airplane that lacks positive static stability to have positive static stability.

I absolutely 100% agree. At no point have I intended to imply that any software solution should justify exceptional certification of an unairworthy frame as airworthy; in case that isn't clear.

I've only tried to communicate the fact that the software can physically remedy the behavior enough to apparently bring it within the capability of a human to control (as has been demonstrated by the non-crashed flights, as Boeing will inevitably argue).

I absolutely, unequivocally reject any argument that the software fix is compliant with regulations as written, or should be accepted as an acceptable remedy in it's current form.

I've had my view somewhat shaped by D.P. Davies in regard to the application of "gadgets" for certification. I think that any such system must be essentially bulletproof, and avoided at all costs by engineering the problem out if possible; and if allowed must unquestionably get the point across to the pilot that they are in dangerous waters.

The 727 had it's Stick Pusher in the U.K. This seems to be a modern retreating of the same path, and to be honest, I'm siding more toward the conservative side you hold of not allowing MCAS to remedy these handling faults. It really would be an example of the slippery slope of normalization of deviance in action.

I really hope all pilots, aerodynamicsts, and engineers take notice, and speak up. I can sit in these threads and try to spread understanding to the nine winds; but I'm some dude on the Net, who has no professional affiliation to any of this, but a big fat keg of outrage because this is not Quality damnit.
This thread is for breathless catastrophizing. Not sure why your reasonable comment is here.
Electrochemical migration is an issue in high-rel PCBs, though I don’t think that is true electro migration from charge carriers. Silver and tin dendrites have failed satellites.
I'd argue the opposite point, the problem with static websites is that they were bad at capturing state. That is what lead to the bloat of JQuery messes in websites and inefficient parsing of the HTML tree. Now that developers have so many platforms to target in so many ways, having a consistent way of state to permeate through websites reduces work.

Don't take me wrong, I love crafting my website 20kb of CSS over static files. Always sign me up for a static site, but for complex websites, where interactivty and state are needed, it's important to have these frameworks.
They're awful. If you go to a phishing site and don't see the image, and you're in the 99% of users, you're not going to say, "oh no, this must be a phishing site!" If you notice at all, you're going to think "they finally got ride of that stupid penguin picture".

Did you ride the bus today? Did you notice whether they removed one of the ads you saw yesterday? Yeah, neither did I.
Happened to me in Monza, Italy after the F1 race. A whole line of cars went down ever smaller roads until it was so narrow that only a bike or pedestrian could fit through. Getting 100+ cars to back up took a very, very long time.
Install the PrivacyPass Firefox or Chrome extension. It was developed by Cloudflare, Firefox, and Tor in partnership. It has you answer a ReCAPTCHA and using some crypto magic, generate a bunch of CAPTCHA bypass tokens that can't be traced to your specific computer.

https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/11500199265...

https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-supports-privacy-pass...

https://blog.cloudflare.com/privacy-pass-the-math/

https://github.com/privacypass/challenge-bypass-extension
That's an interesting video, which part did you intend to support your HEVC winning claim?

Not the bit when he says AV1 looks much better than x265 (which he started and led development on) I guess.
Xkcd 2168: reading Wikipedia in the Greek original
Multiverse Debugging: Non-Deterministic Debugging for Non-Deterministic Programs [pdf]
Race has nothing to do with falling on one side of a normal distribution. I'm not sure how you got that from what I said.
Those two things (how to perform districting and how to count votes) are completely unrelated and separate problems.

If you keep your heavily partisan districts, ranked choice isn't going to fix things if you've used data to ensure that the people in that districts are likely to vote the way you want. Ranked choice (or similar changes) doesn't create a more balanced partisan body in the district, it just changes the need for a Primary to decide who will be represented.

Districts matter because they're baked into the system. You want to get rid of them, that's a whole other can of worms but you can't pretend that drawing 3 districts, one with a +20% conservative lean, the other with a +20% conservative lean and the 3rd with a +90% liberal lean isn't going to continue being a problem.

Your plan is great at fracturing the parties, but that assumes that there's any value in that.
Regardless what they think they are doing, they are still stating their own opinion. If we can try to interpret things in this way, even "I am stating a fact" becomes "I believe I am stating a fact."
>>Nobody here is even saying that the_donald subreddit represents all of Trump supporters.
So why are you playing that card?

Because of the following comments:
>>“On the contrary. Deplatforming fascism works[1]. This removes a small number of tools that they use to recruit. It is step in the right direction.”

I regret engaging in this discussion. I guess it’s time to give up on trying to understand each other’s point of view, because disagreement is currently seen as a personal attack on HN.
Indeed, it's very disappointing to see such a long article without any mention of their plans for addons.

It isn't even clear that they're not going to replace Android Firefox with Fenix before getting extensions working.

As far I know this issue is the most recent source of information:
https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/issues/574

It says «We are currently finalizing the transition plan».
As another commenter said, that solution leaks security information - it says "this domain is a customer of ours and is configured to use a special authentication setup." Some big and lucrative customers will object to this leakage. Requiring an attacker to wait for a full page load to test an email address has a rate-limiting effect.

An AJAX solution can still be the right tradeoff of user experience vs security for some sites, and the article gave a couple of examples of major sites that have followed your suggestion. But the security downsides mean it's not right for every case.
And still I prefer all these decisions to a pseudo-compagny that try to create a monopoly on publicity by rebranding Google-chrome (WebKit). Brave could almost be qualified of a scam.

They have all ingredients of a scam, including an ICO.
Pay them (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19630181).

Other reasonable suggestions include:
- Post on producthunt
- Post on reddit
- Google Ads
- Facebook page
- Cold-emails
- Word of mouth
- Business cards
- Scour the internet for forums related to your web apps

The best success I've had has come from winning the HN lottery, I got on the front page. Otherwise paying people was 2nd. I don't have a 3rd option that has worked well enough yet.
Mansour As-Salimi (منصور السالمي)
[NYC] Senior Software Engineer, Back End (Multiple Positions)
That would piss off the content creators no doubt. Let people have the traffic for the content they create.

dang et al do an amazing job of fixing links when needed and getting rid of blog spam.

Banning FB outright isn't necessary because it's not always reposted elsewhere and is far too popular. Despite still having an awful long-form reading UI/UX despite years of designs and a focus on 'groups'...
'filthy rich' alter egos can protect your privacy
Over the course of a year I perused virtually all of the English language EWDs and read many in depth. They are extremely interesting. I especially like watching him develop his notation as he learns.

I also find the ones that are basically rants extremely entertaining. Others may not, but that's fine, skip them then.

And some are a mix, this one being a must-read: https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~EWD/transcriptions/EWD10xx/EWD103...
You are required to use reCAPTCHA on the California DMV website when making appointments and other functions.

https://www.dmv.ca.gov

It will also log you in to google on the first page.

Additionally, the stations at the DMV all have tablets on stands, showing Google logins for some operations.
With a new look and UI, a walkthrough maybe warranted. Took me a while to find the bookmark button. And the color scheme on the button itself is not as intuitive, does not present the idea on first viewing whether a page is bookmarked or not. But overall, looks great and works fast too. I am sure more devlopments are yet to come.

For now, looks promising to be a challenger to the Chrome monopoly.
Allowing people to defecate and urinate on the streets with impunity, is not really doing anything.
Once it happened to me that it got too sandy too sudden and I got stuck. It is easy to make fun of such mishaps but hey shit happens. It happened even without Google Maps.
Is it that different from the way Google Analytics works?
> I'm not signing up for a handful of subpar streaming services just because the studios got greedy

I can see why people feel this way, but there is a third option. Just don't watch their shows.

I don't understand why people feel like they have a right to consume whatever media they want.
For every mean-spirited hate post that gets promoted, another tweet about knitting is not promoted. Why is censorship only bad if the content is hateful?
The people who made the gerrymandered electorates. They got in because they’re a fair representation of the people.

Duh.

Happily they’ve filled two Supreme Court seats, one by prohibiting a sitting president from getting any nomination through for An entire year

[edit to note that both parties in the US do this wherever they have power to]
The same thing that remains when your computer stops responding: a hard reset.
My point was that ensembles of deep neural networks are commonly used and yield higher accuracies.
So if you're running the wrong combination of addons/VPNs/browser you're denied access to half the web because Big G says so? And now they're aggressively pushing sysadmins to install silent data harvesting scripts on every page of their sites? WTF more will it take to get people interested in breaking up these monopolies?
It's not comprehensive, but I prefer the strategy of publicly releasing the information as they have it available, even if it means it often raises more questions.

Even if they don't have the entire transition planned out, I think it was important for Mozilla to communicate their Android dev focus was gonna shift to GeckoView, from existing apps, to allow external devs, and customers to have a better plan, even if they don't have the add on strategy and timeline fully fleshed out.

The alternative is waiting a few months to know any of this was happening.
Don't take it so literally. Can you find 100 people (or a few dozen) in your circles that could be first users of your product? Start with them. If you have trouble gaining traction with those folks, you may have trouble getting others to pay for your product.

The caveat being that you have to make sure the people you're inviting fit somewhere in your customer profile. You can get discouraging feedback if your initial invitees don't fit your product.
Women have been putting them in purses instead of pants pockets for a long time. Pockets usually aren't even an option for womens' clothing.
That information is leaking anyway. Besides, a smart attacker ain't waiting for page loads, he's got scripts. It's all security theater. If a corporate customer insists on objecting, maybe you could charge them $$$ to add a special case for their domain.
What is the threat model here? How am I compromised if part of my password gets typed somewhere else?

It's already plaintext when it's typed. If there's a keylogger on my machine, they're getting the password.

If it's typed into another field, I'm really not concerned. I'm not logged in yet. So if it gets typed somewhere and submitted through a form, it may end up in a log somewhere un-associated with my username.

If the concern is that it's seen in public, this is valid, I guess, but not a concern for me. I access private services in private. Probably 90% of my computing is done in my home.
There does seem to be a certain "external things are the reason for my misery" thread through all these stories that bugs me, even though it's an interesting and well-written piece.

These patients, with the exact same circumstances, could have found some peace by accepting and working within their constraints - the 70-year old woman could accept the situation with the granddaughter and find other outlets for caretaking or being with children, or tried a legal way to address the situation, accepting the outcome whether it works or not ("I took my best shot, the rest is up to fate"). The man with PTSD could learn techniques, CBT perhaps, to cope with the anxiety triggers and expand his comfort zone in the world again, found ways to deal with his anger so it didn't turn into violence, etc.

Not saying these circumstances are easy, but everyone's life has particular challenges and avenues of growth, and in the grand scheme that's often a good thing. Everyone's life has constraints, without exception - I can't teleport instantly anywhere I want on the planet by snapping my fingers; if I spend my days lamenting that and thinking that I should, I'll be miserable.

On the one hand yes we should help each other better our external circumstances; but on the other hand I believe most external things aren't truly necessary for contentment, and indeed the belief that they are causes more misery than the circumstances.
I'm confused. What's an example of a tweet from a government official which breaks the rules but deserves to be kept up?
Do you think the CIA is still importing the stuff to fund murder campaigns or have they taken the high road now?
What about Google Analytics? They already have all my browsing history. reCAPTCHA data is not even as detailed as GA.
NASA planning final stages for mission to explore full-metal asteroid 16 Psyche
And if you’re not, registered hams make a game out of finding particularly egregious pirate stations and reporting them to the FCC.
“The Most Qualified Person” Rule
Actually, I think it's easier to remember it's always an opinion than to always be charitable. Maybe I really don't like a person and so it's very hard to be charitable in a given moment, but that person's statements are still their opinion and don't get to override my own experiences.
Speaking of piracy, I´ve heard amazing things about IPTV.
If it comes down to Chrome or Safari, I will gladly use Chrome. Safari is far too wonky for me, and whenever I tried using it, I always had bad experiences. Google might be evil-ish, but I find their ecosystem far more pleasant than Apple's. And while Google might try to collect lots of data about my online behavior, I can always use something like a Pihole or other kinds of ad-block to stop them from getting that data.
Yeah I decide to read that book and install the Docker file. The thing is I'm kind of not sure how to setup the whole thing in Linux as I also need Python, some database and gcc. I think I should be able to find some tutorials for Ubuntu.
It's also worth noting that districts useful, just not when heavily partisan. For example, if you have a city that is 51+% white, and all your council elections are at large, it is entirely possible for white voters, as a bloc, to just overrule the other 49% all the time.

This is less probable with districts because in general races are not well-mixed in American cities in terms of spatial distribution.
The solution is to have proportional voting, not ranked voting.

Ranked voting solves a specific issue: voting for a government position for which there is a single position: eg president, governor, etc
Has there ever been a platform for experts to build and share checklists and for every/any task?
Which is based on a line from Hamlet with the same reasoning ("I must be cruel only to be kind.").
>You reported it to Apple I assume?...

Why would they report that to Apple?

Serious question.

Does Google maps use data from Apple now or something?
Its pretty great that so many branches of life, at least currently, seem to be developing intelligence (mammals, birds, octopus, even some fish). I'd really be curious to know how intelligent multi-cellular species from the past were. In my mind this suggests that there is some serious selection pressure for intelligence in evolution, at least here on Earth. If pressures were similar on other planets, mammalian-level intelligence might be fairly common among multi-cellular life on other worlds.
When did this start? I used the DMV page without a google account in February with no issues, and the local DMV has no tablets as of May.
Critical. I applaud them taking leadership here. I feel like the climate of the internet has us in a nasty quagmire where these companies are find themselves in a “damned if they don’t but perhaps double-damned if they do” kind of impasse. So kudos to twitter for actually trying.

I really hope they create a system whereby the public can audit their decisions and deliberations.
I don't know what else you call it when you get supreme executive power despite a majority of the voters not wanting you to have it. I'm aware that it wasn't illegal, but it doesn't mean it's legitimate.
I know people are (rightfully) worried about centralisation on the Internet, but I still wonder how come there's virtually no "competition" to reCaptcha. Even from one of the "centralised" players.

For example, even Cloudflare, which has its own "checking your browser" protection, still uses reCaptcha in some other cases... Why doesn't Cloudflare offer a reCaptcha alternative to their customers? (a transparent one, more like reCaptcha v3 rather than the intrusive 5-second one...).
I'd suggest waiting until iOS 13 for native SMB support.
Maybe it got lost in translation, but I'm curious to what an "embedded software (?) shop" is?
Its scary how prevalent Whats App is in India. A lot of official communication happens over WhatsApp. So it makes sense to move sensitive communication over something homegrown and outside jurisdiction of foreign government. But Indian government does not have a very good track record in terms of cyber security so an actual secure implementation seems pretty far off.
> trying to create a psyop[0], or disinformation campaign, or even a sockpuppet army

That's not a viable reason. Anyone doing so is going to have a budget and human reCAPTCHA solving is less than $0.01 per CAPTCHA. It costs very little for mass account creation, reCAPTCHA or not.
Curiously enough, the only parts of the country that have ever approached anything resembling "failure" are (heavily progressive) urban areas like NYC and Detroit.
Zcretshare – a utility to securely share secrets/key materials (PGP alternative)
Sure, but obviously it’s more valuable if you give the ad access to your DOM so it can ‘optimize the ad placement’.
Sure. I was responding explicitly to concerns about multi-page login workflows breaking password managers. My response is about using a password manager that can support these login workflows.

The layman is not concerned with the issue I was responding to. I agree with you that the login forms should be better. But I am making a point that "it breaks my password manager" can be answered with "get a better password manager, or learn better how to use yours."
https://www.failory.com/interview-failure collects stories of such startups.
That too could be isolated to a single reCAPTCHA session, keeping within the scope of a single iframe or page load.

The idea of tracking your history across multiple reCAPTCHA loads across multiple domains to build a user profile is what sounds like a giant privacy red flag, even though it's entirely possible given the current implementation.

Additionally asking hosts to include JS directly onto their domain which sets 3rd party cookies/data across every page in addition to tracking referring domains is equally a bad idea. reCAPTCHA 2/3 does require loading 3rd party JS directly on page, which I'd imagine is necessary to create callbacks in the frontend upon verification (as iframe content messaging is very awkward):

https://developers.google.com/recaptcha/docs/v3

Ideally the JS simply loads an iframe of the captcha HTML and handles the callbacks from events in the iframe. That's it. It shouldn't be touching anything else on your website. I'd be curious to see a reverse engineering to see how much the JS really does...
They said they were "currently" finalising their transition plans in February, so I think it's reasonable to assume that the plans have been finalised by now.
Any tweet from Trump which actively bullies his political opponents through name calling can probably be considered a violation of Twitter terms.
>When a Tweet has this notice placed on it, it will feature less prominently on Twitter, and not appear in:

>Safe search
>Timeline when switched to Top Tweets
>Live events pages
>Recommended Tweet push notifications
>Notifications tab
>Explore

Getting out in front of the 2020 election, I see. Better conform to Twitter's code of conduct if you want to maximize reach!

Edit: Good time to get to know who will be making the decisions on throttling exposure- do not cross these groups! https://about.twitter.com/en_us/safety/safety-partners.html
Randomized SQL Testing in CockroachDB