skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you've got a case bad enough to cause mysterious problems, it's a very bad idea to "just nuke it". Firstly, die-off reactions are a concern. Secondly, the treatment can be very serious (i.v. antibiotics in many cases). Thirdly, antibiotics are not really healthy, though not horribly. However, with the growing body of research surrounding the issue of gut health and its impacts, I'm not sure I'd want to take antibiotics without being sure.

With respect to false positives/negatives, use the igenex test. If you get a good doctor, he'll know how to interpret the results better; you can have high results in certain bands which the CDC does not usually consider relevant but which can still be indicative.

All that aside, no responsible doc "just gives you the drugs". Let's not forget there are a thousand things it could be; just giving the drugs for all would probably kill you. Also, that's how we end up with resistant bacteria.
It won't require a warrant because you were beating your heart in public.
> Customers do not prefer it, it was not popular, otherwise we would still see that form factor.

Customers loved iPhone SE, both because it was cheap and because of its size.
The only benefit I’ve ever found of a small phone is that it fits better in a pocket. The things I do one-handed on a phone are already well provided for; mostly just scrolling and swiping. For most activities I’m two-handing my phone anyway, and a larger phone makes that easier and faster.

When using the phone as, well, a phone, I find smaller phones annoying. I’m never quite sure if the mic can pick up my voice if the earpiece is near my ear. I’m also much more likely to drop the smaller phone.

I’ve been this way for a long time. An early phone of mine was the LG Env which opened up and had a large-for-the-time QWERTY keyboard. It required two hands even way back in 200x.

I doubt that I’m representative of the average person in this regard. But I doubt you are either. I suspect for most people one-handedness is a desirable trait in a phone, but not as strongly desirable in the average person as it appears to be for you, so it just gets eaten by trade offs.
Here's the actual press release from Duke. It has a little more information on the technology, though it's still not super detailed.

https://news.duke-energy.com/releases/duke-energy-renewables...
You're talking about changes that would cause the plane to be a very different plane than the 1967 737, and would then need a new type rating. If you're going to do that, you might as well just throw out the 737 design altogether and make an all-new clean-sheet design. Boeing wanted to avoid that because that costs a lot more money and pilots would need retraining on the new type. They wanted to be able to call this piece of junk a "737" and claim that pilots didn't need any new training to fly it.
Yup, i skip, and often flag any twitter link and come to the comments. Unreadable and not a valid source for tech news imho. Its literally people screaming on digital streetcorners.
I mean, the fact that you can get banned on TD immediately for commenting anything even remotely critical of the president suggests that it is very unlikely that TD "isn't any more toxic than other political subs on reddit." There were entire threads in TD calling for violent intervention in Oregon; similar posts are not found in any of the other political subs. Even in response to the quarantine, there are plenty of comments suggesting violent revolution.

This claim that "other subs are just as toxic" seems to be a common refrain among TD supporters (as well as white nationalist hate subs). Do you have any evidence to support this?
you should see the futuristic landscape of wind turbines in scotland set against dramatic rural landscapes with ancient farm walls and hedges, a sight to behold
Would they have known about the wiggle room without opening the safe, though? I figured they found this out after inspecting the lock once the safe was open. So if they didn't know about this wiggle room -- or know what amount of wiggle was allowed -- could they have benefited in any way?
After many rounds, you expect to see half heads and half tails. In that case your outcome at n rounds would be around 1.5^n/2 * 0.6^n/2 = 0.9^n/2 which trends towards zero.

You would need around 26% more heads than tails just break even (0.6*(1.5^1.26)=1). But even if you were lucky at first, you will always "regress toward the means" in terms of head to tails ratio if you kept playing.
> I don't get it! My hands are probably bigger than 95% of all humans, and I don't think a phone needs to be much bigger than the SE.

I believe bigger phones are first computers for a lot of people, and they never graduate to owning a PC.
But then they would have to deal with it.
Funnily enough the SE my friends have is the exact reason I always test mobile CSS on the Chrome iPhone SE simulation, since if it fits that screen, it will probably fit the others as well.
Well, isn't the reason simply the timelag? The iPhone 6–8 are mid-lifecycle, the larger ones are relatively new, and the smaller ones rather at the end of their life cycle? After all iPhones seem to have a 5+ year lifespan [0]. Also the larger X phones come with a crazy price tag.

[0] https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12806
Yes, this is all too real to me. What is really scary though, is just how much support the idea of autonomous weapons has in the military-industrial sector - it seems that everyone is working on similar programs.

The most shocking angle of all, is how willing people are to build this technology - like, the cool factor overrides any moral or ethical issues, and even bringing up a question of ethics around these technologies will get you segregated from the 'cool hunter' classes...
The author is assuming independence in each of these events, and I highly doubt that, eg,

P(depressed | on food stamps) == P(depressed)
I'm a native speaker and I get it wrong all the time.
In the larger scale type of manufacturing I'm working with, those small bots tend to have trade-offs that mean they're not really worth choosing over a larger, more traditional manufacturing robot, or a solution without robotics at all. Mounting difficulties, lack of range of movement, and lack of robustness being the core issues. In most scenarios, you're better off avoiding robots and going for something statically mounted. Failing that, choosing a Kawasaki model that's been in production the last 30 years. Then you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's going to run for the next decade without a hitch. You can find operators with experience relatively cheap. Every imaginable mounting head exists and has been in production long enough to know the issues you're going to face with it.

The big robot will survive in large scale manufacturing for the same reason Java survives in enterprise; it's part of the culture at this point. It does its job well, it hardly ever fails, and it's relatively easy to bring someone up to speed on working with them. Like Java, you'll probably see a number of companies pop up that prefer a newer technology, because it fits their use case well. But I'd expect the bulk of total money spent to continue to be on the kinds of industrial robots we work with now.

The place I can see small robots making an impact is knowledge work, such as laboratories or design. And realistically, in those fields we've never been time constrained. It's more common, in my experience, that the limiting factor is the number of good ideas a person can come up with. There's no way to reduce "hours formulating an idea" short of AGI. Scientists have to read papers, designers have to study a company or product to make all of the branding coherent.

All of that said, the newer, low cost bots will probably move the needle, but they won't accelerate the pace of automation significantly. More likely, they'll contribute to maintaining the current acceleration.
Having to use a seatbelt or helmet doesn't prevent you from going to any place you want to go.

Not being able to install any software you want on a device you own is not a small inconvenience cost, it is a great artificial limitation meant to take control away from the user and put the user at the mercy of the vendor who can then use it for other user hostile actions (e.g. forced obsolescence, a common tactic in the example of gaming consoles brought before).

And especially in this case, any "better" outcome is really small and short term (the user being unable to do much with their own device means they are also unable to install unwanted software) whereas the larger picture outcome is user hostile - a gradual loss of control and ownership to the goods you are paying for.
Its also bad for perception of the aviation industry if people die from faulty hardware. Many people don't like to fly already because they don't feel safe. These type of incidents don't help calm those fears.
Heh, what were you doing back then? The Nokia 9210 and its successors were the status symbol for most of early 00s.

The Ericsson T66 was the smallest phone for quite a while, but few people actually liked it.
I like the idea. Third voice was fun for a while.

Are the iframes opt-in per domain? If not, how do you deal with leaking internal DNS names (referers) from within companies and government organizations? I don't see a referer policy [1]

Does your addon respect CSP policies? I assume the browser would enforce this, if iframes are not permitted.

[1] - https://securityheaders.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fcomntr.github.i...

The domain mentioned in the README is not up.
Ironic that the first paragraph or so of that article was unreadable because of overlying ads.
Im not sure I agree with your rather chatitable interpretation of most twitter users. Most seem firmly in the void shouting camp to me.
Streaming TV is about to get expensive – here's why
> Expected more from Quanta Magazine...

You won't if you keep reading them.
I brute-forced a 32-bit random number generator in an internet worm, back in the day[1]. Brute force is underrated.

[1] http://www.icir.org/vern/papers/witty-imc05.pdf
Coinbase rende disponibile il supporto Lightning Network
Ask HN: UX research about API onboarding
I'm a UX researcher working in the transportation industry. My company is working on making a series of APIs available to its customers and we'd like to gather some insights from the community about what developers consider to be a good experience in terms of onboarding API services (from browsing an API portal to signing up and making your first API call).

If you care to expand on all (or any) of the following topics, it'd be very appreciated:

1 - Awareness and discoverability

2 - API portal content
(e.g. documentation, API offering catalog)

3 - Registration and authentication processes

4 - API account management
(e.g. keys, users, teams)

5 - Sandbox
(thoughts on open vs. closed access sandbox/testing environments)

6 - App authorization
(e.g. when a second layer of authorization is necessary for production/go-live)

7 - Support

8 - Status and Errors
(e.g. how outages are communicated, changelogs, versioning)
Literally the "hot comments" pattern ;)
Thanks! How do I download it from there? So unclear :)
Not Selling Up
AOT has always been an option on .NET, even if until Windows 8 it lacked some love.

Additionally it has been available in Mono and other runtimes as well.
I had an iPhone 6 for awhile, and though I could manage it with one hand, I found it hurt my thumb a bit more, it was harder to grip with the round edges, and bigger in my pocket.
Capital in the economic sense is not just dollars, it includes buildings and trucks and cranes and agricultural tractors.

The minute you overspecify a law to apply only to some products you are creating opportunities for loopholes. See this classic story about vans vs cars, and import taxes:
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45875405

Is a John Deere tractor a robot? What about a roomba? A 3d printer? What about a disassembled robot? The wheels of a robot? How do you define robot?

What do you tax, the purchase of a robot? The use? The ownership?

There are very tricky questions that try to fix an artificial problem. Tax the company or the person behind x, be x a robot, a field, or a brand that generates money (or not, if you are against taxes). This is not a new problem.
At 2.15pm today, the UK was importing ~11% via it's euro interconnects (biggest 3.8% from the Netherlands). It of course varies depending on demand and weather, and sometimes we export back to the continent.

According to [1], the UK imported ~6% in total in 2018 :

[1] https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-uk-electricity-generati...
Sure, which implies the money I store in the bank is debit they owe me. But worded that way I might be induced to think I deserve some kind of interest payment...
The report itself (skip National Review's explainer, since their writers and editors are the worst people in the entire world) is here:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5a70a7c3010027736a227...

At first blush the paper itself doesn't look very interesting. Everything in the paper hinges on its use of the term "extreme views," which in their usage is about perception and has nothing to do with the objective reality of what constitutes an extreme view (pp. 56-67).
It is the same story over and over again. Yes, for a business running a website of any sorts, it is easy money just to include ads from an independant (from you) ad provider. By just signing up and including the necessary scripts into your web site, the money keeps coming without any further effort necessary. This is also the reason, we have so many new web sites popping up - just by attracting traffic you can make money.

But the downside - at least for any legitimate business like newspapers - is, that you are selling out your estate to someone you do not control. And as experience shows, the ad providers mostly don't deserve the trust which they are given. As a consequence, ad blocking more and more becomes an act of self-defense.

What is needed is the return of running ads like printed magazines did - the inclusion of the ads needs to be part of the editing process and curated by the publication. They need to take up full responsibility and liability for the ads they serve. And as a consequence, ads might be actually get looked at again. Personally, I am much more likely to look at a printed ad and usually it is much more relevant than the "targetted" crap we get to see on the web.
(Re: micropayments) Sigh... Flattr seemed so promising back in 2011.
You don't have to use the schema of schema.org. You can provide your own semantics (and build on pre-existing ones, like schema.org). The point is that you can provide information that is human readable and machine-processable (either through HTML or formats like JSON-LD).
No one used to whip out a newspaper in the middle of the checkout line or for those thirty seconds in the elevator.
A smaller phone is less expensive to buy. A smaller phone gets mishandled and dropped less often. Moreover, a smaller phone is less expensive to repair when that happens.
Not an EE by any stretch, but I've always thought this was the primary reason.
I find it funny that so often so many commenters on "Hacker" News are terrified of breaking the rules... Also, there's plenty of world outside of USA.
This comment is being written from the ThinkPad A485 that's been assigned to me from my employer. It too is amazingly serviceable, as many ThinkPads have built a reputation for upholding. I have grown accustom to only considering ThinkPads when eyeing a new laptop.

Another corporate laptop I have had the joy of using is the HP EliteBook 840 G3, which is a predecessor of these devices inspected by iFixit. Like the ThinkPad's TrackPoint, it has a PointStick which is nearly as usable. Opening the device up reminds me a lot of my personal ThinkPad T460S.

Going forward, it's exciting to know that reparable laptops are not exclusive to one vendor.

Also, props to Dell, who's recent Latitude laptops are still compatible with old docks sporting a serial port - don't know of any other vendors making those.
Also in medicine, it's often not the practitioner who suffers the consequences, which even if we ignore the moral aspects, means the feedback loop isn't closed tightly, making learning more difficult.
‘I turned a side hustle into millions'
About a year ago, I was waiting in line at Dollar Tree (guilty pleasure), and I had to wait almost a half-hour in line. Even though there were two cashiers, they were constantly communicating back and forth, introducing a constant blocking factor and effectively reducing it one queue, and I was trying to think about how to model this with pi-calculus while I was waiting.

Obviously there's a math for basically anything, but reading this makes me glad I'm not the only one who has thought about this. This article has given me some reading fodder for this weekend...thanks!
Maybe you're right, but your comment is less helpful or interesting to other readers than GP's however few citations it has.

> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

> Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
The problem was that because it was an unknown component its failure mode was not known, which created/exacerbated the panic.

There is a simple procedure, which is already part of the standard memory checklists. What to do in case of runaway trim. The pilots must/should be able to notice the trim wheels spinning, they then can disable trim motors and fall back to manually cranking them.

The problem is, panic makes a mess of almost anybody. Sure, pilots shouldn't be anybody, but we know how much cost cutting has been going on.
AWK is such an amazing tool
It's remarkable to me that anyone would argue Apple, of all design firms, is swayed by mere consumer opinion.
The moment when a Wight burst in your cluster of archers in Myth, and the game voice just said “casualties”.

The butcher in Diablo 1, filled with a room of dismembered corpses.
I'd like to see the European and Chinese aviation authorities put a hard stop to these non-solutions if the FAA doesn't. At this point, I don't think the FAA is at all trustworthy; they've proven themselves untrustworthy with the way they handled the certification of this turkey and how they were literally the last aviation authority in the world to ground the plane.
2019 Status of the Social Security and Medicare Programs
Haven't seen that much constructive examples of applied CoCs to be honest. But I agree, non-news.
Using a 6.7" phone now (S10 5G), with size L hands (when buying bike gloves) it's surprising how fine it is to use one handed in general. For typing I do need two hands, but the same was the case for my older smaller phones.

I do love the real estate the 6.7" provides me, and am quickly getting used to this as the new standard for myself going forward.
another iPhone SE user here.
I've got it after my Nexus 5X died the first time and I had sometime with a friend's backup iPhone 5.

I really wish to see iPhone SE2 with X like screen keeping same dimensions for my hands. :)

To be honest, I didn't find larger device more productive and usually when reading something I end up going on some Tablet or my laptop. but maybe that's just me...

> I'd imagine that this will only accelerate once the SE is the only 4" screen left.

one note though. Apple released new iPod Touch. so there's currently an active 4" product in the iOS eco-system.
Ahh, Yes, the European way, lose money on whatever they touch and make it up with executive bonuses...
What drove Vitalik Buterin to decentralization (according to his dad)
If you are in RF, you may well be already using "cornerless" smooth traces. Google "topological router"
Samsung S10e and others from: https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2018&nHeightM...
Right now we assume that the Price of the Item includes the taxes ... therefore we haven't added taxes in the end-user bill. We add delivery fee and market fee and calculate the Net-Payable.

But as you say ... if its needed we can add taxes ... in the bill ... and its not so much difficult to integrate that ...

I will be glad to see more contributions to the project ... i believe one of the best advantages of open-source is that people can share and collaborate openly !
New Rules, New Politics: How a revolution in economics has changed politics
Being non-profit does not somehow protect companies or their customers from making bad decisions. For instance Mozilla lately has been trying to take a position on privacy. They do this at the same time that they direct their users to Google search by default which is about as anti-privacy as you could possibly get. The reason is because they make a ton of money doing it.

Other recent bad decisions from them would include the decision to forcefully install a Mr. Robot related promo into the browser. And now most recently they plan to transition to a freemium model for FireFox where the regular FireFox will be free but "premium" features will now require a monthly fee. If you find these behaviors to those of a company who put mission ahead of profit, then we will have to simply agree to disagree.
Just take a look at https://gab.com/popular and you can make your judgement in less than a minute.
I suspect this has a lot to do with older phones becoming available on MVNOs in the <$300 range.
Here's one of my opinions: Everything anyone ever says is their own opinion based on their own experiences.

Here's another: We'd all be better off if we held the opinion above, and remembered it when assessing what people say. We'd be able to interpret statements like "Contributing to OSS is awesome!" as "In my own experience, contributing to OSS has been awesome", where such an interpretation doesn't erase or override one's own opinions and experiences. Not saying this is easy to do, just that it is beneficial.
> "For the past six or seven years, there was this slow realization that he was becoming forgetful. It was apparent," Gantry said. "For the past six or seven years, there was this slow realization that he was becoming forgetful. It was apparent."

I can't tell if this is a subtle joke or an egregious editing failure.
ok, should i say something like: i would like to see evidence of this outrageous statement?
This is resume padding and a red flag.

The right tool for the right job AND shop, or you end up with a major maintenance nightmare.
California was Mexico less than 200 years ago
I didn't play much of it because it was so horrifying. The way your character struggled and bled as he died was too much for me to deal with.
Download the community version of Delphi or Eiffel.

Then check their compile times, language features vs Go.

Or even better, get Turbo Pascal 7 for MS-DOS and run it on DosBox.

It is only impressive for developers that never used such languages.
This https://www.whoisxmlapi.com/whois-database-download.php is a start, but there's new ones every second so you're going to need to update a lot.

I think it's not possible as domains don't have to be registered necessarily - a server can serve a domain at a particular IP so long as the requesting client uses a domain that the server responds to.

Obviously if it's registered domains then you can in theory just get the list from the registrar. They probably sell the full list for a price.

I imagine you can harvest a list with sufficient resources.
I also have bigger hands than just about everybody down here in SE Asia (I'm from the Anglosphere) and I prefer the iPhone SE/4" form factor.

I think Jobs was onto something when he insisted that users should be able to operate the device with one hand, meaning able to reach all the icons on the screen with their thumb.
There is a post published on Jordan's blog covering this, might be easier to read (no Facebook login nag): https://www.jordanmechner.com/prince-of-persia-30th-annivers...