skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly. The praetorian guard become the real emperor of Rome or the Shogun exiles the emperor to play ceremonial roles in Kyoto. Except in this case without the need to maintain a popular figure of divine mandate for public purposes, the guards just shoot the former billionaires. In the end there is no hedge against death or total societal breakdown no matter how rich you are.
Wait but I just mean the terminal could also be the ssh/winrm connection manager. I'm guessing that could maybe be done in the settings too I suppose.

It would still be OpenSSH under the hood.
Java also has no mfence or clflush support, so crypto.zero would never be secure. It might overwrite the key in the store buffer only, but not on the heap immediately, so prone to sidechannel attacks.
Having seen the inside of both good and bad product organizations, culture beats process any day of the week. Get the core values right, hire smart people and everything will fall into place.

A corollary is that cargo-culting well-developed processes generally means you’re copying from a company with a culture that couldn’t address those functions organically. So you may actually just be lifting an over-engineered process designed to address a cultural weakness at the original company.
Not that it makes a moral difference, but the victims aren't all hardened criminals. They are political dissidents, people who follow the wrong religion, and racial minorities.

Most of the greatest mass atrocities in world history have been framed as a "tradeoff". Destroying some lives to save others isn't a functioning society, it's a living nightmare.
Harvested Alive (2017):
https://www.reddit.com/r/Documentaries/comments/akbaxf/harve...
The statistics for this paper are pretty straight forward. The sample size is small, so recovering a significant effect with frequentist hypothesis tests like MANOVA with 30 samples is challenging. However, the authors went to great lengths to filter out subjects with confounding factors. So even though the final sample size is small, it's intentionlly focused on the main effects of the study.
I would be most curious for the cite myself!
At least in medicine, there's a useful distinction between "statistically significant" (the math says that this drug works) and "clinically significant" (this might actually be worth giving to patients).
Well the guidelines also say not to post shallow dismissals...
Yes it absolutely should be if the original is highly cited on an ongoing basis.

For you to dismiss the fake news that this Science journal article generated, combined with the justifications of ignoring or dismissing arguments by all conservatives as essentially a scientifically proven mental disability is astounding.
A strange thought: maybe the somewhat-global trend among Western powers toward political parties attempting to foment a climate of populist nationalism, is really an attempt to make people more willing to sacrifice profit margins to move manufacturing “back home”, such that China can actually be faced on level ground.

I feel like our politicians have maybe decided that voters are too smart for a sudden switch to “China bad, Chinese people bad, hate them, cut ties with them” rhetoric (as has usually historically happened in the run-up to a declaration of war), so instead they’ve just dropped the specific context of who is supposed to be bad, and are kind of vague-polemic-ing about all foreigners instead, in the hopes that that’ll stir up at least some of the same effects that historical politicians were taking advantage of.
You really shouldn't use WebMD as a primary source for anything.

They are a content farm owned by Internet Brands and their only focus is creating content as vehicles for pharmaceutical and consumer packaged goods advertisements.
What has this got to do with 1984? I don't remember anything about forced organ transplants in there.
Legal system was put in place to prevent mob rule. Internet has again enabled mobs to go around and freely harrass, bully and target individuals in order to enforce their own ideals, instead of what is written in the law.

What makes someone upset is not the same what is unjust.
As a driver developer, I've been on the receiving end of stuff breaking due to changes in macOS many a time. Based on my experience, I find it much more likely that Apple simply does not care about this problem/does not consider it a problem. By that I mean they are not willing to assign developer resources to the situation because from their point of view it is not a supported configuration, plain and simple. The fact that it ever worked is largely accidental as far as they are concerned.

One of their highest priorities at the moment appears to be to remove any 3rd party code running in the context of Apple processes. For examples, you don't need to look far: kext -> DriverKit/System Extension transition, hardened runtime, etc. The Nvidia driver breaking is just a consequence of that increasing lockdown. The simplest solution would be to allow nvidia's code to run in the context of core system and user processes again (kernel, WindowServer, just about any GUI app) which presumably is not palatable to them or they wouldn't have made the change in the first place. The alternative would be to farm this type of driver out into a sandboxed user process. (Nowadays this means DriverKit.) Aside from potential performance issues, this would be a lot of work, so it's probably never going to happen unless literally millions of end users start complaining.
It creates an incentive to hand out death sentences instead of lesser more appropriate punishments.
While I'd imagine you'd ignore U.S. abuses and provocations, (Iran?), I imagine? Is China worse than Saudi Arabia for example? Because I can't imagine U.S. speaking strongly against KSA, can you?

The U.S. doesn't really care about human rights, or its own abuse of them, (was any top official prosecuted for Iraq?), so you'd be voting for posturing.
Surely “sift” would’ve been a better anogram?

“Search (and) index full text”
Probably worth looking into this existing project: https://github.com/etcet/HNES
This is mitigation up until total collapse.
Because it creates a conflict of interest in the state. Similarly we don't let the state employ prisoners in any sort of for profit endeavor.

Back in the day the British had prisoners move large rocks from one side of the prison yard to the other and then back again. That's brutish but there some logic behind it to keep the state from enjoying the activity.
They make stuff cheaply.
Some countries implement an opt-out system. If you do not want your body to be reused after you die, you have to declare it in advance.

This is hugely beneficial for patients.

Now, even this hugely emotional article does not talk about murder.
It corrupts the “justice” system even more by giving an incentive to sentence the suspect to death as opposed to just prison time.

Of course, the death penalty itself is IMO immoral and I do not support it, but these are separate issues. The death penalty being there is one thing but at least nobody is benefiting from it being used. Harvesting organs from its victims changes that.
They're holding people in camps for extended periods. It appears (at least from what I've read) that they're really only murdering them for the organs, not because they were going to kill them. Keeping people imprisoned for no-crime is wrong, but not as bad as killing them, and is fairly proportional to the length of confinement, too. Thus, it is reasonable to specifically protest the organ-harvesting.
To avoid cherry-picking, it should go back to the formation of the Earth.
I don’t think the harvesting alone is the main issue. I think it’s the (perceived or real) systemic abuse, e.g. the quantity. Especially if you consider, according to the article, they also have an organ donation registry. You just can’t disconnect the two issues here, they’re inextricably linked.
Or should even be considered "a practice" at all for that matter.
This is a controversial subject. It is important to get information from sources that have rigorous fact-checking and a reputation to defend.
I'm not sure sure why this is news... I'm trying to recall a Corona commercial that doesn't have supermodels in bikinis ruining around on a beach.
And this wasn’t enough already?

Tiananmen Square protest death toll was 10,000:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-42465516

>"Students linked arms but were mown down including soldiers. APCs then ran over bodies time and time again to make 'pie' and remains collected by bulldozer. Remains incinerated and then hosed down drains.
"Four wounded girl students begged for their lives but were bayoneted."
Honestly, if we were even going to begin to entertain any notions even slightly related to this, I'd want to suggest that if we insist on having the death penalty as a punishment, then those who are put to death should, if suitable, become automatic organ donors.
This is an interesting interview with a well known CCP critic that discusses the history of this program and a bunch of other minimally discussed things.

I would encourage people to take the time to watch this.

https://youtu.be/nxyVZh_fVVw
This is kind of how I feel about Windows 95. I remember when there was only DOS, and then Windows 3 came out, and then Windows 95 which seemed like the very perfection of UI. Since then it seems to have gone downhill. Not very many true innovations, which is partly why I started experimenting with desktop Linux and finally switched to Mac OS X 10.4, because it felt like the final evolution of the desktop. Nowadays, nothing seems quite ideal, but Win95/98 will always seem like the epitome of desktop UI, the perfect union of form and function. Probably just nostalgia and rose colored glasses though in all honesty.
That's partly my fault. Evan focuses on more technical sides of things but there are people in the team that focus more on the community aspect and we didn't catch that potential naming issue and the whole message that the RFC gives away.

We're all still learning how to work with the RFC documents. We want them to be an important tool for the community but initially, the response from the community was very low. Paradoxically this whole situation made the wider community aware of those RFC documents so hopefully it will go in a good direction. But that initial low response made us believe "oh we have time to sort out things like the phrasing". Turned out it was wrong.

The advice to change the names came from the community and it was a good one. It got support in the core team internal channels and got implemented.
indeed, it was a fine movie, good action, drama and all that. not hard science-fiction, and i don't remember learning anything new either. but my hope is that the commercial success of the movie will attract more chinese science-fiction, so that this won't be the pinnacle of what chinese science-fiction films can achieve, but only the beginning.
Keras – Hyperparameter Tuning for Humans
Also the "we can get you organs in a day, give us the specific requirements..." is a pretty serious red flag even if there's a high normal donation rate.
Leisure Suit Larry and Loom have already been covered. He's working roughly in chronological order.
Why is no-one making the "free speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences" argument in response to small(er) businesses being afraid to criticize oligopolies?
It’s one thing to harvest organs if the patient dies of accidents/natural causes, and personally I am in favour of the opt-out system.

It’s a whole other thing of killing the patient on purpose to harvest their organs.
No, you're not allowed to question.

You're required to question!

-At least if you actually want to derive any benefit from the process.

Science is most assuredly a "use your (own) brain" kind of endeavor. ;-)
Or the UK, where the reactor graphite has lots of cracks, but people need power and jobs, so now they're trying to relax the safety limit, you couldn't make this stuff up:

> EDF plans to ask the regulator for permission to restart with a new operational limit of up to 700 cracks.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-47485321
I'm not quite sure what you're saying. Are you arguing that, because some republicans bandy about the term socialism in loose and pejorative ways, that therefore we should feel bound to that definition of Socialism? That seems like a strange argument to make.

Why exactly do you want people to 'come at you'?
Honestly it takes 1984 a step further. We can’t say because they are harvesting organs it doesn’t have the same themes as 1984. This is terrifying.
> Why do we consider it ethical for a state to execute prisoners, but consider harvesting their (now useless) organs to save more lives is ethically abhorrent?

I don't know if the following moral argument would pursuade most people, but I think it does work if you accept it is ethical for the state to execute people in the first place.

It is wrong because the state now derives a material benefit from harvesting the prisoner's organs. This treats the prisoner as an means rather than an end in themselves. This is a bad thing in itself for someone who subscribes to Immanuel Kant's view of morality (or something like it). But it is, in addition, something of a hazard in providing the government with an incentive beyond justice itself to kill people.

The death penalty is still moral in this framework because it is meted out to people who have themselves murdered others, and thus decided that the law to which they hold themselves permits killing, and it is therefore appropriate for the state to treat them as reasonable beings, which means treating them according to their own moral law. (this is a terrible explanation, but I hope it is a good first step. I can try and reply more later if you ask questions.).

The death penalty is not permissible for whatever crime however, only specific ones.
This is a phrasing issue. In the team we use the compatibility word all the time in the "it's a good feature proposal but what about compatibility" context. For us this word had a positive conotation and we missed the fact that it can be treated in a different way. That's a good lesson for the future.
Light interaction is physical reaction of photons with electrons and it depends on how the electron cloud is distributed. All the vibrations and complex geometries make it really hard to calculate exact solutions.

Even that is not always enough. Gold has appears yellow because 5d orbital's distance from nucleus increases and 6s orbital's distance decreases due to relativistic effects. You need relativistic quantum chemistry to figure that out.
It's a point of view that makes no sense. Murdering one person to save another is not "noble". It negates the entire point of "human rights" in the first place.

You might as well suggest that people who need organs should be able to kill a random person on the street to get them.
Apple’s team that greenlights iPhone apps for the App Store
Budapest Convention Offers an Opportunity for Modernizing Crimes in Cyberspace
Similar to this map?

https://ss2.climatecentral.org
Looks like a very shallow article that hasn't actually solved the meat of the problems. Am I reading it wrong?
Out of curiosity - Which database is this? and is it really taboo to have views joining against multiple other views?

If the underlying views were performant- I'd assume the query optimizer would do the right thing(at least 90% of the time).

EDIT: I guess it depends - Just did more research and found this [1]. As long as the views don't do unnecessary heavy lifting or joining unnecessary tables, it should be fine.

[1] https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/151169/are-views-har...
See, this is pretty typical of how the Chinese are told about their own government’s abuses in schools and media: “but what about the other guy?!”.

It’s just not a valid argument. It serves only to change the topic and justify nationalism.
A small whale. Less than half the length of a blue whale, and less than 1% the mass.
This is clearly a side branch, but I'll bite. Can you point to historical real world examples?
Nah that's totally ridiculous. Death is as serious a punishment as possible and can never be appealed once delivered, there should never be any incentives to deliver the death sentence besides seeing that justice is done.
I don't know if this is true. Most simple animals are very curious.

If it doesn't move => go check it out.
"U.S. abuses and provocations, (Iran?)," - this is a two sided coin.
Thanks for that, I wasn't aware of their background, or that it was Muller that vocally "broke the hockey stick" then ended up proving it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Earth
I grew up in Sweden with extensive Freedom to roam rights where you can visit all the forest and lakes. But my view has gone in the opposite direction, as someone who loves being in nature I thought the idea was wonderful and I have spent so much time in nature picking mushrooms and nuts. It has been great for me and I respect nature and try to leave it as I found it.

Unfortunately I can't say the same for other people. I just keep seeing more and more trash around pretty lakes because people got there and have a party and just leave all the trash. I found piles of junk in the forest just to learn that people just dump it there because it's easy and free. The problem is that it's basically impossible to enforce the Freedom to roam rules about not leaving trash or cutting down trees and so on. Basically it is just free for all to dump trash and behave like people want because of the lack of enforcement.

At this point I really wish to own a forest but not in Sweden, I want to own it in a country where I have real property right were I can people away from it because I don't want them to ruin it. Sure I don't need 100,000 of acres but I still want to own forest and be able to keep people from using it without permission.
Or, y’know, they might serve everyone else client-side code, but serve one particular user server-side code. (Sort of like the hypothetical NSA Windows Update attack.)

This is why most crypto web-apps have a browser-extension form; you can check in your browser extension list to verify which version of the extension you have, and so know that it’s safe if someone you trust has already audited that version.
Sometimes the only correct response is to cry ... but when you stop, make what you do count. You may not have the power to change the original situation but you can always make someone's day at least a little bit better.
What was your requirements for the last few elections?
Hollidays are exactly to profit from being away from work.
Hmm, no, that is convincing. Especially since the state now has an incentive to kill someone, I guess that would open up a whole can of worms.
That's true, thanks for the counterpoint.
a good starting point to get into chinese science-fiction is clarkesworld ( http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/ ), which, since a few years is publishing a translated chinese story every month. (and just recently they also added translations from korean too)
For starters, we don’t all consider it ethical for a state to execute prisoners.

One thing the U.S. could do would be to end capital punishment in our own country. Bluntly, it would have all the moral leadership of sanctions and none of the economic impact.
Should we do an exercise in how much knowing how to write compilers helps in the day to day life of your average SAAS CRUD developer or bespoke app developer - my original statement?
With Vue 3 we're introducing tree-shaking of individual Vue features which will get rid of unwanted

The "production" build will ship with the stuff that particular project uses. That means both what they use in their codebase and what Vue uses internally to handle that code.

But there also has to be a way for Vue to understand what the user wants to be in the bundle. This is easier for the users who use the new syntax, where the individual features are explicitly imported.
How about the BBC, is that good enough?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-asia-china-45474277/uigh...
> "I don't know what text it was, and when I got back I just deleted everything off my phone."

Seems fishy. If I had been wrongly accused, you better believe I'd be taking screenshots and backing up those screenshots in multiple places.
> Similarly we don't let the state employ prisoners in any sort of for profit endeavor.

Doesn't the US have prisoners working for well under a dollar an hour in places?
Yes, believing false knowledge is unsettling. But it's unlikely the results in question were that momentous that they stayed with people outside the field. If the results were that, impactful the refuting article would belong in Science.
As an old(?) person who does everything by the book in C++, I couldn't really relate to it.

At least at my company it's hard to get hired to a programming position on soft skills alone. I've interviewed some very nice people who ended up not getting hired due to trouble whiteboarding.

As far as I can tell no one I work with is a an influencer on insta-twit. Some coworkers are better than others, but on the whole they all know the front end of a for loop from the back and are willing to learn.

And I end up spending way more time not writing code than writing it.
I'm thinking the politicians from anyplace that would be a problem are strongly disincentivized from making any such law. If a guy owns a big enough tract, then that's potential for a huge roads project to go around that tract. Roads projects mean money and jobs, lots of the former and lots, and lots of the latter. Jobs tends to mean votes. Especially in rural areas.

If anyone can just go through the land anyway, all of a sudden there is no need for any projects. At least no big one.

But maybe I'm just being cynical.
The point isn't the women. You're right, women's bodies are effective tools for selling stuff. That's not news.

The point is that these women are being hired effectively as paid advertisers for products that are not allowed to be advertised on the platform.

Now, you can argue about whether those restrictions are good or not. But nonetheless Facebook/Instagram and Twitter won't take money for "gun ads". Yet they are running what are quite clearly gun ads anyway.
I think the OP was merely opining that they'd rather see this, than people dying for pure profit motive. I know that, were I provided a choice between killing someone for forced organ donation that could potentially save lives, versus killing someone for greed, profit, or punishment, with no way to say "no", I'd choose the former. Making it clear, however, that I'd rather never have to make that choice in the first place.
In my very brief experience, I find APL easier to read than J (although J looks more interesting feature-wise). Maybe the symbols help after all.
There are lots of studies[1] by various groups that say Windows defender is just as good and alternative AV is no longer needed. I also recall seeing that non Windows defender AV's cause significant performs problems although I can't find a reference.

[1]https://www.maketecheasier.com/is-windows-defender-good-enou...
Ok, so can you say the results? Spent a couple minutes reading and still have no idea what they are trying to say.
My point wasn’t so much about whether it’s right or wrong for private landowners to own that much land. It’s that the western continental US is really big (and empty) as compared to Cyprus or Israel.
A psychopath might say the consequences are acceptable or ok so it's still subjective
Mimalloc – A compact general-purpose allocator
At least several thousand people are executed in China annually. Can their bodies be used?