skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hagoromo actually solved that problem too, it's thicker and so doesn't resonate at that ear-piercing frequency.
I've taken to Muji pens, 0.38mm. I love the finer point to them--hard to find anything smaller than 0.5mm in the US.
Why not have both? Still allow users to submit their own listings but (like twitter/Instagram) have an additional verification process which gives business a "blue tick" if verified.
> I can't for the life of me find the same quality uni ball pens anywhere in the US or online.

Here's the mother lode: https://www.jetpens.com/

Reviews: https://www.jetpens.com/reviews
I do agree it will be a shit show when the big one hits. Don’t rely on earthquake insurance to fix your problems. Unless you have $$$$, your house is not going to be in the front of the line for rebuilding. Spend a thousand dollars now on braces and bolts.

I imagine everyone in the building trades will be fully employed in the rebuilding effort even if CEA runs out of money. The state would probably bail the CEA out, but either way people are going to be waiting for a long time for someone to come give them a new house.
This is the new manufacturer of Hagoromo:

http://www.sejongmall.co.kr (Korean only)

http://www.kompass.kr/img/catalogue/20180719094839_1.pdf (English brochure)
I do something similar for my own blog, purely because I enjoy having the flexibility of styling every blog post in a way that's appropriate for that specific page (i.e. a blog I did on photography[1] vs a blog I did on gaming[2])

That said, I'm a man of convenience. Mixins are too much of a niceity to throw out so I wrote some small apache cgis to dynamically compile pug (aka jade) and stylus. I typically write directly on the server just using vim. Certainly not the work flow for everyone, but I quite like the experience.

[1] http://jjcm.org/blog/anatomy_of_a_surreal_photoshoot/
[2] http://jjcm.org/blog/how_to_play_pa/
I suppose I'll have to settle for a black Squier lookalike now! Which admittedly doesn't sound bad at all.
> Cannabis listed 62 times as medicine in 1899 Merck Manual"

Ask a physician today whether cannabis should be recommended for anything and the probably most likely answer is "we just don't have enough good studies to know yet".

But in 1937 and 1970, they were really sure about it; they claimed "cannabis is not medically useful for any person with any condition" and nobody successfully argued the medical utility or liberty arguments! They've held that position while curing people with prison: people who are exercising their liberty to risk self-harm in pursuit of happiness. So, now, people in States that haven't yet pursued legalization and automated expungement don't sue suppliers who have insufficient quality control due to prohibition (and tax-free margin inflation) instead of regulation in the interest of public health that upholds our highest values: Equality, Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

How different might things have been had we required evidence-based justification for universal quantifications like "not medically useful for any person with any condition" to be kept on file with the Library of Congress for further review.

An observation-based study that couldn't have been a Randomized Controlled Trial (the "gold standard" for clinical research):
"Hypothesizing that marijuana smokers are at a significantly lower risk of carcinogenicity relative to tobacco-non-marijuana smokers: evidenced based on statistical reevaluation of current literature." (2008) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19004418/

This meta-analysis considered 10,700 studies, threw most out for not meeting the inclusion criteria, and concluded that there is sufficient evidence to recommend cannabis for a number of conditions: “The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research” (McCormick et al. 2017) http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/reports/2017/health-effects...
especially singlemode fiber optical amplifiers
Lyle Gun
A rough ASCII sketch to illustrate this:

Regular lens:

_____
/ \
/ \

Fresnel lens:

_____
/|/ \|\
Taiwanese, in Transition
How to Split a String in C++ (Blog Post)
Related paper from 1994: http://papers.nips.cc/paper/893-a-growing-neural-gas-network...
with a NERVA powered craft launched on top of something the size of a fully expendable Falcon heavy, maybe...
> But if I was to post 'you don't see motorbike sidecars these days' then some nitpicker on HN would Google search a new Kickstarter project of a motorbike sidecar and - two seconds later - mod me down for being generally but not universally correct.

I'm of course not going to downvote you, but just to help you out with your point IMZ-Ural still manufacture motorcycles with sidecars to this day, and in fact are working on a fully electric model.
I will just play devil's advocate. Sometimes different cultures have very different ideas about what is an ethical way of doing things. If you're passing judgement on Walmart here, I think you're also passing judgement on Brazilian culture. Of course, you're welcome to do so, and I might even agree with you. But if you want to fine Walmart for doing things the "Brazilian way" while operating in Brazil, then I think if you are going to be a principled person you must also advocate for trade sanctions or other barriers to doing business with Brazil since you think their way of doing things is naughty. I hope you're prepared for a long battle though, because once you get done fussing at the Brazilian people and their culture you've got a very, very long list of other countries you need to be prepared to harass.
Rust Streams
They controlled for exactly what you are saying. They added a key which has value only to the wallet owner and not the finder. There was not as big of an increase in returns. This led them to conclude the more likely explanation was the “I’m not a thief” reasoning.
Perhaps we could jail Airbus too?

https://www.spiegel.de/international/business/suspicions-of-...

https://www.economist.com/business/2018/02/08/airbus-executi...
I've found strict typing, along with type inference and a good IDE, to be much faster than a dynamic language.
From the Wikipedia page: "Although the decision does not address "corporate personhood," a long-established judicial and constitutional concept, much attention has focused on that issue."[0]

"How should one interpret [the case] then?" Recognize that Citizen's United is _not_ about corporate personhood, and actually read what the case was about. The number of times I've heard people making snarky remarks about Citizen's United without having read anything about the case is amazing.

In the US, corporate personhood is about:

(1) Corporations having equal protection under the law as persons (ie the 14th amendment applies to corporations).

(2) Coporations having the same rights as persons to draft and enforce contracts, making them "legal entities". This is related to (3).

(3) "Person" as a concept applies to associations of people rather than just individuals; associations of individuals includes corporations. See here: [1]

None of these things were decided in Citizen's United and further, it had no legal bearing on the case law surrounding these things.

Instead Citizen's United was about whether a particular law violated the 1st Amendment. Specifically the law prohibited corporations from releasing media 60 days before an election if it could impact the results of that election by reaching 50,000 or more people in the electorate. But the 1st Amendment makes no distinction between e.g. newspaper companies and other corporations, so the majority opinion was that this law and other laws that limit speech of associations of people infringe on the 1st Amendment.

From the opinion: "If the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech."

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_person
We can't jail Walmart, but we should be able to jail its CEO. Perhaps if being CEO meant taking the risk of jail for the corporation's misdeeds, the job would actually be worth the ridiculous salary it pays out, and provide a much stronger incentive for the CEO to police illegal conduct internally.
The initial release was 8 years ago. Surely, you've had at least an ounce of curiosity about how the front-end ecosystem has changed since then? Even if you didn't adopt it, just to maybe poke around and look at what React, Vue, et. al. are up to?

It's not be dismissive of what you currently do. But perhaps you might see new efficiencies that allow you to do more with less, with these newer solutions.
So, now its the US governments chance to hold out its hand.

These are so trivial for a company like Walmart, and no-one is being individually held responsible. So it just looks like an official bit of us gov bribery, just like the fee's to avoid the security line at the airport. Cloak it in a bit of legal mumble jumbo and the us government gets its payout too.

Frankly though too, these foreign anti-bribery laws seem so antiquated. Every year I have to sit through training for them as part of the corporate hand waving (we can't be responsible we trained our employees). Yet really it pales in comparison to the damage actually being done, and in the cases where the officials will actually take bribes just puts us based companies at a disadvantage to other foreign companies willing to pay the bribes. Especially in cases where the companies from other countries will waltz in with "infrastructure improvements", "cheap loans" whatever...
You also can tack on `?mode=guest_open` to view any massdrop URL without a login.

https://drop.com/buy/drop-oblotzky-gmk-oblivion-v2-custom-ke... -- keycap set is $125
Wasn't it a headache dealing with hardware compatibility/drivers in linux if you were dealing with an assortment of computers?
Should doctors and or patients have read only API access to the emr?
Should doctors and or patients have read only api access to their patients records or their own records in the electronic medical record ? If yes, how do I convince the medical informatics community ?
I bought some 0.18s back in the early 00s. Most were too scratchy.
Pressure’s 400-year-old measurement techniques get an upgrade
Top Layer of SMETS2 meters in pallets don't work
People can still log into your account if your unique password leaks. It just prevents them logging into your other accounts.

Point is, TOTP isn't useless.
Human beings are allowed to organize for the purposes of political action and whether or not they decide to form a corporation doesn't matter because "corporation" isn't a constitutional concept.

Further, "personhood" means you can sue the corporation, it can hold property, etc. Lawyers usual call "corporate personhood" "legal entity."
Clean Go Code
> At a press conference about Star Trek: The Next Generation, a reporter asked Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry about casting Patrick Stewart, commenting that "Surely by the 24th century, they would have found a cure for male pattern baldness." Gene Roddenberry had the perfect response.

> "No, by the 24th century, no one will care."

https://boingboing.net/2015/07/08/star-trek-creators-perfect...
Marketing cores lol...
It's a rock. It's a kind of rock we've never seen before, so it's got some properties that... we've never seen before.

But it's still just a rock. :)
I'm not a high frequency trader. When I want to sell (all highly liquid shares), I've made that decision on other factors than a 0.1% variation of the listed stock price.

What I care about is that it sells.

It's hold-over from the dotcom days when I saw colleagues sell options with a limit order just above the current listed price that never got fulfilled in an a constant down market.
Does you advocacy extend to other “cultural differences” like child labour, age of consent laws, or indentured servitude?
A marketable limit order is strictly better: "I'll sell at the best price available, but no more than X% worse than the current price" vs. "I'll sell at literally any price". In most cases, they give identical results, except in certain catastrophic cases where the limit order will save you (e.g., flash crash).
What else should I call an account that was created today with 10 posts on this one thread?

I also broke the rules intentionally by using caps instead of asterisks. For that I apologize, but regardless of HN rules there is something going on in this thread. More than simple honest discussion.
I am a ruby developer who tried rust. I don't think its the language thats the issue, its the libraries and tooling. I tried rust with rocket and I spent a week trying to get the rust app to connect to postgres because of having to deal with so many things like connection pools and setting up the ORM. I eventually just gave up and used rails where you just tell it the username and password for your database and you are pretty much good to go.
fyi, Chrome 76 in beta with undetectable incognito mode. https://twitter.com/paul_irish/status/1138471166115368960
The thing with chalk is: if you see a piece of chalk, you can use it. After you're done, put it down and forget it.

If you see a marker... 50% chance it's dead, 25% chance it's barely alive, 15% chance it's legible from the back row, 10% chance it's fresh and usable the way you describe it. It's impossible to tell before you try.

After you're done with it, you need to remember to close the cap, or find a trash can to chuck it into (and make a call if the marker kind-of-still-works-but-not-really). Seems like a small thing, but adds mental overhead. And it's a big enough overhead that a lot of people don't do it. Otherwise, how would we end up with the distribution above in the first place?

Now teaching/explaining is a performance art. Doing the "wait, let me try another marker, is it better now?" dance ruins the show.

That's why mathematicians prefer chalk. The subject matter is already difficult enough, there's not enough bandwidth for all of that nonsense. Have chalk, will write. End of story.
I've never picked up 8 sticks of chalk in a row trying to find one that works, though.
> In theory it could unfairly handicap American companies relative to foreign companies.

This really sounds a lot to me like "money good, ethics bad".
Same story here.

My daughter was born in 2006 with meconium aspiration. Nurses hand-bagged her for 8 hours before taking her in ambulance to the nearest ECMO facility.

She was on ECMO for a few days, and miraculously recovered.

We took her to followup clinics every few months, expecting some sort of learning disabilities or lung damage. Turns out there were zero complications.

Today she is completely fine!
Microsoft acquires Pull Panda for code-review collaboration
As I understand, Racket seems to be the gold standard in that area.
If you'd like to own one, here is a 1957 Chrysler 300C, with record player:

"You'll find a factory 392 cid, 375 horsepower V-8 engine under the hood with a Torqueflite 3-speed automatic transmission, factory dual arm torsion bar front suspension, power steering, power brakes, a power convertible top and an ultra-rare factory installed Hiway Hi-Fi entertainment system, which plays 16 2/3 RPM records."

https://classiccars.com/listings/view/1226380/1957-chrysler-...

$189,990
Investors can usually cash out during the IPO itself, they are only banned from trading between the IPO and the end of the lock up period.
This is interesting, but one thing I didn't understand from the video demo (which shows a background check form and a payment form)

Aren't these SaaS tools like Stripe (payments) and Checkr (background checks) already built in a way that allows you to never have sensitive PII like payment info or SSN touch your servers?
> All the content written is still applicable.

Technically yes, but what if someone only uses hooks and has never used classes?

And, viceversa, since there is now a lot of people moving to hooks and producing React literature for hooks what if you only have used classes?

So now, to be able to read all the React literature one has to understand both methodologies.

> The developers and documentation even advises against rewriting old components with hooks unless you need to.

It doesn't matter. A big chunk of the JS community is hype-based.
The "meatball" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_landing_system

The system described is for aircraft carriers. I know about it because I maintained a smaller version on a fast frigate in the seventies. It was slaved to the ship's gyrocompass, which provided a stable horizontal reference.

(Besides navigation, the gyrocompass also provided that stable reference to the ship's gun.)
Google 2-Step Verification is vulnerable to phishing just like TOTP is. You can go to a phishing site without realizing it's not Gmail, you enter your username and password, the phishing site gives those to Gmail on your behalf, the phishing site causes 2-Step Verification to happen, and Google sends a push notification to your phone for you to let the attacker into your account. (I believe Apple's default 2FA mentioned by GP works the same way.)

Security keys (and the newer project from Google to let your phone act as one over bluetooth) don't have this vulnerability because they connect right to your computer and talk to your browser (and not the attacker's) to verify the domain you're accessing.
I set a limit $50 because they didn’t announce a price as far as I could tell, and I knew I was going to be working today and couldn’t pay attention. It did cost me some because I could have bought more shares had I set a lower limit, but I am happy the trade executed at a low price.
I saw some news saying that ruby 3 would have types built in.
That is basically a summation of “national interests” in the sense that politicians use it.
Staying static just gives space to complacent, politics playing technology "elders".
Point Bonita is closer, if you're in SF.

Alcatraz and the Faralones are technically within SF city limits.

http://www.terragalleria.com/images/us-ca/usca30023.jpeg

https://californiathroughmylens.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/...

http://www.lighthousefriends.com/light.asp?ID=100
Like Yelp, Angie's List businesses can pay for more prominent placement, and AL uses dark UI patterns to make it seem like they're somehow more legitimate than other reviewers, when in fact they just got there due to paying more. Same with Yelp.

One of the worst experiences I've ever had with a contractor was with an electrician who had 117 A+ reviews on Angie's List (K&K Electric of Rockville, MD). They took 7 hours to complete a 1.5 hour job (installing a 40 foot cable run for a car charger), then threatened to put a lien on my house because I wanted to pay less as a result of the experience. It was a total shouting match (full disclosure: part of the tension was that I had to pay them 40 days later since I was out of the country for 4 weeks). On top of all that, the permit was rejected because they didn't properly label the high voltage, high amp breakers.

Now I realize they probably paid for those "117 A+" reviews.
>The entire history of technological progress that has brought more people out of poverty is of better and more automated agriculture and manufacturing and distribution.

Absolutely agreed. But previous technical progress has moved the bulk of people from one repetitive task (farming) to another (manufacturing).

It is a great goal to eliminate dreary jobs, but if the current process does not create new repetitive jobs but eliminates that category of task in favor of high skill tasks, then there is going to have to be some mechanism to impart those skills.

During previous technical revolutions, there was no effort to do so and luckily the new jobs could be learned in minimal time. But these are the exact jobs that are going to disappear now. And ironically people are becoming more skeptical of universities not less.

So yes, it is a great goal to eliminate low skill jobs, but assuming some invisible force will give everyone a challenging job that they can do is perhaps magical thinking. Consider: if you tell a factory worker that his job will be automated away, he is not relived by it but panicked. If it is an improvement for him, one has to ask why.

> If there's no one to buy, there won't be any reason to make them.

This is what caused of the great depression: concentration of wealth away from consumers who drive the economy and into a tiny number of hands. If it's just one company or even sector that fails then it's just a bump. If it's widespread or systemic then it's a disaster.
“Culture is the foundation of everything we do at Walmart. We define culture as our values in action..

Service to the customer

Respect for the individual

Strive for excellence

Act with integrity”

-Wal Mart’s horseshit values statement, the same as the value statement of every other corporation. Why does every company bother doing this again?
The type signatures are pretty noisy to read, though, some syntax can definitely help. Maybe with Ruby 3?
No, but mostly because nobody directly uses OSM. They all use Google.

Same with Wikipedia. Wikipedia has been gamed a bit but the excellent moderators have kept many things at bay. I don't think it's impossible for someone like Encyclopedia Brittanica (an online version) to resurface.
My girlfriend took her 12-inch MacBook in for its 2nd(!) keyboard replacement. When she asked about a loaner, the employee actually recommended buying and returning a new one. She got the new retina Air for a nice 5 day test drive — and now we're both pretty sold on it.
Taiwan to introduce rent subsidies to encourage marriage, childbearing
I have published two books so far using the most obscene of methods; I parse my own HTML into XeTeX using a mix of bash and Python.

Parsing HTML is supposedly a big no-no but what’s the problem when it’s your own code?

Anyway, it seems like most comment here are trying to reinvent the wheel when any variant of LaTeX is a great solution; there are never any compromises to be made with TeX.
I have a set of Mitsubishi Pencil Hi-Uni 10B to 10H pencils and I love them.
That means that your may overheat but won't be covered.
> critical of Chinese trade practices and I was surprised that he perceived the article as "anti-Chinese".

For many Chinese, "learning" is semantically equal to "emulating". e.g. Learning to walk, learning to write, learning everything else. It's natural that the most advanced technological countries should influence the rest, like the rich is supposed to fund the poor and the strong should help the weak. And "learning" fast should be praised, like in schools. It's like a teacher shows off its skills and told students it's forbidden for follow? Tons of Chinese can not get the hang of this.

One more reason many Chinese people lost hope for the US during this trade war, is because it's argued that China does not practice "rule of the law", then Rubio introduced a bill that would nullity all Huawei patents registered in the US. So for many people, the US laws are as manipulative as China's. This is explosive WTF.
It's a Cosmic Dust Bunny.
I'm saying that if people are not able to have a certain standard of living due to their income, why should it be framed as their fault? Obviously I'm not saying someone should be able to live in a 3000 sq. ft. house when I say "certain standard of living."

In your case, you probably made the choice of your living arrangement, not a choice your employer made for you. That's different.
Researchers confirm that narwhals and belugas can interbreed
"But this behavior stems from toxic masculinity. The culture of overwork in Japan has been predominantly a male phenomenon which is why Karoshi tends to occur among men."

It stems from overambitious people who don't care for others, not masculinity. Masculinity points towards males which doesn't help. Call it "overworking culture" to be inclusive. What do you do with a boss who has all attributes of "femininity" but works employees to the bone? Suddenly that's masculinity? Or is that not possible since feminine bosses don't do that?