skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Apple's Difficult App Store Decisions Determined by Executive Review Board Run
It's useful because the read-string in core is passing a string to the reader, essentially like an eval[1].

The edn namespace is for Extensible Data Notation[2], and exports functions for reading an object from a stream and from a string without passing it to the lisp reader.[3]

[1] https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/read-string
[2] https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.edn
[3] https://clojure.github.io/clojure/clojure.edn-api.html
Yep, some blind programmers use vim. One of my blind programmer friends uses neovim and tmux, or at least he did a couple years ago when he blogged about a related utility he wrote [1]; I haven't asked him what he currently uses.

As for the sea of divs in your application, here are the most important things you should do:

1. Don't use a div or span for a clickable element that acts like a link or button, unless you give it the appropriate ARIA role and handle keyboard focus. I'd say it's better to use a real link or button unless there's some reason that absolutely won't work with your CSS.

2. Put an ARIA main landmark at the start of the main page content. This can be a div with role="main", or you can use the main tag. I don't think it matters anymore which one you use.

3. If a page has section headings, use real heading tags (h1-h6).

Hope this helps. Thanks for paying attention to accessibility!

[1]: https://www.thewordnerd.info/blog/tma-the-tmux-automator/
Ditching My Smartphone
I'm confused why there is such a dissonance on the definition of "autopilot." Most people are fully aware that commercial planes have at least one human pilot in addition to an "autopilot," and I think the passengers on the plane would be very unwilling to fly if the human pilots weren't present. "chauffeur" seems like it would be misleading for partial self-driving software, but "autopilot" seems spot on: helpful, but not good enough to replace the human.
Why is it...I unplug EVERYTHING yet red light on until I hit remote again to be off? Nothing is plugged into electrical. No batteries. Covered tv w blanket.
This is exceedingly delightful
Your making a lot of assumptions. For example, who said anything about a product. Not all "players" small or large are selling something. Sometimes people just like to make stuff that works well for themselves and others.
Thanks for mentioning! I’ll fix it.
If you’re interested in Apple UX design, check out this blog [0] from Apple’s first HCI engineer.

This one [1] is one of my favorites, about the MacOS dock when it was first released.

[0] https://www.asktog.com/

[1] https://www.asktog.com/columns/044top10docksucks.html
And it's also better for human eyes, see here :

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20207577
They freely admitted at the time that the video was what they eventually wanted the terminal to look like, not what it is now. And it’s version 0.2, I’d rather they get the fundamentals right first before adding all the visual flair.
I see it supports background images now.

Who uses this? Why? Why is that worth the reduced readability?

I have a hard time wrapping my head around why such a feature would ever be implemented.

I guess... mischief? When somebody leaves their computer unlocked, you could set the background image to a screenshot of the terminal with a bunch of text. :-(
Cell servicss like Jio bundle in live tv for free as well as on demand cinema. So the value prop to pay for a provider separately to get services on your TV is decreased. It's a separate cost for the same thing. So people are more likely to probably purchase new cellular connected tablets - rather than TVs.
Love the greppability and reconstructability. This should be the submission.
> They are thinking the same thing as people who drive drunk.

They're worse. People who drive drunk don't necessarily make a fully conscious decision to do that. Their judgement is already impaired.

But if they think that sleeping with autopilot on is reasonable, that's 100% on them. It's something they decided ahead of time.
I am not sure the following advice will help, but it has helped my teenage daughter.

What helped me the most when I was a teenager was to discover that not washing my face frequently reduced facial acne. As gross as this may sound, I used oil and manually scrapped my facial skin clean when needed. Later on, I learned this was a common practice by Greeks and Romans.

I found this article for you:
https://medium.com/@plumeriatiki/ancient-masters-of-healthy-...
I much prefer jq[1]. Actively developed and written in C.

[1]:https://github.com/stedolan/jq
You'll find that indeed most manufacturers offer AEB, forward and rear collision avoidance, many of them offering side collision detection. Subaru, Volvo, Toyota, Audi, Mercedes, for ones I know for a fact. I'm more unsure as to why you think other manufacturers don't do these things.
I imagine it’s there to sort of show off, and prove that the terminal is finally hardware-accelerated (conhost.exe used GDI, which was CPU-only), where you get these features for free. There’s no reason to turn it on if you don’t need it’s though.
Mobile readable version on the site:

https://www.kleinbottle.com/guarantee.htm
Quite literally...
I guess I'm realizing I never approached this from a standpoint of expecting top people to stay on top forever, so the inquiry seems a little misguided to me. Even if you manage to dominate your field, in the very best case you're going to grow old & die someday. That's the pessimistic, decay theory. Or there's the optimistic, "progress" theory: If you believe humanity is on a more-or-less continuous arc of steady progress, that means somebody better is always coming along sooner or later to surpass your work.
Given that publishing an article costs money publishing an attempted replication is not likely to happen - if it succeeds it won't happen because we basically already gave you the information, and if it fails it probably won't happen because so what - a replication failed, should they publish it, what if someone comes along and says no we succeeded in our replication should that be published as well because someone else had a replication fail?

How much of the journal should be given over to replications that fail, and then the replications that succeed where another failed, and any potential back and forth?

At any rate a replication study while important for the process of science is not so important for the process of news and as Science is a business and using their resources for publishing replications does not seem likely to increase their profit (but maybe even reduce it) while increasing their cost, I am surprised anyone would even think it should or would happen.

Perhaps what there should be is a reproducibility column, where studies attempting to replicate previously published studies are noted. A paragraph summation could be given. As reproducibility of a finding becomes accepted further replications would be dropped from the column as redundant.

on edit: grammar fix.
Europe is doing well only because their population is limited and resources are plenty full.

Huge oil reserves with a country as small as Norway which has a tiny population.

And we can argue lots of these resources were acquired at the time when colonialism was a thing and rest all development is built upon surplus from that.

Maybe not all European countries were colonists but later they'll make a union and trade will be free in that union resulting in some countries losing their land and companies to foreign European countries (as happened in some East European countries)

So the union ensured that they'll be bailed out on the back of those powerful European countries.

Europe is a special case in a book with homogenous population, so religious or racial difference isn't resulting in serious disagreement and violence and this brings a lot of stability to it.

All I want to say is China does not have same advantages as European country so it might not work the way you imagine without Chinese Communist Party.
HN is pretty different from Reddit at least, at least taking Reddit as a whole (e.g. r/lisp may be different). Whether it's better or not I suppose depends on one's point of view.
Uhh, my Audi did exactly that. Blind spot monitoring was adaptive to the speed differential. My current car uses brake light detection to assist with braking. These are not features unique to Tesla.
Tesla itself used to only mandate that you touched the steering wheel every quarter hour.
The only true freedom my gender as a cis female appears to deny me is the freedom to network equally well professionally so I can make money on par with a man. Most men seem to think "A woman spoke to me! She must be looking for sex!" And it's a huge career development obstacle.

Sex is never, ever a case of one person having unilateral freedom. That is simply not how that works. (When someone does try that, it usually gets called rape.)

As stated above, if you think you can sleep around freely because you've solved the threat of pregnancy issue, a typical consequence of that is an STD. Some of those are pretty gruesome.

There may also be positive health consequences of pregnancy.

Life is complicated. There are no simple and easy slam dunk answers.
Probably the opposite. Bank signs deal with banclist, notifies shareholders official information disclosures will only be done through banclist.
They don't "sleep" as in regularly take planned naps due to trust in autopilot. They fall asleep, causing danger to passengers. Same thing happens on the road to drivers without autopilot - they just rarely get to talk about it afterwards.
As for the to-do part, I use a personal kanban implemented with Trello. It's simple, even primitive, but it has been working great so far.

To organize my meetings, my events, I use a CalDAV compatible service (FastMail) which is synchronized with my smartphone.

I work as an independent consultant, and I don't make the distinction between my "personal" time and my "professional" time. So, I use the same calendar for all my stuff.
I cannot agree more. I know quite a few hard working but unlucky folks - and the hard work is generally necessary to capitalize on the luck.
Problem is it's not a "correction". There was nothing really there in the first place, which is what the first paper said to anyone with a modicum of mathematical knowledge.

It's like any other paper that reports a statistically non significant result. The appropriate response is, "Well, OK. Sure, whatever." But yeah, we're not gonna take up space from something else that may be important, just to go back and forth over this statistically non significant result. You let them do that in your journal that crap will go on forever and you'll never have space for anything substantive. I'm sure liberal and conservative political types must have some other place they can do that at.

If you have a new result in some new area, that's one thing. But if all you have is the exact same result saying that the old non significant result is, um, non significant? I mean, I gotta agree with HN User "Gatsky". "Who cares?"

But I'm a research scientist by training and a stickler for protocol. So it's likely my age is showing and the rest of the world wants to loosen up these days? I'm just the old man yelling at the liberal and conservative kids to get off my lawn.
What HBO’s Chernobyl got right, and what it got terribly wrong
You can see the open vents on the ridge in the first photo.
Its also weird that nobody mentions what OS they are running. Firefox on Mac is really different than Firefox on windows.
Science Journal allows you to gather data from the world around you
Qt lets me bind the interface to the actual hardware. How would Webkit/WPE let me do that?
Your definition of "true freedom for women" is forced sterilization of men? Seriously? You don't see some problem with logical consistency, or moral basis, or even the definition of "freedom"?
> "scale up"

yep, BUT cube-square law applies
the significant difference between python and scheme here is that python is not small.

but then, scheme is heading in the same direction if you look at the latest standards development
Hmm. Unless my understanding is off, these tail calls will work right if there happens to be a word in the stack where the missing argument is supposed to be, and that word has a value of 1 (correct string length). Because that looks indistinguishable from the correct argument having been passed.

So that suggests a run-time solution like this:

1. The function examines the string length argument word. If that word is 1, everything is cool; the function proceeds, the helper function is tail called and so forth.

2. If, on entry, that word is not 1, then the function calls itself (with a real non-tail call that allocates new argument). It passes itself the missing 1 value properly. When that call nested returns, it also returns.

3. This nested invocation issued in (2) now sees a value of 1 in that argument since it is correctly passed, and so it proceeds as given in step (1). When all that tail-call-ology finally executes a proper return somewhere, it will return to this nested invocation of that function, which will pop out, and return to the C caller, as described in (2).

No need for a compiler switch to turn off tail calls. Tail calls work among functions that obey the ABI (like all Fortran-Fortran calls). When an ABI violation is detected, then we get an extra frame. (Hopefully there aren't tail calling loops that involve cycling between Fortran and broken C.)

The broken C can be gradually fixed. The workaround can be deprecated and removed when that happens. Correct code doesn't trigger the workaround behavior in the invoked functions and also doesn't suffer the performance hit of the extra nested call. That creates an incentive to fix the C code.
Just a thought I have sometimes:

Both these accounts fit with lower levels of testosterone with age...
And that doesn't answer my question about Reliance agreesively discounting data plans.

Reliance just like any other telecom operator was laying cables which they could even lease to other private players.

But what exactly gave them enough confidence to go ahead with Jio, a deep discounted mobile network.
So why not push for mandatory sterilization of women as well? Same logic. And, you know, equality.
I now have read that the Libra will have complete liquidity, will be pegged to multiple currencies and will earn interest (which goes to founding organizations).

How can all these things be true? Are they just using these terms with the same freedom they use the word "crypto-currency"?.
Camber (1999)
It wasn't gold foil: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapton
highly educated people middle class and upper people can have more in common with the same type of people in other countries, consuming the same goods, media, and entertainment, than the citizens of their own country who are in different circumstances.
Traditionally, most people start with an interest in computing. I was a biology major that stayed up late at night learning C++ instead of studying biology. I ended up switching into computer science as a junior and never looked back.

If you enjoy building things, spend time building something simple for yourself in a language that is easily approachable like javascript, python, or go. A good first program to write is a generator of some sort. Perhaps a maze or Sudoku generator. If that goes well, then a related solver.
I find it hard to believe that this is "fast" as advertised when it isn't even compiled with optimizations: https://github.com/f-prime/fist/blob/9049066e8d49ff41f2272ec...
I think you express it the wrong way round. The windows cannot be opened, because that way they can be made better for thermal isolation, which is obviously a major design criteria in cold climate.
What notable has come out since then?
Also, earlier in our development (in general, or in an area), we don't yet know what's known and unknown (by anyone).

Nor might we know when a teacher or mentor is communicating something textbook vs. some non-textbook insight or new idea.
You are saying that society needs certain people to have enormous sums of money to be better (however you define it, apparently you are saying that only these people can do certain things because they have individual control of large amounts of money; but I don't see how it's better than organizations, governmental or otherwise, having control of large sums of money) than a society where certain people are not enormously wealthy?
Hm, essentially JSON->Properties file. Cool. I wrote a little script the other day and decided Properties format was a pleasant way to define the config, maybe this could dovetail with similar future endeavors.
I just explained in my post why it’s not the same.

It’s not about equality. It would be about equality if men can get pregnant and give birth too. But no. It’s not about equality. Men are not equal to women.

I didn’t understand the point about civil war.
Any reason I can't fill the potholes near me with molten iron other than the city will get mad at me?
They'd also fit with anything else that changes over time.
Walking Stewart
It’s not forced. It’s mandatory after they have sired 1-2 children.

It’s free and incentivized to those who opt for it. The cryo freezing and storage of sperm for future progeny would be free too.

No. I don’t see a problem with logical consistency. In fact, I think it’s superior logic than the goat rodeo we are having now.
I was not talking about STDs.
SBCL is so large because it's not particularly optimized for size. A stripped libecl.so is a couple of megabytes.
There is an active lamson fork https://github.com/moggers87/salmon that retains the original GPL license and supports current Python 2.x and 3.x versions.
FDA approves new drug for women with low sexual desire disorder
Exactly this. And no, without breaking standard conforming Fortran code it's not possible to special case CHARACTER(len=1) arguments.
When a Pipe Bursts at Amazon, This Engineer Jumps into Action
New law states gov't responsible for teaching Japanese to foreigners
Not sure what you mean, but the reason for sealed windows is that building code mandates all ventilation through heat exchangers for energy efficiency, and having windows open would completely ruin the designed airflow.
> I'm much less confident about everything

This doesn't seem like a bad thing.

Maybe people just realize as they grow older how complex things really are, and eventually learn not to fall for the dunning Kruger effect on everything
Yes! My two top peeves with the majority of soft-science research are underpowered studies (and associated false conclusions) and a seemingly total neglect of effect size. The binary question 'is an intervention better?' is not the right question. To discuss any medical, social, policy, etc intervention you need to know how much benefit it delivers. This can then be assessed compared to costs and difficulties of the intervention.

Of course, effect size isn't enough either. You still need a good understanding of the range of outcomes, if there are significant fraction of participants who had poor/negative outcomes, etc. This can be hidden a bit inside a single metric like effect size.
What's so bad about processed foods? Scientists offer clues
APL is the true origin of the phrase “write-only code.”
Steam explosion under the molten iron comes to mind.
Given the crisis of 2008, I would say that this failed utterly, wouldn't you? It's just another few millions lost in regulation compliance to add to the billions lost to the "outright scammers" that are the regulated banks.
Looks like the project is still under development but I think that having a http based interface would make this much more accessible to be used easily from multiple languages.

Disclosure: I work on a similar open source search engine (https://github.com/typesense/typesense)
Then why publish the original paper?
Norwegian island of Sommaroey wants to abolish time
I wish I lived in the area, I would love to meet Mr. Stoll. I only recently watched The Cuckoo's Egg, which is from the 1980s and which he is the star of. A tremendously interesting story for anyone unfamiliar with it who uses this site I am sure, he was basically the first person to really track international hackers and did so at a time when law enforcement didn't even know if any laws had been broken despite military computers being compromised and secrets stolen. What I also found surprisingly and interesting was that in the film, parts of it were filmed in his home. The exact same home I recognized from his appearances in Numberphile videos where I first found out about his klein bottles. He does seem like a genuinely curious person, with a zest for life that can only come from being terribly interested in everything, and those are often the greatest people to know.
I’m not sure that doing that check in every function that might be called from C would actually improve performance compared to just turning off tail calls.
macOS appears to support multiple args just fine. Which is why it annoys me that Shellcheck bitches about using more than one arg even though I'm writing a script for macOS specifically.
If you don't publish replications and failures to replicate, you aren't publishing science. If a study is worth publishing once, it's worth publishing enough times to establish its result as conclusive. Otherwise, you haven't discovered anything, and the whole scientific process has failed, since the purpose of the scientific process is to discover conclusions.

You're right that in business, there's a disincentive to publish replications, because business treats science publication as literary nonfiction: they're trying to publish the most sensational results, because the most sensational results sell journals. This is one of the strongest arguments that scientific publication shouldn't be a business: making scientific publication a business creates incentives for scientific publications to not publish science.
Over-75s caused twice as many traffic fatalities as younger drivers in 2018
[hyperbolic]
Common Lisp deserves more love. People are just too much jealous to admit that CL is one of the best language of the world. How someone can think that JavaScript, PHP, Java and other stuff alike are at least non-miserable in comparison with something so powerful as Common Lisp?
[/hyperbolic]

Keeping the humor-ish stuff aside, actually taking CL here as example it's someway ignorant. That's doesn't make any sense to me. Seems that all that opinion are based in nothing more that nothing when it concerns about Common Lisp literature experience and personal experience with the language.

Some languages are popular, but they being popular doesn't proofs that they are good languages. This is a fact based on the type of problems most of the people are trying to solve.

CL being big it's some way comparable to C++, but for big problems, sometimes we need complex tools. CL is not for kids, neither C++. Common Lisp it's a language for hackers.
Wouldn't it be much less game-able to forbid LYING in a document, as understood by the elusive man-in-the-street?

Seriously: to judge a contract in case of a conflict, pick 12 people from the street and ask them to summarize it. Go with what they wrote. Going to "experts" when deciding language is what created the current mess, sticking to them is not going to solve it.
The hacker news guidelines explicitly mention avoiding calling names like idiotic/idiots.

@dang: does this merit a flag or ban?

I think toxic fanatism make hn a worse place for discussion.
Riding grass cutters for orchards gaining attention for use at solar plants
I hope the Coreboot people are extremely careful about this. Accepting code from a giant agency with the goal of making everyone less safe is very dangerous.
This blue pigment is used on the shrouds of AMD Radeon Pro graphics cards. https://www.amd.com/en/graphics/workstations
Are you kidding? There's a huge contingent of libertarians in tech.
Lil Nas X Is More Than Just a Meme Lord, Apparently