skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's probably even more common in the private sector (especially in relatively informal business arrangements where contracts consist of boilerplate).
My wife and I were fascinated by a version of Nude from 10 years before In Rainbows.
Domain Knowledge and Interpretation of the Single Responsibility Principle
I think the venture capitalist conveniently forget that a way to maintain or increase household income......

Is to not let millions of job leave the country in the first place. And preferably not to countries that abuses human rights.
Who writes perfect code? Generally speaking, I find the more people working on a single codebase the more chance you have for introducing flaws.
Indeed, thumbs up. This should be a post of its own.
Hearing parents complain about their own life choices as though they are martyrs upon him parenthood was thrust by the universe is categorically more grating than any form of advice coming from anybody.
They're separate airframes. There are literally only a very small number of components (mostly the engine) that are the same across all three variants, and all three variants have different dimensions and flight characteristics.
> I had my title in-hand and signed it over to them, so I was really confused why that was necessary among several other things.

They file the paperwork with the state.
If possession of the title printout was sufficient to legally take possession of someone's car, that would open the door to a lot of easy car thefts.
The US has too much education. About half of college graduates are doing jobs that don't require a college education. Worse, many of them borrowed to go to college.
Reminds me of when I look at milk cartons and they say "From cows not treated with the hormone rBST." The only reason I can think of that you'd be so specific rather than just saying "Hormone free!" or something is that the cows must be treated with some hormone other than rBST.
One Firefox option I love but don't see used much is the optional search bar you can add next to the url bar. I MUCH prefer to use that for searching for two main reasons:

1. It always "just works". I've run into problems with both Chrome and Firefox getting confused by a search term I entered into the URL bar.

2. The search string persists even after clicking on results. This is particularly helpful when I'm having trouble finding a good result and want to make a slight change to my previous search string, or I want to remember exactly which search term brought up a specific result.
Have they actually made any progress though? This seems like they just had a bunch of PR statements and empty promises.
Point taken. I'll be more careful in future.
Yeah, since it's already in France, better store it in one of their churches!
What's the monetary benefit to the industry in doing that?

The open source solutions aren't good because validating and fixing this data is very time consuming (read: expensive) and carried legal liability (read: expensive). Open source tends to not be good at requiring many people to do tedious things (see: most open source documentation). Companies could pay people to do it but then you've recreated a commercial vendor except competitors who don't pay get a benefit. Companies tend to open source things which are not direct competitive advantages for others in the same industry while this would be exactly that.
isn't that a bit circular? If investment costs (lets include capital, time, and risk)were low, wouldn't there be a influx of motivated innovators to create a greater selection of new drugs, which would either drive down price of equivalent drugs (or produce better drugs with are more efficacious/less toxic)? If investment costs/risk aren't limiting abundant new drugs, what is?
I would clarify and say that it's aimed at high school students with a serious thirst for competition math and math in general, Evan hangs around a lot (or at least he used to) on the Art of Problem Solving forums, and I think it's these students who spend their day pouring over math discussions, and math problems, that the book is aimed at.

These students would already know that Z is the set of integers, and if they didn't I don't think it would be a deterrent to pouring over the book.
SCOTUS urged to examine first sale doctrine regarding digital goods [pdf]
Yeah, I may have made the title worse by trying to shorten it. If a mod can change it back it'd be great.
What kind of match? Romantic match?

What was your reaction when a stranger called you for a date?
> The next generation of MacBooks - whatever they're called - will be an evolution of ipad, using ARM hardware and running an iOS-derived OS.

No they won't. I mean, it's conceivable that they could be using ARM chips (though Apple would need a strategy for emulating x86_64 in this case, like they did for PowerPC->i386), but there's no way they're going to be running iOS.

Apple is slowly expanding the capabilities of the iPad, that's certainly true, but it's not even close to replacing a laptop for all tasks. iPads are becoming usable for more and more tasks, but there's a very long way to go before the laptop is obsolete, and I don't expect iPad to ever actually go that far (if it did, it would just end up being a laptop). Even given laptop hardware, iOS is not set up to be able to replace macOS for all tasks.

Even ignoring all that, Catalyst is if anything evidence to the contrary, that Apple sees macOS as being very much alive and wants to encourage more apps to be developed for it. Catalyst isn't just iOS apps on macOS, it's also tools to extend your iOS codebase to adopt macOS-specific features, like multiple overlapping windows of arbitrary sizes, menu bars, a mouse¹, titlebar controls, and more.

¹I know iOS 13 now supports using a mouse on iPadOS, but it's just an accessibility feature that looks to the app like a touch, it doesn't e.g. support hover states, or encourage smaller click targets, or anything like that.
I would suggest that you take the time to reflect on the fact that if almost everyone disagree with you, it might point to something that you misunderstand. Either about the meaning of what they say or your understanding of the subject.

Their paper shows that the algorithm takes a constant time to compute the Cth coef. of the Nth step, for a given C and N. Not that the algorithm time is independent of C and N. C and N are not the input of the GCD. The algorithm running time is constant for the input of the GCD. It is dependent on C and N.
No, iOS has no such capability. Ironically, it's always been considered the more secure approach - Android Facebook users were able to set FB Messenger as their SMS app, and FB vacuumed up the data of anyone naive enough to do so.
"The fact that Z denotes the set of integers is a sort of mathwide standard."

I'm pretty sure I saw that in my high school in the early 90s, but it was a one-off event where we discussed ℕ, ℝ, ℤ, and ℚ, but we never used them for anything. I'm sitting here trying to remember our high-school set theory (which is getting cognitive interference from my college training on the topic), but my memory is claiming I either never had to write {x | x ∃ ℤ} in high school, or if I ever did, we blipped over it really quickly.

High school math generally implicitly takes place in "casual ℝ". I call it casual because the only time it even gets close to really hammering on the characteristics of real numbers is in the limit discussion. I certainly never heard "Dedekind cut" in high school.
I can't find the study now, but I read previously that even filling in a questionare asking about tennagers sexual history (or lack of) increases the chance of those teenagers having children and abortions. I assume at that in some level this seeds the idea of sex and babies in a group that might have not had that thought, opportunity or imputus otherwise.
Spy used AI-generated face to connect with targets
This is the standard use of "royalty free". I think you're in error here, not the site.
Depends on the company.

My employer offers unlimited vacation time. And people use it. My boss has taken off 3.5 months in the year since she started (not all at once). Other people in my department have racked up nearly 2 months of vacation in the 8 months since they started.

Our company encourages it, and HR has been diligent with managers about enforcing employees' rights to take vacation as long as it doesn't interfere with their work. As part of that, they require managers to structure assignments so that employees can take time off between projects if they would be too busy to take time off during a project, i.e., by requiring staggered staffing.
The title of the paper is "Fast constant-time gcd computation and modular inversion". The algorithm presented in the paper does not compute GCDs or modular inverses in time O(1). The time taken for either of those tasks is O(n (log n)^(2+o(1))).

The algorithm presented in the paper also doesn't take a bounded number of polynomial multiplications, though I'm not sure why those should be the relevant thing to count. In section 5.4 they say they split a size-n problem into two problems whose size add up to n using O(1) polynomial multiplications of size about n, and that their algorithm takes them both to be of size ~ n/2. That means O(n) polynomial multiplications, but most of them are small so the total cost for given n is, as they say in section 5.5, Theta(log n) times the cost of polynomial multiplication provided a fast polynomial multiplication algorithm is used.

The worst-case bound, both for the number of polynomial multiplications and for the actual running time, does depend on n. (The former is of order n but, again, most of the polynomial multiplications are small; the latter is of order about n (log n)^2.)

(As for the cryptographic "constant time" notion, my understanding from the paper is that with a naive timing model -- e.g., assuming that all memory accesses take equal time -- their algorithm is exactly constant-time for fixed input size. They say in a footnote near the end of section 7: "There is considerable variation in the cycle counts, more than 3% between quartiles, presumably depending on the mapping from virtual addresses to physical addresses. There is no dependence on the secret input being inverted.")
Except .. Project Zero has released stuff affecting other Google teams before. It’s universal.
Pardon me for interrupting the debate between you gentlemen. I thought I'd toss in a couple cents.

The constitution was never fully agreed upon in spirit. It was "these are the rules we agree upon in TEXT", but each man had his own ideas, and they figured it'd be better to let it slide and figure out the meanings later. However, I'm pretty sure, given they were fighting a revolution, the founding fathers had no intention of letting in too much federal government control. They would be appalled by what they see today. Remember that they chose the Articles of Confederation first.

In short, nobody - even the founding fathers - have ever fully agreed upon the meaning of the Constitution. So to say, "The Constitution only limits federal powers, but not state powers." is just as much opinion as "The 10th amendment limits both state and federal powers".

However, in response to you're arguments specifically, eesmith: Given that the average demographic on HN tends to oppose government surveillance, it seems rather nonsequitor that they would continue to give the gov power over such necessary things as maps, esp considering what the gov could do with that. The fact is, if you don't draw the line of power somewhere, it'll continue to be pushed back for further loss of liberty for the AVERAGE individual.
Also, "Native Americans" were not American citizens, so they weren't entitled to the same treatment under law. No offense, but law isn't "fair to all people".
When my little boy was a toddler (maybe 1.5?) he was curious about a pot of water I was boiling. I was holding him and he leaned over to put his finger in it. My first reaction was to pull him away and shout, "No". Instead I decided to calmly explain to him that it was hot and he shouldn't touch it. He still wanted to put his finger in it.

Well, it wasn't yet boiling and I was holding him and could pull him away, so I let him gingerly put a finger into the water. He cried, we washed his finger in cold water, and a few minutes later all was well. Since then I've never, ever had to worry about him near anything hot, even as a toddler. And more generally when I tell him something is dangerous he internalizes it well--doesn't mean he won't refrain from something, though. Maybe the carefulness is more likely a coincidence or his nature, but the lesson about hot things burned into his consciousness.

It's obvious in retrospect, but I guess a parents job isn't to prevent their kid from hurting themselves, it's to make sure that when they hurt themselves only the lesson is lasting. More recently it's become evident to me that not only do they need to hurt themselves to learn, but it's important to make it a positive experience, the pain notwithstanding. For example, now whenever toddler #2 falls down on the pavement my refrain is "good fall!", and I imitate dusting my hands off. I'll keep my distance unless it looks like she needs help getting up or consoling, but try to do it calmly and positively. Now, a couple of months into it, whenever she falls she jumps up, smiles, and brushes her hands, even if she's scraped. I did something like this with her brother but never so deliberately and consistently.

Somewhat relatedly: I think it depends on the kid and the family, but neither of my kids respond well to loud voices, no matter if well meaning or urgent. It was frustrating for me to change my habits because when I was growing up elevated voices weren't negative, just a signal to pay attention. Maybe it's genetic or maybe just how their mother has habituated them, but if I elevate my voice they invariably take it negatively. They seem to pay attention better and react more positively if I modulate my voice. Being conscientious about my voice also causes me to think twice about how I respond, even in imminent situations like you describe. Unless there's a risk of permanent brain injury or mutilation (at home, at least, usually self-evident), I try to tell myself to stop and slow down and consider whether I should just let nature take its course. It's worth the risk. That is, most of the time it's worth the risk to wait a second to consider the situation rather than just reacting, and if you do react it's then easier to do it calmly.

Not preaching, just sharing. It all definitely depends on the parent and the kid and the situation, but I've learned a lot from people sharing their parental experiences and anecdotes on HN, even when I disagreed or didn't find it applicable.
Even extensions in Firefox can't customise the page you see when you open the browser! I used a "new tab" extension, but for some reason Firefox doesn't treat the first tab you open as a "new tab"(1). I quickly noticed heaps of annoyances like that when I recently tried to switch to Firefox.

1. I'm pretty sure there is an issue for this in their tracker but they don't seem to think it's important enough to fix.
You might be interested in reading Maria Montessori (of Montessori school fame). Her stance is very much towards molding the environment rather than the child. She basically says that you can't mold the child, but you can become an obstacle to their development.
One thing that comes to mind is the significant cost asymmetry of a false result or error.
At step 2: any release of any information is enough to get people looking in the right general direction.
A contract signed under duress is not a valid contract.

There's no reason that the provider's testimony is magically preferred over the patient's, and in fact the generaly pratice is to resolve ambiguities in favor of the person who did not write the contract and is not the professional who has had plenty of pratice to know what they should be doing.
"by definition, doesn’t contribute economic value that exceeds the cost of producing it"

You mean it doesn't capture the value. It may indeed contribute huge value without capturing it.
Shame they didn't show the same level of competence with add ons.
Physicists seem to be doing a pretty good job, mathematicians as well.
Wish that was the case with Mozilla.
Using go/analysis to write a custom linter
I also agree that it's incredibly debatable. Though, please note that there was a Bloomberg piece earlier this year [0] that claimed that 'higher minimum wages haven't increased unemployment', based on a research paper [1].

Of course, one paper isn't enough; I'm willing to learn if there's contradictory evidence out there, too.

[0]: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-24/u-s-ec...

[1]: https://www.nber.org/papers/w25434
This. Not every job or career needs a college education. A lot of college tracks, such as a lot of liberal arts, while useful in the general sense have few corresponding career paths with a resumable ROI for all the debt that those paths lead to.

And, what is worse is that in general there is no, or very limited, concept of on job training. Everyone wants experts who can become productive on day one.
It's a weird piece. It presents as something more akin to the interlinking blog sites that just link to other blog articles (but at least some of these links are to reputable organizations), but that style doesn't do much to actually impart information to the reader. Laying some basis of what to expect in what is being linked to helps quite a bit, but this article is too lazy to do so.

Combined with overreaching assertions, the whole article just makes me feel like they're trying to manipulate me in a ham-handed way. And I'm someone receptive to this argument! I can imagine anyone that already hold beliefs otherwise immediately ignoring it.
Strawmen go rogue, admit billionaires aren't a secret club with homogeneous viewpoints.
GO find one of the children that has been helped by the new Cystic Fibrosis drugs (or their parents) and have a chat about this.
>In other words: this is all speculation, there's no evidence of coordination other than it looking like it for people who are already wanting that as their narrative.

It's amazing that people cannot see beyond their own self-righteous indignation enough to discern that this is what's happening.
you are promoting falsehoods, and now accuse me of breaking site guidelines.

i suggest you read a bit about what you’re writing about.

wikipedia is a good start, but it’s just a start:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_trade_of_the_Soviet_...
I wonder if the US economy could change to accommodate all that education. If it could change the proportion of low-education (and typically low wealth creating) jobs and simply have more people working at higher-levels, creating more wealth. Why are there so many low-productivity, low-wealth-creating jobs that don't require higher levels of education (be that college or other), and what can we do about it?
It’s not true that WikiLeaks never slowly released information before. That was entirely consistent with how they had been doing things.
The best level designs guide you to certain things while making you feel like you discovered or solved something completely on your own.

Sometimes indies use procedural generation as a shortcut to creating levels (or replayability) without consideration for these patterns, and instead of creating an engaging varied scenario they end up being obviously disjointed and break the flow of the player.
You'll need a personal copy of that conversation if this were to come up. We don't know what their retention policy is, or if they'll mysteriously be unable to find it in a court case.
It's been obvious for years that prosecutors are pushing surveillance laws to the breaking limit and often go beyond that in ways that defense attorneys and judges don't even realize.

Like it took judges 10-15 years to figure out what the prosecutors/FBI/police were doing with Stingrays. Once they started to understand how that stuff works they started requiring warrants for its use.

But there are dozens of other tools and loopholes like it that prosecutors are exploiting because judges don't have a clue about new tech advances.

For instance, most defense attorneys and judges probably don't even realize that a lot of prosecutors use tainted data through illegal surveillance and parallel construction. Since this sort of action is hardly ever punished there's little wonder that they keep doing stuff like this.
Depends on the drone. I have a commercial DJI drone that has sensors and a nice easy mode that will stop you crashing into stuff (at least forwards and backwards, there are no side sensors). But it also has a "sport" mode that disables the sensors to allow faster flight.

I also have a home built racing drone that has no anti crash sensors, very little natural stabilty and can fly about twice as fast. It's insanely fun to fly, but believe me it requires very quick reactions and I crash it regular even when sober.
Interesting, since this is one of the feature that I had abandoned. I thought that such a feature would needlessly be a bit too aggressive if you get what I am saying.

Nevertheless, in the "custom styles" input in the popup, you enter the following to blur out all points, comments etc:

span.score,
td.subtext a:last-child {
filter: blur(3px)
}
Data Moats Are Not Just About the Data
I work remote, I do two video calls per day
You don't even need to sign anything sensible at all. They almost certainly aren't going to check, and if you try to defraud the restaurant by refusing to pay, you might find yourself in trouble, regardless of signature.
André Staltz's writing is always a pleasure to read. I still show people his intro to reactive programming https://gist.github.com/staltz/868e7e9bc2a7b8c1f754
Excellent article. Also a good reason to remind everyone of the Rockstar programming language: https://github.com/RockstarLang/rockstar

"But why?

Mainly because if we make Rockstar a real (and completely pointless) programming language, then recruiters and hiring managers won't be able to talk about 'rockstar developers' any more."

Now we just need to add a "Ninja" programming language, and maybe a couple more.
Most loans are based on owner occupancy so the bank (really the Federal Government) will require that you are going to live the in house “immediately” to qualify for a better rate.
It's hard to believe Google actually hop onto the blockchain bandwagon as well, given the father of the Internet and their Chief Internet Evangelist Vint Cerf[1] famously said "No" to blockchain [2].

[1]: https://ai.google/research/people/author32412

[2]: https://twitter.com/vgcerf/status/1019987651301081089
RedisLabs switched a bunch of their software to nonfree licenses and antirez can't really do anything about it. No matter what he says, I don't think he's in a position (i.e. financially) to oppose that decision by RedisLabs, even though it's clearly against the interests of the open source project.
Are you the author of this article?
I'm inclined to agree with you, however the FDA has problems with a lack of transparency. A pharmaceutical company can run 20 studies, and show one result to the FDA that shows safety and efficacy with p < .05. We already have an irreproducibility crisis in science. Medical studies, more than any other type of science, should be pre-registered with the FDA, and the results of those studies should be made public, regardless of their findings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-registration_(science)

https://www.xkcd.com/882/
One step at a time.

https://collegeinfogeek.com/feynman-technique/
The pebble is still there, but most people learn to walk in such a way that they don't put their full weight on that part of their foot.

This might not be the most efficient way to walk, but once you've done it for a while it starts to feel natural.
US Military Video Shows Hypersonic Aircraft Test Flight
I believe your mistake is using the term racism when you mean to say classism or elitist.