skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
in my case, I cannot sign up to Scoot because I do not have a driver license. Theoretically I can't ride skip either, but they accepted a picture of my passport so it works.
I've been around infosec for 21 years and this is still a 0day. That term has no strong definition, certainly not one that would allow precise interpretation as above, but in this case even a vague sense of what it means covers the situation easily: _users_ have had no time to patch
The following bullet points encapsulate DevOps to me:

- Codifying infrastructure with tools such as Packer, Terraform, Ansible. The infrastructure should be just as auditable, repeatable, and transparent as the code.

- Empowering and allowing the engineers who write code to deploy it.

- Immutable servers/containers.

- A solid suite of monitoring and alerting tools that auto-heal (preferred) or at least notify when things go wrong.
Is this LightTable Chris Granger?
I see the "I don't crave meat" take a lot from people who have been vegan for a long time, but among my friends who have all become vegan in the last three years we eat an absolute _ton_ of gardein products. I'd say I buy around three fake meat products a week. I'd definitely eat lab grown meat if it were relatively healthy.
Great explanation! Although I have to wonder, why did the author choose to use Rust for this project? As far as I can see, it didn't really use any of Rust's advanced features not available in C or C++, like tagged unions, pattern matching, advanced type system, traits, borrow checking…

For what it's worth, I translated the whole code into C++. And it's essentially the same: https://gist.github.com/kccqzy/c404b8614f39f854f137dcc9284b0... And it runs correctly on macOS and Linux when compiled with clang.
For the same reason they don’t stock their bar with beer stolen from the brewery?
There are two conflicting claims floating around in this thread:

> "And just moves the costs elsewhere" / "the good old 'bus them out of town, let them be someone else's problem' non-solution."

And

> "The King County homeless census[1] found the overwhelming majority of homeless in the area were living in the area before becoming homeless."

It's pretty obvious both aren't true. Either Seattle's homeless are produced primarily by Seattle, or Seattle's homeless supply is from other cities. If the homeless are coming from other cities, that supports the idea that Seattle is making itself attractive to the nation's homeless (and should stop doing that.) If Seattle's homeless are predominately from Seattle, not other cities, then Seattle should seek to emulate cities that produce fewer homeless.

Personally I believe the later theory is false. I don't believe that most of the homeless in Seattle are originally from Seattle. However many in Seattle buy into that narrative. I think Seattle is filled with homeless because other cities kick them out and Seattle welcomes them with open arms.
It might not be cheaper, though I suspect it would be just because white elephants will white elephant. And besides, what's the likelihood that three separate projects will fail? But the likelihood that a jack of all trades will be a master of none, and thus perhaps ineffective, is pretty high.

> at the drop of a hat

Ha! There are still multiple variants, and you cannot reconfigure instances of one variant to be instances of another, and certainly not at the drop of a hat.
Isn't partaking in thought-provoking discussion reward enough?

This also seems like one of those things where Goodhart's law may apply.
That is an interesting point. If they "default" to private seems a little like wanting their cake and eating it too.
What a depressing thread.

In one corner, we have people that are absolutely exhausted of the current state of affairs. The trash, the needles in parks, human feces, the tents ... etc. They want someone to do something about it, but it's not clear at all what that something really is or who would do it. If it were clear, we wouldn't be arguing about it. There are real costs to a draconian reversion to hardcore enforcement. People will get hurt, unnecessarily.

In the other, we have people that seem completely convinced that enforcing any kind of norms against anti-social behavior - indeed, outright dangerous behavior - is simply an extension of the War on Drugs, and further criminalizes marginalized people by cycling them through a prison system that seems equally uninterested in actually solving the problem. And there are real costs here, too. People are getting hurt continually by repeat offenders, and by the other social costs of living where parts of the city are unclean or unsafe, or both.

I've lived in Seattle since 2011 (with a 29 month cumulative absence for a deployment and then for school), and I think it's just absolutely nuts to think that decriminalizing usage has done anything but make this problem worse. I understand the impulse behind it. I really do. But we can't keep trying to convince ourselves that this is "working", unless "working" is really "condition people to think that this is the new norm". Obviously, I guess I sit in the first corner. There's no real middle ground between these two cohorts, as far as I can tell. One group sees the other's concerns as reactionary or uncompassionate, and the other see's the first group's compassion as naive and even a deep enabling of the problem.

For me, I don't want to live in a city like this. That's maybe the only middle ground that exists between the two groups - neither want this. But my sense is that we're at a true impasse here, and that, and I'm just being realistic given the political arrangement here in Seattle, we're going to keep doing "more of this", whatever "this" is. The second camp has clearly captured city leadership, and decriminalization, lax or no enforcement of existing laws, and a general apathy (or maybe it's faith) about the situation will guide policy. We'll become the next SF, and then wake up one day wondering "how did this happen"?
https://www.nature.com/articles/0802300

>CONCLUSIONS: Fish-eaters, vegetarians and especially vegans had lower BMI than meat-eaters. Differences in macronutrient intakes accounted for about half the difference in mean BMI between vegans and meat-eaters. High protein and low fibre intakes were the factors most strongly associated with increasing BMI.
WSL 2 is, sure, more technically interesting then WSL 1.

That doesn't mean it's more useful for most real world tasks. A first iteration that is more technically novel followed by a second that is both more pedestrian and more functional is not an uncommon pattern.
The wikipedia article for Ross Ulbricht says this:

On the last day of trial, Serrin Turner, the lead prosecutor, addressed the jury and stated that none of the six contracted murders-for-hire allegations occurred.[27] One charge of procuring murder was originally filed in October 2013 in a separate pending indictment in Maryland (which was later dismissed with prejudice in its entirety in July 2018);[citation needed] the other five allegations were never filed.[37]

Obviously wikipedia is not a valid source, etc etc. But I've heard the assassination thing before and I'm wondering what information we have about the alleged assassination attempts.
I think this assessment is very apt, I've long wanted to get the chops to visualize all the action taking place on my network access. It's all so hidden and under the hood, it would be very revealing for a YouTuber to do a walkthrough to show how leaky apps and websites are and what sort of payloads are coming off their devices to remote targets.
In the early to mid 80s "layer 3 switching" was becoming a thing and each switch vendor had their own method for implementation. Cabletron was a large switch vendor then and their method of layer 3 switching depended upon ARP. Each host would be assigned a /32 ip address and their default gateway would be their own ip address. There was a registry setting available on Windows NT server that would cause the DHCP server to provide hosts with DHCP address and router assignments that met these requirements.

Ports that had routers connected to them were designated as router ports and needed to have proxy arp enabled.

Whenever a host wanted to talk to any IP address which was not already in it's arp cache it would send an arp request. The management system of the switch, which in this case was software running on a server outside the switch, would look up in it's tables if it knew the IP address from another switch port. If so and all policies allowed the host sending the request to speak to the port the destination was associated with the manager would respond to the arp request with the mac of the destination. If the requested IP address didn't exist in it's tables the request would be flooded out all router ports.
> If you read the history of the SR1 takedown, you see that the FBI interviewed buyers whose packages had been intercepted by Customs. And from what I've seen, there's no indication that any of them were prosecuted.

At least 65 SR1 buyers are known to have been arrested: https://www.gwern.net/DNM-arrests
PingCAP CTO here, I really enjoy the cooperation with Kyle this two months. I want to talk a little bit about my feelings.
Before the "official" Jepsen test, TiDB has already written its own Jepsen test cases for a long time. Our past Jepsen test code has become a good starting point in this test. In addition, as a result, the test case written by the database developer will inevitably have some blind spots. This is even if you have your own Jepsen test passed, I still recommend you to do the official test by Kyle's team.

In the process of testing, we have no way to influence what Kyle tests. Usually, only Kyle will tell us when abnormal behaviour occurs. Our main job is to analyze the cause and then fix it.
Here are some tips for recommending friends who want to do Jepsen test in the future:

1. Carefully check your documentation before testing to make sure it is consistent with your database implementation.

2. It is best for someone on the team to understand and build your own Jepsen test environment internally and test parallelly with the Kyle team.

3. Simplified deployment process is very helpful

4. Be sure the version of your DB before testing. Usually, you can select one when starting the test and select one before the end.

I really enjoy working with Kyle. I would say Kyle has a good sense of humor :), and I hopes to have another chance to cooperate Kyle and his team in the future! Thank you.
Sensorimotor Mechanics of People with a Sixth Finger
I don't know about La Liga specifically but in general bars pay a much higher fee than end users to stream sports because it's such a big value-add for them. It's likely that these bars are streaming publicly on a user license, rather than using an illegal stream. The value proposition isn't necessarily that far out - just people want to pay less for things and will do if they can.
F-35 and all fighter jets all use and must use by design synthetic stability, without computer control the airframe would be impossible to pilot. You need this aerodynamic instability to be maneuverable. If you don't have it turning is very slow. Flight characteristics are very much dependent on software. It isn't a glitch or a "move fast break shit" but a fundamental design feature of fast maneuverable planes.
I believe that a mix of 5th-gen airplanes and many UAVs, both with AI and with remote pilots hosted on stand-off AWACS-style planes, is the right answer.

I believe the same would be true for tanks. Lots of small and nimble tanklets remotely operated from stand-off mobile c&c centers.
You can't steal information
Can you explain what the benefit of syncing between google photos and drive is? Is it just another backup?
Here's a CSS-only hacky version I threw together:

#hnmain td td:last-child .pagetop {
font-size: 0;
}
#hnmain td td:last-child .pagetop a {
font-size: 10pt;
}
#hnmain td td:last-child .pagetop a:first-child::after {
content: ' | ';
}
So VR helmets, EW antennas embedded in stealth skin, and crazy combat networking are all trivial features that we should expect a gaggle of government contractors to get right on the first pass? I'm not sure I buy that argument. The plane looks plenty fancy to me, at least in the context of its alternatives ("first lol" tech demonstrators don't count).
I wouldn’t say they explicitly “lied” that would imply that they were all being intentionally dishonest. I think many of them thought they knew more than they did. I see this not only from people who are just starting out, but also from people working at BigCo.

Putting my developer hat on. I interview a “senior developer”

They say on their resume that they have “used AWS”. Come to find out that all they have done was remoted into some EC2 instances.

They say they have used a certain CI/CD platform. I ask them have they set a pipeline up from scratch. They say no - someone else did it, we are expected to “own the whole stack” including setting up our own pipeline for our microservice. Not a deal breaker. That can be learned in a day. We have plenty of samples they can copy from existing pipelines for almost every scenario.

They put down databases they are experienced with. I give them a scenario and I ask them to model a table schema with it. They can’t do it. They are usually handed a table schema by the “database developers” [sic].

So finally I start working my way up to the actual development and I realize that because they were just a cog in the wheel at BigCorp, they never got a chance to design or write anything from scratch. They never had the joy of creating a brand new repo and doing a git commit with the message “initial commit”. Not horrible, but at a small company, you don’t get any handholding. You’re expected to work directly with the semi-technical product owner or even the end user if you’re senior enough. You are the Directly Responsible Individual.

So now, it’s demo day. The “senior developer” is demoing his code to management who is asking him questions and he melts under pressure or he gets defensible about “his code” and interrupts the CxO.

I want to know his temperament before I hire him.

I know people are going to say it’s not “fair” to expect that from a developer. I’ve had to learn every level of the stack. At some point you can’t call yourself a “senior developer” if you don’t know anything about the underlying infrastructure for your code or how to deploy it.

The next pushback I get is that J don’t remember what’s its like being a junior developer. Six months into my first job I was told to write a distributed data entry system that was going to be used to create a new department in the company. I had to sink or swim by myself - this was over two decades ago.
Whose your fave Youtube reviewer for CPU releases?
Its when you do three jobs at once and get paid for one in my experience.
Don't know about Spain in particular, but usually the fees in European countries are calculated for each individual bar, based on size and location. E.g. in Germany for a package of the top two major German leagues and UEFA (and some international ones), you can expect EUR 100-200 for tiny pubs in rural areas and small towns, EUR 500 for mid-sized bars and pubs in mid-sized cities, and up to EUR 2000 for big bars in big cities, per month.
Most of it is fanboys or anti-fanboys.

You'd think people in software would be more familiar with having defects in your product not meaning doom or incompetence.
When Consumer and Revenue Are Add Odds at a SaaS Startup
"hasn't yet had a business model... built on surveillance."

It's a change in wording of the parent, I thought it was obvious with the ellipses I was doing s/has never really had/hasn't yet/ on that comment.

Apple will sell you up the river as soon as it suits them to do it, assuming they haven't already which you can't know. I really think it's terribly naive to come to a different opinion on that but some people just love Apple and strongly believe they can do no wrong. Even around here...

Remember how apple were "nicer" than microsoft because they had no market share, then got it and became far, far worse immediately? 30% of your revenues taxed by apple for writing software running on the OS they wrote. Microsoft had wet dreams about being so evil. And so it is with their data collection, if they're nice only because they haven't yet worked out how to monetise it effectively with the opportunity cost of pretending they care about your privacy for marketing purposes, which they OBVIOUSLY don't. I mean seriously does anyone believe Apple give a flying hoot about your privacy? I struggle to see how such an opinion is tenable beyond "oh but they're not as bad as Google or Kim Jong Un yet"
During networking class it sort of dawned on me that the internet people and LAN people were different and ignoring each other, but they never actually said this. Doing so would have made things a lot clearer.
The book "Drug Interdiction: Partnerships, Legal Principles, and Investigative Methodologies for Law Enforcement" was written by law enforcement, for law enforcement. Here is an excerpt from the section about controlled deliveries:

>The undercover agent will attempt to solicit any statements in which the suspect may admit knowledge of the parcel delivery. The key to any parcel investigation is for law enforcement to prove that the subject had knowledge of the parcel’s contents. This is critical to the prosecution of the suspect in a parcel investigation. It is virtually impossible to litigate a criminal case without proving knowledge of contents.

I'll let you draw your own conclusions. Stay safe out there.
Global breadth remains supportive for stocks
WSL 2 requires Hyper-V. I wouldn't enable that even if you pay me. Windows already crashes too much, when you add Hyper-V to the mix it's a nightmare. I don't know how what or why it just screwed any PC I enabled it. I could swear my PC also became slower but I don't have any data to back that claim.
I mean having a look around at some of the technical innovation in this space seems to show that there are many firsts happening with the airframe.

https://www.wired.com/2016/06/course-f-35-comes-400000-augme...

They may not be firsts overall, but it seems like a pretty complicated environment to perform testing and development in.

I have to wonder what getting a software build out for a fighter jet must be like, and getting someone up in the air in different environments to test it must make the testing process daunting.
Glad I'm not the only one that thought this. I just want a folder on my computer I can put stuff in and have it backed up / synced automatically. I don't use/want any other features.
I think that somehow correcting the power imbalance is the key to improving the lives of grad students. In most normal jobs, if your boss is a jerk, you typically have the ability to leave and go somewhere else, and quite possibly end up better compensated as a result. It is exceedingly difficult to switch phd advisors, especially without sustaining a significant setback in your graduate career. I believe this one of the leading factors in exploitive advisor-grad relationships.
> Going for "toy" code to production ready is hard.

Too true. I recently implemented a feature, and I had a standalone working version 90% complete in a day or two. Getting the thing solid, tested, and integrated took the better part of a month.

Part of that, I think, is our education model. Every project I ever had in school was started from scratch, I worked on it for a short period of time, turned it in, and never looked at it again. I got really good at that. I can write a toy version of a hard problem in a very short period of time. But I'm terrible at integrating those things into a larger whole, and I know for a fact I'm not alone in this.

I think it's a huge problem that corporations think that a CS degree is job training and won't hire you if you haven't done it, but colleges think it's about abstract concepts and research and don't teach engineering principles.
Agreed. As much as I thought it looked like a pregnant fish from the side, I wonder if Boeing's design would have been better later in the development lifecycle.
The article OP linked to has 24 trackers blocked by uBlock Origin, where the original source has 8 trackers blocked. Either way, get an ad blocker, I suppose, but we should read the original source wherever possible to support the actual journalism
Liberty Media has indeed done well. I can now easily keep up with highlights and also purchase/stream races live which are affordable and available by race/entire season at reasonable prices.

World Rally Championship (WRC) is doing this too.

Cricket caught up too, ICC cricket world cup that occurs once every 4 years and this tournament is going on right now, ICC is now offering highlights packages on the official youtube accounts. There wasn't a way to purchase/watch highlights of games even if one wanted to pay for it before.

Even French open tennis had highlights packages available on their official youtube accounts.

Provide some basic stuff out for free, in interest of promoting the sport, consider it cost of user acquisition. And, then provide options to stream/additional access for a reasonable cost. Seems to work well for some sports, wonder when others will catch up.
Banning go fmt gets rid of one of the best parts of the go ecosystem, and I am horrified that you would do so.

go fmt may not be anyone's favorite code style, but having go fmt is so much better than dealing with everyone else's favorite (incompatible!) styles.
Why would one pick C or C++ over Rust for this project?
Keep your Slack status automatically sync'd with Google Calendar events
Yeah, I think the big question is which style of C&C is better. A single pilot in a F-35 closer to the action, or a bunch of pilots further away in a sitting duck with a big antenna.

The answer might even change as AI develops.

If I had a budget the size of the US military, I'd want both.
It used to be reasonably common to mute commercial TV and listen to the ABC (public radio)'s broadcast for commentary in AFL and cricket in Australia.

I don't hear about it much anymore which I would guess is due to the encoding delay of digital TV vs analogue radio broadcast and the general lack of AM/FM radios in the living area.

Foxtel (pay TV) also trialed an alternative commentary track with a more parochial commentator for Collingwood games.
Lots of people pretending Google has Microsoft's best interests at heart.
That's not really conclusive evidence that he wasn't identified by the government and rounded up later, though.
Has VR ever been sold as "practical"? I've never seen it used for anything than gaming. That's a large enough market to justify the tech IMO.
Sounds like the sort of thing your compiler should choose for you.
Huh, pretty good.

I'd say it's now $3,750 for the whole setup.

$3,000 for the tower/laptop plus docking station [1] [2], $650 for dual monitors [3] [4], and $100 for peripherals [5] [6] [7].

And that's with Amazon + non-Mac.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/ThinkPad-20ER002KUS-Windows-Professio...

[2] https://www.amazon.com/Lenovo-ThinkPad-Docking-40AJ0135US-Ge...

[3] https://www.amazon.com/Dell-27-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor-S2719DGF...

[4] https://www.amazon.com/WALI-Standing-Adjustable-Capacity-MF0...

[5] https://www.amazon.com/CORSAIR-K55-RGB-Gaming-Keyboard/dp/B0...

[6] https://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Lag-Free-Wireless-Gaming-Mou...

[7] https://www.amazon.com/SteelSeries-QcK-Cloth-Gaming-Mouse/dp...
> freaking victory if you ask me, San Francisco has been completely backward on this scooter permit.

Backwards in what sense? As a rider of the Muni I'm personally tired of stepping over scooters near Folsom/Embarcadero and regularly almost getting side swiped walking on the sidewalk. I think scooters are a viable mode of transportation but my safety isn't something I'd like to risk due to Bird's lack of willingness to work with the city and provide a safe deployment.

Also, I'm not sure exactly what you're point is. It seems you are conflating homelessness, high cost of living with Bird's scooter transportation.