skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is and isn't an issue.

By default, intranet authentication (spnego) is disabled in Firefox. There are numerous guides explaining how to turn it on, and it takes all of a couple of minutes to set up correctly after which point it just works.

FWIW IE has this problem too, in that by default it only enables negotiation for unqualified hostnames. If you want people to use an FQDN, you have to go add that FQDN to a list buried behind a couple of advanced dialogs.
Why does the truth have to be packaged for believably?

I'm not asking you to change your mind, I'm stating reality.
> hypocrisy was at the bottom

Where it belongs. Reminds me of Norm MacDonald’s recent joking about Bill Cosby being a hypocrite.
It is true that iTunes and Finder were written in Carbon, but it is also true that Apple's original plan was for Yellow Box (the OpenStep API that later became Carbon) to be the main API for developing programs under Rhapsody, which was essentially NeXT with Mac OS 8 theming and UI guidelines. Rumor has it that Adobe and Microsoft balked at the prospect of having to port their applications to Yellow Box (there was no guarantee in 1997 that Apple's purchase of NeXT would pay off), which led to Apple announcing its Mac OS X strategy during WWDC 1998, which included Carbon as a first-class API for the development of Mac OS X applications alongside Cocoa (Yellow Box).

Regarding iTunes, one detail about Carbon that is sometimes forgotten is Carbon originally ran on Mac OS 8 and 9 to facilitate the transition to Mac OS X (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_(API) ; to quote, "Carbon was introduced in incomplete form in 2000, as a shared library backward-compatible with 1997's Mac OS 8.1. This version allowed developers to port their code to Carbon without losing the ability for those programs to run on existing Mac OS machines.") Given that Mac OS 9 was still current when the first version of iTunes was released, it made sense for iTunes to be developed as a Carbon application (since Carbon applications can run on Mac OS 8 and 9 as well as Mac OS X) rather than as a Cocoa application (which can only run on Mac OS X).
That's an entirely different situation to the one GP linked. In your case the artifacts were excavated but in his case they were literally seized violently. It's even more egregious in his case because not only did the artifact have cultural significance, it had religious significance that was being violated.
I don't see why it's not both these things?
Highly amusing. Though, I think the original title "Dataset of Linus Torvalds' rants classified by negativity using sentiment analysis" is more accurate (and also funnier).
I read everything put in front of me when I bought my car. Boy was the finance guy pissed, cause it took me like an hour, and he makes his living upselling add-ons and stuff.

I'm also a pretty fast reader, so it is pretty obvious that they absolutely expect you to not read whatever it is you are signing, because I assume that it would take most other people well over an hour to read.
HSTS Preload prevents that from happening even if they never visited the site
I'm honestly surprised there hasn't been vigilante action to get historical artifacts returned from certain countries that looted all over the world (mostly England/France/Spain).
Turkey is not part of the Middle East.

The "playing of both sides" tactic is as old as dirt, and not exclusive to middle Eastern regimes. In fact, I'm certain Western nations perfected the art of doing this

Edit: I stand corrected. Turkey is considered part of the middle East.
> Among other things, this paper is not about an implementation methodology that ensures the GCD algorithm will take exactly the same amount of time regardless of the input.

The introduction to the paper talks about the importance of developing constant-time implementations of Euler's algorithm to avoid timing attacks, pointing out how algorithms with conditional jumps are susceptible to, for example, cache timing attacks.

As far as I understand it, a constant time algorithm, in the cryptographic sense, is one whose running time is uncorrelated with the precise secret information. If it were correlated, then timing attacks would let you infer the secret information. Presumably, if there is no random model, then the definition is that the algorithm must run in the exact same amount of time no matter the input, assuming a fixed size for the inputs. (At least one of the cited papers agrees with this definition.)

The contribution of the paper is a constant time divstep algorithm. The quote "All of these algorithms take constant time, i.e., time independent of the input coefficients for any particular (n, c)" seems to have ambiguous quantifiers and should be rewritten. It should be something like "given a fixed number of iterations n and a fixed number of input power series coefficients c, our divstep takes a constant n(c + n) simple operations, and the algorithm is constant time, i.e., the running time is not correlated with the precise inputs." Section 1.1 gives exact cycle counts for various CPUs.

Section 7 discusses how to use bit masking to actually implement it in a constant time way (in the cryptographic sense).

Anyway, divstepsx is certainly not O(1) time unless n and t are fixed constants.
I'll one up this. I recently went to Kaiser for a procedure and they handed me the signature thing and said, "you need your signature to indicate that you've checked-in". So I signed it. As the final part of check-in they handed me a stack of papers and said, "here's what you signed!"

I was stunned because they never gave any indication that the signature was for some sort of contract/legal form! Perhaps I should have suspected, but it still seemed really underhanded… If they had, I would have insisted on reading it first. Luckily, reading it afterward it was something I would have signed anyway, but come on!
consulting, where consulting is often just freelancing, is pretty inflexible about termination - the rule should be that you make at least 2X your normal monthly wage - but adjust for small times (increase, decrease slightly for longer times).

Generally with a 3 month project I do exactly 2 times my normal monthly wage, if I do a direct negotiation with company 2.5 times.

Generally termination is instantaneous because they are paying lots more for me than if I were a normal employee. But sometimes I have managed to get termination for a week or two, never more than that.

500 is not really a large company, although it is for a startup. In my experience smaller companies tend to be more jerks, because to them the money they are paying for a consultant is just WHOAAA. They want you to be productive day 1 and not mess anything up ever. Really big companies think productive in a couple weeks please, and if you do significantly better than that they are pleased. I like consulting for big companies because I get my money, they like to renew me, they don't care about what they pay they just want to get the results. I hate consulting for small companies, and will pretty much only do it anymore if project really interesting or I have friends there.

on edit: fixed typo.
From the source you linked:

"This story is based on interviews with more than 20 current and former USC employees. Most spoke on the condition of anonymity, citing patient confidentiality laws"

Odd behavior citing patient confidentiality laws if the former USC employees does not think they divulged any information that is covered by patient confidentiality.
Thank you for the positivity, maybe it will make me give it another try.
One of the earliest science fiction movies dealt with the question of, "if aliens were to land, how might we greet them?" Answer: "we'd shoot first, ask questions later." (The Day the Earth Stood Still) Sunny outlook on that one, eh?
This is a case of reading the headline, but really, no one other than developers embrace open source, if were honest with ourselves.
thank you very much! embrace extend extinguish must stop.
the vague possibility of windows creating de facto, 2 flavours of GNU software is something to head off.
if anyone and everyone can run any GNU code, on a win10 system, the corpse of linux on desktop will be laid out in state.

I might also add the link provided, points to some discussion that illuminates my concerns, namely the reduced functionality of the WSL environment.
There are two private RSA keys in the repository. That may be intentional, but it's usually not a good idea.

https://github.com/ByronHsu/Never-Blink/blob/master/backend/...

https://github.com/ByronHsu/Never-Blink/blob/master/backend/...
$100 isn't a roadblock to a funded implementation effort, but that's not the only meaningful interaction a functioning society can or should have with a standard. $100 is a large roadblock to many other types of meaningful interaction.
>You dont need that falsified data to come to the conclusion vaccinations in the US are a problem.

Yes you do. Vaccines are not a problem, they are a solution to a problem which has plagued every generation of humanity for all of history up until the past 3 generations.

Stop promoting child maiming and child murder. Vaccines have provably saved billions of lives.

And the fact that you would hide American racism and the shocking infant mortality in black communities under the anti-vax label? It's one of the most dishonest things I've ever read.

America has an infant mortality problem because we have a racism problem. FULL STOP END OF DISCUSSION. There is no infant mortality problem in white or Asian communities. That's just a fact. It has literally nothing to do with vaccines.
Companies spend money on advertising because it works.

Edit: Realized after you asked about credit score. A credit score is quite different than what China's rating system is all about from my understanding. Being dependable on repaying money or paying money you've promised to pay is a very specific rating that aligns with a person's accountability and/or ability to predict and manage their situation.
[sorry- splitting this off 'cause it's getting a bit large and to make the
whole thing easier to read]

>> What seems novel here is how significant architecture alone is (I wouldn't
guess it being this powerful), and this possibly has implications on the
connection with the human brain -- in which my vague impression is that
connections themselves are much more tuned than weights; also possibly giving
greater emphasis on architecture training.

You are surprised by how significant architecture is. I am not surprised at
all. I think it's been very clear for a while now that the success of deep
neural networks is entirely due to their architectures that are fine-tuned to
specific tasks. On the one hand, it's obvious that this is the case if you
look at the two major successes of deep learning: CNNs for vision and LSTMs
(and variants) for sequence learning. Both are extremely precise, extremely
intricate architectures with an intense focus one one kind of task, and that
kind of task, alone. On the other hand, the vast majority of neural net
publications are specifically about new architectures, or, rather, tweaks to
existing architectures.

In fact, in my boldest moments I'd go as far as to suggest that weight
training with gradient optimisation has kept deep neural nets back. Gradient
optimisation gets stuck in local minima, and it will always get stuck in
local minima, and therefore always be dumb as bricks. Which is evident in the
way deep neural nets overfit and are incapable of extrapolating outside their
training datasets.
Sure, that's possible.

One issue they had was their kids stayed up too late, didn't get enough sleep and screamed a lot near the end of the day. They were late to school (in elementary level) because the parents were tired too.

I think this is objectively bad parenting... but I could be wrong.

Edit: since I got one down vote let me add > they scream at their kids regularly (daily, sometimes the normal tone), let them play video games endlessly without supervision, and many other odd things. Kept a dog in a crate permanently in the house where it crapped and screeched at everyone. The list is long... Look at my other comments, I don't want to keep piling things on, but do some pretty outlandish things as parents.
The US is claiming that he illegally accessed a government system and that is why they have jurisdiction. Whether or not he actually did that is questionable.
My single greatest piece of advice:

Institute a safe word with your child. It goes both ways, no exceptions. When the safe word is issued, whatever was safeworded stops.

Typical rules of safe words, but my kid is 15 and we still use the safe word when things are going wayward (jokes, fights, annoyances, repetitions, references). Probably started it when he was 1 or 2.

Second favorite bit of advice:

Routines (brushing teeth, going to bed, leaving the house) should be as close to silent, w/r/t instructions, as possible. Talk to each other, but don't negotiate "whatever's next" or "c'mon" or "hurry up".
Published factual information that was damaging to a political candidate because it exposed their wrongdoing.
I doubt the other party would admit to that.

When it comes to he said she said you need actual evidence. The judge generally weighs what's said between both parties equally unless there's a reason not to.
I think it's important to distinguish between journalists who work in dangerous zones and get killed by accident vs intentional killings, usually to suppress the press. There isn't much you can do about the former but the latter is really dangerous and very tempting for authoritarians and others who want to stay in the shadows.
Isn't this similar to a neural network where the weights are binary: 0 or 1?
That seems tough. They might have to use more than a gram of flavor in every 1000 liter batch. I don't know if they would be able to handle such quantities of taste.
>two subjects

The conclusion is interesting but thats not much of a sample
Two actually, there's the one with "Maximum" too ;)
The parent was mentioning telling entrepreneurs this advice, who are interested in starting a business and making money.

"Contrary to American beliefs (being an American myself) not evertying is about making the most money."

It's not. But you will only really ever get to work on what you want when you are making enough money to quit your day job.

Contributing to open source can be a great experience. It can also be very taxing, especially when you have a family/other obligations outside of work.
I believe the findings of the Mueller report, that Trump did not collude with the Russians to sway the election. I'm rather relieved about it. The possibility of Russia hacking our elections was a very serious matter and I'm glad the case is closed. Still, I'm very very distressed about Trump being President. At least the Russians aren't involved. Now, regarding war crimes and killing journalists, Soviet Russia had a long history of that. It's very disturbing the US is going down that path.
Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian intelligence hacker group that hacked the Democratic National Committee emails and delivered to Assange and Wikileaks to publicly release. [1] Wikileaks then dropped the emails in parcels - behavior they had never done before - in order to manipulate news headlines leading up to the 2016 federal elections. [2]

This is confirmed by numerous, independent security firms, such as CrowdStrike, Fidelis Cybersecurity, Fireeye's Mandiant, SecureWorks, ThreatConnect, and others - making it not the same as the WMDs in Iraq smokescreen.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
[2] https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/wikileaks-hillary-clint...
Diversify on water? Or go into colas and kombuchas?

I don’t think the market potential is anywhere close to saturated. I can’t get lacroix at most (fast food) restaurants, for example. There is a large macro trend towards healthier eating, and lacroix is a prime target to eat away at colas. They need distribution and marketing prowess, not new products IMHO.
I trust those that have a clear ethics policy, such as WiredCutter which is run by NYC and maintains a firewall between the reviewers and their sales/affiliate teams.
So if I run Linux software on a Linux VM hosted on Azure where the servers themselves run a modified version of Windows Server 2008, is that also unacceptable? What if I run a Linux VM on VMWare running on Windows? Since it is open source, what if I just take your code, fork it, take out the checks for WSL and release my version that does work on WSL?
I think you are correct, I would add that by nature it seems kids model their behavior after their parents somewhat automatically.

I've turned my family around from some pretty bad behavior simply by changing how I act. If they don't change automatically to follow, I may have to point out the change I made, and that I expect them to as well.
Apple MBP 15 2019 disappoints in review – is Apple using selected test samples?
This is a good thing to talk about but let's not pretend that this is just a government thing.
> he's guilt of publishing video showing US armed forces murdering unarmed journalists and civilians.

I am not aware that Mr. Assange ever published anything 'showing US armed forces murdering unarmed journalists and civilians,' although I have read allegations in the press that he published video of people being killed collareally to lawful military action. Collateral damage is not murder. Yes, innocents get killed in armed conflict. The frequency needs to be minimised, of course.

International law forbids intentionally attacking civilians or attacking an otherwise-legitimate military target when civilian casualties are clearly excessive in relation to the military advantage; it doesn't forbid belligerents from taking a course of action which will result in unintentional civilian casualties.

I am neither a lawyer nor a targeteer, though, so I could have gotten some of the wording or details wrong, but I believe the general principle is true.
Assange working with Russians is a conclusion reached by all US intelligence agencies. Saddam having WMDs was only the conclusion of a stovepiped intelligence team that reported directly to Dick Cheney and created by him (the office of special plans).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stovepiping
Why would the US go to all this trouble just to put him in jail for less than a year?
> It is weird and unfair for a support partner [GitHub] to earn significantly more money than the core persons involved in open source

>> How are the Electron project creators and core contributors not 'the core persons involved in open source'?

>>> I didn't say that and would not have agreed to saying that.

?

> requiring their participation in the culture of gifting

If it's required, it's not really gifting, is it?

> why companies typically don't participate in open source commons

Open source has never been better supported by corporations. Billions (probably tens of billions) of dollars are being poured in to open source. redis was a hobbyist project and now it's backed by over $100M in corporate money.

I just very much dislike this view that open source is in a bad place because it doesn't fit some moral judgement of how money should work in open source. It's like Stallman's campaign for 'freedom' as long as your view of 'freedom' is exactly the same as his.
Except that IE6 didn't die when IE7 came out - it stuck around. I was working at a company that still had to support IE6 when IE8 was coming out - and firefox was quite popular by that point - we ended up dropping support for it shortly after chrome got popular.

IE6 outlived it's expected lifetime by leaps and bounds due to lots of customers stuck on machines locked into running old version of windows due to financial or corporate policy reasons.
I backed my rental car into a tree and scratched the bumper on the vacation end of a business trip to Israel a couple of years ago. When I was at the rental agency working out how much I owed them, the lady handed me a paper to sign, completely in Hebrew, then got visibly annoyed when I insisted on looking at it through Google translate first.
Austrian Postal Service Releases Crypto Collectible Stamps
So sad. Everything we are living through is "1984" in real life. Journalism, please break free of the statism and embrace your true role!

When Trump got elected, everyone in the media lost their collective minds. I mean, really, Jalopnik? You dolts!

You were supposed to maintain distance, not gotten involved, not backed a horse at all. You failed at that completely!

Now you will suffer the consequences for it you Pravda fools.
>>But I think you need to take a step back and ask what the point of a military is.

I completely agree. I think at the heart of the United States is a terrible vagueness and corrupt idea of why we have a military.

They to call it the War Department. While that certainly doesn't sound very nice, it cut to the direct point in having a military: fighting a war. That made it a lot easier to reason about.

So what's a war? A war is when people are doing something you don't like and you want them to stop. You have tried talking and reasoning with them and that didn't work. So you have to figure out other ways of making them stop fighting you.

That's it. You don't need guns, tanks, or even explosives. If you can make those other people over there stop fighting you, they surrender, you win.

At some point, probably around the time of WWI, mission creep started taking us into all kinds of places that either wasn't a war or we didn't like admitting was a war. So we started changing the language, setting up all sorts of units and programs that were only tangentially-related to war, and so forth. I read at some point when Bush was president we had military operations in over 80 countries.

Now most of those operations were peaceful: medic clinics, training, and so forth. You could argue that they were strategically fighting a war -- happy, trained people tend to be happier. But that sure looks like social programs, diplomacy, and police action than war. Don't get me wrong: these may be great things to do. My point is that if you stretch the language so far, then pretty much any damned thing you want to can be considered part of the military. Or a war, for that matter.

Based on this, and the ton of inertia and corruption that's been associated with war fighting since forever, I really don't think we can expect the Department of Defense to act in a sane manner. My gut tells me that we built the F-35 because we thought that's what we were supposed to do: come up with new, expensive tech that's better than the other guys.

We're going to need to get back to funding DoD to fight wars: real, live, in-person conflicts where the other guys need to be convinced to stop fighting us. That's going to take a ton of re-organization and strategic planning that I don't see happening any time soon. (Also, agreed with your statement about tunneling money to contractors, and defending the country. We've come a long, terrible way from the idea of a citizen soldier defending his home.)
Basically as I've read it the charge isn't about the disclosures themselves but Assange's assistance in cracking a password to get to the documents.
You sure bread and pasta make you gain weight because "carbs," not just because bread and pasta taste good?