skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I did a little research, and it doesn't appear that the complex is owned by either Whole Foods or Amazon, but rather a Colorado-based developer (non-local, haha).

https://www.statepress.com/article/2019/02/newwholefoodscomi...

Your neighbors are apparently upset enough to spend the time creating an entire faux-site critical of the project! I'm impressed.

http://thelocaltempe.co
Just FYI, there are few remaining use cases for OrderedDict, now that built-in dict keeps insertion order.
>It's the fact that the 23 people killed in school shootings in 2018 - tragic as these deaths are - have managed to take away all the attention from the over 3,000 children killed by motor vehicles that year.

Should we really be comparing the two? I mean, even as a teenage driver, you are warned about the dangers of distracted driving, DD, etc. Automobile accidents are a common occurrence and a risk that people willingly take and accept whenever they enter their car.

I’ve seen multiple stories in a night about automobile crashes on my local news and not national, which is how it should be. Auto accidents usually only affect the community it happened in, not the US as a whole. When we understand the damage—physical and mental—gun violence causes to society as a whole compared to auto accidents, it is no surprise that gun violence is a much more out-of-left-field event than an auto accident.

To combat this, though, would you suggest we ban all motor vehicles? You see how silly that is to read? Even if it is silly to you, attempting to regulate the automotible industry would be a lot harder than putting limitations on available guns. Hell, we don’t even have a solid public transportation system that would be able to handle all of the commuters who gave up their cars to combat the auto accident statistics.
Yes, of course. But what makes the logical content of the documents/elements in the "paper trail" something that cannot be represented as text files or perhaps photographs?
Yes; I've done this myself. It's also not uncommon for individuals to contract themselves out through a shell corporation.

The test as indicated in the article doesn't say anything about this kind of B2B arrangement, though. Why wouldn't this law apply to individuals in this case?
I managed to get an Apple LaserWriter II to render a Mandelbrot set very nicely at 300dpi in reasonable time by tracing the boundaries of a few select level sets: much fewer points to examine so much faster.
Discrete Mathematics and Functional Programming (2016)
IMO they are. I teach k12 esl(pre:edit, kindergarten to year 12 English as a second language), my highest levels - free conversation we tried a spot where students would tell us about an interesting news story they had seen, heard or read about in the last week. We have dropped that idea. 30 students over a month we're regularly admitting to not actually knowing any real news outside of their immediate circle.

Note that these students arnt known for slacking off when it comes to homework, we deliberately didn't set a goal, it was something we planned to ask in class without notice.

Small sample, absolutely. But it was eye opening for the 4 teachers in this.

Not sure if this will help the conversation, but a little anecdote doesn't hurt every now and then :-)
In any event, I think all the relevant naval operations from this era are documented, but not perhaps well-collated. Pirates on the other hand were not well-known for documenting their operations. Some archival research may result in historic candidates for the vessel.
Then probably it is a UAV from another U.S. DoD dept acting as a Red Team to test the 'New Air Defense Tech'.
If you think this stuff is wild wait till more people hear about UAP’s turning off Nukes, with military eyewitnesses verifying that it happened on multiple occasions...
Cars killing people also usually do not have a wide reaching effect beyond the community it happened in.
I feel like your argument is biased towards the contractor argument probably caused by your own experiences. Have you considered the opposite side where there are people who _only_ wants to be a full time employee so there's stability in their lives?

Its hard to take your words that _most_ people want it without anything backing.
What reason do you have to believe we can't tackle both problems at once? Society confronts countless major problems concurrently. You could equally argue that every moment spent considering automobile accidents is time that could be better spent confronting climate change.
Indeed I do.

1) Cease all forms of oil and automobile subsidy.

2) (At the federal level) change the structure of infrastructure aid to states to incentivize pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure over automobiles.

3) Ensure the schools are accessible by pedestrians and cyclists and that they are located in areas which are surrounded by traffic-calming infrastructure.

4) (at the local level) build more curb-extensions, greenways, chicanes, diverters, and other structures to get cars away from schools, playgrounds, and other areas where kids play.

There are sound, scientifically-backed tactics for doing this, but most of them require getting a place on the agendas of several legislative committees who are probably too busy talking about banning a particular color rifle or some other asinine thing.
> "What's the best trackball in 2019?"

Kensington Slimblade, still.
Right, that hasn't done kids any favors.

Parents who treat their children as if they are fragile (for example, by keeping them away from dirt and potential allergens, such as peanuts) are depriving their children’s immature immune systems of the learning experiences those systems need to develop their maximum protective capacity.

Children’s social and emotional abilities are as antifragile as their immune systems. If we overprotect kids and keep them “safe” from unpleasant social situations and negative emotions, we deprive them of the challenges and opportunities for skill-building they need to grow strong.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jan/10/by-mol...
But it's not just a hard problem we can solve once, it's a wildly difficult problem that we haven't been able to solve for thousands of years.

I brought up the Defense in Depth angle because I think it's kind of the same category of problem. Why do we need multiple layers of security on our devices -- why shouldn't Apple just validate the code on everything that gets submitted to the store? Why shouldn't developers just write code that's bug free?

Because they just can't.

It's not that everyone has stopped trying to answer questions like "what is the purpose of society?". Nobody's talking about abandoning anything. If you think the problem is solveable, you're welcome to jump into philosophical circles right now and solve it. And once you've solved it, I promise I will happily move over to a totalitarian system where a perfectly informed formula decides what my life should be.

In the meantime, we need a pragmatic solution, and individual freedom is the best one I've seen proposed.
Skynet Moto-Terminator
Yeah! what about that![0]

0: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
What your teachers prob never told you about the parabola, hyperbola and ellipse
I don't think I am. I can certainly understand that it's doubly frustrating when after all the explanations you still don't get an answer - but there's a couple of further issues with your point specifically. As has been noted elsewhere, questions need to be appropriate for the venue they're asked in. A general-purpose channel for <language>-users may not be the best place to ask extremely niche questions about algorithm design in edge-case scenarios where none of the usual answers apply.

If what you're doing is hyper-specialised to your individual environment, there's a very real chance no-one will know the answer. If you put the effort in to explain, in detail, WHY you need this really strange problem, you may get lucky and someone smart and experienced in a closely related field may be around and willing to put in the time to help you. Or not. But you're still going to need to be willing to to in depth into the reasons behind what you're doing or they will likely ignore you.

The lack of response probably isn't because people are dazed and confused, it's probably because your constraints are so restrictive that what you need isn't free IRC help, but a specialist contractor who you're actually paying for their time.
They should have put some round ears on it...
Genomics institute to close world-leading animal facility
>Voluntary delegation is different than involuntary delegation

I mean, this is 100% correct, yet that's not quite the problem, and stating it that way leads to overall confusion, the issue is that policy makers, companies and other profit motivated groups found ways to get inside the root unconscious mental proceses which lead to concious decision making, this just means that said groups can hijack the agency of thousands of people at the same time with the same set of tools. That is what's happening right now, it had been the case that groups were using mass media to manufacture consent, but this new machinery is far more efficient and less expensive than previous systems

The defense in depth analogy is indeed very good, yet the agency of a critical amount of people has been compromised by this new machinery, and this machinery preys on people's unconscious instincts, fears and epigenetic predispositions. Those are things which simply can't really be postdoc taught to hundreds of millions of people at a whim
> School shootings are not a leading cause of death for kids in the USA. Instead, they cause terror: freaking active shooter drills, metal detectors and security theater, armed campus officers, all the crap that I really don’t want my kids to go through.

Shooting incidents don't cause those things. Administrators and school boards who are unwilling to engage in thought leadership do.
Seems reasonable to me that there's more coverage of terrorism than heart disease. It's less predictable, more diverse, less within my personal control, etc. I'm more interested in the one murder in my town this year than in the hundred deaths from heart disease.
In a word, trust. You can represent the information digitally, including via scanning, but you cannot digitally guarantee that the representation matches the paper copy; and the paper copy will likely hold in any disputes absent evidence of manipulation of the paper copy.
Magic Leap is the most obvious one that comes to mind.

I can't say if Facebook/Oculus has set as high goals.

Others could have been working on grand tech but not that I'm aware of:

- Amazon: Diamond Age Dynabook
- Netflix: eyeTV
- Microsoft: Hololens already
- Apple: eyePhone
Then what's the point if gig economy?

With these laws it won't be profitable for those companies to run their business.
Minor bug on the website: on mobile opening the menu brings up a "view on github" link which covers the close button.
It really depends on the suspect. If the suspect is a white supremacist, it's all over the news immediately. If it doesn't fit the current narrative, we might see the suspect 3 days later.

I've been recently paying attention to this and one of the latest shootings involved a trans student in the process of transitioning. It had barely any coverage.

There really is a bias in the media that is now bordering on censorship.
Having said that I personally would prefer more coverage of new ideas, research discoveries and other more thought provoking topics that also sent so depressing.
nowadays its mostly fortnite skins
That's something both Polish and international historians condemn, and there's no serious justification of this act, not in maintream Polish history books, nor on Wikipedia (described as "annexation" in .pl wiki). PS: Poland was not a signatory to the Munich agreements.
a bit exaggerated, but sadly there's a core of truth to it.
I think we're going to have to learn to live with some kind of either:

A. Radical transparency, where everyone has access to everything about everyone else and privacy exists as "rice paper" privacy[1]; or

B. Techno-totalitarianism with people divided into "Morlocks" and "Eloi", technocrats and techno-serfs.

As technology progresses the amount of available data grows geometrically, and I don't think there's any realistic way to put that genie back in the bottle (without postulating some sort of massive civil/ecological collapse), so I don't think the argument about "privacy" makes sense. The FANG companies et. al. are already in a god-like position in re: the hoi polloi.

I think we should assume "total information awareness" and then try to build a worthwhile civilization on that basis.

(FWIW, I hope for A but it seems like B is pretty much inevitable at this point. YMMV)

[1] In Japan walls were made of literal rice paper stretched on frames, and as an obvious corollary people generally knew their neighbors' business. "Rice paper privacy" refers to social conventions to, er, "pretend" that there was actual privacy.
> That's not an externality. The person starving to death is the same person who didn't buy insurance.

It is an externality. Maybe you don't mind having the streets of your town full of homeless people, but I do. In fact, I mind it very much. When someone ends up on the street, that makes my life less pleasant even though I'm not the one who was uninsured.
The law is about classifying individual contractors as employees. It's not going to re-classify employees of one company as employees of another.
> To combat this, though, would you suggest we ban all motor vehicles? You see how silly that is to read?

I assert that this is a naked strawman. Do you think that Vision Zero and similar projects deserve such a simplistic response?

There are proven ways to reduce automobile deaths, but they require political will and action.
Instead of WWII they started to teach about The Great Patriotic War, which starts in 1941, when Germany attacks USSR. I heard many Russians deny WWII, since the first two years are full of shameful acts and nazi-friendly stuff.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Patriotic_War_(term)
Actually, this might happen in the future. You could totally see it as, any independent person who want to offer rides as a service might need a platform for it. And if Uber offers itself more as a marketplace, this could make sense. Pay Uber a fixed price to be on the app, or have them take a percentage, and be routed through calls, but set your own prices for the rides.

I'm surprised there isn't an Uber like app that operates this way yet actually.
microk8s worked out of the box for me. On Ubuntu and even CentOS.
They aren't "charged with" anything. Some elementary particles happen to interact with one another in a particular and consistent way, and we label them according to how they behave with something we call charge.

Electric charge is fundamental.
This was downvoted to death within 6 minutes.
Downvoters: why?

Perhaps people think it's off-topic, and distracts from the discussion at hand.
Well Uber has not been profitable for 10 years. So, changing the laws will make it worse. But uber is horrible anyway.
Showing victims vs suspects is a con. It's not a secret how to responsibly cover shootings in the news, and hasn't been for 30 years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PezlFNTGWv4
I don't think that the particular cause of death has a dramatic impact on the wideness of the reach of the effect.
Ask HN: Best way to monetize how-to content?
Frequently when working on a project, I figure out how to do something novel with a technology/language/framework, or something that's unique for a combination of tools. Often times there just isn't any helpful explanations of the use-case online, or the documentation/tutorials out there are not fleshed out in any quality format that's beginner friendly.

In those cases, I'd love to have a process to make content that shows others how to get started solving the similar problems I faced. What would be the optimal choice (or combination) of formats that would be the most profitable? Youtube tutorial video, along with a written article (personal blog post, then exported to Medium) and link to github sample code? Micro course on a proprietary learning platform like Udemy? I'd love to know what combination others have found that has produced the most results in exposure and profit.
The public demanded it! You can’t just be an administrator and say, “well, school shootings are bad, but statistically they aren’t a problem, so we don’t need to do anything.” Well, you can try to make this argument, but you’ll be out of your job quickly.

Kids die in auto accidents at the rate of auto accidents, a tragedy, a common tragedy, so no one pays much attention to it. But school shootings, they aren’t common at all, they are horrific, and no one wants to be caught doing nothing about it, and since we can’t get rid of the guns in the USA, active shooter drills it is.
From another POV: those two week later Poland as a state didn't exist, the former Polish government was in exile, and USSR took back territories that Poland took from USSR in the 1919-1921 Polish-Soviet war.
Nintendo had only two buttons until the Gameboy Advance. Even the NES just had two.
Can you host the control server yourself without public cloud?
When it comes to gang shootings in the inner city, it's way more than what's in this list.
Antitrust also covers government. If Google colluded to pass laws to prevent competition, they broke the law.
>You can also approach someone else at faster closing speed than c if both parties are traveling where the sum of their velocities toward each other is greater than c (like both are going at .6c).

In neither your reference frame or the other person's will it appear to be true that your closing speed is faster than c.

However due to the speed of light delay you may perceive the other person as going much faster than c, but this is strictly an illusion. For example, if I were watching a near-light speed ship approaching earth in a telescope, I might see it begin its journey and then see it arrive a few seconds later and my monkey brain would conclude it made the whole trip in the time I was watching it. In reality the light from when it started the trip is a few years old.
Probably some teenagers have done important things. I don't expect them to have a long list of accomplishments (or even the same is true of most adults), but I am also not going to denigrate or take away from their experience with phrasing like "ain't done jack squat". Seems unnecessarily angry, and like a put-down.
Entropic: A Federated Package Manager
I gotta say those folks on Brave New World seemed quite happy tbqh
Alternatively, companies are able to keep a larger share of the value generated by labor by exploiting differences in living conditions and standards of living (usually unfavorable conditions/standards).
HTTPS: //befittinglife.net/blog-details/62
Nasa Hires 3 Companies for Moon Science Deliveries
I think that adults realize that one is put through so many contexts through life that one's "traits" and strengths changes as the wind blows them. To that end, social roles are a more reliable measure as to what they can give or experience; they are what one has to provide, or has provided, after all.
Sun's Mysterious 11-Year Cycle Appears to Be Driven by Alignment of the Planets
"USSR attacked Poland on 17-th of September 1939 (co-starting the 2WW, together with Germany)."

German army was to complete the occupation of the Sudetenland (part of Czechoslovakia) by October 10 (1938), and an international commission would decide the future of other disputed areas. Czechoslovakia was informed by Britain and France that it could either resist Germany alone or submit to the prescribed annexations. The Czechoslovak government chose to submit.

The Soviet Union also had a treaty with Czechoslovakia, and it indicated willingness to cooperate with France and Great Britain if they decided to come to Czechoslovakia’s defense, but the Soviet Union and its potential services were ignored throughout the crisis.

https://www.britannica.com/event/Munich-Agreement
A decade ago I used to point people with dumb questions to this guide. Now I believe I was wrong. It is good when you are facing a smart question, but to answer on a dumb one with a link to the smart question guide or to LMGTFY[1] is a no way.

If you do not like the question, you are free to ignore it. Hopefully someone else will answer. If you see that a couple of days no one is volunteered, you might want to nicely point people to a local faq or to a guide. It is not that hard.

But mostly I dislike this guide due to a stance Raymond and Rick took: "we are cool smart and busy hackers, so go google, search for answer in a mailing lists (mostly completely unusable), read the manual (a few dozens of pages with a good chance to not find any answers), and complete a couple of other rituals to deserve a right to ask us". Go jump to a lake with your arrogance. I'll ask someone else.
If it was the opposite, then you'd complain that they're using victims to make more money and destroying their dignity.

Advice: don't read US newspapers if they bother you, start your own newspaper or simply get over it. One can't please everyone and US has the inconvenient freedom of speech.
Fact is that shooters and serial killers are idolized by the press and Hollywood. Every time there's a school shooting (every other week) the press shows images of the shooter and a bunch of teenagers is inspired to do the same. We make movies & TV series about serial killers. Scroll through Netflix and every other thumbnail has a gun. It's constantly reinforced in our minds.
To me this is a much more easier problem to solve than the gun deaths issue. You might not like all of these, but here are some effective ideas... Enforce speed limit laws more often. Not just two hours once a month in spots. Enforce no phone use laws. (Stand on any street corner and you will easily spot this issue.) Ban car commercials on TV that display cars speeding. Install speed governors on cars sold in the US. Don't design city streets like highways. Narrow the width of the lanes. Install more round-a-bouts.
At the time, it didn't prevent Poles to take their bite from Czechoslovakia too.
Not disagreeing that shooters who do t fit the narrative get less coverage, but I’d also point out that the shooting you’re describing in Colorado had a (thankfully) very low body count
Can someone explain the rationale of setting up a domain for just one blog post?

As well as seeming like quite a lot of effort, the fact domains expire means that content probably won't past 2 years unless you fancy keeping paying for the handful of visitors it'll get.
Can you summarize this and say what makes it obligatory?