skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, but the satellites are not too maneuverable. The trajectory is mostly mechanical.
Most people wouldn't do that because it's effectively redundant if you trust TLS and that the server is not compromised. However I think your proposed technique would be useful in cases where TLS is broken or the server is in some way compromised, running on low trust hardware, etc. So it's a good precautionary measure.

Grandparent is also right that your users password can still be compromised on other services, giving an attacker a way into your own. Password managers don't have that problem.
I think 'Township money' just means the resources of the community.
as a prospective user, bad code makes me skeptical of the computation accuracy.
My understanding is that this is correct.
Blendle.com works fairly well for news consumption. It's the microtransaction model, but they've got it fairly streamlined, they have most of the big names signed up and their daily summary is nice.
(Same discussion as on lobste.rs)

Thank you for this link, I've only seen the initial CVE announcement.

> This is not FUD [...]

The site is practicing FUD, it accomplishes communicating a message in an untruthful fashion by mixing two different things into one. (Just check out their stack overflow links, it is not clear if they are talking about root or `--privileged`)

People are confused wether `docker root == host system root` and this site doesn't help them to get a better understanding whether or not it is the case. (It isn't) Plus it misses what its main goal should be, running a Secure Docker environment.

You are talking about a previous exploit, not a permanent issue. Keeping your host system up to date and additional hardenings is always going to be necessary in exposed environments.

> Use Docker containers with SELinux enabled (--selinux-enabled). This prevents processes inside the container from overwriting the host docker-runc binary.

Authors recommendation is also using SELinux, this also helped with outer Docker/Kernel related vulnerabilities in the past. Why isn't the page even mentioning this?

---

I think it is important to give a proper outlook on how problematic things are and not to confuse people with super high expectations. You often end up running containers that you have only little control about.

1. Avoiding root in self-built containers is definitively the way to go, since it reduces (unnecessary) attack surface, but

1. It requires some glue code

2. Might slow down your builds (`Dockerfile` multistage `cp --from=0 /app /app` loses permissions, requires chown afterwards)

2. Avoiding root in CI/CD is nearly impossible
1. many package managers won't work

2. some capabilities to test things (sshd for testing ansible scripts for example)

3. can you use kaniko for building Docker images from within Docker without root?

3. Harden your Docker host

1. Use SELinux

2. Use monitoring

3. Drop capabilities that aren't necessary (NET_BIND_SERVICE, NET_RAW, ...)

4. Use docker network separation

5. Frequent system updates

4. Keep yourself up-to-date, especially if you are running an exposed environment

Just googled and this is rather more helpful:

- https://dev.to/petermbenjamin/docker-security-best-practices...

- https://blog.aquasec.com/docker-security-best-practices

- https://sysdig.com/blog/7-docker-security-vulnerabilities/

- https://github.com/docker/docker-bench-security
Gls: Goroutine Local Storage
You are right, it would probably be a long shot.

I am basing this on some assumptions, such as that the truncation happens after Gmail's content sanitizing has already happened, not before.

But even omitting the security aspect, such rude truncation is something I would have expected on some low-budget webmail app done as a high-school student's IT class project, not on a polished offering of a multi-billion company.
Whole genome sequencing on humans has only existed for 16 years (1). In 2003, the cost was prohibitive until NGS (next generation sequencing) techniques became commercialized. We can definitely disagree here as 15 years of research which in my worldview is focused mostly on coding DNA and karyotyping doesn’t seem like much to draw this conclusion. There’s plenty of decades old science that has shifted or been rewritten due to the rise of new techniques related to faster computing power.

It’s quite possible that I’m biased based on the labs I’m familiar with and papers I’ve been reading. I just haven’t seen the focus that you are talking about.

1 https://www.yourgenome.org/facts/timeline-history-of-genomic...
I've often wondered why the government doesn't establish a trust to fund public news.
That's true... to a point. There could be a "load more" button - rather than taking users to a new mail view. There could be a "plain text" mode. There could be a "turn off images" option (there is, but it is hidden well).

There are lots of ways of making things faster for people with slow/expensive Internet connections without degrading the experience for everyone else.
The job of police is to police (it's kind of in the name). Enforcing laws is only a small part of policing. It's unfortunate that many people, including both police and politicians, seem to forget or maybe don't understand that.

Policing means arbitrating in a dispute even when no laws have been broken, helping those in our community incapable of helping themselves (accident victims, people whose meds are off). It doesn't really mean the regular use of violent force or even the threat of an immediate death penalty to gain compliance with a personally conveyed order. Tht's not justice and it's arguably not even law enforcement.
> > Partner with brands to create sponsored articles

> Which is a nicer way of saying “just get out of the news business and go into marketing.”

I disagree. No one said to have everything be sponsored and when the content is good (and clearly marked up as sponsored) it can be fine.
It is a very great pity that Bloomberg did not release the 418 page document they claim to have seen. It could be enormously helpful in countering the FUD created by Ethiopian Airlines and amplified by the idiot news media.

The narrative seems now to be deteriorating from "Boeing made an unsafe plane" to "oh, there were too many distractions for the poor pilots", which is objectively rubbish. The preliminary accident report makes it factually clear that the pilots were incapable of flying the aircraft manually.

Distractions and heavy workload are a normal part of flying a commercial aircraft. Properly trained pilots do not crash planes because there are too many things beeping and saying "terrain, pull up".
React Hooks in Apollo Client for GraphQL Queries and Mutations
I think the unfortunate assumption fact is that intentions and especially original intentions don't really matter with how much they drift.

Newspapers really mostly cost time - it is just that people can't spare the time - much less with the relevant abilities.

I am not sure if there is one without problems in some way. Even independent funding can always be corrupted. I sadly must question the historic effectiveness of the newspapers at the first goal.

In the past they were really /even worse/. Kent State was initially greeted with a "the damn kids had it coming" reaction and the Winter Soldier testimonies of War Crimes committed or witnessed in Vietnam were outright ignored on the east coast. We remember Woodward and Bernstein well for their role in the Pentagon Papers but they were outliers and even they relied upon covert betrayals showing the ineffectiveness of the news institutions at being effective oversight under those circumstances when there was an entire additional secret and illegal undeclared war in Cambodia.

Internet reporting can be better at least for breaking big stories as anyone can post bombshells - but anyone can also post absolute crap.
Could you have unquoted attributes in transitional?
Australian Teen Hacked Apple Twice in Search of a Job Offer
LOL. This is because Apple can do no right on HN.
C++ has concepts now. What's the excuse?
I think it's still worth paying attention to size of the JS download. If you download 500k of JS, it means that after ungzipping it, it will be 2mb or more. Your browser needs to parse and execute that code, which also takes time, and it impacts the user experience.

Also it's easier (at least from developer's perspective) to deal with a big image than to deal with big JS codebase. You can't just replace it with something smaller, you often need to spend a significant amount to shrink it.
RabbitMQ 3.8 Feature Focus – Single Active Consumer
Low-code feels like a deja vu. I call it throwable applications.

built quick to satisfy a short term need.

There is a space for those but it doesn't fit all.
Even if sort overcomes the memory limitation by using disk space, it's O(n log n), whereas de-duplication through a hash is O(n).

You might be better off switching to another scripting language that has some database API for storing key/value pairs on disk.

Or: use a 64 bit machine for a bigger address space, and add temporary swap files so you have more virtual memory.
I agree.

I think it's worth reading the sucsess stories of mendix/outsystems about using their low-code tool to build complex software , like hospital management systems or hospital analytics system, and than try to form an opinion.

https://ryortho.com/breaking/kermit-using-mendix-helping-hos...

https://www.outsystems.com/blog/introducing-sapphire-hospita...
i tried firefox, and loved the experience, but ran into a few minor bugs related to css that just made absolutely no sense.

also, it regularly ran my cpu at max throttle when doing anything video-related within the browser (watching netflix, on a video chat, etc), while chrome is much more cpu-friendly with those things (don't know why that is).

I tried Opera, as well, and ran it as my main browser for months (almost a year, actually), but there is a wierd bug in windows related to the browser bar expanding when the machine wakes up from sleep, where the only way to fix it is to restart the browser entirely.
>It also opens many people to reading and philosophy...

I would argue that the more religious the less one is inclined to broader reading and philosophy because the practice is usually constrained to one's own religious ideologies.
Hope he gets a job lol
One thing that bothers me is that churches still get special status. When you look at the Catholic Church it’s pretty much guaranteed that any other organization would have been shut down a long time ago if it had shown the same behavior in light of child abuse. Churches should be treated like any other organization but I think there is still a lot of reluctance to do so.
ESGV as an ETF of this.
I don't think so. For example, sum of first 5 integers:

sum i = 1 to 5 of i -> 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 15

Nothing mutable there. In functional programming this is done with a `fold`, which doesn't use mutation.
Sounds like you're frustrated and also know it's you got you into this.
News needs to evolve. Right now, we are not frustrated with news websites, but with the way they try to make money, and put obstacles in the way of users getting what they want - news. Infact, for the most users, they are so used to website that they wont even look at the part which displays ads. And there is no point showing ads to the regular readers - unless the ad inventory buyers are unlimited - as the same ad loses relevance over time. Right now, the focus of the news sites is to get as many users as possible (not just views) without focusing on the core users.

My feeling is that it wont be a tweak in the business model but more in the way news is offered. One often talked about ideal case is that ads become so relevant that they are not intrusive, but that is yet to take scale, and is costly even for the ones who try to do it.

There are good websites which get enough money to live on donation and do produce the content worthy of it. Then there are different ways of consuming news which have worked. Like Inshorts - news in 60 words, mostly a jist without clickbait - which works really well in India, and can survive on ad model around relevant content.

Last thing I feel is bringing an offline model online, which for some reason these websites did away with. Newspapers mostly worked because everyone had an opinion after reading the news. News sites dont like community and moderation and prefer to have them on social media, but that is where the opportunity lies. Make room for discussion, get users engaged, let the author explain his point, and then you dont have to show too many ads on the user's first visit. Maybe this is an extension of twitter, or maybe it gets dirty (hence moderation), I think it will work given how it works now on reddit and even whatsapp groups.
The Guardian has taken a clear turn towards a clickbait approach in the last several years. Much of the newspaper is now as as sensationalist as a tabloid, although The Guardian has taken the opposite side of the culture wars from most of them as its niche.

I still find some quality reporting in The Guardian, but it too is clearly facing the same financial pressures as other newspapers.
I think it's slightly more nuanced in that it's "codeless software that tries to replicate all the use cases functions of coded software" is doomed to fail.

Look at Zapier, while they do (now) have some options that let you build your own functions, etc. their bread and butter is replacing custom cross service integrations with a handful of clicks and some structured data.
I was asked to comment by Thomas Claburn from The Register[1]:

The most concise summary I can come up with is in the article:

> Google's primary business is incompatible with unimpeded content blocking.

* * *

[1] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/05/29/google_webrequest_a...
That's not a very good analogy, given that the only reason fruit is healthy is because of all the fiber that slows down sugar absorption. If you drank the same amount of sugar in a moderate amount of fruit as juice it would be unhealthy.
Saying "A can provide X" doesn't mean "without A there cannot exist X"
Don't excuse "established religion" so quickly. With the accumulation of prestige and power comes even greater crimes: https://buffalonews.com/2019/05/19/why-buffalos-child-molest...
> A little more than 12 years ago, building and hosting a website was a serious undertaking, costing thousands, and requiring many experts.

Certainly not - any teenager could do it alone even more than twelve years ago. I remember using Notepad - before syntax highlighting was really a thing - to build a site in PHP and hosting it with Apache. The only cost was the domain registration fee.
Completely agree. JPIMedia seems to be one of the big players, most of their content is just from "the i newspaper". There's a little bit of local content, and it's all locked behind a "turn off your ad-blocker or else" script.

Newsquest is another. Poorly written journalism which usually looks as if it hasn't been proof-read.
News websites, if you're going to have a monthly limit of n articles (NYT, HBR, etc.), let me first have the option of continuing to read after loading the page. Too many times following some link (from Hacker News, Twitter, etc.) leads to an article I don't want to read but counts against my tiny monthly allowance.
7-Part Series on Running Spring Boot and Angular Applications on Azure
If this is just windows done better that's interesting, if this is another chromium style stripped down OS I'm not sure how to feel about that - as long as it wouldn't impact main windows that's fine but gaming is a pretty important use case for windows, and hopefully a stripped down OS without strong support for computers that can do things like run more demanding software locally wouldn't become their flagship. For other use cases, thisbis definitely instep forward, chromebooks are great for people not familiar with technology who just want something that works, and not needing to fiddle around with updates will be a boon.
Is this the modular Mac Pro everyone's waiting for (not from aesthetics point of view, of course)?
This always reminds me of this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw9gaEiQAxY

people should be paid to work to a product under some direction, if you want some professional outcome

teams where people come and go rarely have built solid products

Take for example the Linux kernel, Alan Cox has been working on it non-stop from 1991 to 2009, and even after resigning as TTY maintainer, he was still heavily involved up to 2014

From 1999 to 2009 he was employed by RedHat and after That by Intel until 2013

I can't honestly say he did RedHat or Intel interests more than he did Linux community as a whole interests

He's a big advocate and activist for free software, but he also said "Yearn for the good old days when you knew every contributor by name and the source code fitted on a single floppy disc ?"

In a way or another, a small group of "directors" is always better for the good of both the product and the users
They are tax deductible and also probably get subsidies from municipalities.
Deep South Secessionists Working with California Liberals for Peaceful Secession
What if I told you common sense Americans everywhere can see behind that veil and are waking up? There are some of us that are tired of paying congress to work half the year and argue, so we have come up with a peaceful solution.

Secession is the legal process of a state leaving the Union. We've been taught for years that this is treason and wrong.

According to Article III of the Constitution, treason is defined as making war against the states, and the constitution does not mention secession ONCE. Neither does it say that we are indivisible or a permanent union.

The idea we are "indivisible" comes from the pledge of allegiance, which was written by a socialist named Francis Bellamy.

Right now, a new movement in SC has launched called Palmetto State Independence, and they are working with CalExit and other grassroots movements in Texas, Vermont, New Hampshire, Alaska and Hawaii to see a peaceful secession in our lifetime.

This could happen. The only legal decision on secession is the case of Texas vs. White, which explicitly says that secession could happen through "consent of the states"...

Our vision is that once California secedes, we can form a coalition of red and blue states that govern themselves in almost every way, but still come together as Americans for issues like defense, humanitarian aid, etc. Check out the link for more info...

http://www.facebook.com/palmetto.independence
"Worse than these four" can still be "better than most". There is nothing you said that contradicts GP.
Top Reasons to Add Instructor Led Training to Your Online Training Program
I feel Svelte is the framework that Angular author actually wanted to build since the first version.
never ceases to amaze..
It isn't. It's a good article in the sense that it points out bad app behavior, but a bad one in that it suggests this is an iPhone problem, not a mobile problem.
Presumably the remaining 20% would still use an accountant or tax software, so they'd be no worse off than they are today.
https://www.chessprogramming.org/Programming

The "beginner chess engine" for the wiki is here: https://www.chessprogramming.org/CPW-Engine (focusing on readability instead of optimizations)

For the heuristics of stockfish themselves, see https://hxim.github.io/Stockfish-Evaluation-Guide/
Separation of powers. Private people and corporations can't have you arrested and then spread stories about how you deserved it.

The paranoia that it would be abused is very rational given that mere Whitehouse Access has been abused as a carrot/stick to influence reporting.
I recommend everyone watch this video. It's geared towards lawyers. If the police are asking questions with any level of suspicion at all, don't talk to them. Even if you do not lie, and are innocent, the things you say can still be used against you.

Summarizing:

1. There is no way it can help.

2. If your client is guilty (or even innocent), they might admit guilt with nothing in return.

3. If your client is innocent, they can still make some small mistake or tiny mistruth that can be used to convict by seeding doubt.

4. If your client is innocent, and does not make any small mistake or tiny mistruth, what is said can still be used in court to convict.

5. If your client is innocent, and tells the police absolutely nothing incriminating at all, the police can still mis-remember the conversation and result in a conviction.

6. If your client is innocent, and tells the police absolutely nothing incriminating at all, and the clients statements are videotaped so it cannot be mischaracterized, the police can still augment the conversation from their personal knowledge and result in a conviction.

There's more, it goes on and on and on. Don't talk to police if you are being questioned about something, whether you did it or not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
Police raid on journalist's home has grave First Amendment implications
Know when you are reading whataboutism[0].

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
If you read a book on the Third Reich, would you suppose it was being raised as a positive example?

In a similar way, a great deal of the Old Testament is presenting history, not condoning those beastly actions (and, indeed, often directly and straightforwardly condemning them). Context is vital.
Five Lessons from History
Why would a Chinese Linux derivative need be open source? It's not like you're going to go into China and force the government to comply with your license.
The vast majority of churches are net positives for their communities, this applies to _all_ churches. Are you saying the local Islamic centre, or protestant church should suffer because of the corruption in the Catholic organization?
Anecdotal but I switched to Chrome when it came out because it's JS engine was (or at least felt) massively faster than Firefox's.
That's the bare minimum you'll have to fill out. If you have investment accounts, you tack on more forms. If you have an inheritance, there's more paperwork. If you withdraw from your retirement accounts, you could have more.
Visualizing GitHub Repository Activity with Flutter Web
Neither the BBC nor The Guardian are non-biased they both have view points.

The Guardian are pretty open about their's, the BBC claim to be non-biased while giving people like Nigel Fromage, pro-brexit right-wingers, climate change deniers an easy ride.
i had a opposite experience. memory usage was great in firefox, but it pegged my CPU.
> "Dumb people are happier than smart people"

That seems counter intuitive, and everything I'm seeing on an initial search says the opposite. Example: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-19659985.

The aggregate conclusion I'm seeing is that smarts corresponds with a small bump in happiness.
Both, especially TheGuardian have a liberal bias.
Encouragement 101: The Courage to Be Imperfect [pdf]
I expect that there will be more examples once the project is deemed to be ready for public use
Accurate, current information on topics that are relevant to the continued health and progress of society is presumably of great value to those members of society - which is to say, people would pay for that. If that information costs $1,000 to gather and publish, and 1,500 people are willing to pay a dollar to read it (or rather, 100,000 people will pay $0.25 to read it and a collection of other stories like it), then you're in business!

Unfortunately, it's proven to be a hard problem to look at your $500 profit and refuse an additional $500 profit to run a scummy ad next to the valued story. Ethics and long-term-value decisions are just not easy to optimize for - and I don't think the government is very good at that either; they just optimize for the next election instead of profits, which doesn't seem any better.
Chuck Forsberg
Some hugh school students used forsberg dos for dummies book to hack into norad missile defense system in colorado some decades ago and almost launched nuclear missiles. ccwonderlin