skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You're right, my bad. But the new guide is the image I describe above, with the half-and-two-quarters plate. This is still a carb rich diet.

In fact, it's virtually identical to the 2007 diet, only really changing the format of the advice.

Even more so- the new guide now describes the food category that includes meat as "protein foods":

https://food-guide.canada.ca/en/healthy-eating-recommendatio...

These are:

eggs
lean meats and poultry
lean cuts of beef, pork and wild game
turkey
chicken
nuts and seeds
peanuts
almonds
cashews
nut butters
sunflower seeds
fish and shellfish
trout
shrimp
salmon
scallops
sardines
mackerel
lower fat dairy products
milk
yogurt
lower sodium cheeses
beans, peas and lentils
brown, green or red or other lentils
peas such as chickpeas and split peas
dried beans such as black beans and kidney beans
fortified soy beverages, tofu, soybeans and other soy products

So again, nuts and seeds, beans and legumes -not a low-carb diet by any means.
The problem is to show that the graphs are the same or different up to relabeling of the vertices. I.e. the graphs

0-1-2 0-2-1

are the same if you swap the labels 1 and 2. You could try to brute force it by trying all possible permutations of vertex labels, but there are n! of those to try, so that doesn't help much. Any polynomial-ish algorithm would need to do something clever that takes advantage of the structure of the problem.
https://archive.org/details/MurrayGellMannTheQuarkAndTheJagu...
23'000'000 USD: Stock Market for Beginners 2019 by Ex-McKinsey and UBS Banker 2
If you look a little further down in the thread, there are (purported) former Tesla employees talking about what sounds like a really horrible experience working there -- being treated terribly, all the really experienced people leaving, etc.

To me, if those are real former employees telling the truth, that's a lot more meaningful than the comparison to Enron.
Agreed. I can't remember the exact issue, but I found a great answer on Ubuntu Exchange one day about some firewall rules. The OP wanted to do something really arcane that may introduce some security vulnerabilities.

The "accepted answer" was someone asking "why"? He asked it five times. His best advice was to always ask "why" at least five times - that almost inevitably gets you to the real meat of the problem.
The Church-Turing Thesis: Logical Limit or Breachable Barrier?
That goes counter to what this article is saying with the whole "Roger Dad" approach. He gives many examples where people took the general approach to start, specialized late and rose to the top.
The government cannot book the projected increased tax revenues from a healthier populace as an asset that offsets the money it paid to provide healthcare. The government can book a mortgage-backed security it purchased as an asset that offsets the purchase price of the asset.

Now, I think that universal healthcare certainly provides benefits that make it worthwhile, just as the bailout provided financial stability benefits that made it worthwhile. But those things are in the benefits column. I'm talking about how much an accountant would say that a government program cost.
Yes, it says the contrapositive.

I feel like a lot of advice of the form "it's cheaper to eat at home" comes from fairly privileged folks (middle class and up). If you don't a priori have a kitchen, then you might have to double your rent expense to afford a place where you can cook and eat at home.

Now, if you have a kitchen -- and many folks do -- then perfectly solid advice.
> I mean, everything is propeitary then.

Yeah, that's precisely the problem. Though you're right, the M0 at least does fit what I'm talking about pretty well, in-order, no-MMU, etc.
Do payers in other countries agree to cover 2.1M bill or is it only the US?
Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup (https://crawl.develz.org/) is an excellent game that has a very open development process while keeping clear design goals.
I'm 27 and so far, the older I've gotten the less desire I have to do work that needs to be done.
China’s Biggest Chip Maker, SMIC, to Withdraw from New York Stock Exchange
Remember that one time Linus (Linus Tech Tips) criticized the Apple Mac because it uses slashes as path separator?
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/larryosterman/2005/06/24/wh...
It matters for the same reason first impressions matter. It's a lot harder to succeed in a relationship with someone if you start off on the wrong foot.

I know many others, and myself, who won't be playing Fallout:76 or No Man's Sky because both games were colossal train wrecks on launch that over-promised (or over-hyped) and under-delivered. It doesn't matter much if these issues are eventually fixed, most of the player base will have already moved on. Some many go back and try it out when they hear "it's better now" but many won't.

The games will be remembered poorly by most people, even if they eventually do become good and that is what the quote means.
Honestly, it actually DOES make sense to use separate characters for directory-delineation versus option switches.

There was no way of knowing in 1982 that UNIX was going to take over the world. That everything from corporate mainframes, to desktop PC's, and even phones would rally around the conventions of this largely academic OS.
This is completely true until software eats their industry up as it almost invariably does. Just in the examples provided by the author, insurance is undergoing a shift to direct-to-consumer, and I firmly believe that mobile apps are going to become super important differentiators in that industry. Real estate takes longer to take the sledgehammer to because of entrenched agents' smart use of regulation as a moat, but it's clearly coming next.

Put another way, a company's organization can be seen as its software, except it's running on a kind of wet, carbon-based hardware that does certain things much better than the silicon-based ones, and other things much worse. As the capabilities of the silicon-based computer increase relative to the capabilities of the carbon-based, there are few industries where it would be wise to continue purchasing software like one purchases pencils.
Huawei's voice in future tech standards restricted
Caltech Mourns the Passing of Murray Gell-Mann (1929–2019)
I think we're already doing that now
Show HN: Temporary.pw
Not usually one to plug stuff - but the Wayback Machine browser extension is very useful for "This is down, would you like to see a snapshot" (or "This is up now for now, would you like it snap-shotted"... or my favourite "I can't believe they put this up, let me ensure this is preserved for evidence if somebody decides to re-write history")
Distorted Videos of Nancy Pelosi Spread on Facebook and Twitter, Helped by Trump
At a short glance, it reminds me a lot of Monument Valley, which cleverly changes the dimensionality of the world with rotation.
In the article, it says for 32%, discretionary spending was the primary cause. That's all I was talking about.
I think it's just that many natural algorithms happen to have polynomial time complexity, since it's basically the complexity of iterated loops. Same with logarithms.
Because O(e^x) > O(x^n), for all Integer values of "n".

So Polynomial is simply a class that we know is strictly "faster" (well, asymptotically faster) than any exponential function.

In practice, I think real-life humans only care for "small polynomials". An algorithm with complexity (x^5000) will be growing too quickly to be used in practice, even if its big-Oh is technically polynomial.

Well, I say that, except 3SAT solvers are a thing and that's provably NP-complete. So lots of people bang their heads against the NP-complete problems anyway.
> The staging area is totally unnecessary IMO. I think git would be easier if we didn't have it.

Staging area / Index is one of the best features of Git for me.

If I end up having a bunch of semi related changes in-progress; being able to easily group those into individual commits is great.

> The term `checkout` is multiplexed to do more things than I would've guessed.

Agree
These articles aren't for the Artisan - they are for, in your metaphor, the apprentice and journeyman.

You should do a lot of learning on using a table saw before you touch one. Using git wrong won't kill you, using a table saw wrong will.
Copyright?
I'll have to remember that one. In a way, I'm advocating for everyone to be at least two kinds of specialist and generalist at the same time.
Is it just about convenience and unrealistic expectations? Cooking can be cheap, eating out teens to be more expensive, but many of us feel we have to do it. Few people take a sandwich to work - many seem to rather buy it.

The same for "how to holiday". Holiday means today taking a plane (or in the case of USA long distance driving as well) and staying in a hotel (or Airbnb and then eating out). What happened to cheap holidays like camping and hiking? Am I just in the wrong crowd these days or has this mostly faded out?
Loki author here: got some ideas? We’re all ears!
Megaglest
> Could you explain why you like this better than a traditional multi monitor layout?

With the (traditional) horizontal layout you have to turn your head or your complete body towards a monitor. With a vertical setup, you can always sit/stay in a symmetrical way towards your monitors and instead of turning your head you have to tilt it.

In the end, it all comes down to how your body fits into that setup, but I feel a lot more comfortable if I don't have to turn my head. Tilting just feels better (less asymmetrical stress on my shoulders when you keep your head in a fixed position).

> And how wouldit compare to vertical monitors horizontally next to each other?

I never worked with vertical monitors for a long time so far, but I guess three would be a better choice for me than two, as I could have one centered monitor. A pro for vertical monitors would be that at least they would reduce the angle I have to turn my head.
On the other hand, I don't know who these articles are really for. I have _never_ met a developer who struggles with git. Not many claim to understand it deeply, but all can rebase, cherry-pick, use the reflog, etc. and almost never do they run into issues.

It mystifies me. Git isn't hard, nor complicated. "Checkout" has a few too many meanings, and thats the singular gripe I have with it.
School Shamed Six-Year-Old to Return Lunch Because She Didn't Have Enough Money
It’s not obvious to me that a battery powered drill is the best tool for the job. If you are a professional doing non-trivial work sometimes the corded drill, with all its benefits, is exactly what is needed.
Opinion – This is why Huawei is being banned
Where workers risk losing jobs to automation, training must start now
I know lebron played football. I'm sure he played some baseball and soccer too.

Everyone you listed specialized in a particular sport. Specializing in a particular sport doesn't mean that's all you do. You can specialize in hockey but also play baseball or basketball for fun, etc. And if you are exceptionally gifted, nothing prevents you from "specializing" in two sports. But the point is that you "specialize".

I wouldn't call Jordan, Gretzky, Sanders or Robinson "phenomenal" "multi-sport" athletes. Jordan wasn't a phenomenal baseball player. Neither was Deion Sanders. I've never heard of gretzky being "phenomenal" outside of hockey. I only know of Robinson from baseball. And Bo Jackson specialized in two sports and he was phenomenal in both.

Once again, you can specialize in a sport and play other sports.
I wish the cabling could be made a little neater with desktop setups. Power cables, video cables, USB cables. I use a KVM so even more cables. Hopefully Thunderbolt/USB4 will simplify things a bit in the future.
From the Google examples:

> a team is encouraged to set as goals about 50% more tasks than they are likely to actually accomplish.

> If a team scores significantly higher than that, they are encouraged to set more ambitious OKRs for the next quarter.

I lived through this in Scrum sprints. There is a baked in incentive to sacrifice some iterations every once in a while to ajust the average expectation, while keeping an overall positive look.

Otherwise without having used it seems to me that OKRs are another rather plain tool that works for clever organisations but fails when applied dumbly. Is there anything specific to it that makes worst case scenarii better ?
It's not removed. Turn "showdead" on in your profile.
I think experience has shown that some people really like tools that others find really awkward. Sometimes even over the same features described in completely different ways. It is counterintuitive and different from other VCS and reuses commands to mean very different things (especially checkout and reset); that doesn't matter to people who are used to methodically learning these things from first principles.

Plus there's an intrinsic elitism in it being hard to use.
There shouldn't be any problem than. Huwaei or anyone else can make their own "proprietary" operating system, since it is better than "a bullshit opensource software", and they can happily get higher margins there and be happy forever.
Your claim is that before humans, Earth's climate was static?
Netflix de La Formation
Hmm, I was expecting this to be like the PGS and friends kickstarter scams but it's by Panic which I respect very much. I've used almost everything they've made and I've played Firewatch (Great story, not really a game as much as a choose-your-own-adventure-story but your choices don't matter).

I'm probably not going to be buying this day 1 but this is very interesting and if anyone can do it Panic can. Best of luck to them!
CP/M had nothing to do with DEC, and digital research had nothing to do with DEC either. What was the DEC connection? Did VMS use backslash for paths?
Honestly, he should release it as is just because the concept might not be great the first time.

Remember Narbacular Drop? You probably don't, because it was a clunky free game with bad graphics.

Remember Portal? That was made by the same devs, when Valve hired them after seeing Narbacular Drop's seamless teleportation mechanics.
True, although the superconducting effect is lost under high electric fields.

A superconducor rejects magnetic fields (a bit like a Faraday cage). What if you cranck it up high enough and force the superconductor in place? You lose superconductivity.

For that reason, there is actually a limit to thew current that can be transmitted, though it is much higher than with conventional cables (you still can't power a city with a hair-thin cable, IIRC).
better question: why does my Ford navigation use backslash as the alternate street name separator? unbelievably irksome to me.
Any number of things can trip one up if they haven't been identified, so aren't being proactively managed. It could be as simple as "I have allergies and I don't know it, so I can't connect the dots that when I do X, I am exposed to something I am mildly allergic to and then I accomplish a whole fat lot of nothing."

The problem, of course, is that I find the majority of things I do fall into that latter camp where I can't muster the drive to put in effort.

Please just start reading the resources I pointed you to.

There's also this, which I am the author of, though there isn't much there currently: https://raisingfutureadults.blogspot.com/
Iirc Aaron Reynolds said it was done simply to be distinct. A way to reduce the chance of lawsuit.
> The government cannot book the projected increased tax revenues from a healthier populace as an asset that offsets the money it paid to provide healthcare.

From an MMT perspective, the government (any one using it's own fiat currency) creates and destroys money rather than spending and receiving it, even if it pretends otherwise in an outdated effort to ape a commodity-/representational-money system.

So, viewed that way, it really has no need for such an asset.

> Now, it is true that money spent on universal healthcare isn't being lit on fire--the government and the people gain some benefit from it. But that's in the benefit column, not the cost column.

In the cost column is a reduction in private healthcare costs exceeding the I crease in public expenditures, as shown in every analysis (including ones from hostile sources), so if the government raised taxes so as to leave private taxpayers in the same position as they would be in with status quo policy, net government outflow would be reduced without any adverse impact on taxpayers.
The class of polynomial time algorithms is closed for some things, that you often see in algorithms:
- If you run two polynomial time algorithms in parallel, the result is a polynomial time algorithm again.
- If one operation of a polynomial time algorithm, is calling another polynomial time algorithm, then the result runs in polynomial time again.
Naive question: istn't the idea of "growth stocks" to become value stocks at some point?
Messing up a rebase and then force pushing your altered history might at least equate to shaving off a small chunk of finger :-)
For many of us git should be a multiplier - spend time doing your code and experiments in a safe way, because git, used well, will protect you. As such, learn the tool! Pro Git[0] is great, and you learn the how, but more importantly the why of the tool, so that you can make git a multiplier.

[0]https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2
So, you're doing well, which means the meritocracy is working. Your 'friends' who also worked hard, and were, most likely, deceived into believing higher education was a path to success, deserve what they got, right? This kind of brash self-centered attitude should be surprising, but it isn't.

Tradesmen who dropped out of higher education are by an large cultural morons who are perfectly suited to the emerging neo-feudalism of modern society because they are completely unaware of anything happening around them, and are wholly concerned with their limited financial and material circumstances.
waits for generic treatment to surface for 1/10000 of the price in another market
I would be more interested in the security implications. Hackers now have access to the source code; what kind of attack surfaces does this yield against customers who purchased the compromised software?
I mean, I bought that game a long time, and only bothered to look up what features they have recently brought to the table.

They only brought multiplayer support a couple months ago. Honestly, this was one of those too little too late kind of things.
Actually, my lower monitor is my primary monitor for my desktop PC. But for a while, I used a similar setup with a Thinkpad as my lower monitor and that worked just fine for me too even though I used the large upper monitor as the primary monitor then.
I think this is accurate. As you get older it’s more obvious that video games are kind of an artificial happiness, similar to doing mushrooms or something. It’s not that they’re not fun per se, but it’s hard to actually feel good about spending lots of time doing something that’s not going to contribute to your long term wellbeing.
Heh, I guess it is still also seen as an escape because the title of this blog just has double quotes with no backslash.
Because polynomial complexity is the measure of what makes a tractable problem [1]. If the question is why - there's no formal reason. Tractability is really just subjective human standards: even high-degree polynomial time is often considered to not enough for a solution to be worthwhile computing.

[1][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobham%27s_thesis]
Yes I'd noticed this once or twice and momentarily wondered why there wasn't a problem. I hadn't realised it was now officially ok
What if one spouse makes seven figures and the other is unemployed and takes care of the household? The income disparity then is too high for this, it seems to me, but maybe it's just me.
Org mode is a great answer for the todo wish.
I am convinced art is one of VR killer apps.

First we have VR-native art. Like Quill, Tiltbrush, Medium, etc. that let you lay down paint strokes in mid air in space for volumetric illustrations (an entirely new medium that didn't exist before), or sculpt virtual objects.

Then we have VR as a mean to create 3D assets for games. Medium, Gravity sketch, etc. Sculpt in VR, export, retopo. Same as what you'd do with a ZBrush workflow except you sculpt the thing organically. Currently most useful for organic shapes, possibly hard surfaces depending on the tool used.

Coming soon, VR for rigging and animating assets.

Then we have VR-based museums for traditional art. Then VR-based museums for VR-based art.

Then we have VR for movie pre-production, where it is used to visit a movie set before it is fully built, like Spielberg used in Ready Player One. This can also be used to figure out key shots angles.
Why in the world would you say that? I check out a branch, I write some code, it doesn't do what I want, I do a git reset and try again.

If you aren't using git reset that means you're either a genius coder who doesn't make mistakes, or you are a coder who would rather keep going down a bad path instead of just starting fresh. Some people find it easier to just start fresh.
How did TOPS-10 handle directories? The article says "Note that the odd numbers in square brackets [27,5434] are the TOPS-10 way of specifying directories," but doesn't give any more detail.

I am shamelessly uninterested in poring over the linked TOPS-10 manual to find out, so I'm hoping you know. :D
The advantages of having a big customer base are tremendous. If you build an amazing exercise tracker iOS app, for example, you'll have to go convince every user from scratch to start using your product. Doesn't matter if it's the best exercise tracker possible, if Apple comes in with the shittiest version of it but pre-installs it on all iPhones, they'll have 10x your users in a week.
Agree (And ironically of course some people agree on this in the discussion on every one of these articles).

Git is the C++ of version control. Of course it’s powerful. Of course it can do everything. And of course it’s a huge frustrating footgun with error messages that rival any c++ template compiler error.

The problem is that we have made it a de facto standard so it’s hard to replace. Even if a much better VCS emerged tomorrow, it doesn’t help if there isn’t support in large issue trackers, CI/CD systems, IDEs and so on.

I have great hopes that pijul will be the better git. But again, it’s the tooling and ecosystem that matters, not the qualities of the vcs itself.
You can do that in svn too with the "changelist".
Per the article, DEC's TOPS-10.
Payers in other countries can use their countries' negotiating power to negotiate with Novartis. The United States is definitely capable of doing the same in theory.
I love how sourcehut complements git rather than parasitizing on it. That is, I can't fault github's ability to be a dumb remote to publish branches to - but once you use it for that, they have a foot in the door for all the prongs of their proprietary lock-in and what is frankly value-subtract. I'm not worried about that with sourcehut because 1) I don't have to go full sourcehut kool-aid unless I want to (in fact, there's actually too little linkage among the components at present), and 2) if I do, then the kool-aid I've bought into is... a mailing list workflow using decades-old standard technology, where the webapp views are optional.
No, graph libraries usually relay on some variation of VF2 and maybe (but I haven't checked) in some cases on the more complicated nauty/traces algorithms.
There are garbage collection libraries in progress: rust-gc[1] and shifgrethor[2]. If you mean language support, then no, not really, though it was discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/415

[1]: https://github.com/Manishearth/rust-gc
[2]: https://github.com/withoutboats/shifgrethor
>this study conflicts with several other studies that found significantly higher rates of injury

Can you provide a citation?