skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's not a debate over whether the US hoovers up information. Most of this US vs China debate centers on one thing: which side do you want to give your information to. That is what is being argued over; that dispute is going to get worse for a while yet as China pushes outward globally in its tech ambitions.

The better alternative: I don't want anyone to have my information - unfortunately is largely not going to be an option. The choice will mostly be between the US and China (or in some cases, European tech providers, which will frequently work with the US). If it's not already that way, it certainly is going to be in the next 10 or 20 years.
I used it quite a bit for a 3 year period from 2011-2014 or so. I imagine it's changed a bit since then (but it didn't really change that much in that time period, so I wouldn't imagine that it's completely different since the last 5 years). Overall it had an old VB5 feel: you could do simple things _really_ simply, but difficult things were more or less impossible, and even if you wanted to step out of the infrastructure and do the difficult things somewhere else, integrating back into Salesforce was still a major hassle and often not worth the effort.

At its core, it's sort of a dynamic form builder: you design your data model and Salesforce creates input/entry forms for the data objects in the model. If there's a one-to-many relationship between two objects, when you edit one, you see a list of the related objects, and you can do bulk operations on the list in place. You have some customization options but for the most part, Salesforce creates all the UI for you and because it's uniform, it's easy for users to work with.

The two biggest problems were limits and opacity. Salesforce imposes limits on how many operations per second you can perform like reads or writes, and its not usually easy or even possible to predict what limits you're going to bump against, so you end up discovering them through trial and error (in production!). The other problem is the opacity of the platform - it's working a lot of magic under the covers and you have no visibility into what it's doing and definitely no control over it. If you thought Ruby on Rails was hard to reason about, just wait until you meet Salesforce!

All in all, I'd recommend doing as little "in Salesforce" as you can realistically get away with - your users might demand it because they know it, but Salesforce makes you feel like you can run your entire business in there, but those are murkier waters than you would imagine.
This ignores half the problem and it's telling you tried to slide past it. You certainly can and probably will deliver message content sent from a protonmail account to a non-protonmail account.

I'm not an expert in Swiss law, so I have no idea. I'll wait for a 3rd party I trust to vet your claim.
And Fedora!
To me, the most interesting thing was that quality was slower over a period of weeks, but faster over a period of months. I mean, I think that most people get the idea that low-quality code slows you down in the long run, but "the long run" is closer than most of us thought.
Certainly Yehuda from Ember had some influence on us :), so as many others like Richard from Svelte or Evan from VueJs.

A lot of good conversations happen within the last two years to be where we are today!

Hopefully some of our solutions and ideas will help improve the ecosystem.
Learning XML External Entity (XXE) Injection (Tutorial)
No one cares about the truth. XYZ is identified as a potential carcinogen? It is mostly used to attack a dietary group involving XYZ than to actually cure cancer. You see this liberally happening with red meat, despite questionable evidence towards it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20029519

It is all rather amusing, actually.
You should be using OnPush everywhere, then your struggle will change to only getting changes detected in certain scenarios. Still a pain sometimes but not as bad as the Default change detection strategy.
Various services like that have come about (for example, LaterPay). They just didn't catch on because, again, micropayments are not the hard part.
Aye but the reason it's called pug is they got into problems because Jade was already used.

Naming is hard.

I really like pug though, with Vue SFC it's really clean.
The answer appears to be yes though involuntarily.
Absurd. If you wish to be a competitive farmer, you need a tractor. If you wish to be a competitive auto mechanic, you need a set of expensive tools and parts. If you want to be a competitive mobile app developer, you need a Mac. Every trade has a cost-of-entry.

EDIT: further, porting Xcode to another platform would be non-trivial. With the addition of Marzipan, you can forget about Xcode being on any third-party platform.
I'm not arguing against the idea that low-star riders make drivers' experiences worse and that's why they have low ratings. I'm arguing against the idea that a "social metric", which can be changed and expanded (to include, hypothetically, your credit score), should be used to deny access to services, without strong guarantees about the sources and other aspects of that social metric.

The Orwellian aspect is when companies start sharing their scores, and when those scores start having clearly highly subjective influences.
I will read into it, thanks for providing additional info.
What is the point of lists like this? It seems like it would be a lot more helpful to offer something constructive instead of meditating on what rubes we are.
> but is not quite as expressive

It's as expressive.

> For example, Hoare Logic cant really deal with Higher-Order things.

1. It can. 2. It doesn't matter so much, as there are no higher order "things" but rather higher-order ways to describe things. For example, in mathematics higher-order systems can be described as either higher-order ODEs or equivalent first-order ODEs. In other words, "order" is a feature of the signifier, not the signified. For example, things that would be higher-order in Agda are first-order in TLA+ (and you don't need to go that far: formal set theories are usually first-order, yet you need higher-order typed logics to describe the same things).

> They do struggle with more "extensional" properties, such as function extensionality.

Well, that's because they're constructive. There are type-theory-based proof assistants that more easily support classical mathematics, like Lean.
And average users don't care an iota about the differences in render engines. They see the UI, features like syncing bookmarks and such and think that's the browser. It's a different perspective.
Even if you do, it's a better investment to learn a general high level language with strong scripting capabilities, but that is also good at many things else.

Sure, the days you'll need awk, you'll take 15 minutes instead of 2 writing your script. So what ?

But the rest of the year, you'll have a more versatile toolbox at your disposal for automatic things, testing, prototype network processes, make quick web sites or API, and explore data sets.

That being said, I can see the point of learning awk because, well, it's fun.
I actually own a Helm, and I like it very much!
Can you give me an example of this? I'm genuinely wondering if I've just dodged a pain point so far.

My other strongest languages are Golang and JavaScript, so I'm used to (duck-)typed and untyped approaches, and I've never felt that Elixir was difficult to work with because of the lack of types. I've treated pattern-matching like type inference, and as long as you have guard clauses, the worst that can happen is a runtime error which you "let fail" anyway.

I guess the guard clauses are a bit of boilerplate, but I feel like these complaints have a different root. I just don't see it yet.
Beautiful as well :)
If there is any question to if this was published by Mozilla:

https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/29#iss...
I wholeheartedly agree as an iOS dev and as an iOS power user.

However I fear regulators don't have this granular view and technical depth.

I'm more concerned about misinformed, blanket regulation more than the API-restrictions.
If you want to put sql in your templates, I can't help you
Okay - fair.

How does that change the fact that saying "I tweeted it so it's true" is not a strong argument in a he-said-she-said debate?
The 5 star rating system being used reminds me a lot of eBay's feedback system. eBay's system has changed quite a lot over the years, and much could be said about each change they made, but specifically the 5 star system and the bar they set was always problematic because of the disconnect between what buyers thought a fair rating was vs what eBay considered fair.

In eBay land, anything less than 5 stars is unacceptable, but for most normal people if you asked them they might say 3 stars is fair for a perfectly acceptable experience. If you get too many 3 star ratings from happy satisfied customers your average might drop from 4.9 to 4.7 and suddenly you're on thin ice and at risk of having your account closed.

Looking at this article it appears Uber is using a similar system. They require an average rating of 4.6-- meaning every 4 star review you get is actually a ding against you-- even though those 4 star reviews might've been perfectly happy riders who just felt in their minds that 4 = Good, 5 = Outstanding or something.
We will work with marketing to fix it.
Hopefully http://lwc.dev works better, but any feedback is welcome :)
From https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/about.html#offline:

> Less than 100% reliability is essential for the sustainability of an off-the-grid solar system, because above a certain threshold the fossil fuel energy used for producing and replacing the batteries is higher than the fossil fuel energy saved by the solar panels.

Looks like it's a messaging thing, mostly to show that such a website can be done. They discuss energy usage wrt environmental impact a lot on that page.

EDIT: that is to say, it's definitely engineered to shut down, rather than to stay up
Deepnote – Jupyter Alternative for Teams
Do you know this from experience or is it a personal belief?
There are drivers who flat out can't drive. Sure, they got me to the destination without crashing, but I've had ones who were sawing away at the wheel like they where trying to start a fire and used the accelerator and brakes as if they were boolean controls.

That's not a 5. I find Uber and Lyft drivers to be providing a great service at a fair price and most of them earn a 5 rating and a tip.
Vendors have been selling various iterations of the "non-technical people can draw diagrams on the screen and then run it" idea for decades.

There are 2 main problems with this idea:
1) it is still code, so you have to think like a coder
2) any non-trivial routine fills pages of "diagram" and is arguably harder to follow than the 20 lines of code that would have sufficed.

An example of (1):
At a pretty big early 00's e-commerce site, we decided to let a couple managers implement some "promotions" (conditional discounts) using the commerce suite's drag-n-drop feature. Add an inkjet printer to your cart, get free photo paper. Great. But they forgot to add the reversal logic, so crafty customers quickly figured out how to get reams of free paper! Oops.
The overheated reactions in this thread are so bizarre. The only surprising thing is the implication that only now is it possible to get yourself banned from Uber for bad behavior as a passenger.
Titanium dioxide is a common tattoo ink and a fair amount of research has gone into studying where that ends up if it does not stay in the skin.

The tattoo removal process allegedly does not work with white ink (titanium dioxide) as it does not get zapped by a laser to break down in the way other compounds do.

Generally the body moves these foreign things only if they get to the nanoparticle size out to the liver, so a lot of this article sounds rather similar to what goes on with the tattoo process.

A hastily Googled article:

https://www.nhs.uk/news/lifestyle-and-exercise/tattoo-ink-pa...

Titanium dioxide is rather harmless compared to other tattoo ink colours, it has nothing compared to the cobalts, cadmiums and other 'salts' that make up other colours, and, despite advances in organic chemistry, you still need these heavy metals to make bright colours. We have moved on from lead but not much.

Getting back to the main article, there is good and bad in nano-particles. For instance, regular salt is now at the nano-particle size in 'beige' foods. This is how 'low salt' was achieved, the receptors on the tongue just need to get satisfied. So, imagine your 'freedom fries' with exceedingly fine salt on them, your tongue does not realise these are small particles rather than table-salt style crystals. If you are going to have salt for taste then you might as well have a small amount of the small particles - that are water soluble - rather than the bigger crystals - that are also water soluble. Your sodium intake is lower but there is no taste hardship involved.

For this reason I would take a lot of the article with a pinch of salt and move away from living beside a main road, nowadays cars emit far more nano-particles than they used to and your lungs can't stop them getting into the bloodstream. Visible smoke can at least be coughed up rather than just absorbed by your lymph nodes.
>how does it make you feel?

Like part of the problem.
I make no-code ETL software for non-technical users (https://easymorph.com) and I don't think the article is correct.

A general-purpose low/no-code tool may be an utopia. But task-specific low/no-code software can be very effective and successful. And yes, it does remove/reduce dependency on developers for non-technical people. For corporate users dealing with internal IT departments is frequently a big hassle. Which is by the way one of the reasons why cloud apps are becoming so popular - because they reduce dependency on in-house IT departments.

Although, for low/no-code software it's important to have a decent and reliable API to be able to integrate and interoperate with external apps and systems. With such API it doesn't really matter if the app was developed using a written code, or visual tool.

Second, have good logging/auditing capabilities.

Third, play nicely with security/administration - support LDAP, SSL, etc.
If any Product Manager at Uber is remotely decent at their job, they'd pull out the rating system for both drivers and riders ASAP. The system makes no sense when everyone on both sides are forced to give a 5 star rating whether you were treated like royalty or just been dropped off at your stop like a countless other identical rides because the floor is at 4.6.
Have an issue with a driver/rider? Create a system where both can file a complaint with proper reasoning to be provided, or else we can go about our day like literally every other commercial transaction you have.
I love both Elixir and Ruby and the somewhat overlapping communities but I wouldn't say the libraries are "up to par".
I ran IKEv2 2-3 VPNs for multiple years with a few dozen users, I have to say from experience I disagree with you there (I'm the author of the repo, @pirate). For various reasons, StrongSwan required manual intervention much more frequently than WireGuard has for far. Often I'd have to manually restart the service, or adding a new host would break stuff for all the others. The minimal config required to match my current WireGuard config was about 3x the number of lines, which meant 3x the number of things that could break each time I added a host. Even if it's better documented, that surface area is painful to deal with from a Sysadmin perspective when all I want is something that just works.
Switch to OnPush, use async pipes and immutable data structures. Add to that some of the virtualization components that ship with @angular/cdk and you're pretty golden most of the time.
He said forgeign language.

I hypothesize a foreign language might require some mental effort and isn't accessed the same as the native language. The fading consciousness might lose a native language sooner, maybe.
>But these kids are living in a good economy.

If they were living in a good economy then there wouldn’t be 1,000,000 student loans going into default every year.

Sure corporations are making record profits, but wages have been stagnant for 30-40 years, workers have never seen a higher wage gap, and the economy has the lowest social mobility of any 1st world country.
As an attorney, I would expect a better substantiation than "I tweeted it, so it's true".

But, fair enough regarding request vs. order. I am not familiar with Swiss law terminology.

And he might be right! But to claim he is right because "I tweeted it during the conference" is, as I said, not swaying me either way.
And I got asked to leave one pub because another family member had complained about the noise from the establishment.
If you manage to get an app to the point that the only thing between you and releasing is a “minor bug” and then halt there, I would be kind of shocked that you managed to get that far in the first place.

The second-place item is “privacy” rejections, which surely lead to many more developers abandoning their ideas. (Good.)

Apple did not provide enough data for us to answer your question with any more certainty, but at least they offered enough to guess with.
These types of allegations keep on appearing. I know we all generally trust CERN scientists (after all, they must be smart people who care), but to keep everyone’s trust I suspect nothing less than full transparency will do.

Where is ProtonMail’s data stored? Where are its web servers? Who has physical access? Who has login keys/credentials to storage and server machines? Who does security audits, how are they done, when we’re they done last, what were the results, and what steps are you taking to improve your system’s security? And most importantly, what exactly does ProtonMail do when dealing with authorities and other entities that want access to user data?

Security is a process, not a destination - that’s a mantra everyone in the security world learns early on. But trust is also a process, not a destination. As an example of a company that treats both as a process, consider AgileBits, the developer of 1Password. Their white papers are case studies in transparency.
I appreciate you fighting for us! I switched away from Gmail to your service once I discovered just how in-bed Gmail is with the intelligence agencies.

We're at a tipping point right now--either privacy starts to win back ground our we're in for a very tough time. The very basis of Western style freedom is on the line. I don't want to live in China for a very good reason! What happened in Australia recently is a travesty, and watching free speech evaporate in New Zealand also made me quite sick to my stomach. We have to stand up now and tell them ENOUGH!
WireGuard has already been re-written in rust by CloudFlare, see https://blog.cloudflare.com/boringtun-userspace-wireguard-ru...

The C version is still faster because it's a kernel module.
To add to this, the Angular engineers at Google are responsible for updating all however-many-hundred of those internal applications if they make any backwards incompatible changes.
I'd encourage you not to rate low over the TPMS sensor light - it's far from a guarantee of actually low tire pressure.

On many cars, TPMS sensor problems cause the light to blink at startup, then stay on steadily just like you had a low tire. That includes "the tire doesn't have a sensor", which can save about $200 on each valve stem. Given how quickly an Uber driver can rack up mileage, I wouldn't be surprised if many of them are just saving money on tires by getting sensor-less ones.

(Admittedly you can't tell if they're checking the pressure manually; I would think so to save on tire lifespan, but it's obviously not guaranteed. Of course, not seeing the light isn't a guarantee either.)
But then you’re eating... packaged frozen meals. Most of those are full of salt and preservatives, taste terrible, and are just generally bad. Maybe you have found a magical source of fresh, healthy, good tasting frozen meals, but that absolutely does not exist in most of the US.

I think it can be assumed that discussions about wholesome food excludes fast food by default.
How does abstaining count towards having quorum? Does it count equal to other votes?
That line sent a chill down my spine. I'd hate to refactor those devs' work. Oh wait, that's my day job.
It's been documented that drivers have rated riders low for not giving a tip or not leaving a review... Are those really "jerks"?
I suspect you didn't try out the user agent strings. Only one of those 4 is blocked.
Because China lacks its own greedy folks and America is the birthplace and only stronghold of greed. Never is China’s history have there been humanitarian violations. That’s only happened in Western cultures. Philanthropy is a widespread, embraced philosophy in China and is completely rejected and even frowned upon in America.

Kind of CNN’s take in a nutshell at this point.
Considering the hellscape that is working in an Amazon warehouse I'm amazed anyone thought it was going to pass. A company that makes its employees piss in bottles doesn't give a damn about the slow erosion of American privacy rights.
> There's no need to evaluate different routers, form libraries

That's a great thing about Vue, too. vue-router and vuex are well-designed and well-supported / integrated. Makes a huge difference.
Sigh... it's one of those articles. Headline claims "scientists" do this, but the quote in the article is:

> "As a consumer, I wash all my foods like crazy,” says Christine Ogilvie Hendren, executive director of the Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology at Duke University

So... she's an advocate against this stuff pushing an agenda that it shouldn't be there, not a scientist talking about a finding.

That said: there's no particular reason for TiO2 powder to be in food. It's an inert white pigment, and does nothing but make the processed food (which we already know is bad for you absent any colorings added) more attractive.

But come on folks: this story is sensationalist nonsense. Actual science on this stuff seems broadly unconclusive, and this particular pigment is in very wide deployment across basically the whole world. Any measurable effects are going to be very low significance.
Everyone's experience is different here, but I've grown to hate these all-encompassing frameworks -- somehow I always run into their limits. As far as I understand, Angular has its own module system, its own dependency injection, its own test framework. If you have any special requirements for any of those, you usually can't rely on the vast JavaScript ecosystem because Angular doesn't play well with many common JavaScript techniques. React also has a precompile step with JSX, but that's simple syntactic sugar, and besides that, React is really just a well-behaved library with a surprisingly small API surface. It doesn't try to do everything and it plays well with non-React libraries, at least in my limited experience. I usually find that in any context, taking such a mix-and-match approach is a lot more flexible in the long run than using a large framework.
I agree – I'm pushing for a solution that Apple can implement without needing any outside help or influence (like MFi for data).

But they may need the threat of legal action or government action to push them in that direction.
When I was 18 i could not have figured out how to approach this. And i had nobody who could have told me what to do. Getting a degree is still the safe option. In addition at least in
The big companies I know having no degree is pretty much a showstopper. You simply won’t get an interview