skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
All the time. Docker containers are such a great distribution format. More specifically, typically a Dockerfile itself or Dockerfile along with the image as opposed to just the image (but sometimes just the image).

And convince them of what exactly?
Old steel elevated tracks like the L are kinda crummy. You have to deal with weather both on the tracks and the stations, they darken whatever is below them, are incredibly loud, and wear out relatively quickly. Derailments can be catastrophic because trains fall from a great height (as happened in the Loop in 1977). Using concrete solves the noise problems, but requires more space and money.
Definitely don't bother looking into what you're doing (or not doing) on a structural/organizational level that is causing your employees to fall for potential scams. Just fire them, it's a lot easier that way.

BUT, if you INSIST on thinking about things at that level instead of just firing your employees who surely must be stupid idiots who hate security: one small thing my company did was to make a browser extension that shows emails from internal addresses in a different color than emails from outside the company.
You can just use Animal_id as the PK for all the tables (in the other tables it will also be an FK to Animals) and dump the relationship tables.

> My only concern is that the Animal table will grow rapidly as more pets and animal types are added and will be a performance issue.

Why? You aren't duplicating data anywhere (except perhaps the unnecessary IDs), so why do you think there is a more compact representation? It doesn't matter much what table the data is in as long as it appears only once.
Going to be blunt here, that's an awful rating. How many rides have you taken? Maybe it's a low sample size? If it's hundreds, then it's very likely you're doing something that's bothering many drivers. For example, maybe you have a hygiene issue. Ask some drivers about your rating... you aren't getting a 3.9 merely for not being chatty or "popular". You are actively upsetting many of the people driving you. Plenty of people don't chat and get ratings 4.85+.

I'm surprised you get picked up with such a low rating, to be honest.
"He's not a genius" thats pretty debatable statement he has very deep technical expertise in a number of fields that alone can easily qualify him as genius.
I agree, it looks pretty hopeless sometimes, and I definitely appreciate what Musk and Gates are doing.

I’d highly recommend reading “Winners Take All”, as it completely flipped my opinion on this subject. The author argues that giving up and trusting rich philanthropists to fix things further undermines our faith in the political system, requiring us to give billionaires even more power. And it distracts us from the question of whether we should change the system to prevent individuals from having that much power in the first place.
What if we find that certain protected classes tend to have a lower rating than others? Would Uber banning them constitute racism/religious discrimination/*phobia? Would there be grounds for a class action if not an outright discrimination suit?
John sonmez advice for doomers [video]
I feel the same way, for the last year mine was 4.86 and just recently it’s dropped to 4.81.

It’s definitely something that worries me as it’s out of my control.
On the other hand I rate every single driver 5/5 almost without fail, even if they were rude. I figure if their livelihood relies on it then I'd be an asshole if I didn't metagame the system.
> There is no other programming language that has union types as powerful as TypeScript

How about Swift and OCaml? ReasonML comes to mind too. Haven't tried actively comparing any of them though.
For my kids, contagious diseases come from the doctor's office. (there is a concentration of sick people) The most horrifying disease was hand/foot/mouth disease, which really should be called hand/foot/mouth/anus disease but that would be rude. It can cause paralysis. There is no vaccine. My kids got huge blisters, including one that fully covered the end of a thumb.

So, bear in mind, that doctor visit carries some risk and could even cause permanent damage.
Ark Deployer – Create your own custom blockchain in minutes
Both Google and Facebook were caught breaking the rules when it came to using internal certificates and were having users install privacy invasive apps.

https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/01/facebook-google-scandal/

Not to mention FB buying a VPN provider specifically to spy on users.

So if Apple can’t trust two of the largest tech companies in the world to follow the rules, are they suppose to trust Joe Random Developer?
It’s so crazy to me how many people on here assume that whatever the market determines must be fundamentally morally correct in all situations. Like the premise is always how come all these poor people chose NOT to be successful?

It’s a stupid human invention, not a god.
I'm not sure they would be allowed to provide access to another party at all, if the other party wasn't accredited, regardless of consent.

I'm sure they've looked into this with their lawyers, but acting as an escape route for banking data to non-approved entities is not likely to be smiled upon.
>The implementation in question uses battery-backed RAM for performance, but that's just an implementation detail.

Can you give more details on this? (What is the solution, and what does it cost? What kind of computer you use it on? How large is the memory?) Very curious.
The pros are you aren't creating unnecessary sequences and tables, which has both storage space and join complexity savings.

The cons are...none, really; the extra surrogate keys aren't buying you anything.
Ask HN: What are you missing from Netlify?
Netlify is offering a fantastic service for web developers!

What would be some other functionalities that would help your web projects even more?
I'm not sure what you mean by drop and then re-introduce, buried in a Git commit. We made a single commit to remove keygen, after displaying a public deprecation-will-be-removed notice in the spec for some years. Dropping keygen was part of a highly-public pull request, which gathered discussion from all browser vendors, as well as interested community members. The pull request was only merged once all four browser vendors supported removal (2 had already removed by that point).
I doubt one bad night will affect your ability to get a ride, assuming you have a decent amount of other trips “proving” you won’t be a problem, driver or passenger wise.
Sure but it's averaged out quickly as you take more rides. A 3.9 is not because the person isn't chatty or popular.
Alfred 4 Is Here
It's also a very tiny edge case that someone is trying to gain improper or unlawful entry to a workplace. It's not my job to put myself at risk in order to stop an intruder. It's not my job to play policy police with my co-workers, either.

My employer recognizes this and uses mantraps to physically prevent tailgating at unguarded entries.
Another big issue is that if chrome makes it difficult to disable ads such that 99% of chrome users aren't able to do it, websites may simply choose to block Firefox as it would be easy to do so without losing a large part of user base while making sure no users are blocking ads. Right now there are far too many users using ad blockers.
I mean we would be paid for viewing ads this way instead of being paid nothing as it is now, and losing all our privacy instead.

Seems like a win/win to me. Advertisers would actually pay the eyeballs that should be paid for seeing ads instead of the middleman in the attention economy. The technology in the Basic Attention Token performs all the functions instead.
I wonder how much that tendency is the result of Europeans having more exposure to "management by the numbers" kind of rating/review systems. Nearly everyone has held or known someone close to them with a job where a mostly meaningless customer review/rating/survey grade had an enormously disproportionate impact on their perceived job performance. The only times I'll ever rate something that isn't exceptionally good or exceptionally bad is when it is obviously tied to that person's performance metrics and they met expectations.
>Antitrust law considers the entire market not just how one company treats their own customers. Apple's policies have no effect on your ability to sell apps on Android

Android and iOS are separate markets. Let's say I have a hugely popular app on iOS that I make millions a month selling. Some company comes out with an exact replica for Android and begins giving it away for free. The impact on my sales will basically be zero. There are few people out there that own an Android and iOS device and even fewer that will switch based on one app.

>Developers are free to release the same app on Apple and Android, and customers are free to buy into the Apple system or the Android system.

Again, you can't use your position in one market (phone hardware sales) to exclude competition in another (app sales). The existence of a competitor or competitors in phone sales doesn't change that.

>This is Apple's choice in how they configure those computers; it's not legally mandated.

Does that mean you no longer think this:

>Hardware, software, and inventory are bundled into an experience by every retailer in existence.
That's silly, customized built-ins are not an essential feature. They are a nice to have. You can get by without ever using them, which is indeed what most people do. As does the subject of this discuss, the Lightning Web Components doesn't use that feature at all.
> You're insisting on an equivalent education, which would mean teaching with that same bias.

Please learn what "equivalent" means. Maybe get some help at your local public school. It doesn't mean "identical" with the same biases etc. It's entirely possible to define what would constitute an equivalent education even in a subject such as history (never mind neutral subjects such as math which you seem unwilling to talk about) without requiring the exact same interpretation. In fact, public schools try very hard to accommodate all manner of ideological biases, while home-schoolers are often very inimical to all beliefs except their own. By demonstrating that tendency, you make a good argument against unregulated home schooling.
If that’s the bar, the org should just strip out all external links. Voilà.

That way they’ll also protect themselves against an external vendor that gets used to spearphish you.
The writing has been on the wall for a long time now.
In the late 90’s my parents homeschooled me. We had a subscription to a teaching service that broadcast lessons on Satellite at 2am. My parents set the VCR to record each night and then we played the tape back for “class”. Everything was awful. To this day, my understanding of elementary science is a little worse than one would expect because my mom didn’t enjoy teaching science.

I’m so glad for advanced services making more forms of schooling possible for people.

Just to throw some ice on some of the heat in the comments...

- homeschooling isn’t for everyone, but it works wonderfully for some. My sister hated it and I loved it. People are different and need different approaches to learning.

- some people who homeschool are religious, and some of them are “fundamentalist”. But most of the people I encountered were simply “religious.” There’s a difference. ;)
I'm a reasonably well paid software engineer in Silicon Valley, but I don't get a bonus or options of any kind. I suppose my employer to could take vacation days from me or not give me a raise next year, but if they did either of those things because I "failed" a phishing test (where "fail" doesn't even involve giving up any credentials) I would probably be looking for a new job anyway so they might as well fire me.
I've done this with the older lightning CSS based toolkit and it was great.

The front end was React/Redux and we just wrapped the bits of markup we needed into React components.
I support this bet. Take any other tech from top of HN, in 10 years it will change the society more than crypto.
The fats found in red meat are pretty well balanced fats that we, as humans can readily metabolize and use. The risks of saturated fats were never substantiated and walked back significantly in the past decade, and as to cholesterol is actually beneficial to one's numbers (also, see: cholesterol hacking).

Now, the nutrition profile of naturally fed animal sources is very different from garbage/feed fed livestock. Which is another issue at hand.

Personally, I'm allergic to legumes so can't really handle any of the vegetarian options out there.
No. (and it's only a dumb question if you don't ask)

close() flushes the application buffer into the vfs buffer, but it does not guarantee the vfs buffer is flushed to the disk buffer, nor does it guarantee the disk buffer flushes to disk. A successful fsync() call guarantees these things.\*

\* except if the disk drive controller lies about flushing its buffer to disk, but there's nothing you can do about that besides buying a better disk.
Why should the legal system force Apple to do this? I get that it would prevent this type of scenario, but why should the the law care about this scenario at all?
No, not most people. Industry professionals deploying applications using frameworks that help with the problem.

I probably wouldn't want a fat PT, the same I don't want my sysadmin to be running apps as root.
The drivers income depends on their star rating remaining high. I don't see how it's "right" to jeopardize this.
Not only is this not relevant at all, but Reddit also gave you 4 years of Gold (now Premium) as part of that sunset for buying the paid version. On top of however much use you got out of that initial (and tiny) fee for Alien Blue pro.

Reddit Gold/Premium includes an ad-free experience on their site and app.
Chex is subject to the FCRA, so at the very least one should be able to appeal (Chex) on the basis of inaccurate information, and to get a report from Chex explaining the information they have on you.

As well, if a bank denies you a checking account due to a Chex report, the bank is under obligation of letting you know why (again, thanks to the FCRA).

Now, this doesn't mean that it's _fair_ (it isn't), but the law does offer you some measure of transparency.
If it's so hard to tell, doesn't that make it bona-fide dystopian?

In a certain sense it doesn't matter if the original post is satire - enough people unironically agree for it to be real.
I love how refreshingly honest his keynotes are.
This is a cool story. But the dream of Mars started later than that.

In fact if the Russians had been willing to sell the dot com billionaire some rockets for his publicity stunt of getting a plant to Mars, SpaceX would have never been formed.
I don't drive Uber, but on Lyft if a driver or passenger gives a 3-star or below rating it's considered such a poor ride that they won't be matched up again. Far from "average."
How to Get Rid of (Paper) Junk Mail
Given the bulk of the things you've listed here, which seem to serve very practical purposes, maybe never. I wouldn't call data structures a "technology" so much as I would label them as a theoretical underpinning to much of computer science. If your goal is to learn practical technologies (which is a good goal!) you don't really _need_ to learn data structures deeply -- they're just not a skill you need in day-to-day software life (for most people). I'm a software engineer, and the idea of implementing so much as a binary heap (which is nearly one of the first data structures you learn) at work is a preposterous idea. That said, if you want to learn about data structures, go for it! They're incredibly interesting and will give you a way deeper appreciation for computer science and the work that goes into developing complex algorithms. There's just not necessarily a "pedagogical" place to stick in learning data structures with the sorts of technologies you've listed.
This will lead to some interesting discussions during election campaigns...
"Uncharted Territory" / wild West is easily enough appeal to make it worth it.

Musk could be the sheriff of a colony in his very own space Western. People have worked hard their whole lives for much less.
Generation Z Is Already Bored by the Internet (2018)
That's quite a reach.

How is taking a small percentage of your income and being debt free somehow more of a burden than graduating with 100k in debt that cannot be wiped away even in bankruptcy?
Well lest we forget that some companies only pursue those who management at some level wants out. Many times negative consequence campaigns are just used to hide real intent.

then throw in all the people excluded from being judged and it can affect morale to where people get ambivalent about other security issues.
It's either two queries or something like this:

select * from users where username = :username or :username is null

That can be considered slightly better than two queries or slightly worse, depending on who you ask. And it is indeed the state of query reuse if you are not using at least decently smart query builder.

My impression is that many people simply don't have the kind of requirements that call for such advanced run-time query composition.
Gratuity Shaming
Historically speaking such a population is more prone to support authoritarianism than revolution. A good question to ask is: Is it in Trump's best interest for his base to advance economically, or descend further? I am quite confident that Trump and the Republican leadership knows the answer to this question.
Mars is not full of people. Improving climate on Earth, means billions of people to deal with.

Also, these aren’t exclusive tasks. Everything that works for Mars also helps earth and in many cases specifically with climate change.
If they start deactivating users with rating below average they will soon have very few users left.
>Two complained about my taking work calls in the car. I started requesting permission, at the beginning of the ride, to take a phone call.(It’s their car, after all.)

That's ridiculous. Who is paying who again?
They would spend all their time struggling to stay alive; no real science would ever get done. Look at the space station today. They're in a low earth orbit, completely dependent on resupply and accomplish very little other than siphon funding from unmanned exploration that actually leads to amazing breakthroughs because, "humans in space!"
I was once at a place where the company homepage was owned. Fun times.

Just starting your web-browser would exécuté some Java vuln and scareware you.
That's pretty standard. The problem is that they don't actually attempt to phish you. These emails are only good if your security model is that you can't click untrusted links (i.e. you want to defend against browser 0-days). If that's the security model, why do I even have a browser on my computer? In fact, my organization's policy says that I'm allowed to use my work computer for personal business (like reading a HN article while I'm taking a break)... If they have no problem with me browsing reasonable parts of the public internet, they have no business failing me on a phishing test that never even asks for any credentials.
I'm not sure I would consider uniformity "low" standards.

It's quite useful when there are multiple smallish projects, for example your typical web agency.

Also useful when you have one or two experienced programmers and a few less experienced ones: makes it easier to review the code.

That said for a highly custom application, especially one you're betting the company on, and need full control, a lower level approach can be beneficial.

Not limited to Angular vs Vue.js, the same applies to Django and Flask for example.
I'm not a fan of antitrust as a tool to punish tech companies, but I think there would be great benefit in cleaving Chrome off of Google. The tension between Google's business model and what is good for users is just too great.
Cuba legalizes private Wi-Fi, importation of routers
I agree, but I also think there is some demand for those fields. The problem is they often become a sort of catch-all for people that don't have a particular focus while they're still in school which doesn't really benefit anyone a lot of times
I think so much of it was also Microsoft realizing they need a really good answer for "why doesn't Win32 work on this Windows?" They may have thought they could do a transition like with the jump from Win16 to Win32 in the Win32 to (proto-) UWP jump in Windows 8, but they partly forgot how long they supported back compat for Win16 applications and they partly forgot that Win32's lifetime was more than triple Win16's and that means a lot more apps that people care about possibly losing.

It took a concerted push in Windows 10 to remove most of the "seams" between UWP and Win32 (to the point where now you can even have UWP Islands inside of Win32 apps). We're also seeing years later the fruits of labor to better emulate Win32 on ARM in the latest Windows 10 on ARM builds.

Though now with Chromebooks gaining popularity they are in danger of being too late again even though now they have an answer to "Can this Windows run Win32 applications, too?" because Chromebook and the increased market shares of iOS and Android have left an increasing number of people wondering what they need Win32 applications for. (The rumors that Microsoft might not even brand whatever this "Modern OS" project is as "Windows" and it may not even refer to current Windows on ARM efforts seems to maybe imply that Microsoft really is too late back to this market that they tried to enter earlier.)
I'm more in line with your girlfriend -- if the majority of ratings I'm giving out aren't 3 stars (on a 5 star system), then I'm doing it wrong. 3 means average, after all.

And I agree with you -- this sort of disparity is why ranking systems like that aren't terribly useful. Take Amazon, for instance. People there seem to weight their ratings according to price, so something that is cheap and mediocre can get 4 or 5 stars.

All of this sort of nonsense taught me to ignore ratings.
I think the West solved some of its pollution problems by outsourcing them to China...
As an Apple employee (not in any role related to the app store), and satisfied user of Happy Scale, I'm sorry to hear about the ranking loss.

On the other hand, it's in the nature of machine learning systems such as search that sometimes, a simple update of the underlying model can lead to drastic changes in search results (say, for argument's sake, that there has been a recent influx of apps using the word "tracker", which could lead to the word being considered essentially noise).

This can happen without any "bug" in the underlying system, even less a sinister agenda to undermine any developer or help another one. So while these possibilities can and should be investigated, ultimately search results will sometimes change.
Energy drinks may have unintended health risks
I generally feel that way too, but the US banking system just isn't built for it. It's hard to get too mad at Plaid for spoofing when my checking account's ID number is the only password required for authorizing electronic transfers.
So I guess it's fine for the US to ship Intel hardware with suspected backdoors in the ME. But it's somehow unacceptable for the Chinese to be rumoured to do the same?
Why should MS be forced to promote alternatives to IE?
It's not about being punished for being physically overpowered - it's about being a five foot 3 intern and having someone 6'1 250 lbs, in a suit and in a hurry, behind you, tailgating.

The implications are enough to make it a shitty situation for such a person have to turn around and say "sorry person that looks c-suite, you can't come in with me."
>only existed because of historical circumstances that cannot be replicated

Replace historical with political. Distribution is always political. You want a strong middle class raise top marginal tax rates back up to 70%
But then what happens if someone give a 4 when they always give 5? If your normal is the maximum, it screw quite a bit with the reality.