this post will be highly incendiary do not continue reading if you have sensible vapors.

why would high iq be a good thing as we head into global governance? people might get the wrong type of ideas and attempt a resistance which would slow the process down for another 100 years and get millions killed in civil global wars, probably using genetic/viral weapons. this would inevitably occur due to opportunistic high iq individuals seeking self-advancement through disruption, as it did during the american, french, bolshevik and chinese revolutions - all previous attempts at the same thing.

you either create culturo-ethno-homogeneity in the species and get beyond history, or you revert back into endless conflict and power dynamics between disparate human groups which are all basically trying to do the same thing (cleanse the other groups and become genetically dominant by becoming homogenous, typically through conflict). you can thank this type of universalist acceleration to the abrahamic religions which inspired by pre-socratic, babylonian and far-eastern philosophies of monism lead to a viral spread of this unification-goal idea - which emerges as logical extrapolations of the 'human story', as a type of genetic mythmaking.

lots of strategies can be used here, clearly the reproductive one employed by africans is successful since all that is left of non-african humans are traces of dna in more distant genetic groups, the vast genetic diversity in africa alone shows you that the strategy worked incredibly well there as a speciesglue - presumably the size of the continent and the rich conditions for early hominid life created many branches of humanity - which eventually were unified under the reproduction/conquest strategy of homo sapiens sapiens who then expanded perhaps out of necessity to the rest of the planet and out competed the other earlier hominid/erectus groups which may also have african origins following an early migration pattern. humans genocided and interbred with non-humans, and now there are only humans left (probably).

we accept that early (urban) civilization prefers certain climate zones due to the dependency on animal husbandry and agriculture. clearly proto-human life also has ecological niches, probably not a lot of hominid fossils in antarctica, and the african continent was the most gentle and therefore overpopulated first - leading to the relatively rapid expansion of new invasive species globally, with distant islands like new zealand settled last.

it makes perfect sense that it is happening again, and why a group which self-promotes it's high iq (european jews) are radically ethnocentric to the point of blood-law racism and are also involved as narrative shapers in the future discussion about who gets to keep unmixed genetic ancestry under the guise of religious and cultural traditions. and also why asian cultures become authoritarian and xenophobic. and also why intelligent people immigrate to other countries. and also why stupid people are more violent. all different strategies for genetic self-determination. to live in peace is the antithesis of life, and requires complete separation or unification, we will obviously do both by colonizing other planets and slowly mixing and engineering all humans into a tighter cluster of averages.

big wars often create the post-war malaise which allows you an unprecedented level of power through complacency in the population to radically shift forward with unpalatable agendas. clearly the american media establishment through it's various parent companies and quasi-international conglomerates wants a big war, to slow asia, redefine nationhood, and rewrite history again.