skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> they cause problems when taken internally, but used externally there shouldn't be any problem.

I don't know about parabens specifically, but that sounds like a reckless approach, akin to assuming a gun isn't loaded. You have proof it's harmful under X conditions, but you're just going to assume it's benign under Y?
Your story feels very similar to this thread on reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/axqkcq/i...

Maybe you can find some answers there ?
Isn't this the plot of Idiocracy...stupid people have more kids?
That looks interesting for other purposes I'd like to try. I love builds that let gravity do the work.

I have been wanting to try it again using a swivel in the line to allow the balloon to spin freely, but then use a tail/fin type of attachment to keep the rig oriented. It seems like anything would have to make it better.
I think the complexity for this setup is about the same. Once the different AWS services are provisioned during the initial setup, subsequent deploys are quite straightforward. For example, I have a three-line Makefile target for Jekyll sites that looks something like this (using Docker with a local `aws-cli` image wrapping the CLI):

docker run --rm -e "JEKYLL_ENV=production" -v $(PWD)/src:/srv/jekyll -it jekyll/jekyll:3.8.5 jekyll build
docker run --rm -itv $(HOME)/.aws:/root/.aws aws-cli aws s3 sync src/_site s3://www.<mydomain>
docker run --rm -itv $(HOME)/.aws:/root/.aws aws-cli aws cloudfront create-invalidation --distribution-id <mydistribution> --paths "/*"
Try writing something in machine code?
Your site specific hash, if leaked into logs and generated using a fixed hashing algorithm, would just be a step of obscurity, a rainbow table generated according to that hashing algorithm would be able to extract the original typed password pretty reliably for use in compromising other accounts held by the individual on other sites.

There are ways to actually add security above SSL but they require a per-session nonce. The most secure versions of these operate on some sort of out-of-band time-scrambling algorithm that's issued to users on an individual basis (usually a dongle) which is basically a nonce that's been pre-arranged a few years in advance, these can (if done correctly) provide all the security of on-demand generated nonces and physical keys combined.

Fixed hashing algorithms add such a negligible amount of security that I'd prefer to avoid them due to the tech debt their existence incurs outweighing their advantage.
The Mueller Report that totally exonerates the President and yet the President won't release it in full to Congress. The only one sliming the President is Trump himself.
The Genius Famine
I agree. I actually prefer goblet squats right now. Also going to try front-squats and see how that feels.
Everyone keeps claiming that exact tracking is necessary, or that this is ineffectual (as DNT).

It is clear that browsers are doing everything they can to prevent user abuse. So let’s imagine they succeed.

Imagine what happens to the current advertising model if browsers completely break cross origin tracking. That means you can’t link purchases to the original ads, and so the compensation model no longer works at all.

This provides a mechanism to do the required attribution without also tracking or compromising a user’s privacy. Without that, there isn’t a way for the current ad model to work.
I'm sorry, I hope my comment didn't come across as flippant about how the majority of churches treat women, LGBTQ+ people, and others. I'm pretty firmly in the unbeliever category myself and left out of disgust with all the exclusionary practices.

I did spend several years in an ELCA church pastored and co-pastored by a woman and by a gay man, who made a point every week of welcoming non-believers to the service. It nuanced my worldview a little bit. They were lovely people, but the congregation was definitely fighting upstream in wider Christian culture.

In my mind, the main secular benefit of church (for people who were not excluded) was access to ready-made community, reinforced by a regular meeting space and rituals (like singing) that help people bond and process major life transitions. I've been on the outside for about five years and haven't really found anything that fills that space, although I'm always interested to hear what others have found.
That's basically what you are doing isn't it?
IQ attempts to measure intelligence. Key difference. You should not put too much weight on an attempt to measure subjective qualities or reduce a human being to a number.
Unless you're a computer scientist studying algorithms, probably not. But when I defended my Master's thesis in CS way back in 1983 - yes, I'm that old - my fiancee[1] gave me the three-volume set of Knuth as a graduation gift. I had used his algorithm for arbitrary precision arithmetic in my thesis project. I had figured out addition and subtraction trivially, and had gotten multiplication on my own, but division eluded me. I credit Knuth in part for my being able to graduate with my M.S. Also: my thesis advisor had found a mistake in an earlier edition and was credited in the notes in the back of one of the volumes. So: your mileage may vary. [1] Still married, 35 years at last count.
I hear you. One of my friends (female) is a physicist whose career has succeeded in the face of many of her peers telling her - repeatedly, for decades - that women can't be as good as men at hard sciences because their brains are just wired differently at a biological level (a traditional attitude in the field). It's pretty draining.

I just can't get too exercised about "Boy's Guide" level insensitivity. If my daughter wants to go to Wall St., she's gonna need waaayyyy thicker skin than that. The biz attracts assholes and predators; it's not exactly snowflake-friendly.

I mean, at least i-banks are no longer openly allowing charges at whorehouses and strip clubs on company cards, but stuff like this does go on:

https://seagullreference.blogspot.com/2009/12/gross-details-...
Render – Heroku-like cloud hosting at a better price
I host all kinds of completely normal websites (ie, amateur radio) as tor hidden services. TOR is great because you actually own your domain instead of just leasing it on the whim of some corporation.

Once you get past the controversy TOR hidden services are more like the 1990s web than what you describe.
http://www.unz.com/jthompson/swanning-about-fooled-by-algebr...
This happened to me when I worked at TCS right out of college. I did the same thing as you and brought my case to HR and they didn't seem to care. When the client interviewed me I was very open about my actual skills and told them when something was just not true when they'd reference a lie on my resume that the company fabricated. Nothing negative ever happened to me during my employment there but I immediately started looking for another job.
Ok, we'll put that above.

Edit: actually, let's change the URL from https://e360.yale.edu/digest/a-major-u-s-utility-is-closing-... to the press release it points to, which is actually more informative. Being less informative than a press release is maybe not the greatest quality for an article...
As the paper and the article say, what matters is not the technical aspect of where to handle an exception, but to give some serious thought to what should be done when it occurs (as opposed to just logging it). Serious problems happen when people don't pay enough attention to that.
Just go with anything. Strength regimens basically all work, as long as you eat enough and increase the weight, just as all diets work when you eat less. People have gotten incredibly strong lifting rocks. I used to lift barbells, then switched to more functional strength of carrying 40 lb packs up mountains and climbing vertical faces.
This is an important point that people need to keep in mind. From a psychological perspective it is also a little bit evil in that it "feels" like a community and people participate like its a community, but the reality is that it isn't a community at all in the communal action sense.

Essentially Google gets "free" developer time as people work on problems and pitch in possible solutions. Google can influence what is worked on by whining about things, and they are free to take or discard the offerings.

This isn't particularly surprising to me as it feels very similar to the way I felt when working there. Which is that people in engineering worked on projects that they were passionate about, but whether or not those projects got support, or were shipped, or released into products. That stuff was all done "elsewhere" by some group of people who were generally known, but not really part of the day to day. I tended to think cynically of them as 'class A' shareholders, or 'class B' shareholders[1].

I don't think there is anything wrong with managing a program this way, I do however think they go out of their way to create a community illusion to foster more participation. That tells me that if they were up front about things, they feel people might not be as eager to participate. To the extent that they are deceptive in their communications, that I would consider wrong.

[1] Class B shareholders get to vote on shareholder issues, but there is always more voting power in the class A shares so that the class A folks can veto or reject any notion they dislike, no matter how popular with the class B folks.
A Sampling of Public Opinion in India
Girls guides were about the activities most girls were engaged in at the time, cooking, sewing, etc. You never would have seen a "Girls Guide to Shortwave Radio," for example, fifty years ago because practically no women were doing it. I am sure it would have delighted a small handful of girls, but that is not how markets work. You don't print a book if it is not going to sell.

I generally disagree with your position on gender roles, which I think evolve naturally and are not necessarily bad.
Safari already does actively work to block trackers.
This is a huge step in the right direction. Despite your thoughts on death and burial traditions, the reality is that the most common practices are not eco friendly.

In the U.S. each year we bury 20m ft of hardwood, 1.6m tons of concrete and 4.3m gallons of embalming fluid. [1]

An average cremation takes 28 gallons of fuel. [1]

Also, just my own opinion based on observation, why do cemeteries get all the best real estate?? Dead people can't enjoy that view.

[1] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/how-your-death-affects-cl_b_6...
Top Mistakes Made by New Affiliate Marketers
It wouldn't add much security. If any web page can read the configuration data, an attacker can capture it by tricking you into opening a web page.
CO2 maybe?

https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-re...
I don't know if "thinking" in the context of that quote requires high IQ. I think that a high IQ person does less conscious thinking and "just gets" complex problems easily.

I think Alfed Whitehead is supporting IQ rise as civilization advances, since baseline abstractions, problems solving techniques, and patterns are taught to us by our parents / community, and are accumulated over time. We have observed this to be true continuously.

An IQ test is timed and requires pattern recognition and selection for the most part. These things are exactly the type of "operations we perform without thinking" that general intelligence supports. Being good at finding and acting on general patterns without deep thought is extremely helpful and is probably (at least loosely) associated with high IQ.
I don't pay full price in that scenario, I pay over full price. You end up paying full price.

At any rate, I actually just avoid the supermarket near me that has a circular and go to the one that averages lower prices but without those "killer deals". I'm not doing poorly for myself so I'd be happy to subsidize people less well off (which ideally would all be consolidated into my taxes) but I think the cost in terms of time and paper goods couponing levies on society is simply not worth it.
A racing surfkite like this one [1] has no problem going upwind really fast.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltDLsumdXLA
I think I got it. The simplest way I can describe it is the gear on the far right is turning the whole square frame on the left because the little shaft turns inside the big shaft. The 2nd gear from the right (that is connected to the big shaft) is turning the "thing-thats-already-turning", so you get 2X rpm.
True. If I was google I'd spend millions getting lawyers and lobbyists to try to change how fair use is applied and interpreted in the U.S. so it is as clear cut as "an excerpt of up to this percent size of the total work is fair use regardless of context" combined with "excerpts are not permitted to be pieced or packaged together in such a way that the entire or most of the original work can be consumed". So you wouldn't be allowed to just make a playlist of 30 second clips on youtube that equals the entire movie, but a stupid script could figure out if a clip counts as fair use.

To clarify, this would work the same way classified information works in the DoD -- many small pieces of information can be one classification level (or even unclassified), but if you aggregate them, they can become a higher classification level in aggregate. Similarly, small fair-use clips on an individual level would retain fair-use status, but if you start aggregating them, via a playlist or some other method, the playlist would not be fair use and would count as infringement.

The ballsier move than simply lobbying forever would be for Google to just go ahead and do this -- go ahead and write a script/AI that rejects infringement reports and/or DMCA requests on excerpts that are less than 5% of the total work on the basis that such a small excerpt necessarily must be fair use no matter the context because of the small size of the clip, and then battle each case out in court on behalf of the infringing user. I think they would win every single case, and once they have won a few in a row, precedent would take care of the rest and predatory media companies would stop trying.

This isn't impossible. Google is in a position to clarify / influence how copyright law is applied, and they should do it.
You're confusing two very different things:

1 - Stealing technology from one country and using it within your own country to increase your competitiveness.

2 - Stealing technology from one country and using it to build a competitive advantage for your firms in that first country (or any other country not your own).

The first, depending one which treaties your country is a part of, may not even be considered stealing. The second clearly is.
I was not aware Beat Saber would be available on a standalone device, that truly is awesome! Though you do lose out on custom songs, which is a huuuge downside for beat saber
I wouldn't worry too much. There is a feedback loop. Modern industrial society has a few core components like welfare, addiction, extreme individualism, inequality, and short term thinking that do not select for high IQ and are not amenable to fostering high IQ - we end up with DINKs and idiocracy and people just don't have to be that smart to survive and operate. There's very little need today to plan ahead, to figure things out, to do new things. But the assumption is that modern society needs some high IQ to operate. At some point, IQ drops to the point where modern industrial society fractures, and selection forces reemerge to favor IQ friendly environments.

You should worry that about the possibility that recent tech has sidestepped the IQ feedback loop. That is, the tech is good enough without human input that it can sustain a low IQ society. In that case, it's downhill from here.

Interesting read: http://iqpersonalitygenius.blogspot.com
I'm glad that this blog post starts off with the principles behind the design of this technology because even if the specific design or implementation turns out to be flawed there is something to go back to and refine. The principles here seem similar to what a billboard ad or a paper ad effectively requires i.e. engagement and conversion is the responsibility of the ad buyer.
Maybe we can speciate into grunting Amazon-prime-subscribing Eloi, and the technologically literate Morlocks who feed on them.
Undercover video shows brutalities on FalunGong prisoners in Chinese labor camps
We are talking about general civilization's aggregate IQ though. Sure, there are people too smart or exotic to measure, but that's true on both ends of the spectrum, so might they balance out?

Perhaps, you know, in the past, it was more difficult for those with lower IQ's to survive. Now people with lower IQ's can survive for longer, which is good for them -- absolutely! -- however, it would reduce average IQ's.

That would also suggest, this isn't something bad for civilization like the article suggests. Perhaps the same number of incredibly intelligent people like the ones you mention are better able now in this modern age to get their solutions to more people to make it easier to live.
That should indeed be the default behavior out of the box with the way the S3 buckets are configured. I have a couple Jekyll sites deployed this way, and a request to the parent directory does get served by the contents in `index.html`. Are you not seeing that behavior?

I'd definitely like to add more variants of the default stack. At the minimum, I'm sure there are folks that prefer `www` redirects to the apex domain, or removing the `www` subdomain altogether.
Surely IQ increase/decrease over time would give an IQ rate.
There are tons of socioeconomic factors to consider, but I know a lot more fairly average IQ couples with 4 kids instead of two, and I know a lot more smart people who are either childfree or single than parents.

The ability to use birth control properly requires some intelligence.

The needs/career ambitions of a knowledge work career sometimes push aside the desire for a family.

Not trying to be down on people who have lots of kids! There's just tons of factors, some less obvious.
With regards to the app, I find that a lot of the good functionality was taken away when Medhi moved to a subscription model.

Personal Training Coach is free (or premium w/ one-time fee), has UX like the StrongLifts app, and contains tons of exercise programs, not just SL/SS.

I don't represent Personal Training Coach, am just a satisfied customer.
This library is very explicitly targeted to browsers and makes repeated mention of compatibility testing for them, so the parent question is on point.
I'm guessing you're in India? This is such common practice that as a CTO I've been forced to blanket ban working with Indian firms. This is one of the least dishonest things they do, some of the other stuff I could tell stories about is far worse.

You're doing the right thing, but that doesn't mean you won't be punished for it in the short term. Hopefully someone recognizes your integrity in the long term and you are rewarded accordingly but there are no guarantees.
Please just flag and move on, as the site guidelines ask. If you reply, you not only troll-feed, but leave off-topic subthreads dangling after we ban the accounts.

In egregious cases, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com too, which guarantees we'll see it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Most of these things don't result in a cleanly attributable death, just increased risk of already common end of life diseases. Or a reduction in quality of life.

HFCS won't kill you even if you drink it in bulk. Spend 40 years eating it and you get a 10% higher chance of, say, dying before 70.
Try OpenSuse, their KDE environment has an excellent level of polish.
Sure you are. You're hurting all the developers who will have to jump through timed test hoops to prove they know how to do things because the prospective employer has been burned by engineers who lied on their resumes. If you're a consulting company you're hurting all the other consulting companies that do business honestly, and have to try to build good working relations with customers that have been burned by dishonesty like this. In other words, you're hurting everyone, and making everything worse.
Ford might have out-creeped Boston Dynamics with a 2-legged delivery robot
Hi HN, I’m Erik CEO at Tesseract. Tesseract went through YC in Summer 2017 and builds in space propulsion. Please reach out if you have any questions
It demonstrates a company with a lack of integrity. In my experience such companies end up losing and their poor ethics smear the reputation of people that worked there. It sounds like you have a choice to make.
The first one I clicked was a video, but this one has animations that are very impressive! https://animagraffs.com/mechanical-watch/
You are delusional. How is this NOT unethical?
There is really no need to hurry with strength training. When I started Starting Strength, I burned out after a few weeks because of too much weight, despite following common advice and really liking it in the beginning.

I'm not a fan of the No Pain No Gain philosophy. I get a lot more reps done with better recovery when I train cautiously, which means I get to do it with more consistency, which in my book is King.

Joe Rogan has a video titled "How to workout smarter" with Firas Zahabi who explains it really well. It was enlightening to me.
What are the advantages of having a committee involved in the design of Go? In the case of C++, based on the threads that I read on HN, I see people being unhappy about the decisions taken by its committee.
Yeah, "lobbying" should be outright banned.
That still sounds quite optimistic to me.
Why do we allow this. Why have we allowed an entity to exist that is driven so fully by greed to the disregard of all other pursuits - and understand, corporations aren't a natural existence, they are a thing constructed wholly by our societies.
This is the kind of study where I expect in a few months to see headlines about IQ NOT dropping, and then more headlines about how IQ is dropping and in the end the whole thing is inconclusive.

The more attention grabbing the headline is the more skeptical I am of the study.
Cycling to work through cavernous limestone mines turned into a business park
This is one of those things like "In the Beginning Was the Command Line" that sounded profound in its day, but didn't take into account the inexorable march of time. In 2019, there is a strong bias to write Web service applications in the same language as the client. If you're doing greenfield development and do not choose JavaScript as your implementation language, someone will tell you you're being impractical.
What the FAA should have done, too.
Pretty sure those are almost all of the most popular statically typed languages (absent C#, which has about the same verbosity as Java). I'm sure I'm wrong if you're willing to lower the threshold for "popular" enough.
You are a thorough outlier. I don't get motion sick either, but it is still a completely immersive experience.
You assume that I hadn't seen the video before writing that.

Look at the quotes. They are over the top. You don't think it's possible that a 1989 reporter could have taken some liberties and not been called on it?
Why would I use your library over the tried and true https://github.com/dchest/tweetnacl-js
?
I like mimetics.

I'm not a distributed database expert.

But I'm wondering: is this analogous to sharding? Not really, I guess.
Eventual consistency? Not really, I guess.

Is it: sharding + replication + "ordering" => Eventual consistency?

What do we have in tech that behaves like this?