skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Comment régler le problème de packs de langue sous Windows 10 version 1809
I agree with you. Money can't create happiness on its own, but as a reasonably happy person, I'd much prefer to have more money than less.
I'm glad to hear of this class. I think I'll take it in order to see if I can learn some things I didn't know.

That said, the article is very poorly written. The author appears to not have a good understanding of what constitutes standards of proof in the social sciences, and in what way studies in social sciences ought to be spoken about.

(For example, they refer to a landmark Princeton study that "proved" money doesn't equal happiness, then states that some later studies with a different demographic "disproved" this.

But the first study did not prove anything by most meanings of the word, nor did the second disprove it. They provided evidence, suggested conclusions, invited interpretation...etc. You can't prove lasting things about changing statistical aggregates, nor prove things about individuals based on group statistics. That is not how statistics works.)

Then there is the cheesy bit where they show themselves "scoring points" on a professor who "concedes" that a car could be an experience, if you can focus on the experience of driving it...but frankly she's gently correcting them, not conceding a point. (Note that these scare quotes are my interpretation; they are not said in the article.)

I do think in general that I don't like this folksy let's-pretend-the-journo-knows-nothing-because-some-readers-won't style. Perhaps it's an imperfection of mine rather than the author's.

I'd rather they just tell me what they know or found out, or quote the authority, because I don't find the fact that they had a conversation with the authority human-interesting. (That is, I think they're angling for a human interest style in this sort of piece, but there is nothing of human interest in showing me you had a conversation with a person.)
I mean, gore-tex (ePTFE) has been used for medical implants for decades.
Have there been any "successful" UBI experiments? I've seen results from a few that didn't pan out as expected, but conclusions were generally either that the method was flawed (which might be a cop-out) or that the amount provided didn't rise to the level of "true" UBI.

I'm genuinely curious as to whether it could replace other existing welfare programs, or if it would exacerbate self-destructive behaviors in the absence of opportunities for earned and delayed gratification.
1. Profiler. There's a standard tool that tells you what part of your code is slow. Over half the time it'll find something dumb and easy to fix instead of whatever you expected.

2. SQL / relational database schemas. Persistence opens up a lot of capabilities. And databases themselves are very well-optimized; if you do any nontrivial data manipulation it's likely that whatever the query planner comes up with will be faster than your first idea of how to do it by hand.

3. Graph searches. An awful lot of problems can be solved by knowing how to turn problem into a graph search. Make sure not to fall into the trap of thinking a graph search is limited to paths through space - you can solve problems like "get through this dungeon with keys and doors" by adding duplicate nodes for the different states.

4. Sequential Bayesian Filters. Are almost as useful as graphs, but aren't in a standard CS curriculum so you'll look like a wizard. These solve the problem of "I want to know a thing and I know how it changes over time, but I only can get rough estimates for its current state." Kalman Filters are simple and give great results when applicable. Particle Filters have lower quality but are applicable to more problems and dirt simple to code.
IME the issue is not being overwhelmed with libs/frameworks, the issue is SPAs requires way more work.
It's true, they're the only ones actually putting people on payroll to send them out to areas, do interviews and original investigation. Everybody else is just reaggreggating others from other news outlets, social media and public documents with their own analysis. But even the big mainstream companies suck at local reporting for their own towns. For things that are not national federal news you have to really get it from other people.
If our mutual boss was named Paul, quite likely :)
They’ve got a long history of doing this. I learned about it from the documentary Food, Inc. (which I’d highly recommend), but it’s also been widely covered in the media:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/feb/12/monsanto...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/agricultural-giant-battles-smal...
It’s just like that,

Except that the NYT and Safeway don’t pretend that their product isn’t the result of curation.

There is nothing ‘organic’ about organic search results.
this is my definition of a boring programmer:

- makes code that works

- solves people's problems

- doesn't care what other programmers think

edit: the truth is a boring programmer won't even read this, just doesn't care, doesn't read hn, just does stuff
You inserted the concept of spirituality in an attempt to take some kind of stance; that was never present. You fabricated that, then complained when you were downvoted for being obtuse, and you keep complaining about lack of intelligent discourse while ignorantly hammering at a point that doesn't exist here.
Or it can buy experiences, it doesn't make you appreciate the little things that make it awesome though ;)

In the same reasoning, most of my friends have no "lack of money", in the sense that they are'nt filthy rich. But they earn good money.

I have noticed that almost none of them are jealous of each other. Which are truly the best friends to have.

Don't get me started about people who complain all the time, but just want to talk the talk, without doing the walk. They won't bring joy, ever.

Some people are a lot richer, so what. I would also never went to trade places with someone who is a millionaire suddenly and have all their friends change because of that single thing.

Appreciating what you have is not such a rare thing ( outside of IT). But it's almost never mentioned here, everyone wants to start the next unicorn, while forgetting that a solid business/job keeps you more sane.
If you own a shopping centre, and rent out the spaces to shops, do shoppers at those stores count as customers of the store, or of the shopping centre owner?
Well, frankly, I don’t really want a revocation list, and I don’t really want signed extensions in the first place. It’s my browser, and it’s not Mozilla’s business to decide what I install on my browser.

And I most definitely don’t want my browser to fail into an unsafe configuration.
LibrePlanet 2019 videos now live
Nowaday IT people seems to crave for stickers on their laptop.
That's very nice, but saying it's strictly superior to async/await is a stretch. Fibers/stackful coroutines are a different approach with its own tradeoffs.

On the plus side, fibers offer almost painless integration of synchronous code, while async/await suffer from the "colored functions" problem[1].

The price you pay for that, is the higher overhead of having to allocate stacks. If you don't support dynamic stacks which can be resized, you basically don't have a much better overhead than native threads. There are two solutions I'm aware of, both of them have been done by Go at different times: segmented stacks and re-aligning and copying the stack on resize. Both carry some memory overhead (unused stacks) and computational overhead (stack resizing).

[1] http://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2015/02/01/what-color-is-y...
I also have a Model S with this occurring on my v2 MCU. I was told by a service tech they were collecting VINs, and would have a fix available this year. I opted out of arbitration when I took delivery of the vehicle, so I intend to sue in small claims court to have it replaced if Tesla does not perform the repair as a warranty claim. Waiting for a fix I'm fine with. Being stuck with it in a $100k car that is less than a year old I am not.
I used to think like that and then I learned that suicide rate is extremely high among young people with gender dysphoria and these medicines are known to reduce that risk.
It is clear, I think.
The person you are responding to is referring to DDG.
Wow! I had no idea there was a whole industry selling spyware to dictatorships. Surveillance equipment, yes, but not actual hacking tools. Really sickening. Must be why governments in Europe are so afraid of Huawei building 5G networks - they will only run Chinese spyware.
Small scale Ag is the opposite of Factory Farming. The latter relies on economies of scale and a long supply chain. The former has a shorter supply chain and tries to grow on demand.

Factory farming grows commodities, not food. It exploits labor, soil and destroys habitat. It keeps farmers in debt and they have to keep running faster to stay in the same place.

While more can be grown in the same acre and with the same water(presumably), it includes inputs like pesticides, herbicides and large machinery. It concentrates power in a few hands. It reduces plant varieties and is tied to speculative markets. It requires subsidies and keeps farmers on knife’s edge.

Maybe the spoon fed notion of abundance that comes from the lab and through chemical means..through mining and reliance on fossil fuels...through long supply chains, labour exploitation, subsidies and massive carbon foot print is a fallacy. Might it be that you are mistaken? Please reconsider your POV.
The article is promoting a book, which upon cursory examination seems to have a lot of illustrations.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-13/secretive-israeli-...
Constitutional Amendments were not designed to directly contradict the purpose of the constitution; why would you do so if not for a blatant power grab? Why not allow states to do it for themselves? Broad-brush national solutions do not always work well. Labor costs are higher in certain places, conditions vary, etc. Why do it federally?
Two genuine questions.

1. "Svelte is a component framework — like React or Vue — but with an important difference. Traditional frameworks allow you to write declarative state-driven code, but there's a penalty: the browser must do extra work to convert those declarative structures into DOM operations, using techniques like virtual DOM diffing that eat into your frame budget and tax the garbage collector."

Is this a practical concern for folks writing CRUD SPAs? I've never experienced degradation in performance due to virtual dom diffing.

2. "Svelte runs at build time, converting your components into highly efficient imperative code that surgically updates the DOM."

Angular has its ahead-of-time (AOT) compiler for applications built in production mode. Is this any different from Svelte? It sounds like Svelte claims to be novel, but Angular too does build-time template optimization.
Agree with Kye. In general, SCOTUSblog is a vastly better source on all Supreme Court cases than any traditional news site.
"For instance, search for "has Infowars ever been correct" on Google and then Duck Duck Go."
Wow. Completely different results.
You can easily skill shift a coal miner into eg the natural gas industry. Including at 10 years prior to retirement. I've known at least a dozen miners that transitioned to natural gas, in the greater Marcellus shale region.

When shifting an experienced miner to the natural gas industry, the problem isn't education, it's replacement pay. They're usually technically, industrially competent people, and are well suited to the oil and natural gas industries as far as ease of skill adaptation goes. It's something our government/s should be pursuing aggressively (except usually the states where the coal industry exists don't want to go against those jobs and actively encourage that shift). If done correctly, you could make the job shift from coal to other energy industries far easier, buffering the labor hit, and drain the coal industry of the labor it needs to operate (accelerating its demise).
What's the argument against just relying on "cabin overheat protection" to keep the climate in spec? Seems like that would solve a lot of their supply chain limitations at once with relatively minimal battery drain - though it does seem wasteful to spend energy keeping electronics comfy in the sun.
Exactly. It's a complete mischaracterization to call every stock market boom and bust cycle a result of "greed," and yet people refuse to stop doing so. I guess it creates a sense of moral outrage, and makes readers feel righteously justified.
Maybe don't list 10 years of experience on your resume if they have all been in junior roles. Maybe just list the last 2 or 3 years of experience.

If you put some contact info on your HN profile, I might be able to do another mock interview and give you feedback if you are interested.
We should be putting those workers to work as part of the NPS/US Forest Service in Appalachia and the Rocky Mountains as these extraction jobs phase out. Better to focus on conservation and remediation instead of extraction IMHO (and the cost to employee someone in such a role is not much higher per person, ~$65k/year, than they'd receive at max social security benefits [~$35k/year]).
Since when is gratitude a religious concept?

That's like saying love is a religious concept, just because some religions talk about love.
Well, by that argument, all economic activity of any description is bad for the environment. Paying anyone to do anything ever is bad. In fact, just being alive is bad. Anyone who talks a big talk about the environment without immediately reducing their carbon footprint by committing suicide is a hypocrite.

Which may well be true! But then it seems unfair to single out eating in a restaurant - given that the other humans already exist whether you buy the meal or not, it doesn't seem especially bad in the scheme of things you could be paying someone to do.
Well, I mean, that person serving the food would still exist and respirate and consumer even if they had a different job. The slippery slope of "humans cause carbon emissions" quickly descends to some Malthusian debates which basically end up as "Thanos did nothing wrong".
Why do you end up losing the jobs?
The secure enclaves on Android smartphones have a poor track record. Even the top-of-the-line manufacturers have seen published hacks of their TEE environments, and those are usually just the tip of the iceberg. Android is incomparable to Apple's platform in this regard. (I'm not trying to argue the iPhone is unhackable, though.)

FWIW, I'm an Android user.
That response doesn't make any sense.

I didn't agree or disagree with, I simply asked the OP to explain their reasoning.

And I also disagree that the burden of proof would be on the "other side". The status quo is trial by jury. That will never change if nobody wants to explain why they think it's bad or what would work better.
What I Learnt from Larry Ellison
All my life I've thought spyware was developed primarily by evil Russian and Chinese hackers. But apparently also by Israeli developers with their government's blessing and open endorsement. That's some very shady stuff.

Gamma Group is an Anglo-German company that provides similar surveillance software with government blessing and endorsement. Hacking Team (Italian company) sells similar surveillance software to various European governments. Before an embarrassing data breach in 2015 they also used to sell surveillance software to various totalitarian regimes outside Europe.
True to some degree, at least for GTA you can clearly place the blame on the parent for not scrutinizing the recommended rating for the game they let there kid play.
SpaceX has had similar issues with using industrial grade parts in situations where their competitors typically use aerospace grade ones [1]. Although in their case the failures are a bit more visually spectacular than some yellow stripes [2]

[1]: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/public_...

[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuNymhcTtSQ&t=3m
Ideas are fascinators and the most interesting of which will find audiences. Those audiences will not depose of those ideas easily. It's a not an entirely novel new concept. I think of the spread of a religion throughout most of human history. Stoya wasn't talking about some high minded conceptual idea when she chose her stage name, but rather something she just connected to at a point in her life.
I think they're usually called "no skins"
Why do you think their opinion should be expressed in their comment?
Web is such an overcomplicated
exploit-riddled mess that only a handful of megacorps even have the resources to maintain a browser--and most have thrown in the towel on that front.

For documents, PDF seems far more sane.

For example, PDF is guaranteed to terminate. Document embedded JavaScript isn't.
In enterprise environments, I more often see overuse of message brokers. I am all for targeted use of messaging systems, but what I usually see is an all or nothing approach where as soon as a team starts using messaging they use it for _all_ interprocess communication.

This has some very painful downsides.

First, traditional message brokers (ie queues, topics, persistence, etc) introduce a potential bottleneck for all communication, and on top of that they are _slow_ compared to just using the network (ie HTTP, with no middleman). I've had customers who start breaking apart their monoliths and replacing with microservices, and since the monolith used messaging they use messaging between microservices as well. Well, the brokers were already scaled to capacity for the old system, so going from "1" monolith service to "10" microservices means deploying 10x more messaging infrastructure. Traditional messaging brokers also don't scale all that well horizontally, so that 10x is probably more like 20x.

Second, performance tuning becomes harder for people to understand. A core tenant of "lean" is to reduce the number/length of queues in a system to get more predictable latency and to make it easier to diagnose bottlenecks. But everyone always does the opposite with messaging: massive queues everywhere. By the time the alarms go off, multiple queues are backing up and no one is clear on where the actual bottleneck is.

What I would like to see more of is _strategic_ use of messaging. For example, a work queue to scale out processing, but the workers use HTTP or some other synchronous method to call downstream services. Limiting messaging to very few points in the process still give a lot of the async benefits to the original client, while limiting how often requests hit the broker and making it easier to diagnose performance problems.
I would expect to be able to leave my car in a parking lot for a week or two (unplugged) and still be able to drive away when I return. I feel like with overheat protection the battery would be dead by the time I got back.
This is the same country that has a secret nuclear stockpile (developed in partnership with Apartheid South Africa) with plans to use the threat of bombing their European "allies" as blackmail.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option
Price and pollution yes, but carbon no. Natural gas plants, while nominally 490 gCO2-eq/kW vs. coal's 800, are still very high carbon. Add in methane leaks from pipeline distribution and then LNG compression energy as the export market from the US rapidly increases in the gulf and it's parity. Fracked natural gas is a disaster from a climate change perspective.

This is why we need to price in carbon externalities in energy markets.
Overheat protection deactivates when the battery pack reaches 20% state of charge. EVs are a bit of a different model; whenever parking for long periods, I endeavor to find a lot that lets me plug in, even if it's 120V 15A (which is enough to keep the cabin cool and the battery somewhat conditioned, although not enough to charge if both of the previously mentioned activities are occurring). Haven't had an airport or long term parking lot yet I could not find an approved outlet or EV charger for my use, but YMMV.

@leggomylibro: To reply to your deleted comment, you asked if the vehicle needed 1800W to keep itself conditioned but not maintain state of charge. It's closer to 1440W, as a 15A 120V circuit is derated to 12A (80%) for continuous duty cycle. Coolant pumps can be power hungry!

@akozak: I believe it is Tesla specific. I am unaware of the feature being present on other EVs.
work out what your enemy considers an uncrossable boundary - then cross it - gets them every time.

source - Art of War, probably...
This seems like an appropriate time to invoke http://boringtechnology.club/ -- more thoughts on why to avoid the flavor of the month when you're trying to build useful software that doesn't _need_ dependencies on shiny new stuff.
Its seem much less development than pyre.chat, but it is a functional client (tho pictures all end up in a folder when sent your way, as images + ncurses doesn't really work).
That, and 'overheat protection' apparently doesn't work...
Why shouldn’t it be subject to the laws of supply and demand? If my passion is Russian Literature, you’re saying that someone (who?) must create a demand for that so that I can make a living pursing my passion?
There is no explicit forbiddance of Request/Reply semantics in a message bus. Data on a message bus absolutely does not have to be one way.
Google's search algorithms are their secret sauce intellectual property. Why would they share them with you?
Interesting to hear about this lack of boundaries among Israelis, is this only for non-Israelis or do you/they cross each others boundaries? Is this a cultural thing, why do you think this the case?
This is why I’m religious. Christianity, in accordance with scripture and tradition, is a path to mental and spiritual well-being that was tested by my ancestors for millennia.

Sadly, as scripture tells us, many (most) people who claim to be Christians are wolves in sheep’s clothing. But there are plenty of wolves hiding in the guise of the other paths too. Caveat emptor.
Stephanie Seneff has some interesting things to say about glyphosate. https://youtu.be/mX5OiRRNRnU
Perhaps, but I’ve been feeling the great schism[1] happening in front end development between a more design oriented developers and the tech oriented developers. Being on the design side of the schism (what this 2014 article calls BFED) I feel unsatisfied with the current state of front end mentality (even though its settled). I feel that the pressure to use the wrong set of tools to arrive at the wrong conclusion too great. The fact that selection between these wrong set of tools is less overwhelming, feels irrelevant.

Note that there are still what I consider right tools and right conclusions. They are just under in terms of popularity and it feels like the industry is pushing me away from them.

[1]: https://css-tricks.com/the-great-divide/
so you're claiming... "It's different this time" ?
I'm working on something new and and the whole frontend ecosystem makes me nervous. The last time I did any kind of production-level frontend work was 2004.

It feels like I woke from a coma and am trying to adjust to a new kind of world with flying cars except they don't really fly.

I mean, I feel insecure for writing CSS by hand, not using webpack/roll-up or a whole frontend build flow. I do like Mithril.js and Svelte though so perhaps I'll start using bits of that in my new project.
I’m sure it was completely Israeli government involvement with the technologically advanced US playing no lead role. ...
California jury hits Bayer with $2B award in Roundup cancer trial
https://www.letjamz.com/9239/what-we-do-in-the-shadows-seaso...
What link did that happen with?
Maybe a Jim Lovell level pilot?
wanna get a spray of it in the face?
In "Awards presentation and speech" Stallman talks about keeping the phone antenna off and carrying a pager. Can pagers not be tracked the same as phones? If not, would it be difficult to fit pager tech in a phone?