skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Precisely. Musk is a con artist, none of his businesses are or ever will be profitable. He exists to facilitate the flow of money from middle class to the powerful few.
People don't care about five 9s anymore? It's not as important as it was (I assume—I wasn't really around at the time), but cloud providers definitely advertise their number of 9s.
Show HN: Web Template Converter..React JavaScript/TS CSS/Styled Components, Vue
Until he publishes the last book I don’t believe he wrote the queen going mad into the story.
Yep. I've looked into direct primary care which hole punches the doctor patient firewall, but I'm sure I'd have to negotiate a rate with the doctor for a special needs kid like my daughter.

In my city though there's doctors who accept $50 a month GP direct payment and you can email them and communicate directly with your doctor. I interviewed a few of them, had a casual hour conversation with one about ketogenic diet and he recommended some books. So different than regular insurance doctors where you get virtually no time at all. Obviously not everyone can afford it since it bypasses insurance completely, but it's still an interesting concept.
Explanation fails when you take Marvel studios into account. Overall consistent product with some outstanding and satisfying movies. Disney/HBO seem like hacks in comparison. Now that Disney is assuming control of Marvel however i expect the quality to drop because of things like James Gunn incident etc. Companies that are too concerned with image and aligning with the cultural zeitgeist are consistently putting out mediocre products
That's completely wrong, how did you get that idea? All countries with nuclear waste I'm aware of have the same nuclear waste problem. Germany is one example and probably the worst offender, it does not even have one nuclear waste storage facility (and early tries looked like this: https://static.geo.de/bilder/51/5b/41390/article_image_big/0...) and just exports it to other countries (mainly France) that store it in other temporary places.

Last time I looked into it not one country had the ability to reprocess the fuel (and how would that work anyway?) and there was only one country in Europe that claimed it will have a storage facility fit for storing the waste forever, highly disputed (there are multiple for weakly radioactive waste but none for the highly radioactive stuff).

> This is a political problem, not a technical problem

Even if that were true (it isn't) that wouldn't not make it any better. Nuclear energy would still be way too dangerous, it doesn't matter whether the cause for its danger technical or political.

---

No one besides us two will read this, so I will add something I normally would not:

You claim a lot of falsehoods in this thread, like this now and the navy incidents. May I politely invite you to inform yourself a little bit better about this nuclear energy question? I really think that the political power amassed on HN could influence future politics on this question, and HN loves technical solution but sometimes misses the sensitivity for the danger on nuclear energy (probably reflecting that in the US there is no proper green energy movement and knowledge about this is in general limited). You adding completely wrong information to the discussion does not help improving the situation. So, as a real honest request: Please read up a bit more on this and don't spread pro-nuclear propaganda here.
That's actually really good
Your last sentence is a fair point. But now I have to ask - where do you live? Is it really a thing to blast through stop signs there? I think I can say truthfully that in MN (USA) people stop at stop signs, always.
No, 2018 is the model of the car. Commenter above misread the first sentence.

Accident happened on March 1, 2019, and the car was a 2018 Model 3.

> Tesla Inc’s Autopilot system was engaged during a fatal March 1 crash of a 2018 Model 3 in Delray Beach...
It may help to document ideas and pitfalls as you think of them. If you're trying out things in code, leave that work on your own branches, and link from the doc. It gives managers a tangible artifact to see you're making progress. It's also valuable documentation for others after the task is done. Extra plus: come performance review time, you have a paper trail of everything you've done, everything you tried that didn't work out, everything you can take credit for.
It's understandable to flag mails from reputation domains as spams if there's no SPF and DMARC, but there is. It's totally unreasonable.

> The filtering is schizophrenic.

The unfortunate result of machine learning? I guess Google's spam filter has lots of pattern-matching and heuristics that don't follow "the rules of E-mails" exactly. Anecdotes in the comments I linked says Google's spam filter has became more aggressive in recent years, I suspect it must be ML.

I hope other HN readers can give a more informative answer to your post, as a sender, I'm having the same problem, it's two sides of the same coin...
We don’t have any minimum wage in Sweden. What we do have however are strong unions and free higher education. Somehow I get the feeling that as a nation, we care a lot more about the little guy and his social mobility than the US does.
> It isn't a good example. Damore wasn't "fired because of an offended woman". Regardless of what you think of Damore, that isn't close to accurate. We all need to be much more careful about facts than that.

I don't necessarily condone Damore's action (or Google's reaction, for that matter) but I'm incredulous that someone could suggest this is not accurate (well, except for the fact that it wasn't an individual woman). I'm interested to hear why you think this is inaccurate.

I also feel it's absurd to characterize it as flamebait. It's directly relevant to the question under discussion - why gender issues are making men feel uncomfortable in the workplace. That doesn't mean their discomfort is justified - maybe you agree, maybe you don't. But flagging these comments indicates you feel that noone is even *allowed to discuss it openly.
They do share an intense attention to detail though, Ikea is similar in many ways.
Cartesian trees do not provide the ability to get items at arbitrary indices within the data structure in an efficient member from my understanding. In order to get the Nth item in the tree, a linear traversal is required. Furthermore, to get the index at which an item is inserted or removed requires the same traversal to accumulate the index.
The lesson is that automation can fail suddenly, even in domains like aerospace which are unusual in that they have an infrastructure of professionalism and safety. If an automatic system fails and then leaves the system in a position that humans can't recover from then the failure will be complete.

This is not real supervision, automatic systems must be designed to relinquish control before the situation is dangerous.
Intel ModernFW
The way Aldi works I wouln't expect it to ever completely take over the market. Its selection is not intended to be big enough to do so. Generally you buy 80% or more of your stuff at Aldi, then go to the grocery store right next door and finish the rest of your list which Aldi doesn't carry. Also, what does a "small grocer" even look like these days? The only grocery stores I see that don't seem to be part of larger chains is ethnic food stores, and Aldi is definitely not in that market.
> Don't make it a dinner or drinks? Just meet and discuss work 1 on 1. That's the surest way to communicate the intentions of the meeting.

The problem here is non-formal social opportunities that aren't meetings and don't take the place of meetings. If there's solid work-related content to discuss then of course you can meet with someone and discuss it, but that's not the same as grabbing dinner with someone when you're both working late and chattering about career-related stuff.

> Also: do you offer to mentor the "not pretty" females? That statement alone in your post shows a remarkable immaturity in you about women in the workplace.

Of course I do, I mentor anyone who asks to be mentored. Formal work relationships like mentoring aren't a problem because they're explicitly endorsed by the company and usually facilitated by a manager or initiated by the mentee. I worry that I'm being too condescending as a mentor because of implicit bias, or overcompensating in the direction of not giving enough help, but that's a different problem.

"Am I doing this because she's pretty?" is relevant to the conversation about this article because creepy behavior by men who are attracted to women seems to be a core complaint of professional women and a part of the #MeToo movement, and men are asked to be aware of their own biases and motivations and actions to try to fix this.
Lend your car out 100,000 times (not just once). That would "earn" you the "impunity" to falsely accuse one of your clients of stealing your car.

But remember, that you will have the "impunity" for only 1 in 100,000.
Hmm.. It is not that we dont care about service. It is more about what kind of service you can get. If you go to IKEA and say ”Hey, I am a student what is the best sofa for my budget?” they will help you find something without upselling you. If they cant help you find something they will usually refer you to OTHER stores. Service is more than just being a slave to the customer.
Federated learning is a potentially really great idea, but it's important to be upfront about its limitations. Just because I can't prove that a piece of data came from your device doesn't mean that a machine learned model trained on that data isn't violating your privacy.

For example, say we deployed federated learning to train a predictive language model, and allowed it to learn from emails, say, inside Google. Looking at what the model predicts when you type "Here at Google our next secret project is..." could very likely reveal something they wouldn't want widely revealed.
In the ballpark of 140.
> I think we're due for the idea that a proxy can be designated as a trusted intermediary, most especially if it's run on a personal basis.

We have that idea now; you designate the proxy as a trusted intermediary by accepting its certificate. The chain looks something like this:

You: browser, take me to https://youtube.com
Browser: proxy, get me https://youtube.com
Proxy: YouTube, get me /
YouTube: I'm youtube.com -- here's a certificate signed
by the government of Egypt that proves it. And
here are the contents of /
Proxy (to browser): I'm youtube.com -- here's a
self-signed certificate attesting to
that. And here are the contents of /
Browser (to user): SECURITY ALERT! SECURITY ALERT!

Configure your browser to accept that certificate, and your proxy can handle its own connection to youtube and just pretend, to your browser, that it is youtube.
Any reasonable embedding of a graph should be as an attachment that your client receives at the same time as the rest of the email.

> There's no way that was an intended part of the design.

There is certainly a way. And regardless of whether it's intended, it you're dead-set on configuring your system so that it automatically contacts arbitrary 3rd party servers, then you shouldn't be too surprised when that happens. "Bad guys" are known to be opportunistic.
She was able to repeat back details of the reservation that I had not given them, so she had definitely found the reservation. This made the discovery of charges to my card even more frustrating later on.
> decent product with nice dev tooling

whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat hahahaha i can't take that seriously; I've used it and it felt like a giant pit of despair
Yes, it's been flagged - ironic, given the nature of the subject matter.
even if we know that he provided outlines, we don't know to what extent if any the producers chose to follow them.
I personally do not believe this page because I've viewed in the past when Reddit was down and it the status showed just that. However, once whatever was wrong got fixed and their system came back up, all those error statuses just disappeared and availability went back to 100% (or whatever) like nothing ever happened.

What's the point of keeping track of these things if downtime is going to be quietly sanitised away after the fact.
Europe seems to be going in the right way with the GDPR, no?
This one is interesting, I'll have to read about that. Right now it doesn't seem to make any sense to me. I mean, if statistically model w/ my data is no different from the model w/o my data, then by definition it must be no better or worse. If it would truly be the case, there wouldn't be any reason to even include the result of such training, would it?
Hmm makes sense. Her change was telegraphed in E4.
A write-up of the technical side http://avherald.com/h?article=40de5374
I've seen plenty of corporates automate systems that don't warrant automation. Somehow development gains a momentum which nobody is able to stop. SAP sites seemed to be the worst for this.
At the very least, you could chalk it up to human error.
Another reason GMO is pushed by multi-nationals is because it helps the company take power away from the farmer.

Those GMO seeds are covered by Intellectual Property Law and that power lets the company controls every aspect of how that seed is used by the farmer.

And when the farmer resists it end up in court.
I think you mean Postbox? The only Postman app I see is the API development tool.
You are confusing complexity with chaotic system. Weather is not more complex system it is just chaotic system so it changes a lot with very small difference in initial parameters. You can make very simple system that you cant predict.It just have to be chaotic. For example double pendulum.
Telescript, and their concept for agents was the reason I was looking for a job there. I went to the first dev conference they had (I think). But this side of the business didn’t seem to have the required commitment by the management, compared to the handheld devices, but more of an afterthought. But I have no real insight to what actually happened.
I know a few stores in Europe that have a wall separating the conveyor belts in two parts [0]. The cashier can basically chose if the product will end up on the left or right end of the belt, giving the customers time to pack their things while already serving the next customer on the other side.

[0] https://static.az-cdn.ch/__ip/r-ymFggeoyzNSXf6FkMQRwePLN0/57...
Arrests data hints about the probability of future arrests and similar troubles with the law.
Economics journal that only publishes results that are no big deal
Pilot here. 100% agree. An autopilot isn't autonomous (like the most of the public think). It's more like flying the plane by pushing buttons vs manipulating the flight controls. You dial up a heading or altitude and press execute. You still have to watch it closely and it does mess up quite often ie: won't capture a localizer, altitude wasn't armed, etc. Procedure in the cockpit is to call out altitudes like "1000 above" when leveling off.

I've flown an F-16 where the fly by wire system won't let you over G the jet. So, I think some level of automation is good in that regard. But, it's very subtle and you feel in control at all times. I would never fly an aircraft that would actively take over control of the aircraft... because the automation messes up all the time.
> * Enforce style rules with a linter/test, like "UPDATE must have a LIMIT"

As someone who has never had access to a DB with any serious number of users, can you explain this one further? What if you really do want to update every row? Do you just do LIMIT INT_MAX or the like, and just force people to write that so that they always know they're updating the entire table? Or are you saying you should only ever use UPDATE on a known finite (and small?) number of rows?
A charitable read of GP means it might not necessarily be an intentional false accusation.

A simple misunderstanding of a truly collegial touch, an off the cuff remark, a glance, a gesture - all completely normal otherwise and often spontaneous - and you can find yourself on the defensive.

And given social media and the virality of outrage (see Jon Ronson's So You've Been Publicly Shamed, or go Google Johnny Depp and Amber Heard for an example of how he said she said testimony is reported as "Big if true") it's clear that the paranoia stems from the disproportionate reputational damage in the court of public opinion, not the accusation itself.

Which is accurately reflected in the headline as "discomfort" - having to highly self-regulate your words and actions is, by definition, uncomfortable.

Not that it can't and shouldn't be done. But to follow your analogy of getting hit by a truck then mentoring women is like playing a never-ending round of Frogger.
I assume you're vegan, you don't own a car, you never travel by airplane, you don't use heating or air conditioning, you only take cold showers, you wear your clothes until they're worn out beyond repair, etc. When somebody takes environmentalism that seriously, it might actually make sense to worry about a few grams of plastic.
"Anticipatory plagiarism occurs when someone steals your original idea and publishes it a hundred years before you were born."
I disagree. I use the search function in Slack all the time. Documentation can't replace the meta discussions that give you the bigger picture and help you resolve specific problems. Slack is like our company's own Stack Overflow.
The underlying character needs and triggers were established over many seasons, and the multiple triggers were laid on heavily throughout S8 (and some pretty heavily in S7.)

The idea that the actions were unmotivated is bizarre; I get that some fans were hoping (and that narrative convention supports those hopes) that Dany would transcend her clearly established flaws, but the idea that there was anything not clearly established, in either general orientation or specific triggers, is hard to believe.
It is unusual for a business that is so cost focused to do that. Normally low margin businesses can't turn off that frugal mentality when it comes to rewarding staff.
The drugs thing is only Berlin, at least in Germany. Drinking everywhere (though not at all times) is normal in all of Germany AFAICT. It's legal and nobody cares if you still behave.
I agree that D&D are plotters now. The real problem is that they were panters for every season up to these last 2. They'd look at book characters and think "not that important" and leave them out, or wildly change events from the books to put out something that seemed more dramatic.

But like a kid who partied too hard senior year and found out his final project is due in a week, they seem to have woken up one day and realized they'd moved way, way too far from the source material, and then just jerked the wheel to steer it back in a straight line towards the intended book ending. Characters who've developed differently in the show than in the books? Whiplashed back to the book versions. The Night King taken down in a single episode, with no real understanding of what he was trying to do, or what any of it really meant. Dany destroying all of King's Landing, but instead of a culmination of increasingly morally grey choices as she takes the throne from a loved leader, she's murdering civilians who don't even like Cersei because a bunch of dudes kept saying she was crazy (or something).

Frankly I'd have preferred they just made up some hollywood ending that vaguely fit the direction they'd brought the show, instead of giving us all whiplash.
I have said this elsewhere but there is little more satisfying for this 90s nerd than curling up on the couch and spending the afternoon with one of Fabien’s books. Nostalgia and tech detail, doesn’t get much better than this.
You can read the corresponding thread and see that not many folks there were really talking about that at the time. I think this analysis is too retroactive. E4 had many issues, particularly centering on Jaime, Brienne, Euron and the Iron Fleet, and the nonsensical nature of the Cersei negotiation. It also declined to fix issues presented by E3 (e.g., other than the funeral, it was as if the NK and WW conflict never happened, it didn't expand on Bran, etc.).
I found that I am passionate about my skillset but not the industry as a whole. So my industry experience doesn't lend itself to spotting problems I can care about. Passion has never really affected my ability to deliver once I spotted a problem I thought I could solve, but I would be lying if I said I hadn't quit early on a few projects because I just didn't care if they failed. Sometimes I wish I were more ruthlessly in love with money to use that as a driver, but I'm not.

So I have been trying out developing cycling products. My skillset still applies, bootstrapping an online business and all the technology involved with it. Except now the purpose is delivering a product I care a bit more about. I am finding it far easier to stay motivated for this project. If only because I actually want to use it myself once it is done.
I don't really get the point of your statement.

There was still an extremely competent ready and able pilot at the helm who should've been able to disengage the auto-pilot features of a plane with faulty sensors, take control and land safely but couldn't. Seems like ridiculous failure mode to be honest.
React would be ok but Firebase at Facebook scale would be insanely expensive. There has to be something self hosted. And may be custom built.
Nissan Takes on Tesla with Hands-Free ProPILOT 2.0
At Facebook scale, there can be no one solution, it has to be purpose built for use cases.
That is a really cool idea! The whole Voronoi topic is kind of a passion project - I really like the look and feel of the Voronoi pattern.

So I'll keep that in mind for later, thanks!
Romans in Pompeii Repaired the Roads with Molten Iron
Well I came from the pre jQuery era but the whole industry is obsessed with react. There are tons of tools available web components are becoming standard, ultimately using native apis is far more performent but it's also more standard and consistent and easier than the old days to write pure vanilla js.
Tried babylonjs week ago when they released new version. It was my first experience with 3D in the browser. But must say was very positive. I was able to do everything I wanted. The only bad was the lights shines through solid objects, so modeled room lamp is visible from the outside of the building :).

I didn't tried threejs though. So sorry for being bit of topic.
Unless there's less reliability with a quarter (which is a bit thin) compared to a 1€ or £1, which are nicely chunky, I'm surprised that's a problem.

As soon as they can reach, unlocking the cart is the child's job anyway.
Those English people are really nice, using french words to express negative things.
ETS has no facility to insert/remove an object and get the index at which the object was inserted to/removed from. This is needed in order to synchronize windows within the sorted set to our clients. We would have loved to use ETS, and use it in many places actually, and have open-sourced a few:

- https://github.com/discordapp/zen_monitor

- https://github.com/discordapp/gen_registry

- https://github.com/discordapp/ex_hash_ring