skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are some real limitations in matters of range and equipment. They are not allowed to have aircraft carriers or cruise missles. IIRC, they are not allowed bomber planes as well. Tools of projections are forbidden.
Honest to god, I don't know how people who find `git` hard to use manage to write code. Everyone on the Internet acts like the concepts are impossible to grasp and it's like really easy to grok.

Honestly, it faded into the background of code from the beginning. I mean, I know "Forward-port local commits to the updated upstream head" means nothing to anyone not already familiar with `git rebase` but a practical mastery of the tool is very easy to achieve.

I honestly think this is a pedagogical lack. We tell everyone it's this complex thing and that they should be scared of rebase and the reflog and they believe it. Maybe if we didn't, it'd be easier.
They cannot inflate the numbers. There is a (free) card system. When boarding the bus you have to validate the ticket. The ticket system is handled by a separate company, not by the bus companies.
That's not public git history though, those are just patches on mailing lists. Even before it goes into maintainer's lists, in my experience it's extremely rare that a maintainer will force push to their own public -next branch.
This is juts blogspam for your company, like all of your submissions.
Excommunication is used for people who repeatedly offend the church via some dogmatic means, not for people who commit crimes while staying inside its structures.
Oh yeah, I understand. That's why I brought up the last part. Germany did a relatively good job after the war of apologizing for its warcrimes and rooting out the toxic culture that led to them. I was trying to describe the gravity of the crimes that happened during the war with that comparison, less so the modern day feelings.
> It is clearly misleading to point at an island of green energy when there's coal all around it.

...which is the reason why they have to turn off turbines. And the reason why they keep this coal running is because nobody want's to kill jobs when there are elections incoming and the right wing party is on the run in the region.

> You can just export it, coal is valuable.

No, it's not. It's already heavy subsidized and coal in Poland or even further east is so cheap, it's still cheaper if you carry it through half of Europe. Most of the mines in Germany has been closed down because of this even before the environmental movement got popular. How do you not know this?

> That's an "interesting" way to frame the high volatility of wind energy against the low volatility of other methods, when having to buffer that volatility is the main problem.

No it's not. If I have cheap renewable energy but can't transfer it because I have to pay for coal, it's clogging the infrastructure. So just what I wrote.

> I haven't "seen" anything. No numbers, no calculations.

It's not like those are the 90s. You didn't even know how cheap coal is. Maybe you should invest some time googling. The information is out there.

> that can't be what prevents the development of alternatives. Germany has blown an incredible amount of subsidies into wind energy, so now you're telling me there's none left to solve its problems because of coal?

What are you talking about?
https://www.energy-charts.de/ren_share.htm?source=ren-share&... This is the development of alternatives and it's not stopping or anything like that. Coal power plants are being turned off and there is already a deadline for them all. There is not even theoretical space for nuclear there.
Reading this article, I realize that I'm old now. I still remember wrestling with cvs, svn. Merge, branch were slow and even more challenging. It was much easier to mess up and so difficult to rewind.

When I first learned git, I thought it's pretty neat. It solves merge, branch, rewind problems. Git is one of the things in life that doesn't work like the way we think. But it turns out to be a better way.
Seven of the eight leaders of the Soviet Union were military men — all but the last. Gorbachev was trained as a lawyer and worked as a bureaucrat of some kind.

Yeltsin, a civil engineer, followed Gorbachev in 1991 as the first President of Russia. Putin followed Yeltsin in 1999.
> not...charged by the city district attorney

> a city can ticket a individual indefinately

For breaking the law. That's the point. A ticket, no matter how small, is punishment for a criminal offense.

Knowingly ticketing and arresting the guy is wrong. The fact that it is the judge who repeatedly throws it out means the prosecutors are moving forward with charges.
You're actually getting at something deeper which I've been noticing more and more lately. Many people seem really reluctant to learn how to use things. It only seems to happen with software. They see a program or a new language and seem to think "well, I'm already a coder, I should be able to use this". When it's even slightly different to what they expect they complain that it's "hard".

It's really strange to me. Imagine if people did that outside of software. I can already walk so I must be able to ride a bike. I can speak English, so I must be able to speak French. The same goes for software. I spent years trying to understand infix notation and learning the precedence rules. Why would it not take time and effort to learn prefix notation?
Many of these problems can be avoided by using a pull-request style workflow.
Seems plausibly easy enough to solve at least partly with some technology. The article states that tourists and non-residents still need to pay, so I guess they still have a ticketing system. Just issue yearly cards to eligible citizens and use that to track ridership
That's for security reasons. Apple doesn't want outdated web engines becoming vulnerabilities.
Good catch; year added above.
This then discourages ad hoc teamwork because you can't touch feature branches other than the ones you own. And because the results of getting it wrong are hairy, people will tend to stay away just in case. It's a chilling effect.

Or, someone might have created another branch off your feature branch, because they depend on your work. Now you've creaed a time bomb for them when they try to merge their work after you've merged your alternative-history version of it. (and the failure mode is just weird, it takes experience to identify that all those seemingly nonsensical merge conflicts are result of this situation)

Etc. It just breaks a lot of things. The Git model and bad UI are already taxing enough to work with in your head, concurrently with your actual programming and domain cognitive load, that adding the uncertainty and multiplied complexity from having history rewritten around you is just a bad tradeoff.

(This may be different if the scenario is not a team, of course...)
Google returns

2.4M results for:

Parked car burst into flames "mercedes" -tesla -bmw

1M for

Parked car burst into flames "tesla" -mercedes -bmw

0.5M for

Parked car burst into flames "bmw" -mercedes -tesla

Unscientific I know but surely an indication that at least some parked cars do burst into flames. Not usually I'll grant you, but a bit more frequently than one might think.
You are literally change averse, target users aren't.
Yeah, that's what I was referring to as short term - hours to a day. The linked YouTube video is a year. If a cis-man was to take a similar dose (and thus say, have double physiological T levels) they would certainly not notice their voice changing the next days.

Most transgender medicine protocols target physiological levels of the hormones for the desired gender. It gets a bit more complicated with transwomen, because women have a tremendous range of variation during each cycle (never mind pregnancy), and because high estrogen levels can suppress testosterone on their own (so you don't need a separate medication to do that)... so there are different schools of thought as to the best way to do it.

Targeting physiological levels is done mostly because that seems like a good idea a priori. One of the joys of being transgender is being part of an ongoing science experiment.
>the Israeli industry has much to gain by advertising their prowess in order to bolster their IT security bone fides internationally

Absolutely. The Israeli Cybersecurity brand is built partially on such (sometimes unsubstantial) PR.

The bubble is doing well though! almost 500 startups, > 1Billion$ VC funding in 2018 alone. Devs are happy.
This is not standard. If you still want the job, try the following: print it, cross out the parts you don’t like, initial the changes, sign it and send back the scanned pdf. Most of the time HR doesn’t notice or care as long as they can check it off their list.
Like a few other replies, I force push on my branches all the time.

I push my code up to my origin as soon as I can and as I go I’ll fix up my commits and force push.

There are some advantages for me anyway. Pushing to origin kicks off some smoke tests and end to end tests that are fairy slow and cumbersome to run on my dev machine. That helps me catch bugs earlier, especially since I’m working on a Microservices architecture. Also it acts as a backup for if my dev machine dies on me. I prefer to fix up and force push to create a clean logical story from my code rather than leave in spurious commits which exist only to fix linting for example.
First come first served works fine. Making poor people wait longer impoverishes them by imposing a significant time cost. There is no particular reason to privilege better-off people on basic services, you are not more important just because you have more money.
Wow, sounds like Dallas has a bunch of little Eichmanns working for it.
are you really asking someone to justify how people benefit from freedom?
I agree with the other comrade who commented. Avoid joining this employer if you can.
Hyundai Motor and Kia Motors Invest 80M EUR in Rimac Automobili
The Israeli military-industrial ELINT industry and C4I people sell stuff to all sorts of authoritarian regimes. Even the ones that the US and UK won't touch.
This isn't particularly convincing, given that it's such a small and skewed sample and the effect is so small. The average CEO in this sample operates a firm of 8B and makes 8M - the effect they found was 30M for firm size and 19K for annual comp for each percentage decrease in pitch. It's quite likely that merely adding, say, Steve Jobs or Michael Bloomberg into the sample would've been enough to reverse the effect. Also, what would be much more interesting is if CEOs as a group were substantially different from the general population in this regard - but they are saying the median CEO wasn't at all extraordinary.

To the extent that there is an effect, I think the causality may be the other way - voice pitch isn't an immutable characteristic of each speaker but situational. One well-known effect is that people tend to speak with a higher pitch when talking to relatively high status people and a lower pitch when talking to relatively low status people. It seems quite possible that CEOs of larger companies perceive wall street analysts and investors as lower status than CEOs of smaller companies do, causing this discrepancy. It seems far more plausible than lower-pitched men being CEOs of disproportionately larger firms, without the same effect holding up across the entire professional spectrum.
OK hot shot. Tell everyone here how you've never fucked up commands and had to blow out a repo and start over and how were all idiots for having done that.

It's a tool. Any tool can be confusing if the person isn't taught how to use it. Git requires teaching so there's a lot of room for misunderstanding.
I'm not familiar with Canada's public pensions. Do you know the difference between them and US social security?
This has been immensely useful every now and then
I might be able to answer that. I have terrible memory, so it's hard to remember in every detail, all steps for certain algorithms.
My brain is great at indexing (I remember where I can find a link to a given article explaining that), and I'm good at offsetting my disability with bookmarks, tags and notes on the books I read.

All this works great on the real job and sucks terribly for interviewing (and school tests)!
Why hasn't the city fenced off the knoll, and built something, say a utility shed, on it?

It's good to see that you can fight City Hall and that City Hall can be incompetent in their brutality.
Right. Who are these people who do (numpy stuff) linear algebra, svd decomposition, pseudoinverses, linear regression, machine learning, but see a S-expression and immediately give up?
you just rebase on top of their changes. No biggie here. It does not matter one bit if their branch rewrites itself underneath.
I've spent most of the last decade working on data-intensive web applications which definitely deserve to be SPAs. There's lots of opportunity, especially if you're willing to move away from the "retail" public-facing web.
Building a Better DSC Script
You're not the first person to be in this position, and there are ways out.

My advice is to find something that pitches a career change to organisations. For example, take a short period of study, and then in your applications say something like "After 10 years of X, I decided to follow my real passion Y, and I'm now looking for ways to expand in this role. Of course, I still bring all my past experience that I believe will be invaluable in this junior role..."

I've seen people do this - it works. Tell a story, believe it yourself, and you will convince others to give you a chance in a junior role that you can them move quickly upwards from.
> unemployment has been essentially eradicated in Japan

Much of that is the surprising amount of minor busywork the country uses instead of welfare support e.g. multiple people doing circulation around a minor bit of roadwork when other countries would use traffic signs or temporary traffic lights. This is mostly unreliable contract and part-time work.

Japan has fairly high rates of relative and working poverty, with north of 15% living under the poverty line.
It's almost as if there is a discrepancy between an audience that uses television as their primary news source as opposed to searching for it via Google. As if they might not be the same people
Hit an ad wall. Outline: https://outline.com/z28n5H
To clarify, you are hinting that there is a strong case to me be made for holding you liable, correct? I had a hard time determining what your takeaway was.

I would agree with that, as society should work to prevent actions that significantly increase the probability of severe harm, even if complete and definitive proof of harm cannot be had in each individual case.

I would be surprised if case law doesn't support that general idea. I'm sure the courts have had to deal with probabilistic situations before.
And Monsanto has also been accused of ghostwriting papers supporting its position.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-09/monsanto-...
Amazon Packing Robots Could Threaten Jobs
I guess the word you are looking for is "cultural assimilation". 内鮮一体 is the specific case of Japan and Korea.

The Japanese were fresh out of their own industrial revolution so had plenty of experience to do the same thing in Korea. The legacy of that is that Korean and Japanese societies have a lot in common eg Chaebol and Keiretsu. Following the war Japan sheltered people persecuted by the ROK dictatorship (eg Kim Dae-jung, Lee Byung-chul)

> I think part of the hostility from either of the countries is caused by only seeing part of the reality.

It's tribal. East Asian People are racist against each other and each other's countries, but East Asian Persons get on just fine.
"Money launderin'!? They gonna come talk to me about Money launderin'!? In West Baltimore?! Sheeeeit, where do you think I'm gonna raise cash for the whole damn ticket!? From laundromats and shit!? From some tiny-ass Korean groceries?! You think I got time to ask a man why he given me money or where he gets his money from?! I'll take any motherfucker's money if he's givin' it away!"
Fully free public transport isn't that rare in the US: My home city, Missoula, Montana, has had it for years.[1] No passes, no metering. Wikipedia has a list, of course. [2] However, some of those routes aren't fully free, just free to some and, therefore, still incur metering costs. I wonder how much metering a bus route costs, overall, inclusive of enforcement of laws against "turnstile-jumping" or whatever you'd call it.

[1] https://www.mountainline.com/mountain-line-to-operate-zero-f...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_public_transport
> suggesting that early-career setback appears to cause a performance improvement among those who persevere.

I think this might be simply because a career setback event crates selection pressure in the months following it, purging the bad candidates from this pool. As a result, this purged pool then outperforms the no-setback pool for simple statistical reasons.

I see no reason to conclude that the individual scientists’ behavior was changed by the event.

Therefore I don’t follow the conclusion cited above.

And it’s also not clear if the people who drop out from the setback pool are necessarily the non-gritty people, or maybe the not-so-smart people.

Therefore I don’t follow how they come to the conclusion about grit vs aptitude cited in the headline.
Git is just for programmers. It was made by and for kernel developers, no less. There are better tools for other people.

If you don't care what a DAG is, you will never understand what git is or what it's for. No arguments. Git is a tool for building a DAG. If you don't need a DAG you don't need git.
yes. If it is this hard to understand rebasing, how can there be understanding of other programming core concepts?
Software Carpentry: teaching basic lab skills for research computing
Curious as to why you think it's a bubble. Israeli startups have had many successful exits in recent years, although mostly acquisitions, and not many big flops.
He settled and is able to do it free and clear as of a couple of years ago. I visited dallas last summer and went to talk to him for a few minutes. Had no cash on me so I couldn't buy one of his DVD's he's selling. He needs to get square or something.

Seemed like an alright guy. I thanked him for fighting the good fight against government overreach and went on my way.
The platform that Microsoft wants to push is not just Windows. It's Azure. The HoloLens 2 keynote made a big deal out of opening the ecosystem to Apple and Android clients.
The shuttle had to make tons of major design compromises in order to get funding, and that basically reduced its utility, limited its launch rate and capacity, and blew out the operational costs.

Critically, the shuttle dumped its engines into the ocean, which meant extensive rebuilding and refurbishing was required in order to make them flightworthy again. The fastest reuse time for a Space Shuttle after the Challenger disaster was almost 3 months (and before it was nearly 2).

The most expensive component of a rocket is the first stage (particularly its engines), and SpaceX lands those on a pad, which means no costly saltwater removal. SpaceX is aiming to reuse a rocket within 24 hours this year (So far the fastest they've done is 71 days, but they're being cautious).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Space_Shuttle...
I wouldn't sign it. This is not common at all, and while it's probably not enforceable, you don't want to chance it. It's interesting that they have told you that this is common in Silicon Valley because California has restrictions on requiring employees to assign rights to work created on their own time.
Git isn't hard but it's usually taught like absolute shit. From the get go you're told to use 4 commands, 2 of which are usually not explained and when they are it's often hand wavey. From there on its usually people pontificating about high level philosophy while failing to give concrete working examples. At least that was my experience.

I'm decent at got now for the work I do so I'm cool with it. It really is an awesome tool. But for some reason its just collectively taught like shit.
> First, traditional message brokers (ie queues, topics, persistence, etc) introduce a potential bottleneck for all communication, and on top of that they are _slow_ compared to just using the network (ie HTTP, with no middleman).

How is multiplexing supposed to work with plain HTTP without middleman? One of the main uses for message queues is efficient fan-out (m + n connections instead of m x n).
The jury is always biased by design. It’s never a goal to make the jury objective and/or competent, ever.
> ...despite the fact that it held the temperature at +40C which is about the temperature where a child's organs will start shutting down...

I've been in hotter places than that as a child and my organs are still functioning. Not that convincing a tale, got to be honest.
As evidenced by that explosion, yes.
That's because a file system is something you already understand, even if you've never actually used an old fashioned paper filing system. The software is providing you with something you understand.

Git is not providing you with something you understand. It is providing you with a DAG and you neither understand what that is or why you need it. The DAG is not the "internals of git". This is the big mistake. It is git. Everything about git is about building that DAG.
As another israeli - certainly a good thing. For a nation in our position, in a deeply hostile region, where a major military defeat is certain to be genocide, doing everything possible for national defence is the only way possible to survive. Stuxnet in particular is something that I'm extremely proud of.
The cost of nuclear disaster in Fukushima was only a small part of the total cost. There were zero deaths caused by the accident but about 20 000 deaths from the whole disaster.
From The Times[1]:

> More than 3,300 people were detained and questioned last year over so-called trolling on social media and other online forums

13 forces declined to give the information which means it is very likely to be far higher. That was a couple of years ago and it appears to be increasing.

As to advantages of free speech, social freedoms are strongly correlated with economic freedom, and hence, economic success. Simply to look at an ordered list by GDP would correlate with free speech strongly. Even the anomolies would support it, like China, by using a historical chart.

Are hate speech laws making Europe safer? Maybe it would be better if you tried to show that with some statistics.

[1] https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/police-arresting-nine-peo...
> Who's politicized the rape charges other than Assange

Swedish LE when they refused to hear the case with Assange in the embassy. Whether he's guilty or innocent, I can't take it as anything other than "we don't care about the case or the victims, we just wanted the extradition".
While I agree with this sentiment (and despise “Twitter activists”) https://onemilliontweetmap.com says otherwise
Git being difficult has unfortunately become a meme, and like all memes, gets propagated irrespective of its truth value.

Like I get it, we all enjoy making fun of vi but imagine every thread about vi only filled with people harping about ":wq". It gets tiring real soon.
Is the official motto: Argo FUrself? ;)
> First come first served works fine.

Do you mean first to book in advance? Then people could squat on tickets, taking more than they need.

Do you mean first to arrive at the station? Then that's a drag on the economy as workers waste time being at the station early so they can get a seat on a train.
This is not a public transportation problem, this is a housing/wage problem.
> This is a private company with international investors.

Knowing nothing about the company in question, I'm still certain that most of its founders, investors and employees come from 8200. So, government doesn't need to be formally involved in any way, it's just the same social circles, everybody just knows everyone.