skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nope. It was 60 from short-term ARS, plus "up to 4000" early cancer fatalities over the decades in a population where a few million would get natural cancers anyway. [1]

[1] https://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2008/09-86753_Report_20...

If you're going to say stuff, please provide credible references. There are some whackjob studies that say 1000000 died from Chernobyl, but they've been discredited by the scientists of the UN working groups. Even Greenpeace doesn't believe that number. UNSCEAR is the Chernobyl equivalent of today's IPCC for climate change.
That’s two separate factors. Different insurance plans have different contracted providers, and different employers subsidize different portions of their employee’s health insurance premiums. Some employers might subsidize 50%, some 80%, some $100, etc.

I was referring to the cost of insuring someone, regardless of who is paying. I’ve compared costs on healthcare.gov to employer based options in a few states, and they’re not far off from each other unless the employer has many younger employees and few old employees.
I'm sure that git's branches could allow you to maintain one repo for both free and pro features for a project. It may take some wrangling but I don't see any major caveats to doing it this way.

https://x-team.com/blog/our-git-workflow-forks-with-feature-...
Two things I don't like in your examples:

First, the default source changes depending on the target. In my opinion it would be more intuitive and simple if the default source is always HEAD. The documentation for --source in your link probably makes sense for a git developer, but not at all for a user. (Especially the part about its default value if absent).

Second, rename "--staged" to "--index".

So in summary, to update your examples, how about:

git restore --index file # reset the index from HEAD

git restore --worktree file # reset the worktree from HEAD

git restore --worktree --source=index file # reset the worktree from the index

git restore --index --worktree file # reset both the index and worktree from HEAD

git restore file # reset the worktree from HEAD
Match now offers dating coaches, helps members with profiles, dating challenges
Not seeing that, perhaps because I am on mobile. I have a tab with a chart, a tab with a csv, and a tab with the sources.

Edit: or on desktop. Can you post the link to the article you're seeing please?
Hi,

Can anyone help me with this?

I know that if you go to dev.missilesys.com, and download the cert you see that it is signed by
International Weapons Export Inc.

so i created a root ca with the same name

than i created a csr with common name administrator

than i created a cert, i used the csr and the root ca i generated

after that i created a pfx, it's the same as p12 afaik, and tried to login i'm getting error 400

i wanted to use the original ca from the web site, i decoded the file p12, but i don't have the private key

anyone can help me? thanks
Ah good feedback, thanks!!! Are you using a desktop or are you looking on your phone or something?
> Is this interesting for Android developers

Yes, but AFAIK it's likely more appropriate for devs who already had considered NDK.
Indeed software engineering pretty much consists of abstractions. (And computer science is basically the science of formalized abstraction, that's basically what CS is).

If we didn't have any abstractions at all.. we'd all be writing machine code in 1s and 0s. (and even that is an abstraction, of course...) That wouldn't get us very far.

People, including in this thread, also often talk about a particular abstraction being "a leaky abstraction". Implying some abstractions are, some aren't. Whereas in fact the 'law' quoted says that all "non-trivial abstractions, to some degree, are leaky." They're all leaky, the map is never the territory. But it's the business we're in. (But some abstractions are more useful, more successful, and/or more dangerous than others... in a given context of usage, always in a given context).
theintercept.com, therealnews.com, Max Blumenthal, Dan Cohen, Aaron Mate, Abby Martin, Caitlin Johnstone, Rania Khalek, and Kyle Kulinski are just a few.
That's not true. There have been many studies indicating a possible link between Roundup and cancer, which is why it was listed as"possible carcinogen"and even banned in France. Besides, Monsanto even tried to make studies that showed no link between the two. Science does matter
Can we consider electricity to be permanent?
If there ever was a clear case for a law that should be revoked, it's that one. The whole point is that you can negotiate prices and make medical care cheaper for everyone. Banning that is the clearest evidence that the system is designed to increase corporate profits, not heal people.
Not just China. Now that plastic is part of the Basel convention, it's going to be more difficult for the US to export its plastic waste anywhere.
https://tt-rss.org/ hosted on a small VPS.
I don't think this is a fair comparison as a museum is normally opened with the sole desire of preserving history ( Profit is often desired but not the incentive for opening )

Do you think google bought YouTube originally to preserve history or to create a new line of profit and enhance its brand?
It's called database normalization.
Simply presenting data can still be biased. For example you can choose what metrics to show or you can choose to omit data (deaths for solar and wind) in order to make your preferred choice more palatable.

I'm not accusing the authors of doing this because I don't know much about this field, but it's worth being aware that even raw data can be biased.
Videos still need to be indexed, why would Google keep the videos without indexing them?
> the people against Deere here are drastically simplifying agriculture’s OEM business model

That's their problem, not the consumer's. Once you buy something you should be able to do anything you want with it. I don't see any problem if they sell detuned engines and consumers retune them to get the HP back.
The firmware is going to be open-source - I have no doubt that people cleverer than us will know ways to improve it.

The most important factor for me is that we keep our API stable. That said there is tonnes of scope to add new features and improve/tune features without breaking existing projects.
That's included in the number of 11 gCO2-eq/kWh. Please refer to this comment where you were lightly reprimanded for saying that.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19905223

I say carbon-free for anything that's under 40 gCO2-eq/kWh (so I can include solar), which is 10x less than natural gas, 20x less than coal. Nuclear is 40x less natural gas! It's the lowest carbon energy source we know, tied with wind.
> impressive energy density of 460 Wh/Kg

How does it compare with the best current battery technology?

If it's significant enough that's big news, I'm sure this might trigger some intense attempts of industrial spying.

Also I wonder why it's always the military and public funding making real progress in research, almost never private ventures.
Bitcoin Surges Above $8k; Investors Say ‘Crypto Winter’ Is Over
State of the share: Mobile content sharing in 2019
There's a difference between physics in abstract, more akin to math, and physics as intuitive assessment of your surroundings.
An 80 km exclusion zone is a gross exageration. There hasn't been such a huge exclusion zone, not even in the cases of Chernobyl and Fukushima.
How to Start a Cultural Revolution – Ben Horowitz (2017) [video]
I mean...........yeah. I make $125/hr consulting doing a mix of front end and back end web development. The market is really strong for that. Maybe not for glorified brochure sites, but when it comes to actual web app development the market is super strong.
Probably one of many but to be clear, I'm not actually returning anything. The packages are _being returned_ as "undeliverable." Having never actually had possession of the item, I'm incapable of actually returning it. I've asked Amazon to ship it another way but they can't seem to figure it out. Since I do eventually want the item, I'm hoping it makes it some day.
The man page for git reset states in its first paragraph:

> In the first and second form, copy entries from <tree-ish> to the index. In the third form, set the current branch head (HEAD) to <commit>, optionally modifying index and working tree to match.

When your documentation starts by saying (in effect) "this command does several different things", that should be a very strong sign that your command UX has some issues.
Facts in a society are what that society deems or 'proven to be as truth'. Most facts are indeed a fact because a large amount of people (in the respective field) agree that it is a 'fact' ('irrefutable truth' as seen by that society or group).
Userspace isolation doesn't matter when the malware only cares about what's in userspace.
I would expect the material stay up: at the moment, everything back to 1998/1999 is still accessible:

https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/teaching/material.html
> Like having snipers shooting at thousands of civilians, kids, journalists, paramedics, who are protesting inside their own borders.

Ugh... this is so myopic and sounds like you're intentionally not telling the truth.

all those "kids", "journalists", and "paramedics" were shown to be carrying bombs or other explosives.
All about the future! A records are old school :)
How to Stay Sane While Running a Startup
Hopefully fans are archiving dedicated channels, like speedrunning groups, e.g. AGDQ, which is easy with youtube-dl's playlist command-line option. I'm probably being naive but deleting unprofitable videos seems like a remote risk compared to DMCA takedowns. But even without legal issues, YT seems to be finding more and more ways to stuff ads into the normal video viewing experience.
its in the article itself -

"A recent study estimates that more than a quarter of all that waste could be pouring in from just 10 rivers, eight of them in Asia."
You don't need math to enjoy or even perform music, or to understand it in a certain way. But there is another way to understand it that is purely mathematical, and it is quite enriching.

The start of the rabbit hole is the pythagorean comma and it has a very real effect on the real-world messy compromises that are involved in tuning instruments to play with each other in multiple keys.

The terrible beauty and ugliness that are one and the same stems from the simple fact that if you go up a fifth, say, C to G, it sounds the purest if the pitch is exactly 1.5 times as high, or 3/2. If you keep going up five notes at a time, eventually you get back to a C, having gone through all the other notes in the process.

But the pure, good sounding way to get from a C to a higher C is to double its frequency. And you never can get to exactly a power of two by repeatedly multiplying by 1.5. So the C you get by going up by octaves and the C you get by going up by fifths come out different.

A consequence of that is it is impossible to play all the different chords in a key as pure, perfectly-in-tune chords without at least one "floater" note (my term) that changes pitch depending on which chord it's part of at the time. See Just Intonation for more information. It's geeky stuff, but has an effect on the way real musicians play certain instruments, such as harpsichord and pedal steel guitar, and it has bothered and fascinated certain musicians ever since the ancient Greeks if not before.
> Berlin is the shithole of Germany [...]

I mean the good thing is that unpleasant people like you don't live anywhere near it which makes it awesome again!
That's interesting. How did you get the ratio of 1/10th?

I wonder if there's research that systematically tracks the difference between what papers publish and the actual payout over time?
Queue is a component of the solution for this kind of non-transactional process, not the entire thing.
Lightning at the End of the Tunnel: Overcoming Bitcoin’s UX Challenges
> git, ugly as it is, reflects the underlying data model. Once you understand that data model...

This is, like, the very definition of bad/sloppy UX.
The unusual pension funding requirement forced on the USPS might be an instance of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast
They all have short term interests, since the people doing the investing aren’t going to be around for the whole ride. In theory, defined benefit pensions are great, but in practice I haven’t seen any evidence that they have sufficiently superior performance to make up for the possibilities of bad investments, corruption, etc.
The article itself can be found at

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1175-6
liferea - https://lzone.de/liferea/
Perhaps we may have a data revolution before the point of having to delete this old content arrives. I remember watching something on the possibility of storing data within DNA ( the long-term storage possibilities looked very promising not that long ago ).

Is there any other exciting tech which may be on the horizon / advancements in this field?
That and I planned to put stickers and stuff in. Asking for return envelopes and addresses seems a little bit terrible :)
I’m wondering if Apollo mission was actually using feet or meters for calculations.
Chrome, VS Code, and whatever terminal ships with Mint. That's about it. Seems like everything I need to do happens in the browser or terminal these days, which is one reason I've been able to start using Linux on a daily basis again.
If that's what it takes to make these companies not behave like absolute gangsters so be it.

Most big to massive companies wipe their butts with a couple million dollars fines as a "cost of doing business".
> It looks like you could model this naively with a discrete time Markov chain using a 3x3 stochastic matrix and three states: healthy, infected and deceased.

Diffusion is a Markov process, yes. But you'd need three states per cell (not sure if that's what you meant by three states).
That, and I’m sure they employ “cold storage” using slower (and cheaper) spinning disks.
> By definition, nuclear plants are near coastal areas or a river, so prone to ocean rising water (or tsunamis), floods or droughts.

Not always. The Palo Verde nuclear generating station is in the middle of the desert.

(Ok, technically it's near the Gila river, but there's rarely water in that part of the Gila river anymore.)
It’s not like it doesn’t work in other countries (see France).
> Dropping down to a lower level of abstraction from the get go because you might need that level of control for performance reasons in the future sounds like a typical case of premature optimization to me.

On the flip side, I can make use of the code generation tools i have compiled (some myself, some others) and write code just as fast, if not faster, using raw sql and simple data structures than I did when I used ORMs.

There are infinitely many possibilities in between:

- A developer who is experienced in modeling and sql will deliver working software faster than a developer who might be experienced, but not with modeling and not familiar with a particular ORM or a particular version of that ORM. We could continue ad nauseam here.

The main point: if all things are equal, meaning you have a two developers, one comfortable and experienced in their tools of choice, the "raw sql and simple data modeler" developer and the developer very comfortable in their ORM of choice, the raw sql developer will deliver working software at the same time as the ORM developer, but will have a smaller surface area for buggy software due to the increased inadvertent complexity of using an ORM, and poorer database designs, since naturally, developers that rely on ORMs tend to have poorer or suboptimal database design (see this classic talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFLRc6y_O3s)

Again if the rebuttal to the database design point is "well you should still know SQL" then what point does the ORM serve?! To write less code? Anyone can write a code generator. If in order to be an effective ORM user I have to know the ORM and understand the SQL it generates to tweak the ORM flags or features to make it generate better SQL, then not only is it a leaky abstraction, it s a bad abstraction. I rely on my compiler to write assembly for me because I can't write assembly better than my compiler and I don't know x86_64 better than compiler developers. If I can't rely on my ORM to write good enough SQL, and I have to know the underlying things going on with the ORM, then why use the ORM? Again, "less code" by itself is not a sufficient answer.

As your database fills, the performance penalty for using the unoptimized mapped queries and the unoptimized data schema will start to increase by whole factors.
There is an incredibly long tail of videos that are (almost) never watched. All those 200mb videos add up to a lot of money.
Blame HN for not including a block quote formatting option (which basically every other comment system on the internet has).
UK fintechs receive more investment than any other country
Internet, Dogs, and the ABC Conjecture
I appreciate this clarification, but still find this a bit absurd. I'm all for making corporations responsible for their actions as it surely doesn't happen enough, but even $200M is a huge amount of money for one couple.

Wasn't this used by many farmers?

Making a small number of huge payouts does not seem like justice for the majority of people affected.
> so it may be that someone had a half-formed idea of how to trigger memory unsafety

So someone just had the idea to test the new feature for soundness? It's not as if someone ran some kind of fuzzing or updated a formal methods model? If so, I think it's great that there's vigilant folks out there who try to break new features like this.
The case against Roundup is real but not airtight. Even in a worse-case scenario it is less toxic than many other herbicides. Occasional exposure to it is less risky than occupational exposure.

My take.

I prefer mechanical destruction of weeds, mulching, etc. to the use of herbicides.

We have a bottle of Roundup around to use on poison ivy; not only do you not want to touch poison ivy, but we have very little of it on our property and we think we can eradicate it.

Other than that we don't use herbicides. If we grew corn and were serious about it we might use 2,4-D.

I don't recommend herbicides at all for lawn and garden use. Chemlawn goes and sprays a mixture of chemicals indiscriminately and it doesn't make a lot of sense. Suburbanites think they have to do it because frequently the topsoil was scraped away when their subdivision was built and their lawns and not well established. A well-established lawn is the toughest enemy weeds can have, but it is sad to see what happens if you try to grow a lawn without topsoil.
I generally really like using the USPS, though not as much as when I could ship a Priority Mail Small Flat Rate Box for $4.95. USPS is very effective for some purposes, and I have the impression that, overall, they take integrity of delivery seriously. I also like that the workers are getting pensions, and the ones I see seem committed to the work.

USPS's reputation has also saved a few eBay sales, when the buyer said they didn't receive the item. I ask the buyer to please double-check that it didn't get mixed in with the junk mail or something, and say that, if it's not there, I'll refund them in full immediately and ask the USPS Postal Investigator to figure out what happened. Every double-check thus far has found the package.
This is what epa said:

Last month, the Environmental Protection Agency issued an interim review that said the agency “continues to find that there are no risks to public health when glyphosate is used in accordance with its current label and that glyphosate is not a carcinogen.”

Here is what EFSA said:

http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/glyphosate

In September 2017, articles appeared in a number of European press outlets casting doubt on the integrity of the EU assessment of glyphosate, in particular the content of the assessment report submitted to EFSA by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR). EFSA responded with a statement in which it defended the robustness of the EU assessment and pointed out that the allegations were based on a misunderstanding of the peer review process.

This drug has been used forever so there should be a lot of data available.
I understood it to mean the independent country rather than the US state. Apparently the opposite was meant.
Tesla Model 3 have battery with estimate density of 250 Wh/kg so that would almost double current density
Just yesterday I saw:

Nearly 100,000 coal miners at risk of losing pension money by 2022

https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/national-govt--politics...
I missed the evidence, let alone evidence.
Interestingly they could also just keep the best resolution version of rare videos, and have really powerful encoders if anyone suddenly asked for a lowres version. Then they can deliver as well as cache the lowres version in case someone else wants to look at it an hour later, but maybe drop it after a week of no access.
Mastering the Kubeconfig File
- CryptoVerif uses a probabilistic process calculus adapted to its use case, detailed in [1];

- There is no verified kernel. All algorithms, including an equational prover for simplification of games, are implemented in ~30k to 40k LOC of OCaml. The correctness of CryptoVerif’s game transformations has been proved manually [1]. A formal link between these proofs and the OCaml code is not established;

- During a proof, after each game transformation, CryptoVerif checks a list of invariants. This already allowed to find implementation errors in the past.

- There are regression tests using proofs that have been done before with CryptoVerif, with both proofs that are supposed to succeed and proofs that are supposed to fail.

To conclude, CryptoVerif has no high-assurance guarantees on its code like Coq and others, but is the only tool that is capable to treat complex real-world protocols.

[1] https://prosecco.gforge.inria.fr/personal/bblanche/publicati...
Who Killed the American Demoscene?
Like the EPA? https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/glyp...

A legal system that allows $2B punitive awards based on factual findings contrary to the official position of the government enforcing that legal system is not a legal system, but simply mob rule.
They (and maybe you?) are missing the point of the Law of Leaky Abstractions here.

The point is that no matter how good your abstraction there will be corner cases where it gets in the way. This is also a great example of the perfect being an enemy of the good. Some people will try to get that last gap out of their abstraction to the point of it then becoming a little bit worse in all cases and still not being perfect.

The point is that your abstraction shouldn't get in your way. It should be easy to bypass when you need to.

The problem with ORMs in particular is that this tends to be impossible. Any ORM I've used has added a caching layer so then you can't run raw SQL queries and the ORM is never as expressive enough as raw SQL. Sometimes you just want a subset of columns but ORMs don't tend to support that since a table is mapped to an object and it's either all or nothing.

Years ago, this is why I eschewed the likes of Hibernate and preferred things like iBatis.
Seeing as electricity is a commodity, made by many different suppliers, we can consider it much closer to "permanent" than a website existing at the whim of a single company.
Ask HN: What's with companies making mid-levels interview seniors and leads?
Seems backwards to me.
Even then, wouldn't the weighting of the items be based on cost, and not nutritional value per serving? 1L tub of ice cream is usually cheaper than a 1lb steak. And even then, you likely aren't consuming the two items at the same rate. So on trip #2, you might buy another steak, but you won't be buying another tub of ice cream.